1 2 Seas Programme thematic capitalisation: Thematic cluster initiative Possible cluster hypotheses for: - Applied Research, Innovation and Business Support - Risk management in the context of Integrated Coastal Zone Management - Accessibility of the area - Social Inclusion
2 Context: In 2012, the 2 Seas Programme launched its thematic capitalisation which aims at consolidating, valorising and disseminating the achievements of the projects/networks in the current programming period as well as supporting development activities to prepare for the future. This is the distinctiveness of the 2 Seas thematic capitalisation: the actions to be developed should first of all valorise the existing and, whenever possible, build on their achievements to take a step forward and inform the future. Programme authorities decided to launch a thematic cluster initiative in 2013 as the main action of the 2 Seas thematic capitalisation. Although cluster initiatives are welcome under all themes (see Terms of Reference for thematic clusters for more information), Programme Authorities have agreed on a list of four preferred thematic priorities for which they particularly wish to see clusters developed: Applied Research, Innovation and Business Support Risk management in the context of Integrated Coastal Zone Management Accessibility of the area Social inclusion Following this decision, the Joint Technical Secretariat has carried out an analysis to investigate the possible hypotheses of clusters under these four themes. This document intends to provide project partners with the outcomes of this desk-research in order to help them in the process of developing clusters. It must be outlined that the hypotheses of clusters described in this document are indicative. They are only intended to give examples of possible clusters and do not pretend to be exhaustive nor binding. Rationale and methodology of the analysis: For the four themes listed above, the Joint Technical Secretariat has undertaken desk-research on the Application Forms of the approved AND rejected projects under the given themes (the thematic breakdown of projects can be found at the end of this document). Capitalisation between projects tackling the same theme can be approached differently: 1/ from a thematic point of view and 2/ from a methodological and approach point of view. This document has therefore taken these two aspects into account while analyzing the different projects and proposing different hypotheses of possible clusters. This could also allow project partners to stimulate the development of a variety of innovative and different types of clusters. Beyond the theme(s) addressed and the approach and methodologies (e.g. target groups, tools developed etc.) used by the different projects, it is also important to consider the partnerships. Organisations involved in several projects addressing the same theme could for instance facilitate the capitalisation process. 2/16 2 Seas Programme thematic capitalisation: JTS analysis on hypotheses of possible clusters under four themes
3 Therefore, a three step-approach has been used to conduct this analysis and has been applied to each of the four themes: 1/ Analysis of 2 Seas projects (both approved and rejected) 2/ Partner analysis 3/ Formulation of hypotheses of possible clusters I. Applied Research, Innovation and Business Support This theme fits perfectly with the thematic orientations of the future Cohesion Policy for the programming period. It is also strongly linked to the Smart Growth pillar of the Europe 2020 strategy. This smart growth priority aims at developing an economy based on knowledge and innovation. During the last decade, the Triple Helix model of University-Industry-Government relations has gained a prominent position in the role Higher Education Institutes play in the so-called knowledge-based economy. That is why we propose to use this model (applying it to the regional context: Higher Education Institutes Private Sector (mainly SMEs in the 2 Seas Programme context) Institutional stakeholders ) to analyse the type of interactions between the regional innovation actors involved in 2 Seas projects. Triple Helix model adapted to the 2 Seas Programme context Further to this analysis on the interactions between the regional innovation actors, the sectors in which projects are working will be considered to identify any potential capitalisation. A total number of 31 projects dealing with this theme 1 have been assessed in this thematic and content analysis: 20 of them are approved projects and the remaining 11 were rejected during the different Calls for Proposals. 1 It is to be noted that this theme actually combines two of the themes highlighted in the table at the end of this document (thematic breakdown of projects): Research & Innovation; Entrepreneurship & Business Support.
4 Sectors PROJECTS APPROVED (in black) and REJECTED (in italic blue) IN THE 2 SEAS PROGRAMME Air Quality Network of SMEs through intensive support Type of interaction between "Higher Education Institutes (HEIs) - Private Sector (SMEs) - Institutional stakeholders" based on the Triple Helix model Network of HEIs Linking HEIs and Private sector CLEANTECH Linking SMEs networks and institutional stakeholders Linking HEIs and institutional stakeholders Linking HEIs, private sector and institutional stakeholders Other (raising entrepreneurship in specific target groups of citizens) Healthcare POINT MultiDES BioCare IDEA CURA-B SBSME SHIVA SYSIASS Transport SCODECE i-mocca TEM LETSGO Neurosciences TC2N Food mecagro2 2ST Fish & Chips Eco-innovation LCAP ECO-MIND Construction and building 2ST SBSME BUFU Maritime POINT TIME Agriculture WUE-IMAGE No particular focus TEN BPPE SUPERLINKS Design Your Innovation FUSION GAPS SUPPORT SET EDIE
5 Involvement of single organisations in Approved projects 116 partners are involved in the 20 approved projects from which there are 89 single organisations. This means that some organisations are involved in several projects, which could also help cluster development purposes. Here is a breakdown of organisations per number of projects in which they are involved: Number of projects per organisation Number of organisations The 4 organisations involved in three projects are: - Kamer van Koophandel Oost-Vlaanderen (BPPE, 2ST and FUSION) - Provinciale Ontwikkelingsmaatschappij West-Vlaanderen (2ST, TEN and Cura-B) - University of Kent (CLEANTECH, SYSIASS and FUSION) - Université de Lille 1 Sciences et Technologies (IDEA, MultiDES and i-mocca) Business Support Kent is involved in 4 projects (FUSION, 2ST, BPPE and ECO-MIND) These five organisations could be seen as driving forces in the process of capitalizing on existing projects given their strong involvement in 2 Seas projects. They actually represent the three types of stakeholders defined in the Triple Helix model: - Higher Education Institutes: University of Kent and Université de Lille 1 - Institutional stakeholders: Provinciale Ontwikkelingsmaatschappij West-Vlaanderen and Business Support Kent (acting as a service provider for institutional stakeholders) - Private sector representation: Kamer van Koophandel Oost-Vlaanderen The figure below shows that some organisations (and thus projects) could have a pivotal role in the cluster process. For instance, the FUSION and 2ST projects and notably the Kamer van Koophandel Oost- Vlaanderen and Provinciale Ontwikkelingsmaatschappij West-Vlaanderen could have an important role to play, in terms of thematic interest and partnership relations with other projects. It is to be noted that Kent County Council (being partner strongly involved in these two projects Lead Partner of 2ST) could also have an important role as well.
6 Example of interactions between organisations involved in at least three (two for HEI, ICAM and Kent CC) projects under this theme Hypotheses of possible clusters It is important to bear in mind that Programme Authorities wish to see the development of clusters that combine the three complementary elements of the theme: Applied Research, Innovation and business support. Although links could be identified between projects working in the same sector, a cluster should try not to be limited to a single type of stakeholders and/or to a single type of interaction in the regional innovation scheme: it should push to valorise and combine the results already achieved under the three above mentioned elements. An important group of projects (10 in total: 7 approved, 3 rejected) make concrete links between Higher Education Institutes ( research activities ) and the Private Sector (mainly Small and Medium Enterprises). These links are of course different in nature and vary from very direct (Private sector involved as formal partners) to indirect (Private sector as final beneficiary of project outputs).
7 A second group of projects (8 in total: 6 approved, 2 rejected) work in the Healthcare sector. It is interesting to note that all the bilateral interactions within the Triple Helix model are covered by projects that is to say that this group presents a good variety of type of projects: from sciences to business support in that sector. Furthermore, although not considered under this theme at the first place, the Dignity In Care project could also be of interesting added-value in such a cluster. A relatively smaller group of projects (3 approved projects in total) work in the food sector. In those three projects, the private sector is strongly involved in the project activities (direct beneficiary of business support or of the technical outputs). Two projects have relatively similar activities in terms of links between Higher Education Institutes and healthcare institutions (hospitals, medical foundations etc.). Although they develop different products (an intelligent wheelchair for SYSIASS and virtual sculpture for SHIVA), it might be interesting for them to jointly valorise their results and go a step forward. The last column of the table shows that two approved projects are clearly different from the others in this analysis. BUFU and GAPS are both looking at entrepreneurship although with specific target groups. One could imagine some common grounds between these two projects and projects under the Social Inclusion theme, notably those looking at strengthening the link between excluded people and the labour market (TSE, SUCCEs and ilaebor) that could lead to potential capitalisation actions. Transport has been the most popular research and innovation sector in the 2 Seas Programme in terms of projects submitted, similarities and common ground could be found between the two approved projects (i-mocca and SCODECE) in order to go a step further. It is also to be noted that FUSION is the only project that links up the three actors of the regional innovation Higher Education Institutes, institutional organizations (Kent County Council as Lead Partner) and private sector representations (Kamer van Koophandel Oost-Vlaanderen, Chambre de Commerce du Grand Lille). Considering the potential links with other projects through the partners involved, it could be interesting to build on FUSION (which is already a capitalisation project based on ECOMIND and BPPE) as well as involved other projects under this theme. II. Risk management in the context of Integrated Coastal Zone Management This theme fits well with the thematic orientations of the future Cohesion Policy for the programming period. It is also strongly linked to the objectives of the EU Integrated Maritime Policy in terms of tools for integrated maritime policy-making as well as for delivering the highest quality of life in Coastal regions (both elements being flagship initiatives of the above mentioned Maritime policy). Considering the geographical area of the 2 Seas Programme and its maritime dimension, risk management and Integrated Coastal Zone Management are also considered as very important aspects that could strongly benefit from further capitalisation between projects. A total number of 16 projects dealing with this theme have been assessed in the analysis: 13 of them are approved projects and the remaining 3 were rejected during the different Calls for Proposals.
8 PROJECTS APPROVED (in black) and REJECTED (in italic blue) IN THE 2 SEAS PROGRAMME Risk addressed Coastal flooding Projects addressing this risk Flood Aware, FLOODCOM, CLAAS, CODYMAC Community engagement FLOODCOM, Flood Aware CLAAS Methodology used for risk management Remote-sensing monitoring Socio-economic impact analysis Changes in marine water quality DYMAPHY, ISECA, MICRO DYMAPHY, ISECA ISECA, MICRO Invasive species MEMO, RINSE RINSE MEMO Coastal climate change ARCH-MANCHE, CC2150 ARCH-MANCHE, CC 2150 Maritime safety MIRG-EU, 3i 3i Pesticides management RICH Integrated Coastal Zone Management projects C-SCOPE, GIFS C-SCOPE, GIFS
9 Involvement of organisations in Approved projects 78 partners are involved in the 13 approved projects from which there are 66 single organisations. This means that some organisations are involved in several projects, which could also help cluster development purposes. Here is a breakdown of organisations per number of projects in which they are involved: Number of projects per organisation Number of organisations The 4 organisations involved in three different projects are all universities and research institutes: - Centre for environment, fisheries and aquaculture science (CEFAS) (DYMAPHY, MEMO and MICRO) - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS) (ARCH-MANCHE, DYMAPHY and MICRO) - Institut Français de Recherche pour l'exploitation de la Mer (IFREMER) (DYMAPHY, MEMO and MICRO) - Stichting Deltares (ARCH-MANCHE, MEMO and MICRO) These four universities and research institutes (together with others that are involved in two projects) are all working in the same field (marine research) and already cooperate in the same projects. These organisations could therefore be potential driving forces in the process of capitalising on existing projects given their strong involvement in 2 Seas projects. Hypotheses of possible clusters Several links between projects addressing the same risks could be made: Four projects (2 approved projects (Flood Aware and FLOODCOM), 2 rejected) are looking at coastal flooding risk. The two approved projects seem complementary, as one is looking at communication and raising awareness whereas the other is more involved in flooding prevention actions (investments are done as part of the project). This could therefore be an area in which a cluster might be developed. A group of 3 projects (DYMAPHY, ISECA and MICRO) aims at addressing the risks implied by changes in marine water quality. All three projects are looking at different aspects of changes in marine water quality, but they are all aiming at informing and providing tools to help decision-making to relevant stakeholders in the 2 Seas area. It is furthermore interesting to note that these projects have common links with other projects in other European Territorial Cooperation Programmes (notably the CHARM III project funded by the France (Channel) England Programme).
10 Maritime safety is also addressed by two projects (MIRG-EU and 3i). Both have different approaches to maritime safety as MIRG-EU is looking at incidents on sea and ports (fire control, dangerous hazards etc.) whereas 3i wants to develop an Unmanned Aircraft System to monitor vessels activities in the Channel and North Sea. These two could however have some interesting links (it is interesting to note that this was already mentioned in 3i s Application Form). Climate change s impact on coastal areas is being addressed by two approved projects (CC2150 and ARCH-MANCHE). Although the scope and approach used by the different projects are different, some links could be made between these two projects. An interesting area for capitalisation under the Risk management theme could also be the methodologies and approaches used by the different projects. This could be more oriented towards horizontal capitalisation, but still remains within the scope of the Risk management and Integrated Coastal Zone Management. Making the communities aware of the risk and involving them in the risk management process is a very important element of risk management and Integrated Coastal Zone Management projects. 7 out of the 13 approved projects have a strong focus on community engagement. Projects have developed various tools and methodologies to engage with their main target groups, and have already published or will publish best practices guides. There is therefore room for exchanges, valorisation and further developments on this aspect. Remote-sensing monitoring seems to be a very valuable method when it comes to specific risks (changes in marine water quality and maritime safety). Three projects (DYMAPHY, ISECA and 3i) use different remote-sensing technologies to address the risks. Two of these three projects are looking specifically at changes in marine water quality (eutrophication and phytoplankton). One could therefore imagine that joint actions might be developed to valorise and disseminate the tools and technologies developed, and explore further opportunities. The socio-economic impact of the different risks is also a very important element of such projects. Three of them particularly look at socio-economic analysis: ISECA, MICRO and MEMO. This could also be an area on which a cluster might be developed. III. Accessibility of the area This theme fits well with the thematic orientations of the future Cohesion Policy for the programming period. It is also strongly linked to the objectives of the Resource Efficient Europe flagship initiative of the EU 2020 strategy. A total number of 9 projects dealing with this theme have been assessed in the analysis: 6 of them are approved projects and the remaining 3 were rejected during the different Calls for Proposals. Here are the main results of this analysis:
11 PROJECTS APPROVED (in black) and REJECTED (in italic blue) IN THE 2 SEAS PROGRAMME Potential clusters on ports Potential clusters on soft mobility Themes tackled Projects addressing the themes Themes tackled Projects addressing the themes Port reconversion Yacht Valley, Transcoast Urban soft mobility Bike Friendly Cities Intermodality C2C, PATCH Countryside soft mobility Access to Countryside (ATC) Port management PATCH, C2C, Transcoast Port accessibility C2C SAPA Logistic PATCH, C2C Crossborder profiling PATCH, C2C Marina development Yacht Valley, TRANSCOAST Tenmar, AVANTI Diversification of port activity PATCH
12 Involvement of single organisations in Approved projects 51 partners are involved in the 6 approved projects from which there are 44 single organisations. This means that some organisations are involved in several projects, which could also help cluster development purposes. Here is a breakdown of organisations per number of projects in which they are involved: Number of projects per organisation Number of organisations The 7 organisations involved in two projects are: - Port authorities: Autonoom Gemeentebedrijf Haven Oostende, Chambre de Commerce et d'industrie de Calais Port of Calais, Portsmouth Commercial Port (C2C, PATCH) - Local authorities: East Sussex County Council, Provincie West-Vlaanderen, SEEDA (ATC; PATCH), Provincie Zeeland (Bike Friendly Cities, Transcoast) Hypotheses of possible clusters The most popular theme addressed by 2 Seas Accessibility projects is related to ports. The second one focuses on the soft mobility development. Several links between projects related to ports could be made: Four projects (2 approved projects Yacht Valley and Transcoast; 2 rejected) are looking at marina development. The two approved projects could peer-review the actions carried out under this theme, with Yacht Valley having a specific focus on nautical centre services whereas Transcoast has a wider approach on general reconversion of derelict areas in marinas. It is to be noticed that whereas in the case of Yacht Valley the theme around marina development is the key theme, this is not the case for Transcoast, for which this constitutes one of the sub-themes tackled. A group of 3 projects (PATCH, C2C and Transcoast) aims at enhancing port management. PATCH developed an e-learning platform to organise web-seminars (webinars) to train ports operators. Transcoast and C2C approached the issue of ports management rather from a global perspective linked to the visioning. Transcoast developed an economic model for ports in the area. The model is available online and ports can adapt it to their features. C2C developed a Strategic cross-border Port and Transport Infrastructure Investment Framework Study. Although these samples might have a different angle, there is potentially scope for a cluster.
13 A further group of 3 projects could be clustered around the theme port reconversion and diversification. PATCH focused very much on the diversification, Transcoast and Yacht Valley focus on reconversion, but both elements could be interesting to combine. A last group composed of 2 projects, notably C2C and Patch, have many similarities as they both touch themes such as intermodality and modal shifts, improvement of the quality of logistics and an ambition to re-profile small and medium size ports at a cross-border level. 2 projects also aim at developing of soft mobility solutions to improve the accessibility of the 2 Seas area. The Bike Friendly Cities project focuses on urban mobility solution, notably the use of bike. The ATC focuses on countryside project accessibility via soft mode of transport. The 2 projects have a least 1 transversal common theme which is community awareness and ownership of the actions carried out. They could work together in order to capitalize the techniques and good practices around this method. IV. Social Inclusion This theme fits well in the thematic orientations of the future Cohesion Policy for the programming period. It is also strongly linked to the objectives of the Agenda for new skills and jobs of the EU 2020 strategy. A total number of 16 projects dealing with this theme have been assessed in the analysis: 13 of them are approved projects and the remaining 3 were rejected during the different Calls for Proposals. PROJECTS APPROVED (in black) and REJECTED (in italic blue) IN THE 2 SEAS PROGRAMME Youngsters (under 25 years old) Projects Villa CrossMedia, ACCES, SUCCES AOB, Growing Places, SMACO21, LYU Target groups Migrants and ethnic minorities People suffering from addictions (drugs, alcohol etc.) Population in deprived areas without specific targeted part of the population Villa CrossMedia, AIMER LYU CAFTA, DNA DNA, INSPIRER, ilaebor, TSE, Heroes2C
14 PROJECTS APPROVED (in black) and REJECTED (in italic blue) IN THE 2 SEAS PROGRAMME Increasing residents' participation in the decisionmaking process Strengthening links with the labour market Projects ACCES, DNA ilaebor, TSE, SUCCES Approaches used to address social exclusion Improving existing services to excluded people Energy efficiency Increasing ownership of neighbourhoods by the population SUCCES, TSE, AIMER INSPIRER DNA Supporting Volunteering Villa Cross Media Others AIMER, CAFTA Involvement of single organisations in Approved projects 45 partners are involved in the 13 approved projects from which there are 39 single organisations. This means that some organisations are involved in several projects, which could also help cluster development purposes. Here is a breakdown of organisations per number of projects in which they are involved: Number of projects per organisation Number of organisations Medway Council is involved in 5 different Social Inclusion Projects (ACCES, AIMER, INSPIRER, SUCCES and DNA) and is Lead Partner of 4 of them (ACCES, AIMER, INSPIRER and SUCCES). This organisation could therefore be a key stakeholder in the cluster process under this theme. OCMW Kortrijk is involved as partner in three different projects (SUCCES, INSPIRER and DNA).
15 It is also to be noted that out of the 39 individual organisations involved in social inclusion projects, only four are based in the Netherlands. Hypotheses of possible clusters Potential links between projects could be envisaged under two different and complementary angles. The most obvious element is the target groups of the different projects, as this could be a basis for the development of cluster between projects addressing the same target groups. Another angle could be to look at the different approaches used by the projects to address social exclusion in the different deprived areas. Several links between projects targeting the same groups of population could be made: Seven projects (3 approved projects (VillaCrossMedia, ACCES and SUCCES), 4 rejected) support young people in their respective territories. These projects could put their different tools and lessons learnt together to improve social inclusion initiatives towards youth. Organisations originally involved in the four rejected projects could also bring interesting added-value given their experience in this field. Three projects (2 approved projects (VillaCrossMedia and AIMER), 1 rejected (LYU)) aim at helping migrants and ethnic minorities towards a better social integration. Both projects could share their results and propose further developments. Two approved projects (CAFTA and DNA) develop social inclusion initiatives to support people suffering from addictions (drugs, alcohol etc.). Furthermore, three projects using the same approaches and methodologies could work together to capitalise on their results. Three approved projects (SUCCES, ilaebor and TSE) develop pilot activities to help people from deprived areas enter the labour market. These projects seem to be using different but complementary approaches that could be useful to learn from at crossborder level. This could be an interesting area for capitalisation and one could also imagine that further cooperation could be made with entrepreneurship projects (BUFU and GAPS for instance).
16 Thematic priority (Sustainable) tourism Accessibiliy of the area Common heritage Education / Language training Energy efficiency / Renewable energies Entrepreneurship and Business Support Integrated Coastal Zone Management Leisure and Social tourism Low Carbon Economy Nature and Landscape management Promoting Knowledge Transfer Research & Innovation Resources management Risks management Services / Heath care Social inclusion Other 2 Seas Projects addressing this thematic priority (This is an informative breakdown realised by the JTS to help you finding potential cooperation). More information on each of the following projects can be found in the "Approved projects database" on the Programme website. CAST, Great War, GREET, SEACo, STEP, SusTRIP, TGN ATC, Bike Friendly Cities, C2C, PATCH, TRANSCOAST, Yacht Valley A2S, BOAT 1550 BC, C21P, Crysalis, HERE, Heroes 2C, HMS, SHAPING 24, T.R, TMS, Walls and Gardens, WW2 Heritage None SISCo 2ST, BPPE, BUFU, CURA-B, ECOMIND, FISH & CHIPS, FUSION, GAPS, TEN, TIME, CC2150, C-SCOPE, GIFS Face2Face, IC MUSIC, ICP, LCP, Sea Media ACE ARCH, BALANCE, MULTI-FOR, Natura People, Urban Habitats None CLEANTECH, BioCare, IDEA, i-mocca, MeCagr02, MultiDES, SCODECE, SHIVA, SYSIASS, TC2N PRISMA, SWAP NOW 3i, ARCH-MANCHE, DYMAPHY, Flood Aware, FLOODCOM, ISECA, MEMO, MICRO, MIRG-EU, RINSE CBOOPSD, Dignity In Care, Learning Cities ACCES, AIMER, CAFTA, DNA, ilaebor, INSPIRER, SUCCES, TSE, Villa Crossmedia MaxiGreen, VIVID
Contribution of the Kent, Greater Essex and East Sussex Local Enterprise Partnership to the consultation on the conclusions of the Fifth Cohesion Report on Economic, social and territorial cohesion: the
CAIMANs FINAL COMMITTEE Venice, June 11th 2015 The Interreg MED Programme 2014-2020 The Interreg MED Programme 2014-2020 The Interreg MED Programme 2014-2020 The Interreg MED Programme 2014-2020 The Interreg
COMMUNITY-LED LOCAL DEVELOPMENT COHESION POLICY 2014-2020 The new rules and legislation governing the next round of EU Cohesion Policy investment for 2014-2020 have been formally endorsed by the Council
European Union European Regional Development Fund Sharing solutions for better regional policies Interreg Europe Programme Manual 22 June 2015 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION... 5 A) PROGRAMME... 5 1.
ti LIST OF THE FICIARIES OF ALL CALLS FOR PROPOSALS cofinanced European Regial Development Fund () through the INTERREG IV A 2 Seas crossborder cooati Programme (List published in compliance with the requirements
SOUTH EAST EUROPE TRANSNATIONAL CO-OPERATION PROGRAMME 3 rd Call for Proposals Terms of reference Efficient access to a SEE coordinated multimodal freight network between ports and landlocked countries
European Union European Regional Development Fund Sharing solutions for better regional policies Interreg Europe Programme Manual 23 March 2015 This document was endorsed by the programming committee on
Seminario formativo per funzionari e amministratori camerali "La programmazione europea nel settore turistico" Donatella Soria, Silvia Draghi Unioncamere Veneto - Bruxelles 1/7/2014 1 Legal Framework EU
Guidance Note 1 Welcome to the Interreg VA France (Channel) England Programme I. Introduction Welcome to this manual dedicated to supporting existing and potential Lead partners and Partners of the INTERREG
INTERREG EUROPE 2014-2020 CCI 2014 TC 16 RFIR 001 Cooperation Programme document Final 07 May 2014 Based on the Model for cooperation programmes under the European territorial cooperation goal as established
INTERREG EUROPE 2014-2020 CCI 2014 TC 16 RFIR 001 Cooperation Programme document Final 07 May 2014 Based on the Model for cooperation programmes under the European territorial cooperation goal as established
EUROPEAN REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT FUND From INTERREG IVC to INTERREG EUROPE name, position On behalf of INTERREG IVC INTERREG infopäivä 12 December 2014, Helsinki Summary 1. Finland in INTERREG IVC 2. State
1.1.1. 30 May 2012 Table of contents 0. Introduction... 1 1. General programme information... 2 1.1. Main objectives of the programme...2 1.2. Programme area...2 1.3. Programme funding...2 1.4. Programme
URBACT III OPERATIONAL PROGRAMME (2014-2020) CALL FOR PROPOSALS FOR THE CREATION OF 20 ACTION-PLANNING NETWORKS Open 30 March 2015 16 June 2015 1 TABLE OF CONTENT INTRODUCTION... 3 SECTION 1 - ABOUT URBACT
SME Policy Framework for St. Maarten May, 2014 Department of Economic Affairs, Transportation & P. 1 of 16 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Introduction 2. SME Developments in St. Maarten 2.1 Definition 2.2 Government
ROADMAP Title of the initiative: Youth programme post 2013 Type of initiative (CWP/Catalogue/Comitology): CWP Lead DG: DG EAC/E-2, Youth in Action Unit Expected date of adoption of the initiative (month/year):
INTERREG EUROPE 2014-2020 Cooperation Programme document Final Draft 10 January 2014 Based on the European Commission s Draft template and guidelines for the content of the cooperation programme Version
European Union European Regional Development Fund Sharing solutions for better regional policies Application form Disclaimer: This document was endorsed by the programming committee on 10 February 2015.
QUÉBEC DECLARATION ON ECOTOURISM In the framework of the UN International Year of Ecotourism, 2002, under the aegis of the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) and the World Tourism Organization
LIFE ORIENTATION DOCUMENT The European Union provides funding and grants for a broad range of projects and programmes covering areas such as education, health, consumer protection, environmental protection,
1 REGIONAL DIMENSION OF THE 7th FRAMEWORK PROGRAMME The new Call and Work Programme Regions of Knowledge 2012-13-1 Dr. Salvatore La Rosa Policy and Project officer European Commission Directorate General
Joint conclusions of the Spanish Presidency EU Youth Conference youth employment and social inclusion, Jerez, Spain 13-15 April 2010 Youth Employment is the common theme of the three EU Youth Conferences
Informal Meeting of EU Ministers Responsible for Territorial Cohesion and Urban Matters Preamble Declaration of Ministers towards the EU Urban Agenda Riga, 10 June 2015 On 10 June 2015, in Riga (Latvia),
National Society leadership and management development (supporting National Society development) Executive summary This is one of four sub-plans of the programme Supporting National Society development.
PROGRAMME MANUAL 1. MED FRAMEWORK Index 1. MED FRAMEWORK...1 1.1. Background and programme objective...3 1.1.1. Overview of Interreg MED Programme...3 1.1.2. Programme Area...4 1.1.3. Priority axes and
EUROPEAN COMMISSION DIRECTORATE-GENERAL FOR EDUCATION AND CULTURE DGVT Meeting in Ireland 21 22 May 2013 Agenda item II Document 3 OMC THEMATIC WORKING GROUPS IN EDUCATION AND TRAINING Education Ministers
5 JUNE 2015 MINISTERIAL MEETING OF THE BLUE WEEK 2015 We, Ministers responsible for Ocean/ Fisheries/ Maritime Affairs, having met in Lisbon on June the 5 th, 2015, at the invitation of the Minister of
OPINION ON GENDER DIMENSION IN THE NEXT PROGRAMMING PERIOD OF THE STRUCTURAL FUNDS 2007-2013 Advisory Committee on Equal Opportunities Between Women and Men July 2006 1 Opinion 1 on GENDER DIMENSION IN
Updated: March 2015 The Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) provides a forum in which governments can work together to share experiences and seek solutions to common problems.
1 Declaration on the 20th Anniversary of the Barents Euro-Arctic Cooperation (Kirkenes, Norway, 3 4 June 2013) Prime Ministers and other high-level representatives of the members of the Barents Euro- Arctic
Northern Dimension Policy Framework Document (effective as 1 January 2007) 1. Introduction 1. The Northern Dimension covers a broad geographic area from the European Arctic and Sub- Arctic areas to the
Ref. Ares(2014)882600-24/03/2014 COSME ENHANCING EUROPEAN TOURISM S COMPETITIVENESS AND SUSTAINABILITY Tourism Work Programme 2014 1 COSME objectives The Union s programme to strengthen the competitiveness
COMMUNICATION STRATEGY of the Interreg IPA Cross-border Cooperation programme Croatia Serbia 2014-2020 Contents 1. Introduction... 3 2. objectives and communication objectives... 4 3. communication activities
EUROPEAN UNION The President's Office Committee of the Regions GSPI/2011/03 Keynote speech by the President of the Committee of the Regions Mrs Mercedes Bresso 6 th Annual Brussels Climate Change Conference
Priority 2 description Efficient management of natural resources Extract of the Cooperation Programme Priority 2 description Efficient management of natural resources of Interreg Baltic Sea Region, a transnational
COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES Brussels, 23.05.2005 COM(2005) 208 final COMMUNICATION FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE COUNCIL AND THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT European Space Policy - Preliminary Elements
NGO Major Group Priorities and Actions for sustainable development in SIDS This statement is made by civil society organisations participating in the SIDS Inter-regional Preparatory Meeting held in Barbados
Complementary Additional Programme 2014-2015 / Concept note Safe Water Quality for All Uses: Promoting science-based policy responses to water quality challenges Geographical scope/benefitting country(ies):
Atlantic Arc Commission Marine Renewables Energies: Sources of growth for the Atlantic Regions Note approved by the Atlantic Arc Commission on 24 September 2014 European context: In January 2014, the European
Connecting Europe for New Horizon European activities in the area of Big Data Márta Nagy-Rothengass DG CONNECT, Head of Unit "Data Value Chain" META-Forum 2013, 19 September 2013, Berlin OUTLINE 1. Data
SOUTH EAST EUROPE TRANSNATIONAL CO-OPERATION PROGRAMME 3 rd Call for Proposals Terms of reference Climate Change Adaptation: assessing vulnerabilities and risks and translating them to implementation actions
Work Programme Funding priorities for 2015 European Union Programme for Employment and Social Innovation (EaSI) Table of Contents 1. Introduction... 3 2. Policy context in employment, social and working
VET4EU2 Declaration on the medium-term deliverables of the Riga Conclusions Preamble We, the European Associations of VET providers EfVET, EUCEN, EUproVET, EVBB and EVTA (participants of the platform VET4EU2
EUROPEAN COMMISSION Employment, Social Affairs and Equal Opportunities DG Directorate-General General Coordination, Interinstitutional Relations Brussels, 21 December 2006 01/FB D(2006) PROGRESS/003/2006
Territorial Agenda of the European Union 2020 Towards an Inclusive, Smart and Sustainable Europe of Diverse Regions agreed at the Informal Ministerial Meeting of Ministers responsible for Spatial Planning
EUROPEAN COMMISSION Employment, Social Affairs and Inclusion DG Social Market Economy in Member States II : ESF Geographical & financial support, Thematic reporting, CELFI CALL FOR PROPOSALS VP/2012/005
Perspectives of the marine and maritime open access research infrastructure development in Lithuania Saulius Gulbinskas, Asta Raugalienė Association Baltic Valley, Klaipeda Are EU innovation and research
Guidance Version 15/12/2015 The present Guidance has been produced in the framework of the first Call for Proposals for the selection of Urban Innovative Actions projects. It has been conceived to complement
Opportunities for the Automotive Sector in Horizon 2020 Cliff Funnell UK FP7/H2020 Surface Transport NCP Opportunity: The performance of the UK automotive sector and the success of the Low Carbon Vehicles
COOPERATION PROGRAMME INTERREG NORTH-WEST EUROPE 2014-2020 CCI 2014 TC 16 RF TN 006 Approved by the European Commission on 18 June 2015 INDEX SECTION 1 - STRATEGY FOR THE COOPERATION PROGRAMME... 3 SECTION
Planning Policy Statement 2015 Introduction It is just over 50 years since national planning legislation was first implemented in Ireland. The Government wishes to reaffirm its strong belief in the value
Annex 1: Conceptual Framework of the Swiss-Polish Cooperation Programme The Conceptual Framework is an integral part of the Framework Agreement between the Swiss Federal Council and the Government of the
CYPRUS: Prioritisation, Entrepreneurial Discovery and Policy mix in the RIS3 process Portoroz (SI), 15-16 May 2014 Leonidas Antoniou Antonis Theocharous Spyros Avdimiotis Which issues would you like to
Brussels, 31 May 2011 Joint position on the Consultation Paper on the Green Paper on the future of the VAT Towards a simpler, more robust and efficient VAT system COM(2010) 695 final Introduction Conscious
13 February 2006 Screening report Turkey Chapter 26 Education and Culture Date of screening meetings: Explanatory meeting: 26 October 2005 Bilateral meeting: 16 November 2005 1 I. CHAPTER CONTENT The areas
DRAFT COOPERATION PROGRAMME INTERREG VB NORTH WEST EUROPE 2014-2020 FOR PUBLIC CONSULTATION (Draft version 4 March 2014) INDEX SECTION 1. Strategy for the cooperation programme... 3 1.1 Strategy for the
BOOK OF ABSTRACTS 1 AGENDA 14h15 OPENING SESSION Phil Cooke, CASS, University of Cardiff, Maritime Clusters and Knowledge Transfer: An Overview of the Atlantic Area 14h45 Workshop Traditional Knowledge
INTERACT III 2014-2020 Operational Programme version 2.4 (pre-final draft), June 2014 CCI Title INTERACT III 2014-2020 Version First year Last year Eligible from Eligible until EC decision number EC decision
1 Response from REGLEG to the Consultation on the Common Strategic Framework REGLEG welcomes the early publication of the Commission Staff Working Document Elements for a Common Strategic Framework 2014
New structural funds programme and its use on Pre-Commercial Procurement and Public Procurement of Innovation PUBLIC DEMAND OF INNOVATION FOR: Efficient Public Services and Competitive European Industries
August 2013 Horizon 2020 Aligning your innovation strategy to increase competitiveness From the authors The Horizon 2020 programme is the major funding body for research and innovation initiatives across
EUROPEAN COMMISSION DIRECTORATE GENERAL FOR RESEARCH & INNOVATION Brussels, 24 January 2013 CALL FOR EXPRESSIONS OF INTEREST FOR THE SELECTION OF EXPERTS FOR THE HORIZON 2020 ADVISORY GROUPS 1. Background
Interreg Baltic Sea Region 2 nd Call for Applications Priorities 1-3 Announcement Note for Step 1: Concept Note Timeline: 1 March 2016 1 June 2016 1. Introduction Interreg Baltic Sea Region is launching
Inspire policy making by territorial evidence ESPON Day What European Territory Today and Tomorrow? ESPON Scientific Platform and Tools (Priority 3) Marjan van Herwijnen, ESPON Coordination Unit Scientific
- IVO4ALL - INTERNATIONAL VOLUNTEERING OPPORTUNITIES FOR ALL Newsletter 1 Summer 2015 After a year of preparation, the IVO4ALL project has officially started in February 2015. It aims at increasing the
Urban Mobility Package Support to local authorities action in building sustainable local mobility plans COM(2013) 913 final Together towards competitive and resource-efficient urban mobility April 2014
Strategy for 2012 to 2015 ELY Centre for An active player from rural areas to the metropolis Well-being and impact through cooperation network The operating environment of the Centre for Economic Development,
Urban Agenda for the EU Pedro Campos Ponce NL Ministry of the Interior and Kingdom Relations ESPON Seminar Territory matters: Keeping Europe and its regions competitive Amsterdam 16 June 2016 What is the
CALL FOR PAPERS 9 th Annual South East European Doctoral Student Conference Thursday 25 th & Friday 26 th September 2014 Thessaloniki Greece http://www.seerc.org/dsc2014/ Building on the success of the
INTERREG IVA 2 Mers Seas Zeeën Cross-border Cooperation Programme 2007-2013 Programme Manual Guidance on Eligibility and Project Management Version 06/02/2013 Operational programme of the European Territorial
MP4 WP4.1 Retroactive evaluation of on-the-ground benefits Evaluation report: Gamlestaden in Gothenborg, Sweden Academics University of Copenhagen Copenhagen, Denmark Practitioner City of Gothenburg Gothenburg,
"Inteligent Energy in cities financing schemes for non-investment projects under IEE Programme Antonina Kaniszewska IEE National Contact Point Competitiveness and Innovation framework Programme (CIP) (2007-2013)
Islamic Republic of Afghanistan, Ministry of Rural Rehabilitation and Development (MRRD) Ministry of Rural Rehabilitation & Development Post Disaster Need Assessment (PDNA) Training Manual Social Protection
COMMON STRATEGIC FRAMEWORK 2014-2020 & BIODIVERSITY summary report of the etc asp greenalps project 2 Impressum Publisher: greenalps project Author: Marianne Badura blue! advancing european projects for
MANAGEMENT and USE of DATA SUPPORTING EFFECTIVE MARINE GOVERNANCE. CONCEPTS AND CONTEXT CONTEXT INSPIRE Directive - Came into force on 15 May 2007 - To create an EU Spatial Date Infrastructure (SDI) so
www.harvestatlantic.eu HARNESSING ALL RESOURCES VALUABLE TO ECONOMIES OF SEASIDE TERRITORIES ON THE ATLANTIC THE MARITIME ECONOMY Maritime activities are one of the key elements for the competitiveness
EUROPEAN COMMISSION Brussels, 15.7.2011 COM(2011) 441 final COMMUNICATION FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT, THE COUNCIL, THE EUROPEAN ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL COMMITTEE AND THE COMMITTEE OF THE
Participation of the MARTINS project group in the consultation on the Green Paper Towards an integrated European maritime policy the 6th & 7th of June 2007 In order to underline the ever growing need to
4 TENDER REQUIREMENTS The tender document comprises all the components needed to understand the group's strategic and local development directions. The tender document will apply throughout the programming
Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe Secretariat EEF.DEL/19/08 29 January 2008 ENGLISH only Conference Services Sixteenth OSCE Economic and Environmental Forum - Part 1: Maritime and inland
COUNCIL OF EUROPEAN MUNICIPALITIES AND REGIONS CONSEIL DES COMMUNES ET REGIONS D EUROPE Registered in the Register of Interest Representatives of the European Commission. Registration number: 81142561702-61