1 Research Degree Procedures The policies and procedures of the Australian Institute of Business (AIB) relating to research higher degree study are included in this document. 1. Research at AIB AIB is a business school built on a foundation of Work-Applied Learning. Its research is focused on issues that confront managers in their workplace. AIB Research has practical application, emphasising a scholarly approach to solving real world problems. The AIB Research Philosophy is set out in the degree handbooks and on the AIB website. 2. Definitions DBA means the Doctor of Business Administration degree MMgt means the Master of Management degree MMgt (Research) means the Master of Management (Research) degree MMgt (WAL) means the Master of Management (Work Applied Learning) degree PhD means the Doctor of Philosophy degree RPL Committee means the AIB Committee that reviews and decides on applications for Recognition of Prior Learning or credit transfer Research degree means a degree which is awarded on the basis of a thesis embodying the results of a research project, and any coursework topics or other formal studies undertaken during the candidature which do not constitute more than one-third of the final assessment for the degree. 3. Criteria for Admission The criteria for admission depend on the course: 3.1 PhD Educational Requirements For admission to the programme, applicants should normally have a Master s degree (AQF Level 9) in business and commerce or related discipline area at Credit or higher level Grade Point Average with an appropriate research component; or a Bachelor s degree (AQF Level 8) in business and commerce or related discipline area with minimum of upper second honours or equivalent. Work experience Management or professional experience of 3-5 years Page 1 of 15
2 English Proficiency Applicants whose first language is not English need to demonstrate proficiency in English with a first degree completed in the English language or a score of 600 or better on the TOEFL or 7 or better on the IELTS (with no individual band score below 6 ) or an equivalent score in other acceptable tests. Other evidence of English language proficiency may be accepted. Workplace Access All applicants must have access to a workplace on which they can base their assignments and research. 3.2 DBA Educational Requirements For admission to the programme, applicants should normally meet one of the following criteria: a Masters Degree (AQF Level 9) at Credit or higher level Grade Point Average with an appropriate research component; or a Bachelor s degree with Honours (AQF Level 8) with minimum second upper honours or equivalent; or Work experience Management or professional experience of 3-5 years Writing Ability All candidates must be able to demonstrate the ability to write substantial professional or other reports in English. English Proficiency Applicants whose first language is not English need to demonstrate proficiency in English with a first degree completed in the English language or a score of 600 or better on the TOEFL or 7 or better on the IELTS (with no individual band score below 6 ) or an equivalent score in other acceptable tests. Other evidence of English language proficiency may be accepted. Workplace Access All applicants must have access to a workplace on which they can base their assignments and research. 3.3 MMgt Educational Requirements For admission to the programme, applicants should normally meet one of the following criteria: Bachelor Degree (AQF Level 7) or equivalent in business and commerce or related discipline area; or AQF Level 8 qualification (or equivalent) in any discipline. Work experience At least two years relevant work experience. English Proficiency Applicants whose first language is not English need to demonstrate proficiency in English with a first degree completed in the English language or a score of 575 or better on the TOEFL or 6.5 or better on the IELTS or an equivalent score in other acceptable tests. Other evidence of English language proficiency may be accepted. Page 2 of 15
3 Workplace Access All applicants must have access to a workplace on which they can base their assignments and research. 3.4 MMgt (WAL) Educational Requirements For admission to the programme, applicants should normally meet one of the following criteria: Bachelor Degree (AQF Level 7) or equivalent in business and commerce or related discipline area; or Relevant professional qualification conducted at a standard equivalent to a Bachelor s Degree. Applicants with a Graduate Certificate (AQF Level 8) in Work Based Learning or Action Research and Action Learning or equivalent will be granted advanced standing of 40 credit points in the Master of Management (Work Applied Learning). English Proficiency Applicants whose first language is not English need to demonstrate proficiency in English with a first degree completed in the English language or a score of 575 or better on the TOEFL or 6.5 or better on the IELTS or an equivalent score in other acceptable tests. Other evidence of English language proficiency may be accepted. Workplace Access All applicants must have access to a workplace on which they can base their assignments and research. 3.5 MMgt (Research) Educational Requirements For admission to the programme, applicants should normally meet one of the following criteria: Bachelor Degree (AQF Level 7) or equivalent in business and commerce or related discipline area; or An AQF Level 8 qualification (or equivalent) in any discipline. Work experience Extensive relevant work experience including: three or more years of management experience at a senior level involving the direction of staff or responsibility for the integration of those staff; and demonstrated responsibility for strategic decisions about an organization or a function within it; and demonstrated ability to write substantial management or other reports in English English Proficiency Applicants whose first language is not English need to demonstrate proficiency in English with a first degree completed in the English language or a score of 575 or better on the TOEFL or 6.5 or better on the IELTS or an equivalent score in other acceptable tests. Other evidence of English language proficiency may be accepted. Page 3 of 15
4 Workplace Access All applicants must have access to a workplace on which they can base their assignments and research. 4. Application Process 4.1 On receipt by AIB of an indication of interest in any research higher degree course, the applicant will be asked to provide: i. A completed Application Form ii. Official certified transcripts of academic records, including full details of all courses undertaken and grades obtained. English translations must be supplied for documents in languages other than English iii. Proof of English proficiency in the case of an international applicant iv. Evidence of work experience, where applicable v. Evidence of ability to write in a professional manner vi. An up to date Curriculum Vitae vii. An Outline of the proposed research topic. 4.2 The following will be taken into consideration when assessing applications for admission to candidature: i. whether the applicant meets the entry criteria; ii. whether the proposed research topic is acceptable to AIB and can be matched to AIB's research resource capabilities; iii. whether the research site is supportive of the research; and iv. whether appropriate Research Supervisors are available. 5. Appointment of Research Supervisors 5.1 AIB works with the candidate to agree to a Research Supervisory Team that meets the personal needs of the candidate and has the appropriate skill set to ensure that the research project and the course is completed in a timely manner and of an appropriate standard. The skill set AIB seeks in its Research Supervisory Team for a candidate, through the qualifications and experience of the team, is two-fold. The primary skill is in mentoring candidates through a high-quality research project process, including: development of a valueadded research proposal; sound, relevant and valid data collection and analysis; and communication of findings through a thesis. The primary skill is supported by an appropriate number of experts with in-depth knowledge of the underlying disciplines of the research, and the skill to assist candidates to identify gaps in relevant theory and application knowledge. Workplace problems often contain transdisciplinary needs across a number of underlying disciplines. Furthermore the underlying disciplines associated with work-place problems may cover a number of operational areas, such as finance, marketing, operations, human resource management and strategic management. AIB has a part- and full-time core of teaching staff and research Supervisors. To cover facilitation and transdisciplinary needs AIB has a list of available and approved adjunct staff. A member of staff of the work-place setting may be invited as an expert to the Research Supervisory Team where appropriate. 5.2 Each candidate will be assigned a Principal Research Supervisor and at least one additional Supervisor. The candidate must be consulted and must agree to their appointment before the Supervisors are appointed. Page 4 of 15
5 5.3 The Research supervisors for doctoral degrees and the Principal Supervisors for Masters degrees should have doctoral degree qualifications, but Masters degree co-supervisors may be included on the Research Supervisory Team with Masters degrees.; 5.4 The Research Supervisory team must include people who have: Experience with facilitating and mentoring research candidates at the level being supervised, Experience in research or in application of knowledge to business such as in: academic or applied research, information collection and dissemination, consulting, or senior management of organisations or projects, Continuing active participation in original research in line with AIB s research focus. 5.5 Although the Supervisors have joint responsibility to supervise the candidate for the duration of candidature, the Principal Research Supervisor has the main responsibility of coordinating communication between the Supervisors and the candidate, and for resolving any issues. 5.6 Regular contact should be maintained with candidates by their Supervisors by appropriate means including face-to-face meetings, telephone, facsimile and mail, and computer-based distributed education techniques, for academic supervision, guidance, support and feedback. Candidates should contact their Supervisors regularly to discuss progress, identify any issues early and seek appropriate guidance. Supervisors should refer to the AIB Supervisor Guidelines for details of roles and responsibilities. 6: Admission and Enrolment 6.1. Where an applicant has been accepted as a candidate for a research higher degree, a letter of offer will be sent to the applicant with relevant information including the degree for which the applicant is a candidate, fees payable, and how the offer can be accepted On the applicant s acceptance of the offer, the candidate will be sent a letter of acceptance with an information pack which includes details of the Research Higher Degrees policies and procedures. 6.3 A candidate must enrol by the date specified in the letter of acceptance of candidature. If the candidate has not enrolled by the date specified, the offer will lapse and the candidate will have to go through the application process again if s/he wishes to enrol subsequently. 6.4 Where an applicant applies for entry into a PhD or DBA, they will be registered provisionally as a PhD/DBA candidate as appropriate, pending satisfactory progress in terms of the conditions of their candidacy. 7. Required Course of Structured Activities 7.1 A candidate commencing a research higher degree must satisfactorily complete a required program of structured activities as specified in the course in which the candidate is enrolled. 7.2 Under certain circumstances, the Research Manager will recommend to the RPL Committee that the requirement for successful completion of the required course of structured activities, or parts of the course, be waived according to the AIB Credit Transfer Policy and/or Recognition of Prior Learning Policy. Such waiver must be assessed, and approved by the RPL Committee. Page 5 of 15
6 8. Research Proposal 8.1 Candidates must prepare a research proposal as part of their Research Proposal Subject with the guidance of their Principal Research Supervisors. 8.2 The proposal should be developed according to the specifications in the Research Proposal subject (705RDIS). It should define the area to which the research project will relate, and should contain a clear description of the work that the candidate intends to undertake, the research strategies intended to be used. A summary of the relevant literature, research questions, the research schedule and the research participants and/or organisation that will be the focus of the research project. 8.3 In the proposal, the candidate should note whether there are intellectual property implications of the proposed research as regards the organisation in which the research will take place, and whether these implications have been appropriately dealt with. The candidate should produce a letter of consent from the organisation in which the research will take place. 8.4 The proposal should also specify the ethical issues arising from the research and how the candidate intends to address them. 9. Research Assessment Panel 9.1 The research proposal must be approved by a specially-convened Research Assessment Panel for approval. This Panel is comprised of at least three persons, one of whom is the Principal Research Supervisor, and the others being specialists in areas which would be of benefit to the candidate. 9.2 If the Panel is of the view that the intellectual property implications have not been appropriately dealt with, the candidate will be advised to obtain independent legal advice to resolve the matter. 9.3 The Panel may require the candidate to re-present their research proposal if it finds that the scope of the project is inappropriate to the course in question, or if it determines that the research proposal, as drafted, contains serious methodological or ethical issues that need resolving. 9.4 When the research proposal has been approved by the Panel, an application will be made by the candidate for consideration by AIB s Ethics Committee. 10. Ethics Approval 10.1 It is the Principal Research Supervisor s responsibility to ensure that the candidate's proposal has appropriate ethics approval for their research. If a candidate's research proposal does not receive ethics approval, the candidate has the option of resubmitting the research proposal for ethics approval after the deficiencies have been rectified or of choosing another research approach or topic, failing which, their candidature will be terminated Candidates must apply for Ethics Approval using the required Ethics Approval Application Form and guidelines. Page 6 of 15
7 10.3 Candidates must ensure that their proposed research project complies with the following guidelines, which are a summary of the more detailed applicable research ethics standards as expressed in the NHMRC National Statement on Ethical Conduct of Human Research 2007 (Updated March 2014), in order to gain the approval of the Ethics Committee (the research may gain approval at either low risk or beyond low risk levels, and each level of risk will be assessed and approved by a distinct AIB Research Ethics Committee constituted to deal with Level 1 (low risk) or Level 2 (greater than low risk) research ethics applications): i) The research must conform to generally accepted moral and scientific standards. ii) In the conduct of the research, the candidate must at all times respect the rights, wishes, beliefs, personality, freedom and consent of the individual research participants. iii) Before research is undertaken, the candidate must show that he or she understands that the consent of the research participants should be obtained. To this end, the candidate is responsible for providing the research participants with sufficient information, at an appropriate level of comprehension, about the purposes, methods, demands, risks, time involved and inconveniences of the study. Unless there are good reasons to the contrary, consent to participate in the study should be obtained in writing. If consent is not obtained in writing, the candidate should record the conditions under which consent is given. iv) The research participants must be free to withdraw consent to further participation at any time. They are free to decline to provide information on any issue. v) Special care must be taken in relation to consent and to safeguarding individual rights where the research involves those in dependant relationships or comparable situations. vi) Procedures for data collection, analysis and storage shall ensure that the information contributed by individual research participants remains confidential and that no participants can be individually identified unless written authorisation by them have been obtained. vii) Where the research procedures involve or include the administration of questionnaires or the conducting of interviews, consent requirements may be considered satisfied by the inclusion of a covering letter or statement identifying the candidate administering the questionnaire or interview and their Principal Research Supervisor, indicating the nature and general purposes of the project, the participant s right to withdraw consent to further participation at any time and to decline to answer any specific questions, and the procedures to maintain confidentiality of data. viii) In the case of recorded interviews and group interactions, the candidate must provide the research participants with an indication of the purposes for which the recording may be used and conditions proposed for safeguarding confidentiality and governing its subsequent retention. ix) Recording of interviews and/or group interactions may take place only with the written consent of the research participants Upon approval by the Ethics Committee of the proposed research project, the candidate may commence the fieldwork under the guidance of the Principal Research Supervisor. 11. Status, Duration and Extension of Candidature 11.1 For the PhD and DBA degrees the maximum duration of candidature will normally be three years for a full-time candidate and six years for a part-time candidate. Page 7 of 15
8 11.2 The maximum duration of the candidature for the MMgt, MMgt (WAL) and MMgt (Research) degrees will normally be one and a half years for a full-time candidate and three years for a part-time candidate Upon the recommendation of the Principal Research Supervisor, the Research Manager may approve extensions to candidature provided the candidature does not exceed seven years in the case of PhD and DBA candidates or four years in the case of MMgt candidates Applications for extensions beyond the limits set in 11.3 must be submitted to the Research and Higher Degrees Committee. In the event of extenuating circumstances, the Research and Higher Degrees Committee may, in its sole discretion, grant an extension of time for such period as it deems appropriate. The then current annual fees will be charged for the extended candidature. 12. Variations to Conditions of Candidature 12.1 Where the candidate wishes to vary the following conditions of candidature, a written application must be made to the Research Manager, and must be accompanied by a recommendation from the Principal Research Supervisor. After consultation with the candidate s Principal Research Supervisor, the Research Manager will notify the candidate of the outcome of an application. i. Leave of absence of candidature Candidates may apply for periods of intermission from their candidature for up to a total of twelve months. They may apply for additional periods of Leave of Absence if there are exceptional circumstances ii. Change of status between full-time and part-time iii. Change of status from internal to external iv. Significant amendment to research topic Upgrade or Transfer between Degrees -The following procedures apply where candidates who wish to upgrade their MMgt candidature to a DBA or a PhD, or transfer between a DBA and a PhD. The Research Manager will notify the applicant of the outcome of an application. i. Candidates must apply for an upgrade or transfer when well advanced in the candidature for their current degree, and before they have submitted that degree's thesis/dissertation for examination ii. iii Candidates must submit o their currently completed work (ie chapters or partially completed chapters), o a page research proposal for the further degree (or, if the current dissertation/thesis is almost complete, a 5-10 page report), o a one-page letter of support from the Principal Supervisor. When preparing the research proposal (or the report) for the further degree, candidates should be mindful of the differences between Masters and doctoral level theses and the differences between DBA and PhD. In the research proposal (or report) candidates should clearly demonstrate that the research will meet the requirements of the further degree. If the current dissertation/thesis is almost complete, the required five to ten-page report about that thesis/dissertation should cover: Page 8 of 15
9 - the research that has already been done and the contributions to the literature that it provides; - what further research and writing will be done for the further degree's thesis/dissertation; - a schedule for that further research and writing; and - the contributions to the literature and/or practice that the further thesis/dissertation will provide. iv. The request for upgrade from MMgt to doctoral degree will be assessed by one internal and one external assessor and a request for a transfer from DBA to PhD will be assessed by one internal assessor. The assessors must meet the same standards as examiners for the degree. v. When considering an application for upgrade, the assessors will require assurance that: - the nature of the research is substantial enough to warrant an upgrade; - the thesis will make a contribution to knowledge and/or practice appropriate to the further degree; and - the candidate has demonstrated a capacity to undertake work at the level of the further degree. vi. The assessors will advise on whether they agree or do not agree to the upgrade, and also make suggestions for improvements to the dissertation or thesis. If there is disagreement between the two assessors, the Chair of the Research and Higher Degrees Committee or his or her nominee, will make the final decision Temporary or Permanent Change of Supervisor where a candidate's Principal Research Supervisor is absent from AIB for more than three months, the Research Manager will appoint a temporary replacement Supervisor. The Research Manager will, after consultation with the candidate, appoint a permanent replacement Principal Research Supervisor where: the Supervisor is no longer with AIB; or there is a change in the candidate's research project such that a different Principal Research Supervisor would be more appropriate; or irreconcilable differences between the candidate and the Supervisor require a change in supervision arrangements. 13. Withdrawal from Candidature 13.1 If a candidate wishes to withdraw from their studies, they are encouraged to discuss this with their Supervisors and the Research Manager, in order to try to resolve any problems the candidate may have in the study environment If the candidate decides to withdraw, they must notify the Research Manager of the withdrawal in writing, giving the reasons for and the effective date of the withdrawal The Research Manager will acknowledge the notification, confirm the date on which the withdrawal is effective and take any action necessary to suspend any scholarship. Page 9 of 15
10 13.4 A candidate who has withdrawn and who subsequently wishes to re-enrol has to apply to AIB for re-admission. AIB will determine whether the candidate will be re-admitted and whether the period of candidature will be adjusted to take account of the previous candidature. 14 Provisional candidature of DBA and PhD candidates 14.1 In respect of the DBA and PhD only, at the end of the first year of full-time study or second year of part-time study, the Research and Higher Degrees Committee shall consider the reports or statements furnished by the candidate and the reports of the Research Supervisors regarding the candidate and shall determine on one of the following outcomes: to confirm the candidature; or to extend provisional candidature to a specified date; or to terminate the candidature. Research Proposal Completion and Obtaining Human Research Ethics Committee Approval For candidature to be confirmed, the candidate should demonstrate a capacity to undertake research at a doctoral level, by submitting a Research Proposal developed according to the specifications in the Research Proposal subject (705RDIS), outlining the conceptual framework and research design of the candidate's thesis. Then the candidate needs to obtain the approval of the Human Research Ethics Committee to undertake this research. Extension of Provisional Candidature Provisional candidature may be extended for a specified period to give the candidate a further opportunity to meet the conditions for confirmation of candidature. Termination of Candidature Candidature will be terminated if the candidate has failed to comply with the conditions of candidature after having been advised in writing that failure to comply within the required time will result in termination of candidature The Supervisors are expected to monitor the performance of the candidate relative to the standard for the degree, and to ensure that the candidate is made aware if the candidate s progress is unsatisfactory or if the work is below the standard generally expected Where the Principal Supervisor perceives that it may become necessary to recommend that a candidature be terminated because of unsatisfactory progress, the Supervisor must give the candidate a preliminary warning in writing to that effect, stating the reasons why the candidate's progress is considered to be unsatisfactory. The Supervisor should inform the candidate s other Supervisor(s) of the preliminary warning and try to work with the candidate to improve the candidates' progress. 15. Review of Progress 15.1 A regular review of higher degree candidates is undertaken to formally monitor progress where both the candidate and Principal Research Supervisor complete a Quarterly Progress Report and submit it to the Research Manager The quarterly review requires the candidate and the Principal Research Supervisor to separately report on the progress made by the candidate over the last period and it is used by AIB to assess whether the candidature is progressing satisfactorily, and whether the candidature should continue. Page 10 of 15
11 15.3 The final review each year includes a requirement for the candidate to independently discuss their progress with the Research Manager and identify any issues impacting on their progress Upon receipt of the Quarterly Progress Report, or at any other time, the Research Manager will review the progress of a candidate and consider the recommendations from the Supervisors. The Research Manager will make a recommendation to the Research and Higher Degrees Committee who will decide on a course of action as follows: i. If the progress is satisfactory, the candidate be allowed to continue as a candidate for the degree; or ii. If the progress is unsatisfactory, the candidate be allowed to continue as a candidate subject to such conditions as the Research Manager may impose; or iii. If the progress is unsatisfactory and the candidate is a PhD or DBA candidate, the candidate be given a preliminary warning in writing by the supervisor and if the progress continues to unsatisfactory, the candidate be asked to show cause why their candidature should not be transferred to a Master s degree candidature or be terminated; or iv. If the progress is unsatisfactory and the candidate is a Master s candidate, the candidate be asked to show cause why their candidature should not be terminated Where a show cause decision has been made, the following procedures will apply: i. The Research Manager will write to the candidate: - explaining why the candidate's progress has been found to be unsatisfactory; - asking the candidate to show cause why the candidature should not be terminated or transferred; - describing the procedures for the termination of candidature; and - notifying the candidate that if a response is not received within the specified period the candidature will be terminated or transferred. ii. If the candidate requests an interview with the Research Manager in order to discuss his iii. or her response to the letter, the interview should be granted. The candidate will be invited to attend a meeting with the Research Manager at which time their case is to be considered or, in the case of a candidate who is not a resident of South Australia, to send a representative or to participate by means of video conference. If attending in person, the candidate may be accompanied by a student or staff member or a support person to present the facts of the present situation, but the candidate will not be permitted to have legal representation at the meeting. v. The candidate and/or representative must be present throughout discussion of the case and must be allowed to participate in the discussion. The candidate and/or representative must be absent when the case is decided. vi. If a candidate required to show cause fails to respond to the request, the Research Manager will recommend to the Research and Higher Degrees Committee that the candidature be terminated After the formal meeting between the Research Manager and the candidate, the Research Manager will recommend one of the following actions to the Research and Higher Degrees Committee: i. take no further action; or ii. permit the candidate to continue under specified conditions; or iii. transfer candidate from DBA or PhD to MMgt candidature; or iv. terminate the candidate s enrolment. Page 11 of 15
12 15.7 The Research Manager must immediately inform the candidate of the decision, the reasons for the decision and the procedures for appeal The appeal procedures are set out in the Academic and Non-Academic Grievance Handling Policy. 16 Appointment of Examiners 16.1 The criteria for the appointment of examiners depends on the degree: i. PhD two external examiners who have research PhD s or equivalent doctoral degrees, have acknowledged expertise in a relevant field, and who have empathy with the theoretical framework used by the candidate. The Supervisors will not act as examiners. ii. DBA or MMgt (Research) two external examiners who have research PhD s or professional doctorates or equivalent doctoral degrees, have acknowledged expertise in a relevant field, and who have empathy with the theoretical framework used by the candidate. The Supervisors will not act as examiners. iii. MMgt or MMgt (WAL) one examiner who has a research PhD or professional doctorate or an equivalent doctoral degree and who may or may not be external to AIB. The Supervisor(s) will not act as an examiner At least three months before the candidate is due to submit the completed thesis, the candidate and their Research Supervisors shall: i. complete and sign an 'Intention to Lodge' form including a summary of the thesis; and ii. shortlist the names of potential external examiners with the candidate having the power to veto, but not to choose The Principal Research Supervisor shall then notify the Research and Higher Degrees Committee of the names of possible examiners, including reserve examiners (in the event that a preferred nominee is unable to act as examiner), and provide a justification and CV for each possible examiner. The information provided on each potential examiner should include his or her academic qualifications (and/or professional qualifications if appropriate), institutional affiliation and rank, and details of any relevant published work in the field of the thesis. The Research Supervisor should ensure that, inter alia, the potential examiners are free from bias as regards the candidate, the Research Supervisor or the research method adopted, and that they are still active in the field of research pertaining to the thesis The Research Manager will officially write to the examiners to advise the name of the candidate, the title of the thesis/dissertation and inviting them to act as examiners If an examiner is unable to accept an invitation or fails to respond to an invitation within four to six weeks (despite being sent reminder notifications), an invitation will be sent to a person approved as a reserve examiner. 17 Submission of thesis 17.1 The candidate must lodge an electronic copy of the final thesis with the Research Manager. The candidate must sign a declaration that the thesis does not contain any material previously published or written by another person except where due reference is made in the text or footnotes. Page 12 of 15
13 17.2 On receipt of the thesis, the Research Manager will forward one copy of the thesis to each examiner together with the following: i. Examiner s Report and Guidelines for Examination; ii. information on the examination processes including matters in relation to the disclosure of the examiner s report to the candidate; iii. timelines for the completion of the assessment process (turnaround period on receipt of the thesis is normally eight weeks); and iv. information in relation to payment for examination The identity of examiners will not be revealed to candidates until the examination process has been completed and then not if an examiner has expressed a desire to remain anonymous. 18. Examination process 18.1 From the time of the submission of the thesis, a candidate must not initiate contact with their examiners on any matter concerning the thesis From the time of the appointment of examiners, there must not be any direct contact between an examiner and a Supervisor in relation to the thesis. If an examiner has a query, it must be directed to the Research Manager who will refer it to the candidate or the Supervisors Consultation between examiners will not be permitted prior to submission of the initial report The examination process of the thesis/project depends on the degree: PhD, DBA and MMgt (Research) The examiners will be asked to recommend one of the following results: i. that the thesis be accepted without revision; or ii. that the thesis be accepted subject to minor amendments as specified, to be done to the satisfaction of the Principal Research Supervisor (where minor amendments refer to corrections involving typographical or other spelling errors, errors in grammar and/or syntax, etc. and not require additional data collection or analysis); or iii. that the candidate be required to undertake more substantial revisions to the thesis, to be done to the satisfaction of the Principal Research Supervisor, and Chair of Research and Higher Degrees Committee or his or her nominee; or iv. that the candidate be required to undertake substantial revisions to the thesis and that the thesis be re-submitted for examination; or v. that the thesis be rejected, but in the case of a candidate who has submitted a thesis for the degree of PhD or DBA, an appropriate Masters degree should be awarded; or vi. that the thesis be rejected and the candidate not be permitted to re-submit it for examination. In the case of a disagreement between examiners: Page 13 of 15
14 In the event that examiners are not unanimous in making any one of the recommendations above, and their recommendations based on section 18.4 are at least two levels apart, the Supervisor and the candidate are provided with copies of the examiners' reports and are invited to comment. In this process the examiners' identities are not revealed to the candidate. The Research and Higher Degrees Committee will then consider all the documentation presented and recommend an examination outcome or recommend that a third examiner be appointed. Where a third examiner is appointed, the examiner will independently examine the thesis and provide a recommended result. The Research and Higher Degrees Committee will consider all three examiners reports, together with the candidate and Supervisor response to the initial examiners and recommend an examination outcome. MMgt and MMgt (WAL) The examiner will be asked to recommend one of the following results: i. that the project/thesis be accepted without revision; or ii. that the project/thesis be accepted subject to minor amendments as specified, to be done to the satisfaction of the Principal Research Supervisor (where minor amendments refer to corrections involving typographical or other spelling errors, errors in grammar and/or syntax, etc. and not require additional data collection or analysis); or iii. that the candidate be required to undertake more substantial revisions to the project/thesis, to be done to the satisfaction of the Principal Research Supervisor, and Chair of the Research and Higher Degrees Committee or his or her nominee; or iv. that the candidate be required to undertake substantial revisions to the project/thesis and that the project/thesis be re-submitted for examination; or v. that the project/thesis be rejected and the candidate not be permitted to re-submit it for examination If revisions are required, the candidate will be asked to undertaken the revisions in the following timeframes: Minor revisions 2 months Major revisions 4 months Resubmit for examination 6 months In the event that an allegation of academic dishonesty has been made during the examination process, the Research and Higher Degrees Committee should refer the candidate to the Academic Integrity Policy and the Academic and Non-Academic Grievance Handling Policy of AIB. 19. Outcome of the Examination When the examination result has been determined, the following procedures will apply: Page 14 of 15
15 i. the Research Manager will advise the Research and Higher Degrees Committee to recommend approval of the issue of the award, and then forward the minutes to the Academic Board for formal approval of the issue of the award. ii. The Academic Board will then certify that the candidate has qualified for the award of the degree. 20. Conferral of the Award When the award is certified by the Academic Board, the Research Manager will provide a letter to the candidate advising them they may now start using their post nominal, notify the candidate of the degree conferral procedures, and provide the candidate with a copy of the examiners' reports. 20. Lodging of Theses The Research Division will arrange copies of the final form thesis/dissertation to be lodged in the Library as a bound hard copy and an electronic copy and for copies to be sent to the Research Supervisors. Related Forms: Application Form for Award Intention to Lodge Thesis Nomination of Examiners Variation to Candidature Responsibility: Research Manager Related Policies: Research and Research Degrees Policy Research and Publications Policy Admissions Policy Academic Integrity Policy Terms of Reference of Academic Board and Associated Committees of Australian Institute of Business Current Status: Version 5 Approved By: Academic Board Date of Approval: 28 August 2015 Previous versions: 25 March December July December 2008 Page 15 of 15
REGULATION 5.1 HIGHER DOCTORATES, THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY, PROFESSIONAL DOCTORATES AND MASTERS DEGREES BY RESEARCH PART A GENERAL PART B HIGHER DOCTORATES PART B THE SCHEDULE PART C THE DEGREE
PROGRAMME REGULATIONS Professional Doctorate Regulations 1. Regulations for Professional Doctorate Qualifications 1.1 Summary 1.1.1 These regulations apply to all Professional Doctorate degrees at Unitec.
Bath Spa University Research Degree Regulations 2014-15 Approved by Academic Board 22 July 2014 1. Supervised Research Degrees 1.1 Master of Philosophy (MPhil), Doctor of Philosophy (PhD), Professional
REGULATION 5.1 HIGHER DOCTORATES, THE DOCTORAL DEGREE (RESEARCH), THE DOCTORAL DEGREE (PROFESSIONAL) AND THE MASTERS DEGREE (RESEARCH) PART A GENERAL PART B HIGHER DOCTORATES PART B THE SCHEDULE PART C
RDC-B REGISTRATION AND PROGRESSION REGULATIONS FOR THE AWARD OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY (PhD) MASTER OF PHILOSOPHY (MPhil) 2015-16 ACADEMIC YEAR TO BE USED IN CONJUNCTION WITH: RDC-A GENERAL FRAMEWORK AND
Academic Board September 2015 Australian Catholic University Research and Professional Doctorate Degree Regulations Effective 30 September 2015 CONTENTS Preamble 1. Definitions 2. Application of Regulations
REGULATIONS FOR THE DEGREES OF MPHIL AND PHD These regulations are approved by Senate. They were most recently updated in July 2014. Effective date: July 2014 Institute of Education University of London
Doctor of Philosophy (Clinical Psychology) Working Rules THE AUSTRALIAN NATIONAL UNIVERSITY COLLEGE OF MEDICINE, BIOLOGY & ENVIRONMENT DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY (CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY) Definitions WORKING RULES
REGULATION 23 MASTERS DEGREES BY RESEARCH 1. General The University confers Masters Degrees by Research in line with the Framework for Higher Education Qualifications in England, Wales and Northern Ireland
GUIDELINES FOR A CODE OF PRACTICE FOR MASTERS BY RESEARCH Compiled by: The Interfaculty Graduate Studies Board October, 2003 Table of Contents Chapter 1. Responsibilities 4.1 Responsibilities of the student...
Principal Regulations for Research Degrees 4.1. In the University the following research degrees are conferred: Masters by Dissertation (MA or MSc by Dissertation), Master of Philosophy (MPhil), Doctor
A17.0 Research Higher Degree Programs Policy Policy Category Academic Document Owner Vice Chancellor and President Responsible Officer Academic Director Review Date 1 January 2015 File Number Staff Code
RESEARCH DEGREE REGULATIONS These regulations apply to programmes of study leading to the award of Master of Philosophy and Doctor of Philosophy, including the Doctor of Philosophy awarded on the basis
MASTER OF PHILOSOPHY On-Campus; Online MPHIL AQF 9 OVERVIEW The Master of Philosophy (MPhil) is a higher degree by research which aims to develop students independent research skills under academic supervision.
Common Rules Courses leading to the Awarding of a Professional Doctorate (Research) Doctor of Version: 3.00 Approved: Council Date: 20 June 2008 Administered: Governance Next Review: June 2011 COMMON RULES
ACADEMIC AWARD REGULATIONS Framework and Regulations for Professional Doctorates Name of regulation : Purpose of regulation : Approval for this regulation given by : Responsibility for its update : Regulation
Guidance for Internal and External Examiners of Candidates for Research Degrees REVISED SEPTEMBER 2013. TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 APPOINTMENT OF EXAMINERS...1 2 APPOINTMENT OF AN INDEPENDENT CHAIR...1 3 DISPATCH
PROCEDURE Area covered ADMISSION TO HIGHER DEGREEE RESEARCH PROGRAMS This Procedure is University-wide Version 2.0 Approval date 16 March 2016 Effective date 16 March 2016 Next review date March 2019 Policy
Made by the Academic Board of Monash University Version incorporating amendments as at 21 March 2013 Part 1 - General 1. Masters degrees The masters degrees that may be undertaken in the faculty are specified
RDC-C REGISTRATION AND PROGRESSION REGULATIONS FOR THE AWARD OF DOCTOR OF PROFESSIONAL STUDIES (DProf) MASTER OF PROFESSIONAL STUDIES (MProf) 2015-16 ACADEMIC YEAR TO BE USED IN CONJUNCTION WITH: RDC-A
Academic Principles and Regulations Section G: Regulations for Research Awards of the University August 2015 Approved by Academic Board July 2011, November 2011, July 2013, July 2014 and July 2015 Contents
SECTION SIX Bachelor Degree Programs & Specific Regulations Bachelor of Ministry - BMin Bachelor of Theology BTh Bachelor of Ministry (Honours) BMin(Hons) Bachelor of Theology (Honours) - BTh(Hons) 1 BACHELOR
ACADEMIC AWARD REGULATIONS Regulations for the Award of the University s Degrees of Master of Philosophy and Doctor of Philosophy by Supervised Research Name of regulation : Purpose of regulation : Approval
Masters by Research Definition The Master's by Research degree is designed for students to develop advanced skills in carrying out independent and sustained research. The thesis demonstrates a critical
Doctor of Theology (AQF Level 10 Doctoral Degree) 81 Course Rationale DOCTOR OF THEOLOGY (AQF LEVEL 10 DOCTORAL DEGREE, COURSE CODE 180) From its inauguration the Doctor of Theology (ThD) has been used
UCL Academic Manual 2015-16 Chapter 8: Derogations and Variations UCL Institute of Education UCL IOE Doctor in Educational Psychology (DEdPsy) Regulations 2015-16 (New Students) Contact: Lizzie Vinton,
1 University of KwaZulu-Natal Recommended examination policies and procedures for Masters degrees Definition of terms: The definitions of terms provided in the General Academic Rules and Rules for Students
ACADEMIC AWARD REGULATIONS Regulations for the Award of the Doctor of Philosophy on the Basis of Published Work Name of regulation : Purpose of regulation : Approval for this regulation given by : Responsibility
A2: Regulations for research degrees: Master of Philosophy (MPhil), Doctor of Philosophy (PhD), Doctor of Medicine (MD) by research and thesis Academic Year 2014/15 Contents Admission... 1 English language
A4: Regulations for practitioner doctorate degrees: Doctor of Business Administration (DBA), Doctor of Clinical Practice (DClinPrac), Doctor of Engineering (EngD), Doctor of Psychology (PsychD) Academic
Starting Guide for PhD School of Graduate Studies (SGS) 1 PhD / Master (By Research) Programmes Offered 1. Doctor of Philosophy (Business Administration) PhD (BA) 2. Doctor of Philosophy (Education) PhD
Regulations for the Award of the Degrees of Master of Philosophy and Doctor of Philosophy 2014/15 September 2014 Notes 1. All sections of this document, including the annexes and forms, are available online.
Nottingham Trent University Quality Handbook Part D: Regulations Section 16E: Professional Doctorate Degrees Contents Preface... 3 Scope of the regulations... 3 Changes to the regulations... 3 Consultation...
Higher Degrees by Research Admissions Policy Responsible Officer Deputy Vice-Chancellor (Research) Approved by Vice-Chancellor Approved and commenced January, 2015 Review by January, 2016 Relevant Legislation,
REGULATIONS FOR THE PHILOSOPHIAE DOCTOR DEGREE (PHD) AT THE NORWEGIAN UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY (NTNU) 1 Passed by the Board of NTNU on 23 January 2012 under the provisions of the Act of 1 April
PROGRAM RULES FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY PURPOSE This policy provides guidance to prospective applicants, current candidates, supervisors and administrators on the degree of Doctor of Philosophy.
Senate Regulations for the Award of Doctoral Degrees by Examination and Thesis (Professional Doctorates) These regulations govern the award of degrees of Doctoral Degrees by Examination and Thesis (Professional
Professional Doctorates: Framework and Regulations Effective from 1 July 2011 Contents 1 Introduction... 4 2 General... 4 3 Programme of study: structure... 4 4 Application and Admission... 5 5 Enrolment...
Criteria for the Accreditation of DBA Programmes 1 1 INTRODUCTION 1.1 This document sets out the criteria for DBA programme accreditation. While setting the standards that accredited provision is expected
Responsible Office: DVC Research & Grad. Studies Pages of these Procedures 1 of 8 Procedures of Policy No. (4) - 1. Program Administration Each Professional Doctorate Program (PDP) is administered through
ASTON UNIVERSITY REGULATIONS FOR STUDENTS REGISTERING FOR HIGHER DEGREES BY RESEARCH AND THESIS MPhil and PhD For students registering on or after 1 October 1999 REG/98/244(3) replaces REG/88/320(1) INTRODUCTION
AUSTRALIAN CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY POLICY ON PROFESSIONAL DOCTORATE DEGREES 1.0 PREAMBLE This policy sets out the general conditions for the award of Professional Doctorates by Australian Catholic University.
POPULATION HEALTH MEDICAL POST GRADUATE SCHOLARSHIP CONDITIONS OF AWARD Established in 1989, the WCH Foundation is a not for profit organisation governed by a Committee of Trustees and incorporated under
DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY (PhD) A WORK APPLIED PROFESSIONAL DOCTORATE The Australian Institute of Business is an institution of higher learning in Australia that is accredited by the Australian higher education
DEPARTMENT OF BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES GRADUATE POLICIES & PROCEDURES MANUAL This graduate manual is intended for the informational use of graduate students in the Department of Biological Sciences only. Its
RESEARCH DEGREES ACADEMIC FRAMEWORK 1 INTRODUCTION 1.1 This document sets out the regulatory requirements of the Research Degrees Academic Framework ( the Framework ) for Canterbury Christ Church University
Higher Degree by Research Graduate Research Coordination Policy Responsible Officer Deputy Vice-Chancellor (Research) Approved by Vice-Chancellor Approved and commenced January, 2015 Review by January,
Strathclyde Business School DBA Handbook 2015/16 1 Welcome to Strathclyde Business School (SBS) I am delighted to welcome you to the SBS DBA programme, which I hope will prove to be a challenging and rewarding
1 University of KwaZulu-Natal Recommended examination policies and procedures for PhD degrees Definition of terms: The definitions of terms provided in the General Academic Rules and Rules for Students
5.2 for MPhil, PhD, PhD(Eur), PhD by Prior Output, DLitt, DSc Principles 1 The University shall award the degrees of Master of Philosophy (MPhil) and Doctor of Philosophy (PhD) to registered students who
MAC1981 University of Wolverhampton Regulations for the Degree Awards of: Master of Philosophy Doctor of Philosophy PhD by Published Work and Postgraduate Diploma (by Research) Effective from 1 January
A2: Regulations for research degrees: Master of Philosophy (MPhil), Doctor of Philosophy (PhD), Doctor of Medicine (MD), Doctor of Business Administration (DBA), Doctor of Clinical Practice (DClinPrac),
August 2012 Nottingham Trent University Academic Standards and Quality Handbook Section 14A. Regulations for Research Degrees CONTENTS Page A. introduction 2 B. Principles 2 C. Applications for admission
THE UNIVERSITY OF THE WEST INDIES SCHOOL FOR GRADUATE STUDIES AND RESEARCH REGULATIONS FOR GRADUATE DIPLOMAS AND DEGREES WITH EFFECT FROM AUGUST 2001 SECTION 1 GENERAL REGULATIONS SECTION 2 REGULATIONS
UNIVERSITY OF BIRMINGHAM REGULATIONS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF BIRMINGHAM SECTION 6 - PROGRAMMES OF STUDY Executive Brief Sets out the requirements, such as credit requirements and minimum / maximum duration,
ACADEMIC REGULATIONS FOR PROFESSIONAL DOCTORATE PROGRAMMES From 1 September 2014 1. The Award 1.1 The Professional Doctorate is a doctorate level qualification for professionals working in a particular
Research Services Higher Degree by Research Handbook Prepared by: Research Services Contents About This Handbook... 3 Support Structures... 3 The Graduate Centre... 3 International Student Support... 3
Regulation on doctoral studies at the Agricultural University of Iceland Art. 1. Terms and scope. This Regulation refers to the doctoral studies at the Agricultural University of Iceland which is carried
GUIDELINE Higher Degree by Research (HDR) application for admission and enrolment Date of approval 18-Jun-14 Approved by Head of Higher Education and Research Date of effect 18-Jun-14 Current to 18-Jun-17
Regulations governing the degree of Philosophiae Doctor (PhD) at Hedmark University College Approved by the University College Board on 16 December 2009 pursuant to Section 3-3 of the Norwegian Act relating
Regulations for the award of PhD and MPhil These Regulations apply to students registering in and after January 2011 1 1 Admission and Registration 1.1 The normal minimum entrance requirement for registration
GUIDANCE NOTES ON UNIVERSITY REGULATIONS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY (PhD) BY RESEARCH These notes provide guidance on the regulations for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy by Research which
120 Doctor of Theology (AQF Level 10 Doctoral Degree) Course Rationale DOCTOR OF THEOLOGY (AQF LEVEL 10 DOCTORAL DEGREE, COURSE CODE 180) From its inauguration the Doctor of Theology (ThD) has been used
DEPUTY VICE-CHANCELLOR AND VICE-PRESIDENT (RESEARCH) ADELAIDE GRADUATE CENTRE POLICY FOR THE ADMINISTRATION AND AWARD OF DOUBLE BADGED DOCTORAL DEGREES Authorised By: Vice-Chancellor and President Date
SECTION EIGHT Research Degree Programs & Specific Regulations Common elements in higher research awards Code of supervisory practice Master of Arts (Honours) - MA(Hons) Master of Theology (Honours) - MTh(Hons)
11.1 RESEARCH DEGREE REGULATIONS [PhD and MPhil] 1 CARDIFF METROPOLITAN UNIVERSITY RESEARCH DEGREES REGULATIONS MPHIL BY RESEARCH AND PHD BY RESEARCH CONTENTS 1. Introduction 2. Research Degrees Covered
ROUTE OF PROGRESSION THROUGH THE STRUCTURED RESEARCH MASTERS PROGRAMME Introduction... 2 Entry Requirements... 2 Standard applications... 2 Procedures for non-standard entrants... 2 Procedures for International
University of Brighton Regulations for Research Degrees 2015/16 1 Scope Programmes of research may be undertaken in any field of study provided that the proposed programme: (i) can be appropriately supported
XIV. Doctor of Philosophy Degree Progress Regulations Postgraduate research students are responsible for familiarising themselves with the Code of Practice for Research Degree Programmes approved by Senate,
825 REGULATIONS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY (PhD) (Applicable to students enrolled in or after September 2007. Regulations applicable to other students are available at the website: http://www.hku.hk/gradsch/web/regulations).
Ph.D. Program Handbook School of International Service American University Academic Year 2011-12 Edition Table of Contents Academic Year 2011-12 Edition... i Introduction... ivv Purpose of this Handbook...
Made by the Academic Board of Monash University Version incorporating amendments as at 21 March 2013 Part I - General 1. Masters Degrees The masters degrees listed in Schedule I may be undertaken in the
2014 Scholarship Conditions of Award (last updated: 21 October 2013) The PhD Scholarship: Wealth from Waste CSIRO research cluster 1 Eligibility 1.1 General The PhD scholarship: Wealth from Waste CSIRO
Recommended Guidelines for the Doctor of Philosophy Degree (PhD) Recommended by the Board of the Norwegian Association of Higher Education Institutions on 29 April 2011. Updated and amended on 16 January
Your consent to our cookies if you continue to use this website.