Health Insurance Lecture s notes (Syllabus) by Aldona Skučaitė


 David Cook
 1 years ago
 Views:
Transcription
1 Health Insurance Lecture s notes (Syllabus) by Aldona Skučaitė
2 2 Course content 1. Peculiarities of Health insurance markets (see [1], [4], [8], [9], p.p , [1]) (a) Preferences and choice of individuals under risk: Utility theory; Allais parado; Prospect theory (b) Comparison of Health care market and "ideal" market (see ([1])) (c) Asymmetric information and its consequences  moral hazard and adverse selection  in insurance markets (see ([8]), ([1])) 2. Health Care Financing (see [2], [7] ) (a) "Ideal" health care system: main goals, tasks and measures (b) Two main systems for financing of health care: public  mandatory and private  voluntary (c) Health care systems in European Union and USA 3. Actuarial Models for Health Insurance (see [5], p.p ; 8142; ) (a) Multiple state model. Markov chain. Semi Markov model (b) Medical epenses insurance (c) Disability insurance (d) Critical illness insurance (e) Long term care insurance
3 Chapter 1 Health Insurance Markets 1.1 Preferences and choice of individuals under risk Utility Theory Probably, the first time suggested by D. Bernoulli, developed by J. von Neumann and O. Morgenstein, see Theory of Games and Economic Behaviour, 1944). Formal hypothesis and applications may be found, for eample, in [4]. Choices of individuals in riskless situation as well as under risk are eplained here. Let U()  utility function of individual,  wealth (income, assets, etc.), U is supposed to be non decreasing. Suppose that individual must choose between two alternatives  risky choice A, where: { I1, with probability < α < 1; (A) = I 2, with probability 1 α. Corresponding utilities are: for riskless alternative B  U(I ) for risky alternative (A)  Û(A) = αu(i 1) + (1 α)u(i 2 ) According to Formal hypothesis of Utility theory individual s choice will be: { A, if Û(A) > U(I ); B, if U(I ) > Û(A). 3
4 4 CHAPTER 1. HEALTH INSURANCE MARKETS Let Ī(A) = αi 1 +(1 α)i 2. If I = Ī(A), premium for insurance (gamble) is called "fair" ("actuarially fair"). If in this case individual chooses (A), his behavior is said to be "risk seeking", otherwise if individual chooses (B) his behavior is "risk avoiding". Let I :  state of wealth such that: U(I ) = Û(A). From inequality: we get: Û(A) > U(Ī) I > Ī and vice versa. The difference I Ī  is the maimum amount that individual will pay for insurance in ecess of actuarially fair premium. Utility function of risk averse individual is concave upwards, while of risk seeking individual  concave downwards. Utility theory eplains both risk aversion and risk seeking behavior, mainly: Risk averse individuals will buy insurance but will not gamble Risk seeking individuals will gamble but will not buy insurance Risk averse individuals agree to pay insurance premium which is greater than actuarially fair premium Since many individuals buy insurance and gamble, most probably utility function is at first concave upwards and concave downwards later Criticism of Utility theory. Allais parado (1953) Utility theory is useful for eplanation of both risk avoiding and risk seeking behavior. In many situations it eplains market behavior quite well. However, in some situations choices of individuals contradict Utility theory. Consider socalled Allais parado (see, for eample, [9], [6]) Suppose individuals are asked to select either investment strategy F 1 or F 2. Under each strategy possible wins (profits) are , 1 millions or 3 millions. Corresponding probabilities are shown in table below: $ 1 mil $ 3 mil $ F 1 1 F
5 1.2. COMPARISON OF HEALTH CARE MARKET AND "IDEAL" MARKET5 Eperiments show that majority of individuals chooses F 1, that is F 1 F 2 (F 1 dominates (is better than F 2 ). Now, again suppose that individuals to asked to select either investment strategy F 3 or F 4. Again, possible wins (profits) are , 1 millions or 3 millions and corresponding probabilities are as follows: $ 1 mil $ 3 mil $ F F In this situation majority of individuals chooses F 3, that is F 3 F 4. It is easy to see that such choices contradict Utility theory, because since F 1 F 2 : U(1), 1U() +, 89U(1) +, 1U(3), (1.1.1) while from the F 3 F 4 we get:, 9U() +, 1U(3), 89U() +, 11U(1) (1.1.2) and it is easy to see that inequalities (1.1.1) and (1.1.2) are opposite. There are more similar eperiments which results contradicts Utility theory (see, for eample, [6]). Some methods for improvement of Utility theory are proposed (see [9]), however we will not study these theories in this course. 1.2 Comparison of Health care market and "ideal" market Some concepts from Microeconomy: Ideal market Market imperfections Information asymmetry: Adverse selection Moral hazard
6 6 CHAPTER 1. HEALTH INSURANCE MARKETS Comparison of Health care industry market and ideal market are presented in [1]. In this paper many features of health care industry most of which contradict theory of ideal market are described, for eample: Nature of demand and supply Epected behavior of physician as provider of services Product uncertainty Pricing process Moral hazard If we use Theory of Ideal insurance, then, under assumption that individuals are risk averse and average cost of medical care is m, individuals will prefer insurance for a price m. Actually due to risk avoidance individuals will agree to pay more than m for insurance provided than insurance premium is not "too unfair". Actually due to administrative costs insurance premium must be higher than actuarially fair premium. In such case optimal policy for insured is no longer full insurance. Two main theorems about optimal policy are proved in the paper Theorem. If an insurance company is willing to offer any insurance policy against loss desired by the buyer at a premium which depends only on the policy s actuarial value, then the policy chosen by a risk averting buyer will take the form of 1 percent coverage above the deductible minimum. Proof. Let W  initial wealth, X  possible random loss, I(X)  insurance benefit paid if loss X occurs, P  insurance premium, Y (X)  wealth of individual after loss occurred and insurance benefit was paid. So Y (X) = W P X + I(X). (1.2.1) Let utility function be U(y), where y  wealth. Then individual seek to maimize: E[U(Y (X))]. (1.2.2)
7 1.2. COMPARISON OF HEALTH CARE MARKET AND "IDEAL" MARKET7 Insurance benefit must be nonnegative, so: I(X), X. (1.2.3) If policy is optimal then it must be the best from the set of all policies with the same actuarial value E[I(X)] in the sense of Consider two insurance policies. Initial policy is I(X) with I 1 (X) > and Y 1 (X 1 ) > Y 1 (X 2 ). Suppose δ > is sufficiently small that: and I 1 (X) >, if X 1 X X 1 + δ (1.2.4) Y 1 (X ) < Y 1 (X), if X 2 X X 2 + δ, X 1 X X 1 + δ (1.2.5) Define π 1  probability that X lies in (X 1, X 1 + δ); and π 2  probability that loss X lies in (X 2, X 2 + δ). Then we may choose sufficiently small ε >, such that from (1.2.4) and (1.2.5) we get: and I 1 (X) π 2 ε, if X 1 X X 1 + δ (1.2.6) Y 1 (X ) + π 1 ε < Y 1 (X) π 2 ε, if (1.2.7) X 1 X X 1 + δ, and X 2 X X 2 + δ Define new insurance policy I 2 (X), which is: I 1 (X) π 2 ε, [X 1, X 1 + δ]; I 2 () = I 1 (X) + π 1 ε, [X 2, X 2 + δ]; I 1 (X), elsewhere. From (1.2.6) we get that I 2 (X), so (1.2.3) is satisfied. Suppose that f()  is probability density function of X. Then:
8 8 CHAPTER 1. HEALTH INSURANCE MARKETS E[I 2 (X) I 1 (X)] = X1 +δ X 1 [I 2 () I 1 ()]f()d + = ( π 2 ε) X1 +δ X 1 = π 2 επ 1 + π 1 επ 2 =, f()d + π 1 ε X2 +δ X 2 X2 +δ X 2 [I 2 () I 1 ()]f()d f()d so actuarial values of both policies are the same. It is obvious that Y 2 (X) Y 1 (X) = I 2 (X) I 1 (X). From (1.2.7) we get: Y 1 (X ) < Y 2 (X ) < Y 2 (X) < Y 1 (X) if (1.2.8) X 2 X X 2 + δ X 1 X X 1 + δ, because: Y 2 (X ) = Y 1 (X ) + I 2 (X ) I 1 (X ) = Y 1 (X ) + π 1 ε > Y 1 (X ); Y 2 (X) > Y 2 (X ) ; Y 2 (X) = Y 1 (X) + I 2 (X) I 1 (X) = Y 1 (X) π 2 ε < Y 1 (X) Since Y 1 (X) Y 2 (X) = everywhere ecept [X 1, X 1 + δ] and [X 2, X 2 + δ] we have: and E[U(Y 2 (X)) U(Y 1 (X))] = (1.2.9) X1 +δ X 1 From the Mean value theorem we get: [U(Y 2 ()) U(Y 1 ())]f()d + X 2 +δ X 2 [U(Y 2 ()) U(Y 1 ())]f()d. U(Y 2 (X)) U(Y 1 (X)) = U (Y (X))(Y 2 (X) Y 1 (X)) (1.2.1) where Y (X) is between Y 1 (X) and Y 2 (X). So from (1.2.8) we get: = U (Y (X))(I 2 (X) I 1 (X)), Y (X ) < Y (X), if X 2 X X 2 + δ, X 1 X X 1 + δ.
9 1.2. COMPARISON OF HEALTH CARE MARKET AND "IDEAL" MARKET9 Since individuals are risk averse U (y) is decreasing function of y, so U (Y (X )) > U (Y (X)). We may find u such that U (Y (X )) > u, if X 2 X X 2 + δ (1.2.11) U (Y (X)) < u, if X 1 X X 1 + δ. Putting (1.2.1) into (1.2.9), we get: E[U(Y 2 (X)) U(Y 1 (X))] = X1 +δ π 2 ε +π 1 ε X 1 X2 +δ X 2 U (Y ())f()d U (Y ())f()d. And finally from (1.2.11) we obtain: E[U(Y 2 (X)) U(Y 1 (X))] > π 2 εuπ 1 + π 1 εuπ 2 =, so second policy is better than initial policy and risk averse individual will choose the second one. So, the policy I 1 (X) cannot be optimal if one can find two values of X  X 1 and X 2 for which: I(X 1 ) > and Y (X 1 ) > Y (X 2 ). So, suppose that Y min  minimal value of wealth (Y (X)) under optimal policy. Then according to the theorem I(X) = if Y (X) > Y min. So, insurance benefit is not paid until wealth of individual does not reach Y min. This is insurance policy with 1 percent coverage above stated deductible Remark. Alternative proof may be found in [9] Theorem. If insurance company and insured person are both risk averters and there no other costs ecept of coverage of losses then any non trivial Pareto optimal policy I(X) has the property < di < 1. Such type dx of policies is called coinsurance policies.
10 1 CHAPTER 1. HEALTH INSURANCE MARKETS The proof may be found in [1]. Problem of moral hazard is addressed in more detail in [8]. In this paper moral hazard is treated more like rational economical behavior rather than "moral" problem. Some suggestions how to deal with consequences of moral hazard are provided (deductibles and coinsurance). 1.3 Asymmetric information in insurance markets Probably best known work describing the impact of asymmetric information to insurance markets is [1] by M. Rothschild and J. Stiglitz (1976). It is said that insurance policy belong to equilibrium set if under assumption that individuals buy maimum one insurance policy (which must maimize their epected utility): no insurance contract in the equilibrium make negative epected profits there is no contract outside the equilibrium which if offered will make a non negative profit. Authors show that if two groups of individuals eist in the market  the low risk group and the high risk group  then there may be no equilibrium in the market. Moreover they show that eistence of high risk individuals eerts a negative eternality on low risk individuals  there are losses for low risk individuals if high risk individuals are present. However, high risk individuals are not be in a better position than they would be in isolation. For complete proof see [1]. 1.4 Sample eercises 1 Eercise. Suppose that risk averse individual whose utility function is u() is considering whether to insure against random risk or not. Individual may choose not to insure at all; to buy full insurance or to buy partial insurance. Individual s choice must maimize his / her epected utility. { Suppose that initial wealth of individual is w. Random loss is d < w, with probability p; ξ =, 1p. Show that:
11 1.4. SAMPLE EXERCISES If insurance premium is actuarially fair individual will choose full insurance. 2. If insurance premium is no longer actuarially fair and equal (1+ρ)Eξ), ρ >, then individual will not choose full insurance. Interpret (comment) these situations. 2 Eercise. Individual whose initial wealth is w = 2 and utility function is u() = 4 2 ; 2 faces random loss: ξ U[; 2]. Suppose that insurance premium is actuarially fair but individual decides to insure only against 8% of loss. Calculate his / her epected utility if: 1. Benefit paid is always equal to 8% of loss (proportional insurance) {, ξ < d; 2. Deductible d is set so that insurance benefit is : ξ d, ξ d.. It is insurance with deductible. Deductible d must be such that epected benefit I is 8% of possible loss, that is E[I] =.8E[ξ] = Maimum coverage s is set such that: to be E[I] =.8E[ξ] = 8. { ξ, ξ < s; s, ξ s. Again calculate s Which option is best for individual? Interpret results. 3 Eercise. Suppose that risk { averse individual with initial wealth w = 2 2, p =, 25; may suffer random loss ξ =, 1 p =, 75. Policies of proportional insurance are traded in the market. Under insurance conditions k ( k 1) percent of loss is compensated while insurance premium is calculated: G = (1 + ρ) k E[ξ]. Find optimal (best) insurance policy and ρ =, 2 and utility function of individual is: 1. u() = u() = ln( + 1) In both cases calculate lowest level of ρ for which optimal decision of individual will be not to insure (to accept loss himself). Compare results. Interpret them using concept of risk aversion.
12 12 CHAPTER 1. HEALTH INSURANCE MARKETS 4 Eercise. Suppose that: Individual with utility{ function u() = ln and 2,.25; initial wealth w = 21 may suffer random loss ξ =,.75. Insurance policies (α 1 ; α 2 ) are traded in the market, where α 1  insurance premium; α 2  insurance benefit minus insurance premium (see model in [1]. Suppose that due to perfect competition profits of insurers is zero. In the system of coordinates (W 1 ; W 2 ) (W 1  wealth in the case of no loss; W 2  wealth after loss) show the point of initial wealth status (without any insurance) and break even line. a) Suppose that all individuals are identical (their utility functions and accident probabilities are the same). Write down the equation of individual utility indifference curve (the one that maimizes individual s utility). Using MsEcel in the system of coordinates (W 1 ; W 2 ) graph break even line, "fair odds" line and utility curve of individual. Eplain choice of individual in this situation. b) Suppose that probability,25 is mean value of accident probabilities in the market. Actually, half (5%) of individuals belong to high risk group (p H =.35), while the other  to low risk group (p L =.15). Insurance companies know the proportion of high and low risk individuals in the market, but are unable to distinguish to which group individual belong. In this situation show the set of contracts which belong to possible separating equilibrium (You are not supposed to eplore whether or not equilibrium eist) and eplain Your decision.
13 Chapter 2 Health Care Financing 2.1 "Ideal" health care system Ehaustive eplanation of features of Ideal health care system is given in [2]. According to World Health Organization health is  "a state of complete physical, mental and social wellbeing and not merely the absence of disease or infirmity". Main goals of any health care system are  Cost, Quality and Access. Main problems of health care financing, tasks of any health care system and comparison of two main ways of financing  public mandatory and private voluntary  are presented in the paper. 2.2 Health care systems in European Union and USA Main issues: Financing system: public, private or mi of both; share of public and private ependitures in total health ependitures Role of Voluntary health insurance Achievement of Cost, Quality and Access goals See [2], [7] and / or any other reliable source that you will be able to achieve. 13
14 14 CHAPTER 2. HEALTH CARE FINANCING 2.3 Sample eercises 5 Eercise. Select any European country and make short presentation (51 min.) about its Health care system.
15 Chapter 3 Actuarial Models for Health Insurance The content of this chapter is based on material from [5]. 3.1 Multiple state models and Markov process The basis of majority actuarial models used for health insurance is Multiple state models. Let I  set of possible states (we will suppose that it is finite set), I = {1, 2,..., N} while J  set of direct transitions, J {(i, j) i j; i, j I}. Suppose that all states are reachable from initial state via direct or indirect transitions. The pair (I, J)  is called Multiple state model. Define S(t)  state of a system at time t and let S() = 1. We will call the process {S(t), t }  time continuous stochastic process any realization of this process  s(t) is called trajectory of the process. Stochastic process {S(t), t } is called time continuous Markov chain if n and any finite sets t < t 1 < < t n < u and i, i 1,..., i n, j, satisfying condition: P r(s(t ) = i,..., S(t n 1 ) = i n 1, S(t n ) = i n, S(u) = j) > (3.1.1) the following relation hold: P r(s(u) = j S(t ) = i, S(t 1 ) = i 1,..., S(t n ) = i n ) = P r(s(u) = j S(t n ) = i n ). (3.1.2) 15
16 16 CHAPTER 3. ACTUARIAL MODELS FOR HEALTH INSURANCE (3.1.2) is called Markov property. Obvious that for any w > u > t n : P (S(u) = j, S(w) = k S(t ) = i,..., S(t n 1 ) = i n 1, S(t n ) = i n ) = P (S(u) = j S(t ) = i,..., S(t n 1 ) = i n 1, S(t n ) = i n ) P (S(w) = k S(t ) = i,..., S(t n 1 ) = i n 1, S(t n ) = i n, S(u) = j) = P (S(u) = j S(t n ) = i n ) P (S(w) = k S(u) = j). In more general case when S(z) = s(z), z t Markov property is defined: τ, u : τ < u and integer numbers i, j, s(z) ( z < τ) such that: P ([S(z) = s(z), z < τ], [S(τ) = i], [S(u) = j]) > the following must hold: P (S(u) = j [S(z) = s(z), z < τ], [S(τ) = i]) (3.1.3) = P (S(u) = j S(τ) = i). (3.1.4) Probabilites (3.1.2), e.g. P r(s(u) = j S(t) = i), t < u and i, j I are called transition probabilities and defined P ij (t, u) = P r(s(u) = j S(t) = i). Obvious: P ij (t, t) = δ ij, t, where δ ij = { if i j; 1 if i = j. If pairs t, u, t < u and i, i, j I probabilities P ij (t, u) depend only on the difference u t, the process is called homogeneous. In most actuarial applications processes are not homogeneous. Obviuos that: P ij (t, u) 1 i, j t u; (3.1.5) P ij (t, u) = 1 i t u. j I Chapman  Kolmogorov equations hold: P ij (t, u) = P ik (t, w)p kj (w, u), (3.1.6) k I
17 3.1. MULTIPLE STATE MODELS AND MARKOV PROCESS 17 where t w u. (3.1.6) is derived using Markov property: P ij (t, u) = P r(s(u) = j S(t) = i) = P r(s(u) = j, S(w) = k S(t) = i) k I = P r(s(w) = k S(t) = i) P r(s(u) = j S(t) = i, S(w) = k) k I = P r(s(w) = k S(t) = i) P r(s(u) = j S(w) = k) k I = P ik (t, w)p kj (w, u). k I Define occupancy probabilities: P ii (t, u) = P r(s(z) = i, z [t; u] S(t) = i). (3.1.7) Obvious that: t w u. P ii (t, u) = P ii (t, w) P ii (w, u), (3.1.8) Classification of states: Absorbing state i  P ii (t, u) = 1, t u; Transient state i  P ii (t, ) =, t ; Strictly transient state i  P ii (t, u) = P ii (t, u) < 1, t u. Define intensity of transition µ ij (t): µ ij (t) = lim u t P ij (t, u) u t. (3.1.9) For homogeneous Markov process: µ ij (t) = lim u t P ij (t, u) u t = µ ij.
18 18 CHAPTER 3. ACTUARIAL MODELS FOR HEALTH INSURANCE We will define: µ i (t) = j:j i µ ij (t). (3.1.1) Then: µ i (t) = j:j i lim u t P ij (t, u) u t 1 P ii (t, u) = lim. u t u t = lim u t j:j i P ij(t, u) u t Kolmogorov forward differential equations: d dt P ij(z, t) = k:k j P ik (z, t)µ kj (t) P ij (z, t)µ j (t), (3.1.11) where t, z, z t  any time moments and i, j  possible states of model; boundary condition P ij (z, z) = δ ij. Obviuos that (3.1.11) may be presented: dp ij (z, t) = P ik (z, t)µ kj (t)dt P ij (z, t)µ j (t)dt. (3.1.12) k:k j Derivation of (3.1.11). Using (3.1.6) we have: P ij (z, t + t) = P ik (z, t)p kj (t, t + t) + P ij (z, t)p jj (t, t + t) then: k:k j P ij (z, t + t) P ij (z, t) t = k:k j P ik (z, t) P kj(t, t + t) t +P ij (z, t) P jj(t, t + t) 1. t Moreover: so 1 P jj (t, t + t) = P jk (t, t + t), k:k j
19 3.2. SEMI MARKOV PROCESSES AND MARKOV PROCESSES OF IIND ORDER19 P ij (z, t + t) P ij (z, t) t = k:k j P ik (z, t) P kj(t, t + t) P ij (z, t) P jk (t, t + t) t t k:k j Taking lim t + we get (3.1.11), or dp ij (z, t) = P ik (z, t)µ kj (t)dt P ij (z, t)µ j (t)dt. (3.1.13) k:k j Kolmogorov backward differential equations: d dz P ij(z, t) = P ij (z, t)µ i (z) P kj (z, t)µ ik (z) k:k i For derivation see [5]. Occupancy probabilities satisfy: with boundary condition P ii (z, z) = 1. From (3.1.14) we get: d dt P ii(z, t) = P ii (z, t)µ i (t), (3.1.14) d dt ln P ii(z, t) = µ i (t). (3.1.15) And from (3.1.15), using boundary condition P ii (z, z) = 1, we get: P ii (z, t) = ep[ t z µ i (u)du]. 3.2 Semi Markov processes and Markov processes of IInd order See [5]. In most actuarial models for health insurance it is possible to split states and use Markov process instead of semi Markov process, see [5].
20 2 CHAPTER 3. ACTUARIAL MODELS FOR HEALTH INSURANCE 3.3 Actuarial values of premiums and reserves We will suppose that process satisfy Markov property. Define: p i (t)  rate of continuous premium paid at the moment t if S(t) = i, then p i (t)dt  premiums paid during the interval [t, t + dt). b j (t)  rate of annuity benefit paid at moment t if S(t) = j. c ij (t)  single (lump sum) benefit paid at moment t if transition from i to j occurs. d j (t)  single (lump sum) benefit paid at moment t if S(t) = j. { 1, if E  is true; Let: v = e δ and I E =, otherwise. Present value at the moment t of continuous annuity  b j (u) paid during interval [u, u + du) is: So: Y t (u, u + du) = v u t I S(u)=j b j (u)du. Y t (u 1 ; u 2 ) = u2 u 1 And actuarial present values are: v u t I S(u)=j b j (u)du. and E[Y t (u, u + du) S(t) = i] = v u t P ij (t, u)b j (u)du E[Y t (u 1 ; u 2 ) S(t) = i] = If b j (u) 1 then define: a ij (t, n) = t u2 u 1 v u t P ij (t, u)b j (u)du. v u t P ij (t, u). For lump sum benefit c jk (u) we have present value at moment t: Y t (u) = v u t I {S(u )=j S(u)=k}c jk (u)
21 3.3. ACTUARIAL VALUES OF PREMIUMS AND RESERVES 21 and actuarial present value: E[Y t (u) S(t) = i] = v u t P ij (t, u)µ jk (u)c jk (u)du. If c ij (u) = 1 then define: Ā ijk (t, n) = v u t P ij (t, u)µ jk (u)du t Ā i.k (t, n) = Ā ijk (t, n) j:j k Ā ij. (t, n) = Ā ijk (t, n) k:k j For lump sum benefit d j (u) present value at the moment t: and actuarial present value: If d j (u) = 1, then define: Y t (u) = v u t I S(u)=j d j (u), E[Y t (u) S(t) = i] = v u t P ij (t, u)d j (u). Ē ij (t, u) = v u t P ij (t, u). If c jk (u) = 1, u (t, n] and d j (m) = 1, then: Ā ij. (t, n, m) = Āij.(t, n) + Ēij(t, m). For n = m we get generalized formula of endowment insurance. Actuarial present value of benefits at the moment t if S(t) = i is: B i (t, n) = + t t v u t ( j v u t ( j = v u t ( u:u t j P ij (t, u)b j (u))du + P ij (t, u)µ jk (u)b jk (u))du + k:k j P ij (t, u)d j (u)). While actuarial present value of premiums is :
22 22 CHAPTER 3. ACTUARIAL MODELS FOR HEALTH INSURANCE P i (t, n) = t v u t ( j P ij (t, u)p j (u))du, Then according to Equivalence principle: P 1 (, n) = B 1 (, n). Prospective reserve at time t (if S(t) = i) is calculated: V i (t) = B i (t, n) P i (t, n) Since S() = 1, then V 1 () =. If only two types of benefits b j (u) and c jk (u) are used then: V i (t) = t t t v u t j v u t j v u t j P ij (t, u)b j (u)du + (3.3.1) P ij (t, u)µ jk (u)c jk (u)du k:k j P ij (t, u)p j (u)du and: d dt V i (t) = δ V i (t) b i (t) + p i (t) j:j i µ ij (t)[c ij (t) + V j (t) V i (t)] (Use backward Kolmogorov differential equations for derivation of above formula). So: or d V i (t) = δ V i (t)dt + p i (t)dt b i (t)dt (3.3.2) j:j i µ ij (t)[c ij (t) + V j (t) V i (t)]dt (3.3.3)
23 3.3. ACTUARIAL VALUES OF PREMIUMS AND RESERVES 23 p i (t)dt = Investment premium { }} { [d V i (t) δ V i (t)dt] + Risk premium { }} { + b i (t) + µ ij (t)[c ij (t) + V j (t) V i (t)]dt j:j i = I + b i (t) + II Discrete time Markov processes Let I  set of possible states, S(t); t =, 1, stochastic process. Process S(t) is called discrete time Markov chain, if n and for any finite sets t < t 1 < < t n < u and i, i 1,..., i n the following holds: P r(s(u) = j S(t ) = i, S(t 1 ) = i 1,..., S(t n 1 = i n 1, S(t n ) = i n ) (3.3.4) = P r(s(u) = j S(t n ) = i n ), if P r(s(t ) = i, S(t 1 ) = i 1,..., S(t n 1 = i n 1, S(t n ) = i n, S(u) = j) >. In such case: P ij (t, u) = k I P ik (t, w)p kj (w, u), where t, w, u  discrete time moments (t w u). Obvious that: P ij (t, u) = k I P ik (t, t + 1)P kj (t + 1, u).
24 24 CHAPTER 3. ACTUARIAL MODELS FOR HEALTH INSURANCE 3.4 Disability insurance Generally  3 state model: 1st state  "active", 2nd state  "invalid", 3rd  "dead" Hamza notation P 11 (, t) t p aa P 11 (z, t) t z p aa +z P 11 (, t) t p aa P 12 (, t) t p ai µ 12 (t) µ ai +t a 11 (, n) = a aa :n a 11 (, ) = a aa a 22 (t, n) = a ii +t:n t Suppose that age of insured person at start of policy is, S( + t)  state of policy at the moment + t, t >, S() = a. Disability annuity is paid, its present value: Define: Then: Y = v u I {S(+u)=i} du φ(, u) = P (S( + u) = i S() = a) ā ai = E(Y S() = a) = Let Γ  set of policy conditions: where: Γ = [n 1, n 2, f, m, r], v u φ(, u)du (3.4.1) n 1 n 2  waiting period (measured from start of policy)  end of policy period
25 3.4. DISABILITY INSURANCE 25 f  waiting period (measured from inception of illness) m  maimum annuity payment period (in years from start of payment) r  last moment when annuity is paid Define: φ Γ (, u)  probability that individual who bought insurance at () is ill and is paid annuity at time + u (according to policy conditionsγ). Obviuos: φ Γ (, u) φ(, u). And: For eample: φ [,,,, ] (, u) = φ(, u) φ [,n,,,n] (, u) = { φ(, u), if u < n;, if u n, and: ā ai,γ = ā ai : n = v u φ [,n,,,n] (, u)du = v u φ(, u)du We will suppose that conditions of Markov process are satisfied. Let: tp gh y = P (S(y + t) = h S(y) = g); h = a, i, d; g = a, i, and µ gh y tp gh y t t = lim ; h = a, i, d; g = a, i; h g, tp hh y = P (S(y + u) = h, u [, t] S(y) = h); h = a, i. Define probability: tp ai y (τ) = P (S(y + u) = i, u [t τ, t] S(y) = a); τ t Obviuos that: tp ai y () = t p ai y tp ai y (τ) =, τ t
26 26 CHAPTER 3. ACTUARIAL MODELS FOR HEALTH INSURANCE or: If τ t, then: It is easy to show that: From (3.4.2) get: t τ tp ai y (τ) = up aa y µ ai y+u t u p ii y+udu. (3.4.2) ā ai = tp ai v t dt (3.4.3) t tp ai y = up aa y µ ai y+u t u py+udu. ii (3.4.4) Then from (3.4.3) and (3.4.4) we have: ā ai = t v t up aa After changing integration order: Define: ā ai = Define function: v u up aa µ ai +u t u p ii +ududt. (3.4.5) [ ] µ ai +u v t u t up+udt ii du. (3.4.6) u ā ii y = zpy ii v z dz. ψ(, u, t) = u p aa ψ(, t z, t) = t z p aa Then, for eample, if Γ = [, n,,, ]: µ ai +u t u p ii +u, µ ai +t z z p ii +t z, a ai,γ = = = tp ai t t v t dt + tp ai n ψ(, u, t)v t dudt + (t n)v t dt ψ(, t z, t)v t dzdt + n t n t n ψ(, u, t)v t dudt ψ(, t z, t)v t dzdt.
27 3.4. DISABILITY INSURANCE 27 If insurance premium is paid continuously at the rate P (u), if S(u) = a, then: For constant premium rate: v u up aa P (u)du = ā ai,γ. P = āai,γ. ā aa :m Let Γ = [, n,,, n]. Prospective reserve for active members at time moment + t is: V a +t,γ = t P m t v u up aa +t µ ai +t+ua ii +t+u:n t u du up aa +tv u du, and reserve for disabled members: V i +t,γ = t m t v u up ii +tdu P Eample of approimation formula: From (3.4.6)we have: ā ai = v u up aa up ia +tv u du. [ ] µ ai +u v t u t up ii +udt du u ā ai = Define: h= 1 h+up aa µ ai +h+uv h+u [ t h up ii +h+u vt h u dt]du (3.4.7) h+u Then: a +h+u = t h up ii +h+u vt h u dt. h+u
28 28 CHAPTER 3. ACTUARIAL MODELS FOR HEALTH INSURANCE So: ā ai = h= 1 h+up aa µ ai +h+uv h+u a +h+udu (3.4.8) ā ai v h+1/2 a +h+1/2 h= 1 From Chapman  Kolmogorov equation: h+up aa µ ai +h+udu (3.4.9) and then h+up aa = h p aa up aa +h + h p ai up ia +h So finally: h+up aa h p aa up aa +h ā ai = = = v h+1/2 a +u+1/2 h= v h+1/2 a +u+1/2 h= h= h= 1 1 h+up aa µ ai +h+udu hp aa up aa +hµ ai +h+udu 1 v h+1/2 a +u+1/2 hp aa up aa +hµ ai +h+udu v h+1/2 a +u+1/2 hp aa ω +h. +udu  probability for inception of illness for indi where ω = 1 vidual aged (). u p aa µ ai 3.5 Critical illness insurance Define mortality probabilities µ ai ; µ ad = µ ad(o) ; µ id(o) ; µ id(d). Sometimes duration of illness r is important, then use probabilities µ id(o),r ; µ id(d),r. Then
29 3.5. CRITICAL ILLNESS INSURANCE 29 tp aa = t p aa = ep [ [ τp ii +u, = ep or, if we ignore illness duration r, : [ tp ii = ep t t (µ ai τ y+u + µ ad(o) y+u ] )du (µ id(o) y+u+r,r + µ id(d) y+u+r,r)dr (µ id(o) y+u ] + µ id(d) y+u )du Stand alone, or additional, benefit If transition a i occurs benefit of 1 is paid, define its present value by Ā (DD),n, then Ā (DD),n = up aa µ ai +uv u du. For continuous premium we have: P,n = Ā(DD),n, ā aa,n Reserve for active members: V a +t,n t = Ā(DD) +t,n t P,n ā aa +t,n t, where: Ā (DD) +t,n t = u tp aa +tµ ai +uv u t du. t In this case reserve in state i is not needed. Suppose that benefit is paid in installments α, β, 1 α β at time moments + u; + u + τ 1 ; + u + τ 1 + τ 2, second and third parts of benefit are paid only if insured person is alive at benefit payment moment. Then: [ ] Ā (DD;α,β),n = up aa µ ai +u αv u + τ1 p ii +u,βv u+τ 1 + τ1 +τ 2 p+u,(1 ii α β)v u+τ 1+τ 2 du, so premium is : P,n = Ā(DD;α,β),n ā aa,n ],
30 3 CHAPTER 3. ACTUARIAL MODELS FOR HEALTH INSURANCE and reserves: V a +t,n t = Ā(DD;α,β) +t,n t P,n ā aa +t,n t V i +t = u+τ1 tp ii +t,t uβv u+τ 1 t + u+τ1 +τ 2 tp ii +t,t u(1 α β)v u+τ 1+τ 2 t ; u t < τ 1 V i +t = u+τ2 tp ii +t,t u(1 α β)v u+τ 2 t ; u + τ 1 t < u + τ 1 + τ Accelerated insurance Suppose that fraction λ 1 of benefit is paid upon diagnosis of illness and rest part  (1 λ) on death of individual (if death occurs during policy period). Then: [ Ā (D+DD;λ),n = up aa µ ad(o) +u v u + µ ai +u(λv u + (1 λ) Define: Ā (DD;λ),n = Ā (D;λ),n = so: If λ = 1, then up aa µ ai up aa [ +uλv u du µ ad(o) +u v u + µ ai +u(1 λ) Ā (D+DD;λ),n Ā (DD;1),n = Ā (D;1),n = = Ā(D;λ),n u + Ā(DD;λ),n up aa µ ai +uv u du up aa µ ad(o) +u Formulas for discrete case may be found in [5]. 3.6 Long term care insurance v u du u ] v u+r rp ii +u(µ id(o) +u+r + µ id(d) +u+r)dr) d ] v u+r rp ii +u(µ id(o) +u+r + µ id(d) +u+r)dr du, Again, multiple state model is used to model LTC insurance policy conditions. For types of cover and calculation of premiums and / or reserves see [5].
HeriotWatt University. M.Sc. in Actuarial Science. Life Insurance Mathematics I. Tutorial 5
1 HeriotWatt University M.Sc. in Actuarial Science Life Insurance Mathematics I Tutorial 5 1. Consider the illnessdeath model in Figure 1. A life age takes out a policy with a term of n years that pays
More informationEquilibrium in Competitive Insurance Markets: An Essay on the Economic of Imperfect Information
Equilibrium in Competitive Insurance Markets: An Essay on the Economic of Imperfect Information By: Michael Rothschild and Joseph Stiglitz Presented by Benjamin S. Barber IV, Xiaoshu Bei, Zhi Chen, Shaiobi
More informationUnraveling versus Unraveling: A Memo on Competitive Equilibriums and Trade in Insurance Markets
Unraveling versus Unraveling: A Memo on Competitive Equilibriums and Trade in Insurance Markets Nathaniel Hendren January, 2014 Abstract Both Akerlof (1970) and Rothschild and Stiglitz (1976) show that
More information( ) is proportional to ( 10 + x)!2. Calculate the
PRACTICE EXAMINATION NUMBER 6. An insurance company eamines its pool of auto insurance customers and gathers the following information: i) All customers insure at least one car. ii) 64 of the customers
More informationFurther Topics in Actuarial Mathematics: Premium Reserves. Matthew Mikola
Further Topics in Actuarial Mathematics: Premium Reserves Matthew Mikola April 26, 2007 Contents 1 Introduction 1 1.1 Expected Loss...................................... 2 1.2 An Overview of the Project...............................
More informationOptimal insurance contracts with adverse selection and comonotonic background risk
Optimal insurance contracts with adverse selection and comonotonic background risk Alary D. Bien F. TSE (LERNA) University Paris Dauphine Abstract In this note, we consider an adverse selection problem
More informationRegret and Rejoicing Effects on Mixed Insurance *
Regret and Rejoicing Effects on Mixed Insurance * Yoichiro Fujii, Osaka Sangyo University Mahito Okura, Doshisha Women s College of Liberal Arts Yusuke Osaki, Osaka Sangyo University + Abstract This papers
More informationAsset Pricing. Chapter IV. Measuring Risk and Risk Aversion. June 20, 2006
Chapter IV. Measuring Risk and Risk Aversion June 20, 2006 Measuring Risk Aversion Utility function Indifference Curves U(Y) tangent lines U(Y + h) U[0.5(Y + h) + 0.5(Y h)] 0.5U(Y + h) + 0.5U(Y h) U(Y
More informationMay 2012 Course MLC Examination, Problem No. 1 For a 2year select and ultimate mortality model, you are given:
Solutions to the May 2012 Course MLC Examination by Krzysztof Ostaszewski, http://www.krzysio.net, krzysio@krzysio.net Copyright 2012 by Krzysztof Ostaszewski All rights reserved. No reproduction in any
More informationAdverse Selection and the Market for Health Insurance in the U.S. James Marton
Preliminary and Incomplete Please do not Quote Adverse Selection and the Market for Health Insurance in the U.S. James Marton Washington University, Department of Economics Date: 4/24/01 Abstract Several
More informationChoice under Uncertainty
Choice under Uncertainty Part 1: Expected Utility Function, Attitudes towards Risk, Demand for Insurance Slide 1 Choice under Uncertainty We ll analyze the underlying assumptions of expected utility theory
More informationNovember 2012 Course MLC Examination, Problem No. 1 For two lives, (80) and (90), with independent future lifetimes, you are given: k p 80+k
Solutions to the November 202 Course MLC Examination by Krzysztof Ostaszewski, http://www.krzysio.net, krzysio@krzysio.net Copyright 202 by Krzysztof Ostaszewski All rights reserved. No reproduction in
More informationChapter 2. 1. You are given: 1 t. Calculate: f. Pr[ T0
Chapter 2 1. You are given: 1 5 t F0 ( t) 1 1,0 t 125 125 Calculate: a. S () t 0 b. Pr[ T0 t] c. Pr[ T0 t] d. S () t e. Probability that a newborn will live to age 25. f. Probability that a person age
More informationA linear algebraic method for pricing temporary life annuities
A linear algebraic method for pricing temporary life annuities P. Date (joint work with R. Mamon, L. Jalen and I.C. Wang) Department of Mathematical Sciences, Brunel University, London Outline Introduction
More information2. Information Economics
2. Information Economics In General Equilibrium Theory all agents had full information regarding any variable of interest (prices, commodities, state of nature, cost function, preferences, etc.) In many
More informationWald s Identity. by Jeffery Hein. Dartmouth College, Math 100
Wald s Identity by Jeffery Hein Dartmouth College, Math 100 1. Introduction Given random variables X 1, X 2, X 3,... with common finite mean and a stopping rule τ which may depend upon the given sequence,
More informationExplaining Insurance Policy Provisions via Adverse Selection
The Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance Theory, 22: 121 134 (1997) c 1997 The Geneva Association Explaining Insurance Policy Provisions via Adverse Selection VIRGINIA R. YOUNG AND MARK J. BROWNE School
More informationSOCIETY OF ACTUARIES. EXAM MLC Models for Life Contingencies EXAM MLC SAMPLE WRITTENANSWER QUESTIONS AND SOLUTIONS
SOCIETY OF ACTUARIES EXAM MLC Models for Life Contingencies EXAM MLC SAMPLE WRITTENANSWER QUESTIONS AND SOLUTIONS Questions February 12, 2015 In Questions 12, 13, and 19, the wording was changed slightly
More informationOn Compulsory PerClaim Deductibles in Automobile Insurance
The Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance Theory, 28: 25 32, 2003 c 2003 The Geneva Association On Compulsory PerClaim Deductibles in Automobile Insurance CHUSHIU LI Department of Economics, Feng Chia
More informationARC Centre of Excellence in Population Ageing Research. Working Paper 2015/03
ARC Centre of Ecellence in Population Ageing Research Working Paper 2015/03 Actuarial Values for Longterm Care Insurance Products. A Sensitivity Analysis Ermanno Pitacco * * Professor, University of Trieste,
More informationSolution. Let us write s for the policy year. Then the mortality rate during year s is q 30+s 1. q 30+s 1
Solutions to the May 213 Course MLC Examination by Krzysztof Ostaszewski, http://wwwkrzysionet, krzysio@krzysionet Copyright 213 by Krzysztof Ostaszewski All rights reserved No reproduction in any form
More informationImpact of Genetic Testing on Life Insurance
Agenda, Volume 10, Number 1, 2003, pages 6172 Impact of Genetic Testing on Life Insurance he Human Genome project generates immense interest in the scientific community though there are also important
More information4. Life Insurance. 4.1 Survival Distribution And Life Tables. Introduction. X, Ageatdeath. T (x), timeuntildeath
4. Life Insurance 4.1 Survival Distribution And Life Tables Introduction X, Ageatdeath T (x), timeuntildeath Life Table Engineers use life tables to study the reliability of complex mechanical and
More informationLecture notes for Choice Under Uncertainty
Lecture notes for Choice Under Uncertainty 1. Introduction In this lecture we examine the theory of decisionmaking under uncertainty and its application to the demand for insurance. The undergraduate
More informationFundamentals of Actuarial Mathematics
Fundamentals of Actuarial Mathematics S. David Promislow York University, Toronto, Canada John Wiley & Sons, Ltd Contents Preface Notation index xiii xvii PARTI THE DETERMINISTIC MODEL 1 1 Introduction
More informationMORTALITY OF DISABLED PEOPLE
MORTALITY OF DISABLED PEOPLE Ermanno Pitacco DEAMS, University of Trieste (Italy) ermanno.pitacco@econ.units.it 1. INTRODUCTION Various types of insurance products require, as an item of the technical
More informationSome Polynomial Theorems. John Kennedy Mathematics Department Santa Monica College 1900 Pico Blvd. Santa Monica, CA 90405 rkennedy@ix.netcom.
Some Polynomial Theorems by John Kennedy Mathematics Department Santa Monica College 1900 Pico Blvd. Santa Monica, CA 90405 rkennedy@ix.netcom.com This paper contains a collection of 31 theorems, lemmas,
More informationExam Introduction Mathematical Finance and Insurance
Exam Introduction Mathematical Finance and Insurance Date: January 8, 2013. Duration: 3 hours. This is a closedbook exam. The exam does not use scrap cards. Simple calculators are allowed. The questions
More informationPractice Exam 1. x l x d x 50 1000 20 51 52 35 53 37
Practice Eam. You are given: (i) The following life table. (ii) 2q 52.758. l d 5 2 5 52 35 53 37 Determine d 5. (A) 2 (B) 2 (C) 22 (D) 24 (E) 26 2. For a Continuing Care Retirement Community, you are given
More informationPerformance Analysis of a Telephone System with both Patient and Impatient Customers
Performance Analysis of a Telephone System with both Patient and Impatient Customers Yiqiang Quennel Zhao Department of Mathematics and Statistics University of Winnipeg Winnipeg, Manitoba Canada R3B 2E9
More information3. The Economics of Insurance
3. The Economics of Insurance Insurance is designed to protect against serious financial reversals that result from random evens intruding on the plan of individuals. Limitations on Insurance Protection
More informationIndexed and NonIndexed Insurance
The Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance, 7 (No 24, July 1982), 264275 Indexed and NonIndexed Insurance by Yaffa Machnes * IntroductIon Inflation is usually defined as a substantial increase in the general
More informationDemand for Health Insurance
Demand for Health Insurance Demand for Health Insurance is principally derived from the uncertainty or randomness with which illnesses befall individuals. Consequently, the derived demand for health insurance
More informationYes, No, Perhaps?  Explaining the Demand for Risk Classification Insurance with Fuzzy Private Information
Yes, No, Perhaps?  Explaining the Demand for Risk Classification Insurance with Fuzzy Private Information Richard Peter, Andreas Richter, Petra Steinorth December 9, 010 Abstract We examine the demand
More informationAnalyzing the Demand for Deductible Insurance
Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 18:3 3 1999 1999 Kluwer Academic Publishers. Manufactured in The Netherlands. Analyzing the emand for eductible Insurance JACK MEYER epartment of Economics, Michigan State
More informationHealth Economics. University of Linz & Demand and supply of health insurance. Gerald J. Pruckner. Lecture Notes, Summer Term 2010
Health Economics Demand and supply of health insurance University of Linz & Gerald J. Pruckner Lecture Notes, Summer Term 2010 Gerald J. Pruckner Health insurance 1 / 25 Introduction Insurance plays a
More informationWhat we ll be discussing
Teaching programme: Course: Main text: Master of Public Health, University of Tromsø, Norway Health economics and policy (HEL3007) JA Olsen (2009): Principles in Health Economics and Policy, Oxford University
More information3 Introduction to Assessing Risk
3 Introduction to Assessing Risk Important Question. How do we assess the risk an investor faces when choosing among assets? In this discussion we examine how an investor would assess the risk associated
More informationC2922 Economics Utility Functions
C2922 Economics Utility Functions T.C. Johnson October 30, 2007 1 Introduction Utility refers to the perceived value of a good and utility theory spans mathematics, economics and psychology. For example,
More informationWhat we ll be discussing
Teaching programmes: Master of Public Health, University of Tromsø, Norway HEL3007 Health Economics and Policy Master of Public Health, Monash University, Australia ECC5979 Health Economics Master of
More informationOn the mathematical theory of splitting and Russian roulette
On the mathematical theory of splitting and Russian roulette techniques St.Petersburg State University, Russia 1. Introduction Splitting is an universal and potentially very powerful technique for increasing
More informationPolynomial Degree and Finite Differences
CONDENSED LESSON 7.1 Polynomial Degree and Finite Differences In this lesson you will learn the terminology associated with polynomials use the finite differences method to determine the degree of a polynomial
More informationOptimal proportional reinsurance and dividend payout for insurance companies with switching reserves
Optimal proportional reinsurance and dividend payout for insurance companies with switching reserves Abstract: This paper presents a model for an insurance company that controls its risk and dividend
More informationDisability insurance: estimation and risk aggregation
Disability insurance: estimation and risk aggregation B. Löfdahl Department of Mathematics KTH, Royal Institute of Technology May 2015 Introduction New upcoming regulation for insurance industry: Solvency
More informationFinance 400 A. Penati  G. Pennacchi Market MicroStructure: Notes on the Kyle Model
Finance 400 A. Penati  G. Pennacchi Market MicroStructure: Notes on the Kyle Model These notes consider the singleperiod model in Kyle (1985) Continuous Auctions and Insider Trading, Econometrica 15,
More informationA, we round the female and male entry ages and
Pricing Practices for Joint Last Survivor Insurance Heekyung Youn Arkady Shemyakin University of St. Thomas unded by the Society of Actuaries Abstract In pricing joint last survivor insurance policies,
More informationMaking use of netting effects when composing life insurance contracts
Making use of netting effects when composing life insurance contracts Marcus Christiansen Preprint Series: 2113 Fakultät für Mathematik und Wirtschaftswissenschaften UNIVERSITÄT ULM Making use of netting
More informationContents. 6 Graph Sketching 87. 6.1 Increasing Functions and Decreasing Functions... 87. 6.2 Intervals Monotonically Increasing or Decreasing...
Contents 6 Graph Sketching 87 6.1 Increasing Functions and Decreasing Functions.......................... 87 6.2 Intervals Monotonically Increasing or Decreasing....................... 88 6.3 Etrema Maima
More informationOptimal demand management policies with probability weighting
Optimal demand management policies with probability weighting Ana B. Ania February 2006 Preliminary draft. Please, do not circulate. Abstract We review the optimality of partial insurance contracts in
More informationIntermediate Micro. Expected Utility
Intermediate Micro Expected Utility Workhorse model of intermediate micro Utility maximization problem Consumers Max U(x,y) subject to the budget constraint, I=P x x + P y y Health Economics Spring 2015
More informationSome Research Problems in Uncertainty Theory
Journal of Uncertain Systems Vol.3, No.1, pp.310, 2009 Online at: www.jus.org.uk Some Research Problems in Uncertainty Theory aoding Liu Uncertainty Theory Laboratory, Department of Mathematical Sciences
More informationMATHEMATICS OF FINANCE AND INVESTMENT
MATHEMATICS OF FINANCE AND INVESTMENT G. I. FALIN Department of Probability Theory Faculty of Mechanics & Mathematics Moscow State Lomonosov University Moscow 119992 g.falin@mail.ru 2 G.I.Falin. Mathematics
More informationMATH 10550, EXAM 2 SOLUTIONS. x 2 + 2xy y 2 + x = 2
MATH 10550, EXAM SOLUTIONS (1) Find an equation for the tangent line to at the point (1, ). + y y + = Solution: The equation of a line requires a point and a slope. The problem gives us the point so we
More informationSELECTION IN INSURANCE MARKETS by Steven E. Landsburg University of Rochester
SELECTION IN INSURANCE MARKETS by Steven E. Landsburg University of Rochester Consider an insurance market say, for insurance against accidental injuries. Agents face different levels of accident risk,
More informationAdverse selection in health insurance: are first best. contracts impossible?
Adverse selection in health insurance: are first best contracts impossible? David Alary CERPEMSDF, University Paris Dauphine Franck Bien EuRISCO LEGOS, University Paris Dauphine Abstract In this note,
More informationPartial Derivatives. @x f (x; y) = @ x f (x; y) @x x2 y + @ @x y2 and then we evaluate the derivative as if y is a constant.
Partial Derivatives Partial Derivatives Just as derivatives can be used to eplore the properties of functions of 1 variable, so also derivatives can be used to eplore functions of 2 variables. In this
More information(Common) Shock models in Exam MLC
Making sense of... (Common) Shock models in Exam MLC James W. Daniel Austin Actuarial Seminars www.actuarialseminars.com June 26, 2008 c Copyright 2007 by James W. Daniel; reproduction in whole or in part
More informationEconomics 401. Sample questions 1
Economics 40 Sample questions. Do each of the following choice structures satisfy WARP? (a) X = {a, b, c},b = {B, B 2, B 3 }, B = {a, b}, B 2 = {b, c}, B 3 = {c, a}, C (B ) = {a}, C (B 2 ) = {b}, C (B
More informationLecture Note 16 Adverse Selection, Risk Aversion and Insurance Markets.
Lecture Note 16 Adverse Selection, Risk Aversion and Insurance Markets. 14.03/14003 Applied Microeconomic Theory and Public Policy, Fall 2010 David Autor, Massachusetts Institute of Technology November
More informationPricing of Limit Orders in the Electronic Security Trading System Xetra
Pricing of Limit Orders in the Electronic Security Trading System Xetra Li Xihao Bielefeld Graduate School of Economics and Management Bielefeld University, P.O. Box 100 131 D33501 Bielefeld, Germany
More informationInsurance. Michael Peters. December 27, 2013
Insurance Michael Peters December 27, 2013 1 Introduction In this chapter, we study a very simple model of insurance using the ideas and concepts developed in the chapter on risk aversion. You may recall
More information1 Maximizing pro ts when marginal costs are increasing
BEE12 Basic Mathematical Economics Week 1, Lecture Tuesda 12.1. Pro t maimization 1 Maimizing pro ts when marginal costs are increasing We consider in this section a rm in a perfectl competitive market
More informationThe Heat Equation. Lectures INF2320 p. 1/88
The Heat Equation Lectures INF232 p. 1/88 Lectures INF232 p. 2/88 The Heat Equation We study the heat equation: u t = u xx for x (,1), t >, (1) u(,t) = u(1,t) = for t >, (2) u(x,) = f(x) for x (,1), (3)
More informationHackingproofness and Stability in a Model of Information Security Networks
Hackingproofness and Stability in a Model of Information Security Networks Sunghoon Hong Preliminary draft, not for citation. March 1, 2008 Abstract We introduce a model of information security networks.
More informationA characterization of trace zero symmetric nonnegative 5x5 matrices
A characterization of trace zero symmetric nonnegative 5x5 matrices Oren Spector June 1, 009 Abstract The problem of determining necessary and sufficient conditions for a set of real numbers to be the
More informationInsurance and Public Pensions : (b) Adverse Selection
Insurance and Public Pensions : (b) Adverse Selection Adverse selection is said to occur if potential buyers of insurance know their own probabilities of loss better than do insurance companies. So suppose
More informationIndiana State Core Curriculum Standards updated 2009 Algebra I
Indiana State Core Curriculum Standards updated 2009 Algebra I Strand Description Boardworks High School Algebra presentations Operations With Real Numbers Linear Equations and A1.1 Students simplify and
More informationDEPARTMENT OF ECONOMICS EXPLAINING THE ANOMALIES OF THE EXPONENTIAL DISCOUNTED UTILITY MODEL
DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMICS EXPLAINING THE ANOMALIES OF THE EXPONENTIAL DISCOUNTED UTILITY MODEL Ali alnowaihi, University of Leicester, UK Sanjit Dhami, University of Leicester, UK Working Paper No. 07/09
More informationCash Flows and Policyholder Behaviour
D E P A R T M E N T O F M A T H E M A T I C A L S C I E N C E S UNIVERSITY OF COPENHAGEN Cash Flows and Policyholder Behaviour in the semimarkov life insurance setup Kristian Buchardt Ph.D.student http://math.ku.dk/~buchardt
More informationIntroduction. Asymmetric Information and Adverse selection. Problem of individual insurance. Health Economics Bill Evans
Introduction Asymmetric Information and Adverse selection Health Economics Bill Evans Intermediate micro build models of individual, firm and market behavior Most models assume actors fully informed about
More informationLecture Notes on Actuarial Mathematics
Lecture Notes on Actuarial Mathematics Jerry Alan Veeh May 1, 2006 Copyright 2006 Jerry Alan Veeh. All rights reserved. 0. Introduction The objective of these notes is to present the basic aspects of the
More informationTABLE OF CONTENTS. GENERAL AND HISTORICAL PREFACE iii SIXTH EDITION PREFACE v PART ONE: REVIEW AND BACKGROUND MATERIAL
TABLE OF CONTENTS GENERAL AND HISTORICAL PREFACE iii SIXTH EDITION PREFACE v PART ONE: REVIEW AND BACKGROUND MATERIAL CHAPTER ONE: REVIEW OF INTEREST THEORY 3 1.1 Interest Measures 3 1.2 Level Annuity
More informationDemand and supply of health insurance. Folland et al Chapter 8
Demand and supply of health Folland et al Chapter 8 Chris Auld Economics 317 February 9, 2011 What is insurance? From an individual s perspective, insurance transfers wealth from good states of the world
More informationMidterm exam, Health economics, Spring 2007 Answer key
Midterm exam, Health economics, Spring 2007 Answer key Instructions: All points on true/false and multiple choice questions will be given for the explanation. Note that you can choose which questions to
More informationChapter 21: The Discounted Utility Model
Chapter 21: The Discounted Utility Model 21.1: Introduction This is an important chapter in that it introduces, and explores the implications of, an empirically relevant utility function representing intertemporal
More informationTHE FUNDAMENTAL THEOREM OF ARBITRAGE PRICING
THE FUNDAMENTAL THEOREM OF ARBITRAGE PRICING 1. Introduction The BlackScholes theory, which is the main subject of this course and its sequel, is based on the Efficient Market Hypothesis, that arbitrages
More informationLecture 11 Uncertainty
Lecture 11 Uncertainty 1. Contingent Claims and the StatePreference Model 1) Contingent Commodities and Contingent Claims Using the simple twogood model we have developed throughout this course, think
More information1. (First passage/hitting times/gambler s ruin problem:) Suppose that X has a discrete state space and let i be a fixed state. Let
Copyright c 2009 by Karl Sigman 1 Stopping Times 1.1 Stopping Times: Definition Given a stochastic process X = {X n : n 0}, a random time τ is a discrete random variable on the same probability space as
More informationManual for SOA Exam MLC.
Chapter 4. Life Insurance. c 29. Miguel A. Arcones. All rights reserved. Extract from: Arcones Manual for the SOA Exam MLC. Fall 29 Edition. available at http://www.actexmadriver.com/ c 29. Miguel A. Arcones.
More informationMultistate transition models with actuarial applications c
Multistate transition models with actuarial applications c by James W. Daniel c Copyright 2004 by James W. Daniel Reprinted by the Casualty Actuarial Society and the Society of Actuaries by permission
More informationLOSS COVERAGE IN INSURANCE MARKETS: WHY ADVERSE SELECTION IS NOT ALWAYS A BAD THING
LOSS COVERAGE IN INSURANCE MARKETS: WHY ADVERSE SELECTION IS NOT ALWAYS A BAD THING MingJie Hao, Pradip Tapadar and R. Guy Thomas School of Mathematics, Statistics and Actuarial Science, University of
More informationTaylor Polynomials and Taylor Series Math 126
Taylor Polynomials and Taylor Series Math 26 In many problems in science and engineering we have a function f(x) which is too complicated to answer the questions we d like to ask. In this chapter, we will
More informationStochastic Inventory Control
Chapter 3 Stochastic Inventory Control 1 In this chapter, we consider in much greater details certain dynamic inventory control problems of the type already encountered in section 1.3. In addition to the
More informationThe Basics of Interest Theory
Contents Preface 3 The Basics of Interest Theory 9 1 The Meaning of Interest................................... 10 2 Accumulation and Amount Functions............................ 14 3 Effective Interest
More informationBinomial lattice model for stock prices
Copyright c 2007 by Karl Sigman Binomial lattice model for stock prices Here we model the price of a stock in discrete time by a Markov chain of the recursive form S n+ S n Y n+, n 0, where the {Y i }
More informationIntegral Calculus  Exercises
Integral Calculus  Eercises 6. Antidifferentiation. The Indefinite Integral In problems through 7, find the indicated integral.. Solution. = = + C = + C.. e Solution. e =. ( 5 +) Solution. ( 5 +) = e
More informationThe Relation between Two Present Value Formulae
James Ciecka, Gary Skoog, and Gerald Martin. 009. The Relation between Two Present Value Formulae. Journal of Legal Economics 15(): pp. 6174. The Relation between Two Present Value Formulae James E. Ciecka,
More informationf x a 0 n 1 a 0 a 1 cos x a 2 cos 2x a 3 cos 3x b 1 sin x b 2 sin 2x b 3 sin 3x a n cos nx b n sin nx n 1 f x dx y
Fourier Series When the French mathematician Joseph Fourier (768 83) was tring to solve a problem in heat conduction, he needed to epress a function f as an infinite series of sine and cosine functions:
More informationSocial Insurance (Chapter12) Part1
(Chapter12) Part1 Background Dramatic change in the composition of government spending in the U.S. over time Background Social insurance programs: Government interventions in the provision of insurance
More informationYou Are What You Bet: Eliciting Risk Attitudes from Horse Races
You Are What You Bet: Eliciting Risk Attitudes from Horse Races PierreAndré Chiappori, Amit Gandhi, Bernard Salanié and Francois Salanié March 14, 2008 What Do We Know About Risk Preferences? Not that
More informationPUTNAM TRAINING POLYNOMIALS. Exercises 1. Find a polynomial with integral coefficients whose zeros include 2 + 5.
PUTNAM TRAINING POLYNOMIALS (Last updated: November 17, 2015) Remark. This is a list of exercises on polynomials. Miguel A. Lerma Exercises 1. Find a polynomial with integral coefficients whose zeros include
More informationSCREENING IN INSURANCE MARKETS WITH ADVERSE SELECTION AND BACKGROUND RISK. Keith J. Crocker
SCREENING IN INSURANCE MARKETS WIT ADVERSE SEECTION AND BACKGROUND RISK Keith J. Crocker University of Michigan Business School 70 Tappan Street Ann Arbor, MI 4809 and Arthur Snow Department of Economics
More informationFair Valuation and Hedging of Participating LifeInsurance Policies under Management Discretion
Fair Valuation and Hedging of Participating LifeInsurance Policies under Management Discretion Torsten Kleinow Department of Actuarial Mathematics and Statistics and the Maxwell Institute for Mathematical
More informationIntroduction to Probability
Introduction to Probability EE 179, Lecture 15, Handout #24 Probability theory gives a mathematical characterization for experiments with random outcomes. coin toss life of lightbulb binary data sequence
More informationEconomics of Insurance
Economics of Insurance In this last lecture, we cover most topics of Economics of Information within a single application. Through this, you will see how the differential informational assumptions allow
More informationCritical points of once continuously differentiable functions are important because they are the only points that can be local maxima or minima.
Lecture 0: Convexity and Optimization We say that if f is a once continuously differentiable function on an interval I, and x is a point in the interior of I that x is a critical point of f if f (x) =
More informationMarket Failure. EC4004 Lecture 9
Market Failure EC4004 Lecture 9 Today. Online Exam. Quantity Demanded, Quantity Supplied at each price 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 Supply at each Price, S(p) t Demand at each Price, D(p) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
More informationBonusmalus systems and Markov chains
Bonusmalus systems and Markov chains Dutch car insurance bonusmalus system class % increase new class after # claims 0 1 2 >3 14 30 14 9 5 1 13 32.5 14 8 4 1 12 35 13 8 4 1 11 37.5 12 7 3 1 10 40 11
More informationINTERNATIONAL COMPARISON OF INTEREST RATE GUARANTEES IN LIFE INSURANCE
INTERNATIONAL COMPARISON OF INTEREST RATE GUARANTEES IN LIFE INSURANCE J. DAVID CUMMINS, KRISTIAN R. MILTERSEN, AND SVEINARNE PERSSON Abstract. Interest rate guarantees seem to be included in life insurance
More information