1 SECURITIES LAW: The Risks of Raising Funds and Selling Interests in the Oil & Gas Industry By: James (J.V.) F. Anderton, V and Michael G. Stefanko of Loomis, Ewert, Parsley, Davis & Gotting, P.C. 09/18/2013
2 What this presentation is (and is not) Thegoalofthispresentationistohelpyou identify some key issues associated with selling ownership interests in assets/entities. This presentation is not intended as legal advice for any specific situation. You are encouraged to seek counsel to discuss any situation you may encounter which raises issues under securities laws.
3 Food Coma Let s be honest. Lunch ended about an hour ago, and it is unlikely most of you deal with securities laws on a daily basis. As you will see, when you deal with securities laws you must be careful, because the penalties for failure to comply are severe. Stay awake you might learn something. Besides, there is a break after us.
4 What are the Basic Securities Laws? Two broad categories: Federal Laws: Securities Act of 1933 (the 33 Act ) Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the 34 Act ) Other rules from the Securities and Exchange Commission ( S.E.C. ) State Laws: Commonly known as Blue Sky Laws and vary by state Generally, you must comply with both or have an exemption from state laws.
5 Federal Securities Laws Our focus will be on 33 Act issues. 34 Act sets forth rules for companies that have on going reporting obligations due to either the number of owners or because it is listed on a stock exchange.
6 Federal Securities Laws: 33 Act So what is a security? Any note, stock, treasury stock, security future, security based swap, bond, debenture, evidence of indebtedness, certificate of interest or participation in any profitsharing agreement, collateral trust certificate, preorganization certificate or subscription, transferable share, investment contract, voting trust certificate, certificate of deposit for a security, fractional undivided interest in oil, gas, or other mineral rights, any put, call, straddle, option, or privilege on any security, certificate of deposit, or group or index of securities (including any interest therein or based on the value thereof), or any put, call, straddle, option, or privilege entered into on a national securities exchange relating to foreign currency, or, in general, any interest or instrument commonly known as a security, or any certificate of interest or participation in, temporary or interim certificate for, receipt for, guarantee of, or warrant or right to subscribe to or purchase, any of the foregoing. 15 USC 77b.
7 What is an investment contract? According to the Supreme Court it is a contract, transaction or scheme whereby a person (1) invests his money (2) in a common enterprise and (3) is led to expect profits (4) solely from the efforts of the promoter or a third party. This is the Howey Test.
8 While all four factors of the Howey Test must be satisfied for an investment contract to be determined to be a security, the focus of any dispute will likely revolve around the last two factors that the Investors are led to expect profits solely from the efforts of others. Further, the factual distinctions between the cases where the interests sold were determined to be securities and where the interests sold were determined not to be securities can seem insignificant.
9 Investments found to be securities in the oil & gas industry: The sale of a fractional interest in an oil and gas lease was a security when the managerial decisions that would dictate success or failure remained with the seller. Parvin v Davis Oil Co., 524 F.2d 112 (9 th Cir. 1975). If a fractional undivided interest is created for purposes of a sale,theconveyanceoftheinterestisthesaleofasecurity. Nolfi v Ohio Kentucky Oil Corp., 675 F.3d 538 (6 th Cir. 2012). This case is from the Sixth Circuit and is the controlling law in Michigan. As you will see below, certain jurisdictions differ slightly, but they appear to get to the same result. If an investment is a fractional undivided interest in oil or gas, then the statute specifies that it is a security as a matter of law. Id.
10 Investments found not to be securities in the oil & gas industry: Not every sale of a fractional interest in oil, gas, or other mineral rights is the sale of a security. Woodward v Wright, 266 F.2d 108 (10 th Cir. 1959). This position seems contrary to the Sixth Circuit s ruling. The distinction is that while an interest is a security, participation in the activities of the entity may remove the matter from the registration requirements. It does not include isolated sales or assignments of oil and gas leases or fractional parts thereof to specific person (ultimately this case held the interest was a security). Id. The sale of a factional interest to an entity involved in the oil and gas industry and had control over the wells at issue was not a security. Ballard & Cordell Corp. v Zoller and Danneberg Exploration, Ltd., 544 F.2d 1059 (10 th Cir. 1976).
11 Investments found not to be securities in the oil & gas industry (continued): Entering into an oil and gas lease with a landowner is not a security. Fearneyhough v McElvain, 598 F.Supp. 905 (C.D. Ill. 1984). The transfer of all of one s interest in an oil and gas lease is not a security. Graham v Clark, 332 F.2d 155 (6 th Cir. 1964)
12 These issues do have the attention of the S.E.C. In May of 2013, the S.E.C. issued an Investor Alert on Private Oil and Gas Offerings. This was only 1 of 6 Investor Alerts issued by the S.E.C. thus far in These Investor Alerts focus primarily on potentially fraudulent activities.
13 So you think you have a security? See a lawyer to help with either (1) registration or (2) find an applicable exemption. Registration: Unless an exemption applies, securities that are being offered must be registered with the S.E.C. and frequently the applicable state. Registration is time consuming and costly.
14 If you want to avoid registration, you must be able to fit within an exemption. There are exempt securities and exempt transactions. Generally, exempt securities will not be applicable to oil & gas situations, so the key is finding an exempt transaction. Exempt transactions include (1) intra state offerings, (2) private offerings, and (3) small issue offerings.
15 Exempt transactions sound interesting? You are in luck! This presentation is meant to be an introduction into securities laws, with a later presentation to focus in detail on exempt transactions and their requirements.
16 Are there other aspects to the 33 Act beyond registration or exemption? Yes. The 33 Act has rules regarding how sales by the issuer/promoter must occur, how downstream sales must occur. The 33 Act also provides for enforcement by any person who purchases a security that was sold without complying with the 33 Act.
17 How does enforcement work? Any security that is not sold in compliance with the 33 Act registration requirement or an applicable exemption therefrom, can be subject to a suit. Note: there is no requirement that something went wrong, it is enough that the security was sold without compliance with the 33 Act.
18 What are the damages? Either (1) rescission (plaintiff returns the security and defendant returns the payment with interest) or (2) the loss on plaintiff s investment if plaintiff has sold the security. Who is liable? The seller. However, courts have included in the definition anyone who was an active participant in negotiation of the sale in question.
19 How long after the purchase does a plaintiff have to bring a suit? Generally the statute of limitations is 1 year, but it can be up to 3 years in the case of fraud. Takeaway for you: if you are selling a security and plan to do something with the money raised, either comply with the 33 Act or risk a rescission suit long after the money has been used.
20 More enforcement issues: In addition to purchasers of securities having enforcement rights, the S.E.C. can investigate and enforce the securities laws. Remedies available to the S.E.C. include (1) civil fines, (2) cease and desist orders, and (3) other injunctive orders to prevent future violations of the laws.
21 The really scary enforcement issue: The justice department can seek criminal charges in cases of willful misrepresentation and fraud. The punishment if found guilty is prison.
22 Federal Securities Laws: 34 Act Rule 10b 5 (promulgated under the 34 Act) is applicable to securities exempt from registration under the 33 Act and 34 Act, and allows a person to file a suit for fraud. Limitations period is 2 years after discovery or 5 years after the transaction occurred.
23 Blue Sky Laws Laws generally cover registration (and exemptions) of securities, and distributions of securities by brokers/dealers. Remedies of a purchaser of a security under the Michigan Uniform Securities Act of 2002 are similar to the remedy under the 33 Act, but the Michigan Act explicitly contemplates the plaintiff can also have their attorney fees paid.
24 Blue Sky Laws (Cont.) Note that for registration/exemptions under state laws, Congress enacted laws in the 1990s that pre empted various state laws regarding registration. However, it is important to have an attorney determine if the registration process or applicable exemption therefrom at the federal level preempts any blue sky requirements.
25 Blue Sky Laws (Cont.) There have been recent examples in Michigan of individuals/companies violating securities laws see, e.g., Jordan River Resources Between 2003 and 2007, a group of individuals solicited funds from investors in the mid Michigan area. The company promised 6.0% returns per month from oil and gas exploration activities in Oklahoma and Texas. This case was not a simple matter of failing to register. This was essentially a Ponzi scheme and the guilty parties were charged criminally. While failing to comply with securities requirements does not require fraud, companies that fail to comply and face lawsuits and enforcement will likely be viewed in the same light. This would make finding future investors much more difficult.
26 The JOBS Act & Crowdfunding What is all the fuss about? Jumpstart our Business Startups Act of 2012 was supposed to allow for the little guy to invest in non publicly traded companies with fewer legal hurdles. What you need to know, is that to this point the S.E.C. has not provided full regulatory guidance for how this will work.
27 Questions? Thank you for your time. Please feel free to contact either: J.V. Anderton, Esq. or Michael G. Stefanko, Esq. 124 W. Allegan, Suite 700 Lansing, MI (517)
A Primer on Securities Laws and Exemptions including recent changes made pursuant to the Jobs Act By Romana Kaleem, Esq. 1 On September 23, 2013, certain amendments to the Securities Act of 1933 (the Securities
The following excerpt is from Investment Company Determination under the 1940 Act: Exemptions and Exceptions by Robert H. Rosenblum. This excerpt is from Chapter 2, Definition of a Security.. Reprinted
Attachment B PRINCIPLES SECTION I. CODE OF ETHICS FOR POINT CAPITAL, INC. STATEMENT OF GENERAL FIDUCIARY This Code of Ethics (the "Code") has been adopted by Point Capital, Inc. (the Corporation ) in compliance
292.310 Definitions for chapter. When used in this chapter, unless the context otherwise requires: (1) "Agent" means any individual other than a broker-dealer who represents a brokerdealer or issuer in
APPLICATION OF THE FEDERAL SECURITIES LAWS TO THE ISSUANCE OF SECURITIES BY INSURANCE COMPANIES Phillip E. Allen, Esq. 502.568.9100 This article summarizes the application of the Securities Act of 1933
Part I Section 851. Definition of Regulated Investment Company 26 CFR 1.851 2: Limitations (Also Sections 7704, 7805; 301.7805 1) Rev. Rul. 2006 1 ISSUE If a corporation enters into a derivative contract
COMPLIANCE WITH FEDERAL SECURITIES LAW REQUIREMENTS FOR QUALIFIED PLANS AND SERPS Pension, Profit-Sharing, Welfare, and Other Compensation Plans ALI-ABA October 20-22, 2005 Washington, D.C. Pamela Baker
TITLE 15 - COMMERCE AND TRADE CHAPTER 2D - INVESTMENT COMPANIES AND ADVISERS SUBCHAPTER II - INVESTMENT ADVISERS 80b 2. Definitions (a) In general When used in this subchapter, unless the context otherwise
64th Legislature HB0057 AN ACT ENHANCING PROTECTIONS FROM SECURITIES FRAUD FOR THE ELDERLY OR PERSONS WITH DEVELOPMENTAL DISABILITIES; INCREASING ACCESS TO THE SECURITIES ASSISTANCE RESTITUTION FUND FOR
Chapter 21 Credit Services Organizations Act 13-21-1 Short title. This chapter is known as the "Credit Services Organizations Act." Enacted by Chapter 29, 1985 General Session 13-21-2 Definitions -- Exemptions.
Raising Small Business Capital in Nebraska through Securities Sales The Nebraska Department of Banking and Finance, Bureau of Securities, regulates the capital markets in Nebraska by registering securities
RESTATED CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION of JPMORGAN CHASE & CO. Under Section 245 of the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware JPMorgan Chase & Co. (the Corporation ), does hereby certify under
FORM MLOE-1 State of Maryland Office of the Attorney General Securities Division NOTICE CLAIMING MARYLAND LIMITED OFFERING EXEMPTION (MLOE) Under The Maryland Securities Act Section 11-602(9) and Regulations
A Bit of Background Securities regulation in the United States followed several centuries of regulation in England. Brokers were licensed in England as early as 1285. All such regulation was aimed at the
ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING BEFORE THE MARYLAND SECURITIES COMMISSIONER IN THE MATTER OF: * ROBERT BRUCE SANDO, * File No. 2000-0140 Respondent. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * CONSENT ORDER WHEREAS, the Maryland
November 4, 2013 Regulation Crowdfunding Recently, the Securities and Exchange Commission ( SEC ) voted 5-0 to approve the release of proposed Regulation Crowdfunding (the Proposed Rule ) under the JOBS
2013-2014 DEVELOPMENTS IN BANKING LAW 545 XIII. Arnold v. Life Partners, Inc.: Life Settlements are Securities in Texas A. Introduction On August 28, 2013, the Dallas Court of Appeals held in Arnold v.
In consideration of payment of the premium and subject to the Declarations, General Terms and Conditions, limitations, conditions, provisions and other terms of this Policy, the Company and the Insureds
Regular Session, 0 SENATE BILL NO. ACT No. BY SENATOR MARIONNEAUX 0 AN ACT To amend and reenact R.S. :.,.(A),.(), (), () and (0),.,.(A)(),.0(C),.(B) and (C),.(B) and (C), and., and to repeal R.S. :.(),.,
Case 8:15-cr-00244-SDM-AEP Document 3 Filed 07/08/15 Page 1 of 15 PageID 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. CASE NO. 8:15-CR-244-T-23AEP
SECURITIES SUPPLEMENT Name of Applicant Firm: _ Attorneys 1. For each attorney of the Applicant Firm handling Securities matters, please provide the following information: Attorney Name Securities Billable
SECURITIES FOR JUNIOR LAWYERS AND LEGAL SUPPORT STAFF PAPER 1.1 A Basic Overview of Securities Regulation in British Columbia These materials were prepared by Dwight D. Dee of Miller Thomson LLP, Vancouver,
STATE OF MAINE YORK, ss. SUPERIOR COURT CIVIL ACTION DOCKET NO. CV-05- STATE OF MAINE and SECURITIES ADMINISTRATOR, Plaintiffs, v. COMPLAINT LORI M. HEMINGS, Defendant. INTRODUCTION 1. The State of Maine
Case 4:10-cv-00706 Document 1 Filed in TXSD on 03/04/10 Page 1 of 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION U.S. COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION, v. Plaintiff,
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Plaintiff, v. Civil No. 07-1221 DANIEL D. WEDDINGTON; JAMES R. EARL; MID-CON PETROLEUM, INC., AURORA CAPITAL
Name of Insurance Company to which application is made Proposal Form Financial Institutions Professional Liability Insurance NOTICE: THIS IS A CLAIMS-MADE POLICY. EXCEPT AS MAY BE OTHERWISE PROVIDED HEREIN,
ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING BEFORE THE SECURITIES COMMISSIONER OF SOUTH CAROLINA IN THE MATTER OF: ) ) ORDER TO CEASE AND DESIST Louis H. Rivas ) ) and ) File No. 08008 ) The FOREX Project, ) ) Respondents.
June 10, 2010 2010 Legislative Amendments to the Indiana Code Relating to First Lien Mortgage Act (the Act ) Effective July 1, 2010 (except as otherwise indicated) Questions, Answers, and Administrative
PRB 99-38E CANADA BUSINESS CORPORATIONS ACT: INSIDER TRADING Penny Becklumb Law and Government Division Revised 14 October 2008 PARLIAMENTARY INFORMATION AND RESEARCH SERVICE SERVICE D INFORMATION ET DE
STATE OF WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS SECURITIES DIVISION IN THE MATTER OF DETERMINING Whether there has been a violation of the Securities Act of Washington by: Pangea Petroleum Corp.,
ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING BEFORE THE SECURITIES COMMISSIONER OF SOUTH CAROLINA IN THE MATTER OF: Joel L. Gillespie, Thomas G. Carls, Carls Financial Group, Bridgewater, Inc. Respondents. ORDER TO CEASE
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Before the COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION In the Matter of: Coinflip, Inc., d/b/a Derivabit, and Francisco Riordan, CFTC Docket No. 15-29 Respondents. ORDER INSTITUTING PROCEEDINGS
IX. FLORIDA CONSUMER COLLECTION PRACTICES ACT Sec. 559.55 Definitions. 559.551 Short title. PART IV - CONSUMER COLLECTION PRACTICES (FCCPA) 559.552 Relationship of state and federal law. 559.553 Registration
Statement of General Policy TORTOISE CREDIT STRATEGIES, LLC CODE OF ETHICS Tortoise Credit Strategies, LLC (the Adviser, we, or us ) seeks to foster a reputation for integrity and professionalism. That
ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING BEFORE THE SECURITIES COMMISSIONER OF SOUTH CAROLINA IN THE MATTER OF: John B. Kern, ORDER TO CEASE AND DESIST File No. 13077 Respondent. WHEREAS, the Securities Division of the
SECURITIES ACT OF 1933 Release No. 8750 / November 8, 2006 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Before the SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 Release No. 54720 / November 8, 2006 INVESTMENT
CLS Investments, LLC Instructions for the Solicitor Application and Agreement Please complete all fields on page 1 of the Solicitor Application and Agreement. Some general guidelines are set forth below.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION, v. Plaintiff, ULRICH GARBE, a/k/a ULI GARBE and SUNSTATE FX INC., a Florida corporation, Defendants.
EMPLOYMENT PRACTICES LIABILITY INSURANCE SUPPLEMENTAL APPLICATION NOTICES: THE EMPLOYMENT PRACTICES LIABILITY COVERAGE PART/ENDORSEMENT PROVIDES THAT THE LIMIT OF LIABILITY AVAILABLE TO PAY JUDGMENTS OR
In the matter of: STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF LABOR & ECONOMIC GROWTH OFFICE OF FINANCIAL AND INSURANCE SERVICES Before the Commissioner of the Office of Financial and Insurance Services Management
STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF LABOR & ECONOMIC GROWTH OFFICE OF FINANCIAL AND INSURANCE SERVICES Before the Commissioner of the Office of Financial and Insurance Services In the matter of: Robert Smart
Policy Title: Effective Date: 1/30/2008 Supersedes Date: N/A Colorado West HealthCare System Grand Junction, CO CWHS-WIDE POLICY FALSE CLAIMS ACT Responsible Departments: All Departments Administration
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Before the SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION INVESTMENT ADVISERS ACT OF 1940 Release No. 4219 / October 7, 2015 ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING File No. 3-16887 In the Matter of Blackstone
LETTER OPINION 94-L-128 Ms. Nancy J. Lewis Deputy Securities Commissioner State Capitol 600 East Boulevard Avenue Bismarck, ND 58505 Dear Ms. Lewis: Thank you for your letter asking whether the North Dakota
Matchmaking Basics: How it Works, Current Regulations and Key Considerations Background Matchmaking sites, also referred to as matchmaking platforms, have come to play a more significant role in capital
ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING BEFORE THE SECURITIES COMMISSIONER OF MARYLAND IN THE MATTER OF: * ASIA PACIFIC ENERGY INC. * TRAVIS ARMSTRONG * GLOBAL PARTNERS CAPITAL * Securities Division No. 2007-0126 GERARD
STATE SECURITES EXEMPTIONS & LEGENDS 1 Whether you raise capital by selling equity or debt, the offering will be viewed as selling securities. Each securities offering must either be registered with federal
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Before the SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 Release No. 75362 / July 6, 2015 ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING File No. 3-16675 In the Matter of Wisteria
595 STEWART AVE GARDEN CITY, NEW YORK 11530-4735 P 516-745-1111 F 516-745-5733 SOBELINS.COM EMPLOYMENT PRACTICES LIABILITY INSURANCE APPLICATION NOTICE: THE POLICY FOR WHICH THIS APPLICATION IS SUBMITTED
Credit Services Organization Act 24 O.S. 131 148 Chapter 8 Credit Services Organization Act Section 131 Short Title This act shall be known and may be cited as the "Credit Services Organization Act". Added
Session of 00 HOUSE BILL No. 0 By Committee on Insurance - 0 0 AN ACT enacting the Kansas professional employer organization licensing act. Be it enacted by the Legislature of the State of Kansas: Section.
STATE OF WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS SECURITIES DIVISION IN THE MATTER OF DETERMINING Whether there has been a violation of the Securities Act of Washington by: James H. Liddell and
Case 4:15-cv-00438-A Document 1 Filed 06/10/15 Page 1 of 9 PageID 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT for the NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE ) COMMISSION ) ) PLAINTIFF ) ) v. ) Civil Action
ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING BEFORE THE SECURITIES COMMISSIONER OF MARYLAND IN THE MATTER OF: * KEVIN T. FORRESTER D/B/A * Case No. 2007-0174 FORRESTER FINANCIAL GROUP * Respondent. * * * * * * * FINAL CONSENT
Case 1:05-cv-00739-GJQ Document 1 Filed 10/27/2005 Page 1 of 14 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Civil No. ) CHARLES
SEC Receivers v. Bankruptcy Trustees: Liquidation by Instinct or Rule Written by: Marcus F. Salitore Jackson Walker LLP; Dallas, Texas firstname.lastname@example.org Civil complaints filed by the Division of Enforcement
Case 5:09-cv-01284-R Document 131 Filed 11/29/10 Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA U.S. COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION and OKLAHOMA DEPARTMENT OF SECURITIES ex
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Before the SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 Release No. 76144 / October 14, 2015 ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING File No. 3-16898 In the Matter of Respondent.
Policy/Procedure Department Administration Effective 08/15/2008 Scope Organization Cross Reference Review Date 08/14/2008,12/18/2013 Revision History Signatures Date 12/18/2013 Prepared by Lavonda Cravey
Pretrial Practice 2015 4:00 P.M. PANEL TOPIC SETTLEMENT AGGREGATE SETTLEMENT CONCERNS May 12, 2015 New York, New York Kelly Strange Crawford, Esq. AGGREGATE PROCEEDINGS Class Actions SINGLE LAW SUIT PROCEEDING
ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING BEFORE THE SECURITIES COMMISSIONER OF MARYLAND IN THE MATTER OF: * Arnold M. Hecht * Case No. 2009-0304 Respondent. * * * * CONSENT ORDER WHEREAS, the Securities Division of the
EMPLOYMENT PRACTICES LIABILITY INSURANCE MAINFORM APPLICATION THIS IS AN APPLICATION FOR A POLICY THAT IS WRITTEN ON A CLAIMS-MADE BASIS AND COVERS ONLY CLAIMS FIRST MADE AGAINST THE INSUREDS DURING THE
Name of Insurance Company to which Application is made PROPERTY MANAGER SUPPLEMENTAL APPLICATION This is a supplement to an application for a CLAIMS-MADE and Reported Policy. It is to be used solely in
STATE OF OKLAHOMA nd Session of the rd Legislature () SENATE BILL AS INTRODUCED By: Crain An Act relating to Medicaid fraud; amending O.S., Sections 0 and 0, which relate to the Oklahoma Medicaid Program
Michigan Department of Licensing and Regulatory Affairs Corporations, Securities & Commercial Licensing Bureau Corporations Division TRADEMARKS, SERVICE MARKS, AND INSIGNIAS: A GENERAL OVERVIEW Authorized
1 0 1 TITLE VIII PAYMENT, CLEARING AND SETTLEMENT SUPERVISION SEC. 01. SHORT TITLE. This title may be cited as the Payment, Clearing, and Settlement Supervision Act of 00. SEC. 0. FINDINGS AND PURPOSES.
PJC 105.12 Question and Instruction on Violation of Texas Securities Act Factual Misrepresentation QUESTION Did Don Davis commit a securities law violation against Paul Payne? A securities law violation
2:04-cv-72741-DPH-RSW Doc # 17 Filed 08/31/05 Pg 1 of 5 Pg ID 160 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, v. Plaintiff,
CONTRIBUTION AGREEMENT of INCROWD ALABAMA FUND I, LLC INSTRUCTIONS TO INVESTORS EACH PROSPECTIVE INVESTOR IN INCROWD ALABAMA FUND I, LLC (THE COMPANY ) SHOULD EXAMINE THE SUITABILITY OF THIS TYPE OF INVESTMENT
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA Criminal No.: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) ) Plaintiff, ) DEFERRED PROSECUTION ) AGREEMENT v. ) ) BIXBY ENERGY SYSTEMS, INC., ) ) Defendant. ) The United
RESTATED CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION of JPMORGAN CHASE & CO. Under Section 245 of the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware JPMorgan Chase & Co. (the Corporation ), does hereby certify under
Code of Ethics Effective June 1, 2015 APPLICABLE RULES AND REGULATIONS Rule 17j-1 of the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended Rule 204A-1 of the Investment Advisers Act of 1940, as amended I. POLICY
Title V Preventing Fraud and Abuse Subtitle A- Establishment of New Health and Human Services and Department of Justice Health Care Fraud Positions Sec. 501. Health and Human Services Senior Advisor There
CHARLES RIVER LABORATORIES INTERNATIONAL, INC. STATEMENT OF POLICY CONCERNING TRADING POLICIES (revised May 10, 2011) 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page No. I. SUMMARY OF THE COMPANY POLICY CONCERNING TRADING POLICIES...
COMPLIANCE WITH REGULATION U: A REFRESHER by Barry W. Hunter Complying with Regulation U 1 (herein sometimes referred to as the "Regulation") involves more than just including in the loan documents a covenant