A State-Wide EHR for NSW Health

Advertisement


Advertisement
Similar documents
PCEHR CONNECTIVITY FOR HOSPITALS AND HEALTH SERVICES CONSIDERING CONNECTING TO THE PERSONALLY CONTROLLED ELECTRONIC HEALTH RECORD (PCEHR)

EMPI: A BUILDING BLOCK FOR INTEROPERABILITY

ehealth and the personally controlled electronic health record (PCEHR) system

Stage 1 vs. Stage 2 Comparison Table for Eligible Hospitals and CAHs Last Updated: August, 2012

Kaiser Permanente Comments on Health Information Technology, by James A. Ferguson

Bridging the Gap between Inpatient and Outpatient Worlds. MedPlus Solution Overview: Hospitals/IDNs

hospital s or CAH s inpatient or professional guidelines

Health Information Exchange in NYS

Kaiser Permanente HealthConnect The Substance, Strategy, and Impact of Kaiser Permanente s Electronic Health Record (EHR) System

Introduction to Information and Computer Science: Information Systems

HEAL NY Phase 5 Health IT RGA Section 7.1: HEAL NY Phase 5 Health IT Candidate Use Cases Interoperable EHR Use Case for Medicaid

Provider Manual Section 4.0 Office Standards

EMR Name/ Model. Cerner PowerChart Ambulatory (PowerWorks ASP)

EMR Adoption Survey. Instructions. This survey contains a series of multiple-choice questions corresponding to the 5-stage EMR Adoption Model.

EMR Name/ Model. meridianemr 4.2 CCHIT 2011 certified

Domain 3: Assessment, System Selection and Implementation. Module 3A: Purpose, Adoption and Use of Health Information Systems

Meaningful Use. Medicare and Medicaid EHR Incentive Programs

Achieving Meaningful Use

What is HealthShare?

Health Information Technology and Management

InteliChart. Putting the Meaningful in Meaningful Use. Meeting current criteria while preparing for the future

Health Information Technology 101

Physician Practice Connections Patient Centered Medical Home

Preparing for Online Communication with Your Patients

The Six A s. for Population Health Management. Suzanne Cogan, VP North American Sales, Orion Health

Consumer Engagement with Health Information Technology Summary of NeHC Survey Results

Health Information Technology & Management Chapter 2 HEALTH INFORMATION SYSTEMS

Achieving Meaningful Use with Centricity EMR

Stage 1 vs. Stage 2 Comparison Table for Eligible Professionals Last Updated: August, 2012

CMS & ehr - An Update

Introduction What s in it for me? Frequently Asked Questions Integration and Security IT Optimization Alberta Netcare Information

Implementing Electronic Health Records in the Kurdistan Region

Big Time, Big Deal. Strategies for Creating a Successful Organization-wide EMR. Charles B Wang Community Health Center Laminasti (Ina) Elbaar

Stage 1 vs. Stage 2 Comparison for Eligible Professionals

Stage 1 measures. The EP/eligible hospital has enabled this functionality

HealthInfoNet CLINICAL PORTAL USER REFERENCE GUIDE. Revised: Page 1 of 32

Northern Ireland. Desmond O Loan. Head of Strategy, Design & Programme Control. Health & Social Care Board, Belfast

Meaningful Use Criteria for Eligible Hospitals and Eligible Professionals (EPs)

Health Home Performance Enhancement through Novel Reuse of Syndromic Surveillance Data

Power of one: one emr for the state, one record for the patient

AAP Meaningful Use: Certified EHR Technology Criteria

About NEPA HIE. Our Goals

RECORD ELECTRONIC HEALTH (EHR) PATIENT SYSTEM CARE WORKFLOW MANAGEMENT AN INNOVATIVE AND

Alberta Electronic Health Record Regulation Section 5 Framework September 2011 Version 1.1

Contact Information: West Texas Health Information Technology Regional Extension Center th Street MS 6232 Lubbock, Texas

ELECTRONIC HEALTH INFORMATION

Practice Fusion Whitepaper

Table of Contents. Preface CPSA Position How EMRs and Alberta Netcare are Changing Practice Evolving Standards of Care...

Australian Safety and Quality Framework for Health Care

RPMS EHR Remote Support and Configuration

Addressing the State of the Electronic Health Record (EHR)

IL-HITREC P.O. Box 755 Sycamore, IL Phone Fax

Presented by: DV-NJ HIMSS Fall Event 10/22/2009. Colleen Woods, Chief Information Officer, State of NJ Department of Human Services

Report involving the community in their health. Electronic Health Record. NSW Health Strategy for the. NSW EHR*Net

HealthLink Messaging Technology

HealthLink SmartForms Technology

MEETING MEANINGFUL USE IN MICROMD -STAGE TWO- Presented by: Anna Mrvelj EMR Training Specialist

Health Information Exchange

Meaningful Use Objectives

We Believe the Possibilities. Eclair Case Study: Northern Regional EMR

Where to Begin? Auditing the Current EHR System

The EP/eligible hospital has enabled this functionality

Information Governance. A Clinician s Guide to Record Standards Part 1: Why standardise the structure and content of medical records?

Andrew C. Bledsoe, MBA, CHPA, PCMH CCE Executive Director. Northeast KY Regional Health Information Organization.

Sample Assignment 1: Workflow Analysis Directions

EHR Software Feature Comparison

EMR Technology Checklist

New York ehealth Collaborative. Health Information Exchange and Interoperability April 2012

Health Information Exchange in Minnesota & North Dakota

Summary of the Proposed Rule for the Medicare and Medicaid Electronic Health Records (EHR) Incentive Program (Eligible Professionals only)

Clinical Workflow Solutions EXTENSION HealthAlert

Going beyond Meaningful Use with EMR solutions from the Centricity portfolio

Engage. Connecting with your community to improve population health outcomes. Key Benefits. Orion Health Engage 1

Meaningful Use - The Journey Ahead. John D. Halamka MD CIO, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center and Harvard Medical School


The Paper World What s your current experience at a doctor s office?

The EP/eligible hospital has enabled this functionality. At least 80% of all unique patients. seen by the EP or admitted to the

Patient Centered Medical Home (PCMH): Communication and Care Coordination

CAPITAL PROJECT PLAN CLINICAL AND SYSTEMS TRANSFORMATION PROJECT AUGUST 14, 2013

TABLE 4: STAGE 2 MEANINGFUL USE OBJECTIVES AND ASSOCIATED MEASURES SORTED BY CORE AND MENU SET

Streamline Your Radiology Workflow. With Radiology Information Systems (RIS) and EHR

Vermont s EHR Pilot. State Alliance Learning Forum September 25-26, 2008

Clintegrity 360 QualityAnalytics

Provincial Forum on Adverse Health Event Management

Rhode Island Hospital/Hasbro Children s Hospital The Miriam Hospital Newport Hospital Bradley Hospital Gateway Healthcare

Medweb Telemedicine 667 Folsom Street, San Francisco, CA Phone: Fax:

Tips for Success. Defining EHR System Requirements

Appendix 2. PCMH 2014 and CMS Stage 2 Meaningful Use Requirements

Stage 2 Final Rule Overview: Updates to Stage 1 and New Stage 2 Requirements

2014 AHA Annual Survey Information Technology Supplement Health Forum, L.L.C.

Core Set of Objectives and Measures Must Meet All 15 Measures Stage 1 Objectives Stage 1 Measures Reporting Method

THE ACTIVELY CONNECTED PHYSICIAN

Canada Health Infoway

State: Hawai i. Health Information Exchange Strategic and Operational Plan Profile. Overview. HIT Coordinator: Mark Anderson. Award Amount: $5,603,318

1. Introduction - Nevada E-Health Survey

Special Topics in Vendor- Specific Systems. Outline. Results Review. Unit 4 EHR Functionality. EHR functionality. Results Review

DEMYSTIFYING ELECTRONIC HEALTH Presented to Central East LHIN Board of Directors. January 22, 2014

Centricity Enterprise Provider Tools

I n t e r S y S t e m S W h I t e P a P e r F O R H E A L T H C A R E IT E X E C U T I V E S. In accountable care

Advertisement
Transcription:

A State-Wide EHR for NSW Health New South Wales Health, NSW, Australia New South Wales (NSW) Health provides healthcare to the most populous state in Australia, covering an area of 800,000 sq km and a population of 6.5 million people. There are eight area health services (AHSs) operating throughout the NSW region: Hunter/New England, Greater Southern, Southeast/Illawarra, Wentworth, Northern Sydney/Central Coast, Sydney South West, Greater Western and North Coast. Within each AHS there are a number of hospitals and health services. Integrating Islands of Data State-Wide In 2000, the NSW Department of Health identified information technology (IT) as a key to improving healthcare services. Disparate islands of information across the AHSs, combined with a lack of integration, had traditionally prevented NSW Health from improving the delivery of health care. Service providers lacked the ability to access a full record of their patient s medical history. This meant that resource and tests were often duplicated across the various care settings. The lack of integration and accessibility was costly and impaired each service provider s ability to deliver the most effective patient care. NSW Health identified a state-wide Electronic Health Record (EHR) as the means for making patient information more integrated and accessible across the state. A state-wide EHR would provide them with: A summary view of patient information: A summary containing every patient s longitudinal medical history, from all public and private health service providers in all care settings. Information on health services provided for each patient: Key information on all health services provided to that patient, regardless of the location of the service e.g. General Practice, Inpatient, Outpatient, Emergency Department, and Community Health. Consumer access to their own health record: Consumer access to their health record via an Internet browser. This enables the consumer to be involved in creating their health record as well as enabling them to add additional details. Overview New South Wales (NSW) Health provides healthcare to the most populous state in Australia, covering an area of 800,000 sq km and a population of 6.5 million people. NSW Health identified a state-wide Electronic Health Record (EHR) as the means for making patient information more integrated and accessible across the state. Customer Profile New South Wales Health, NSW, Australia Customer Website www.health.nsw.gov.au Scenario Integration System Business Situation Lack of integration and accessibility was costly and impaired each service provider s ability to deliver the most effective patient care. NSW Health identified a state-wide Electronic Health Record (EHR) as the means for making patient information more integrated and accessible across the state. Business Solution NSW Health decided to implement the CareJunction EHR solution, called health e link, comprised of software from Orion Health and HealthLink. Business Benefits Easier access to comprehensive information, region-wide Closer collaboration of primary and secondary care Improved data quality for better decision making Reduced costs of health care Consumers have an active involvement in the management of their health care

Selecting Experience At the end of 2003, NSW Health issued a request for tender (RFT) to a number of vendors. In March 2004, a shortlist of vendors was put together to perform product demonstrations and site visits. CareJunction was selected as the successful consortium. CareJunction is a partnership of three companies: Orion Health, Logica CMG and HealthLink. CareJunction stood apart from other vendors because of their experience implementing similar solutions elsewhere. Orion Health had previously implemented the Capital Health EHR in Alberta, Canada and the Integrated Disease Management solution for the HealthConnect initiative in Tasmania, Australia. Setting SMART Milestones Detailed project planning began immediately following the announcement of CareJunction as preferred contractor. Critical to the success of the project was developing a set of realistic milestones against which progress could be measured: July to August 2003: Initial Implementation Planning Study workshops held for eight weeks to confirm understanding of requirements and business process. Oct to end November 2003: Solution design workshops over an eight week period. Led by CareJunction, the workshops included key stakeholders: clinicians, administrators, AHSs and NSW Health representatives. July 2004: Project begins. A long term vision is set for the state-wide rollout to be complete by 2010. Mid October 2005: User Acceptance Testing begins. March 2006: Training and pilot sites go-live. Pilot sites are the Hunter AHS Chronic Disease population and Western Sydney AHS Paediatric population. These pilot sites cover 11 hospitals, 9,000 clinical users and 16,000 registered consumers. Other sites throughout NSW that are not included in the pilot will go live at a date still to be determined. Still to come: In the future, the EHR will be used to support more complex types of patient information, including referrals and care plan management. Key plans include shared work lists and disease management with decision support and notifications. Technology Benefits Single Accurate Source of Information Improved Clinician Satisfaction Easy to Use, Easy to Implement Lower Cost of Ownership Scalable Enterprise Wide Information Foundation Ready to Be Extended Technology In Use Concerto Medical Applications Portal Concerto Clinical Data Viewer Concerto Clinical Data Repository Concerto Clinicals Medical Templates Concerto Clinicals Forms Concerto Enterprise Master Patient Index (EMPI) Concerto Provider Index Rhapsody Integration Engine HealthLink For further information, contact: Orion Health Ltd. www.orionhealth.com International Head Office Auckland, New Zealand Phone: +64 9 638 0600 USA Headquarters Phone: +1 800 905 9151 EMEA Headquarters Phone: +44 870 432 9580

Regional EHR Software Solutions The CareJunction EHR solution, called health e link, comprised of software from Orion Health and HealthLink. Concerto Medical Applications Portal (MAP): for secure, single sign on access to patient records. Concerto MAP allows users to gain a summary of the most up to date information from any location and at any time Concerto Clinical Data Viewer: for instant online access to a patient's laboratory and radiology reports. Concerto Clinical Data Repository: for storing patient s laboratory and radiology reports. Concerto Clinical Medical Templates: to produce and manage a broad range of medical documents in legible electronic templates Concerto Clinical Forms: To provide a data capture mechanism for recording measurements such as body weight, height, diabetes measurements, spirometry readings, etc Concerto Enterprise Master Patient Index (EMPI): for the creation and maintenance of an authoritative central repository containing patient demographic information and identifiers. Concerto Provider Index: for the creation and maintenance of a comprehensive and trusted directory of information about facilities, health professionals, organizations and the services they provide. Rhapsody Integration Engine: for the integration of information across all of the systems and AHSs HealthLink: for secure messaging network/infrastructure Functional Aspects of an Effective Regional EHR Consumer search: All consumers enrolled in the program are able to access their own records over the Internet. They are able to view documents, pathology and radiology reports stored against their record. They are also able to contribute to the electronic record by adding in valuable clinical information such as their symptoms, blood glucose measurements and weight.

Clinician work lists: Clinician work lists are manually maintained and individually customized. Work lists help clinicians to manage their work routine. Work lists also display any new information on their patients, such as test results. Notifications based on incoming data: Notifications are displayed on the clinicians work list as new information comes in. Notifications display information such as when their patients are admitted, when test results arrive and any abnormal results. User to user messaging: This feature allows clinicians to send secure messages to one another regarding the care of their patients. These messages contain hyperlinks to the relevant patient s record as well having the ability to contain document attachments. Results viewing: Users can gain instant access to all patient results including radiology reports, pathology reports and laboratory test information. The user can view these results in a cumulative and graphical view. Growth charts: Charts illustrate height, weight and head circumference of a child. The data can be sent to the system via the messaging interface or it can be entered in online. Online data entry and problem lists: The system supports the entry of data into specifically designed templates. These templates are a combination of disease specific and generic discharge summary templates for providers who cannot enter this information via their own systems. There is also an online problem list template for maintaining a patient s problems. This list can be managed and updated by authorized users. Aggregate lists: The system provides the ability for users to view up-to-date, dynamically generated lists of important patient information. These lists include current medications, problem lists, allergies and alerts, immunizations and encounters a patient has had with any healthcare organization (e.g. inpatient admission, family physician visits etc). Opt-Out Feature Ensures Clinician and Patient Buy-in Implementing a successful state-wide EHR is dependant on gaining buy-in from both healthcare providers and patients. A high volume of registered consumers (patients) is needed to assure clinicians that all information needed is available to them. The CareJunction solution recognized that an opt-out model was the key to gaining community acceptance. The opt-out model works by automatically registering all consumers to ensure that there is a high level of participation and therefore patient information. Consumers must actively opt-out if they do not want to take part in the program. Prior to go-live, NSW Health ran a media campaign informing consumers of the benefits of the system and how they can deactivate their account if they do not want to take part. Consumers wanting access to their own record need to apply for permission. Consumers can determine their own access policy, which allows them to deny or permit access to individual users or organizations. Consumers are given the ability to specify which data types are sensitive and can t be viewed by a provider. This enhances consumer control over their medical record and improves consumer confidence in the EHR system. The system links parents and/or guardians to dependents, so they can control consent for their children s record. They may also be issued with logins to their children s record online. This allows parents to enter milestones for their baby (e.g. walks at 11 months) and chart their height, weight and head circumference against national averages.

When a child turns 15, consent status and access to the record passes to them. Reports are run regularly to identify such children so they may be contacted by letter. The child decides whether to continue to allow their parent or guardian to view their record. Benefits Easier access to comprehensive information, region-wide: The system provides a single point of access to multiple sources of up-to-date information. This saves providers the time that they would normally spend looking for information across multiple systems. Closer collaboration of primary and secondary care: The EHR gathers information from all care settings across the community. The EHR enhances the communication between health services by making the complete view of patient data widely available. Improved data quality for better decision making: The EHR provides each health provider, in each AHS with a complete view of the patient s medical history. This facilitates health provider decision making by giving them all necessary information. Reduced costs of health care: Access to summary information reduces the likelihood of duplicated diagnostic tests and prescribing errors Consumers have an active involvement in the management of their health care: The ability for patients to access their own medical information means that they can play a greater role in the management of their health.