The Forum of Complex Injury Solicitors Incorporating the Richard Grand Society
|
|
- Arleen Jackson
- 8 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 The Forum of Complex Injury Solicitors Incorporating the Richard Grand Society R D G R A N D R V A L L A N C E J C A H I L L P A L L E N P B A L E N J C H A M B E R L A Y N E A D E S M O N D C F A Z A N M H A R V E Y C J A C K S O N S J O H N T L E E G M C C O O L P M O R G A N B N E I L L R N E L S O N - J O N E S T O B S O R N E H P O T T E R R S W A N N E Y T W A R D M Y O U N G R P A N N O N E J P I C K E R I N G T C O O K K R O H D E A A L E X A N D E R J M C Q U A T E R R L A N G T O N D M A R S H A L L C E T T I N G E R K T O N K S
2 EUROPEAN COMMISSION - COMPENSATION FOR VICTIMS OF CROSS- BORDER ROAD TRAFFIC ACCIDENTS IN THE EUROPEAN UNION A RESPONSE BY FOCIS OCTOBER 2012 The members of the Forum of Complex Injury Solicitors (FOCIS) act for seriously injured claimants with complex personal injury and clinical negligence claims, including group actions. The objectives of FOCIS are to:- 1. Promote high standards of representation of claimant personal injury and medical negligence clients, 2. Share knowledge and information among members of the Forum, 3. Further better understanding in the wider community of issues which arise for those who suffer serious injury, 4. Use members' expertise to promote improvements to the legal process and to inform debate, 5. Develop fellowship among members. Membership of FOCIS is intended to be at the most senior level of the profession, currently standing at 27 members. The only formal requirement for membership of FOCIS is that members should have achieved a pre-eminence in their personal injury field. Five of the past presidents of APIL are members of FOCIS. Firms represented by FOCIS members include: Anthony Gold Atherton Godfrey Boyes Turner Charles Russell Digby Brown Field Fisher Waterhouse Freeth Cartwright
3 Girlings Hodge Jones & Allen Hugh James Irwin Mitchell Kester Cunningham John Kingsley Napley Leigh Day Linder Myers MPH Osborne Morris & Morgan Pannones Parlett Kent Potter Rees Prince Evans Russell-Cooke Russell Jones & Walker Stewarts Law Our response to your consultation is based on the following fundamental principles essential to our Civil Justice System, as follows:- 1. Access to Justice for all in our society 2. Protection of those who have been injured by the negligence of others
4 3. Tortfeasor/polluter pays 4. Full care and redress for the injured party 5. Speedy and fair resolution 6. Public confidence in the Civil Justice system. FOCIS welcomes this further consultation to address the adverse effects to victims of crossborder road traffic accidents relating to the applicable law for the assessment of damages and limitation periods. We are concerned that significant under-compensation for victims will otherwise arise, perhaps unintentionally, as a result of Regulation (EC 864/2007 Rome II ) Compensation Awards From the options presented we favour option 6, the application of the laws of the country of the victim s residence. However, we believe it would be better still for the assessment of damages to be in accordance with the laws of the forum, as was the position in English proceedings prior to Rome II. Option 6 will simplify cross-border claims and reduce claim costs. The number of such cross-border claims is so small that the costs to RTA insurers of the above would be negligible and unlikely to have any material impact on premiums. The rights for victims of road traffic accidents to pursue their claims in their home courts, and to bring their actions directly against the defendant s insurer, should be extended to the victims of other accidents. In England, as confirmed by the House of Lords in Harding -v- Wealands, the laws relating to the assessment of damages were procedural. Consequently claimants (from any country) pursuing their claims through the English courts were entitled to recover damages based on English compensation principles. Rome II appears to have reversed that position to the detriment of claimants in English proceedings, consequently creating the additional complexity and associated legal costs of both parties ascertaining and proving by expert evidence what the laws of damages are in the other jurisdiction (usually the lex loci delicti) and how they should apply to the claim. This requirement for foreign expert evidence is causing significant problems and additional cost to cross-border RTA claims. Some defendants are arguing that this expert evidence should not be limited to one foreign law expert, but also that most or all the liability or quantum experts should be from that country or have knowledge of the particular foreign law. In catastrophic injury claims that could involve 10 or more experts per party from the other jurisdiction and the additional cost that entails (including translation costs).
5 In addition to the complexity and costs that this causes, it also has significant potential for injustice, because the laws of the assessment of damages vary widely from country to country and are inter-related with other provisions that country makes for those who have sustained injuries, for instance via their medical system. In addition, that country s laws may be based on considerations from that country s financial or societal issues, which do not easily translate to the claimant s situation. For instance in Harding -v- Wealands, the laws of New South Wales (where the accident occurred) would have applied various caps and limits on the compensation available to Mr Harding for his loss of earnings and his care needs based on pay rates that were applicable in New South Wales, but quite different from those applicable in England. In addition the laws of New South Wales provided for a very different discount rate (5% rather than 2.5% in England) for the calculation of multipliers for future loss, which were based on financial considerations relating to the economy of New South Wales. Had these been applied to England they would have resulted in significant under-compensation to Mr Harding who was a tetraplegic with significant lifetime losses. In reality he would have been unable to fund his future care needs that would obviously arise in England. Unless Rome II is amended, current and future claimants in Mr Harding s position will be similarly under compensated. We oppose the wait and see approach of option 1 and we are concerned that recital 33 of Rome II is likely to be ineffective in enabling the Courts to adequately provide for appropriate compensation based on the claimant s residence, because they will still have to adhere to Articles 4(1)-4(3), which may apply laws for the assessment of damages which differs considerably from the actual losses the claimant is likely to incur in his home country. We agree with the MOJ s position in response to the 2009 consultation: that in relation to options 3, 4 and 5 it would be very difficult to formulate any agreed guidelines given the wide disparity in Member States compensation systems, and this would in any event be disproportionate to the scale of the problem and would have wider implications for compensation awards in other circumstances. Fort these reasons, any harmonisation of the substantive law in this area would not be appropriate. We also agree with the MOJ s position in response to the 2009 consultation in relation to options 7 and 8: provisions on first party insurance in this area would create disparities in other areas and would create a privileged class of victims whose injury was sustained in a road traffic accident rather than in an accident not involving a motor vehicle. These options also seem to assume that victims will be passengers of a motor vehicle, which will not be the case for pedestrians and cyclist victims. Whilst, of the options presented, option 6 is the one that best accords with the principles we refer to in the preamble, we are of the view that it would be preferable for the assessment of damages to be in accordance with the laws of the forum, as was the position in England and Wales prior to Rome II. In the majority of cases that would have the same consequence as option 6, because most victims will chose to bring their claims in their home courts. However, in the event that they chose to litigate in another country, or (for non-rtas in
6 which there is no direct right of action against the insurer) they were forced to bring their claim in another country, then it would avoid the courts of that country facing the complications of having to have expert evidence on assessment of damages in the claimant s home country. It would also avoid the scenario mentioned in the consultation of a court having to assess damages on a number of different bases if there are multiple claimants of different nationalities. We note the MOJ s response to the 2009 consultation was heavily premised on the understanding that the number of such cross border claims was small. In the report of the Commission s own contractor (Contract ETD/2007/ IM/H2/116) executive summary to the Final Report, Part II Analysis, it is stated at paragraph that the authors of the present study believe that the percentage of persons effectively concerned by this study is very limited and represents far less than one percent of all road traffic accidents. Consequently the costs to RTA insurers of the above would be negligible and unlikely to have any material impact on premiums. There will also be some cases (i.e. where the claim is brought in the victim s home courts applying less generous compensation laws than applied where the accident occurred) in which the above leads to lower compensation and a saving to the insurers when contrasted with the current Rome II position. In contrast, the impact on the cross-border victim of continuing to apply the law of the place where the accident occurred is often profound. In the case of those who have suffered catastrophic injuries it can result in substantial undercompensation. Those under-compensated victims then fall back on their own welfare state to meet their residual needs (in so far as the State provides a safety net) but at the cost to that country s tax payers. It is anomalous and unfair that the victims of accidents other than RTAs are not afforded the same right of action in their home courts, and a direct right of action against the defendant s insurers. The victims of accidents do not choose to be injured and should not be forced to litigate abroad, nor through the artificial construct of bringing a claim against a Defendant whose defence is run by his insurers. Limitation Periods Of the options proposed we see option 8 as preferable; that the limitation period be calculated according to the law of the country of the visiting victim s place of residence. However, as with our submission above concerning compensation awards, we believe the best option would be the limitation period being according to the laws of the country in which the claim is brought. We also support the concepts of options 2 and 3 of providing people with better information of their rights in cross-border situations, although we see this as a modest impact supplementary measure as opposed to an alternative change in the law as proposed above. Option 7, a Europe-wide harmonisation of limitation periods also has merit, but would no doubt take many years to achieve, with the likelihood of injustice in the meantime.
7 We oppose option 4, as the requirement of an earlier notice to the insurer runs the risk of creating an unwarranted second hurdle for the victims of accidents, in addition to the actual limitation period.
A response by the Association of Personal Injury Lawyers
European Commission Compensation of victims of Cross-Border Road Traffic Accidents in the European Union A response by the Association of Personal Injury Lawyers May 2009 Page 1 of 8 The Association of
More informationEUROPEAN COMMISSION GREEN PAPER A EUROPEAN ORDER FOR PAYMENT PROCEDURE AND MEASURES TO SIMPLIFY AND SPEED UP SMALL CLAIMS LITIGATION
EUROPEAN COMMISSION GREEN PAPER A EUROPEAN ORDER FOR PAYMENT PROCEDURE AND MEASURES TO SIMPLIFY AND SPEED UP SMALL CLAIMS LITIGATION A RESPONSE BY THE ASSOCIATION OF PERSONAL INJURY LAWYERS MAY 2003 The
More informationA response by the Association of Personal Injury Lawyers
European Commission Compensation of victims of Cross-Border Road Traffic Accidents in the European Union A response by the Association of Personal Injury Lawyers September 2012 Page 1 of 6 The Association
More informationA Response by the Forum of Insurance Lawyers to the European Commission s Consultation on Limitation Periods for Compensation Claims for Victims of
A Response by the Forum of Insurance Lawyers to the European Commission s Consultation on Limitation Periods for Compensation Claims for Victims of Cross-Border Road Traffic Accidents in the European Union.
More informationDEALING WITH INTERNATIONAL PERSONAL INJURY CLAIMS KATHERINE ALLEN IRWIN MITCHELL SOLICITORS
DEALING WITH INTERNATIONAL PERSONAL INJURY CLAIMS KATHERINE ALLEN IRWIN MITCHELL SOLICITORS Acting for clients who have been injured in accidents abroad can be immensely challenging and complex. There
More informationLEGAL AID ADVISORY COMMITTEE REVIEW INTO ESTABLISHING A CONTINGENCY LEGAL AID FUND IN NORTHERN IRELAND
LEGAL AID ADVISORY COMMITTEE REVIEW INTO ESTABLISHING A CONTINGENCY LEGAL AID FUND IN NORTHERN IRELAND WRITTEN SUBMISSIONS OF THE ASSOCIATION OF PERSONAL INJURY LAWYERS 1. The Association of Personal Injury
More informationCOMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES
COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES PROPOSAL FOR A DIRECTIVE AMENDING COUNCIL DIRECTIVES 72/166/EEC, 84/5/EEC, 88/357/EEC, 90/232/EEC AND DIRECTIVE 2000/26/EC ON INSURANCE AGAINST CIVIL LIABILITY IN
More informationSee further www.focls.org.uk.
RESPONSE BY THE FORUM OF COMPLEX INJURY SOLICITORS TO THE CONSULTATION "Solving Disputes in the County Court: creating a simpler, quicker and more proportionate system Members of the Forum of Complex Injury
More informationA response by the Association of Personal Injury Lawyers
Competition Commission Private Motor Insurance Market Investigation: Provisional Findings A response by the Association of Personal Injury Lawyers January 2014 Page 1 of 5 The Association of Personal Injury
More informationLEGAL SERVICES COMMISSION (LSC) CIVIL SPECIFICATION CONSULTATION A RESPONSE BY THE ASSOCIATION OF PERSONAL INJURY LAWYERS
LEGAL SERVICES COMMISSION (LSC) CIVIL SPECIFICATION CONSULTATION A RESPONSE BY THE ASSOCIATION OF PERSONAL INJURY LAWYERS APRIL 2007 The Association of Personal Injury Lawyers (APIL) was formed by claimant
More informationThe Jackson Report - insurance industry myths and the reality for employers. Tom Jones Head of Policy & Public Affairs Thompsons Solicitors
The Jackson Report - insurance industry myths and the reality for employers Tom Jones Head of Policy & Public Affairs Thompsons Solicitors Background to Jackson Jackson Review of Civil Costs ordered in
More informationAn Introductory Guide to Rome II for Personal Injury Practitioners
An Introductory Guide to Rome II for Personal Injury Practitioners An Introductory Guide from the International Practice Group Spring 2010 Charles Dougherty and Marie Louise Kinsler Introduction On 11
More informationHER MAJESTY S COURTS SERVICE (HMCS) Part of the Ministry of Justice (MoJ) CIVIL COURT FEES A RESPONSE BY THE ASSOCIATION OF PERSONAL INJURY LAWYERS
HER MAJESTY S COURTS SERVICE (HMCS) Part of the Ministry of Justice (MoJ) CIVIL COURT FEES A RESPONSE BY THE ASSOCIATION OF PERSONAL INJURY LAWYERS June 2007 The Association of Personal Injury Lawyers
More informationwww.mcdermottqc.com Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Bill: Implications for Personal Injury Litigation
www.mcdermottqc.com Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Bill: Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Bill: The Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Bill covers a wide
More informationBrain injury claims. A niche personal injury practice focused on catastrophic and neurotrauma claims
Brain injury claims As specialist brain injury lawyers we are renowned for our experience in dealing with these complex claims. We focus on your claim and what you need in the early days after a serious
More informationHow To Write A Letter To The European Commission On A Number Of Issues
PEOPIL The Pan-European Organisation of Personal Injury Lawyers www.peopil.com PEOPIL RESPONSE TO THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION «GREEN PAPER ON THE REVIEW OF COUNCIL REGULATION (EC) NO 44/2001 ON JURISDICTION
More informationKeoghs LLP response to the Legal Services Board consultation: Referral fees, referral arrangements and fee sharing.
Introduction: response to the Legal Services Board consultation: Referral fees, referral arrangements and fee sharing. Keoghs is the only top 100 law firm to focus exclusively on the insurance sector and
More informationSCOTTISH EXECUTIVE HEALTH DEPARTMENT THE RECOVERY OF NATIONAL HEALTH SERVICE COSTS IN CASES INVOLVING PERSONAL INJURY COMPENSATION
SCOTTISH EXECUTIVE HEALTH DEPARTMENT THE RECOVERY OF NATIONAL HEALTH SERVICE COSTS IN CASES INVOLVING PERSONAL INJURY COMPENSATION A RESPONSE BY THE ASSOCIATION OF PERSONAL INJURY LAWYERS NOVEMBER 2002
More informationDepartment of Justice for Northern Ireland Alternative Methods of Funding Money Damages Claims
Department of Justice for Northern Ireland Alternative Methods of Funding Money Damages Claims A response by the Association of Personal Injury Lawyers June 2013 Page 1 of 8 The Association of Personal
More informationSTUC response to the Review of Expenses and Funding in Civil Litigation in Scotland
STUC response to the Review of Expenses and Funding in Civil Litigation in Scotland Introduction As the representative body of Scotland s trade unions, STUC is keenly interested in ensuring that its affiliated
More informationBrain injury lawyers. Field Fisher Waterhouse provides a first-class service to clients. The Legal 500
Brain injury lawyers Field Fisher Waterhouse provides a first-class service to clients. The Legal 500 www.ffw.com/personalinjury Freephone 0800 358 3848 Specialist brain injury solicitors Our brain injury
More informationINFORMATION GATHERING EXERCISE QUESTIONNAIRE
ANNEX B INFORMATION GATHERING EXERCISE QUESTIONNAIRE 1. Are the stated aims and purposes of the current voluntary pre-action protocols adequate to comply with the recommendations of the Scottish Civil
More informationDEPARTMENT FOR CONSTITUTIONAL AFFAIRS (DCA) CLAIMS MANAGEMENT REGULATION PROFESSIONAL INDEMNITY INSURANCE
DEPARTMENT FOR CONSTITUTIONAL AFFAIRS (DCA) CLAIMS MANAGEMENT REGULATION PROFESSIONAL INDEMNITY INSURANCE A RESPONSE BY THE ASSOCIATION OF PERSONAL INJURY LAWYERS MAY 2007 The Association of Personal Injury
More informationEUROPEAN COMMISSION: DIRECTORATE GENERAL FOR ENERGY AND TRANSPORT
EUROPEAN COMMISSION: DIRECTORATE GENERAL FOR ENERGY AND TRANSPORT COMMISSION STAFF WORKING PAPER RIGHTS OF PASSENGERS IN INTERNATIONAL BUS AND COACH TRANSPORT A RESPONSE BY THE ASSOCIATION OF PERSONAL
More informationBar Council and the Personal Injuries Bar Association response to the Extension of the RTA Portal PA Scheme consultation paper
Bar Council and the Personal Injuries Bar Association response to the Extension of the RTA Portal PA Scheme consultation paper 1. This is the response of the General Council of the Bar of England and Wales
More informationEnhanced court fees - briefing for MPs and Peers
Enhanced court fees - briefing for MPs and Peers For further information please contact: Iana Vidal (Public Affairs Adviser, the Law Society) T: 020 7316 5581, E: iana.vidal@lawsociety.org.uk Key Points
More informationIntroduction of a ban on the payment of referral fees in personal injury cases Equality Impact Assessment
Introduction of a ban on the payment of referral fees in personal injury cases Equality Impact Assessment Introduction This Equality Impact Assessment (EIA) relates to amendments to the Legal Aid, Sentencing
More informationThe Jackson Reforms Jan Thompson, Director
The Jackson Reforms Jan Thompson, Director In response to the perceived compensation culture in our civil justice system, the government has announced their intention to implement the majority of Lord
More informationProposals for Reform of Civil Litigation Funding and Costs in England and Wales
Proposals for Reform of Civil Litigation Funding and Costs in England and Wales Consultation Paper Response of JUSTICE February 2011 Q 1 Do you agree that CFA success fees should no longer be recoverable
More informationCOMMITTEE ON COURT PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE REVIEW OF PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE IN RELATION TO PERSONAL INJURIES LITIGATION
COMMITTEE ON COURT PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE REVIEW OF PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE IN RELATION TO PERSONAL INJURIES LITIGATION THE SUBMISSIONS OF THE ASSOCIATION OF PERSONAL INJURY LAWYERS FEBRUARY 2003 The executive
More informationFieldfisher Personal Injury Solicitors
Fieldfisher Personal Injury Solicitors Response to the Government s Proposals for the Reform of Court fees All the photography in this submission is of individuals and familes that we have assisted with
More informationCOMMENTS ARISING FROM PRELIMINARY REPORT WITH SPECIFIC REFERENCE TO CLINICAL NEGLIGENCE LITIGATION
REVIEW OF CIVIL LITIGATION COSTS COMMENTS ARISING FROM PRELIMINARY REPORT WITH SPECIFIC REFERENCE TO CLINICAL NEGLIGENCE LITIGATION IN RELATION TO : EXPERTS The Preliminary Report deals with the issue
More informationIn order to prove negligence the Claimant must establish the following:
Introduction A wealth of law exists to provide compensation to people who have suffered injuries, both physical and psychological, following an accident. This fact sheet provides a very brief guide to
More informationDEPARTMENT OF HEALTH THE RECOVERY OF NATIONAL HEALTH SERVICE COSTS IN CASES INVOLVING PERSONAL INJURY COMPENSATION
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH THE RECOVERY OF NATIONAL HEALTH SERVICE COSTS IN CASES INVOLVING PERSONAL INJURY COMPENSATION A RESPONSE BY THE ASSOCIATION OF PERSONAL INJURY LAWYERS NOVEMBER 2002 The executive committee
More informationA response by the Association of Personal Injury Lawyers
Financial Services Authority (FSA) Financial Services Compensation Scheme: temporary high deposit balances A response by the Association of Personal Injury Lawyers June 2009 Page 1 of 7 The Association
More informationTaylor Review. UNISON Scotland response to Review of Expenses and Funding of Civil Litigation in Scotland
Taylor Review UNISON Scotland response to Review of Expenses and Funding of Civil Litigation in Scotland March 2012 Taylor Review UNISON Scotland response to Review of Expenses and Funding of Civil Litigation
More informationWe agree that by not increasing small claims track hearing fees, the Government is ensuring access to justice is not compromised.
Ministry of Justice Consultation Court Fees: Proposals for Reform Response from the Motor Accident Solicitors Society January 2014 Introduction This response is prepared on behalf of the Motor Accident
More informationConsultation Document. Reducing the number and costs of whiplash claims. Response from:
Consultation Document Reducing the number and costs of whiplash claims Response from: British Vehicle Rental and Leasing Association River Lodge Badminton Court Amersham BUCKS HP7 0DD Tel: +44 1494 434747
More informationHOUSE OF COMMONS HEALTH COMMITTEE INQUIRY INTO HEAD INJURY REHABILITATION WRITTEN EVIDENCE OF THE ASSOCIATION OF PERSONAL INJURY LAWYERS
HOUSE OF COMMONS HEALTH COMMITTEE INQUIRY INTO HEAD INJURY REHABILITATION WRITTEN EVIDENCE OF THE ASSOCIATION OF PERSONAL INJURY LAWYERS 19 FEBRUARY 2001 The executive committee would like to acknowledge
More informationSUBMISSION OF THE LAW SOCIETY S WORKING PARTY TO THE LEGCO LEGAL AFFAIRS PANEL REGARDING THE OPERATIONS OF RECOVERY AGENTS IN HONG KONG
LC Paper No. CB(2)517/05-06(01) SUBMISSION OF THE LAW SOCIETY S WORKING PARTY TO THE LEGCO LEGAL AFFAIRS PANEL REGARDING THE OPERATIONS OF RECOVERY AGENTS IN HONG KONG 1. This is a submission of the Recovery
More informationBriefing for the Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Bill Committee. An interlocking package of reforms
Briefing for the Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Bill Committee An interlocking package of reforms March 2012 Briefing for Members of the Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders
More informationBrain injury lawyers Rehabilitation Change Support Care Family Pain Anger Justice Therapy
Brain injury lawyers Rehabilitation Change Support Care Family Pain Anger Justice Therapy Fieldfisher provides a first-class service to clients. www.fieldfisher.com/personalinjury Freephone 0800 358 3848
More informationA response by the Association of Personal Injury Lawyers May 2014
Scottish Civil Justice Council Information gathering exercise on pre-action protocols A response by the Association of Personal Injury Lawyers May 2014 Page 1 of 8 The Association of Personal Injury Lawyers
More informationL.E. LAW INFORMATION SHEET NO. 11 GUIDE TO PERSONAL INJURY CLAIMS
LE Law Services Ltd 127 High Road Loughton Essex IG10 4LT Telephone: 020 8508 4961 Facsimile: 020 8508 6359 www.lelaw.co.uk L.E. LAW INFORMATION SHEET NO. 11 GUIDE TO PERSONAL INJURY CLAIMS 1. Introduction
More informationA response by the Association of Personal Injury Lawyers
Department for Transport The definition of Significant Personal Injury under the 5 th Motor Insurance Directive (2005/14/EC) A response by the Association of Personal Injury Lawyers July 2009 Page 1 of
More informationHow To Compare Costs Between The Two Jurisdictions
Research and Information Service Research Paper January 2012 Fiona O Connell Justice Related Issues Regarding Car Insurance Costs NIAR 642-11 This paper proves information on the legal processes, legal
More informationSHERIFF COURT RULES COUNCIL PROPOSALS FOR PROCEDURAL RULES FOR PERSONAL INJURY ACTIONS IN THE SHERIFF COURT
SHERIFF COURT RULES COUNCIL PROPOSALS FOR PROCEDURAL RULES FOR PERSONAL INJURY ACTIONS IN THE SHERIFF COURT A RESPONSE BY THE ASSOCIATION OF PERSONAL INJURY LAWYERS (APIL 07/06) OCTOBER 2006 1 The Association
More information1. Liverpool Law Society
Response of Liverpool Law Society to the Competition and Markets Authority Private Motor Insurance Market Investigation Notice of Further Consultation on Remedy 1C 1. Liverpool Law Society Liverpool Law
More informationC.M. Haughey Solicitors Compensation Guide
C.M. Haughey Solicitors Compensation Guide www.cmhaugheysolicitors.ie Athena Goddess of Wisdom, Strength and Strategy. When your experience needs our experience About Us C. M. Haughey Solicitors, located
More informationDepartment of Justice for Northern Ireland Civil Legal Aid Remuneration
Department of Justice for Northern Ireland Civil Legal Aid Remuneration A response by the Association of Personal Injury Lawyers November 2013 Page 1 of 5 The Association of Personal Injury Lawyers (APIL)
More informationFIXED RECOVERABLE COSTS IN CLINICAL NEGLIGENCE PRE CONSULTATION RESPONSE BY. Action against Medical Accidents
FIXED RECOVERABLE COSTS IN CLINICAL NEGLIGENCE PRE CONSULTATION RESPONSE BY Action against Medical Accidents Questionnaire The Government proposes to introduce fixed recoverable costs for all cases where
More informationWhether the government is correct in describing the UK as the whiplash capital of the world
Whiplash and the cost of motor insurance: what s behind the insurance industry claims Submission to the Transport Committee by Thompsons Solicitors April 2013 About Thompsons Thompsons is the UK s most
More informationLAW REFORM (CONTRIBUTORY NEGLIGENCE) AMENDMENT BILL 2001
1 LAW REFORM (CONTRIBUTORY NEGLIGENCE) AMENDMENT BILL 2001 EXPLANATORY NOTES GENERAL OUTLINE OBJECTIVES OF THE LEGISLATION The purpose of this Bill is to address the impact of the decision of the High
More informationIN THE SOUTH GAUTENG HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA
1 NOT REPORTABLE IN THE SOUTH GAUTENG HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA JOHANNESBURG CASE NO: 46854/2009 DATE: 29/04/2011 DELETE WHICHEVER IS NOT APPLICABLE REPORTABLE: YES/NO OF INTEREST TO OTHER JUDGES: YES/NO
More informationLimitation of Liability
Limitation of Liability Submission to the Attorney-General (Western Australia) July 2000 The Institution of Engineers, Australia Institution of Engineers, Australia 11 National Circuit, Barton, ACT, 2604
More informationCivil Litigation Reforms & AIG
Access to Justice Civil Litigation Reforms & AIG Start The reforms AIG Response day 1-5 day 6-20 day 21-25 AIG process map Overview and key Changes For more details of the reforms click here > The Jackson
More informationPERSONAL INJURIES PROCEEDINGS ACT (QLD) 2002 (PIPA): SECTION 30
Mr Philip Reed Director General Department of Justice and Attorney-General GPO Box 149 BRISBANE QLD 4001 Via email: jane.flower@justice.qld.gov.au 15 March 2012 Dear Mr Reed PERSONAL INJURIES PROCEEDINGS
More informationThe industry is delivering on its commitment to pass on savings to customers
TRANSPORT SELECT COMMITTEE INQUIRY COST OF MOTOR INSURANCE: WHIPLASH Evidence from the Association of British Insurers The Association of British Insurers (ABI) is the voice of the insurance and investment
More informationCONSULTATIVE DOCUMENT. CONSULTATION PAPER on the Compensation of victims of Cross-Border Road Traffic Accidents in the European Union
EUROPEAN COMMISSION Internal Market and Services DG FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS Insurance and pensions Brussels, 26 March 2009 MARKT/H2/RM markt.h.2(2009)61541 FS/050.160/0032 CONSULTATIVE DOCUMENT CONSULTATION
More informationScottish Government Removal of the 3 year limitation period from civil actions for damages for personal injury for in care survivors of historical
Scottish Government Removal of the 3 year limitation period from civil actions for damages for personal injury for in care survivors of historical child abuse A response by the Association of Personal
More informationThere are alternatives to Sir Rupert Jackson s recommendations that have the benefit that they might actually work.
First published in the Solicitors Journal April 2011 Let us not bend with the remover to remove There are alternatives to Sir Rupert Jackson s recommendations that have the benefit that they might actually
More informationASLEF Response to the Making Justice Work Consultation Reform (Scotland) Bill
ASLEF Response to the Making Justice Work Consultation Reform (Scotland) Bill The Associated Society of Locomotive Engineers and Firemen (ASLEF) is the UK s largest train driver s union representing approximately
More informationLegal Support Service South West. Support for life after childhood brain and other serious injuries. www.childbraininjurytrust.org.
Legal Support Service South West Support for life after childhood brain and other serious injuries www.childbraininjurytrust.org.uk Hello and welcome to the Legal Support Services booklet for the South
More informationResponse to sheriff court rules council consultation on proposals for procedural rules for personal injury actions in the sheriff court September
Response to sheriff court rules council consultation on proposals for procedural rules for personal injury actions in the sheriff court September 2006 ^ÄçìííÜÉpÅçííáëÜ`çåëìãÉê`çìåÅáä qüé påçííáëü `çåëìãéê
More informationPUBLIC CONSULTATION 1. INTRODUCTION
PUBLIC CONSULTATION ON LIMITATION PERIODS FOR COMPENSATION CLAIMS OF VICTIMS OF CROSS-BORDER ROAD TRAFFIC ACCIDENTS IN THE EUROPEAN UNION 1. INTRODUCTION For more than 10 years the European Union has developed
More informationPUBLIC. CIVIL JUSTICE COMMITTEE Minutes of the meeting on 12 November 2014 at 10.30 in the Holborn/Lincoln Room, 113 Chancery Lane, London
Posted on Corporate Business on 10 December 2014 as approved by the Chair Present: Apologies CIVIL JUSTICE COMMITTEE Minutes of the meeting on 12 November 2014 at 10.30 in the Holborn/Lincoln Room, 113
More informationNORTHERN IRELAND AFFAIRS COMMITTEE THE COMPENSATION AGENCY A RESPONSE BY THE ASSOCIATION OF PERSONAL INJURY LAWYERS
NORTHERN IRELAND AFFAIRS COMMITTEE THE COMPENSATION AGENCY A RESPONSE BY THE ASSOCIATION OF PERSONAL INJURY LAWYERS SEPTEMBER 2003 1 The Association of Personal Injury Lawyers (APIL) was formed in 1990
More informationResponse of Browne Jacobson LLP (Solicitors) Civil Law Reform Bill - CP53/09
Response of Browne Jacobson LLP (Solicitors) - CP53/09 February 2010 Contents Contents... 2 Introduction... 3 Browne Jacobson LLP... 3 Interest in the Consultation... 3 The Response... 3 Summary... 4 Response
More informationLegal Services Board. Draft Business Plan 2009/10. A response by the Association of Personal Injury Lawyers
Legal Services Board Draft Business Plan 009/10 A response by the Association of Personal Injury Lawyers March 009 The Association of Personal Injury Lawyers (APIL) is a not-for-profit organisation whose
More informationMedical Negligence. A guide for clients. The team provides a first class service at all levels of experience. The Legal 500
www.ffw.com/personalinjury Freephone 0800 358 3848 www.ffw.com/personalinjury Freephone 0800 358 3848 Medical Negligence A guide for clients The team provides a first class service at all levels of experience.
More informationEXPLANATORY MEMORANDUM TO THE CONDITIONAL FEE AGREEMENTS ORDER 2013. 2013 No. 689
EXPLANATORY MEMORANDUM TO THE CONDITIONAL FEE AGREEMENTS ORDER 2013 2013 No. 689 1. This explanatory memorandum has been prepared by the Ministry of Justice and is laid before Parliament by Command of
More informationCIVIL JUSTICE COUNCIL THE IMPACT OF THE JACKSON REFORMS ON COSTS AND CASE MANAGEMENT
Introduction CIVIL JUSTICE COUNCIL THE IMPACT OF THE JACKSON REFORMS ON COSTS AND CASE MANAGEMENT Submission by the Motor Accident Solicitors Society (MASS) March 2014 1. This response is prepared on behalf
More informationPUBLIC CONSULTATION 1. INTRODUCTION
PUBLIC CONSULTATION ON LIMITATION PERIODS FOR COMPENSATION CLAIMS OF VICTIMS OF CROSS-BORDER ROAD TRAFFIC ACCIDENTS IN THE EUROPEAN UNION 1. INTRODUCTION For more than 10 years the European Union has developed
More informationClinical Negligence. Investigating Your Claim
www.lees.co.uk Clinical Negligence Investigating Your Claim Lees Solicitors LLP 44/45 Hamilton Square Birkenhead Wirral CH41 5AR Tel: 0151 647 9381 Fax: 0151 649 0124 e-mail: newclaim@lees.co.uk 1 The
More informationPERIODICAL PAYMENTS AND TERMINAL DISEASE. Introduction
PERIODICAL PAYMENTS AND TERMINAL DISEASE Introduction 1. The litigation of cases involving those with terminal or potentially terminal disease presents numerous forensic difficulties to the litigator.
More informationBar Council response to the Reducing Legal Costs in Clinical Negligence Claims pre-consultation paper
Bar Council response to the Reducing Legal Costs in Clinical Negligence Claims pre-consultation paper 1. This is the response of the General Council of the Bar of England and Wales (the Bar Council) to
More informationCosts Law Update Lamont v Burton
- The Defendant Costs Specialists Costs Law Update Lamont v Burton The Court of Appeal s decision last week in Lamont v Burton [2007] EWCA Civ 429 is likely to have serious costs implications for defendants
More informationConditional Fee Arrangements, After the Event Insurance and beyond!
Conditional Fee Arrangements, After the Event Insurance and beyond! CFAs, ATEs, DBAs Let s de-mystify the acronyms! 1. Conditional Fee Arrangements 1.1. What is a Conditional Fee Arrangement A conditional
More informationA brief guide to professional negligence claims
A brief guide to professional negligence claims Contents Introduction Do I have a claim? Important considerations Pre-action protocol procedure Court proceedings Contact information Introduction Claims
More informationMinistry of Justice Whiplash Reform Programme: consultation on independence in medical reporting and expert accreditation
Ministry of Justice Whiplash Reform Programme: consultation on independence in medical reporting and expert accreditation Question 1: Do you agree that the proposed amendments to paragraphs 7.1A(1) and
More informationIN THE MATTER OF the Insurance Act, R.S.O. 1990, c.i.8, as amended, and Ontario Regulation 668.
IN THE MATTER OF the Insurance Act, R.S.O. 1990, c.i.8, as amended, and Ontario Regulation 668. AND IN THE MATTER OF the Arbitration Act, S.O. 1991, c.17 AND IN THE MATTER OF AN ARBITRATION BETWEEN: STATE
More informationLegal Services Consumer Panel Referral Arrangements: Call for Evidence Thompsons Submission February 2010
Legal Services Consumer Panel Referral Arrangements: Call for Evidence Thompsons Submission February 2010 BACKGROUND Until 2004 referral fees were prohibited under Solicitors Professional Rules. The Solicitors
More informationScottish Civil Justice Council Personal Injury Committee. Information Gathering Exercise on Pre Action Protocols
Scottish Civil Justice Council Personal Injury Committee Information Gathering Exercise on Pre Action Protocols Response from the Motor Accident Solicitors Society June 2014 Introduction This response
More informationSCOTTISH LAW COMMISSION DAMAGES FOR PSYCHIATRIC INJURY. DISCUSSION PAPER No. 120
SCOTTISH LAW COMMISSION DAMAGES FOR PSYCHIATRIC INJURY DISCUSSION PAPER No. 120 A RESPONSE BY THE ASSOCIATION OF PERSONAL INJURY LAWYERS NOVEMBER 2002 The executive committee would like to acknowledge
More informationReview of the Uninsured and Untraced Drivers Agreements
Review of the Uninsured and Untraced Drivers Agreements Covering letter The Secretary of State for Transport is a party with the Motor Insurers Bureau (MIB) to two agreements, the Uninsured Drivers Agreement
More informationReform to Lost Years Damages in Mesothelioma Claims
Reform to Lost Years Damages in Mesothelioma Claims September 2008 Neil Fisher and Kevin Johnson John Pickering and Partners LLP Email: kj@johnpickering.co.uk 19 Castle Street Liverpool L2 4SX Tel: 0151
More informationDamage vs Damages: Stylianou v Suncorp, Rome II and the Applicable Law in International Personal Injury Law
Damage vs Damages: Stylianou v Suncorp, Rome II and the Applicable Law in International Personal Injury Law The recent case of Stylianou v Toyoshima and Suncorp Metway Insurance Limited [2013] EWHC 2188
More informationReferral fees, referral arrangements and fee sharing
Referral fees, referral arrangements and fee sharing This response to the consultation is prepared by Glaisyers Solicitors LLP. Our experience spans the RTA/PI sector, conveyancing and wills/probate and
More informationWORKCOVER QUEENSLAND AMENDMENT BILL 2002
1 WORKCOVER QUEENSLAND AMENDMENT BILL 2002 EXPLANATORY NOTES GENERAL OUTLINE Objectives of the legislation To provide for miscellaneous amendments to the WorkCover Queensland Act 1996. Reason for the Bill
More informationConditional Fee Agreements: best practice. no win - no fee - limiting the cost of claims to taxpayers
Conditional Fee Agreements: best practice no win - no fee - limiting the cost of claims to taxpayers contents 1 outline of problem page 1 outline of problem 3 2 worst practice 4 3 best practice 6 4 the
More informationMedical Negligence. A client s guide. head and shoulders above the rest in terms of skills, experience and quality. The Legal 500
www.personalinjury.ffw.com Freephone 0800 358 3848 www.personalinjury.ffw.com Freephone 0800 358 3848 Medical Negligence A client s guide head and shoulders above the rest in terms of skills, experience
More informationDiscussion document on Referral fees, referral arrangements and fee sharing. Zurich response
Michael Mackay Legal Services Board 7th Floor, Victoria House Southampton Row London WC1B 4AD Your reference Our reference Date 4 January 2011 Discussion document on Referral fees, referral arrangements
More informationLegal Watch: Personal Injury
Legal Watch: Personal Injury 2nd July 2014 Issue: 025 Part 36 As can be seen from the case of Supergroup Plc v Justenough Software Corp Inc [Lawtel 30/06/2014] Part 36 is still the subject of varying interpretations.
More informationWhat is my claim worth?
What is my claim worth? This is probably the most common and important question asked by a Claimant pursuing a personal injury claim. At the end of the day, it is the recovery of compensation for the injury
More informationThe Lifecycle of a Personal Injury Claim. By Andrew Mckie (Barrister at Law) Clerksroom July 2012. Telephone 0845 083 3000 or go to www.clerksroom.
1 1. Introduction The Lifecycle of a Personal Injury Claim By Andrew Mckie (Barrister at Law) Clerksroom July 2012 The aim of the presentation is to look at the basic steps from the taking instructions
More informationUSING LAWYERS IN HONG KONG
USING LAWYERS IN HONG KONG This Guide deals in general terms with using lawyers in Hong Kong. It aims to help a seafarer understand the legal profession in Hong Kong, and how to select, engage and if need
More informationGIRO40 8 11 October, Edinburgh
GIRO40 8 11 October, Edinburgh Bodily Injury Where next? Tim Jordan The MDU Cherry Chan Barnett Waddingham James Turner The MDU 14 October 2013 1 Questions Comments Expressions of individual views by members
More informationThis response is prepared on behalf of the Motor Accident Solicitors Society (MASS).
Introduction This response is prepared on behalf of the Motor Accident Solicitors Society (MASS). MASS is a society of solicitors acting for the victims of motor accidents, including those involving Personal
More informationAsbestos Disease Claims
Asbestos Disease Claims A client s guide Spring 2007 Contents 2. Essential elements for a successful claim 3. What we will do 3. Funding the case 3. Preliminary investigations 4. What happens next? 4.
More informationProposals for Reform of Civil Litigation Funding. Implementation of LJ Jacksons recommendations. (Consultation paper 13/10 November 2010)
Proposals for Reform of Civil Litigation Funding Implementation of LJ Jacksons recommendations (Consultation paper 13/10 November 2010) Following Lord Justice Jacksons report, the Ministry of Justice is
More information