Range A Pilot Study by Michael A. Levi by Gabrielle Petron et al. Accepted for publication in Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres
|
|
- Bruce Bridges
- 8 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Reply to Reply to Comment on Hydrocarbon emissions characterization in the Colorado Front Range A Pilot Study by Michael A. Levi by Gabrielle Petron et al. Accepted for publication in Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres Michael A. Levi 1 1 Council on Foreign Relations, New York, NY, USA Abstract The reply by Petron et al. [2012a] to my comment, Levi [2012], on their paper, Petron et al. [2012], defends their original conclusion: fugitive emissions in an area that they observed in 2008 were likely larger those indicated by previous estimates. The reply also claims to have now better characterized the uncertainties in their and my approaches. In particular, they question the representative nature of a data set that Petron et al. relied on, and that Levi retained, though they do not recalculate their estimates. Petron et al. also claim to show that the analysis in Levi [2012] is flawed because, they argue, it implies the physically unrealistic conclusion that fugitive emissions from the natural gas operations that Petron et al. studied may be negative. Petron et al. [2012a] are reasonable to be skeptical of the data set that they highlight. I show in this reply that if that data set is indeed not representative of condensate tank flashing in the area under study, it is impossible to produce the results in Petron et al. [2012] that the authors now defend. I also show that the other critique of Levi [2012] offered by Petron et al., i.e. that
2 Levi s analysis has physically unrealistic implications, relies on an incorrect interpretation of the formulas in that comment. Only one of two conclusions is possible: the results in Levi [2012] are correct, or the conclusions in both Levi [2012] and Petron et al. [2012] are unjustified. 1. Introduction and Questionable Assumptions Petron et al. [2012] and Levi [2012] both estimate fugitive methane emissions from natural gas operations by assuming that observed methane and light alkanes in the air sampled by Petron et al. [2012] came primarily from fugitive emissions at natural gas operations and flashing of condensate tanks. Both juxtapose the same atmospheric observations of the ratio of methane-topropane with the same range of possible profiles for flashing emissions, replying on profiles from 16 condensate tanks (all reported in [Petron et al. 2012]). Petron et al. [2012] and Levi [2012] also constrain the possible composition of fugitive natural gas emissions by using the same set of 77 profiles for Colorado natural gas wells (reported in [COGCC 2007]), though in different ways. Following Petron et al. [2012a], we use the term fugitive emissions rather than venting here, in order to be more general regarding possible emissions sources. We include in fugitive emissions all methane, propane, and n-butane emissions upstream of natural gas processing facilities, including from well venting, incomplete combustion of flares, compressor engines, and gathering systems. We assume here (as is done implicitly in Petron et al. [2012] and Petron et al. [2012a]) that these all exhibit the same ratios of methane-to-propane and methaneto-n-butane as raw gas, an assumption that we revisit below. (Our definition of fugitive
3 emissions does not include products of incomplete combustion, such as formaldahyde, which are not fugitives and are of no consequence to the analysis here.) Petron et al. [2012] discard data points directly downwind of a natural gas and propane processing plant that leads to strong propane enhancements, eliminating that as a possible source. Petron et al [2012] assume that the ratio of methane to propane in fugitive emissions is bounded by the mean (24.83) and median (15.43) of that ratio in the 77 wells. Levi [2012] notes that the results in Petron et al. [2012] are highly sensitive to this assumption and argues that there is no basis for it, given that no claim is made that the 77 wells are representative of either producing or fugitive-emissions-prone wells in the area under study. Levi [2012] notes that a ninety percent confidence interval for the ratio of methane-to-propane in the 77 well sample more appropriate given that nothing is known about whether the sample is represenatative contains wells with methane-to-propane ratios that range from 8.79 to It observes that, using the methodology in Petron et al. [2012], this implies a fugitive methane emissions rate that is bounded below by 66 Gg/yr well below the lower uncertainty bound presented in Petron et al. [2012] and defended in Petron et al. [2012a], but consistent with previous estimates and is not bounded above. Petron et al. [2012a] do not respond to this critique directly. They do, however, address it indirectly in the context of arguing that other results in Levi [2012] are implausible. They observe that in the WRAP Phase III inventory [Bar-Ilan et al 2012] of oil and gas activities in the area under study, 49% of the total VOC fugitive emissions were attributed to pneumatic devices and 32% to unpermitted fugitives emissions from various pieces of equipment at well pads. They then note that, in 2009, Colorado implemented regulations requiring low-bleed controllers on all valves in the area under examination, and infer that high-bleed valves were
4 likely used across the oil and gas field during the period that Petron et al. [2012] studied (in 2008). From this, they conclude that unpermitted fugitive emissions were also likely ubiquitous in the Denver-Julesburg Basin in There are two main problems with this reasoning. The fact that regulations were imposed in 2009 does not imply that emissions were uniformly distributed ( ubiquitous ) among different types of wells prior to that year. (Regulations often impose uniformity on previously uneven practices.) More important, as pointed out in Levi [2012] but not addressed in Petron et al. [2012a], Petron et al. [2012] show that assuming that the WRAP Phase III figures are correct implies that fugitive emissions in the Denver-Julesberg basin are far lower than the alarmingly high ones that Petron et al. [2012] estimate using their top-down methods. Indeed a central conclusion in Petron et al. [2012] is that bottom-up estimates of methane emissions based on the WRAP Phase III figures are far too low (which suggests that something is missing from them). The implication is that either the WRAP Phase III figures are incorrect, in which case they should not be used to defend the conclusions in Petron et al. [2012], or they are are correct, in which case they contradict the conclusions in Petron et al. [2012] that are defended in Petron et al. [2012a]. Neither possibility reinforces the conclusions in Petron et al. [2012]. 2. Summary of Critique of Levi [2012] Unlike Petron et al. [2012], Levi [2012] makes no assumptions about the ratio of methane to propane in fugitive natural gas emissions. Instead, it uses observations of the atmospheric propane-to-n-butane ratio reported in Petron et al. [2012], together with a 95-percent confidence interval for the propane-to-n-butane ratio in fugitive natural gas emissions for the 77 wells also
5 used by Petron et al. [2012]. This allows it to constrain estimates of fugitive methane emissions. Its results are consistent with previous bottom-up studies but not with the top-down estimates in Petron et al. [2012]. Petron et al. [2012a] do not directly challenge any of the physical reasoning behind the analysis in Levi [2012]. Instead they claim to show that the approach taken in Levi [2012] implies physically implausible results, and hence is problematic. They then infer that the supposedly implausible results may be partly explained by the fact that the full range of possible flashing emission profiles and the total VOC flashing source are likely not captured by the set of 16 flashing emission estimates used by Petron et al. [2012] and Levi [2012]. Some skepticism regarding the representative nature of the flashing profiles is reasonable (though Petron et al. [2012a] do not justify the conclusion that they are likely wrong). We show below, however, that their critique of the remainder of the methodology in Levi [2012] is unsound. Moreover, applying the critique of the 16 flashing emission profiles in Petron et al. [2012a] to the methodology in Petron et al. [2012] severely undermines their own original results. 3. Physical Realism of Levi [2012] Levi [2012] derives formulas for fugitive emissions of methane, propane, and n-butane given atmospheric methane-to-propane and methane-to-n-butane ratios; assumptions about the relationship between propane and n-butane concentrations in fugitive-emissions-prone wells derived from the dataset of 77 wells; and a range of possible emissions from condensate tank flashing (which are constrained to be linear combinations of the profiles considered by Petron et al [2012]). Petron et al. [2012a] do not directly challenge the physical logic of any of the
6 analytical steps in Levi [2012], nor do they challenge the atmospheric concentration ratios used in Levi [2012], or the assumptions that Levi [2012] makes about gas that enters the atmosphere as fugitive emissions. They do note in passing that Levi [2012] does not discuss the possibility that there is a third major source of n-butane emissions, other than fugitive emissions and flashing, that is co-located with, and proportional to, existing sources of propane emissions. For there to be a third source matching this description, there would need to be a common driver of all fugitive and flashing emissions that also drove significant n-butane emissions from this third source. This same source could not generate significant propane or methane emissions; otherwise, it would invalidate the critical assumption in Petron et al. [2012] that there are only two main types of sources of such emissions in the area under study. Petron et al. [2012a] offer no suggestions for what this highly unusual source might be. That said, it is possible in principle that incomplete combustion of raw gas in flares and compressors could result in emissions that have a different ratios of methane-to-propane and methane-to-n-butane from those characteristic of either raw gas venting or condensate tank flashing. If such fractionation is occurring strongly and at a significant scale, then the two-source assumption used in Petron et al. [2012] and retained in Levi [2012] and Petron et al. [2012a] is incorrect. This could, in principle, fatally undermine the results in both papers. Petron et al. [2012a], in any case, focus instead on the use the 16 condensate tank flashing profiles, first used in Petron et al. [2012], in Levi [2012]. They write that Levi s calculation implies that only one condensate tank flashing profile (tank #14) out of the set of 16 in the CDPHE dataset results in non-negative propane and butane fugitive fluxes. For the other 15 modeled flashing composition profiles, Levi s calculations require that fugitive emissions must remove propane and n-butane to match the atmospheric ratios.
7 This is incorrect. No tank profile results in anything; the relationships in question are only arithmetic. To be certain, if one assumes that all flashing emissions come from a single tank profile, then for 15 of the 16 profiles, the implied fugitive emissions of propane and n-butane are indeed negative. But there is no reason to believe that flashing emissions are due to a single tank profile. The correct implication to take from the exercise in Petron et al. [2012a] is that, as shown in Levi [2012], it is not plausible that all flashing emissions come from the same profile. Indeed it would be quite surprising if they did. Petron et al. [2012a] continue by arguing that Levi s minimum fugitive methane emission estimates rely on a combination of the tank #14 positive estimate and a negative contribution from the estimate associated with tank #8. Given that we are dealing with source processes [leaks] that must be zero or positive [emitting to the atmosphere, not removing mass from the atmosphere], any single fugitive emission has to be positive to be considered part of the solution. Based on this, Petron et al [2012a] reject the remaining analysis in Levi [2012]. Their reasoning is incorrect: it attributes physical causation ( removing mass from the atmosphere ) to an arithmetic manipulation. Given a set of constraints on atmospheric concentrations of methane, propane, and n-butane, and a set of possible values of emissions from certain sources that contribute to these, Levi [2012] estimates emissions from other (unknown) sources by requiring that the combination add up to the observed concentrations. There is nothing unusual or unphysical about the fact that higher emissions from some sources will imply lower emissions from others, given constraints on their total. These lower emissions are the inappropriately labeled negative or removed emissions that Petron et al. [2012a] have identified. Petron et al. [2012a] insist this is unacceptable, and thus conclude that there is something fundamentally flawed in the approach in Levi [2012]. There is no reason to do so.
8 4. Condensate Tank Flashing Profiles Petron et al. [2012a] do, however, reasonably point out that the results in Levi [2012] indicate that fugitive emissions are biased toward dry gas wells. In part for that reason (though in part because they are skeptical of the negative propane and butane fugitive emissions) they reasonalbly suggest that the 16 flashing profiles used in Petron et al. [2012] and retained in Levi [2012] may be unreliable. (This is in part why Levi [2012] noted that statistically meaningful samples of flashing emission profiles from condensate tanks would be valuable.) The implication is that the results in Levi [2012], which rely on the flashing profiles in question, are likely incorrect. This critique is inconsistent with the defense of the ultimate results in Petron et al. [2012] by Petron et al. [2012a]. In Petron et al. [2012], the formula for fugitive methane emissions contains a factor equal to the difference between the mass of propane from flashing emissions (scaled by the atmospheric ratio of methane to propane) and the mass of methane from flashing emissions (equation 3). But Petron et al [2012a], after calling the tank flashing profiles relied upon in Petron et al [2012] into question, suggest no new constraints on tank flashing emissions. If the flashing profiles used in Petron et al [2012] are unreliable, there is now no way to calculate that paper s estimates of fugitive methane emissions, which depend vitally on the flashing profiles. One can only conclude that either the flashing profiles are reasonably representative in which case Petron et al [2012a] have presented no reason to question the results in Levi [2012] or the flashing profiles are unrepresentative, in which case neither Petron et al. [2012] nor Levi
9 [2012] have any basis to report reliable estimates of fugitive methane emissions. In either case, the results reported in Petron et al. [2012] are without foundation. Since the flashing profiles of condensate tanks in the area under study have likely changed since Petron et al. [2012] collected their data in 2008 (Petron et al [2012a]), this part of the debate is unlikely to be resolved definitively. Debate and observations should focus on rigorously understanding what is happening today through multiple observational and analytical methods. Several data collection efforts that could enable this are currently underway [EPA, 2012]. References Bar-Ilan, A., and R. Morris (2012), Final Emissions Technical Memorandum, No. 4a (Colorado Basins), 33p, available at Colorado Oil and Gas Conservation Commission (COGCC) (2007), Greater Wattenberg area baseline study, report available in the Library section at EPA (2012), Summary of Stakeholder Workshop on the U.S. GHG Inventory for Natural Gas Systems Held September 13-14, 2012 in Washington, DC, available at orkshop_ng_in_the_ghg_inventory_report.pdf Levi, M. A. (2012), Comment on Hydrocarbon Emissions Characterization in the
10 Colorado Front Range A Pilot Study, J. Geophys. Res., 117, D21203, doi: /2012jd Pétron, G., et al. (2012), Hydrocarbon Emissions Characterization in the Colorado Front Range A Pilot Study, J. Geophys. Res., 117, D04304, doi: /2011jd Petron, G., G. J. Frost, M. K. Trainer, B. R. Miller, E. Dlugockencky, and P. P. Tans (2012a), Reply to comment on "Hydrocarbon emissions characterization in the Colorado front range - A Pilot Study" by Michael A. Levi, J. Geophys. Res., doi: /2012jd018487, in press. Pétron, G., et al. (2012), Hydrocarbon Emissions Characterization in the Colorado Front Range A Pilot Study, J. Geophys. Res., 117, D04304, doi: /2011jd
Garry Kaufman Colorado Air Pollution Control Division May 14, 2014
Garry Kaufman Colorado Air Pollution Control Division May 14, 2014 Colorado emissions data by sector Greenhouse gas emissions (GHG) Nitrogen oxides (NO x ) Volatile organic compounds (VOC) Past efforts
More informationEvidence of Emissions from Oil and Gas Drilling Operations in Northeastern Colorado
Evidence of Emissions from Oil and Gas Drilling Operations in Northeastern Colorado NOAA GMD: Gaby Petron, Steve Montzka, Ben Miller, Adam Hirsch*, Anna Karion, Colm Sweeney, Jon Kofler, Arlyn Andrews,
More informationFREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS
Methane Emissions from Process Equipment at Natural Gas Production Sites in the United States: Pneumatic Controllers FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS Frequently asked questions are organized into sections addressing
More informationReal Number of Truck Trips Per Horizontal Fracking Well: 6,790
Source: http://www.marcellus-shale.us/brine-tankers.htm Real Number of Truck Trips Per Horizontal Fracking Well: 6,790 Source: Department of Environmental Conservation revised dsgeis, Chapter 6.11, Table
More informationTHE BASICS Q: What is VOC? Q: What are flashing losses/voc emissions from hydrocarbon storage tanks? - 1 -
Calculation of Flashing Losses/VOC Emissions from Hydrocarbon Storage Tanks THE BASICS Q: What is VOC? A: VOC is an acronym that stands for Volatile Organic Compounds. VOC are components of hydrocarbon
More informationHighlights of Colorado s New Oil and Gas Hydrocarbon Emission Reduction Rules - Adopted February 2014
Highlights of Colorado s New Oil and Gas Hydrocarbon - Adopted February 2014 Presentation to the Colorado Counties, Inc. June 3, 2014 Mike Silverstein Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment
More informationAir Quality Regulation of the Oil and Gas Production Sector in Colorado and Beyond. Garry Kaufman Holland & Hart LLP
Air Quality Regulation of the Oil and Gas Production Sector in Colorado and Beyond Garry Kaufman Holland & Hart LLP 1 Important Information This presentation is similar to any other legal education presentation
More informationCO-PRODUCING WELLS AS A MAJOR SOURCE OF METHANE EMISSIONS: A REVIEW OF RECENT ANALYSES PREPARED BY ENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND MARCH 2014
CO-PRODUCING WELLS AS A MAJOR SOURCE OF METHANE EMISSIONS: A REVIEW OF RECENT ANALYSES PREPARED BY ENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND MARCH 2014 The Environmental Protection Agency s ( EPA s ) New Source Performance
More informationColorado s Recent Efforts to Address Hydrocarbons from Oil and Gas Operations
Colorado s Recent Efforts to Address Hydrocarbons from Oil and Gas Operations Presentation to the Joint Meeting of the Southern Ute Indian Tribe/State of Colorado Environmental Commission and the Colorado
More informationMETHANE EMISSIONS MITIGATION OPTIONS IN THE GLOBAL OIL AND NATURAL GAS INDUSTRIES
METHANE EMISSIONS MITIGATION OPTIONS IN THE GLOBAL OIL AND TURAL GAS INDUSTRIES Robinson, D.R., ICF Consulting, Inc. Fernandez, R., U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Kantamaneni, R. K., ICF Consulting,
More informationFixing the Leaks: What Would it Cost to Clean Up Natural Gas Leaks?
FACT SHEET AND ANALYSIS Fixing the Leaks: What Would it Cost to Clean Up Natural Gas Leaks? About the Authors: The study was designed, carried out, and written by Carbon Limits, a Norwegian consulting
More informationCFSD 21 ST CENTURY SKILL RUBRIC CRITICAL & CREATIVE THINKING
Critical and creative thinking (higher order thinking) refer to a set of cognitive skills or strategies that increases the probability of a desired outcome. In an information- rich society, the quality
More informationGHG-emissions of Russian long distance gas transport pipelines and options for mitigation
GHG-emissions of Russian long distance gas transport pipelines and options for mitigation based on results of new measurements of Wuppertal Institute in Cooperation with MPI Mainz and VNIIGAZ Moscow Stefan
More informationCOLORADO REGULATION 7
COLORADO REGULATION 7 Author: Jay Christopher, Business Unit Manager, Air & Process Services, Trihydro Corporation Jane Steere, QAQC Coordinator, Air & Process Services, Trihydro Corporation ABSTRACT The
More informationTransCanada Case Study: Emissions Management System
Case Study: Emissions Management System Jim Cormack Senior Advisor, Climate Change October 31, 2007 Agenda How does track and manage its emissions? Development of an Emissions Management Strategy Creation
More information1. Whether the concept of materiality can be applied in the context of the CDM
Project Developer Forum input on materiality Preamble In the current version of the Draft Clean Development Mechanism Project Standard published in conjunction with annotated agenda to EB63, section 12.8.4.1
More informationDeveloping Colorado s s Oil and Gas Emissions Controls Overview of the Process and Requirements
Developing Colorado s s Oil and Gas Emissions Controls Overview of the Process and Requirements Presentation for the Interstate Oil & Gas Compact Commission s Annual Business Meeting May 19, 2015 Mike
More informationInstrument Gas to Instrument Air Conversion Protocol October 2009 SPECIFIED GAS EMITTERS REGULATION OCTOBER 2009. Version 1.0.
SPECIFIED GAS EMITTERS REGULATION QUANTIFICATION PROTOCOL FOR INSTRUMENT GAS TO INSTRUMENT AIR CONVERSION IN PROCESS CONTROL SYSTEMS Version 1.0 OCTOBER 2009 Page 1 Disclaimer: The information provided
More informationof Upstream Oil and Gas Activities in the Rocky Mountain States
AC Comprehensive Emissions i Inventory of Upstream Oil and Gas Activities in the Rocky Mountain States t Amnon Bar-Ilan, Ron Friesen, John Grant, Alison Pollack, Ralph Morris ENVIRON International Corporation
More informationDRAFT AIR QUALITY MANAGEMENT IN GARFIELD COUNTY: COLORADO S MOST ACTIVE ENERGY DEVELOPMENT REGION
DRAFT AIR QUALITY MANAGEMENT IN GARFIELD COUNTY: COLORADO S MOST ACTIVE ENERGY DEVELOPMENT REGION Task 3: Assessment and Analysis of Issues Facing Garfield County Prepared for: Garfield County Public Health
More informationCompany Name: City, State, Zip Code: Annual Report Summary
Company Information 2014 Company Name: Contact: Title: Address: City, State, Zip Code: Telephone: Fax: E-mail: Transmission Sector Summary BMP 1: Directed inspection and maintenance at compressor stations
More informationMethane Research: The 16 Study Series AN UNPRECEDENTED LOOK AT METHANE FROM THE NATURAL GAS SYSTEM
Methane Research: The 16 Study Series AN UNPRECEDENTED LOOK AT METHANE FROM THE NATURAL GAS SYSTEM Methane (CH4) is a growing environmental concern. Methane is a potent greenhouse gas that is contributing
More informationCANADIAN WESTERN NATURAL GAS COMPANY LIMITED EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
CANADIAN WESTERN NATURAL GAS COMPANY LIMITED ACCEPTING THE CHALLENGE EXECUTIVE SUMMARY In May of 1995, Canadian Western Natural Gas joined Canadian industry leaders in support of Canada's Voluntary Challenge
More informationTHE FUNDAMENTAL THEOREM OF ARBITRAGE PRICING
THE FUNDAMENTAL THEOREM OF ARBITRAGE PRICING 1. Introduction The Black-Scholes theory, which is the main subject of this course and its sequel, is based on the Efficient Market Hypothesis, that arbitrages
More informationHow To Make A High Co 2 Gas Blend
ECONOMICAL OPTION FOR CO 2 / METHANE SEPARATION IN PRODUCED GAS CONTAINING A HIGH CO 2 FRACTION F. Patrick Ross, P.E. TPR Consulting 9907 Sagecourt Drive Houston, Texas 77089 (713) 870-9208 pat.ross@att.net
More informationNSPS Subpart OOOO: Applicability and Compliance Basics
NSPS Subpart OOOO: Applicability and Compliance Basics Kentucky Oil & Gas Association 2013 Western Kentucky Meeting September 12, 2013 Roy Rakiewicz All4 Inc. Rob Flynn Environmental Standards, Inc. www.all4inc.com
More informationIndustries. March 2014. Prepared for Environmental Defense Fund 257 Park Avenue South New York, NY 10010
Economic Analysis of Methane Emission Reduction Opportunities in the U.S. Onshore Oil and Natural Gas March 2014 Prepared for Environmental Defense Fund 257 Park Avenue South New York, NY 10010 Prepared
More information3. Data Analysis, Statistics, and Probability
3. Data Analysis, Statistics, and Probability Data and probability sense provides students with tools to understand information and uncertainty. Students ask questions and gather and use data to answer
More informationWoodfibre Liquefied Natural Gas (LNG) Project. Review of Related Upstream Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emissions Estimates
1 February 2016 Woodfibre Liquefied Natural Gas (LNG) Project Review of Related Upstream Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emissions Estimates Summary The Canadian Environmental Assessment Agency (the Agency) sought
More informationNatural Gas Dehydrator Optimization
Natural Gas Dehydrator Optimization IAPG & US EPA Technology Transfer Workshop November 5, 2008 Buenos Aires, Argentina Natural Gas Dehydration: Agenda Methane Losses Methane Recovery Is Recovery Profitable?
More informationSet-Based Design: A Decision-Theoretic Perspective
Set-Based Design: A Decision-Theoretic Perspective Chris Paredis, Jason Aughenbaugh, Rich Malak, Steve Rekuc Product and Systems Lifecycle Management Center G.W. Woodruff School of Mechanical Engineering
More informationOptimization of Natural Gas Processing Plants Including Business Aspects
Page 1 of 12 Optimization of Natural Gas Processing Plants Including Business Aspects KEITH A. BULLIN, Bryan Research & Engineering, Inc., Bryan, Texas KENNETH R. HALL, Texas A&M University, College Station,
More informationNatural gas liquids recovery from gas turbine fuel
Natural gas liquids recovery from gas turbine fuel By Simone Amidei, Francesca Monti, Riccardo Valorosi / GE Oil & Gas GE imagination at work Natural gas liquids recovery from gas turbine fuel By Simone
More informationGlobal Gas Flaring Reduction Partnership & Measurement of Flare/Vent Volumes. World Bank Francisco J. Sucre
Global Gas Flaring Reduction Partnership & Measurement of Flare/Vent Volumes World Bank Francisco J. Sucre Content Global Gas Flaring Reduction (GGFR) Gas Flaring in Mexico Global Voluntary Flaring Reduction
More informationAlberta oil-sands and climate: Warming from well-to-wheel emissions
Alberta oil-sands and climate: Warming from well-to-wheel emissions N.C. Swart 1 and A.J. Weaver 1 1 School of Earth and Ocean Sciences, University of Victoria, Victoria, BC, Canada, V8W 3V6. 1 Well-to-wheel
More informationSummary of GAO Cost Estimate Development Best Practices and GAO Cost Estimate Audit Criteria
Characteristic Best Practice Estimate Package Component / GAO Audit Criteria Comprehensive Step 2: Develop the estimating plan Documented in BOE or Separate Appendix to BOE. An analytic approach to cost
More informationEmissions Uncertainty: Focusing on NOx Emissions from Electric Generating Units
Emissions Uncertainty: Focusing on NOx Emissions from Electric Generating Units Emily Wisner +, David Mobley *, George Pouliot * & Bill Hunt + + Statistics Department, North Carolina State University,
More informationGAO FEDERAL OIL AND GAS LEASES
GAO United States Government Accountability Office Report to Congressional Requesters October 2010 FEDERAL OIL AND GAS LEASES Opportunities Exist to Capture Vented and Flared Natural Gas, Which Would Increase
More informationBEST PRACTICES IN LEAK DETECTION AND REPAIR (LDAR) PROGRAMS. November 06, 2014 By: François Thibodeau, Eng.
BEST PRACTICES IN LEAK DETECTION AND REPAIR (LDAR) PROGRAMS November 06, 2014 By: François Thibodeau, Eng. 2 PRESENTATION OVERVIEW 1. Essential Components of a LDAR Program 2. LDAR Best Practices a. A
More informationGreat Basin Mine Watch Earthworks the Sierra Club s Toiyabe Chapter Idaho Conservation League
Great Basin Mine Watch Earthworks the Sierra Club s Toiyabe Chapter Idaho Conservation League December 27, 2005 Leo Drozdoff, Administrator Nevada Division of Environmental Protection 901 South Stewart
More informationColorado Oil and Gas Emissions Rules
Colorado Oil and Gas Emissions Rules GREEN COMPLETION PRACTICES shall mean those practices intended to reduce emissions of salable gas and condensate vapors during cleanout and flowback operations prior
More informationFROM: TJ Rivard, Dean, School of Humanities & Social Sciences
TO: Mary Blakefield, Associate Vice Chancellor FROM: TJ Rivard, Dean, School of Humanities & Social Sciences DATE: June 17, 2009 RE: General Education Assessment for 2008 09 Introduction In the spring
More informationDecreasing Methane Emissions for Natural Gas Distribution Systems
Decreasing Methane Emissions for Natural Gas Distribution Systems Brian Lamb and Steven L. Edburg Washington State University, Pullman, WA Thomas W. Ferrara, Touché Howard, and Wesley Dyck Conestoga-Rovers
More informationOil and Gas Air Quality Regulations and Permitting
Oil and Gas Air Quality Regulations and Permitting Adam Berig Olsson Associates Colorado Springs Oil and Gas Committee Presentation February 2012 Who Regulates Air Quality? United States Environmental
More informationTIPS DATA QUALITY STANDARDS ABOUT TIPS
2009, NUMBER 12 2 ND EDITION PERFORMANCE MONITORING & EVALUATION TIPS DATA QUALITY STANDARDS ABOUT TIPS These TIPS provide practical advice and suggestions to USAID managers on issues related to performance
More informationBridge Fuel or Gangplank? America s Natural Gas. James McGarry Chief Policy Analyst Chesapeake Climate Action Network
Bridge Fuel or Gangplank? America s Natural Gas James McGarry Chief Policy Analyst Chesapeake Climate Action Network Climate Change & Energy 350 parts per million (ppm): The CO2 concentration in our atmosphere
More informationREGULATORY ANALYSIS. February 11, 2014. Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment
REGULATORY ANALYSIS for Proposed Revisions to Colorado Air Quality Control Commission Regulation Numbers 3, 6 and 7 (5 CCR 1001-5, 5 CCR 1001-8, and CCR 1001-9) February 11, 2014 Colorado Department of
More informationAddressing Air Emissions from Marcellus Shale Natural Gas Production. Joe Osborne Lauren Burge Group Against Smog & Pollution Pittsburgh, PA
Addressing Air Emissions from Marcellus Shale Natural Gas Production Joe Osborne Lauren Burge Group Against Smog & Pollution Pittsburgh, PA Pitt Environmental Law Council September 25, 2012 Why Air? Natural
More informationThe CPA Way 4 - Analyze Major Issues
The CPA Way 4 - Analyze Major Issues This document focuses on Analyze Major Issue(s), the third part of The CPA Way, as shown in the following diagram. Analysis is usually the most time-consuming part
More informationAnalysis of GHG emissions from Travis County Landfills from 2010 to 2030 A Report to the City of Austin Office of Sustainability
Analysis of GHG emissions from Travis County Landfills from 2010 to 2030 A Report to the City of Austin Office of Sustainability August 2013 Xiuzhu Shao Student, Department of Civil, Architectural, and
More informationDraft Large-scale Consolidated Methodology ACM00XX: Construction of a new natural gas power plant
CLEAN DEVELOPMENT MECHANISM CDM-MP66-A01 Draft Large-scale Consolidated Methodology ACM00XX: Construction of a new natural gas power plant COVER NOTE 1. Procedural background 1. The Executive Board of
More informationGHG data management issues in an Oil Company. Maria Mantini, Corporate HSE Leonardo Gelpi, Corporate M2M Oil & Gas Session New Delhi, 4 th March 2010
GHG data management issues in an Oil Company Maria Mantini, Corporate HSE Leonardo Gelpi, Corporate M2M Oil & Gas Session New Delhi, 4 th March 2010 Agenda Boundaries and approaches definition GHG data
More informationInterstate Natural Gas Association of America
Interstate Natural Gas Association of America February 17, 2016 Via email (ghginventory@epa.gov and weitz.melissa@epa.gov) Ms. Melissa Weitz Climate Change Division Office of Atmospheric Programs (MC-6207A)
More informationThermal Mass Flow Meters
Thermal Mass Flow Meters for Greenhouse Gas Emissions Monitoring Natural Gas Measurement for Emissions Calculations Flare Gas Monitoring Vent Gas Monitoring Biogas and Digester Gas Monitoring Landfill
More informationHis balance sheet is simple:
FINANCIAL REPORTING / OPINION The missing piece in liquidity calculations Why calculating the current portion of fixed assets would provide a more accurate picture of financial health BY STEPHEN BARTOLETTI
More information2 ESTIMATION. Objectives. 2.0 Introduction
2 ESTIMATION Chapter 2 Estimation Objectives After studying this chapter you should be able to calculate confidence intervals for the mean of a normal distribution with unknown variance; be able to calculate
More informationChevronTexaco Corporate Energy and GHG Inventory System: SANGEA
ChevronTexaco Corporate Energy and GHG Inventory System: SANGEA Second Annual Conference on Carbon Sequestration May 5-8, 2003 Susann Nordrum Technology Company, a division of Chevron USA, Inc. 2003. All
More informationSoftware Verification and System Assurance
Software Verification and System Assurance John Rushby Based on joint work with Bev Littlewood (City University UK) Computer Science Laboratory SRI International Menlo Park CA USA John Rushby, SR I Verification
More informationCharacterizing Air Emissions from Natural Gas Drilling and Well Completion Operations
Characterizing Air Emissions from Natural Gas Drilling and Well Completion Operations Jeff Collett Department of Atmospheric Science Colorado State University Unconventional Gas Extraction Lower 48 States
More informationPennsylvania Marcellus Shale Short- Term Ambient Air Sampling Project
Pennsylvania Marcellus Shale Short- Term Ambient Air Sampling Project Marcellus Shale Conference November 16, 2011 Nick Lazor Chief, Air Quality Monitoring Division Bureau of Air Quality PA Department
More informationM. Omara, M. R. Sullivan, X. Li, N. Zimmerman, R. Subramanian, A. A. Presto, and A. L. Robinson
Comparison of facility-level methane emissions from natural gas production well pads in the Marcellus, Denver-Julesburg, and Uintah Basins preliminary measurement results M. Omara, M. R. Sullivan, X. Li,
More informationCharacterization of Greenhouse Gas Emissions Involved in Oil and Gas Exploration and Production Operations
Characterization of Greenhouse Gas Emissions Involved in Oil and Gas Exploration and Production Operations Review for the California Air Resources Board by Angela Zahniser What greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions
More informationThe Greenhouse Gas Protocol
The Greenhouse Gas Protocol Introduction to the Greenhouse Gas Protocol Corporate Accounting and Reporting Standard The Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Protocol Corporate Accounting and Reporting Standard provides
More informationINTERNATIONAL FRAMEWORK FOR ASSURANCE ENGAGEMENTS CONTENTS
INTERNATIONAL FOR ASSURANCE ENGAGEMENTS (Effective for assurance reports issued on or after January 1, 2005) CONTENTS Paragraph Introduction... 1 6 Definition and Objective of an Assurance Engagement...
More informationResponse to Critiques of Mortgage Discrimination and FHA Loan Performance
A Response to Comments Response to Critiques of Mortgage Discrimination and FHA Loan Performance James A. Berkovec Glenn B. Canner Stuart A. Gabriel Timothy H. Hannan Abstract This response discusses the
More information(Adopted July 7, 1989)(Amended December 7, 1990) (Amended May 13, 1994) FUGITIVE EMISSIONS OF VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS
(Adopted July 7, 1989)(Amended December 7, 1990) (Amended May 13, 1994) RULE 1173. FUGITIVE EMISSIONS OF VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS (a) (b) Purpose This rule is intended to control volatile organic compounds
More informationAESTHETIC AND NOISE CONTROL REGULATIONS
AESTHETIC AND NOISE CONTROL REGULATIONS 801. INTRODUCTION The rules and regulations in this section are promulgated to control aesthetics and noise impacts during the drilling, completion and operation
More informationIntroduction to. Hypothesis Testing CHAPTER LEARNING OBJECTIVES. 1 Identify the four steps of hypothesis testing.
Introduction to Hypothesis Testing CHAPTER 8 LEARNING OBJECTIVES After reading this chapter, you should be able to: 1 Identify the four steps of hypothesis testing. 2 Define null hypothesis, alternative
More informationRegulatory Impact Analysis
Regulatory Impact Analysis Final New Source Performance Standards and Amendments to the National Emissions Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants for the Oil and Natural Gas Industry U.S. Environmental
More informationEmissions from Natural Gas Production in the Barnett Shale Area and Opportunities for Cost Effective Improvements
Emissions from Natural Gas Production in the Barnett Shale Area and Opportunities for Cost Effective Improvements report by: Al Armendariz, Ph.D. Department of Environmental and Civil Engineering Southern
More informationMEMORANDUM. TO: Greenpeace FROM: Point Carbon DATE: 9/10/09
MEMORANDUM TO: Greenpeace FROM: Point Carbon DATE: 9/10/09 SUBJ: Waxman-Markey (ACES 2009) Project Report Findings: As a whole, Coal receives significant financial funding under the allowance allocation
More informationState Energy Forecasting An Overview of Methods. Denise Mulholland, USEPA June 19, 2008
1 State Energy Forecasting An Overview of Methods Denise Mulholland, USEPA June 19, 2008 Overview 2 What is an energy forecast and why develop one? How does a state create a baseline forecast? What are
More informationReview of Varshney/Tootelian Report Cost Of AB 32 On California Small Businesses Summary Report Of Findings
Review of Varshney/Tootelian Report Cost Of AB 32 On California Small Businesses Summary Report Of Findings James L Sweeney 1 Draft 2 : February 16, 2010 In June 2009. Sanjay B. Varshney and Dennis H.
More informationSmall Business Economic Impact Statement Chapter 173-441 WAC Reporting of Emission of Greenhouse Gases
Small Business Economic Impact Statement Chapter 173-441 WAC Reporting of Emission of Greenhouse Gases September 2010 Publication no. 10-02-024 Publication and Contact Information This report is available
More informationSummary Fact Sheet for WEB Trading Program: Monitoring, Recordkeeping and Reporting
Summary Fact Sheet for WEB Trading Program: Monitoring, Recordkeeping and Reporting The monitoring provisions for the WEB trading program balance the need for accurate monitoring to provide certainty for
More informationProject Management: Back to Basics
About this research note: Technology Insight notes describe emerging technologies, tools, or processes as well as analyze the tactical and strategic impact they will have on the enterprise. Project Management:
More informationCRITICAL READING OF THE WUPPERTAL INSTITUTE STUDY
University of Liège FACULTY OF APPLIED SCIENCES INDUSTRIAL CHEMISTRY LABORATORY PROFESSOR ALBERT GERMAIN CRITICAL READING OF THE WUPPERTAL INSTITUTE STUDY Greenhouse Gas Emissions from the Russian Natural
More informationGHG Emissions Associated with Two Proposed Natural Gas Transmission Lines in Virginia i. Summary of GHG Emission Estimates
GHG Emissions Associated with Two Proposed Natural Gas Transmission Lines in Virginia i Summary of GHG Emission Estimates The primary purpose of this white paper is to estimate possible greenhouse gas
More informationModule 3: Functional Requirements
smart BA Distance Learning Programme Module 3: Functional Requirements Hello and welcome to the smart BA distance learning programme Module 3 in this module you are going to analyse the requirements of
More informationA Review of Cost of AB 32 on California Small Businesses Summary Report of Findings by Varshney & Associates
A Review of Cost of AB 32 on California Small Businesses Summary Report of Findings by Varshney & Associates Matthew E. Kahn UCLA and NBER Professor, Institute of the Environment Department of Economics
More informationFixed-Effect Versus Random-Effects Models
CHAPTER 13 Fixed-Effect Versus Random-Effects Models Introduction Definition of a summary effect Estimating the summary effect Extreme effect size in a large study or a small study Confidence interval
More informationHydrocarbon emissions characterization in the Colorado Front Range: A pilot study
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH, VOL. 117,, doi:10.1029/2011jd016360, 2012 Hydrocarbon emissions characterization in the Colorado Front Range: A pilot study Gabrielle Pétron, 1,2 Gregory Frost, 1,2 Benjamin
More informationBoonin on the Future-Like-Ours Argument against Abortion. Pedro Galvão Centro de Filosofia da Universidade de Lisboa
Boonin on the Future-Like-Ours Argument against Abortion Pedro Galvão Centro de Filosofia da Universidade de Lisboa David Boonin s recent book 1 is an impressively deep and detailed attempt to establish
More informationComparing Life-Cycle Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Natural Gas and Coal
Comparing Life-Cycle Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Natural Gas and Coal August 25, 2011 Mark Fulton Managing Director Global Head of Climate Change Investment Research Nils Mellquist Vice President Senior
More informationAir emissions reduction strategy
Pemex Exploración y Producción (PEP) Air emissions reduction strategy Natural Gas STAR Implementation Workshop Global Methane Initiative Denver, Colorado. April, 2012 Agenda Introduction Business Plan
More informationConsultation response: PPC Technical Guidance Note 35 Anaerobic Digestion
Consultation response: PPC Technical Guidance Note 35 Anaerobic Digestion The Anaerobic Digestion and Biogas Association ( ADBA ) is the trade association that represents the range of interests and matters
More informationEnergy Management for Industry
Energy Management for Industry B usiriesses must closely manage their operations in order to be successful. But they often overlook rrianaging the use oi their energy resources as a key way to reduce operating
More informationEmissions from Natural Gas Production in the Barnett Shale Area and Opportunities for Cost-Effective Improvements
Emissions from Natural Gas Production in the Barnett Shale Area and Opportunities for Cost-Effective Improvements report by: Al Armendariz, Ph.D. Department of Environmental and Civil Engineering Southern
More informationHydrocarbon Emissions Characterization in the Colorado Front Range A Pilot Study
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 Hydrocarbon Emissions Characterization in the Colorado Front Range A Pilot Study Gabrielle Pétron 1,2, Gregory Frost 1,2, Benjamin R. Miller 1,2,
More informationControl Device Requirements Charts For Oil and Gas Handling and Production Facilities
Device Charts For Oil and Gas Handling and Production Facilities Purpose/Scope: The purpose of this document is to provide standardized guidance for use by the regulated community and air permit reviewers,
More informationProduct Mix as a Framing Exercise: The Role of Cost Allocation. Anil Arya The Ohio State University. Jonathan Glover Carnegie Mellon University
Product Mix as a Framing Exercise: The Role of Cost Allocation Anil Arya The Ohio State University Jonathan Glover Carnegie Mellon University Richard Young The Ohio State University December 1999 Product
More informationTECHNICAL SUPPLEMENT 3: EQUIPMENT LEAK FUGITIVES
TECHNICAL SUPPLEMENT 3: EQUIPMENT LEAK FUGITIVES Technical Disclaimer This technical supplement is intended to help you accurately determine and correctly report equipment leak fugitive emissions. It does
More informationTrace Gas Exchange Measurements with Standard Infrared Analyzers
Practical Environmental Measurement Methods Trace Gas Exchange Measurements with Standard Infrared Analyzers Last change of document: February 23, 2007 Supervisor: Charles Robert Room no: S 4381 ph: 4352
More informationSNAP CODE: 090206. SOURCE ACTIVITY TITLE: Flaring in Gas and Oil Extraction NOSE CODE: 109.03.14
SNAP CODE: 090206 SOURCE ACTIVITY TITLE: WASTE INCINERATION Flaring in Gas and Oil Extraction NOSE CODE: 109.03.14 NFR CODE: 1 B 2 c 1 ACTIVITIES INCLUDED Flaring is gas combusted without utilisation of
More informationPhilosophy 1100: Introduction to Ethics
Philosophy 1100: Introduction to Ethics WRITING A GOOD ETHICS ESSAY The writing of essays in which you argue in support of a position on some moral issue is not something that is intrinsically difficult.
More informationHow to Earn the LEED Green Power Credit
3D EG REES WH ITE PAPER How to Earn the LEED Green Power Credit Using on-site and off-site renewable energy to mitigate the impact of greenhouse gas emissions associated with a LEED project s energy use
More informationInaccurate and Biased: Cost-Benefit Analyses of Transport Infrastructure Projects
Inaccurate and Biased: Cost-Benefit Analyses of Transport Infrastructure Projects Presentation at the workshop Critically Examining the Current Approaches to Transport Appraisal Petter Næss Professor in
More informationPew Center/NCEP 10-50 Workshop. Critique of The Future of Nuclear Power: An Interdisciplinary MIT Study
From workshop proceedings, The 10-50 Solution: Technologies and Policies for a Low-Carbon Future. The Pew Center on Global Climate Change and the National Commission on Energy Policy. Pew Center/NCEP 10-50
More information