1 Lecture 4: Psychology of probability: predictable irrationality. David Aldous September 15, 2014
2 Here are two extreme views of human rationality. (1) There is much evidence that people are not rational, in the economist s sense [maximization of expected utility (MEU)]. Some would argue we need descriptive economics; I would argue that all should be taught about probability, utility and MEU and act accordingly [Dennis Lindley, Understanding Uncertainty.] (2) You mentioned research which revealed that shoppers often prefer 50% extra free to a notionally more generous 33% reduction in price, and you cited this as evidence of irrationality or poor mathematical ability on the part of consumers Since all value is subjective, if people value 50% extra free more highly than 33% off, then that is an end of the matter. Whether or not the resulting behaviour conforms to some autistic neoclassical idea of rationality is irrelevant. [Rory Sutherland, Ogilvy & Mather UK. Letter to The Economist July ]
3 The 2011 best-seller Thinking, Fast and Slow by Nobel Prize winning Kahneman gives a wide-ranging and very non-technical account of human rationality and irrationality. The key point is that we re not arbitrarily irrational but that our intuition is predictably irrational (title of popular 2008 Ariely book) in ways one can describe. The part of this field relevant to us concerns decisions under uncertainty, which necessarily involves issues of probability and utility. Psychology research gets real data from real people, but the data mostly consists of subjects answers to hypothetical limited explicit relevant data exam-style questions involving uncertainty. My personal view of this field is that we have a good understanding of how people think about such hypothetical questions, but it is less clear how closely this translates to their real life behavior, two obvious issues being real life does not present us with limited explicit relevant data your answer to a what you would do if... question may well not be what you would actually do in real life.
4 A 2004 book Cognition and Chance: the psychology of probabilistic reasoning by Nickerson gives extensive summaries of the research literature and descriptions of experiments (surveys). Course project: repeat some experiment on your friends. Later I will describe two such course projects done by students in previous years. Amongst many survey articles, Cognitive biases potentially affecting judgment of global risks (Yudkowsky, 2008) is relevant to a later lecture. I don t have any new data to serve as anchor for today s lecture. Here is a famous example which reveals one important general principle. Text here copied from Wikipedia Framing (social sciences) several later examples also copied from relevant Wikipedia articles.
5 Two alternative programs have been proposed to combat a new disease liable to kill 600 people. Assume the best estimate of the consequences of the programs are as follows. (information presented differently to two groups of participants in a psychology study). info presented to group 1: In a group of 600 people, Program A: 200 people will be saved Program B: there is a one-third probability that 600 people will be saved, and a two-thirds probability that no people will be saved info presented to group 2: In a group of 600 people, Program C: 400 people will die Program D: there is a one-third probability that nobody will die, and a two-third probability that 600 people will die In group 1, 72% of participants preferred program A In group 2, 22% preferred program C. The point of the experiment is that programs A and C are identical, as are programs B and D. The change in the decision frame between the two groups of participants produced a preference reversal: when the programs were presented in terms of lives saved, the participants preferred the secure program, A (= C). When the programs were presented in terms of expected deaths, participants chose the gamble D (= B).
6 This example illustrates a general framing principle, observed in many contexts. Our heuristic decisions under uncertainty are strongly affected by whether our attention is focused on the possible benefits/gains or on the possible risks/losses. The framing issue arises in many risk contexts medicine whether to have an operation financial investments
7 Let me quickly mention another well known cognitive bias, called Anchoring. To quote Wikipedia, this is the common human tendency to rely too heavily on the first piece of information offered (the anchor ) when making decisions. Once an anchor is set, other judgments are made by adjusting away from that anchor, and there is a bias toward interpreting other information around the anchor. For example, the initial price offered for a used car sets the standard for the rest of the negotiations, so that prices lower than the initial price seem more reasonable even if they are still higher than what the car is really worth. As the last sentence implies, anchoring can be used as a negotiating tactic to gain advantage. This bias is perhaps not so relevant to probability questions, but is loosely related to one of our Lecture 1 survey questions.
8 Here is data from a Lecture 1 survey question 34 responses. (a) It was estimated that in 2013 there were around 1,400 billionaires in the world. Their combined wealth, as a percentage of all the wealth (excluding government assets) in the world, was estimated as roughly 1.5% 4.5% 13.5% 40.5% (b) I think the chance my answer to (a) is correct is % response number students average guess P(correct) 1.5% 5 54% 4.5% 3 37% 13.5% 12 36% 40.5% 14 64% This data is interesting for several reasons. (1) The figures are from Piketty s Capital in the Twenty-First Century who gives the estimate 1.5%. (2) One can regard this as an instance of anchoring, because I placed the correct answer at one extreme of the possible range of answers. (3) It is also a dramatic illustration of overconfidence in that the people most confident in their opinion were in fact the least accurate.
9 Wikipedia has a long List of cognitive biases [show] and Kahneman s book discusses many of those related to probability and utility. Only a few are mentioned in this lecture. In the studies above, participants were simply asked questions. But structuring psychology studies as games (rather than as just answering questions) has several advantages, in particular making voluntary participation more appealing. So let me describe two game-structured projects done by students in this course in previous years, repeating on a small scale studies described in the academic literature.
10 [demonstrate Project 1 with cards]
11 Project 1. Set-up. From 2 decks of cards assemble one deck with (say) 34 black cards and 17 red cards. Get 50 tokens (or dimes or Monopoly currency notes). Procedure. Show participant the deck, say it s a non-standard deck with different numbers of black and red cards, but say I m not going to tell you anything else whether there are more black or more red. Say you will shuffle and deal face-up cards. Each time the participant must bet 1 token on the color of the next card can bet on either red or black. You do this quickly; at the end ask participant what strategy they were using to decide which way to bet. A common answer is after a while I noticed there were more red than black cards maybe around 2/3 were black so I bet on black 2/3 of the time. Analysis. At this point the participant may realize that in fact this strategy is not optimal. Once you decide there are more blacks than reds, you should always bet on black.
12 This error is called Probability matching. The brief Wikipedia article has the note you can help Wikipedia by expanding it, so that s a project. Our second project illustrates a less well known effect.
13 Project 2. Set-up. Take a bingo game, in which you can draw at random from balls numbered 1-75, or similar randomization device. Take 5 tokens. Procedure. Tell participant you will draw balls one by one; each time, the participant has to bet 1 token on whether the next ball drawn will be a higher or lower number than the last ball drawn. After doing 5 such bets, tell participant there will be one final bet, but this time you can choose either to bet 1 token, or to bet all your tokens. Finally, ask participant what was their strategy for which way to bet, and how did they decide at the final stage whether to bet all their tokens or just 1. Results. Before the final bet, almost everyone does the rational strategy if the last number is less than 37 they bet the next will be larger. What we re interested in is their rationale for how much to bet at the last stage. A surprising number of people invoke some notion of luck I was ahead, so didn t want to press my luck by betting everything at the last stage. Conclusion. Even when primed to think rationally, people often revert to thinking about chance in terms of luck.
14 Another common cognitive error is base rate neglect, which is the psychologist s phrase for not appreciating Bayes formula. In a famous example, subjects are asked the following hypothetical question. A taxi was involved in a hit and run accident at night. Two taxi companies, the Green and the Blue, operate in the city. 85% of the taxis in the city are Green and 15% are Blue. A witness identified the taxi as Blue. The court tested the reliability of the witness under the same circumstances that existed on the night of the accident and concluded that the witness correctly identified each one of the two colors 80% of the time and failed 20% of the time. What is the probability that the taxi involved in the accident was Blue rather than Green knowing that this witness identified it as Blue? Most people answer either 80% or make some guess over 50%. The correct answer, via Bayes formula, is [board]
15 Base rate neglect. (Wikipedia). If presented with related base rate information (i.e. generic, general information) and specific information (information only pertaining to a certain case), the mind tends to ignore the former and focus on the latter. An everyday example, at a wedding you might wonder about the chances this marriage will last 10 years. People s assessment of such things is strongly based on the specifics of the couple involved. But in most examples, you get an improved estimate by moving toward the base rate or population average. A common textbook example concerns false positives in medical tests. Another contemporary example concerns facial recognition technology. Consider the following hypothetical setting.
16 In a city of 1 million inhabitants let there be 100 terrorists and 999,900 non-terrorists. Thus, the base rate probability of a randomly selected inhabitant of the city being a terrorist is , and the base rate probability of that same inhabitant being a non-terrorist is In an attempt to catch the terrorists, the city installs an alarm system with a surveillance camera and automatic facial recognition software. The false negative rate: If the camera scans a terrorist, a bell will ring 99% of the time, and it will fail to ring 1% of the time. The false positive rate: If the camera scans a non-terrorist, a bell will not ring 99% of the time, but it will ring 1% of the time. Suppose now that an inhabitant triggers the alarm. What is the chance that the person is a terrorist? Someone making the base rate fallacy would infer that there is a 99% chance that the detected person is a terrorist. In fact (Bayes formula) the chances they are a terrorist are actually near 1%, not near 99%.
17 The effects we have described are replicable in experiments, and we are confident that people do actually encounter such situations and make these kinds or errors in the real world. But a critique of this style of work is that, by basing theory on hypothetical questions with limited explicit relevant data, one can get out of touch with typical real world issues. I will give two critique examples. The first involves reverse engineering a famous example. Consider two hypothetical scenarios. Scenario 1. Police know, from existing evidence, that one of two suspects committed a crime. Suspect 1 has attributes A and B Suspect 2 has attribute A (don t know whether B). (for instance, A = tall, B = wearing dark jacket at the time) Then find a new witness who is pretty sure the criminal has attributes A and B. Common sense and Bayes rule agree that, whatever the prior probabilities from other evidence, this extra evidence shifts the probability toward suspect 1.
18 Scenario 2. One suspect police sure this is criminal but are gathering extra evidence for trial. New witness says: pretty sure person has attributes A and B. Which is more likely: (i) the criminal has attribute A (don t care whether B) (ii) the criminal has attributes A and B. In this abstract formulation, and to students who have taken a course in mathematical probability, as a simple matter of logic (i) must be more likely than (ii). But when the question is dressed up in a more colorful story then people often say that (ii) is more likely then (i). This error is called the Conjunction fallacy. The best-known hypothetical story here is Linda the feminist bank teller, as follows.
19 Linda is 31 years old, single, outspoken, and very bright. She majored in philosophy. As a student, she was deeply concerned with issues of discrimination and social justice, and also participated in anti-nuclear demonstrations. Which is more probable? (i) Linda is a bank teller. (ii) Linda is a bank teller and is active in the feminist movement. Most people say (ii) is more likely.
20 The standard explanation for the error in intuition is discussed in another Wikipedia article Representativeness heuristic. That is, the mental picture we get from the story fits (ii) better than (i), To me, the key point is that the type of comparison we are asked to do in scenario 2 is very artificial I can think of no everyday life setting where we would care about comparing two probabilities like (i) and (ii) for the same entity, so we have no experience of doing so. In contrast, comparing different entities which menu item will I enjoy more? is something we do many times a day, so an alternative explanation of this particular heuristic error is that we confuse scenario 2 with the much more familiar scenario 1. So Linda the feminist bank teller works as a memorable example amongst the long list of counterintuitive examples within elementary probability (birthday problem, Monty Hall problem,... ) but I view it as an artificial game (like Monty Hall) rather than a general principle (like the birthday problem, which spotlights the much more general fact that coincidences happen by pure chance more often than intuition suggests).
21 A second critique, applicable to textbook exercises as well as these studies in psychology, is that questions based on limited explicit relevant data don t address the complexities of real life probability, from which our intuition presumably developed. Here is a hypothetical, though not so unrealistic, story.
22 In casual conversation with a stranger in the next airplane seat, you ask do you have children? and the response is yes, two boys. Based on this, what is the chance that the two boys are twins? This is a fairly realistic conversation. Of course, if you cared about twins you could just ask, so thinking about probabilities here is artificial, but let s do it anyway. We re looking for an approximate answer, and I won t discuss all the common sense approximations being made. First we need the empirical frequency of a birth giving twin boys, which turns out to be about 5/1000. Second, amongst 2-child families in general, the frequency of 2 boys must be about 1/4. Now we can estimate the population ratio (number of families with twin boys, no other children) (number of families with two boys, no other children) 2%. Interpreting ratio of frequencies as a conditional probability, P(twins 2 boys, no other children) 2% and one might give about 2% as the answer to the original question.
23 This answer is drastically wrong! The information we have is not 2 boys, no other children but instead the information is the specific form of the response yes, two boys. A person with twins might well have mentioned this fact in their response e.g. yes, twin boys. And a person with non-twins might have answered in a way that implied non-twins, e.g. Sam s in College and Jim s in High School. The best answer to the original question that I can devise is 2% p q ; where p is the chance a person with twins answers in such a way that you can t infer twins; q is the chance a person with non-twins answers in such a way that you can t infer non-twins. Common experience is that people with twins might well actually tell you, so let me guess p = 1/8 and q = 1/2, leading to my best guess 0.5% for the desired probability.
24 The point: for doing probability calculations, and even more so in doing statistical analysis of data based on human responses, it can be misleading to use information without thinking how the information was obtained.
25 Utility theory is the classical model, referred to in our two opening quotations, for rational agents making decisions. Utility is a deliberately vague word, meaning a numerical measure of desirability of outcomes. First consider ordinary non-random settings. Why do we buy things? Theory says you have a utility for money function U(x), generally assumed increasing but concave. You also have a utility U for owning any particular item. If you have money x and the item costs y then buying the item will increase your utility if U(x y) + U > U(x). Utility theory says, as a definition or axiom, that the rational way to make decisions is to take the action that maximizes utility. Utilities clearly are subjective, and theory allows them to be arbitrary (different people buy different things), but theory then insists you should behave rationally in this particular sense.
26 In principle you have a utility for everything. For instance time (air travel: direct flight or 2-stop). Note U(x) not assumed straight line losing all you money, or doubling your money, are not equal-but-opposite so being as risk-averse as you wish is counted as rational. One might think this theory can explain everything, but it doesn t. For instance, utility theory says you should have the same utility for owning an item, regardless of whether or not you actually own it (price willing to pay to buy should be same as price willing to accept to sell). But in fact there is the endowment effect: people place a higher value on objects they own than objects they do not own. To demonstrate this effect in the real world one wants a situation where one can eliminate possible extraneous reasons. Here is a very ingenious example.
27 Duke University has a very small basketball stadium and the number of available tickets is much smaller than the number of people who want them, so the university has developed a complicated selection process for these tickets that is now a tradition. Roughly one week before a game, fans begin pitching tents in the grass in front of the stadium. At random intervals a university official sounds an air-horn which requires that the fans check in with the basketball authority. Anyone who doesn t check in within five minutes is cut from the waiting list. At certain more important games, even those who remain on the list until the bitter end aren t guaranteed a ticket, only an entry in a raffle in which they may or may not receive a ticket. After a final four game in 1994, economists Ziv Carmon and Dan Ariely called all the students on the list who had been in the raffle. Posing as ticket scalpers, they probed those who had not won a ticket for the highest amount they would pay to buy one and received an average answer of $170. When they probed the students who had won a ticket for the lowest amount they would sell, they received an average of about $2,400. This showed that students who had won the tickets placed a value on the same tickets roughly fourteen times as high as those who had not won the tickets.
28 [show page 1 again]
29 Let s anyway continue with utility theory as a prescription for how people should behave. Consider the context of decisions under uncertainty, that is random outcomes. If we assign utilities to all possible outcomes, and if we know how our available choices affect the probabilities of the various outcomes, then we can make the choice that maximizes expected utility (MEU; note Wikipedia discusses this as Expected utility hypothesis). First, a few uncontroversial comments. If your wealth is $10K and somehow have an opportunity to bet (win or lose) $5K with a 51% chance of winning, most people would not take that bet. But if the chance of winning were 99% then most people would take that bet. MEU theory explains this by saying that you would take the bet if the probability p of winning satisfies pu(15k) + (1 p)u(5k) > U(10K).
30 So according to MEU theory being risk-averse for large amounts is rational being risk-averse for small amounts in not rational. So, for instance, buying insurance to offset possible large losses is rational buying insurance to offset possible small losses is not rational
Book Review of Rosenhouse, The Monty Hall Problem Leslie Burkholder 1 The Monty Hall Problem, Jason Rosenhouse, New York, Oxford University Press, 2009, xii, 195 pp, US $24.95, ISBN 978-0-19-5#6789-8 (Source
Statistical Fallacies: Lying to Ourselves and Others "There are three kinds of lies: lies, damned lies, and statistics. Benjamin Disraeli +/- Benjamin Disraeli Introduction Statistics, assuming they ve
Lecture 8 The Subjective Theory of Betting on Theories Patrick Maher Philosophy 517 Spring 2007 Introduction The subjective theory of probability holds that the laws of probability are laws that rational
Ignoring base rates People were told that they would be reading descriptions of a group that had 30 engineers and 70 lawyers. People had to judge whether each description was of an engineer or a lawyer.
Probability and Expected Value This handout provides an introduction to probability and expected value. Some of you may already be familiar with some of these topics. Probability and expected value are
Beyond the Polyester Veil : A Personal Injury Negotiations Case Study I m going to tell you something else almost as useful.i m going to tell you the big secret of handling your personal injury case. For
Elementary Statistics and Inference 22S:025 or 7P:025 Lecture 20 1 Elementary Statistics and Inference 22S:025 or 7P:025 Chapter 16 (cont.) 2 D. Making a Box Model Key Questions regarding box What numbers
Prospect Theory Ayelet Gneezy & Nicholas Epley Word Count: 2,486 Definition Prospect Theory is a psychological account that describes how people make decisions under conditions of uncertainty. These may
Section 7C: The Law of Large Numbers Example. You flip a coin 00 times. Suppose the coin is fair. How many times would you expect to get heads? tails? One would expect a fair coin to come up heads half
psychology and economics lecture 9: biases in statistical reasoning tomasz strzalecki failures of Bayesian updating how people fail to update in a Bayesian way how Bayes law fails to describe how people
2009-8-18 0 Insurance and Gambling Eric Hehner Gambling works as follows. You pay some money to the house. Then a random event is observed; it may be the roll of some dice, the draw of some cards, or the
Club Accounts. 2011 Question 6. Anyone familiar with Farm Accounts or Service Firms (notes for both topics are back on the webpage you found this on), will have no trouble with Club Accounts. Essentially
VISUAL GUIDE to RX Scripting for Roulette Xtreme - System Designer 2.0 UX Software - 2009 TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION... ii What is this book about?... iii How to use this book... iii Time to start...
6.42/8.62J Mathematics for Computer Science Srini Devadas and Eric Lehman May 3, 25 Lecture otes Expected Value I The expectation or expected value of a random variable is a single number that tells you
Expected Value 24 February 2014 Expected Value 24 February 2014 1/19 This week we discuss the notion of expected value and how it applies to probability situations, including the various New Mexico Lottery
Week 2: Conditional Probability and Bayes formula We ask the following question: suppose we know that a certain event B has occurred. How does this impact the probability of some other A. This question
How to get profit-creating information from your accountant What a tailored accounting service can do for you How could you get much more out of the accounting service you re already paying for? Possibly
What does it mean for something to be random? An event is called random if the process which produces the outcome is sufficiently complicated that we are unable to predict the precise result and are instead
Gaming the Law of Large Numbers Thomas Hoffman and Bart Snapp July 3, 2012 Many of us view mathematics as a rich and wonderfully elaborate game. In turn, games can be used to illustrate mathematical ideas.
CROSS EXAMINATION OF AN EXPERT WITNESS IN A CHILD SEXUAL ABUSE CASE Mark Montgomery Post Office Box 161 Durham, NC 27702 (919) 680-6249 firstname.lastname@example.org Opinion Testimony by a Pediatrician/Nurse/Counselor/Social
THE EXPECTED VALUE FOR THE SUM OF THE DRAWS In the game of Keno there are 80 balls, numbered 1 through 80. On each play, the casino chooses 20 balls at random without replacement. Suppose you bet on the
In this chapter, we present the theory of consumer preferences on risky outcomes. The theory is then applied to study the demand for insurance. Consider the following story. John wants to mail a package
Overview Box Part V Variability The Averages Box We will look at various chance : Tossing coins, rolling, playing Sampling voters We will use something called s to analyze these. Box s help to translate
Moving on If you re still reading this, congratulations, you re likely to be in the minority of traders who act based on facts, not emotions. Countless others would have simply denied the facts, and moved
FRAMING EFFECTS A framing effect is usually said to occur when equivalent descriptions of a decision problem lead to systematically different decisions. Framing has been a major topic of research in the
Chapter 3 Prediction Markets, Fair Games and Martingales Prediction markets...... are speculative markets created for the purpose of making predictions. The current market prices can then be interpreted
If you like a flutter on the horses or any other sport then I would strongly recommend Betfair to place those bets. I find it amazing the number of people still using high street bookmakers which offer
Strong Student Model These writing models are also available in Assessment Masters. The Case for Graduated Licenses Statistics about teenage driving are illuminating: automobile accidents are the leading
SPECIAL REPORT: 4 BIG REASONS YOU CAN T AFFORD TO IGNORE BUSINESS CREDIT! 4 BIG REASONS YOU CAN T AFFORD TO IGNORE BUSINESS CREDIT! Provided compliments of: FIRSTUSA DATA SERVICES, LLC 877-857-5045 SUPPORT@FIRSTUSADATA.COM
Filename: P4P 019 The Facts of Life Insurance Todd: [0:00:18] Hey everybody, welcome to another edition of The Prosperity Podcast, this is No BS Money Guy Todd Strobel. Once again, we re lucky enough to
REWARD System For Even Money Bet in Roulette By Izak Matatya By even money betting we mean betting on Red or Black, High or Low, Even or Odd, because they pay 1 to 1. With the exception of the green zeros,
Results Ticker: Dutch Auctions With A Money-Back Guarantee Sandeep Baliga and Jeff Ely 2 Concept The Problem A venue like a stadium, a theatre, or an orchestra has a fixed capacity of seats in different
374 Chapter 8 The Mathematics of Likelihood 8.3 Expected Value Find an expected value involving two events. Find an expected value involving multiple events. Use expected value to make investment decisions.
In conditions of laissez-faire the avoidance of wide fluctuations in employment may, therefore, prove impossible without a far-reaching change in the psychology of investment markets such as there is no
FUNDING INVESTMENTS FINANCE 738, Spring 2008, Prof. Musto Class 4 Market Making Only Game In Town, by Walter Bagehot (actually, Jack Treynor) Seems like any trading idea would be worth trying Tiny amount
Pascal s wager So far we have discussed a number of arguments for or against the existence of God. In the reading for today, Pascal asks not Does God exist? but Should we believe in God? What is distinctive
Summary Annuities: Basics You Need to Know Last update: May 14, 2014 The key feature of most annuities is the promise to provide you an income for life, no matter how long you live. This paper explains
Ch. 4 Discrete Probability Distributions 4.1 Probability Distributions 1 Decide if a Random Variable is Discrete or Continuous 1) State whether the variable is discrete or continuous. The number of cups
A SYSTEM DYNAMICS MODEL OF FUTURES MARKET Jiong You Department of Management Science, School of Management Fudan University Shanghai, 200433, P.R.China Email: email@example.com ABSTRACT Futures and options
The result of the bayesian analysis is the probability distribution of every possible hypothesis H, given one real data set D. This prestatistical approach to our problem was the standard approach of Laplace
Lecture 13 Understanding Probability and Long-Term Expectations Thinking Challenge What s the probability of getting a head on the toss of a single fair coin? Use a scale from 0 (no way) to 1 (sure thing).
Two-State Options John Norstad firstname.lastname@example.org http://www.norstad.org January 12, 1999 Updated: November 3, 2011 Abstract How options are priced when the underlying asset has only two possible
Slide 1 Math 1520, Lecture 23 This lecture covers mean, median, mode, odds, and expected value. Slide 2 Mean, Median and Mode Mean, Median and mode are 3 concepts used to get a sense of the central tendencies
Free Legal Consumer Guide Series Brought To You By Meeting All Your Legal Needs For 50 Years 2 What You Need To Know About Workers Compensation HOW TO USE THIS GUIDE If you read this guide, you will discover
BINGO TRAINING Last Updated August 2014 Overview The Weekly Sunday Bingo at St John s is by far our greatest money maker. For the 2013-2014 Year, we made close to $225,000 in profit from Bingo. This effort
Copyright (c) 2015 Christopher Small and The Art of Lawyering. All rights reserved. 1 In this special report, I ll be sharing with you the ten biggest mistakes that lawyers make when marketing their law
I m Graydon Trusler and I ve been doing all the Marketing for my wife s divorce law firm in Austin for 8 years or so. I m going to take the same approach with you that I have with our marketing aimed at
Strike Rate!! Introduction Firstly, congratulations of becoming an owner of this fantastic selection system. You ll find it difficult to find a system that can produce so many winners at such low liability.
ECO 220 Intermediate Microeconomics Professor Mike Rizzo Third COLLECTED Problem Set SOLUTIONS This is an assignment that WILL be collected and graded. Please feel free to talk about the assignment with
The Mathematician s Wastebasket Volume 1, Issue 4 Stephen Devereaux April 28, 2013 Beating Roulette? An analysis with probability and statistics. Every time I watch the film 21, I feel like I ve made the
The FOREX Master Plan 1. Introduction First of all I need to say that I did not write this ebook for me, but for each and every one of you. I hope that it will be beneficial for everybody that reads it
Pay per Click Success 5 Easy Ways to Grow Sales and Lower Costs Go Long! The Benefits of Using Long Tail Keywords clogged sewage line, I ll see a higher conversion How many keywords are in your pay-per-click
The Math Suppose there are n experiments, and the probability that someone gets the right answer on any given experiment is p. So in the first example above, n = 5 and p = 0.2. Let X be the number of correct
Week 5: Expected value and Betting systems Random variable A random variable represents a measurement in a random experiment. We usually denote random variable with capital letter X, Y,. If S is the sample
Money and the Single Parent Apprisen 800.355.2227 www.apprisen.com Money and the Single Parent Being a single parent is not easy. As a matter of fact, it is really hard. Single parents are stretched in
DISTRIBUTION-BASED PRICING FORMULAS ARE NOT ARBITRAGE-FREE DAVID RUHM DISCUSSION BY MICHAEL G. WACEK Abstract David Ruhm s paper is a welcome addition to the actuarial literature. It illustrates some difficult
Conditional Probability, Independence and Bayes Theorem Class 3, 18.05, Spring 2014 Jeremy Orloff and Jonathan Bloom 1 Learning Goals 1. Know the definitions of conditional probability and independence
Free Legal Consumer Guide Series Brought To You By Meeting All Your Legal Needs For 50 Years 2 How To Handle A Traffic Ticket HOW TO USE THIS GUIDE If you read this guide, you will discover what you need
This document and all the contents are. No part of this may be reproduced in any form without prior written consent. Disclaimer Neither Sporting Bots Limited, nor anyone associated with Sporting Bots Limited
Chapter End of Chapter Review Question KEY - (Key Question) Complete the following table and answer the questions below: Units consumed Total utility Marginal utility 0 0 0 0 0 a. At which rate is total
Exam Name How many distinguishable permutations of letters are possible in the word? 1) CRITICS 2) GIGGLE An order of award presentations has been devised for seven people: Jeff, Karen, Lyle, Maria, Norm,
The power of money management One trader lost ($3000) during the course of a year trading one contract of system A. Another trader makes $25,000 trading the same system that year. One trader makes $24,000
Probability, statistics and football Franka Miriam Bru ckler Paris, 2015 Please read this before starting! Although each activity can be performed by one person only, it is suggested that you work in groups
3 The 3 Biggest Mistakes Investors Make When It Comes To Selling Their Stocks and a simple three step solution to consistently outperform the market year after year after year. 2 Dear friend and fellow
The Definitive Guide to Swing Trading Stocks 1 DISCLAIMER The information provided is not to be considered as a recommendation to buy certain stocks and is provided solely as an information resource to
Innovation, Fads and Long-Term Value in Management Accounting Joan Luft Michigan State University January 2006 Draft: Do not reproduce 1 Innovation Innovate or die, we are told. It's the core of excellence
1 Critical Thinking Typical Comments I m not sure what they expect when they ask us to critically evaluate The word critical sounds so negative, as though you have to undermine everything The word analysis
Dear Business Owner, I know you get calls from all sorts of media outlets and organizations looking to get a piece of your advertising budget. Today I am not pitching you anything. I would just like to
THE WINNING ROULETTE SYSTEM by http://www.webgoldminer.com/ Is it possible to earn money from online gambling? Are there any 100% sure winning roulette systems? Are there actually people who make a living
Lecture 2: The Kelly criterion for favorable games: stock market investing for individuals David Aldous September 8, 2014 Most adults drive/own a car Few adults work in the auto industry. By analogy Most
Ideas for improving your trading in 2010 Trader_Dante Copyright Trader_Dante 2010 Page 1 of 18 Disclaimer All reasonable steps and due diligence have been taking in preparing this document. However, it
THEME: VALUING GOODWILL By John W. Day, MBA ACCOUNTING TERM: Goodwill Goodwill is the difference between the value of a business enterprise as a whole and the sum of the current fair values of its identifiable
Duty of Care and Negligence Villamanta Disability Rights Legal Service Inc. Information Sheet Updated March 2007 What is Negligence? Negligence is when someone who owes you a duty of care, has failed to
6.825 Techniques in Artificial Intelligence Decision Making under Uncertainty How to make one decision in the face of uncertainty Lecture 19 1 In the next two lectures, we ll look at the question of how
Anytime Adviser New Car Buying Coach Welcome. This interactive guide offers you strategies for getting the best deal on a new car. Let's begin. Interested in a little guidance to negotiate your best deal
Marketing Automation And the Buyers Journey A StrategyMix White Paper By Jonathan Calver, Managing Director, StrategyMix About this Paper This paper will first introduce you to the principles and concepts
STUDENT MODULE 12.1 GAMBLING PAGE 1 Standard 12: The student will explain and evaluate the financial impact and consequences of gambling. Risky Business Simone, Paula, and Randy meet in the library every
Lotto Master Formula (v.) The Formula Used By Lottery Winners I. Introduction This book is designed to provide you with all of the knowledge that you will need to be a consistent winner in your local lottery
Seven Things You Must Know Before Hiring a Real Estate Agent 1 Introduction Selling a home can be one of the most stressful situations of your life. Whether you re upsizing, downsizing, moving across the
Equity Release Guide www.seniorissues.co.uk For more information or to speak to one of our trained advisers please telephone our Senior Issues Team on 0845 855 4411 The Caesar & Howie Group 7/3/2008 EQUITY
Day Trading vs. Swing Trading by ChartSpeak Sunday, August 1, 2004 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dialog: VIP LESSON 049 - Future of Business A: We really embarrassed ourselves last night at that business function. B: What are you talking about? A: We didn't even have business cards to hand out. We
Chapter Overview PUBLIC HEALTH OPTOMETRY ECONOMICS Kevin D. Frick, PhD This chapter on public health optometry economics describes the positive and normative uses of economic science. The terms positive
A Few Basics of Probability Philosophy 57 Spring, 2004 1 Introduction This handout distinguishes between inductive and deductive logic, and then introduces probability, a concept essential to the study