1 Ph.D. Thesis Research: Where do I Start? Notes by Don Davis Columbia University If you are the next Paul Samuelson and will wholly transform the field of economics, pay no heed. If you are the next Ken Arrow and will invent a new branch of economics, these notes are not for you. The aim here is more humble: to provide strategies for identifying exciting thesis research topics for the rest of us. There is no algorithm that yields an exciting thesis. Too much depends on your energy and imagination. But there are more and less efficient ways of trying to identify exciting topics. And I will try to convey at least my own aesthetics about what interesting research is about. These may vary a bit by sub-field and certainly across economists, so certainly seek out others perspectives. So, ignore these suggestions if you choose but have a good reason to do so. How Do I Find The Right Topic? First, there is no Right Topic. What is hot today may be ice cold by the time that you go on the job market. You don t want the nineteenth best paper of the year on a hot topic. Much more important is to find something that is important and genuinely interests you. There are great papers to be written in almost all fields. You need to settle on an area where you are sufficiently interested that you don t mind making some investments, since these investments are preparing you not only for thesis work but also for your next round of papers as an assistant professor. Let me underscore that you should focus on an important problem. The lore of economics includes what is sometimes termed Summers Law (yes, after Larry). This holds that it takes just as much time to write an unimportant paper as an important one. Hence... you might as well work on important topics. (Note: This is not an incitement to work on broad, vague topics!). This is not as trivially obvious as it might first appear. Lets start with a first fact: Most of economics is boring. No, I don t mean this in the way that the public at large means it; on the contrary, I think that economics done well can be beautiful and fascinating. What I mean is that most writing on economics is boring because: (1) It does not address interesting questions; (2) It has nothing new to add that is itself important; or (3) Even if the researcher does in fact have something new and important to say, the researcher does such a poor job of articulating this that the reader has little chance of figuring this out.
2 How do I know if I have an interesting topic? First, be aware that interesting inevitably has a subjective, aesthetic component. So we cannot expect to find necessary and sufficient conditions for an interesting topic. Nonetheless, there are useful indicators. When I undertake a research project, I find it a useful artifice to think of one of the more skeptical members of the profession repeatedly pressing me with the question: Why should I care? How am I going to convince this skeptic that she should pay attention to my research? One part of the answer is that I am asking and answering a question that has some substantive real-world counterpart. Moreover, I would also like to be able to argue that the issue is an important one. Hence, real-world examples can be influential and magnitudes matter. In trying to convince yourself (and others), you should be as concrete as possible in explaining both the type of problem to which this applies and what the magnitude of the problem is. Certainly an indicator (not a proof!) that a problem is interesting is that good minds have spent time thinking about it. I note this because most economists will grant the prior that if several leaders in a certain field have struggled with a problem, it is likely to be an important question (i.e. if these people spent most of their time struggling with unimportant problems, they would be unlikely to be leaders in their field!). But you should rely on this only as an indicator. You should be able to tell an independent story about why the area is important. Moreover, working on areas well combed over by the leaders of the field also has a number of pitfalls, discussed more fully below. Let s assume now that you have made a convincing case that the problem that you are addressing is one that we do care about i.e. it is one with a real world counterpart of some significant magnitude. How do you convince your reader that you have something new and important to say about the problem? Let me stop to emphasize both new and important. New. In economics, as elsewhere, you are going to be paid by your marginal not your average product. Solow s model of economic growth won him a chair at MIT and the Nobel Prize, but you will be less successful if you write it down again. You may convince us that it addresses an important problem, but there may be nothing in what you have done that is new. How do you know if what you are doing is new? One answer is to go back and read the entire history of the literature in your particular area. This is a tempting option as you can surely convince yourself and your advisers that you are working hard. Unfortunately it is also a very inefficient path, more likely to mire you in controversies that are old and forgotten for good reason than to show the path forward. The first step should surely be to talk to someone actually working in the area or at least reasonably familiar with it to find out if someone has already answered the question you are pondering (your adviser is
3 hopefully a good starting point). Second, one can look at recent surveys of the literature or recent working papers directly on the topic as coming close to providing a sufficient statistic for what has been done before in the area. This can be extremely useful, but you should at least be aware that even serious academic work often contains spin that may tend to understate the accomplishments of older literatures relative to recent (especially those that the author has contributed to). Third, naturally Econlit and the Social Science Citation Index can be extremely helpful in identifying related work and should be consulted carefully. If you are not familiar with both of these, you should stop reading this very instant and return once you have figured out how they are used! Let s assume now that you have convinced us that you are working on an important problem with real-world counterparts and that matter in substantive terms, and moreover that your approach to the problem is new. How do you convince us that the work that you will show us is important? We all know of important papers that have launched vast literatures. But much of the resulting literature ends up in third-tier journals if it is published at all. Occasionally a paper, even in a huge literature, rises to the top nonetheless. Why the different outcomes? The key, I think, is to convince readers that the novel element in your paper is in fact important. How do you do this? The threshold is that after reading your paper, researchers familiar with the literature in your area should see the world differently. How to do this varies to a certain extent based on whether you are writing in theory or empirics. If it s a theory paper, one element would be if there is a problem that people have understood is important but have not known how to solve. If you can make an advance of this type, that will be very impressive. A second possibility is that there is an outcome that, under reasonable assumptions, people had not thought possible. If you can show that this outcome is indeed possible, then this can be very impressive as well. Note, though, the clause under reasonable assumptions! One important element of the problem may be to establish that in fact the type of assumptions that you make are more reasonable than those that the prior literature makes (or at least no less reasonable). If you are working on an empirical topic, again it is not sufficient to do something that is new. You have to convince us it is important. Taking someone else s regression model and adding a new variable that turns out to be statistically significant may be okay for an econometrics exercise, but will it land your paper in a top journal? To start, we have to be sure that you have already met our prior questions that the over all question you address is important and that what you are doing is new. For an empirical paper, we must then ask whether there is good theoretical motivation for the inclusion of the new variable. Are we including it in the regression analysis in an appropriate way? In addition to statistical significance, do we also have economic significance i.e. are the magnitudes economically important. In the end, we are faced with the same question as in theory: After reading your study, will the leading researchers in the field be forced to look at the area in a way differently than they did before and in a way that matters substantively. If yes, then you have a nice paper that you should send to a top journal. If not, then maybe you should think again about the value of the project.
4 A similar set of questions arise if you make a larger departure in your empirical framework. Is there a strong tie between the theory and the empirical framework chosen? Is the approach sufficiently well motivated, both by the theory and the econometrics underlying the specification, that the results of the study are likely to move people s priors about the economic magnitudes at issue? It is true that the profession tends to grant more latitude to researchers who are trying to address an interesting new problem empirically, partly on the idea that follow-on work may help to elaborate the robustness of the framework. But the basic framework must be sufficiently compelling that the results will have some power in influencing people s priors. That is, the results have to be convincing. Before moving on to more practical matters, let us summarize what has come before. You should choose a topic that is demonstrably important, that has elements which are themselves new and important, and the resulting study should be both reasonable and convincing. One summary test for this is to ask: If the study proceeds well, can I plausibly hope to have it accepted at a first-tier journal (AER, JPE, QJE, etc.)? If the answer is no, then perhaps you should spend a bit more time identifying a topic for which the answer is yes. It is an unfortunate fact that even the things you find very compelling may not ultimately convince the rest of the profession that they should be in a top journal. But you will almost certainly fail to get there if you do not ask yourself this question at the outset. Where do I start? Strategies for Research: The foregoing has tried to identify markers of good research projects, questions you should be asking yourself as you proceed in your thesis work. But there are also more pragmatic questions about how to identify good research projects, how to spend your time, etc. There is no unique path to identifying a good research project. Some might find inspiration in Adam Smith. Some might find inspiration in Fred Flintstone. So the following suggestions point to areas where I think the probability mass is concentrated. If you want to write applied theory, read empirics. My aesthetics are that the most interesting work in economics must have some real substantial contact with both theory and empirics. The number of internally consistent theoretical economic models that can be written down is unbounded. But which are interesting? Which are papers that you might want to send to a top journal? If you are Gerard Debreu, you may end up writing very abstract models, but the profession as a whole does not have any problem understanding the importance of a consistent statement of conditions for the existence of a competitive equilibrium. For those who are going to do more applied theory, the threshold for it being interesting rises substantially in terms of finding an empirical counterpart. Interesting applied theory is not just looking down the matrix of combinations of possible assumptions to find cells that have not been filled in. Again, the number of these is unbounded. Instead, the key is to find why, having filled in one of those cells, the reader should think that this is an interesting cell to have filled.
5 Being able to point to empirical facts that would be hard to understand given existing theories is one very important way to convince your reader that your paper is essential, not clutter, and the more important those facts, the more important the contribution of the theory (holding fixed the wow factor of the technical contributions). If you want to write empirics, read theory. For those who plan to write in empirics, there are several good reasons to steep yourself in theory. The first is simply because you would like to have your empirical work place some intellectual capital on the line. What views of the world will we affirm or abandon (strengthen or weaken) on the basis of your empirical work? If you do not have an answer to this, then the empirical work will not be very exciting. Yes, sometimes we just want to estimate an elasticity and we can tell a story about why we care about it. If the approach to estimation has some novel and important element, that can be its own justification. Failing this, the excitement in empirical work is to cast doubt on/rule out some views of the world that people might otherwise have maintained. A second reason for reading theory is simply that the more closely your empirical work is tied to the underlying theory, the more convincing will be the resulting estimates. There is a Research Frontier ; Your job is to find it. Some questions in the field have been answered, or approaches so exhaustively explored that it is nearly impossible to identify topics or questions able to move people s priors. On the other hand, there is often a set of questions that the leaders in the field are currently struggling with and may be very far from having definitive answers. Being able to weigh in on these problems with a new insight (and avoid dead topics) is an important step. So much of your work is finding the frontier. Go to weekly departmental seminars in your field. This may be a direct source of ideas for research. After all, the speakers are selected for being leaders in the field and they are presenting their research that is usually at the working paper stage. In addition, it is important to watch how those who have been successful in the field structure their inquiry. Do they convince you that they are dealing with a question that is important, that they have something new and important to contribute to this, and that the contribution they make is reasonable and compelling? Often the answer will be no. It is important to see why this is the case, where they fall short. These will be important lessons as you develop your own research. Go to seminars of potential new assistant professors at your school. They are in the position you want to be in within a couple or a few years. Why not go to see which ones fly and which ones dive and to figure out why. In addition, if they happen to be in an area that interests you, they are likely to be very much at the frontier.
6 Read the working papers of the intellectual leaders in your narrowly focused research area. This combines two ideas. The first is that within any reasonably-narrowly defined area of economics, there is usually only a small set of people who consistently push forward the frontiers of research. One of your early exercises is to identify this research community and find out what the problems are which they are struggling with currently. (Of course, do be aware that sometimes these leaders may be at seemingly unlikely places!). Of course, the rise of the web makes this vastly simpler than it was only a few years back. Check out their web pages; check the NBER; check the CEPR. Again, the premise is that current work is close to (but not exactly!) a sufficient statistic for what has come before. Take advantage of this. Read the best journals selectively. There are a couple of issues here. The first is that material in the journals is inevitably dated. An empirical project may involve conceptualizing the problem, waiting for a grant approval, gathering and cleaning data, getting the software programs up and running, doing first runs, writing a paper, issuing it as a working paper, sending it to journals, getting rejections, doing revisions, submitting a final draft, and waiting for it to finally appear. Thus the paper in the issue that arrived today may reflect the state of thinking five years ago! On the other hand, you should expose yourself to material broader than your own research project, for two key reasons. The first is that there may be unexpected synergies between work in other fields and your own inquiries. Many economists have made a career out of exploring just one or a couple of those synergies. Second, by reading some of the best research and by looking at it with the appropriate questions in mind, you can come to understand concretely what the profession recognizes as outstanding research. Talk, Talk, Talk! Write, Write, Write! Interaction with your professors and your fellow students is where a lot of your ideas should come from. Moreover, this is not a passive process. Often it is in the course of trying to articulate something that you think that you understand that you find the weak point in the logic of prior work, which then points you in the direction of something exciting. Trying to articulate things, both orally and in writing, is an important part of the process. Question Authority! Economics, or academics more generally, is not a place for reverence! Read what is being written in your field, recognize the contributions that have come in the prior literature, but do not be awed by it. Question everything. Try to state the arguments in your own words. Do you find the arguments convincing? Are there some lapses in the broader claims that are made? Often these will be the paths open for new and interesting papers. While one should respect prior work for having brought the field as far as it has come,
7 every step forward begins by recognizing the limitations of what has come before. If you look at the prior work too reverently, it will be hard to see these steps forward. Don t Take Courses! By the third year of a PhD program, your job is research, not more courses! You can take more courses (of course), but you should have a very good reason for doing so. Acceptable reasons include (a) It is a course that takes you to the frontier of research in an area in which you plan to do research or (b) It develops mathematical or econometric techniques that you plan to use in short order. The reason that I advise not taking courses is that it is a convenient, comforting, and seemingly rationalizable way of avoiding the harder, more frustrating, but necessary conversion from being a consumer of research to being a producer of research. Focus on your primary task developing your own research program. Don t teach!... more than you have to. For many, teaching is attached to a stipend or is otherwise economically unavoidable. In this case, do what you must! Moreover, there are some real intellectual and practical advantages from doing a couple of terms of TA work. Explaining the concepts to others is very useful in consolidating them in yourself. But beyond this, the returns become strongly negative. Your job is research and anything that distracts you from this is a heavy cost. The first cost, which may seem remote at the time that you are deciding on the teaching, is that it could delay completion of the thesis by a year or more. An even larger cost is if it crowds out time to write a really great thesis. As a PhD student, your time is very valuable; treat it that way. Dealing with advisors. Advisors want you to succeed. We would love to have Harvard or MIT pursuing all of our students. Engage your advisers with ideas. Do not be afraid to speak up the risks of saying nothing far outweigh the costs of occasionally saying something stupid (so long as you also occasionally say something interesting!). These contacts can be very important in allowing the adviser to eventually speak of you with confidence at the time you go on the market. Also, don t wait to write a whole paper before running ideas by your professors. They may be able to save you lots of time by asking pointed questions early. You don t have to accept what they say, but have a good reason for ignoring their advice. Your advisor is too nice! Believe it or not, your advisors like you! They like you both as a younger colleague and as a human being. And therein lies a big potential problem for you: Your advisor may be too nice! The job market, by contrast, can be cruel. Potential employers, such as professors at other schools, just don t share the same warm, fuzzy feelings for you as your advisors. They are going to pay good money for a product (you) that, for better or worse, in sickness and in health... they will have to live with for years to come. One consequence of this asymmetry is that, in spite of their best efforts, advisors may fail to
8 ask some tough, probing questions about your thesis work that you will not be able to avoid once you are on the market. How do you deal with this? The first is simply to ask your advisors to be as frank and critical as they are able when reviewing your work. Better to have this done by someone who likes you and wants you to succeed than for it to be done by someone who just relishes the opportunity to dissect a job market candidate. Second, diversify. If you can t find more than one or a couple of advisers who think that what you are doing is interesting and important, then perhaps you should think over the topic again. Present your work whenever possible. Sign up to present in student seminars. Deadlines help to focus the mind and you learn a lot both about what works and what doesn t by practice. Ask the students on the job market currently: Are their seminars at the end of the market much better than at the outset. Almost inevitably the answer is yes and by a large margin. Experience matters. Consider writing your first paper jointly. One of the biggest obstacles in writing a thesis is getting the first paper written. One way to make this first step easier is to write a joint paper. There are several advantages to this. The first is that it is much harder to become thoroughly stalled on a project that you are working on with someone else. Neither wants to be seen as the sluggard. Second, you are likely to write a better paper together than either separately, simply because you bring different skills. Third, this may give you a good start to having a publication even as you go on the job market. Finally, it is fun. So who do you write with? Writing with another PhD student is one good option. You start out on equal terms, can share all aspects of the project, and can usually devote large chunks of time to it. An alternative is to write one paper with one of your professors. This has some big pluses, but potentially also some minuses. How you figure the balance depends on the particular opportunities you have. One big plus is simply that they have more experience in judging whether a particular line of research is likely to be fruitful, what methods are appropriate, and how to write the paper up in a manner that is appealing to the journals. After all, these are the skills that got them their position in the first place! The biggest plus may simply be the opportunity to see at first hand the choices and decisions that are made at various stages of a research project by someone with a track record for successful research. But there are some potential minuses as well. It is a fact of life that the profession tends to assume that the intellectual heavy lifting in a paper was done by the professor even if the professor stands ready to swear that it was a fully equal project (and even if the reality is that the student may have done a more than equal share!). This is a good reason why you do not want your main job market paper to be joint with a professor (and why it is also best not to have the job market paper be any joint paper). But getting the first paper written and possibly accepted at a journal even as you are writing your main job market paper on your own can be a big plus.
9 Writing matters. Your job as a researcher is not only to create new knowledge, but also to communicate it effectively. You cannot persuade your reader that you have done something important if they cannot figure out what you did or why even you think it is important. Bad writing often accompanies muddled thinking. State theses clearly and precisely and you may be able to see where the gaps are that need to be filled in. If your topic is boring, even transparent writing cannot rescue it. But leaden prose may lead many readers to give up on a paper that, written more clearly and precisely, they might find pretty interesting. Moreover, especially early in your career, the reader is unlikely to have a strong commitment to slogging through your writings. If you make the task loathsome, the reader will simply stop. Make life easy for your reader. Help her to identify simply and precisely the contributions of your paper. Presentation matters. The same lessons hold for seminar presentations only more so. You should be able to summarize what question you are asking, why it is important, what is new, and what you will do to convince the seminar attendee in no more than a few sentences. If you cannot do this in perfectly intelligible English, then you do not understand your own topic well enough. All other versions of your presentation should be looked on as simple elaborations of this core set of ideas. Why? The profession needs a simple take-away idea from your paper that is memorable. The successive elaborations reflect the fact that in different fora (face-to-face meeting, formal job interview, job market seminar), you will need to take the same message and make it successively richer, more nuanced. This is never more important than when you are on the job market, when you have to speak to a broad range of economists rather than specialists in your own field. Inspiration is where you find it. Maybe this is a disclaimer. In the end, there can be no rules for finding a thesis topic, since it can t be mechanical. Much depends on your creativity and inspiration, your insightfulness and energy. A bit of magic is required. If your adviser tells you to stop working on such and such problem and to return to problem X where you were working, they probably know what they are talking about, but then again they may be wrong. You should listen to what they have to say, but be willing to make the substantive judgment that they are wrong. How do you create your own magic? Some people say their best ideas come when they are in the shower, or playing raquetball, or.... I m not sure the answer is that I should direct you to take lots of showers! You have to find your own muse. Success and failure, in the end, are in your hands only. February 2001
Critical analysis Be more critical! More analysis needed! That s what my tutors say about my essays. I m not really sure what they mean. I thought I had written a really good assignment this time. I did
How to start research and how to present it? Peter Kondor Budapest, CEU, 2010 Introduction What is research? How to start? How to present it? How to make it a paper? The main purpose of workshop to provide
Organizations, People and Strategies in Astronomy I (OPSA I), 143-147 Ed. A. Heck,. UNEXPECTED ADVICE FOR BEGINNING GRADUATE STUDENTS IN ASTROPHYSICS JEFFREY L. LINSKY JILA University of Colorado and NIST
superior service / feb 2014 EMPLOYEE ENGAGEMENT Five best practices for protecting and investing in your most prized corporate asset: Your employees! By Eli Federman, Customer Service Simplified Pipeline
Why Your Job Search Isn t Working 6 mistakes you re probably making and how to fix them I t s easy to think that your lack of success in finding a new job has nothing to do with you. After all, this is
REPLY TO STEARNS: SOME ACYNICAL ADVICE FOR GRADUATE STUDENTS Raymond B. Huey Preface When Steve showed me the preliminary outline for his talk, my first response was to say, "Steve, this is really cynical,
How to Study Mathematics Written by Paul Dawkins Before I get into the tips for how to study math let me first say that everyone studies differently and there is no one right way to study for a math class.
Six Tips for Getting Great Letters of Recommendation for College Written by: Mark A. Montgomery, Ph.D. One of the most important elements of your college application is the recommendation of a teacher.
BACKGROUND OF THE PROBLEM SECTION WHAT DO YOU NEED TO CONSIDER? This section is like the free style competition in gymnastics. While there are certain things that you must do, the manner in which you prepare
APPLICATION GUIDE TO GRADUATE SCHOOL IN PHILOSOPHY Section 1: Preparing for Graduate Study in Philosophy 1 Graduate school in philosophy is the natural option for many undergraduate majors in philosophy.
Dear Job Applicant, I m sorry you re looking for a job. I ve done it myself, and it s not much fun. For what it s worth, I did so when the world seemed much less competitive, when the competition had fewer
Writing Thesis Defense Papers The point of these papers is for you to explain and defend a thesis of your own critically analyzing the reasoning offered in support of a claim made by one of the philosophers
Chapter Four: How to Collaborate and Write With Others Why Collaborate on Writing? Considering (and Balancing) the Two Extremes of Collaboration Peer Review as Collaboration * A sample recipe for how peer
Fundamentals of Project Management, 4 th Edition Simple Solutions for Busy People By Joseph Heagney (A Book review by R. Max Wideman, FPMI) The views expressed in this article are strictly those of Max
7 COMMENTS FROM FORMER CLERKS What follows is a compilation of letters from alumni and faculty members who have served judicial clerkships. We have included these letters to give you some candid and personal
Advice for Applying to Grad School in Economics Disclaimer: These are just opinions, and some people may disagree with the claims here. You should seek opinions from your advisors. Choosing classes Graduate
INTERVIEW TIPS If you've been invited to interview, it means you've passed the first part of the screening process. Congratulations! Your CV must have demonstrated that you have relevant experience for
COLD MARKET LEAD SCRIPTS COLD LEAD BUSINESS SCRIPT I use several different introductions when it comes to calling purchased leads or leads that I have generated on my own through different ads. You will
C-12 INFORMATION SHEET SAMPLE INTERVIEW QUESTIONS TEACHER S MASTER QUESTIONS ABOUT YOU Tell Me a Little about Yourself. The interviewers want to know if you are well adjusted, work well with others, have
28 Preview Now More Than Ever: Community Colleges Daniel Wister When Miranda left for school at a faraway university, she thought that all her dreams were on their way to coming true. Then, once disappointment
The Ph.D. Job Hunt Helping Students Find the Right Positions Edward D. Lazowska Department of Computer Science & Engineering University of Washington Our reputations individually and institutionally are
Writing the Personal Statement A statement of purpose, or personal statement, is a brief and focused essay about one's career or research goals, and is frequently required for applicants to universities,
Your Professional Reputation 1 There is no way to put a price on your professional reputation, its value to you is priceless Copyright Per Frykman Inc 2012 We want to challenge the traditional and safe,
Philosophy 1100: Introduction to Ethics WRITING A GOOD ETHICS ESSAY The writing of essays in which you argue in support of a position on some moral issue is not something that is intrinsically difficult.
Game Theory and Poker Jason Swanson April, 2005 Abstract An extremely simplified version of poker is completely solved from a game theoretic standpoint. The actual properties of the optimal solution are
Interview Skills Guide The main purpose of an interview is to sell yourself to a company/organization and convince them that they should hire you. As a candidate you are a salesperson, selling the most
Compass Interdisciplinary Virtual Conference 19-30 Oct 2009 10 Things New Scholars should do to get published Duane Wegener Professor of Social Psychology, Purdue University Hello, I hope you re having
Scripts for Recruiters Companion Script Guide for The New Recruiters Tool Kit www.greatrecruitertraining.com Copyright 2010 Scott Love 1 How to Use This Guide Use this companion script guide while watching
Financial Freedom: Three Steps to Creating and Enjoying the Wealth You Deserve What does financial freedom mean to you? Does it mean freedom from having to work, yet still being able to enjoy life without
home find jobs post resume career tools recruiters More Recruiter Resources View Article Archive Sign up for Newsletter Submit an Article Last Week's Articles Clarify Expectations and Follow-Up with Those
Win More Business With Persuasive and Compelling Author: Greg Roworth B Bus (Acc) MBA What is the purpose of your website? For most businesses, a website has a number of objectives that may include generating
The Importance of Goal Setting When Starting Your Own Online Business A Special Report By: Tom Browne 1. Dare to Have Big Dreams 2. Dream Boards 3. How to Set a Goal 4. Short- and Long-Term Goals 5. Identify
1 Google Lead Generation For Attorneys Leverage The Power Of AdWords To Grow Your Law Business FAST You re about to discover the secrets of fast legal practice success with Google AdWords. Google AdWords
Thinking of Applying to Graduate School in Environmental Science? In many environmental science fields obtaining a graduate degree will increase your range of employment options or improve your earnings.
by Matthew Simmons part-time Marketing Director Introduction Let's set the scene - you are an entrepreneur who has invented a great idea, or perhaps you are a manager in a larger organisation who is about
HOW TO GET A PH.D. IN MATHEMATICS IN A TIMELY FASHION SARA C. BILLEY Mathematics research is fun, engaging, difficult, frustrating, and different than most 9-5 jobs. This article is meant to provide some
Purdue University Calumet Counseling Center Letter of Recommendation Writing Guide Phone: 219-989-2366 Location: Gyte 5 Email: firstname.lastname@example.org http://purduecal.edu/counseling Writing Letters of Recommendation
Strong Answers to Top 10 Interview Questions: The sooner a candidate can work their way into a regular conversation versus a question and answer period, the more likely they are to land the job. The conversation
WRITING A RESEARCH PAPER FOR A GRADUATE SEMINAR IN POLITICAL SCIENCE Ashley Leeds Rice University Here are some basic tips to help you in writing your research paper. The guide is divided into six sections
PASSING THE TORCH How to plan for a successful succession KEY TAKEAWAYS Having a succession plan in place is vital to the ongoing success and potentially to the near-term growth of your practice. You can
DOES ONLINE LEARNING HAVE A ROLE IN LIBERAL ARTS COLLEGES? An Interview with Council of Independent Colleges President Richard Ekman Rebecca Griffiths December 2014 Ithaka S+R is a strategic consulting
These exercises look at the topics in the context of a communications mix. We start with an examination of what advertising objectives are (Exercise 7.1). We then look at how to set advertising objectives
15 Toughest Interview Questions and Answers! Reference: WomenCo. Lifestyle Digest, email@example.com 1. Why do you want to work in this industry? I love to shop. Even as a kid, I spent hours flipping
Customer Referral Programs A How-To Guide to Help You Generate Better Sales Leads Whatare Customer Referral Programs? Customer referral programs are a simple, low cost and effective marketing strategy,
How to Get Hired for a Cybersecurity Internship by Wilton Jowett Introduction This guide provides information relevant to those seeking an internship in the cybersecurity field. The first section covers
Three Attributes of Every Successful Merchant Services Program-20140604 1602-1 [Start of recorded material] [Starts Mid Sentence] thank everyone that s joined the call today. I know everybody is busy with
HOW TO GET THE MOST (FOR YOURSELF) FROM TRAINING WHY TRAINING? WHY NOW? If training is not important to a particular job today, that job probably will not be important much longer, either. What makes training
Google Lead Generation For Attorneys - Leverage The Power Of Adwords To Grow Your Law Business FAST You re about to discover the secrets of fast legal practice success with Google AdWords. Google AdWords
An Innocent Investigation D. Joyce, Clark University January 2006 The beginning. Have you ever wondered why every number is either even or odd? I don t mean to ask if you ever wondered whether every number
The Harvey Mudd Guide to Graduate School in Computer Science 1 Introduction This guide is intended for Harvey Mudd students who are considering graduate school in computer science. The guide is intended
Tips and Techniques The Interview These tips are designed to place you in the best possible position to succeed. Keep in mind, a little confidence goes a long way. Eye contact, posture and body language
GUIDE TO DEVELOPING A STRONG SCHOLARSHIP APPLICATION Now That You ve Decided to Apply The aim of this handout is to help you prepare your application for a scholarship now that you have decided to apply.
Module 6: How to Write the Book Okay, guys. Katrina Starzhynskaya here, and lesson 6, how to actually write the book: time frame, where to get your ideas from, and how to get inspired. Let s begin. Time
Your personal statement HOW TO WRITE THE PERFECT TEACHER TRAINING APPLICATION Contents 1. The basics 2. What to do 3. What not to do 4. Things to cover a. Introduction b. Teaching skills c. Other skills
Harvard College Program in General Education Faculty of Arts and Sciences Harvard University A Guide to Writing in Ethical Reasoning 15 A Guide to Writing in Ethical Reasoning 15 Professor Jay M. Harris
INTERVIEWING QUESTIONS THE EMPLOYERS INTERVIEW PERSPECTIVE Interviewers want to determine if you are a fast learner, a good problem-solver, and a versatile, goal-directed person, whether you will fit the
Hiring an Evaluation Consultant A Usable Knowledge White Paper Eric Graig, Ph.D. Managing Director USABLE KNOWLEDGE, INC. 370 West 255 th Street, Riverdale, NY 10471 Telephone: 212 9318540 www.usablellc.net
Consumer Awareness Guide Using Recruitment Agencies Prepared By Ian M Campbell Avenue Scotland Introduction At Avenue Scotland, we take great pride in the honest, professional service we provide. We have
Top NINE Ways Financial Advisors Use Our Software to Get New Customers And Increase their Sales Our software opens up so many ways to get new business because it is Quick, Simple, and Visual. This allows
Moving on If you re still reading this, congratulations, you re likely to be in the minority of traders who act based on facts, not emotions. Countless others would have simply denied the facts, and moved
When you apply to graduate schools/professional programs, most often you will be asked to submit a personal statement or letter of intent as part of your application. This guide uses the wording of personal
"#$%&$'()&"*+,%-(-'.+&/(,$0,%-(-'.,$%1/)$2 "(34&'(,&5-'6%"&%-&/ +)&/&)6'4$3(/0&%&4&/-.'&4($6##$726'8()& "#$%'&()%&*+&,$-(-'.&+%/(0&5-'6%9 "#$%&'()*&+,-&',. The following guidelines come from the College
Tricks To Get The Click 10 Tips for Writing Better PPC Text Ads If you want to sell products or generate leads online, a user- friendly, conversion- optimized website is Step 1. But when it comes to search
Commentary November 11, 2013 We Must Prepare Ph.D. Students for the Complicated Art of Teaching By Derek Bok Graduate study for the Ph.D. in the United States presents a curious paradox. Our universities
N Ways To Be A Better Developer Lorna Mitchell and Ivo Jansch This book is for sale at http://leanpub.com/nways This version was published on 2015-01-06 This is a Leanpub book. Leanpub empowers authors
JAN OCT APR JUL Creating a Year Round Peer-to-Peer Fundraising Machine RESOURCE GUIDES CREATING A YEAR ROUND PEER-TO-PEER FUNDRAISING MACHINE Peer-to-peer fundraising has rapidly become a favorite among
The 13 Pitfalls of selling your home... And how a Seller Advocate can help you avoid them Pitfall 1. Poor research. An incompetent agent can lose you a lot of money - all because people try to cut corners.
University of Minnesota NSCI 4100 001 Fall 2012 01/10/2013 Number of questionnaires = 17 Page 1 of 2 Dr. McLoon was one of the best instructors I have ever had. He presented difficult material in an interesting
Writing the Empirical Social Science Research Paper: A Guide for the Perplexed Josh Pasek University of Michigan January 24, 2012 Correspondence about this manuscript should be addressed to Josh Pasek,
Take your business to the next level Best in Class Customer Retention A 5% Improvement Can Double Your Bottom Line Profits Free Sales and Marketing Audit Call 410-977-7355 Lead Scoring, Prioritization,
Your Image of the Child: Where Teaching Begins by Loris Malaguzzi These comments are translated and adapted from a seminar presented by Professor Loris Malaguzzi in Reggio Emilia, Italy, June 1993. There
10 common problems professional photographers face - and how to overcome them The Institute of Professional Photography 10 Common problems professional photographers face - and how to overcome them Nothing
University application essays (or personal statements ) What to say, and what not to say! Essays are an important part of your application The less important your GPA and test scores, the more important
CAREER SERVICES COVER LETTER GUIDE Career Services Goodwin College One Riverside Drive East Hartford, CT 06118 (860) 727-6768 COVER LETTERS COVER LETTER GUIDE Your cover letter introduces you to a prospective
SO YOU HAVE TO WRITE A DISSERTATION PROPOSAL? SOME THOUGHTS ON HOW TO KEEP FROM BEING OVERWHELMED AND MOVE STEADILY TOWARDS YOUR GOAL. By Elizabeth Ferry Department of Anthropology, Brandeis University
J U N E 2 0 11 To centralize or not to centralize? Andrew Campbell, Sven Kunisch, and Günter Müller-Stewens It s a hard call made harder by power struggles. CEOs can force a more thoughtful debate by asking
Why Computer Science? Robert H. Sloan University of Illinois at Chicago I have two teenage daughters. The older one is in college, and is studying computer science (CS). The younger one is in high school,
PHILOSOPHY AT COPENHAGEN BUSINESS SCHOOL by Ole Thyssen research professor, dr. phil Dept. Of Management, Politics and Philosophy Copenhagen Business School In 1986, a position in general systems theory
Universal Banking Solution System Integration Consulting Business Process Outsourcing Customer experience is a key differentiator in banking In recent years, customer experience has caught the imagination
How to Write a Philosophy Paper Shelly Kagan Department of Philosophy 1. Every paper you write for me will be based on the same basic assignment: state a thesis and defend it. That is, you must stake out
University of Connecticut Writing Center Writing a Psychology Literature Review There are two main approaches to a literature review in psychology. One approach is to choose an area of research, read all