The Yosemite Project A Roadmap for Healthcare Information Interoperability
|
|
|
- Archibald Hopkins
- 10 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 The Yosemite Project A Roadmap for Healthcare Information Interoperability David Booth, Hawaii Resource Group Conor Dowling, Caregraf Michel Dumontier, Stanford University Josh Mandel, Harvard University Claude Nanjo, Cognitive Medical Systems Rafael Richards, Veterans Affairs Semantic Technology and Business Conference 21-Aug-2014 SEE LATEST VERSION:
2 Outline Mission and strategy Semantic interoperability Standards Translations Roadmap for interoperability Cost 2
3 MISSION: Semantic interoperability of all structured healthcare information 3
4 MISSION: Semantic interoperability of all structured healthcare information 4
5 STRATEGY: RDF as a universal information representation 5
6 Universal information representation Q: What does instance data X mean? A: Determine its RDF information content Instance data RDF <Observation xmlns=" <system value=" <code value="3727 0"/> <display value="bpsystolic, sitting"/> <value value="120"/> <units value="mmhg"/> </Observation> 6
7 Why RDF? "Captures information content, not syntax" "Allows data models and vocabularies to evolve" "Multi-schema friendly" "Good for model transformation" "Allows diverse data to be connected and harmonized" "Supports inference" Endorsed by over 100 thought leaders in healthcare and technology as the best available candidate for a universal healthcare exchange language See 7
8 Semantic interoperability: The ability of computer systems to exchange data with unambiguous, shared meaning. Wikipedia 8
9 Two ways to achieve interoperability Standards: Make everyone speak the same language I.e., same data models and vocabularies Translations: Translate between languages I.e., translate between data models and vocabularies 9
10 Obviously we prefer standards. But
11 Standardization takes time COMING SOON! COMPREHENSIVE STANDARD DUE
12 Standards trilemma: Pick any two Timely: Completed quickly Good: High quality Comprehensive: Handles all use cases 12
13 Modernization takes time Existing systems cannot be updated all at once 13
14 Diverse use cases Different use cases need different data, granularity and representations One standard does not fit all! 14
15 Standards evolve Version n+1 improves on version n 15
16 Healthcare terminologies rate of change Slide credit: Rafael Richards (VA) 16
17 Translation is unavoidable! Standardization takes time Modernization takes time Diverse use cases Standards evolve 17
18 A realistic strategy for semantic interoperability must address both standards and translations. 18
19 Interoperability achieved by standards vs. translations Translations Interop Standards Standards Convergence 19
20 How RDF Helps Standards 20
21 Standard Vocabularies in UMLS AIR ALT AOD AOT BI CCC CCPSS CCS CDT CHV COSTAR CPM CPT CPTSP CSP CST DDB DMDICD10 DMDUMD DSM3R DSM4 DXP FMA HCDT HCPCS HCPT HL7V2.5 HL7V3.0 HLREL ICD10 ICD10AE ICD10AM ICD10AMAE ICD10CM ICD10DUT ICD10PCS ICD9CM ICF ICF-CY ICPC ICPC2EDUT ICPC2EENG ICPC2ICD10DUT ICPC2ICD10ENG ICPC2P ICPCBAQ ICPCDAN ICPCDUT ICPCFIN ICPCFRE ICPCGER ICPCHEB ICPCHUN ICPCITA ICPCNOR ICPCPOR ICPCSPA ICPCSWE JABL KCD5 LCH LNC_AD8 LNC_MDS30 MCM MEDLINEPLUS MSHCZE MSHDUT MSHFIN MSHFRE MSHGER MSHITA MSHJPN MSHLAV MSHNOR MSHPOL MSHPOR MSHRUS MSHSCR MSHSPA MSHSWE MTH MTHCH MTHHH MTHICD9 MTHICPC2EAE MTHICPC2ICD10AE MTHMST MTHMSTFRE MTHMSTITA NAN NCISEER NIC NOC OMS PCDS PDQ PNDS PPAC PSY QMR RAM RCD RCDAE RCDSA RCDSY SNM SNMI SOP SPN SRC TKMT ULT UMD USPMG UWDA WHO WHOFRE WHOGER WHOPOR WHOSPA Over 100! 21
22 How Standards Proliferate Used by permission 22
23 Each standard is an island Each has its "sweet spot" of use Lots of duplication 23
24 RDF and OWL enable semantic bridges between standards Goal: a cohesive mesh of standards that act as a single comprehensive standard RDF also helps avoid the bike shed effect... 24
25 Bike shed effect a/k/a Parkinson's Law of Triviality Organizations spend disproportionate time on trivial issues. -- C.N. Parkinson, Nuclear Plant 2. Bike Shed Cost: $28,000,000 Discussion: 2.5 minutes Cost: $1,000 Discussion: 45 minutes 25
26 Standards committees and the bike shed effect Syntax! Committees spend hours deciding on data formats, syntax and naming Irrelevant to the computable information content 26
27 RDF helps avoid the bike shed effect Each group can use its favorite data format, syntax and names RDF can uniformly capture the information content 27
28 Needed: Collaborative Standards Hub SNOMED-CT LOINC FHIR HL7 v2.5 ICD-11 A cross between BioPortal, GitHub, WikiData, Web Protege, CIMI repository, HL7 model forge, UMLS Semantic Network and Metathesaurus Next generation BioPortal? 28
29 Collaborative Standards Hub Repository of healthcare information standards Supports standards groups and implementers Holds RDF/OWL definitions of data models, vocabularies and terms Encourages: SNOMED-CT FHIR LOINC HL7 v2.5 ICD-11 Semantic linkage Standards convergence 29
30 Collaborative Standards Hub SNOMED-CT Suggests related concepts Checks and notifies of inconsistencies within and across standards Can be accessed by browser or RESTful API LOINC FHIR HL7 v2.5 ICD-11 30
31 Collaborative Standards Hub Can scrape or reference definitions held elsewhere Provides metrics: SNOMED-CT LOINC FHIR HL7 v2.5 ICD-11 Objective (e.g., size, number of views, linkage degree) Subjective (ratings) Uses RDF and OWL under the hood Users should not need to know RDF or OWL 31
32 icat: Web Protege tool for ICD-11 32
33 icat development of ICD-11 In three years: 270 domain experts around the world 45,000+ classes 260,000+ changes 17,000 links to external terminologies 33
34 FIBO development process Financial (FIBO) standards are developed in RDF/OWL 34
35 How RDF Helps Translation 35
36 How RDF helps translation RDF supports inference Can be used for translation RDF acts as a universal information representation Enables data model and vocabulary translations to be shared 36
37 Translating patient data 2. Translate Crowd-Sourced Translation Rules Hub Rules Source v2.5 Target 1. Lift to RDF 3. Drop from RDF Steps 1 & 3 map between source/target syntax and RDF Step 2 translates instance data between data models and vocabularies (RDF-to-RDF) A/k/a semantic alignment, model alignment 37
38 How should this translation be done? 2. Translate Crowd-Sourced Translation Rules Hub Rules Source v2.5 Target 1. Lift to RDF 3. Drop from RDF Translation is hard! Many different models and vocabularies Currently done in proprietary, black-box integration engines 38
39 Translation strategies Point-to-Point Hub-and-Spoke Point-to-point is easier/faster for each translation Hub-and-spoke requires fewer translations: O(n) instead of O(n^2) Hub-and-spoke requires a common data model Both strategies can be used! 39
40 Which common data model? Hub-and-Spoke Standardization may choose a common data model: Moving target Must be able to represent (but not require) the finest granularity needed by any use case Different use cases may use other data models, mapped to/from the common data model Speeds standardization of common data model Avoids bike shed effect 40
41 Where are these translation rules? 2. Translate Crowd-Sourced Translation Rules Hub Rules Source v2.5 Target 1. Lift to RDF 3. Drop from RDF By manipulating RDF data, rules can be mixed, matched and shared 41
42 Needed: Crowd-Sourced Translation Rules Hub Based on GitHub, WikiData, BioPortal, Web Protege or other Hosts translation rules Agnostic about "rules" language: Any executable language that translates RDF-to-RDF (or between RDF and source/target syntax) 42
43 Translation rules metadata Source and target language / class Rules language E.g. SPARQL/SPIN, N3, JenaRules, Java, Shell, etc. Dependencies Test data / validation License (free and open source) Maintainer Usage metrics/ratings Objective: Number of downloads, Author, Date, etc. Subjective: Who/how many like it, reviews, etc. Digital signatures of endorsers? 43
44 Patient data privacy 2. Translate Crowd-Sourced Translation Rules Hub Rules Source v2.5 Target 1. Lift to RDF 3. Drop from RDF Download translation rules as needed plug-and-play Run rules locally Patient data is not sent to the rules hub 44
45 Roadmap for Interoperability 45
46 Roadmap Semantic Interoperability 6. Collaborative Standards Convergence 5. RDF/OWL Standards Definitions 2. RDF Mappings 1. RDF as a Universal Information Representation 7. Interoperability Policies 4. Crowd-Sourced Translation Rules 3. Translations between models & vocabularies 46
47 Roadmap - 1 Semantic Interoperability Use 6. Collaborative Standards RDFConvergence as a common 5. RDF/OWL Standards Definitions foundation 2. RDF Mappings 1. RDF as a Universal Information Representation 7. Interoperability Policies semantic 4. Crowd-Sourced Translation Rules 3. Translations between models & vocabularies 47
48 Roadmap - 2 Semantic information Interoperability For common healthcare representations*, define an RDF 6. Collaborative mappingstandards to/from each format,7.data Interoperability Convergence model and vocabulary "lift" and Policies "drop". 5. RDF/OWL Standards Definitions *Both standard 2. RDF Mappings 1. RDF as a Universal Information Representation 4. Crowd-Sourced Translation and proprietary Rules 3. Translations between models & vocabularies 48
49 Roadmap - 3 Semantic Interoperability Define translation rules for 6. Collaborative instance data thatstandards is expressed in Convergence RDF representations 5. RDF/OWL Standards Definitions 2. RDF Mappings 1. RDF as a Universal Information Representation 7. Interoperability Policies 4. Crowd-Sourced Translation Rules 3. Translations between models & vocabularies 49
50 Roadmap - 4 Create a hub for crowd-sourcing 6. Collaborative translation rules Standards Convergence 5. RDF/OWL Standards Definitions 2. RDF Mappings 1. RDF as a Universal Information Representation Semantic Interoperability 7. Interoperability Policies 4. Crowd-Sourced Translation Rules 3. Translations between models & vocabularies 50
51 Roadmap - 5 Semantic Interoperability definitions of Create RDF / OWL the data models and vocabularies 6. Collaborative Standards defined by healthcare standards 7. Interoperability Convergence 5. RDF/OWL Standards Definitions 2. RDF Mappings 1. RDF as a Universal Information Representation Policies 4. Crowd-Sourced Translation Rules 3. Translations between models & vocabularies 51
52 Roadmap - 6 Semantic Interoperability 6. Collaborative Standards Convergence 5. RDF/OWL Standards collaborative Definitions 7. Interoperability Policies 4. Crowd-Sourced Translation Rules Create a standards hub for RDF/OWL standards 2. RDF definitions, to facilitate standards Mappings convergence 3. Translations 1. RDF as a Universal Information Representation between models & vocabularies 52
53 Roadmap - 7 Adopt policy incentives for 6. Collaborative healthcare providers to achieve semantic interoperability.standards Convergence 5. RDF/OWL Standards Definitions 2. RDF Mappings 1. RDF as a Universal Information Representation Semantic Interoperability 7. Interoperability Policies 4. Crowd-Sourced Translation Rules 3. Translations between models & vocabularies 53
54 Roadmap - 7 (a) Adopt free and open 6. Collaborative interoperability standards. Standards Convergence 5. RDF/OWL Standards Why? Definitions Eliminate IP barriers to 2.interoperability. RDF Mappings 1. RDF as a Universal Information Representation Semantic Interoperability 7. Interoperability Policies 4. Crowd-Sourced Translation Rules 3. Translations between models & vocabularies 54
55 Roadmap - 7 (b) Adopt policy incentives for 6. Collaborative healthcare providers to achieve semantic interoperability.standards Convergence 5. RDF/OWL Why? Standards Definitions healthcare provider Semantic Interoperability 7. Interoperability Policies 4. Crowd-Sourced Translation Rules A has no natural business incentive to 2. RDF make its data interoperable with Mappings 3. Translations competitors. between models 1. RDF as a Universal Information Representation & vocabularies 55
56 Roadmap Semantic Interoperability 6. Collaborative Standards Convergence 5. RDF/OWL Standards Definitions 2. RDF Mappings 1. RDF as a Universal Information Representation 7. Interoperability Policies 4. Crowd-Sourced Translation Rules 3. Translations between models & vocabularies 56
57 What will semantic interoperability cost? My guesses... Initial Ongoing Standards $40-500M + $30-400M / year Translations $30-400M + $20-300M / year Total $60-900M + $50-700M / year What are yours? 57
58 Opportunity cost Non-interoperability $30000 Million per year* Interoperability *Source: $700 Million per year? 58
59 Biggest payoff opportunities Semantic Interoperability 6. Collaborative Standards Convergence 5. RDF/OWL Standards Definitions 2. RDF Mappings 1. RDF as a Universal Information Representation 7. Interoperability Policies 4. Crowd-Sourced Translation Rules 3. Translations between models & vocabularies 59
60 Questions? 60
61 BACKUP SLIDES 61
62 Related Activities New HL7 group on "RDF for Semantic Interoperability": ONC's "Interoperability Roadmap" (draft): 62
63 A Roadmap for Healthcare Information Interoperability Semantic Interoperability 6. Collaborative Standards Convergence 5. RDF/OWL Standards Definitions 2. RDF Mappings 1. RDF as a Universal Information Representation 7. Interoperability Policies 4. Crowd-Sourced Translation Rules 3. Translations between models & vocabularies 63
64 A Roadmap for Healthcare Information Interoperability Semantic Interoperability Collaborate standards convergence 7 ss ary 4 ds r da n ta S the 1. RDF as a Universal Information Representation Wh en sla te Tra n i ze d 2 dar an St Ne ce Standards in RDF 3 Lift to RDF Interoperability incentives 5 6 Crowd-sourced translation rules Translations between models & vocabularies 64
65 Steps 2 and 5 Existing Standard Definition XML Schema + Text RDF / OWL 5 Standard Definition Corresponds to + Text Describes Describes XML Instance Data <Observation xmlns=" <system value=" <code value="3727 0"/> <display value="bpsystolic, sitting"/> <value value="120"/> <units value="mmhg"/> </Observation> RDF / OWL Ontology RDF Instance Data 2 Lift/Drop Mapping 65
66 Roadmap Semantic Interoperability 1. RDF as a Universal Information Representation 66
The Yosemite Project for Healthcare Information Interoperability
The Yosemite Project for Healthcare Information Interoperability David Booth, HRG and Rancho BioSciences Conor Dowling, Caregraf Michel Dumontier, Stanford University Josh Mandel, Harvard University Claude
Why RDF for Healthcare Interoperability?
Why RDF for Healthcare Interoperability? Part 2 of Yosemite Series David Booth, Ph.D. HRG / Rancho BioSciences [email protected] 23-Jul-2015 Latest version of these slides: http://yosemiteproject.org/2015/webinars/why-rdf/
Comparing the Yosemite Project and ONC Roadmaps for Healthcare Information Interoperability
Comparing the Yosemite Project and ONC Roadmaps for Healthcare Information Interoperability David Booth, PhD Yosemite Project Steering Committee Rancho BioSciences, LLC Hawaii Resource Group, LLC These
IDRT: Integration and Maintenance of Medical Terminologies in i2b2
1. European i2b2 Academic User Group Meeting IDRT: Integration and Maintenance of Medical Terminologies in i2b2 TMF-funded project "Integrated Data Repository Toolkit Matthias Löbe, Sebastian Stäubert,
3M Health Information Systems
3M Health Information Systems 1 Data Governance Disparate Systems Interoperability Information Exchange Reporting Public Health Quality Metrics Research Data Warehousing Data Standards What is the 3M Healthcare
FHIM Model Content Overview
FHIM Model Content Overview Federal Health Information Model (FHIM) and Associated Terminology Models Goal Produce a logical, health information model that supports semantic interoperability and that is
What s next for openehr. Sam Heard Thomas Beale
What s next for openehr Sam Heard Thomas Beale Current situation (2010-) General industry movement toward SOA, growing use of terminology SOA: IHE Information / messages HL7 v3 failed, org in fresh look
Open Source egovernment Reference Architecture Osera.modeldriven.org. Copyright 2006 Data Access Technologies, Inc. Slide 1
Open Source egovernment Reference Architecture Osera.modeldriven.org Slide 1 Caveat OsEra and the Semantic Core is work in progress, not a ready to use capability Slide 2 OsEra What we will cover OsEra
Designing a Semantic Repository
Designing a Semantic Repository Integrating architectures for reuse and integration Overview Cory Casanave Cory-c (at) modeldriven.org ModelDriven.org May 2007 The Semantic Metadata infrastructure will
Terminology Services in Support of Healthcare Interoperability
Terminology Services in Support of Healthcare Russell Hamm Informatics Consultant Apelon, Inc. Co-chair HL7 Vocabulary Workgroup Outline Why Terminology Importance of Terminologies Terminologies in Healthcare
Quest for a Business Rules Management Environment (BRME) in the Internal Revenue Service
Business Rules and Requirements Management Internal Revenue Service Business Rules and Requirements Management Office (BRRM) Quest for a Business Rules Management Environment (BRME) in the Internal Revenue
A.I. in health informatics lecture 5 standards & ontolologies
A.I. in health informatics lecture 5 standards & ontolologies kevin small & byron wallace * Slides reuse material from Kleinsorge, Willis, and Emrick; 2007. today standards facilitates interoperability
SNOMED-CT. http://www.connectingforhealth.nhs.uk/technical/standards/snomed 4. http://ww.hl7.org 5. http://www.w3.org/2004/owl/ 6
Is Semantic Web technology ready for Healthcare? Chris Wroe BT Global Services, St Giles House, 1 Drury Lane, London, WC2B 5RS, UK [email protected] Abstract. Healthcare IT systems must manipulate semantically
DISCUSSION PAPER ON SEMANTIC AND TECHNICAL INTEROPERABILITY. Proposed by the ehealth Governance Initiative Date: October 22 nd, 2012
DISCUSSION PAPER ON SEMANTIC AND TECHNICAL INTEROPERABILITY Proposed by the ehealth Governance Initiative Date: October 22 nd, 2012 Introduction Continuity of care is a key priority for modern healthcare
A Semantic Foundation for Achieving HIE Interoperability
A Semantic Foundation for Achieving HIE Interoperability Introduction Interoperability of health IT systems within and across organizational boundaries has long been the holy grail of healthcare technologists.
Meaningful Use Stage 2 Certification: A Guide for EHR Product Managers
Meaningful Use Stage 2 Certification: A Guide for EHR Product Managers Terminology Management is a foundational element to satisfying the Meaningful Use Stage 2 criteria and due to its complexity, and
Semantic Interoperability
Ivan Herman Semantic Interoperability Olle Olsson Swedish W3C Office Swedish Institute of Computer Science (SICS) Stockholm Apr 27 2011 (2) Background Stockholm Apr 27, 2011 (2) Trends: from
Data Integrity in an Era of EHRs, HIEs, and HIPAA: A Health Information Management Perspective
Office for Civil Rights, HHS National Institute for Standards and Technology Conference Safeguarding Health Information: Building Assurance through HIPAA Security Data Integrity in an Era of EHRs, HIEs,
Re: Comments on 2015 Interoperability Standards Advisory Best Available Standards and Implementation Specifications
April 29, 2015 Karen DeSalvo, MD, MPH, MSc National Coordinator Office of National Coordinator for Health IT Department of Health and Human Services 200 Independence Ave, SW Washington, DC 20201 Re: Comments
MITA Information Architecture. May 8, 2006
MITA Information Architecture May 8, 2006 Purpose of the MITA Information Architecture Align information requirements with Medicaid enterprise vision and direction Lower overall life-cycle costs Enable
Federated, Generic Configuration Management for Engineering Data
Federated, Generic Configuration Management for Engineering Data Dr. Rainer Romatka Boeing GPDIS_2013.ppt 1 Presentation Outline I Summary Introduction Configuration Management Overview CM System Requirements
TRANSFoRm: Vision of a learning healthcare system
TRANSFoRm: Vision of a learning healthcare system Vasa Curcin, Imperial College London Theo Arvanitis, University of Birmingham Derek Corrigan, Royal College of Surgeons Ireland TRANSFoRm is partially
Model Driven Interoperability through Semantic Annotations using SoaML and ODM
Model Driven Interoperability through Semantic Annotations using SoaML and ODM JiuCheng Xu*, ZhaoYang Bai*, Arne J.Berre*, Odd Christer Brovig** *SINTEF, Pb. 124 Blindern, NO-0314 Oslo, Norway (e-mail:
Department of Defense. Enterprise Information Warehouse/Web (EIW) Using standards to Federate and Integrate Domains at DOD
Department of Defense Human Resources - Enterprise Information Warehouse/Web (EIW) Using standards to Federate and Integrate Domains at DOD Federation Defined Members of a federation agree to certain standards
IBM Watson and Medical Records Text Analytics HIMSS Presentation
IBM Watson and Medical Records Text Analytics HIMSS Presentation Thomas Giles, IBM Industry Solutions - Healthcare Randall Wilcox, IBM Industry Solutions - Emerging Technology jstart The Next Grand Challenge
Standardized Terminologies Used in the Learning Health System
Standardized Terminologies Used in the Learning Health System Judith J. Warren, PhD, RN, BC, FAAN, FACMI Christine A. Hartley Centennial Professor University of Kansas School of Nursing 1 Learning Objectives
A Repository of Semantic Open EHR Archetypes
International Journal of Artificial Intelligence and Interactive Multimedia, Vol. 3, Nº 2. A Repository of Semantic Open EHR Archetypes Fernando Sánchez, Samuel Benavides, Fernando Moreno, Guillermo Garzón,
Theodoros. N. Arvanitis, RT, DPhil, CEng, MIET, MIEEE, AMIA, FRSM
TRANSFoRm Theodoros. N. Arvanitis, RT, DPhil, CEng, MIET, MIEEE, AMIA, FRSM Biomedical Informatics, Signals & Systems Research Laboratory School of Electronic, Electrical & Computer Engineering College
How To Understand The Difference Between Terminology And Ontology
Terminology and Ontology in Semantic Interoperability of Electronic Health Records Dr. W. Ceusters Saarland University Semantic Interoperability Working definition: Two information systems are semantically
The OMG BPM Standards
The OMG BPM Standards Derek Miers CEO, BPM Focus +44 (20) 8742 8500 UK Office +44 (7703) 178 500 UK Cell +1 (714) 600 9010 US Cell [email protected] A BPM Definition Business Process Management is primarily
Using the MetaMap Java API
Using the MetaMap Java API Willie Rogers June 2, 2014 Contents 1 Purpose 2 2 MetaMap API s Underlying Architecture 2 3 Pre-requisites 2 4 Downloading, Extracting and Installing the API distribution 2 5
DDI Lifecycle: Moving Forward Status of the Development of DDI 4. Joachim Wackerow Technical Committee, DDI Alliance
DDI Lifecycle: Moving Forward Status of the Development of DDI 4 Joachim Wackerow Technical Committee, DDI Alliance Should I Wait for DDI 4? No! DDI Lifecycle 4 is a long development process DDI Lifecycle
Clinical Decision Support Systems An Open Source Perspective
Decision Support Systems An Open Source Perspective John McKim CTO, Knowledge Analytics Incorporated [email protected] http://www.knowledgeanaytics.com OSEHRA Open Source Summit 2014 Agenda CDS
Clinical Mapping (CMAP) Draft for Public Comment
Integrating the Healthcare Enterprise 5 IHE Patient Care Coordination Technical Framework Supplement 10 Clinical Mapping (CMAP) 15 Draft for Public Comment 20 Date: June 1, 2015 Author: PCC Technical Committee
Health IT Interoperability: HITSP Overview, Update and Discussion
Health IT Interoperability: HITSP Overview, Update and Discussion July, 2008 Jamie Ferguson KP Health IT Strategy & Policy Health IT Strategy & Policy Agenda Overview Introductory Overview of HITSP HITSP
How To Use Networked Ontology In E Health
A practical approach to create ontology networks in e-health: The NeOn take Tomás Pariente Lobo 1, *, Germán Herrero Cárcel 1, 1 A TOS Research and Innovation, ATOS Origin SAE, 28037 Madrid, Spain. Abstract.
Service Road Map for ANDS Core Infrastructure and Applications Programs
Service Road Map for ANDS Core and Applications Programs Version 1.0 public exposure draft 31-March 2010 Document Target Audience This is a high level reference guide designed to communicate to ANDS external
Electronic Submission of Regulatory Information, and Creating an Electronic Platform for Enhanced Information Management
Written Notice of Participation by the Clinical Data Interchange Standards Consortium (CDISC) and Written Statement for Discussion Topics to be Addressed In the FDA Public Hearing: Electronic Submission
An Architecture to Deliver a Healthcare Dial-tone
An Architecture to Deliver a Healthcare Dial-tone Using SOA for Healthcare Data Interoperability Joe Natoli Platform Architect Intel SOA Products Division April 2008 Legal Notices This presentation is
Electronic Health Record. Standards, Coding Systems, Frameworks, and Infrastructures
Brochure More information from http://www.researchandmarkets.com/reports/2178436/ Electronic Health Record. Standards, Coding Systems, Frameworks, and Infrastructures Description: Discover How Electronic
Extending SOA Infrastructure for Semantic Interoperability
Extending SOA Infrastructure for Semantic Interoperability Wen Zhu [email protected] Sumeet Vij [email protected] 3rd Annual DoD SOA & Semantic Technology Symposium July 14, 2011 www.alionscience.com
Secure Semantic Web Service Using SAML
Secure Semantic Web Service Using SAML JOO-YOUNG LEE and KI-YOUNG MOON Information Security Department Electronics and Telecommunications Research Institute 161 Gajeong-dong, Yuseong-gu, Daejeon KOREA
business transaction information management
business transaction information management What CAM Is The CAM specification provides an open XML based system for using business rules to define, validate and compose specific business documents from
Enterprise Application Designs In Relation to ERP and SOA
Enterprise Application Designs In Relation to ERP and SOA DESIGNING ENTERPRICE APPLICATIONS HASITH D. YAGGAHAVITA 20 th MAY 2009 Table of Content 1 Introduction... 3 2 Patterns for Service Integration...
The Development of the Clinical Trial Ontology to standardize dissemination of clinical trial data. Ravi Shankar
The Development of the Clinical Trial Ontology to standardize dissemination of clinical trial data Ravi Shankar Open access to clinical trials data advances open science Broad open access to entire clinical
The Healthcare Services Platform Consortium
The Healthcare Services Platform Consortium 1 FEBRUARY 24, 2015 STANLEY M. HUFF, MD CHIEF MEDICAL INFORMATICS OFFICER INTERMOUNTAIN HEALTHCARE HSPC Mission Statement 2 Improve health by creating a vibrant,
A Framework to Assess VistA Open-Source SOA-Stacks
A Framework to Assess VistA Open-Source SOA-Stacks An Open-Source VistA SOA Platform objective is to provide an environment within which VA employees, large prime contractors, healthcare professionals,
EHR Standards Landscape
EHR Standards Landscape Dr Dipak Kalra Centre for Health Informatics and Multiprofessional Education (CHIME) University College London [email protected] A trans-national ehealth Infostructure Wellness
Combining SAWSDL, OWL DL and UDDI for Semantically Enhanced Web Service Discovery
Combining SAWSDL, OWL DL and UDDI for Semantically Enhanced Web Service Discovery Dimitrios Kourtesis, Iraklis Paraskakis SEERC South East European Research Centre, Greece Research centre of the University
Practical Image Management for
Practical Image Management for Pharma Experiences and Directions. Use of Open Source Stefan Baumann, Head of Imaging Infrastructure, Novartis Agenda Introduction Drug Development, Imaging Trial Overview
HL7 Clinical Genomics and Structured Documents Work Groups
HL7 Clinical Genomics and Structured Documents Work Groups CDA Implementation Guide: Genetic Testing Report (GTR) Amnon Shabo (Shvo), PhD [email protected] HL7 Clinical Genomics WG Co-chair and Modeling
SNOMED CT Cardiology Reference Set Development, Malaysia. SNOMED CT Conference Amsterdam, The Netherlands 30-31 October 2014
SNOMED CT Cardiology Reference Set Development, Malaysia SNOMED CT Conference Amsterdam, The Netherlands 30-31 October 2014 Content developmental process of the first SNOMED CT Reference Set (refset) development
CREATING AND APPLYING KNOWLEDGE IN ELECTRONIC HEALTH RECORD SYSTEMS. Prof Brendan Delaney, King s College London
CREATING AND APPLYING KNOWLEDGE IN ELECTRONIC HEALTH RECORD SYSTEMS Prof Brendan Delaney, King s College London www.transformproject.eu 7.5M European Commission March 2010-May 2015 Funded under the Patient
What is the Certified Health Record Analyst (CHDA)?
What is the Certified Health Record Analyst (CHDA)? Ellen S. Karl, MBA, RHIA, CHDA, FAHIMA Exam specifics; how long is it, how do I apply, etc.? Exam specifics; how long is it, how do I apply, etc.? Number
Standards and their role in Healthcare ICT Strategy. 10th Annual Public Sector IT Conference
Standards and their role in Healthcare ICT Strategy 10th Annual Public Sector IT Conference Peter Connolly Oct 2014 What is the Direction of Travel? 1 Understanding the Why- The Data Context 2 Stakeholder
HL7 V2 Implementation Guide Authoring Tool Proposal
HL7 V2 Authoring Tool Proposal Robert Snelick, NIST National Institute of Standards and Technology May 14 th 2012 Contact: [email protected] NIST and Veterans Administration Joint Project NIST will provide
Meaningful use. Meaningful data. Meaningful care. The 3M Healthcare Data Dictionary: Enabling effective health information exchange
Meaningful use. Meaningful data. Meaningful care. The 3M Healthcare Data Dictionary: Enabling effective health information exchange Understanding health information exchanges (HIEs) What is the goal of
Amit Sheth & Ajith Ranabahu, 2010. Presented by Mohammad Hossein Danesh
Amit Sheth & Ajith Ranabahu, 2010 Presented by Mohammad Hossein Danesh 1 Agenda Introduction to Cloud Computing Research Motivation Semantic Modeling Can Help Use of DSLs Solution Conclusion 2 3 Motivation
Improving EHR Semantic Interoperability Future Vision and Challenges
Improving EHR Semantic Interoperability Future Vision and Challenges Catalina MARTÍNEZ-COSTA a,1 Dipak KALRA b, Stefan SCHULZ a a IMI,Medical University of Graz, Austria b CHIME, University College London,
Semantic Modeling with RDF. DBTech ExtWorkshop on Database Modeling and Semantic Modeling Lili Aunimo
DBTech ExtWorkshop on Database Modeling and Semantic Modeling Lili Aunimo Expected Outcomes You will learn: Basic concepts related to ontologies Semantic model Semantic web Basic features of RDF and RDF
Semantic Method of Conflation. International Semantic Web Conference Terra Cognita Workshop Oct 26, 2009. Jim Ressler, Veleria Boaten, Eric Freese
Semantic Method of Conflation International Semantic Web Conference Terra Cognita Workshop Oct 26, 2009 Jim Ressler, Veleria Boaten, Eric Freese Northrop Grumman Information Systems Intelligence Systems
ConnectVirginia EXCHANGE Onboarding and Certification Guide. Version 1.4
ConnectVirginia EXCHANGE Onboarding and Certification Guide Version 1.4 July 18, 2012 CONTENTS 1 Overview... 5 2 Intended Audience... 5 3 ConnectVirginia Background... 5 3.1 Federated... 5 3.2 Secure...
The American Academy of Ophthalmology Adopts SNOMED CT as its Official Clinical Terminology
The American Academy of Ophthalmology Adopts SNOMED CT as its Official Clinical Terminology H. Dunbar Hoskins, Jr., M.D., P. Lloyd Hildebrand, M.D., Flora Lum, M.D. The road towards broad adoption of electronic
Resource Oriented Architecture and REST
Resource Oriented Architecture and REST Assessment of impact and advantages on INSPIRE Roberto Lucchi, Michel Millot European Commission Joint Research Centre Institute for Environment and Sustainability
Data Modeling in the Age of Big Data
Data Modeling in the Age of Big Data Pete Stiglich Pete Stiglich is a principal at Clarity Solution Group. [email protected] Abstract With big data adoption accelerating and strong interest in NoSQL
Open Ontology Repository Initiative
Open Ontology Repository Initiative Frank Olken Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory National Science Foundation [email protected] presented to CENDI/NKOS Workshop World Bank Sept. 11, 2008 Version 6.0 DISCLAIMER
SHIB PROJECT Coding Standards CCHI Data Dictionary
SHIB SHIB PROJECT Coding Standards CCHI Data Dictionary Context of the CCHI Data Dictionary Coding Standards The purpose is to define the core coding standards which are integral to the health insurance
ARCHETYPE ALIGNMENT: A TWO-LEVEL DRIVEN SEMANTIC MATCHING APPROACH TO INTEROPERABILITY IN THE CLINICAL DOMAIN
ARCHETYPE ALIGNMENT: A TWO-LEVEL DRIVEN SEMANTIC MATCHING APPROACH TO INTEROPERABILITY IN THE CLINICAL DOMAIN Jesús Bisbal Universitat Pompeu Fabra (CISTIB) and CIBER-BBN, Pg Circumvallacio 8, Barcelona
Common Warehouse Metamodel (CWM): Extending UML for Data Warehousing and Business Intelligence
Common Warehouse Metamodel (CWM): Extending UML for Data Warehousing and Business Intelligence OMG First Workshop on UML in the.com Enterprise: Modeling CORBA, Components, XML/XMI and Metadata November
The Ontological Approach for SIEM Data Repository
The Ontological Approach for SIEM Data Repository Igor Kotenko, Olga Polubelova, and Igor Saenko Laboratory of Computer Science Problems, Saint-Petersburg Institute for Information and Automation of Russian
Whitepaper Data Governance Roadmap for IT Executives Valeh Nazemoff
Whitepaper Data Governance Roadmap for IT Executives Valeh Nazemoff The Challenge IT Executives are challenged with issues around data, compliancy, regulation and making confident decisions on their business