1 Navigating a Meaningful Use Audit: Are You Ready? Brian Flood 2014 Husch Blackwell LLP
2 Agenda For This Segment ARRA, HITECH, and Meaningful Use What is Meaningful Use? Progress to Date How providers meet Meaningful Use Meaningful Use Audits Red Flags What if I fail an Audit? Client Experiences: Lessons Learned Client Experiences: Best Practices
3 ARRA, HITECH, and Meaningful Use The Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health (HITECH) Act was enacted as part of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (ARRA). The HITECH Act includes more than $19 billion to help develop a robust IT infrastructure and data exchange capabilities for healthcare, as well as to assist providers in adopting and using Health Information Technology, including the implementation of Electronic Health Records (EHRs). The Medicare and Medicaid EHR Incentive Program, a.k.a. Meaningful Use is born! The goal of this program is to increase EHR adoption, and support the meaningful use of EHR technology in order to improve safety, quality and reduce the cost of care.
4 ARRA, HITECH, and Meaningful Use Yes, there are incentive$! Eligible Hospitals (EHs) can receive several million in incentives (dependent upon various factors). Eligible Professionals (EPs) can receive up to $44k under Medicare or up to $63,750 under Medicaid.
5 Meaningful Use The term Meaningful Use" means that providers need to show they're using certified EHR technology in ways that can be measured significantly in quality and in quantity. Stage 1 (2011) sets the baseline for electronic data capture and information sharing using EHRs. Stage 2 (2014) focuses on data sharing, patient engagement, and Health Information Exchange. Eligible Hospitals can begin reporting period in October 2013 Eligible Professionals can begin reporting period in January 2014 Stage 3 (expected to begin in 2016) will continue to expand on previous baselines to improve clinical outcomes.
6 Meaningful Use (cont'd) What do EP s and EH s have to do? It s not enough just to own a certified EHR. Providers have to show CMS that they are using their EHRs in ways that can positively affect the care of their patients. To do this, providers must meet objectives established by CMS. Then they will be able to demonstrate, or attest that they met the applicable measures. EPs and EHs must meet all Core Set Objectives to successfully attest to Meaningful Use. Some core objectives have exclusions that can be taken, which indicates that the EP or EH does not have to actually meet that objective, based on a particular circumstance or exception. EPs and EHs must also meet a specified number of Menu Set Objectives (varies by EP/EH and MU stage).
7 Meaningful Use (cont'd) Most objectives are based on how the EHR is used for patient care E.g., More than 30% of unique patients with at least one medication in their medication list seen by the EP or admitted to the eligible hospital s or CAH s inpatient or emergency department have at least one medication order entered using CPOE. However there are other measures related to data sharing E.g., Public Health objectives where EPs/EHs have to prove they have the ability to send data to various Public Health agencies (e.g., immunization data to state immunization registries). One measure is related to security of patient information Conduct or review a security risk analysis in accordance with the requirements under 45 CFR (a)(1) and implement security updates as necessary and correct identified security deficiencies as part of its risk management process. Measures are generally Yes/No or Percentage-based
8 Meaningful Use: Progress to Date From a CMS Fact Sheet, released 4/23/2013: Hospital Participation: More than 85% of eligible hospitals are participating in the Medicare and Medicaid EHR Incentive Programs, and more than 75% have received incentive payments for meaningfully using EHR technology. Physicians and other Health Care Provider Participation: More than 388,000 of the nation s eligible professionals have registered to participate in the Medicare and Medicaid EHR Incentive Programs, representing 73% of all providers eligible to participate. More than 230,000, or 44% of all eligible professionals, have received an EHR incentive payment for meaningfully using EHR technology.
9 In For A Penny In For A Pound Any provider attesting to receive an EHR incentive payment for either the Medicare or Medicaid EHR Incentive Program potentially can be subject to an audit. Here is what you need to know to make sure you are prepared. =
10 Meaningful Use Audits Audits In early 2012, the U.S. Government Accountability Office (GAO) looked at steps taken by the federal government and the states to verify participants meet criteria for receiving payments and are putting computerized information to meaningful use. The EHR programs may be at greater risk of improper payments than other, more established CMS programs because they are new programs with complex requirements that providers must meet to qualify for incentive payments. Robert Anthony Deputy Director of CMS's Health IT Initiatives Group said that CMS aims to audit about 5% of all meaningful use program participants. CMS will look to conduct the same amount of pre-payment audits and post-payment audits; A majority of these will be via "desk audits," but on-site audits could occur; and Other sources have numbers as high as 10% for EHs and 20% for EPs.
11 Meaningful Use Audits (cont'd) March, 2013: CMS Issues FAQ #7711 Re-asserts that any single shortfall results in recoupment. To ensure you are prepared for a potential audit, save the electronic or paper documentation that supports your attestation. An audit may include a review of any of the documentation needed support the information that was entered in the attestation. The level of the audit review may depend on a number of factors, and it is not possible to include an all-inclusive list of supporting documents."
12 Meaningful Use Audits (cont'd) The same CMS guidance also stated: The accounting firm Figliozzi & Company will be the designated contractor performing audits on behalf of CMS, and will perform audits on Medicare EPs and eligible hospitals, as well as on hospitals that are dually-eligible for both the Medicare and Medicaid EHR Incentive Programs. The individual states and their contractors will perform audits on Medicaid providers.
13 Overview of the CMS EHR Incentive Programs Audits All providers attesting to receive an EHR incentive payment for either the Medicare or Medicaid EHR Incentive Programs should retain ALL relevant supporting documentation (in either paper or electronic format) used in the completion of the Attestation Module responses. Documentation to support the attestation should be retained for six (6) years post-attestation. Documentation to support payment calculations (such as cost report data) should continue to follow the current documentation retention processes. CMS, and its contractors, will perform audits on Medicare and dually-eligible (Medicare and Medicaid) providers. States, and their contractors, will perform audits on Medicaid providers. CMS and states will also manage appeals processes.
14 Overview of the CMS EHR Incentive Programs Audits (cont'd) Preparing for an Audit To ensure you are prepared for a potential audit, save the electronic or paper documentation that supports your attestation. Also save the documentation that supports the values you entered in the Attestation Module for Clinical Quality Measures (CQMs). Hospitals should also maintain documentation that supports their payment calculations. Upon audit, the documentation will be used to validate that the provider accurately attested and submitted CQMs, as well as to verify that the incentive payment was accurate.
15 Details of the Audits There are numerous pre-payment edit checks built into the EHR Incentive Programs' systems to detect inaccuracies in eligibility, reporting, and payment. Post-payment audits will also be completed during the course of the EHR Incentive Programs. If, based on an audit, a provider is found to not be eligible for an EHR incentive payment, the payment will be recouped. CMS has an appeals process for eligible professionals, eligible hospitals, and critical access hospitals that participate in the Medicare EHR Incentive Program. States will implement appeals processes for the Medicaid EHR Incentive Program. For more information about these appeals, please contact your State Medicaid Agency.
16 When Selected for Audit For Medicare eligible professionals and for hospitals that are eligible for both Medicare and Medicaid EHR incentive payments - When a provider is selected for an audit, they will receive an initial request letter from the audit contractor. The request letter will be sent electronically by the audit contractor from a CMS address and will include the audit contractor s contact information. The address provided during registration for the EHR Incentive Program will be used for the initial request letter. The initial review process will be conducted at the audit contractor s location, using the information received as a result of the initial request letter. Additional information might be needed during or after this initial review process, and in some cases an on-site review at the provider s location could follow. A demonstration of the EHR system could be requested during the on-site review. A secure communication process has been established by the contractor, which will assist the provider to send any information that could be considered sensitive. Any questions pertaining to the information request should be directed to the audit contractor. States will have separate audit processes for their Medicaid EHR Incentive Program. For more information about these audit processes, please contact your State Medicaid Agency.
17 Documentation An audit may include a review of any of the documentation needed to support the information that was entered in the attestation. The level of the audit review may depend on a number of factors, and it is not possible to include an all-inclusive list of supporting documents. The primary documentation that will be requested in all reviews is the source document(s) that the provider used when completing the attestation. This document should provide a summary of the data that supports the information entered during attestation. Ideally, this would be a report from the certified EHR system, but other documentation may be used if a report is not available or the information entered differs from the report.
18 Summary Documentation This summary document will be the starting point of most reviews and should include, at minimum: The numerators and denominators for the measures The time period the report covers Evidence to support that it was generated for that eligible professional, eligible hospital, or critical access hospital. Although the summary document is the primary review step, there could be additional and more detailed reviews of any of the measures, including review of medical records and patient records. The provider should be able to provide documentation to support each measure to which he or she attested, including any exclusions claimed by the provider.
19 Document Retention For Audit What information should an eligible professional, eligible hospital, or critical access hospital participating in the Medicare or Medicaid Electronic Health Record (EHR) Incentive Programs maintain in case of an audit?
20 Meaningful Use Audits - Guidance CMS guidance, issued in February of 2013 states the following in regards to supporting documentation for audits: Providers who receive an EHR incentive payment for either the Medicare or Medicaid EHR Incentive Program potentially may be subject to an audit. Eligible professionals (EPs), eligible hospitals, and critical access hospitals (CAHs) should retain ALL relevant supporting documentation (in either paper or electronic format) used in the completion of the Attestation Module responses. Documentation to support attestation data for meaningful use objectives and clinical quality measures should be retained for six (6) years post-attestation.
21 A Few Examples of Additional Support are as Follows: Drug-Drug/Drug-Allergy Interaction Checks and Clinical Decision Support Proof that the functionality is available, enabled, and active in the system for the duration of the EHR reporting period. Electronic Exchange of Clinical Information Screenshots from the EHR system or other documentation that document a test exchange of key clinical information (successful or unsuccessful) with another provider of care. Alternately, a letter or from the receiving provider confirming the exchange, including specific information such as the date of the exchange, name of providers, and whether the test was successful. Protect Electronic Health Information Proof that a security risk analysis of the certified EHR technology was performed prior to the end of the reporting period (e.g., report which documents the procedures performed during the analysis and the results). Drug Formulary Checks Proof that the functionality is available, enabled, and active in the system for the duration of the EHR reporting period. Immunization Registries Data Submission, Reportable Lab Results to Public Health Agencies, and Syndromic Surveillance Data Submission Screenshots from the EHR system or other documentation that document a test submission to the registry or public health agency (successful or unsuccessful). Alternately, a letter or from registry or public health agency confirming the receipt (or failure of receipt) of the submitted data, including the date of the submission, name of parties involved, and whether the test was successful. Exclusions Documentation to support each exclusion to a measure claimed by the provider.
22 Red Flags Elements of provider attestation Inconsistency between numerator / denominators that should be related Exclusions that may be inconsistent with other measures CMS Data supplemental to attestations Measures or exclusions inconsistent with patient mix (both hospital and EP specialty) Peer group comparisons State and local public health capabilities EHR Vendor characteristics Providers who indicated use of multiple EHR products to meet requirements EHR s with capability of collecting data for only a few CQM s (ambulatory only) Representative sample of Certified EHR vendors
23 What Happens if I Fail an Audit? Appeal? What caused the fail? E.g., audit logs EHR certification process did not require this for specific functionality Core Objective 2: Drug-drug and drug-allergy interaction checks Core Objective 11: Clinical decision support rule Menu Objective 1: Drug formulary checks or Do nothing Learn from mistakes, return the incentive money and move forward!
24 Review, Withdrawal and Appeal To date the review standard is Pass/Fail. Documentation for attestation and core measures are reviewed. All measures must be accomplished and documented to pass. A properly performed and documented risk assessment must be presented to the auditor. You can withdraw and pay the funds back prior to being audited if you believe this is a proper business decision. You cannot pay them back during an audit. You can appeal the audit but you must have sufficient documentation to support your appeal.
25 Client Experiences: Best Practices Designate a person to be in charge in the event of an audit, and to own the Book of Evidence. Keep internal teams informed, and aware of procedures. Establish contact with auditor. Monitor the deadlines established by the auditor. Seek the EHR vendor for support. Seek counsel if needed!
26 Client Experiences: Lessons Learned The most common points of interest for audits include: Core Measure #15 Security Risk Analysis Have to have this and has to cover specific areas Refer to the OCR Guidance on Risk Analysis Method used to incorporate Emergency Department (ED) patients (All ED Visits or Observation Services) Yes/No measures Proof of Possession
27 Client Experiences: Lessons Learned (cont'd) Recommended Book of Evidence includes, but is not limited to: EHR vendor purchase agreements; EHR implementation documents (project plans, configuration documents, etc.); Attestation reports generated from the EHR which reconciles exactly to the attestations made for each Core and Quality measure; Documentation for Public Health measures with confirmation s from contacts at the Public Health Agencies (where applicable); A statement about change control and source code control systems which documents that functionality such as Drug/Allergy Interaction Checking, Drug Formularies and Clinical Decision Support Rules were enabled for the entire reporting period; Documentation that explains the interpretations made by management for measures where exclusions were taken; Complete Security Risk Analysis documentation including identified threats and mitigation plans (as per OCR guidance); and Screenshots, screenshots, screenshots.
28 Confusing Advice
29 Important Payment Adjustment Information For Medicare EPs Eligible professionals (EPs) participating in the Medicare EHR Incentive Program may be subject to payment adjustments beginning on January 1, CMS will determine the payment adjustment based on meaningful use data submitted prior to the 2015 calendar year. EPs must demonstrate meaningful use prior to 2015 to avoid payment adjustments. Determine how your EHR Incentive Program participation start year will affect the 2015 payment adjustments: If you began in 2011 or 2012 If you first demonstrated meaningful use in 2011 or 2012, you must demonstrate meaningful use for a full year in 2013 to avoid the payment adjustment in If you began in 2013 If you first demonstrate meaningful use in 2013, you must demonstrate meaningful use for a 90-day reporting period in 2013 to avoid the payment adjustment in 2015.
30 Important Payment Adjustment Information For Medicare EPs (Cont'd) If you plan to begin in 2014 If you first demonstrate meaningful use in 2014, you must demonstrate meaningful use for a 90-day reporting period in 2014 to avoid the payment adjustment in This reporting period must occur in the first nine (9) months of calendar year 2014, and EPs must attest to meaningful use no later than October 1, 2014, to avoid the payment adjustment. Avoiding Payment Adjustments in the Future You must continue to demonstrate meaningful use every year to avoid payment adjustments in subsequent years. If you are eligible to participate in both the Medicare and Medicaid EHR Incentive Programs, you MUST demonstrate meaningful use to avoid the payment adjustments. You may demonstrate meaningful use under either Medicare or Medicaid.
31 Reminder: Important Payment Adjustment Information for Medicare EPs: Eligible professionals (EPs) participating in the Medicare EHR Incentive Program may be subject to payment adjustments beginning on January 1, CMS will determine the payment adjustment based on meaningful use data submitted prior to the 2015 calendar year. EPs must demonstrate meaningful use prior to 2015 to avoid payment adjustments. Determine how your EHR Incentive Program participation start year will affect the 2015 payment adjustments. If you began in 2011 or 2012 If you first demonstrated meaningful use in 2011 or 2012, you must demonstrate meaningful use for a full year in 2013 to avoid the payment adjustment in If you began in 2013 If you first demonstrate meaningful use in 2013, you must demonstrate meaningful use for a 90-day reporting period in 2013 to avoid the payment adjustment in If you plan to begin in 2014 If you first demonstrate meaningful use in 2014, you must demonstrate meaningful use for a 90-day reporting period in 2014 to avoid the payment adjustment in This reporting period must occur in the first nine (9) months of calendar year 2014, and EPs must attest to meaningful use no later than October 1, 2014, to avoid the payment adjustment. Avoiding Payment Adjustments in the Future You must continue to demonstrate meaningful use every year to avoid payment adjustments in subsequent years. If you are eligible to participate in both the Medicare and Medicaid EHR Incentive Programs, you MUST demonstrate meaningful use to avoid the payment adjustments. You may demonstrate meaningful use under either Medicare or Medicaid. If you are only eligible to participate in the Medicaid EHR Incentive Program, you are not subject to these payment adjustments.
32 CMS and ONC announced the intent to change the Stage 3 timeline and extend Stage 2 of meaningful use through CMS and ONC announced the intent to change the Stage 3 timeline and extend Stage 2 of meaningful use through Important to note about the proposed timeline: It does not delay the start of Stage 2 of meaningful use. It does not affect the current reporting periods and deadlines for 2014 participation. What this Means for You: If you begin participation with your first year of Stage 1 for the Medicare EHR Incentive Program in 2014: You must begin your ninety (90) days of Stage 1 of meaningful use no later than July 1, 2014, and submit attestation by October 1, 2014, in order to avoid the 2015 payment adjustment. If you have completed 1 year of Stage 1 of meaningful use: You will demonstrate a second year of Stage 1 of meaningful use in 2014 for a three-month reporting period fixed to the quarter for Medicare or any ninety (90) days for Medicaid. You will demonstrate Stage 2 of meaningful use for two years (2015 and 2016). You will begin Stage 3 of meaningful use in If you have completed two or more years of Stage 1 of meaningful use: You will still demonstrate Stage 2 of meaningful use in 2014 for a three-month reporting period fixed to the quarter for Medicare or any ninety (90) days for Medicaid. You will demonstrate Stage 2 of meaningful use for three years (2014, 2015 and 2016). You will begin Stage 3 of meaningful use in Please be sure to look for additional guidance in the Federal Register for rulemaking on this proposal.
33 BEGINNING IN 2015, MEDICARE ELIGIBLE PROFESSIONALS WHO DO NOT SUCCESSFULLY DEMONSTRATE MEANINGFUL USE WILL BE SUBJECT TO A PAYMENT ADJUSTMENT. THE PAYMENT REDUCTION STARTS AT 1% AND INCREASES EACH YEAR THAT A MEDICARE ELIGIBLE PROFESSIONAL DOES NOT DEMONSTRATE MEANINGFUL USE, TO A MAXIMUM OF 5%.
34 Former CFO indicted over fraudulent meaningful use claims - February 11, 2014 White faces up to seven (7) years in prison. CFO of now-closed Shelby Regional Medical Center in Texas, has been indicted for allegedly defrauding the federal government of nearly $800,000. Shelby was among thousands of providers that received payments through the government's meaningful use program. Under the program, health care providers who demonstrate meaningful use of certified electronic health record (EHR) systems can qualify for Medicaid and Medicare incentive payments. The indictment states that Shelby was granted $785,655 in January 2013 for successful demonstration of meaningful use during the 2012 full-year reporting period. In addition, the hospital had received $1.17 million in meaningful use payments from CMS in November The indictment alleges that he: Submitted the attestation while knowing the hospital did not meet the program's requirements and "only minimally used the EHR platform and continued to use paper records and charts as well as older, uncertified technology"; Directed the hospital's EHR vendor to input data into the system manually from paper records and other sources, even after the FY 2012 reporting period; and "[K]nowingly and willingly made materially false, fictitious and fraudulent statements and representations, and made and used false writings and documents" to defraud the EHR incentive program.
36 Brian Flood Partner Austin, Texas
37 Thank You Husch Blackwell LLP
38 Post-Pay Audit Engagement Letter & Information Request
39 Post-Pay Audit Engagement Letter & Information Request (Cont'd)
40 HITECH Incentive Payment
41 HITECH Incentive Payment - (Cont'd)
42 Hospital Appeal Filing Request
43 Hospital Appeal Filing Request (Cont'd)
44 Hospital Appeal Filing Request (Cont'd)
45 Hospital Appeal Filing Request (Cont'd)
46 Hospital Appeal Filing Request (Cont'd)
47 Hospital Appeal Filing Request (Cont'd)
48 HITECH EHR Meaningful Use Audit Determination Letter
49 HITECH EHR Meaningful Use Audit Determination Letter (Cont'd)
Meaningful Use Audits Best Practices for keeping your Incentive Dollars Mark Norris, CEO Medical Records Services, LLC 4.16.14 1 Are you ready? Are you sure???? 2 3 Audits are here it s not pretty. There
Become Audit Proof What You Need To Know To Protect Your Practice Disclaimer This webinar is based on official guidance by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) and the Office of the National
Meaningful Use of EHR and CMS Audit Presenter: Jay.Fisher@C3Partners.biz Structure of Today s Discussion Impact of Audit Event Likelihood of Audit Event Probable Audit Selection Factors Audit Processes
Stage 2 EHR Incentive Programs Supporting Documentation For Audits Last Updated: February 2014 Overview Providers who receive an EHR incentive payment for Stage 2 of the Medicare or Medicaid EHR Incentive
How to prepare for an EHR incentive audit What is an EHR incentive program? The Medicare and Medicaid EHR Incentive Programs provide incentive payments to eligible professionals, eligible hospitals, and
Meaningful Use, Penalties and Audits SHERI SMITH, FACMPE STATE VOLUNTEER MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY Copyright 2014 State Volunteer Mutual Insurance Company Medicare/Medicaid Incentive Program Medicare/Medicaid
Audit Alert: Are You Prepared? You Have A Good Chance of Being Selected HIT Summit July 26, 2014 Lee Castonguay Hawaii Pacific Regional Extension Center email@example.com Or How to keep your incentive
Meaningful Use Stage 2 MU Audits Presented by: Deb Anderson, CPHIMS HTS Consultant HTS, a division of Mountain Pacific Quality Health Foundation 1 CEHRT Certified Electronic Health Record Technology (EHR)
MEDICARE EHR: PREPARING FOR 2015 Community Counts Practice Effectiveness Web Series ION June 26, 2014 Risë Marie Cleland Oplinc, Inc. Important to Remember The information provided in this presentation
Electronic Health Record (EHR) Incentive Payment Program Review of Meaningful Use Stage 2 Regulation Changes and Other Impacts to the Medicaid EHR Incentive Program for 2014 that combines the effective
Meaningful Use - The Basics Presented by PaperFree Florida 1 Topics Meaningful Use Stage 1 Meaningful Use Barriers: Observations from the field Help and Questions 2 What is Meaningful Use Meaningful Use
HCCA Upper Northeast Regional Conference Meaningful Use Best Compliance Practices May 17, 2013 Lourdes Martinez, Esq. firstname.lastname@example.org 111 Great Neck Road Great Neck, NY 11021 (516) 393-2200
Meaningful Use Audits NextGen Physician Consulting Services Agenda Audit Overview Documentation for measures requiring numerator and denominator data Documentation for attestation only measures Security
Meaningful Use Preparedness HEALTHCARE FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATION 07/24/2015 Agenda Incentive Payments Measures Tracking Physicians Tracking Payment Audits EHR Incentive Program Meaningful Use The
Checklist and Related Guidance for Meaningful Use Audits This checklist was prepared by Jill M. Girardeau, Partner, Womble Carlyle Sandridge & Rice, LLP and Dina Marty, Counsel, Wake Forest Baptist Medical
Meaningful Use Audit Red Flags: Pay Careful Attention To The Security Risk Analysis - Or Else Jim Tate Founder: EMR Advocate, Inc. Managing Partner: HITECH Answers Author of The Incentive Roadmap The Meaningful
Community Health Center Association of Connecticut Meaningful Use: Audit Preparedness And Other Challenges February 12, 2015 Joan W. Feldman, Esq. William J. Roberts, Esq. Shipman & Goodwin LLP 2014. All
Meaningful Use Stages 1 and 2 and How to Survive a Meaningful Use Audit Charles Jarvis, Senior Manager Outline Overview Meaningful Use Stage 1 Differences between Stage 1 and Stage 2 Surviving a Meaningful
Overview This tip sheet provides examples of the types of supporting documentation that may be requested during a pre-payment review in order to verify an eligible professional's (EP) or eligible hospital's
Leslie H. Perkins Leslie H. Perkins It s where we drive Quality Improvement and Get Money to aid in our ability to provide quality patient care The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (Recovery Act)
Medicare & Medicaid EHR Incentive Programs Elizabeth S. Holland, MPA Director, HIT Initiatives Group Office of E-Health Standards & Services, CMS Program Progress Registered Eligible Hospitals 5.33% 94.67%
CMS EHR Incentive Programs: An Overview Meaningful Use Stages Vidya Sellappan Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Office of E-Health Standards and Services HIT Initiatives Group August 13, 2014 Table
Semi-Annual Blueprint Conference October 20, 2014 Heather EJ Kendall, PhD Medicaid Operations Administrator EHR Incentive Program Audit Lead VT Department of Health Access Incentive program audit background
WHAT JUST HAPPENED TO THE EMR PROGRAM? November 5, 2015 Michael Orr Director email@example.com 254.776.8244 ext. 43928 Travis Skinner Senior Managing Consultant firstname.lastname@example.org 254.776.8244 ext. 43936 1 TO
Department of Health and Human Services OFFICE OF INSPECTOR GENERAL EARLY ASSESSMENT THAT CMS FACES FINDS OB STACLES IN OVERSEEING THE MEDICARE EHR INCENTIVE PROGRAM Daniel R. Levinson Inspector General
Eligible Hospital and Critical Access Hospital (CAH) Attestation Worksheet for Stage 2 of the Medicare Electronic Health Record (EHR) Incentive Program The Eligible Hospital and CAH Attestation Worksheet
Incentives to Accelerate EHR Adoption The passage of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA) of 2009 provides incentives for eligible professionals (EPs) to adopt and use electronic health records
Meaningful Use in 2015 and Beyond Changes for Stage 2 Jennifer Boaz Transformation Support Specialist Proprietary 1 Definitions AIU = Adopt, Implement or Upgrade EP = Eligible Professional API = Application
ROPES & GRAY ALERT Health Care February 28, 2012 CMS Issues Proposed Rule on Stage 2 Meaningful Use, ONC Issues Companion Proposed Rule on 2014 EHR Certification Criteria On February 23, 2012, the Centers
Meaningful Use for Physician Offices Eligibility, Registration and Meeting the Criteria Elizabeth M. Neuwirth 203 772 7742 email@example.com H. Kennedy Hudner 860 240 6029 firstname.lastname@example.org
EHR Incentive Program Focus on Stage One Meaningful Use Kim Davis-Allen, Outreach Coordinator Kim.email@example.com October 16, 2014 Checklist Participation Explanation Program Updates Stage One
An Overview of Meaningful Use: FAQs On Feb. 17, 2009, President Obama signed the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (ARRA) into law. This new law includes provisions (known as the HITECH Act)
A Guide to Understanding and Qualifying for Meaningful Use Incentives A White Paper by DrFirst Copyright 2000-2012 DrFirst All Rights Reserved. 1 Table of Contents Understanding and Qualifying for Meaningful
Meaningful Use 2015 and beyond Presented by: Anna Mrvelj EMR Training Specialist 1 Agenda A look at the CMS Website Finding your EMR version Certification Number Proposed Rule by the Centers for Medicare
Adopting an EHR & Meaningful Use Learn how to qualify for the EHR Incentive Program The materials in this presentation, or prepared as part of this presentation, are provided for informational purposes
EHR Incentive Programs: 2015 through 2017 (Modified Stage 2) Overview CMS recently released a final rule that specifies criteria that eligible professionals (EPs), eligible hospitals, and critical access
Medicare & Medicaid EHR Incentive Programs Eligibility 2 Who is Eligible to Participate? Eligibility was defined in statute Hospital-based EPs are NOT eligible for incentives DEFINITION: 90% or more of
WHAT S NEW ON THE EHR FRONT? Mike Orr, Director Travis Skinner, Senior Managing Consultant TODAYS AGENDA Finalized 2015 EHR Modification Rule (EHs & EPs) New Measures & Objectives EHR Tentative Settlement
WHAT S NEW ON THE EHRFRONT? Mike Orr, Director Travis Skinner, Senior Managing Consultant TODAYS AGENDA Finalized 2015 EHR Modification Rule (EHs & EPs) New Measures & Objectives EHR Tentative Settlement
MEANINGFUL USE STAGE 2 2015 FOR ELIGIBLE PROVIDERS USING CERTIFIED EMR TECHNOLOGY STAGE 2 REQUIREMENTS EPs must meet or qualify for an exclusion to 17 core objectives EPs must meet 3 of the 6 menu measures.
Presented by Terri Gonzalez Director of Practice Improvement North Carolina Medical Society Meaningful Use is using certified EHR technology to: Improve quality, safety, efficiency, and reduce errors Engage
Who are we? Purdue Healthcare Advisors (PHA)*, a business unit of Purdue University, specializes in affordable assistance to organizations that share our passion for healthcare transformation. We bring
Meaningful Use Updates Stage 2 and 3 Julia Moore, Business Analyst SMC Partners, LLC July 8, 2015 Stage 2 Requirements 2015 EPs beyond 1st year of MU must report on a full year of data EPs in 1 st year
Meaningful Use Criteria for Eligible and Eligible Professionals (EPs) Under the Electronic Health Record (EHR) meaningful use final rules established by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS),
Meaningful Use Rules Proposed for Electronic Health Record Incentives Under HITECH Act By: Cherilyn G. Murer, JD, CRA Introduction On December 30, 2009, The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS)
Stage 2 Overview Tipsheet Last Updated: August, 2012 Overview CMS recently published a final rule that specifies the Stage 2 criteria that eligible professionals (EPs), eligible hospitals, and critical
Overview of MU Stage 2 Joel White, Health IT Now 1 Agenda 1. Introduction 2. Context 3. Adoption Rates of HIT 4. Overview of Stage 2 Rules 5. Overview of Issues 6. Trend in Standards: Recommendations v.
CY 2014 MPFS Final Rule Summary December 3, 2013 Page 1 Modifications to the Medicare and Medicaid Electronic Health Record (EHR) Incentive Program for 2014 Final Rule Summary SEPTEMBER 2014 Page 2 TABLE
Meaningful Use Update AGENDA Quick Refresher on Meaningful Use Overview of Stage 2 Meaningful Use Audits 2 MEANINGFUL USE STAGES Stage 1 focus on data capture, getting the foundation in place Stage 2 focus
Meaningful Use Updates HIT Summit September 19, 2015 Meaningful Use Updates Nadine Owen, BS,CHTS-IS, CHTS-IM Health IT Analyst Hawaii Health Information Exchange No other relevant financial disclosures.
Stage 2 Meaningful Use What the Future Holds Lindsey Wiley, MHA HIT Manager Oklahoma Foundation for Medical Quality An Important Reminder For audio, you must use your phone: Step 1: Call (866) 906-0123.
MEDICAL ASSISTANCE STAGE 2 SUMMARY OVERVIEW On September 4, 2012, CMS published a final rule that specifies the Stage 2 Meaningful Use criteria that eligible professionals (EPs), eligible hospitals (EHs)
MEANINGFUL USE STAGE 2 REQUIREMENTS FOR ELIGIBLE PROVIDERS USING CERTIFIED EMR TECHNOLOGY On August 24, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) posted the much anticipated final rule for Stage
AAP Meaningful Use: Certified EHR Technology Criteria On July 13, 2010, the US Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) released a Final Rule establishing the criteria with which eligible pediatricians,
Meaningful Use Stage 2 Presented by: Sarah Leake, HTS Consultant HTS, a division of Mountain Pacific Quality Health Foundation 1 HTS Who We Are Stage 2 MU Overview Learning Objectives 2014 CEHRT Certification
Stage 2 Final Rule Overview: Updates to Stage 1 and New Stage 2 Requirements The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) issued the Stage 2 Final Rule on September 4, 2012. The Stage 2 Final Rule
The HITECH Act and Meaningful Use Implications for Population and Public Health Bill Brand, MPH Public Health Informatics Institute Meaningful Use for Public Health Professionals: Basic Training May 16,
RESOURCE AND PATIENT MANAGEMENT SYSTEM RPMS EHR Remote Support and Configuration Agenda April 30 th May 4th, 2012 IHS Office of Information Technology (OIT) Albuquerque, New Mexico & Samuel Simmonds Memorial
202 General Compliance Hot Topics A Time to Reap and a Time to Sow Brian Flood, Partner Husch Blackwell LLP Regulators are being chided for their low return on investment and low collection of overpayments.
MEANINGFUL USE Stages 1 & 2 OVERVIEW Meaningful Use is the third step in the journey to receive funds under the CMS EHR Incentive Programs. Meaningful Use (MU) is the utilization of certified electronic
ARRA INCENTIVE FOR ELIGIBLE HOSPITALS On July 13, 2010, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) and the Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology (ONC) issued the
Click to edit Master title style Modified Stage 2 Meaningful Use 2015-2017 Bruce Maki, MA M-CEITA / Altarum Institute Regulatory & Incentive Program Analyst 12/14/2015 1 1 Agenda 1. Overview of M-CEITA
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Room 352-G 200 Independence Avenue, SW Washington, DC 20201 Office of Communications FACT SHEET FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE Contact:
EHR Incentive Programs A program administered by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) Eligible Professional s Guide to STAGE 2 of the EHR Incentive Programs September 2013 TABLE OF CONTENTS...
Meaningful Use Objectives The purpose of the electronic health records (EHR) incentive program is not so much the adoption of health information technology (HIT), but rather how HIT can further the goals
HOW CLINICAL EDUCATORS CAN MAKE MEANINGFUL USE MEANINGFUL Daryl Wieland, MD Tammy Gruenberg, MD Michelle Giannone, MD Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY DISCLOSURE We have no financial disclosures
WHITE PAPER Meaningful Use Stage 2 Requirements Primer Shefali Mookencherry, MPH, MSMIS, RHIA Principal Consultant Hayes Management Consulting Hayes WHITE PAPER: Meaningful Use Stage 2 Requirements Source:
Meaningful Use: Terms & Timelines, Changes to Stage 1, and Stage 2 Overview NYC REACH Primary Care Information Project NYC Department of Health & Mental Hygiene 1 Agenda Terms & Timelines of Meaningful
EHR Meaningful Use Incentives for School-Based Health Clinics Denise Holmes Institute for Health Care Studies Michigan State University September 27, 2011 Background The Health Information Technology for
PREPARING FOR EMR PROGRAM SUCCESS IN 2016 December 15, 2015 Travis Skinner, CPA Senior Managing Consultant firstname.lastname@example.org Michael Orr, CPA Director email@example.com David McDonald, CPA Director firstname.lastname@example.org
Minnesota EHR Incentive Program (MEIP) 2015 2017 Program Year Timeline for EPs, EHs and CAHs Updated November 2015 Glossary CAH Critical access hospitals CEHRT Certified electronic health record technology
Meaningful Use: Stage 1 and 2 Hospitals (EH) and Providers (EP) Lindsey Mongold, MHA HIT Practice Advisor Oklahoma Foundation for Medical Quality Meaningful Use Stage 1 Focuses on Functional & Interoperability
Making Sense of Meaningful Use: Stage 2 1 Who are we? Purdue Healthcare Advisors (PHA)*, a business unit of Purdue University, specializes in affordable assistance to organizations that share our passion
Medicare Electronic Health Record Incentive Program The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (Recovery Act) of 2009 provides for incentive payments for Medicare eligible professionals (EPs) who are meaningful
CORE OBJECTIVES (16 total) Stage 1 vs. Stage 2 Comparison Table for Eligible Hospitals and CAHs Last Updated: August, 2012 Stage 1 Objective Use CPOE for medication orders directly entered by any licensed
EMR and Meaningful Use How to Prepare for Audits and Avoid Penalties Payment Adjustments for Eligible Professionals who are not Users of Certified Electronic Health Records (EHR) Technology Off-Label Use
CMS Medicare and Medicaid Electronic Health Record (EHR) Incentive Programs Final Rule Overview October 8, 2015 Elizabeth S. Holland Center for Clinical Standards and Quality Centers for Medicare & Medicaid
Chapter 1 Where to Begin? Auditing the Current EHR System After implementation, allow for a period of stabilization, so physicians and employees can gain more comfort using the electronic health record
Welcome to the PAHCOM/CMS Webinar Series on EHR Incen5ves Topic: CMS and PAHCOM Presents: EHR Incen5ve Programs Speaker: Robert Anthony - Health Specialist in the Office of E- Health Standards and Services
How to Achieve Meaningful Use with ICANotes Meaningful use involves using an EHR in a way that the government has defined as meaningful to collect incentive payments. but do not participate. Note: If you
Electronic Health Record (EHR) Incentive Program Stage 2 Final Rule Update September 6, 2012 Medical Assistance HIT Initiative 1 Introduction Timeframes Agenda Medicaid Eligibility Updates Stage 1 MU Optional
November 8, 2012 Practice Group: Health Care Stage 2 of Meaningful Use: Ten Points of Interest By Patricia C. Shea On September 4, 2012, the Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Medicare
Meaningful Use Audit: A Quick Reference For Certified EHR Eligible Professionals www.revenuexl.com CONTENTS Meaningful Use Audit : What Physicians Must Expect from it? 1 Meaningful Use Audit : An Essential
Click to edit Master title style How to Play by the (Final) Rules: An Overview of Meaningful Use Stage 2 Bruce Maki, MA M-CEITA / Altarum Institute Regulatory and Incentive Program Analyst March 11, 2015
CMS AND ONC FINAL REGULATIONS DEFINE MEANINGFUL USE AND SET STANDARDS FOR ELECTRONIC HEALTH RECORD INCENTIVE PROGRAM The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) and the Office of the National Coordinator
Preparing for HIPAA and Meaningful Use Compliance Audits Presented by: David Holtzman VP of Compliance, CynergisTek CynergisTek, Inc. 11410 Jollyville Road, Suite 2201, Austin TX 78759 512.402.8550 email@example.com
HITECH Act Update: An Overview of the Medicare and Medicaid EHR Incentive Programs Regulations The Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health Act (HITECH Act) was enacted as part of
Michigan Medicaid EHR Incentive Program Update Jason Werner - MDCH Program Timeline Meaningful Use Timeline Meaningful Use Stages st year 0 0 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 00 0 0 AIU $,50 3 TBD TBD TBD TBD 0 AIU
DEMONSTRATING MEANINGFUL USE STAGE 1 REQUIREMENTS FOR ELIGIBLE PROVIDERS USING CERTIFIED EHR TECHNOLOGY IN 2014 The chart below lists the measures (and specialty exclusions) that eligible providers must
Eligible Hospitals Participation Year 2-3 (MU1) Webinar www.emedny.org/meipass 1 Background Original Legislation The Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health (HITECH) Act, part of
Medicaid EHR Incentive Program Focus on Stage 2 Kim Davis-Allen, Outreach Coordinator Kim.firstname.lastname@example.org Understanding Participation Program Year Program Year January 1 st - December 31st. Year