Indexed As: Wong v. Grant Mitchell Law Corp. et al. Manitoba Court of Queen's Bench Winnipeg Centre Dewar, J. June 4, 2015.
|
|
- Hugh Paul
- 8 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Leo Kai Yen Wong (plaintiff) v. Grant Mitchell Law Corporation, Cynthia Lazar, Taylor McCaffrey LLP, Barristers & Solicitors (defendants) (CI ; 2015 MBQB 88) Indexed As: Wong v. Grant Mitchell Law Corp. et al. Manitoba Court of Queen's Bench Winnipeg Centre Dewar, J. June 4, Summary: The plaintiff sued a law firm, alleging that his lawyers did not provide him with appropriate advice with respect to a limitation period such that he lost his opportunity to sue a psychologist for breach of duty of disclosure. The Manitoba Court of Queen's Bench held that the plaintiff's underlying action against the psychologist would have been unsuccessful. However, the defendant lawyers failed in their duty respecting limitation periods. The court awarded nominal damages of $100. plaintiff claimed that his employer's psychologist breached a duty to him in failing to disclose an assessment report - The plaintiff's lawyers pursued a human rights complaint, despite the plaintiff's repeated requests that the psychologist be sued - The limitation period expired - The plaintiff sued the law firm, alleging that the law firm's failure to advise him respecting the limitation period cost him the opportunity to sue the psychologist (i.e., to pursue the underlying action) - The Manitoba Court of Queen's Bench held that the underlying action would not have been successful - However, the lawyers let their own preference as to the plaintiff's best interests supercede the client's right to choose the litigation path after receiving appropriate advice - If the firm was not prepared to sue the psychologist, the lawyers had a duty to advice the plaintiff to go to another firm to get advice on suing the psychologist, including limitations advice, or at least give him protective advice on the limitation period - The court awarded nominal damages against the lawyers of $100 - See paragraphs 187 to 212. Manitoba Court of Queen's Bench stated that "When a lawyer is sued for failing to properly abide by, or advise, as to a limitation date, there are often two cases that need to be tried within the action against the lawyer. Firstly, if the lawyer defends the allegations that the lawyer has been negligent, and/or has breached a contractual duty, then the court must make a determination concerning the lawyer's liability. Secondly, in the event that the court determines that the lawyer has breached a duty to the plaintiff, the court must consider whether the action that was barred by the missed limitation period ('the underlying action')
2 was meritorious. If it was not, then no significant damage could be ordered against the lawyer since, fortuitously, the plaintiff has lost nothing... If, however, the plaintiff's underlying action was meritorious, the inability to pursue it because of limitations has taken away his/her right to recover a monetary judgment, and the lawyer would be required to compensate the plaintiff for the loss of that right" - See paragraph 96. Manitoba Court of Queen's Bench, per Dewar, J. noted that where a lawyer is sued for missing a limitation date, there are often two cases that need to be tried within the action against the lawyer (i.e., the lawyer's liability and whether the underlying action was meritorious) - Dewar, J., stated that "This approach, however, raises the following question - in order to prove the loss, does the plaintiff need to demonstrate that he/she would have won the underlying action, or does the plaintiff need only demonstrate that he/she had a case worth arguing, in which event he/she has lost the settlement value of the case? In my opinion, if it is possible to try the underlying action at the time that the plaintiff goes to trial against the lawyer, the plaintiff must demonstrate that he/she probably would have had success against the defendant in the underlying action - in other words, the plaintiff must try the underlying action in the same trial in which the plaintiff advances his/her case against the lawyer. If it is not possible to try the underlying action at the time that the trial proceeds against the lawyer, then the court is free to attempt to assess the settlement value of the case and use it as the measure of damage caused by the lawyer's tortious or contractual breach of duty" - See paragraph 97. plaintiff sued a law firm, alleging that the law firm did not provide him with appropriate advice with respect to a limitation period such that he lost his opportunity to sue a psychologist for malpractice - The Manitoba Court of Queen's Bench discussed the proper approach in this type of case - The court stated, inter alia, that in most such cases, the conduct of the solicitor should be reviewed before assessing the strength of the underlying case - The court noted, however, that there were exceptions to this rule - Here, there was evidence that the law firm was aware that a statement of claim could be issued against the psychologist - However, they did not consider it to be the preferable course for the plaintiff to take, or if taken, that it had a reasonable chance of success - The court found that under such circumstances, it made more sense to consider the underlying action first - If the lawyers were correct about their opinion that an action against the psychologist would not succeed, then a court should be aware of that when it assessed the lawyer's conduct - The court, therefore, adjudicated the underlying action first - See paragraphs 96 to 104. Manitoba Court of Queen's Bench stated that "The authorities suggest that where a lawyer fails in a duty respecting limitations where the underlying action would have been unsuccessful in any event, nominal damages are to be awarded" - See paragraph 211.
3 Barristers and Solicitors - Topic 2663 Negligence - Damages - Measure of (incl. nominal damages) - [See first and fifth Barristers and Solicitors - Topic 2584]. Barristers and Solicitors - Topic 2665 Negligence - Damages - Re failure to commence action - [See first and fifth Barristers and Solicitors - Topic 2584]. Medicine - Topic 3083 Relation with patient - Charts, records, opinions and reports - Access to by patient - In McInerney v. MacDonald (SCC 1992), the court set out five situations where the requirement to provide patients access to medical records would not exist: "(1) disclosure may facilitate the initiation of unfounded law suits; (2) the medical records may be meaningless; (3) the medical records may be misinterpreted; (4) doctors may respond by keeping less thorough notes; and (5) disclosure of the contents of the records may be harmful to the patient or a third party" - The Manitoba Court of Queen's Bench held that the Supreme Court in McInerney appeared to recognize the existence of a therapeutic privilege as its fifth exception - However, the Supreme Court explained that for therapeutic privilege to apply, the facts clearly had to demonstrate that harm would result to the patient or third party if disclosure occurred - See paragraphs 135 to 137. Professional Occupations - Topic 2305 Psychologists, therapists and counsellors - General - Disclosure of files to clients - In McInerney v. MacDonald (SCC 1992), the court held that "In the absence of regulatory legislation, the patient is entitled, upon request, to inspect and copy all information in the patient's medical file which the physician considered in administering advice or treatment. Considering the equitable base of the patient's entitlement, this general rule of access is subject to the superintending jurisdiction of the court. The onus is on the physician to justify a denial of access" - The court also set out five situations where the requirement to provide patients access to medical records would not exist, including where disclosure of the contents of the records might be harmful to the patient or a third party (i.e., therapeutic privilege) - The Manitoba Court of Queen's Bench held that the principles laid down in McInerney applied to a treatment relationship between a registered psychologist and a client regarding the right of access of a client to his treating psychologist's file - See paragraphs 117 to 119. Professional Occupations - Topic 2305 Psychologists, therapists and counsellors - General - Disclosure of files to clients - A company psychologist reported to the employer that the plaintiff employee had paranoid personality disorder, but asked that the report not be disclosed directly to the plaintiff because disclosure might be detrimental to his mental health - Almost 11 years later, when the plaintiff learned of the diagnosis, he alleged that there had been a breach of the duty of disclosure by the psychologist - The Manitoba Court of Queen's Bench held that this was an assessment relationship where the duty was owed to the employer and the psychologist had no obligation to disclose the report to the plaintiff - However, the plaintiff was entitled to receive the results of his assessment - Therapeutic privilege did not apply - However, the
4 psychologist's concern that the results might be misinterpreted required that he take reasonable steps to arrange for the proper explanation of the assessment results to the plaintiff, which he did not - The psychologist did not satisfy the onus upon him to justify the non-disclosure of the report - However, held that while there was a breach of the duty to disclose, damages were not established - See paragraphs 105 to 186. Professional Occupations - Topic 2322 Psychologists, therapists and counsellors - Negligence - Duty of care - [See second Professional Occupations - Topic 2305]. Cases Noticed: Fisher v. Knibbe (1992), 125 A.R. 219; 14 W.A.C. 219; 3 Alta. L.R.(3d) 97; 1992 ABCA 121, refd to. [para. 98]. Stealth Enterprises Ltd. v. Hoffman Dorchik et al. (2003), 320 A.R. 300; 288 W.A.C. 300; 2003 ABCA 58, refd to. [para. 98]. Holomego v. Brady, [2004] O.T.C. Uned. B01 (Sup.Ct.), refd to. [para. 98]. Gouzenko v. Harris et al. (1976), 13 O.R.(2d) 730 (H.C.), refd to. [para. 101]. Prior v. McNab (1976), 16 O.R.(2d) 380 (H.C.), refd to. [para. 102]. X. v. Bedfordshire County Council - see P1 et al. v. Bedfordshire County Council. P1 et al. v. Bedfordshire County Council, [1995] 2 A.C. 633; [1995] 3 All E.R. 353; 185 N.R. 173 (H.L.), refd to. [para. 109]. Branco v. Sunnybrook & Women's College Health Sciences Centre et al., [2003] O.T.C. 753; 38 C.P.C.(5th) 155 (Sup. Ct.), refd to. [para. 110]. Milne v. Workers' Compensation Board (Alta.) et al. (2008), 461 A.R. 117; 100 Alta. L.R.(4th) 311; 2008 ABQB 710 (Master), refd to. [para. 112]. Reed v. Bojarski, et al. (2001), 764 A.2d 433; 166 N.J. 89, refd to. [para. 112]. Daly v. United States of America (1991), 946 F.2d 1467 (9th Cir.), refd to. [para. 112]. Green v. Walker, 910 F.2d 291; 59 USLW 2192, refd to. [para. 112]. McInerney v. MacDonald, [1992] 2 S.C.R. 138; 137 N.R. 35; 126 N.B.R.(2d) 271; 317 A.P.R. 271; 93 D.L.R.(4th) 415, appld. [para. 115]. Parslow v. Masters et al. (1993), 110 Sask.R. 253 (Q.B.), refd to. [para. 129]. Mund v. Sovio, [2010] B.C.T.C. Uned. 252; 2010 BCSC 252, refd to. [para. 129]. Meyer Estate v. Rogers (1991), 2 O.R.(3d) 356 (Gen. Div.), refd to. [para. 137]. Serban v. Egolf & Anas Associates (1983), 43 B.C.L.R. 209 (S.C.), refd to. [para. 211]. Counsel: L.K.Y. Wong, appeared in person; William S. Gange and David Cordingley, for the defendants. This case was heard before Dewar, J., of the Manitoba Court of Queen's Bench, Winnipeg Centre, who delivered the following judgment on June 4, Editor: Elizabeth M.A. Turgeon Order accordingly.
5 Barristers and Solicitors - Topic 2663 Negligence - Damages - Measure of (incl. nominal damages) - The plaintiff claimed that his employer's psychologist breached a duty to him in failing to disclose an assessment report - The plaintiff's lawyers pursued a human rights complaint, despite the plaintiff's repeated requests that the psychologist be sued - The limitation period expired - The plaintiff sued the law firm, alleging that the law firm's failure to advise him respecting the limitation period cost him the opportunity to sue the psychologist (i.e., to pursue the underlying action) - The Manitoba Court of Queen's Bench held that the underlying action would not have been successful - However, the lawyers let their own preference as to the plaintiff's best interests supercede the client's right to choose the litigation path after receiving appropriate advice - If the firm was not prepared to sue the psychologist, the lawyers had a duty to advice the plaintiff to go to another firm to get advice on suing the psychologist, including limitations advice, or at least give him protective advice on the limitation period - The court awarded nominal damages against the lawyers of $100 - See paragraphs 187 to 212. Barristers and Solicitors - Topic 2663 Negligence - Damages - Measure of (incl. nominal damages) - The Manitoba Court of Queen's Bench stated that "The authorities suggest that where a lawyer fails in a duty respecting limitations where the underlying action would have been unsuccessful in any event, nominal damages are to be awarded" - See paragraph 211. Barristers and Solicitors - Topic 2665 Negligence - Damages - Re failure to commence action - The plaintiff claimed that his employer's psychologist breached a duty to him in failing to disclose an assessment report - The plaintiff's lawyers pursued a human rights complaint, despite the plaintiff's repeated requests that the psychologist be sued - The limitation period expired - The plaintiff sued the law firm, alleging that the law firm's failure to advise him respecting the limitation period cost him the opportunity to sue the psychologist (i.e., to pursue the underlying action) - The Manitoba Court of Queen's Bench held that the underlying action would not have been successful - However, the lawyers let their own preference as to the plaintiff's best interests supercede the client's right to choose the litigation path after receiving appropriate advice - If the firm was not prepared to sue the psychologist, the lawyers had a duty to advice the plaintiff to go to another firm to get advice on suing the psychologist, including limitations advice, or at least give him protective advice on the limitation period - The court awarded nominal damages against the lawyers of $100 - See paragraphs 187 to 212. Barristers and Solicitors - Topic 2665 Negligence - Damages - Re failure to commence action - The Manitoba Court of Queen's Bench stated that "The authorities suggest that where a lawyer fails in a duty respecting limitations where the underlying action would have been unsuccessful in any event, nominal damages are to be awarded" - See paragraph 211. Professional Occupations - Topic 2322 Psychologists, therapists and counsellors - Negligence - Duty of care - A company
6 psychologist reported to the employer that the plaintiff employee had paranoid personality disorder, but asked that the report not be disclosed directly to the plaintiff because disclosure might be detrimental to his mental health - Almost 11 years later, when the plaintiff learned of the diagnosis, he alleged that there had been a breach of the duty of disclosure by the psychologist - The Manitoba Court of Queen's Bench held that this was an assessment relationship where the duty was owed to the employer and the psychologist had no obligation to disclose the report to the plaintiff - However, the plaintiff was entitled to receive the results of his assessment - Therapeutic privilege did not apply - However, the psychologist's concern that the results might be misinterpreted required that he take reasonable steps to arrange for the proper explanation of the assessment results to the plaintiff, which he did not - The psychologist did not satisfy the onus upon him to justify the non-disclosure of the report - However, held that while there was a breach of the duty to disclose, damages were not established - See paragraphs 105 to 186.
John Douglas McKittrick (plaintiff/respondent) v. The Great-West Life Assurance Company and Great-West Lifeco Inc. (defendants/appellants)
James Jeffery and D'Alton S. Rudd (plaintiffs/respondents) v. London Life Insurance Company and The Great-West Life Assurance Company (defendants/appellants) John Douglas McKittrick (plaintiff/respondent)
More informationIndexed As: Ledcor Construction Ltd. v. Northbridge Indemnity Insurance Co. et al.
Ledcor Construction Limited (respondent/plaintiff) v. Northbridge Indemnity Insurance Company, Royal & Sun Alliance Insurance Company of Canada, and Chartis Insurance Company of Canada (appellants/defendants)
More informationIndexed As: Adobe Systems Inc. et al. v. Thompson. Federal Court Campbell, J. October 18, 2012.
Adobe Systems Incorporated, Microsoft Corporation, and Rosetta Stone Ltd. (plaintiffs) v. Dale Thompson DBA Appletree Solutions (defendant) (T-2055-11; 2012 FC 1219) Indexed As: Adobe Systems Inc. et al.
More informationGADSBY WICKS SOLICITORS EXPLANATION OF LEGAL TERMS
EXPLANATION OF LEGAL TERMS Affidavit: After the event litigation insurance: Application notice: Bar Council: Barrister: Basic Charges: Before the Event Legal Expenses Insurance: Bill of costs: Bolam test:
More informationPERSONAL INJURIES BAR ASSOCIATION STANDARD TERMS AND CONDITIONS TREATED AS ANNEXED TO THE CONDITIONAL FEE AGREEMENT BETWEEN SOLICITOR AND COUNSEL
PERSONAL INJURIES BAR ASSOCIATION STANDARD TERMS AND CONDITIONS TREATED AS ANNEXED TO THE CONDITIONAL FEE AGREEMENT BETWEEN SOLICITOR AND COUNSEL FOR USE AFTER 31 JANUARY 2013 PLEASE NOTE: THESE TERMS
More informationONTARIO SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE
COURT FILE NO.: CV-07-0159-00B1 DATE: October 08, 2009 ONTARIO SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE B E T W E E N: 1013952 ONTARIO INC., operating as the No one attending for Plaintiff Silverado Restaurant and Nightclub
More informationClinical Negligence. Investigating Your Claim
www.lees.co.uk Clinical Negligence Investigating Your Claim Lees Solicitors LLP 44/45 Hamilton Square Birkenhead Wirral CH41 5AR Tel: 0151 647 9381 Fax: 0151 649 0124 e-mail: newclaim@lees.co.uk 1 The
More informationAdvice Note. An overview of civil proceedings in England. Introduction
Advice Note An overview of civil proceedings in England Introduction There is no civil code in England; English civil law comprises of essentially legislation by Parliament and decisions by the courts.
More informationFactors to Consider When Handling a Long Term Disability Benefits Case. Several issues may arise in the course of a lawsuit for long term disability
Factors to Consider When Handling a Long Term Disability Benefits Case Several issues may arise in the course of a lawsuit for long term disability benefits. This paper provides strategic suggestions on
More informationS.116 Of The Courts of Justice Act Can Defendants Impose A Structured Settlement on the Plaintiff? Robert Roth
S.116 Of The Courts of Justice Act Can Defendants Impose A Structured Settlement on the Plaintiff? Robert Roth Historically, at common law, a plaintiff was not obliged to accept a structured settlement,
More informationMedical Negligence. A client s guide. head and shoulders above the rest in terms of skills, experience and quality. The Legal 500
www.personalinjury.ffw.com Freephone 0800 358 3848 www.personalinjury.ffw.com Freephone 0800 358 3848 Medical Negligence A client s guide head and shoulders above the rest in terms of skills, experience
More informationTHE PHYSICIAN S ROLE IN HELPING PATIENTS RETURN TO WORK AFTER AN ILLNESS OR INJURY (UPDATE 2000)
CMA POLICY THE PHYSICIAN S ROLE IN HELPING PATIENTS RETURN TO WORK AFTER AN ILLNESS OR INJURY (UPDATE 2000) This policy addresses the role of attending physicians in assisting their patients to return
More informationCOURT OF QUEEN S BENCH OF MANITOBA
Date: 20080219 Docket: CI 07-01-50371 (Winnipeg Centre) Indexed as: Pickering v. The Government of Manitoba et al Cited as: 2008 MBQB 56 COURT OF QUEEN S BENCH OF MANITOBA BETWEEN: ) COUNSEL: ) THERESA
More informationAssume that the following clause was included in the retainer agreement between SK Firm LLP and the Corporation (the Relieving Clause ):
ETHICAL SCENARIO #3 I. FACT PATTERN A Saskatchewan law firm ( SK Firm LLP ) acts on behalf of an out of province (e.g. national) corporation (the Corporation ). SK Firm LLP s role has been solely to file
More informationHow To Pass A Bill In The United States
S.B. SENATE BILL NO. SENATOR ROBERSON MARCH, Referred to Committee on Judiciary SUMMARY Revises provisions relating to certain civil actions involving negligence. (BDR -) FISCAL NOTE: Effect on Local Government:
More informationLAW REFORM (CONTRIBUTORY NEGLIGENCE) AMENDMENT BILL 2001
1 LAW REFORM (CONTRIBUTORY NEGLIGENCE) AMENDMENT BILL 2001 EXPLANATORY NOTES GENERAL OUTLINE OBJECTIVES OF THE LEGISLATION The purpose of this Bill is to address the impact of the decision of the High
More informationThe discovery principle and limitation of actions for solicitor s negligence: Ferrara v. Lorenzetti, Wolfe Barristers and Solicitors (Ont. C.
February 2013 Civil Litigation Section The discovery principle and limitation of actions for solicitor s negligence: Ferrara v. Lorenzetti, Wolfe Barristers and Solicitors (Ont. C.A) Antonin Pribetic*
More informationFACTORS TO CONSIDER WHEN RETAINING MEDICAL EXPERTS IN PROFESSIONAL LIABILITY AND PERSONAL INJURY CASES
FACTORS TO CONSIDER WHEN RETAINING MEDICAL EXPERTS IN PROFESSIONAL LIABILITY AND PERSONAL INJURY CASES Gary Srebrolow 416.597.4875 gsrebrolow@blaney.com Factors to Consider When Retaining Medical Experts
More informationSenate Bill No. 292 Senator Roberson
Senate Bill No. 292 Senator Roberson CHAPTER... AN ACT relating to civil actions; providing immunity from civil actions for a board of trustees of a school district or the governing body of a charter school
More informationMedical Negligence. A guide for clients. The team provides a first class service at all levels of experience. The Legal 500
www.ffw.com/personalinjury Freephone 0800 358 3848 www.ffw.com/personalinjury Freephone 0800 358 3848 Medical Negligence A guide for clients The team provides a first class service at all levels of experience.
More informationRULE 39 OFFER TO SETTLE
RULE 39 OFFER TO SETTLE Definitions (1) In this rule: Where available "defendant" includes "respondent"; "double costs" means double the fees allowed under Rule 60(2) and includes the disbursements allowed
More informationCase: 1:11-cv-09187 Document #: 161 Filed: 09/22/14 Page 1 of 8 PageID #:<pageid>
Case: 1:11-cv-09187 Document #: 161 Filed: 09/22/14 Page 1 of 8 PageID #: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION PETER METROU, ) ) Plaintiff, ) No. 11 C 9187
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF BRITISH COLUMBIA
Citation: Armstrong v. Dist. of West Vancouver (Corp. Date: 20020129 of) 2002 BCSC 135 Docket: C996141 Registry: Vancouver BETWEEN: IN THE SUPREME COURT OF BRITISH COLUMBIA WENDY ARMSTRONG PLAINTIFF AND:
More informationIf You Purchased Relacore From January 1, 2000 through November 10, 2014, You Could Receive a Payment From a Proposed Class Action Settlement.
If You Purchased Relacore From January 1, 2000 through November 10, 2014, You Could Receive a Payment From a Proposed Class Action Settlement. A court authorized this notice. This is not a solicitation
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO SIXTH APPELLATE DISTRICT WOOD COUNTY. Trial Court No. 2007-CV-0422. Appellee Decided: October 8, 2010 * * * * *
[Cite as Boggia v. Wood Cty. Hosp., 2010-Ohio-4932.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO SIXTH APPELLATE DISTRICT WOOD COUNTY Mary Boggia, et al. Appellants Court of Appeals No. WD-09-091 Trial Court No. 2007-CV-0422
More informationBill 34 The New Limitation Act: Significant Changes and Transition Issues Explained
Bill 34 The New Limitation Act: Significant Changes and Transition Issues Explained A Presentation for CLE Employment Law Conference 2013 Pan Pacific Hotel Vancouver, BC May 9, 2013 Carman J. Overholt,
More informationDiscrimination in the Workplace Against Individuals with Hearing Loss
Discrimination in the Workplace Against Individuals with Hearing Loss An applicant or employee may believe that his or her employment rights have been violated on the basis of a hearing disability. In
More informationConditional Fee Agreement ( CFA ) [For use in personal injury and clinical negligence cases only].
Disclaimer This model agreement is not a precedent for use with all clients and it will need to be adapted/modified depending on the individual clients circumstances and solicitors business models. In
More informationA Guide To Claiming Compensation For Clinical Negligence
A Guide To Claiming Compensation For Clinical Negligence Introduction In order to bring a claim for Clinical Negligence, it is necessary to establish that the Doctor or Nurse involved in your medical treatment
More informationToday I will discuss medical negligence following a number of recent high profile cases and inquests.
Tipp FM Legal Slot 29 th May 2012 Medical Negligence John M. Lynch, Principal Today I will discuss medical negligence following a number of recent high profile cases and inquests. Firstly, what is Medical
More informationUNDERSTANDING THE WORKERS COMPENSATION SYSTEM ADVANTAGES AND DISADVANTAGES
UNDERSTANDING THE WORKERS COMPENSATION SYSTEM ADVANTAGES AND DISADVANTAGES Presented By: Sonia Lanteigne and Michael McGovern Legal Counsel, WorkSafeNB October 8, 2015 TODAY S AGENDA History of workers
More informationASSEMBLY BILL No. 597
california legislature 2015 16 regular session ASSEMBLY BILL No. 597 Introduced by Assembly Member Cooley February 24, 2015 An act to amend Sections 36 and 877 of, and to add Chapter 6 (commencing with
More informationSTANDARD TERMS AND CONDITIONS FOR CLAIMANT EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNAL AND EMPLOYMENT APPEAL TRIBUNAL WORK TREATED AS ANNEXED TO THE CONDITIONAL FEE AGREEMENT
STANDARD TERMS AND CONDITIONS FOR CLAIMANT EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNAL AND EMPLOYMENT APPEAL TRIBUNAL WORK TREATED AS ANNEXED TO THE CONDITIONAL FEE AGREEMENT BETWEEN SOLICITOR AND COUNSEL FOR CLAIMANT EMPLOYMENT
More informationCombar/CLLS Guidance note on the Agreement for the Supply of Services by a Barrister in a Commercial Case
Combar/CLLS Guidance note on the Agreement for the Supply of Services by a Barrister in a Commercial Case Introduction... 2 Background... 2 Entering into an agreement incorporating the Terms... 3 The Services...
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF BRITISH COLUMBIA
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF BRITISH COLUMBIA Citation: Between: And Richard v. British Columbia, 2014 BCSC 1290 William Joseph Richard and W.H.M. Date: 20140714 Docket: S024338 Registry: Vancouver Plaintiffs
More informationHow To Settle A Car Accident In The Uk
PERSONAL INJURY COMPENSATION CLAIM GUIDE PERSONAL INJURY COMPENSATION CLAIM GUIDE This booklet has been produced by D.J. Synnott Solicitors to give our clients an understanding of the personal injury compensation
More informationNOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION TWO
Filed 8/27/14 Tesser Ruttenberg etc. v. Forever Entertainment CA2/2 NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying
More informationWHAT=S THE DEAL WITH GENERAL AND SPECIAL DAMAGES? By William E. McNally and Barbara E. Cotton 1
WHAT=S THE DEAL WITH GENERAL AND SPECIAL DAMAGES? By William E. McNally and Barbara E. Cotton 1 There are times in a civil trial lawyer=s life when he or she must know the difference between general and
More informationClinical negligence. Grounds
Clinical negligence Clinical negligence occurs when the care or treatment the Claimant received from a health service provider was below the standard that is expected. This test was established in the
More informationConditional Fee Agreement: What You Need to Know
Conditional Fee Agreement: What You Need to Know This document forms an important part of your agreement with us. Please read it carefully. Definitions of words used in this document and the accompanying
More informationNEGLIGENT SETTLEMENT ADVICE. Daniel Crowley and Leona Powell consider the Court s approach to negligent settlement advice.
NEGLIGENT SETTLEMENT ADVICE Daniel Crowley and Leona Powell consider the Court s approach to negligent settlement advice. The standard of care owed by a solicitor to his client has been established for
More informationFILING A PERSONAL INJURY OR PROPERY DAMAGE LAWSUIT
Superior Court, County of Ventura Self-Help Legal Access Center FILING A PERSONAL INJURY OR PROPERY DAMAGE LAWSUIT Plaintiff s Instructions When and Where to File 1 SC 8/99 1 When and Where to File 1.
More informationAsbestos Disease Claims
Asbestos Disease Claims A client s guide Spring 2007 Contents 2. Essential elements for a successful claim 3. What we will do 3. Funding the case 3. Preliminary investigations 4. What happens next? 4.
More informationSTANLEY V. MCCARVER: FORMAL DOCTOR- PATIENT RELATIONSHIP NOT REQUIRED FOR NEGLIGENCE LIABILITY
STANLEY V. MCCARVER: FORMAL DOCTOR- PATIENT RELATIONSHIP NOT REQUIRED FOR NEGLIGENCE LIABILITY Patrick I. Biggerstaff I. FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY Nurse Christine Stanley submitted to a tuberculosis
More informationCOURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH
COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH NO. 02-13-00125-CV CHRISTOPHER EDOMWANDE APPELLANT V. JULIO GAZA & SANDRA F. GAZA APPELLEES ---------- FROM COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 2 OF TARRANT COUNTY
More informationASSEMBLY BILL No. 597
AMENDED IN ASSEMBLY APRIL 14, 2015 california legislature 2015 16 regular session ASSEMBLY BILL No. 597 Introduced by Assembly Member Cooley February 24, 2015 An act to amend Sections 36 and 877 of, and
More informationNOTICE TO MONEY CONCEPT (BARRIE) CLIENTS OF EITHER DAVID KARAS OR JAMES STEPHENSON INVOLVED IN LEVERAGED INVESTMENTS
NOTICE TO MONEY CONCEPT (BARRIE) CLIENTS OF EITHER DAVID KARAS OR JAMES STEPHENSON INVOLVED IN LEVERAGED INVESTMENTS NOTICE OF CERTIFICATION AND MOTION FOR SETTLEMENT APPROVAL This is a court authorized
More informationMPRE Sample Test Questions
MPRE Sample Test Questions The following sample questions are examples of test questions similar to those on the MPRE. While these sample questions illustrate the kinds of questions that will appear on
More informationCase: 2:04-cv-01110-JLG-NMK Doc #: 33 Filed: 06/13/05 Page: 1 of 7 PAGEID #: <pageid>
Case: 2:04-cv-01110-JLG-NMK Doc #: 33 Filed: 06/13/05 Page: 1 of 7 PAGEID #: IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION ALVIN E. WISEMAN, Plaintiff,
More informationSUBMISSION OF THE LAW SOCIETY S WORKING PARTY TO THE LEGCO LEGAL AFFAIRS PANEL REGARDING THE OPERATIONS OF RECOVERY AGENTS IN HONG KONG
LC Paper No. CB(2)517/05-06(01) SUBMISSION OF THE LAW SOCIETY S WORKING PARTY TO THE LEGCO LEGAL AFFAIRS PANEL REGARDING THE OPERATIONS OF RECOVERY AGENTS IN HONG KONG 1. This is a submission of the Recovery
More informationAndrew Thurlow & Suzanne Innocenzi v The Architect Studio Pty Ltd [2008] NTMC 005 THE ARCHITECT STUDIO PTY LTD
CITATION: PARTIES: Andrew Thurlow & Suzanne Innocenzi v The Architect Studio Pty Ltd [2008] NTMC 005 ANDREW THURLOW SUZANNE INNOCENZI v THE ARCHITECT STUDIO PTY LTD TITLE OF COURT: JURISDICTION: Local
More informationCHAPTER 43 ACTIONS OF DAMAGES FOR, OR ARISING FROM, PERSONAL INJURIES
CHAPTER 43 ACTIONS OF DAMAGES FOR, OR ARISING FROM, PERSONAL INJURIES Application and interpretation of this Chapter 43.1.-(1) Subject to paragraph (4) and rule 43.1A (actions based on clinical negligence).
More informationcase 1:11-cv-00399-JTM-RBC document 35 filed 11/29/12 page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA FORT WAYNE DIVISION
case 1:11-cv-00399-JTM-RBC document 35 filed 11/29/12 page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA FORT WAYNE DIVISION CINDY GOLDEN, Plaintiff, v. No. 1:11 CV 399 STATE FARM MUTUAL
More informationThe Continuing Legal Education Society of Nova Scotia. A Look at Contingency Fee Agreements
The Continuing Legal Education Society of Nova Scotia A Look at Contingency Fee Agreements Scott C. Norton' McInnes Cooper Raymond F. Wagner Wagner & Associates -------- Suite 1110-1660 Hollis Street,
More informationCase 06-03280 Document 35 Filed in TXSB on 11/27/06 Page 1 of 7 IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
Case 06-03280 Document 35 Filed in TXSB on 11/27/06 Page 1 of 7 IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION IN RE DAVID WIMBERLY, CASE NO. 05-81669-G3-13 Debtor,
More informationThe Insurance Amendment Act One Year Later
The Insurance Amendment Act One Year Later Andrew P. Loewen Fillmore Riley LLP 1700-360 Main Street Winnipeg, MB R3C 3Z3 (204) 957-8360 Email: andrewloewen@fillmoreriley.com 1 On September 1, 2014, the
More informationPERSONAL INJURY CLAIMS
PERSONAL INJURY CLAIMS Frequently Asked Questions 1. Can I make a claim? If you have been injured because of the fault of someone else, you can claim financial compensation through the courts. The dependants
More informationAnatomy of a Medical Malpractice Case
Anatomy of a Medical Malpractice Case You have an important story to tell Let our voice tell your story with power, clarity and effectiveness Our Litigation Team Why choose our team? We provide more than
More informationUNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FIFTH CIRCUIT. No. 94-11035. (Summary Calendar) GLEN R. GURLEY and JEAN E. GURLEY, AMERICAN STATES INSURANCE COMPANY,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 94-11035 (Summary Calendar) GLEN R. GURLEY and JEAN E. GURLEY, Plaintiffs-Appellants, versus AMERICAN STATES INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee. Appeal
More informationHow To Get A Court Order To Stop A Man From Selling A Car To A Woman
DISTRICT COURT, CITY AND COUNTY OF DENVER, COLORADO 1437 Bannock Street Denver, CO 80202 STATE OF COLORADO, ex rel. JOHN W. SUTHERS, ATTORNEY GENERAL, Plaintiff, v. GARY E. MAES, individually and d/b/a
More informationNOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION
NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. FABIO VERGARA, deceased, by the Administratrix of his Estate, Blanca Cardona,
More informationThe Foundation of the International Association of Defense Counsel SURVEY OF INTERNATIONAL LITIGATION PROCEDURES: A REFERENCE GUIDE
Responses submitted by: Name: Roddy Bourke Law Firm/Company: McCann FitzGerald Location: Dublin, Ireland 1. Would your jurisdiction be described as a common law or civil code jurisdiction? The Republic
More information2013 IL App (3d) 120130-U. Order filed September 23, 2013 IN THE APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS THIRD DISTRICT A.D., 2013
NOTICE: This order was filed under Supreme Court Rule 23 and may not be cited as precedent by any party except in the limited circumstances allowed under Rule 23(e)(1). 2013 IL App (3d) 120130-U Order
More informationtrial court and Court of Appeals found that the Plaintiff's case was barred by the statute of limitations.
RESULTS Appellate Court upholds decision that malpractice action barred September 2, 2015 The South Carolina Court of Appeals recently upheld a summary judgment obtained by David Overstreet and Mike McCall
More informationConditional Fee Agreement: What You Need to Know
Conditional Fee Agreement: What You Need to Know This document forms an important part of your agreement with us. Please read it carefully. Definitions of words used in this document and the accompanying
More informationFebruary 2014 MICKLEHAM BUSHFIRE NOTICE OF A CLASS ACTION
February 2014 MICKLEHAM BUSHFIRE NOTICE OF A CLASS ACTION Persons who suffered loss or damage as a result of the Mickleham bushfire which started on 9 February 2014 near the eastern edge of Mickleham Road,
More informationORDER MO-1401. Appeal MA_000155_1. City of Toronto
ORDER MO-1401 Appeal MA_000155_1 City of Toronto NATURE OF THE APPEAL: The City of Toronto (the City) received a request under the Municipal Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act (the Act).
More informationMOTOR VEHICLE ACCIDENT CLAIMS ACT
Province of Alberta MOTOR VEHICLE ACCIDENT CLAIMS ACT Revised Statutes of Alberta 2000 Chapter M-22 Current as of April 1, 2015 Office Consolidation Published by Alberta Queen s Printer Alberta Queen s
More informationTHE IMPACT OF HIPAA ON PERSONAL INJURY PRACTICE
THE IMPACT OF HIPAA ON PERSONAL INJURY PRACTICE JEFFREY B. McCLURE Andrews & Kurth L.L.P. Copyright 2003 by Jeffrey B. McClure; Andrews & Kurth State Bar of Texas 19 TH ANNUAL ADVANCED PERSONAL INJURY
More informationDoctors learn that once they enter the court, they are in someone else's operating room.
Law Society of New Brunswick College of Physicians and Surgeons of New Brunswick New Brunswick Medical Society Canadian Bar Association, New Brunswick Branch Doctors learn that once they enter the court,
More informationSUPERIOR COURT FOR THE COUNTY OF ALAMEDA
If there was a debt on your credit report based on an alleged shoplifting incident at a Nordstrom Store, a class action lawsuit may affect your rights. A court authorized this Notice. This is not a solicitation
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE IN NORTHERN IRELAND PROTOCOL FOR CLINICAL NEGLIGENCE LITIGATION
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE IN NORTHERN IRELAND PROTOCOL FOR CLINICAL NEGLIGENCE LITIGATION 1. Practitioners are reminded of the need to bear in mind the overriding objective set out at Order 1 rule 1(a)
More informationSupreme Court of Florida
Supreme Court of Florida No. SC02-2659 CYNTHIA CLEFF NORMAN, Petitioner, vs. TERRI LAMARRIA FARROW, Respondent. [June 24, 2004] WELLS, J. We have for review Norman v. Farrow, 832 So. 2d 158 (Fla. 1st DCA
More informationMedical Negligence. A client s guide
Medical Negligence A client s guide What is medical negligence? This note is intended to give you a broad outline about medical negligence (sometimes called clinical negligence) cases. It is not a substitute
More informationWILLIAMSON COUNTY, TENNESSEE WORKERS COMPENSATION ANTI-FRAUD PLAN
WILLIAMSON COUNTY, TENNESSEE WORKERS COMPENSATION ANTI-FRAUD PLAN I. Provisions for the prevention, detection and investigation of workers compensation fraud. Williamson County Government will take all
More information5/12/2015 AGGREGATE PROCEEDINGS PURPOSE OF AGGREGATE PROCEEDINGS
Pretrial Practice 2015 4:00 P.M. PANEL TOPIC SETTLEMENT AGGREGATE SETTLEMENT CONCERNS May 12, 2015 New York, New York Kelly Strange Crawford, Esq. AGGREGATE PROCEEDINGS Class Actions SINGLE LAW SUIT PROCEEDING
More informationExercise Care When Suing for Unpaid Fees. by Anthony Davis 1 & Michael Downey 2
Exercise Care When Suing for Unpaid Fees by Anthony Davis 1 & Michael Downey 2 When a client does not pay, should a law firm file suit to collect unpaid fees? For a long time, many have suggested the answer
More informationONTARIO SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE
(PRECEDENT STATEMENT OF CLAIM A ) Court File No. ONTARIO SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE BETWEEN: ******************** Plaintiff and ******** corporation Defendant STATEMENT OF CLAIM TO THE DEFENDANT A LEGAL
More informationNEW JERSEY JUDICIARY SMALL CLAIMS. Superior Court of New Jersey Law Division Special Civil Part Small Claims Section
NEW JERSEY JUDICIARY SMALL CLAIMS Superior Court of New Jersey Law Division Special Civil Part Small Claims Section Small Claims page 1 The small claims section is a court in which you can sue a person
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA If you had a Straight Talk, Net10, Simple Mobile, or Telcel America Unlimited Mobile Service Plan, you may be entitled to a cash refund
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI EASTERN DIVISION
Case: 4:12-cv-02030-DDN Doc. #: 42 Filed: 06/19/13 Page: 1 of 8 PageID #: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI EASTERN DIVISION MARY HAYDEN, ) individually and as plaintiff
More informationwww.mcdermottqc.com Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Bill: Implications for Personal Injury Litigation
www.mcdermottqc.com Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Bill: Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Bill: The Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Bill covers a wide
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. DAVID HIMBER V. AUTOMOBILE CLUB OF NEW YORK, INC. CASE NO.: 09 Civ.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK DAVID HIMBER V. AUTOMOBILE CLUB OF NEW YORK, INC. CASE NO.: 09 Civ. 4143 (SJF) NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT All persons who received
More informationAgents E&O Standard of Care Project
Agents E&O Standard of Care Project Survey Maryland To gain a deeper understanding of the differing agent duties and standard of care by state, the Big I Professional Liability Program and Swiss Re Corporate
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF INDIANA
Pursuant to Ind.Appellate Rule 65(D), this Memorandum Decision shall not be regarded as precedent or cited before any court except for the purpose of establishing the defense of res judicata, collateral
More informationSUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA Case No. SC05-1150
SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA Case No. SC05-1150 In Re: Petition to Amend Rule Rule 4-1.5(f)(4)(B) of the Rules of Professional Conduct / as follows: RESPONSE OF HARRY A. SHEVIN, ESQUIRE IN OPPOSITION TO PETITION
More informationTHE SUPREME COURT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE JAMES YAGER. K. WILLIAM CLAUSON & a. Argued: April 3, 2014 Opinion Issued: August 13, 2014
NOTICE: This opinion is subject to motions for rehearing under Rule 22 as well as formal revision before publication in the New Hampshire Reports. Readers are requested to notify the Reporter, Supreme
More information2014 IL App (1st) 122440-U. No. 1-12-2440 IN THE APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT
2014 IL App (1st) 122440-U SECOND DIVISION July 29, 2014 No. 1-12-2440 NOTICE: This order was filed under Supreme Court Rule 23 and may not be cited as precedent by any party except in the limited circumstances
More informationSMALL CLAIMS. Superior Court of New Jersey Law Division Special Civil Part Small Claims Section
SMALL CLAIMS Superior Court of New Jersey Law Division Special Civil Part Small Claims Section Small Claims page 1 T he Small Claims Section is a court in which you may sue someone (the defendant) to collect
More informationUNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Richmond Division
PUBLISHED UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Richmond Division IN RE: WILLIAM G. DADE ) Case No. 00-32487 ANN E. DADE ) Chapter 7 Debtors. ) ) ) DEBORAH R. JOHNSON ) Adversary
More informationYOUR LEGAL RIGHTS AND OPTIONS IN THIS SETTLEMENT
NOTICE OF PROPOSED CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT Aliano et al. v. Templeton Rye Spirits, LLC, Case No. 2014-CH-15667 (Cir. Ct. Cook Cnty., Ill.) IF YOU PURCHASED TEMPLETON RYE WHISKEY FROM JANUARY 1, 2006 TO
More informationIN COURT OF APPEALS. DECISION DATED AND FILED July 14, 2015. Appeal No. 2014AP1151 DISTRICT I MICHAEL L. ROBINSON, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED July 14, 2015 Diane M. Fremgen Clerk of Court of Appeals NOTICE This opinion is subject to further editing. If published, the official version will appear in the
More informationJUDGMENT AFFIRMED. Division A. Opinion by JUDGE NIETO. Casebolt and Dailey, JJ., concur
COLORADO COURT OF APPEALS February 15, 2001 Court of Appeals No. 98CA1099 El Paso County District Court No. 96CV2233 Honorable Theresa M. Cisneros, Judge Carol Koscove, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Richard Bolte,
More informationRE: 1562860 ONTARIO LTD. c.o.b. as SHOELESS JOE S Plaintiff v. INSURANCE PORTFOLIO INC. and CHRISTOPHER CONIGLIO. Defendants v.
COURT FILE NO.: 4022A/07 (Milton) DATE: 20090401 SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE - ONTARIO RE: 1562860 ONTARIO LTD. c.o.b. as SHOELESS JOE S Plaintiff v. INSURANCE PORTFOLIO INC. and CHRISTOPHER CONIGLIO Defendants
More informationNO. COA12-981 NORTH CAROLINA COURT OF APPEALS. Filed: 19 March 2013. 1. Motor Vehicles Lemon Law disclosure requirement
NO. COA12-981 NORTH CAROLINA COURT OF APPEALS Filed: 19 March 2013 TINA HARDISON and DALTON HARDISON, Plaintiffs, v. Craven County No. 10 CVS 01538 KIA MOTORS AMERICA, INC., Defendant. 1. Motor Vehicles
More informationReed Armstrong Quarterly
Reed Armstrong Quarterly January 2009 http://www.reedarmstrong.com/default.asp Contributors: William B. Starnes II Tori L. Cox IN THIS ISSUE: Joint and Several Liability The Fault of Settled Tortfeasors
More informationProvince of Alberta LIMITATIONS ACT. Revised Statutes of Alberta 2000 Chapter L-12. Current as of December 17, 2014. Office Consolidation
Province of Alberta LIMITATIONS ACT Revised Statutes of Alberta 2000 Current as of December 17, 2014 Office Consolidation Published by Alberta Queen s Printer Alberta Queen s Printer 5 th Floor, Park Plaza
More informationClinical Negligence: A guide to making a claim
: A guide to making a claim 2 Our guide to making a clinical negligence claim At Kingsley Napley, our guiding principle is to provide you with a dedicated client service and we aim to make the claims process
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF FIJI AT SUVA CIVIL JURISDICTION. Civil Action No. HBC 137 of 2008 BETWEEN:
IN THE HIGH COURT OF FIJI AT SUVA CIVIL JURISDICTION Civil Action No. HBC 137 of 2008 BETWEEN: ATISH CHAND SHARMA of Lot 11, J.P. Maharaj Road, Nakasi, Nasinu, Unemployed. PLAINTIFF AND: HARDWOOD SALES
More informationPROFESSIONAL NEGLIGENCE ACTIONS EFFECTIVE EXPERT OPINION EVIDENCE
PROFESSIONAL NEGLIGENCE ACTIONS EFFECTIVE EXPERT OPINION EVIDENCE ) - \ These materials were prepared by Jeffrey Scott of.jeffreyd. Scott Legal Professional Corporation,. Regina, Saskatch13wan for the
More information