CASE ID # [personal information] WORKERS COMPENSATION APPEAL TRIBUNAL WORKERS COMPENSATION BOARD OF PRINCE EDWARD ISLAND DECISION #7

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "CASE ID # [personal information] WORKERS COMPENSATION APPEAL TRIBUNAL WORKERS COMPENSATION BOARD OF PRINCE EDWARD ISLAND DECISION #7"

Transcription

1 C A N A D A CASE ID # [personal information] PROVINCE OF PRINCE EDWARD ISLAND WORKERS COMPENSATION APPEAL TRIBUNAL BETWEEN: WORKER APPELLANT AND: WORKERS COMPENSATION BOARD OF PRINCE EDWARD ISLAND RESPONDENT DECISION #7 Date of Hearing: June 6, 2000 DOUGLAS R. DRYSDALE JOHN K. MITCHELL, Q.C. Carr Stevenson & MacKay Stewart McKelvey Stirling Scales 50 Water Street 65 Grafton Street Charlottetown, PE C1A 7L1 Charlottetown, PE C1A 8B9 Solicitor for the Appellant Solicitor for the Respondent

2 C A N A D A CASE ID # [ personal information] PROVINCE OF PRINCE EDWARD ISLAND WORKERS COMPENSATION APPEAL TRIBUNAL BETWEEN: WORKER APPELLANT AND: WORKERS COMPENSATION BOARD OF PRINCE EDWARD ISLAND RESPONDENT DECISION #7 This is the decision of the Workers Compensation Appeal Tribunal (the Tribunal ) on an appeal by [the worker] on the decision of the Workers Compensation Board (the Board ) dated March 8, 1999, which decision confirmed an earlier decision to terminate the Appellant s benefits effective June 23, [The worker] was injured on July 15, 1996, while working on the [personal information]. He suffered a back injury (twisted his upper back) while [personal information]. At the time of the injury he had been working there for two years. [The worker s] claim for compensation benefits was accepted and benefits were paid pursuant to the Workers Compensation Act.

3 On June 23, 1997 Larry Phelan, Case Manager for [the worker] on behalf of the Board terminated his benefits. Pursuant to section 56 of the Act, [the worker] requested a reconsideration hearing, which was held before Terry Dunsford on June 11, The reconsideration hearing decision was not rendered until March 8, The reconsideration hearing confirmed the decision of Case Manager Larry Phelan that benefits were no longer payable after June 23, [The worker] returned back to work successfully and since June 29, 1998 has not suffered a loss of earning capacity as a result of actual employment. [The worker] and his lawyer, Douglas Drysdale, appeared before the tribunal appealing the decision of Terry Dunsford on numerous grounds and requesting that he be paid benefits for the period between the cessation of his benefits and his return to work the following year (June 23, 1997-June 29, 1998). Geoff Connolly appeared as the lawyer for the Board. The Appellant raises seven grounds of appeal in his Notice of Appeal and Memorandum of Argument: 1. That the Respondent erred by failing to properly determine the Appellant s loss of earning capacity, as required by Section 41 of the Act; 2. That the Respondent erred by terminating the workers compensation benefits as of June 23, 1997 payable to the Appellant without properly determining the Appellant s loss of earning capacity; 3. That the Respondent erred by failing to pay all wage loss benefits to which the Appellant was properly entitled, according to section 40 of the Act; 4. That the Respondent erred by making a decision on the appellant s capacity to earn without sufficient evidence, and by ignoring or giving

4 little or no weight to evidence relevant to the issue; 5. That the Respondent erred and violated the Appellant s right to fair hearing by considering evidence not made know to the Appellant, and by failing to permit the Appellant to challenge or speak to that evidence; 6. That the Respondent erred by failing to properly apply section 17 of the Act. At the hearing these the Appellant consolidated the grounds to the following four: 1. The Board did not pay for the loss of earning capacity experienced by the Appellant; 2. The decision of the Board was made without proper evidence and further failed to consider proper evidence; 3. The Board did not provide a fair hearing as the Appellant was not provided opportunity to question the additional information gathered; and 4. The Board did not properly apply section 17. The Respondent maintains that the loss from the injury terminated June 23, 1997, or alternatively, the claimant was not in a wage loss position as of June 23, In order to appreciate the sequence of events, it is of some assistance to review the following relevant timeline and make mention of the more pertinent documents:

5 July 15, 1996 [the worker s] date of injury September 17, 1996 Medical Report provided by Dr. Jane Touchie (Appellant s family physician in NB) indicating Appellant unable to return to work at this time, with estimated date of return to pre-accident work as 96/12/01 October 1, 1996 Medical Report provided by Dr. Jane Touchie, indicating Appellant cannot return to pre-accident work, with no date filled in for date of return to pre-accident work, and current work capacity ranked as sedentary. November 26, 1996 Medical Report provided by Dr. Andrew Berkshire expressing concern about [the worker] returning to heavy work. March 1997 Medical Report from Dr. Mayerovich (on locum for Dr. Touchie) making no findings about work ability, but indicating there are no objective reasons not to perform a Functional Capacity Evaluation. March 1997 Functional Capacity Evaluation performed by Maureen Rogers, Physiotherapist, with her report listing numerous significant deficits but no finding as to ability to return to work. April 10, 1997 Medical Report provided by Dr. Jane Touchie indicating that the Appellant will never return to pre-accident work, and describes current work capacity as sedentary. June 23, 1997 Compensation terminated October 1, 1997 Appellant makes request for Reconsideration December 1997 Dr. Touchie provides opinion to [the worker s] lawyer indicating that [the worker] is not able to work at the present time and that [the worker s] current disability is caused by his July 1996 work related accident. March 24, 1998 Dr. Marchant (the Board s physician) concludes:

6 [The worker] has recovered from the soft tissue injury of July 15/96, and is fit for light level work based on his FCE (Mar31/Apr1/97), reflecting his present problems based on his non-work related illness June 11, 1998 Oral evidence presented to Terry Dunsford in reconsideration hearing. June 26, 1998 Letter from Terry Dunsford authorized six weeks of physiotherapy treatments regarding your ([the worker s]) ongoing back complaints. June 29, 1998 [the worker] returns back to work in New Brunswick as a supervisor of construction site. July 14, 1998 Letter from Terry Dunsford to [personal information] (the worker s new employer) confirming the Board s decision to authorize physiotherapy treatment, the purchase of an obus form and funding of the Return to Work program. July 16, 1998 Letter from Terry Dunsford to [the worker s] lawyer, confirming funding of Return to Work program, physiotherapy and obus form and notes that he left the issue as to whether or not [the worker] is functionally capable of doing these particular job duties up to his family physician to determine. Dunsford further advises that he will be gathering additional information from [personal information] before rendering the Board s decision on the Reconsideration Hearing. February 19, 1999 Maureen Rogers, Physiotherapist, finds that based on the FCE of 1997: The client rates in a sedentary category for his work abilities. He does not meet the requirements for the light category with respect to weight capacities, and tolerances for walking and standing. * *qualified with provided there has not been a significant change in the client s status

7 February 19, 1999 Memo to Terry Dunsford, Director of Client services from Keith Mullins, Vocational Counsellor responding to request for clarification of the process used to determine the above client s capacity to do suitable alternate employment in April 1997 provides listing of possible jobs suitable for [the worker]. March 8, 1999 Reconsideration Decision rendered April 6, 1999 Notice of Appeal Filed by [the worker] It should also be noted that [the worker] had a history of back problems and suffered from a degenerative disc condition. For the Board, Dr. Marchant determined that the Appellant was capable of performing light level duties. Dr. Marchant s opinion was based upon a review of the file. She did not interview or meet with the Appellant. Her opinion was sought after the request for the reconsideration hearing but before the oral hearing. The F.C.E. performed in 1997, was later interpreted by Maureen Rogers at the Board s request, who found the Appellant was capable of sedentary duties provided there was no significant change. Keith Mullins, vocational counsellor, found as well that based on the F.C.E. the Appellant was capable of performing jobs determined to be Limited or Sedentary in nature. Terry Dunsford requested clarification from both Maureen Rogers and Keith Mullins, after the Reconsideration Hearing but before rendering the decision. Dr. Touchie provided a number of reports with the last dated December 18, 1997 which stated the Appellant was unable to work as a result of the

8 injury of July 15, Obviously, there is inconsistency in reports throughout the history of the claim, with evidence of the Appellant s work ability ranging from non-existent to sedentary to light in nature. The Board did not to follow up with Dr. Touchie (family physician) after her report dated December 18, But yet in later correspondence to the Appellant s new employer, indicated that it would be up to [the worker s] physician to give him medical clearance to participate in those job functions. When the Appellant did return to work in June of 1998, the Board did approve him for the Return to Work Program, whereby the Board funds his initial return to work for 6 weeks at 100%, and authorized additional Physiotherapy payments and the purchase of an Obus Form. THE LAW The role of the Workers Compensation Appeal Tribunal is set out under section 56 of the Workers Compensation Act. There does not seem to be any contention as to the standard of review the tribunal must apply in order to determine whether or not the actions taken by the Board were correct. The test becomes one of being clearly wrong when questions of fact are concerned, as set out in the Shewan v. Abbotsford District No. 34 (1986) 70 B.C.L.R. (4 th ) B.C.C.A: the function of the appellate court is to review the record of the proceedings below and to ascertain whether there has been an error in principle. It can make any order that could have been made by the Tribunal from which the appeal is taken, or set aside the decision below, and direct a new hearing. It should not interfere with the findings of fact made below unless it be established that there was

9 some palpable and overriding error which affected the Tribunals assessments of the facts In short, the rule is that an appellate court will not interfere with the findings of the Tribunal unless they appear to be clearly wrong. Section 6 of the Workers Compensation Act sets out the entitlement of an injured worker to compensation: (1) Where, in any industry within the scope of this Part, personal injury by accident arising out of and in the course of employment is caused to a worker, the Board shall pay compensation by this Part out of the Accident Fund. There is no dispute that the injury as sustained by the Appellant resulted in a loss of earning capacity and was entitled to wage loss benefits. The dispute arises as to how long did this loss of earning capacity continue. When the injury results in a loss of earning capacity benefits remain payable until the loss of earning capacity ends, as determined by the Board, or the worker attains the age of 65 years (s. 40). Section 41(1) provides for the calculation of loss of earning capacity: (1) The loss of earning capacity of a worker is the difference between the worker s net average earnings before the accident; and the net average amount the Board determines the worker is capable of earning after the accident, which amount shall not be less than zero. The Board s position in the case, is that although [the worker] was not employed by June 23, 1997, he no longer suffered from a loss of earning capacity and was capable of making net average earnings equivalent to his pre-accident level and therefore his benefits should cease. In making this determination, the Board is obligated to carefully review the file and to apply the Act in a liberal manner pursuant to the Interpretation Act, S.P.E.I. 1981, c.18, s. 9, and as set out in Dowling v. Prince Edward Island (Workers Compensation Board), [1994] P.E.I.R. 46 (S.C.A.D.), at p. 47.

10 This would include application of Section 17 of the Workers Compensation Act, which provides: Notwithstanding anything in this Act, on any application for compensation the decision shall be made in accordance with the real merits and justice of the case and where it is not practicable to determine an issue because the evidence for or against the issue is approximately equal in weight, the issue shall be resolved in favour of the claimant. Upon a review of the evidence, the conflicting medical reports and the inconsistent approach of the Board in its handling of the claim are readily apparent. Unfortunately in a situation like this it will never be clear as to the actual day [the worker] was able to return to work, however, the Tribunal finds that the Board erred in its application of Section 17, and finds that the evidence of [the worker] ability to return to work was approximately equal in weight and as a result benefits are payable to [the worker] from the date of denial until his return to work. The Board had every opportunity to seek clarification from all the medical personnel involved, but chose only to follow up with its own consultants. The Appeal is allowed. Dated this 29th day of August, PAMELA J. WILLIAMS Vice-Chairperson Appeal Tribunal I CONCUR KEN MONTGOMERY (Employer Representative) NEIL MacFADYEN (Employee Representative)

CASE ID #[ personal information] WORKERS COMPENSATION APPEAL TRIBUNAL WORKERS COMPENSATION BOARD OF PRINCE EDWARD ISLAND DECISION #9

CASE ID #[ personal information] WORKERS COMPENSATION APPEAL TRIBUNAL WORKERS COMPENSATION BOARD OF PRINCE EDWARD ISLAND DECISION #9 C A N A D A CASE ID #[ personal information] PROVINCE OF PRINCE EDWARD ISLAND BETWEEN: WORKERS COMPENSATION APPEAL TRIBUNAL EMPLOYER AND: APPELLANT AND: WORKERS COMPENSATION BOARD OF PRINCE EDWARD ISLAND

More information

WORKERS COMPENSATION BOARD APPEAL TRIBUNAL. [Personal Information] WORKERS COMPENSATION BOARD OF PRINCE EDWARD ISLAND DECISION #42

WORKERS COMPENSATION BOARD APPEAL TRIBUNAL. [Personal Information] WORKERS COMPENSATION BOARD OF PRINCE EDWARD ISLAND DECISION #42 WORKERS COMPENSATION BOARD APPEAL TRIBUNAL CASE I.D. #[personal information] CASE I.D. #[personal information] BETWEEN: [Personal Information] PLAINTIFF AND: WORKERS COMPENSATION BOARD OF PRINCE EDWARD

More information

WORKERS COMPENSATION BOARD APPEAL TRIBUNAL. [Personal information] CASE I.D. #[personal information]

WORKERS COMPENSATION BOARD APPEAL TRIBUNAL. [Personal information] CASE I.D. #[personal information] WORKERS COMPENSATION BOARD APPEAL TRIBUNAL BETWEEN: [personal information] CASE I.D. #[personal information] PLAINTIFF AND: WORKERS COMPENSATION BOARD OF PRINCE EDWARD ISLAND DEFENDANT DECISION #41 [Personal

More information

WORKERS COMPENSATION APPEAL TRIBUNAL. EMPLOYER CASE ID #[personal information] WORKERS COMPENSATION BOARD OF PRINCE EDWARD ISLAND WORKER DECISION #114

WORKERS COMPENSATION APPEAL TRIBUNAL. EMPLOYER CASE ID #[personal information] WORKERS COMPENSATION BOARD OF PRINCE EDWARD ISLAND WORKER DECISION #114 WORKERS COMPENSATION APPEAL TRIBUNAL BETWEEN: EMPLOYER CASE ID #[personal information] AND: APPELLANT WORKERS COMPENSATION BOARD OF PRINCE EDWARD ISLAND RESPONDENT AND: WORKER EMPLOYEE DECISION #114 Appellant

More information

WORKERS COMPENSATION APPEAL TRIBUNAL

WORKERS COMPENSATION APPEAL TRIBUNAL WORKERS COMPENSATION APPEAL TRIBUNAL BETWEEN: [PERSONAL INFORMATION] CASE ID #[PERSONAL INFORMATION] APPELLANT AND: WORKERS COMPENSATION BOARD OF PRINCE EDWARD ISLAND RESPONDENT DECISION #199 Appellant

More information

WORKERS COMPENSATION APPEAL TRIBUNAL [PERSONAL INFORMATION] CASE ID #[PERSONAL INFORMATION] WORKERS COMPENSATION BOARD OF PRINCE EDWARD ISLAND

WORKERS COMPENSATION APPEAL TRIBUNAL [PERSONAL INFORMATION] CASE ID #[PERSONAL INFORMATION] WORKERS COMPENSATION BOARD OF PRINCE EDWARD ISLAND WORKERS COMPENSATION APPEAL TRIBUNAL BETWEEN: [PERSONAL INFORMATION] CASE ID #[PERSONAL INFORMATION] APPELLANT AND: WORKERS COMPENSATION BOARD OF PRINCE EDWARD ISLAND RESPONDENT DECISION #194 Appellant

More information

ADDENDUM REVIEW DECISION. Review Reference #: R0101001 Board Decision under Review: December 8, 2008

ADDENDUM REVIEW DECISION. Review Reference #: R0101001 Board Decision under Review: December 8, 2008 ADDENDUM REVIEW DECISION Re: Review Reference #: R0101001 Board Decision under Review: December 8, 2008 Date: July 2, 2009 Review Officer: Robert de Balinhard This is an addendum to my decision with respect

More information

WORKERS COMPENSATION APPEAL TRIBUNAL WORKERS COMPENSATION BOARD OF PRINCE EDWARD ISLAND DECISION #55. Represented by Keith Mullins

WORKERS COMPENSATION APPEAL TRIBUNAL WORKERS COMPENSATION BOARD OF PRINCE EDWARD ISLAND DECISION #55. Represented by Keith Mullins WORKERS COMPENSATION APPEAL TRIBUNAL FIRM [personal information] BETWEEN: ISLAND PRESS LTD. APPELLANT AND: WORKERS COMPENSATION BOARD OF PRINCE EDWARD ISLAND RESPONDENT DECISION #55 Employer Respondent

More information

WORKERS COMPENSATION APPEAL TRIBUNAL WORKER. and WORKERS COMPENSATION BOARD OF PRINCE EDWARD ISLAND DECISION

WORKERS COMPENSATION APPEAL TRIBUNAL WORKER. and WORKERS COMPENSATION BOARD OF PRINCE EDWARD ISLAND DECISION E Case #[personal information] WORKERS COMPENSATION APPEAL TRIBUNAL BETWEEN: WORKER APPELLANT and WORKERS COMPENSATION BOARD OF PRINCE EDWARD ISLAND RESPONDENT DECISION This is an appeal from the decision

More information

.25 Schedule of [Attorneys'] Attorney's Fees.

.25 Schedule of [Attorneys'] Attorney's Fees. .25 Schedule of [Attorneys'] Attorney's Fees. A. The Commission shall approve [attorneys'] attorney's fees in accordance with the schedule of fees established from time to time by the Commission and set

More information

WORKERS COMPENSATION APPEAL TRIBUNAL

WORKERS COMPENSATION APPEAL TRIBUNAL WORKERS COMPENSATION APPEAL TRIBUNAL BETWEEN: [PERSONAL INFORMATION] CASE ID #[PERSONAL INFORMATION] APPELLANT AND: WORKERS COMPENSATION BOARD OF PRINCE EDWARD ISLAND RESPONDENT DECISION #200 Appellant

More information

Illinois Official Reports

Illinois Official Reports Illinois Official Reports Appellate Court Continental Tire of the Americas, LLC v. Illinois Workers Compensation Comm n, 2015 IL App (5th) 140445WC Appellate Court Caption CONTINENTAL TIRE OF THE AMERICAS,

More information

Decision Number: WCAT-2015-02919

Decision Number: WCAT-2015-02919 WCAT Decision Number: WCAT-2015-02919 WCAT Decision Date: September 23, 2015 Panel: Joanne Kembel, Vice Chair Introduction [1] This is a referral to the chair of the (WCAT) under section 251 of the Workers

More information

WORKPLACE SAFETY AND INSURANCE APPEALS TRIBUNAL

WORKPLACE SAFETY AND INSURANCE APPEALS TRIBUNAL 2005 ONWSIAT 469 WORKPLACE SAFETY AND INSURANCE APPEALS TRIBUNAL DECISION NO. 1300/04 [1] This appeal was considered in Toronto on August 3, 2004, by Tribunal Vice-Chair M. Crystal. THE APPEAL PROCEEDINGS

More information

United States Department of Labor Employees Compensation Appeals Board DECISION AND ORDER

United States Department of Labor Employees Compensation Appeals Board DECISION AND ORDER United States Department of Labor T.J., Appellant and U.S. POSTAL SERVICE, POST OFFICE, NORTH ATLANTA STATION, Atlanta, GA, Employer Appearances: Appellant, pro se Office of Solicitor, for the Director

More information

SUMMARY DECISION NO. 143/97. Suitable employment.

SUMMARY DECISION NO. 143/97. Suitable employment. SUMMARY DECISION NO. 143/97 Suitable employment. The worker slipped and fell in January 1992, injuring her low back and hip. She was awarded a 28% NEL award for her low back condition. The worker appealed

More information

Information for Workers. Information for Workers

Information for Workers. Information for Workers Information for Workers Information for Workers Revised March 2015 Contents Overview... 2 Workplace Injuries... 2 Worker Responsibilities... 2 Employer Responsibilities... 4 WCB Responsibilities... 4 Returning

More information

Long-Term Disability A GUIDE TO YOUR INSURANCE CLAIM

Long-Term Disability A GUIDE TO YOUR INSURANCE CLAIM Long-Term Disability A GUIDE TO YOUR INSURANCE CLAIM CANTINI LAW GROUP ATLANTIC CANADA S INJURY LAWYERS Table of contents 3 Background information about LTD insurance What is LTD insurance? How is LTD

More information

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE NINTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR ORANGE COUNTY, FLORIDA

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE NINTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR ORANGE COUNTY, FLORIDA IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE NINTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR ORANGE COUNTY, FLORIDA PROGRESSIVE AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY, CASE NO.: 2014-CV-000079-A-O Lower Case No.: 2012-SC-002127-O Appellant, v.

More information

RULES OF PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE. August 20, 2015

RULES OF PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE. August 20, 2015 RULES OF PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE August 20, 2015 INDEX PART 1 INTRODUCTION... 1 PART 2 GENERAL RULES... 2 Rule 1 How the Rules are Applied... 2 Applying the Rules... 2 Conflict with the Act... 2 Rule 2

More information

OFFICE OF THE ETHICS COMMISSIONER PROVINCE OF ALBERTA REPORT TO THE SPEAKER OF THE LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY OF THE INVESTIGATION

OFFICE OF THE ETHICS COMMISSIONER PROVINCE OF ALBERTA REPORT TO THE SPEAKER OF THE LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY OF THE INVESTIGATION OFFICE OF THE ETHICS COMMISSIONER PROVINCE OF ALBERTA REPORT TO THE SPEAKER OF THE LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY OF THE INVESTIGATION BY THE ETHICS COMMISSIONER INTO ALLEGATIONS INVOLVING BRIAN EVANS, Q.C., FORMER

More information

NOVA SCOTIA WORKERS COMPENSATION APPEALS TRIBUNAL

NOVA SCOTIA WORKERS COMPENSATION APPEALS TRIBUNAL NOVA SCOTIA WORKERS COMPENSATION APPEALS TRIBUNAL Appellant: [X] (Worker) Participants entitled to respond to this appeal: [X] (Employer) and The Workers Compensation Board of Nova Scotia (Board) APPEAL

More information

2013 IL App (5th) 120093WC-U NO. 5-12-0093WC IN THE APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS FIFTH DISTRICT WORKERS' COMPENSATION COMMISSION DIVISION

2013 IL App (5th) 120093WC-U NO. 5-12-0093WC IN THE APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS FIFTH DISTRICT WORKERS' COMPENSATION COMMISSION DIVISION NOTICE Decision filed 08/20/13. The text of this decision may be changed or corrected prior to the filing of a Petition for Rehearing or the disposition of the same. 2013 IL App (5th 120093WC-U NO. 5-12-0093WC

More information

Compensation Recovery Unit. Z2 - Mandatory reconsideration and appeal guide for recovery of benefits and/or lump sum payments

Compensation Recovery Unit. Z2 - Mandatory reconsideration and appeal guide for recovery of benefits and/or lump sum payments Compensation Recovery Unit Z2 - Mandatory reconsideration and appeal guide for recovery of benefits and/or lump sum payments October 2013 1 Contents Compensation recovery scheme... 3 If you want the Compensation

More information

NOVA SCOTIA WORKERS COMPENSATION APPEALS TRIBUNAL

NOVA SCOTIA WORKERS COMPENSATION APPEALS TRIBUNAL NOVA SCOTIA WORKERS COMPENSATION APPEALS TRIBUNAL Appellant: [X] (Employer) Participants entitled to respond to this appeal: [X] (Worker) and The Workers Compensation Board of Nova Scotia (Board) APPEAL

More information

Workers Compensation Amendment (Transitional) Regulation 2012

Workers Compensation Amendment (Transitional) Regulation 2012 New South Wales Workers Compensation Amendment (Transitional) Regulation 2012 under the Workers Compensation Act 1987 Her Excellency the Governor, with the advice of the Executive Council, has made the

More information

MARCH 9, 2015. Referred to Committee on Commerce, Labor and Energy. SUMMARY Makes various changes relating to workers compensation.

MARCH 9, 2015. Referred to Committee on Commerce, Labor and Energy. SUMMARY Makes various changes relating to workers compensation. S.B. SENATE BILL NO. COMMITTEE ON COMMERCE, LABOR AND ENERGY MARCH, 0 Referred to Committee on Commerce, Labor and Energy SUMMARY Makes various changes relating to workers compensation. (BDR -) FISCAL

More information

Review of Section 38 (Benefits), Workers Compensation Act

Review of Section 38 (Benefits), Workers Compensation Act Legislative Review of Workers Compensation Review of Section 38 (Benefits), Workers Compensation Act Discussion Paper May 2015 Discussion Paper May 2015 Published by: Province of New Brunswick P.O. Box

More information

WORKERS GUIDE YUKON WORKERS COMPENSATION HEALTH AND SAFETY BOARD. working together WITH YUKON WORKERS AND EMPLOYERS

WORKERS GUIDE YUKON WORKERS COMPENSATION HEALTH AND SAFETY BOARD. working together WITH YUKON WORKERS AND EMPLOYERS WORKERS GUIDE YUKON WORKERS COMPENSATION HEALTH AND SAFETY BOARD working together WITH YUKON WORKERS AND EMPLOYERS workers compensation WORKERS COMPENSATION Workers compensation is an employer-funded insurance

More information

General Information on Representing Yourself in a Workers Compensation Case

General Information on Representing Yourself in a Workers Compensation Case General Information on Representing Yourself in a Workers Compensation Case Idaho Industrial Commission PO Box 83720 Boise, ID 83720-0041 Telephone: (208) 334-6000 Fax: (208) 332-7558 www.iic.idaho.gov

More information

APPEAL OF NEW HAMPSHIRE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS (New Hampshire Compensation Appeals Board)

APPEAL OF NEW HAMPSHIRE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS (New Hampshire Compensation Appeals Board) NOTICE: This opinion is subject to motions for rehearing under Rule 22 as well as formal revision before publication in the New Hampshire Reports. Readers are requested to notify the Reporter, Supreme

More information

WORKPLACE SAFETY AND INSURANCE APPEALS TRIBUNAL DECISION NO. 2289/08

WORKPLACE SAFETY AND INSURANCE APPEALS TRIBUNAL DECISION NO. 2289/08 WORKPLACE SAFETY AND INSURANCE APPEALS TRIBUNAL DECISION NO. 2289/08 BEFORE: M. Crystal: Vice-Chair HEARING: October 31, 2008 at Toronto Written case DATE OF DECISION: October 31, 2008 NEUTRAL CITATION:

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA M E M O R A N D U M A N D O R D E R

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA M E M O R A N D U M A N D O R D E R IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA CLEOPATRA MCDOUGAL-SADDLER : CIVIL ACTION : vs. : : ALEXIS M. HERMAN, SECRETARY, : NO. 97-1908 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR : M

More information

NOVA SCOTIA WORKERS COMPENSATION APPEALS TRIBUNAL

NOVA SCOTIA WORKERS COMPENSATION APPEALS TRIBUNAL NOVA SCOTIA WORKERS COMPENSATION APPEALS TRIBUNAL Appellant: [X] (Worker) Participants entitled to respond to this appeal: [X] (Employer) and The Workers Compensation Board of Nova Scotia (Board) APPEAL

More information

Workplace Health, Safety & Compensation Review Division

Workplace Health, Safety & Compensation Review Division Workplace Health, Safety & Compensation Review Division WHSCRD Case No: 14150-06 WHSCC Claim No: 871322 Decision Number: 15005 Keith Barry Review Commissioner The Review Proceedings 1. The hearing of the

More information

WORKPLACE SAFETY AND INSURANCE APPEALS TRIBUNAL DECISION NO. 1708/15

WORKPLACE SAFETY AND INSURANCE APPEALS TRIBUNAL DECISION NO. 1708/15 WORKPLACE SAFETY AND INSURANCE APPEALS TRIBUNAL DECISION NO. 1708/15 BEFORE: E. Kosmidis : Vice-Chair E. Tracey : Member Representative of Employers C. Salama : Member Representative of Workers HEARING:

More information

Ontario ~ Commission des. Ontano OFFICE OF THE DIRECTOR OF ARBITRATIONS PAULO PINTO. and

Ontario ~ Commission des. Ontano OFFICE OF THE DIRECTOR OF ARBITRATIONS PAULO PINTO. and Ontario ~ Commission des Insurance assurances de Commission I Ontario Ontano OFFICE OF THE DIRECTOR OF ARBITRATIONS Appeal P97-00031 PAULO PINTO Appellant/Respondent and GENERAL ACCIDENT ASSURANCE CO.

More information

Noteworthy Decision Summary. Decision: WCAT-2003-01952 Panel: D. Dukelow Decision Date: August 11, 2003

Noteworthy Decision Summary. Decision: WCAT-2003-01952 Panel: D. Dukelow Decision Date: August 11, 2003 Noteworthy Decision Summary Decision: WCAT-2003-01952 Panel: D. Dukelow Decision Date: August 11, 2003 Re-opening Previous Decision Sections 96(2) and 240(2) of the Workers Compensation Act Item #102.01

More information

PERMANENT TOTAL DISABILITY

PERMANENT TOTAL DISABILITY Welcome to the West Virginia Workers Compensation Webinars! PERMANENT TOTAL DISABILITY West Virginia OFFICES OF THE INSURANCE COMMISSIONER June 20, 2008 THE PTD APPLICATION A Claimant cannot be considered

More information

Have you or someone you know suffered a personal injury? TIPS TO MAXIMIZE COMPENSATION

Have you or someone you know suffered a personal injury? TIPS TO MAXIMIZE COMPENSATION Have you or someone you know suffered a personal injury? TIPS TO MAXIMIZE COMPENSATION If you have suffered a personal injury it is important to consider all potential sources of compensation. A personal

More information

WORKERS COMPENSATION APPEAL TRIBUNAL

WORKERS COMPENSATION APPEAL TRIBUNAL WORKERS COMPENSATION APPEAL TRIBUNAL BETWEEN: [PERSONAL INFORMATION] CASE ID #[PERSONAL INFORMATION] APPELLANT AND: WORKERS COMPENSATION BOARD OF PRINCE EDWARD ISLAND RESPONDENT DECISION #201 Appellant

More information

MARCH 5, 2015. Referred to Committee on Commerce and Labor. SUMMARY Revises provisions governing workers compensation.

MARCH 5, 2015. Referred to Committee on Commerce and Labor. SUMMARY Revises provisions governing workers compensation. A.B. ASSEMBLY BILL NO. COMMITTEE ON COMMERCE AND LABOR MARCH, 0 Referred to Committee on Commerce and Labor SUMMARY Revises provisions governing workers compensation. (BDR -) FISCAL NOTE: Effect on Local

More information

DISCUSSION PAPER EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

DISCUSSION PAPER EXECUTIVE SUMMARY DISCUSSION PAPER EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1. TITLE Interest on Compensation 2. ISSUE At issue is a review of the policy for when workers are entitled to the payment of interest on compensation benefits. 3. OVERVIEW

More information

Accidents at Work. Everything you need to know

Accidents at Work. Everything you need to know Accidents at Work Everything you need to know Falling from ladders, slipping on a wet floor, lifting a heavy item, cutting yourself on a machine. Even in the 21st Century the workplace is still dangerous

More information

Inquiry into Schedule 2 of the Veterans Affairs Legislation Amendment (2015 Budget Measures) Bill 2015

Inquiry into Schedule 2 of the Veterans Affairs Legislation Amendment (2015 Budget Measures) Bill 2015 Inquiry into Schedule 2 of the Veterans Affairs Legislation Amendment (2015 Budget Measures) Bill 2015 Senate Foreign Affairs, Defence and Trade Legislation Committee 16 September 2015 GPO Box 1989, Canberra

More information

Automobile Injury Compensation Appeal Commission

Automobile Injury Compensation Appeal Commission Automobile Injury Compensation Appeal Commission IN THE MATTER OF an Appeal by [the Appellant] AICAC File No.: AC-11-010 and AC-11-077 PANEL: APPEARANCES: Ms Laura Diamond, Chairperson Ms Linda Newton

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF INDIANA

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF INDIANA Pursuant to Ind.Appellate Rule 65(D), this Memorandum Decision shall not be regarded as precedent or cited before any court except for the purpose of establishing the defense of res judicata, collateral

More information

2014 CO 5. No. 11SC926, Harman-Bergstedt, Inc. v. Loofbourrow Workers Compensation.

2014 CO 5. No. 11SC926, Harman-Bergstedt, Inc. v. Loofbourrow Workers Compensation. Opinions of the Colorado Supreme Court are available to the public and can be accessed through the Court s homepage at http://www.courts.state.co.us. Opinions are also posted on the Colorado Bar Association

More information

United States Department of Labor Employees Compensation Appeals Board DECISION AND ORDER

United States Department of Labor Employees Compensation Appeals Board DECISION AND ORDER United States Department of Labor M.L., Appellant and DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE, DEFENSE CONTRACT AUDIT AGENCY, Houston, TX, Employer Appearances: Jeffrey P. Zeelander, Esq., for the appellant Office of Solicitor,

More information

HOW TO FILE A DISABILITY CLAIM (For Benefits Provided Pursuant to an Employer Provided Benefit Plan)

HOW TO FILE A DISABILITY CLAIM (For Benefits Provided Pursuant to an Employer Provided Benefit Plan) HOW TO FILE A DISABILITY CLAIM (For Benefits Provided Pursuant to an Employer Provided Benefit Plan) If you have Short Term Disability and/or Long Term Disability coverage by virtue of your employment,

More information

WORKPLACE SAFETY AND INSURANCE APPEALS TRIBUNAL

WORKPLACE SAFETY AND INSURANCE APPEALS TRIBUNAL 2001 ONWSIAT 2499 WORKPLACE SAFETY AND INSURANCE APPEALS TRIBUNAL DECISION NO. 398 01 [1] This appeal was heard in Toronto on February 16, 2001 by Tribunal Vice-Chair E.J. Sajtos. THE APPEAL PROCEEDINGS

More information

Revised Section 4.4 Job Corps Technical Assistance Guide (TAG) E 4.4 INJURIES RESULTING IN STUDENT SEPARATION FROM JOB CORPS

Revised Section 4.4 Job Corps Technical Assistance Guide (TAG) E 4.4 INJURIES RESULTING IN STUDENT SEPARATION FROM JOB CORPS Revised Section 4.4 Job Corps Technical Assistance Guide (TAG) E 4.4 INJURIES RESULTING IN STUDENT SEPARATION FROM JOB CORPS While at a Job Corps center, an enrollee is under the continuous supervision

More information

United States Department of Labor Employees Compensation Appeals Board DECISION AND ORDER

United States Department of Labor Employees Compensation Appeals Board DECISION AND ORDER United States Department of Labor C.B., Appellant and U.S. POSTAL SERVICE, POST OFFICE, HUDSON POSTAL STATION, Modesto, CA, Employer Appearances: Appellant, pro se Office of Solicitor, for the Director

More information

WCAT WCAT. Appealing a Review Division Decision. Employer s Guide. Workers Compensation Appeal Tribunal. Workers Compensation Appeal Tribunal

WCAT WCAT. Appealing a Review Division Decision. Employer s Guide. Workers Compensation Appeal Tribunal. Workers Compensation Appeal Tribunal WCAT Workers Compensation Appeal Tribunal Appealing a Review Division Decision Employer s Guide WCAT Workers Compensation Appeal Tribunal As an employer, you can appeal most Review Division decisions to

More information

STATE OF VERMONT AGENCY OF HUMAN SERVICES DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS. Directive: 393.01

STATE OF VERMONT AGENCY OF HUMAN SERVICES DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS. Directive: 393.01 STATE OF VERMONT AGENCY OF HUMAN SERVICES DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS Directive: 393.01 Subject: Inmate Workers Compensation Effective Date: June 15, 1994 Review and Re-Issue Date: Supersedes: NEW APA Rule

More information

No. 80-100 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA. Claimant and Appellant, Defendant and Respondent.

No. 80-100 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA. Claimant and Appellant, Defendant and Respondent. No. 80-100 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA 1980 KENNETH KIENAS, Claimant and Appellant, JAMES G. PETERSON, Employer, and STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND, Insurer, Defendant and Respondent.

More information

NOVA SCOTIA WORKERS COMPENSATION APPEALS TRIBUNAL

NOVA SCOTIA WORKERS COMPENSATION APPEALS TRIBUNAL NOVA SCOTIA WORKERS COMPENSATION APPEALS TRIBUNAL Appellant: [X] (Worker) Participant entitled to respond to this appeal: The Workers Compensation Board of Nova Scotia (Board) APPEAL DECISION Representative:

More information

REPORTED IN THE COURT OF SPECIAL APPEALS OF MARYLAND. No. 1043. September Term, 2006 ATRELLE T. THOMAS GIANT FOOD, LLC, ET AL.

REPORTED IN THE COURT OF SPECIAL APPEALS OF MARYLAND. No. 1043. September Term, 2006 ATRELLE T. THOMAS GIANT FOOD, LLC, ET AL. REPORTED IN THE COURT OF SPECIAL APPEALS OF MARYLAND No. 1043 September Term, 2006 ATRELLE T. THOMAS v. GIANT FOOD, LLC, ET AL. Eyler, Deborah S., Woodward, McAuliffe, John F. (Ret'd, Specially Assigned),

More information

RENDERED: JUNE 14, 2002; 2:00 p.m. NOT TO BE PUBLISHED NO. 2001-CA-001138-MR

RENDERED: JUNE 14, 2002; 2:00 p.m. NOT TO BE PUBLISHED NO. 2001-CA-001138-MR RENDERED: JUNE 14, 2002; 2:00 p.m. NOT TO BE PUBLISHED C ommonwealth Of K entucky Court Of A ppeals NO. 2001-CA-001138-MR ATLANTA SPECIALTY INSURANCE COMPANY APPELLANT APPEAL FROM MONTGOMERY CIRCUIT COURT

More information

REPORTER. Decision of the Appeal Division

REPORTER. Decision of the Appeal Division WORKERS COMPENSATION REPORTER Decision of the Appeal Division Number: 2001-0897 Date: May 8, 2001 Panel: John Steeves, Paul Petrie, Jill M. Callan Subject: Section 34 Payment of Wage Loss Benefits for

More information

A Paralegal s First WSIB File. Presented by: Ontario Paralegal Association September 26, 2015

A Paralegal s First WSIB File. Presented by: Ontario Paralegal Association September 26, 2015 A Paralegal s First WSIB File Presented by: Ontario Paralegal Association September 26, 2015 Interview Opening a file Determining injured workers problem Defining relevant issues Rules of Conduct Purpose

More information

What do I do about time missed from work to attend appointments relating to my injury?

What do I do about time missed from work to attend appointments relating to my injury? What do I do about time missed from work to attend appointments relating to my injury? An injured worker needs to use accrued leave to be paid for time missed from work to attend appointments relating

More information

NO. COA08-1063 NORTH CAROLINA COURT OF APPEALS. Filed: 16 June 2009

NO. COA08-1063 NORTH CAROLINA COURT OF APPEALS. Filed: 16 June 2009 An unpublished opinion of the North Carolina Court of Appeals does not constitute controlling legal authority. Citation is disfavored, but may be permitted in accordance with the provisions of Rule 30(e)(3)

More information

Social Security (Employment Injuries Insurance) EMPLOYMENT INJURIES (QUESTIONS AND APPEALS) REGULATIONS

Social Security (Employment Injuries Insurance) EMPLOYMENT INJURIES (QUESTIONS AND APPEALS) REGULATIONS Social Security (Employment Injuries Insurance) Regulations made under s.50. 1952-10 EMPLOYMENT INJURIES (QUESTIONS AND APPEALS) () 18.10.1954 Amending enactments Relevant current provisions Commencement

More information

WCB claims. WCB claim process. Worker suffers an injury/occupational disease. Report to first aid/supervisor.

WCB claims. WCB claim process. Worker suffers an injury/occupational disease. Report to first aid/supervisor. Section 4 WCB claims WCB claim process Worker suffers an injury/occupational disease. Worker reports to doctor. Physician s first report is sent to WCB. (Form 8). Report to first aid/supervisor. Injured

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TENNESSEE SPECIAL WORKERS' COMPENSATION APPEALS PANEL KNOXVILLE, MAY 1999 SESSION

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TENNESSEE SPECIAL WORKERS' COMPENSATION APPEALS PANEL KNOXVILLE, MAY 1999 SESSION IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TENNESSEE SPECIAL WORKERS' COMPENSATION APPEALS PANEL KNOXVILLE, MAY 1999 SESSION FILED August 27, 1999 Cecil Crowson, Jr. Appellate Court Clerk ROBERT JONES CUMBERLAND CIRCUIT

More information

WORKPLACE SAFETY AND INSURANCE APPEALS TRIBUNAL DECISION NO. 2115/14

WORKPLACE SAFETY AND INSURANCE APPEALS TRIBUNAL DECISION NO. 2115/14 WORKPLACE SAFETY AND INSURANCE APPEALS TRIBUNAL DECISION NO. 2115/14 BEFORE: C. M. MacAdam : Vice-Chair S. T. Sahay : Member Representative of Employers K. Hoskin : Member Representative of Workers HEARING:

More information

1. A claim is accepted in error or benefits paid in error;

1. A claim is accepted in error or benefits paid in error; #113.10 Investigation Costs Costs may be incurred prior to making a decision on a claim in investigating the validity of the claim or in paying benefits pursuant to an interim adjudication. Where the decision

More information

[Cite as State ex rel. Carlile v. Ohio Bur. of Workers Comp. (2000), 90 Ohio St.3d 20.]

[Cite as State ex rel. Carlile v. Ohio Bur. of Workers Comp. (2000), 90 Ohio St.3d 20.] [Cite as State ex rel. Carlile v. Ohio Bur. of Workers Comp., 90 Ohio St.3d 20, 2000-Ohio-6.] THE STATE EX REL. CARLILE, APPELLANT, v. OHIO BUREAU OF WORKERS COMPENSATION, APPELLEE. [Cite as State ex rel.

More information

2013 IL App (3d) 120130-U. Order filed September 23, 2013 IN THE APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS THIRD DISTRICT A.D., 2013

2013 IL App (3d) 120130-U. Order filed September 23, 2013 IN THE APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS THIRD DISTRICT A.D., 2013 NOTICE: This order was filed under Supreme Court Rule 23 and may not be cited as precedent by any party except in the limited circumstances allowed under Rule 23(e)(1). 2013 IL App (3d) 120130-U Order

More information

Reports or Connecticut Appellate Reports, the

Reports or Connecticut Appellate Reports, the ****************************************************** The officially released date that appears near the beginning of each opinion is the date the opinion will be published in the Connecticut Law Journal

More information

FOR IMMEDIATE NEWS RELEASE NEWS RELEASE # 15. The Opinions handed down on the 25th day of February, 2003, are as follows:

FOR IMMEDIATE NEWS RELEASE NEWS RELEASE # 15. The Opinions handed down on the 25th day of February, 2003, are as follows: FOR IMMEDIATE NEWS RELEASE NEWS RELEASE # 15 FROM: CLERK OF SUPREME COURT OF LOUISIANA The Opinions handed down on the 25th day of February, 2003, are as follows: BY KIMBALL, J.: 2002-C - 1634 RONALD J.

More information

DECISION NO. 1708/10

DECISION NO. 1708/10 B. Kalvin WORKPLACE SAFETY AND INSURANCE APPEALS TRIBUNAL DECISION NO. 1708/10 BEFORE: B. Kalvin : Vice-Chair HEARING: September 9, 2010 at Toronto Oral DATE OF DECISION: September 15, 2010 NEUTRAL CITATION:

More information

Practice Resource. Retainer agreement and information. Personal injury contingent fee. Dear [client name]: Accident of [date of accident]

Practice Resource. Retainer agreement and information. Personal injury contingent fee. Dear [client name]: Accident of [date of accident] Practice Resource Retainer agreement and information Personal injury contingent fee Dear [client name]: Re: Accident of [date of accident] Thank you for asking my law firm to help you with your claim against

More information

Legal Services for Injured Workers. Workers Advisers Program

Legal Services for Injured Workers. Workers Advisers Program Legal Services for Injured Workers Workers Advisers Program Table of Contents Introduction... 2 Responsibilities of the WCB... 3 Responsibilities of the Worker... 4 Responsibilities of the Employer...

More information

LARKIN v. WORKERS COMPENSATION APPEALS BD. OF CALIFORNIA

LARKIN v. WORKERS COMPENSATION APPEALS BD. OF CALIFORNIA LARKIN v. WORKERS COMPENSATION APPEALS BD. OF CALIFORNIA S216986 Supreme Court of California March 6, 2014 Reporter: 2014 CA S. Ct. Briefs LEXIS 407 JOHN LARKIN, Plaintiff, Appellant and Petitioner, v.

More information

2016 IL App (2d) 141240WC-U FILED: NO. 2-14-1240WC IN THE APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS SECOND DISTRICT WORKERS' COMPENSATION COMMISSION DIVISION

2016 IL App (2d) 141240WC-U FILED: NO. 2-14-1240WC IN THE APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS SECOND DISTRICT WORKERS' COMPENSATION COMMISSION DIVISION NOTICE: This order was filed under Supreme Court Rule 23 and may not be cited as precedent by any party except in the limited circumstances allowed under Rule 23(e(1. 2016 IL App (2d 141240WC-U FILED:

More information

2013 2016 Legislative Review of Workers Compensation. 2013 Discussion Paper. Post-Secondary Education, Training and Labour / WorkSafeNB

2013 2016 Legislative Review of Workers Compensation. 2013 Discussion Paper. Post-Secondary Education, Training and Labour / WorkSafeNB 2013 2016 Legislative Review of Workers Compensation 2013 Discussion Paper Post-Secondary Education, Training and Labour / WorkSafeNB 1 Introduction The concept of modern workers' compensation had its

More information

IN THE APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS FOURTH DISTRICT. Workers Compensation Commission Division A.D., 2009

IN THE APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS FOURTH DISTRICT. Workers Compensation Commission Division A.D., 2009 Filed 12/23/09 No. 4--09--0144WC IN THE APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS FOURTH DISTRICT Workers Compensation Commission Division A.D., 2009 GREENE WELDING AND HARDWARE, ) Appeal from the Circuit Court ) of

More information

APPEAL FROM DECISION OF MEDICAL APPEAL TRIBUNAL ON A QUESTION OF LAW

APPEAL FROM DECISION OF MEDICAL APPEAL TRIBUNAL ON A QUESTION OF LAW 19.3.63 R(I) 11/63 APPEAL FROM DECISION OF MEDICAL APPEAL TRIBUNAL ON A QUESTION OF LAW Principles of natural justice--provisions of Interpreters The clairnan t, a Ukrainian married to an English wife,

More information

STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS

STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS BRONSON HEALTH CARE GROUP, INC, d/b/a BRONSON METHODIST HOSPITAL, a Michigan nonprofit corporation, UNPUBLISHED July 16, 2015 Plaintiff-Appellant, v No. 321908 Kalamazoo

More information

STATE OF RHODE ISLAND AND PROVIDENCE PLANTATIONS VS. ) W.C.C. 02-04486 DECISION OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION

STATE OF RHODE ISLAND AND PROVIDENCE PLANTATIONS VS. ) W.C.C. 02-04486 DECISION OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION STATE OF RHODE ISLAND AND PROVIDENCE PLANTATIONS PROVIDENCE, SC. WORKERS COMPENSATION COURT APPELLATE DIVISION JOSEFINA DONAHUE ) ) VS. ) W.C.C. 02-04486 ) ROSS SIMONS, INC. ) DECISION OF THE APPELLATE

More information

ILLINOIS OFFICIAL REPORTS

ILLINOIS OFFICIAL REPORTS ILLINOIS OFFICIAL REPORTS Appellate Court Travelers Insurance v. Precision Cabinets, Inc., 2012 IL App (2d) 110258WC Appellate Court Caption TRAVELERS INSURANCE, Plaintiff-Appellee and Cross-Appellant,

More information

Re Sunforest Investment Corp et al. and Ontario New Home Warranty Program *

Re Sunforest Investment Corp et al. and Ontario New Home Warranty Program * Re Sunforest Investment Corp et al. and Ontario New Home Warranty Program * [Indexed as: Sunforest Investment Corp. v. Ontario New Home Warranty Program] 32 O.R. (3d) 59 [1997] O.J. No. 128 Court File

More information

2015 IL App (1st) 141310-U. No. 1-14-1310 IN THE APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT

2015 IL App (1st) 141310-U. No. 1-14-1310 IN THE APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT 2015 IL App (1st) 141310-U FIRST DIVISION October 5, 2015 No. 1-14-1310 NOTICE: This order was filed under Supreme Court Rule 23 and may not be cited as precedent by any party except in the limited circumstances

More information

[Cite as State ex rel. Exel Logistics, Inc. v. Indus. Comm., 2004-Ohio-3594.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO TENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

[Cite as State ex rel. Exel Logistics, Inc. v. Indus. Comm., 2004-Ohio-3594.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO TENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT [Cite as State ex rel. Exel Logistics, Inc. v. Indus. Comm., 2004-Ohio-3594.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO TENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT State of Ohio ex rel. Exel Logistics, Inc., : Relator, : v. : No.

More information

State of New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division Third Judicial Department

State of New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division Third Judicial Department State of New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division Third Judicial Department Decided and Entered: April 5, 2007 500157 In the Matter of the Claim of JANINE F. MORGAN, Respondent, v NEW YORK CITY DEPARTMENT

More information

Key Provisions of Tennessee Senate Bill 200 Effective July 1, 2014, through July 1, 2016

Key Provisions of Tennessee Senate Bill 200 Effective July 1, 2014, through July 1, 2016 2014 Construction of Statute Definition of Injury (Causation) Revises Section 50-6-116, Construction of Chapter, to indicate that for dates of injury on or after July 1, 2014, the chapter should no longer

More information

Illinois Official Reports

Illinois Official Reports Illinois Official Reports Appellate Court Acuity v. Decker, 2015 IL App (2d) 150192 Appellate Court Caption ACUITY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. DONALD DECKER, Defendant- Appellee (Groot Industries, Inc., Defendant).

More information

Workers Compensation: A Response To the Recent Attacks on the Commission s Authority to Suspend A Claimant s Benefits

Workers Compensation: A Response To the Recent Attacks on the Commission s Authority to Suspend A Claimant s Benefits Workers Compensation: A Response To the Recent Attacks on the Commission s Authority to Suspend A Claimant s Benefits by Charles F. Midkiff Midkiff, Muncie & Ross, P.C. 300 Arboretum Place, Suite 420 Richmond,

More information

ORDER MO-1401. Appeal MA_000155_1. City of Toronto

ORDER MO-1401. Appeal MA_000155_1. City of Toronto ORDER MO-1401 Appeal MA_000155_1 City of Toronto NATURE OF THE APPEAL: The City of Toronto (the City) received a request under the Municipal Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act (the Act).

More information

United States Department of Labor Employees Compensation Appeals Board DECISION AND ORDER

United States Department of Labor Employees Compensation Appeals Board DECISION AND ORDER United States Department of Labor E.D., Appellant and DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, TRANSPORTATION SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, Chicago, IL, Employer Appearances: Appellant, pro se Office of Solicitor,

More information

Illinois Official Reports

Illinois Official Reports Illinois Official Reports Supreme Court Ferris, Thompson & Zweig, Ltd. v. Esposito, 2015 IL 117443 Caption in Supreme Court: FERRIS, THOMPSON AND ZWEIG, LTD., Appellee, v. ANTHONY ESPOSITO, Appellant.

More information

NOVA SCOTIA WORKERS COMPENSATION APPEALS TRIBUNAL

NOVA SCOTIA WORKERS COMPENSATION APPEALS TRIBUNAL NOVA SCOTIA WORKERS COMPENSATION APPEALS TRIBUNAL Appellant: [X] (Worker) Participants entitled to respond to this appeal: The Workers Compensation Board of Nova Scotia (Board) APPEAL DECISION Representatives:

More information

NO. COA01-346 NORTH CAROLINA COURT OF APPEALS. Filed: 6 August 2002

NO. COA01-346 NORTH CAROLINA COURT OF APPEALS. Filed: 6 August 2002 A decision without a published opinion is authority only in the case in which such decision is rendered and should not be cited in any other case in any court for any other purpose, nor should any court

More information

ADMINISTRATIVE DIRECTIVE. To establish a Citywide policy regarding the assignment of employees to Light Duty.

ADMINISTRATIVE DIRECTIVE. To establish a Citywide policy regarding the assignment of employees to Light Duty. 2.02-21 1 of 4 I. PURPOSE To establish a Citywide policy regarding the assignment of employees to Light Duty. II. POLICY Light Duty is intended for employees recovering from a medically documented mental

More information

2014 No. 2044 (L. 28) SENIOR COURTS OF ENGLAND AND WALES COUNTY COURT, ENGLAND AND WALES. The Civil Procedure (Amendment No.

2014 No. 2044 (L. 28) SENIOR COURTS OF ENGLAND AND WALES COUNTY COURT, ENGLAND AND WALES. The Civil Procedure (Amendment No. S T A T U T O R Y I N S T R U M E N T S 2014 No. 2044 (L. 28) SENIOR COURTS OF ENGLAND AND WALES COUNTY COURT, ENGLAND AND WALES The Civil Procedure (Amendment No. 6) Rules 2014 Made - - - - 29th July

More information

STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF CONSUMER AND INDUSTRY SERVICES BUREAU OF HEARINGS. Agency No.

STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF CONSUMER AND INDUSTRY SERVICES BUREAU OF HEARINGS. Agency No. STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF CONSUMER AND INDUSTRY SERVICES BUREAU OF HEARINGS In the matter of Vivian B. Nalu, Petitioner v Public School Employees Retirement System, Respondent / Docket No. 2000-1872

More information

WCAT Decision Number: WCAT-2010-01291

WCAT Decision Number: WCAT-2010-01291 Noteworthy Decision Summary Decision: WCAT-2010-01291 Panel: T. White Decision Date: May 10, 2010 Section 55 of the Workers Compensation Act Policy item #93.22 of the Rehabilitation Services and Claims

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF BRITISH COLUMBIA

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF BRITISH COLUMBIA IN THE SUPREME COURT OF BRITISH COLUMBIA Citation: Between: And Richard v. British Columbia, 2014 BCSC 1290 William Joseph Richard and W.H.M. Date: 20140714 Docket: S024338 Registry: Vancouver Plaintiffs

More information