ORIGINAL ARTICLES ABSTRACT
|
|
- Allyson Williams
- 8 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 ORIGINAL ARTICLES LASIK for Presbyopia Correction in Emmetropic Patients Using Aspheric Ablation Profiles and a Micro-monovision Protocol With the Carl Zeiss Meditec MEL 80 and VisuMax Dan Z. Reinstein, MD, MA(Cantab), FRCSC, FRCOphth; Glenn I. Carp, MBBCh, FC Ophth(SA); Timothy J. Archer, MA(Oxon), DipCompSci(Cantab); Marine Gobbe, PhD, MSTOptom ABSTRACT PURPOSE: To evaluate the monocular and binocular visual outcomes of LASIK with an aspheric micro-monovision protocol in emmetropic patients with presbyopia. METHODS: A retrospective, noncomparative case series included 296 eyes from 148 consecutive emmetropic patients with presbyopia who were treated with LASIKinduced micro-monovision. The CRS-Master software was used to generate ablation profi les for the MEL 80 excimer laser (Carl Zeiss Meditec) and fl aps were created using the VisuMax femtosecond laser (Carl Zeiss Meditec). The target refraction was plano for distance eyes (dominant eye) and between 1.00 and 1.88 diopters (D) for near eyes. Patients were followed for 1 year. Emmetropia was defi ned for inclusion as spherical equivalent refraction 0.88 D, sphere 1.00 D, and cylinder 1.25 D. Median patient age was 55 years (range: 44 to 65 years). Median follow-up was 12.9 months. RESULTS: Mean deviation from intended correction was D, with 91% within 0.50 D and 100% within 1.00 D. Of distance eyes, 95% achieved uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA) of 20/20 or better and 100% achieved 20/32 or better. Binocularly, 98% of patients achieved UDVA of 20/20 or better and 100% achieved 20/32 or better; 96% achieved uncorrected near visual acuity of J2 and 99% could read J3 or better. No eyes lost 2 or more lines of corrected distance visual acuity. An average increase of 0.05 logmar was noted in distance-corrected near visual acuity. A small increase occurred in mesopic contrast sensitivity (CSV- 1000, VectorVision Inc) at 3 cycles per degree (cpd) (P=.016) and no change at 6, 12, or 18 cpd. CONCLUSIONS: This aspheric micro-monovision protocol was a well-tolerated and effective procedure for treating emmetropic patients with presbyopia. [J Refract Surg. 2012;28(8): ] doi: / x Journal of Refractive Surgery Vol. 28, No. 8, 2012 T he treatment of presbyopia in emmetropic patients is currently one of the biggest challenges in refractive surgery and a number of different approaches have been used, including LASIK monovision, 1 corneal multifocal ablation, 2 corneal inlays, 3-6 conductive keratoplasty, 1 intrastromal femtosecond concentric rings, 7,8 and refractive clear lens exchange with multifocal or accommodative intraocular lenses (IOL). 9 We previously described the Laser Blended Vision (Carl Zeiss Meditec, Jena, Germany) technique in myopic 10 and hyperopic populations 11 that combines control of spherical aberration to increase depth of field with micro-monovision (anisometropia of 1.50 diopters [D] in the nondominant eye irrespective of age). In emmetropic patients, as the refractive error correction is small, inducing significant spherical aberration would require a multifocal ablation, but this has been shown to reduce quality of vision, such as decreased contrast sensitivity, 12 increased glare and halos, 12,13 and loss of corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA). 14,15 Emmetropic presbyopic patients often have high expectations because they already have good distance vision and are not used to wearing glasses. Therefore, refractive accuracy and safety (both in terms of quantity and quality of vision) are paramount in these patients. For this reason, the Laser Blended Vision module uses a low degree of asphericity in emmetropic patients and relies more on the near vision afforded by micro-monovision together with the depth of field increase afforded by a change in spherical aberration. From London Vision Clinic, London, United Kingdom (Reinstein, Carp, Archer, Gobbe); the Department of Ophthalmology, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York (Reinstein); and Centre Hospitalier National d Ophtalmologie, Paris, France (Reinstein). Dr Reinstein has a proprietary interest in the Artemis technology (ArcScan Inc, Morrison, Colorado) and is an author of patents related to VHF digital ultrasound administered by the Cornell Center for Technology Enterprise and Commercialization, Ithaca, New York. Dr Reinstein is a consultant for Carl Zeiss Meditec (Jena, Germany). The remaining authors have no proprietary or financial interest in the materials presented herein. Correspondence: Dan Z. Reinstein, MD, MA(Cantab), FRCSC, FRCOphth, London Vision Clinic, 138 Harley St, London W1G 7LA, United Kingdom. Tel: ; Fax: ; dzr@londonvisionclinic.com Received: February 2, 2012; Accepted: May 31,
2 The purpose of this study was to document the safety and efficacy of LASIK with the MEL 80 excimer laser and VisuMax femtosecond laser (Carl Zeiss Meditec) to treat emmetropic patients with presbyopia using an aspheric micro-monovision protocol. PATIENTS AND METHODS This study was a retrospective, noncomparative case series including 160 consecutive emmetropic presbyopic patients undergoing LASIK between November 15, 2007 and June 9, 2010, at the London Vision Clinic, London, United Kingdom. Inclusion criteria were medically suitable for LASIK; no previous ocular, eyelid or orbital surgery; no visually significant cataract; emmetropic refraction in both eyes; distancecorrected near visual acuity (DCNVA) of J3 or worse in both eyes; CDVA 20/20 or better in both eyes; and minimum 1-year follow-up. An emmetropic refraction was defined as spherical equivalent refraction 0.88 D, manifest sphere 1.00 D, and manifest cylinder 1.25 D. Informed consent and permission to use their data for analysis and publication were obtained from all patients. Median follow-up after the primary treatment was 12.9 months. All patients who had not attended 1-year follow-up were contacted by telephone. Of these, 12 (7.5%) patients lived far from London or abroad and were unwilling to travel. These patients were classified as lost to follow-up and were excluded from the analysis. Of the 148 patients included for analysis, the last time point after the primary procedure was 6 months for 1.7% of eyes (n=5) and 1 year for the remaining 98.3% of eyes (n=293). Eyes for which the last time point was earlier than 1-year follow-up underwent retreatment at that time. The following represents the standard treatment protocol for emmetropic presbyopic patients in our practice since August 1, PREOPERATIVE ASSESSMENT A full ophthalmologic examination was performed by an in-house optometrist as described previously. 10,11 MICRO-MONOVISION ASSESSMENT The protocol used to determine the amount of induced myopic target, or add, to use in the nondominant eye has been described in detail previously. 10,11 The age of the patient was not a consideration when choosing the add; rather an add of 1.50 D was used whenever possible and was reduced only if necessary until the patient reported no cross-blur (as defined previously 10,11 ). The add was increased to 1.50 D only if the patient could not comfortably read J2. No contact lens monovision trials were performed. Patients were counseled to expect an adaptation period of at least 3 to 6 months and subjective cross-blur was recorded postoperatively using the following grading categories: none, slight, mild, moderate, and severe. SURGICAL PROCEDURE All patients underwent bilateral simultaneous LASIK using the MEL 80 excimer laser and VisuMax femtosecond laser by one of two surgeons (D.Z.R. [63%], G.I.C [37%]). The CRS-Master software platform (Carl Zeiss Meditec) was used to generate the ablation profiles (version until November 1, 2009, and version after this date). Proprietary aspheric ablation profiles were used for all eyes, which incorporated a small amount of spherical aberration determined according to the patient s age, preoperative spherical aberration, and the amount of refractive correction; the profiles were intended to control the induction of spherical aberration to a level that would provide an increased depth of field, but without affecting contrast sensitivity and quality of vision. Optical treatment zone diameters were 6.00 mm (in 17%), 6.50 mm (in 49%), and 7.00 mm (in 34%). Intended flap thickness was 90 μm in 23%, 95 μm in 0.7%, 100 μm in 44%, 110 μm in 16%, and 120 μm in 17% of eyes. Flap diameter was 8.4 mm in 65%, 8.9 mm in 9%, and 9.2 mm in 26% of eyes. POSTOPERATIVE EVALUATION Patients were instructed to wear plastic shields while sleeping for 7 nights. Topical tobramycin 0.3%/dexamethasone 0.1% and ofloxacin 0.3% were applied four times daily for the first week, which is our standard protocol for broad spectrum prophylaxis. Patients were reviewed at 1 day and 1, 3, 6, and 12 months using our standard protocol as described previously. 10,11 Slit-lamp examination was performed at all postoperative follow-up visits and superficial punctuate keratitis was recorded using a six-grade classification system: none, trace, I-II (not visually significant), and III-V (visually significant). All postoperative examinations were conducted by one of seven in-house optometrists. Manifest refraction was performed based on a standardized protocol, 16 and all optometrists had undergone refraction training with this protocol. A retreatment was offered to all patients who could gain two lines of uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA) and patients with cylinder 0.75 D. Retreatments were performed once stability was demonstrated over a 2-month interval (stability was defined as no change in sphere within 0.25 D and change in cylinder within 0.50 D). 532 Copyright SLACK Incorporated
3 TABLE 1 Mean Spherical Equivalent Refraction of Distance and Near Eyes Before and After Primary Treatment and All Treatments Spherical Equivalent Refraction (Mean SD [Range]) (D) Eyes Parameter Distance Near Preoperative Intended after primary treatment Attempted After primary treatment Difference between eyes after primary treatment Intended after all treatments 1 year after all treatments Difference between eyes 1 year after all treatments ( 0.88 to 1.00) ( 0.13 to 0.00) ( 0.88 to 1.00) ( 0.75 to 1.13) ( 0.13 to 0.00) ( 0.75 to 0.75) (0.38 to 3.13) (0.38 to 2.50) ( 0.88 to 1.00) ( 1.88 to 1.00) ( 0.63 to 2.75) ( 2.50 to 0.38) ( 1.88 to 1.00) ( 2.50 to 0.50) TABLE 2 Preoperative Patient Characteristics and Target Spherical Equivalent Refraction in the Near Eye Parameter Mean SD (Range) Cylinder (D) (0.00 to 1.25) Corneal thickness (µm) (484 to 673) Pupil diameter* (mm) Scotopic (3.36 to 7.50) Mesopic (3.01 to 6.79) Keratometry (D) (39.40 to 47.50) Target SE (D) No. of Patients (%) (0.7) (3.4) (0.7) (79.1) (12.2) (4.7) (0.7) SD = standard deviation, SE = spherical equivalent refraction *P3000 dynamic pupillometer (Procyon Instruments Ltd, London, United Kingdom). STATISTICAL ANALYSIS Outcome measures were calculated according to the standardized graphs as originally defined by Waring The outcomes were analyzed for the primary treatment and for final results after all treatments. For eyes that received retreatment, the refraction and vision at the time of retreatment were used for the primary outcome analysis. The mesopic contrast sensitivity was converted into log values before calculating statistics. The mean normalized mesopic contrast sensitivity ratio was calculated. 20 Student paired t tests were used to assess the change in mesopic contrast sensitivity, and to compare UDVA, CDVA, DCNVA, and uncorrected near visual acuity (UNVA) (logmar). Average pre- and postoperative spherical aberration was calculated for a 6-mm analysis zone using Optical Society of America (OSA) notation. 21 Microsoft Excel 2007 (Microsoft Corp, Redmond, Washington) was used for data entry and statistical analysis. RESULTS Two hundred ninety-six eyes from 148 consecutive patients (41% male, 59% female) were included in the final analysis. Median patient age was 55 years (range: 44 to 65 years). Table 1 shows descriptive statistics of the preoperative, intended, and attempted spherical equivalent refraction and the mean deviation from the Journal of Refractive Surgery Vol. 28, No. 8, 2012 intended spherical equivalent refraction after primary treatment and after all treatments grouped into distance and near eyes. Table 2 presents preoperative patient characteristics and target spherical equivalent refraction of the near eye. The right eye was dominant in 64% of patients. Figure 1 presents efficacy in terms of UDVA and UNVA before and after the primary treatment and after all treatments grouped into binocular and distance and near eyes monocularly. Figure 2 presents the standard graphs for reporting refractive surgery, with the UDVA efficacy histogram replaced by a histogram showing the change in lines of DCNVA (as the UDVA histogram is included in Figure 1). The attempted versus achieved scatterplot only includes data after all treatments. The stability plot includes data after the primary treatment only. The remaining four graphs include data after the primary treatment and after all treatments. Figure 3 presents the combined binocular distance and near visual acuity before and after all treatments. Figure 4 shows the defocus equivalent before and after all treatments for distance eyes only. Table A (available as supplemental material in the PDF version of this article) shows the mean UDVA, CDVA, and DCNVA before and after the primary treatment and after all treatments grouped into binocular 533
4 Figure 1. Cumulative histograms of uncorrected distance visual acuity (left column) and uncorrected near visual acuity (right column) for before (dark grey bars) and after the primary treatment (blue bars) and after all treatments (red bars), grouped into binocular (first row), distance eyes (second row), and near eyes (third row). The preoperative corrected distance visual acuity (light grey bars) is also shown for distance and near eyes. 534 Copyright SLACK Incorporated
5 Figure 2. The standard graphs for reporting refractive surgery, with the uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA) efficacy histogram replaced by a histogram showing the change in lines of distance-corrected near vision acuity (as the UDVA histogram is already included in Figure 1). The attempted versus achieved scatterplot only includes data after all treatments and the linear regression equation and coefficient of determination (r 2 ) are displayed. The stability plot only includes data after the primary treatment. The other four graphs include data after the primary treatment and after all treatments. Journal of Refractive Surgery Vol. 28, No. 8,
6 Figure 4. Histogram of defocus equivalent before and after all treatments for the distance eyes only. Figure 3. Combined distance and near binocular visual acuity before (blue data points) and after all treatments (red data points). Two ellipses are plotted to represent the mean and one standard deviation of the combined distance and near binocular visual acuity before (blue line) and after all treatments (red line). Distance vision is displayed on the x-axis, near vision is displayed on the y-axis and the number of patients with each combination of distance and near vision is represented by the relative size and darkness of the data points. Guidelines are plotted (orange dashed lines) to highlight 20/20 and 20/25 distance vision, and J2 and J5 near vision. and distance and near eyes. Binocular UDVA was one line better than monocular UDVA of the distance eye in 23 (16%) patients, these were the same in 116 (78%) patients, and binocular UDVA was one line worse than monocular UDVA of the distance eye in 9 (6%) patients. The improvement of binocular UDVA compared to monocular UDVA of the distance eyes was statistically significant (P=.01). Table 3 shows the incidence of cross-blur 3 months after the primary treatment and 1 year after all treatments. Of the eyes that lost one line of CDVA after all treatments, 18% were 20/12.5 preoperatively, 76% were 20/16 preoperatively, and 5% were 20/20 preoperatively; 99.3% (296/298) achieved CDVA 20/20 or better postoperatively. Table 4 shows the mean normalized mesopic contrast sensitivity ratio before and after the primary treatment at 3, 6, 12, and 18 cycles per degree (cpd). There was a statistically significant improvement in mesopic contrast sensitivity at 3 cpd, and no statistically significant change at 6, 12, and 18 cpd. The following complications were experienced. Intraoperative epithelial defects occurred in 12 (4.1%) eyes, of which 5 eyes gained 1 line of CDVA and 7 eyes had no change in CDVA after the primary treatment. Table B (available as supplemental data in the PDF version of this article) presents the percentage of eyes with superficial punctate keratitis before and 1 year after the primary treatment. One (0.3%) eye had visually significant superficial punctate keratitis at 1 year. Two (0.7%) cases of suction loss occurred during the creation of the flap interface. Both cases were managed using the standard repair mode to reapply the contact glass, resulting in normal flaps with no bed irregularities as confirmed intraoperatively. In accordance with our retreatment policy and definition of stability, the retreatment rate was 11.8% (35/296 eyes), of which 14 (40%) were for distance eyes and 21 (60%) for near eyes. Of the 28 patients who underwent a retreatment, 7 (25%) received bilateral retreatments. The mean requested increase in myopic spherical equivalent refraction of the near eye was 0.27 D (range: 0.13 to 0.38 D). No patients required the myopic refraction of the near eye to be reduced from target. No patients requested the distance and near eyes be switched. Table 5 shows the mean spherical aberration before and after the primary treatment, and the change in spherical aberration grouped by distance and near eyes. DISCUSSION This aspheric micro-monovision protocol in a population of emmetropic presbyopic patients achieved results similar to those previously reported for myopic 10 and hyperopic populations. 11 Uncorrected binocular visual acuity of 20/20 at distance and J3 at near was achieved in 99% of patients with no loss of CDVA or contrast sensitivity. The aspheric micro-monovision protocol was well tolerated, with only five (3.4%) patients who did not tolerate anisometropia of 1.50 D and just one (0.7%) 536 Copyright SLACK Incorporated
7 TABLE 3 Incidence of Cross-blur Postoperatively 3 Months After Primary Treatment (n=148) No. of Eyes (%) 1 Year After All Treatments (n=148) None 86 (58) 114 (77) Trace 27 (18) 24 (16) Mild 25 (17) 5 (3) Moderate 10 (7) 5 (3) Severe 0 (0) 0 (0) TABLE 4 Mean Normalized Mesopic Contrast Sensitivity Ratio Before and After the Primary Treatment CPD Preoperative Postoperative P Value * CPD = cycles per degree *Increase in mesopic contrast sensitivity. Journal of Refractive Surgery Vol. 28, No. 8, 2012 Eyes Distance Near TABLE 5 Change in Spherical Aberration* Preop ( 0.19 to 0.49) ( 0.18 to 0.44) SA = spherical aberration *Optical Society of America notation. All measurements are in microns. After Primary Treatment ( 0.32 to 0.60) ( 0.51 to 0.37) Change in SA ( 0.36 to 0.24) ( 0.53 to 0.00) patient who did not tolerate 1.25 D on preoperative screening. Also, no patient requested the target spherical equivalent refraction of the near eye be reduced, nor did any patient request both eyes be corrected for distance vision after the primary treatment. The tolerance was similar to that observed in a hyperopic population 11 but better than that observed in a myopic population, where 12% of patients did not tolerate anisometropia of 1.00 D. 10 However, the myopic population was younger (median 49 years) than both the hyperopic (median 56 years) and emmetropic (median 55 years) populations. In the myopic population, all but one of the patients, who could only tolerate 0.75 D in the near eye, were younger than 49 years of age, whereas the majority of patients older than 54 years could tolerate 1.50 D in the near eye. This suggests that patients with mild presbyopia are less tolerant to a larger degree of anisometropia than patients with advanced presbyopia, which agrees with previous reports. 22 The tolerance to micro-monovision was also monitored by recording subjective cross-blur. Although mild/moderate cross-blur was observed in 35 (24%) patients at 3 months, only 10 (7%) patients reported mild/moderate cross-blur at 1 year, demonstrating that the neural adaptation process takes 3 months in most patients, but can take up to 1 year in a few patients. Another interesting finding in this study was that the average DCNVA increased by 0.05 log units (approximately half a line) in both the distance and near eyes. This appears to demonstrate a small increase in depth of field despite only a small degree of asphericity used in the ablation profile. Alternatively, this could be a systematic effort related bias. Femtosecond LASIK monovision has been reported previously with the EC-5000 excimer laser (NIDEK Co Ltd, Gamagori, Japan) and IntraLase FS30 (Abbott Medical Optics, Santa Ana, California), although only the nondominant eye was treated using a target refraction of 1.50 D. 1 Mean UNVA was J3 compared with J1.5 in the present study. The study by Ayoubi et al 1 also reported results of monovision using conductive keratoplasty; spherical equivalent refraction regressed by 1.04 D (65%) over 18 months and induced average cylinder of 1.04 D, resulting in a mean UNVA of J5.5. Multifocal ablation profiles have been described, but currently no published reports exist regarding their use in emmetropic presbyopes. However, published studies using multifocal ablation profiles in hyperopic and myopic patients show a reduction in quality of vision, including decreased contrast sensitivity, 12 increased glare and halos, 12,13 and loss of CDVA. 14,15 Pinhole intracorneal inlays are designed to increase the depth of field based on the principle of pinhole optics to restore near and intermediate acuity without significantly impacting distance vision, with the most common being the KAMRA (AcuFocus Inc, Irvine, California). The first generation KAMRA inlay (ACI-7000, AcuFocus Inc) was 10-μm thick with 1600 microperforations. 4,23,24 The design and materials were then improved (ACI-7000PDT, AcuFocus Inc) to reduce the thickness to 5 μm and increase the number of microperforations to ,6 The results of the published studies using the KAMRA corneal inlay 4-6,23,24 are in- 537
8 cluded in Table C (available as supplemental material in the PDF version of this article). The binocular UNVA was comparable to the present study, although the results with the new ACI-7000PDT were slightly worse (Waring 6 reported mean UNVA between J2 and J3, logmar 0.14). The potential advantage of corneal inlays is that UDVA of at least 20/32 is retained in the eye treated for near vision, whereas only 16% of near eyes in the present study could achieve 20/32. However, binocular UDVA is similar with both techniques and the inlay population reported by Yilmaz et al 4,23 showed that binocular UDVA decreased from 100% 20/20 to 73% 20/20 between 1 and 4 years. On the other hand, micro-monovision relies on the natural process of binocular neural summation and achieves excellent binocular vision despite comparatively blurred distance vision in the near eye. This may be partly explained by the fact that even the small refractive error has been corrected in the distance eye in the present study (as demonstrated by the defocus equivalent analysis in Figure 4), but needs to be confirmed by further study. The safety of corneal inlays is not yet comparable to LASIK, with a 4% to 6% loss of two lines of CDVA reported in two studies 5,24 and a significant decrease in contrast sensitivity in the two studies that reported contrast sensitivity data. 6,24 Refractive intracorneal inlays are also being used to treat presbyopic patients. The first refractive corneal inlays (Permavision; Anamed Inc, Anaheim, California) were associated with poor refractive predictability and loss of CDVA. 25 More recent models have improved the design, such as the Flexivue Microlens (Presbia, Los Angeles, California), 26 the PresbyLens (ReVision Optics Inc, Lake Forest, California), and the Invue Lens (Biovision AG, Bruggs, Switzerland). Using the Invue Lens in a population of emmetropic patients with presbyopia, binocular UDVA was 20/20 or better in 20% of patients and 20/25 or better in all patients, and binocular UNVA was J2 or better in 76% and J3 or better in 98% of patients. 27 No eyes lost more than one line of CDVA; however, there was a decrease in contrast sensitivity. Refractive lens exchange has also been used as a treatment for emmetropic presbyopes by combining clear lens extraction with multifocal or accommodating IOLs to address myopic and hyperopic refractive errors, including presbyopia, and simultaneously eliminating the need for cataract surgery in the future. 9 The outcomes reported in the study of 46 eyes by Alfonso et al 9 were good with mean UDVA of 20/21, mean UNVA of J1.5, and no loss of 2 lines of CDVA. However, refractive lens exchange removes all residual accommodation and intraocular surgery introduces the risk of potentially catastrophic complications, such as the 0.07% risk of endophthalmitis, 1% to 6% risk of macular edema, 0.04% risk of suprachoroidal hemorrhage, 0.25% to 0.41% risk of retinal detachment, and 7% to 31% risk of posterior capsular opacification. 28 This seems a large risk to introduce for 50- to 60-year-old patients with good distance vision when less than half are likely to undergo cataract surgery during their lifetime. 29 Recently, a new technique has been suggested in which a series of concentric cylindrical ring cuts are created intrastromally using a femtosecond laser to induce a central steepening to improve near vision (INTRACOR; Technolas Perfect Vision GmbH, Munich, Germany). 7,8 The study by Ruiz et al 7 reported mean UNVA of J1.5 at 6 months; however, 2 (2.4%) eyes lost 2 lines CDVA. A prospective study by Holzer et al 8 reported mean logmar UNVA of 0.26 (between J2 and J3) and a loss of one line of CDVA in 42% and two lines of CDVA in 8.3% of eyes. At this stage, UNVA and safety do not compare with the other treatment modalities, the long-term stability of the central induced steepening is unknown, contrast sensitivity and quality of vision have been reported to be reduced, 30 refractive error cannot be corrected simultaneously, and a retreatment is not currently possible. This aspheric micro-monovision protocol achieved functional binocular uncorrected distance and near vision without compromising safety in terms of CDVA or contrast sensitivity, while enabling simultaneous correction of even small refractive errors; a combination that has not been demonstrated with any other presbyopic treatment option. AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS Study concept and design (D.Z.R., G.I.C., T.J.A., M.G.); data collection (D.Z.R., G.I.C., T.J.A.); analysis and interpretation of data (D.Z.R., T.J.A., M.G.); drafting of the manuscript (T.J.A.); critical revision of the manuscript (D.Z.R., G.I.C., M.G.); statistical expertise (T.J.A.) REFERENCES 1. Ayoubi MG, Leccisotti A, Goodall EA, McGilligan VE, Moore TC. Femtosecond laser in situ keratomileusis versus conductive keratoplasty to obtain monovision in patients with emmetropic presbyopia. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2010;36(6): Alió JL, Amparo F, Ortiz D, Moreno L. Corneal multifocality with excimer laser for presbyopia correction. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2009;20(4): Seyeddain O, Riha W, Hohensinn M, Nix G, Dexl AK, Grabner G. Refractive surgical correction of presbyopia with the AcuFocus small aperture corneal inlay: two-year follow-up. J Refract Surg. 2010;26(10): Yilmaz OF, Alagoz N, Pekel G, et al. Intracorneal inlay to correct presbyopia: long-term results. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2011;37(7): Copyright SLACK Incorporated
9 5. Dexl AK, Seyeddain O, Riha W, et al. One-year visual outcomes and patient satisfaction after surgical correction of presbyopia with an intracorneal inlay of a new design. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2011;38(2): Waring GO IV. Correction of presbyopia with a small aperture corneal inlay. J Refract Surg. 2011;27(11): Ruiz LA, Cepeda LM, Fuentes VC. Intrastromal correction of presbyopia using a femtosecond laser system. J Refract Surg. 2009;25(10): Holzer MP, Mannsfeld A, Ehmer A, Auffarth GU. Early outcomes of INTRACOR femtosecond laser treatment for presbyopia. J Refract Surg. 2009;25(10): Alfonso JF, Fernandez-Vega L, Valcarcel B, Ferrer-Blasco T, Montes-Mico R. Outcomes and patient satisfaction after presbyopic bilateral lens exchange with the ReSTOR IOL in emmetropic patients. J Refract Surg. 2010;26(12): Reinstein DZ, Archer TJ, Gobbe M. LASIK for myopic astigmatism and presbyopia using non-linear aspheric micro-monovision with the Carl Zeiss Meditec MEL 80 platform. J Refract Surg. 2011;27(1): Reinstein DZ, Couch DG, Archer TJ. LASIK for hyperopic astigmatism and presbyopia using micro-monovision with the Carl Zeiss Meditec MEL80. J Refract Surg. 2009;25(1): Pinelli R, Ortiz D, Simonetto A, Bacchi C, Sala E, Alio JL. Correction of presbyopia in hyperopia with a center-distance, paracentral-near technique using the Technolas 217z platform. J Refract Surg. 2008;24(5): Epstein RL, Gurgos MA. Presbyopia treatment by monocular peripheral presbylasik. J Refract Surg. 2009;25(6): Jung SW, Kim MJ, Park SH, Joo CK. Multifocal corneal ablation for hyperopic presbyopes. J Refract Surg. 2008;24(9): El Danasoury AM, Gamaly TO, Hantera M. Multizone LASIK with peripheral near zone for correction of presbyopia in myopic and hyperopic eyes: 1-year results. J Refract Surg. 2009;25(3): Reinstein DZ, Archer TJ, Couch D. Accuracy of the WASCA aberrometer refraction compared to manifest refraction in myopia. J Refract Surg. 2006;22(3): Waring GO III. Standard graphs for reporting refractive surgery. J Refract Surg. 2000;16(4): Erratum in J Refract Surg. 2001;2017:following table of contents. 18. Reinstein DZ, Waring GO III. Graphic reporting of outcomes of refractive surgery. J Refract Surg. 2009;25(11): Waring GO III, Reinstein DZ, Dupps WJ Jr, et al. Standardized graphs and terms for refractive surgery results. J Refract Surg. 2011;27(1): Wachler BS, Krueger RR. Normalized contrast sensitivity values. J Refract Surg. 1998;14(4): Thibos LN, Applegate RA, Schwiegerling JT, Webb R. VSIA Standards Taskforce Members. Vision science and its applications. J Refract Surg. 2002;18(5):S652-S Miranda D, Krueger RR. Monovision laser in situ keratomileusis for pre-presbyopic and presbyopic patients. J Refract Surg. 2004;20(4): Yilmaz OF, Bayraktar S, Agca A, Yilmaz B, McDonald MB, van de Pol C. Intracorneal inlay for the surgical correction of presbyopia. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2008;34(11): Seyeddain O, Hohensinn M, Riha W, et al. Small-aperture corneal inlay for the correction of presbyopia: 3-year follow-up. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2012;38(1): Mulet ME, Alio JL, Knorz MC. Hydrogel intracorneal inlays for the correction of hyperopia: outcomes and complications after 5 years of follow-up. Ophthalmology. 2009;116(8): Bouzoukis DI, Kymionis GD, Limnopoulou AN, Kounis GA, Pallikaris IG. Femtosecond laser-assisted corneal pocket creation using a mask for inlay implantation. J Refract Surg. 2011;27(11): Bouzoukis DI, Kymionis GD, Panagopoulou SI, et al. Visual outcomes and safety of a small diameter intrastromal refractive inlay for the corneal compensation of presbyopia. J Refract Surg. 2012;28(3): Chan E, Mahroo OA, Spalton DJ. Complications of cataract surgery. Clin Exp Optom. 2010;93(6): The Royal College of Ophthalmologists. Cataract Surgery Guidelines: Septemenber core/core_picker/download.asp?id=544. Accessed July 9, Fitting A, Menassa N, Auffarth GU, Holzer MP. Effect of intrastromal correction of presbyopia with femtosecond laser (INTRACOR) on mesopic contrast sensitivity [German] [published online ahead of print July 5, 2012]. Ophthalmologe. doi: /s x Journal of Refractive Surgery Vol. 28, No. 8,
10 TABLE A Mean logmar (Snellen) Visual Acuities for Binocular, Distance, and Near Eyes Eyes Preoperative After Primary Treatment After All Treatments P Value (Preoperative to Final) Binocular UDVA (20/20.6) (20/17.7) (20/17.0).001 UNVA (20/69.9) (20/23.2) (20/22.2).001 Distance eyes UDVA (20/23.4) (20/18.1) (20/17.3).001 CDVA (20/16.7) (20/15.8) (20/15.7).001 UNVA (20/78.6) (20/73.4) (20/70.2).012 DCNVA (20/74.7) (20/67.3) (20/66.0).001 Near eyes UDVA (20/24.4) (20/52.7) (20/53.6).001 CDVA (20/17.0) (20/17.0) (20/16.9).541 UNVA (20/78.9) (20/23.3) (20/22.4).001 DCNVA (20/73.6) (20/64.0) (20/64.6).001 UDVA = uncorrected distance visual acuity, UNVA = uncorrected near visual acuity, CDVA = corrected distance visual acuity, DCNVA = distance-corrected near visual acuity TABLE B Superficial Punctate Keratitis Before and 1 Year After Primary Treatment No. of Eyes (%) SPK Grade Preoperative 1 Year None 274 (92.6) 256 (86.5) Trace 19 (6.4) 33 (11.1) I 3 (1.0) 6 (2.0) II III 1 (0.3) SPK = superficial punctate keratitits
11 TABLE C Results of Corneal Inlays in Emmetropic Presbyopic Patients Study (y) Age (y) SEQ (D) n F/U (y) Technique Binocular Efficacy (%) Loss 2 20/16 20/20 20/32 J1 J3 Lines CDVA (%) Contrast Sensitivity Complications Yilmaz et al 23 (2008) 46 to to ACI-7000 NR NR NR 85* 100* 0 NR 3 explanted (9%) Yilmaz et al 4 (2011) 46 to to ACI-7000 NR NR 4 explanted (13%) Seyeddain et al 3 (2010) 48 to to ACI-7000 NR NR NR NR None explanted; 2 recentered Seyeddain et al 24 (2012) 48 to to ACI NR Sig. decrease at all cpd None explanted; 2 recentered Dexl et al 5 (2011) 45 to to ACI-7000PDT NR NR NR NR None explanted Waring 6 (2011) 45 to to ACI-7000PDT NR NR NR NR NR NR Sig. decrease at all cpd None explanted Present study (2012) 44 to to LBV MEL Sig. increase at 3 cpd, no change at 6, 12, or 18 See text SEQ = spherical equivalent refraction, F/U = follow-up, CDVA = corrected distance visual acuity, sig. = significant, cpd = cycles per degree *Monocular visual acuity in treated eye. Unclear from the study whether these eyes were included in the visual acuity results. ACI-7000, ACI-7000PDT (AcuFocus Inc, Irvine, California); LBV, MEL 80 (Carl Zeiss Meditec, Jena, Germany)
Comparison Combined LASIK Procedure for Ametropic Presbyopes and Planned Dual Interface for Post-LASIK Presbyopes Using Small Aperture Corneal Inlay
Comparison Combined LASIK Procedure for Ametropic Presbyopes and Planned Dual Interface for Post-LASIK Presbyopes Using Small Aperture Corneal Inlay Minoru Tomita, MD, PhD 1,2 1) Shinagawa LASIK, Tokyo,
More informationWhat now, when Presbyopia sets in? Minoru Tomita, MD, PhD Executive Director Shinagawa LASIK Center, Tokyo, JAPAN
What now, when Presbyopia sets in? Minoru Tomita, MD, PhD Executive Director, Tokyo, JAPAN Financial disclosure Travel expenses for the ASCRS meeting were paid by Ziemer and AcuFocus, Inc. Presbyopia:
More informationOCT-guided Femtosecond Laser for LASIK and Presbyopia Treatment
Shinagawa LASIK Center OCT-guided Femtosecond Laser for LASIK and Presbyopia Treatment Minoru Tomita, MD, Ph.D 1) Executive Medical Director at Shinagawa LASIK Center, Tokyo, Japan 2) Clinical Professor
More informationFaster recovery of visual acuity at all distances
news Special issue PresbyMAX Faster recovery of visual acuity at all distances PresbyMAX μ-monovision: The latest technique for treating presbyopia SCHWIND now offers PresbyMAX µ-monovision as a new option
More informationCorneal-based surgical presbyopic therapies and their application in pseudophakic patients
Washington University School of Medicine Digital Commons@Becker Open Access Publications 2016 Corneal-based surgical presbyopic therapies and their application in pseudophakic patients Grace L. Paley Washington
More informationSmall aperture corneal inlay for the correction of presbyopia: visual results and complications
UPDATE/REVIEW Small aperture corneal inlay for the correction of presbyopia: visual results and complications Javier Tomás-Juan, OD, MSc 1 ABSTRACT: Small aperture corneal inlay is one of the surgical
More informationFIRST EXPERIENCE WITH THE ZEISS FEMTOSECOND SYSTEM IN CONJUNC- TION WITH THE MEL 80 IN THE US
FIRST EXPERIENCE WITH THE ZEISS FEMTOSECOND SYSTEM IN CONJUNC- TION WITH THE MEL 80 IN THE US JON DISHLER, MD DENVER, COLORADO, USA INTRODUCTION AND STUDY OBJECTIVES This article summarizes the first US
More informationNon-surgical Presbyopia correction
Non-surgical Presbyopia correction Presbyopia is the decreasing age-related ability of the eye to focus on objects at close distances! The rate of decline in near visual work is faster compared to 100
More informationLASIK. Complications. Customized Ablations. Photorefractive Keratectomy. Femtosecond Keratome for LASIK. Cornea Resculpted
Refractive Surgery: Which Procedure for Which Patient? David R. Hardten, M.D. Minneapolis, Minnesota Have done research, consulting, or speaking for: Alcon, Allergan, AMO, Bausch & Lomb, Inspire, Medtronic,
More informationRichard S. Hoffman, MD. Clinical Associate Professor of Ophthalmology Oregon Health & Science University
Zeiss Mel 80 and Visumax Refractive Laser Systems Richard S. Hoffman, MD Clinical Associate Professor of Ophthalmology Oregon Health & Science University No Financial Interest ZEISS Workstation CRS-Master
More informationJRS Standard for Reporting Astigmatism Outcomes of Refractive Surgery
EDITORIAL JRS Standard for Reporting Astigmatism Outcomes of Refractive Surgery Dan Z. Reinstein, MD, MA(Cantab), FRCOphth; Timothy J. Archer, MA(Oxon), DipCompSci(Cantab); J. Bradley Randleman, MD S tandardization
More informationAlain Saad, MD, Alice Grise-Dulac, MD, Damien Gatinel, MD, PhD
CASE REPORT Bilateral loss in the quality of vision associated with anterior corneal protrusion after hyperopic LASIK followed by intrastromal femtolaser-assisted incisions Alain Saad, MD, Alice Grise-Dulac,
More informationPresbyopia modern surgical treatments. Johan Lønsmann Poulsen, Euroeyes
Presbyopia modern surgical treatments Johan Lønsmann Poulsen, Euroeyes Presbyopia the earliest treatments Reading stones Emperor Nero (37-68 AD) Presbyopia design trends c. 1400s c. 1680-1750 c. 1800 1850
More informationPseudo-accommodative Cornea (PAC) for the Correction of Presbyopia
Pseudo-accommodative Cornea (PAC) for the Correction of Presbyopia Alaa El Danasoury, FRCS Magrabi Hospitals & Centers Surgical options for the Correction of Presbyopia Monovision Reversal of Presbyopia:
More informationREFRACTIVE SURGERY OCULAR SURGERY NEWS EUROPE EDITION February 1, 2011 Despite economic crisis, presbyopia surgery thrives around the world
REFRACTIVE SURGERY OCULAR SURGERY NEWS EUROPE EDITION February 1, 2011 Despite economic crisis, presbyopia surgery thrives around the world While many areas of the ophthalmic practice have suffered the
More informationAsymmetrical Supracor for hyperopic presbyopes: short term results
ARTICLE Asymmetrical Supracor for hyperopic presbyopes: short term results José Ramón Soler Tomás, MD, PhD 1 ; Graciana Fuentes-Páez, MD 1 ; Sergio Burillo, DDO 1 PURPOSE: To report the pre- and postoperative
More informationINTRACOR. An excerpt from the presentations by Dr Luis Ruiz and Dr Mike Holzer and the Round Table discussion moderated by Dr Wing-Kwong Chan in the
INTRACOR An excerpt from the presentations by Dr Luis Ruiz and Dr Mike Holzer and the Round Table discussion moderated by Dr Wing-Kwong Chan in the 1 Dr Luis Ruiz Presbyopia treatment with INTRACOR Luis
More informationConductive keratoplasty (CK) utilizes radiofrequency energy. Original Article
Original Article Comparing the Rate of Regression after Conductive Keratoplasty with or without Prior Laser-Assisted in situ Keratomileusis or Photorefractive Keratectomy Majid Moshirfar, Erik Anderson
More informationCase Reports Post-LASIK ectasia treated with intrastromal corneal ring segments and corneal crosslinking
Case Reports Post-LASIK ectasia treated with intrastromal corneal ring segments and corneal crosslinking Kay Lam, MD, Dan B. Rootman, MSc, Alejandro Lichtinger, and David S. Rootman, MD, FRCSC Author affiliations:
More informationTrue Solutions for Presbyopia With Laser Technology Capturing the growing presbyopia market sector.
Supplement to June 2010 True Solutions for Presbyopia With Laser Technology Capturing the growing presbyopia market sector. Sponsored by an educational grant from Technolas Perfect Vision Technolas Perfect
More informationInformed Consent for Refractive Lens Exchange (Clear Lens Replacement)
Mark Packer, M.D. Informed Consent for Refractive Lens Exchange (Clear Lens Replacement) This surgery involves the removal of the natural lens of my eye, even though it is not a cataract. The natural lens
More informationWavefront technology has been used in our
Wavefront Customized Ablations With the WASCA Asclepion Workstation Sophia I. Panagopoulou, BSc; Ioannis G. Pallikaris, MD ABSTRACT PURPOSE: WASCA (Wavefront Aberration Supported Cornea Ablation) is a
More informationCustomized corneal ablation and super vision. Customized Corneal Ablation and Super Vision
Customized Corneal Ablation and Super Vision Scott M. MacRae, MD; James Schwiegerling, PhD; Robert Snyder, MD, PhD ABSTRACT PURPOSE: To review the early development of new technologies that are becoming
More informationPresbyopia Treatment by Monocular Peripheral PresbyLASIK
Presbyopia Treatment by Monocular Peripheral PresbyLASIK Robert Leonard Epstein, MD, MSEE; Mark Andrew Gurgos, COA ABSTRACT PURPOSE: To investigate monocular peripheral presby- LASIK on the non-dominant
More informationThe pinnacle of refractive performance.
Introducing! The pinnacle of refractive performance. REFRACTIVE SURGERY sets a new standard in LASIK outcomes More than 98% of patients would choose it again. 1 It even outperformed glasses and contacts
More informationTucson Eye Care, PC. Informed Consent for Cataract Surgery And/Or Implantation of an Intraocular Lens
Tucson Eye Care, PC Informed Consent for Cataract Surgery And/Or Implantation of an Intraocular Lens INTRODUCTION This information is provided so that you may make an informed decision about having eye
More informationAdvanced Eyecare of Orange County Kim Doan, M.D. Eye Physician & Surgeon
Advanced Eyecare of Orange County Kim Doan, M.D. Eye Physician & Surgeon Patient Information Sheet: Cataract Surgery And/Or Implantation of an Intraocular Lens This information is given to you so that
More informationSupplement to September 2013 FEATURED AUTHORS:
Supplement to September 2013 SHAPING THE FUTURE With SCHWIND AMARIS 1050RS and PresbyMAX Hybrid FEATURED AUTHORS: Minoru Tomita, MD, PhD María Clara Arbelaez, MD Michiel H.A. Luger, MD Pierre Baudu, MD
More informationTABLE OF CONTENTS: LASER EYE SURGERY CONSENT FORM
1 BoydVision TABLE OF CONTENTS: LASER EYE SURGERY CONSENT FORM Risks and Side Effects... 2 Risks Specific to PRK... 3 Risks Specific to LASIK... 4 Patient Statement of Consent... 5 Consent for Laser Eye
More informationZEISS Refractive Technologies Opt for excellence when performing 2 nd Generation Laser Vision Correction
Insert to July/August 2015 Sponsored by ZEISS ZEISS Refractive Technologies Opt for excellence when performing 2 nd Generation Laser Vision Correction PRK 1 st Generation LASIK 2 nd Generation SMILE 3
More informationInformed Consent for Refractive Lens Exchange (Clear Lens Extraction)
Informed Consent for Refractive Lens Exchange (Clear Lens Extraction) This form is designed to ensure that you have all the information you need to make a decision about whether or not you wish to undergo
More informationEnhancement of femtosecond lenticule extraction for visual symptomatic eye after myopia correction
Zhao et al. BMC Ophthalmology 2014, 14:68 CASE REPORT Open Access Enhancement of femtosecond lenticule extraction for visual symptomatic eye after myopia correction Jing Zhao, Peijun Yao, Zhi Chen, Meiyan
More informationThe Laser Eye Center s surgeons are sub-specialized in both cornea and refractive surgery, and are among the region s most experienced surgeons.
Laser Eye Center 1 About Us The Laser Eye Center at AUBMC is a state-of-the-art, continuously updated facility with a mission to provide high-precision refractive surgery to correct visual errors. Staffed
More informationPreliminary U.S. FDA Outcomes of SMILE
Preliminary U.S. FDA Outcomes of SMILE D. REX HAMILTON, MD, MS, FACS HEALTH SCIENCES CLINICAL PROFESSOR OF OPHTHALMOLOGY MEDICAL DIRECTOR, UCLA LASER REFRACTIVE CENTER STEIN EYE INSTITUTE, GEFFEN SCHOOL
More informationLife Science Journal 2014;11(9) http://www.lifesciencesite.com. Cross cylinder Challenging cases and their resultswith Nidek Quest (EC-5000)
Cross cylinder Challenging cases and their resultswith Nidek Quest (EC-5000) Gamal Mostafa Abo El Maaty, Mohamed Elmoddather, Mahmoud Ibrahem Ghazy, Mohamed Al-Taher Ophthalmology Department, Faculty of
More informationActive Cyclotorsion Error Correction During LASIK for Myopia and Myopic Astigmatism With the NIDEK EC-5000 CX III Laser
Active Cyclotorsion Error Correction During LASIK for Myopia and Myopic Astigmatism With the NIDEK EC-5000 CX III Laser Sudhank Bharti, MD; Harkaran S. Bains ABSTRACT PURPOSE: To investigate the predictability
More informationRetreatment by Lifting the Original Laser in Situ Keratomileusis Flap after Eleven Years
Retreatment by Lifting the Original Laser in Situ Keratomileusis Flap after Eleven Years Hassan Hashemi, MD 1,2 Mehrdad Mohammadpour, MD 3 Abstract Purpose: To describe a case of successful laser in situ
More informationPresbyMAX For visibly younger eyesight
PresbyMAX For visibly younger eyesight Contents 2 3 SCHWIND eye-tech-solutions So you can still read stories aloud tomorrow CONTENTS Presbyopia 4 5 PresbyMAX 6 7 Visual acuity at all distances 8 9 Your
More informationINFORMED CONSENT TO HAVE LASIK
A Division of Scott & Christie and Associates INFORMED CONSENT TO HAVE LASIK This information is to help you make an informed decision about having Laser Assisted Intrastromal Keratomileusis (LASIK), an
More informationDespite being a relatively safe and
APACRS Asia-Pacific The news magazine of the Asia-Pacific Association of Cataract & Refractive Surgeons Supplement to EyeWorld Asia-Pacific Winter 2015 Shaping the refractive laser landscape Sponsored
More informationREFRACTIVE ERROR AND SURGERIES IN THE UNITED STATES
Introduction REFRACTIVE ERROR AND SURGERIES IN THE UNITED STATES 150 million wear eyeglasses or contact lenses 2.3 million refractive surgeries performed between 1995 and 2001 Introduction REFRACTIVE SURGERY:
More informationHow To Implant A Keraring
Corneal Remodeling Using the Keraring A variety of thicknesses, arc lengths, and optical zone sizes allows tailoring of the procedure to the individual patient. BY DOMINIQUE PIETRINI, MD; AND TONY GUEDJ
More informationWavefront Analysis in Post-LASIK Eyes and Its Correlation with Visual Symptoms, Refraction, and Topography
Analysis in Post-LASIK Eyes and Its Correlation with Visual Symptoms, Refraction, and Topography Maria Regina Chalita, MD, 1 Sai Chavala, MD, 1 Meng Xu, MS, 2 Ronald R. Krueger, MD, MSE 1 Purpose: To evaluate
More informationInformed Consent For Cataract Surgery And/Or Implantation of an Intraocular Lens
Informed Consent For Cataract Surgery And/Or Implantation of an Intraocular Lens INTRODUCTION This information is given to you so that you can make an informed decision about having eye surgery. Take as
More informationEUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL AND MEDICAL RESEARCH www.ejpmr.com
ejpmr, 2015,2(3), 436-440 EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL AND MEDICAL RESEARCH www.ejpmr.com Tumram et al. SJIF Impact Factor 2.026 Research Article ISSN 3294-3211 EJPMR CLINICAL OUTCOME OF TORIC IOL
More informationIntraLase and LASIK: Risks and Complications
No surgery is without risks and possible complications and LASIK is no different in that respect. At Trusted LASIK Surgeons, we believe patients can minimize these risks by selecting a highly qualified
More informationKERATOCONUS IS A BILATERAL, ASYMMETRIC, CHRONIC,
Comparison of and Intacs for Keratoconus and Post-LASIK Ectasia MUNISH SHARMA, MD, AND BRIAN S. BOXER WACHLER, MD PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy of single-segment Intacs and compare with double-segment
More informationVISX Wavefront-Guided LASIK for Correction of Myopic Astigmatism, Hyperopic Astigmatism and Mixed Astigmatism (CustomVue LASIK Laser Treatment)
CustomVue Advantage Patient Information Sheet VISX Wavefront-Guided LASIK for Correction of Myopic Astigmatism, Hyperopic Astigmatism and Mixed Astigmatism (CustomVue LASIK Laser Treatment) Statements
More informationQuality Control in Refractive Surgery
Quality Control in Refractive Surgery Stefan Pieger*, M.Sc. Ingenieurbüro Pieger GmbH, Wendelstein, Germany Introduction Personal experience as application specialist for refractive excimer lasers since
More informationOphthalmic Consultants of Long Island
Case History Improving Cataract and Refractive Surgery Outcomes Through Ocular Surface Optimization 59 year old healthy white female History increased IOP Mother has history of glaucoma Presents for refractive
More informationComparison of Higher Order Aberrations and Contrast Sensitivity After LASIK, Verisyse Phakic IOL, and Array Multifocal IOL
ORIGINAL ARTICLES Comparison of Higher Order Aberrations and Contrast Sensitivity After LASIK, Verisyse Phakic IOL, and Array Multifocal IOL Sasivimon Chandhrasri, MD; Michael C. Knorz, MD ABSTRACT PURPOSE:
More informationProviding Optimal Optics For Your Astigmatic Cataract Patients. While the cornea remains relatively stable and prolate throughout life
Providing Optimal Optics For Your Astigmatic Cataract Patients David I. Geffen, OD, FAAO Why keep the crystalline lens? While the cornea remains relatively stable and prolate throughout life Unless we
More informationComparison of Residual Stromal Bed Thickness and Flap Thickness at LASIK and Post-LASIK Enhancement in Femtosecond Laser-Created Flaps
Comparison of Residual Stromal Bed Thickness and Flap Thickness at LASIK and Post-LASIK Enhancement in Femtosecond Laser-Created Flaps Lingo Y. Lai, MD William G. Zeh, MD Clark L. Springs, MD The authors
More informationInformed Consent for Refractive Lens Exchange (Clear Lens Replacement)
Drs. Fine, Hoffman and Packer, LLC PHYSICIANS AND SURGEONS, EyeMDs OPHTHALMOLOGY I. Howard Fine, M.D. Richard S. Hoffman, M.D. Mark Packer, M.D. 1550 Oak Street, Suite 5 www.finemd.com Eugene, OR 97401-7701
More informationIBRA Professional. Leading Technology for Refractive Outcome Analysis. Brochure 2015
IBRA Professional Leading Technology for Refractive Outcome Analysis Brochure 2015 Introduction IBRA is the leading all-in-one system for refractive laser and lens surgery outcomes, allowing eye surgeons
More informationComparing Femtosecond Lenticule Extraction (FLEx) and Femtosecond Laser In-situ Keratomileusis (LASIK) for Myopia and Astigmatism
Original Article Philippine Journal of OPHTHALMOLOGY Comparing Femtosecond Lenticule Extraction (FLEx) and Femtosecond Laser In-situ Keratomileusis (LASIK) for Myopia and Astigmatism Tina Marie Saban-Roa,
More informationLASIK in the Presbyopic Age Group
LASIK in the Presbyopic Age Group Safety, Efficacy, and Predictability in 40- to 69-Year-Old Patients Ramon C. Ghanem, MD, 1,2 Jose de la Cruz, MD, 1,2 Faisal M. Tobaigy, MD, 1 Leonard P. K. Ang, FRCS(Ed),
More informationLaser refractive surgery is becoming increasingly
Correlation of Aberrations With Visual Symptoms Using Wavefront Analysis in Eyes After Laser in situ Keratomileusis Maria Regina Chalita, MD; Meng Xu, MS; Ronald R. Krueger, MD, MSE ABSTRACT PURPOSE: To
More informationLaser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) has been. Retreatment of Hyperopia After Primary Hyperopic LASIK REPORTS
REPORTS Retreatment of Hyperopia After Primary Hyperopic LASIK Julio Ortega-Usobiaga, MD, PhD; Rosario Cobo-Soriano, MD, PhD; Fernando Llovet, MD; Francisco Ramos, MD; Jaime Beltrán, MD; Julio Baviera-Sabater,
More informationEarly results at 1 and 3 months after Trans-PRK with AMARIS. a no-touch, one-step treatment
Early results at 1 and 3 months after Trans-PRK with AMARIS a no-touch, one-step treatment Trans-PRK advantages - No-Touch treatment in one step (much faster than in the past with 2 steps) - Significantly
More informationPatient-Reported Outcomes with LASIK (PROWL-1) Results
Patient-Reported Outcomes with LASIK (PROWL-1) Results Elizabeth M. Hofmeister, MD CAPT, MC, USN Naval Medical Center San Diego Refractive Surgery Advisor for Navy Ophthalmology Assistant Professor of
More informationINFORMED CONSENT FOR LASER IN-SITU KERATOMILEUSIS (LASIK) USING INTRALASE TM BLADE-FREE TECHNOLOGY
EYE PHYSICIANS OF NORTH HOUSTON 845 FM 1960 WEST, SUITE 101, Houston, TX 77090 Office: 281 893 1760 Fax: 281 893 4037 INFORMED CONSENT FOR LASER IN-SITU KERATOMILEUSIS (LASIK) USING INTRALASE TM BLADE-FREE
More informationLong-Term Outcomes of Flap Amputation After LASIK
Long-Term Outcomes of Flap Amputation After LASIK Priyanka Chhadva BS, Florence Cabot MD, Anat Galor MD, Sonia H. Yoo MD Bascom Palmer Eye Institute, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine Miami
More informationCross-Linking with Refractive Surgery: Pros and Cons
Cross-Linking with Refractive Surgery: Pros and Cons Raj K. Rajpal, M.D. Medical Director and Founder See Clearly Vision Group Mclean, Virginia Clinical Associate Professor Georgetown University Washington,
More informationTRUSTED LASIK SURGEONS. Eye Conditions Correctable by Refractive Surgical Procedures
Eye Conditions Correctable by Refractive Surgical Procedures How does the eye focus? Light rays are focused on to the retina (where the image is relayed to the brain) by the cornea and the lens of the
More informationMedical Director, Shinagawa LASIK Center, Tokyo, Japan Adjunct Professor, Department of Ophthalmology, Wenzhou Medical College, Wenzhou, China
Medical Director,, Tokyo, Japan Adjunct Professor, Department of Ophthalmology, Wenzhou Medical College, Wenzhou, China Financial disclosure: Ziemer Group AG, Switzerland AcuFocus, CA Schwind Eye-Tech-Solutions,
More informationCommon visual problems in older LASIK patients
丘 子 宏 LASIK 手 術 後 的 視 覺 Visual acuity:the measurement of high contrast Snellen acuity but not other functions under different condition Quality of vision: measure the visual functions in variable condition
More informationCONSENT FOR CATARACT SURGERY
CONSENT FOR CATARACT SURGERY INTRODUCTION The natural crystalline lens can become cloudy due to aging, trauma, disease or medications. This condition is called a cataract. When cataracts become visually
More informationLASIK & Refractive Surgery
LASIK & Refractive Surgery LASIK PRK ICL RLE Monovision + + + For over 30 years, The Eye Institute of Utah has been giving people vision for life... The Eye Institute of Utah was the first medical facility
More informationTHE BEST OF BOTH WORLDS Dual-Scheimpflug and Placido Reaching a new level in refractive screening
THE BEST OF BOTH WORLDS Dual-Scheimpflug and Placido Reaching a new level in refractive screening GALILEI G4 Clinical Applications Corneal Implant Planning The comes with a licensable corneal inlay software
More informationCommon Co-management Questions
Issue 037 efocus Innovation. Leadership. Passion for Perfection 415.922.9500 --- www.pacificvision.org Common Co-management Questions Top questions recently asked by optometrists co-managing refractive
More informationAstigmatism and vision: Should all astigmatism always be corrected? 1 Ophthalmic Research Group, Aston University, Birmingham, UK
Astigmatism and vision: Should all astigmatism always be corrected? James S Wolffsohn 1, Gurpreet Bhogal 1 and Sunil Shah 1,2 1 Ophthalmic Research Group, Aston University, Birmingham, UK 2 Midland Eye,
More informationExplanation of the Procedure
Informed Consent Cataract Surgery with Intraocular Lens Implant Please initial below indicating that you have read and understand each section Introduction The internal lens of the eye can become cloudy
More informationBACKGROUND INFORMATION AND INFORMED CONSENT FOR CATARACT SURGERY AND IMPLANTATION OF AN INTRAOCULAR LENS
OMNI EYE SPECIALISTS A Madison Street Company Proudly Owned by Employees Specializing in Medical and Surgical Care of the Eye 55 Madison St, Suite 355 Denver CO 80206 303-377-2020 800-GO-2-OMNI www.omnieye.com
More informationSupraCor Lasik Treatment for Presbyopia
Review Article SupraCor Lasik Treatment for Presbyopia 1 * 1 Al Hindia general hospital, Kerbala, Iraq Abstract P resbyopia, the gradual loss of accommodation that becomes clinically significant during
More informationRosario G. Anera, PhD, Jose R. Jiménez, PhD, Luis Jiménez del Barco, PhD, Javier Bermúdez, PhD, Enrique Hita, PhD
Changes in corneal asphericity after laser in situ keratomileusis Rosario G. Anera, PhD, Jose R. Jiménez, PhD, Luis Jiménez del Barco, PhD, Javier Bermúdez, PhD, Enrique Hita, PhD Purpose: To analyze the
More informationRefractive Surgery Issue. Inlays and Presbyopia: On the Horizon P. 24. Crack a SMILE or Raise a Flap? P. 30. LASIK Xtra: Who Should Get It? P.
MULTIMODAL IMAGING OF PLACOID DISORDERS P. 42 WILLS RESIDENT CASE SERIES P. 67 NTG: THE NOCTURNAL BLOOD PRESSURE FACTOR P. 54 WISE CHOICES FOR OCULAR DIAGNOSES P. 50 NEW WAYS TO DETECT KERATOCONUS P. 58
More informationEarly Clinical Outcomes of Wavefront-Guided Myopic LASIK Treatments Using a New- Generation Hartmann-Shack Aberrometer
ORIGINAL ARTICLE Early Clinical Outcomes of Wavefront-Guided Myopic LASIK Treatments Using a New- Generation Hartmann-Shack Aberrometer Steven Schallhorn, MD; Mitch Brown, OD; Jan Venter, MD; David Teenan,
More informationSCHWIND CAM Perfect Planning wide range of applications
SCHWIND CAM Perfect Planning wide range of applications ORK-CAM PresbyMAX PALK-CAM PTK-CAM 2 SCHWIND CAM the system solution The latest version of the modular SCHWIND CAM represents an even more efficient
More informationInformed Consent for Cataract Surgery and/or Implantation of an Intraocular Lens (IOL)
Bruce H. Brumm, MD, PC 6751 North 72 nd Street, Ste 105 Omaha, NE 68122 (402) 572-2020 800-775-5909 www.brummeye.com Informed Consent for Cataract Surgery and/or Implantation of an Intraocular Lens (IOL)
More informationRelationship between Induced Spherical Aberration and Depth of Focus after Hyperopic LASIK in Presbyopic Patients
Relationship between Induced Spherical Aberration and Depth of Focus after Hyperopic LASIK in Presbyopic Patients Benjamin Leray, MD, 1, * Myriam Cassagne, MD, MSc, 1, * Vincent Soler, MD, PhD, 1 Eloy
More informationADDENDUM to the Informed Consent for Cataract Surgery with Intraocular Lens Implant
ADDENDUM to the Informed Consent for Cataract Surgery with Intraocular Lens Implant INTRODUCTION Except for unusual situations, a cataract operation is indicated only when you cannot function satisfactorily
More informationClearVision. Pacific ClearVision Institute. Informed Consent For Cataract Surgery And/Or Implantation of an Intraocular Lens
ClearVision Pacific ClearVision Institute Informed Consent For Cataract Surgery And/Or Implantation of an Intraocular Lens INTRODUCTION This information is given to you so that you can make an informed
More informationRefractive Surgery Education and Informed Consent
Refractive Surgery Education and Informed Consent Tripler Army Medical Center Refractive Surgery Center Warfighter Refractive Eye Surgery Program (WRESP) Goals of this Briefing To explain the Warfighter
More informationWHAT IS A CATARACT, AND HOW IS IT TREATED?
4089 TAMIAMI TRAIL NORTH SUITE A103 NAPLES, FL 34103 TELEPHONE (239) 262-2020 FAX (239) 435-1084 DOES THE PATIENT NEED OR WANT A TRANSLATOR, INTERPRETOR OR READER? YES NO TO THE PATIENT: You have the right,
More informationIn 2001, femtosecond (FS) laser technology was introduced
CLINICAL SCIENCE Clinical Outcomes After SMILE and Femtosecond Laser-Assisted LASIK for Myopia and Myopic Astigmatism: A Prospective Randomized Comparative Study Manli Liu, PhD, Yile Chen, PhD, Danyang
More informationSimple regression formula for intraocular lens power adjustment in eyes requiring cataract surgery after excimer laser photoablation
J CATARACT REFRACT SURG - VOL 32, MARCH 26 Simple regression formula for intraocular lens power adjustment in eyes requiring cataract surgery after excimer laser photoablation Samuel Masket, MD, Seth Everett
More informationALTERNATIVES TO LASIK
EYE PHYSICIANS OF NORTH HOUSTON 845 FM 1960 WEST, SUITE 101, Houston, TX 77090 Office: 281 893 1760 Fax: 281 893 4037 INFORMED CONSENT FOR LASER IN-SITU KERATOMILEUSIS (LASIK) INTRODUCTION This information
More informationShinagawa LASIK Center. Examination rooms
Examination rooms Since was established in October 2004 and from that time through March 2010 we have performed over 700,000 cases. in Tokyo (70% of operations) and 3 branch clinics in Osaka, Nagoya, and
More informationCustomized corneal ablation can be designed. Slit Skiascopic-guided Ablation Using the Nidek Laser. Scott MacRae, MD; Masanao Fujieda
Slit Skiascopic-guided Ablation Using the Nidek Laser Scott MacRae, MD; Masanao Fujieda ABSTRACT PURPOSE: To present the approach of using a scanning slit refractometer (the ARK 10000) in conjunction with
More informationWavefront-guided Excimer Laser Vision Correction After Multifocal IOL Implantation
Wavefront-guided Excimer Laser Vision Correction After Multifocal IOL Implantation Bettina B. Jendritza, MD; Michael C. Knorz, MD; Steve Morton ABSTRACT PURPOSE: To investigate the use of wavefront-guided
More informationPost LASIK Ectasia. Examination: Gina M. Rogers, MD and Kenneth M. Goins, MD
Post LASIK Ectasia Gina M. Rogers, MD and Kenneth M. Goins, MD October 6, 2012 Chief Complaint: Decreasing vision after laser- assisted in- situ keratomileusis (LASIK) History of Present Illness: This
More informationPremium IOL Implantation Calculations in Post-LASIK Cataract Eyes Using ASCRS IOL Calculator
Premium IOL Implantation Calculations in Post-LASIK Cataract Eyes Using ASCRS IOL Calculator Sahiba K Chailertborisuth, Saneha K. C. Borisuth, Navaneet S.C. Borisuth, MD, PhD Virdi Eye Clinic & Laser Vision
More informationA new method of cornea modulation with excimer laser for simultaneous correction of presbyopia and ametropia
DOI 10.1007/s00417-012-1948-1 REFRACTIVE SURGERY A new method of cornea modulation with excimer laser for simultaneous correction of presbyopia and ametropia Detlef Uthoff & Markus Pölzl & Daniel Hepper
More informationINFORMED CONSENT FOR LASIK SURGERY
IMPORTANT: READ EVERY WORD! This information is to help you make an informed decision about having laser assisted in-situ keratomileusis (LASIK) surgery to treat your nearsightedness, farsightedness and/or
More informationIntracorneal Ring Segments Implantation Followed by Same-day Topography-guided PRK and Corneal Collagen CXL in Low to Moderate Keratoconus
SURGICAL TECHNIQUE Intracorneal Ring Segments Implantation Followed by Same-day Topography-guided PRK and Corneal Collagen CXL in Low to Moderate Keratoconus Waleed Al-Tuwairqi, MD; Mazen M. Sinjab, MD,
More informationDesigning multifocal corneal models to correct presbyopia by laser ablation
Designing multifocal corneal models to correct presbyopia by laser ablation Aixa Alarcón Rosario G. Anera Luis Jiménez del Barco José R. Jiménez Journal of Biomedical Optics 17(1), 018001 (January 2012)
More informationrefractive surgery a closer look
2011-2012 refractive surgery a closer look How the eye works Light rays enter the eye through the clear cornea, pupil and lens. These light rays are focused directly onto the retina, the light-sensitive
More informationCustomVue Treatments for Monovision in Presbyopic Patients with Low to Moderate Myopia and Myopic Astigmatism
CustomVue Treatments for Monovision in Presbyopic Patients with Low to Moderate and Myopic Introduction Pre-Operative Examination Surgical Technique 1 2 IMPORTANT INFORMATION CustomVue Monovision treatments
More informationChanges in higher order aberrations after wavefront-guided PRK for correction of low to moderate myopia and myopic astigmatism: Two-year follow-up
European Journal of Ophthalmology / Vol. 17 no. 4, 2007 / pp. 507-514 Changes in higher order aberrations after wavefront-guided PRK for correction of low to moderate myopia and myopic astigmatism: Two-year
More information