LIABILITY CHRONICLE CHANGES TO MARYLAND PREMISES LIABILITY. Quality Representation, Personal Service THE LIABILITY NEWSLETTER

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "LIABILITY CHRONICLE CHANGES TO MARYLAND PREMISES LIABILITY. Quality Representation, Personal Service THE LIABILITY NEWSLETTER"

Transcription

1 LIABILITY CHRONICLE THE LIABILITY NEWSLETTER OF FRANKLIN & PROKOPIK Editor: Stephen J. Marshall Summer 2014 Franklin & Prokopik UPCOMING EVENTS September 11, 2014 Virginia Workers Compensation Seminar Fairfax, VA November 4, 2014 Labor & Employment Seminar Turf Valley, MD March 19, 2015 Maryland Liability Seminar Hanover, MD April 30, 2015 Maryland Workers Compensation Seminar Hunt Valley, MD May 14, 2015 District of Columbia Workers Compensation Breakfast-N-Learn Linthicum, MD See website for more details on all of our events. Inside this issue: Delaware Update 2 Florida Update 3 Virginia Update 3 West Virginia Update 4 Why There Will Always Be Lawyers... 5 Attorney Direct Dial 7 CHANGES TO MARYLAND PREMISES LIABILITY MARYLAND S HIGH COURT APPLIES STATUTE OR ORDINANCE RULE TO MARYLAND PREMISES LIABILITY CASES AND FORGIVES CHILD TRESPASSERS In Blackburn Limited Partnership d/b/a Country Place Apartments, et al. v. Alicia Daley Paul, the Maryland Court of Appeals affirmed a reversal of summary judgment finding and held that a property owner s duty to comply with COMAR (Maryland s code of administrative regulations) provisions governing pool safety extends to a child trespasser, despite the common-law rule that property owners owe no affirmative duty to trespassers. In this tragic case, a three-year old boy, Christopher, sustained life altering brain injuries after wandering into the pool located at his parents apartment complex. The boy s mother filed suit against the property owner, property manager, and the pool operator alleging negligence and negligence per se. The pool fence alleged to have violated COMAR regulations and provisions of the Montgomery County code as pertaining to barrier and fencing requirements. In turn, the property owners moved for summary judgment on the basis that they only owed a duty to refrain from willfully or wantonly injuring Christopher, as he was a trespasser. The owners further argued that the codes and regulations could not retroactively apply to the subject pool as it was erected before the codes took effect. The Circuit Court granted the motion for judgment, relying on Maryland common law, finding that a potential violation of a statutory regulation is only relevant if the Court found that property owners owed a duty beyond what is owed to a trespasser. The boy s mother appealed to the Court of Special Appeals which reversed the Circuit Court. The inter mediate court rejected the property owners position that a defendant must owe a commonlaw duty to a plaintiff before violation of a statute can be used as evidence of negligence. The Court of Appeals granted certiorari to further examine the issue, and affirmed the intermediate court. The Court highlighted a crucial distinction as guidance to Maryland trial courts, that the statute must protect a specific class of persons and not be passed for the benefit of the public before violation of a statute can be used as evidence of negligence. In this instance, the COMAR and County regulations concerning Quality Representation, Personal Service Phone: The B & O Building, Two North Charles Street, Suite 600, Baltimore, MD Facsimile: Easton MD Hagerstown MD Herndon VA Martinsburg WV Tampa FL Wilmington DE

2 summer 2014 Page 2 pool fencing and barriers at issue compelled the conclusion that they were enacted to prevent the drowning of young children. Therefore, in this rare instance, where Christopher belonged to the express class of persons the statute was enacted to protect, the violation of the code could be submitted to the jury, despite his status as a trespasser. The case was remanded for trial. In effect, the Blackburn decision mandates that Maryland property owners make certain that pre-existing pools are in compliance with the barrier provisions contained in COMAR and applicable county codes despite extensive costs required to retrofit or change barriers. The Court of Appeals explicitly found that the grandfathering provisions of COMAR did not apply, as grandfathering that jeopardizes the health or safety of the public is explicitly precluded within COMAR. Property owners following the Blackburn decision should ensure compliance with all barrier and fencing requirements or risk facing exposure for injuries sustained by child trespassers. For more information about this article, contact Carrie V. Bohrer at or (410) DELAWARE UPDATE IN THE TRENCHES: DELAWARE F&P ATTORNEYS DELIVER A WIN FOR A TRUCKING CLIENT AFTER STIPULATING THAT CLIENT S DRIVER WAS RESPONSIBLE FOR COLLISION. Marie Smith v. Harry Greif and Harry s Transport Inc., C.A. No: N MMJ After three days of evidence and argument and half a day of deliberations, William ( Skip ) Crawford and Krista Shevlin recently obtained a verdict in favor of the Firm s client following a jury trial in the Superior Court in Delaware. The case involved a negligence claim filed by Plaintiff arising out of a chainreaction rear end automobile accident. It was undisputed that Plaintiff was stopped in traffic with a vehicle stopped behind her ( the middle vehicle ). It was further undisputed that the driver of our client s tractor-trailer was unable to stop before striking the middle vehicle, forcing it into the rear of Plaintiff s stopped vehicle. However, the force of the middle vehicle striking Plaintiff was miniscule with virtually no damage to the rear of Plaintiff s vehicle. Despite this, the Plaintiff, through expert medical testimony, alleged extensive damages including two surgeries to address a herniated disc at C6-C7 and radiculopathy. Plaintiff was alleging $162, in special damages as well as ongoing pain and suffering and permanent disability. The defense countered the allegations with the testimony from Dr. Scott Rushton, a spinal surgeon and Dr. Sandra Metzler, Ph.D., a biomechanical engineer. Those experts conceded the Plaintiff sustained a cervical sprain/strain in the accident and causally related approximately $14, of medical bills to injuries resultant from the accident. The defense experts also testified the spinal surgeries and extensive treatment were not related to the accident. The claims of the driver of the middle vehicle were settled. Plaintiff sued both the Firm s client driver and the driver of the middle vehicle. The driver of the middle vehcile was dismissed on a Motion for Summary Judgment based on the undisputed testimony of all parties and witnesses that the middle vehicle stopped short of Plaintiff and was forced into Plaintiff after being struck by the Frim s client s driver. The Firm s client conceded responsibility for the incident. The sole issues for the jury were causation of the claimed injuries and the nature and extent of the Plaintiff s damages. Prior to trial, Plaintiff filed a Motion in Limine to exclude the testimony from the defense biomechanical expert, Dr. Metzler, on the basis that her evidence did not meet the Daubert standard. According to Plaintiff s counsel and the trial court, no Delaware Court had ever before allowed the testimony of a biomechanical engineer at trial. The Court held a hearing on the motion and heard testimony from Dr. Metzler regarding the investigation and methods utilized to formulate her opinions. After the hearing, the Court issued an Order permitting Dr. Metzler to testify at

3 summer 2014 Page 3 trial to her opinions as to the force of impact and likelihood of this causing the injuries alleged. Before the Court s ruling, Plaintiff s settlement demand was $400, and she refused to negotiate below that number. Subsequent to the Court s ruling allowing Dr. Metzler to testify, Plaintiff lowered her demand to $160, The Firm s client countered with an Offer of Judgment of $85, The offer was rejected. Following a three day trial, the jury returned its verdict in less than four hours and only awarded Plaintiff $48, in damages. As the verdict was below the Offer of Judgment, pursuant to Delaware law, Defendants are entitled to the litigation costs incurred subsequent to the Offer of Judgment. For more information about this article, contact William Skip Crawford at or (302) FLORIDA UPDATE SUBSEQUENT MEDICAL MALPRACTICE JURY INSTRUCTION ADOPTED IN FLORIDA CIVIL CASES The Florida Supreme Court recently approved and adopted a standard jury instruction in civil cases which solidifies Florida case law which charges a negligent tortfeasor with legal responsibility for post accident medical malpractice committed by a health care provider who renders treatment to the injured plaintiff. The new jury instruction was prompted by longstanding Florida case law which viewed a treating doctor s negligence in rendering medical care for a tort victim s initial injuries as a part of the consequences caused by the original tortfeasor s actions. In Stuart v., Hertz Cor p., the Court held that an active tortfeasor in an automobile accident could not bring a third-party action for indemnity against a physician for damages directly attributable to malpractice which aggravated the plaintiff s injuries. After the Stuart decision, trial lawyers have relied on the case to successfully argue that a wrongdoer is liable for the ultimate result, even if the result was caused by the negligence of a physician who increased the plaintiff s damages. With the new standard instruction, juries will be given the following charge: If you find that defendant caused [loss], [injury] [or] [damage] to claimant then defendant is also responsible for any additional [loss] [injury] [or] [damage] caused by medical care or treatment reasonably obtained by claimant. In practice, the adoption of the standard jury instruction on this issue requires defense counsel to ensure that their medical experts understand the application of the law on this issue and to remain diligent in the preparation of their medical experts for deposition and trial. Likewise, clients and claims adjusters alike should beware that an extremely favorable Compulsory Medical Examination report can be a double-edged sword, especially when the examining expert is overly critical of the medical necessity of the plaintiff s subsequent treatment. If the defense physician ultimately suggests that Plaintiff s treating doctor committed malpractice, that medical expert may inadvertently become the star witness - but not for the defense! For more information about this article, contact Natalie Stroud Fenner at or (813) VIRGINIA UPDATE RECENT GOOD CONTRIBUTORY NEGLIGENCE HOLDING IN VIRGINIA (RGR, LLC v. Settle, Supreme Court of Virginia Record No ) Recently, the Supreme Court of Virginia reversed a $2.5 million dollar verdict on the

4 summer 2014 Page 4 basis that the truck driver was contributorily negligent. Plaintiff, the truck driver s widow, sued RGR, LLC ( RGR ), Norfolk Southern and two (2) other commercial business entities alleging that Defendants created a hazardous condition by stacking lumber near the railroad tracks. Plaintiff further alleged that Defendants breached their duty of care to the truck driver by blocking the view of those traveling on a private road and failed to take reasonable steps to make the railroad crossing safe. According to the allegations, as a result the truck driver could not see the approaching train in enough time to stop and avoid the collision. The jury awarded Plaintiff $2.5 million with prejudgment interest and the trial court declined to set aside the verdict. On appeal, RGR argued that the truck driver was familiar with the crossing, and that even though other individuals heard the train s horn, the truck driver did not look to his right or left before attempting to cross the railroad tracks. RGR argued that the truck driver failed to exercise reasonable care and his failure to do so was the proximate cause of the accident. The Court applied the principals set out in Wright v. Norfolk & W. Ry. Co., 245 Va. 160 (1993), a case in which plaintiff drove his truck from a stopped position of safety onto the crossing directly in front of the train when its engine was less than 10 feet away. In the case at hand, the uncontradicted evidence showed that the truck driver was familiar with the crossing, had notice of the limited sightline posed by the configuration of the lumber stacks, and the angle of the tracks to both east and west. Despite the witness testimony that the truck driver was proceeding to the crossing at a speed of five (5) miles per hour or less, the Court ruled that he did not approach the crossing in a manner that would have enabled him to stop, look and listen with reasonable care which would have revealed the presence of the train. Ultimately, the Court found that the truck driver failed to exercise reasonable care for his own safety despite the known dangerous sightline at the crossing. The Supreme Court of Virginia reversed the trial court verdict and entered final judgment for RGR. For more information about this article, contact Jessica J. Berdichevsky at or (571) WEST VIRGINIA UPDATE WEST VIRGINIA SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS CLARIFIES THE BREADTH OF THE COLLATERAL SOURCE RULE On April 6, 2010, Plaintiff Samuel C. Liston was a passenger in a vehicle sitting at a stop light that was hit by a vehicle operated by Defendant John E. Kainey, who had previously consumed a number of alcoholic beverages, such that an hour after the collision, his blood alcohol was measured at.328, over four times the legal limit. At the trial of this matter, the Defendant admitted that he was solely liable for the collision, and the case was bifurcated into a two-phase damages trial. The first phase was to determine the amount of the compensatory damages; and the second phase was to determine whether and to what extent the Defendant should pay punitive damages. In regard to compensatory damages, the Plaintiff argued that he had incurred medical bills in excess of $70, The Plaintiff argued that the incurred medical bills were prima facie evidence that the expenses were necessary and reasonable, and the Plaintiff therefore sought to recover the entire billed amount as his necessary and reasonable medical expenses. Conversely, the Defendant filed a Motion in Limine which asserted that only a portion of each medical bill had been paid either by the Plaintiff, or the Plaintiff s health insurance carrier. Specifically, the Defendant argued that the Plaintiff s medical bills were discounted, reduced, or adjusted downward, that the remaining unpaid portions of the medical bills were written off

5 summer 2014 Page 5 by the Plaintiff s medical providers, that the Plaintiff s damages should be limited to the amounts actually paid by the Plaintiff and the amounts actually paid on Plaintiff s behalf by a collateral source. The Circuit Court denied the Defendant s Motion in Limine, stating that the discounts or write-offs were a collateral source to the Plaintiff. Moreover, the Circuit Court reasoned that under the Collateral Source Rule, the Plaintiff was entitled to recover damages for the value of any reasonable and necessary medical services he received, whether such services were rendered gratuitously, or paid for by another. On appeal, the West Virginia Supreme Court of Appeals stated that the question presented to the Court concerns the process of how to calculate the reasonable value of the Plaintiff s medical services in light of the Collateral Source Rule. To that end, the Court provided a thorough analysis of the evolution of the Collateral Source Rule and West Virginia law, as well as the underlying public policy implications related thereto. Moreover, the Court stated that the status of the Collateral Source Rule in West Virginia requires that a person who is negligent and injures another owes to the latter full compensation for the injury inflicted and payment for such injury from a collateral source in no way relieves the wrongdoer of the obligation. In addition, the Court then cited the Restatement (2 nd ) of Torts, which identifies the four general categories of collateral benefits that should never be subtracted from a plaintiff s recovery as insurance policies, employment benefits, gratuities, and social legislation benefits. In light of these collateral sources and any other benefits received by a plaintiff, the Court stated that a tort defendant s liability can only be reduced by benefits received from the original tortfeasor, the tortfeasor s agent, or a joint tortfeasor. The Court further reasoned that a plaintiff may recover the full amount of his or her reasonable and necessary medical expenses regardless of how or even whether the Plaintiff s obligations to the medical provider was later discharged because the Plaintiff became liable for the bills when the services were received. Therefore, the Court held that the Collateral Source Rule protects the amounts discounted from the Plaintiff s medical bill or that amount which is written off by the medical provider because the amount of the medical expense that was discounted or written off can be considered both a benefit of the Plaintiff s bargain with his health insurance carrier, and a gratuitous benefit arising from the Plaintiff s bargain with the medical provider. In other words, a creditor s partial forgiveness of a tort victim s medical bills via write-down, is properly considered a third party payment, evidence of which is barred by the Collateral Source Rule. Finally, the Court further held that collateral source benefits are not subtracted from a plaintiff s recovery that applies to proceeds or benefits from sources such as insurance policies, whether maintained by the Plaintiff or a third party; employee benefits; services or benefits rendered gratuitously (whether free, discounted, or later written off); and social legislation benefits. The law does not differentiate between the nature of these collateral source benefits, so long as they did not come from the Defendant or a person acting for the Defendant. Practical implications of the Court s ruling in this matter are hard to predict at this point. Some may say that the Court s ruling will not impact the current practices of the plaintiff s bar in the plaintiff friendly venues of West Virginia state courts; however, it is not out of the question to believe that insurance companies may use the Court s ruling to strengthen their negotiating position for unpaid medical bills, such that the amount of write-offs decrease and their collections increase in matters which culminate in civil litigation. For more information about this article contact Gregory E. Kennedy at or (304) WHY THERE WILL ALWAYS BE LAWYERS... You Might Be A Lawyer If... You are charging someone for reading these jokes. The shortest sentence you have ever written was more than eighty words long.

6 summer 2014 Page 6 You have a daughter named Sue and a son named Bill. Your other car is a BMW. When you look in a mirror, you see a lawyer. When your wife says "I love you," you crossexamine her. s?page=4 WHERE WE VE BEEN... At the USLAW Spring Conference, Ami Dwyer spoke on Wrap Insurance Programs on a Construction Project April 3-5, Colin Bell attended the Trucking Boot Camp for the Claims Professional April 8, 2014 in Chicago, IL and April 10, 2014 in Dallas, TX. Tamara Goorevitz presented The Basics, Just the Basics regarding the provisions of Broker/Carrier/Shipper contracts at the Annual Conference of the Transportation Intermediaries Association in Tucson, AZ April 10, Steve Marshall attended the 2014 DRI Products Liability Seminar from April 9-11 in Phoenix, AZ. Colin Bell attended the Annual Conference of the Transportation Lawyers Association April 29- May 3, 2014 in St. Petersburg, FL. Kiran Rosen attended DRI s Retail and Hospitality Seminar in Chicago, IL May 15-16, Andrew Stephenson attended the Trucking Boot Camp for the Claims Professional May 21, 2014 in Atlanta, GA and May 22, 2014 in Orlando, FL. Steve Marshall, Andrew Stephenson, and Tamara Goorevitz attended the 2014 DRI Trucking Law Seminar in Las Vegas, NV June Colin Bell spoke at the Conference of Freight Counsel in Eagle, CO June 21-23, WHERE WE RE GOING... David Skomba and Andrew Stephenson will be presenting to various syndicates at Lloyds of London, in London, UK, September 3-6, M a r y l a n d s N o n - E c o n o m i c D a m a g e s C a p T a b l e Date of Accident Cap October 1, 2009 to September 30, 2010 $725,000 October 1, 2010 to September 30, 2011 $740,000 October 1, 2011 to September 30, 2012 $755,000 October 1, 2012 to September 30, 2013 $770,000 October 1, 2013 to September 30, 2014 $785,000 FRANKLIN & PROKOPIK 24-HOUR EMERGENCY RESPONSE Because accidents don't always happen during business hours, Franklin & Prokopik has a 24-hour emergency response system in place for those situations where immediate action is needed to protect your interests. If you would like copies of our emergency response cards, please contact Joan Hartman, our Marketing Director, at or call her at and she will be happy to provide them to you Maryland District of Columbia Delaware Florida Virginia West Virginia Speakers Available! We can provide presentations tailored to your specific needs and can satisfy your annual training requirement. Contact Joan Hartman, our Marketing Director, at to make arrangements.

7 summer 2014 Page 7 Attorney Direct Dial Adkins, Jr., Neal G Flynn, Brendan J McAfee, John P Skomba, David A Akpan, Imoh E Fowler, Bradley F McChrystal, Lynne K Stephenson, Andrew T Archibald, John K Goorevitz, Tamara B.* McGough, Timothy P.* Stone, Sally A Arnsdorf, Ralph L.* Green, Elizabeth A McKenzie, Laura S.* Story, David M Ayd, Jessica J.* Handscomb, John J.* Miller, Kara M Thompson, Barbara* Bell, Colin Helsel, Jennifer Ramey Murray, Jessica L Troese, Antonio S Bohrer, Carrie V Hoffman, Joshua M.* Neighbors, Helen D Ward, Cheryl A Cardile, Salvatore J Howell, Brandi R Patel, Archita N Zenkewicz, Kristine R Cole, Andrew L Hunt, Jr., Robert S Patel, Nirav Colvin, Shannon O Corso, Scarlett M Jackson, Maija B James, Jessica L Prokopik, Michael W Rahi, Simran *Admitted to D.C. Bar Cramer, A. Lauren Kennedy, Gregory E Randall, Jr., Albert B Crawford, William A King, Brittany L Rhodes, Kimberly P Dannenberg, Rebecca L.* Kozlowski, Angela G.* Rosen, Kiran Sharma* Dwyer, Ami C Lemmert, Sarah S Royer, Lauren M Erwin, Zachary L.* Litovitz, Erica L Rufe, John P.* Fenner, Natalie S.* Marshall, Stephen J Schantz, Melissa A Fitzpatrick, Lynn M Mayfield, Alex M Shevlin, Krista E First Initial Last

8 Quality Representation, Personal Service Franklin & Prokopik A Professional Corporation The B & O Building Two North Charles Street, Suite 600 Baltimore, Maryland F&P Liability Chronicle summer South Washington Street Suite 6 Easton, Maryland Facsimile Opal Court Hub Plaza, Second Floor Hagerstown, Maryland Facsimile Dulles Corner Boulevard Suite 1150 Herndon, Virginia Facsimile South Queen Street Second Floor Martinsburg, West Virginia Facsimile Highland Manor Drive Suite 200 Tampa, Florida Facsimile Delaware Avenue Suite 1210 Wilmington, Delaware Facsimile A Professional Corporation - Attorneys at Law Franklin & Prokopik. F&P Liability Chronicle is a quarterly publication of Franklin & Prokopik. This publication is not intended to provide legal advice. Specific questions regarding any legal issue should be addressed to counsel. All Rights Reserved.

v. Record No. 080751 OPINION BY JUSTICE BARBARA MILANO KEENAN June 4, 2009 LOUIS N. JOYNES, II, ET AL.

v. Record No. 080751 OPINION BY JUSTICE BARBARA MILANO KEENAN June 4, 2009 LOUIS N. JOYNES, II, ET AL. PRESENT: All the Justices LEO WILLIAMS v. Record No. 080751 OPINION BY JUSTICE BARBARA MILANO KEENAN June 4, 2009 LOUIS N. JOYNES, II, ET AL. FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE CITY OF PORTSMOUTH Dean W. Sword,

More information

PUBLICATION PROVIDED BY: RISSMAN, BARRETT, HURT DONAHUE & McLAIN, P.A.

PUBLICATION PROVIDED BY: RISSMAN, BARRETT, HURT DONAHUE & McLAIN, P.A. PUBLICATION PROVIDED BY: RISSMAN, BARRETT, HURT DONAHUE & McLAIN, P.A. 201 EAST PINE STREET 15 TH FLOOR P.O. BOX 4940 ORLANDO, FLORIDA 32802-4940 TELEPHONE (407) 839-0120 TELECOPIER (407) 841-9726 ORLANDO@RISSMAN.COM

More information

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Richmond Division

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Richmond Division PUBLISHED UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Richmond Division IN RE: WILLIAM G. DADE ) Case No. 00-32487 ANN E. DADE ) Chapter 7 Debtors. ) ) ) DEBORAH R. JOHNSON ) Adversary

More information

THE THREAT OF BAD FAITH LITIGATION ETHICAL HANDLING OF CLAIMS AND GOOD FAITH SETTLEMENT PRACTICES. By Craig R. White

THE THREAT OF BAD FAITH LITIGATION ETHICAL HANDLING OF CLAIMS AND GOOD FAITH SETTLEMENT PRACTICES. By Craig R. White THE THREAT OF BAD FAITH LITIGATION ETHICAL HANDLING OF CLAIMS AND GOOD FAITH SETTLEMENT PRACTICES By Craig R. White SKEDSVOLD & WHITE, LLC. 1050 Crown Pointe Parkway Suite 710 Atlanta, Georgia 30338 (770)

More information

Recent Case Update. www.pjmlaw.com 1. VOL. XXIII, NO. 2 Summer 2014

Recent Case Update. www.pjmlaw.com 1. VOL. XXIII, NO. 2 Summer 2014 Recent Case Update VOL. XXIII, NO. 2 Summer 2014 Legal Malpractice Attorney-Client Relationship Summary Judgment Williamson v. Schweiger (Court of Appeals, 13 AP 1777, July 1, 2014) (unpublished) Plaintiff

More information

In the Missouri Court of Appeals Eastern District DIVISION THREE

In the Missouri Court of Appeals Eastern District DIVISION THREE In the Missouri Court of Appeals Eastern District DIVISION THREE GERALD J. BAMBERGER, et al., ) No. ED92319 ) Appellants, ) ) Appeal from the Circuit Court vs. ) of St. Louis County ) 08SL-CC01435 CHARLES

More information

Reed Armstrong Quarterly

Reed Armstrong Quarterly Reed Armstrong Quarterly January 2009 http://www.reedarmstrong.com/default.asp Contributors: William B. Starnes II Tori L. Cox IN THIS ISSUE: Joint and Several Liability The Fault of Settled Tortfeasors

More information

RIGHT Lawyers. Stacy Rocheleau, Esq. Gary Thompson, Esq.

RIGHT Lawyers. Stacy Rocheleau, Esq. Gary Thompson, Esq. rightlawyers.com RIGHT Lawyers Right Lawyers has successfully represented numerous clients in the areas of car accidents, work injuries, and slip and falls. The goal of this guide is to provide you answers

More information

$24.55 4.4.12 2012 WL

$24.55 4.4.12 2012 WL Cook County Jury Awards $24.55 Million to Woman Paralyzed in Car Accident 4.4.12 This case was reported informally by Patrick Dowd, Chicago, Illinois attorney, and the jury verdict was reported by Westlaw

More information

CASE INFORMATION SHEET FLORIDA LEGAL PERIODICALS, INC. P.O. Box 3370, Tallahassee, FL 32315-3730 (904) 224-6649/(800) 446-2998 * FAX (850) 222-6266

CASE INFORMATION SHEET FLORIDA LEGAL PERIODICALS, INC. P.O. Box 3370, Tallahassee, FL 32315-3730 (904) 224-6649/(800) 446-2998 * FAX (850) 222-6266 CASE INFORMATION SHEET FLORIDA LEGAL PERIODICALS, INC. P.O. Box 3370, Tallahassee, FL 32315-3730 (904) 224-6649/(800) 446-2998 * FAX (850) 222-6266 COUNTY AND COURT: Pasco County Florida NAME OF CASE:

More information

Cardelli Lanfear P.C.

Cardelli Lanfear P.C. Michigan Prepared by Cardelli Lanfear P.C. 322 West Lincoln Royal Oak, MI 48067 Tel: 248.850.2179 Fax: 248.544.1191 1. Introduction History of Tort Reform in Michigan Michigan was one of the first states

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2012-CA-01714-SCT

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2012-CA-01714-SCT IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI MEMORIAL HOSPITAL AT GULFPORT v. NO. 2012-CA-01714-SCT IN THE MATTER OF THE GUARDIANSHIP OF NICHOLAS PROULX, A MINOR BY AND THROUGH HIS FATHER, TIMOTHY PROULX AND HOPE

More information

trial court and Court of Appeals found that the Plaintiff's case was barred by the statute of limitations.

trial court and Court of Appeals found that the Plaintiff's case was barred by the statute of limitations. RESULTS Appellate Court upholds decision that malpractice action barred September 2, 2015 The South Carolina Court of Appeals recently upheld a summary judgment obtained by David Overstreet and Mike McCall

More information

112 Ohio St.3d 17, 2006 Ohio 6362 (December 20, 2006).

112 Ohio St.3d 17, 2006 Ohio 6362 (December 20, 2006). I. ROBINSON V.BATES, 112 Ohio St.3d 17, 2006 Ohio 6362 (December 20, 2006). A. Landlord-tenant case In Hamilton County, Ohio, Plaintiff tenant sued her landlord for personal injuries caused when she broke

More information

STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, THIRD CIRCUIT 03-987 **********

STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, THIRD CIRCUIT 03-987 ********** STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, THIRD CIRCUIT 03-987 LAWANDA THEODILE VERSUS RPM PIZZA, INC. ********** APPEAL FROM THE OFFICE OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION - # 4 PARISH OF LAFAYETTE, NO. 03-02178 SHARON

More information

2005-C -2496 CHARLES ALBERT AND DENISE ALBERT v. FARM BUREAU INSURANCE COMPANY, ET AL. (Parish of Lafayette)

2005-C -2496 CHARLES ALBERT AND DENISE ALBERT v. FARM BUREAU INSURANCE COMPANY, ET AL. (Parish of Lafayette) FOR IMMEDIATE NEWS RELEASE NEWS RELEASE # 0 FROM: CLERK OF SUPREME COURT OF LOUISIANA The Opinions handed down on the 17th day of October, 200, are as follows: PER CURIAM: 2005-C -249 CHARLES ALBERT AND

More information

Amy S. Harris Shareholder

Amy S. Harris Shareholder Shareholder Amy Harris joined Macdonald Devin in 1989 and represents clients in state and federal trial and appellate courts, primarily in insurance defense litigation and insurance coverage. She has served

More information

CIVIL DIVISION PLAINTIFF S PROPOSED JURY INSTRUCTIONS. The Plaintiff, JENNIFER WINDISCH, by and through undersigned counsel, and

CIVIL DIVISION PLAINTIFF S PROPOSED JURY INSTRUCTIONS. The Plaintiff, JENNIFER WINDISCH, by and through undersigned counsel, and IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 16TH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR MONROE COUNTY, FLORIDA JENNIFER WINDISCH, Plaintiff, v. CIVIL DIVISION CASE NO: 2007-CA-1174-K JOHN SUNDIN, M.D., RHODA SMITH, M.D., LAURRAURI

More information

Illinois Supreme Court Requires Plaintiff to Apportion Settlements Among Successive Tortfeasors

Illinois Supreme Court Requires Plaintiff to Apportion Settlements Among Successive Tortfeasors Illinois Supreme Court Requires Plaintiff to Apportion Settlements Among Successive Tortfeasors By: Joseph B. Carini III & Catherine H. Reiter Cole, Grasso, Fencl & Skinner, Ltd. Illinois Courts have long

More information

Illinois Injury Guide. INJURY LAW OFFICES Toll Free (866) 891-9211

Illinois Injury Guide. INJURY LAW OFFICES Toll Free (866) 891-9211 Illinois Injury Guide INJURY LAW OFFICES Toll Free (866) 891-9211 Woodruff Johnson & Palermo is a law firm that represents injury victims and their families. Our experienced legal team will help you like

More information

****************************************************** The officially released date that appears near the beginning of each opinion is the date the

****************************************************** The officially released date that appears near the beginning of each opinion is the date the ****************************************************** The officially released date that appears near the beginning of each opinion is the date the opinion will be published in the Connecticut Law Journal

More information

2013 IL App (3d) 120130-U. Order filed September 23, 2013 IN THE APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS THIRD DISTRICT A.D., 2013

2013 IL App (3d) 120130-U. Order filed September 23, 2013 IN THE APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS THIRD DISTRICT A.D., 2013 NOTICE: This order was filed under Supreme Court Rule 23 and may not be cited as precedent by any party except in the limited circumstances allowed under Rule 23(e)(1). 2013 IL App (3d) 120130-U Order

More information

Chapter 4 Crimes (Review)

Chapter 4 Crimes (Review) Chapter 4 Crimes (Review) On a separate sheet of paper, write down the answer to the following Q s; if you do not know the answer, write down the Q. 1. What is a crime? 2. There are elements of a crime.

More information

Personal Injury Litigation

Personal Injury Litigation Personal Injury Litigation The Anatomy of a New York Personal Injury Lawsuit An ebook by Stuart DiMartini, Esq. 1325 Sixth Avenue, 27 th Floor New York, NY 10019 212-5181532 dimartinilaw.com Introduction

More information

PRESENT: Hassell, C.J., Keenan, Koontz, Kinser, Lemons, and Agee, JJ., and Stephenson, S.J.

PRESENT: Hassell, C.J., Keenan, Koontz, Kinser, Lemons, and Agee, JJ., and Stephenson, S.J. PRESENT: Hassell, C.J., Keenan, Koontz, Kinser, Lemons, and Agee, JJ., and Stephenson, S.J. TAMELA H. WEBB OPINION BY v. Record No. 071008 SENIOR JUSTICE ROSCOE B. STEPHENSON, JR. June 6, 2008 CHARLES

More information

JUSTICE COURT # 2 GRAHAM COUNTY STATE OF ARIZONA P.O. BOX 1159, 136 WEST CENTER STREET, PIMA AZ 85543 PHONE (928) 485-2771 FAX (928) 485-9961

JUSTICE COURT # 2 GRAHAM COUNTY STATE OF ARIZONA P.O. BOX 1159, 136 WEST CENTER STREET, PIMA AZ 85543 PHONE (928) 485-2771 FAX (928) 485-9961 JUSTICE COURT # 2 GRAHAM COUNTY STATE OF ARIZONA P.O. BOX 1159, 136 WEST CENTER STREET, PIMA AZ 85543 PHONE (928) 485-2771 FAX (928) 485-9961 SMALL CLAIMS INSTRUCTIONS FOR FILING ***EFFECTIVE JANUARY 1,

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION EIGHT

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION EIGHT Filed 10/11/13 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION EIGHT ED AGUILAR, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. B238853 (Los Angeles County

More information

FEATURE ARTICLE Evidence of Prior Injury. Admissibility of Evidence of Prior Injury Under the Same Part of the Body Rule

FEATURE ARTICLE Evidence of Prior Injury. Admissibility of Evidence of Prior Injury Under the Same Part of the Body Rule FEATURE ARTICLE Evidence of Prior Injury Admissibility of Evidence of Prior Injury Under the Same Part of the Body Rule By: Timothy J. Harris Broderick, Steiger, Maisel & Zupancic, Chicago I. Introduction

More information

NPH INJURY REPORT. Personal Injury Legal Update & Benefits for NEPBA Members COPYRIGHT 2009, NOLAN PERRONI HARRINGTON, LLP. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.

NPH INJURY REPORT. Personal Injury Legal Update & Benefits for NEPBA Members COPYRIGHT 2009, NOLAN PERRONI HARRINGTON, LLP. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. NPH INJURY REPORT Personal Injury Legal Update & Benefits for NEPBA Members Economic Recovery for the Injured Law Enforcement Professional Some Important Facts There are several common sources of recovery

More information

Agents E&O Standard of Care Project

Agents E&O Standard of Care Project Agents E&O Standard of Care Project Survey Maryland To gain a deeper understanding of the differing agent duties and standard of care by state, the Big I Professional Liability Program and Swiss Re Corporate

More information

JENNIFER (COLMAN) JACOBI MMG INSURANCE COMPANY. in the Superior Court (Hancock County, Cuddy, J.) in favor of Jennifer (Colman)

JENNIFER (COLMAN) JACOBI MMG INSURANCE COMPANY. in the Superior Court (Hancock County, Cuddy, J.) in favor of Jennifer (Colman) MAINE SUPREME JUDICIAL COURT Decision: 2011 ME 56 Docket: Han-10-526 Argued: April 12, 2011 Decided: May 10, 2011 Reporter of Decisions Panel: SAUFLEY, C.J., and ALEXANDER, SILVER, MEAD, GORMAN, and JABAR,

More information

SLOANE AND WALSH, LLP FALL LAW UPDATE 2012

SLOANE AND WALSH, LLP FALL LAW UPDATE 2012 BAD FAITH UPDATE: MASSACHUSETTS Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court determines underlying judgment is measure of damages for excess insurer s bad faith. Rhodes v. AIG Domestic Claims, Inc., 461 MA 486

More information

Defendant has a duty to act as a reasonable person would in like or similar circumstances to avoid causing unreasonable risk of harm to others.

Defendant has a duty to act as a reasonable person would in like or similar circumstances to avoid causing unreasonable risk of harm to others. NEGLIGENCE (Heavily Tested) (Write On the Bar): In order for Plaintiff to recover in Negligence, she or he must plead and prove: DUTY, BREACH OF DUTY, ACTUAL CAUSATION, PROXIMATE CAUSATION, AND DAMAGES.

More information

Quality Representation, Personal Service

Quality Representation, Personal Service LIABILITY CHRONICLE THE LIABILITY NEWSLETTER OF FRANKLIN & PROKOPIK Editor: Stephen J. Marshall Fall 2015 Franklin & Prokopik UPCOMING EVENTS THE PHANTOM MENACE OF PREMISES LIABILITY CLAIMS October 22,

More information

ATTORNEY HELP CENTER: MEDICAL MALPRACTICE

ATTORNEY HELP CENTER: MEDICAL MALPRACTICE ATTORNEY HELP CENTER: MEDICAL MALPRACTICE The healthcare industry has exploded over the last thirty years. Combined with an increasing elderly population, thanks to the Baby Boomer generation, the general

More information

Professional Practice 544

Professional Practice 544 February 15, 2016 Professional Practice 544 Tort Law and Insurance Michael J. Hanahan Schiff Hardin LLP 233 S. Wacker, Ste. 6600 Chicago, IL 60606 312-258-5701 mhanahan@schiffhardin.com Schiff Hardin LLP.

More information

STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, THIRD CIRCUIT 12-107 ************

STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, THIRD CIRCUIT 12-107 ************ STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, THIRD CIRCUIT 12-107 THELMA M. HODGES AND MARCUS J. McCOY VERSUS MICHAEL A. TAYLOR ************ APPEAL FROM THE THIRTY-FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT PARISH OF JEFFERSON

More information

IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA Clyde Kennedy, : Petitioner : : v. : No. 1649 C.D. 2012 : Submitted: May 17, 2013 Workers Compensation Appeal : Board (Henry Modell & Co., Inc.), : Respondent

More information

FARAH & FARAH RULES OF LAW

FARAH & FARAH RULES OF LAW RULES OF LAW Injury Case Roadmap: The Legal Process for Personal Injury Cases BY EDDIE E. FARAH & CHARLIE E. FARAH, ATTORNEYS AT LAW ...insurance companies more and more are being run by bean counters,...

More information

No. 64,825. [January 10, 1985] So.2d 1041 (Fla. 2d DCA 1984), which the district court has

No. 64,825. [January 10, 1985] So.2d 1041 (Fla. 2d DCA 1984), which the district court has .. No. 64,825 FIDELITY AND CASUALTY COMPANY OF NEW YORK, Petitioner, v. JAMES L. COPE, as personal representative of the ESTATE OF ANNA L. COPE, deceased, Respondent. [January 10, 1985] McDONALD, J. We

More information

ANSWER A TO QUESTION 8

ANSWER A TO QUESTION 8 ANSWER A TO QUESTION 8 Q-1 Torts Barb v. Adam Negligence Per Se - See under Breach. (defined intra) Crossing the double line - excusable NEGLIGENCE Negligence where a duty is owed and that duty is breached

More information

Attorneys at Law. Telephone: (312) 262 6700 Facsimile: (312) 262 6710. 30 N LaSalle Street Suite 1524 Chicago, IL 60602. www.mossingnavarrelaw.

Attorneys at Law. Telephone: (312) 262 6700 Facsimile: (312) 262 6710. 30 N LaSalle Street Suite 1524 Chicago, IL 60602. www.mossingnavarrelaw. 30 N LaSalle Street Suite 1524 Chicago, IL 60602 Telephone: (312) 262 6700 Facsimile: (312) 262 6710 Attorneys at Law THE FIRM With over 40 years of combined litigation experience, Adria Mossing and Jim

More information

RENDERED: FEBRUARY 8, 2008; 10:00 A.M. NOT TO BE PUBLISHED Commonwealth Of Kentucky Court of Appeals NO. 2006-CA-002347-MR DEBRA LYNN FITZGERALD

RENDERED: FEBRUARY 8, 2008; 10:00 A.M. NOT TO BE PUBLISHED Commonwealth Of Kentucky Court of Appeals NO. 2006-CA-002347-MR DEBRA LYNN FITZGERALD RENDERED: FEBRUARY 8, 2008; 10:00 A.M. NOT TO BE PUBLISHED Commonwealth Of Kentucky Court of Appeals NO. 2006-CA-002347-MR DEBRA LYNN FITZGERALD APPELLANT APPEAL FROM WARREN CIRCUIT COURT v. HONORABLE

More information

Notice of Collective Action and Opportunity to Join

Notice of Collective Action and Opportunity to Join Notice of Collective Action and Opportunity to Join THIS NOTICE MAY AFFECT YOUR RIGHTS PLEASE READ CAREFULLY To: Former Federal Bureau of Investigation ( FBI ) trainees who attended New Agent ( NA ) training

More information

CASE NO. 1D09-2525. Robert B. George and Christian P. George of Liles, Gavin, Costantino, George & Dearing, P. A., Jacksonville, for Appellees.

CASE NO. 1D09-2525. Robert B. George and Christian P. George of Liles, Gavin, Costantino, George & Dearing, P. A., Jacksonville, for Appellees. IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA CINDY L. SOREL, n/k/a CINDY L. EBNER, CASE NO. 1D09-2525 Appellant, v. TROY CHARLES KOONCE and COMCAST OF GREATER FLORIDA/GEORGIA, INC.,

More information

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE NINTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR ORANGE COUNTY, FLORIDA

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE NINTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR ORANGE COUNTY, FLORIDA IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE NINTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR ORANGE COUNTY, FLORIDA PROGRESSIVE AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY, CASE NO.: 2014-CV-000079-A-O Lower Case No.: 2012-SC-002127-O Appellant, v.

More information

-----------------.----------------------------------------a-ax

-----------------.----------------------------------------a-ax SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF BRONX: PART IA-3 -----------------.----------------------------------------a-ax ~YSOroANO. : Plaintiff, ALDOINOA, LSB LECTRIC CORP., and THE CITY OF NEW

More information

Recent Case Update. Insurance Stacking UIM Westra v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company (Court of Appeals, 13 AP 48, June 18, 2013)

Recent Case Update. Insurance Stacking UIM Westra v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company (Court of Appeals, 13 AP 48, June 18, 2013) Recent Case Update VOL. XXII, NO. 2 Summer 2013 Insurance Summary Judgment Stacking UIM Saladin v. Progressive Northern Insurance Company (Court of Appeals, 12 AP 1649, June 4, 2013) On August 26, 2010,

More information

FORC QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF INSURANCE LAW AND REGULATION

FORC QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF INSURANCE LAW AND REGULATION The plaintiff in Schmidt filed suit against her employer, Personalized Audio Visual, Inc. ("PAV") and PAV s president, Dennis Smith ("Smith"). 684 A.2d at 68. Her Complaint alleged several causes of action

More information

Managing Jones Act Personal Injury Litigation The Vessel Owner s Perspective. Lawrence R. DeMarcay, III

Managing Jones Act Personal Injury Litigation The Vessel Owner s Perspective. Lawrence R. DeMarcay, III Managing Jones Act Personal Injury Litigation The Vessel Owner s Perspective by Lawrence R. DeMarcay, III Presented to the Offshore Marine Services Association / Loyola College of Law Industry Seminar

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF IOWA

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF IOWA IN THE SUPREME COURT OF IOWA No. 08 1635 Filed February 4, 2011 TIMOTHY L. MERRIAM, An Individual; JUSTINE MERRIAM, Both Individually and as Next Friend of CHRISTOPHER MERRIAM, A Minor, KAYLA MERRIAM,

More information

No. 06SC558, Morris v. Goodwin: -- civil substantive issues -- damages -- interest. The Colorado Supreme Court reverses the court of appeals

No. 06SC558, Morris v. Goodwin: -- civil substantive issues -- damages -- interest. The Colorado Supreme Court reverses the court of appeals Opinions of the Colorado Supreme Court are available to the public and can be accessed through the Court s homepage at http://www.courts.state.co.us/supct/supctcaseannctsindex.htm and are posted on the

More information

2013 IL App (1st) 120898-U. No. 1-12-0898

2013 IL App (1st) 120898-U. No. 1-12-0898 2013 IL App (1st) 120898-U FOURTH DIVISION March 28, 2013 No. 1-12-0898 NOTICE: This order was filed under Supreme Court Rule 23 and may not be cited as precedent by any party except in the limited circumstances

More information

PREVIEW. 1. The following form may be used to file a personal injury lawsuit.

PREVIEW. 1. The following form may be used to file a personal injury lawsuit. Information or instructions: Plaintiff's original petition-auto accident 1. The following form may be used to file a personal injury lawsuit. 2. It assumes several plaintiffs were rear-ended by an employee

More information

Recent Case Update. VOL. XXIV, NO. 2 Summer 2015

Recent Case Update. VOL. XXIV, NO. 2 Summer 2015 Recent Case Update VOL. XXIV, NO. 2 Summer 2015 Wrongful Death Survival Claims Statute of Limitations Christ v. Exxon Mobil Corporation, (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 12 AP 1493, June 23, 2015) The estates

More information

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT JANUARY TERM 2008. v. Case No. 5D07-1738

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT JANUARY TERM 2008. v. Case No. 5D07-1738 IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT JANUARY TERM 2008 OCALA JOCKEY CLUB, LLC, DANIEL L. CASE, ET AL., Appellants, v. Case No. 5D07-1738 RANDY ROGERS, Appellee. / Opinion

More information

Supreme Court of Florida

Supreme Court of Florida Supreme Court of Florida No. SC02-2659 CYNTHIA CLEFF NORMAN, Petitioner, vs. TERRI LAMARRIA FARROW, Respondent. [June 24, 2004] WELLS, J. We have for review Norman v. Farrow, 832 So. 2d 158 (Fla. 1st DCA

More information

[The Maryland statutory provisions regulating motor vehicle insurance, Maryland Code

[The Maryland statutory provisions regulating motor vehicle insurance, Maryland Code No. 122, September Term, 1999 Barry W. Lewis v. Allstate Insurance Company [The Maryland statutory provisions regulating motor vehicle insurance, Maryland Code (1997, 2001 Supp.), 19-501 et seq. of the

More information

Update on SB3, The Georgia Tort Reform Law (Updated 3/22/2010)

Update on SB3, The Georgia Tort Reform Law (Updated 3/22/2010) Update on SB3, The Georgia Tort Reform Law (Updated 3/22/2010) Table of Contents: I. Damage Caps (O.C.G.A. 51-13-1) II. Joint and Several Liability (O.C.G.A. 51-12-31 and 51-12-33) III. Emergency Care

More information

Injury Law Attorney Clearwater - New Port Richey - Tampa Bay

Injury Law Attorney Clearwater - New Port Richey - Tampa Bay Injury Law Attorney Clearwater - New Port Richey - Tampa Bay You need an aggressive injury lawyer to fight for your rights WHAT IS INJURY LAW? Injury Law is what an injury attorney would refer to as Tort

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS NO. 13-1006 IN RE ESSEX INSURANCE COMPANY, RELATOR ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS PER CURIAM Rafael Zuniga sued San Diego Tortilla (SDT) for personal injuries and then added

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF INDIANA

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF INDIANA Pursuant to Ind.Appellate Rule 65(D), this Memorandum Decision shall not be regarded as precedent or cited before any court except for the purpose of establishing the defense of res judicata, collateral

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF INDIANA

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF INDIANA Pursuant to Ind.Appellate Rule 65(D), this Memorandum Decision shall not be regarded as precedent or cited before any court except for the purpose of establishing the defense of res judicata, collateral

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE ROGER HAUTH, Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 00-166-JJF ROBERT P. LOBUE, ESQUIRE, Defendant. Kevin William Gibson, Esquire of Gibson & Perkins,

More information

Kenneth B. Walton Senior Partner, Chair, Employment Practices Group kwalton@donovanhatem.com 617-406-4524 direct 617-406-4501 fax

Kenneth B. Walton Senior Partner, Chair, Employment Practices Group kwalton@donovanhatem.com 617-406-4524 direct 617-406-4501 fax Kenneth B. Walton Senior Partner, Chair, Employment Practices Group kwalton@donovanhatem.com 617-406-4524 direct 617-406-4501 fax Experience Kenneth B. Walton is a Founding Partner of the Boston-based

More information

Illinois Official Reports

Illinois Official Reports Illinois Official Reports Appellate Court Acuity v. Decker, 2015 IL App (2d) 150192 Appellate Court Caption ACUITY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. DONALD DECKER, Defendant- Appellee (Groot Industries, Inc., Defendant).

More information

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT. No. 08-1412. In re: GEORGE W. COLE, Debtor. CITY OF WILKES-BARRE, Appellant v.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT. No. 08-1412. In re: GEORGE W. COLE, Debtor. CITY OF WILKES-BARRE, Appellant v. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT NOT PRECEDENTIAL No. 08-1412 In re: GEORGE W. COLE, Debtor CITY OF WILKES-BARRE, Appellant v. ROBERT P. SHEILS, Jr., Trustee On Appeal from the United

More information

Kenneth B. Walton Partner, Chair, Employment Practices Group Member, Executive Committee kwalton@donovanhatem.com 617-406-4524 direct 617-406-4501 fax

Kenneth B. Walton Partner, Chair, Employment Practices Group Member, Executive Committee kwalton@donovanhatem.com 617-406-4524 direct 617-406-4501 fax Kenneth B. Walton Partner, Chair, Employment Practices Group Member, Executive Committee kwalton@donovanhatem.com 617-406-4524 direct 617-406-4501 fax Experience Kenneth B. Walton is a Founding Partner

More information

2014 IL App (1st) 122440-U. No. 1-12-2440 IN THE APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT

2014 IL App (1st) 122440-U. No. 1-12-2440 IN THE APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT 2014 IL App (1st) 122440-U SECOND DIVISION July 29, 2014 No. 1-12-2440 NOTICE: This order was filed under Supreme Court Rule 23 and may not be cited as precedent by any party except in the limited circumstances

More information

ASSEMBLY BILL No. 597

ASSEMBLY BILL No. 597 AMENDED IN ASSEMBLY APRIL 14, 2015 california legislature 2015 16 regular session ASSEMBLY BILL No. 597 Introduced by Assembly Member Cooley February 24, 2015 An act to amend Sections 36 and 877 of, and

More information

LOUISIANA PERSONAL INJURY ACCIDENT BASICS

LOUISIANA PERSONAL INJURY ACCIDENT BASICS LOUISIANA PERSONAL INJURY ACCIDENT BASICS The Concept of Negligence If you have been injured, only an experienced Louisiana personal injury accident attorney can evaluate the unique facts and circumstances

More information

Lowcountry Injury Law

Lowcountry Injury Law Lowcountry Injury Law 1917 Lovejoy Street Post Office Drawer 850 Beaufort, South Carolina 29901 Personal Injury Phone (843) 524-9445 Auto Accidents Fax (843) 532-9254 Workers Comp DanDenton@Lawyer.com

More information

DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS. No. 03-CV-1445. Appeal from the Superior Court of the District of Columbia (CA-3748-02)

DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS. No. 03-CV-1445. Appeal from the Superior Court of the District of Columbia (CA-3748-02) Notice: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the Atlantic and Maryland Reporters. Users are requested to notify the Clerk of the Court of any formal errors so that corrections

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA VERA WILLNER, ET AL. V. MANPOWER INC., CASE NO. 3:11-CV-02846-JST (MEJ)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA VERA WILLNER, ET AL. V. MANPOWER INC., CASE NO. 3:11-CV-02846-JST (MEJ) UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA VERA WILLNER, ET AL. V. MANPOWER INC., CASE NO. 3:11-CV-02846-JST (MEJ) IMPORTANT: You are not being sued. Please read this Notice carefully.

More information

MASSACHUSETTS INSURANCE LAW UPDATE

MASSACHUSETTS INSURANCE LAW UPDATE THE MCCORMACK FIRM, LLC ATTORNEYS AT LAW MASSACHUSETTS INSURANCE LAW UPDATE Plaintiff Awarded in Excess of $1 Million For Insurer s Failure to Settle Automobile Liability Claim Within $20,000 Policy Limits

More information

PRACTICE GUIDELINES MEMORANDUM. RE: Sample Bankruptcy Motions and Orders for Personal Injury Practitioners and Trustees

PRACTICE GUIDELINES MEMORANDUM. RE: Sample Bankruptcy Motions and Orders for Personal Injury Practitioners and Trustees PRACTICE GUIDELINES MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: Attorneys Practicing Before Me And Other Interested Persons C. Timothy Corcoran, III United States Bankruptcy Judge DATE: January 3, 2000 1 RE: Sample Bankruptcy

More information

CASE INFORMATION SHEET FLORIDA LEGAL PERIODICALS, INC. P.O. Box 3370, Tallahassee, FL 32315-3730 (904) 224-6649/(800) 446-2998 * FAX (850) 222-6266

CASE INFORMATION SHEET FLORIDA LEGAL PERIODICALS, INC. P.O. Box 3370, Tallahassee, FL 32315-3730 (904) 224-6649/(800) 446-2998 * FAX (850) 222-6266 CASE INFORMATION SHEET FLORIDA LEGAL PERIODICALS, INC. P.O. Box 3370, Tallahassee, FL 32315-3730 (904) 224-6649/(800) 446-2998 * FAX (850) 222-6266 COUNTY AND COURT: IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 18TH JUDICIAL

More information

STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS

STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS BUDDY JOHNSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, UNPUBLISHED August 20, 1999 and NANCY JOHNSON, Plaintiff, v JAMES K. FETT and MUTH & FETT, P.C., No. 207351 Washtenaw Circuit Court

More information

CAUSE NO. 02-01125-J CHARLES DURHAM IN THE 191ST DISTRICT COURT LARVAN PERAILTA DALLAS COUNTY, TEXAS PLAINTIFF S MOTION TO RECOVER EXPENSES OF PROOF

CAUSE NO. 02-01125-J CHARLES DURHAM IN THE 191ST DISTRICT COURT LARVAN PERAILTA DALLAS COUNTY, TEXAS PLAINTIFF S MOTION TO RECOVER EXPENSES OF PROOF CAUSE NO. 02-01125-J CHARLES DURHAM IN THE 191ST DISTRICT COURT VS. LARVAN PERAILTA DALLAS COUNTY, TEXAS PLAINTIFF S MOTION TO RECOVER EXPENSES OF PROOF TO THE HONORABLE COURT: Comes Now, Charles Durham,

More information

2015 IL App (1st) 141985-U. No. 1-14-1985 IN THE APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT

2015 IL App (1st) 141985-U. No. 1-14-1985 IN THE APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT 2015 IL App (1st) 141985-U No. 1-14-1985 NOTICE: This order was filed under Supreme Court Rule 23 and may not be cited as precedent by any party except in the limited circumstances allowed under Rule 23(e)(1).

More information

NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION

NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. DARYL A. WILLIAMS, v. Plaintiff-Appellant, COUNTY OF SOMERSET, COUNTY OF SOMERSET

More information

What to expect when you are injured in a New York accident!

What to expect when you are injured in a New York accident! What to expect when you are injured in a New York accident! An ebook by Stuart DiMartini 1325 Sixth Avenue, 27 th Floor New York, NY 10019 dimartinilaw.com 2012 Law Offices of Stuart DiMartini P a g e

More information

FECA 8131. FECA and Third Party Subrogation. It s really a Statutory RIGHT OF REIMBURSEMENT FECA THIRD PARTY REQUIREMENTS

FECA 8131. FECA and Third Party Subrogation. It s really a Statutory RIGHT OF REIMBURSEMENT FECA THIRD PARTY REQUIREMENTS FECA and Third Party Subrogation It s really a Statutory RIGHT OF REIMBURSEMENT Session 4 Federal Workers Compensation Conference 2012 Cathy Carter and Paul Klingenberg Department of Labor Office of Solicitor,

More information

CITY OF DELAND FLORIDA. REQUEST FOR COMMISSION ACTION August 2 2010

CITY OF DELAND FLORIDA. REQUEST FOR COMMISSION ACTION August 2 2010 Department Legal CITY OF DELAND FLORIDA REQUEST FOR COMMISSION ACTION August 2 2010 Attachments SUBJECT Consideration re Settlement X Correspondence regarding David Johnson deceased Prepared by Darren

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2004-CA-01391-COA

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2004-CA-01391-COA IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2004-CA-01391-COA PEGGY HUDSON FISHER APPELLANT v. WILLIAM DEER, GANNETT MS CORP. AND GANNETT RIVER STATES PUBLISHING CORP. D/B/A THE HATTIESBURG

More information

STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A13-1110. Faron L. Clark, Respondent, vs. Sheri Connor, et al., Defendants, Vydell Jones, Appellant.

STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A13-1110. Faron L. Clark, Respondent, vs. Sheri Connor, et al., Defendants, Vydell Jones, Appellant. STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A13-1110 Faron L. Clark, Respondent, vs. Sheri Connor, et al., Defendants, Vydell Jones, Appellant. Filed January 21, 2014 Affirmed Hooten, Judge Cass County District

More information

THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE. APPEAL OF GEORGE D. GAMAS (New Hampshire Compensation Appeals Board)

THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE. APPEAL OF GEORGE D. GAMAS (New Hampshire Compensation Appeals Board) NOTICE: This opinion is subject to motions for rehearing under Rule 22 as well as formal revision before publication in the New Hampshire Reports. Readers are requested to notify the Reporter, Supreme

More information

S13G1048. CARTER v. PROGRESSIVE MOUNTAIN INSURANCE. This Court granted a writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals in Carter

S13G1048. CARTER v. PROGRESSIVE MOUNTAIN INSURANCE. This Court granted a writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals in Carter 295 Ga. 487 FINAL COPY S13G1048. CARTER v. PROGRESSIVE MOUNTAIN INSURANCE. HINES, Presiding Justice. This Court granted a writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals in Carter v. Progressive Mountain Ins.,

More information

FILED December 15, 2015 Carla Bender 4 th District Appellate Court, IL

FILED December 15, 2015 Carla Bender 4 th District Appellate Court, IL NOTICE This order was filed under Supreme Court Rule 23 and may not be cited as precedent by any party except in the limited circumstances allowed under Rule 23(e(1. 2015 IL App (4th 150225-U NO. 4-15-0225

More information

AMENDED COMPLAINT. Plaintiff THOMAS J. BARRY hereby files this Complaint for damages against

AMENDED COMPLAINT. Plaintiff THOMAS J. BARRY hereby files this Complaint for damages against IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 15TH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY FLORIDA CASE NO: CA 02-12996AJ THOMAS J. BARRY, vs. Plaintiff, GEICO GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant. / AMENDED COMPLAINT

More information

2014 IL App (1st) 123454-U No. 1-12-3454 February 11, 2014 Modified Upon Rehearing April 30, 2014 IN THE APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS FIRST DISTRICT

2014 IL App (1st) 123454-U No. 1-12-3454 February 11, 2014 Modified Upon Rehearing April 30, 2014 IN THE APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS FIRST DISTRICT 2014 IL App (1st) 123454-U No. 1-12-3454 February 11, 2014 Modified Upon Rehearing April 30, 2014 THIRD DIVISION NOTICE: This order was filed under Supreme Court Rule 23 and may not be cited as precedent

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION FIVE

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION FIVE Filed 10/22/99 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION FIVE DILLON BOLTON, Plaintiff and Appellant, B123278 (Super. Ct. No. SC037295)

More information

2013 IL App (1st) 120546-U. No. 1-12-0546 IN THE APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT

2013 IL App (1st) 120546-U. No. 1-12-0546 IN THE APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT 2013 IL App (1st) 120546-U Third Division March 13, 2013 No. 1-12-0546 NOTICE: This order was filed under Supreme Court Rule 23 and may not be cited as precedent by any party except in the limited circumstances

More information

2015 IL App (3d) 130003-U. Order filed February 5, 2015 IN THE APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS THIRD DISTRICT A.D., 2015

2015 IL App (3d) 130003-U. Order filed February 5, 2015 IN THE APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS THIRD DISTRICT A.D., 2015 NOTICE: This order was filed under Supreme Court Rule 23 and may not be cited as precedent by any party except in the limited circumstances allowed under Rule 23(e(1. 2015 IL App (3d 130003-U Order filed

More information

RECENT DEVELOPMENTS IN MCS-90 ENDORSEMENTS FOR TRUCK INSURANCE

RECENT DEVELOPMENTS IN MCS-90 ENDORSEMENTS FOR TRUCK INSURANCE RECENT DEVELOPMENTS IN MCS-90 ENDORSEMENTS FOR TRUCK INSURANCE - By - Martin B. Adams Kopff, Nardelli & Dopf LLC www.kndny.com December 1, 2005 Truckers involved in interstate trucking activities are subject

More information

Illinois Fund Doctrine

Illinois Fund Doctrine Illinois Fund Doctrine Illinois Association of Defense Trial Counsel By: Michael Todd Scott State Farm Insurance Company, Bloomington The Illinois Fund Doctrine, Can It Be Avoided? I. Introduction Since

More information

SOUTHERN INSURANCE COMPANY OF VIRGINIA OPINION BY v. Record No. 011583 JUSTICE LAWRENCE L. KOONTZ, JR. April 19, 2002 JOHN A. WILLIAMS, ET AL.

SOUTHERN INSURANCE COMPANY OF VIRGINIA OPINION BY v. Record No. 011583 JUSTICE LAWRENCE L. KOONTZ, JR. April 19, 2002 JOHN A. WILLIAMS, ET AL. Present: All the Justices SOUTHERN INSURANCE COMPANY OF VIRGINIA OPINION BY v. Record No. 011583 JUSTICE LAWRENCE L. KOONTZ, JR. April 19, 2002 JOHN A. WILLIAMS, ET AL. FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF CAMPBELL

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON October 11, 2005 Session

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON October 11, 2005 Session IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON October 11, 2005 Session M&M AUTO SALES v. OLD REPUBLIC SURETY COMPANY v. BROOKS ROAD AUTO MART, LLC; BROOKS ROAD AUTO MART LLC D/B/A MEMPHIS AUTO WORLD;

More information

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Columbia County. Paul S. Bryan, Judge.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Columbia County. Paul S. Bryan, Judge. IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellant, NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF

More information

RICHARD D. FIORUCCI, ET AL. OPINION BY v. Record No. 131869 JUSTICE ELIZABETH A. McCLANAHAN OCTOBER 31, 2014 STEPHEN CHINN

RICHARD D. FIORUCCI, ET AL. OPINION BY v. Record No. 131869 JUSTICE ELIZABETH A. McCLANAHAN OCTOBER 31, 2014 STEPHEN CHINN PRESENT: All the Justices RICHARD D. FIORUCCI, ET AL. OPINION BY v. Record No. 131869 JUSTICE ELIZABETH A. McCLANAHAN OCTOBER 31, 2014 STEPHEN CHINN FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE CITY OF ALEXANDRIA James

More information