1 What Happens After You Win: Protecting Personal Injury Awards for Elderly and Disabled Plaintiffs Written by Emily S. Starr Prepared by The Law Office of Ciota, Starr & Vander Linden LLP 625 Main Street 7 State Street Fitchburg, MA Worcester, MA (978) (508) Fax (978) Fax (508) January 14, 2003 Emily S. Starr, all rights reserved Revised: July 6, 2007
3 2 The impact of the successful resolution of a personal injury claim on low income disabled or elderly persons, if not handled correctly, can be devastating: it can result in the loss of the two essential need-based benefits - SSI (Supplemental Security Income) and MassHealth. And the loss of those benefits can sometimes have a far greater impact than just the loss of the cash and medical coverage. Often these benefits are the key to accessing crucial supplemental services and placements in the community. Arguably, counsel is obligated to alert clients to these issues and failure to do so may be considered negligent representation. 1 Eligibility of disabled individuals for need-based benefits is generally dependent upon satisfying an income test and sometimes also dependent upon satisfying an asset test. The receipt of any but the smallest personal injury award can increase the disabled individual s income and assets above the eligibility thresholds and result in the loss of benefits unless a strategy is developed and implemented, ideally before the matter is settled. SSI is the most commonly received income benefit that has both an income and asset limit. MassHealth for institutionalized persons or persons over 64 years of age also has both eligibility criteria. MassHealth for non-institutionalized persons under age 65 has only an income limit. MassHealth eligibility for children living with a parent, who require a nursing home or hospital level care, is evaluated independent of the parent s financial status but depends upon the child having both limited income and limited assets. Housing subsidy programs generally have only income limits. In general, when an application for a need based benefit is filed, the applicant signs an agreement to notify the agency within ten days of any change in financial circumstances. A MassHealth application, for instance, requires notification of any claim or lawsuit filed and, within 10 days of receipt, to report receipt of any money received. It is crucial, therefore, before receipt of a settlement or judgment, to have determined whether the Plaintiff will continue to 1 See Doucette v. Kwait, 392 Mass 915 (1984) in which the Court found that the discharge of unchallenged liens was a service that should be provided as part of personal injury representation.
4 need support from benefits programs and, if so, how ongoing eligibility will be maintained. 3 Implementation of a successful strategy immediately upon receipt of the award can minimize disruption caused by a loss of benefits. For example a personal injury award is considered, by the Social Security Administration, as income in the month received. If it has not been spent or transferred in conformity with the rules within that calendar month, in the next month it would be considered a resource. 20 CFR (d). A well designed plan will result in the award being spent down or transferred before the first day of the calendar month following receipt of the funds. I. HAVE PERSONS OTHER THAN THE DISABLED INDIVIDUAL SUFFERED AN INJURY? Planning to preserve benefits must be considered from the outset of litigation. For instance, in some cases persons other than the disabled person have also suffered as a result of the injury to the disabled person. Unless the other person s assets and/or income are taken into account in determining the disabled person s eligibility for need-based benefits, a personal injury award on behalf of that person will not impact the disabled person s benefits. Thus, it is important when commencing litigation to consider naming plaintiffs in addition to the disabled individual. Allocating a portion of a settlement to someone other than the disabled person may produce a dual benefit: not only may the allocated portion of the settlement not be counted as income or an asset of the disabled person, but liens on the allocated portion of the recovery may also be avoided. II. WHO CAN COMMENCE AND SETTLE A PERSONAL INJURY ACTION? Competent individuals eighteen years of age or older can commence personal injury claims. Persons under age eighteen or incompetent persons cannot commence actions on their own behalf. A personal injury claim of a minor or incompetent person may be brought by a court appointed guardian or conservator. If the minor or incompetent person does not have a guardian or conservator, a claim may be brought by a person acting as next friend or guardian ad litem. See Rule 17(b) of the Massachusetts Rules of Civil Procedure and G.L. c Neither a guardian nor a conservator appointed by the probate court, nor a person acting as next friend, is required to obtain judicial approval of the settlement. However, without judicial approval of a settlement, the representative
5 is exposed to the risk of a claim by or on behalf of the minor or incompetent that the settlement was inadequate or inappropriate. Faced with such a claim, a representative who did not have court approval would have to prove that the compromise was made in good faith and in the exercise of sound judgment. Jones v. Jones, 297 Mass 198 (1937). 4 There are two Massachusetts statutes that authorize the court to approve compromises of claims of this nature. G.L. c pertains to guardians or conservators appointed by the probate court. G.L. c C1/2 pertains to approval of a settlement by the trial court. Anyone settling a claim on behalf of a minor or incompetent should seriously consider availing themselves of the protection afforded through these statutes. Defendant s counsel will often require such approval although, in the 1941 case of O Rourke v. Sullivan, the Supreme Judicial Court held that a compromise by a fiduciary who did not have court approval would be binding on the parties thereto if made in good faith. O Rourke v. Sullivan, 309 Mass 424 (1941). The remedy for an inadequate settlement would be a claim against the fiduciary. There are differences in the procedures involved in obtaining approval by the Probate Court and approval by the Trial Court. A. Probate Court Approval G.L. c provides that [t]he probate court may authorize... guardian, conservator...to adjust by arbitration or compromise any demand in favor of or against the estate by him represented. A claim seeking such authorization is commenced by the filing of Form AC67, the standard petition for compromise/arbitration. The Registry will issue a citation but, if all persons interested have filed a written assent to the petition and/or signed a written compromise agreement, notice is not necessary. The court will frequently appoint a guardian ad litem to represent the interests of the ward in regard to a petition to compromise. B. Trial Court Approval G.L. c C1/2, a statute first enacted in 1991, pertains to approval of a settlement on behalf of a minor or an incompetent by the trial court. It provides that the trial court may review and approve a settlement for damages because of personal injury in any case before the court or even in a case where the claim is not in suit. The statute authorizes the trial court to make such orders and take such action as it deems necessary to effectuate the disposition of a settlement approval including, but not limited to, the appointment of a guardian, the appointment of a guardian ad litem, or the holding of an evidentiary hearing.
6 5 In a case already before the trial court, a party to the matter may seek approval by filing a petition for settlement approval signed by all the parties. If the claim is not in suit, any party to the settlement may initiate an action by filing a complaint and petition for settlement approval. C C½ is exceedingly broad in ways that are both problematic from some perspectives and useful from others. By amendment in 1994, the statute provides that a guardian or guardian ad litem appointed pursuant to this statute shall have the same authority as if appointed pursuant to a proceeding under Chapter 201. Apparently a guardian appointed pursuant to this statute has all of the power accorded to a fiduciary appointed pursuant to the traditional guardianship statute without many of the protections afforded to a ward under a traditional guardianship proceeding. For instance, it does not require that notice of the petition be given to both parents of a minor nor to the heirs or spouse of a mentally ill or retarded individual, the individual him or herself, or, in appropriate cases, the Veteran s Administration or the Department of Mental Retardation. It does not mandate the filing of a fiduciary bond nor does it require the guardian to file an inventory. It is not even clear what court has jurisdiction over the guardian once the settlement has been approved. There have been no reported cases involving this statute so clarification will have to await further legislative action or judicial interpretation. However, though the probate court can allow the guardian of a mentally ill or retarded person to undertake estate planning for the ward, it cannot authorize such planning by the guardian of a minor whereas the trial court has no such restriction. G.L c In addition, the probate court s authority to authorize the management of a ward s assets ends when the otherwise competent minor reaches age eighteen. In these authors experiences, the trial court is generally more paternalistic and often allows the ward s assets to remain under management until a much older age. III. PUBLIC BENEFITS REIMBURSEMENT SSI does not impose a lien on, or expect to be reimbursed from, a personal injury award. MassHealth, on the other hand, not only expects reimbursement in appropriate cases, but is generally unwilling to compromise. The last page of a MassHealth application sets forth the recipient s obligations relative to (1) notifying the Office of Medicaid (OM) of any claim or lawsuit filed; and (2) repayment. The OM has the right to be reimbursed when the injury for which an award is paid caused medical expenses which were financed by MassHealth. In that case, before any funds are paid to the disabled individual, the OM has the right to assert a claim for reimbursement for all Medical Assistance paid out on
7 behalf of the MassHealth recipient which were caused by the injury. This is the case even if the disabled individual proposes to use the award to fund a trust from which the OM will be reimbursed following the disabled individual s death. 130 CMR (D) provides: 6 An individual who has received or will be receiving payments from a third party as a result of an accident, injury, or other loss must first repay the Division for medical assistance under G.L. c. 118E 22 and 42 U.S.C. 1396a(a)(25)(A) and (B) and the Department of Transitional Assistance for financial assistance under G.L. c. 18 5G, even if such third -party payments have been or will be placed in a special-needs or pooled trust in accordance with 42 U.S.C. 1396p(d)(4). (See the section on trusts, below.) There is a right to a hearing to test the correctness of the amount of the lien, i.e., to determine whether the medical expenditure is related to the accident or injury for which the third party claim was brought. Whelan v. Division of Medical Assistance, 44 Mass. App. Ct. 663 (1998). The Whelan case contained a suggestion that the Commonwealth might be required to reduce its lien by the costs of recovery, but this dicta has been expressly disavowed by the Supreme Judicial Court s decision in Pierce v. Christmas Tree Shops, Inc., 429 Mass. 91 (1999). As is the case with private insurer s liens under G.L. c A, the attorney for an injured party should attempt to negotiate a voluntary reduction in the Commonwealth s lien before a case is actually settled. The amount of the Commonwealth s reimbursement may be further limited as a result of a 2006 decision by the Unites States Supreme Court in Arkansas Dept. Of Health and Human Servs. v Ahlborn, (547 US 268 ). In that case the Court addressed the issue of what amount of the proceeds of a settlement can be used to satisfy a Medicaid lien and held that the anti-lien provision contained in 42 USC 1396(p)a bars states from imposing liens against the property of Medicaid recipients prior to their deaths, and that the statutory exception to that provision, which permits states to enforce statutory liens on settlements, judgments or awards of monies to Medicaid recipients, applies only to the portion of the settlement, judgment or award allocated to past medical expenses. (42 USC 1396[a][a] and 1396k[a].) In Ahlborn, plaintiff suffered brain damage as the result of a car accident. The case was settled for $550,000.00, which represented 1/6th of the full value of the case, which was estimated at $3,040, The Arkansas State Agency asserted a lien on the settlement proceeds for $215,000.00, which was the amount incurred for plaintiff's medical expenses. The Supreme Court agreed with the plaintiff that since her claim was settled for 1/6 of its value, Arkansas State Agency could only collect 1/6th of its claim for medical expenses, or $35,
8 7 IV. PRESERVING BENEFITS AFTER THE PERSONAL INJURY MATTER IS RESOLVED The receipt of a settlement or judgment is generally considered income in the month of receipt. Typically, for that month, the plaintiff will be ineligible for any public benefits. If the funds are not spent down in that month, then they are counted as a resource for the following months, continuing to preclude eligibility for benefits programs that impose an asset limit. Even if a program does not have an asset limit, retention of the funds in the name of the Plaintiff could be detrimental to eligibility because of the income generated by the funds. A personal injury award received by a disabled person need not affect public benefits eligibility beyond the month in which the settlement is received if the settlement is managed correctly. The three strategies for managing a settlement are: spending the funds; transferring the funds to a trust in compliance with the rules of the particular government benefit program that is sought to be preserved; and giving away the funds altogether. A. Spending the Award A personal injury award can be spent in order to use it up and preserve eligibility. Even if the public benefits program counts assets, the funds can be used to purchase non-countable assets. All government benefit programs which have an asset eligibility limit exclude some assets from counting for eligibility purposes. The most common are a home of any value; a car; a prepaid irrevocable burial contract; clothing; and household goods (up to a certain value). It is prudent to study the list of non-countable assets in advance of receiving the funds so that the expenditures can be planned and executed quickly. B. Transferring the Award to a Trust The transfer of the award to a trust is generally the best approach for preserving a settlement which cannot be fruitfully spent but can be most fraught with danger if the trust is not drafted in accordance with the particular rules of the public benefits program for which eligibility is sought to be maintained.
9 The transfer of an award to a trust involves two sets of rules: 8 transfer of asset rules; and countable asset rules. (1) Transfer of Assets With regard to the transfer of asset rules Some public benefits programs deny eligibility to persons who have given away their assets in order to achieve eligibility. Included among those are long term care MassHealth but (not community based MassHealth) and Supplemental Security Income (SSI). There is no transfer of asset penalty in community based MassHealth program. Section 8 housing subsidy rules do not deny eligibility due to a transfer but do assume that for several years after the transfer, the transferor is receiving income generated by the transferred assets. Even where there is a transfer of asset rule, there are often exceptions. In the long term care MassHealth and SSI programs, there are exceptions for assets transferred to disabled children, to trusts for the sole benefit of disabled children, to certain types of qualified special needs trusts often referred to as (d)(4)(a) trusts, and to certain qualified pooled trusts. A (d)(4)(a) trust, as described below, is a type of qualified special needs trust which can be established for a disabled person under age 65 but which must reimburse the state government for medical benefits paid on behalf of the disabled person after that individual s death. (2) Non-Countable Trusts The fact that a personal injury award received by a disabled person has been transferred into a qualified trust does not necessarily shelter the award. The trust must comply with the particular rules of the public benefits program of concern. Certain rules are common to all trusts of this nature: The trust must be irrevocable; The beneficiary cannot have authority to make distributions. In other words, the beneficiary cannot be the Trustee;
10 9 The trust should be completely discretionary. If the Trustee is required to distribute income, the income will be considered available to the beneficiary and, could, thus, affect eligibility for benefits. If the Trustee is required to distribute principal, the Trust itself will be considered an asset; and In most cases the trust should indicate that its purpose is to supplement, but not replace, public benefits. There are also rules unique to each public benefit program that must be explored before establishing a trust. It is crucial that the trust drafter is acquainted with these rules. (3) Traditional Supplemental Needs Trusts and Pay Back Trusts Historically, before the use of trusts to achieve eligibility for public benefits became so widespread, so long as a trust complied with the rules set forth above, the trust would not be seen as an asset for public benefits purposes. In the Medicaid arena, both the Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1985 and the Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1993 restricted the types of trusts that would be non-countable for Medicaid purposes. In the SSI arena, restrictions were reintroduced by the Foster Care Independence Act of OBRA of 1993, while making it more difficult for most individuals to establish trusts for themselves and still achieve MassHealth eligibility, created some exceptions for trusts established with the funds of disabled individuals. That statue essentially authorized the establishment of two different types of trusts: pay back trusts and pooled trusts. Those federal provisions have been implemented in Massachusetts by regulations found at 130 CMR Before discussing those regulations it merits mention that these rules do not apply to trusts for MassHealth recipients under 65 unless they require long term care. That is because, since July of 1997, there has been no asset limit in the MassHealth program for non institutionalized younger individuals. Therefore, even if a trust must be used to prevent the income generated by the personal injury award from making the under age 65 Plaintiff ineligible for MassHealth, that trust need only be a discretionary supplemental needs trust as described above. It need not be one of the two OBRA mandated trusts. If, however, the Plaintiff requires SSI benefits for support, or expects to need MassHealth benefits after age 65, the trust must be one of two OBRA approved trusts. With regard to the OBRA approved trusts, 130 CMR (D)(1) implementing OBRA 93 provides that the following trusts are not subject to the income and asset countability rules of MassHealth otherwise imposed upon trusts.
11 10 a. Qualified Special Needs Trust (d)(4)(a). created for a disabled individual under age 65, established for the sole benefit of the individual by the individual s parent, grandparent, legal guardian, or a court, and provides that the State will receive amounts remainning in the trust upon the death of the individual up to the amount paid by the Division of Medical Assistance for services to the individual. b. Qualified Pooled Trust (d)(4)(c) trust created by a nonprofit organization, in which a separate account is maintained for each beneficiary but in which the assets are pooled for investment and management purposes, the account was created for the sole benefit of the individual by the individual, the individual s parent or grandparent, legal guardian, or court acting on behalf of the individual, the individual was disabled at the time his or her account in the pool was created, and the trust provides the State will receive amounts remaining in the trust upon the death of the individual up to the amount paid by the Division of Medical Assistance for services to the individual except that the trust can retain reasonable and appropriate amount a determined by the Division of Medical Assistance. (4) Court Approval of Trusts for Incompetent Plaintiffs Under Guardianship If a case is resolved by a settlement, the plaintiff is under guardianship, and the plan is to place the settlement in a trust, there are theoretically two courts - the trial court and the probate court - that have jurisdiction relative to approval of the trust. One interesting question raised by this statutory scheme is whether, even if the trial court approves the settlement and trust under G.L c C ½, the probate court must also review the guardian s actions. There is no law on this issue but it seems rather onerous to have two separate courts review the same proposal. One way to approach the analysis is to view any trust established for the plaintiff with trial court approval under the c C ½ as a trust created
12 11 by order of the court rather than a trust created by a guardian. Under this analysis it could be argued that the guardian would not have to seek probate court approval of the trust and the transfer thereto as the funds would not have come into his/her possession as guardian. Accordingly, the guardian would not be required to report the receipt and distribution of this settlement on the probate court accounting as, again, the funds would never have come into the guardian s possession. (5) Distributions from Non - Countable Trusts Even if a trust is drafted correctly, distributions from the trust can jeopardize ongoing benefits eligibility if the trustee has not been counseled as to how to best distribute the trust s income and assets. Cash distributions to the disabled public benefits recipient are always problematic. Purchases for the beneficiary are preferable though it is important that the trustee understand any in-kind income rules as well as the program s asset rules. MassHealth does not recognize inkind income so where a trust beneficiary is receiving MassHealth, only, the trustee need not be as careful about the purchases made with trust assets as where a trust beneficiary is receiving SSI. 130 CMR (D) and (C). C. Giving Away Assets Unfortunately, disabled persons who do not have good counsel often give the assets to a relative to hold as it appears to be the least complicated approach. Even if this does not result in loss of eligibility due to the imposition of a transfer of asset penalty, it can lead to a loss or reduction of the award due to the circumstances or actions of the transferee. Among the more likely problems are the expenditure of the settlement by the transferee for his/her own benefit; the division of the settlement with the transferee s spouse if the transferee is involved in a divorce; or the loss of the settlement to the transferee s heirs if the transferee dies before the disabled person or to estate taxes on the transferee s estate. Even in the most stable and financially secure family, this should be the approach of last resort. V. Conclusion The responsibility of counsel handling litigation of a personal injury matter on behalf of a disabled public benefits recipient goes way beyond simply handling the claim itself. It requires knowledge of the rules of the relevant public benefits programs so that the claim, and settlement thereof, can bring the greatest benefit to the client.
13 12 The receipt of a personal injury award by a disabled person need not adversely affect the individual s public benefits. If planned correctly, the award can supplement, but not replace, the disabled person s public benefits and allow the injured disabled person more opportunities and a better quality of life. F:\forms\ARTICLES\What Happens After You Win - Protecting Personal Injury Awards for Elderly and Disabled Plaintiffs.wpd
Special Needs Trusts in the Context of Personal Injury Settlements I. INTRODUCTION Virtually any personal injury case will involve two issues that are often seen as afterthoughts by personal injury attorneys,
A Primer on Special Needs Trusts JOHN STAUNTON, P.A. A Professional Association Copyright 2008. John Staunton, P.A. Contents WHAT MAKES A TRUST A SPECIAL NEEDS TRUST 3 ELIGIBILITY FOR MEANS TESTED PROGRAMS
SPECIAL TOPICS IN GUARDIANSHIP COMPROMISING CLAIMS FOR MINORS AND INCAPACITATED ADULTS November 8, 2013 Stephanie F. Brown McMickle, Kurey & Branch 200 South Main Street Alpharetta, GA 30009 (678) 824-7800
Attorney Sharon L. Pope DILLMAN & POPE, ATTORNEYS AT LAW 1160 SILAS DEANE HWY. WETHERSFIELD, CT. 06109 860-563 -4070; S POP E@CTS EN IORLAW.COM OBRA'93 MEDICAID TRUSTS FOR PERSONS WITH disabllltles Background
NC MEDICAID ESTATE AND THIRD PARTY RECOVERY Presentation to the North Carolina Chapter of the National Academy of Elder Law Attorneys September 18, 2014 Brian D. Rabinovitz Assistant Attorney General North
Littman Krooks LLP Special Report Using Self-Settled Special Needs Trusts to Protect Many public benefits available to persons with disabilities, such as Supplemental Security Income (SSI) and Medicaid,
Special Report Utilizing Special Needs Trusts for Disabled Persons With Litigation Proceeds Case Study 1: A personal injury settlement public benefits lost John suffered a disabling brain injury as a result
Developments Concerning the Applicability of State Medicaid Lien Statutes 2321 N. Loop Drive, Ste 200 Ames, Iowa 50010 www.calt.iastate.edu Updated February 15, 2014 - by Roger A. McEowen Overview Medicaid
Special Needs Trusts and Government Benefits Preservation Peter H. Wayne, IV Wyatt, Tarrant & Combs, LLP (502) 562-7532 firstname.lastname@example.org Q. What is a special needs trust? A. A Special needs trust (
Special Report Using Self-Settled Special Needs Trusts to Protect Public Benefits Many public benefits available to persons with disabilities, such as Supplemental Security Income (SSI) and Medicaid, place
VIRGINIA ACTS OF ASSEMBLY -- 2015 SESSION CHAPTER 585 An Act to amend and reenact 38.2-2206 of the Code of Virginia and to amend the Code of Virginia by adding in Article 7 of Chapter 3 of Title 8.01 a
Littman Krooks LLP Special Report Public Benefits and Case Study 1: Spouse with a disability no public benefits Bill and Linda are in the their mid-30s and have decided to divorce. Linda has Multiple Sclerosis
Unraveling the Mystery of Conservatorships and Special Needs Trusts Conservatorships Who, What, Where, When, Why and How? Parents have the absolute right to make decisions for their children until they
THE LAW FIRM OF BOVE & LANGA A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION TEN TREMONT STREET, SUITE 600 BOSTON, MASSACHUSETTS 02108 Telephone: 617.720.6040 Facsimile: 617.720.1919 www.bovelanga.com Trusts & Estates Forum
Planning For Individuals With Disabilities: Special Needs Trusts Amber K. Quintal special needs trusts are means for persons with disabilities to qualify to receive government benefits from needs-based
Special Report Public Benefits and Matrimonial Settlements Case Study 1: Disabled spouse no public benefits Bill and Linda are in the their mid-30s and have decided to divorce. Linda has Multiple Sclerosis
What Attorneys Need To Know About Special Needs Trusts Bernard A. Krooks and Andrew Hook A. What Is A Special Needs Trust? 1. Introduction a. People with disabilities have many needs beyond basic medical
A Look at the Law Special Needs Trusts: A Planning Tool with Promise by Ruthann P. Lacey With one in every 26 American families reporting raising a child with a disability, 1 interest in and demand for
Liens: Workers' Compensation, Medicare, Medicaid, ERISA & DPW Presented by: Daniel J. Siegel, Esquire Law Offices of Daniel J. Siegel, LLC Integrated Technology Services, LLC 66 West Eagle Road Suite 1
10.09.24.08-2.08-2 Treatment of Trust Amounts. A. (text unchanged) B. Treatment of Trusts Established after August 10, 1993. (1) (5) (text unchanged) (6) The following trusts may not be counted in determining
Special Needs Trusts What is a special needs trust? Why establish a special needs trust? What requirements must a special needs trust meet? What types of special needs trusts are available? How is a special
THE ELEVENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT MIAMI-DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA CASE NO. 08-1 (Court Administration) ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER NO. 08-18 (Rescinding AO No. 06-04 and AO No. 08-05) IN RE: RE-ESTABLISHMENT OF STANDARDS
Court Approval Over Cases Involving Injuries to Minors By Adam J. Zayed In Illinois, a minor is considered a ward of the court, and the court has a duty and broad discretion to protect the minor s interests.
Senate Bill 202 By: Senators Unterman of the 45th, Mullis of the 53rd and Chance of the 16th A BILL TO BE ENTITLED AN ACT 1 2 3 4 To amend Article 5 of Chapter 8 of Title 31 of the Official Code of Georgia
Medi-Cal Handbook page 47-1 47. 47.1 Background The Omnibus Reconciliation Act of 1993 (OBRA 93) was amended to provide new requirements for the treatment of trusts and annuities. The new procedures for
WHAT TRIAL LAWYERS NEED TO KNOW ABOUT SPECIAL NEEDS TRUSTS AND DISABILITY PLANNING David L. McGuffey, CELA 202 W. Crawford Street, Ste B Dalton, GA 30720 (706) 428-0888 email@example.com Disabled individuals
TAKING CONTROL OF YOUR FUTURE THROUGH BASIC ESTATE PLANNING Prepared by Emily S. Starr The Law Office of Ciota, Starr & Vander Linden LLP 625 Main Street Seven State Street Fitchburg, MA 01420 Worcester,
Thoughts on Supporting Healthy Dependents Using Funds from a Disabled Parent s or Spouse s Special Needs Trust David Lillesand, Esq. www.floridaspecialneedslaw.com (305) 670-6999 The issue. Can the Trustee
california legislature 2015 16 regular session ASSEMBLY BILL No. 597 Introduced by Assembly Member Cooley February 24, 2015 An act to amend Sections 36 and 877 of, and to add Chapter 6 (commencing with
AMENDED IN ASSEMBLY APRIL 14, 2015 california legislature 2015 16 regular session ASSEMBLY BILL No. 597 Introduced by Assembly Member Cooley February 24, 2015 An act to amend Sections 36 and 877 of, and
COURT OF COMMON PLEAS PROBATE DIVISION ASHTABULA COUNTY, OHIO IN THE MATTER OF RULES OF COURT FOR THE COMMON PLEAS COURT PROBATE DIVISION ASHTABULA COUNTY, OHIO JUDGMENT ENTRY Pursuant to Superintendence
How Money Damages and Settlements Impact Selected Public Benefits Patricia Baker, Massachusetts Law Reform Institute Ruth Bourquin, Mass. Law Reform Institute Deborah Harris, Mass. Law Reform Institute
Ask the Lawyer: Power of Attorney, Guardianship and Representative Payee By Anne Parette, Esq. Question My 28-year-old daughter recently sustained a severe traumatic brain injury in an automobile crash.
Questions and Answers The Homestead Act Massachusetts General Laws, Ch. 188, 1-10 William Francis Galvin Secretary of the Commonwealth updated 8/1/13 William Francis Galvin Secretary of the Commonwealth
3721L.01I AN ACT To amend chapter 383, RSMo, by adding thereto thirteen new sections relating to the Missouri health care arbitration act. BE IT ENACTED BY THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF THE STATE OF MISSOURI,
Managing Wrongful Death Settlements The Honorable David M. Murkowski Chief Judge, Kent County Probate Court I. History and Background All actions for wrongful death are statutory. No right of action existed
Local Rules of Court Geauga County Court of Common Pleas Probate Division (Effective July 1, 2009) Index to Rules Local Probate Rule 1...Hours of Court Local Probate Rule 2...Examination of Files, Records
About Guardianship Services of Seattle Created in 1985, Guardianship Services of Seattle provides fiduciary services to a wide variety of people. We act as court appointed guardian or trustee. Individuals
Court Services and Offender Supervision Agency for the District of Columbia Page 2 III. DELEGATION OF AUTHORITY The General Counsel is delegated authority pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2672 to consider, ascertain,
Arkansas Department of Human Services Your Guide To Medicaid Estate Recovery In Arkansas Table of Contents What is Estate Recovery? 3 Who does it affect? 4 What is a HCBS Waiver Program? 4 What is an estate?
****************************************************** The officially released date that appears near the beginning of each opinion is the date the opinion will be published in the Connecticut Law Journal
Personal Injuries Happen. Justice Is Sought. Special Needs Must Be Addressed. Special Needs Require Special Settlement Planning Why Use the Special Needs Law Firm? In most personal injury cases, the path
IN BRIEF Referred to in the June 2006 issue, page 2 PROFESSIONAL LIABILITY FUND MALPRACTICE PREVENTION EDUCATION FOR OREGON LAWYERS MEDICARE AND MEDICAID LIENS IN P.I. CASES When a client s injury is caused
1 DIVORCE AND SPECIAL NEEDS PLANNING: ISSUES WHEN A PARTY IN A DIVORCE HAS A DISABILITY OR HAS A CHILD WITH A DISABILITY Submitted by: Theresa M. Varnet Spain, Spain & Varnet P.C. 33 North Dearborn Street,
QUESTIONS & ANSWERS ABOUT FINANCIAL ELIGIBILITY FOR MEDICAID NURSING HOME SERVICES IN FLORIDA This summary is intended to provide a limited overview of Medicaid eligibility for nursing home services in
LEGAL SMARTS FOR FAMILIES WITH SPECIAL NEEDS CHILDREN Guardianship Government Benefits Special Needs Trusts GUARDIANSHIP 1. Why should it be considered? 2. What is it? 3. How do you get it? 4. When can
Probate and Estate Planning Section State Bar of Michigan Acting for Adults who become Disabled Notes 2 Acting for Adults who Become Disabled Table of Contents An Overview.........................................
Senate Engrossed State of Arizona Senate Forty-fifth Legislature First Regular Session 0 SENATE BILL AN ACT AMENDING SECTION -, ARIZONA REVISED STATUTES, AS AMENDED BY LAWS 00, CHAPTER, SECTION ; AMENDING
NEGOTIATING WITH MEDICARE AND MEDICAID I. MEDICARE PROVIDES HEALTHCARE COVERAGE A. Persons 65 Years Old and Older B. Certain Disabled Persons under 65 C. Persons with End-Stage Renal Disease II. MEDICARE
Title 7. Probate Rules Chapter 1. General Provisions Rule 7.1. Probate rules Rule 7.2. Preliminary provisions Rule 7.3. Definitions and use of terms Rule 7.4. Waiver of rules in probate proceedings Rule
GUARDIANSHIP LAW IN NORTH CAROLINA for General Guardians - Guardians of the Person-Guardians of the Estate IMPORTANT The Clerk of Superior Court in all 100 counties in North Carolina serves as the judge
Case 3:06-cv-00701-MJR-DGW Document 526 Filed 07/20/15 Page 1 of 8 Page ID #13631 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS ANTHONY ABBOTT, et al., ) ) No: 06-701-MJR-DGW Plaintiffs,
Appendix I: Select Legislative Appendix I: Select Federal Legislative is and Mesothelioma Benefits Act H.R. 6906, 93rd 1973). With respect to claims for benefits filed before December 31, 1974, would authorize
What Trustees Should Know About Florida s New Attorneys Fee Statute By David P. Hathaway and David J. Akins Introduction More and more lawsuits are filed in Florida alleging that the trustee of a trust
SJC RULE 1:07 (1) REPORT COURT: Department FISCAL YEAR: 2015 Type of 1. Counsel in Mental Health Cases A Substituted Judgment and Rogers cases G.L. c. 190B, 5-306A(a) Counsel for incapacitated person or
Arkansas Department of Health & Human Services v. Ahlborn: Sea Change or Status Quo for Resolution of Medicaid Liens? The Medicaid program, a public assistance system providing medical care for certain
LegalShield Service Definition Listing Advice & Consultation Attorney Advice & Consultation LegalShield gives the member the ability to talk to an attorney on any of his/her legal matters without worrying
Small Hands-Big Dangers Our children are our most valuable resource and keeping them safe should be our first priority. It is the greatest tragedy when a child is seriously hurt or killed by negligence
NEW MEXICO SELF-INSURERS' FUND WORKERS' COMPENSATION AND EMPLOYERS' LIABILITY PLAN In return for the payment of the premium and subject to all terms of this Policy, we agree with you as follows. GENERAL
RULE 4-1.5 FEES AND COSTS FOR LEGAL SERVICES (a) Illegal, Prohibited, or Clearly Excessive Fees and Costs. [no change] (b) Factors to Be Considered in Determining Reasonable Fees and Costs. [no change]
IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA Dustin C. Sams, an incapacitated : person, by Julie L. Raybuck, guardian, : Petitioner : : No. 2245 C.D. 2012 v. : : Submitted: May 31, 2013 Department of Public
STATE OF ARIZONA MEDICAID ESTATE RECOVERY PROGRAM DE-810 (Rev. 07/15) Page 1 This brochure provides a general description of the Arizona Estate Recovery Program. Individual circumstances may vary and affect
Impediments to Settlement W. Bruce Barrickman, Esq. 5775 Glenridge Drive Suite E100 Atlanta, GA 30328 678-222-0248 www.bayadr.com IMPEDIMENTS TO SETTLEMENT W. Bruce Barrickman, Esq. Mediation is a great
SETTLEMENT CONSULTING Special Needs Trust FAQs What Is A Special Needs Trust? The primary purpose of creating a Special Needs Trust is to continue the monthly tax-free SSI disability benefits and secure
AOC-E-850, July 2014 Estate Procedures for Executors, Administrators, Collectors By Affidavit, and Summary Administration IMPORTANT NOTES The Clerk of Superior Court in all 100 counties serves as the judge
SPECIAL NEEDS TRUST NEWSLETTER SEPTEMBER 2009 A. KEL LONG, III P.C. 3060 Peachtree Rd., Suite 1725 Atlanta, GA 30305 404 238 0174 AKL3PC@mindspring.com www.akellong.com For this edition of the newsletter,
Updated July 2015 REVISITING DIRECTOR AND OFFICER INDEMNIFICATION: PROVISIONS IN THE NEW D.C. NONPROFIT ACT 1. Initial Considerations The District of Columbia has recently modernized its statute dealing
TRANSFER OF HOME TO CHILDREN THE PROS AND CONS By Lois G. Andrews, Esq. and James L. Young, Esq. IMPORTANT NOTE: The purpose of this outline is to familiarize the reader with some of the various laws and
MEDICARE AND LIABILITY CASES I. The Significant Statutory and Code Provisions A. The Medicare Secondary Payer Statute The Medicare Secondary Payer statute (MSP) has been the law for well over 25 years.
Medical Malpractice Reform 49 This Act to contains a clause wherein the state legislature asks the state Supreme Court to require a plaintiff filing a medical liability claim to include a certificate of
4245 Kemp Blvd., Suite 1007 Wichita Falls, Texas 76308 HOURLY CONSULTING AGREEMENT This is an agreement between Personal Money Planning ( Advisor ), and ( Client ). By this agreement, Client retains Advisor
CLIENT INFORMATION: GUIDELINES ON ADMINISTRATION & BILLING As updated from time-to-time for billing rates and responsible attorney and, following actual notice to the client. This agreement forms the basis
Personal Injury Liens and Estate Recovery P R E S E N T E D B Y : G R E T C H E N G U N N M E R R I L L S e n i o r A s s i s t a n t A t t o r n e y G e n e r a l C i v i l E n f o r c e m e n t D i v
Massachusetts General Laws, Ch. 188, 1-10 This webpage has been designed to answer some of the basic questions asked every day pertaining to the Homestead Act. It is not designed to provide any legal advice
Will, trust and estate disputes Contents Types of claim Is the Will valid? Inheritance Act Claims Have you not been left sufficient financial provision following the death of a friend or relative? Promissory
1 ESTATE PLANNING 101: WILLS, TRUSTS, AND POWERS OF ATTORNEY: WHAT SOCIAL SERVICES PROFESSIONALS NEED TO KNOW TO SERVE THEIR CLIENTS JANNA DUTTON, ATTORNEY GOVERNOR'S CONFERENCE ON AGING, 2011 Issues Involved
KASSOFF, ROBERT & LERNER, LLP. ATTORNEYS AT LAW 100 Merrick Road West Building Suite 508 Rockville Centre, New York 11570 (516) 766-7700 Fax (516) 766-0738 Joan Lensky Robert NEW YORK STATE MEDICAL INDEMNITY
WHEN A CHILD MAY HAVE A TORT CLAIM: WHAT S THE CHILD S COURT- APPOINTED ATTORNEY TO DO? The Oregon Child Advocacy Project Professor Leslie J. Harris and Child Advocacy Fellows Colin Love-Geiger and Alyssa
PRACTICE GUIDELINES MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: Attorneys Practicing Before Me And Other Interested Persons C. Timothy Corcoran, III United States Bankruptcy Judge DATE: January 3, 2000 1 RE: Sample Bankruptcy
Role of Foster Parents in Family Court This information packet has been written for foster parents, those individuals licensed by the Department of Social Services (DSS) to provide temporary care for children
BYLAWS OF CHAMPIONS MADE FROM ADVERSITY A GEORGIA NONPROFIT CORPORATION TABLE OF CONTENTS ARTICLE I INTRODUCTORY... 1 Section 1.1 Name... 1 Section 1.2 Purpose... 1 Section 1.3 Offices... 1 Section 1.4
August 2006 Vol. 35, No. 8 [Page 97] Court Approval of the Settlement of Claims of Persons Under Disability by C. Jean Stewart Trust and Estate articles are sponsored by the CBA Trust and Estate Section.
PUBLIC ENTITY RISK MANAGEMENT AUTHORITY MEMORANDUM OF WORKERS COMPENSATION AND EMPLOYERS LIABILITY COVERAGE FOR THE PERIOD JULY 1, 2015 TO JUNE 30, 2016 EFFECTIVE: JULY 1, 2015 PUBLIC ENTITY RISK MANAGEMENT
MUST BE POSTMARKED NO LATER THAN DECEMBER 28, 2015 In re Tower Group International, Ltd. Securities Litigation c/o A.B. Data, Ltd. P.O. Box 170500 Milwaukee, WI 53217-8091 1-800-328-6074 www.towersecuritiessettlement.com
South Dakota Parental Rights and Procedural Safeguards Special Education Programs Revised July 2011 Prior Written Notice... 1 Definition of Parental Consent... 3 Definition of a Parent... 3 Parental Consent...
This document was prepared by: John Doe 100 Main Street Atlanta, Georgia 33034 Return To: John Doe 100 Main Street Atlanta, Georgia 33034 DURABLE POWER OF ATTORNEY OF John Doe I. PRINCIPAL AND ATTORNEY-IN-FACT