1 GENERAL PRACTICE LEGAL MALPRACTICE IN LIGHT OF TOGSTAD LIABILITY FOR CURBSTONE OPINIONS? By Michael J. Hoover, DirectorFtn 1 Minnesota Office of Lawyers Professional Responsibility Reprinted from Bench & Bar of Minnesota (November 1980) INTRODUCTION On April, 11, 1980, the Minnesota Supreme Court decided the celebrated legal malpractice case of Togstad v. Vesely, Otto, Miller & Keefe.Ftn 2 The Togstad decision, holding the defendant lawyers negligent in improperly advising a wife about her husband s alleged medical malpractice claim, has received considerable attention. The purpose of this article is to analyze Togstad and provide practical suggestions for guarding against its consequence. FACTS OF THE TOGSTAD CASE The Alleged Medical Malpractice John Togstad was admitted to a hospital on August 16, 1971, where tests disclosed that his severe headaches were caused by a large aneurysm. A clamp was surgically implanted on August 27, 1971, in Mr. Togstad s neck to allow the gradual closure of the artery.ftn 3 One of the risks associated with the procedure is that paralysis may result if the brain does not receive an adequate flow of blood. If the blood supply becomes so low as to endanger the patient s health, the clamp can be adjusted to establish proper blood circulation.ftn 4 Two days after implantation, a nurse observed that Mr. Togstad could neither speak nor move, and called a resident physician, who did not adjust the clamp. Mr. Togstad s primary physician arrived an hour later and promptly opened the clamp, but Togstad suffered paralysis in his right arm and leg and is unable to speak.ftn 5 Mrs. Togstad became suspicious about her husband s treatment due to the conduct and statements of the hospital nurses shortly after the paralysis occurred.ftn 6 She noticed that nurses were upset and crying and that her husband s condition was a topic of conversation.ftn 7 One nurse told her that Mr.
2 Togstad was fine at 2:00 A.M., but when she returned at 3:00 A.M., he was unable to move or speak.ftn 8 Consultation with the Law Firm About fourteen months after her husband s hospitalization, Mrs. Togstad met with Attorney Jerre Miller about her husband s condition. The appointment was made by Mr. Togstad s former work supervisor who knew the defendant through a local luncheon club. Neither Mr. nor Mrs. Togstad had any prior contact with the firm.ftn 9 Mrs. Togstad testified that she went to the law firm for legal advice what to do, where shall we go from here? Ftn 10 She said that she told the defendant everything that happened at the hospital, and about the procedure and what was undertaken, what was done, and what happended. Ftn 11 She brought no records with her, but the defendant took notes and asked questions during the 45-minute meeting. At its conclusion, Mrs. Togstad said Miller advised her he did not think we had a legal case, however, he was going to discuss this with his partner. Ftn 12 When she did not hear from the firm after a few days, she decided that they had concluded there wasn t a case. There were no fee arrangements, no medical authorizations, and Mrs. Togstad was not billed for the interview.ftn 13 Although the defendants did agree with most of the basic facts alleged by Mrs. Togstad, there were some significant differences. While the plaintiff alleged that she was seeking the legal opinion of the defendant about whether there was a viable claim, the defendant argued that he was merely asked whether she had a case that our firm would be interested in undertaking. Ftn 14 At trial, however, the defendant did testify that Mrs. Togstad was there to see whether or not she had a case and whether the firm would accept it. Ftn 15 The defendant also claimed that he told Mrs. Togstad that because of the grievous nature of the injuries sustained by her husband, that this was only my opinion and she was encouraged to ask another attorney if she wished for another opinion and she ought to do so promptly. Ftn 16 This was denied by Mrs. Togstad, as was the defendant s claim that he advised her that his firm did not have expertise in medical malpractice.ftn 17 Mrs. Togstad did not consult another attorney until one year after she talked to the defendant because of her claimed reliance upon the defendant s legal advice that they did not have a case.ftn 18 Expert Testimony At the trial, each of the parties called expert witnesses. The plaintiffs expert testified that in rendering legal advice regarding a claim of medical malpractice, the minimum an attorney should do would be to request medical authorizations from the client, review the hospital records, and consult with an
3 expert in the field. Ftn 19 One of the defendants experts testified that when an attorney is asked whether he will take a case, his only responsibility in refusing it is to so inform the party. Ftn 20 He did say, however, that if an attorney is asked a legal opinion on the merits of a malpractice claim, he should check hospital records and consult with an expert before giving an opinion.ftn 21 The second defense expert testified that when a person consults him about a medical malpractice action, he has to make a decision as to whether or not there probably is or probably is not, based upon that information, medical malpractice. Ftn 22 If there is not, he continued, he would then inform the client but would never render a categorical opinion.ftn 23 He did acknowledge that if he were consulted for a legal opinion regarding medical malpractice fourteen months after the questioned incident, ordinary care and diligence would prompt him to tell the party about the two-year statute of limitations.ftn 24 Trial Result The jury submitted a special verdict finding the hospital and the doctor negligent and finding that the doctor s negligence was a direct cause of Mr. Togstad s injuries. The jury also found an attorney/client relationship between Mrs. Togstad and the defendant, that the defendant was negligent in rendering advice regarding the possible claims of the Togstads, and but for his negligence, they would have been successful in their action against the doctor. The jury also found that the Togstads were not negligent in pursuing their claims against the doctor. Mr. Togstad was awarded $610,500, and Mrs. Togstad $39,000.Ftn 25 The Supreme Court affirmed the denial of a motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict. THE LEGAL MALPRACTICE ISSUES ON APPEAL The Court noted that in a legal malpractice action, there are four necessary elements: 1. An attorney/client relationship; 2. Negligence by the defendant or breach of contract; 3. The negligence or breach of contract must be the approximate cause of the plaintiffs damages; and 4. But for the defendant s conduct, the plaintiffs would have been successful in the prosecution of their claim.ftn 26 Either tort or contract may serve as a basis for legal malpractice liability. In fact, some commentators have characterized malpractice suits as being neither in contract nor in tort, but as lying in a borderland area between the two.ftn 27 The Court observed that many of its recent legal malpractice decisions have analyzed the
4 attorney/client considerations in contractual terms. Under the contract theory, the basis of liability is the reliance by the recipient on the advice given. In Togstad, the trial court applied a contract analysis in ruling on the attorney/client relationship question. One statement of the contract analysis is as follows: Generally speaking, the relation of attorney and client is a matter of contract... A valid offer and acceptance will constitute the relation of attorney and client. Thus, the contract of employment, in general, consists of an offer or request by the client and an acceptance or assent by the attorney... Formality is not an essential element of the employment of an attorney. The contract may be express or implied and it is sufficient that the advice and assistance of the attorney is sought and received, in matters pertinent to his profession. An acceptance of the relation is implied on the part of the attorney from his acting in behalf of his client in pursuance of a request by the latter. (Emphasis supplied.)ftn 28 The Court noted that one law review comment suggested that the proper analysis in Togstad was to apply principles, of negligence. Under such an analysis, liability arises if the defendant renders legal advice under circumstances which make it reasonably foreseeable to him that if such advice is negligently given, the individual receiving it may be injured.ftn 29 After discussing the alternative theories of liability, the Court refused to base its decision on either analysis, but instead held that under either theory the evidence shows that a lawyer/client relationship is present here. Ftn 30 REACTION TO TOGSTAD Togstad has been greeted with apprehension by the bar. It has also been the subject of considerable commentary.ftn 31 The decision even evoked an unusual expression of sympathy for the profession from a lay source, who said he would be worried sick if he were a member of a Minnesota professional partnership, and added: How can we expect professional people to serve the public prudently, wisely and fully professionally with that kind of an ax hanging over their heads? The alternative of course is to load up the firm with vast insurance coverages the cost of which, inevitably, must be passed on to the public in the form of higher fees and to conduct the practice with an exhaustive and costly pursuit of and study into every possible contingency that might develop... a kind of defensive sort of practice in the face of the malpractice suit threat. And we wonder why professional service costs keep rising. Ftn 32
5 The remainder of this article will focus on preventing malpractice in Togstad situations. Rejecting the Case on the Merits One commentator, in an article written prior to the Supreme Court s decision in Togstad, described its significance as follows: The fundamental proposition underscored by the Minnesota case is that a lawyer cannot reject any case brought to him for consideration by a potential client on the basis of the lawyer s judgment as to the merits of the case unless the lawyer makes a careful investigation of the facts and the legal issues involved. If the plaintiff s position in the Minnesota case is sustained, it will be forcibly brought home that any undertaking to advise a party professionally brings into play all of the lawyer s professional responsibility to a client. Ftn 33 In Togstad, the posture of the case required an assumption by the Court that Mrs. Togstad sought and received legal advice from the defendant. In rendering the advice, the defendant appeared to the client to be rejecting the case on the merits. According to plaintiffs experts, consultation with an expert and review of medical records is an absolute minimum which should be performed by the attorney before an opinion on the merits is rendered.ftn 34 The general rule, as stated by the Court, is that an attorney must perform the minimal research that an ordinarily prudent attorney would do before rendering legal advice. Ftn 35 It thus appears from Togstad that in any situation where an attorney undertakes to render an opinion on the merits of a case, he will be required to do more or less, depending upon the exact nature of the case. In a commercial case, where the facts may be clear, legal research may be sufficient. In other cases, both factual investigation and legal research may be required. In other cases, such as medical malpractice cases, an attorney may need to go even further, and consult with experts in the particular field. In any event, the attorney must perform the minimal acts which a reasonably prudent lawyer would perform before rendering an opinion on the merits of the case. Rejecting the Case Other than on the Merits In Togstad, the client and the attorney differed on the nature of the opinion rendered by the attorney. The client felt, the jury found, and the Supreme Court assumed, that the lawyer rendered legal advice concerning the merits of the case. The attorney argued that the advice given was merely concerning whether the case was one which the firm was interested in accepting. There are, of course, many settings in which an attorney may decline proffered employment and in which the refusal has nothing to do with the merits of the case. There may be ethical conflicts of interest, the attorney may not do the kind of work involved in the offered case, the attorney may be too busy to handle the matter, or he may simply desire to avoid the case without having a specific reason.
6 One of the defendant s experts testified that when a lawyer refuses a case, his only duty is to inform the client if the refusal is for reasons other than the merits of the case. It appears from Togstad, however, that more is required. It has been suggested that if a case is rejected other than on the merits, the fact that it is so rejected must be communicated to the client.ftn 36 It has also been suggested that besides communicating the exact reasons for the rejection of the case, if it is rejected other than on the merits, the person should be advised to consult another attorney, and should be advised about the statute of limitations which applies to the case, or at a minimum, that the passage of time may cut off the right to bring the case. Ftn 37 The Necessity of a Writing One commentator has stated as follows: Finally, there is no escaping the clear message of the Minnesota case, which is that in all events a letter must be written. Ftn 38 The initial reaction of many practitioners to this statement must inevitably be why?. Secondary considerations must be to whom such writing should be sent, and what they should contain. The differences in the testimony of the client and attorney in Togstad clearly indicate the primary reason for sending a letter. A carefully drafted letter may be both a source of advice to the recipient as well as a record of what transpired between the recipient and the attorney. In cases where the recollection of the attorney and the recipient differ, the letter may resolve the conflict. To whom should such letters be sent? Office visitors and drop-ins? Yes. Telephone callers? Probably. Curbstone contacts? Possibly. In short, the letter should be sent to anyone to whom statements were made which could reasonably be interpreted as legal advice upon which a reasonable person might rely, or as a result of which, if such statements were made negligently, the individual receiving them might be injured.ftn 39 In all cases where employment is declined, the client should be advised of the reason for declining the employment. In other words, it should be clear to the client whether the decision to reject the case is based upon the attorney s opinion about its merits or for other reasons. Whatever the reasons for declining the case, it also seems advisable to mention the applicable statute of limitations. In mentioning the statute of limitations, the client should clearly be advised that once the deadline passes, it is likely that no lawsuit will ever be possible. Where there are questions about the statute of limitations, it may be best to discuss those briefly, and indicate to the client the conservative estimate of when the statute expires. It is always desirable to suggest to a person whose case has been rejected, for whatever reason, that another attorney may or should be consulted. As desirable as it is in cases where the case is rejected on the
7 merits, such as suggestion is crucial in cases where the attorney has rejected the case for reasons other than its merits. While the foregoing would seem to be minimal ingredients of rejection letter, other information may be desirable. It may be desirable for the lawyer, in summary form, to state the times and content of the recipient s conversations and contacts with the lawyer. If the lawyer is rejecting the case on the merits, a statement of the facts as he understands them and a summary of his research, consultations, and investigation is desirable. It should be noted that the rejection of a case is not the only event in which a letter is desirable: The thought is that every new client contact should be followed up promptly with a letter which describes exactly what the lawyer has undertaken to do. This letter would include reference to significant follow-up actions to be taken by the client; any limitations on the lawyer s undertaking; major factual assumptions; and reference to fee and cost arrangements. Ftn 40 CONCLUSION Togstad has real ramifications for Minnesota attorneys. Before rendering an opinion rejecting a case on its merits, an attorney may be required to do legal research, factual investigation, and consult with experts. If the case is rejected other than on its merits, the attorney may still be required to advise the rejected client about the statute of limitations and to suggest that another attorney be consulted promptly. In all cases of rejection, and indeed in cases of limited acceptance, the attorney should formally communicate his decisions, their bases, and the minimal advice required by Togstad to the clients in writing. To some, these suggestions, especially the formal written requirement, may seem burdensome. The essential common ingredients, if not the specific contents, of rejection letters should, however, be fairly easy to standardize in a law office. The alternative, as the defendants in Togstad found, is a substantial pecuniary penalty. FOOTNOTES 1 The opinions expressed herein are the personal opinions of the writer, and should not be attributed to the Lawyers Professional Responsibility Board. The author also expresses thanks to St. Paul attorney Terry L. Wade and to third-year law student Richard Harden for their assistance and suggestions N.W. 2d 686 (1980). 3 Id. at Id. 5 Id. 6 Id. at Id. 8 Id. 9 Id. 10
8 Id. 11 Id. 12 Id. 13 Id. 14 Id. at Id. 16 Id. 17 Id. at Id. at Id. at Id. at Id. 22 Id. 23 Id. 24 Id. 25 Id. 26 Id; See also Christy v. Saliterman, 288 Minn. 144, 179 N.W. 2d 288 (1970). 27 Prosser, The Borderland of Tort and Contract, and Selected Topics on the Law of Torts, 380 (1954) C.J.S., Attorney and Client, Togstad at 693, citing Comment, Attorney Malpractice: Use of Contract Analysis to Determine the Existence of An Attorney/Client Relationship, 63 Minn. L. Rev. 751 (1979). 30 Togstad at See, e.g., 63 Minn. L. Rev. 751, supra; Gates, The Minnesota Malpractice Case, Legal Malpractice Review, (May-June, 1980) (St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Company). 32 Tilton, Something Else to Worry About, West St. Paul Sun (Aug. 6, 1980). 33 Gates, supra. at Togstad at Id. at Gates, supra. at 31. Although the focus of this article is on legal malpractice, it is interesting to note that the proposed Model Rules of Professional Conduct now pending in the ABA could have an impact in this area. Rule 1.15(c) is proposed as follows: (c) A lawyer may limit the nature and purposes of the representation provided to a client if: (1) the client s interest will not be materially impaired by the limitation; and (2) the limitation is adequately disclosed to the client before the representation is undertaken. Arguably, to the extent that an attorney has undertaken to reject a case on the merits, his responsibility to the client cannot be limited. If he desires to limit his liability in an undertaking to reject a case other than on the merits, it would seem that he must make adequate disclosure to the client. 37 Gates, supra at Id. 39 Togstad, supra. at 693, f.n Gates, supra. at 31.
This article originally appeared in The Colorado Lawyer, Vol. 25, No. 26, June 1996. by Jeffrey R. Pilkington TORT AND INSURANCE LAW REPORTER Informal Discovery Interviews Between Defense Attorneys and
REAL PROPERTY QUESTION CORNER: (By Kraettli Q. Epperson) THE ELUSIVE LEGAL MALPRACTICE STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS FOR ATTORNEY TITLE OPINIONS (PARTS I AND II OF II PARTS) PUBLISHED IN THE OKLAHOMA COUNTY BAR
THE THREAT OF BAD FAITH LITIGATION ETHICAL HANDLING OF CLAIMS AND GOOD FAITH SETTLEMENT PRACTICES By Craig R. White SKEDSVOLD & WHITE, LLC. 1050 Crown Pointe Parkway Suite 710 Atlanta, Georgia 30338 (770)
STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS BUDDY JOHNSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, UNPUBLISHED August 20, 1999 and NANCY JOHNSON, Plaintiff, v JAMES K. FETT and MUTH & FETT, P.C., No. 207351 Washtenaw Circuit Court
5.51 LEGAL MALPRACTICE (Approved 6/79) CHARGE 5.51A Page 1 of 9 A. General Duty Owing An action brought against an attorney alleging negligence in the practice of law is referred to as a malpractice action.
Author: Attorney Dan A. Riegleman N63 W23965 Main Street Sussex, Wisconsin 53089 Prepared: 06/01/10 WHITE PAPER: DR2504 Addressing Abusive Lawyer Conduct in Relation to Litigation Proceedings There are
Reflections on Ethical Issues In the Tripartite Relationship [click] By Bruce A. Campbell 1 Introduction In most areas of the practice of law, there are a number of ethical issues that arise on a frequent
Nebraska Ethics Advisory Opinion for Lawyers No. 91-3 I. AS COUNSEL FOR A PLAINTIFF, AN ATTORNEY MAY NOT ETHICALLY INTERVIEW PRESENT OR FORMER EMPLOYEES OF A DEFENDANT CORPORATION IF: (a) THE EMPLOYEES
WHAT IS LEGAL MALPRACTICE IN CALIFORNIA? A client who sustains harm as a direct result of legal malpractice can file a civil lawsuit against the attorney who was responsible for causing that harm. MICHAEL
MPRE Sample Test Questions The following sample questions are examples of test questions similar to those on the MPRE. While these sample questions illustrate the kinds of questions that will appear on
THE COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS HOLDS THAT SUMMARY JUDGMENT IS IMPROPER WHEN QUESTIONS OF MATERIAL FACT ARRISE IN MEDICAL MALPRACTICE ACTIONS In Villines v. North Arkansas Regional Medical Center, 1 the
RESULTS Appellate Court upholds decision that malpractice action barred September 2, 2015 The South Carolina Court of Appeals recently upheld a summary judgment obtained by David Overstreet and Mike McCall
STATE OF MINNESOTA IN SUPREME COURT A08-1105 Court of Appeals Page, J. Concurring, Magnuson, C.J., and Gildea, J. In re Paul W. Abbott Company, Inc., Appellant, Filed: June 18, 2009 Office of Appellate
SECTION 1 Establishing the Attorney-Client Relationship The establishment of the attorney-client relationship involves two elements: a person seeks advice or assistance from an attorney; and the attorney
CLIENT COMMUNICATIONS: A CRITICAL ASPECT OF SOUND LEGAL PRACTICE AND LAW FIRM MANAGEMENT The lawyer with insurance has been and will continue to be a deep pocket target. There are some simple yet effective
05/02/03 See News Release 032 for any concurrences and/or dissents. SUPREME COURT OF LOUISIANA NO. 03-B-0910 IN RE: HARRY E. CANTRELL, JR. ATTORNEY DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS PER CURIAM This matter arises
In the United States Court of Appeals No. 12-3901 For the Seventh Circuit CINDY GOLDEN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee. Appeal from the United
WHEN A CHILD MAY HAVE A TORT CLAIM: WHAT S THE CHILD S COURT- APPOINTED ATTORNEY TO DO? The Oregon Child Advocacy Project Professor Leslie J. Harris and Child Advocacy Fellows Colin Love-Geiger and Alyssa
In the Supreme Court of Georgia Decided: March 27, 2015 S14G0919. GALA et al. v. FISHER et al. HINES, Presiding Justice. This Court granted a writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals in Fisher v. Gala,
Introduction Effective Use of Experts By: Peter Kryworuk & Tyler Kaczmarczyk Lerners LLP Litigating the Medical Malpractice Claim Ontario Bar Association April 29, 2013 The importance of expert opinion
The DelliCarpini Law Firm Melville Law Center 877.917.9560 225 Old Country Road fax 631.923.1079 Melville, NY 11747 www.dellicarpinilaw.com John M. DelliCarpini Christopher J. DelliCarpini (admitted in
2014 IL App (1st) 122440-U SECOND DIVISION July 29, 2014 No. 1-12-2440 NOTICE: This order was filed under Supreme Court Rule 23 and may not be cited as precedent by any party except in the limited circumstances
CHAPTER 34 INFORMED CONSENT FOR THE NURSE I. INTRODUCTION The goal of informed consent is patient autonomy or self-determination. To be autonomous, individuals must be able to control their bodies by controlling
PRODUCT LIABILITY Product Liability Litigation The Effect of Product Safety Regulatory Compliance By Kenneth Ross Product liability litigation and product safety regulatory activities in the U.S. and elsewhere
STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS STANLEY NOKIELSKI and BETHANY NOKIELSKI, UNPUBLISHED January 4, 2011 Plaintiffs, v No. 294143 Midland Circuit Court JOHN COLTON and ESTHER POLLY HOY- LC No. 08-3177-NI-L
Agents E&O Standard of Care Project Survey Maryland To gain a deeper understanding of the differing agent duties and standard of care by state, the Big I Professional Liability Program and Swiss Re Corporate
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA CAROSELLA & FERRY, P.C., Plaintiff, v. TIG INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant. CIVIL ACTION NO. 00-2344 Memorandum and Order YOHN,
Recent Developments in Fraud Law By: Clinton C. Carter Beasley, Allen, Crow, Methvin, Portis & Miles, P.C. 272 Commerce Street Montgomery, Alabama 36104 February 13, 2004 Recent developments in fraud law
Illinois Association of Defense Trial Counsel Springfield, Illinois www.iadtc.org 800-232-0169 IDC Quarterly Volume 24, Number 1 (24.1.62) Health Law Update By: Roger R. Clayton, Mark D. Hansen, and J.
KENTUCKY BAR ASSOCIATION Ethics Opinion KBA E-275 Issued: July 1983 This opinion was decided under the Code of Professional Responsibility, which was in effect from 1971 to 1990. Lawyers should consult
Present: All the Justices COMMERCIAL UNDERWRITERS INSURANCE COMPANY v. Record No. 000474 OPINION BY JUSTICE ELIZABETH B. LACY January 12, 2001 HUNT & CALDERONE, P.C., ET AL. FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE
Injured on the Job Your Rights under FELA Quick Facts: What To Do If Injured 1. Consult your own doctor for treatment. Give your doctor a complete history of how your injury happened. Make sure that the
Title: Current Construction Injury Law in California Issue: Oct Year: 2003 Current Construction Injury Law in California Morgan C. Smith Since the last issue of the Forum dedicated to construction litigation,
June 1, 2011 I. EMPLOYMENT LAW Employer Must Show Economic Injury to Successfully Invoke Key Employee Exception Under the Family and Medical Leave Act In Johnson v. Resources for Human Development, Inc.,
MAINE SUPREME JUDICIAL COURT Decision: 2008 ME 21 Docket: Cum-07-86 Argued: November 5, 2007 Decided: January 31, 2008 Reporter of Decisions Panel: SAUFLEY, C.J., and LEVY, SILVER, MEAD, and GORMAN, JJ.
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND RELEASED November 19, 1996 A party may file with the Supreme Court a petition to review an adverse decision by the Court of Appeals. See 808.10 and RULE 809.62, STATS.
Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida Opinion filed February 12, 2014. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing. No. 3D12-2622 Lower Tribunal No. 11-10021 Fernando Montes
STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS VALERIE E. SFREDDO and JOSEPH SFREDDO, UNPUBLISHED August 19, 2004 Plaintiffs-Appellants, v No. 249912 Court of Claims UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN REGENTS and LC No. 02-000179-MH
Medical Malpractice Litigation in Arizona Michael J. Ryan Broening Oberg Woods & Wilson, P.C. firstname.lastname@example.org ARIZONA S CURRENT LEGAL CLIMATE FOR MEDICAL MALPRACTICE LAWSUITS Trends in the number of medical
****************************************************** The officially released date that appears near the beginning of each opinion is the date the opinion will be published in the Connecticut Law Journal
DELAWARE STATE BAR ASSOCIATION COMMITTEE ON PROFESSIONAL ETHICS OPINION 1991-4 August 21, 1991 THIS OPINION IS MERELY ADVISORY AND IS NOT BINDING ON THE INQUIRING ATTORNEY OR THE COURTS OR ANY OTHER TRIBUNAL.
The Foundation of Juvenile Practice Part 1: You are Adversary Counsel, NOT a GAL! Private Bar Certification Forensic Exercise November 19, 2014 Role of Juvenile Defense Counsel: Forensic Exercise: Question
2013 IL App (1st) 120898-U FOURTH DIVISION March 28, 2013 No. 1-12-0898 NOTICE: This order was filed under Supreme Court Rule 23 and may not be cited as precedent by any party except in the limited circumstances
ISBA Advisory Opinion on Professional Conduct ISBA Advisory Opinions on Professional Conduct are prepared as an educational service to members of the ISBA. While the Opinions express the ISBA interpretation
Premises Liability for Third Party Crime (Full Article) Owners and managers of commercial property (including leased residential properties) can be held liable under civil negligence claims for harm to
Personal Injury Litigation The Anatomy of a New York Personal Injury Lawsuit An ebook by Stuart DiMartini, Esq. 1325 Sixth Avenue, 27 th Floor New York, NY 10019 212-5181532 dimartinilaw.com Introduction
In the Missouri Court of Appeals Western District STEVE AUSTIN, Appellant, v. JOHN SCHIRO, M.D., Respondent. WD78085 OPINION FILED: May 26, 2015 Appeal from the Circuit Court of Clinton County, Missouri
Informed Consent, Wisconsin-Style Are You Meeting the Reasonable Patient Standard? February 2013 Lockton Companies Informed consent is a fundamental aspect of patient care. NANCY LAMO RN/BSN, JD, CPHRM
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC05-1150 IN RE: PETITION TO AMEND RULE 4-1.5(F)(4)(B) OF THE RULES OF PROFESSIONAL CONDUCT / COMMENTS OF DAN CYTRYN, ESQUIRE OF LAW OFFICES CYTRYN & SANTANA, P.A.
RECENT MEDICAL MALPRACTICE CASES By Judge Bryan C. Dixon 1. MERE TELEPHONE CONVERSATION WITH TREATING DOCTOR DOES NOT ESTABLISH DUTY TO PATIENT Jennings v. Badgett, 2010 OK 7 Facts: Plaintiffs are parents
COLORADO COURT OF APPEALS February 15, 2001 Court of Appeals No. 98CA1099 El Paso County District Court No. 96CV2233 Honorable Theresa M. Cisneros, Judge Carol Koscove, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Richard Bolte,
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE Assigned on Briefs Oct. 6, 2008 RICHARD V. FULLER, ET AL. v. JOHN DENNIE CRABTREE, JR., M.D. Appeal from the Circuit Court for Coffee County No. 32,579
ATTORNEY HELP CENTER: MEDICAL MALPRACTICE The healthcare industry has exploded over the last thirty years. Combined with an increasing elderly population, thanks to the Baby Boomer generation, the general
STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS AARON THERIAULT, assignee of TERRI S LOUNGE, INC., d/b/a TERRI S LOUNGE, UNPUBLISHED October 14, 2008 Plaintiff-Appellee, and MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY HEALTH,
ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLANTS David P. Murphy Emily M. Hawk David P. Murphy & Associates, P.C. ATTORNEY FOR APPELLEES Robert S. O'Dell O'Dell & Associates, P.C. Carmel, Indiana Greenfield, Indiana In the Indiana
MULTIPLE REPRESENTATION AND DRAFTING CONTINGENCY FEE AGREEMENTS ADVANCED PERSONAL INJURY LAW COURSE CLE TEXAS STATE BAR 2013 S AM J OHNSON S COTT, DOUGLASS & MC C ONNICO, L.L.P. A TTORNEYS A T L AW WWW.
PRESENT: All the Justices RICHARD D. FIORUCCI, ET AL. OPINION BY v. Record No. 131869 JUSTICE ELIZABETH A. McCLANAHAN OCTOBER 31, 2014 STEPHEN CHINN FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE CITY OF ALEXANDRIA James
AN ANALYSIS OF MARYLAND LAW REGARDING AN INSURER S DUTY TO DEFEND INCLUDING AN ANALYSIS OF THE TYPES OF CONFLICTS OF INTEREST BETWEEN AN INSURED AND THE INSURER THAT MAY REQUIRE THE INSURER TO ACCEPT AND
Filed 8/27/14 Tesser Ruttenberg etc. v. Forever Entertainment CA2/2 NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying
District Court, City and County of Denver, Colorado Court Address: 1437 Bannock Street, Denver, CO 80202 THE PEOPLE OF THE ST ATE OF COLORADO Plaintiff v. 0 COURT USE ONLY D DANIEL Accused Douglas K. Wilson,
UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND SCHOOL OF LAW LEGAL METHOD-CIVIL PROCEDURE (3 Hours) Day Division Wednesday, December 18, 1991 Professor Condlin - Section B 9:10 a.m. - 12:10 p.m. No. Signature: Printed Name: INSTRUCTIONS:
Colorado s Civil Access Pilot Project and the Changing Landscape of Business Litigation On January 1, 2012, new rules approved by the Colorado Supreme Court entitled the Civil Access Pilot Project ( CAPP
Order filed February 18, 2011 NOTICE: This order was filed under Supreme Court Rule 23 and may not be cited as precedent by any party except in the limited circumstances allowed under Rule 23(e)(1). IN
NOTICE OF PROPOSED CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT AND HEARING This Notice summarizes your rights under the proposed settlement of a class action lawsuit as described below. You are eligible to receive a portion
LEGAL ETHICS OPINION 1814 UNDISCLOSED RECORDING OF THIRD PARTIES IN CRIMINAL MATTERS In this hypothetical, a Criminal Defense Lawyer represents A who is charged with conspiracy to distribute controlled
Michigan Prepared by Cardelli Lanfear P.C. 322 West Lincoln Royal Oak, MI 48067 Tel: 248.850.2179 Fax: 248.544.1191 1. Introduction History of Tort Reform in Michigan Michigan was one of the first states
NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION A-2749-94T3 ROBERT OLDS, v. Plaintiff-Appellant, DENNIS DONNELLY, v. Defendant-Third Party
LEGAL MALPRACTICE AND THE CRIMINAL DEFENSE ATTORNEY By Peter L. Ostermiller Occasionally, a defendant, while incarcerated and apparently having nothing better to do, will file a Motion under RCr. 11.42,
The Ohio State University Knowledge Bank kb.osu.edu Ohio State Law Journal (Moritz College of Law) Ohio State Law Journal: Volume 23, Issue 4 (1962) 1962 One Year Malpractice Statute of Limitations Held
Massachusetts Legislature Reforms Medical Malpractice Legislation to Promote Apologies and Encourage Settlements By: On November 4, 2012, a number of statutory provisions reforming the medical malpractice
Medical Malpractice Litigation What to Expect as a Defendant Being named as a defendant in a malpractice suit may be your first exposure to civil litigation. You will probably wish it would just go away.
A&E Briefings Structuring risk management solutions Spring 2012 Indemnification Clauses: Uninsurable Contractual Liability J. Kent Holland, J.D. ConstructionRisk, LLC Professional consultants are judged
Making Sure The Left Hand Knows What The Right Hand Is Doing Representing Health Care Providers In Medical Negligence Cases by: Troy J. Crotts, Esq. Florida Continues as National Leader in Disciplinary
2015 IL App (1st) 141985-U No. 1-14-1985 NOTICE: This order was filed under Supreme Court Rule 23 and may not be cited as precedent by any party except in the limited circumstances allowed under Rule 23(e)(1).
Title XLV TORTS Chapter 768 NEGLIGENCE View Entire Chapter 768.28 Waiver of sovereign immunity in tort actions; recovery limits; limitation on attorney fees; statute of limitations; exclusions; indemnification;
Summary of the Key Provisions of Florida Medical Malpractice Statutes 766.102. Medical negligence; standards of recovery; expert witness (5) A person may not give expert testimony concerning the prevailing
This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. 480A.08, subd. 3 (2010). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A10-1489 Barry H. Nash, Appellant, vs. James D. Gurovitsch,
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 16TH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR MONROE COUNTY, FLORIDA JENNIFER WINDISCH, Plaintiff, v. CIVIL DIVISION CASE NO: 2007-CA-1174-K JOHN SUNDIN, M.D., RHODA SMITH, M.D., LAURRAURI
PART III Discovery CHAPTER 8 Overview of the Discovery Process Generally, discovery is conducted freely by the parties without court intervention. Disclosure can be obtained through depositions, interrogatories,
In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit No. 14 1449 BASHIR SHEIKH, Plaintiff Appellant, v. GRANT REGIONAL HEALTH CENTER, Defendant Appellee. Appeal from the United States District
NEW HAMPSHIRE BAR ASSOCIATION Ethics Committee Formal Opinion 1993-94/7 Candor to Tribunal: Use of Questionable Evidence In Criminal Defense January 27, 1994 RULE REFERENCES: *Rule 1.2 *Rule 1.2(a) *Rule
ARBITRATION ADVISORY 1997-03 FEE ARBITRATION ISSUES INVOLVING CONTINGENCY FEES August 22, 1997 Points of view or opinions expressed in this document are those of the Committee on Mandatory Fee Arbitration.