How To Defend An Airport Liability Claim
|
|
- Curtis Horn
- 3 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Enforceability of Indemnity Agreements Between Airport Authorities And Their Contractors/Tenants A paper presented in connection with the Airports Council International North America s th Annual Risk Management Conference held in West Palm Beach, FL. on January 12-14, 2014 Bruce R. Marx, Esq. MARLOW, ADLER, ABRAMS, NEWMAN & LEWIS 4000 Ponce de Leon Boulevard Suite 570 Coral Gables, Fl Main Telephone Number: bmarx@marlowadler.com
2 TABLE OF CONTENTS ABOUT THE AUTHOR...ii ENFORCEABILITY OF INDEMNITY AGREEMENTS... 1 I. INTRODUCTION... 1 II. RELEVANT LEGAL PRINCIPALS... 1 a. Premises Liability b. Common Law Indemnity... 2 c. Contractual Indemnity... 2 d. Recovery of Defense Expenses by Indemnitees from Indemnitors... 5 III. Conclusion... 6 i
3 ABOUT THE AUTHOR Bruce R. Marx Direct Dial: Fax: Bruce Marx is a partner in the law firm of Marlow, Adler, Abrams, Newman & Lewis located in Coral Gables, Fl. He has been a practicing defense attorney since 1991 specializing in the defense of complex claims against aviation, admiralty and hospitality-related businesses. Part of Bruce s aviation practice includes the defense of various airport authorities and fixed based operators located throughout the state of Florida from Jacksonville to Key West. Bruce graduated in 1987 with a B.A. from Tulane University in New Orleans and obtained his J.D. in 1991 from St. Thomas University in Miami. ii
4 ENFORCEABILITY OF INDEMNITY AGREEMENTS BETWEEN AIRPORT AUTHORITIES AND THEIR CONTRACTORS/TENANTS I. INTRODUCTION By the nature of its operation, airport property (including the leaseholds of airport tenants such as F.A.A. approved repair facilities and/or fixed based operators) provides an environment susceptible to personal injury and property damage claims. Given the manner in which airport authorities operate through contractors/tenants, there is usually more than one culpable party responsible for a particular loss. Accordingly, it is important for airport authorities to have valid indemnity agreements in place with their contractors in order to pass on the costs of the defense and indemnity for contractor/tenant-related claims. This writer has had the privilege of representing various airport authorities and fixed based operators throughout the State of Florida from Jacksonville to Key West. These claims, a majority of which are predicated upon premises liability theories, bring into play the interaction between indemnity and insuring provisions contained in contracts between airport authorities and their contractors/tenants. Without fail, questions always arise (mostly during the pre-suit stages of a claim) as to the scope of the contractor's/tenant s indemnity obligation owed to the airport authority. When the airport authority makes a pre-suit tender of a claim upon a contractor and/or its insurance carrier, the tender is usually refused based upon the fact that the investigation into the particular claim is either ongoing, or there is no current evidence of negligence on the part of the contractor/named insured. In most cases, the indemnity issues are not finally resolved until such time as suit is actually filed in the particular case. The following will serve as a basic outline of the relevant Florida case law relating to contractual indemnity agreements, as well as various issues which affect the tender of a claim. An understanding of the law discussed below will assist anyone wading through the process of enforcing the indemnity agreements in place between airport authorities and their contractors/tenants. II. RELEVANT LEGAL PRINCIPALS a. Premises Liability. Under Florida law, an invitee is a person who is invited to enter or remain on the premises for a purpose directly connected with business dealings with the possessor of the premises. Post v. Lunney, 261 So. 2d 146 (Fla. 1972). A premises owner and/or occupier owes an invitee the following duties: (1) to use ordinary or reasonable care in keeping the premises in a reasonably safe condition and (2) to warn of latent or concealed perils that are known or should be known to the owner or occupier, of which the invitee is unaware and which the invitee cannot discover through the exercise of reasonable care. Hickory House, Inc. v. Brown, 77 So. 2d 249 (Fla. 1955) and Matukas 1
5 v. Kassam, 702 So. 2d 543 (Fla. 5th DCA 1997). Inasmuch as the foregoing duties are non-delegable, the airport authority will always enjoy exposure directly to the claimant for the injuries sustained on its property. If there is a properly drafted indemnity agreement in place between the airport authority and its contractor, however, the airport authority can shift the liability for the claimant's injury to the contractor/tenant. b. Common Law Indemnity Common law indemnity is a right which inures to one who discharges a duty owed by him, but which, as between himself and another, should have been discharged by the other and is allowable only where the whole fault is in the one against whom indemnity is sought. AMI Insurance Agency v. Elie, 394 So. 2d 1061 (Fla. 3rd DCA 1981) (emphasis supplied). Common law indemnity is an equitable remedy that arises out of obligations imposed by special relationships which create vicarious, constructive, derivative or technical liability upon one for acts of another. Camp, Dresser & McKee, Inc. v. Paul N Howard Company, 853 So. 2d 1072 (Fla. 5th DCA 2003); Dade County School Board v. Radio Station WQBA, 731 So. 2d 638 (Fla. 3rd DCA 1999) and Houdaille Industries, Inc. v. Edwards, 374 So. 2d 490 (Fla. 1979). c. Contractual Indemnity Contractual indemnity is a tool by which the risk of loss is shifted by one party (iethe indemnitee/airport authority) to another (the indemnitor/contractor) even if the party shifting the loss is at fault. Unlike common law indemnity, contractual indemnity is not concerned with special relationships or vicarious, constructive, derivative or technical liability-rather, it is concerned with the express terms of the agreement to indemnify. Camp, 853 So. 2d at p Indemnity contracts are subject to the general rules governing the formation, validity and construction of contracts. Contractual indemnity issues arising out of airport premises liability claims usually involve two separate contracts: 1) the contract between the airport authority and its contractor; and 2) the commercial general liability insurance policy secured by the indemnitor (the named insured) providing insurance coverage to the indemnittee as an additional insured. Once notice of a claim is received by the airport authority, it is important to try and identify all of the responsible contractors for the incident so they (and their insurers) can be placed on notice as soon as possible. Rarely does a premises liability claim arise on airport property that does not involve at least one contractor whose negligence caused and/or contributed to the subject injury. Accordingly, the focus from the outset should be upon the culpable contractor so as to be in a position to shift the risk of loss from the airport authority to the contractor's insurer. The airport authorities whom this writer has represented generally maintain very good record keeping. Accordingly, once the potential liability of the contractor is identified, immediate steps should be taken to secure a copy of the indemnity 2
6 agreement that was in force and effect at the time of the subject incident along with a copy of the certificate of insurance identifying the airport authority as an additional insured under the contractor's commercial general liability insurance policy. Because there are notice provisions contained in the subject service contract with the contractor, as well as the insurance policy of the contractor's insurer, it is imperative that notices issue as soon as possible so as to avoid any type of late notice defense. After receipt of the aforementioned documents, the wording of the indemnity provision needs to be carefully studied as same will provide a barometer as to what to expect by way of resistance on the part of the contractor and/or its insurer in providing a defense to the suit and, ultimately, in providing indemnity to the airport authority. Although they are looked upon with disfavor, agreements for indemnification which protect an indemnitee against the indemnitee's own negligence and/or wrongful acts will nonetheless be enforced by Florida Courts so long as the contracts express an intent in clear and unequivocal terms to provide for such indemnity. See, Cox Cable Corp. v. Gulf Power Company, 591 So. 2d 627 (Fla. 1992); Charles Poe Masonry, Inc. v. Spring Lock Scaffolding Rental Equipment Co., 374 So.2d 487 (Fla. 1979); University Plaza Shopping Center v. Stewart, 272 So.2d 507 (Fla. 1973); Greater Orlando Aviation Authority v. Bulldog Airlines, Inc., 705 So. 2d 120 (Fla. 5th DCA 1998); and Allianz Insurance Company v. Goldcoast Partners, Inc., 684 So. 2d 336 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996). Therefore, in order for the indemnitee to be indemnified for its own wrongful conduct, a specific provision protecting the indemnitee from liability caused by the indemnitee's own negligence is required. Id. This specificity requirement is necessitated the fact that contracts providing indemnification for one's own negligence are disfavored in Florida and are strictly construed. See, United Parcel Service of America, Inc. v. Enforcement Security Corporation, 525 So.2d 424 (Fla. 1st DCA 1987). Rarely does a claim involve a services contract wherein the contractor/tenant has agreed to indemnify the airport authority for the airport authority's own negligence and/or wrongful acts. 1 As previously stated, airport premises liability claims usually involve allegations of joint negligence against the airport authority and their contractor/tenant. Although each complaint must be reviewed on a case by case basis with respect to the allegations presented against an airport authority, there are Florida cases which require a contractor to indemnify the airport authority in instances where joint negligence is alleged. Florida D.O.T. v. V.E. Whitehurst & Sons, Inc., 636 So.2d 101 (Fla. 1st DCA 1994) (cause of action for indemnification was stated based upon the contractual provision that the contractor would indemnify the FDOT from all actions and liabilities "due to any negligent act or occurrence of omission or commission of the contractor, its subcontractors, agents or employees" and the provision providing 1 Attached at the end of this paper are a few sample indemnity agreements which have been the focus of litigation involving certain Florida Airport Authorities and their contractors and/or tenants. The first indemnity provision of the attached samples is the most beneficial contract this writer has ever seen utilized by an airport authority to secure indemnity for its own wrongful acts and/or conduct consistent with the Florida law cited above. 3
7 indemnification except for "damages directly caused or resulting from the sole negligence of the department or any of its officers, agents or employees."); United Parcel Service of America, Inc. v. Enforcement Security Corp., 525 So.2d 424 (Fla. 1st DCA 1987) (indemnification provisions in contract between joint tortfeasors was enforced in case where contract provided indemnification for all claims "except from and against all losses, damages, expenses, etc., as set forth hereinabove, arising out of the sole negligence of UPS."); Mitchell Maintenance Systems v. State D.O.T., 442 So.2d 276 (Fla. 4th DCA 1983) (Department of Transportation could obtain contractual indemnification from its contractor where contractor agreed to indemnify the Department "except that neither CONTRACTOR nor any of its subcontractors will be liable under this section for damages arising out of injury or damage to persons or property directly caused or resulting from the sole negligence of Department or any of its contractors, agents or employees."); City of Jacksonville v. Franco, 361 So.2d 209 (Fla. 1st DCA 1978) (under indemnity contract, city was liable to railroad for indemnity regardless of railroad's contributing negligence); and Leonard L. Farber Co., Inc. v. Jaksch, 335 So.2d 847 (Fla. 4th DCA 1976) (Lessee was liable to indemnify lessor from matters "occasioned wholly or in part by any act or omission of lessee."). When an airport claim is assigned to this writer for handling, it is usually already in suit. At this point, the claims handler has already provided notice of the airport authority's request for a defense/indemnity and has likely received a notice from the contractor (and/or its insurer) that the tender has been refused. The standard response usually provided to the tender request is that the facts of the claim are under investigation and, as a result, no decision can be reached. While this response may suffice pre-suit, as there are no record legal allegations by which to judge the contractor's/insurer's obligation to defend and/or indemnify, as shown below it can no longer suffice once a complaint has been filed. Once suit is filed, the defense/indemnity obligations of contractors and their insurers become more immediate than they were pre-suit. Under Florida law, there are two duties (similar to duties owed by insurers under their insurance policies) which arise in the context of indemnity contracts: (1) the duty to indemnify and hold harmless the indemnitee, and (2) the duty to defend the indemnitee. National RR Passenger Corp. v. Roundtree Transport and Rigging, Inc., 286 F.3d 1233 (11th Cir. 2002). The duty to defend is entirely separate from the right to indemnification. Id.; Department of Transportation v. Southern Bell Telephone and Telegraph Company, Inc., 635 So. 2d 74 (Fla. 1 st DCA 1994) ("The duty to defend is entirely separate from the duty indemnify because the duty to defend is based upon the allegations contained in the complaint at the time of its filing). Therefore, since the duty to defend is based solely upon the allegations contained in a complaint, the issue of the airport authority's fault is of no relevance to the analysis as to whether the duty to defend is owed by the contractor and/or its insurer. DOT, 635 So. 2d at p. 78 ("[t]urning next to DOT's claim for breach of Bell's duty to defend, even if DOT was later determined to be solely liable to Misener on its claim for damages and had no right to indemnification from Bell, Bell's duty to defend is 4
8 entirely separate from DOT's right to indemnification, because its duty to defend must be determined from the allegations in Misener's complaint against DOT at the time it was filed.") and J.A. Jones Construction Co. v. Zack Co., 232 So. 2d 447 (Fla. 3d DCA 1970) ("[h]ere the claim asserted and sued upon by Eastern was of that character, in that it represented a potential liability of the contractor for property damage for which the contractor would have been entitled to indemnity, thereby calling into effect the obligation of the subcontractors to supply Jones' defense, regardless of whether the party asserting the claim should win or lose upon a final determination of the suit."); See also, Metropolitan Dade County v. CBM Industries of Minnesota, Inc., 776 So. 2d 937 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000) (janitorial service contract owed airport a defense in premises liability claim where complaint against airport contained allegations of active and passive negligence of airport); Hart Properties v. Eastern Elevator Service Corp., 357 So. 2d 257 (Fla. 3rd DCA 1978) ("It is well established in Florida that when the active or primary negligence of one tortfeasor and the passive or secondary negligence of another tortfeasor combine to proximately cause an injury to a third party, the passively negligent tortfeasor is entitled to indemnity from the actively negligent one."); Florida Power Corporation v. Taylor, 332 So. 2d 687 (Fla. 2 nd DCA 1976) (Id.); GACL, Inc. v. Riviera Tile and Terrazzo Co., 300 So. 2d 39 (Fla. 3rd DCA 1974) (Id.); Maybarduk v. Bustamante, 294 So. 2d 374 (Fla. 4th DCA 1974) (Id.). Once a complaint is filed, the contractor and/or its insurer have to consider the airport authority's request for a defense and/or indemnity. The filing of the complaint creates pressure upon the contractor and/or its insurer to make a determination since the filing of the complaint commences the legal process wherein the indemnitee will have to secure defense counsel. As a result, an additional element of pressure is placed upon the contractor and/or its insurer given the potential exposure for the airport authority's attorney's fees in the defense of the underlying action for which indemnity is sought. d. Recovery of Defense Expenses by Indemnitees from Indemnitors Once the contractor is presented with the tender of defense after the filing of a complaint, the exposure for the attorney's incurred by the airport authority fees becomes an additional item of potential damages. This potential exposure is useful in forcing an acceptance of the tender of defense. Additionally, this attorney's fee exposure is useful in forcing a complete acceptance of the tender, including an agreement to indemnify the airport authority with a waiver of any future reservation of rights, in cases involving joint negligence. "It has been established in Florida that generally an indemnitee is entitled to recover, as part of his damages, reasonable attorney's fees, and reasonable and proper legal costs and expenses, which he is compelled to pay as a result of suits by or against him in reference to the matter against which he is indemnified." Insurance Company of North America v. King, 340 So. 2d 1175 (Fla. 4th DCA 1976). The fees and costs that are subject to recovery, however, are the fees and costs incurred in defending the underlying case, not the fees and costs incurred in establishing the right to indemnity. 5
9 Jewelcor Jewelers & Distributors, Inc. v. Southern Ornamentals, Inc., 499 So. 2d 850 (Fla. 4th DCA 1987) ("there is an exception to the general rule that an indemnitee is entitled to recover reasonable attorney's fees and that is that attorney's fees in establishing the right to indemnification are not allowable."). Given the foregoing case law, an airport authority is entitled to make claim for the attorney's fees it incurs in connection with the defense of the underlying claim. In addition to citing to the contractor and/or its insurer the exposure for attorney's fees under indemnity law, there is additional practical leverage that can be utilized to force an insurer to accept a tender fully, completely and without reservation. In the complaints filed against the airport authority and their contractor, the active negligence of the airport authority is alleged in concert with the active negligence of the contractor. When this occurs, the contractor's insurer often times tries to offer a defense to the airport authority which is subject to a reservation of any defenses under the policy. If it is that important for the contractor's insurer to preserve such reservations under the policy, they must, by law, appoint separate counsel to defend the County. 2 Otherwise, there is an impermissible conflict of interest that exists with one set of counsel representing the named insured contractor and the additional insured airport authority. This writer has found the requirement that the insurer must assign mutually agreeable counsel to be quite helpful in forcing the contractor's insurer to simply withdraw any policy defense and provide coverage to the airport authority under the subject policy. This way, the counsel appointed by the insurer to represent the named insured (contractor) can also represent the airport authority without conflict which provides an obvious economic benefit to the contractor's insurance carrier since it does not have to pay two sets of counsel. More importantly, it effectively represents and acknowledgement by the contractor s insurer to pay for the exposure being foisted upon the airport authority. III. Conclusion. Indemnity agreements and insurance clauses are useful risk shifting provisions among the parties to various business relationships. In order to be enforceable, however, the indemnity provisions require specificity and the intent of the parties must be clear and unequivocal. Because indemnity agreements will be construed by the court, as a matter of law, it is important for the drafters to use very specific language in ensuring that the airport authority will be indemnified by its contractor/tenant even if the airport authority s was the cause of the liability in whole or in part. 2 Florida's claims administration statute, provides that in order for an insurer to preserve all policy defenses, that insurer must, inter alia, "retain independent counsel which is mutually agreeable to the parties." 6
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
Indemnity Clauses. Just boilerplate, right?
Indemnity Clauses Just boilerplate, right? Indemnity The obligation resting on one person to make good any loss or damage another has incurred or may incur by acting at his request or for his benefit,
More informationHOLD HARMLESS, INDEMNITY, SUBROGATION AND ADDITIONAL INSURED INSURANCE IN TRANSPORTATION CONTRACTS
HOLD HARMLESS, INDEMNITY, SUBROGATION AND ADDITIONAL INSURED INSURANCE IN TRANSPORTATION CONTRACTS By James W. Bryan Nexsen Pruet P.L.L.C. Greensboro, North Carolina 336-373-1600 jbryan@nexsenpruet.com
More informationCalifornia Civil Code 2782.05
California Civil Code 2782.05 (a) Except as provided in subdivision (b), provisions, clauses, covenants, and agreements contained in, collateral to, or affecting any construction contract and amendments
More informationCalifornia Senate Bill 474 Impact on Owners & Contractors
California Senate Bill 474 Impact on Owners & Contractors Beginning January 1, 2013, project owners, general contractors ( GC ), construction managers ( CM ) and any lower tier contractor who employs subcontractors
More informationA&E Briefings. Indemnification Clauses: Uninsurable Contractual Liability. Structuring risk management solutions
A&E Briefings Structuring risk management solutions Spring 2012 Indemnification Clauses: Uninsurable Contractual Liability J. Kent Holland, J.D. ConstructionRisk, LLC Professional consultants are judged
More informationContractual Liability and the CGL Policy
Contractual Liability and the CGL Policy May 2002 What is meant by contractual liability and how it actually works is not always well understood. In this new column, Craig Stanovich helps clear up the
More informationKnow Your Indemnity Obligation Know Your Risk Know Your Insurance Company
Know Your Indemnity Obligation Know Your Risk Know Your Insurance Company by KEVIN R. CARLIN, ESQ. Roadmap Key Points to Take From This Presentation: Type I, Type II &Type III indemnity How to identify
More informationIndemnification Clauses, Part 1* Discussion from a/e ProNet's Risk Management and Contract Guide. J. Kent Holland, Jr., Esq.
Indemnification Clauses, Part 1* Discussion from a/e ProNet's Risk Management and Contract Guide J. Kent Holland, Jr., Esq. Issue: Indemnification provisions in contracts may require the design professional
More informationCALIFORNIA Strict Indemnity Language. CALIFORNIA Intermediate Indemnity Language
CALIFORNIA Strict Indemnity Language Contractor (Indemnitor) shall indemnify, defend, and hold harmless Authority, its officers, officials, employees, and volunteers from and against any and all liability,
More informationWorkplace Related Injuries
Workplace Related Injuries A Discussion of the Relevant Provisions of New York State Labor Law By: WARREN S. KOSTER, ESQ. CALLAN, REGENSTREICH, KOSTER & BRADY ONE WHITEHALL STREET NEW YORK, NEW YORK 10004
More informationCase 6:12-cv-00914-RBD-TBS Document 136 Filed 07/16/14 Page 1 of 7 PageID 4525
Case 6:12-cv-00914-RBD-TBS Document 136 Filed 07/16/14 Page 1 of 7 PageID 4525 TROVILLION CONSTRUCTION & DEVELOPMENT, INC.; and CASA JARDIN CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, INC., UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE
More informationThe Insurance Coverage Law Information Center
The following article is from National Underwriter s latest online resource, FC&S Legal: The Insurance Coverage Law Information Center. The Insurance Coverage Law Information Center LIABILITY CLAIMS COSTS
More informationHow To Defend An Employee Against An Employee In A Construction Accident
Risk-Shifting Agreements In Construction Contracts: Why Insurance May Not Work The Way It Used To David S. White The newer additional-insured clause might leave the owner and subcontractor without the
More informationIndemnity and Insurance Provisions in Commercial Contracts
Survey Says: The Feud Over Insurance and Indemnity Provisions in Business Contracts Indemnity and Insurance Provisions in Commercial Contracts Kenneth M. Gorenberg Stefan R. Dandelles Indemnity and insurance
More informationCOMMENTARY. California s New Subcontractor Defense Regime for Non-Residential Projects: Creating Order or Chaos?
May 2013 JONES DAY COMMENTARY California s New Subcontractor Defense Regime for Non-Residential Projects: Creating Order or Chaos? As explained in a recent Commentary (available at http://www.jonesday.com/navigating_treacherous_
More informationRisk Shifting: Indemnity & AI Provisions in a Construction Contract
Risk Shifting: Indemnity & AI Provisions in a Construction Contract Wednesday, August 15, 2012 Presented By the IADC Construction Law & Litigation Committee Welcome! The Webinar will begin promptly at
More informationcarefully consider the utilization of negligence in a construction defect case, however, the contractor will likely have defenses to assert against
Contractor Negligence in a Florida Construction Defects Case Part I: Elements and Duty By: Christopher M. Cobb, Esquire and Austin B. Calhoun, J.D. 2013 Construction defects are a problem in Florida. In
More informationFLORIDA MARINA STORAGE AGREEMENTS AT A GLANCE Prepared by: Keith S. Brais, Esq. Brais & Associates, P.A. www.braislaw.com
I. Introduction FLORIDA MARINA STORAGE AGREEMENTS AT A GLANCE Prepared by: Keith S. Brais, Esq. Brais & Associates, P.A. www.braislaw.com The purpose of this article to inform the reader about the interplay
More informationTHE LIFE OF AN ACCIDENT AND HOW TO HANDLE IT: CASE STUDY
14 TH ANNUAL RISK MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE THE LIFE OF AN ACCIDENT AND HOW TO HANDLE IT: CASE STUDY Mark Meyer Cal Burnton 1 POTENTIAL PARTIES (DEEP POCKETS) - Eastpointe Airport - owned airport - erected
More informationINDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR AGREEMENT
INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR AGREEMENT This Independent Contractor Agreement (this Agreement ) is made and entered into as of, 20, by and between [INSERT NAME OF CONTRACTING PARTY] (the Contracting Party ),
More informationCase 1:03-cv-00630-RHB Document 92 Filed 02/17/2006 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
Case 1:03-cv-00630-RHB Document 92 Filed 02/17/2006 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION J.B. LABORATORIES, INC., a Michigan Corporation, v. Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant,
More informationCONTRACTUAL AND INSURANCE RELATED RISK SHIFTING TOOLS
CONTRACTUAL AND INSURANCE RELATED RISK SHIFTING TOOLS P R E S E N TED TO THE A S S O C I AT I O N O F C O R P O R AT E C O U N S E L A P R I L 3, 2 0 1 2 J O S E P H L. P E L L I S I I J P E L L I S @
More informationThe Hold Harmless Agreement and the CGL
The Hold Harmless Agreement and the CGL Since most insurance agents are not attorneys, dealing with the contractual liability exposure and coverage is a bewildering and intimidating prospect. To make matters
More informationWHAT IS IT, HOW TO DEAL WITH IT, AND WHERE IS IT GOING?
WHAT IS IT, HOW TO DEAL WITH IT, AND WHERE IS IT GOING? Moderator: Paul H. Leonard Policyholders view: Andrew M. Weiner Insurers view: Wallace C. Magathan, III First Party Hull Claims Third Party Passenger
More informationLimitation of Liability. By: Michael Clark mclark@siegfriedlaw.com
Limitation of Liability By: Michael Clark mclark@siegfriedlaw.com Limitation of Liability Clauses What is a limitations of liability clause Limitations of liability attempt to limit, define or eliminate
More informationCharter Service Agreement
Charter Service Agreement This Charter Service Agreement ("Agreement") is effective as of the day it is executed by and between Apollo Jets, LLC, a New York limited liability company with its primary place
More informationRisk Transfer: A Strategy to Help Protect Your Business. Risk Control
Risk Transfer: A Strategy to Help Protect Your Business Risk Control Businesses rely on crucial relationships with contractors, subcontractors, vendors and consumers. In these relationships, agreements
More informationObtaining Indemnity Through Effective Tender Letters
Page 1 of 5 Portfolio Media. Inc. 648 Broadway, Suite 200 New York, NY 10012 www.law360.com Phone: +1 212 537 6331 Fax: +1 212 537 6371 customerservice@portfoliomedia.com Obtaining Indemnity Through Effective
More informationManaging Liability Risks Posed by Independent Contractors http://delvacca.acc.com
USING CONTRACTORS? Managing Liability Risks Posed by Independent Contractors http://delvacca.acc.com Panel Jonathan H. Spergel, Esq. Manko, Gold, Katcher & Fox, LLP Christopher D. Ball, Esq. Manko, Gold,
More informationUnited States Workers Compensation/Indemnification Overview
United States Workers Compensation/Indemnification Overview January 18, 2012 Jill Kirila jill.kirila@squiresanders.com Kevin Hess kevin.hess@squiresanders.com 36 Offices in 17 Countries Workers Compensation
More informationMarine Insurance Day October 5, 2012 Additional Insureds & Marine Insurance. Joe Grasso and Michael Thompson
Marine Insurance Day October 5, 2012 Additional Insureds & Marine Insurance Joe Grasso and Michael Thompson 1 Agenda General Principles Case Studies Takeaways and Q&A 2 Named Insureds v. Additional Insureds
More informationMINORS ON CAMPUS. 1. Supervision, Background Investigations, Compliance with Laws and Rules:
MINORS ON CAMPUS Required Provisions in Affiliation Agreements/Contracts [Appendix D] 1. Supervision, Background Investigations, Compliance with Laws and Rules: (A) Licensee shall, at licensee s sole cost
More informationCALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION CONTRACTOR LIABILITY INSURANCE
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION CONTRACTOR LIABILITY INSURANCE The following are excerpts from Caltrans 2010Standard Specifications. Specifications are subject to change so refer to the project
More informationWhat You Should Know About General Agreements of Indemnity and Why You Should Know It
What You Should Know About General Agreements of Indemnity and Why You Should Know It Summary When a contractor (for purposes of this discussion, contractor includes subcontractor) first seeks surety credit,
More informationCase 3:13-cv-00054 Document 120 Filed in TXSD on 05/04/15 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS GALVESTON DIVISION ORDER
Case 3:13-cv-00054 Document 120 Filed in TXSD on 05/04/15 Page 1 of 7 This case is being reviewed for possible publication by American Maritime Cases, Inc. ( AMC ). If this case is published in AMC s book
More informationCase 3:07-cv-01180-TEM Document 56 Filed 04/27/2009 Page 1 of 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA JACKSONVILLE DIVISION
Case 3:07-cv-01180-TEM Document 56 Filed 04/27/2009 Page 1 of 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA JACKSONVILLE DIVISION JAMES E. TOMLINSON and DARLENE TOMLINSON, his wife, v. Plaintiffs,
More informationIn Defense of Insured Contracts
In Defense of Insured Contracts July 2007 The term "insured contract" certainly sounds reassuring. As the definition of "insured contract" lists not only certain contracts or agreements (contract for the
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON JUNE 19, 2008 Session
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON JUNE 19, 2008 Session GEORGIA-PACIFIC LLC, ET AL. v. SWIFT TRANSPORTATION CORPORATION Direct Appeal from the Chancery Court for Shelby County No. CH-07-1107-2
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS 444444444444 NO. 11-0425 444444444444 PETROLEUM SOLUTIONS, INC., PETITIONER, v. BILL HEAD D/B/A BILL HEAD ENTERPRISES AND TITEFLEX CORPORATION, RESPONDENTS 4444444444444444444444444444444444444444444444444444
More informationConstruction Defect Action Reform Act
COLORADO REVISED STATUTES Title 13. Courts and Court Procedure Damages Regulation of Actions and Proceedings Article 20. Actions Part 8. Construction Defect Actions for Property Loss and Damage Construction
More informationvs. JURY TRIAL DEMANDED COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES AND DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL Plaintiff JAMES SCHAIRER, by and through undersigned counsel, hereby sues
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE th 16 JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR MONROE COUNTY, FLORIDA GENERAL JURISDICTION DIVISION CASE NO. JAMES SCHAIRER, individually, Plaintiff, vs. JURY TRIAL DEMANDED PAUL KERCHER,
More informationIN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA
IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA Clyde Kennedy, : Petitioner : : v. : No. 1649 C.D. 2012 : Submitted: May 17, 2013 Workers Compensation Appeal : Board (Henry Modell & Co., Inc.), : Respondent
More informationINSURANCE AND INDEMNIFICATION REQUIREMENTS. RE: CCTV system for bus shelters at the Economy Lot PAGE 1 OF 4
1THE PHILADELPHIA PARKING AUTHORITY RE: CCTV system for bus shelters at the Economy Lot PAGE 1 OF 4 Prior to commencement of the contract and until completion of your work, shall, at its sole expense,
More informationHow To Get A $500.00 Payout From A Claim For Benefits Without Prejudice
STATE OF FLORIDA DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS OFFICE OF THE JUDGES OF COMPENSATION CLAIMS ORLANDO DISTRICT OFFICE Eliezier Andino, Employee/Claimant, vs. Hy-Tech Recovery and Towing, LLC/, Employer/
More informationFOR PROPERTY LOSS AND DAMAGE 1
13-20-801. Short title Colorado Revised Statutes Title 13; Article 20; Part 8: CONSTRUCTION DEFECT ACTIONS FOR PROPERTY LOSS AND DAMAGE 1 This part 8 shall be known and may be cited as the Construction
More informationEmployers Liability and Insurance Coverage in the Construction Industry
Illinois Association of Defense Trial Counsel Springfield, Illinois www.iadtc.org 800-232-0169 IDC Quarterly Volume 18, Number 1 (18.1.29) Insurance Law By: Gregory G. Vacala and Allison H. McJunkin Rusin
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF INDIANA
ATTORNEY FOR APPELLANT Steven St. John Skiles Detrude Indianapolis, Indiana ATTORNEY FOR APPELLEE Francis A. Veltri Travelers Staff Counsel Merrillville, Indiana IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF INDIANA BC Osaka,
More informationCAMBRIDGE PROPERTY & CASUALTY SPECIAL REPORT
CAMBRIDGE PROPERTY & CASUALTY SPECIAL REPORT MANAGING THE RISK OF INDEPENDENT CONTRACTORS WORKING IN YOUR BUILDING This Special Report was written by Daniel P. Hale, J.D., CPCU, ARM, CRM, LIC, AIC, AIS,
More informationIndemnity Agreements & California s Crawford Decision: Its Implications and Strategies for Defense
Indemnity Agreements & California s Crawford Decision: Its Implications and Strategies for Defense Prepared for the Construction Law Section Meeting at the 2011 Annual Meeting of the Federation of Defense
More informationAnesthesia Providers, Inc. CRNA GENERAL INFORMATION FORM. Name First Name M.I. Last Name. Address Street Address Apt. # City State Zip Code
Anesthesia Providers, Inc. CRNA GENERAL INFORMATION FORM *Please Print Name First Name M.I. Last Name Address Street Address Apt. # City State Zip Code Date of Birth / / Mo. Date Year Home Telephone -
More informationATTACHMENT A.6 INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS ROUTINE CONSTRUCTION, MAINTENANCE AND REPAIR PROJECTS
ATTACHMENT A.6 INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS ROUTINE CONSTRUCTION, MAINTENANCE AND REPAIR PROJECTS Contractor shall obtain insurance of the types and in the amounts listed below. A. COMMERCIAL GENERAL AND UMBRELLA
More informationEffect of Clause in Liability Insurance Policy Excluding Coverage for Contractual Indemnity Liability
Fordham Law Review Volume 25 Issue 4 Article 6 1956 Effect of Clause in Liability Insurance Policy Excluding Coverage for Contractual Indemnity Liability Recommended Citation Effect of Clause in Liability
More informationConstruction Defects And 'The Space Between'
Portfolio Media. Inc. 860 Broadway, 6th Floor New York, NY 10003 www.law360.com Phone: +1 646 783 7100 Fax: +1 646 783 7161 customerservice@law360.com Construction Defects And 'The Space Between' Law360,
More informationBUSINESS ASSOCIATE AGREEMENT
BUSINESS ASSOCIATE AGREEMENT This Business Associate Agreement (the Agreement ), is made effective as of the sign up date on the login information page of the CarePICS.com website, by and between CarePICS,
More informationA. The vessel owner has appointed Solstice Sailing, Inc. as agent to manage and charter the yacht identified in the below as:
THIS AGREEMENT is made between Solstice Sailing, Inc., DBA, a Michigan Company of Traverse City, Michigan (,Solstice Sailing") and, Charterer" (Print Charterer Name here) RECITALS A. The vessel owner has
More informationCONDITIONAL PAYMENT BONDS -- PANACEA OR PANDORA? STUART H. SOBEL, ESQ. Siegfried, Rivera, Lerner, DeLaTorre & Sobel, P.A. March, 1998.
CONDITIONAL PAYMENT BONDS -- PANACEA OR PANDORA? STUART H. SOBEL, ESQ. Siegfried, Rivera, Lerner, DeLaTorre & Sobel, P.A. March, 1998 Introduction In 1991, 713.245 Fla. Stat. ("Conditional Payment Bond
More informationAGREEMENT FOR FINANCIAL AND ACCOUNTING CONSULTATION SERVICES
AGREEMENT FOR FINANCIAL AND ACCOUNTING CONSULTATION SERVICES THIS AGREEMENT is made as of December 1, 2003, by and between the San Francisquito Creek Joint Powers Authority, a body corporate and politic
More informationAIA Document A310 TM 2010
AIA Document A310 TM 2010 Bid Bond CONTRACTOR: OWNER: «Lane County» «125 East Eighth Avenue BOND AMOUNT: $ PROJECT: (Name, location or address, and Project number, if any) «Lane County Adult Corrections
More informationAPPORTIONMENT OF LIABILITY: UNIFORM APPORTIONMENT OF TORT RESPONSIBILITY ACT AS COMPARED TO RESTATEMENT THIRD, TORTS
APPORTIONMENT OF LIABILITY: UNIFORM APPORTIONMENT OF TORT RESPONSIBILITY ACT AS COMPARED TO RESTATEMENT THIRD, TORTS Presented by: Douglas G. Houser Bullivant Houser Bailey, P.C. Portland, Oregon -2- Where
More informationContract Guide Course for Design Professionals: Part II
Contract Guide Course for Design Professionals: Part II Presented by: J. Kent Holland, J.D. ConstructionRisk, LLC Kent@ConstructionRisk.com 703-623-1932 1 AIA Registered Course This program is registered
More informationA. For the consideration agreed below to be paid to Contractor by City, Contractor shall provide
STATE OF TEXAS CONTRACT FOR SERVICES COUNTY OF DALLAS THIS CONTRACT is made and entered into by and between the CITY OF DALLAS, a Texas municipal corporation, located in Dallas County, Texas (hereinafter
More informationSURETY. and Title: (Any additional signatures appear on the last page of this Performance Bond.)
Performance Bond Document A312 2010 CONTRACTOR: (Name, legal status and address) SURETY: (Name, legal status and principal place of business) OWNER: (Name, legal status and address) CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT
More informationSouth Australia LAW REFORM (CONTRIBUTORY NEGLIGENCE AND APPORTIONMENT OF LIABILITY) ACT 2001
South Australia LAW REFORM (CONTRIBUTORY NEGLIGENCE AND APPORTIONMENT OF LIABILITY) ACT 2001 An Act to reform the law relating to contributory negligence and the apportionment of liability; to amend the
More informationCLAIMS AGAINST TRANSLATORS: THE TRILOGY OF PREVENTION, HANDLING AND RESOLUTION PART ONE: PREVENTION AND MITIGATION
CLAIMS AGAINST TRANSLATORS: THE TRILOGY OF PREVENTION, HANDLING AND RESOLUTION PART ONE: PREVENTION AND MITIGATION Martin M. Ween, Esq. Partner Wilson, Elser, Moskowitz, Edelman & Dicker, LLP 150 E. 42
More informationInsight from Carlton Fields
Insight from Carlton Fields 2011 Indemnity Clauses in By: Jason Perkins & April Bristow Types of Indemnity Although the defi nition of indemnify as a general concept is fairly straightforward (Black s
More informationIN THE NEBRASKA COURT OF APPEALS. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND JUDGMENT ON APPEAL (Memorandum Web Opinion)
IN THE NEBRASKA COURT OF APPEALS MEMORANDUM OPINION AND JUDGMENT ON APPEAL (Memorandum Web Opinion) CITY OF LINCOLN V. DIAL REALTY DEVELOPMENT NOTICE: THIS OPINION IS NOT DESIGNATED FOR PERMANENT PUBLICATION
More informationHandling Real Property leasing exposures
Reprinted with permission from The John Liner Letter, Volume 44, Number 2; January 2007. Copyright 2007, Standard Publishing Corp., Boston, MA. All rights reserved. www.spcpub.com A MONTHLY BUSINESS INSURANCE
More informationLEASE AGREEMENT INSURANCE AND INDEMNIFICATION LANGUAGE
LEASE AGREEMENT INSURANCE AND INDEMNIFICATION LANGUAGE Tenant assumes the liability for damage to its improvements, fixtures, partitions, equipment and personal property therein, and all appurtenances
More informationCase 8:13-cv-00295-EAK-TGW Document 145 Filed 02/12/15 Page 1 of 12 PageID 5551 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION
Case 8:13-cv-00295-EAK-TGW Document 145 Filed 02/12/15 Page 1 of 12 PageID 5551 SUMMIT CONTRACTORS, INC., Plaintiff, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION v. CASE NO. 8:13-CV-295-T-17TGW
More informationv. CASE NO.: CVA1 09-16 Lower Court Case No.: 2008-CC-7009-O
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE NINTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR ORANGE COUNTY, FLORIDA ELOURDE COLIN, Appellant, v. CASE NO.: CVA1 09-16 Lower Court Case No.: 2008-CC-7009-O PROGRESSIVE AMERICAN INSURANCE
More informationRISK MANAGEMENT IN CONTRACTS
RISK MANAGEMENT IN CONTRACTS There are many circumstances in which an Institution will contract with another party including service contracts, sales agreements, leases, practicum placement and affiliation
More informationIndependent Contractor Agreement. Name of Contractor: Address: Social Security or Tax I.D. Number:
HOFSTRA UNIVERSITY Name of Contractor: Address: Social Security or Tax I.D. Number: Independent Contractor Agreement THIS INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR AGREEMENT (together with any attachments referred to below,
More informationSPECIAL REPORT MANAGING THE RISK OF INDEPENDENT CONTRACTORS WORKING IN YOUR BUILDING
SPECIAL REPORT MANAGING THE RISK OF INDEPENDENT CONTRACTORS WORKING IN YOUR BUILDING (04-04-14) This Special Report was written by Daniel P. Hale, J.D., CPCU, ARM, CRM, LIC, AIC, AIS, API of Marsh & McLennan
More informationFACILITIES USE AGREEMENT
FACILITIES USE AGREEMENT Effective Date: Sponsor: Sponsor Address: Facility: THIS FACILITIES USE AGREEMENT ( Agreement ) is effective as of the Effective Date set forth above, by and between Temple University
More informationCase 3:09-cv-01222-MMH-JRK Document 33 Filed 08/10/10 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA JACKSONVILLE DIVISION
Case 3:09-cv-01222-MMH-JRK Document 33 Filed 08/10/10 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA JACKSONVILLE DIVISION PHL VARIABLE INSURANCE COMPANY, Plaintiff, vs. Case No. 3:09-cv-1222-J-34JRK
More informationINSURANCE REQUIREMENTS FOR ALL CITY CONTRACTS
INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS FOR ALL CITY CONTRACTS 1. GENERAL PROVISIONS A. Indemnification. The Contractor shall indemnify and save harmless the City of Lincoln, Nebraska from and against all losses, claims,
More informationNAMING OTHER PARTIES AS ADDITIONAL INSUREDS. Roofing contractors typically are required to name owners, general contractors, property
NAMING OTHER PARTIES AS ADDITIONAL INSUREDS INTRODUCTION Roofing contractors typically are required to name owners, general contractors, property managers, architects and others as additional insureds
More informationTHE STATE OF FLORIDA...
TABLE OF CONTENTS I. THE STATE OF FLORIDA... 2 A. FREQUENTLY CITED FLORIDA STATUTES... 2 1. General Considerations in Insurance Claim Management... 2 2. Insurance Fraud... 5 3. Automobile Insurance...
More informationCase 0:14-cv-62840-JIC Document 44 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/30/2015 Page 1 of 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
Case 0:14-cv-62840-JIC Document 44 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/30/2015 Page 1 of 12 UNITED STATES LIABILITY INSURANCE COMPANY, v. Plaintiff, KELLEY VENTURES, LLC, KEVIN P. KELLEY, and PHOENIX MOTORS, INC.,
More informationAGREEMENT FOR MOVING OVERSIZED LOADS OVER HIGHWAY-RAIL GRADE CROSSINGS SCRRA FORM NO. 4
AGREEMENT FOR MOVING OVERSIZED LOADS OVER HIGHWAY-RAIL GRADE CROSSINGS SCRRA FORM NO. 4 SCRRA File No. SCRRA Project/Task No. CPUC No. Subdivision Thomas Guide Page The Contractor, hereby requests permission
More informationCITY OF BOCA RATON POLICE & FIREFIGHTERS RETIREMENT SYSTEM AND [CONSULTANT] CONSULTING SERVICES AGREEMENT
CITY OF BOCA RATON POLICE & FIREFIGHTERS RETIREMENT SYSTEM AND CONSULTING SERVICES AGREEMENT This Agreement, made as of the day of, 2015 between the Board of Trustees of the City of Boca Raton Police &
More informationHow To Write A Contract Between College And Independent Contractor
Independent Contractor Agreement (Long Form) This Agreement is made between Babson College ("College"), a Massachusetts non-profit corporation with a principal place of business at 231 Forest Street, Babson
More information-1- -2- -3- -4- -5- INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS FOR DEVELOPER EXTENSION AGREEMENTS 1.1 The developer shall obtain and keep in force during the term of the contract, Commercial General Liability insurance policies
More informationNPSA GENERAL PROVISIONS
NPSA GENERAL PROVISIONS 1. Independent Contractor. A. It is understood and agreed that CONTRACTOR (including CONTRACTOR s employees) is an independent contractor and that no relationship of employer-employee
More informationfor Landlords and Tenants Negotiating Insurance, Indemnity and Mutual Waiver of Subrogation Provisions
Presenting a live 90 minute webinar with interactive Q&A Commercial Leases: Risk Mitigation Strategies for Landlords and Tenants Negotiating Insurance, Indemnity and Mutual Waiver of Subrogation Provisions
More informationSTATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS
STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS CREATIVE DENTAL CONCEPTS, L.L.C., Plaintiff-Appellant, UNPUBLISHED June 26, 2014 V No. 315117 Oakland Circuit Court KEEGO HARBOR DEVELOPMENT, L.L.C., LC No. 2012-126273-NZ
More informationAIA Document A312 - Electronic Format. Performance Bond
AIA Document A312 - Electronic Format Performance Bond THIS DOCUMENT HAS IMPORTANT LEGAL CONSEQUENCES: CONSULTATION WITH AN ATTORNEY IS ENCOURAGED WITH RESPECT TO ITS COMPLETION OR MODIFICATION. AUTHENTICATION
More informationBelow is an overview of the Molex lease process as it applies to Molex Application Tooling equipment.
Dear Valued Customer, Below is an overview of the Molex lease process as it applies to Molex Application Tooling equipment. Lease process: Molex does not offer leases for all of the equipment that we promote.
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE December 1, 2003 Session
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE December 1, 2003 Session FARMERS MUTUAL OF TENNESSEE v. ATHENS INSURANCE AGENCY, CHARLES W. SPURLING and wife, CAROLYN SPURLING Direct Appeal from the
More information2012 IL App (1st) 112728-U. No. 1-11-2728
2012 IL App (1st 112728-U FIRST DIVISION November 5, 2012 No. 1-11-2728 Notice: This order was filed under Supreme Court Rule 23 and may not be cited as precedent by any party except in the limited circumstances
More informationINSURANCE POLICIES. by Bankruptcy Code Section 541. That section provides, in pertinent part:
BANKING LAW JOURNAL by Bankruptcy Code Section 541. That section provides, in pertinent part: The commencement of a case under section 301, 302, or 303 of this title creates an estate. Such estate is comprised
More informationCITY OF SHERWOOD Independent Contractor Agreement (for Personal Services or for Public Works under $25,000)
CITY OF SHERWOOD Independent Contractor Agreement (for Personal Services or for Public Works under $25,000) Dated: Parties: City of Sherwood ( CITY ) 20 NW Washington Street Sherwood, Oregon 97140 And
More informationCLAIMS AGAINST TELEPHONE ANSWERING SERVICES: THE TRILOGY OF PREVENTION, HANDLING AND RESOLUTION PART ONE: PREVENTION AND MITIGATION
CLAIMS AGAINST TELEPHONE ANSWERING SERVICES: THE TRILOGY OF PREVENTION, HANDLING AND RESOLUTION PART ONE: PREVENTION AND MITIGATION Martin M. Ween, Esq. Partner Wilson, Elser, Moskowitz, Edelman & Dicker,
More information388 Blohm Ave. PO Box 388 Aromas CA 95004-0388 (831)726-3155 FAX (831)726-3951 email aromaswd@aol.com ADDENDUM NO. 1
388 Blohm Ave. PO Box 388 Aromas CA 95004-0388 (831)726-3155 FAX (831)726-3951 email aromaswd@aol.com May 6, 2015 To: All Plan Holders From: Vicki Morris General Manager Subject: Water Serviceline Installation
More informationIn the Missouri Court of Appeals Eastern District
In the Missouri Court of Appeals Eastern District DIVISION TWO FRANCIS GRAHAM, ) No. ED97421 ) Respondent, ) Appeal from the Circuit Court ) of St. Louis County vs. ) ) Honorable Steven H. Goldman STATE
More informationWEST PALM BEACH CITY COMMISSION Agenda Cover Memorandum
WEST PALM BEACH CITY COMMISSION Agenda Cover Memorandum Originating Department: Recreation (REC) Subject: Meeting Type: Regular Special Agenda Date: 10/14/2014 Advertised: Required?: Yes No Date: Paper:
More informationNos. 2 09 1120, 2 10 0146, 2 10 0781 cons. Order filed February 18, 2011 IN THE APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS SECOND DISTRICT
Order filed February 18, 2011 NOTICE: This order was filed under Supreme Court Rule 23 and may not be cited as precedent by any party except in the limited circumstances allowed under Rule 23(e)(1). IN
More informationHow To Change A Personal Injury Case Into A Wrongful Death Case In Florida
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC11-1173 L.T. NO. 3D10-488 JOAN RUBLE, as Personal Representative of the Estate of LANCE RUBLE, deceased, Petitioner, vs. RINKER MATERIALS CORPORATION, RINKER
More informationProfessional Practice 544
February 15, 2016 Professional Practice 544 Tort Law and Insurance Michael J. Hanahan Schiff Hardin LLP 233 S. Wacker, Ste. 6600 Chicago, IL 60606 312-258-5701 mhanahan@schiffhardin.com Schiff Hardin LLP.
More informationItems 1-7 above shall not be subject to any of the following limiting or exclusionary endorsements:
Page 1 of 5 Supplier's Insurance. Before commencing the Work, and as a condition of any payment due under this Subcontract, Supplier shall, at its own expense, procure and maintain insurance on all of
More information