# Putnam Notes Polynomials and palindromes

Save this PDF as:

Size: px
Start display at page:

## Transcription

1 Putnam Notes Polynomials and palindromes Polynomials show up one way or another in just about every area of math. You will hardly ever see any math competition without at least one problem explicitly concerning polynomials; occasionally you find one where they show up in an implicit way later. It is well-known that not every polynomial over the reals has a full set of roots. (I mean, x has no real roots, for instance.) But they almost do; every constant polynomial over the complex numbers factors into degree one polynomials. So if we count the roots with multiplicity, a polynomial of degree n has n roots. This easily implies that, if p(x) is a nonconstant polynomial over the reals, then it factors into polynomials of degree one and two. [I hope I don t need to explain any of the terminology of the last paragraph. I am willing to do so, but this stuff is really basic. So I hope is the direct connection between factoring and finding roots. Incidentally, on the Putnam and most other competitions, the word number is usually a real number. If it s more restricted or more general or just different, this is usually either clear from context or made explicit.] Our first problem is actually standard, but it showed up on the Putnam, to my surprise. PROBLEM 1 (A2, 1999). Show that if p(x) is a polynomial such that p(a) 0 for all a, then there are polynomials p 1,..., p k such that p(x) = k j=1 p j(x) 2. [Note that there is no mention of what kind of number a is, or what the coefficients are. Thus they are all real by default. k must be a positive integer, because nothing else makes sense.] Solution: This is done (like a lot of these things) by induction on the degree n of p. The cases n = 0 and n = 1 are trivial. We suppose that the result is true for any polynomial q with degree m < n. We have that, if p(x) = a n x n + a n 1 x n a 0, then p(x) = a n (x r 1 ) d1 (x r 2 ) d2 (x r l ) d l (x 2 + b 1 x + c 1 ) e1 (x 2 + b t x + c t ) et, where r 1,...,r l are the distinct real roots (if any) and each x 2 + b s x + c s (if any) is irreducible over the reals that is, it is positive for every real x. Let s assume for simplicity of notation that a n = 1. (Without loss of generality, right? I mean it has to positive (why?), so... ) We first consider the case when d 1 0 that is, there s at least one real root. I claim that d 1 must be even. Otherwise, by choosing a numbers a and b close enough to r 1 but on opposite sides of it, we have that p(a) and p(b) have opposite signs. That is, one s positive and one s negative. How close is close enough? Well, if ɛ is the distance from r 1 to the closest other real root and we choose a < r 1 < b with both r 1 a and b r 1 less than ɛ, then if d 1 is odd, (a r 1 ) d1 is negative, and (b r 1 ) d1 is positive. Now for 1

2 any j 1 (j < l), it s clear that (a r j ) dj and (b r j ) dj have the same sign (a and b are both on the same side of r j ). So do a 2 + b s a + c s and b 2 + b s b + c s for the quadratic irreducible factors (if any) both of these are positive. So p(a) and p(b) would have opposite signs if they are that close to r 1, contradicting the basic assumption. Now letting (x r 1 ) d1 = q(x) 2 and (by the IH) the product t(x) of all the other factors be k j=1 t j(x) 2, we can let p j (x) = q(x)t j (x). [You should check ideally in your head, or the head of some other bright person that p(x) = q(x) 2 t(x) implies that t(a) 0 for all a, too. You should also note that this part of the problem shows that, if p(a) 0 for all a and p(x) has all its roots real, then p(x) is a perfect square.] So we may assume that p(x) has at least one irreducible (over the reals) factor of the form x 2 + bx + c. [In fact, we could at this point assume that p factors completely into such quadratics, but this is overkill.] If the complex roots of this quadratic are α ± βi, then the quadratic itself is (x α) 2 + β 2. So if p(x) = (x 2 + bx + c)t(x), we easily check that t(a) 0 for all a. By induction, t(x) = v j=0 t2 j (x) for some polynomials t j, and then p(x) will be a sum of 2v perfect squares. I trust this is clear, if rather long-winded. [All those parenthetical asides... ] But I wanted not just to solve it, but to pull it to pieces, to extract as much pedagogical juice as was there. I believe this result was known to Da Big Guy. I used the following very basic fact about an arbitrary nonconstant polynomial p(x) = a n x n + + a 0 (with a n 0) rather explicitly in the above proof: If the roots of p(x) are r 1,...,r n (repeated with multiplicity if necessary), then p(x) = a n x n + + a 0 = a n (x r 1 ) (x r n ). This is a routine observation, but it s often overlooked. Since any polynomial over any field has a full set of roots in some probably bigger field (Algebra I stuff, and you need to know this), this always provides two ways of looking at any nonconstant polynomial. Even more overlooked is the consequence concerning the coefficients. Just by multiplying out the right-hand side of that last equation, we see that a n 1 a n = r 1 +r 2 + +r n. Also + an 2 a n = r 1 r 2 +r 1 r 3 + +r n 1 r n. And so on; ( 1) j a n j a n is the sum of a bunch of products those products consist of the r k s taken j at a time. In particular and a very useful obervation r 1 r 2 r n = ( 1) n a 0 a n. Let s see this in action. The next problem was B4 on Putnam PROBLEM 2. Suppose that f(z) = az 4 + bz 3 + cz 2 + dz + e = a(z r 1 )(z r 2 )(z r 3 )(z r 4 ), where a,b,c,d and e are integers with a 0. Show that if r 1 + r 2 is rational, and r 1 + r 2 r 3 + r 4, then r 1 r 2 is rational. 2

3 A few points worth making: first, the use of z as the variable implicitly allows the r j s to be complex. This does not really affect the problem. Second, the coefficeints being integers is a bit bogus they might as well be rationals. Third, what the proof shows is that this works over any pair of fields F K. If a,b,c,d and e come from F and the roots r 1,..., r 4 are in K, and we assume that r 1 + r 2 is an element of F which is different from r 3 + r 4, then r 1 r 2 must also be in F. Solution: By the observation above, we know that r 1 + r 2 + r 3 + r 4 = b a, r 1 r 2 +r 1 r 3 +r 1 r 4 +r 2 r 3 +r 2 r 4 +r 3 r 4 = c a, r 1r 2 r 3 +r 1 r 2 r 4 +r 1 r 3 r 4 +r 2 r 3 r 4 = d a and r 1 r 2 r 3 r 4 = e a. Of course, all the right-hand sides of these equations are rational. From this and the fact that r 1 + r 2 is rational, we get that the following are rational, too: r 3 + r 4 = b a (r 1 + r 2 ); r 1 r 2 + r 3 r 4 = c a (r 1 + r 2 )(r 3 + r 4 ); and r 1 r 2 (r 3 +r 4 )+r 3 r 4 (r 1 +r 2 ) = d a. So r 1r 2 (r 1 +r 2 )+r 3 r 4 (r 1 +r 2 ) is also rational. Subtracting the last two expressions, we see that r 1 r 2 [(r 1 + r 2 ) (r 3 + r 4 )] is rational. Of course (r 1 + r 2 ) (r 3 + r 4 ) is rational, and since it s nonzero, we can divide by it to draw the desired conclusion. An important property of polynomials with integer coefficients is Gauss Lemma, which in this context says the following: LEMMA (da Big Guy). Suppose that p(x) is a polynomial with integer coefficients and that p(x) = p 1 (x)p 2 (x) where p 1 and p 2 have rational coefficients. Then there are rational constants c 1 and c 2 such that q 1 = c 1 p 1 and q 2 = c 2 p 2 have integer coefficients; further p(x) = q 1 (x)q 2 (x). [Slogan: If it factors over the rationals, then it factors over the integers, with basically the same factors. ] A simple corollary is this: if p(x) has integer coefficients, and the integer c is a root of p, then p(x) = (x c)q(x) where q has integer coefficients. This can also be proved directly rather easily. It s a simple observation, but the main thing that makes the rather bizarre proof in the next one run. PROBLEM 3 (A6, Putnam 2000) Let f(x) be a polynomial with integer coefficients. Let a 0 = 0 and a n+1 = f(a n ) for any nonnegative integer n. Show that if a m = 0 for some positive m, then a 1 = 0 or a 2 = 0. Solution: We start with some simple observations. First, a 1 is the constant coefficient of f. Next, a 1 a n for every n (by induction; if f(x) = a 1 + b 1 x + + b j x j, then a n+1 = f(a n ) = a 1 + b 1 a n + + b j a j n, etc.) Now we proceed by contradiction. Assume that a 1 and a 2 are 0, but a m = 0 with m 3 further assume that m has been chosen as small as possible. The last assumption tells us that sequence of a n s doesn t cycle until we hit n = m. That is, if k < l m, we must have a k a l otherwise, by applying f m l times, we would get a k+(m l) = a m = 0, whereas k + (m l) < m. So a m = f(a m 1 ) = 0. Thus f(x) = (x a m 1 )g(x) where g has integer coefficients. We must have that a m 1 a 1 and we already know a 1 a m 1. So 3

4 a m 1 = ±a 1 ; and a m 1 = a 1 is impossible. Hence a m 1 = a 1 and f(x) = (x + a 1 )g(x). Notice that g(x) has constant coefficient 1. Now comes the crunch; working backwards, we show for each 2 k m 2 the following by induction on k. CLAIM. a m k = ka 1 and g(a m k ) = 1. (If m = 3, the claim is vacuously true and we proceed to the next step. We stop once we hit k = m 2.) To show the claim, we start with the case k = 2. We know that a m 2 = ba 1 for some integer b. So a 1 = a m 1 = f(a m 2 ) = (a m 2 + a 1 )g(a m 2 ) = a 1 (b + 1)g(a m 2 ). Cancelling the a 1 s, we must have b + 1 = ±1. b = 0 is impossible, so indeed b = 2 and thus g(a m 2 ) = 1, not -1. For the general case, suppose we have as the induction hypothesis that for any 2 j < k, a m j = ja 1 and g(a m j ) = 1 and k m 2. Start by applying this to j = k 1; (k 1)a 1 = a m (k 1) = f(a m k ) = (a m k + a 1 )g(a m k ). Now for some integer c, a m k = ca 1 and we investigate the possibilities for c, eventually concluding that it has to be k. c cannot be 0 or 1. It also cannot be j for any 1 j < k as a m k a m j = ja 1. Substituting ca 1 for a m k in the last displayed equation, and cancelling a 1 s, we get (k 1) = (c + 1)g(a m k ) and so (c + 1) (k 1). Now we suppose c > 1 and rule that out. Since we know that g(a m (k 1) ) = 1, then g(x) 1 has root a m (k 1) = (k 1)a 1, so that g(x) = 1 + (x + (k 1)a 1 )h(x). If h(a m k ) = 0, then g(a m k ) = 1 and c = k; otherwise g(a m k ) = 1 + (c + k 1)a 1 h(a m k ) (c + k 1) a 1 1. But also g(a m k ) f(a m k ) = a m (k 1) = (k 1) a 1. These inequalities make c > 1 impossible. The only choice left for c is indeed k (just using c + 1 k 1). This immediately forces g(a m k ) = 1, and keeps the induction rolling. That s the proof of the claim. We apply it to k = m 2. We get a 2 = (m 2)a 1 and g(a 2 ) = 1. We have (m 2)a 1 = a 2 = f(a 1 ) = 2a 1 g(a 1 ), 4

5 so g(a 1 ) = m 2 2. But as above, g(x) = 1 + (x + (m 2)a 1)p(x), where p has integer coefficients. So g(a 1 ) (a 1 + (m 2)a 1 )p(a 1 ) 1. In case p(a 1 ) 0, this is m 2. That s out. If p(a 1 ) = 0, then g(a 1 ) = 1, but then f(a 1 ) = 2a 1, and we know it s (m 2)a 1. So that s out, too. We have our final contradiction, and thus the proof of the statement. Something that should be better known than it is concerns the multiplicity of roots of a polynomial. The basic fact is: Suppose that r is a root of the polynomial p(x). Then r is of multiplicity 2 if and only if r is also a root of p (x). (This is easily proved using the product rule.) From this it follows easily that r has multiplicity exactly m if and only if r is a root of p(x), p (x),..., p (m 1) (x) but not of p (m). (p (k) (x) is the kth derivative of p.) It is also easy to see that the multiplicity of r as a root of p must be exactly m 1. [These facts are usually stated for polynomials over the reals and complex numbers, but are true over field of characteristic 0 if one uses the formal derivative for p(x) = n k=0 a kx k, define p (x) = n k=1 ka kx k 1. Weirdness can happen in finite characteristic what, specifically?] PROBLEM 4 (B2, Putnam 1999).Let P (x) be a polynomial of degree n such that P (x) = Q(x)P (x), where Q(x) is a quadratic polynomial and P (x) is the second derivative of P (x). Show that if P (x) has at least two distinct roots then it must have n distinct roots. [The roots may be either real or complex.] Solution: Note that P cannot be a nonzero constant, nor can it have degree 1. We also ignore the (either trivial, or meaningless) case when P is the constant 0. By comparing the coefficients of x n, we see that the x 2 -coefficient of Q can 1 only be n(n 1). We do the problem in the contrapositive. Suppose that r is a root of P which has multiplicity at least 2. We show that r has multiplicity n, and that does it there can be no other roots. To do this, we show that r is a root of P (k) for every k < n. Now by the observations in the last couple of paragraphs, the multiplicity of r as a root of P is two less than its multiplicity in P. This implies that (x r) 2 1 Q and so Q can only be n(n 1) (x r)2. The given equation becomes n(n 1)P = (x r) 2 P. We show by induction on k that [n(n 1) k(k 1)]P (k) = (x r) 2 P (k+2) + 2k(x r)p (k+1). Interpreting P (0) as P itself, this is just the last equation in case k = 0. For k = 1 it follows immediately from the last equation by differentiating. Indeed, if are given the displayed equation, the differentiating both sides yields [n(n 1) k(k 1)]P (k+1) = (x r) 2 P (k+3) +2(x r)p (k+2) +2k(x r)p (k+2) +2kP (k+1). Shifting 2kP (k+1) across the equality and collecting P (k+2) -terms gives [n(n 1) (k + 1)k]P (k+1) = (x r) 2 P (k+3) + 2(k + 1)(x r)p (k+2), 5

6 finishing the inductive step. Now if k < n, n(n 1) k(k 1) > 0 and x r is patently a root of the right-hand side of the displayed equation we proved, so indeed x r is a root of P (k). This does it. [I presume this is not the first time you have seen a proof of something by induction where we have to prove something stronger than what we really want to keep the ball rolling. Often, the difficulty is finding the correct induction hypothesis.] One of the cuter simple ideas associated with polynomials is the notion of palindrome. For simplicity, we assume p(x) = n k=0 a kx k with both a n, a 0 0; we won t define palindromes of other polynomials. The palindrome P al(p) of p is the polynomial n k=0 a m kx k, also of degree n. (E.g., if p(x) = 3x 3 +2x+1, then P al(p)(x) = x 3 +2x 2 3.) P al(p) is easily seen to be the same as x n p(x 1 ). If, we have P al(p) = p, p itself is called a palindrome. [I should mention that while the terminology palindrome is standard, the notation P al(p) is not as far as I know, there is no standard notation for the palindrome of a polynomial.] A few simple observations, all readily checked from the definition or the easy characterization. First P al(p al(p)) = p for any p of the required form (this would not work if we extended the definition to all polynomials in the most obvious way). Next, P al(p(x)q(x)) = P al(p(x))p al(q(x)). (Under certain situations, P al(p + q) = P al(p) + P al(q), too, but not always.) Most important, r is a root of p(x) (of multiplicity m) if and only if r 1 is a root of P al(p)(x) (of the same multiplicity m). In particular, if p is its own palindrome, then when r is a root, so is r 1. I trust you see this is rather adorable. But is it useful? Well, check out following two items, neither of which mentions palindromes explicitly. PROBLEM 5 (B5, Putnam 1990). Does there exist an infinite sequence a 0, a 1,..., a n,... of nonzero real numbers such that, for every n 1, p n (x) = a 0 +a 1 x+ +a n x n has n distinct real roots? Solution: The answer s yes, but it s not as obvious as it might look. In fact, something more is true: CLAIM: Suppose that p(x) = n k=0 a kx k is a polynomial with n distinct nonzero real roots. Then there is an ɛ > 0 such that whenever 0 < a n+1 < ɛ, p(x) + a n+1 x n+1 has n + 1 distinct real roots. It is clearly enought to verify this claim, because it allows us to pick our a n s inductively so that each p n has n distinct real roots. Any a 0 and a 1 will get us started. So why is the claim true? Given p n = p as above, let q n (x) = P al(p n ). Then q n has n distinct nonzero real roots if r 1,..., r n are the roots of p n, then r1 1,..., r 1 n are the roots of q n. Then xq n (x) has n + 1 distinct real roots, one of which is zero. Now if a n+1 0 is any real number which is small enough in absolute value, then xq n (x) + a n+1 still has n + 1 distinct real roots, all nonzero. xq n (x) will have n relative extremums, one between each consecutive pair of roots. This 6

7 is by Rolle s Theorem. Each relative minimum value will be negative and each relative maximum value positive; if we move the graph of y = xq n (x) up or down by a small enough constant (less in absolute value than the smallest absolute value of these minimum and maximum values), this will remain true. (I trust this is clear; perhaps an actual graph would help.) Now take p n+1 = a 0 + a 1 x + + a n x n + a n+1 x n+1, the palindrome of xq n + a n+1 ; it has n + 1 distinct real roots. I dare you to do this without using the palindrome repeating the idea without using the name doesn t count. The next one really has a sort of semi-palindrome in it. But you should see that the idea is the same. How do think I found g(x) in the first place? PROBLEM 6 (A6, Putnam 85). Given a polynomial p(x) = m k=0 a kx k, let Γ(p(x)) = m k=0 a2 k. Given f(x) = 3x2 + 7x + 2, find with proof a polynomial g(x) such that 1. g(0) = 1, and 2. Γ(f(x) n ) = Γ(g(x) n ) for every positive integer n. Of course, if q = P al(p), then Γ(p) = Γ(q), but that doesn t work in this case, as the palindrome of f has constant coefficient 3, not 1. But... Solution: Start by factoring f (always a good move with polynomials). f(x) = (3x + 1)(x + 2), so maybe the quasi-palindrome g(x) = (3x + 1)(2x + 1) = 6x 2 + 5x + 1 works. In fact it does, and here s why. First note that f(x) n = (3x + 1) n (x + 2) n and g(x) n = (3x + 1) n (2x + 1) n, for all n; also (x + 2) n and (2x + 1) n are palindromes of each other. Now Γ is not multiplicative; (e.g., Γ(3x + 1) = 10, Γ(x + 2) = 5 and Γ((3x + 1)(x + 2)) = 62). But it has the following property, which does the trick. CLAIM: If p 1 (x) = q(x)r 1 (x) and p 2 (x) = q(x)r 2 (x), where r 2 = P al(r 1 ), then Γ(p 1 ) = Γ(p 2 ). Proof of the claim (and then end of the problem): The crucial observation is that, for any p(x), Γ(p) is the constant coefficient (that is, the coefficient of x 0 ) in the product p(x)p(x 1 ). This is easily seen just by multiplying out (a 0 + a 1 x + + a m x m )(a 0 + a 1 x a m x m ). So Γ(p 1 ) is the constant coefficient of q(x)q(x 1 )r 1 (x)r 1 (x 1 ) and Γ(p 2 ) is the constant coefficient of q(x)q(x 1 )r 2 (x)r 2 (x 1 ). But as r 1 and r 2 are palindromes, r 1 (x)r 1 (x 1 ) = r 2 (x)r 2 (x 1 ) = x n r 1 (x)r 2 (x). That does it. Here s an oldie-but-goodie. PROBLEM 7 (A3, Putnam 78) Let p(x) = 2+4x+3x 2 +5x 3 +3x 4 +4x 5 +2x 6, and for 0 < k < 5, define x k I k = p(x) dx. 0 7

8 For which value of k is I k minimum? Solution: You will note that the crucial properties of p are (i) it has no nonnegative roots; and (ii) it s a palindrome. If you change the degree (which could be anything at least 2) the numbers will change but the idea won t. Note that I k could also be defined for 1 < k 0 using the same formula. For negative k, the integral is also improper at 0, but it converges as long as k > 1. We do so that is, we extend the definition to 1 < k < 5. Having noticed that p is a palindrome, we make the obvious substitution. Let u = x 1 ; then p(x) = p(u 1 ) = u 6 p(u). dx = du u and of course x k = u k. 2 The integral becomes which is 0 u k u 6 p(u) ( du u 2 ), 0 u 4 k p(u) du, which is I 4 k. (This works for any 1 < k < 5.) The minimum occurs when k = 4 k, that is, when k = 2. Indeed, we show that I k > I 2 when k > 2 (and hence when k < 2). Say k = 2 + 2α where 0 < α < 3 2. Then I k I 2 = 1 2 (I 2+2α + I 2 2α 2I 2 ) = x 2+2α 2x 2 + x 2 2α dx. p(x) The denominator is always positive on [0, ), and so is the numerator, except at x = 0, x = 1. It s x 2 (x 2α 2 + x 2α ) = x 2 (x α x α ) 2. So the last integral is positive, so I k > I 2. That does it. The notion of palindrome extends in an obvious way to numbers expressed in decimal notation (e.g., and are palindromes of each other, and just plain a palindrome) or indeed in any base. Since decimal notation is polynomial in nature, this is to be expected. The next little gem does not mention polynomials at all, but should be thought of in terms of them. PROBLEM 8 (B5, Putnam 2002). A base b palindrome is an integer which is the same when read backwards in base b. For example, 200 is not a palindrome in base 10, but it is a palindrome in base 9 (242) and in base 7 (404). Show that there is an integer which for at least 2002 values of b is a palindrome in base b with three digits. Although I m not sure that I approve of using digits for places like that, this is in a way a classic Putnam problem. That is, you can look at it and pick away at it forever without getting anywhere, but it becomes obvious (and short) once you get the idea. Solution: A base b palindrome with three digits is aca in base b. We must have 1 a < b and 0 c < b. The number represented is then ab 2 + cb + a = a(b 2 + 1) + cb. In case c = 2a, this simplifies to a(b + 1) 2. 8

9 Let N = [(2002)!] 2 and for j = 1, 2,..., 2002 let a j = j 2, c j = 2j 2 and b j = (2002)! j 1. Clearly a j < c j < b j for each j. The number represented by the base b j expression a j c j a j is then a j b 2 j + c jb j + a j = a j (b j + 1) 2 = N for all j. Without the first paragraph, which is not necessary, this answer is shorter than the statement of the problem. But enough about palindromes for now. Here s another problem in which no mention is made of polynomials, but they help with the notation. It s easy if you look at it right. PROBLEM 9 (Putnam A2, 1986) Find the units digit (the number in the ones place) of [ ]. Solution: While it is not necessary, it is useful to think of as x, so that = x 200. In fact, you might want to think of 3 as y. Let s do so. x 200 y 200 = (x y)(x x 198 y + + xy y 199 ), so x 200 = (x x 198 y + xy y 199 )(x y) + y 200. Now y 200 = ( 3) 200 = < , so the integer part of x200 x y is x xy y 199, which is clearly equivalent to ( 3) 199 (mod 10). Operating mod 10, ( 3) 199 = ( 3)(9 99 ) is equivalent to ( 3)(( 1) 99 ) = +3. The final (units) digit is 3. For another example where polynomials come in handy, look at this beauty. PROBLEM 10 (B5, Putnam 2000). Let S 0 be a finite nonempty set of positive integers. We define sets S 1, S 2,...,S n,... of positive integers as follows: Integer a is in S n+1 if and only if exactly one of a and a 1 is in S n. Show that there exist infinitely many integers N such that S N = S 0 {N + a : a S 0 }. So the set S 0 replicates itself later, but reproduces the original, too. It s not obvious how to usefully bring polynomials into this, but just watch. In fact, they are polynomials over the 2-element field Z 2. Solution: Given any finite nonempty set of positive integers S, let p S (x) be the polynomial (with coefficients in Z 2 ) s S xs. For any such S, consider (1 + x)p S. If a 1 S and a / S, then the coefficient of x a in (1 + x)p S is 1 as x a 1 is multiplied by x; if a S but a 1 / S, the coefficient is again 1. If neither is in S, the coefficient is 0, as it is if both a 1 and a are in S then we get 1 x a + x x a 1 = 0x a since we are over Z 2. Thus, if S = S n, (1 + x)p S = p Sn+1. Generally, (1 + x) n p S0 = p Sn for each n. Now if N = 2 m for some m, then (1 + x) N = 1 + x N as we are operating 9

10 over Z 2. If we also suppose that N > a for any a S 0, then (1 + x) N p S0 = (1 + x N )p S0 = a S 0 x a + a S 0 x N+a with no cancellations. This shows that if N is a large enough power of 2, S N has exactly the form requested in the statement of the problem. I could go on, but for now just a word about polynomials in more than one variable. The basic thing to know is that if p(x 1,..., x n ) and q(x 1,..., x n ) are such polynomials (over any infinite field F, usually the reals) and p(ā) = q(ā) for every ā F n, then the coefficients must be identical. This is obvious when n = 1, but true for any n. To spell out what I mean, given any tuple e = (e 1,..., e n ) of nonnegative integers, there is a coefficient c e of x e1 1 xen n occurring in p and such a coefficient d e in q. If p(ā) = q(ā) for every ā, then c e = d e for every e. (This is not hard to prove by induction; it is standard, so you can use it. Also, it definitely needs that the field is infinite if F is finite, it s false even if n = 1.) Let s do a pretty simple one. PROBLEM 11 (B1, Putnam 2003). Do there exist polynomials a(x), b(x), c(y) and d(y) such that a(x)c(y) + b(x)d(y) = 1 + xy + x 2 y 2 holds identically? Solution: No, as you would expect. The first solution I got to this was very ad hoc, involving taking derivatives and examining the coefficients in detail. I probably couldn t reproduce it to save my life. I present two proofs, one very simple-minded which I found later, the other a very clever one that Mathieu Guay-Paquet showed me. Proof 1. Suppose towards a contradiction that we have such a(x), etc. I first claim that a(x) cannot have two (or more) distinct complex roots. For suppose that a(r 1 ) = a(r 2 ) = 0 with r 1 r 2. Then b(r 1 )d(y) = 1 + r 1 y + r1y 2 2 and b(r 2 )d(y) = 1 + r 2 y + r2y 2 2 (for all y); but this implies that 1 + r 1 y + r1y 2 2 and 1 + r 2 y + r 2 y 2 are scalar multiples of each other (over the complexes). That s false. Similarly, of course, b(x), c(y) and d(y) can have a most one complex root apiece. Next, I claim that if indeed a(x) has a complex root, it must be 0. For if r 0 and a(r) = 0, then b(r)d(y) = 1 + ry + r 2 y 2 for all y. Obviously b(r) 0. But then d(y) has the two distinct roots 1 2r ( 1 ± i 3), contrary to the above. Similarly the only possible root of the others is 0. So the only possibility is that a(x) = a(1)x k, b(x) = b(1)x l, c(y) = c(1)y m and d(y) = d(1)y n for some integers k, l, m, n. And that s out, too. Proof 2. Suppose that a(x), b(x), c(y) and d(y) form a counterexample, where a(x) = a 0 + a 1 x + a 2 x , b(x) = b 0 + b 1 x + b 2 x , c(y) = 10

11 c 0 + c 1 y + c 2 y and d(y) = d 0 + d 1 y + d 2 y , where in each case the... stands for terms of higher degree. Then 1+xy+x 2 y 2 = (a 0 +a 1 x+a 2 x )(c 0 +c 1 y+c 2 y )+(b 0 +b 1 x+b 2 x )(d 0 +d 1 y+d 2 y ). Comparing the coefficients of x 0 y 0, xy and x 2 y 2 on each side gives a 0 b 0 +c 0 d 0 = a 1 b 1 + c 1 d 1 = a 2 b 2 + c 2 d 2 = 1. Comparing the coefficients of x, y, x 2, y 2, x 2 y and xy 2 we see that a 1 c 0 + b 1 d 0 = a 0 c 1 + b 0 d 1 = a 2 c 0 + b 2 d 0 = a 0 c 2 + b 0 d 2 = a 0 b 0 ( ) a 2 c 1 + b 2 d 1 = a 1 c 2 + b 1 d 2 = 0. Thus, a 1 b 1 c0 c 1 c 2 = I, the d a 2 b 0 d 1 d identity matrix. This is impossible over any field. The second proof (Mathieu s) shows the impossibility of the identity of the polynomials over any field; it is thus slightly preferable to mine, which can be directly adapted to any field of characteristic different from 2 or 3. 11

### PUTNAM TRAINING POLYNOMIALS. Exercises 1. Find a polynomial with integral coefficients whose zeros include 2 + 5.

PUTNAM TRAINING POLYNOMIALS (Last updated: November 17, 2015) Remark. This is a list of exercises on polynomials. Miguel A. Lerma Exercises 1. Find a polynomial with integral coefficients whose zeros include

### Chapter 4, Arithmetic in F [x] Polynomial arithmetic and the division algorithm.

Chapter 4, Arithmetic in F [x] Polynomial arithmetic and the division algorithm. We begin by defining the ring of polynomials with coefficients in a ring R. After some preliminary results, we specialize

### a 1 x + a 0 =0. (3) ax 2 + bx + c =0. (4)

ROOTS OF POLYNOMIAL EQUATIONS In this unit we discuss polynomial equations. A polynomial in x of degree n, where n 0 is an integer, is an expression of the form P n (x) =a n x n + a n 1 x n 1 + + a 1 x

### PROBLEM SET 6: POLYNOMIALS

PROBLEM SET 6: POLYNOMIALS 1. introduction In this problem set we will consider polynomials with coefficients in K, where K is the real numbers R, the complex numbers C, the rational numbers Q or any other

### MOP 2007 Black Group Integer Polynomials Yufei Zhao. Integer Polynomials. June 29, 2007 Yufei Zhao yufeiz@mit.edu

Integer Polynomials June 9, 007 Yufei Zhao yufeiz@mit.edu We will use Z[x] to denote the ring of polynomials with integer coefficients. We begin by summarizing some of the common approaches used in dealing

### Some Polynomial Theorems. John Kennedy Mathematics Department Santa Monica College 1900 Pico Blvd. Santa Monica, CA 90405 rkennedy@ix.netcom.

Some Polynomial Theorems by John Kennedy Mathematics Department Santa Monica College 1900 Pico Blvd. Santa Monica, CA 90405 rkennedy@ix.netcom.com This paper contains a collection of 31 theorems, lemmas,

### it is easy to see that α = a

21. Polynomial rings Let us now turn out attention to determining the prime elements of a polynomial ring, where the coefficient ring is a field. We already know that such a polynomial ring is a UF. Therefore

### Factoring Polynomials

Factoring Polynomials Sue Geller June 19, 2006 Factoring polynomials over the rational numbers, real numbers, and complex numbers has long been a standard topic of high school algebra. With the advent

### 1 = (a 0 + b 0 α) 2 + + (a m 1 + b m 1 α) 2. for certain elements a 0,..., a m 1, b 0,..., b m 1 of F. Multiplying out, we obtain

Notes on real-closed fields These notes develop the algebraic background needed to understand the model theory of real-closed fields. To understand these notes, a standard graduate course in algebra is

### SOLVING POLYNOMIAL EQUATIONS

C SOLVING POLYNOMIAL EQUATIONS We will assume in this appendix that you know how to divide polynomials using long division and synthetic division. If you need to review those techniques, refer to an algebra

### THE FUNDAMENTAL THEOREM OF ALGEBRA VIA PROPER MAPS

THE FUNDAMENTAL THEOREM OF ALGEBRA VIA PROPER MAPS KEITH CONRAD 1. Introduction The Fundamental Theorem of Algebra says every nonconstant polynomial with complex coefficients can be factored into linear

### Sequences and Series

Sequences and Series Consider the following sum: 2 + 4 + 8 + 6 + + 2 i + The dots at the end indicate that the sum goes on forever. Does this make sense? Can we assign a numerical value to an infinite

### 6 EXTENDING ALGEBRA. 6.0 Introduction. 6.1 The cubic equation. Objectives

6 EXTENDING ALGEBRA Chapter 6 Extending Algebra Objectives After studying this chapter you should understand techniques whereby equations of cubic degree and higher can be solved; be able to factorise

### Unique Factorization

Unique Factorization Waffle Mathcamp 2010 Throughout these notes, all rings will be assumed to be commutative. 1 Factorization in domains: definitions and examples In this class, we will study the phenomenon

### Tim Kerins. Leaving Certificate Honours Maths - Algebra. Tim Kerins. the date

Leaving Certificate Honours Maths - Algebra the date Chapter 1 Algebra This is an important portion of the course. As well as generally accounting for 2 3 questions in examination it is the basis for many

### Integer roots of quadratic and cubic polynomials with integer coefficients

Integer roots of quadratic and cubic polynomials with integer coefficients Konstantine Zelator Mathematics, Computer Science and Statistics 212 Ben Franklin Hall Bloomsburg University 400 East Second Street

### WHAT ARE MATHEMATICAL PROOFS AND WHY THEY ARE IMPORTANT?

WHAT ARE MATHEMATICAL PROOFS AND WHY THEY ARE IMPORTANT? introduction Many students seem to have trouble with the notion of a mathematical proof. People that come to a course like Math 216, who certainly

### Factoring Trinomials: The ac Method

6.7 Factoring Trinomials: The ac Method 6.7 OBJECTIVES 1. Use the ac test to determine whether a trinomial is factorable over the integers 2. Use the results of the ac test to factor a trinomial 3. For

### Notes on Factoring. MA 206 Kurt Bryan

The General Approach Notes on Factoring MA 26 Kurt Bryan Suppose I hand you n, a 2 digit integer and tell you that n is composite, with smallest prime factor around 5 digits. Finding a nontrivial factor

### Math 345-60 Abstract Algebra I Questions for Section 23: Factoring Polynomials over a Field

Math 345-60 Abstract Algebra I Questions for Section 23: Factoring Polynomials over a Field 1. Throughout this section, F is a field and F [x] is the ring of polynomials with coefficients in F. We will

### Copyrighted Material. Chapter 1 DEGREE OF A CURVE

Chapter 1 DEGREE OF A CURVE Road Map The idea of degree is a fundamental concept, which will take us several chapters to explore in depth. We begin by explaining what an algebraic curve is, and offer two

### 3 1. Note that all cubes solve it; therefore, there are no more

Math 13 Problem set 5 Artin 11.4.7 Factor the following polynomials into irreducible factors in Q[x]: (a) x 3 3x (b) x 3 3x + (c) x 9 6x 6 + 9x 3 3 Solution: The first two polynomials are cubics, so if

### REVIEW EXERCISES DAVID J LOWRY

REVIEW EXERCISES DAVID J LOWRY Contents 1. Introduction 1 2. Elementary Functions 1 2.1. Factoring and Solving Quadratics 1 2.2. Polynomial Inequalities 3 2.3. Rational Functions 4 2.4. Exponentials and

### 3.2 The Factor Theorem and The Remainder Theorem

3. The Factor Theorem and The Remainder Theorem 57 3. The Factor Theorem and The Remainder Theorem Suppose we wish to find the zeros of f(x) = x 3 + 4x 5x 4. Setting f(x) = 0 results in the polynomial

### Lagrange Interpolation is a method of fitting an equation to a set of points that functions well when there are few points given.

Polynomials (Ch.1) Study Guide by BS, JL, AZ, CC, SH, HL Lagrange Interpolation is a method of fitting an equation to a set of points that functions well when there are few points given. Sasha s method

### Copy in your notebook: Add an example of each term with the symbols used in algebra 2 if there are any.

Algebra 2 - Chapter Prerequisites Vocabulary Copy in your notebook: Add an example of each term with the symbols used in algebra 2 if there are any. P1 p. 1 1. counting(natural) numbers - {1,2,3,4,...}

### Revised Version of Chapter 23. We learned long ago how to solve linear congruences. ax c (mod m)

Chapter 23 Squares Modulo p Revised Version of Chapter 23 We learned long ago how to solve linear congruences ax c (mod m) (see Chapter 8). It s now time to take the plunge and move on to quadratic equations.

### SUBGROUPS OF CYCLIC GROUPS. 1. Introduction In a group G, we denote the (cyclic) group of powers of some g G by

SUBGROUPS OF CYCLIC GROUPS KEITH CONRAD 1. Introduction In a group G, we denote the (cyclic) group of powers of some g G by g = {g k : k Z}. If G = g, then G itself is cyclic, with g as a generator. Examples

### FACTORING POLYNOMIALS IN THE RING OF FORMAL POWER SERIES OVER Z

FACTORING POLYNOMIALS IN THE RING OF FORMAL POWER SERIES OVER Z DANIEL BIRMAJER, JUAN B GIL, AND MICHAEL WEINER Abstract We consider polynomials with integer coefficients and discuss their factorization

### calculating the result modulo 3, as follows: p(0) = 0 3 + 0 + 1 = 1 0,

Homework #02, due 1/27/10 = 9.4.1, 9.4.2, 9.4.5, 9.4.6, 9.4.7. Additional problems recommended for study: (9.4.3), 9.4.4, 9.4.9, 9.4.11, 9.4.13, (9.4.14), 9.4.17 9.4.1 Determine whether the following polynomials

### RESULTANT AND DISCRIMINANT OF POLYNOMIALS

RESULTANT AND DISCRIMINANT OF POLYNOMIALS SVANTE JANSON Abstract. This is a collection of classical results about resultants and discriminants for polynomials, compiled mainly for my own use. All results

### 1.3 Algebraic Expressions

1.3 Algebraic Expressions A polynomial is an expression of the form: a n x n + a n 1 x n 1 +... + a 2 x 2 + a 1 x + a 0 The numbers a 1, a 2,..., a n are called coefficients. Each of the separate parts,

### Math Review. for the Quantitative Reasoning Measure of the GRE revised General Test

Math Review for the Quantitative Reasoning Measure of the GRE revised General Test www.ets.org Overview This Math Review will familiarize you with the mathematical skills and concepts that are important

### Introduction to Algebraic Geometry. Bézout s Theorem and Inflection Points

Introduction to Algebraic Geometry Bézout s Theorem and Inflection Points 1. The resultant. Let K be a field. Then the polynomial ring K[x] is a unique factorisation domain (UFD). Another example of a

### Mathematics Review for MS Finance Students

Mathematics Review for MS Finance Students Anthony M. Marino Department of Finance and Business Economics Marshall School of Business Lecture 1: Introductory Material Sets The Real Number System Functions,

### Modern Algebra Lecture Notes: Rings and fields set 4 (Revision 2)

Modern Algebra Lecture Notes: Rings and fields set 4 (Revision 2) Kevin Broughan University of Waikato, Hamilton, New Zealand May 13, 2010 Remainder and Factor Theorem 15 Definition of factor If f (x)

### Basic Concepts of Point Set Topology Notes for OU course Math 4853 Spring 2011

Basic Concepts of Point Set Topology Notes for OU course Math 4853 Spring 2011 A. Miller 1. Introduction. The definitions of metric space and topological space were developed in the early 1900 s, largely

### CHAPTER SIX IRREDUCIBILITY AND FACTORIZATION 1. BASIC DIVISIBILITY THEORY

January 10, 2010 CHAPTER SIX IRREDUCIBILITY AND FACTORIZATION 1. BASIC DIVISIBILITY THEORY The set of polynomials over a field F is a ring, whose structure shares with the ring of integers many characteristics.

### FACTORING IN QUADRATIC FIELDS. 1. Introduction. This is called a quadratic field and it has degree 2 over Q. Similarly, set

FACTORING IN QUADRATIC FIELDS KEITH CONRAD For a squarefree integer d other than 1, let 1. Introduction K = Q[ d] = {x + y d : x, y Q}. This is called a quadratic field and it has degree 2 over Q. Similarly,

### Number Theory Hungarian Style. Cameron Byerley s interpretation of Csaba Szabó s lectures

Number Theory Hungarian Style Cameron Byerley s interpretation of Csaba Szabó s lectures August 20, 2005 2 0.1 introduction Number theory is a beautiful subject and even cooler when you learn about it

### 3. INNER PRODUCT SPACES

. INNER PRODUCT SPACES.. Definition So far we have studied abstract vector spaces. These are a generalisation of the geometric spaces R and R. But these have more structure than just that of a vector space.

### Die ganzen zahlen hat Gott gemacht

Die ganzen zahlen hat Gott gemacht Polynomials with integer values B.Sury A quote attributed to the famous mathematician L.Kronecker is Die Ganzen Zahlen hat Gott gemacht, alles andere ist Menschenwerk.

### SECTION 0.6: POLYNOMIAL, RATIONAL, AND ALGEBRAIC EXPRESSIONS

(Section 0.6: Polynomial, Rational, and Algebraic Expressions) 0.6.1 SECTION 0.6: POLYNOMIAL, RATIONAL, AND ALGEBRAIC EXPRESSIONS LEARNING OBJECTIVES Be able to identify polynomial, rational, and algebraic

### Factoring Polynomials

Factoring Polynomials 4-1-2014 The opposite of multiplying polynomials is factoring. Why would you want to factor a polynomial? Let p(x) be a polynomial. p(c) = 0 is equivalent to x c dividing p(x). Recall

### FACTORISATION YEARS. A guide for teachers - Years 9 10 June 2011. The Improving Mathematics Education in Schools (TIMES) Project

9 10 YEARS The Improving Mathematics Education in Schools (TIMES) Project FACTORISATION NUMBER AND ALGEBRA Module 33 A guide for teachers - Years 9 10 June 2011 Factorisation (Number and Algebra : Module

### 9. POLYNOMIALS. Example 1: The expression a(x) = x 3 4x 2 + 7x 11 is a polynomial in x. The coefficients of a(x) are the numbers 1, 4, 7, 11.

9. POLYNOMIALS 9.1. Definition of a Polynomial A polynomial is an expression of the form: a(x) = a n x n + a n-1 x n-1 +... + a 1 x + a 0. The symbol x is called an indeterminate and simply plays the role

### CM2202: Scientific Computing and Multimedia Applications General Maths: 2. Algebra - Factorisation

CM2202: Scientific Computing and Multimedia Applications General Maths: 2. Algebra - Factorisation Prof. David Marshall School of Computer Science & Informatics Factorisation Factorisation is a way of

### Reducibility of Second Order Differential Operators with Rational Coefficients

Reducibility of Second Order Differential Operators with Rational Coefficients Joseph Geisbauer University of Arkansas-Fort Smith Advisor: Dr. Jill Guerra May 10, 2007 1. INTRODUCTION In this paper we

### Polynomials. Key Terms. quadratic equation parabola conjugates trinomial. polynomial coefficient degree monomial binomial GCF

Polynomials 5 5.1 Addition and Subtraction of Polynomials and Polynomial Functions 5.2 Multiplication of Polynomials 5.3 Division of Polynomials Problem Recognition Exercises Operations on Polynomials

### The Division Algorithm for Polynomials Handout Monday March 5, 2012

The Division Algorithm for Polynomials Handout Monday March 5, 0 Let F be a field (such as R, Q, C, or F p for some prime p. This will allow us to divide by any nonzero scalar. (For some of the following,

### CHAPTER II THE LIMIT OF A SEQUENCE OF NUMBERS DEFINITION OF THE NUMBER e.

CHAPTER II THE LIMIT OF A SEQUENCE OF NUMBERS DEFINITION OF THE NUMBER e. This chapter contains the beginnings of the most important, and probably the most subtle, notion in mathematical analysis, i.e.,

### POLYNOMIAL RINGS AND UNIQUE FACTORIZATION DOMAINS

POLYNOMIAL RINGS AND UNIQUE FACTORIZATION DOMAINS RUSS WOODROOFE 1. Unique Factorization Domains Throughout the following, we think of R as sitting inside R[x] as the constant polynomials (of degree 0).

### Discrete Mathematics: Homework 7 solution. Due: 2011.6.03

EE 2060 Discrete Mathematics spring 2011 Discrete Mathematics: Homework 7 solution Due: 2011.6.03 1. Let a n = 2 n + 5 3 n for n = 0, 1, 2,... (a) (2%) Find a 0, a 1, a 2, a 3 and a 4. (b) (2%) Show that

### H/wk 13, Solutions to selected problems

H/wk 13, Solutions to selected problems Ch. 4.1, Problem 5 (a) Find the number of roots of x x in Z 4, Z Z, any integral domain, Z 6. (b) Find a commutative ring in which x x has infinitely many roots.

### What are the place values to the left of the decimal point and their associated powers of ten?

The verbal answers to all of the following questions should be memorized before completion of algebra. Answers that are not memorized will hinder your ability to succeed in geometry and algebra. (Everything

### 7. Some irreducible polynomials

7. Some irreducible polynomials 7.1 Irreducibles over a finite field 7.2 Worked examples Linear factors x α of a polynomial P (x) with coefficients in a field k correspond precisely to roots α k [1] of

### 5. Factoring by the QF method

5. Factoring by the QF method 5.0 Preliminaries 5.1 The QF view of factorability 5.2 Illustration of the QF view of factorability 5.3 The QF approach to factorization 5.4 Alternative factorization by the

### OSTROWSKI FOR NUMBER FIELDS

OSTROWSKI FOR NUMBER FIELDS KEITH CONRAD Ostrowski classified the nontrivial absolute values on Q: up to equivalence, they are the usual (archimedean) absolute value and the p-adic absolute values for

### Indiana State Core Curriculum Standards updated 2009 Algebra I

Indiana State Core Curriculum Standards updated 2009 Algebra I Strand Description Boardworks High School Algebra presentations Operations With Real Numbers Linear Equations and A1.1 Students simplify and

### Mathematics Course 111: Algebra I Part IV: Vector Spaces

Mathematics Course 111: Algebra I Part IV: Vector Spaces D. R. Wilkins Academic Year 1996-7 9 Vector Spaces A vector space over some field K is an algebraic structure consisting of a set V on which are

### Factoring Polynomials

Factoring Polynomials Hoste, Miller, Murieka September 12, 2011 1 Factoring In the previous section, we discussed how to determine the product of two or more terms. Consider, for instance, the equations

### Prime Numbers and Irreducible Polynomials

Prime Numbers and Irreducible Polynomials M. Ram Murty The similarity between prime numbers and irreducible polynomials has been a dominant theme in the development of number theory and algebraic geometry.

### Algebra Unpacked Content For the new Common Core standards that will be effective in all North Carolina schools in the 2012-13 school year.

This document is designed to help North Carolina educators teach the Common Core (Standard Course of Study). NCDPI staff are continually updating and improving these tools to better serve teachers. Algebra

### 3.6 The Real Zeros of a Polynomial Function

SECTION 3.6 The Real Zeros of a Polynomial Function 219 3.6 The Real Zeros of a Polynomial Function PREPARING FOR THIS SECTION Before getting started, review the following: Classification of Numbers (Appendix,

### Module MA3411: Abstract Algebra Galois Theory Appendix Michaelmas Term 2013

Module MA3411: Abstract Algebra Galois Theory Appendix Michaelmas Term 2013 D. R. Wilkins Copyright c David R. Wilkins 1997 2013 Contents A Cyclotomic Polynomials 79 A.1 Minimum Polynomials of Roots of

### U.C. Berkeley CS276: Cryptography Handout 0.1 Luca Trevisan January, 2009. Notes on Algebra

U.C. Berkeley CS276: Cryptography Handout 0.1 Luca Trevisan January, 2009 Notes on Algebra These notes contain as little theory as possible, and most results are stated without proof. Any introductory

### The finite field with 2 elements The simplest finite field is

The finite field with 2 elements The simplest finite field is GF (2) = F 2 = {0, 1} = Z/2 It has addition and multiplication + and defined to be 0 + 0 = 0 0 + 1 = 1 1 + 0 = 1 1 + 1 = 0 0 0 = 0 0 1 = 0

### PROOFS BY DESCENT KEITH CONRAD

PROOFS BY DESCENT KEITH CONRAD As ordinary methods, such as are found in the books, are inadequate to proving such difficult propositions, I discovered at last a most singular method... that I called the

### Mathematics for Computer Science/Software Engineering. Notes for the course MSM1F3 Dr. R. A. Wilson

Mathematics for Computer Science/Software Engineering Notes for the course MSM1F3 Dr. R. A. Wilson October 1996 Chapter 1 Logic Lecture no. 1. We introduce the concept of a proposition, which is a statement

### Understanding Basic Calculus

Understanding Basic Calculus S.K. Chung Dedicated to all the people who have helped me in my life. i Preface This book is a revised and expanded version of the lecture notes for Basic Calculus and other

### BEGINNING ALGEBRA ACKNOWLEDMENTS

BEGINNING ALGEBRA The Nursing Department of Labouré College requested the Department of Academic Planning and Support Services to help with mathematics preparatory materials for its Bachelor of Science

### 2 Integrating Both Sides

2 Integrating Both Sides So far, the only general method we have for solving differential equations involves equations of the form y = f(x), where f(x) is any function of x. The solution to such an equation

### Factoring Algorithms

Factoring Algorithms The p 1 Method and Quadratic Sieve November 17, 2008 () Factoring Algorithms November 17, 2008 1 / 12 Fermat s factoring method Fermat made the observation that if n has two factors

### Section 1.1. Introduction to R n

The Calculus of Functions of Several Variables Section. Introduction to R n Calculus is the study of functional relationships and how related quantities change with each other. In your first exposure to

### Algebra Practice Problems for Precalculus and Calculus

Algebra Practice Problems for Precalculus and Calculus Solve the following equations for the unknown x: 1. 5 = 7x 16 2. 2x 3 = 5 x 3. 4. 1 2 (x 3) + x = 17 + 3(4 x) 5 x = 2 x 3 Multiply the indicated polynomials

### A Second Course in Mathematics Concepts for Elementary Teachers: Theory, Problems, and Solutions

A Second Course in Mathematics Concepts for Elementary Teachers: Theory, Problems, and Solutions Marcel B. Finan Arkansas Tech University c All Rights Reserved First Draft February 8, 2006 1 Contents 25

### Solutions for Practice problems on proofs

Solutions for Practice problems on proofs Definition: (even) An integer n Z is even if and only if n = 2m for some number m Z. Definition: (odd) An integer n Z is odd if and only if n = 2m + 1 for some

### QUADRATIC RECIPROCITY IN CHARACTERISTIC 2

QUADRATIC RECIPROCITY IN CHARACTERISTIC 2 KEITH CONRAD 1. Introduction Let F be a finite field. When F has odd characteristic, the quadratic reciprocity law in F[T ] (see [4, Section 3.2.2] or [5]) lets

### Taylor and Maclaurin Series

Taylor and Maclaurin Series In the preceding section we were able to find power series representations for a certain restricted class of functions. Here we investigate more general problems: Which functions

### 1 Short Introduction to Time Series

ECONOMICS 7344, Spring 202 Bent E. Sørensen January 24, 202 Short Introduction to Time Series A time series is a collection of stochastic variables x,.., x t,.., x T indexed by an integer value t. The

### Tips for Solving Mathematical Problems

Tips for Solving Mathematical Problems Don Byrd Revised late April 2011 The tips below are based primarily on my experience teaching precalculus to high-school students, and to a lesser extent on my other

### RINGS WITH A POLYNOMIAL IDENTITY

RINGS WITH A POLYNOMIAL IDENTITY IRVING KAPLANSKY 1. Introduction. In connection with his investigation of projective planes, M. Hall [2, Theorem 6.2]* proved the following theorem: a division ring D in

### SMT 2014 Algebra Test Solutions February 15, 2014

1. Alice and Bob are painting a house. If Alice and Bob do not take any breaks, they will finish painting the house in 20 hours. If, however, Bob stops painting once the house is half-finished, then the

### Solutions Manual for How to Read and Do Proofs

Solutions Manual for How to Read and Do Proofs An Introduction to Mathematical Thought Processes Sixth Edition Daniel Solow Department of Operations Weatherhead School of Management Case Western Reserve

### Algebra I Vocabulary Cards

Algebra I Vocabulary Cards Table of Contents Expressions and Operations Natural Numbers Whole Numbers Integers Rational Numbers Irrational Numbers Real Numbers Absolute Value Order of Operations Expression

### Factoring Polynomials and Solving Quadratic Equations

Factoring Polynomials and Solving Quadratic Equations Math Tutorial Lab Special Topic Factoring Factoring Binomials Remember that a binomial is just a polynomial with two terms. Some examples include 2x+3

### Metric Spaces. Chapter 1

Chapter 1 Metric Spaces Many of the arguments you have seen in several variable calculus are almost identical to the corresponding arguments in one variable calculus, especially arguments concerning convergence

### 1.3 Polynomials and Factoring

1.3 Polynomials and Factoring Polynomials Constant: a number, such as 5 or 27 Variable: a letter or symbol that represents a value. Term: a constant, variable, or the product or a constant and variable.

### 9.2 Summation Notation

9. Summation Notation 66 9. Summation Notation In the previous section, we introduced sequences and now we shall present notation and theorems concerning the sum of terms of a sequence. We begin with a

### POLYNOMIALS and FACTORING

POLYNOMIALS and FACTORING Exponents ( days); 1. Evaluate exponential expressions. Use the product rule for exponents, 1. How do you remember the rules for exponents?. How do you decide which rule to use

### 11 Ideals. 11.1 Revisiting Z

11 Ideals The presentation here is somewhat different than the text. In particular, the sections do not match up. We have seen issues with the failure of unique factorization already, e.g., Z[ 5] = O Q(

### Solutions to TOPICS IN ALGEBRA I.N. HERSTEIN. Part II: Group Theory

Solutions to TOPICS IN ALGEBRA I.N. HERSTEIN Part II: Group Theory No rights reserved. Any part of this work can be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means. Version: 1.1 Release: Jan 2013

### JUST THE MATHS UNIT NUMBER 1.8. ALGEBRA 8 (Polynomials) A.J.Hobson

JUST THE MATHS UNIT NUMBER 1.8 ALGEBRA 8 (Polynomials) by A.J.Hobson 1.8.1 The factor theorem 1.8.2 Application to quadratic and cubic expressions 1.8.3 Cubic equations 1.8.4 Long division of polynomials

### Lecture Notes on Polynomials

Lecture Notes on Polynomials Arne Jensen Department of Mathematical Sciences Aalborg University c 008 Introduction These lecture notes give a very short introduction to polynomials with real and complex

### SECTION 2.5: FINDING ZEROS OF POLYNOMIAL FUNCTIONS

SECTION 2.5: FINDING ZEROS OF POLYNOMIAL FUNCTIONS Assume f ( x) is a nonconstant polynomial with real coefficients written in standard form. PART A: TECHNIQUES WE HAVE ALREADY SEEN Refer to: Notes 1.31

### Factorization Algorithms for Polynomials over Finite Fields

Degree Project Factorization Algorithms for Polynomials over Finite Fields Sajid Hanif, Muhammad Imran 2011-05-03 Subject: Mathematics Level: Master Course code: 4MA11E Abstract Integer factorization is

### MATH 21. College Algebra 1 Lecture Notes

MATH 21 College Algebra 1 Lecture Notes MATH 21 3.6 Factoring Review College Algebra 1 Factoring and Foiling 1. (a + b) 2 = a 2 + 2ab + b 2. 2. (a b) 2 = a 2 2ab + b 2. 3. (a + b)(a b) = a 2 b 2. 4. (a