Rainy River District School Board SECTION 3
|
|
|
- Tiffany Taylor
- 10 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Rainy River District School Board SECTION 3 Personnel PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL PROCEDURE PURPOSE 3.46 The purpose of the performance appraisal is to evaluate job performance in the probationary term for new staff and provide feedback on job performance for permanent staff. RATIONALE Regular performance appraisals support staff in developing the competencies they require to fulfil their role to the highest standard. GUIDELINES 1.0 General Guidelines 1.1 Performance appraisals are designed to: Align individual objectives and initiatives with the Board s strategic direction; Encourage meaningful communication between employees and supervisors; Identify areas that require further professional development and personal growth; Provide appropriate and timely feedback to employees regarding their performance; Improve organizational effectiveness. 1.2 Supervisors will use the appropriate form found on the Board s Form page. 2.0 Conducting Performance Appraisals 2.1 The Board shall evaluate the performance of the Director of Education in accordance with criteria established and approved by the Board. The Board shall evaluate the Director s performance based on Board Policy 3.40 Director s Performance Review. 2.2 The Director of Education shall be responsible for the performance appraisal of the Board s supervisory officers as per the Ministry of Education s Supervisory Officer Performance Appraisal system. 2.3 Supervisory Officers shall supervise and evaluate the performance of all principals, managers and other support staff for whom they are responsible. Principal and vice principal performance appraisals will be as per the Education Act and the Ministry of Education s Principal and Vice Principal Performance Appraisal Manual. 2.4 Managers shall supervise and evaluate the performance of all support staff for whom they are responsible.
2 2.5 School Administration shall be responsible for the supervision and evaluation of all employees who are assigned to a school. Teachers will be appraised as per the Education Act and the Ministry of Education s Teacher Performance Appraisal Manual. 2.6 All other employees - Managers, Non-Union, Designated Early Childhood Educators, Education Support Personnel, Secretaries, Caretakers, and Maintenance Staff will follow the process outlined in sections 3.0 and 4.0 below. 2.7 Upon completion of the appraisal process, the employee will be provided a signed copy of the appraisal and a copy will be forwarded to Human Resources to be placed in the employee s personnel file. 3.0 Probationary Employees Managers, Non-Union, Designated Early Childhood Educators, Education Support Personnel, Secretaries, Caretakers, and Maintenance Staff 3.1 Managers and non-union staff, except non-union secretaries, will be appraised using the Performance Framework for Non-Union Staff. 3.2 Designated Early Childhood Educators (DECEs) will be appraised using the DECE Performance Appraisal. Educational Support Personnel (ESP) will be appraised using the Educational Support Personnel Performance Appraisal. Secretaries, caretakers, and maintenance staff will be appraised using the Performance Appraisal for Non-Classroom Staff. 3.3 For managers, non-union staff, DECEs, ESPs, secretaries, caretakers, and maintenance staff, the Performance Appraisal form is independently completed by these staff members prior to the joint meeting. The final Performance Appraisal score reflects input from the employee and the supervisor. The final score is the supervisor score. 3.4 The Performance Appraisal shall be completed at least two weeks prior to the end of the probationary term of employment. If the result of the appraisal is satisfactory (as per the applicable performance appraisal report), the probationary employee is recommended for permanent employment. If the result of the appraisal is not satisfactory (as per the applicable performance appraisal report) the probationary employee may receive an additional three month term of probation, followed by a second appraisal, or termination. 3.5 Probationary term timelines are noted in current collective agreements (Educational Support Personnel, CUPE) or General Terms and Conditions of Employment for Non- Union and Non-Teaching Employees (non-union employees). 3.6 Support staff recommended for permanent employment shall receive a performance appraisal in the next year of employment after completing probation, and then at least every five years.
3 4.0 Permanent Employees - Managers, Non-Union, Designated Early Childhood Educators, Education Support Personnel, Secretaries, Caretakers, and Maintenance Staff 4.1 Appraisals for permanent employees will be conducted using the evaluation reports outlined in 3.1 and The performance appraisal report will be completed by the supervisor prior to an interview with the employee. The supervisor and the support staff employee shall meet to review the performance appraisals completed by each party. The supervisor will complete the final performance appraisal and provide recommendations regarding job performance and continued employment. 4.3 Support staff will independently complete the performance appraisal prior to meeting with the supervisor for an interview to review the results of the performance appraisal. 4.4 If the result of the appraisal is satisfactory (as per the applicable performance appraisal report), this appraisal will be repeated at least every five years. If the result of the appraisal is not satisfactory (as per the applicable performance appraisal report), this appraisal may be repeated within three months. If the result of the second appraisal is unsatisfactory, the support staff will be terminated. 5.0 Employees in Temporary/Long-Term Assignments 5.1 A performance appraisal will be prepared once prior to the conclusion of the assignment of a casual employee to their first temporary assignment for a period of six months, or longer. 5.2 A performance appraisal will be prepared once prior to the conclusion of the assignment of an occasional teacher to their first long-term assignment for a period of four months, or longer since the implementation of the OT Evaluation process in September, A performance appraisal will be prepared once prior to the conclusion of the assignment of a permanent employee to their first temporary assignment outside of their own job classification for a period of six months or longer. 5.4 The above performance appraisals will be conducted as follows: Managers and Non-union staff, excluding non-union secretaries, will be appraised using the Performance Framework for Non-Union Staff. Designated Early Childhood Educators (DECEs) will be appraised using the DECE Performance Appraisal. Educational Support Personnel (ESP) will be appraised using the Educational Support Personnel Performance Appraisal. Secretaries, caretakers, and maintenance staff will be appraised using the Performance Appraisal for Non-Classroom Staff. Long Term Occasional Teachers will be appraised using the Long Term Occasional (LTO) Teacher Evaluation process as outlined in Procedure 3.88, Occasional Teacher Evaluation.
4 6.0 Record Keeping 6.1 Upon hire or upon the return of a permanent employee from a leave of absence, the Human Resources Department will update the schedule for the school or department, outlining those employees who require a performance appraisal. 6.2 Human Resources will record the date of completion of the performance appraisal for the support staff employee and safely file the completed performance appraisal in the Human Resources Department. Human Resources will also record in the schedule the due date of the next performance appraisal. 6.3 On May 1st of each year, Human Resources will advise Principals of outstanding performance appraisals. On June 1 of each year Human Resources will advise the Superintendents of Education of outstanding performance appraisals. Permission is required from the Superintendent of Education to defer a performance appraisal to another school year. Definitions: For the purpose of this procedure, supervisor shall mean: i) principal / vice principal ii) immediate site supervisor For the purpose of this procedure, support staff shall mean: i) Educational Support Personnel (Education Assistant, Communication Assistant, Library Assistant, Library Technician, Medical Education Assistant). ii) CUPE Employees (Head Maintenance/Area Supervisor, Maintenance I,II,II, IV, Head Caretaker/Lead Custodian, Caretaker/Custodial, Van Driver/Caretaker, Accounting Clerk 2, 3,4, Secretary 1/Accounting Clerk 1, Secretary I, II, III,IV, Transportation Coordinator, Early Childhood Educator). iii) Non-union employees (Executive Assistant, Administrative Assistant, Human Resources Coordinator, Accountant, Communications Officer, Network Technician, School Attendance Counsellor). For the purpose of this procedure, long term occasional teacher shall mean an occasional teacher assignment of 4 months or more.
5 CROSS REFERENCE Supervisory Officer Appraisal Report Ministry of Education Teacher Performance Manual Procedure 3.88 Occasional Teacher Evaluation Performance Framework for Non- Union Staff Designated Early Childhood Educators Educational Support Personnel Non-Classroom Staff DATE REVIEWED January, 2015 LEGAL/MINISTRY OF EDUCATION REFERENCE Education Act Ontario Regulation 274/12
CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE REVIEW PROCEDURAL GUIDELINES
INTRODUCTION CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE REVIEW PROCEDURAL GUIDELINES The City of Corpus Christi's Performance Management Process is designed to: 1. Communicate performance expectations
POLICY STATEMENT AND REGULATIONS
POLICY STATEMENT AND REGULATIONS Number 100.16 EXEMPT STAFF PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL POLICY POLICY: All exempt District staff shall have their performance reviewed 1) twice during any probationary period
HUMAN RESOURCES DEPARTMENT. Guide to Evaluating Classified Employees
HUMAN RESOURCES DEPARTMENT Guide to Evaluating Classified Employees HUMAN RESOURCES DEPARTMENT Guide to Evaluating Classified Employees San Juan Unified School District 3738 Walnut Ave. Carmichael, CA
Brant Haldimand Norfolk Catholic District School Board
Brant Haldimand Norfolk Catholic District School Board POLICY: PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL FOR NON-TEACHING STAFF Adopted: 10/02/04 Policy No: 300.06 Former Policy #: Revised: 22/06/10 Policy Category: Human
Teacher Performance Appraisal. Frequently Asked Questions. Table of Contents. Classroom Observation & Pre- and Post-Observation Meetings 9
Teacher Performance Appraisal Frequently Asked Questions Table of Contents TOPIC PAGE General 2 Responsibility for Conducting Appraisals 4 Frequency 5 Competency Statements 6 Annual Learning Plan 7 Scheduling
Administrative Procedure Manual Human Resources: Evaluations Secretary AP: 209C
Name: School: Employment Date: Length of time in present position: Performance Appraisal Date: Appraiser Name & Position: Note: Additional bullets can be used to adapt the evaluation for mutually agreed
PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL PROFESSIONAL STUDENT SERVICES PERSONNEL (PSSP)
BOARD PROCEDURE Approval Date 2015 Review Date 2020 Contact Person/Department Human Resources Administrator Replacing All previous procedures Page 1 of 20 Identification HR 4525 PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL PROFESSIONAL
ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURE. Teacher Performance Appraisal
ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURE HR113 Teacher Performance Appraisal Board Received: Review Date: Accountability: 1. Frequency of Reports As needed 2. Severity Threshold As needed (eg. Changes in Ministry guidelines/collective
PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL
Aligns employee performance plans with organizational goals Focuses employees on achieving results Requires employee performance plans to include clear performance elements (expectations) with measurable
STAFF PERFORMANCE EVALUATION QUESTIONNAIRE
STAFF PERFORMANCE EVALUATION QUESTIONNAIRE JOB PERFORMANCE OF: EVALUATION PERIOD: FROM TO DATE: Dear Colleague: The assessment procedure for Support Staff includes evaluations by co- workers and other
The University of Southern Mississippi Performance Appraisal Instructions
Performance Appraisal Instructions Instructions: A current job description is needed to complete this performance appraisal. Essential tasks are numbered on the job description, and these task numbers
Annual Performance Evaluation Form
Annual Performance Evaluation Form Instructions & Guidelines Performance Evaluation Form Instructions: The purpose of this performance evaluation form is to establish goals and expectations for the current
Jolie Wineroth, Executive Director Human Resources
HUMAN RESOURCES Jolie Wineroth, Senior Executive Director 555 Franklin Street, San Francisco, CA 94102-5299 (415) 241-6144 Fax (415) 241-6147 E-Mail: [email protected] September, 2008 MEMORANDUM TO:
PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL FOR MIDDLE MANAGEMENT
BOARD PROCEDURE Approval Date 2010 Review Date 2015 Contact Person/Department Human Resources Administrator Replacing All previous policies Page 1 of 12 Identification HR-4540 PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL FOR
PERFORMANCE EVALUATIONS
PERFORMANCE EVALUATIONS INDEX CODE: 707 EFFECTIVE DATE: 07-06-15 Contents: I. Policy II. Objectives of Performance Evaluation III. Elements of the System IV. Responsibilities V. Frequency & Types VI. Utilization
Performance Management
Performance Management PURPOSE... 1 POLICY STATEMENT... 2 WHO SHOULD KNOW THIS POLICY... 2 DEFINITIONS... 2 REGULATIONS... 3 1.0 TIMING AND FREQUENCY OF APPRAISALS... 3 2.0 PERFORMANCE PLANNING... 3 2.1
Chabot-Las Positas College Community District
Chabot-Las Positas College Community District CLASSIFIED EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE EVALUATION Employee Name (First, Middle, Last): Employee Position Title: Please Check Type of Report Probation: 3-mo, 5-mo;
School Based Salary Scales
Frontier School Division School Based Salary Scales Non-Unionized Support Staff Effective July 1, 2015 SCHOOL BASED SALARY SCALES INDEX Salary Scales Page 3 Custodian, Security, Kitchen Page 3 Maintenance
Staff Performance Review Policy and Procedure
Staff Performance Review Policy and Procedure Policy/Document Approval Body: Governance Board Date Created: 26 October 2012 Policy Custodian: Policy Contact: File Location: Location on EIT website: Review
STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM Name Social Security No. Agency Department Position Classification Date Assigned to Current Position Performance Review From To PLANNING STAGE
Performance Appraisal Handbook For Supervisors. For the evaluation of Non-Instructional Academic Staff (NIAS) and University Staff
Performance Appraisal Handbook For Supervisors For the evaluation of Non-Instructional Academic Staff (NIAS) and University Staff Department of Human Resources May 2013 Introduction Performance management
Performance Appraisal: Director of Education. Date of Next Review: September 2015 (every 2 years)
POLICY SECTION: SUB-SECTION: POLICY NAME: POLICY NO: Board of Trustees Director Performance Appraisal: Director of Education H.C.06 Date Approved: September 26, 2013 Date of Next Review: September 2015
EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL POLICY
EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL POLICY Introduction: How to Use This Tool Employee performance appraisals are usually completed at least once per year in almost every organization. Performance appraisals
Department of Homeland Security Management Directive System MD Number: 3180 SENIOR EXECUTIVE SERVICE PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT
Department of Homeland Security Management Directive System MD Number: 3180 SENIOR EXECUTIVE SERVICE PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT 1. Purpose This directive establishes Department of Homeland Security (DHS) policy
Sample Performance Appraisal
Sample Performance Appraisal Employee Name: Employee Job Title: Review Period Start: Review Period End: Hire Date: Location: Supervisor: Appraisal Date: General Information The purpose of the review is
Human Resources 2014 2015 REORGANIZATION 1
Human Resources 2014 2015 REORGANIZATION 1 Table of Contents I. Our Focus 3 II. How We Get There 4 III. Organizational Charts 5-9 IV. Summary of Reorganization 10-13 V. Buckets of Work for 2014-2015 13
SMITHSONIAN DIRECTIVE 212, Federal Personnel Handbook, Chapter 430 NON-SENIOR-LEVEL PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL PROGRAM
SMITHSONIAN DIRECTIVE 212, Federal Personnel Handbook, Chapter 430 September 30, 2010 NON-SENIOR-LEVEL PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL PROGRAM Purpose 1 Policy 1 Coverage 2 Exclusions 2 Definitions 3 Responsibilities
Regulations for the Degree of Doctorate in Clinical Psychology (Clin Psy D)
Regulations for the Degree of Doctorate in Clinical Psychology (Clin Psy D) SCHOOL OF MEDICINE HEALTH POLICY AND PRACTICE Alterations to the programmes of courses and seminars published in these Regulations
1. The Director of Human Resources (Staffing) shall have the general qualifications of a teacher as prescribed by the State Department of Education.
DIRECTOR OF HUMAN RESOURCES (STAFFING) A. QUALIFICATIONS: 1. The Director of Human Resources (Staffing) shall have the general qualifications of a teacher as prescribed by the State Department of Education.
GENERAL SCHOOL ADMINISTRATION
SECTION C GENERAL SCHOOL ADMINISTRATION Section C provides a repository for statements about the school district management, the administrative structure, school building, and department administration.
Regulations for the Degree of Doctorate in Clinical Psychology (ClinPsyD)
Regulations for the Degree of Doctorate in Clinical Psychology (ClinPsyD) 1 SCOPE OF THESE REGULATIONS 1.1 These regulations govern the award of the degree of Doctorate in Clinical Psychology. 1.2 A candidate
FANSHAWE COLLEGE POLICY MANUAL TITLE: PERFORMANCE PLANNING, REVIEW AND COMPENSATION ADJUSTMENT - ADMINISTRATIVE EMPLOYEES 1-B-25
1. ADMINISTRATIVE POLICIES AND PROCEDURES SECTION B -HUMAN RESOURCES TITLE: PERFORMANCE PLANNING, REVIEW AND COMPENSATION ADJUSTMENT - ADMINISTRATIVE EMPLOYEES 1-B-25 POLICY NUMBER: EFFECTIVE: 2012 04
SECTION III. The Responsibilities of School Counselors And Other Staff Members
SECTION III The Responsibilities of School Counselors And Other Staff Members Counselors Orientation Professional school counselors accept the responsibility to help all students through a systematically
B. Probationary Evaluations
A.R. Number: 5.7 Effective Date: 2/1/2007 Page: 1 of 9 I. PURPOSE A. This policy outlines the Employee Performance Evaluation System (EPES) and the process to be followed for evaluating City of Richmond
Performance Appraisal Process
Table of Contents Essential Process Deadline Dates... 3 Mission, Strategic Priorities, Strategic Theme... 4 Process Description... 5 Components... 5 Major Areas of Performance Appraisal... 8 Performance
LOS ANGELES UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT Policy Bulletin
TITLE: NUMBER: ISSUER: Performance Evaluation for UTLA Bargaining Unit Personnel John E. Deasy, Ph.D. Superintendent Justo Avila, Chief Human Resources Officer Human Resources Division Rachel Bonkovsky,
EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL FORM
EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL FORM Name: Job Title: Date: Department: Type of Appraisal: Annual Probationary Self Evaluation Appraisal Period: From: To: Instructions: Please carefully review the employee
THE SCHOOL BOARD OF ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA TEACHER PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL SYSTEM, 2014-2015 TABLE OF CONTENTS
, 2014-2015 TABLE OF CONTENTS Purpose and Key Components... 1 1. Core of Effective Practices... 1 2. Student Growth... 2 3. Evaluation Rating Criteria... 13 4. Teacher and Principal Involvement... 14 5.
NOT APPLICABLE (N/A): Reviewer has no direct knowledge of employee's behavior in this area. Job Knowledge Score: / 5.0
Manager Performance Appraisal Appraisal Score Overall Score: / 5.0 Employee Information Name: Manager Name: Job Title: Department: Hire Date: Rating Scale Definition (5) EXCEPTIONAL: Consistently exceeds
*This is a sample only actual evaluations must completed and submitted in PeopleSoft*
*This is a sample only actual evaluations must completed and submitted in PeopleSoft* Employee information Employee name Position title/department Date of Hire Employee ID number Supervisor s name Today
Bloomfield College Staff Employee Performance Review 2014-15
Bloomfield College Staff Employee Performance Review 2014-15 Employee Name: Position: Evaluator: Department: Date of Evaluation: Date of Hire: 1. Summary of departmental mission and customer service philosophy:
College of Design. Merit Pay Rating System. Merit Rating System
College of Design Merit Pay Rating System Merit Rating System The College of Design will use the Performance Only model of merit pay. Merit rating system and definition a. Merit pay matrix if defined at
ACCIDENT AND INCIDENT REPORTING (Incidents Involving Accident, Personal Injury, Assaults, Property Loss, Damage or Theft) NEPN Code: EBBB.
ACCIDENT AND INCIDENT REPORTING (Incidents Involving Accident, Personal Injury, Assaults, Property Loss, Damage or Theft) Rationale: Timely reporting of accidents and incidents in a consistent manner is
Manchester Community Schools Bus Driver Performance Appraisal
Manchester Community Schools Bus Driver Performance Appraisal Performance Appraisal Full Performance Appraisal and Development Plan Probationary Appraisal 3 Month 6 Month Employee s name (Last, First,
Boston University. 2015 Performance Evaluation Program. Administrative Employees Exempt and Non-Exempt
Boston University 2015 Performance Evaluation Program Administrative Employees Exempt and Non-Exempt (excludes staff covered by Collective Bargaining Agreements and Certain Contracts) October 2015 TABLE
Chapter 8a Public Education Human Resource Management Act. Part 1 General Provisions
Chapter 8a Public Education Human Resource Management Act Part 1 General Provisions 53A-8a-101 Title. This chapter is known as the "Public Education Human Resource Management Act." 53A-8a-102 Definitions.
TEACHER PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL. Technical Requirements Manual
TEACHER PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL Technical Requirements Manual 2010 This publication is available on the Ministry of Education s website at www.edu.gov.on.ca. Une publication équivalente est disponible en
CURRITUCK COUNTY CLASSIFICATION BY SALARY GRADE FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDING JUNE 30, 2016
SALARY GRADE SALARY RANGE CLASSIFICATION 50 $23,346-$32,000 Custodian 50.5 $24,670-$34,440 Senior Center Assistant Coordinator 51 $25,241-$34,653 Maintenance Helper Park Attendant Rural Attendant 52 $27,135-$37,343
Teacher Assistant Performance Evaluation Plan. Maine Township High School District 207. Our mission is to improve student learning.
2012 2015 Teacher Assistant Performance Evaluation Plan Maine Township High School District 207 Our mission is to improve student learning. 0 P age Teacher Assistant Performance Evaluation Program Table
ONTARIO LEADERSHIP STRATEGY. Principal/ Vice-Principal Performance Appraisal
ONTARIO LEADERSHIP STRATEGY Principal/ Vice-Principal Performance Appraisal T E C H N I C A L R E Q U I R E M E N T S M A N U A L 2013 Contents PREFACE...3 1 INTRODUCTION 1.1 Context: The Ontario Leadership
PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL SYSTEM
County of Greenville PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL SYSTEM THE DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN RESOURCES Employee Performance Appraisal System Purpose The County of Greenville performance appraisal system is designed to accomplish
Department of Management Services Division of Human Resource Management PROGRAM GUIDELINES
Department of Management Services Division of Human Resource Management PROGRAM GUIDELINES SUBJECT: Administration of the Performance Management Process STATUTORY/RULE REFERENCE: EFFECTIVE DATE: Section
HALIFAX REGIONAL SCHOOL BOARD Creating Conditions to Support Student Success in our Priority Schools
Public x Report No. 2015-10-38 Private Date: October 28, 2015 HALIFAX REGIONAL SCHOOL BOARD Creating Conditions to Support Student Success in our Priority Schools PURPOSE: To provide the Governing Board
DMA POLICY: 3-05-01-2013 NAME: PAY PLAN POLICY
DMA POLICY: 3-05-01-2013 NAME: PAY PLAN POLICY EFFECTIVE DATE: September 1.2013 I. PURPOSE The purpose of this document is to summarize the Department program for implementing compensation under the broadband
Policy Title Fringe Benefits & Salary Code No. 402.40
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 West Ada School District, Meridian CLASSIFIED PERSONNEL
MADISON METROPOLITAN SCHOOL DISTRICT HUMAN RESOURCE POLICIES AND PROCEDURES LEAVES OF ABSENCE WITHOUT PAY: NON-MEDICAL AND MEDICAL
MADISON METROPOLITAN SCHOOL DISTRICT HUMAN RESOURCE POLICIES AND PROCEDURES LEAVES OF ABSENCE WITHOUT PAY: LEAVES OF ABSENCE WITHOUT PAY: NON-MEDICAL AND MEDICAL I. Non-Medical Leaves Without Pay A. Personal
Support Services Evaluation Handbook
Support Services Evaluation Handbook for members of Paraprofessionals and School-Related Personnel (PRSP), Baltimore Teachers Union, Local 340 City Union of Baltimore (CUB), Local 800 Baltimore City Public
Director of Human Resources and Employee Performance
JOB DESCRIPTION Niles Township High School District 219 Director of Human Resources and Employee Performance REPORTS TO : POSITION OBJECTIVE : Assistant Superintendent of Human Resources To support the
Policy Title Fringe Benefits & Salary Code No. 402.40
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 REVISED FIRST READING JANUARY 13, 2015 Joint School
POLICY. Principal/Vice Principal Selection Process
POLICY HR6 Principal/Vice Principal Selection Process Board Received: January 30, 2012 Review Date: February 2015 Policy Statement: It is the policy of the Grand Erie District School Board to select and
DISTRICT: Date Submitted to DOE: Contact Person s Name Title. Phone # E mail:
Review and Approval Checklist for RTTT Principal Evaluation Systems 6 1 2011 *represents beginning of change and # represents end of change. * Modified to Reflect Statutory Changes 4/12/11 # DISTRICT:
Executive Summary. This procedure supports Priority #4 of the Board Improvement Plan which states:
Executive Summary Policy and Procedure #409.0, Licensed Child Care in Schools Procedure #409.1, Security for Licensed Child Care and Before and After Care Programs in Schools Application Policy and Procedure
York Catholic District School Board
Ministry of Education York Catholic District School Board Follow-up Report to the Operational Review August 2012 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION... 1 2. STATUS AND IMPLEMENTATION UPDATE... 3 3. GOVERNANCE
Special Pay Increase (SPI) Guidelines For USPS and A&P Positions
Salary increases that are not a result of a new hire, promotion, reclassification, conversion, or mandated raise process fall under the category of Special Pay Increases (SPI s). Such increases can be
SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 71 (COMOX VALLEY) PAY GRADE CLASSIFICATION
SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 71 (COMOX VALLEY) PAY GRADE CLASSIFICATION Pay Job Title Description Location Grade Schedule Electrician Chargehand Maintenance 13 B Plumber/Heating Mechanic Chargehand Maintenance
~~4 <l,.p. Human Resources Director
Approved: City of Riverside, California Human Resources Policy and Procedure Manual ~~4
DETERMINATION OF SALARY SCHEDULES
CHAPTER XII: SALARIES, OVERTIME PAY, AND BENEFITS RULE 12.1 DETERMINATION OF SALARY SCHEDULES Section 12.1.1 Fixing Annual Salary Schedules 12.1.2 Factors in Salary Determination 12.1.3 Salary Studies
1.2 School teacher qualifications are required for employment in all school teacher (classroom teacher and school leader) positions in the
Policy Title: School Teacher Qualifications Published: 2009 Identifier: STQ200908 Legislation: Public Sector Management Act 1994 Public Sector Management Standards Education Act 2004 1. POLICY STATEMENT
Teacher Evaluation Plan and Handbook Of Procedures. Mr. Arne Duncan Chief Executive Officer Chicago Public Schools
Teacher Evaluation Plan and Handbook Of Procedures Mr. Arne Duncan Chief Executive Officer Chicago Public Schools CONTENTS Introduction 3 Educational Roles 3 Teacher Long-Range Plans 4 Classroom Teachers
CENTRAL WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY GUIDELINES FOR SCHOOL PSYCHOLOGY INTERNSHIP PROGRAMS
CENTRAL WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY GUIDELINES FOR SCHOOL PSYCHOLOGY INTERNSHIP PROGRAMS Rationale Over the past two decades, the role and function of school psychologists has been changing and expanding. While
Cape Elizabeth School Department Job Description. TITLE: Director of Special Education QUALIFICATIONS: Education /Certification
TITLE: Director of Special Education QUALIFICATIONS: Education /Certification Cape Elizabeth School Department Job Description Maine Department of Education certification as Administrator of Special Education/State
Performance Evaluation System Protocol. Licensed Executive Professionals
Colorado Springs School District 11 Dr. Nicholas Gledich, Superintendent Performance Evaluation System Protocol Licensed Executive Professionals Revised March 2014 235169.6 Department of Human Resources
F. PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL AND DEVELOPMENT SYSTEM
F. PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL AND DEVELOPMENT SYSTEM GENERAL POLICY It is the policy of Scott County to regularly evaluate the work performance of its employees and provide them with relevant feedback to enable