Resistance of Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients to Changing Therapy
|
|
- Allison Johns
- 8 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 ARTHRITIS & RHEUMATISM Vol. 56, No. 7, July 2007, pp DOI /art , American College of Rheumatology Resistance of Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients to Changing Therapy Discordance Between Disease Activity and Patients Treatment Choices Frederick Wolfe 1 and Kaleb Michaud 2 Objective. Despite advances in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) treatment, patients decisions regarding therapy often deviate from expert recommendation. This study was undertaken to investigate patients acceptance and satisfaction with therapy, willingness to change therapy, and reasons for not changing. Methods. Participants (n 6,135) completed an 11-item questionnaire concerning treatment preferences. Eight questions assessed reasons for not wanting to change therapy. The contribution of individual predictors was determined by logistic regression analysis. Results. Questionnaire responses showed that 63.8% of the patients would not want to change therapy as long as their condition didn t get worse; 77.3% were satisfied with their medications, while 9.4% were dissatisfied. These assessments were weakly related to RA activity and functional status. Side effects had occurred in 22.4% of the patients during the previous 6 months, and in 65.5% at some period during their lifetime. Predictors of unwillingness to change therapy were satisfaction with RA control, which had an odds ratio (OR) of 6.8 (95% confidence interval [95% CI] ), risk of side effects (OR 4.4 [95% CI ]), physician opinion (OR 1.9 [95% CI ]), fear of loss of control (OR 1.8 [95% CI ]), lack of better medications (OR 1.4 [95% CI ]), and costs (OR 1.3 [95% CI ]). There was little difference in 1 Frederick Wolfe, MD: National Data Bank for Rheumatic Diseases, Wichita, Kansas; 2 Kaleb Michaud, PhD: National Data Bank for Rheumatic Diseases, Wichita, Kansas, and University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha. Address correspondence and reprint requests to Frederick Wolfe, MD, National Data Bank for Rheumatic Diseases, 1035 North Emporia, Suite 230, Wichita, KS fwolfe@arthritisresearch.org. Submitted for publication October 30, 2006; accepted in revised form March 29, results between patients who were receiving biologic agents and those who were not. Conclusion. There is substantial discrepancy between declared satisfaction with therapy and measured RA activity and functional status. Most RA patients are satisfied with their therapy, even many with abnormal scores. Fear of loss of control of RA and fear of side effects are major patient concerns. Maintenance of current status, rather than future improvement, appears to be a high priority for patients. Important advances in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) treatment began with the availability of effective disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs), such as methotrexate (1). After use of methotrexate became common, studies showed that its effectiveness was related to dose, and that in the absence of adverse effects, 20 mg weekly was the appropriate dosage level (1). In contrast, the effects of most earlier DMARD therapies were relatively dose independent. This advance in effective, dose-dependent therapy was followed by the general availability of biologic therapy and the later demonstration that combinations of methotrexate and biologic agents are more effective than either treatment alone in relieving symptoms, improving function, and retarding radiographic erosion (2 6). Studies have also shown that simultaneous use of multiple DMARDs leads to improved outcomes (7,8), and, in some studies, treatment has resulted in profound improvement, even remission, in many users of biologic agents or combinations of biologic agents and DMARDs (2,6,9). Taken as a whole, these data imply that aggressive, high-dose, multiple-drug therapy, often including biologic agents, should be used to optimize treatment of RA. A second important treatment-related advance is the use of validated measurement tools to assess re- 2135
2 2136 WOLFE AND MICHAUD sponse to therapy. When response is judged to be inadequate, more aggressive therapy is said to be indicated. Tools for measuring response include the Disease Activity Score (10), the Simplified Disease Activity Index (11,12), the Clinical Disease Activity Index (11), and patient-based assessments such as the Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) (13), the Rheumatoid Arthritis Disease Activity Index (14), and the Patient Activity Scale (PAS) (15). Such tools are suitable for use in randomized clinical trials and clinical practice. The PAS is a 0 10 measure of RA disease activity in which higher values indicate greater RA disease activity. It is computed by multiplying the HAQ by 3.33 and then dividing the sum of the scores on a visual analog scale (VAS) for pain, VAS for global assessment, and (multiplied) HAQ by 3. Given the promise of effectiveness described above, one might expect that high-dose methotrexate, combination therapy, and biologic agents would be the treatment norm in clinical practice. However, that has not been the case. A number of factors might influence physicians current treatment recommendations. Published literature on large clinical studies of biologic agents has been available for only 6 years, and this might simply not be a long enough time to communicate the putative benefits of these agents to physicians and patients, despite marketing efforts by manufacturers of the drugs. It might also be that physicians do not believe the results of clinical trials can be extrapolated to clinical practice, or they may be concerned about possible shortor long-term side effects, or about costs (16 18). Another reason therapy is not as aggressive as often advocated may reflect issues or preferences that are important to patients but are not reflected in expert recommendations or in results of clinical trials. In this investigation we addressed patient preferences concerning RA therapy, starting with the often-heard patient comment, As long as I don t get worse I ll stay with my current treatment. We studied 6,135 RA patients with regard to their willingness or unwillingness to change therapies, their stated reasons for these decisions, including physician recommendations, and associated characteristics. PATIENTS AND METHODS In January 2006 we surveyed 6,135 patients with RA who were enrolled in a National Data Bank for Rheumatic Diseases longitudinal observational study regarding satisfaction with RA therapy and factors that might lead patients to change therapy. Participants were recruited from the practices of US rheumatologists, and are followed up prospectively with semiannual detailed, 28-page questionnaires, as previously Table 1. Treatment predictor variables and preference for not changing therapy Responses according to whether the statement As long as I don t get worse I wouldn t want to change my arthritis medications (question 1) was answered true or false Question All patients (n 6,135) (100.0%)* True (n 3,914) (63.8%)* False (n 2,221) (36.2%)* % difference (true false) (95% CI) 2. I don t need new medications because I am satisfied with the ( ) control I have over my arthritis. 3. I don t want the risk of side effects that might come from ( ) taking new medications. 4. I want to follow my doctor s suggestions, and my doctor ( ) thinks I don t need to change medications. 5. I am concerned that new treatments might not work as well ( ) and that I might lose control of my arthritis. 6. I don t think there are medications currently available that ( ) are better than the medications I am using now. 7. I don t want to take treatments that require injections or ( ) IVs. 8. I can t afford the cost of new medications ( ) 9. Getting approval from my insurance company and the hassle ( ) of tests and medical visits for new drugs are important problems for me. * Values are the percent of patients responding with agreement to the given question (questions 2 9) among the group of patients overall, the group responding true to question 1, and the group responding false to question 1. 95% CI 95% confidence interval; IVs intravenous treatments. The greater the difference, the stronger the association with unwillingness to change therapy.
3 RESISTANCE TO CHANGING THERAPY IN RA 2137 Table 2. Multivariable predictors of unwillingness to change therapy* Odds ratio Model 1 Model 2 Model 3 Model 4 RA control is satisfactory Risk of side effects Doctor thinks current medications are best Fear loss of control Can t afford new medication There is no better medication Don t want injections/ivs Too much hassle Age (per 10 years) Sex (male) Married College graduate Total income (per $10,000 [US]) Employed RA duration (years) Lifetime no. of DMARDs/biologic agents Currently taking a biologic agent Currently taking prednisone Currently taking methotrexate VAS pain (0 10) 0.95 HAQ disability (0 3) 1.02 AIC 5, , , , * In all models, n 6,135. RA rheumatoid arthritis; IVs intravenous treatments; DMARDs disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs; VAS visual analog scale; HAQ Health Assessment Questionnaire; AIC Akaike s information criterion. P P P described (17,19 22). RA was diagnosed by the patients rheumatologists. We obtained sociodemographic data including age, sex, education level, income, and employment status. We also obtained scores on disease-related patient outcomes, including HAQ disability scores (23), pain, and global severity, and with these values, assessed RA disease severity according to the PAS. Information on current and past RA therapy was recorded. Eleven questions specifically addressed issues regarding change of therapy and satisfaction with therapy. In question 1 (Table 1), patients reported whether or not they would change therapy, by endorsing the statement As long as I don t get worse I wouldn t want to change my arthritis medications. For simplicity in the descriptions below, we sometimes refer to the groups as those who would and those who would not change therapy, omitting the qualifier as long as I don t get worse. Questions 2 9 (Table 1), referred to below as treatment predictor questions, addressed reasons for patient unwillingness to change therapy. In question 10, patients rated their satisfaction with current treatment according to the following categories: very satisfied, somewhat satisfied, neither satisfied nor dissatisfied, somewhat dissatisfied, or very dissatisfied. Finally, in question 11, patients indicated, as a percent, how much more effective a medication would have to be before they would switch therapies. Multivariable analyses of the role of treatment predictors (questions 2 9) and other variables in relation to willingness to change therapy (question 1) were performed by logistic regression (Table 2). We calculated Akaike s information criterion (AIC), a method for selecting among nested models by applying a penalty for each included variable. In general, the preferred model is the one with the lowest AIC value. The percent of missing values per variable in Table 2 ranged from 0 to 3.5% except for total household income, for which the percent of missing values was 8.7%. To perform the multivariable regression optimally, we used multiple imputation of missing values by chained equations (MICE), as described by Royston and Cox (24,25). The 5 imputed data sets created by the MICE procedure were analyzed simultaneously. Group comparisons for other variables were performed using linear regression or chi-square analysis when appropriate. Correlation coefficients were determined by the Spearman method. The associations between treatment predictor variables and HAQ and PAS scores were measured using Kendall s tau-a and the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (26) (Table 3). ROC values can be interpreted as indicating no association ( ), poor ( ), fair ( ), good ( ), or excellent ( ). Kendall s tau is related mathematically to
4 2138 WOLFE AND MICHAUD Table 3. Association of activity-associated treatment predictor variables with HAQ and PAS scores* Tau-a (AUC ROC) 95% CI Question 2. I don t need new medications because I am satisfied with the control I have over my arthritis. HAQ (0.656) PAS (0.726) Question 3. I don t want the risk of side effects that might come from taking new medications. HAQ (0.532) PAS (0.567) Question 4. I want to follow my doctor s suggestions, and my doctor thinks I don t need to change medications. HAQ (0.591) PAS (0.646) Question 5. I am concerned that new treatments might not work as well and that I might lose control of my arthritis. HAQ (0.514) PAS (0.557) * HAQ Health Assessment Questionnaire; PAS Patient Activity Scale; AUC ROC area under the receiver operating characteristic curve; 95% CI 95% confidence interval. the area under the ROC curve. The tau-a allows rough understanding of the degree to which variables such as satisfaction with arthritis control are simultaneously associated with variables such as HAQ and PAS scores. Kendall s tau has a simple interpretation, i.e., the percent concordance between variables. For example, the value of shown in the first cell of Table 3 indicates that it is 15.5% more likely that a person with a low HAQ score will report being satisfied with control over arthritis activity than that a patient with a high HAQ score will report being satisfied with control over arthritis activity. Data were analyzed using Stata, version 9.2 (Stata- Corp, College Station, TX). P values less than 0.05 were considered significant. Confidence intervals (CIs) were established at 95%. All tests were 2-tailed. RESULTS The median age of the study participants was 62.7 years, and the median duration of RA was 14.8 years. Of the 6,135 study participants (20.1% male, 79.9% female), 63.8% reported that they would not want to change therapy as long as their condition didn t get worse (Table 1), including 61.8% of the patients who were currently using biologic agents and 65.9% of those who were not. Because this difference was small, we combined current users and nonusers of biologic agents in the analyses described below, except as described. Of the 55.6% of patients who were taking methotrexate, the mean and median weekly dosage was 15 mg. Table 1 presents the questionnaire statements about new (future) treatment and the relationship between such statements and unwillingness to change therapy. Generally, patients were concerned about the risk of side effects (72.5%) and losing control of their arthritis (68.1%). They indicated that they didn t want to change therapy because they were satisfied with their current arthritis control (53.3%), or felt that their doctor thought they did not need to change medications (71.5%), that there were no better medications than those they were currently taking (66.3%), and that the hassle of new tests and insurance approval was an important problem (54.6%). Fewer than half (42.7%) indicated that they couldn t afford new medications, and 35.7% did not want to take medications that required intravenous (IV) administration or injection. For each of the above statements, the percent difference between patients who would change therapy and those who would not was further examined (Table 1). The greater the difference, the stronger the association with unwillingness to change therapy. A difference of 56.5% was noted for satisfaction with arthritis control, followed by 40.1% for risk of side effects. Cost of medications (8.1%) and hassle factor (4.0%) appeared to play almost no role in differentiating those who would change medications from those who would not. Following their physicians instructions (36.1%), concern about loss of control (35%), no availability of better medication (27.2%), and not wishing to use IV medications or injections (16.0%) held the middle positions. The associations noted in Table 1 were not independent; therefore, we examined these factors in multivariable logistic regression models (Table 2). In the simplest model (model 1), satisfaction with RA control (odds ratio [OR] 7.3) and risk of side effects (OR 4.5) were the dominant correlates of unwillingness to change
5 RESISTANCE TO CHANGING THERAPY IN RA 2139 therapy. Also important, though less so, were the physician s opinion (OR 2.0), fear of loss of control (OR 1.8), and inability to afford new treatment (OR 1.5). To this simple model, we added demographic and psychosocial factors (model 2). Greater income (OR 0.95 per $10,000 [US]) and college education (OR 0.8) were associated with willingness to change therapy, while being married was associated with not wanting to change therapy. There was only a slight change in the OR of treatment predictor variables as an effect of the additional variables in this model. Addition of current use of prednisone, biologic agents, and methotrexate (model 3) resulted in essentially no change to the model. However, addition of HAQ and VAS pain scores to the model (model 4) did result in some changes. The use of biologic agents was associated with willingness to change therapy, as were higher pain scores. Methotrexate use was associated with unwillingness to change therapy. The final ORs for the treatment predictor variables were as follows: satisfaction with RA control 6.8 (95% CI ), risk of side effects 4.4 (95% CI ), physician s opinion 1.9 (95% CI ), fear of loss of control 1.8 (95% CI ), no better medication 1.4 (95% CI ), and inability to afford new treatment 1.3 (95% CI ). To gain insight into the role of adverse effects in willingness or unwillingness to change therapy, we examined patient-reported side effects. Of interest, 22.4% of the patients in this study reported experiencing side effects attributed to specific treatments during the previous 6 months, and 14.1% reported side effects attributed to DMARDs, biologic agents, or prednisone. Of the DMARD, biologic agent, or prednisone side effects, 34.2% were reported to be severe and 42.7% to be moderate. Approximately two-thirds (65.5%) of the RA patients reported having had a side effect to an arthritis medication at some point during their lifetime. Patients reporting side effects were more likely to be unwilling to change therapy (OR 1.8 [95% CI ]) and to be concerned about the risk of side effects (OR 1.2 [95% CI ]). We attempted to gauge quantitatively how much better a medication would have to be before patients would want to change therapy. Question 11 asked, Imagine that a medication is being developed for your rheumatic disease condition. How much more effective would the medication have to be compared with your current medications to make you switch to it? Choices of 0 100%, in point ranges, were presented. Patients who reported not wanting to change therapy (question 1) indicated that on average the medication would have to be 75.8% better before they would change therapy, compared with an average of 52.3% among patients who would change therapy (P 0.001). In addition, irrespective of patients replies regarding willingness to change therapy, users of biologic agents responded that they would have to have a medication that was 67.4% better than their current therapy in order for them to be willing to switch therapies, compared with 65.7% for nonusers of biologic agents (P 0.093). Associations between treatment predictors and overall satisfaction with measures of RA activity and severity. Table 3 presents selected treatment predictor variables and their relationship to RA activity as measured by the PAS, and to RA activity/severity as measured by the HAQ. All associations were weak. The strongest association was between the PAS score and satisfaction with RA control (tau-a [area under the ROC curve 0.726]). Weaker still were the associations of the PAS score with physician instructions (taua [ROC 0.646]), fear of side effects (tau-a [ROC 0.567]), and loss of arthritis control (tau-a [ROC 0.557]). For all questions examined, HAQ scores showed even weaker associations. These data indicate that patient measures of disease activity/severity are only weakly linked to decisions about therapy. We also assessed the relationship between overall satisfaction with current therapy as measured by the 5-category satisfaction question (question 10) and the PAS measure of RA activity and similar measures. The correlations between satisfaction with current therapy and scores on such measures were as follows: PAS 0.465, Figure 1. Distribution density of Health Assessment Questionnaire scores in relation to patients reports of their degree of satisfaction with control of their rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Vertical lines at 0.5, 1.0, and divide the histograms into compartments of mild, moderate, severe, and very severe functional states.
6 2140 WOLFE AND MICHAUD among non biologic agent users. This small difference was statistically significant by ordered logistic regression (P 0.001) and remained significant after adjustment for age, sex, and RA duration or for age, sex, RA duration, HAQ score, and pain score. Figure 2. Distribution density of Patient Activity Scale scores in relation to patients reports of their degree of satisfaction with control of their rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Vertical lines at 1.9, 3.8, and 5.6 divide the histograms into compartments of mild, moderate, severe, and very severe disease activity. patient global assessment 0.442, pain 0.439, Short Form 36 physical component scale (27) 0.386, HAQ The weakness of the association between satisfaction with RA control (question 2) and RA activity/severity as assessed with the HAQ and the PAS is also illustrated in Figures 1 and 2, respectively. Considerable overlap is seen in these figures, i.e., many patients with HAQ or PAS scores that indicate unsatisfactory function or disease activity levels were satisfied with their RA control, while others with good scores for function or disease activity were dissatisfied with their RA control. Use of biologic agents, preference for therapy change, and satisfaction with therapy. After adjustment for age, sex, and duration of RA, current biologic agent users had a lifetime use of 4.5 DMARDs or biologic agents (95% CI ), compared with 2.5 (95% CI ) among patients not currently taking biologic agents. Current users of biologic agents were more likely to want to change therapy than those not currently taking these agents (OR 1.2 [95% CI ]); however, this difference disappeared after adjustment for age, sex, and duration of RA (OR 1.1 [95% CI ], P 0.130). Overall, 77.3% of all patients were very satisfied or somewhat satisfied with their medications (question 10) while 9.4% were somewhat or very dissatisfied. Satisfaction was greater among patients not taking biologic agents. On a 1 5 scale of satisfaction (with higher scores representing greater dissatisfaction), the average score was 2.01 among current biologic users and 1.88 DISCUSSION More than three-fourths of the patients in this study (77.3%) were satisfied with their RA medications. A lesser proportion (53.3%) indicated that they did not need new medications because they were satisfied with the control they had over their arthritis. However, 71.3% of the patients who were satisfied with their therapy had moderate or greater arthritis activity as assessed by the PAS, 67.3% had HAQ scores 0.5, and 46.9% had HAQ scores 1.0 (Figures 1 and 2). The correlations of the PAS and the HAQ scores, respectively, with satisfaction with therapy were and 0.344, and correlations of PAS and HAQ scores with satisfaction with RA control were even weaker (Table 3). These data indicate that there is an important discrepancy between declared satisfaction with therapy and measured activity and functional status, and that clinical activity is not an adequate explanation for satisfaction with therapy. Such a discrepancy between overall satisfaction and RA disease assessments has been noted previously in an insightful study by Leeb and colleagues (28). Being satisfied with therapy for RA appears to represent much more than current disease status. In particular, satisfaction with therapy may incorporate the idea of not getting worse. Stated otherwise, one might say, Even if therapy did not improve me as much as I might wish, I am satisfied with my therapy because it appears to have stabilized my RA. Given relatively stable RA and prior experience with RA treatments, maintenance of current status (not getting worse) appears to be given high priority by patients. In addition, changing treatment implies that there will be improvement, i.e., that there is a better treatment than the one now received. Of interest, 66.3% of patients did not think there was a better treatment than what they were now receiving, including 57.7% of those not receiving biologic agents. The major results of our study appear in Table 2. The belief that RA control is adequate (OR 6.8) and the fear of side effects (OR 4.4) dominate the predictors of treatment change after adjustment for all sociodemographic and RA predictors. Prior studies have indicated that patients with RA have great concern about treatment side effects, often with the implication that these
7 RESISTANCE TO CHANGING THERAPY IN RA 2141 fears may be irrational. We noted that 22.4% of study patients reported experiencing, within the last 6 months, side effects attributed to specific treatments and 14.1% reported side effects attributed to DMARDs, biologic agents, or prednisone. The RA-related side effects were rated severe in 34.2% of the cases and moderate in 42.7%. Sixty-six percent of the RA patients reported having had a side effect to an arthritis medication at some point in their lifetime. These data suggest that concerns about side effects may be appropriate even if beliefs about side effects sometimes represent an inappropriate risk benefit analysis by patients (29). The literature suggests that RA patients are risk aversive (30). Our data are consistent with this assessment but also suggest that within the categorization of risk aversion is the fear of tipping the balance from stable RA to worsening RA. Aversion to treatment changes might also be related to nonmedical factors, such as cost, inconvenience, and administrative hassles. We found that although such issues were a general concern of RA patients, they played a small role in the thinking about changing therapy (Table 2). A number of studies have addressed medication use from the patient s perspective (29 34), including a detailed questionnaire study by Neame and Hammond (35). The current study differs from earlier investigations in several important ways. First, our study focused on maintaining therapy and the reasons for not changing. In addition, we used patient-derived activity/severity scores to further understand patient preferences, and we addressed patients concerns about therapy rather than approaching RA treatment from the perspective of physicians concerns about adherence and compliance. Adherence and compliance may be much more important concepts in nonsymptomatic illnesses such as hypertension and osteoporosis. However, in symptomatic illnesses such as RA, ascertaining patients impressions of the worth of treatment may be a more appropriate and realistic approach to understanding treatment value. This study has a number of limitations. First, the questionnaire inquired about attitudes rather than behaviors, and it is possible that respondents might say one thing and do another. Second, patients beliefs about effectiveness and side effects might be wrong. Even so, patients make decisions about their health and in the long run decide the worth of therapies. Patients reluctance to change therapy may stem in part from wisdom about homeostasis that goes beyond the experimentation of clinical trials, and that is based on personal experience and preferences for the future. The idea of not getting worse may be an important outcome that has not been considered sufficiently in treatment-related decision making. In summary, there is substantial discrepancy between RA patients declared satisfaction with their treatment and measured disease activity and functional status. Most patients are satisfied with their therapy, even many with abnormal scores. Fear of loss of RA control and fear of side effects are major patient concerns. Maintenance of current status, rather than future improvement, appears to be a high priority for patients. AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS Dr. Wolfe had full access to all of the data in the study and takes responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis. Study design. Wolfe, Michaud. Acquisition of data. Wolfe, Michaud. Analysis and interpretation of data. Wolfe, Michaud. Manuscript preparation. Wolfe. Statistical analysis. Wolfe, Michaud. REFERENCES 1. Weinblatt ME. Rheumatoid arthritis in 2003: where are we now with treatment? Ann Rheum Dis 2003;62 Suppl 2:ii Breedveld FC, Weisman MH, Kavanaugh AF, Cohen SB, Pavelka K, Van VR, et al, for the PREMIER Investigators. The PRE- MIER study: a multicenter, randomized, double-blind clinical trial of combination therapy with adalimumab plus methotrexate versus methotrexate alone or adalimumab alone in patients with early, aggressive rheumatoid arthritis who had not had previous methotrexate treatment. Arthritis Rheum 2006;54: Finckh A, Simard JF, Duryea J, Liang MH, Huang J, Daneel S, et al, for the Swiss Clinical Quality Management in Rheumatoid Arthritis Project. The effectiveness of anti tumor necrosis factor therapy in preventing progressive radiographic joint damage in rheumatoid arthritis: a population-based study. Arthritis Rheum 2006;54: Smolen JS, Aletaha D, Keystone E. Superior efficacy of combination therapy for rheumatoid arthritis: fact or fiction? [review]. Arthritis Rheum 2005;52: Hyrich KL, Symmons DP, Watson KD, Silman AJ, on behalf of the British Society for Rheumatology Biologics Register. Comparison of the response to infliximab or etanercept monotherapy with the response to cotherapy with methotrexate or another diseasemodifying antirheumatic drug in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: results from the British Society for Rheumatology Biologics Register. Arthritis Rheum 2006;54: Klareskog L, van der Heijde D, de Jager JP, Gough A, Kalden J, Malaise M, et al, and the TEMPO (Trial of Etanercept and Methotrexate with Radiographic Patient Outcomes) Study Investigators. Therapeutic effect of the combination of etanercept and methotrexate compared with each treatment alone in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: double-blind randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2004;363: O Dell JR, Elliott JR, Mallek JA, Mikuls TR, Weaver CA, Glickstein S, et al. Treatment of early seropositive rheumatoid arthritis: doxycycline plus methotrexate versus methotrexate alone. Arthritis Rheum 2006;54: O Dell JR, Haire CE, Erikson N, Drymalski W, Palmer W,
8 2142 WOLFE AND MICHAUD Eckhoff PJ, et al. Treatment of rheumatoid arthritis with methotrexate alone, sulfasalazine and hydroxychloroquine, or a combination of all three medications. N Engl J Med 1996;334: St.Clair EW, van der Heijde DM, Smolen JS, Maini RN, Bathon JM, Emery P, et al, for the Active-Controlled Study of Patients Receiving Infliximab for the Treatment of Rheumatoid Arthritis of Early Onset Study Group. Combination of infliximab and methotrexate therapy for early rheumatoid arthritis: a randomized, controlled trial. Arthritis Rheum 2004;50: Van der Heijde DM, van t Hof MA, van Riel PL, Theunisse LM, Lubberts EW, van Leeuwen MA, et al. Judging disease activity in clinical practice in rheumatoid arthritis: first step in the development of a disease activity score. Ann Rheum Dis 1990;49: Leeb BF, Andel I, Sautner J, Bogdan M, Maktari A, Nothnagl T, et al. Disease activity measurement of rheumatoid arthritis: comparison of the Simplified Disease Activity Index (SDAI) and the Disease Activity Score including 28 joints (DAS28) in daily routine. Arthritis Rheum 2005;53: Smolen JS, Breedveld FC, Schiff MH, Kalden JR, Emery P, Eberl G, et al. A simplified disease activity index for rheumatoid arthritis for use in clinical practice. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2003;42: Fries JF, Spitz PW, Kraines RG, Holman HR. Measurement of patient outcome in arthritis. Arthritis Rheum 1980;23: Stucki G, Liang MH, Stucki S, Bruhlmann P, Michel BA. A self-administered Rheumatoid Arthritis Disease Activity Index (RADAI) for epidemiologic research: psychometric properties and correlation with parameters of disease activity. Arthritis Rheum 1995;38: Wolfe F, Michaud K, Pincus T. A composite disease activity scale for clinical practice, observational studies and clinical trials: the Patient Activity Scale (PAS/PAS-II). J Rheumatol 2005;32: Lambert CM, Sandhu S, Lochhead A, Hurst NP, McRorie E, Dhillon V. Dose escalation of parenteral methotrexate in active rheumatoid arthritis that has been unresponsive to conventional doses of methotrexate: a randomized, controlled trial. Arthritis Rheum 2004;50: Michaud K, Messer J, Choi HK, Wolfe F. Direct medical costs and their predictors in persons with rheumatoid arthritis: a three-year study of 7,527 patients. Arthritis Rheum 2003;48: Pincus T, Sokka T. Should contemporary rheumatoid arthritis clinical trials be more like standard patient care and vice versa? Ann Rheum Dis 2004;63 Suppl 2:ii Wolfe F, Michaud K, Anderson J, Urbansky K. Tuberculosis infection in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and the effect of infliximab therapy. Arthritis Rheum 2004;50: Wolfe F, Michaud K. Severe rheumatoid arthritis (RA), worse outcomes, comorbid illness, and sociodemographic disadvantage characterize RA patients with fibromyalgia. J Rheumatol 2004;31: Wolfe F, Michaud K. Lymphoma in rheumatoid arthritis: the effect of methotrexate and anti tumor necrosis factor therapy in 18,572 patients. Arthritis Rheum 2004;50: Wolfe F, Michaud K. Heart failure in rheumatoid arthritis: rates, predictors, and the effect of anti-tumor necrosis factor therapy. Am J Med 2004;116: Fries JF, Spitz PW, Young DY. The dimensions of health outcomes: the Health Assessment Questionnaire, disability and pain scales. J Rheumatol 1982;9: Royston P. Multiple imputation of missing values: update. Stata J 2005;5: Royston P, Cox NJ. A multivariable scatterplot smoother. Stata J 2005;5: Newson R. Parameters beyond nonparametric statistics: Kendall s tau, Somer s D and median differences. Stata J 2002;2: Ware JE Jr, Snow KK, Kosinski M, Gandek B. SF-36 health survey: manual and interpretation guide. Boston: The Health Institute, New England Medical Center; Leeb BF, Andel I, Leder S, Leeb BA, Rintelen B. The patient s perspective and rheumatoid arthritis disease activity indexes. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2005;44: Ho M, Lavery B, Pullar T. The risk of treatment: a study of rheumatoid arthritis patients attitudes. Br J Rheumatol 1998;37: Fraenkel L, Bogardus S, Concato J, Felson D. Unwillingness of rheumatoid arthritis patients to risk adverse effects. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2002;41: Fraenkel L, Bogardus ST, Concato J, Felson DT, Wittink DR. Patient preferences for treatment of rheumatoid arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis 2004;63: Marshall NJ, Wilson G, Lapworth K, Kay LJ. Patients perceptions of treatment with anti-tnf therapy for rheumatoid arthritis: a qualitative study. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2004;43: Morrison E, Crosbie D, Capell HA. Attitude of rheumatoid arthritis patients to treatment with oral corticosteroids. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2003;42: Berry D, Bradlow A, Bersellini E. Perceptions of the risks and benefits of medicines in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and other painful musculoskeletal conditions. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2004;43: Neame R, Hammond A. Beliefs about medications: a questionnaire survey of people with rheumatoid arthritis. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2005;44:762 7.
Current Rheumatoid Arthritis Treatment Options: Update for Managed Care and Specialty Pharmacists
Current Rheumatoid Arthritis Treatment Options: Update for Managed Care and Specialty Pharmacists 1. Which of the following matches of biologic targets that contribute to rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and
More informationEtanercept (Enbrel ) in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis with Recent Onset Versus Established Disease: Improvement in Disability
Etanercept (Enbrel ) in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis with Recent Onset Versus Established Disease: Improvement in Disability SCOTT W. BAUMGARTNER, ROY M. FLEISCHMANN, LARRY W. MORELAND, MICHAEL H.
More informationPredictors of Physical Therapy Use in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis
Predictors of Physical Therapy Use in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis Maura Iversen,, PT, DPT, SD, MPH 1,2,3 Ritu Chhabriya,, MSPT 4 Nancy Shadick, MD 2,3 1 Department of Physical Therapy, Northeastern
More informationBEDFORDSHIRE AND LUTON JOINT PRESCRIBING COMMITTEE (JPC)
BEDFORDSHIRE AND LUTON JOINT PRESCRIBING COMMITTEE (JPC) September 2014 Review date: September 2017 Bulletin 203: Tocilizumab (subcutaneous) in combination with methotrexate or as monotherapy for the treatment
More informationBiologic Treatments for Rheumatoid Arthritis
Biologic Treatments Rheumatoid Arthritis (also known as cytokine inhibitors, TNF inhibitors, IL 1 inhibitor, or Biologic Response Modifiers) Description Biologics are new class of drugs that have been
More informationTreating Rheumatoid Arthritis to Target : multinational recommendations assessment
Treating Rheumatoid Arthritis to Target : multinational recommendations assessment The results of the physicians survey Data presented from the publication: B. Haraoui, et al. Ann Rheum Dis. 2011;70:1999-2002.
More information1.0 Abstract. Title: Real Life Evaluation of Rheumatoid Arthritis in Canadians taking HUMIRA. Keywords. Rationale and Background:
1.0 Abstract Title: Real Life Evaluation of Rheumatoid Arthritis in Canadians taking HUMIRA Keywords Rationale and Background: This abbreviated clinical study report is based on a clinical surveillance
More informationABOUT RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS
MEDIA BACKGROUNDER ABOUT RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a type of arthritis (chronic inflammatory polyarthritis) that typically affects hands and feet, although any joint in the body
More informationACR and EULAR Improvement Criteria Have Comparable Validity in Rheumatoid Arthritis Trials
ACR and EULAR Improvement Criteria Have Comparable Validity in Rheumatoid Arthritis Trials ANKE M. van GESTEL, JENNIFER J. ANDERSON, PIET L.C.M. van RIEL, MAARTEN BOERS, CEES J. HAAGSMA, BILL RICH, GEORGE
More informationEffectiveness and Drug Adherence in Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients on Biologic Monotherapy: A prospective observational study in Southern Sweden
Effectiveness and Drug Adherence in Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients on Biologic Monotherapy: A prospective observational study in Southern Sweden Collaborators: Primary investigators Dr Lars Erik Kristensen,
More informationVectra DA Blood Test for Rheumatoid Arthritis. Original Policy Date January /2014
MP 2.04.81 Vectra DA Blood Test for Rheumatoid Arthritis Medical Policy Section 2.0 Original Policy Date January /2014 Last Review Status/Date 1/2014 Disclaimer Our medical policies are designed for informational
More informationMorgan Schultz 1, Stephanie Keeling 2, Steven Katz 2, Walter Maksymowych 2, Dean Eurich 3, Jill Hall 1 1
Morgan Schultz 1, Stephanie Keeling 2, Steven Katz 2, Walter Maksymowych 2, Dean Eurich 3, Jill Hall 1 1 Faculty of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, 2 Faciluty of Medicine and Dentistry, 3 School
More informationIn the last decade, there have been major changes in the
233 Promising New Treatments for Rheumatoid Arthritis The Kinase Inhibitors Yusuf Yazici, M.D., and Alexandra L. Regens, B.A. Abstract Three major advances over the last decade have impacted the way we
More informationImprovement in Quality of Life of Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients on Biologic Therapy
Improvement in Quality of Life of Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients on Biologic Therapy R Adams 1, Ct Ng 2, A Gibbs 2, L Tilson 1, D Veale 2, B Bresnihan 2, O FitzGerald 2, M Barry 1 1. National Centre for
More informationHow To Treat Rheumatoid Arthritis
RHEUMATOLOGY Rheumatology 2012;51:v48 v54 doi:10.1093/rheumatology/kes122 Developing an effective treatment algorithm for rheumatoid arthritis Edward C. Keystone 1, Josef Smolen 2 and Piet van Riel 3 Abstract
More informationRheumatoid Arthritis Disease Activity Measures: American College of Rheumatology Recommendations for Use in Clinical Practice
Arthritis Care & Research Vol. 64, No. 5, May 2012, pp 640 647 DOI 10.1002/acr.21649 2012, American College of Rheumatology SPECIAL ARTICLE Rheumatoid Arthritis Disease Activity Measures: American College
More informationpåçííáëü=jéçáåáåéë=`çåëçêíáìã==
påçííáëü=jéçáåáåéë=`çåëçêíáìã== adalimumab 40mg pre-filled syringe for subcutaneous injection (Humira ) No. (218/05) Abbott New indication: treatment of active and progressive psoriatic arthritis in adults
More informationRheumatoid Arthritis and Treat-to-Target
Rheumatoid Arthritis and Treat-to-Target A Case of Need Encountering Opportunity Need RA affects approximately 1.5 million adults in the United States 1 20%-30% face permanent work disability if not treated
More informationApplication of Explicit Process of Care Measurement to Rheumatoid Arthritis: Moving from Evidence to Practice
Arthritis & Rheumatism (Arthritis Care & Research) Vol. 55, No. 6, December 15, 2006, pp 884 891 DOI 10.1002/art.22361 2006, American College of Rheumatology ORIGINAL ARTICLE Application of Explicit Process
More informationEvidence-based Management of Rheumatoid Arthritis (2009)
CPLD reviews its distance learning programmes every twelve months to ensure currency. This update has been produced by an expert and should be read in conjunction with the Evidencebased Management of distance
More informationDISEASE COURSE IN EARLY RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS: AN OBSERVATIONAL STUDY
ORIGINAL ARTICLES DISEASE COURSE IN EARLY RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS: AN OBSERVATIONAL STUDY Teodora Serban 1,2, Iulia Satulu 2, Oana Vutcanu 2, Mihaela Milicescu 1,2, Carina Mihai 1,2, Mihai Bojinca 1,2, Victor
More informationRecognizing the Value of Innovation in the Treatment of Rheumatoid Arthritis
White Paper March 2013 Recognizing the Value of Innovation in the Treatment of Rheumatoid Arthritis Catherine Augustyn, Brigham Walker, and Thomas F. Goss, PharmD Boston Healthcare Associates, Inc., Boston,
More informationDose Escalation of Parenteral Methotrexate in Active Rheumatoid Arthritis That Has Been Unresponsive to Conventional Doses of Methotrexate
ARTHRITIS & RHEUMATISM Vol. 50, No. 2, February 2004, pp 364 371 DOI 10.1002/art.20167 2004, American College of Rheumatology Dose Escalation of Parenteral Methotrexate in Active Rheumatoid Arthritis That
More informationImmune modulation in rheumatology. Geoff McColl University of Melbourne/Australian Rheumatology Association
Immune modulation in rheumatology Geoff McColl University of Melbourne/Australian Rheumatology Association A traditional start to a presentation on biological agents in rheumatic disease is Plasma cell
More informationCan Rheumatoid Arthritis treatment ever be stopped?
Can Rheumatoid Arthritis treatment ever be stopped? Robert L. DiGiovanni, DO, FACOI Program Director Largo Medical Center Rheumatology Fellowship robdsimc@tampabay.rr.com Do not pour strange medicines
More informationRecognizing the Value of Innovation in the Treatment of Rheumatoid Arthritis
White Paper March 2013 Recognizing the Value of Innovation in the Treatment of Rheumatoid Arthritis Catherine Augustyn, Brigham Walker, and Thomas F. Goss, PharmD Boston Healthcare Associates, Inc., Boston,
More informationThe PREMIER Study. Supported by Abbott Laboratories. 1 Ferdinand C. Breedveld, MD: Leiden University Medical
ARTHRITIS & RHEUMATISM Vol. 54, No. 1, January 2006, pp 26 37 DOI 10.1002/art.21519 2006, American College of Rheumatology The PREMIER Study A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind Clinical Trial of Combination
More informationFibromyalgia Diagnosis
ARTHRITIS & RHEUMATISM Vol. 54, No. 1, January 2006, pp 169 176 DOI 10.1002/art.21533 2006, American College of Rheumatology Fibromyalgia Diagnosis A Comparison of Clinical, Survey, and American College
More informationDisease Therapy Management (DTM) Enhances Rheumatoid Arthritis Treatment
A WHITE PAPER BY Disease Therapy Management (DTM) Enhances Rheumatoid Arthritis Treatment Increased adherence rates deliver improved outcomes for patients FALL 2010 The Benefits of DTM for Rheumatoid Arthritis
More informationORIGINAL ARTICLE INTRODUCTION
Arthritis Care & Research Vol. 66, No. 2, February 2014, pp 173 179 DOI 10.1002/acr.22107 2014, American College of Rheumatology ORIGINAL ARTICLE Is Swollen to Tender Joint Count Ratio a New and Useful
More informationNew Evidence reports on presentations given at EULAR 2012. Rituximab for the Treatment of Rheumatoid Arthritis
New Evidence reports on presentations given at EULAR 2012 Rituximab for the Treatment of Rheumatoid Arthritis Report on EULAR 2012 presentations Long-term safety of rituximab: 10-year follow-up in the
More informationThe Journal of Rheumatology Volume 37, no. 8. Improving the Routine Management of Rheumatoid Arthritis: The Value of Tight Control
The Journal of Rheumatology Volume 37, no. 8 Improving the Routine Management of Rheumatoid Arthritis: The Value of Tight Control PHILIP J. MEASE J Rheumatol 2010;37;1570-1578 http://www.jrheum.org/content/37/8/1570
More informationRheumatoid arthritis is an autoimmune disease that affects. Review
Review Annals of Internal Medicine Systematic Review: Comparative Effectiveness and Harms of Disease-Modifying Medications for Rheumatoid Arthritis Katrina E. Donahue, MD, MPH; Gerald Gartlehner, MD, MPH;
More informationto Part of Dossier: Name of Active Ingredient: Title of Study: Quality of life study with adalimumab in rheumatoid arthritis. ESCALAR.
2.0 Synopsis Abbott Laboratories Name of Study Drug: Individual Study Table Referring to Part of Dossier: Adalimumab (HUMIRA) (For National Authority Use Only) Name of Active Ingredient: Adalimumab Title
More informationThe Widening Mortality Gap Between Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients and the General Population
ARTHRITIS & RHEUMATISM Vol. 56, No. 11, November 2007, pp 3583 3587 DOI 10.1002/art.22979 2007, American College of Rheumatology The Widening Mortality Gap Between Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients and the
More informationustekinumab 45mg solution for injection in pre-filled syringe (Stelara ) SMC No. (944/14) Janssen-Cilag Ltd
ustekinumab 45mg solution for injection in pre-filled syringe (Stelara ) SMC No. (944/14) Janssen-Cilag Ltd 07 February 2014 The Scottish Medicines Consortium (SMC) has completed its assessment of the
More informationDr Sarah Levy Consultant Rheumatology Croydon University Hospital
Dr Sarah Levy Consultant Rheumatology Croydon University Hospital Contents Definition/ epidemiology Diagnosis Importance of early diagnosis/ treatment Guidelines Evidence based treatment protocol Current
More informationChapter 1. Scope and objectives of the thesis
Chapter 1 Scope and objectives of the thesis Chapter 1 Observational studies: focus on leflunomide The view that randomized controlled trials are the gold standard for evaluation and that observational
More information1. Title 2. Background
1. Title EARLY PsA Effectiveness of early Adalimumab therapy in psoriatic arthritis patients from Reuma.pt, the Rheumatic Diseases Portuguese Register, Portuguese RheumatoLogy SocietY (SPR) 2. Background
More informationPatient Perceptions Concerning Pain Management in the Treatment of Rheumatoid Arthritis
The Journal of International Medical Research 1; 1213 1224 [first published online as 38(4) 7] Patient Perceptions Concerning Pain Management in the Treatment of Rheumatoid Arthritis P TAYLOR 1, B MANGER
More informationAssessing Methotrexate Adherence in Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Cross-Sectional Survey
DOI 10.1007/s40744-015-0011-1 ORIGINAL RESEARCH Assessing Methotrexate Adherence in Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Cross-Sectional Survey Dana B. DiBenedetti. Xiaolei Zhou. Maria Reynolds. Sarika Ogale. Jennie
More informationMortality in patients with rheumatoid arthritisassociated interstitial lung disease treated with an anti-tumor necrosis factor agent
ORIGINAL ARTICLE Korean J Intern Med 2015;30:104-109 Mortality in patients with rheumatoid arthritisassociated interstitial lung disease treated with an anti-tumor necrosis factor agent Bon San Koo, Seokchan
More informationCombination of Infliximab and Methotrexate Therapy for Early Rheumatoid Arthritis
ARTHRITIS & RHEUMATISM Vol. 50, No. 11, November 2004, pp 3432 3443 DOI 10.1002/art.20568 2004, American College of Rheumatology Combination of Infliximab and Methotrexate Therapy for Early Rheumatoid
More informationDevelopment and Validation of the Health Assessment Questionnaire II
ARTHRITIS & RHEUMATISM Vol. 50, No. 10, October 2004, pp 3296 3305 DOI 10.1002/art.20549 2004, American College of Rheumatology Development and Validation of the Health Assessment Questionnaire II A Revised
More informationDAS28 criteria for initiation of biologics in early RA: a clinician s view. Dr Patrick Kiely St George s Healthcare NHS Trust, London
DAS28 criteria for initiation of biologics in early RA: a clinician s view Dr Patrick Kiely St George s Healthcare NHS Trust, London History: NICE (E&W) guidelines for starting anti-tnf agents April 2001
More informationA User's Guide to: Rheumatoid and Arthritis Outcome Score RAOS
RAOS User's Guide 2004 A User's Guide to: Rheumatoid and Arthritis Outcome Score RAOS RAOS is developed as an instrument to assess the patients opinion about their hips/knees and/or feet and associated
More information11. Analysis of Case-control Studies Logistic Regression
Research methods II 113 11. Analysis of Case-control Studies Logistic Regression This chapter builds upon and further develops the concepts and strategies described in Ch.6 of Mother and Child Health:
More informationTheodore Pincus, M.D., Philip T. Skummer, Michael T. Grisanti, Isabel Castrejón, M.D., and Yusuf Yazici, M.D.
177 MDHAQ/RAPID3 Can Provide a Roadmap or Agenda for all Rheumatology Visits When the Entire MDHAQ is Completed at All Patient Visits and Reviewed by the Doctor Before the Encounter Theodore Pincus, M.D.,
More informationSpeaking Plainly. Biologic treatment options for rheumatoid arthritis
in association with Plain English Campaign Speaking Plainly Biologic treatment options for rheumatoid arthritis A guide to help healthcare professionals talking to patients with rheumatoid arthritis Foreword
More informationThe Vectra DA Test for Rheumatoid Arthritis
Medical Policy Manual Topic: Vectra DA Blood Test for Rheumatoid Arthritis Date of Origin: June 2014 Section: Laboratory Last Reviewed Date: May 2015 Policy No: 67 Effective Date: July 1, 2015 IMPORTANT
More informationEtanercept Versus Methotrexate in Patients With Early Rheumatoid Arthritis
ARTHRITIS & RHEUMATISM Vol. 46, No. 6, June 2002, pp 1443 1450 DOI 10.1002/art.10308 2002, American College of Rheumatology Etanercept Versus Methotrexate in Patients With Early Rheumatoid Arthritis Two-Year
More informationTight control early rheumatoid arthritis clinic in Hong Kong: a pilot study
O R I G I N A L A R T I C L E Tight control early rheumatoid arthritis clinic in Hong Kong: a pilot study Kitty Y Kwok MH Leung 郭 殷 梁 滿 濠 Objective To evaluate disease activity in early rheumatoid arthritis
More informationOriginal paper Reumatologia 2015; 53, 4: 200 206 DOI: 10.5114/reum.2015.53997
Original paper Reumatologia 05; 53, 4: 00 06 DOI: 0.54/reum.05.53997 Rheumatoid arthritis treatment with TNF inhibitors and alternative procedures in case of its failure results of the Polish survey in
More informationRheumatoid Arthritis monitoring of DMARDs
www.bpac.org.nz keyword: DMARDS Rheumatoid Arthritis monitoring of DMARDs Key reviewers: Professor John Highton, Head of Section, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Dunedin School of Medicine,
More informationArthritis Research UK Epidemiology Unit
Arthritis Research UK Epidemiology Unit Qualitative research proposal to explore factors influencing acceptable risk thresholds used to recommend particular treatment options for rheumatoid arthritis.
More informationMonitoring Response to Therapy in Rheumatoid Arthritis
236 Monitoring Response to Therapy in Rheumatoid Arthritis Perspectives from the Clinic Patricia Daul, R.N., and Joseph Grisanti, M.D. Abstract The major objectives in treating patients with rheumatoid
More informationThe new ACR/EULAR remission criteria: rationale for developing new criteria for remission
RHEUMATOLOGY Rheumatology 2012;51:vi16 vi20 doi:10.1093/rheumatology/kes281 The new ACR/EULAR remission criteria: rationale for developing new criteria for remission Vivian P. Bykerk 1,2 and Elena M. Massarotti
More informationDevelopment of Antiinfliximab Antibodies and Relationship to Clinical Response in Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis
ARTHRITIS & RHEUMATISM Vol. 54, No. 3, March 2006, pp 711 715 DOI 10.1002/art.21671 2006, American College of Rheumatology Development of Antiinfliximab Antibodies and Relationship to Clinical Response
More informationRheumatic Disease and Multidimensional Effectiveness Measurement Based on Response to Treatment
COMMENTARY The ACR20 and defining a threshold for response in rheumatic diseases: too much of a good thing David T Felson 1* and Michael P LaValley 2 Abstract In the past 20 years great progress has been
More informationSYNOPSIS. 2-Year (0.5 DB + 1.5 OL) Addendum to Clinical Study Report
Name of Sponsor/Company: Bristol-Myers Squibb Name of Finished Product: Abatacept () Name of Active Ingredient: Abatacept () Individual Study Table Referring to the Dossier (For National Authority Use
More informationBasic research methods. Basic research methods. Question: BRM.2. Question: BRM.1
BRM.1 The proportion of individuals with a particular disease who die from that condition is called... BRM.2 This study design examines factors that may contribute to a condition by comparing subjects
More information11/8/2011. Administrative Definitions of Rheumatoid Arthritis: Rising Prevalence Regardless of Definition Used. No Disclosures. Background.
Administrative Definitions of Rheumatoid Arthritis: Rising Prevalence Regardless of Definition Used Christine A. Peschken, Carol A. Hitchon, Hui Chen, Allan Garland, Hani S. El-Gabalawy, Charles N. Bernstein
More informationMethods for Measuring Dose Escalation in TNF Antagonists for Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients Treated in Routine Clinical Practice
Methods for Measuring Dose Escalation in TNF Antagonists for Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients Treated in Routine Clinical Practice Gu NY 1, Huang XY 2, Globe D 2, Fox KM 3 1 University of Southern California,
More informationDOCTOR DISCUSSION GUIDE FOR RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS
DOCTOR DISCUSSION GUIDE FOR RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS Talking your Doctor About Rheumatoid Arthritis Preparing for your Doctor s Appointment Early and aggressive treatment can help you forestall the joint damage
More informationUnderstanding and improving communications between people with rheumatoid arthritis and their healthcare professionals. RCUKCOMM00116w February 2014
Understanding and improving communications between people with rheumatoid arthritis and their healthcare professionals RCUKCOMM00116w February 2014 This project has been funded by Roche Products Ltd &
More informationTreating Rheumatoid Arthritis to Target : the patient version of the international recommendations
Treating Rheumatoid Arthritis to Target : the patient version of the international recommendations Data presented from the publication: M. de Wit, et al. Ann Rheum Dis. 2011;70:891-5. Epub Apr 7, 2011.
More informationSusanne Schmitz, 1 Roisin Adams, 2 Cathal D Walsh, 1,2 Michael Barry, 2 Oliver FitzGerald 3 EXTENDED REPORT. Clinical and epidemiological research
EXTENDED REPORT Clinical and epidemiological research A mixed treatment comparison of the effi cacy of anti-tnf agents in rheumatoid arthritis for methotrexate non-responders demonstrates differences between
More informationFrequent headache is defined as headaches 15 days/month and daily. Course of Frequent/Daily Headache in the General Population and in Medical Practice
DISEASE STATE REVIEW Course of Frequent/Daily Headache in the General Population and in Medical Practice Egilius L.H. Spierings, MD, PhD, Willem K.P. Mutsaerts, MSc Department of Neurology, Brigham and
More informationUnmet Needs in RA: The Role of Anti-TNF Therapy
A SUPPLEMENT TO Rheumatology News Unmet Needs in RA: The Role of Anti-TNF Therapy Therapeutic Issues in RA Clinical Practice Roy Fleischmann, MD (Chair) Clinical Professor of Medicine University of Texas
More informationRheumatoid arthritis disease measurement: a new old idea
RHEUMATOLOGY Rheumatology 2012;51:vi21 vi27 doi:10.1093/rheumatology/kes282 Rheumatoid arthritis disease measurement: a new old idea Kathryn F. Hobbs 1,2 and Marc D. Cohen 1,3 Abstract In many medical
More informationInterpretation of Somers D under four simple models
Interpretation of Somers D under four simple models Roger B. Newson 03 September, 04 Introduction Somers D is an ordinal measure of association introduced by Somers (96)[9]. It can be defined in terms
More informationMedicines for Psoriatic Arthritis. A Review of the Research for Adults
Medicines for Psoriatic Arthritis A Review of the Research for Adults Is This Information Right for Me? Yes, this information is right for you if: Your doctor* has told you that you have psoriatic (pronounced
More informationEarly identification and treatment - the Norwegian perspective. Till Uhlig Dept of Rheumatology Diakonhjemmet Hospital Oslo, Norway
Early identification and treatment - the Norwegian perspective Till Uhlig Dept of Rheumatology Diakonhjemmet Hospital Oslo, Norway Oslo Rheumatoid Arthritis Registry (ORAR) Very early Arthritis Clinic
More informationComparative effectiveness and predictors of response to tumour necrosis factor inhibitor therapies in rheumatoid arthritis
RHEUMATOLOGY Rheumatology 2012;51:2020 2026 doi:10.1093/rheumatology/kes184 Advance Access publication 28 July 2012 Original article Comparative effectiveness and predictors of response to tumour necrosis
More informationDefinitions of remission for rheumatoid arthritis and review of selected clinical cohorts and randomised clinical trials for the rate of remission
Definitions of remission for rheumatoid arthritis and review of selected clinical cohorts and randomised clinical trials for the rate of remission H. Mäkinen 1, P. Hannonen 1, T. Sokka 1,2 Jyväskylä Central
More informationMedia Release. Basel, 11 June 2009. RA patients with enhanced response identified
Media Release Basel, 11 June 2009 New data demonstrate the ability of MabThera to reduce the progression of joint damage when used as a first-line biologic treatment in rheumatoid arthritis RA patients
More informationIMPROVING THE ROUTINE MANAGEMENT OF RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS: THE VALUE OF TIGHT CONTROL
ARTICOLE DE ORIENTARE IMPROVING THE ROUTINE MANAGEMENT OF RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS: THE VALUE OF TIGHT CONTROL Philip J. Mease, MD From Seattle Rheumatology Associates, Seattle, Washington, USA Summary Evidence
More informationRheumatology Advance Access published January 7, 2013. Autonomous online health assessment questionnaire registry in daily clinical practice
Concise report Rheumatology Advance Access published January 7, 2013 RHEUMATOLOGY 53 doi:10.1093/rheumatology/kes389 Autonomous online health assessment questionnaire registry in daily clinical practice
More informationThe incidence of permanent work disability in patients with rheumatoid arthritis in Sweden 1990-2010: before and after introduction of biologic agents
The incidence of permanent work disability in patients with rheumatoid arthritis in Sweden 1990-2010: before and after introduction of biologic agents Eva Hallert, Magnus Husberg and Lars Bernfort Linköping
More informationRheumatoid Arthritis. Outline. Treatment Goal 4/10/2013. Clinical evaluation New treatment options Future research Discussion
Rheumatoid Arthritis Robert L. Talbert, Pharm.D., FCCP, BCPS University of Texas at Austin College of Pharmacy University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio Outline Clinical evaluation New treatment
More informationThe treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) has. Article
Article Annals of Internal Medicine Treatment of Very Rheumatoid Arthritis With Symptomatic Therapy, Disease-Modifying Antirheumatic Drugs, or Biologic Agents A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis Axel Finckh,
More informationLeslie R. Harrold 1*, George W. Reed 2, Robert Magner 1, Ashwini Shewade 3, Ani John 3, Jeffrey D. Greenberg 2,4 and Joel M.
Harrold et al. Arthritis Research & Therapy (2015) 17:256 DOI 10.1186/s13075-015-0776-1 RESEARCH ARTICLE Open Access Comparative effectiveness and safety of rituximab versus subsequent anti tumor necrosis
More informationSECTION 3. Criteria for Special Authorization of Select Drug Products. Section 3 Criteria for Special Authorization of Select Drug Products
SECTION 3 Criteria for Special Authorization of Select Drug Products Section 3 Criteria for Special Authorization of Select Drug Products CRITERIA FOR SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION OF SELECT DRUG PRODUCTS The
More informationPfizer Medical Education Group Request for Proposals (RFP) Rheumatoid Arthritis Adherence to Medications for RA
Pfizer Medical Education Group Request for Proposals (RFP) Rheumatoid Arthritis Adherence to Medications for RA I. Background The Pfizer Medical Education Group (MEG) is the unit within Pfizer that provides
More informationComparison of Long-Term Clinical Outcome With Etanercept Treatment and Adalimumab Treatment of Rheumatoid Arthritis With Respect to Immunogenicity
ARTHRITIS & RHEUMATISM Vol. 64, No. 12, December 2012, pp 3850 3855 DOI 10.1002/art.34680 2012, American College of Rheumatology Comparison of Long-Term Clinical Outcome With Etanercept Treatment and Adalimumab
More informationBritish Journal of Rheumatology 1996;35:1101-1105
British Journal of Rheumatology 1996;35:1101-1105 REMISSION IN A PROSPECTIVE STUDY OF PATIENTS WITH RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS. AMERICAN RHEUMATISM ASSOCIATION PRELIMINARY REMISSION CRITERIA IN RELATION TO THE
More informationA 5 YEARS REVIEW OF RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS PATIENTS TREATED WITH METHOTREXATE: MAXIMUM TOLERATED DOSE AND ADVERSE DRUG EVENTS
A 5 YEARS REVIEW OF RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS PATIENTS TREATED WITH METHOTREXATE: MAXIMUM TOLERATED DOSE AND ADVERSE DRUG EVENTS P R E S E N T E D B Y : O O I Y E E S H I N P E G A W A I F A R M A S I U 4 8
More informationAssessment of Medication Adherence in Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients
J.J. Appl. Sci. Vol. 10, No. 2 (2008) Assessment of Medication Adherence in Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients Kholoud Z. Qoul, Ikbal N. Thuheerat & Imad Al-Dogham Royal Medical Services, Amman, Jordan Received:
More informationA New Era in Rheumatoid Arthritis Treatment
A New Era in Rheumatoid Arthritis Treatment Jill C. Costello, MD; Paul B. Halverson, MD ABSTRACT Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) is a systemic autoimmune disease that primarily manifests as a chronic symmetric
More informationRoche s RoACTEMRA improved rheumatoid arthritis signs and symptoms significantly more than adalimumab as single-agent therapy
Media Release Basel, 6 June 2012 Roche s RoACTEMRA improved rheumatoid arthritis signs and symptoms significantly more than adalimumab as single-agent therapy Roche (SIX: RO, ROG; OTCQX: RHHBY) today announced
More informationRheumatology Advance Access published February 1, 2012
Rheumatology Advance Access published February 1, 2012 RHEUMATOLOGY Concise report doi:10.1093/rheumatology/ker425 The provisional ACR/EULAR definition of remission in RA: a comment on the patient global
More informationVery early rheumatoid arthritis as a predictor of remission: a multicentre real life prospective study
EXTENDED REPORT Very early rheumatoid arthritis as a predictor of remission: a multicentre real life prospective study Elisa Gremese, 1 Fausto Salaffi, 2 Silvia Laura Bosello, 1 Alessandro Ciapetti, 2
More informationGuidelines for the Pharmaceutical Management of Rheumatoid Arthritis Swedish Society of Rheumatology, April 14, 2011
Guidelines for the Pharmaceutical Management of Rheumatoid Arthritis Swedish Society of Rheumatology, April 14, 2011 Working party: Eva Baecklund, Helena Forsblad d Elia, Carl Turesson Background Our purpose
More informationMedical Policy Manual. Topic: Vectra DA Blood Test for Rheumatoid Arthritis Date of Origin: June 2014
Medical Policy Manual Topic: Vectra DA Blood Test for Rheumatoid Arthritis Date of Origin: June 2014 Section: Laboratory Last Reviewed Date: June 2014 Policy No: 67 Effective Date: September 1, 2014 IMPORTANT
More informationTreatment for Rheumatoid Arthritis and the Risk of Hospitalization for Pneumonia
ARTHRITIS & RHEUMATISM Vol. 54, No. 2, February 2006, pp 628 634 DOI 10.1002/art.21568 2006, American College of Rheumatology Treatment for Rheumatoid Arthritis and the Risk of Hospitalization for Pneumonia
More informationDefining Remission in Rheumatoid Arthritis
Defining Remission in Rheumatoid Arthritis Part 1: Why is a new remission definition in rheumatoid arthritis needed? Background Increasing numbers of patients reach remission Abundance of remission definitions
More informationStandard of care for RA in SA 2013
Standard of care for RA in SA 2013 Background Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a chronic inflammatory disease, which if treated inadequately leads to irreversible joint damage, resulting in deformities, disability
More informationShared care protocol for the management of patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis treated with disease modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs)
Tameside Hospital NHS Foundation Trust and NHS Tameside and Glossop Shared care protocol for the management of patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis treated with disease modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs)
More informationRituximab (MabThera ) in rheumatoid arthritis: non-nice approved indications
Rituximab (MabThera ) in rheumatoid arthritis: non-nice approved indications Lead author: Stephen Erhorn NHS Regional Drug & Therapeutics Centre (Newcastle) July 2011 2011 Summary NICE guidance is extensive
More informationLinking biobanks to registries: Why and how? Anne Barton
Linking biobanks to registries: Why and how? Anne Barton Biobanks why should we collect samples? Anti-TNF treatment in RA Cost approx. 8,000/person/year 30-40% RA patients do not respond Rare, serious
More information