1 * by Barbara Leigh Smith and Jean T. MacGregor *This is an abbreviation of Smith and MacGregor s article, What Is Collaborative Learning?" in Collaborative Learning: A Sourcebook for Higher Education, by Anne Goodsell, Michelle Maher, Vincent Tinto, Barbara Leigh Smith and Jean MacGregor. It was published In 1992 by the National Center on Postsecondary Teaching, Learning, and Assessment at Pennsylvania State University. Collaborative learning is an umbrella term for a variety of educational approaches involving joint intellectual effort by students, or students and teachers together. Usually, students are working in groups of two or more, mutually searching for understanding, solutions, or meanings, or creating a product. Collaborative learning activities vary widely, but most center on students exploration or application of the course material, not simply the teacher s presentation or explication of it. Collaborative learning represents a significant shift away from the typical teachercentered or lecture-centered milieu in college classrooms. In collaborative classrooms, the lecturing/ listening/note-taking process may not disappear entirely, but it lives alongside other processes that are based in students discussion and active work with the course material. Teachers who use collaborative learning approaches tend to think of themselves less as expert transmitters of knowledge to students, and more as expert designers of intellectual experiences for students-as coaches or mid-wives of a more emergent learning process. Assumptions about Learning Though collaborative learning takes on a variety of forms and is practiced by teachers of different disciplinary backgrounds and teaching traditions, the field is tied together by a number of important assumptions about learners and the learning process. Learning is an active, constructive process: To learn new information, ideas or skills, our students have to work actively with them in purposeful ways. They need to integrate this new material with what they already know-or use it to reorganize what they thought they knew. In collaborative learning situations, our students are not simply taking in new information or ideas. They are creating something new with the information and ideas. These acts of intellectual processing- of constructing meaning or creating something new-are crucial to learning. Learning depends on rich contexts: Recent research suggests learning is fundamentally influenced by the context and activity in which it is embedded (Brown, Collins and Duguid, 1989). Collaborative learning activities immerse students in challenging tasks or questions. Rather than beginning with facts and ideas and then moving to applications, collaborative learning activities frequently begin with problems, for which students must marshal pertinent facts and ideas. Instead of being distant observers of questions and answers, or problems and solutions, students become immediate practitioners. Rich contexts challenge students to practice and develop higher order reasoning and problemsolving skills.
2 Learners are diverse: Our students bring multiple perspectives to the classroom-diverse backgrounds, learning styles, experiences, and aspirations. As teachers, we can no longer assume a one-size-fits- all approach. When students work together on their learning in class, we get a direct and immediate sense of how they are learning, and what experiences and ideas they bring to their work. The diverse perspectives that emerge in collaborative activities are clarifying but not just for us. They are illuminating for our students as well. Learning is inherently social: As Jeff Golub points out, Collaborative learning has as its main feature a structure that allows for student talk: students are supposed to talk with each other...and it is in this talking that much of the learning occurs. (Golub, 1988) Collaborative learning produces intellectual synergy of many minds coming to bear on a problem, and the social stimulation of mutual engagement in a common endeavor. This mutual exploration, meaning-making, and feedback often leads to better understanding on the part of students, and to the creation of new understandings for all of us. Goals for Education While we use collaborative learning because we believe it helps students learn more effectively, many of us also place a high premium on teaching strategies that go beyond mere mastery of content and ideas. We believe collaborative learning promotes a larger educational agenda, one that encompasses several intertwined rationales. Involvement. Calls to involve students more actively in their learning are coming from virtually every quarter of higher education (Astin, 1985; Bonwell and Eison, 1991; Kuh, 1990; Study Group on the Conditions of Excellence in Higher Education, 1984). Involvement in learning, involvement with other students, and involvement with faculty are factors that make an overwhelming difference in student retention and success in college. By its very nature, collaborative learning is both socially and intellectually involving. It invites students to build closer connections to other students, their faculty, their courses and their learning. Cooperation and teamwork. In collaborative endeavors, students inevitably encounter difference, and must grapple with recognizing and working with it. Building the capacities for tolerating or resolving differences, for building agreement that honors all the voices in a group, for caring how others are doing -- these abilities are crucial aspects of living in a community. Too often the development of these values and skills is relegated to the Student Life side of the campus. Cultivation of teamwork, communitybuilding, and leadership skills are legitimate and valuable classroom goals, not just extracurricular ones. Civic Responsibility: If democracy is to endure in any meaningful way, our educational system must foster habits of participation in and responsibility to the larger community. Collaborative learning encourages students to acquire an active voice in shaping their ideas and values and a sensitive ear in hearing others. Dialogue, deliberation, and
3 consensus-building out of differences are strong threads in the fabric of collaborative learning, and in civic life as well. Collaborative Learning Approaches Collaborative learning covers a broad territory of approaches with wide variability in the amount of in-class or out-of-class time built around group work. Collaborative activities can range from classroom discussions interspersed with short lectures, through entire class periods, to study on research teams that last a whole term or year. The goals and processes of collaborative activities also vary widely. Some faculty members design small group work around specific sequential steps, or tightly structured tasks. Others prefer a more spontaneous agenda developing out of student interests or questions. In some collaborative learning settings, the students task is to create a clearly delineated product; in others, the task is not to produce a product, but rather to participate in a process, an exercise of responding to each other s work or engaging in analysis and meaning-making. Cooperative Learning Cooperative learning represents the most carefully structured end of the collaborative learning continuum. Defined as the instructional use of small groups so that students work together to maximize their own and each other s learning (Johnson et al. 1990), cooperative learning is based on the social interdependence theories of Kurt Lewin and Morton Deutsch (Deutsch, 1949; Lewin, 1935). These theories and associated research explore the influence of the structure of social interdependence on individual interaction within a given situation which, in turn, affects the outcomes of that interaction (Johnson and Johnson, 1989). Pioneers in cooperative learning, David and Roger Johnson at the University of Minnesota, Robert Slavin at Johns Hopkins University, and Elizabeth Cohen at Stanford, have devoted years of detailed research and analysis to clarify the conditions under which cooperative, competitive, or individualized goal structures affect or increase student achievement, psychological adjustment, self-esteem, and social skills. In cooperative learning, the development of interpersonal skills is as important as the learning itself. The development of social skills in group work-learning to cooperate -- is key to high quality group work. Many cooperative learning tasks are put to students with both academic objectives and social skills objectives. Many of the strategies involve assigning roles within each small group (such as recorder, participation encourager, summarizer) to ensure the positive interdependence of group participants and to enable students to practice different teamwork skills. Built into cooperative learning work is regular group processing, a debriefing time where students reflect on how they are doing in order to learn how to become more effective in group learning settings (Johnson, Johnson and Holubec, 1990). Problem-Centered Instruction Problem-centered instruction, widely used in professional education, frequently is built around collaborative learning strategies. Many of these spring from common roots, especially the work of John Dewey in the early part of this century. Dewey endorsed discussion-based teaching and believed strongly in the importance of giving students
4 direct experiential encounters with real-world problems. Guided Design, cases, and simulations are all forms of problem-centered instruction, which immerse students in complex problems that they must analyze and work through together. These approaches develop problem-solving abilities, understanding of complex relationships, and decisionmaking in the face of uncertainty. While problem-solving has long been a focus of professional education, it is increasingly regarded as an important aspect of the liberal arts as well. In collaborative endeavors, students inevitably encounter difference, and must grapple with recognizing and working with it. Guided Design: Guided Design is the most carefully structured approach to problemcentered instruction. The approach asks students, working in small groups, to practice decision-making in sequenced tasks, with detailed feed-back at every step. Developed in the late 1960 s in the engineering program at West Virginia University, the Guided Design approach has since been adopted in many disciplines and professional programs, most notably in engineering, nursing and pharmacy, but in many liberal arts and sciences courses as well (Borchardt, 1984; Day et al, 1984; detornay and Thompson, 1987; Miller, 1981; Roemer, 1981; Vogt et al., 1992). Cases: Case studies have long been a staple for teaching and learning in the professions, particularly in the fields of business, law and education, and they are now being used in many other disciplines as well (Christensen and Hanson 1987). A case is a story or narrative of a real life situation that sets up a problem or unresolved tension for the students to analyze and resolve. The use of cases does not necessarily imply collaborative learning or small seminar discussion. However, case method teaching frequently asks small groups of students to tackle cases in class or in study group sessions. Problem-centered Instruction in Medical Education. Problem-centered instruction has also emerged in recent decades in the field of medical education. This work began in England, then spread to Canada and ultimately to the U. S. M.L.J. Abercrombie s research in England in the 1950 s made a compelling case for discussion methods of teaching, contending that when people work in teams, they make more valid judgments than when working alone. This pioneering research had a profound impact on collaborative learning in medical education both in England and North America (Abercrombie, 1961, 1970). McMaster University in Canada was one of the early leaders in problem-centered medical education (Barrows and Tamblyn, 1980), followed by Western Reserve University, the University of New Mexico, and others. In 1985, the Harvard Medical School adopted a problem-based curriculum entitled New Pathways that has garnered national attention. Simulations: Simulations are complex, structured role-playing situations that simulate real experiences. Most simulations ask students, working individually or in teams, to play the roles of opposing stakeholders in a problematic situation or an unfolding drama. Taking on the values and acting the part of a stakeholder usually gets students
5 emotionally invested in the situation. The key aspect of simulations, though, is that of perspective-taking, both during the simulation exercise and afterwards. Following the simulation, there is usually a lengthy discussion where students reflect on the simulation and explore their own actions and those of others. This is where important concepts and lessons emerge. There are now a large number of simulations or educational games, as they are sometimes called, relating to many disciplinary areas (Abt, 1987; Bratley, 1987). Writing Groups Both in theory and practice, the most concentrated effort in undergraduate collaborative learning has focused on the teaching of writing. The writing group approach, (known variously as peer response groups, class criticism, or helping circles) has transformed thousands of college writing classes. Through the spread of writing-across-the-curriculum initiatives, writing groups increasingly are appearing in other courses as well. Peer writing involves students working in small groups at every stage of the writing process. Many writing groups begin as composing groups: they formulate ideas, clarify their positions, test an argument or focus a thesis statement before committing it to paper. This shared composing challenges students to think through their ideas out loud, to hear what they sound like, so they will know what to say in writing. Writing groups also serve as peer response groups. Students exchange their written drafts of papers and get feedback on them either orally or in writing. This is a challenging process, one that requires students to read and listen to fellow students writing with insight, and to make useful suggestions for improvement. Word processors have helped peer writing enormously; in many writing labs, students share their drafts and revise them right on the screens. Peer Teaching With its roots in our one-room schoolhouse tradition, the process of students teaching their fellow students is probably the oldest form of collaborative learning in American education. In recent decades, however, peer teaching approaches have proliferated in higher education, under many names and structures (Whitman, 1988). The following examples represent three of the most successful and widely adapted peer teaching models. Supplemental Instruction: The Supplemental Instruction approach is an undergraduate teaching assistant model developed by Deanna Martin at the University of Missouri- Kansas City. It has been adopted at hundreds of colleges in the United States and abroad. This urban campus recognized the need to offer tutoring help to students, but budgetary constraints made one-to-one tutoring too expensive. Its search for an alternative approach led to Supplemental Instruction. This approach focused not on at risk students, but rather on at risk classes, entry-level classes in health sciences, and later in general arts and sciences classes, where more than 30 per cent of the students were either withdrawing or failing. The university invites advanced undergraduates who have done well in those classes to become SI leaders. These students are paid to attend the class, and to convene Supplemental Instruction sessions at least three times a week at hours convenient to students in the class. (Blanc, DeBuhr and Martin, 1980)
6 Writing Fellows: The Writing Fellows approach, pioneered by Tori Haring-Smith at Brown University, is a peer teaching approach somewhat parallel to Supplemental Instruction. The writing fellows are upper-division students who are strong writers. After extensive training, these students are deployed to an undergraduate class (generally in the discipline of their major) where they read and respond to the papers of all the students. Haring-Smith calls this a bottom-up approach to sustaining writing-across-thecurriculum initiatives, particularly in large classes where many faculty flag at assigning writing because there are simply too many papers to which to respond. Over 50 colleges and universities have created Writing Fellows Programs. Mathematics Workshops: A third peer teaching approach that spread rapidly in the late 1980 s is the intensive mathematics workshops program developed by Uri Treisman while he was at the University of California at Berkeley. Treisman wanted to address the drawbacks of traditional tutoring models-particularly those geared to minority students in academic difficulty. Finding that study groups made a difference in student success, he created a co-peer teaching approach called the Professional Development Program. The program assumes the culture of an honors program rather than a remedial program. Graduate instructors (usually doctoral candidates) lead math workshops built around small group problem-solving, with an explicit emphasis on peer teaching. These workshops supplement the regular lecture and discussion sections of mathematics courses. This intensive small group workshop approach, which emphasizes developing strength rather than remediating weakness, and peer collaboration rather than solo competition, completely reversed the prevailing patterns of failure by Hispanic and African American students in calculus classes at Berkeley (Treisman, 1985). This intensive math workshop approach has since spread widely in the mathematics community in high schools, as well as in both two- and four-year colleges. Writing Fellows... are a bottom-up approach to sustaining writing-across-the curriculum initiatives... Discussion Groups and Seminars The terms discussion group and seminar refer to a broad array of teaching approaches. In college settings we usually think of discussions as processes, both formal and informal, that encourage student dialogue with teachers and with each other. All the approaches we have described above involve discussion. Most, however have distinct protocols, goals, or structures framing the activity. What we are describing heremore open-ended discussion or seminars-puts the onus on the teacher or the students to pose questions and build a conversation in the context of the topic at hand. There is enormous variability, then, in terms of who sets the agenda, who organizes and monitors the discussion, and who evaluates what. Some discussions or seminars may be heavily teacher-directed, others much more student-centered. There are myriad possibilities for discussions, and many good resources on strategies exist (Christensen et al.,1991; Eble, 1976; McKeachie, 1986; Neff and Weimer, 1989).
7 Learning Communities Collaborative learning practitioners would say that all collaborative learning is about building learning communities. However, we use the term learning community here in a broader but more specific sense, in terms of intentional reconfiguration of the curriculum. In the past 15 years, a number of colleges have recognized that deep-seated structural factors weaken the quality of undergraduate learning and inhibit the development of community. These schools have attacked the problem directly by developing learning communities, a purposeful restructuring of the curriculum to link together courses so that students find greater coherence in what they are learning and increased interaction with faculty and fellow students (Gabelnick, MacGregor, Matthews, and Smith, 1990). As such, learning communities are a delivery system and a facilitating structure for the practice of collaborative learning. Learning community curriculum structures vary from campus to campus. They can serve many different purposes, but have two common intentions. They attempt to provide intellectual coherence for students by linking classes together and building relationships between subject matter, or by teaching a skill (e.g., writing or speaking) in the context of a discipline. Second, they aim to build both academic and social community for students by enrolling them together in a large block of course work. Learning communities directly confront multiple problems plaguing under-graduate education: the fragmentation of general education classes, isolation of students (especially on large campuses or commuter schools), lack of meaningful connection- building between classes; the need for greater intellectual interaction between students and faculty; and lack of sustained opportunities for faculty development. By altering the curricular structure to provide larger units of study, learning communities frequently provide more time and space for collaborative learning and other more complicated educational approaches. Small group workshops and book seminars are staples of most learning communities. Peer writing groups and team projects associated with labs and field work are also fairly common. Study groups emerge in learning communities, both intentionally and spontaneously. These programs provide a unique social and intellectual glue for students that results in high rates of student retention, increased student achievement and more complex intellectual development (MacGregor, 1991). Creating a collaborative classroom can be wonderfully rewarding opportunity but it is also full of challenges and dilemmas. Collaborative Learning: Challenges and Opportunities Creating a collaborative classroom can be a wonderfully rewarding opportunity but it is also full of challenges and dilemmas. Few of us experienced collaborative work in our own undergraduate settings, and much of our graduate school training reinforced the teacher-centered, lecture-driven model of college teaching. For each of us, stepping out of the center and engaging students in group activity is hard work, especially at first.
8 Designing group work requires a demanding yet important rethinking of our syllabus, in terms of course content and time allocation. If some (or a great deal) of the classroom time is considered an important social space for developing understandings about course material, or if some of the out-of-class time is devoted to study groups or group projects, how should we design the rest of the class time (lectures, assignments, examinations)? How do we ensure students are learning and mastering key skills and ideas in the course, while at the same time addressing all the material of the course? Teaching in collaborative settings puts front and center the tension between the process of student learning and content coverage. As we become more involved in using collaborative learning, we discover what radical questions it raises. Collaborative learning goes to the roots of long-held assumptions about teaching and learning. Classroom roles change: both teachers and students take on more complex roles and responsibilities. (Finkel and Monk, 1983; MacGregor, 1990 ). The classroom is no longer solo teacher and individual students- it becomes more an interdependent community with all the joys and tensions and difficulties that attend all communities. This degree of involvement often questions and reshapes assumed power relationships between teachers and students, (and between students and students), a process that at first can be confusing and disorienting (Romer and Whipple, 1990). Not only is course content reshaped, so are our definitions of student competence. Because the public nature of group work makes demonstration of student learning so continuous, collaborative learning both complicates and enriches the evaluation process. Challenges to collaborative learning at the classroom level are compounded by the traditional structures and culture of the academy, which continue to perpetuate the teacher-centered, transmission- of-information model of teaching and learning. The political economy of the academy is set up to front load the curriculum with large lower division classes in rooms immutably arranged for lectures, usually in classes limited to fifty-minute hours. Student-student interaction; extended, careful examination of ideas; the hearing-out of multiple perspectives; the development of an intellectual community - all these are hard to accomplish under these constraints. The lecture-centered model is reinforced (both subtly and blatantly) by institutional reward systems that favor limited engagement in teaching, and give greater recognition to research. Achievement for teachers and students alike is assumed to be a scarce honor, which one works for alone, in competition with peers. This assumption of scarcity is the platform for norm-referenced grading, or grading on the curve, a procedure that enforces distance between students and corrodes the trust on which collaborative learning is built. Moreover, our definitions of our selves as teachers, as keepers and dispensers of disciplinary expertise, are still very much bound up in the lecture podium. For example, a colleague recently told us a poignant story about his dean coming to observe his teaching. The dean looked into the room where students were avidly engaged in small group work.
9 Turning to leave, the dean said to our colleague, Oh, you re doing groups today. Ill come back when you re teaching. We have a long way to go. What really has propelled us and our colleagues into collaborative classrooms is the desire to motivate students by getting them more actively engaged. Nonetheless, wanting to be a facilitator of collaborative learning and being good at it are very different things. As with all kinds of teaching, designing and guiding group work takes time to learn and practice. And for students, learning to learn well in groups doesn t happen overnight. Most teachers start with modest efforts. Many work with colleagues, designing, trying and observing each other s approaches. At their best, collaborative classrooms stimulate both students and teachers. In the most authentic of ways, the collaborative learning process models what it means to question, learn and understand in concert with others. Learning collaboratively demands responsibility, persistence and sensitivity, but the result can be a community of learners in which everyone is welcome to join, participate and grow. References Abercrombie, M. L. J. Aims and Techniques of Group Teaching. Surrey, England: Society for Research into Higher Education Abercrombie, M. L. J. The Anatomy of Judgement. London: Book Guild, Abt, C. Serious Games. Washington, D.C.: University Press of America, Astin, A. Achieving Educational Excellence. San Francisco, Jossey Bass, Barrrows, N.S. and R.M. Tamblyn. Problem-Based Learning: An Approach to Medical Education. New York: Springer Publishing, Blanc, R. A. and L.E. DeBuhr, and D. C. Martin. Breaking the Attrition Cycle. Journal of Higher Education. 54, (1), Bonwell, C. and J. Eison. Active Learning: Creating Excitement in the Classroom. ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report (1),1991. Borchardt, D. Think Tank Theatre: Decision-Making Applied. Lanham, MD: University Press of America, Brown, J.S., A. Collins, and P. Duguid. Situated Cognition and the Culture of Learning. Educational Researcher. 18 (1), Bratley, P. et. al. A Guide to Simulations. 2nd edition. Springer-Verlag, Bricker, David C. Classroom Life as Civic Education: Individual Achievement and Student Cooperation in Schools. New York: Teachers College Press, Christensen, C. R., and A.J. Hansen. Teaching and the Case Method. Boston, Mass.: Harvard Business School, 1987.
10 Christensen, C.R., D. Garvin, and A. Sweet. Education for Judgement: The Artistry of Discussion Leadership. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Busi-ness School, Day, P.J., H.J. Macy and E.C. Jackson. Social Working: Exercises in Generalist Practice. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall, de Tornay, R. and M.A. Thompson. Strategies for Teaching Nursing. New York: John Wiley and Sons, Deutsch, M. A Theory of Cooperation and Competition. Human Relations, 2. Eble, K. The Craft of Teaching. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, Finkel, D. L. and G. S. Monk. Teachers and Learning Groups: Dissolution of the Atlas Complex. In C. Bouton and R. Y. Garth (Eds.) Learning in Groups. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, no. 14 San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, Gabelnick, F. and J. MacGregor, R. Matthews, and B.L. Smith. Learning Communities: Creating Connections Among Students, Faculty and Disciplines. San Francisco: Jossey Bass New Directions for Teaching and Learning, Number 41, Spring Gere, A. Writing Groups: History, Theory and Implications. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press, Golub, J. (Ed). Focus on Collaborative Learning. Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English, Johnson, D.W. and R.T. Johnson. Cooperation and Competition: Theory and Research. Edina, MN: Interaction Book Company, Johnson, David W., R. Johnson, and E. Holubec. Circles of Learning: Coopera-tion in the Classroom. Edina, MN: Interaction Book Company, Kuh, G. et al. Involving Colleges: Successful Approaches to Fostering Student Learning and Development Outside the Classroom. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, Lewin, K. A Dynamic Theory of Personality. New York: McGraw Hill, MacGregor, J. What Difference Do Learning Communities Make? Washington Center News, (6) 1, Olympia, WA: Washington Center for Undergraduate Education, The Evergreen State College. MacGregor, J. Collaborative Learning: Shared Inquiry as a Process of Reform. In M. Svinicki, (Ed.) The Changing Face of College Teaching. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, no. 42, San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, McKeachie, W. Teaching Tips: A Guidebook for the Beginning Teacher. Lexing-ton, MA: D.C. Heath, Miller, D.I. Experience in Decision Making for Students of Industrial Psychol-ogy. Washington, D.C.: University Press of America, Neff, R and M. Weimer. Classroom Communication: Collected Readings for Effective Discussion and Questioning. Madison, WI: Magna Publications, Roemer, K.M. Build Your Own Utopia. Washington D.C.: University Press of America, Romer, K. and W. Whipple. Collaboration across the Power Line. College Teaching, 1990, 39 (2).
Essays on Teaching Excellence Toward the Best in the Academy Volume 2, Number 3, 1990-91 A publication of The Professional & Organizational Development Network in Higher Education (www.podnetwork.org).
Learning Better Together: The Impact of Learning Communities on Student Success Vincent Tinto Syracuse University Despite recent innovations, it remains the case that most students experience universities
1 Conley, D. T. (2010). College and Career Ready: Helping all Students Succeed Beyond High School. San Francisco: Jossey Bass. (Abstract prepared for AVID Postsecondary by Harriet Howell Custer, Ph.D.)
Get to Know My RE Observe Collect Evidence Mentor Moments Reflect Review Respond Tailor Support Provide Provide specific feedback specific Feedback What does my RE need? Practice Habits Of Mind Share Data
A Primer on Writing Effective Learning-Centered Course Goals Robert K. Noyd (DFB) & The Staff of The Center for Educational Excellence (CEE) US Air Force Academy A Shift from a Topic-Centered to a Learning-Centered
Strategies for Engaging Students in Large Classes Karl A. Smith Civil Engineering University of Minnesota firstname.lastname@example.org http://www.ce.umn.edu/~smith Opening the Door: Sharing the Craft of Teaching University
Essays on Teaching Excellence Toward the Best in the Academy A Publication of The Professional & Organizational Development Network in Higher Education Vol. 19, No. 5, 2007-2008 Building Assignments that
Grand Valley State University School of Social Work Grand Valley State University was chartered by the Michigan Legislature in 1960, in response to the need for a public, four-year institution of higher
IDEA PAPER #42 Integrated Course Design L. Dee Fink University of Oklahoma Teaching is a complex human action. The many tasks that are involved comprise four general components: Knowledge of the subject
MAJOR NEW IDEAS THAT CAN EMPOWER COLLEGE TEACHING This is a list of major ideas on college teaching, shown by the year in which a new publication either introduced the idea or consolidated existing information
May 2002 Volume 59 Number 8 Beyond Instructional Leadership Pages 61-63 The Changing Shape of Leadership The Annenberg Institute for School Reform's work with principals, superintendents, and other educators
A Common North Star: College Summit and the Common Core State Standards Overview The broad based adoption of the Common Core State Standards (Common Core) presents a challenge to any organization serving
College Credit College Ready Skills (High School) Course of Study NCNSP Design Principle 1: Ready for College Students are tracked according to past performance into regular and honors level courses. All
Essays on Teaching Excellence Toward the Best in the Academy Volume 6, Number 6, 1994-95 A publication of The Professional & Organizational Development Network in Higher Education (www.podnetwork.org).
Abstract Limbach, Barbara Chadron State College Waugh, Wendy Chadron State College This paper identifies an interdisciplinary, five-step process, built upon existing theory and best practices in cognitive
Status of Assessing Student Learning Outcomes in Community Colleges Jack Friedlander, Executive Vice President, Educational Programs, Santa Barbara City College and Andreea Serban, Associate Vice President
VII Additional Resources Additional Resources Websites: In addition to websites at individual institutions, these are the premier websites for information on learning communities and freshman seminars.
EFRT 305 Human Development and Learning Required Textbooks: Slavin, Robert E., (2010). Educational psychology: Theory and practice. 9 th Ed. ISBN: 9780137034352 EMSP Registration: This course has a field
Curriculum and Instruction: A 21st Century Skills Implementation Guide Produced by To succeed in college, career and life in the 21st century, students must be supported in mastering both content and skills.
12 Section Two: Ohio Standards for the Teaching Profession 1 Teachers understand student learning and development and respect the diversity of the students they teach. Teachers display knowledge of how
Essays on Teaching Excellence Toward the Best in the Academy Volume 7, Number 7, 1995-96 A publication of The Professional & Organizational Development Network in Higher Education (www.podnetwork.org).
Tending the Fire: Facilitating Difficult Discussions in the Online Classroom Julie Higbee Instructional Specialist University of Phoenix Online Campus Kathy Ferguson Faculty, University of Phoenix Online
Teamwork for Learning and Project Success Workshop Notes and Handouts Teamwork for Learning and Project Success Jim Borgford-Parnell Purpose: This presentation explains the benefits of teamwork, factors
Draft Policy on Graduate Education Preface/Introduction Over the past two decades, the number and types of graduate programs have increased dramatically. In particular, the development of clinical master
Active and Collaborative Learning through a Blog Network Jack Zheng Southern Polytechnic State University email@example.com ABSTRACT This paper describes a team blog network method designed for a graduate
Elementary MEd I. The Relationship of the Program with the Unit s Conceptual Framework Shaping Tomorrow: Ideas to Action The Early Elementary Education program for prospective elementary education candidates
Journal of Education and Training Studies Vol. 2, No. 2; April 2014 ISSN 2324-805X E-ISSN 2324-8068 Published by Redfame Publishing URL: http://jets.redfame.com Group Selection and Learning for a Lab-Based
COURSE CATALOG Contents Introduction... 3 Delta Courses... 4 The College Classroom... 4 The College Classroom: International Students, International Faculty... 4 Diversity in the College Classroom... 4
Philosophy Online class observations are meant to facilitate an instructor s professional growth. They will be used to create an opportunity for reflection and stimulate ideas for improvement in the online
ASU College of Education Course Syllabus ED 4972, ED 4973, ED 4974, ED 4975 or EDG 5660 Clinical Teaching Course: ED 4972, ED 4973, ED 4974, ED 4975 or EDG 5660 Credit: 9 Semester Credit Hours (Undergraduate),
228 ADMINISTRATIVE PROCESS OF DEVELOPING ONLINE COURSES Jong Hwa Lee * INTRODUCTION Teaching online means conducting a course partially or entirely through the Internet. It is a form of distance education,
Illinois Professional Teaching Standards Preamble: We believe that all students have the potential to learn rigorous content and achieve high standards. A well-educated citizenry is essential for maintaining
Pamplin College of Business Strategic Plan 2014-2019 Adopted: 5-13-2014 Revised: 7-3-2014 1. Introduction Pamplin is a nationally recognized, integral part of Virginia Tech the premier research university
Creating Meaningful Environments for Leadership Education Kathy L. Guthrie, Ph.D. Assistant Professor Educational Leadership and Policy Studies Florida State University Tallahassee, FL firstname.lastname@example.org
POWAY UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT CONTINUUM OF TEACHING STANDARDS Poway Unified School District Teaching Standards Domain I Domain II Domain III Domain IV Domain V Planning and Designing Instruction Element
Charting Your Course: Instructional Design, Course Planning, and Developing the Syllabus Danielle Mihram, Ph.D. Faculty Fellow and Director USC Center for Excellence in Teaching email@example.com Originally
Essays on Teaching Excellence Toward the Best in the Academy Volume 8, Number 1, 1996-97 A publication of The Professional & Organizational Development Network in Higher Education (www.podnetwork.org).
Developing Engaging Lessons: Students Work More You Work Less We ten feel we must carry the entire responsibility for students learning a kind Atlas Complex. 1 We do have responsibility to teach but we
1 SUPPORTING FIRST-YEAR TRANSITIONS TEMPLE UNIVERSITY Jodi Levine Laufgraben, Michele L. O Connor, and Jermaine Williams Learning communities at Temple University began in 1993 with about two hundred students.
Fornreris and Campbell, Critical Thinking and Clinical Reasoning in the Health Sciences, Facione and Facione (eds.), California Academic Press. 1 Measuring Thinking Worldwide This document is a best practices
Alignment of State Standards and Teacher Preparation Program Standards Hilda Medrano Jaime Curts The University of Texas Pan American (UTPA), at the most southern tip of South Texas is located about 20
Towson University Strategic Academic Plan 2010-2016 University Summary Mission Statement Towson University, as the state s comprehensive Metropolitan University, offers a broad range of undergraduate and
Model for Practitioner Evaluation Manual SCHOOL COUNSELOR Approved by Board of Education August 28, 2002 Revised August 2008 Model for Practitioner Evaluation Guidelines and Process for Traditional Evaluation
Essays on Teaching Excellence Toward the Best in the Academy Volume 1, Number 1, 1989-90 A publication of The Professional & Organizational Development Network in Higher Education. Critical Thinking by
Crosswalk of the New Colorado Principal Standards (proposed by State Council on Educator Effectiveness) with the Equivalent in the Performance Based Principal Licensure Standards (current principal standards)
21 st Century Curriculum and Instruction The relationship between curriculum and instruction is obviously a very close one. Curriculum is essentially a design, or roadmap for learning, and as such focuses
Objectives Introduction to Cooperative Learning Adapted by E. Fox in Jan. 2001 from Methods for Developing Coopoerative Learning on the Web by Roger T. Johnson and David W. Johnson The objectives of this
REVISED RESOLUTION ON THE ROLE OF COMMUNICATION IN GENERAL EDUCATION ADOPTED BY THE NCA LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY NOVEMBER 17, 2012 AUTHORS Cheri J. Simonds Jacquelyn Buckrop Mark Redmond Deborah Hefferin Quianthy
Tips for Choosing a TESOL Master s Program Whether you are just breaking into the TESOL field or have already been in the profession for some time, a great way to increase your knowledge and expand your
1 A Short Guide to Inclusive, Learning- centered Course Design Introduction It is no longer news to say that we live in a diverse world, and today our college campuses reflect this reality more than ever
By Dr. Kevin L. Ensor Improving Developmental College Counseling Programs Utilizing the Advancement Via Individual Determination (AVID) to Motivate At-Risk Students DR. KEviN L. ENsoR, has more than 20
Quality Educational Programs, Inc. 1891 North Gaffey Street #228 San Pedro CA 90731 800-486-8650 Teaching Students with Special Needs: Inclusion Strategies for the Classroom Teacher A Distance Learning
J. COLLEGE STUDENT RETENTION, Vol. 5(2) 135-145, 2003-2004 INSTRUCTION AND ACADEMIC SUPPORT EXPENDITURES: AN INVESTMENT IN RETENTION AND GRADUATION ANN M. GANSEMER-TOPF JOHN H. SCHUH Iowa State University,
Vrasidas & McIsaac 1 Integrating Technology in Teaching and Teacher Education: Implications for Policy and Curriculum Reform Dr. Charalambos Vrasidas Dr. Marina S. McIsaac About the Authors Dr. Charalambos
Teacher Evaluation Missouri s Educator Evaluation System Teacher Evaluation Protocol Introduction Missouri s Educator Evaluation System was created and refined by hundreds of educators across the state.
Characteristics of Effective and Sustainable Teaching Development Programs for Quality Teaching in Higher Education This presentation will address the following conference aim/question: What are the contextual
Best Practices for Developmental Math Programs To assist Illinois community colleges improve their developmental math programs, the following best practices have been selected from existing sources and
4 The rate of expansion of online classes at community colleges has required hiring and training faculty for the online class offerings. The demand is being met in large part by adjunct faculty, who, as
Commentary Shifting Teacher Education From Skilling Up to Sustaining Beginning Teachers C. Aiden Downey, Lee Schaefer, and D. Jean Clandinin ABSTRACT Early career teacher attrition is a serious concern.
INSTRUCTIONAL PERSPECTIVES OF NURSE EDUCATORS ENGAGED IN TEACHING VIA DISTANCE EDUCATION Gretchen Drinkard & John A. Henschke Abstract The purpose of this study was to contribute to knowledge regarding
THE FRAMEWORK FOR INSTRUCTIONAL COACH ENDORSEMENT GUIDELINES PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION TABLE OF CONTENTS Definition of an Endorsement Certificate... 3 Introduction to Instructional Coach Endorsement
THE GRADUATE ACADEMIC PROGRAM MASTER OF ARTS IN EDUCATION The Master of Arts in Education (M.A.Ed.) degree program is designed to meet the professional development needs of certified, in-service teachers
College Quarterly Spring 2011 - Volume 14 Number 2 Home Contents An Interprofessional Approach to Business Planning: A Model of Collaboration By Cory Ross, Kathleen Alexander, Renata Gritsyuk, Arleen Morrin,
GEORGE MASON UNIVERSITY GRADUATE SCHOOL OF EDUCATION FOUNDATIONS OF EDUCATION LEADERSHIP: ECONOMICS AND LEADERSHIP EDLE 803 (3 Credits) Spring 2005 Instructor: Scott C. Bauer Phone: 703-993-3775 Fax: 703-993-3643
Colorado Professional Teaching Standards Standard I: Teachers demonstrate knowledge of the content they teach a. Teachers provide instruction that is aligned with the Colorado Academic Standards and their
University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Quality Initiative Proposal Renewing our Commitment to Undergraduate Education Submitted to the Higher Learning Commission of the North Central Association of Colleges
Teaching for Learning in the 21 st Century: A Pedagogical Approach for Using an Advanced Technology Classroom Aram M. Donigian This paper was completed and submitted in partial fulfillment of the Master
THE RE-DESIGN OF A STATISTICS COURSE Laurie Huffman Georgia College CBX 17 Milledgeville, GA 31061 firstname.lastname@example.org Abstract This project describes a re-thinking of a traditional Probability and
Dean of the School of Adult Learning North Park University Chicago, IL Click Here To Apply Dean of the School of Adult Learning North Park University POSITION PROFILE and ANNOUNCEMENT North Park University
An Environmental Scan of Best Practices in Public Health Undergraduate Medical Education REPORT 5: Strengths, Weaknesses and Applicability of Teaching Methods MARCH 2009 Prepared by the Nevis Consulting
Open and Distance Learning Student Retention: A Case Study of the University of Papua New Guinea Open College INTRODUCTION Prof. Dr. Abdul Mannan, University of Papua new Guinea Open College, email@example.com
Taking Student Retention Seriously: Rethinking the First Year of College Vincent Tinto Syracuse University Pell Institute for the Study of Opportunity in Higher Education Introduction Many colleges speak
for Entering California Community College Students: How One Institution Can Make an Impact Esau Tovar Santa Monica College Merril A. Simon 1 California State University, Northridge Abstract As the need
www.ncolr.org/jiol Volume 7, Number 3, Winter 2008 ISSN: 15414914 Assessment of Online Learning Environments: Using the OCLES(20) with Graduate Level Online Classes Thomas A. DeVaney Nan B. Adams Cynthia
1 2 3 4 5 Specialized Knowledge Broad and Integrative Knowledge Intellectual Skills Applied and Collaborative Learning Civic and Global Learning The Degree Qualifications Profile (DQP) provides a baseline
INTRODUCTION TO PROJECT BASED LEARNING BEGIN WITH THE END IN MIND CRAFT THE DRIVING QUESTION PLAN THE ASSESSMENT MAP THE PROJECT MANAGE THE PROCESS INTRODUCTION TO PROJECT BASED LEARNING INTRODUCTION TO
Essays on Teaching Excellence Toward the Best in the Academy Volume 8, Number 2, 1996-97 A publication of The Professional & Organizational Development Network in Higher Education (www.podnetwork.org).
Essays on Teaching Excellence Toward the Best in the Academy Volume 13, Number 1, 2001-02 A publication of The Professional & Organizational Development Network in Higher Education (www.podnetwork.org).
Engaging Students for Optimum Learning Online Informing the Design of Online Learning By the Principles of How People Learn What Is Engagement? As early as 1995, student engagement was "the latest buzzword
Letter of Endorsement Teacher Leadership and Instructional Coaching Online Graduate Education for Today s Teachers and Leaders Motivate Educators. Enrich Teaching Experiences. Letter of Endorsement: TEacher
Educational Technology that Transforms: Educators Transformational Learning Experiences in Professional Development Kathleen P. King Fordham University, USA Abstract: Research conducted among 175 teachers
DEEPER LEARNING COMPETENCIES April 2013 Deeper learning is an umbrella term for the skills and knowledge that students must possess to succeed in 21 st century jobs and civic life. At its heart is a set
HOW THE LIBERAL ARTS AND PROFESSIONAL PROGRAMS WORK TOGETHER A Presidential White Paper from Jonathan Brand June 2015 HOW THE LIBERAL ARTS AND PROFESSIONAL PROGRAMS WORK TOGETHER June 2015 This white paper
Principal Performance Review Office of School Quality Division of Teaching and Learning Principal Practice Observation Tool 2014-15 The was created as an evidence gathering tool to be used by evaluators
VOCATION AND SERVICE LEARNING: FOSTERING REFLECTION AND CITIZENSHIP IN AN INFORMATICS CURRICULUM Nathaniel J. Brown, Anji E. Wall, John P. Buerck Saint Louis University This paper proposes a new definition
Strategies That Foster Critical Reading This guide offers strategies faculty members can use to foster careful reading and critical thinking. Provide Guidance before Each Reading Make Them Curious Professors
Overview of the Career-related Programme For use from August 2016 This pre-publication has been released for information only, to help with planning. Although the content has been substantially finalized,
LEARNING FROM MASTERS: ACADEMIC APPRENTICESHIP MODEL FOR COMPUTATIONAL DESIGN EDUCATION HALIL ERHAN College of Information Technology UAE University, UAE Al-Ain firstname.lastname@example.org Abstract. Education is
GaPSC Teacher Leadership Program Standards Purpose: Georgia has identified a need to improve P-12 students academic performance as measured by various assessments. One method to ensure improved student
DEFIANCE COLLEGE Strategic Plan 2013-2016 The at Defiance is part of the Division of Business, Education, and Social Work. The department includes majors in Business Administration and Accounting; minors
THE USE OF TECHNOLOGY IN PSYCHOLOGY: EXAMPLES FROM AN INTRODUCTORY PSYCHOLOGY AND STATISTICS CLASS Isabelle D. Cherney Creighton University Department of Psychology 2500 California Plaza Omaha, NE 68178