1 Screening by the Company You Keep: Joint Liability Lending and the Peer Selection Maitreesh Ghatak presented by Chi Wan 1. Introduction The paper looks at an economic environment where borrowers have some information about the nature of each other s projects that lenders do not, and analyses a contractual mechanism through which lenders can untilise information borrowers may have about each other, and thereby overcoming the problems of adverse selection in credit markets. This paper shows that by lending to self-selected groups of borrowers and making them jointly liable for each other s loan repayment, a lender can achieve high repayment rates even when these borrowers cannot offer any collateral. 2. Motivation This work is motivated by contractual methods successfully used by real world lending institutions, such as group-lending programmes and credit cooperatives. The practice of using joint liability to lend successfully to borrowers who cannot offer any conventional collateral actually goes well back in history. One of the dramatic success story of group lending is about the Grameen Bank.
2 3. Past Literature (brief and for the theoretically purposes of the paper) (a) The existing literature has largely treated group formation under joint liability lending as exogenous. (b) Van Tassel (1999) Tassel s paper shows that under imperfect information, lenders may be able to utilize joint liability contracts as a way to screen agent types by inducing endogenous group formation and self-selection among the borrowers. (c) Armendariz and Gollier (1998) Joint liability can improve the pool of borrowers if borrowers have perfect knowledge of their partners.
3 4. The model A one-period model of a credit market under adverse selection. Technology and Perferences A large number of borrowers who live in a same village. All borrowers are assumed to be risk-neutral and maximise expected returns. Every borrower is endowed with one unit of labor and a risky investment project To launch the project, it requires one unit of capital and one unit of labor. The outcome of the risk project is either a success (S) ora failure (F), denoted as a binary random variable x S, F Two types of borrowers: risky and safe borrowers. For risky borrowers, the probability of success of their project is p r, and for safe borrowers, that is p s. p r p s Risky and safe borrowers exist in proportions and 1 in the population. The return of the project is a random variable y i i s, r, y i R i,0. Borrowers of both types have a reservation payoff u. Risk neutral banks The opportunity cost of capital per loan is 1.
4 Information and Contracting The type of a borrower is unknown to the lenders (banks). Borrowers know each other s types. The information assumption of this model is that the outcome of a project of a borrower, x, is obervable by the bank at no cost and is verifiable. The realized returns of a project of a borrower, y i,isvery costly to observe for the bank. A limited liability constraint. In case their projects fail, borrowers are liable up to the amount of the wealth they posses, w. Wetakew 0 for simplicity. The only contractible variable is the vector of project outcomes of all borrowers, denoted as X. A lending contract can only specify a transfer from a borrower to the bank for every realization of X.
5 Two types of credit contracts: Individual Liability Contract That is a standard debt contract (SDC) between a borrower and the bank with a fixed repayment r in the case of non-bankruptcy state (x S ), and maximum recovery of debt in the case of bankruptcy state (x F ). We assume there is no recovery of debt in this model for simplicity. Joint Liability Contract Bank asks borrowers to form groups of a certain size. Every borrower has an individual liability component r and a joint liability component c. In the case of bankruptcy (x F), the borrower pays nothing back to the bank (zero recovery value of the debt). In the case of non-bankruptcy (x S), the borrower pays r back for his own debt and pays an additional joint liability payment c per member of his group whose projects have failed. Thus unlike SDC, repayment of joint liability contract is not fixed in the non-bankruptcy states.
6 5. Individual Liability Lending 5.1 The Full Information case If bank has full information about a borrower s type, then the optimal contracts are standard debt contracts (SDC) under which the borrower pays nothing when his project fails, and the interest rate when his project succeeds. The equilibrium interest rates: r i p i, i r, s. 5.2 The Asymmetric Information case Bank will offer a pooling individual liability contract with the interest rate r s r r r. Then the expected payoff to borrower of type i would be the difference between the expected payoff and the expected interest payment. U i r p i R i rp i, i r, s. The literature on the adverse selection problem in credit markets assumes that borrowers differ by a risk parameter which is not observed by the bank. (i) Assume that the risky and safe projects have the same mean return, that is p s R s p r R r R, but risky projects have a greater spread around the mean. (ii) Assume that risky projects have a lower mean than safe projects, but both types of projects have the same return when they succeed. That is to assume R s R r R, and p r p s.
7 The Underinvestment Problem Assume all projects have the same mean return, p s R s p r R r R, but risky projects have a greater variance around the mean. Assume that these projects are socially porductive, that means the expected return is larger than the opportunity costs of labor and capital: R u. In the full information case, the bank charges different interest rates for different types of borrowers, and the interest rates would be the opportunity cost of capital devided by the possibility of success r i /p i, i r, s. The expected payoff of each type of borrower will be equal to the difference between the expected payoff from the project and the expected interest payment: U i r i p i R i r i p i R. The average repayment rate will be equal to p, the average probability of success for the entire population. In the asymmetric information case, if the bank charges all borrowers the same interest rate r, and both types of borrowers borrow in equilibrium, from the zero profit constraint we get r / p. The participation constraints: For safe borrowers: U s r p s R s ps p R ps p u For risky borrowers: U r r p r R r pr p R pr p u R ps p u. If R ps p u, a pooling contract does not exist, and only the risky borrowers would borrow from bank. The repayment rate and welfare are strictly less than that under full-information. This is known as the lemons or the under-investment problem in credit markets with adverse selection.
9 The Overinvestment Problem By solving the participation constraints: For safe borrowers: U s r p s R s ps p p sr ps p u For risky borrowers: U r r p r R r pr p p rr pr p u p r R p u. Assume p r R u, that means risky projects are unproductive. If p r R u, the risky borrower will find it profitable to borrow as p they are cross-subsidised by safe borrowers even through they make a negative contribution to social surplus. This is the overinvestment problem in the credit market with adverse selection.
10 6. Joint Liability Lending The joint liability lending can improve efficiency so long as borrowers have some private information about each other s projects Group Formation: The Assortative Matching Property The equilibrium in the group-formation game will satisfy the optimal sorting property: borrowers not in the same type could not form a group without making at least one of them worse off. Proposition 1. Joint liability constracts lead to positive assortative matching in the formation of groups. Comments & Intuition For any given joint liability contract r, c, borrowers will always choose partners of the same type. Borrowersareallowedtobeabletomakesidepaymentto each other. So in principle, a risky borrower can make a transfer to a safe borrower to have him as a partner. After compensating the safe borrower for the loss of having a risky partner, a risky borrower will never find it profitable to bribe a safe borrower to be in his group.
11 The expected payoff of type-i borrower under a joint liability contract r, c would be: U ii r, c p i p i R i r p i 1 p i R i r c p i R i p i r p i 1 p i c i r, s Assume that all projects have the same mean return, p s R s p r R r R. The indifference curve of a borrower of type i in the r, c plane is represented by this line rp i c 1 p i p i Const. The slope of an indifferenc curve of a type i borrower is dc dr U ii Const 1 1 p i. p s p r 1 1 p s 1 1 p r. Preferences of borrowers over joint liability contracts satisfy the single-crossing property.
13 6.2. Optimal Joint Liability Contracts: Joint Liability as a Screening Device The contracting problem is the following sequential game: stage 1: the bank offers a finite set of joint liability contracts r 1, c 1, r 2, c 2, ; In this two-type-borrower case, we restrcit the bank s choice of optimal contracts to a pair r r, c r and r s, c s designed for groups consisting of risky and safe borrowers respectively. stage 2: borrowers who wish to accept any one of these contracts select a partner and do so; stage 3: projects are carried out and outcome-contingent transfers as specified in the contract are met. Borrowers who choose not to borrow enjoy their reservation payoff of u. The bank s objective is to choose r r, c r and r s, c s to maximize a weighted average of the expected utilities of a representive borrower of each of the two possible types: V U rr r r, c r 1 U ss r s, c s, where 0, 1.
14 The bank is facing the following constraints: (1) The zero-profit constraint of the bank For the separating contracts r r, c r and r s, c s, it requires: r r p r c r 1 p r p r r s p s c s 1 p s p s. It ensures that the expected repayment from each loan is at least as large as the opportunity cost of capital. Let r, c denote the contract that satisfies the zero-profit constraints for both risky and safe borrowers with equality. rpr c 1 p r p r r rps c 1 p s p s pr p s 1 / p r p s c / pr p s Assume p r p s 1 to ensure that r 0.. For a pooling contract r, c, the zero-profit constraint is: r r p r c r 1 p r p r 1 r s p s c s 1 p s p s. (2) The participation constraint of each borrower. U ii r i, c i u, i r, s. (3) The limited liability constraint That requires the sum of individual and joint liability payments, r c, cannot exceed the realized revenue from the project when it succeeds: r i c i R i, i r, s. (4) The incentive-compatibility constraint U rr r r, c r U rr r s, c s U ss r s, c s U ss r r, c r That requires that it is in the self-interest of a borrower to choose a contract that is designed for his type.
15 By Proposition 1, for any given joint liability contract r, c offered by the bank in stage 1, assortative matching will result in stage 2 of this game. LEMMA 1. If r r, c r and r s, c s satisfy the incentive-compatibility constraints, then they will induce assortative matching in the group formation stage. LEMMA 1 ensures that even if the bank offers a menu of joint liability contracts in stage 1, assortative matching will still result in stage 2 of the game.
16 Joint liability lending and the underinvestment problem All projects have the same mean return, p s R s p r R r R. LEMMA 2. For any joint libaility contract r, c, ifr r and c c,then U ss r, c U rr r, c, andifr r and c c,thenu ss r, c U rr r, c. If we set U ii r, c equal u, then the indifference curve of each type will correspond the set of contracts that satisfy the zero-profit constraints for that type of borrowers. Then Point A is the contract r, c, that satisfies the zero-profit contraints for both risky and safe borrowers with equality. This lemma follows from the single-crossing property, and helps to identify the set of incentive-compatible contracts.
18 Proposition 2. Suppose that assumptions A1, A2, A3 and A4 hold. Then optimal separating joint liability contracts r r, c r and r s, c s exist which have the property r s r r and c s c r. The average repayment rate and welfare under these contracts are equal to their full-information levels and strictly higher than those under individual liability contracts. A1: R u A2: R ps p u A3: p r p s 1 A4: R 1 ps p r ZPC r : the set of contracts that satisfy the zero-profit constraints for risky borrowers with equality. ZPC s : the set of contracts that satisfy the zero-profit constraints for safe borrowers with equality. AC: The set of incentive-compatible contracts for risky borrowers. DA: The set of incentive-compatible contracts for safe borrowers. LLC: the set of contracts that satisfy the limited liability constraint with equality. AC: the optimal contracts for risky borrowers. BA: the optimal contracts for safe borrowers.
20 Proposition 3 show that the optimal pooling contract achieves higher repayment rates and welfare than individual liability contracts under more general conditions than separating contracts. Proposition 3. If assumptions A1, A2, A3 and A4 hold then a unique optimal pooling joint liability contract exists and is equal to r, c. Even if A4 is not satisfied so that optimal separating joint liability contracts do not exist, so long as A5 is satisfied together with A1, A2, and A3, optimal pooling joint liability contracts exists and achieve higher repayment rates and welfare than individual liability contracts. Assumption A5: R ps p u, where p r 2 1 p s 2 /p s p. A5 ensures that the limited liability constraint is satisfied. In the r, c plane the line r p r 1 p s c p r 1 p r 1 p s 1 p s Const represents an indifference curve of an average borrower as well as an iso-profit curve of the bank when offering a pooling contract.
21 ZPC r,s : the set of contracts that satisfy the pooled zero-profit line. ZPC r : the set of contracts that satisfy the zero-profit constraints for risky borrowers with equality. ZPC s : the set of contracts that satisfy the zero-profit constraints for safe borrowers with equality. LLC: the set of contracts that satisfy the limited liability constraint with equality. PC s : represents the assumption A2 R ps p u, and ensure the existence of a pooling contract. In the figure, point A is above the line LLC, soa4isviolated. A set of optimal pooling contracts nevertheless exists as illustrated by the line segment BC, and that is guaranteed by Proposition 3.
23 6.2.2 Joint liability lending and the overinvestment problem In this part, the paper shows that joint liability contracts can discourage unproductive risky borrowers from borrowing, and solve the overinvestment problem under individual liability lending. Since the proof of the assortative matching property in group-formation, and consequently, the single-crossing property of indifference curves do not depend on the distribution of the revenues of the projects, Proposition 1 still applies in this case. As the incentive-compatibility and zero-profit constraints are the same as before, the set of incentive-compatible contracts that satisfy the zero-profit constraints for risky and safe borrowers are the same as well. Proposition 4. Suppose that the assumptions A1, A2, A3 and A4 hold. If projects have different mean returns and risky projects are unproductive in terms of expected returns, joint liability contracts will discourage risky borrowers from borrowing and thereby achieve a strictly higher average repayment rate and expected social surplus compared to individual liability contracts. A1 : p r R u. A2 : p r R p u. A3: p r p s 1. A4 : R 1 p s 1 p r.
24 8. Some Extersions 8.1. Risk Averse Borrowers When the borrowers are risk averse, the main results go through! However, there s only a unique pair of optimal separating contracts in this case Multiple States of the World and Costly State Verification It s showed that if verifying returns is costly, the optimal contract is a standard debt contract. If the borrower doesn t announce bankruptcy, pays his dues to the bank, and bank doesn t undertake costly output verification. And borrower announces bankruptcy only when he realized that return is less than his debt to the bank, and bank collects all output net of verification costs Correlated Project Returns If project returns are positively correlated, then there is less heterogeneity and less room for the effects of joint liability to work. The joint liability works particularly well if project returns are negatively correlated Optimal Size of the Group Joint liability works better than other financial contracts because group members have superior information on one another. This advantage is likely to be diluted in larger groups. On the other hand, if the project returns are uncorrelated, an increase in group size improves the effectiveness of joint liability because it increase the number of states of the world in which the group as a whole can repay its members loans.
26 9. Conclusion This paper proposed a theory to explain how joint liability contracts can achieve high repayment rates even when borrowers have no conventional collateral to offer. It is based on the fact that borrowers are asked to self select group members, which is shown to economize on information costs by exploiting local information. 10. Criticisms & Extersions (1) The whole argument is built on the assumption that the preferences of borrowers over joint liability contracts satisfy the single-crossing property. (2) The group size is assumed to be the same over the whole population. (3) The peer-pressure may also play a role in joint liability lending programme.
2. Information Economics In General Equilibrium Theory all agents had full information regarding any variable of interest (prices, commodities, state of nature, cost function, preferences, etc.) In many
Unraveling versus Unraveling: A Memo on Competitive Equilibriums and Trade in Insurance Markets Nathaniel Hendren January, 2014 Abstract Both Akerlof (1970) and Rothschild and Stiglitz (1976) show that
Finance 400 A. Penati - G. Pennacchi Notes on On the Efficiency of Competitive Stock Markets Where Traders Have Diverse Information by Sanford Grossman This model shows how the heterogeneous information
Slides 9 Debraj Ray Columbia, Fall 2013 Credit Markets Collateral Adverse selection Moral hazard Enforcement Credit Markets Formal sector: State or commercial banks. Require collateral, business plan Usually
Should Banks Trade Equity Derivatives to Manage Credit Risk? Kevin Davis 9/4/1991 Banks incur a variety of risks and utilise different techniques to manage the exposures so created. Some of those techniques
Lectures 26 and 27 24 and 29 April 2014 Operation of the Market may not function smoothly 1. Costly/impossible to monitor exactly what s done with loan. Consumption? Production? Risky investment? Involuntary
Micro-Credit and Group Lending: The Collateral Effect Lykke Eg Andersen 1 Institute for Socio-Economic Research (IISEC) & Osvaldo Nina Department of Economics and IISEC Catholic University of Bolivia (UCB)
ECO 317 Economics of Uncertainty Fall Term 2009 Slides to accompany 15. Adverse Selection in Insurance Markets ADVERSE SELECTION GENERAL ISSUES One party in a trade or contract has advance private information
Chapter 21: The Discounted Utility Model 21.1: Introduction This is an important chapter in that it introduces, and explores the implications of, an empirically relevant utility function representing intertemporal
Moral Hazard Itay Goldstein Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania 1 Principal-Agent Problem Basic problem in corporate finance: separation of ownership and control: o The owners of the firm are typically
Modeling Insurance Markets Nathaniel Hendren Harvard April, 2015 Nathaniel Hendren (Harvard) Insurance April, 2015 1 / 29 Modeling Competition Insurance Markets is Tough There is no well-agreed upon model
Forward Contracts and Forward Rates Outline and Readings Outline Forward Contracts Forward Prices Forward Rates Information in Forward Rates Reading Veronesi, Chapters 5 and 7 Tuckman, Chapters 2 and 16
Research Summary Saltuk Ozerturk A. Research on Information Acquisition in Markets and Agency Issues Between Investors and Financial Intermediaries An important dimension of the workings of financial markets
\ins\liab\dlirpr.v3a 06-06-07 The Reasonable Person Negligence Standard and Liability Insurance Vickie Bajtelsmit * Colorado State University Paul Thistle University of Nevada Las Vegas Thistle s research
Work incentives and household insurance: Sequential contracting with altruistic individuals and moral hazard Cécile Aubert Abstract Two agents sequentially contracts with different principals under moral
Financial Institutions I: The Economics of Banking Prof. Dr. Isabel Schnabel Gutenberg School of Management and Economics Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz Summer term 2011 V4 1/30 I. Introduction II.
Group Lending and Enforcement October 2007 () Group lending October 2007 1 / 26 Group Lending in Theory Grameen I ("classic") 2:2:1 staggering at 4-6 week intervals 1 loan cycle = a year joint liability:
Chapter 12 Asymmetric Information CHAPTER SUMMARY In situations of asymmetric information, the allocation of resources will not be economically efficient. The asymmetry can be resolved directly through
Loans, Insurance and Failures in the Credit Market for Students Elena Del Rey and Bertrand Verheyden December 2009 Version in progress Abstract In the education literature, it is generally acknowledged
Module 7: Debt Contracts & Credit ationing Information Economics (Ec 515) George Georgiadis Two Applications of the principal-agent model to credit markets An entrepreneur (E - borrower) has a project.
Why Do Firms Announce Open-Market Repurchase Programs? Jacob Oded, (2005) Boston College PhD Seminar in Corporate Finance, Spring 2006 Outline 1 The Problem Previous Work 2 3 Outline The Problem Previous
Optimal insurance contracts with adverse selection and comonotonic background risk Alary D. Bien F. TSE (LERNA) University Paris Dauphine Abstract In this note, we consider an adverse selection problem
SCREENING IN INSURANCE MARKETS WIT ADVERSE SEECTION AND BACKGROUND RISK Keith J. Crocker University of Michigan Business School 70 Tappan Street Ann Arbor, MI 4809 and Arthur Snow Department of Economics
You Are What You Bet: Eliciting Risk Attitudes from Horse Races Pierre-André Chiappori, Amit Gandhi, Bernard Salanié and Francois Salanié March 14, 2008 What Do We Know About Risk Preferences? Not that
Competitive Screening in Credit Markets with Adverse Selection: A Cover Version of Bester s Model Ran Spiegler April 18, 2013 Abstract This note presents a simple model of competitive screening in a credit
The Role of Joint Liability ontracts and Guarantor ontracts in Micro nance Tomek Katzur Robert Lensink May 22nd, 2 Abstract. We extend the existing literature on group lending contracts by analyzing the
Lecture notes 8: Credit Markets Credit markets very important to efficient running of economy o Saving for retirement, etc. o Borrowing to start and run a business, operate a farm etc. Credit markets in
Option Value of Credit Lines as an Explanation of High Credit Card Rates by Sangkyun Park Federal Reserve Bank of New York * Address: Sangkyun Park Federal Reserve Bank of New York Capital Markets Function
Preliminary, not for quotation Moral Hazard and the Structure of Debt Contracts obert. Bliss Calloway School of Business and Accountancy Wake Forest University and Stephen D. Cauley ichard S. Ziman Center
NBER WORKING PAPER SERIES OPTIMAL PROVISION OF LOANS AND INSURANCE AGAINST UNEMPLOYMENT FROM A LIFETIME PERSPECTIVE Joseph Stiglitz Jungyoll Yun Working Paper 19064 http://www.nber.org/papers/w19064 NATIONAL
Optimal Collective Contract Without Peer Information or Peer Monitoring Arup Daripa Economics, Birkbeck College London University Current Version: June 2007 FORTHCOMING: Journal of Development Economics
Prices versus Exams as Strategic Instruments for Competing Universities Elena Del Rey and Laura Romero October 004 Abstract In this paper we investigate the optimal choice of prices and/or exams by universities
Copyright c 2005 by Karl Sigman Portfolio mean and variance Here we study the performance of a one-period investment X 0 > 0 (dollars) shared among several different assets. Our criterion for measuring
The Impact of Interlinked Insurance and Credit Contracts on Financial Market Deepening and Small Farm Productivity June 2011 Summary Twin puzzles Ample evidence that uninsured risk depresses small holder
In this chapter, we present the theory of consumer preferences on risky outcomes. The theory is then applied to study the demand for insurance. Consider the following story. John wants to mail a package
Insurance Markets with Differential Information S. Hun Seog [석승훈] Graduate School of Management, KAIST (KGSM) 207-43 Cheongryangri-Dong, Dongdaemun-Gu, Seoul, 130-722, KOREA Email: email@example.com
Accounting Conservatism and Debt Contracts: Efficient Liquidation and Covenant Renegotiation Jing Li Tepper School of Business Abstract This paper develops a theoretical model to understand the role of
Business Cycles and Lending Standards Nicolás Figueroa and Oksana Leukhina July 2010 Aggregate productivity falls in recessions and rises in expansions. Several empirical studies suggest that the systematic
SELECTION IN INSURANCE MARKETS by Steven E. Landsburg University of Rochester Consider an insurance market say, for insurance against accidental injuries. Agents face different levels of accident risk,
Journal of Development Economics Ž. Vol. 60 1999 195 228 www.elsevier.comrlocatereconbase The economics of lending with joint liability: theory and practice 1 Maitreesh Ghatak a, Timothy W. Guinnane b,)
Income contingent loans: Some General Theoretical Considerations, with applications I. Introduction Joseph E. Stiglitz 1 Income contingent loan programs run by governments represent an important social
Prof. Dr. Thomas Steger Advanced Macroeconomics II Lecture SS 2012 6. Budget Deficits and Fiscal Policy Introduction Ricardian equivalence Distorting taxes Debt crises Introduction (1) Ricardian equivalence
Credible iscovery, Settlement, and Negative Expected Value Suits Warren F. Schwartz Abraham L. Wickelgren Abstract: This paper introduces the option to conduct discovery into a model of settlement bargaining
Choice under Uncertainty Part 1: Expected Utility Function, Attitudes towards Risk, Demand for Insurance Slide 1 Choice under Uncertainty We ll analyze the underlying assumptions of expected utility theory
Fund Manager s Portfolio Choice Zhiqing Zhang Advised by: Gu Wang September 5, 2014 Abstract Fund manager is allowed to invest the fund s assets and his personal wealth in two separate risky assets, modeled
RICARDIAN EQUIVALENCE WITH A TAX ON INTEREST INCOME by Steven E. Landsburg University of Rochester 1. Introduction cut: Consider the following two propositions concerning the effects of a deficit-financed
Dynamic microlending under adverse selection: Can it rival group lending? Christian Ahlin Michigan State University Brian Waters UCLA Anderson July 2014 Abstract We derive an optimal lending contract in
INTERNET APPENDIX TO TIME FOR A CHANGE : LOAN CONDITIONS AND BANK BEHAVIOR WHEN FIRMS SWITCH BANKS This appendix contains additional material: I. Assumptions II. Simulations III. Static Results IV. Dynamic
A Welfare Criterion for Models with Distorted Beliefs Markus Brunnermeier, Alp Simsek, Wei Xiong August 2012 Markus Brunnermeier, Alp Simsek, Wei Xiong () Welfare Criterion for Distorted Beliefs August
Testing for Adverse Selection and Moral Hazard in Consumer Loan Markets Wendy Edelberg* February 10, 2004 Abstract This paper explores the significance of unobservable default risk in mortgage and automobile
Insurance under moral hazard and adverse selection: the case of pure competition A. Chassagnon P.A. Chiappori March 1997 Abstract We consider a model of pure competition between insurers a la Rothschild-
CHAPTER 7: OPTIMAL RIKY PORTFOLIO PROLEM ET 1. (a) and (e).. (a) and (c). After real estate is added to the portfolio, there are four asset classes in the portfolio: stocks, bonds, cash and real estate.
Demand for Health Insurance Demand for Health Insurance is principally derived from the uncertainty or randomness with which illnesses befall individuals. Consequently, the derived demand for health insurance
ECON 312: Oligopolisitic Competition 1 Industrial Organization Oligopolistic Competition Both the monopoly and the perfectly competitive market structure has in common is that neither has to concern itself
Chapter 2 An Introduction to Forwards and Options Question 2.1. The payoff diagram of the stock is just a graph of the stock price as a function of the stock price: In order to obtain the profit diagram
Chapter 11: probs #1, #3, and #4, p. 298 Problem set 4: due week of Feb 20-24 Chapter 12: probs #1 a-b-c-d, #2, #3, pp. 320-321 Future problem sets Chapter 13: probs #1, #2 a-b-c-d, #3, #5, pp. 347-348
THE FUNDAMENTAL THEOREM OF ARBITRAGE PRICING 1. Introduction The Black-Scholes theory, which is the main subject of this course and its sequel, is based on the Efficient Market Hypothesis, that arbitrages
Capital Allocation Between The Risky And The Risk- Free Asset Chapter 7 Investment Decisions capital allocation decision = choice of proportion to be invested in risk-free versus risky assets asset allocation
Equilibrium in Competitive Insurance Markets: An Essay on the Economic of Imperfect Information By: Michael Rothschild and Joseph Stiglitz Presented by Benjamin S. Barber IV, Xiaoshu Bei, Zhi Chen, Shaiobi
Intellectual Property Right Protection in the Software Market Yasuhiro Arai Aomori Public College 153-4, Yamazaki, Goushizawa, Aomori-city, Aomori 030-0196, Japan March 01 Abstract We discuss the software
analysing existence in general insurance environments that go beyond the canonical insurance paradigm. More recently, theoretical and empirical work has attempted to identify selection in insurance markets
Slides 9 Debraj ay Columbia, Fall 2013 Credit Markets Collateral Adverse selection Moral hazard Enforcement Credit Markets Formal sector: 0-0 State or commercial banks. equire collateral, business plan
Lending Without Access to Collateral A Theory of Micro-Loan Borrowing Rates Sam Cheung and Suresh Sundaresan Current Draft: Oct 8, 2006 First Draft: May 2006 Comments Invited. The second author would like
NBER WORKING PAPER SERIES THE ALLOCATION OF CREDIT AND FINANCIAL COLLAPSE N. Gregory Mankiw Working Paper No. 1786 NATIONAL BUREAU OF ECONOMIC RESEARCH 1050 Massachusetts Avenue Cambridge, MA 02138 January
The economics of sovereign debt restructuring: Swaps and buybacks Eduardo Fernandez-Arias Fernando Broner Main ideas The objective of these notes is to present a number of issues related to sovereign debt
Preliminary and Incomplete Please do not Quote Adverse Selection and the Market for Health Insurance in the U.S. James Marton Washington University, Department of Economics Date: 4/24/01 Abstract Several
Bank Loans, Trade Credits, and Borrower Characteristics: Theory and Empirical Analysis Byung-Uk Chong*, Ha-Chin Yi** March, 2010 ABSTRACT Trade credit is a non-bank financing offered by a supplier to finance
Policies for Banking Crises: A Theoretical Framework Rafael Repullo CEMFI and CEPR September 2004 Abstract This paper analyzes the effects on ex ante risk-shifting incentives and ex post Þscal costs of
Discussion of Margin Calls, Trading Costs and Asset Prices in Emerging Markets: The Financial Mechanics of the Sudden Stop Phenomenon by Enrique Mendoza and Katherine Smith Fabrizio Perri NYUStern,NBERandCEPR
Why Plaintiffs Attorneys Use Contingent and Defense Attorneys Fixed Fee Contracts Winand Emons 1 Claude Fluet 2 1 Department of Economics University of Bern, CEPR, CIRPEE 2 Université du Québec à Montréal,
ECON 4110: Sample Exam Name MULTIPLE CHOICE. Choose the one alternative that best completes the statement or answers the question. 1) Economists define risk as A) the difference between the return on common
1.4 Hidden Information and Price Discrimination 1 To be included in: Elmar Wolfstetter. Topics in Microeconomics: Industrial Organization, Auctions, and Incentives. Cambridge University Press, new edition,
Econ 497 Barry W. Ickes Spring 2007 Midterm Exam:Answer Sheet 1. (25%) Consider a portfolio, c, comprised of a risk-free and risky asset, with returns given by r f and E(r p ), respectively. Let y be the
Conditions for Efficiency in Package Pricing Babu Nahata Department of Economics University of Louisville Louisville, Kentucky 40292, USA. e-mail: firstname.lastname@example.org and Serguei Kokovin and Evgeny Zhelobodko
Cash-flow business taxation revisited: bankruptcy, risk aversion and asymmetric information November 015 WP15/31 Robin Boadway Queen s University Motohiro Sato Hitotsubashi University Jean-François Tremblay
Lecture 9 Part 2: Screening and Signaling in Games with Incomplete Information. 1 Lecture Outline Screening and signaling incentives arise in games where uncertainty is exogenous and some players are better
By Kenneth R. Samuelson, Bobby Samuelson & Brandon W. Davis A Penton Trusts&Estates Media Publication The Journal of Wealth Management for Estate-Planning Professionals Since 1904 Do Your Homework on Indexed
Non-Exclusive Competition in the Market for Lemons Andrea Attar Thomas Mariotti François Salanié October 2007 Abstract In order to check the impact of the exclusivity regime on equilibrium allocations,
Chapter 14 Understanding Financial Contracts Learning Objectives Differentiate among the different mechanisms of external financing of firms Explain why mechanisms of external financing depend upon firm
FIN-469 Investments Analysis Professor Michel A. Robe Practice Set #4 and Solutions. What to do with this practice set? To help students prepare for the assignment and the exams, practice sets with solutions
Bank Loan Maturity and Priority When Borrowers Can Refinance Douglas W. Diamond University of Chicago revised June 1992 Prepared for the conference on Financial Intermediation in the Construction of Europe
Lecture 1: current account - measurement and theory What is international finance (as opposed to international trade)? International trade: microeconomic approach (many goods and factors). How cross country