SAFETY PERFORMANCE INDICATORS 2013 DATA

Transcription

1 SAFETY PERFORMANCE INDICATORS 213 DATA Report No. 213s (July 214) OGP DATA SERIES International Association of Oil & Gas Producers

2 P ublications Global experience The International Association of Oil & Gas Producers has access to a wealth of technical knowledge and experience with its members operating around the world in many different terrains. We collate and distil this valuable knowledge for the industry to use as guidelines for good practice by individual members. Consistent high quality database and guidelines Our overall aim is to ensure a consistent approach to training, management and best practice throughout the world. The oil and gas exploration and production industry recognises the need to develop consistent databases and records in certain fields. OGP s members are encouraged to use the guidelines as a starting point for their operations or to supplement their own policies and regulations which may apply locally. Internationally recognised source of industry information Many of our guidelines have been recognised and used by international authorities and safety and environmental bodies. Requests come from governments and non-government organisations around the world as well as from non-member companies. Disclaimer Whilst every effort has been made to ensure the accuracy of the information contained in this publication, neither OGP nor any of its members past present or future warrants its accuracy or will, regardless of its or their negligence, assume liability for any foreseeable or unforeseeable use made thereof, which liability is hereby excluded. Consequently, such use is at the recipient s own risk on the basis that any use by the recipient constitutes agreement to the terms of this disclaimer. The recipient is obliged to inform any subsequent recipient of such terms. Copyright notice The contents of these pages are The International Association of Oil and Gas Producers. Permission is given to reproduce this report in whole or in part provided (i) that the copyright of OGP and (ii) the source are acknowledged. All other rights are reserved. Any other use requires the prior written permission of the OGP. These Terms and Conditions shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales. Disputes arising here from shall be exclusively subject to the jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales.

3 OGP safety performance indicators 213 data Report No: 213s July 214 Revision history Version Date Amendments 1.1 August 214 Minor correction to TRIR and LTIF definitions (pp 3-2 and 3-3) 1. July 214 First issued

4 International Association of Oil & Gas Producers Preface The International Association of Oil & Gas Producers, OGP, has been collecting safety incident data from its member companies globally since The data collected are entered into the OGP safety database, which is the largest database of safety performance in the E&P industry. The principal purpose of the data collection and analysis is to record the global safety performance of the contributing OGP member companies on an annual basis. The submission of data is voluntary and is not mandated by OGP membership. The annual reports provide trend analysis, benchmarking and the identification of areas and activities on which efforts should be focused to bring about the greatest improvements in performance. The OGP incident reporting system covers worldwide exploration and production (E&P) operations, both onshore and offshore, and includes incidents involving both member companies and their contractor employees. The key indicators presented are: number of fatalities, fatal accident rate, fatal incident rate, number of lost work day cases and number of lost work days, total recordable injury rate, lost time injury frequency, number of restricted duty case and restricted duty days, and number of medical treatment cases. The report presents contributing OGP members global results for these indicators, which are then analysed by region, function and company. A code is used to preserve the anonymity of the reporting company, which will typically report its own data as well as that of its associated contractors (see Appendix C). In 21, data collection was initiated to capture causal factors associated with fatal incidents and high potential events. These data are presented in section 2.11 of this report. Wherever practicable, results are presented graphically. The data underlying the charts are presented in Appendix B. The causal factors and chart data are available to OGP members in editable format from the members area of the OGP website. The tables are organised according to the section in the report where the chart appears. Fatal incident and high potential event descriptions previously included in this report as appendices C and D are now available for download on the OGP Safety Zone website: The main changes to the 213 report are: The addition of TRIR presented by country (see Section 3.7) FAR and LTIF by function are now presented as 5-year rolling average instead of the 3-year rolling average The region previously named South is now referred to as South & Central. The change does not affect the historical results in this report. These changes reflect the Safety Data Subcommittee s aim to improve the consistency of presentation of the data. Scope of reporting and data validation This report is published with two separate addendums which can be downloaded from the OGP public website. These provide the narrative descriptions for the fatal incidents and high potential events which have been reported by the participating member companies. The data requested from participating OGP member companies are published in an annual User Guide in two parts: Part A contains definitions and the scope of the safety data submission. This document is published on the OGP public website. Part B contains practical information for the Company nominees submitting the data, copies of the data submission forms and a data submission checklist. companies is conducted by the OGP secretariat and any data validated by an OGP workgroup is blind coded to preserve the anonymity of the reporting companies. A self-assessment questionnaire is included within the data submission process to determine the alignment between the requested data and the company submissions. The information provided in this questionnaire is also used in the validation process. Data that appear to be incorrect and that cannot be confirmed by the submitting company as correct may be excluded from the data set at the discretion of the secretariat. The scope of data included within this report is detailed in Appendix A. The safety data submission process is used for the collection of data relating to safety performance, process safety performance and motor vehicle crashes. The OGP safety database has built-in data validation requirements and each company data submission is validated by the OGP secretariat and the workgroup (Safety Committee Sub- Committee, Task Force or Network) responsible for the data set in accordance with the OGP data collection and reporting procedure. Any communication with reporting ii OGP

5 Safety performance indicators 213 data Data series Other OGP data reports include: Environmental Performance Indicators Health Performance Indicatorst Process Safety Event Data. These are available from the OGP website: OGP iii

6 International Association of Oil & Gas Producers The safety statistics for 213 were derived from data provided by the following companies: Contributing OGP Members Addax Petroleum Limited Adnoc Anadarko Bashneft BG Group BHP BP Cairn Energy Cairn India Chevron CNOOC ConocoPhillips Dolphin Energy Dong E&P E.ON eni ExxonMobil GALP GDF Suez E&P International Hess Corporation INPEX Kosmos Kuwait Oil Company Maersk Oil Marathon Oil Company MOL Nexen Inc Oil Search OMV Pan n Energy Pemex Perenco Petrobras PETRONAS Carigali Sdn Bhd Premier Oil PTT EP Qatar Petroleum RasGas Repsol RWE Dea AG Sasol Shell Companies Statoil Suncor Talisman Energy Total Tullow Oil Wintershall Woodside Yemen LNG iv OGP

7 Safety performance indicators 213 data Contents Executive Summary vii 1. Summary General Fatalities Total recordable injuries Lost time injuries Overall results Fatalities Fatal accident rate (FAR) Fatalities by incident category and activity Number of fatal incidents per 1 million work hours Total recordable injury rate (TRIR) Lost time injury frequency (LTIF) Lost work day cases by categories and activities Severity of lost work day cases Severity of restricted work day cases Incident triangles Causal factors analysis OGP Life-Saving Rules Results by region Fatalities by region Fatal accident rate (FAR) by region Total recordable injury rate (TRIR) by region Lost time injury frequency (LTIF) by region FAR, TRIR and LTIF 5-year rolling averages by region Severity of lost work day cases by region Individual country performance Incident triangles by region Results by function Fatalities by function Fatal accident rate (FAR) 5-year rolling average Total recordable injury rate (TRIR) by function Lost time injury frequency (LTIF) 5-year rolling average by function Severity of lost work day cases by function Exploration performance Drilling performance Production performance Construction performance Unspecifed performance Results by company Overall company results Company results by function Appendix A: Database dimensions A-1 Appendix B: Data tables B-1 Appendix C: Contributing companies C-1 Appendix D: Countries represented D-1 Appendix E: Glossary of terms E-1 OGP v

8 International Association of Oil & Gas Producers vi OGP

9 Safety performance indicators 213 data Executive Summary The 213 OGP Safety Performance Indicators show that the Fatal Accident Rate for reporting companies has decreased by 11% compared with 212. The number of fatalities has decreased from 88 in 212 to 8 in of the fatalities reported in 213 occurred in 3 incidents. Analysis of the fatal incident descriptions has shown that at least 67% of the fatal incidents reported in 213 can be linked to failure to follow the OGP Life Saving Rules published in March 212, see OGP report 459. There are a number of common causal factors related to the fatal incidents and high potential events from 21 to 213. The top 5 causal factors for 213 are also the 5 causal factors that consistently appear in the 212, 211 and 21 top 1 for both fatal incidents and high potential events. These are: Process (conditions): Organisational: Inadequate training/competence People (acts): Inattention/Lack of Awareness: Improper decision making or lack of judgment Process (conditions): Organisational: Inadequate work standards/procedures Process (conditions): Organisational: Inadequate supervision Process (conditions): Organisational: Inadequate hazard identification or risk assessment The 6 th most common causal factor for fatal incidents, which did not show in the top 1 for High Potential Events, was: People (acts): Following procedures: Improper position (line of fire) Personal injury performance shows the lost time injury frequency decreasing by 6% and the total recordable injury rate decreasing by 8% compared with 212 results. However it can be seen that the severity of lost work day cases has increased. Four fatal incidents were as a result of process safety events. Fig.1: Number of fatalities and fatal accident rate [Data page B-2] Number of fatalities Fatalities FAR Fig.2: OGP Life-Saving Rules applicable to 213 fatal incidents per cent of total 213 incidents [Data page B-6] International Association of Oil & Gas Producers From OGP Safety Performance Indicators 213 data Insufficient information to assign a rule 14% No appropriate rule 19% Supplementary rules 51% Fig.3: Lost time injury frequency and total recordable injury rate per million hours worked [Data page B-2 & B-3] FAR - Fatal accidents per 1 million hours worked Core rules 16% 5 TRIR LTIF Fatal accident rate (FAR) 4 The number of company/contractor fatalities per 1,, (1 million) hours worked. 3 Total recordable injury rate (TRIR) The number of recordable injuries (fatalities + lost work day cases + restricted work day cases + medical treatment cases) per 1,, hours worked. 2 Lost time injury frequency (LTIF) 1 The number of lost time injuries (fatalities + lost work day cases) per 1,, hours worked OGP vii

10 International Association of Oil & Gas Producers viii OGP

11 Safety performance indicators 213 data 1. Summary The OGP safety performance indicators report summarises the safety performance of contributing OGP member companies for 213. The key performance indicators (KPI) used to benchmark safety performance are: number of fatalities, fatal accident and incident rates, total recordable injury rate and lost time injury frequency. Third party fatalities are not included in this report. 1.1 General The safety performance of contributing OGP member companies in 213 is based on the analysis of million work hours of data. Submissions were made by 5 of the 62 operating company OGP members. The data reported cover operations in 11 countries. Hours worked millions [Data page B-19] work hours contractor 1 5 work hours company OGP 1-1

12 International Association of Oil & Gas Producers 1.2 Fatalities Fig 1.2.1: Fatalities by reporting category, 213 % fatalities associated with each reporting category [Data page B-3] Falls from height 3.8% Explosions or burns 5.% Pressure release 7.5% Caught in, under or between 8.8% Assault or violent act 11.3% Struck by 12.5% Exposure noise, chemical, biological, vibration 1.3% Overexertion, strain 1.3% Exposure electrical 1.3% Fig 1.2.2: Fatalities by activity, 213 % fatalities associated with each activity [Data page B-3] Unspecified other 3.8% Transport land 7.7% Construction, commissioning, decommissioning 7.7% Production operations 11.5% Seismic/survey operations 2.6% Other 26.3% Water related, drowning 21.3% Transport air 21.8% Against the background of a 2% increase in work hours reported, the number of fatalities has decreased from 88 in 212 to 8 in 213. The 8 fatalities occurred in 43 separate incidents. The resulting Fatal Accident Rate (2.12) is 11% lower than last year s figure (2.38). The company and contractor FAR are 1.83 and 2.2 respectively. Onshore and offshore FAR are 1.7 and 3.27 respectively. The reported fatalities are divided into activity and category. The activity with the highest number of fatalities reported by the OGP member companies is Transport air (22%) with 17 fatalities as a result of 2 separate helicopter crash incidents. 13 fatalities (17%) were reported in 13 separate incidents in the Drilling, Workover, Well Services activity and 12 fatalities (15%) were reported in 2 separate events in the Transport water, including marine activity activity. These include a tug that capsized during static tow operations to an export tanker in Nigeria in which 11 contractor employees lost their lives. One incident was reported in the production operations activity (11% of the total fatalities) in which 9 company employees lost their lives in a terror attack in Algeria. With regard to the incident category, 21 of the fatalities reported in 213 (26%) were categorised as Other and were related to 5 fatal incidents including the 2 helicopter crashes in which 17 people died and 3 incidents in which 4 people died for which the details were not available (2% of fatal incidents reported in 212 were in the category Other ). Fatalities categorised as Water related, drowning were the second greatest contributors to the fatality statistics with 17 fatalities in 6 separate incidents, accounting for 21% of the fatalities (1% in 212). This includes the incident in Nigeria where a tug capsized resulting in 11 contractor deaths. Drilling, workover, well services 16.7% Maintenance, inspection, testing 12.8% Transport water, inc. marine activity 15.4% 1-2 OGP

13 Safety performance indicators 213 data The fatal accident rate for 213 is 2.12, 11% lower than the 212 rate. The offshore FAR (3.27) for 213 is more than three times the 212 result (.89) and the onshore rate (1.7) fell by 41%. Fig 1.2.3: Fatal accident rate - company and contractors per 1 million hours worked [Data page B-2] 8 Overall Company FAR 6 Contractor FAR OGP 1-3

14 International Association of Oil & Gas Producers 1.3 Total recordable injuries Fig 1.3.1: Total recordable injury rate company & contractors per million hours worked [Data page B-2] Overall Contractor Company The rate for all recordable injuries (fatalities, lost work day cases, restricted work day cases and medical treatment cases) was 1.6 injuries per million hours worked (1.74 in 212). The only region that showed an increase in TRIR in 213 compared with the TRIR for 212 was South & Central (3%). A reduction in TRIR from 212 to 213 was shown in Africa (8%), Asia/Australasia (29%), Europe (2%), FSU (18%), Middle East (12%) and North (9%) OGP

15 Safety performance indicators 213 data 1.4 Lost time injuries The overall Lost Time Injury Frequency (LTIF) fell from.48 in 212 to.45 in 213. This represents a reduction of 6% compared with 212 and 72 fewer lost time injuries. This reduction is similar in both company and contractor performance. The company and contractor LTIF both show a reduction compared with 212 (15% and 4% respectively). The onshore and offshore LTIF both also show a reduction compared with 212 (11% and 5% respectively). There were 1627 reported injuries resulting in at least one day off work, 1312 incidents were contractor related and 315 were company related. OGP member companies reported days of work lost through injuries. The greatest number of incidents was reported as Struck by (367 cases accounting for 23% of the total; 212 results showed 48 cases accounting for 24% of the total). Caught in, under or between accounted for 341 cases, 21% of the total (21% of the total in 212). The lost time injury frequency has plateaued from 27 for both companies and contractors. Fig 1.4.1: Lost time injury frequency company & contractors per million hours worked [Data page B-3] Exposure noise, chemical, biological, vibration 1.2% Water related, drowning 1.3% Explosions or burns 3.7% Fig 1.4.2: Lost work day cases by category % LWDCs associated with each reporting category [Data page B-4] Exposure electrical.9% Pressure release.7% Assault or violent act.6% Overall Contractor Company 212 Confined space.2% Struck by 22.6% 213 Other 5.3% Cut, puncture, scrape 6.1% Overexerstion, strain 8.5% Falls from height 1.8% Caught in, under or between 21.% Slips and trips (at same height) 17.1% Fig 1.4.3: Lost work day cases by activity % LWDCs associated with each activity [Data page B-4] Transport air 1.7% Seismic/survey operations.9% Transport land 5.6% Transport water, including marine activity 6.5% Diving, subsea, ROV.6% Drilling, workover, well services 2.% Unspecified other 7.3% Office, warehouse, accommodation, catering 8.4% Construction, commissioning, decommissioning 9.% Maintenance, inspection, testing 14.8% Lifting, crane, rigging, deck operations 11.6% Production operations 13.7% OGP 1-5

16 International Association of Oil & Gas Producers 1-6 OGP

17 Safety performance indicators 213 data 2. Overall results In this section the primary indicators used to measure contributing OGP member companies safety performance are; the number and nature of fatalities, total recordable injury rate (TRIR), fatal accident rate (FAR), fatal incidents per 1 million work hours, and lost time injury frequency (LTIF). Third party incidents are not included in this report. 2.1 Fatalities Fatalities Onshore 213 (212) Offshore 213 (212) Total 213 (212) Company 13 (1) 2 (2) 15 (12) Contractor 34 (7) 31 (6) 65 (76) Total 47 (8) 33 (8) 8 (88) Company/contractor fatalities 8 company and contractor fatalities were reported in 213. This is 8 fewer than were reported in 212 and 15 more than in 211. The 8 fatalities occurred in 43 separate incidents. In 213, 13 contractors died as a result of a single helicopter crash in the rainforest in Peru. 11 contractors died when a tug capsized during static tow operations to an export tanker in Nigeria. 9 company employees and 31 third party individuals died as the result of a terror attack in Algeria. 4 contractors died as a result of a helicopter ditching in the sea in the UK. There were 4 incidents that involved 2 fatalities. These were; êêa boat crashed and sank during a water inspection in Mexico êêan oil tank exploded during a maintenance operation in China êêa fatal incident in the USA, no further information has been provided êêan uncontrolled release of pressure from a gas cooler in the Netherlands during a leak test Fig 2.1.1: Number of fatalities and fatal accident rate [Data page B-2] Number of fatalities International Association of Oil & Gas Producers From OGP Safety Performance Indicators 213 data Fatalities FAR FAR - Fatal accidents per 1 million hours worked OGP 2-1

18 International Association of Oil & Gas Producers 2.2 Fatal accident rate (FAR) Fig 2.2.1: Fatal accident rate company & contractors per 1 million hours worked [Data page B-2] 8 6 Overall Company FAR Contractor FAR 213 (212) FAR Relative to 212 FAR Company 1.83 (1.58) (16% higher) Contractor 2.2 (2.59) (15% lower) Overall 2.12 (2.38) (11% lower) Onshore 1.7 (2.87) (41% lower) Offshore 3.27 (.89) (267% higher) Fig 2.2.2: Fatal accident rate onshore & offshore per 1 million hours worked [Data page B-2] Overall Onshore Offshore 213 In 213 there were 15 company fatalities (12 in 212) as a result of 7 separate incidents. êê9 of the company fatalities were as a result of a single terror attack in Algeria in which a further 31 third party individuals lost their lives. In 213 there were 65 contractor fatalities (76 in 212). êê13 of the contractor fatalities were the result of a single helicopter crash in the rainforest in Peru. êê11 of the contractor fatalities were the result of a tug capsize during static tow operations to an export tanker in Nigeria. The difference between the onshore and offshore FAR displays a large variation over the 1-year period shown. Neither is consistently lower. This is generally attributable to single transportation or fire and explosion incidents involving high numbers of fatalities Fatal accident rate (FAR) The number of company/contractor fatalities per 1 (1 million) hours worked. 2-2 OGP

19 Safety performance indicators 213 data 2.3 Fatalities by incident category and activity The largest proportion of the fatalities reported in 213 were categorised as Other (26%) (2% in 212). êê13 of the fatalities were as a result of a single helicopter crash in the rainforest in Peru êê4 of the fatalities were the result of a helicopter ditching into the sea in the UK êêno detailed information was provided by the reporting company for 2 incidents 21% of the fatalities reported in 213 were categorised as Water related, drowning (1% in 212). êê11 contractor employees lost their lives when a tug capsized during static tow operations to an export tanker in Nigeria êê2 workers died when their boat crashed and sank during a water inspection in Mexico êêa technician drowned while bathing in a river in Peru êêone man was lost overboard when a seismic vessel was hit by unexpected waves in Uruguay êêa contractor was lost overboard when the rig that he was working on capsized in Angola êêa mud logger fell into the sea from the access ramp to a tender barge in Myanmar 13% of the fatalities reported in 213 were the result of individuals being struck by falling or moving objects (16% in 212). êêtwo of the fatalities involved separate motor vehicle crashes 11% of the fatalities reported in 213 were categorised as Assault or violent act (3% in 212) and were the result of a single terror attack in Algeria. A reduction is seen in the number of deaths resulting from land transport incidents (6 fatalities) compared with 212 (9 fatalities in 212, 15 in 211). êê6 fatalities were associated with 6 separate incidents 35 of the fatal incidents involved one fatality. Incidents which involved 2 or more fatalities were reported under the categories: êêother (3 incidents). êêwater related, drowning (2 incidents). êêassault and violent act (1 incident). êêexplosions or burns (1 incident). êêpressure release (1 incident). There were no fatal incidents reported under the following categories: êêcut, puncture, scrape. êêconfined space. êêslips, trips, falls (at same height). Fig 2.3.1: Fatalities by reporting category 213 % fatalities associated with each reporting category [Data page B-3] Falls from height 3.8% Explosions or burns 5.% Pressure release 7.5% Caught in, under or between 8.8% Assault or violent act 11.3% Struck by 12.5% Exposure noise, chemical, biological, vibration 1.3% Overexertion, strain 1.3% Fig 2.3.2: Fatalities by activity, 213 % fatalities associated with each activity [Data page B-3] Unspecified other 3.8% Transport land 7.7% Construction, commissioning, decommissioning 7.7% Production operations 11.5% Maintenance, inspection, testing 12.8% Seismic/survey operations 2.6% Exposure electrical 1.3% Other 26.3% Water related, drowning 21.3% Transport air 21.8% Drilling, workover, well services 16.7% Transport water, inc. marine activity 15.4% OGP 2-3

20 International Association of Oil & Gas Producers Fatalities by incident category and activity, 213 Assault or violent act Caught in, under or between Confined space Cut, puncture, scrape Explosion or burns Exposure electrical Exposure noise, chemical, biological, vibration Falls from height Overexertion, strain Pressure release Slips, trips (at same height) Struck by Water related, drowning Other Total Construction, commissioning, decommissioning Diving, subsea, ROV Drilling, workover, well services Lifting, crane, rigging, deck operations Maintenance, inspection, testing Office, warehouse, accommodation, catering Production operations 9 9 Seismic/survey operations Transport air Transport land Transport water, including marine activity Unspecified other 3 3 Total OGP

21 Safety performance indicators 213 data 2.4 Number of fatal incidents per 1 million work hours Number of fatal incidents per 1 million work hours 213 (212) Relative to 212 Fig 2.4.1: Fatal incidents per 1 million work hours company & contractors [Data page B-2] Company.85 (.79) (8% higher) Contractor 1.22 (1.57) (22% lower) Overall 1.14 (1.41) (19% lower) Onshore.94 (1.58) (41% lower) Offshore 1.68 (.89) (89% higher) 6 Overall Contractor Company Overall FAR* 4 The number of fatal incidents per 1 million work hours is a measure of the frequency with which fatal incidents occur, in contrast to the FAR which measures the frequency of fatalities. Accordingly, for company and contractor fatalities, the number of fatal incidents per 1 million work hours will be less than or equal to the FAR. Comparison of FAR and number of fatal incidents per 1 million work hours gives an indication of the magnitude of the incidents in terms of lives lost. Overall the number of fatal incidents per 1 million work hours has decreased by 19% compared with last year and is the lowest on record (43 fatal incidents in 213, 52 fatal incidents in 212) *FAR: Fatal Accident Rate (Number of fatalities per 1 million hours worked) Fig 2.4.2: Fatal incidents per 1 million work hours onshore & offshore [Data page B-2] Overall Onshore Offshore Overall FAR* 4 Fig 2.4.3: Number of fatalities and fatal incidents 1 year trend Fatalities Fatal incidents *FAR: Fatal Accident Rate (Number of fatalities per 1 million hours worked) Fatal incidents per 1 million work hours The number of incidents that result in one or more fatalities per 1,, (1 million) hours. OGP 2-5

22 International Association of Oil & Gas Producers 2.5 Total recordable injury rate (TRIR) Fig 2.5.1: Total recordable injury rate company & contractors per million hours worked [Data page B-2] 6 5 Overall Contractor Company 213 (212) TRIR Relative to 212 TRIR Company.95 (1.12) (15% lower) Contractor 1.77 (1.9) (7% lower) Overall 1.6 (1.74) (8% lower) Onshore 1.33 (1.49) (11% lower) Offshore 2.34 (2.53) (8% lower) Submissions without information on medical treatment cases were filtered out, leaving a dataset of 3665 million hours, 97% of the database (see Appendix A). An overall reduction in TRIR of 8% is seen in Fig 2.5.2: Total recordable injury rate onshore & offshore per million hours worked [Data page B-2] 6 5 Overall Onshore Offshore Total recordable injury rate (TRIR) The number of recordable injuries (fatalities + lost work day cases + restricted work day cases + medical treatment cases) per 1 hours worked. 2-6 OGP

23 Safety performance indicators 213 data 2.6 Lost time injury frequency (LTIF) 213 (212) LTIF Relative to 212 LTIF Company.4 (.47) (15% lower) Contractor.47 (.49) (4% lower) Overall.45 (.48) (6% lower) Onshore.34 (.38) (11% lower) Offshore.77 (.81) (5% lower) Fig 2.6.1: Lost time injury frequency company & contractors per million hours worked [Data page B-3] Overall Contractor Company The overall LTIF decreased by 6% from.48 in 212 to.45 in 213. The company LTIF decreased by 15% compared with There were 1627 reported lost work day cases resulting in at least one day off work, which equates to an average of 31 injuries resulting in at least one day off work every week of the year. Although the absolute number of LWDCs has reduced (1699 in 212), the time away from work has increased compared with 212. See Section 2.8 for further information on Lost Work Day Case severity Fig 2.6.2: Lost time injury frequency onshore & offshore per million hours worked [Data page B-3] Overall Onshore Offshore Lost time injury frequency (LTIF) The number of lost time injuries (fatalities + lost work day cases) per 1 hours worked. OGP 2-7

24 International Association of Oil & Gas Producers 2.7 Lost work day cases by categories and activities Fig 2.7.1: Lost work day cases by category % LWDCs associated with each reporting category [Data page B-4] Exposure noise, chemical, biological, vibration 1.2% Water related, drowning 1.3% Explosions or burns 3.7% Other 5.3% Cut, puncture, scrape 6.1% Overexerstion, strain 8.5% Exposure electrical.9% Pressure release.7% Assault or violent act.6% Confined space.2% Struck by 22.6% Lost work day cases by category Number % Assault or violent act 1.6 Caught in, under or between Confined space 4.2 Cut, puncture, scrape Explosion or burns Exposure electrical 14.9 Exposure noise, chemical, biological, vibration Falls from height Overexertion, strain Pressure release 11.7 Slips and trips (at same height) Struck by Water related, drowning Other Total 1627 Falls from height 1.8% Caught in, under or between 21.% Slips and trips (at same height) 17.1% Of the 1627 reported lost work day cases resulting in at least one day off work, 1312 incidents (81%) were contractorrelated and 315 (19%) were company-related (1356 and 343 respectively for 212). The lost work day case category was provided for all of the Lost Work Day Cases reported, although 5% of the cases were categorised as Other. The pie chart shows the percentage of LWDCs within each of the reporting categories for 213. The greatest number of incidents was reported as Struck by (367 cases accounting for 23% of LWDCs), (212 results showed 48 cases accounting for 24%). Caught in, under or between accounted for 21% of the total reported cases (21% in 212). In comparison with 212, the 213 results were very similar. Lost work day case (LWDC) A Lost work day case is an incident resulting in at least one day off work. Fatal incidents are not included. 2-8 OGP

25 Safety performance indicators 213 data Lost work day cases by category company & contractors Company Contractor Assault or violent act 2 8 Caught in, under or between Confined space 4 Cut, puncture, scrape 29 7 Explosion or burns 8 52 Exposure electrical 2 12 Exposure noise, chemical, biological, vibration 3 17 Falls from height Overexertion, strain Pressure release 2 9 Slips and trips (at same height) 79 2 Struck by Water related, drowning 2 19 Other Total Fig 2.7.2: Lost work day cases by category Company [Data page B-5] Exposure noise, chemical, biological, vibration 1.% Explosions or burns 2.5% Other 5.1% Cut, puncture, scrape 9.2% Falls from height 1.5% Assault or violent act.6% Exposure Electrical.6% Pressure release.6% Water related, drowning.6% Slips and trips (at same height) 25.1% Of the 1627 reported lost work day cases resulting in at least one day off work, 879 incidents (54%) were related to onshore activity and 748 (46%) were related to offshore activity (972 and 727 respectively for 212). Overexertion, strain 11.1% Struck by 12.7% Fig 2.7.3: Lost work day cases by category Contractor [Data page B-5] Caught in, under or between 2.3% Water related, drowning 1.4% Exposure Electrical.9% Exposure noise, chemical, biological, vibration 1.3% Pressure release.7% Assault or violent act.6% Confined space.3% Explosions or burns 4.% Cut, puncture, scrape 5.3% Struck by 24.9% Other 5.4% Overexertion, strain 7.9% Falls from height 1.9% Slips and trips (at same height) 15.2% Caught in, under or between 21.1% OGP 2-9

26 International Association of Oil & Gas Producers Lost work day cases by category onshore & offshore Fig 2.7.4: Lost work day cases by category Onshore [Data page B-5] Assault or violent act.8% Pressure release.9% Exposure noise, chemical, biological, vibration 1.6% Explosions or burns 4.3% Cut, puncture, scrape 4.8% Other 7.3% Overexertion, strain 7.4% Falls from height 11.9% Fig 2.7.5: Lost work day cases by category Offshore [Data page B-5] Exposure Electrical.5% Confined space.3% Water related, drowning.3% Struck by 23.7% Slips and trips (at same height) 2.% Caught in, under or between 16.2% Onshore Offshore Assault or violent act 7 3 Caught in, under or between Confined space 3 1 Cut, puncture, scrape Explosion or burns Exposure electrical 4 1 Exposure noise, chemical, biological, vibration 14 6 Falls from height Overexertion, strain Pressure release 8 3 Slips and trips (at same height) Struck by Water related, drowning 3 18 Other Total Of the 1627 reported lost work day cases resulting in at least one day off work, 879 incidents (54%) were related to onshore activity and 748 (46%) were related to offshore activity (972 and 727 respectively for 212). Exposure Electrical 1.3% Water related, drowning 2.4% Exposure noise, chemical, biological, vibration.8% Assault or violent act.4% Explosions or burns 2.9% Other 3.1% Pressure release.4% Confined space.1% Cut, puncture, scrape 7.6% Caught in, under or between 26.6% Falls from height 9.5% Overexertion, strain 9.8% Slips and trips (at same height) 13.8% Struck by 21.3% 2-1 OGP

27 Safety performance indicators 213 data Lost work day cases by activity Number % Construction, commissioning, decommissioning Diving, subsea, ROV 9.6 Drilling, workover, well services Lifting, crane, rigging, deck operations Maintenance, inspection, testing Office, warehouse, accommodation, catering Production operations Seismic/survey operations 14.9 Transport air Transport land Transport water, including marine activity Unspecified other Total 1627 Fig 2.7.6: Lost work day cases by activity % LWDCs associated with each activity [Data page B-5] Transport land 5.6% Transport water, including marine activity 6.5% Unspecified other 7.3% Office, warehouse, accommodation, catering 8.4% Transport air 1.7% Seismic/survey operations.9% Diving, subsea, ROV.6% Drilling, workover, well services 2.% Lost work day case activities were reported for all of the 1627 Lost Work Day Cases reported, although 7% of the cases were reported as Unspecified-other. In 212, 12% were reported as Unspecified-other. In comparison with 212, 213 results were very similar. Construction, commissioning, decommissioning 9.% Lifting, crane, rigging, deck operations 11.6% Maintenance, inspection, testing 14.8% Production operations 13.7% OGP 2-11

28 International Association of Oil & Gas Producers Lost work day cases by activity company & contractor Fig 2.7.7: Lost work day cases by activity Company [Data page B-5] Construction, commissioning, decommissioning 2.9% Transport land 4.1% Lifting, crane, rigging, deck operations 8.3% Drilling, workover, well services 8.9% Transport air 1.9% Transport water, including marine activity.6% Production operations 28.9% Company Contractor Construction, commissioning, decommissioning Diving, subsea, ROV 9 Drilling, workover, well services Lifting, crane, rigging, deck operations Maintenance, inspection, testing Office, warehouse, accommodation, catering Production operations Seismic/survey operations 14 Transport air 6 21 Transport land Transport water, including marine activity 2 14 Unspecified other Total Unspecified other 12.1% Office, warehouse, accommodation, catering 15.2% Maintenance, inspection, testing 17.1% Fig 2.7.8: Lost work day cases by activity Contractor [Data page B-5] Transport air 1.6% Seismic/survey operations1.1% Transport land 5.9% Diving, subsea, ROV.7% Unspecified other 6.2% Drilling, workover, well services 22.7% Office, warehouse, accommodation, catering 6.7% Transport water, including marine activity 7.9% Production operations 1.1% Maintenance, inspection, testing 14.3% Construction, commissioning, decommissioning 1.4% Lifting, crane, rigging, deck operations 12.4% 2-12 OGP

29 Safety performance indicators 213 data Lost work day cases by activity onshore & offshore Onshore Offshore Construction, commissioning, decommissioning Diving, subsea, ROV 1 8 Drilling, workover, well services Lifting, crane, rigging, deck operations Maintenance, inspection, testing Office, warehouse, accommodation, catering Production operations Seismic/survey operations 12 2 Transport air 7 2 Transport land 89 2 Transport water, including marine activity Unspecified other Total Fig 2.7.9: Lost work day cases by activity Onshore [Data page B-5] Transport water, including marine activity 1.5% Unspecified other 8.6% Lifting, crane, rigging, deck operations 9.6% Transport land 1.1% Office, warehouse, accommodation, catering 1.4% Seismic/survey operations1.4% Transport air.8% Diving, subsea, ROV.1% Drilling, workover, well services 2.1% Production operations 14.1% Maintenance, inspection, testing 11.% Construction, commissioning, decommissioning 12.3% Fig 2.7.1: Lost work day cases by activity Offshore [Data page B-5] Transport air 2.7% Construction, commissioning, decommissioning 5.1% Diving, subsea, ROV 1.1% Seismic/survey operations.3% Transport land.3% Unspecified other 5.7% Drilling, workover, well services 19.9% Office, warehouse, accommodation, catering 6.% Transport water, including marine activity 12.4% Maintenance, inspection, testing 19.3% Production operations 13.2% Lifting, crane, rigging, deck operations 14.% OGP 2-13

30 International Association of Oil & Gas Producers 2.8 Severity of lost work day cases Fig 2.8.1: Severity of lost work day cases company & contractors average days lost per LWDC [Data page B-5] (212) severity Relative to 212 severity Relative to average severity Company (38.81) 12% higher 18% higher Contractor (41.28) 4% higher 6% higher 5 Overall (4.74) 6% higher 9% higher Onshore (36.83) 3% lower 1% lower 4 Offshore (45.99) 11% higher 11% higher Overall Contractor Company OGP member companies reported a total of days lost (LWDC days) through injuries. The number of days lost was reported for 66% of the database (see Appendix A and Appendix C). The offshore LWDC severity is 43% higher than onshore The number of days lost per lost work day case overall has increased by 6% compared with 212 results. Fig 2.8.2: Severity of lost work day cases onshore & offshore average days lost per LWDC [Data page B-5] Overall Onshore Offshore Severity of lost work day cases Severity is defined as the average number of days lost (where reported) for each lost work day case OGP

31 Safety performance indicators 213 data The figures show the average number of days lost per LWDC in 213 compared with the average for the previous 5-year period. A 9% increase is shown in overall LWDC severity when compared with the previous 5-year period. Fig 2.8.3: Severity of lost work day cases company & contractors average days lost per LWDC [Data page B-5] Company Contractor Overall Fig 2.8.4: Severity of lost work day cases onshore & offshore average days lost per LWDC [Data page B-5] Offshore Onshore Overall OGP 2-15

32 International Association of Oil & Gas Producers 2.9 Severity of restricted work day cases Fig 2.9.1: Severity of restricted work day cases company & contractors average days lost per RWDC [Data page B-6] (212) severity Relative to 212 severity Relative to severity Company (13.84) 24% higher 19% higher Contractor (12.5) 18% higher 16% higher Overall (12.21) 19% higher 16% higher Onshore (11.48) 34% higher 25% higher 15 Offshore 13.3 (13.41) 3% lower 2% higher Fig 2.9.2: Severity of restricted work day cases onshore & offshore average days lost per RWDC [Data page B-6] Overall Contractor Company A total of days were restricted (RWDC days) as a result of restricted work day cases, in the sense that normal duties could not be performed. This compares with days lost (LWDC days) on a 24% larger dataset (see Appendix A and Appendix C). The number of days lost per restricted work day case overall has increased by 19% compared with 212 results. The number of days lost to restricted work per case increased most noticeably in onshore operations with a rate of for 213, an increase of 34% compared with the 212 rate (11.48). The severity for company activities of represents an increase of 24% compared with the rate for 212 (13.84) Overall Onshore Offshore Severity of restricted work day cases The average number of days of restricted work per restricted work day case. Restricted work day case days are not reported by all companies. The database for this analysis is therefore reduced to 2,8 million work hours, 53% of all reported hours (see Appendix A) OGP

33 Safety performance indicators 213 data The figures show the average number of days lost per RWDC in 213 compared with the average for the previous 5-year period. The overall average shows an increase of 16% compared with the average for the previous 5-year period. Fig 2.9.3: Severity of restriced work day cases company & contractors average days of restricted work per RWDC [Data page B-6] Company Contractor Overall Fig 2.9.4: Severity of restriced work day cases onshore & offshore average days of restricted work per RWDC [Data page B-6] Offshore Onshore Overall OGP 2-17

34 International Association of Oil & Gas Producers 2.1 Incident triangles Year Ratio of lost time injuries to fatalities Ratio of total recordable injuries to fatalities :1 73: :1 72: :1 93: :1 6: :1 63:1 In this section the relative numbers of types of occupational injury are shown in the form of incident triangles. The ratios have been corrected to account for the absence, in some data submissions, of medical treatment cases. 213 incident triangles Overall 1 fatality 21 lost time injuries 73 recordable injuries Company 1 fatality 21 lost time injuries 48 recordable injuries Contractor 1 fatality 21 lost time injuries 79 recordable injuries 212 incident triangles Lost time injuries Lost work day cases and fatalities. Recordable injuries Fatalities, lost work day cases, restricted work day cases and medical treatment cases. Data are only included where medical treatment cases are reported for the data set. Ratio of lost time injuries to fatalities The number of lost time injuries divided by the total number of fatalities (Lost time injuries/ fatalities). Ratio of total recordable injuries to fatalities The number of recordable injuries divided by the total number of fatalities (recordable injuries/fatalities). Overall 1 fatality 2 lost time injuries 72 recordable injuries Company 1 fatality 28 lost time injuries 69 recordable injuries Contractor 1 fatality 18 lost time injuries 72 recordable injuries 2-18 OGP

35 Safety performance indicators 213 data The varying ratio of fatalities to lost time injuries to recordable injuries for challenges the traditional notion of recordable injuries and lost time injuries overall as a precursor to fatalities as shown in the incident triangles. In some incident categories however such as confined space, assault or violent act and water related, drowning, the ratio will be higher as shown in the tables below. Category LTIs (fatalities+lwdcs) Fatalities Ratio LTI: Fatality Assault or violent act :1 Caught in, under or between :1 Confined space 4 n/a Cut, puncture, scrape 99 n/a Explosions or burns :1 Exposure electrical :1 Exposure noise, chemical, biological, vibration :1 Falls from height :1 Overexertion, strain :1 Pressure release :1 Slips and trips (at same height) 279 n/a Struck by :1 Water related, drowning :1 Other :1 Activity LTIs (fatalities+lwdcs) Fatalities Ratio LTI: Fatality Construction, commissioning, decommissioning :1 Diving, subsea, ROV 9 n/a Drilling, workover, well services :1 Lifting, crane, rigging, deck operations :1 Maintenance, inspection, testing :1 Office, warehouse, accommodation, catering 136 n/a Production operations :1 Seismic / survey operations :1 Transport air :1 Transport land :1 Transport water, incl. marine activity :1 Unspecified other :1 OGP 2-19

36 International Association of Oil & Gas Producers 2.11 Causal factors analysis The allocation of causal factors to fatal incidents and high potential events was requested as part of the 213 data submission. This request was first made in 21, therefore a comparison of four years of data is possible. To standardise the response an OGP list of causal factors and a glossary was provided to the member companies as part of the OGP User Guide. The causal factors list is divided into two sections: People (Acts) classifications usually involve either the actions of a person or actions which were required but not carried out or were incorrectly performed. There are four major categories of actions, with an additional level of detail under each of the major categories. Process (Conditions) classifications usually involve some type of physical hazard or organizational aspect out of the control of the individual. There are five major classification categories, with an additional level of detail under each of the major categories. 2-2 OGP

37 Safety performance indicators 213 data Fatal incident causal factors Causal factors are divided into two separate groups, People (Acts) and Process (Conditions), see OGP User Guide (Report 213su) and Glossary for details. 34 of the 43 fatal incidents reported were assigned causal factors (47 of 52 in 212) 222 causal factors were assigned for the 43 fatal incidents Between 2 and 16 causal factors were assigned per incident (between 1 and 11 in 212). Causal factors assigned for fatal incidents People (acts) Process (conditions): The causal factors assigned to fatal incidents are shown below. The highlighted content indicates the top 1 causal factors assigned to fatal incidents in 213 compared with 212, 211 and 21. Seven of the ten were the same for all four years. Additional information on the fatal incidents reported by region can be found on the OGP Safety Zone website: The information provided includes a narrative description of the incident, the corrective actions and recommendations and the causal factors assigned by the reporting company. Note: the top 11 causal factors have been shown for 213, as both the 1th and 11th most common causal factors were both assigned to 9 of the incidents. Similarly the top 12 causal factors have been shown for 212, as the top 9th, 1th, 11th and 12th causal factors were each assigned 7 times. Causal factors assigned for fatal incidents Process (conditions): Organisational: Inadequate training/competence People (acts): Inattention/Lack of Awareness: Improper decision making or lack of judgment Process (conditions): Organisational: Inadequate work standards/procedures Process (conditions): Organisational: Inadequate supervision Process (conditions): Organisational: Inadequate hazard identification or risk assessment People (acts): Following Procedures: Improper position (in the line of fire) People (acts): Following Procedures: Violation unintentional (by individual or group) People (acts): Use of Tools, Equipment, Materials and Products: Improper use/position of tools/equipment/materials/products Process (conditions): Protective Systems: Inadequate/defective guards or protective barriers Process (conditions): Tools, Equipment, Materials & Products: Inadequate/defective tools/equipment/materials/products Process (conditions): Tools, Equipment, Materials & Products: Inadequate maintenance/inspection/testing Process (conditions): Organisational: Inadequate communication People (acts): Use of Protective Methods: Equipment or materials not secured People (acts): Use of Protective Methods: Inadequate use of safety systems People (acts): Use of Protective Methods: Personal Protective Equipment not used or used improperly Process (conditions): Organisational: Poor leadership/organisational culture People (acts): Use of Protective Methods: Failure to warn of hazard Process (conditions): Protective Systems: Inadequate/defective warning systems/safety devices Process (conditions): Protective Systems: Inadequate/defective Personal Protective Equipment Process (conditions): Tools, Equipment, Materials & Products: Inadequate design/specification/management of change People (acts): Inattention/Lack of Awareness: Lack of attention/distracted by other concerns/stress People (acts): Following Procedures: Improper lifting or loading People (acts): Use of Tools, Equipment, Materials and Products: Servicing of energized equipment/inadequate energy isolation People (acts): Use of Protective Methods: Disabled or removed guards, warning systems or safety devices Process (conditions): Work Place Hazards: Inadequate surfaces, floors, walkways or roads Process (conditions): Work Place Hazards: Hazardous atmosphere (explosive/toxic/asphyxiant) Process (conditions): Work Place Hazards: Storms or acts of nature People (acts): Following Procedures: Work or motion at improper speed People (acts): Following Procedures: Violation intentional (by individual or group) Process (conditions): Organisational: Failure to report/learn from events Process (conditions): Protective Systems: Inadequate security provisions or systems Process (conditions): Work Place Hazards: Congestion, clutter or restricted motion People (acts): Following Procedures: Overexertion or improper position/posture for task 1 3 People (acts): Inattention/Lack of Awareness: Acts of violence People (acts): Inattention/Lack of Awareness: Use of drugs or alcohol 1 People (acts): Inattention/Lack of Awareness: Fatigue 1 1 OGP 2-21