MYRICOM, INC. TEST REPORT FOR THE SERVER RACK, 10G-PCIE2-8B2-2S & 10G-PCIE2-8B2-2QP FCC PART 15 SUBPART B SECTIONS AND CLASS A TESTING

Transcription

1 TESTING CERT #803.01, , , MYRICOM, INC. TEST REPORT FOR THE SERVER RACK, 10G-PCIE2-8B2-2S & 10G-PCIE2-8B2-2QP FCC PART 15 SUBPART B SECTIONS AND CLASS A TESTING DATE OF ISSUE: MARCH 25, 2009 PREPARED FOR: Myricom, Inc. 325 North Santa Anita Ave. Arcadia, CA PREPARED BY: Mary Ellen Clayton CKC Laboratories, Inc Sierra Pines Drive Mariposa, CA P.O. No.: Date of test: February 24 - March 2, 2009 W.O. No.: This report contains a total of 19 pages and may be reproduced in full only. Partial reproduction may only be done with the written consent of CKC Laboratories, Inc. The results in this report apply only to the items tested, as identified herein. Page 1 of 19

2 TABLE OF CONTENTS Administrative Information...3 Approvals...3 Site File Registration Numbers...3 Summary of Results...4 Conditions During Testing...4 Equipment Under Test (EUT) Description...4 Equipment Under Test...4 Peripheral Devices...4 Measurement Uncertainties...5 Report of Emissions Measurements...5 Testing Parameters...5 Conducted Emissions...7 Radiated Emissions...14 Page 2 of 19

3 ADMINISTRATIVE INFORMATION DATE OF TEST: February 24 - March 2, 2009 DATE OF RECEIPT: February 24, 2009 REPRESENTATIVE: Alan Kulawik MANUFACTURER: Myricom, Inc. 325 North Santa Anita Ave. Arcadia, CA TEST LOCATION: CKC Laboratories, Inc. 110 Olinda Place Brea, CA TEST METHOD: ANSI C63.4 (2003) PURPOSE OF TEST: To perform testing of the Server Rack, 10G-PCIE2-8B2-2S & 10G- PCIE2-8B2-2QP with the requirements for FCC Part 15 Subpart B Sections and Class A devices. APPROVALS QUALITY ASSURANCE: TEST PERSONNEL: Steve Behm, Director of Engineering Services Shamnderjit Hundal, Test Engineer SITE FILE REGISTRATION NUMBERS Location Japan Canada FCC Brea A R-2945, C-3248 & T D Page 3 of 19

4 SUMMARY OF RESULTS Test Specification Results Conducted Emissions FCC Part 15 Subpart B Section Class A Pass Radiated Emissions FCC Part 15 Subpart B Section Class A Pass CONDITIONS DURING TESTING No modifications to the EUT were necessary during testing. EQUIPMENT UNDER TEST (EUT) DESCRIPTION The customer declares the EUT tested by CKC Laboratories was representative of a production unit. EQUIPMENT UNDER TEST Server Rack Manuf: Myricom, Inc. Model: 10G-PCIE2-8B2-2QP Serial: NA Server Rack Manuf: Myricom, Inc. Model: 10G-PCIE2-8B2-2S Serial: NA PERIPHERAL DEVICES The EUT was tested with the following peripheral device(s): Mouse Manuf: Model: Serial: Monitor Manuf: Model: Serial: Lenovo NA NA MPC NA NA Keyboard Manuf: Lenovo Model: NA Serial: NA Page 4 of 19

5 MEASUREMENT UNCERTAINTIES Uncertainty Value Parameter 4.73 db Radiated Emissions 3.34 db Mains Conducted Emissions 3.30 db Disturbance Power The reported measurement uncertainties are calculated based on the worst case of all laboratory environments from CKC Laboratories, Inc. test sites. Only those parameters which require estimation of measurement uncertainty are reported. The reported worst case measurement uncertainty is less than the maximum values derived in CISPR Reported uncertainties represent expanded uncertainties expressed at approximately the 95% confidence level using a coverage factor of k=2. Compliance is deemed to occur provided measurements are below the specified limits. REPORT OF EMISSIONS MEASUREMENTS TESTING PARAMETERS The cables were routed consistent with the typical application by varying the configuration of the test sample. Interface cables were connected to the available ports of the test unit. The effect of varying the position of the cables was investigated to find the configuration that produced maximum emissions. Cables were of the type and length specified in the individual requirements. The length of cable that produced maximum emissions was selected. The equipment under test (EUT) was set up in a manner that represented its normal use, as shown in the setup photographs. Any special conditions required for the EUT to operate normally are identified in the comments that accompany the emissions tables. The emissions data was taken with a spectrum analyzer or receiver. Incorporating the applicable correction factors for distance, antenna, cable loss and amplifier gain, the data was reduced as shown in the table below. The corrected data was then compared to the applicable emission limits. Preliminary and final measurements were taken in order to ensure that all emissions from the EUT were found and maximized. CORRECTION FACTORS The basic spectrum analyzer reading was converted using correction factors as shown in the highest emissions readings in the tables. For radiated emissions in dbµv/m, the spectrum analyzer reading in dbµv was corrected by using the following formula. This reading was then compared to the applicable specification limit. Page 5 of 19

6 SAMPLE CALCULATIONS Meter reading (dbµv) + Antenna Factor (db) + Cable Loss (db) - Distance Correction (db) - Preamplifier Gain (db) = Corrected Reading (dbµv/m) TEST INSTRUMENTATION AND ANALYZER SETTINGS The test instrumentation and equipment listed were used to collect the emissions data. A spectrum analyzer or receiver was used for all measurements. The following table shows the measuring equipment bandwidth settings that were used in designated frequency bands. For testing emissions, an appropriate reference level and a vertical scale size of 10 db per division were used. When conducted emissions testing was performed, a 10 db external attenuator was used with internal offset correction in the analyzer. MEASURING EQUIPMENT BANDWIDTH SETTINGS PER FREQUENCY RANGE TEST BEGINNING FREQUENCY ENDING FREQUENCY BANDWIDTH SETTING CONDUCTED EMISSIONS 150 khz 30 MHz 9 khz RADIATED EMISSIONS 30 MHz 1000 MHz 120 khz RADIATED EMISSIONS 1000 MHz >1 GHz 1 MHz SPECTRUM ANALYZER/RECEIVER DETECTOR FUNCTIONS The notes that accompany the measurements contained in the emissions tables indicate the type of detector function used to obtain the given readings. Unless otherwise noted, all readings were made in the "Peak" mode. Whenever a "Quasi-Peak" or "Average" reading is listed as one of the highest readings, this is indicated as a "QP" or an "Ave" on the appropriate rows of the data sheets. The following paragraphs describe in more detail the detector functions and when they were used to obtain the emissions data. Peak In this mode, the spectrum analyzer/receiver readings recorded all emissions at their peak value as the frequency band selected was scanned. By combining this function with another feature of the measuring device called "peak hold," the measuring device had the ability to measure transients or low duty cycle transient emission peak levels. In this mode the measuring device made a slow scan across the frequency band selected and measured the peak emission value found at each frequency across the band. Quasi-Peak When the true peak values exceeded or were within 2 db of the specification limit, quasi-peak measurements were taken using the quasi-peak detector. Average For certain frequencies, average measurements may be made using the spectrum analyzer/receiver. To make these measurements, the test engineer reduces the video bandwidth on the measuring device until the modulation of the signal is filtered out. At this point the measuring device is set into the linear mode and the scan time is reduced. Page 6 of 19

7 CONDUCTED EMISSIONS Test Setup Photos Page 7 of 19

8 Test Data Sheets Test Location: CKC Laboratories, Inc N. Olinda Place. Brea, CA (714) Customer: Myricom, Inc. Specification: FCC Class A COND AVE Work Order #: Date: 2/25/2009 Test Type: Conducted Emissions Time: 5:32:14 PM Equipment: Server Rack Sequence#: 2 Manufacturer: Myricom, Inc. Tested By: S.Hundal Model: 10G-PCIE2-8B2-2QP & 10G-PCIE2-8B2-110V 60Hz 2S S/N: NA Test Equipment: Function S/N Calibration Date Cal Due Date Asset # Spectrum Analyzer US /23/ /23/ LISN /09/ /09/ dB Attenuator None 10/14/ /14/2010 P kHz HPF G /09/ /09/ Conducted Emission Cable Cable #21 05/12/ /12/2010 P04358 Equipment Under Test (* = EUT): Function Manufacturer Model # S/N Server rack Myricom, Inc. 10G-PCIE2-8B2-2QP NA Server rack Myricom, Inc. 10G-PCIE2-8B2-2S NA Support Devices: Function Manufacturer Model # S/N Mouse Lenovo NA NA Keyboard Lenovo NA NA Monitor MPC NA NA Test Conditions / Notes: The two EUTs are plugged into slots in the computer. The computer is hooked up to a monitor, keyboard and mouse. Transducer Legend: T1=150kHz HPF AN02610_ T3=Cable #21 -P Site A 05/12/10 T2=6dB atten-p trn T4=L1 Insertion Loss AN00847_ Measurement Data: Reading listed by margin. Test Lead: Black # Freq Rdng T1 T2 T3 T4 Dist Corr Spec Margin Polar MHz dbµv db db db db Table dbµv dbµv db Ant k Black M Black M Black M Black Page 8 of 19

9 M Black M Black M Black M Black M Black M Black k Black M Black M Black k Black M Black M Black M Black M Black M Black k Black M Black M Black M Black M Black M Black k Black M Black M Black M Black k Black Page 9 of 19

10 Page 10 of 19

11 Test Location: CKC Laboratories, Inc N. Olinda Place. Brea, CA (714) Customer: Myricom, Inc. Specification: FCC Class A COND AVE Work Order #: Date: 2/25/2009 Test Type: Conducted Emissions Time: 5:39:58 PM Equipment: Server Rack Sequence#: 3 Manufacturer: Myricom, Inc. Tested By: S.Hundal Model: 10G-PCIE2-8B2-2QP & 10G-PCIE2-110V 60Hz 8B2-2S S/N: NA Test Equipment: Function S/N Calibration Date Cal Due Date Asset # Spectrum Analyzer US /23/ /23/ LISN /09/ /09/ dB Attenuator None 10/14/ /14/2010 P kHz HPF G /09/ /09/ Conducted Emission Cable Cable #21 05/12/ /12/2010 P04358 Equipment Under Test (* = EUT): Function Manufacturer Model # S/N Server rack Myricom, Inc. 10G-PCIE2-8B2-2QP NA Server rack Myricom, Inc. 10G-PCIE2-8B2-2S NA Support Devices: Function Manufacturer Model # S/N Mouse Lenovo NA NA Keyboard Lenovo NA NA Monitor MPC NA NA Test Conditions / Notes: The two EUTs are plugged into slots in the computer. The computer is hooked up to a monitor, keyboard and mouse. Transducer Legend: T1=150kHz HPF AN02610_ T3=Cable #21 -P Site A 05/12/10 T2=6dB atten-p trn T4=L2 Insertion Loss AN00847_ Measurement Data: Reading listed by margin. Test Lead: White # Freq Rdng T1 T2 T3 T4 Dist Corr Spec Margin Polar MHz dbµv db db db db Table dbµv dbµv db Ant k White M White M White M White Page 11 of 19

12 M White M White M White M White M White k White M White M White M White M White M White M White k White k White M White M White k White k White M White M White M White M White k White M White M White M White Page 12 of 19

13 Page 13 of 19

14 RADIATED EMISSIONS Test Setup Photos Page 14 of 19

15 Test Data Sheets Test Location: CKC Laboratories, Inc N. Olinda Place. Brea, CA (714) Customer: Myricom, Inc. Specification: FCC Class A Work Order #: Date: 3/2/2009 Test Type: Maximized Emissions Time: 22:20:18 Equipment: Server Rack Sequence#: 1 Manufacturer: Myricom, Inc. Tested By: S.Hundal Model: 10G-PCIE2-8B2-2QP & 10G-PCIE2-8B2-2S S/N: NA Test Equipment: Function S/N Calibration Date Cal Due Date Asset # Spectrum Analyzer US /23/ /23/ Bilog Antenna /21/ /21/ Pre amp to SA Cable Cable #10 05/16/ /16/2009 P05050 Cable Cable15 01/05/ /05/2011 P05198 Pre Amp 1937A /02/ /02/ Heliax Antenna Cable P /04/ /04/2010 P05565 Microwave Pre-amp 3123A /28/ /28/ Horn Antenna /06/ /06/ GHz Horn /21/ /21/ GHz cable NA 09/18/ /18/2009 P02946 Equipment Under Test (* = EUT): Function Manufacturer Model # S/N Server rack Myricom, Inc. 10G-PCIE2-8B2-2QP NA Server rack Myricom, Inc. 10G-PCIE2-8B2-2S NA Support Devices: Function Manufacturer Model # S/N Mouse Lenovo NA NA Keyboard Lenovo NA NA Monitor MPC NA NA Test Conditions / Notes: The two EUTs are plugged into slots in the computer. The computer is hooked up to a monitor, keyboard and mouse. Page 15 of 19

16 Transducer Legend: T1=Bilog-AN01995 BILOG_ T3=Cable #15_05198_ Site A, T5=Heliax Cable 54' ANP T7=Horn Ant AN T9=CAB-ANP T2=Cable #10_P05050_ T4=Pre_amp_HP8447D-AN T6=HF_pre AMP-1-26GHz_AN TRN T8=ANT 18-26GHz Horn AN01413 Measurement Data: Reading listed by margin. Test Distance: 3 Meters # Freq Rdng T1 T2 T3 T4 Dist Corr Spec Margin Polar T5 T9 T6 T7 T8 MHz dbµv db db db db Table dbµv/m dbµv/m db Ant M Vert M Vert M Vert M Horiz M Horiz M Vert M Vert M Vert M Vert M Horiz M Vert M Horiz M Vert Page 16 of 19

17 M Horiz M Horiz M Horiz M Vert M Vert M Vert M Vert M Vert M Vert M Horiz M Vert M Horiz M Vert M Vert M Vert M Vert M Vert Page 17 of 19

18 M Horiz M Horiz M Horiz M Vert M Vert M Horiz M Horiz M Vert M Vert M Horiz M Horiz M Horiz M Vert M Horiz M Vert M Horiz M Vert Page 18 of 19

19 M Vert M M Vert Vert M Vert M Vert M Horiz M Vert M Vert M Horiz M Vert M Horiz M Horiz M Horiz M Horiz Page 19 of 19