Case 5:17-cv PSG-DTB Document 1 Filed 01/30/17 Page 1 of 36 Page ID #:1

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "Case 5:17-cv PSG-DTB Document 1 Filed 01/30/17 Page 1 of 36 Page ID #:1"

Transcription

1 Case :-cv-00-psg-dtb Document Filed 0/0/ Page of Page ID #: 0 Steven J. Nataupsky (CA SBN ) steven.nataupsky@knobbe.com Lynda J. Zadra-Symes (CA SBN ) lynda.zadrasymes@knobbe.com Jason A. Champion (CA SBN ) jason.champion@knobbe.com Julianna M. Simon (CA SBN 0) julianna.simon@knobbe.com KNOBBE, MARTENS, OLSON & BEAR, LLP 0 Main Street, Fourteenth Floor Irvine, CA Phone: () 0-00 Facsimile: () 0-0 Attorneys for Plaintiff ENERGY COMPANY IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ENERGY COMPANY, a Delaware corporation, v. Plaintiff, THE NATURE S BOUNTY COMPANY. FKA NBTY, INC., a Delaware corporation; and MET-RX SUBSTRATE TECHOLOGY, INC., a California corporation, Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. :-CV-00 COMPLAINT FOR TRADEMARK INFRINGEMENT, FALSE DESIGNATION OF ORIGIN AND UNFAIR COMPETITION DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL Plaintiff Monster Energy Company ( Plaintiff or Monster ) hereby complains of Defendants The Nature s Bounty Company FKA NBTY, Inc. ( NBTY ) and Met-RX Substrate Technology, Inc. ( Met-RX ) (collectively, Defendants ), and alleges as follows: --

2 Case :-cv-00-psg-dtb Document Filed 0/0/ Page of Page ID #: 0 JURISDICTION AND VENUE. This is an action for ) trademark infringement and false designation of origin under U.S.C. (a), ) trademark infringement under U.S.C., ) statutory trademark infringement under California Business & Professions Code, ) California common-law unfair competition, and ) unfair competition arising under California Business & Professions Code 0 et seq.. The Court has original subject matter jurisdiction over the claims that relate to trademark infringement and false designation of origin pursuant to U.S.C. and (a) and also pursuant to U.S.C. and, as these claims arise under the laws of the United States. The Court has supplemental jurisdiction over the claims in this Complaint which arise under state statutory and common law pursuant to U.S.C. (b) and (a), because the state law claims are so related to the federal claims that they form part of the same case or controversy and derive from a common nucleus of operative facts.. This Court has personal jurisdiction over Defendants because they have a continuous, systematic, and substantial presence within this Judicial District and within California. In addition, by committing acts of trademark infringement, false designation of origin, and unfair competition in this Judicial District, including, but not limited to, using infringing marks in connection with the advertisement, marketing, and promotion of products to customers in this Judicial District, Defendants acts form a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to Monster s claims.. Venue is proper in this Judicial District pursuant to U.S.C. (b) and (c) at least because Defendants reside in this Judicial District by --

3 Case :-cv-00-psg-dtb Document Filed 0/0/ Page of Page ID #: 0 virtue of doing business within the Judicial District and a substantial portion of the events complained of herein took place in this Judicial District. THE PARTIES. Monster is a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of Delaware, having a principal place of business at Monster Way, Corona, California.. Upon information and belief, NBTY is a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of Delaware, having a principal place of business at 00 Smithtown Ave, Ronkonkoma, New York. Defendant NBTY is subject to the personal jurisdiction of this Court by virtue of its substantial contacts with California, including its participation in the acts and events occurring in this Judicial District described herein. Specifically, on information and belief, NBTY is a national distributor of the infringing products. On information and belief, NBTY markets and advertises online the infringing products through the URL, which is available and accessible in California.. Upon information and belief, Met-RX is a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of California, having a principal place of business at 0 Orville Drive, Bohemia, New York. Defendant Met-RX is subject to the personal jurisdiction of this Court by virtue of its substantial contacts with California, including its participation in the acts and events occurring in this Judicial District described herein. COMMON ALLEGATIONS FOR ALL CLAIMS OF RELIEF A. Monster s Trademarks. Monster is a nationwide leader in the business of developing, marketing, selling, and distributing ready-to-drink beverages, including energy drinks. --

4 Case :-cv-00-psg-dtb Document Filed 0/0/ Page of Page ID #: 0. In 0, long before Defendants acts described herein, Monster launched its ENERGY drink brand, bearing its now-famous and ENERGY marks. 0. Since 0, Monster has also consistently used its mark to identify its ready-to-drink beverage product line. Monster s line of drinks now includes over 0 different products. Monster s family of drinks includes, but is not limited to, the following beverages: original Monster Energy and Lo-Carb Monster Energy, Monster Energy Gronk, Monster Assault, Juice Monster Khaos, Juice Monster Ripper ; Juice Monster Pipeline Punch, Ubermonster, Monster Energy Import; Punch Monster Baller s Blend TM ; Punch Monster Mad Dog, Monster Energy Unleaded ; Monster Energy Absolutely Zero, Monster Energy Zero Ultra, Monster Energy Ultra Blue, Monster Energy Ultra Red, Monster Energy Ultra Black, Monster Energy Ultra Citron, Monster Energy Ultra Sunrise, Monster Rehab, which is a line of fruit and tea flavored non-carbonated energy drinks that includes electrolytes, which includes s Monster Rehab Tea + Orangeade + Energy, Monster Rehab Tea + Pink Lemonade + Energy, Monster Rehab Tea + Lemonade + Energy, Monster Rehab Raspberry Tea + Energy, and Monster Rehab Peach Tea + Lemonade; Java Monster, which is a line of dairy based coffee plus energy drinks; Muscle Monster, which is a line of energy shakes, which include grams of protein to aid muscle recovery after a strenuous workout; Monster Energy Extra Strength Nitrous Technology, which is a line of energy drinks with a blend of nitrous oxide and carbon dioxide to create a smoother energy drink; and Monster Energy which is a five ounce super concentrated energy drink, among others (referred to collectively as " line of drinks"). --

5 Case :-cv-00-psg-dtb Document Filed 0/0/ Page of Page ID #: 0. Representative images showing some of the products in Monster s line of drinks are shown below:. Monster is also the owner of numerous trademark registrations for marks that incorporate its ENERGY, M ENERGY, and/or marks for use in connection with beverages and nutritional supplements including the following U.S. Trademark Registrations: --

6 Case :-cv-00-psg-dtb Document Filed 0/0/ Page of Page ID #: 0 MARK ENERGY M ENERGY ENERGY REG. GOODS/SERVICES NO.,0, Nutritional supplements in liquid form, but excluding perishable beverage products that contain fruit juice or soy, whether such products are pasteurized or not,0, Nutritional supplements in liquid form, but excluding perishable beverage products that contain fruit juice or soy, whether such products are pasteurized or not,0,0 Fruit juice drinks having a juice content of 0% or less by volume that are shelf stable, carbonated soft drinks, carbonated drinks enhanced with vitamins, minerals, nutrients, amino acids and/or herbs, but excluding perishable beverage products that contain fruit juice or soy, whether such products are pasteurized or not DATE REG. FILED DATE 0//0 0//0 0//0 0//0 0//0 0/0/0 --

7 Case :-cv-00-psg-dtb Document Filed 0/0/ Page of Page ID #: 0 MARK M ENERGY ENERGY REG. GOODS/SERVICES NO.,, Beverages, namely, carbonated soft drinks, carbonated drinks enhanced with vitamins, minerals, nutrients, amino acids and/or herbs, carbonated energy or sports drinks, fruit juice drinks having a juice content of 0% or less by volume that are shelf stable, but excluding perishable beverage products that contain fruit juice or soy, whether such products are pasteurized or not,0,0 Nutritional supplements in liquid form DATE REG. FILED DATE 0/0/0 0//0 0//0 0// ENERGY,0, Non-alcoholic beverages, namely, energy drinks, excluding perishable beverage products that contain fruit juice or soy 0//0 0// --

8 Case :-cv-00-psg-dtb Document Filed 0/0/ Page of Page ID #: 0 MARK ENERGY REHAB JAVA REG. GOODS/SERVICES NO.,, Promoting goods and services in the sports, motorsports, electronic sports, and music industries through the distribution of printed, audio and visual promotional materials; promoting sports and music events and competitions for others,, Ready to drink tea, iced tea and tea based beverages; ready to drink flavored tea, iced tea and tea based beverages,, Beverages, namely, soft drinks; non-carbonated energy drinks; noncarbonated sports drinks; soft drinks and noncarbonated energy drinks, all enhanced with vitamins, minerals, nutrients, amino acids, and/or herbs, but excluding perishable beverage products that contain fruit juice or soy, whether such products are pasteurized or not DATE REG. FILED DATE 0// 0// 0// 0// //0 0/0/ --

9 Case :-cv-00-psg-dtb Document Filed 0/0/ Page of Page ID #: 0 MARK UNLEADED REHAB REG. GOODS/SERVICES NO.,0, Nutritional supplements; non-alcoholic drinks, namely, carbonated soft drinks, carbonated energy drinks, sports drinks, and soft drinks, energy drinks and sports drinks enhanced with vitamins, minerals, nutrients, amino acids and/or herbs,, Nutritional supplements in liquid form; beverages, namely, non-alcoholic non-carbonated drinks enhanced with vitamins, minerals, nutrients, proteins, amino acids and/or herbs; noncarbonated energy or sports drinks, fruit juice drinks having a juice content of 0% or less by volume that are shelfstable; all the foregoing goods exclude perishable beverage products that contain fruit juice or soy, whether such products are pasteurized or not DATE REG. FILED DATE 0/0/ 0// 0/0/0 0// --

10 Case :-cv-00-psg-dtb Document Filed 0/0/ Page 0 of Page ID #:0 0 MARK MUSCLE MUSCLE REG. GOODS/SERVICES NO.,, Nutritional supplements in liquid form; beverages, namely, soft drinks; nonalcoholic and noncarbonated drinks enhanced with vitamins, minerals, nutrients, proteins, amino acids and/or herbs; noncarbonated energy or sports drinks; all the foregoing goods exclude perishable beverage products that contain fruit juice or soy, whether such products are pasteurized or not,, Vitamin fortified beverages; dairy-based beverages; dairy-based energy shakes; energy shakes; coffee energy shakes; chocolate energy shakes; ready to drink coffee based beverages; ready to drink chocolatebased beverages DATE REG. FILED DATE 0/0/0 0/0/ 0/0/ // -0-

11 Case :-cv-00-psg-dtb Document Filed 0/0/ Page of Page ID #: 0 MARK ENERGY ULTRA RED ENERGY ULTRA BLUE REG. GOODS/SERVICES NO.,, Nutritional supplements in liquid form; vitamin fortified beverages; nonalcoholic beverages, namely, energy drinks, soft drinks, sports drinks, all enhanced with vitamins, minerals, nutrients, amino acids and/or herbs; all the foregoing goods exclude perishable beverage products that contain fruit juice or soy, whether such products are pasteurized or not,, Nutritional supplements in liquid form; vitamin fortified beverages; nonalcoholic beverages, namely, energy drinks, soft drinks, sports drinks, all enhanced with vitamins, minerals, nutrients, amino acids and/or herbs; all the foregoing goods exclude perishable beverage products that contain fruit juice or soy, whether such products are pasteurized or not DATE REG. FILED DATE 0// 0// 0/0/ 0// --

12 Case :-cv-00-psg-dtb Document Filed 0/0/ Page of Page ID #: 0 MARK ENERGY ULTRA BLACK ENERGY ULTRA CITRON ENERGY ZERO ULTRA REG. GOODS/SERVICES NO.,0, Nutritional supplements in liquid form; Nonalcoholic beverages, namely, carbonated soft drinks, carbonated energy drinks, sports drinks, and soft drinks, energy drinks and sports drinks enhanced with vitamins, minerals, nutrients, amino acids and/or herbs,, Nutritional supplements in liquid form; Nonalcoholic beverages, namely, carbonated soft drinks, carbonated energy drinks, sports drinks, and soft drinks, energy drinks and sports drinks enhanced with vitamins, minerals, nutrients, amino acids and/or herbs,, Nutritional supplements in liquid form; Nonalcoholic beverages, namely, soft drinks, carbonated soft drinks, energy drinks, sports drinks; energy drinks and sports drinks enhanced with vitamins, minerals, nutrients, amino acids and/or herbs DATE REG. FILED DATE 0// // 0// // // 0/0/ --

13 Case :-cv-00-psg-dtb Document Filed 0/0/ Page of Page ID #: 0 MARK JUICE ASSAULT ASSAULT M ENERGY REG. GOODS/SERVICES DATE REG. NO. FILED DATE,,0 Nutritional supplements 0// 0/0/ in liquid form; Nonalcoholic beverages, namely, energy drinks and drinks enhanced with vitamins, minerals, nutrients, amino acids and/or herbs, but excluding perishable beverage products that contain fruit juice or soy.,,0 Nutritional supplements // /0/ in liquid form; vitamin fortified beverages; Nonalcoholic beverages, namely, energy drinks, energy drinks flavored with juice, sports drinks, all enhanced with vitamins, minerals, nutrients, proteins, amino acids, and/or herbs, but excluding perishable beverage products that contain fruit juice or soy, whether such products are pasteurized or not,, Beverages, namely, 0//0 0/0/ carbonated drinks enhanced with vitamins, minerals, nutrients, amino acids, and/or herbs; carbonated and noncarbonated energy drinks --

14 Case :-cv-00-psg-dtb Document Filed 0/0/ Page of Page ID #: 0 MARK PUNCH REG. GOODS/SERVICES NO.,0, Nutritional supplements in liquid form; vitamin fortified beverages; Nonalcoholic beverages, namely, energy drinks, energy drinks flavored with juice, sports drinks, all enhanced with vitamins, minerals, nutrients, proteins, amino acids, and/or herbs, but excluding perishable beverage products that contain fruit juice or soy, whether such products are pasteurized or not UBER,, Nutritional supplements in liquid form; beverages, namely, carbonated soft drinks; non-alcoholic carbonated soft drinks and energy drinks enhanced with vitamins, minerals, nutrients, proteins, amino acids and/or herbs; carbonated energy drinks and sports drinks, all the foregoing goods exclude perishable beverage products that contain fruit juice or soy, whether such products are pasteurized or not -- DATE REG. FILED DATE // 0// 0/0/0 0/0/

15 Case :-cv-00-psg-dtb Document Filed 0/0/ Page of Page ID #: 0 MARK LO-CARB ENERGY ENERGY UNLEADED REG. GOODS/SERVICES DATE REG. NO. FILED DATE,, Nutritional supplements; 0//0 0//0 non-alcoholic beverages, namely, energy drinks, drinks enhanced with vitamins, minerals, nutrients, amino acids and/or herbs,, Nutritional supplements 0// 0// in liquid form; Nonalcoholic beverages, namely, carbonated soft drinks, carbonated and non-carbonated energy drinks, sports drinks, and soft drinks, energy drinks and sports drinks enhanced with vitamins, minerals, nutrients, amino acids and/or herbs. Attached hereto as Exhibits A-A are true and correct copies of Monster s trademark registrations identified above.. Pursuant to U.S.C. 0, U.S. Trademark Registration Nos.,0,,,0,,,0,0,,,,,,, and,, are incontestable.. Monster is also the owner of the following California trademark registration for for use in connection with beverages: --

16 Case :-cv-00-psg-dtb Document Filed 0/0/ Page of Page ID #: 0 MARK REG. NO. GOODS/SERVICES DATE FILED REG. DATE 0 Fruit juice drinks, soft drinks, 0//0 0//0 carbonated soft drinks and soft drinks enhanced with vitamins, minerals, nutrients, amino acids and/or herbs, aerated water, soda water and seltzer water. Attached hereto as Exhibit B is a true and correct copy of Monster s California trademark registration identified above. Collectively, the common law trademark rights referenced in paragraphs through and the registrations and trademarks referenced in paragraphs and of this Complaint, including all common law rights therein, are referred to as the Marks.. Since Monster s initial launch of its original ENERGY drinks in 0, and prior to Defendants acts described herein, Monster has continuously used its Marks in connection with its line of drinks and in extensive and widespread promotional, advertising and marketing activities relating to those products. Since 0, Monster has spent approximately $. billion marketing and promoting the brand. Monster has grown into an international brand, as its products are now sold in approximately countries and territories worldwide.. Monster has and continues to widely market and promote its Marks in the industry and to consumers by displaying the Marks on more than. billion cans sold worldwide to date. Monster s promotional efforts also include by way of example but not limitation widespread distribution of promotional and point of sale materials, product samplings, apparel and merchandise bearing the Marks, in --

17 Case :-cv-00-psg-dtb Document Filed 0/0/ Page of Page ID #: 0 magazines and other industry publications, on the ENERGY website and other Internet websites, attendance at trade shows, and sponsorship of concert tours, live events, athletes, athletic teams, and athletic competitions around the world.. Shown below are true and accurate representative images illustrating just a few examples of Monster s point of sale materials bearing Monster s Marks:. As of, Monster sponsors the Ultimate Fighting Championship ( UFC ) as its official energy drink partner (excluding in Brazil). At least one of the Marks appears on the fighter gate vertical bumpers of the UFC s Octagon for most live UFC events, excluding those which take place in Brazil. --

18 Case :-cv-00-psg-dtb Document Filed 0/0/ Page of Page ID #: 0. Monster also sponsors or has previously sponsored more than 0 athletes or athletic teams who compete in a wide-variety of sports, including but not limited to athletes competing in the UFC, the X Games, the Winter X Games, ENERGY AMA Supercross motorcycle racing, Formula One automobile racing, Road Racing World Championship Grand Prix motorcycle racing ( MotoGP ), NASCAR, Professional Bull Riding, the Kentucky Derby and the National Football League ( NFL ). For example, as of November, Monster sponsors Rob Gronkowski, a professional football player who plays for the NFL s New England Patriots. In, Gronkowski set NFL single-season records for touchdowns and receiving yards by a tight end and became the first tight end in NFL history to lead the conference in scoring. Monster also sells and distributes an energy drink called Gronk, which prominently features Gronkowski s nickname, image, and signature, as well as the mark. Gronkowski is often pictured drinking one of Monster s line of drinks and/or wearing clothing bearing the Marks. Representative images of Monster s sponsorship of Gronkowski are shown below. --

19 Case :-cv-00-psg-dtb Document Filed 0/0/ Page of Page ID #: 0. In addition, in November, Monster entered into a sponsorship agreement with Tiger Woods, one of the greatest golfers of all time. When competing, at public appearances, or both, the sponsored athletes and team members almost always wear clothing or use equipment that prominently display the Marks. Through Monster s sponsorships, millions of consumers have been exposed to the Marks when they watch the athletes and teams compete at events many of which are televised nationwide or see the athletes at public appearances or in Internet postings and magazines.. In addition to UFC events, Monster sponsors numerous other athletic events in connection with its line of drinks, apparel, and accessories bearing the Marks. For example, in December, Monster announced that it will be the new title sponsor of America s premier NASCAR stock car racing series, which will now be called the ENERGY NASCAR SERIES. NASCAR races are widely broadcast worldwide in about 0 countries. Monster also sponsors or has sponsored the X Games, --

20 Case :-cv-00-psg-dtb Document Filed 0/0/ Page of Page ID #: 0 the ENERGY AMA Supercross Series, MotoGP races, the ENERGY Pipeline Pro Surf event, the ENERGY Speedway World Championship, the Professional Bull Riders bull riding series and its plus events in cities around the United States (televised in the United States on CBS), the ENERGY Billabong XXL Awards, Street League Skateboarding events, Arenacross events, the Off-Road Championship event (TORC), SCORE Off-Road Racing events, King of the Hammers desert racing event, and the Pole Position racing events, among others. Some examples of Monster s sponsorships in those areas are shown, for example, below: --

21 Case :-cv-00-psg-dtb Document Filed 0/0/ Page of Page ID #: 0. Monster s line of drinks has achieved substantial commercial success. Worldwide retail sales now exceed billion cans per year, with estimated retail sales at approximately $ billion per year worldwide. Monster s brand has established itself as the best-selling energy drink brand in the United States by unit volume.. As a result of Monster s substantial use and promotion of its Marks, the marks have acquired great value as specific identifiers of Monster s products and serve to identify and distinguish Monster s products from those of others. Customers in this Judicial District and elsewhere readily recognize the Marks as distinctive designations of the origin of Monster s brand of drinks and other products and promotional items. The Marks are intellectual property assets of enormous value as symbols of Monster and its quality products, reputation, and goodwill. B. Defendants Infringing Activities. On information and belief, Defendants are engaged in the business of manufacturing, distributing, marketing and/or selling ready-to-drink beverages and nutritional supplements, as well as other products nationwide. Defendants also operate the respective websites and and the following social media accounts: --

22 Case :-cv-00-psg-dtb Document Filed 0/0/ Page of Page ID #: and Without permission or consent from Monster, Defendants have used and are using a mark that is confusingly similar to the Marks to advertise, market, and/or promote Defendants products. Specifically, beginning in April, Defendants have used and continue to use the mark LOVE THE in nationwide television spots, bus ads, press releases, and social media campaigns to advertise, market, and/or promote their line of ready-to-drink beverages and nutritional supplements. Some examples of Defendants advertisements and use are shown below: --

23 Case :-cv-00-psg-dtb Document Filed 0/0/ Page of Page ID #: 0 --

24 Case :-cv-00-psg-dtb Document Filed 0/0/ Page of Page ID #: 0. In addition to their unauthorized use of the LOVE THE mark, Defendants market, advertise, and promote their ready-todrink beverages and nutritional supplements in a manner similar to Monster. For example, following Monster s sponsorship of Rob Gronkowski, Defendants entered into an agreement with NFL player Joey Bosa, a defensive end for the Los Angeles Chargers, formerly known as the San Diego Chargers. Similar to Monster s use of Gronkowski, Defendants use Bosa as a brand spokesperson who is often pictured wearing Met-RX clothing and drinking Met-RX products in advertisements displaying the mark LOVE THE :. Defendants line of ready-to-drink beverages and nutritional supplements includes both ready-to-drink protein beverages, such as Defendants Ultra Recovery High Protein Milk Shakes, and ready-to-drink hydration beverages such as Defendants Super Hydrate Sports Drinks. 0. On information and belief, Defendants manufacture and distribute their ready-to-drink beverages to retail outlets, including grocery stores and major retailers such as Wal-Mart, Amazon, Jet, and to fitness facilities, such as Gold s Gym. --

25 Case :-cv-00-psg-dtb Document Filed 0/0/ Page of Page ID #: 0. Monster s products and Defendants products are ready-to-drink beverages that travel in the same channels of trade and are sold to the same consumers.. Defendants are clearly aware of Monster and its valuable Marks as evidenced by their use of the confusingly similar LOVE THE mark. Defendants are also aware of Monster and its Marks from the multiple letters Monster s counsel sent to Defendants counsel, demanding that Defendants cease use of the LOVE THE mark.. Defendants are not affiliated with Monster. At no time has Monster granted Defendants license, permission, or authority to use or display Monster s Marks.. Defendants have attempted to capitalize on Monster s valuable reputation and customer goodwill in the Marks by using the confusingly similar LOVE THE mark in a manner that is likely to cause consumers and potential consumers to believe that Defendants products are associated with Monster or Monster s products, when they are not.. Without permission or consent from Monster, Defendants have infringed the Marks in interstate commerce by promoting, advertising, and/or promoting ready-to-drink beverages using a mark that is confusingly similar to Monster s Marks.. Upon information and belief, Defendants actions alleged herein are intended to cause confusion, mistake, or deception as to the source of the Defendants products.. Upon information and belief, Defendants actions alleged herein are intended to cause consumers and potential consumers to believe that --

26 Case :-cv-00-psg-dtb Document Filed 0/0/ Page of Page ID #: 0 Defendants business and the goods that Defendants offer are associated with Monster or Monster s products, when they are not.. By virtue of the acts complained of herein, Defendants have created a likelihood of injury to Monster s business reputation and goodwill, caused a likelihood of consumer confusion, mistake, and deception as to the source of origin or relationship of Monster s goods and Defendants products, and have otherwise competed unfairly with Monster by unlawfully trading on and using Monster s Marks without Monster s permission or consent.. Upon information and belief, Defendants acts complained of herein are willful and deliberate. 0. Defendants acts complained of herein have caused damage to Monster in an amount to be determined at trial, and such damages will continue to increase unless Defendants are enjoined from their wrongful acts and infringement.. Defendants acts complained of herein have caused Monster to suffer irreparable injury to its business. Monster will suffer substantial loss of goodwill and reputation unless and until Defendants are preliminarily and permanently enjoined from the wrongful acts complained of herein. FIRST CLAIM FOR RELIEF (Trademark Infringement and False Designation of Origin Under U.S.C. (a)). Monster hereby repeats, realleges, and incorporates by reference paragraphs - of this Complaint as though fully set forth herein.. This is an action for trademark infringement and false designation of origin arising under U.S.C. (a).. As a result of the widespread use and promotion of Monster s Marks, the Marks have acquired strong fame and --

27 Case :-cv-00-psg-dtb Document Filed 0/0/ Page of Page ID #: 0 secondary meaning to consumers and potential customers, in that consumers and potential customers have come to associate the Marks with Monster.. Defendants have infringed the Marks, and created a false designation of origin, by using in commerce, without Monster s permission, the confusingly similar mark LOVE THE in connection with the advertisement, offering for sale, and/or sale of Defendants products, including ready-to-drink beverages.. Defendants actions are likely to cause confusion and mistake, or to deceive as to the affiliation, connection, or association of Monster with Defendants, and/or as to the origin, sponsorship, or approval of Defendants products or Defendants commercial activities, in violation of U.S.C. (a).. Upon information and belief, Defendants did so with the intent to trade upon Monster s reputation and goodwill by causing confusion and mistake among customers and the public and to deceive the public into believing that Defendants products are associated with, sponsored by or approved by Monster, when they are not.. Upon information and belief, Defendants had actual knowledge of Monster s ownership and prior use of the Marks, and without the consent of Monster, willfully violated U.S.C. (a).. Defendants, by their actions, have damaged Monster in an amount to be determined at trial. 0. Defendants, by their actions, have irreparably injured Monster. Such irreparable injury will continue unless Defendants are preliminarily and permanently enjoined by this Court from further violation of Monster s rights, for which Monster has no adequate remedy at law. --

28 Case :-cv-00-psg-dtb Document Filed 0/0/ Page of Page ID #: 0 SECOND CLAIM FOR RELIEF (Trademark Infringement Under U.S.C. ). Monster hereby repeats, realleges, and incorporates by reference paragraphs -0 of this Complaint as though fully set forth herein... This is a claim for trademark infringement arising under U.S.C.. Monster owns valid and enforceable federally registered trademarks for the Marks, including at least the registrations listed in paragraph above.. Defendants have used in commerce, without permission from Monster, colorable imitations, and/or confusingly similar marks to Monster s Marks that are the subject of at least Monster s U.S. Trademark Registration Nos.,0,;,0,;,0,0;,,;,0,0;,0,;,,;,,;,,;,0,;,,;,,;,,;,,;,,;,0,;,,;,,;,,0;,,0;,,;,0,;,,;,,; and,, in connection with the advertising, marketing, and/or promoting of Defendants products, including ready-to-drink beverages. Such use is likely to cause confusion or mistake, or to deceive.. Upon information and belief, the activities of Defendants complained of herein constitute willful and intentional infringements of Monster s registered marks, and Defendants did so with the intent to trade upon Monster s reputation and goodwill by causing confusion and mistake among customers and the public and to deceive the public into believing that Defendants products are associated with, sponsored by, originated from, or are approved by, Monster, when they are not. --

29 Case :-cv-00-psg-dtb Document Filed 0/0/ Page of Page ID #: 0. Upon information and belief, Defendants had actual knowledge of Monster s ownership and prior use of the Marks, and have willfully violated U.S.C... Defendants, by their actions, have damaged Monster in an amount to be determined at trial.. Defendants, by their actions, have irreparably injured Monster. Such irreparable injury will continue unless Defendants are preliminarily and permanently enjoined by this Court from further violation of Monster s rights, for which Monster has no adequate remedy at law. THIRD CLAIM FOR RELIEF (Statutory Trademark Infringement Under California Business & Professions Code ). Monster hereby repeats, realleges, and incorporates by reference paragraphs - of this Complaint as though fully set forth herein. 0. This is an action for statutory trademark infringement under California Business & Professions Code.. Monster registered the mark in connection with drinks and owns California Trademark Registration No. 0,.. Defendants have used and are using in commerce reproductions, counterfeits, copies, or colorable imitations of Monster s trademark in connection with the advertisement, display, promotion, marketing, distribution, sale and/or offer for sale of Defendants products, including readyto-drink beverages. trademarks.. Monster has not authorized or consented to Defendants' use of its. Defendants' unauthorized use of the LOVE THE mark is likely to cause confusion, or to cause mistake, or to deceive as to the source of --

30 Case :-cv-00-psg-dtb Document Filed 0/0/ Page 0 of Page ID #:0 0 origin of Defendants products, in violation of California Business and Professions Code.. Defendants acted willfully, with the intent to harm Monster, and to trade on Monster s reputation and goodwill.. On information and belief, Defendants profited from their infringing conduct.. Defendants, by their actions, have damaged Monster in an amount to be determined at trial.. Defendants, by their actions, have irreparably injured Monster. Such irreparable injury will continue unless Defendants are preliminarily and permanently enjoined by this Court from further violation of Monster s rights, for which Monster has no adequate remedy at law. FOURTH CLAIM FOR RELIEF (Unfair Competition Under California Business & Professions Code 0 et seq.). Monster hereby repeats, realleges, and incorporates by reference paragraphs - of this Complaint as though fully set forth herein. 0. This is an action for unfair competition under California Business & Professions Code 0, et seq.. By virtue of the acts complained of herein, Defendants have intentionally caused a likelihood of confusion among consumers and the public and have unfairly competed in violation of Cal. Bus. & Prof. Code 0, et seq.. Defendants acts complained of herein constitute trademark infringement, unfair competition, and unlawful, unfair, malicious or fraudulent business practices, which have injured and damaged Monster.. Defendants, by their actions, have irreparably injured Monster. Such irreparable injury will continue unless Defendants are preliminarily and -0-

31 Case :-cv-00-psg-dtb Document Filed 0/0/ Page of Page ID #: 0 permanently enjoined by this Court from further violation of Monster s rights, for which Monster has no adequate remedy at law. FIFTH CLAIM FOR RELIEF (California Common Law Unfair Competition). MEC hereby repeats, realleges, and incorporates by reference paragraphs - of this Complaint as though fully set forth herein.. This is an action for unfair competition under the common law of the State of California.. Defendants acts complained of herein constitute trademark infringement and unfair competition under the common law of the State of California.. By virtue of the acts complained of herein, Defendants have willfully and intentionally caused a likelihood of confusion among the purchasing public in this Judicial District and elsewhere, thereby unfairly competing with Monster in violation of the common law of the State of California.. Defendants aforementioned acts have damaged Monster in an amount to be determined at trial.. Defendants have irreparably injured Monster. Such irreparable injury will continue unless Defendants are preliminarily and permanently enjoined by this Court from further violation of Monster s rights, for which Monster has no adequate remedy at law. 0. Defendants willful acts of unfair competition under California common law constitute fraud, oppression and malice. Accordingly, Monster is entitled to exemplary damages pursuant to Cal. Civ. Code Section (a). PRAYER FOR RELIEF WHEREFORE, Monster prays for judgment against Defendants as follows: --

32 Case :-cv-00-psg-dtb Document Filed 0/0/ Page of Page ID #: 0. That the Court render a final judgment in favor of Monster and against Defendants on all claims for relief alleged herein;. That the Court render a final judgment that Defendants have violated the provisions of U.S.C. (a) by willfully infringing the Marks by using a false designation of origin, false description or false representation through the marketing, sale and promotion of Defendants products, including ready-to-drink beverages;. That the Court render a final judgment that Defendants have willfully violated the provisions of U.S.C. by infringing Monster s trademark rights in at least the marks that are the subject of U.S. Trademark Registration Nos.,0,;,0,;,0,0;,,;,0,0;,0,;,,;,,;,,;,0,;,,;,,;,,;,,;,,;,0,;,,;,,;,,0;,,0;,,;,0,;,,;,,; and,,;. That the Court render a final judgment that Defendants have violated the provisions of California Business & Professions Code by willfully infringing the trademark by using a false designation of origin, false description or false representation through the marketing, sale and promotion of Defendants products, including ready-to-drink beverages;. That the Court render a final judgment declaring that Defendants have violated California Business and Professions Code 0, et seq. by committing trademark infringement and unfairly competing with Monster;. That the Court render a final judgment declaring Defendants have violated California common law by unfairly competing with MEC;. That Defendants, their agents, servants, employees, attorneys, successors, and assigns, and all other persons in active concert or participation --

33 Case :-cv-00-psg-dtb Document Filed 0/0/ Page of Page ID #: 0 with any of them who receive actual notice of the injunction by personal service or otherwise, be forthwith preliminarily and permanently enjoined from: a. using the mark LOVE THE in connection with the advertising, promotion, or sale of beverages or nutritional supplements, using any of the Marks in connection with Defendants products, using any of the Marks in advertising or promoting Defendants products, and/or using confusingly similar variations of any of the Marks in any manner that is likely to create the impression that Defendants products originate from Monster, are endorsed by Monster, or are connected in any way with Monster; b. manufacturing, distributing, shipping, importing, reproducing, displaying, advertising, marketing, promoting, transferring, selling, and/or offering to sell any unauthorized products bearing any of the Marks and/or any confusingly similar marks; c. filing any applications for registration of any trademarks, trade dress, or designs confusingly similar to the Marks; d. otherwise infringing any of the Marks or any of Monster s other trademarks; e. falsely designating the origin of Defendants products; f. unfairly competing with Monster in any manner whatsoever; and g. causing a likelihood of confusion or injury to Monster s business reputation;. That Defendants be directed to file with this Court and serve on Monster within thirty (0) days after the service of the injunction, a report, in writing, under oath, setting forth in detail the manner and form in which it has complied with the injunction pursuant to U.S.C.. --

34 Case :-cv-00-psg-dtb Document Filed 0/0/ Page of Page ID #: 0. That Defendants be required to account to Monster for any and all profits derived by Defendants and all damages sustained by Monster by virtue of Defendants acts complained of herein; 0. That Defendants be ordered to pay over to Monster all damages which Monster has sustained as a consequence of the acts complained of herein, subject to proof at trial, together with prejudgment and post-judgment interest;. That this case be deemed exceptional and the amount of the damages be trebled and that the amount of profits be increased by as many times as the Court deems appropriate, pursuant to U.S.C. ;. That an award of treble damages be awarded to Monster pursuant to Cal. Bus. & Prof. Code 0(a);. That Monster be awarded exemplary damages from Defendants pursuant to Cal. Civ. Code. ;. That Defendants actions be deemed willful;. That an award of reasonable costs, expenses, and attorneys fees be awarded to Monster pursuant to at least U.S.C. ;. That Defendants be required to deliver and destroy all devices, literature, advertising, goods and other unauthorized materials bearing the LOVE THE mark, any of the Marks or any confusingly similar marks, pursuant to U.S.C. ;. That Monster be awarded restitution and disgorgement; and. That Monster be awarded such other and further relief as this Court may deem just. --

35 Case :-cv-00-psg-dtb Document Filed 0/0/ Page of Page ID #: 0 Dated: January 0, Respectfully submitted, KNOBBE, MARTENS, OLSON & BEAR, LLP By: /s/ Lynda J. Zadra-Symes Steven J. Nataupsky Lynda J. Zadra-Symes Jason A. Champion Julianna M. Simon Attorneys for Plaintiff, ENERGY COMPANY --

36 Case :-cv-00-psg-dtb Document Filed 0/0/ Page of Page ID #: 0 DEMAND FOR TRIAL BY JURY Pursuant to Rule (b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Plaintiff Monster Energy Company hereby demands a trial by jury on all issues so triable. Dated: January 0, Respectfully submitted, KNOBBE, MARTENS, OLSON & BEAR, LLP By: /s/ Lynda J. Zadra-Symes Steven J. Nataupsky Lynda J. Zadra-Symes Jason A. Champion Julianna M. Simon Attorneys for Plaintiff, ENERGY COMPANY --

Case 1:14-cv-12193-WGY Document 1 Filed 05/16/14 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS COMPLAINT AND JURY DEMAND

Case 1:14-cv-12193-WGY Document 1 Filed 05/16/14 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS COMPLAINT AND JURY DEMAND Case 1:14-cv-12193-WGY Document 1 Filed 05/16/14 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS PRIVATE BUSINESS JETS, L.L.C. Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. PRVT, Inc. Defendant. COMPLAINT

More information

Case4:15-cv-04219-DMR Document1 Filed09/16/15 Page1 of 11

Case4:15-cv-04219-DMR Document1 Filed09/16/15 Page1 of 11 Case:-cv-0-DMR Document Filed0// Page of MICHAEL G. RHODES () (rhodesmg@cooley.com) California Street, th Floor San Francisco, CA Telephone: Facsimile: BRENDAN J. HUGHES (pro hac vice to be filed) (bhughes@cooley.com)

More information

CASE 0:12-cv-02397-RHK-TNL Document 1 Filed 09/14/12 Page 1 of 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

CASE 0:12-cv-02397-RHK-TNL Document 1 Filed 09/14/12 Page 1 of 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CASE 0:12-cv-02397-RHK-TNL Document 1 Filed 09/14/12 Page 1 of 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA QUALITY BICYCLE PRODUCTS, INC. v. Plaintiff, BIKEBARON, LLC SINCLAIR IMPORTS, LLC and

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT IN AND FOR THE DISTRICT OF UTAH, CENTRAL DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT IN AND FOR THE DISTRICT OF UTAH, CENTRAL DIVISION Andrew W. Stavros (8615) Austin B. Egan (13203) STAVROS LAW P.C. 11693 South 700 East, Suite 200 Draper, Utah 84020 Tel: (801) 758.7604 Fax: (801) 893.3573 Email: andy@stavroslaw.com austin@stavroslaw.com

More information

Case 3:14-cv-01824-M Document 1 Filed 05/19/14 Page 1 of 9 PageID 1

Case 3:14-cv-01824-M Document 1 Filed 05/19/14 Page 1 of 9 PageID 1 Case 3:14-cv-01824-M Document 1 Filed 05/19/14 Page 1 of 9 PageID 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION BEST LITTLE PROMOHOUSE IN TEXAS LLC, Plaintiffs,

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE Case :-cv-00-tsz Document Filed 0// Page of 0 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 0 EVAN CONKLIN PLUMBING AND HEATING INC., a Washington corporation d/b/a SEATTLE PLUMBING

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION JPM NETWORKS, LLC, ) d/b/a KWIKBOOST ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. ) 3:14-cv-1507 JCM FIRST VENTURE, LLC )

More information

Case 1:16-cv-00320-CBA-PK Document 1 Filed 01/21/16 Page 1 of 8 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Case 1:16-cv-00320-CBA-PK Document 1 Filed 01/21/16 Page 1 of 8 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK Case 116-cv-00320-CBA-PK Document 1 Filed 01/21/16 Page 1 of 8 PageID # 1 Frank J. Martinez (FJM-2149) THE MARTINEZ GROUP PLLC 55 Washington Street, Suite 253-C Brooklyn, New York 11201 718.797.2341 Telephone

More information

Case 1:10-cv-00168-JBS -KMW Document 1 Filed 01/12/10 Page 1 of 21 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

Case 1:10-cv-00168-JBS -KMW Document 1 Filed 01/12/10 Page 1 of 21 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY Case 1:10-cv-00168-JBS -KMW Document 1 Filed 01/12/10 Page 1 of 21 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY SMART VENT INC., : : Plaintiff, : CIVIL ACTION NO.: : : : USA FLOODAIR VENTS,

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION Case :0-cv-0-VRW Document Filed 0/0/0 Page of FRITZ CLAPP (Cal. Bar No. ) Attorney at Law 0 Foothill Boulevard Oakland, California 0 Telephone: () - Facsimile: () - E-mail: Attorney

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 Luke L. Dauchot (SBN Nimalka R. Wickramasekera (SBN Benjamin A. Herbert (SBN South Hope Street Los Angeles, California 001 Telephone: (1 0-00 Facsimile: (1 0-00 Attorneys for Plaintiff, v.

More information

How To File A Lawsuit Against A Corporation In California

How To File A Lawsuit Against A Corporation In California 1 2 3 4 5 [ATTORNEY NAME] (ATTORNEY STATE BAR NUMBER) [ATTORNEY EMAIL ADDRESS] [LAW FIRM NAME] [LAW FIRM STREET ADDRESS] [LAW FIRM CITY/STATE/ZIP CODE] [LAW FIRM TELEPHONE NUMBER] [LAW FIRM FAX NUMBER]

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION COMPLAINT AND DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION COMPLAINT AND DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL Case 8:12-cv-01479-JDW-MAP Document 1 Filed 07/03/12 Page 1 of 31 PageID 1 PODS ENTERPRISES, INC., UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION vs. Plaintiff, Case No. U-HAUL

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE MOBILE TRANSFORMATION LLC, Plaintiff, v. Civil Case No. A&E TELEVISION NETWORKS, LLC JURY TRIAL DEMANDED Defendant. COMPLAINT Plaintiff

More information

Case5:15-cv-00404-HRL Document1 Filed01/28/15 Page1 of 12

Case5:15-cv-00404-HRL Document1 Filed01/28/15 Page1 of 12 Case:-cv-000-HRL Document Filed0// Page of 0 ERIC DONEY, #0 edoney@donahue.com JULIE E. HOFER, # jhofer@donahue.com ANDREW S. MACKAY, #0 amackay@donahue.com DONAHUE FITZGERALD LLP Harrison Street, th Floor

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION RPOST HOLDINGS, INC., RPOST COMMUNICATIONS LIMITED, and RMAIL LIMITED, CIVIL ACTION NO. Plaintiffs, v. ADOBE SYSTEMS

More information

Case 3:15-cv-05082-JRC Document 1 Filed 02/09/15 Page 1 of 10

Case 3:15-cv-05082-JRC Document 1 Filed 02/09/15 Page 1 of 10 Case :-cv-00-jrc Document Filed 0/0/ Page of 0 0 TEFERI BIKILA, an individual, v. Plaintiff, VIBRAM USA INC., a Delaware corporation, Defendant. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

More information

Trademark Infringement Complaint. No. Plaintiff, by and through its attorneys,, I. PARTIES

Trademark Infringement Complaint. No. Plaintiff, by and through its attorneys,, I. PARTIES Trademark Infringement Complaint [Name/Address] Attorneys for Plaintiff UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON ALPHA, INC., a Washington corporation, v. Plaintiff, MR, DELTA

More information

Case 9:13-cv-81058-RNS Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/17/2013 Page 1 of 15 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

Case 9:13-cv-81058-RNS Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/17/2013 Page 1 of 15 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case 9:13-cv-81058-RNS Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/17/2013 Page 1 of 15 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA STEINGER & ISCOE, P.A. D/B/A STEINGER, ISCOE AND GREENE,

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) COMPLAINT THE PARTIES

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) COMPLAINT THE PARTIES IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE AEROSCOUT, LTD. and AEROSCOUT, INC., v. CENTRAK INC., Plaintiffs, Defendant. C.A. No. JURY TRIAL DEMANDED COMPLAINT Plaintiffs AeroScout,

More information

Case 3:15-cv-01953-MO Document 1 Filed 10/16/15 Page 1 of 8

Case 3:15-cv-01953-MO Document 1 Filed 10/16/15 Page 1 of 8 Case 3:15-cv-01953-MO Document 1 Filed 10/16/15 Page 1 of 8 Brenna K. Legaard, OSB #001658 Email: blegaard@schwabe.com SCHWABE, WILLIAMSON & WYATT, P.C. 1211 SW 5th Avenue, Suite 1900 Portland, OR 97204

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA GREENVILLE DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA GREENVILLE DIVISION IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA GREENVILLE DIVISION ZIPIT WIRELESS INC., Plaintiff, v. BLACKBERRY LIMITED F/K/A RESEARCH IN MOTION LIMITED and BLACKBERRY CORPORATION f/k/a

More information

Case 1:14-cv-01362-UNA Document 1 Filed 10/31/14 Page 1 of 9 PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

Case 1:14-cv-01362-UNA Document 1 Filed 10/31/14 Page 1 of 9 PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE Case 1:14-cv-01362-UNA Document 1 Filed 10/31/14 Page 1 of 9 PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE ENDEAVOR MESHTECH, INC., Plaintiff, v. SCHNEIDER ELECTRIC USA, INC., Civil

More information

Case5:12-cv-00630-LHK Document261 Filed08/31/12 Page1 of 15. Attorneys for Plaintiff and Counterclaim Defendant Apple Inc.

Case5:12-cv-00630-LHK Document261 Filed08/31/12 Page1 of 15. Attorneys for Plaintiff and Counterclaim Defendant Apple Inc. Case:-cv-000-LHK Document Filed0// Page of JOSH A. KREVITT (CA SBN ) jkrevitt@gibsondunn.com H. MARK LYON (CA SBN ) mlyon@gibsondunn.com GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP Page Mill Road Palo Alto, CA 0- Telephone:

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.:

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.: Case 1:10-cv-24283-PCH Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/01/2010 Page 1 of 16 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.: STEVO DESIGN, INC., a Florida corporation, v. Plaintiff,

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA HI LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, a Florida limited partnership; HOOTERS OF AMERICA, LLC, a Georgia limited liability company, Plaintiffs,

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 MICROSOFT CORPORATION, a Washington Corporation v. Plaintiff, SALESFORCE.COM, INC., a Delaware Corporation Defendants. UNITED STATES DISTRICT

More information

Case 1:14-cv-05365-NLH-JS Document 1 Filed 08/26/14 Page 1 of 20 PageID: 1

Case 1:14-cv-05365-NLH-JS Document 1 Filed 08/26/14 Page 1 of 20 PageID: 1 Case 114-cv-05365-NLH-JS Document 1 Filed 08/26/14 Page 1 of 20 PageID 1 FOX ROTHSCHILD LLP By Christopher R. Kinkade Christopher D. Olszyk Michael J. Leonard (Pro Hac Vice Application to be filed) Princeton

More information

Case5:15-cv-02579-NC Document1 Filed06/10/15 Page1 of 8

Case5:15-cv-02579-NC Document1 Filed06/10/15 Page1 of 8 Case:-cv-0-NC Document Filed0// Page of KALPANA SRINIVASAN (0) ksrinivasan@susmangodfrey.com OLEG ELKHUNOVICH () oelkhunovich@susmangodfrey.com SUSMAN GODFREY L.L.P. 0 Avenue of the Stars, Suite 0 Los

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY DEFENDANT S ANSWER

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY DEFENDANT S ANSWER Case 1:14-cv-05919-JEI-KMW Document 19 Filed 02/13/15 Page 1 of 11 PageID: 84 Frank L. Corrado, Esquire Attorney ID No. 022221983 BARRY, CORRADO & GRASSI, PC 2700 Pacific Avenue Wildwood, NJ 08260 (609)

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE. Plaintiff Endeavor MeshTech, Inc. ( Plaintiff or Endeavor ), by and through its

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE. Plaintiff Endeavor MeshTech, Inc. ( Plaintiff or Endeavor ), by and through its UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE ENDEAVOR MESHTECH, INC., Plaintiff, v. ACLARA TECHNOLOGIES LLC, Civil Action No. ORIGINAL COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT JURY TRIAL DEMANDED

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION Case 6:10-cv-00557 Document 1 Filed 10/21/10 Page 1 of 19 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION TRANSDATA, INC., Plaintiff, CIVIL ACTION NO. v. 6:10-cv-557

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF DELAWARE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF DELAWARE DERMAFOCUS LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, v. Plaintiff, ULTHERA, INC., a Delaware corporation. Civil Action No: DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL Defendant.

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION, Plaintiff, Civil Action No. v. WEBVIPER, LLC; d/b/a Yellow Web Services; and TIGERHAWK, LLC; d/b/a Yellow

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 LAW OFFICES OF RONALD A. MARRON RONALD A. MARRON (SBN 10) ron@consumersadvocates.com ALEXIS WOOD (SBN 000) alexis@consumersadvocates.com KAS GALLUCCI (SBN 0) kas@consumersadvocates.com

More information

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO UNLIMITED JURISDICTION

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO UNLIMITED JURISDICTION JAMES C. STURDEVANT (SBN 94551 JESPER I. RASMUSSEN (SBN 121001 THE STURDEVANT LAW FIRM A Professional Corporation 475 Sansome Street, Suite 1750 San Francisco, California 94111 Telephone: (415 477-2410

More information

Case 1:14-cv-01564-WYD-MJW Document 28 Filed 09/25/14 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Case 1:14-cv-01564-WYD-MJW Document 28 Filed 09/25/14 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Case 1:14-cv-01564-WYD-MJW Document 28 Filed 09/25/14 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 8 Civil Action No. 14-cv-01564-WYD-MJW IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO THE HERSHEY COMPANY

More information

Case3:15-cv-01367 Document1 Filed03/24/15 Page1 of 9

Case3:15-cv-01367 Document1 Filed03/24/15 Page1 of 9 Case:-cv-0 Document Filed0// Page of 0 David M. Poore, SBN Scott A. Brown, SBN 0 BROWN POORE LLP 0 Treat Blvd., Suite Walnut Creek, California Telephone: () - dpoore@bplegalgroup.com James Mills, SBN LAW

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEVADA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEVADA PHILIP M. BALLIF Nevada Bar # 2650 DURHAM, JONES & PINEGAR. P.C. 10785 W. Twain Avenue, Suite 200 Las Vegas, Nevada 89135 Telephone: (702 870-6060 Facsimile: (702 870-6090 Email: pballif@djplaw.com JOHN

More information

Case 1:10-cv-10494-WGY Document 1 Filed 03/23/10 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

Case 1:10-cv-10494-WGY Document 1 Filed 03/23/10 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS Case 1:10-cv-10494-WGY Document 1 Filed 03/23/10 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS KONINKLIJKE PHILIPS ELECTRONICS N.V. AND PHILIPS SOLID-STATE LIGHTING SOLUTIONS,

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Case:-cv-0 Document Filed0// Page of Michael Millen Attorney at Law (#) Calle Marguerita Ste. 0 Telephone: Fax: (0) -0 mikemillen@aol.com Attorney for Plaintiff UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT

More information

No. Plaintiff Kelvin Bledsoe ( Plaintiff ), by his undersigned counsel, brings claims

No. Plaintiff Kelvin Bledsoe ( Plaintiff ), by his undersigned counsel, brings claims UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK KELVIN BLEDSOE, Plaintiff, v. SAAQIN, INC., No. COMPLAINT FOR VIOLATION OF FAIR LABOR STANDARDS ACT JURY TRIAL DEMANDED Defendant. Plaintiff Kelvin

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) COMPLAINT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) COMPLAINT IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE ARBITRON INC., v. Plaintiff, SAGA COMMUNICATIONS, INC. and LAKEFRONT COMMUNICATIONS LLC, Defendants. C.A. No. COMPLAINT Plaintiff, Arbitron

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SOUTHERN DIVISION. CASE NO. 8:16-cv-00759

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SOUTHERN DIVISION. CASE NO. 8:16-cv-00759 Case :-cv-00-ab-mrw Document Filed 0// Page of Page ID #: 0 LATHAM & WATKINS LLP Perry J. Viscounty (Bar No. ) perry.viscounty@lw.com 0 Town Center Drive, th Floor Costa Mesa, California - () 0- / () -0

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS LUFKIN DIVISION. v. Case No. COMPLAINT AND JURY DEMAND

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS LUFKIN DIVISION. v. Case No. COMPLAINT AND JURY DEMAND IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS LUFKIN DIVISION ALLURE ENERGY, INC., a Delaware corporation, Plaintiff, v. Case No. NEST LABS, INC., a Delaware corporation, GREEN

More information

Case 1:13-cv-00034-UNA Document 1 Filed 01/04/13 Page 1 of 11 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

Case 1:13-cv-00034-UNA Document 1 Filed 01/04/13 Page 1 of 11 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE Case 1:13-cv-00034-UNA Document 1 Filed 01/04/13 Page 1 of 11 PageID #: 1 STEELHEAD LICENSING LLC, IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE v. Plaintiff, AT&T, INC., and AT&T MOBILITY

More information

Case: 3:12-cv-00012-wmc Document #: 1 Filed: 01/05/12 Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN. Defendants.

Case: 3:12-cv-00012-wmc Document #: 1 Filed: 01/05/12 Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN. Defendants. Case: 3:12-cv-00012-wmc Document #: 1 Filed: 01/05/12 Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN FATWALLET, INC., a Delaware corporation, v. ANDREW CHIU, an individual, and

More information

DISTRICT CT COURT, CITY AND COUNTY OF DENVER, STATE OF COLORADO Case No.. 96-CV-4693

DISTRICT CT COURT, CITY AND COUNTY OF DENVER, STATE OF COLORADO Case No.. 96-CV-4693 DISTRICT CT COURT, CITY AND COUNTY OF DENVER, STATE OF COLORADO Case No.. 96-CV-4693 ORDER FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION ROBERT LEWIS, STOREFRONTS IN CYBERSPACE, a Colorado limited liability company, and

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Case :-cv-000-jah -CAB Document Filed 0// Page of 0 Joshua B. Swigart, Esq. (SBN: ) josh@westcoastlitigation.com Robert L. Hyde, Esq. (SBN: ) bob@westcoastlitigation.com Hyde & Swigart Camino Del Rio South,

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS. ) IATRIC SYSTEMS, INC., ) ) ) Civil Action No. 1:14-cv-13121 ) v. ) ) FAIRWARNING, INC.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS. ) IATRIC SYSTEMS, INC., ) ) ) Civil Action No. 1:14-cv-13121 ) v. ) ) FAIRWARNING, INC. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS IATRIC SYSTEMS, INC., Plaintiff, Civil Action No. 1:14-cv-13121 v. FAIRWARNING, INC., JURY TRIAL DEMANDED Defendant. COMPLAINT Iatric Systems, Inc.

More information

ex rel. BILL LOCKYER, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA,

ex rel. BILL LOCKYER, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, BILL LOCKYER Attorney General of the State of California RICHARD M. FRANK Chief Assistant Attorney General DENNIS ECKHART Senior Assistant Attorney General MICHELLE L. FOGLIANI Deputy Attorney General

More information

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF SOMEWHERE ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF SOMEWHERE ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Harvey C. Berger (SBN POPE & BERGER 0 West "C" Street, Suite 100 San Diego, California 1 Telephone: (1-1 Facsimile: (1 - Attorneys for Plaintiff PLAINTIFF SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA IN AND

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION ACQIS LLC, Plaintiff, COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT v. INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES CORP., Case No. 6:11-CV-546 Jury Trial Demanded

More information

- "'. --, ,-~ ') " UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF ARIZONA. Federal Trade Commission,

- '. --, ,-~ ')  UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF ARIZONA. Federal Trade Commission, - "'. --, -.:li ') " :::; ),-~ --' DA VlD SHONKA Acting General Counsel 2 BARBARA Y.K. CHUN, Cal. BarNo. 0 3 JOHN D. JACOBS, Cal. Bar No. 1344 Federal Trade Commission 4 Wilshire Blvd., Ste. 00 Los Angeles,

More information

Case: 3:14-cv-00062-bbc Document #: 1 Filed: 01/31/14 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN

Case: 3:14-cv-00062-bbc Document #: 1 Filed: 01/31/14 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN Case: 3:14-cv-00062-bbc Document #: 1 Filed: 01/31/14 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN WISCONSIN ALUMNI RESEARCH FOUNDATION, v. APPLE INC., Plaintiff, Case

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS KONINKLIJKE PHILIPS ELECTRONICS N.V. AND PHILIPS SOLID-STATE LIGHTING SOLUTIONS, INC. v. Plaintiffs, CIVIL ACTION NO. 12-cv-10549 DEMAND FOR

More information

GOODIX TECHNOLOGY INC., SHENZHEN HUIDING TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD. A/K/A SHENZHEN GOODIX TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD., and

GOODIX TECHNOLOGY INC., SHENZHEN HUIDING TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD. A/K/A SHENZHEN GOODIX TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD., and 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 AKIN GUMP STRAUSS HAUER & FELD LLP Cono A. Carrano (pro hac vice to be filed) Email: ccarrano@akingump.com David C. Vondle (Bar

More information

Case 6:15-cv-00145-JRG-KNM Document 1 Filed 02/25/15 Page 1 of 12 PageID #: 1

Case 6:15-cv-00145-JRG-KNM Document 1 Filed 02/25/15 Page 1 of 12 PageID #: 1 Case 6:15-cv-00145-JRG-KNM Document 1 Filed 02/25/15 Page 1 of 12 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION SMARTFLASH LLC, and SMARTFLASH TECHNOLOGIES

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA DEBRA WONG YANG United States Attorney GARY PLESSMAN Assistant United States Attorney Chief, Civil Fraud Section California State Bar No. 1 Room 1, Federal Building 00 North Los Angeles Street Los Angeles,

More information

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF KING. No. Plaintiff, Defendants. COMPLAINT I. SUMMARY

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF KING. No. Plaintiff, Defendants. COMPLAINT I. SUMMARY FILED APR 0 PM 1: 1 KING COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT CLERK E-FILED CASE NUMBER: --0- SEA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF KING AMAZON.COM, INC., a Delaware corporation,

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION DR. LAKSHMI ARUNACHALAM, IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION Plaintiff, Civil Action No: v. VICTORIA S SECRET DIRECT BRAND MANAGEMENT, LLC, JURY TRIAL

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION SMILEBOND SYSTEMS LLC, a Michigan Limited Liability Company, v. Plaintiff, GC AMERICA INC. an Illinois Corporation,

More information

Case 2:10-cv-01224-JCM-LRL Document 1 Filed 07/22/10 Page 1 of 8

Case 2:10-cv-01224-JCM-LRL Document 1 Filed 07/22/10 Page 1 of 8 Case :0-cv-0-JCM-LRL Document Filed 0//0 Page of Reno, NV ( -00 Fax ( 0-0 0 Mark R. Thierman, NV# laborlawyer@pacbell.net THIERMAN LAW FIRM, P.C. Reno, Nevada Tel: ( -00 Fax: ( 0-0 David R. Markham, CAL#

More information

) CIVIL NO. v. ) WORLD CLASS NETWORK, INC., ) a Nevada corporation; ) COMPLAINT FOR ) RELIEF. DANIEL R. DIMACALE, an individual; )

) CIVIL NO. v. ) WORLD CLASS NETWORK, INC., ) a Nevada corporation; ) COMPLAINT FOR ) RELIEF. DANIEL R. DIMACALE, an individual; ) 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 STEPHEN CALKINS General Counsel ANN I. JONES RAYMOND E. McKOWN Federal Trade Commission 100 Wilshire Blvd., Suite Los Angeles, California 00 ( -00 JOHN ANDREW SINGER Federal Trade Commission

More information

IN THE UNITED STATE DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE. v. ) C.A. No.

IN THE UNITED STATE DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE. v. ) C.A. No. IN THE UNITED STATE DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE M2M SOLUTIONS LLC, ) a Delaware limited liability company, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) C.A. No. ) ENFORA, INC., a Delaware corporation, ) JURY

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION and JOHN J. HOFFMAN, Acting Attorney General of the State of New Jersey, and STEVE C. LEE, Acting Director of the New

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 1 1 1 1 Sterling A. Brennan (CA State Bar No. 01) E-Mail: sbrennan@mabr.com Tyson K. Hottinger (CA State Bar No. 1) E-Mail: thottinger@mabr.com MASCHOFF BRENNAN LAYCOCK GILMORE ISRAELSEN & WRIGHT, PLLC

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) COMPLAINT WITH JURY DEMAND

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) COMPLAINT WITH JURY DEMAND IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE GENETIC TECHNOLOGIES LIMITED, an Australian corporation, Plaintiff, v. LABORATORY CORPORATION OF AMERICA HOLDINGS, a Delaware corporation,

More information

THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION

THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION Case :-cv-0000 Document Filed 0/0/ Page of Page ID #: 0 James H. Holl, III,, CA Bar # jholl@cftc.gov Thomas J. Kelly, pro hac vice pending tkelly@cftc.gov U.S. COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION st Street,

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA BLACK & HAMILL LLP Bradford J. Black (SBN 1) bblack@bchllp.com Andrew G. Hamill (SBN 1) ahamill@bchllp.com Embarcadero Street, Suite 00 San Francisco, California 1 Telephone: --0 Facsimile: -- DESMARAIS

More information

Case 6:12-cv-00799 Document 1 Filed 10/22/12 Page 1 of 14 PageID #: 1

Case 6:12-cv-00799 Document 1 Filed 10/22/12 Page 1 of 14 PageID #: 1 Case 6:12-cv-00799 Document 1 Filed 10/22/12 Page 1 of 14 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION INVENSYS SYSTEMS, INC. Plaintiff, C.A. No.: v.

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI DIVISION IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI DIVISION GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY, Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. MITSUBISHI HEAVY INDUSTRIES, LTD., MITSUBISHI HEAVY

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE ORIGINAL COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE ORIGINAL COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE imtx STRATEGIC, LLC, Plaintiff, v. APPLE INC., Civil Action No. JURY TRIAL DEMANDED Defendant. Plaintiff imtx Strategic, LLC ( Plaintiff or imtx

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA LYNCHBURG (CHARLOTTESVILLE) DIVISION. Plaintiff, Case No. v.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA LYNCHBURG (CHARLOTTESVILLE) DIVISION. Plaintiff, Case No. v. IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA LYNCHBURG (CHARLOTTESVILLE) DIVISION UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA PATENT FOUNDATION Plaintiff, Case No. v. HAMILTON COMPANY AND HAMILTON

More information

Case: 1:16-cv-04705 Document #: 1 Filed: 04/27/16 Page 1 of 29 PageID #:1

Case: 1:16-cv-04705 Document #: 1 Filed: 04/27/16 Page 1 of 29 PageID #:1 Case: 1:16-cv-04705 Document #: 1 Filed: 04/27/16 Page 1 of 29 PageID #:1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION STACY PINCUS, individually and on behalf

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION Case 2:12-cv-00604-MHS-CMC Document 1 Filed 09/18/12 Page 1 of 16 PageID #: 1 CAPITAL SECURITY SYSTEMS, INC., IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION Plaintiff,

More information

Case3:15-cv-03986-JCS Document1 Filed09/01/15 Page1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case3:15-cv-03986-JCS Document1 Filed09/01/15 Page1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Case:-cv-0-JCS Document Filed0/0/ Page of KRONENBERGER ROSENFELD, LLP Karl S. Kronenberger (Bar No. ) Jeffrey M. Rosenfeld (Bar No. ) Ansel J. Halliburton (Bar No. 0) 0 Post Street, Suite 0 San Francisco,

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Case:-cv-0 Document Filed0// Page of 0 0 LAKESHORE LAW CENTER Jeffrey Wilens, Esq. (State Bar No. 0 0 Yorba Linda Blvd., Suite 0-0 Yorba Linda, CA --0 --0 (fax jeff@lakeshorelaw.org Attorney and Plaintiff

More information

Case 3:15-cv-08128-MLC-LHG Document 1 Filed 11/17/15 Page 1 of 7 PageID: 1

Case 3:15-cv-08128-MLC-LHG Document 1 Filed 11/17/15 Page 1 of 7 PageID: 1 Case 315-cv-08128-MLC-LHG Document 1 Filed 11/17/15 Page 1 of 7 PageID 1 William L. Mentlik Roy H. Wepner Stephen F. Roth Aaron S. Eckenthal LERNER, DAVID, LITTENBERG, KRUMHOLZ & MENTLIK, LLP 600 South

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CA No. COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CA No. COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT Case 1:99-mc-09999 Document 92 Filed 03/02/10 Page 1 of 16 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE APPLE INC., vs. Plaintiff, High Tech Computer Corp., a/k/a HTC Corp., HTC (B.V.I.

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 ALAN HIMMELFARB - SBN 00 KAMBEREDELSON, LLP Leonis Boulevard Vernon, California 00 Telephone: ( - ahimmelfarb@kamberedelson.com JAY EDELSON MICHAEL J. ASCHENBRENER KAMBEREDELSON, LLC

More information

Case4:13-cv-05715-DMR Document1 Filed12/11/13 Page1 of 5

Case4:13-cv-05715-DMR Document1 Filed12/11/13 Page1 of 5 Case:-cv-0-DMR Document Filed// Page of WILLIAM R. TAMAYO, SBN 0 (CA) MARCIA L. MITCHELL, SBN (WA) DERA A. SMITH, SBN (CA) U.S. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION Phillip Burton Federal Building 0

More information

Case 9:15-cv-80366-JIC Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/19/2015 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA. Case No.

Case 9:15-cv-80366-JIC Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/19/2015 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA. Case No. Case 9:15-cv-80366-JIC Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/19/2015 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA ARRIVAL STAR, SA, and MELVINO TECHNOLOGIES LIMITED, Case No.: v.

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE VERINT SYSTEMS INC. and VERINT AMERICAS INC. Civil Action No. Plaintiffs, JURY TRIAL DEMANDED v. CALLCOPY INC. Defendant. COMPLAINT Plaintiffs,

More information

Case 1:14-cv-00946-BNB Document 1 Filed 04/02/14 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 13 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Case 1:14-cv-00946-BNB Document 1 Filed 04/02/14 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 13 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Case 1:14-cv-00946-BNB Document 1 Filed 04/02/14 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 13 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Civil Action No. HUGEDOMAINS.COM, LLC, a Colorado limited liability

More information

Case 1:14-cv-00266-UNA Document 1 Filed 02/26/14 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

Case 1:14-cv-00266-UNA Document 1 Filed 02/26/14 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE Case 1:14-cv-00266-UNA Document 1 Filed 02/26/14 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE RICHARD L. PONZIANI, v. Plaintiff, Civil Action No.: FORD MOTOR

More information

Case 1:15-cv-05819-PGG Document 1 Filed 07/24/15 Page 1 of 18 COMPLAINT

Case 1:15-cv-05819-PGG Document 1 Filed 07/24/15 Page 1 of 18 COMPLAINT Case 1:15-cv-05819-PGG Document 1 Filed 07/24/15 Page 1 of 18 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK PARAMOUNT PICTURES CORPORATION; WARNER BROS. ENTERTAINMENT INC.; TWENTIETH CENTURY

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION C-CATION TECHNOLOGIES, LLC, v. Plaintiff, Case No. 2:14-cv-59 TIME WARNER CABLE INC., TIME WARNER CABLE ENTERPRISES LLC, TIME WARNER

More information

Case 1:14-cv-01414-RBW Document 21 Filed 01/29/15 Page 1 of 15 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case 1:14-cv-01414-RBW Document 21 Filed 01/29/15 Page 1 of 15 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA Case 1:14-cv-01414-RBW Document 21 Filed 01/29/15 Page 1 of 15 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION, 600 Pennsylvania Ave NW Washington, DC 20580, Plaintiff, v. Case

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION Case 1:14-cv-01516-WSD Document 1 Filed 05/19/14 Page 1 of 19 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION CAPITAL SECURITY SYSTEMS, INC. v. Plaintiff, NCR

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA David W. Lincicum (California Bar No. 223566) Burke W. Kappler (D.C. Bar No. 471936) Federal Trade Commission 600 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W. Mail Stop NJ-8122 Washington, D.C. 20580 dlincicum@ftc.gov bkappler@ftc.gov

More information

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE ELEVENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR MIAMI-DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA. v. CASE NO. COMPLAINT

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE ELEVENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR MIAMI-DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA. v. CASE NO. COMPLAINT IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE ELEVENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR MIAMI-DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA STATE OF FLORIDA, DEPARTMENT OF LEGAL AFFAIRS, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL, and THE OFFICE OF THE STATE ATTORNEY

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff,

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, Case :-cv-0 Document Filed 0// Page of Page ID #: BENJAMIN C. MIZER Principal Deputy Assistant Attorney General, Civil Division JONATHAN F. OLIN Deputy Assistant Attorney General MICHAEL S. BLUME Director,

More information

Case 1:12-cv-00939-RPM Document 1 Filed 04/09/12 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Case 1:12-cv-00939-RPM Document 1 Filed 04/09/12 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Case 1:12-cv-00939-RPM Document 1 Filed 04/09/12 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO NEOMEDIA TECHNOLOGIES, INC., Plaintiff, v. SPYDERLYNK, LLC.

More information

Case 1:15-cv-05107 Document 1 Filed 06/30/15 Page 1 of 21

Case 1:15-cv-05107 Document 1 Filed 06/30/15 Page 1 of 21 Case 1:15-cv-05107 Document 1 Filed 06/30/15 Page 1 of 21 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK -----------------------------------------------------------------------x PEGGY CABRERA,

More information

Case 1:15-cv-23425-MGC Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/10/2015 Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.

Case 1:15-cv-23425-MGC Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/10/2015 Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. Case 1:15-cv-23425-MGC Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/10/2015 Page 1 of 11 LESLIE REILLY, an individual, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated, v. Plaintiff, CHIPOTLE MEXICAN GRILL,

More information

Case 4:12-cv-00849-Y Document 1 Filed 11/28/12 Page 1 of 27 PageID 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS, FORT WORTH DIVISION

Case 4:12-cv-00849-Y Document 1 Filed 11/28/12 Page 1 of 27 PageID 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS, FORT WORTH DIVISION Case 4:12-cv-00849-Y Document 1 Filed 11/28/12 Page 1 of 27 PageID 1 COACH, INC. and COACH SERVICES, INC., UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS, FORT WORTH DIVISION Plaintiffs, Civil

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA False Advertising and Copyright Infringement Complaint IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA ALPHA CORPORATION : CIVIL ACTION : Plaintiff : : v. : : ALOYSIUS Q. DELTA

More information

Case 2:07-cv-00447-LED Document 1-1 Filed 10/09/2007 Page 1 of 5

Case 2:07-cv-00447-LED Document 1-1 Filed 10/09/2007 Page 1 of 5 Case 2:07-cv-00447-LED Document 1-1 Filed 10/09/2007 Page 1 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION IP INNOVATION L.L.C. AND TECHNOLOGY LICENSING CORPORATION,

More information

Plaintiff Carol Parker ( Plaintiff ), residing at 32 Coleman Way, Jackson, NJ 08527, by her undersigned counsel, alleges the following upon personal

Plaintiff Carol Parker ( Plaintiff ), residing at 32 Coleman Way, Jackson, NJ 08527, by her undersigned counsel, alleges the following upon personal UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY CAROL PARKER, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated, v. Plaintiff, PARADE ENTERPRISES, LLC, No. 3:14-CV-08084-MAS-DEA AMENDED COMPLAINT

More information