1 Establishing large-scale trans-boundaries MPA networks: the OSPAR example in North-East Atlantic Introduction A pledge to establish a representative network of marine and coastal protected areas by 2012 was made at the World Summit on Sustainable Development in 2002 (Report of the World Summit on Sustainable Development, 2002). In 2004, the Convention on Biological Diversity agreed upon a firm commitment to establish a network of MPA by More recently the World Conservation Union (IUCN) has supported these the previous commitment to implement MPA networks by producing a guide aimed at developing national and regional capacity for building MPA networks (IUCN, 2007). IUCN recognises trans-boundaries MPAs represent one strategy for cooperative management and may involve high-level political initiatives. At a European level, the EU Member States have adopted legislation to protect both natural habitats and wild flora and fauna (EU habitats and birds Directives) through the establishment of. Special Areas of Conservation (SACs) and Special Protection Areas (SPAs) which together contribute to a network of protected sites, the Natura 2000 network. At the regional level, in the North-east Atlantic, the Oslo and Paris Commission ((OSPAR) are also aiming to establish a coherent network of MPAs by This commitment by the OSPAR Contracting Parties has not been easy to achieve due to the ecological, political, legal, social and economical issues relating to this geographical area. This case study provides an update of current progress towards the OSPAR MPA network. Since this network is still at its early stages, the study focuses on the preliminary steps taken in establishing the MPA network in relation to the identification and selection of MPAs. The main challenges arising from the implementation of a coherent large-scale trans-boundaries network of MPA and the main priority objectives to define in order to achieve this. First part gives a background of the OSPAR initiative toward the implementation of an MPA network. Then, further details are presented in relation to the process of implementing the OSPAR network. Finally, after an overall assessment of the OSPAR network, we will be able to draw on some conclusions about this initiative and raise some strategic questions to deal with when implementing such a network. 1 An MPA network can be defined as a collection of individual marine protected areas operating cooperatively and synergistically, at various spatial scales, and with a range of protection levels, in order to fulfil ecological aims more effectively and comprehensively than individual sites could alone. (IUCN, 2007)
2 1. History and background of the OSPAR initiative The 1992 OSPAR Convention is the current instrument guiding international cooperation on the protection of the marine environment of the North-East Atlantic. It combined and up-dated the 1972 Oslo Convention on dumping waste at sea and the 1974 Paris Convention on land-based sources of marine pollution. The work under the Convention is managed by the OSPAR Commission, made up of representatives of the Governments of 15 Contracting Parties and the European Commission, representing the European Community. The work under the Convention is guided by the Ministerial Declarations and Statements made at the adoption of the Convention and at the Ministerial Meetings of the OSPAR Commission. The work applies the ecosystem approach to the management of human activities. In 1998, the OSPAR committee made a decision to implement a network of marine protected areas to protect and conserve the biological diversity of the maritime area and its ecosystems which are, or could be, affected as a result of human activities, and to restore, where practicable, marine areas which have been adversely affected. However, key developments on the MPA network came later with the 2003 Bremen Statement adopted by the second Ministerial meeting of OSPAR Commission. The Statement included the commitment to, through working with HELCOM (Helsinki Convention) and the European Community, identify the first set of Marine Protected Areas (MPAs) by 2006 and establish remaining gaps. It also aimed at completing by 2010 a joint network of well-managed MPAs that, together with the European NATURA 2000 network, is ecologically coherent 2. In addition, the OSPAR Commission adopted a document detailing the guidelines for selecting and managing an OSPAR Network of marine protected areas (OSPAR, 2003). Both those documents have set the basis for the OSPAR MPA network and its priority objectives 3. These are largely ecological and do not include social or economical considerations. Every year the OSPAR Commission updates the status of the OSPAR MPA network. Additionally, meetings of the MPA, Species and Habitats (MASH working group) provide guidance for the implementation of the network, with regard to its ecological coherence for instance. 2 A definition of ecological coherence of MPA network has been agreed by the meeting of the working group on MPA, Species and Habitats (MASH) in Norway, 5-8 October The network should therefore be based on 14 recommendations including key criteria (e.g. connectivity of MPAs, representativity of critical habitats and species, etc.) 3 Aims are to: protect, conserve and restore species, habitats and ecological processes which have been adversely affected by human activities; prevent degradation of, and damage to, species, habitats and ecological processes, following the precautionary principle protect and conserve areas that best represent the range of species, habitats and ecological processes in the maritime area
3 2. Process for establishing the OSPAR network a. Process of identification and selection of MPAs The first process is based on 3 different stages: identification of possible sites; prioritisation of sites for designation; and use of the criteria to meet the aims of the OSPAR network. It is also important to note that such process is highly reliant on the scientific expertise and data provided by contracting parties. The identification of possible sites relies on the ecological criteria/considerations first defined in the guidelines provided by the OSPAR Commission for the identification and selection of MPA (OSPAR, 2003) and updated since. An area will qualify for selection if it meets several of the criteria defined in this document. Those are: threatened or declining species and habitats/biotopes; important species and habitats/biotopes; ecological significance; high natural biological diversity; representativity; sensitivity; and naturalness. Criteria are described as cited in the OSPAR report in Appendix 1. A further assessment of the ecological coherence has been conducted in 2006 and the main criteria identified were representativity, connectivity, replication and adequacy/viability. Those new criteria have been also adopted by the HELCOM network to allow a better coordination. The prioritisation of sites for designation is based once again on the ecological criteria. But a list of practical criteria/considerations is also taken into account. Those encompass markers criteria like size, potential for restoration, etc. details about those criteria are given in appendix 2. The main objective for this step is the identification of most suitable sites for the network implementation. Last step is the study of correlation between the criteria defined and the objectives of the OSPAR network. This should lead to the identification of the final components of the network. b. Further steps in MPA network s development To date, the OSPAR network remains at an early stage of implementation, where the aim is to filling-in the spatial gaps between MPAs in accordance with the criteria defined for selection (see above). After identification and selection of MPA, the OSPAR Commission has defined the new steps to be taken - this has been recently described in a guidance document (OSPAR, 2007b). Commission will assess the representativity of the network through three main stages, which consist in testing the representativity of the network with regard to: Spatial distribution; Relevant Dinter biogeographic provinces 4 ; and Threatened or declined habitats or species. 4 Dinter (2001) has identified a number of biogeographically-determined regions within the OSPAR Maritime area using primarily the factors of temperature, depth and currents and has validated these with biological data. The biogeographic regions proposed by Dinter should form the initial framework for incorporating biogeographic variation within the network.
4 Once representativity is insured by a relevant number and well-distributed MPAs, the network will effectively get started, and further actions will consist in the effective management of the network, as required by the objectives defined by the OSPAR Commission. Parties will then have to develop a management plan, in accordance with the OSPAR management guidelines, to achieve the aims for which the area has been selected. They also have to determine what management measures would be appropriate in the light of those guidelines. 3. Assessment of the OSPAR MPA network Every year the OSPAR Commission produces a report on the status of the OSPAR network of MPA. The most recent status report (OSPAR, 2007a) has presented updated information about the establishment of the OSPAR network. By end 2006, the OSPAR network of MPAs consisted of about km 2, which is not representative of the whole North-East Atlantic (see Appendix 3 for a map of reported OSPAR MPAs). It totals 87 sites nominated by Contracting Parties, partly already adopted by the OSPAR Commission. The vast majority of sites nominated fall within territorial waters 5. Only 9 sites fall within an Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ). One site is on an extended continental shelf. No sites are in areas beyond national jurisdiction (see Appendix 3). The updated list of reported OSPAR MPAs by Contracting Parties has enabled us to provide, for each of the Contracting Parties, the size and number of MPAs (see table 1). Country Number of reported OSPAR MPAs Total surface covered by reported OSPAR MPAs (hectares) Average size of reported OSPAR MPAs (hectares) France Germany Norway Portugal Sweden United Kingdom Table 1: Main features of the reported OSPAR MPAs by Contracting Parties (2006) Source: data from (OSPAR, 2007a) It is relatively obvious that the average sizes of selected MPAs differ among the Contracting Parties. Those dissimilarities between Parties bring the question of the coherence in the design of the MPA network. The OSPAR Commission has recognised that it is not possible to consider the network as coherent now, but the dissimilarities in the MPAs selected is unlikely to change in the future. For instance, MPAs selected in the UK are almost all Special Areas of Conservation (SAC) designated under the EC Habitats Directive, whereas half of the areas selected in Germany are national parks, which may have different characteristic and purposes. Regarding the high seas MPAs, little has been done by OSPAR so far. The 2007 meeting of the working group on MPA species and habitats (MASH) has put forward 5 Territorial waters, or a territorial sea, as defined by the 1982 United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, are a belt of coastal waters extending at most twelve nautical miles from the baseline (usually the mean low-water mark) of a coastal state.
5 the issue of high seas MPAs, and plan to get proposed sites by April The high seas MPAs are easier to deal with than nearshore areas because they are areas beyond national jurisdiction and the OSPAR Commission can therefore have more input into those. In addition, they represent key areas with regard to specific habitats (e.g.deepsea corals) and migratory species. Importantly, the main issues raised by the status report (OSPAR, 2007a) and from interviews with OSPAR secretariat include the followings: Small area of coverage by the MPA network with regard to the overall surface to be managed; There is no reported MPA for Belgium, Iceland, Ireland, The Netherlands and Spain, whereas they present key areas for MPA network implementation; Uneven distribution of sites, mostly located on the coast and only one high sea MPA site proposed so far; Overlapping of OSPAR sites with Natura 2000 sites in the EU countries (78 of the 81 EU sites are Natura 2000 sites) while OSPAR perspective and objectives are broader; and Lack of coordination with the HELCOM network (i.e. different databases and different MPA selection criteria). Those criteria were redefined in 2006 in order to be coherent with HELCOM s. 4. The challenges of trans-boundaries MPA networks: The OSPAR example It is reasonable to acknowledge that ecosystems, habitats and species rarely correspond to political or jurisdictional boundaries. This suggests that some cooperation is needed between management bodies which exert their jurisdiction. Indeed, jurisdiction is shared within the sea between several authorities: the EU and its Member States, but also national authorities on the northern shore (Norway, Denmark and Iceland). The implementation of a trans-national network like the OSPAR network therefore poses problem with regard to national jurisdictions. That is why OSPAR has only a political role in building the MPA network. One of the main issues raised by the OSPAR secretariat is related to inconsistency: contracting parties have different first different approaches to marine habitat protection and species conservation. But they also have to deal with dissimilar concerns: the ecological issues in the Azores (Portugal) vary a lot from the issues dealt with in Norway, etc. Thus, it is important to take carefully into account ecological coherence when building the network in order to come with a good balance in establishment and management measures. One other major challenge is the commitment from contracting parties into the implementation of the network. Since parties may already be part of the Natura 2000 sites network or have their own national network, it may be difficult to get them involved in the building of an additional network. Another issue for bodies like OSPAR to deal with is therefore the degree of freedom they want to give to their parties. For the moment, OSPAR leaves parties with a high degree of freedom and the only mean for OSPAR to get parties committed to a trans-boundaries MPA network is political pressure, which may appear weak to some extent.
6 Conclusion This paper provides an overview of the OSPAR MPA network so far, in the form of an interim assessment. It is too early to draw conclusions on the success or failure of the OSPAR network. Some insights have been given, but one must keep in mind that the network is at its first steps of implementation. Also, differences in the way contracting parties are committed to the network have lead to dissimilar stages of implementation. The OSPAR initiative could help the building of other networks like in the Mediterranean Sea where habitat protection and species conservation is are highly required. In the case of the Mediterranean, a network would allow an effective cooperation between management bodies and scientists. It could provide countries with lacking MPAs with an effective support for national MPAs implementation. In that case, the network would be used 1) for developing individual MPAs in areas where they are needed, and 2) to coordinate a network of MPAs through a transboundaries initiative. This case study enables us to draw on some strategic questions to treat before the establishment of an MPA network: How to build up a coherent network of MPA in a complex and conflicting ecological, legislative, political, and social environment? What are the rationales to get Contracting Parties involved in the building of a trans-boundaries network which interconnect sub-networks (e.g. Natura 2000 network) and national networks? Which degree of hands-on (legal, political and managerial) is necessary in order to achieve a coherent trans-boundaries network of MPAs? What are the reliable data in order to implement an effective and sustainable network and to assess its efficiency later on? What are the priority objectives in order to coordinate actions with adjacent trans-boundaries networks (e.g. HELCOM and OSPAR networks)?
7 References Dinter WP, 2001, Biogeography of the OSPAR Maritime Area. Bundesamt for Naturschutz, Bonn, Germany. 167 pp. IUCN/WCPA, 2007, Establishing Networks of Marine Protected Areas: A Guide for Developing National and Regional Capacity Building MPA Networks. Non-technical summary report. OSPAR, 2003b, Guidelines for the Identification and Selection of Marine Protected Areas in the OSPAR Maritime Area (Reference number: ) OSPAR, 2007a, 2006 Report on the Status of the OSPAR Network of Marine Protected Areas OSPAR, 2007b, Three Initial Spatial Tests Looking at the Ecological Coherence of the OSPAR MPA Network, meeting of MASH working group, Brest (France), 5-8 November 2007 Further details have been given on the OSPAR MPA network with two members of the OSPAR: Jeff Ardron, Scientific Advisor on Marine Protected Areas, German Federal Agency for Nature Conservation Marine and Coastal Nature Conservation Unit; and Sebastian Unger, policy analyst in the OSPAR secretariat. For further information, visit the OSPAR website:
8 Appendix 1: Ecological criteria/considerations Source: OSPAR, 2003 An area qualifies for selection as an MPA if it meets several but not necessarily all of the following criteria. The consideration and assessment of these criteria should be based on best available scientific expertise and knowledge. 1. Threatened or declining species and habitats/biotopes The area is important for species, habitats/biotopes and ecological processes that appear to be under immediate threat or subject to rapid decline as identified by the ongoing OSPAR (Texel-Faial) selection process. 2. Important species and habitats/biotopes The area is important for other species and habitats/biotopes as identified by the ongoing OSPAR (Texel-Faial) selection process. 3. Ecological significance The area has: a high proportion of a habitat/biotope type or a biogeographic population of a species at any stage in its life cycle; important feeding, breeding, moulting, wintering or resting areas; important nursery, juvenile or spawning areas; or a high natural biological productivity of the species or features being represented. 4. High natural biological diversity The area has a naturally high variety of species (in comparison to similar habitat/biotope features elsewhere) or includes a wide variety of habitats/biotopes (in comparison to similar habitat/biotope complexes elsewhere). 5. Representativity The area contains a number of habitat/biotope types, habitat/biotope complexes, species, ecological processes or other natural characteristics that are representative for the OSPAR maritime area as a whole or for its different biogeographic regions and sub-regions. 6. Sensitivity The area contains a high proportion of very sensitive or sensitive habitats/biotopes or species. 7. Naturalness The area has a high degree of naturalness, with species and habitats/biotope types still in a very natural state as a result of the lack of human-induced disturbance or degradation.
9 Appendix 2: Practical criteria/considerations Source: OSPAR, Size The size of the area should be suitable for the particular aim of designating the area, including maintaining its integrity, and should enable the effective management of that area. 2. Potential for restoration The area has a high potential to return to a more natural state under appropriate management. 3. Degree of acceptance The establishment of the MPA has a comparatively high potential level of support from stakeholders and political acceptability. 4. Potential for success of management measures There is a high probability that management measures and the ability to implement them (such as legislation, relevant authorities, funding, and scientific knowledge) will meet the aims for designation. 5. Potential damage to the area by human activities It is an area where significant damage by human activity may happen in the short term. 6. Scientific value The area has a high value for scientific research and monitoring.
10 Appendix 3: Map of MPA nominations Source: OSPAR, 2007a n.b.: To increase visibility, the outlines of the reported OSPAR MPAs (in red) and NEAFC fisheries closures (blue) 6 are outlined slightly larger than to scale. French data are MNHN. 6 It is however noted that NEAFC fishery closures are not OSPAR MPAs.
A protected area is defined by the IUCN as a clearly defined geographical space, recognised, dedicated and managed, through legal or other effective means, to achieve the long-term conservation of nature
Appendix A. The Marine Life Protection Act (MLPA) THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA DO ENACT AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. Chapter 10.5 (commencing with Section 2850) is added to Division 3 of the Fish and
Brussels in Brief Brussels in Brief is a regular feature of the IUCN Newsletter produced by the Institute for European Environmental Policy (IEEP) in Brussels. It provides a platform to explain the substance
9.3.7 Advice December 2014 ECOREGION STOCK Widely distributed and migratory stocks European eel Advice for 2015 The status of eel remains critical and ICES advises that all anthropogenic mortality (e.g.
Overview of the status of the network of Baltic Sea marine protected areas HELCOM Baltic Marine Environment Protection Commission 0 1 Overview of the status of the network of Baltic Sea marine protected
P:35 marine/marine Guidelines CE_2005.doc W orking draf t for intern al use of the Marine W orking Group Guidelines Natura 2000 network in the marine environment Application of the Habitats and Birds Directives
NATIONAL COMMITTEE OF MARINE FISHERIES Nicolas MICHELET - CNPMEM Manchester, 13 March 2008 International Programme for the conservation and the restoration of the European Sturgeon (Acipenser sturio) INFORMATION
Marine Protected Areas POLICY Canada March 1999 Published by: Canada Marine Ecosystems Conservation Branch Oceans Directorate Ottawa, ON K1A 0E6 DFO / 5870 Minister of Public Works and Government Service
OSPAR Convention for the Protection of the Marine Environment of the North-East Atlantic Ministerial Meeting of the OSPAR Commission, Bergen: 23-24 September 2010 WE, THE MINISTERS AND THE MEMBER OF THE
Quality Status report 2010 Ospar Commission OSPAR Commission New Court 48 Carey Street London WC2A 2JQ T +44 (0) 20 7430 5200 F +44 (0) 20 7430 5225 email@example.com www.ospar.org Quality StaTus Report
A Functional Classification System for Marine Protected Areas in the United States The U.S. Classification System: An Objective Approach for Understanding the Purpose and Effects of MPAs as an Ecosystem
National Biodiversity Response PO Box 1715 TAMWORTH NSW 2340 By email: firstname.lastname@example.org RE: Australia s Biodiversity Conservation Strategy 2010-2020 Consultation draft ORGANISATIONAL BACKGROUND The
Annex H6 Approach for assessing impacts on cables (interconnectors and telecom cables) Contents 1 Baseline description... 2 2 Management scenario... 2 2.1 Assumptions about the assessment of environmental
www.gov.uk/defra Environmental damage: extending the Environmental Liability Directive into marine waters Consultation on amending the Environmental Damage (Prevention and Remediation) Regulations 2009
ICES STRATEGIC PLAN 2014 2018 Contents International Council for the Exploration of the Sea Conseil International pour l Exploration de la Mer H. C. Andersens Boulevard 44 46 DK-1553 Copenhagen V Denmark
Development of innovative tools for understanding marine biodiversity and assessing good environmental status: the progress of the EU project DEVOTES Angel Borja Scientific Symposium 2015, 6-7 May, Malmö,
Ecosystem-Based Management: Making it Work in the EU www.marinelaw.ie Overview 1. Context 2. Definitions 3. Legal Basis: International & Regional Law EU Law 4. Conclusions The Context Commission Report
SOUTH GEORGIA AND SOUTH SANDWICH ISLANDS MARINE PROTECTED AREAS: EXISTING PROTECTION AND PROPOSALS FOR FURTHER PROTECTION CONSULTATION DOCUMENT OCTOBER 2012 1 1. Background 1.1 What is a marine protected
UNITED NATIONS ENVIRONMENT PROGRAMME Environment for Development UNEP is the voice for the environment within the United Nations system UNEP s mission is to provide leadership and encourage partnership
Indicator fact sheet Fishing fleet trends Key message: The big EU 15 fishing fleet (1989 2000) has decreased in numbers of vessels (10 %), in tonnage (6 %) and power (12 %) The much smaller EFTA fishing
CHALLENGES OF THE NORD STREAM STREAMLINING THE INTERNATIONAL LEGAL FRAMEWORK FOR SUBMARINE PIPELINES Dr. Sergei Vinogradov CEPMLP, Dundee European Gas Grids Nord Stream truly international project Crosses
Public education, communication & awareness (Broader consideration #6) Best Practice examples Virtually the entire community (including the local communities and the wider public) are very familiar with
Progress Towards the Development of the Six Country Coral Triangle Marine Protected Area System (CTMPAS) Alan White Senior Scientist, The Nature Conservancy and Lynette Laroya MPA Technical Working Group,
Views from Living Marine Resources Management and the Coral Triangle Project Annadel Salvio Cabanban Ecosystem Approach to Fisheries Management Specialist, Coral Triangle Initiative Southeast Asia Project:
Explanatory Memorandum to the Conservation of Habitats and Species (Amendment) Regulations 2012 This Explanatory Memorandum has been prepared by the Environment and Sustainable Development Department and
Table of Contents Introduction 3 Marine and Marine Industries Council 4 Marine Ecosystem Management in Tasmania 5 Representative System of Marine Protected Areas 6 Primary Goal 6 Secondary Goals 6 Ecological
Marine Protected Area Networks: Process design and ecosystembased approaches Hannah Thomas & Nicholas Shears Forest & Bird is New Zealand s largest independent conservation organisation that works to preserve
The Coral Triangle Region, The Coral Triangle Initiative, and the Development of the Six Country Marine Protected Area System Alan White The Nature Conservancy The Coral Triangle Initiative Coral Triangle
Marine protected areas in areas beyond national jurisdiction The pioneering efforts under the OSPAR Convention Erik J. Molenaar & Alex G. Oude Elferink * Introduction The international community has committed
BMP Guidelines for preparing an Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) report for activities related to hydrocarbon exploration and exploitation offshore Greenland Danish National Environmental Research
5 JUNE 2015 MINISTERIAL MEETING OF THE BLUE WEEK 2015 We, Ministers responsible for Ocean/ Fisheries/ Maritime Affairs, having met in Lisbon on June the 5 th, 2015, at the invitation of the Minister of
INTERIM MEASURES ADOPTED BY PARTICIPANTS IN NEGOTIATIONS TO ESTABLISH SOUTH PACIFIC REGIONAL FISHERIES MANAGEMENT ORGANISATION Participants in the negotiations to establish a South Pacific Regional Fisheries
IS ENVIRONMENTAL LAW READY FOR ECOLOGICAL RESTORATION? An Cliquet IUCN AEL Conference, University of Maryland 2 July 2012 Overview Policy and legal obligations for ecological restoration Where, what and
CONVENTION ON THE PROTECTION OF THE MARINE ENVIRONMENT OF THE BALTIC SEA AREA HELSINKI COMMISSION - Baltic Marine HELCOM 19/98 Environment Protection Commission 15/1 Annex 3 19th Meeting Helsinki, 23-27
RSPB Briefing January 2006 The implementation of the European Union Environmental Liability Directive Briefing on the main issues arising in relation water I. Introduction The European Union s Environmental
The Marine Protected Area Inventory New pictures Jordan Gass, Hugo Selbie and Charlie Wahle ESRI Ocean Forum November 6, 2013 Outline What is the MPA Inventory? Purpose Data How it s used Future directions
SUBSIDIARY LEGISLATION WILDLIFE & PROTECTED AREAS Marine Protected Areas Order 2012 S. R. & O. No: 1 of 2012 Made: 23 February 2012 Published: 29 February 2012 Coming into force: on publication IN EXERCISE
Environmental damage: Extending the Environmental Liability Directive into marine waters Consultation on amending the Environmental Liability (Prevention and Remediation) Regulations (Northern Ireland)
Marine Protected Areas Policy and Implementation Plan 1 Published by Department of Conservation and Ministry of Fisheries PO Box 10-420 Wellington, New Zealand www.biodiversity.govt.nz December 2005 Front
Framework for assessing ecological and cumulative effects of offshore wind farms Part A: Methods Version 1.1 2 Framework for assessing ecological and cumulative effects Part A Contents Summary of FAECE
Marine biological diversity beyond areas of national jurisdiction Legal and policy framework 1. The United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS) provides the legal framework within which all
The importance of independent marine evidence provision in a multi-use environment: MBA information resources and The Marine Life Information Network. Matt Frost, Dan Lear, Harvey Tyler-Walters The challenge
Baltic Sea Perspective on - Building a Gas Pipeline and - Oil Spills Dr Juha-Markku Leppänen Head of the Monitoring and Assessment Unit, Marine Research Centre, Finnish Environment Institute (SYKE) Content
Workshop on the Application of an Ecosystem Approach for development of Sustainable Aquaculture in Europe s Outermost Regions and Overseas Countries and Territories Session 3: Stakeholders presentations
The CLME Project: Governance for Caribbean Living Marine Resources Lucia Fanning, Robin Mahon, Patrick McConney, Bertha Simmons Centre for Resource Management and Environmental Studies UWI, Cave Hill Campus,
Page 1 RESOLUTION MEPC.162(56) Adopted on 13 July 2007 GUIDELINES FOR RISK ASSESSMENT UNDER REGULATION A-4 OF THE BWM CONVENTION (G7) THE MARINE ENVIRONMENT PROTECTION COMMITTEE, RECALLING Article 38(a)
INTERNATIONAL OBLIGATIONS AND AGREEMENTS TITLE DESCRIPTION Ratification Focal Point CONVENTIONS The United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS) also called the Law of the Sea Convention or
MAIN BIODIVERSITY RELATED ACHIEVEMENTS AND CHALLENGES ABIDJAN CONVENTION AREA BY NASSERE KABA Interim Coordinator of the Abidjan Convention RCU This presentation is a brief update on the main biodiversity
World Heritage World Heritage Review of existing Tentative Lists Expert Meeting on World Heritage and the Arctic Narvik, 30 November to 1 December 2007 Tentative List of Norway Directorate for Nature Management
- Relevance and Objectives 1. Scope of the Dutch German Exchange (DGE) The Netherlands and Germany have large river systems such as Danube, Rhine, Meuse, Elbe, Weser and Ems, which have important hydrological
CONSERVATION AREAS ACT CAP. 30.15 Conservation Areas Act CAP. 30.15 Arrangement of Sections CONSERVATION AREAS ACT Arrangement of Sections Section 1 Short title... 5 2 Interpretation... 5 3 Declaration
National BiodiversityStrategyandActionPlan (NBSAP),St. Lucia page 8 Resource tenure and access Most agricultural lands, and a majority of forest lands, are privately owned. Two significant trends can be
ECOLOGICAL A MEANS OF CONSERVING BIODIVERSITY AND SUSTAINING LIVELIHOODS RESTORATION The Society for Ecological Restoration International (SER) is a non-profit organization infused with the energy of involved
The Norwegian ecosystem-based management plan for the Barents Sea and sea areas off the Lofoten Islands By: Dr. Erik Olsen, Research Scientist The Barents Sea Continental shelf sea Average depth 230m Area
2008/MRCWG/022 Agenda Item: 10 Coral Triangle Initiative (CTI) on Coral Reefs, Fisheries and Food Securities Purpose: Information Submitted by: Indonesia 21 st Marine Resource Conservation Working Group
ENVIRONMENTAL SCOPING DOCUMENT Guide to Preparing an Environmental Scoping Document 1. Introduction Where the EPA decides to assess a proposal under the Public Environmental Review (PER) process, the EPA
The Offshore MPA Toolbox Implementing Marine Protected Areas in the North-East Atlantic Offshore: Seamounts A Case Study Published by: OASIS, Hamburg &, Frankfurt am Main, September 2004 Authors: Stefanie
Mid Atlantic Fishery Management Council 5 Year Strategic Plan 2014 2018 DRAFT 5/31/2013 Table of Contents Table of Contents... 1 Introduction... 2 The Mid Atlantic Fishery Management Council... 2 Rationale
Priority 2 Protection and restoration of biodiversity and soil and promotion of ecosystem services, including through Natura 2000, and green infrastructure Kristina Veidemane, Baltic Environmental Forum
Part 2 Appendix 2O Greater Black Backed Gull EIA Analysis Greater Black Backed Gull EIA Analysis Introduction Natural England (NE) and JNCC (in their further detailed response to Relevant Representations,
Claudia Copeland Specialist in Resources and Environmental Policy December 15, 2010 Congressional Research Service CRS Report for Congress Prepared for Members and Committees of Congress 7-5700 www.crs.gov
3 1 0 2 v o N 7 6 p o h s k r o w e c r o F ENVIRONMENTAL ASPECT OF EOR CHEMICALS Ying Guo, Total E&P Presented at FORCE - EOR Competence Building Workshop 6. November 2013 PRESENTATION OUTLINE Problems
2.1 INTRODUCTION TO MPA NETWORKS Advantages of Networks 2.2 TYPES OF MPA NETWORKS Social Networks Ecological Networks Management-based Networks Case Study: A Regional Approach to MPA Development in West
NEW YORK SEASCAPE PROGRAM A COMMITMENT TO OCEAN CONSERVATION JULY 2012 1 Wildlife Conservation Society The Wildlife Conservation Society (WCS) saves wildlife and wild places worldwide. We do so through
GREAT BARRIER REEF Climate Change Action Plan 2007 2011 Climate change is now recognised as the greatest long-term threat to the Great Barrier Reef. The Great Barrier Reef is internationally renowned as
CHAPTER 2: APPROACH AND METHODS APPROACH Given Hawaii s biological uniqueness on a global scale, the Comprehensive Wildlife Conservation Strategy (CWCS) recognizes the importance of protecting all native
This article appeared in a journal published by Elsevier. The attached copy is furnished to the author for internal non-commercial research and education use, including for instruction at the authors institution
WASTE MANAGEMENT IN THE TURKISH COASTAL SITES OF THE MEDITERRANEAN SEA The Mediterranean region, due to its climatic and geographical features, has been the home of many civilizations throughout history.
Draft New Museums Site Development Framework Supplementary Planning Document SUSTAINABILITY APPRAISAL SCREENING REPORT MAY 2015 1 Contents 1 INTRODUCTION 3 2 DRAFT NEW MUSEUMS SITE SPD 4 3 STRATEGIC ENVIRONMENTAL
Also available Issue 1: Assessment and Management of Alien Species that Threaten Ecosystems, Habitats and Species Issue 2: Review of The Efficiency and Efficacy of Existing Legal Instruments Applicable
Top 10 Myths Concerning Ecosystem Approaches to Ocean Resource Management Steven Murawski, Ph.D. United Nations Open-ended Informal Consultative Process on Oceans and the Law of the Sea Panel: Demystifying
Barents Euro Arctic Council Seventh Meeting of Environment Ministers Declaration 19 October, 2005 1. The Ministers of the Environment of the Barents Euro Arctic Council (BEAC) representing Denmark, Iceland,
California Marine Life Protection Act Initiative California Natural Resources Agency 1416 Ninth Street, Suite 1311 Sacramento, CA 95814 916.654.1885 To: MLPA Blue Ribbon Task Force From: MLPA I-Team Subject:
Restoring the biodiversity of the Great Barrier Reef: - an important component of ecosystem based management International Symposium on Marine Nature Restoration Copenhagen 11 th -12th March 2013 Jon Day
Towards Experimental Ecosystem Accounts for the Great Barrier Reef Information Paper for the 20th London Group Meeting New Delhi, 15-17 October 2014 Australian Bureau of Statistics Summary The Australian
ICES Advice on fishing opportunities, catch, and effort Northeast Atlantic Ecoregion Published 30 September 2015 Version 2, 9 December 2015 9.3.8 Blue whiting (Micromesistius poutassou) in Subareas I IX,
Biodiversity-related requirements of the Marine Strategy Framework Directive 1 VIVI FLEMING-LEHTINEN BIODIVERSITY-RELATED REQUIREMENTS OF THE MARINE STRATEGY FRAMEWORK DIRECTIVE IN SYNERGY WITH THE HABITATS
Environmental Liability Directive; Implementation, Enforcement, and the Future Valerie Fogleman Consultant, Stevens & Bolton LLP Professor, Cardiff University School of Law Topics Environmental Liability
Chapter 4 Float or Sinker for Europe s Seas? The Role of Law in Marine Governance Brita Bohman and David Langlet Introduction Law and the Environment Marine environmental governance is hugely challenging.
Towards sustainability in the Celtic Sea Supporting Sustainable Seas A guide to implementing the ecosystem approach through the Marine Strategy Framework Directive About PISCES PISCES (Partnerships Involving
Protected Area Categories and Management Objectives A protected area is defined as: An area of land and/or sea especially dedicated to the protection and maintenance of biological diversity, and of natural
FAME PROJECT - INTERNATIONAL WORKSHOP TERESA SIMAS 1 20 TH NOVEMBER, 2012 OBJECTIVES Overview of marine renewable energy development and prospects CONTENTS Green House Gas emissions targets Renewable energy
GUIDANCE ON TYPOLOGY, REFERENCE CONDITIONS AND CLASSIFICATION SYSTEMS FOR TRANSITIONAL AND COASTAL WATERS PRODUCED BY CIS WORKING GROUP 2.4 (COAST) Status Box Status: final draft for presentation at the
Making the polluter pay Environmental Damage Regulations March 2009 Introduction... 1 When do the Regulations apply?... 2 Type of damage... 2 Cause of damage... 3 When did the incident or damage occur?...
22.12.2000 L 327/1 I (Acts whose publication is obligatory) DIRECTIVE 2000/60/EC OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMT AND OF THE COUNCIL of 23 October 2000 establishing a framework for Community action in the field
"Wetlands: water, life, and culture" 8th Meeting of the Conference of the Contracting Parties to the Convention on Wetlands (Ramsar, Iran, 1971) Valencia, Spain, 18-26 November 2002 Ramsar COP8 DOC. 20
Your consent to our cookies if you continue to use this website.