Guidance for Industry



Similar documents
Guidance for Industry Classifying Resubmissions in Response to Action Letters

Guidance for Industry

Guidance for Industry

Guidance for Industry

Guidance for Industry

Guidance Medication Guides Distribution Requirements and Inclusion in Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategies (REMS)

Guidance for Industry and Investigators Safety Reporting Requirements for INDs and BA/BE Studies- Small Entity Compliance Guide

Guidance for Industry. Further Amendments to General Regulations of the Food and Drug Administration to Incorporate Tobacco Products

Guidance for Industry

U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration Center for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER) September 2009 OTC

DSCSA Implementation: Annual Reporting by Prescription Drug Wholesale Distributors and Third-Party Logistics Providers

DRAFT GUIDANCE. This guidance document is being distributed for comment purposes only.

Medical Billing and Agency Formal Disputes

February 2006 Procedural

Guidance for Industry Independent Consultants for Biotechnology Clinical Trial Protocols

Guidance for Industry

U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration Center for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER) March 2006 Compliance

DRAFT GUIDANCE. This guidance document is being distributed for comment purposes only.

Guidance for Industry

Providing Regulatory Submissions In Electronic Format Standardized Study Data

Guidance for Industry 180-Day Exclusivity When Multiple ANDAs Are Submitted on the Same Day

Guidance for Industry Part 11, Electronic Records; Electronic Signatures Scope and Application

Medical Device Data Systems, Medical Image Storage Devices, and Medical Image Communications Devices

Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategies: Modifications and Revisions Guidance for Industry

Guidance for Industry

Guidance for Industry

Guidance for Industry Information Program on Clinical Trials for Serious or Life-Threatening Diseases and Conditions

Guidance for Industry

Guidance for Industry

Guidance for Industry Direct-to-Consumer Television Advertisements FDAAA DTC Television Ad Pre- Dissemination Review Program

Guidance for Industry. 21 CFR Part 11; Electronic. Records; Electronic Signatures. Time Stamps

Guidance for Industry ANDA Submissions Amendments and Easily Correctable Deficiencies Under GDUFA

DRAFT GUIDANCE. This guidance document is being distributed for comment purposes only.

Guidance for Industry

OV E R V I E W A N D G U I D A N C E O N VACC I N E 2 D B A R CO D I N G

Guidance for Industry

Information Sheet Guidance For IRBs, Clinical Investigators, and Sponsors

How To Exempt From Reporting And Recordkeeping Requirements For Tv And Computer Monitors With Cathode Ray Tubes

Use of Electronic Health Record Data in Clinical Investigations

Guidance for Industry

Good Review Practice. October 2009 Labeling

Guidance for Industry FDA Approval of New Cancer Treatment Uses for Marketed Drug and Biological Products

Guidance for Sponsors, Institutional Review Boards, Clinical Investigators and FDA Staff

Guidance for Industry

Recommended Warning for Overthe-Counter. Containing Drug Products and Labeling Statements Regarding Serious Skin Reactions

Unique Device Identifier System: Frequently Asked Questions, Vol. 1 Guidance for Industry and Food and Drug Administration Staff

Contains Nonbinding Recommendations

Guidance for Clinical Investigators, Sponsors, and IRBs

Guidance for Industry

Guidance for Industry Bar Code Label Requirements Questions and Answers

Guidance for Industry

Guidance for Industry Certification Process for Designated Medical Gases

Guidance for Industry Formal Meetings Between the FDA and Sponsors or Applicants

Registration of Human Drug Compounding Outsourcing Facilities Under Section 503B of the FD&C Act. Guidance for Industry

Guidance for Industry

Guidance for Industry Tablet Scoring: Nomenclature, Labeling, and Data for Evaluation

Guidance for Industry and Food and Drug Administration Staff

Determination of Regulatory Review Period for Purposes of Patent Extension;

Determination of Regulatory Review Period for Purposes of Patent Extension; XARELTO

Information Sheet Guidance for Sponsors, Clinical Investigators, and IRBs

Guidance for Clinical Investigators, Industry, and FDA Staff Financial Disclosure by Clinical Investigators

FINAL GUIDANCE. For questions on the content of this guidance, contact Advisory Committee Oversight and Management Staff, at

Refuse to Accept Policy for 510(k)s. Guidance for Industry and Food and Drug Administration Staff

Eclipsys Sunrise Clinical Manager Enterprise Electronic Medical Record (SCM) and Title 21 Code of Federal Regulations Part 11 (21CFR11)

Guidance for Industry Quality Systems Approach to Pharmaceutical CGMP Regulations

Guidance for Industry

Document issued on: December 2, The draft of this document was issued on March 11, Contains Nonbinding Recommendations

Guidance for Industry and FDA Staff Tonometers - Premarket Notification [510(k)] Submissions

Guidance for Industry

Guidance for Industry. 21 CFR Part 11; Electronic Records; Electronic Signatures. Electronic Copies of Electronic Records

Guidance for Industry Computerized Systems Used in Clinical Investigations

Use of Electronic Informed Consent in Clinical Investigations Questions and Answers Guidance for Industry

Guidance for Review Staff and Industry Good Review Management Principles and Practices for PDUFA Products

ectd Digital Handbook Table of Contents

Guidance for Industry and FDA Staff FDA Acceptance of Foreign Clinical Studies Not Conducted Under an IND Frequently Asked Questions

POLICY AND PROCEDURES OFFICE OF NEW DRUGS. NDAs and BLAs: Communication to Applicants of Planned Review Timelines.

Formal FDA Meeting Request: Guidance and Template

Guidance for Industry

FDA Fast Track and Priority Review Programs

DRAFT GUIDANCE. This guidance document is being distributed for comment purposes only.

[DOCKET NO.96N-0002] DRAFT

Home Use Medical Device Electronic Labeling - Structured Product Labeling

Breakthrough Therapy Program U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA)

Guidance for Sponsors, Investigators, and Institutional Review Boards. Questions and Answers on Informed Consent Elements, 21 CFR 50.

Transcription:

Guidance for Industry Providing Regulatory Submissions in Electronic Format Content of Labeling U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration Center for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER) Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research (CBER) April 2005 Electronic Submissions

Guidance for Industry Providing Regulatory Submissions in Electronic Format Content of Labeling Additional copies are available from: Office of Training and Communications Division of Drug Information, HFD-240 Center for Drug Evaluation and Research Food and Drug Administration 5600 Fishers Lane Rockville, MD 20857 (Tel) 301-827-4573 http://www.fda.gov/cder/guidance/index.htm or Office of Communication, Training and Manufacturers Assistance, HFM-40 Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research Food and Drug Administration 1401 Rockville Pike, Rockville, MD 20852-1448 http://www.fda.gov/cber/guidelines.htm Phone: the Voice Information System at 800-835-4709 or 301-827-1800 U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration Center for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER) Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research (CBER) April 2005 Electronic Submissions

Table of Contents I. INTRODUCTION...1 II. III. IV. BACKGROUND...2 A. THE ELECTRONIC LABELING RULE...2 B. NEW TECHNOLOGY FOR PROCESSING LABELING...2 AND LABELING CHANGES...2 GENERAL ISSUES...4 A. FILE FORMATS FOR PROVIDING CONTENT OF LABELING...4 B. CREATING THE CONTENT OF LABELING FILE...4 C. PROCEDURES FOR SENDING THE CONTENT OF LABELING...5 D. TECHNICAL PROBLEMS OR QUESTIONS...5 ORGANIZING THE MAIN SUBMISSION FOLDER...5 i

Guidance for Industry 1 Providing Regulatory Submissions in Electronic Format Content of Labeling This guidance represents the Food and Drug Administration's (FDA's) current thinking on this topic. It does not create or confer any rights for or on any person and does not operate to bind FDA or the public. You can use an alternative approach if the approach satisfies the requirements of the applicable statutes and regulations. If you want to discuss an alternative approach, contact the FDA staff responsible for implementing this guidance. If you cannot identify the appropriate FDA staff, call the appropriate number listed on the title page of this guidance. I. INTRODUCTION This is one in a series of guidance documents intended to assist applicants making regulatory submissions to FDA in electronic format. Agency guidance documents on electronic submissions will be updated regularly to reflect the evolving nature of the technology and the experience of those using this technology. The Agency is adopting new technology for processing and managing labeling and labeling changes, including the content of labeling submitted electronically. This guidance describes how to submit the content of labeling using the Structured Product Labeling (SPL) standard, which is based on extensible markup language (XML). This guidance discusses issues related to the submission of the content of labeling in electronic format for marketing applications for human drug and biologic products, including new drug applications (NDAs), abbreviated new drug applications (ANDAs), and biological license applications (BLAs) for biological products that meet the definition of drug in the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act. The content of labeling is the labeling required under 21 CFR 201.100(d)(3) including all text, tables, and figures (commonly referred to as the package insert or professional labeling). This guidance applies to the content of labeling provided with original submissions, supplements, and annual reports. Copies of the formatted label and labeling and 1 This guidance has been prepared by the Information Management Program in the Center for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER). Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995: This guidance contains information collection provisions that are subject to review by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520). The collections of information in this guidance have been approved under OMB Control No. 0910 0530. 1

specimens of enclosures required elsewhere in the regulations (e.g., 21 CFR 314.50(e)(2)(ii)), including carton and container labels, must still be submitted either electronically in Portable Document Format (PDF) or on paper. For a list of guidances that are under development on electronic submissions, see the guidance Regulatory Submissions in Electronic Format General Considerations. 2 The general considerations guidance also addresses issues (e.g., appropriate file formats, media, and submission procedures) that are common to all submission types. FDA's guidance documents, including this guidance, do not establish legally enforceable responsibilities. Instead, guidances describe the Agency's current thinking on a topic and should be viewed only as recommendations, unless specific regulatory or statutory requirements are cited. The use of the word should in Agency guidances means that something is suggested or recommended, but not required. II. BACKGROUND A. The Electronic Labeling Rule On December 11, 2003, FDA published final regulations (the electronic labeling rule) requiring the submission of the content of labeling in electronic format for marketing applications (68 FR 69009). The requirements of the electronic labeling rule can be found in 314.50(l) for NDAs, 314.94(d) for ANDAs, 601.14(b) for BLAs, and 314.81(b) for annual reports to marketing applications. The effective date of the rule was June 8, 2004. The regulations specify that the content of labeling must be submitted electronically in a form that FDA can process, review, and archive. The regulations also state that FDA will periodically issue guidance on how to provide the electronic submission. This guidance provides information on how to submit the content of labeling in electronic format. B. New Technology for Processing Labeling and Labeling Changes The regulations require that the content of labeling be submitted in a form that we (FDA) can process, review, and archive. Since 1999, FDA has been receiving the electronic content of labeling in Portable Document Format (PDF), and this format has allowed us to process, review and archive the content of labeling. Recently, however, recommendations from the Institute of Medicine and the National Committee on Vital and Health Statistics and mandates in the Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement, and Modernization Act of 2003 (Public Law 108 173) have created a new role for electronic labeling information. Electronically formatted content of labeling will be used to support health information management technologies such as electronic prescribing; the electronic health record (EHR), which will provide health care 2 We update guidances periodically. To make sure you have the most recent version of a guidance, check the CDER guidance page at http://www.fda.gov/cder/guidance/index.htm and the CBER guidance page at http://www.fda.gov/cber/guidelines.htm. 2

providers, patients, and other authorized users access to patient information in electronic format; and the DailyMed, a new way to distribute up-to-date and comprehensive medication information in a computerized format for use in health care information systems. We have determined that our current procedures using PDF are not adequate to support these electronic initiatives. To support the new programs, the Agency is changing the way it processes, reviews, and archives the content of labeling. The Agency is adopting a new technology for exchanging information between computer systems based on Clinical Document Architecture (CDA). CDA was developed by Health Level Seven (HL7), a standards development organization accredited by the American National Standards Institute (ANSI). CDA allows information to be exchanged in extensible markup language (XML) and is the standard being investigated for the EHR. FDA, working with other parties in HL7 (experts from HL7, industry, and technology solution providers), has adapted CDA for labeling in an HL7 standard called Structured Product Labeling (SPL). When compared with PDF, SPL exhibits the following advantages. SPL allows the exchange of information between computer systems in a way that cannot be accomplished with PDF. For example, the information in SPL can be used to support health information technology initiatives for improving patient care. The exchange of labeling changes with SPL can be easier and more efficient for both FDA and manufacturers when compared with PDF. For example, with SPL, only those sections or data elements of the labeling that are changed would need to be checked rather than the entire labeling. SPL allows automation of comparison of text by section and comparison of specific drug information data elements. SPL can also be used to exchange information needed for other submissions, such as drug listing, thus eliminating redundant data collection and improving efficiency. The Agency is developing an automated system using SPL for processing and managing labeling and labeling changes. The Center for Drug Evaluation and Research has identified SPL in public docket number 92S-0251 as a format that FDA can use to process, review, and archive the content of labeling. During our transition to the automated system, the Agency is able to accept the content of labeling in either PDF or SPL file format. After the automated system is implemented, PDF will no longer be a format that we can use to process, review, and archive the content of labeling. The change to SPL will apply only to those submissions with content of labeling files that are provided after the impleme ntation of the automated system. At this time, it is our goal to complete the transition to SPL format for content of labeling submissions for approved prescription drugs by fall 2005. The Agency is changing to SPL format so the content of labeling can be used in a variety of ways searched, moved between systems, combined with other data sources to support electronic health initiatives. At this time, the Agency will continue to receive other parts of electronic applications in the formats described in applicable Agency guidance on electronic submissions. 3

III. GENERAL ISSUES This guidance applies to the content of labeling for any marketing application (ANDAs, BLAs, NDAs) submission required to be submitted in electronic format under 314.50(l) 314.81(b)(2), 314.94(d), and 601.14(b). A. File Formats for Providing Content of Labeling Prior to the implementation of the automated system, we will be able to receive content of labeling in PDF or SPL file format. After implementation of the automated system, we will only be able to receive content of labeling in SPL format. This guidance describes how to submit the content of labeling using XML based on the HL7 SPL specifications. For information on how to submit the content of labeling using PDF based on the Adobe Systems Incorporated specifications, see the current Agency guidance on providing regulatory submissions in electronic format. 3 B. Creating the Content of Labeling File Please refer to the HL7 published specifications for Structured Product Labeling (SPL) for details on how to create the content of labeling file for submission to FDA. The SPL specifications can be obtained from HL7 (www.hl7.org). Additional details on creating SPL for submission to FDA can be found in the HL7 document SPL Implementation Guide for FDA Content of Labeling Submissions. The implementation guide may be found on the HL7 web site at http://www.hl7.org. Links to SPL-related documents located on the HL7 Web site and additional SPL-related resources (including the most recent updates, stylesheet files for viewing SPL files, and example labels) can be found at the FDA Web site at www.fda.gov/oc/datacouncil/spl.html. Bookmarks commonly included in the PDF content of labeling files to sections within the labeling are not needed because the tags in the SPL file provide this functionality. SPL does not replace various methods used for negotiating labeling changes (e.g., FAX, Word files). Prior to the implementation of the automated system, FDA can accept content of labeling submitted in SPL file format only in a complete SPL file. Submission of multiple versions of the labeling (e.g., proposed or current ) and submission of the history.pdf file can be eliminated only after the implementation of the automated system. 3 See the guidances for industry entitled Providing Regulatory Submissions in Electronic Format NDAs and Providing Regulatory Submissions to the Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research (CBER) in Electronic Format Biologics Marketing Applications. To make sure you have the most recent version of a guidance, check the CDER guidance page at http://www.fda.gov/cder/guidance/index.htm or the CBER guidance page at http://www.fda.gov/cber/guidelines.htm. 4

C. Procedures for Sending the Content of Labeling Content of labeling must be provided in electronic format ( 314.50(l), 314.94(d), 601.14(b), and 314.81(b)), even when it is part of a paper submission. Before implementation of the automated system, you should follow the procedures in either this guidance or Agency guidance on submitting electronic NDAs or BLAs 4 for information on how to submit the content of labeling electronically. After implementation of the automated system, you should follow the procedures in this guidance for submission of the content of labeling electronically. Note: In order for FDA to process, review, and archive electronic content of labeling, all submissions, including annual reports, must be made in accordance with certain provisions of 21 CFR part 11 specified in the electronic labeling rule ( 314.50(l), 314.94(d)(1), 601.14(b), and 314.81(b)) and sent to the appropriate central document room facilities specified in public docket number 92S-0251. Electronic documents that are sent directly to division document rooms or to reviewers bypass the controls established for the receipt and archiving of documents and, therefore, are not considered official documents for review. D. Technical Problems or Questions If you have any questions on technical issues related to providing the content of labeling in submissions according to the recommendations in this guidance, please contact the appropriate electronic submission coordinator at esub@cder.fda.gov or esubprep@cber.fda.gov. Specific questions pertaining to content should be directed to the appropriate review division or office. IV. ORGANIZING THE MAIN SUBMISSION FOLDER The content of labeling SPL files should be placed in a single folder titled spl. The spl folder is used for all submissions in SPL whether they are part of an electronic submission or a paper submission. If the content of labeling in SPL is provided with an electronic submission, you should place the spl folder in the appropriate folders for labeling. For additional information on organizing the submission folder in an electronic submission, see current Agency guidance on providing regulatory submissions in electronic format. 5 4 For content of labeling submitted as part of a paper submission, see the guidances for industry entitled Providing Regulatory Submissions in Electronic Format NDAs and Providing Regulatory Submissions to the Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research (CBER) in Electronic Format Biologics Marketing Applications. 5 See footnote 3. 5