1 RACs AND THE MEDICARE AND MEDICAID APPEALS PROCESS Lorman Educational Services Independence, Ohio
2 Presenter Thomas W. Hess Dinsmore & Shohl LLP 191 W. Nationwide Blvd., Suite 300 Columbus, Ohio Phone: Fax:
3 Background It s About Minimizing Improper Payments: CMS is vocal about its focus on minimizing improper payments. The common types of improper payments involve services that: lack medical necessity are improperly coded lack sufficient documentation The admission has to be appropriate, necessary and reasonable. The service has to be appropriate, necessary and reasonable.
4 Background Goals of the RAC Demonstration: use third-party t companies pay contingency fees to those companies for identifying and correcting improper payments (overpayments and underpayments) Where the RAC Demonstration Occurred: CMS selected three RACs that reviewed fee-for-service for claims in California, Florida, and New York over a three-year period.
5 Understanding the RAC Program: Identifying and Returning Underpayments Automated & Complex Reviews: RACs will use automated and complex reviews of medical records to identify Medicare underpayments. Any underpayment findings on claims will be communicated to the affiliated contractor. You Will Receive a Letter and Get Paid: The affiliated contractor will validate the RAC s underpayment finding through the RAC Validation Contractor. Once validated, an Underpayment Notification Letter will be sent to the provider. The relevant contractor will adjust the claim and be responsible for paying the provider. If there is also a corresponding overpayment determination, those amounts will offset the underpayment adjustment.
6 Understanding the RAC Program: Identifying and Collecting Overpayments Automated and Complex Reviews: RACs will also use automated and complex reviews of medical records to identify Medicare overpayments. Limited Scope of Review: CMS has excluded several potential sources of improper payments from RAC scrutiny, including: programs other than Medicare Fee-For-Service (e.g., Medicare Managed Care program) the cost report settlement process mis-coding Evaluation and Management services, and several others. Overpayment Determinations Documented and Validated: When RACs identify an overpayment, the rationale will be documented, with references to Medicare rules and policies. Those determinations are then put through a validation process with the RAC Validation Contractor.
7 Understanding the RAC Program: Identifying and Collecting Overpayments RACs Will Seek to Collect Overpayments: Once identified and validated, d the RAC will seek to correct the overpayment. Notice / Demand: Part A providers will receive a written notification. Part B providers will receive a demand letter. Full or Partial Denial: The letter will detail whether there is a full or partial denial.
8 Understanding the RAC Program: Identifying and Collecting Overpayments Reporting: Suspected fraud or quality issues will be reported. Normal Collection Mechanisms: The overpayment amounts will likely be collected through recoupment vis-à-vis present or future Medicare payments. Other recovery mechanisms will also be available (e.g., twelve month installment plans, referral to United States Treasury for collection, etc.). Collection is a crucial component of the RAC s work because the recovery of overpayments is a prerequisite to the receipt of contingency payments.
9 Understanding the RAC Program: The Coverage/Coding Reviews Automated Reviews Used to Identify Clear Errors: Automated reviews are allowed in circumstances when it is "certain" that payment for services is improper. Example: Example: An Oncology Practice performs a particular medical service over a 7 month period to patients with a particular medical condition. The Oncology Practice was unaware that one-year ago, a new National Coverage Determination ti ( NCD ) was published with respect to such treatments. The NCD affirmatively states that the medical services provided by the Oncology Practice are never reasonable and necessary for that condition. Because it is certain that Medicare s payment for those medical services is improper, the RAC in can utilize data mining techniques to discover that type of billing error.
10 Understanding the RAC Program: The Coverage/Coding Reviews Automated Reviews Not Used if Claim is Potentially Payable: Automated reviews are not used if there is any chance that a claim is payable by Medicare. In those scenarios, RACs that wish to engage g in a review of reimbursed services must instead perform a complex medical review. (Example: NCD says a medical service is rarely necessary for a particular condition, so reimbursement is theoretically possible).
11 Understanding the RAC Program: The Coverage/Coding Reviews Complex Medical Reviews Used When Improper Payments Likely: Complex Medical Reviews are allowed when there is a high probability, rather than a certainty, that the services billed are not covered. Procedure for Medical Records Requests: : Complex medical review involves the inspection of medical records. There are two ways that RACs can request medical records: onsite review or by written request. Keep the following in mind: RACs are sometimes required to pay for obtaining medical records;
12 Understanding the RAC Program: The Coverage/Coding Reviews Complex Medical Reviews If a provider refuses access to medical records during an onsite review, the RAC is not allowed to make an overpayment determination on that basis. Instead, the RAC must request the records in writing, at which point the provider must respond in 45 days. At that point, if the provider fails to respond, the RAC can then make an overpayment determination. RACs are subject to medical record request limits: ecord%20request%20limits.pdf To ease the burden of such requests, CMS permits providers to securely transmit records via electronic means (e.g., CDs)
13 Understanding the RAC Program: Other Structural Nuances Extrapolation: RACs may extrapolate their findings to determine the overpayment amount. Referrals / Tips: RACs may receive and consider referrals or tips regarding potential overpayments, but they are under no obligation to conduct a review.
14 Understanding the RAC Program: Other Structural Nuances RAC Data Warehouse: To prevent duplicate reviews, RACs will submit selected provider and claim data to a web-based application called the RAC Data Warehouse. If a claim has already been reviewed, it will be deemed "excluded." If the provider or claim is part of an ongoing fraud investigation, that provider or claim will be deemed d "suppressed." " Before conducting a review, RACs will use the RAC Data Warehouse to ensure the target of the review is not excluded or suppressed. RACs Lack Settlement Authority: RACs will not have any authority to compromise or settle overpayment debts. Providers are still permitted to make settlement offers, but the RACs will simply forward those offers to CMS, along with a recommendation. CMS will then determine whether the offered settlement is in its best interest.
15 Understanding the RAC Program: A Potential Cause for Concern RAC Clinical Judgments RACs must follow Medicare policies. RACs will also be staffed by a physician medical director and certified coders. The problem is that, according to CMS, RACs will have the authority to use medical literature and clinical judgment to deny claims in the absence of a national or local policy. Providers should be prepared to exercise their Medicare appeal rights in order to challenge such judgments when appropriate.
16 Engaging the Medicare Appeals Process The 5-Step Appeals Process Step 1: Redetermination (Fiscal Intermediary, Carrier, MAC) Step 2: Reconsideration (Qualified Independent Contractor) Step 3: Administrative Judge Hearing (Administrative Law Judge) Step 4: Administrative Council Review (Medicare Appeals Council) Step 5: Judicial Review (U.S. Federal District Court)
17 Engaging the Medicare Appeals Process The 5-Step Appeals Process Note: It appears providers will also have access to a rebuttal process that will precede the appeals process. Providers may be able to respond directly to a RAC within 15 days of an overpayment determination. This may be an excellent tool for providers that somehow failed to respond to a RAC letter requesting medical records. The rebuttal process does not postpone the recoupment or appeal deadlines.
18 Engaging the Medicare Appeals Process Step 1: Redetermination Timing: 30 days avoids recoupment 120 days is the final deadline to submit request for redetermination, absent good cause Interest: Begins to accrue 41 days from the overpayment py letter Request Filed With: Fiscal Intermediary or Carrier, and soon, MACs Content: HIC Claim Number; Services and Dates of Service at Issue; Reasons for Disagreement with Overpayment Determination; Evidentiary Support (Medical Necessity Claim)
19 Engaging the Medicare Appeals Process Step 1: Redetermination Redetermination Conducted By New Person : Someone new at the FI or Carrier or MAC will conduct the redetermination by reviewing the initial findings and evidence, as well as new and additional evidence presented by the provider Timing of Decision: 60 days Nature of the Decision: Favorable, Partially Favorable, Unfavorable
20 Engaging the Medicare Appeals Process Step 2: Reconsideration Timing: Filed With: Content: 60 days avoids recoupment 180 days from Partially Favorable or Unfavorable Redetermination Qualified Independent Contractor All evidence relevant to issues in dispute, the disagreement with the result of the initial overpayment determination, and redetermination explained
21 Engaging the Medicare Appeals Process Step 2: Reconsideration Medical Necessity Issues: If the medical necessity of an item or service is at issue, reconsideration will involve a panel of physicians or other health care professionals that make decisions based on clinical experience, medical records, and other scientific evidence Physician Services Issue: If the medical necessity of physician services is at issue, a physician must be involved in the reconsideration, but that t physician i does not thave to be in the same specialty
22 Engaging the Medicare Appeals Process Step 2: Reconsideration Timing of Decision: Nature of the Decision: 60 days Written notice detailing a reversal or affirmance of the initial determination in whole or in part
23 Engaging the Medicare Appeals Process Step 3: Administrative Law Judge Appeal Timing: 60 days from QIC decision Amount In Controversy Minimum: at least $ New Evidence: No new evidence is introduced at this level of appeal Hearing Election: A hearing can be requested or waived so that an ALJ can make a decision based on the paper record Location: There are four HHS offices that handle such hearings, but the use of ftelephone or video conferencing is more likely
24 Engaging the Medicare Appeals Process Step 3: Administrative Law Judge Appeal CMS / Contractors: These organizations can decide to participate in a hearing Notice of Hearing: Sent 20 days before it is scheduled to occur Decision in 90 Days: The ALJ will issue a written decision with findings of fact, conclusions of law, and reasoning for the decision
25 Engaging the Medicare Appeals Process Step 4: Medicare Appeals Council Timing: Appeal filed within 60 days of ALJ decision Decision to Review: The Council will deny or grant a request for review The Review: The Council will either issue a decision itself or send the case back to the ALJ for further action
26 Engaging the Medicare Appeals Process Standard for Review: abuse of discretion error of law Step 4: Medicare Appeals Council ALJ findings or conclusions are not supported by substantial evidence There is a policy or procedural issues affecting the public interest New and material evidence
27 Engaging the Medicare Appeals Process Step 5: Review by Federal U.S. District Court Timing: 60 days from MAC decision Amount-In-Controversy Minimum: $1, (1/1/2011)
28 Audit Defenses Provider Without Fault Waiver of Liability Treating Physician s Rule Challenges to Statistics Reopening Regulations
29 Audit Defenses Provider Without Fault Section 1870 of the Social Security Act Once an overpayment is identified, payment will be made to a provider if the provider was without fault with regard to billing for and accepting payment for disputed services.
30 Audit Defenses Waiver of Liability Section 1879(a) of the Social Security Act Under waiver of liability, even if a service is determined to be not reasonable and necessary, payment may be rendered if the provider or supplier did not know, and could not reasonably have been expected to know, that payment would not be made.
31 Audit Defenses Treating Physician Rule Treating Physician Rule The treating physician rule, as adopted by some courts, reflects that the treating physician s determination that a service is medically necessary is binding unless contradicted by substantial evidence, and is entitled to some extra weight, even if contradicted by substantial evidence, because the treating gphysician is inherently more familiar with the patient s medical condition than a retrospective reviewer
32 Audit Defenses Provider Without Fault CMS Ruling 93-1: With respect to Part A Claims CMS Rule 93-1 states that treating physician opinion is evidence, but not presumptive, so need to make a case specific argument why physician ss opinion is the best evidence No similar CMS rulings with respect to Parts B, C, or D 42 C.F.R : Conditions of Participation: Utilization Review Provider should always argue that the opinion of the treating ti physician i is the best evidence
33 Audit Defenses Challenges To Statistics Section 935 of the MMS The guidelines for conducting statistical extrapolations are set forth in the Medicare Program Integrity Manual (CMS Pub ), Chapter through
34 Engaging the Medicare Appeals Process Things To Do: 1. Objectively determine whether the overpayment determination was improper; 2. Assess the current / future reimbursement dollars at risk by performing internal audits and take corrective action when necessary; 3. Ascertain the cost of engaging the appeals process, broken down by stage;
35 Engaging the Medicare Appeals Process Things To Do: 4. Investigate and find whether evidentiary support exists; 5. Research whether any primary or secondary sources of reimbursement law or Medicare reimbursement policy help or harm your position (e.g., regulations, National Coverage Determinations, Local Coverage Determinations, articles, etc.); and, 6. Determine whether any fraud or other illegal conduct occurred.
36 Engaging the Medicare Appeals Process Things to Avoid: 1. Engaging the appeals process when its more intelligent and cheaper to pay immediately and avoid interest; 2. Missing time deadlines; 3. Providing little or no evidentiary support; 4. Providing limited analysis; and, 5. Failing to fix identified problems going forward.
37 Medicaid RACs Program Establishment of program. (a) The Medicaid Recovery Audit Contractor program (Medicaid RAC program) is established as a measure for States to promote the integrity of the Medicaid program. Effective date is January 1, The goal is to reduce Medicaid waste and fraud by $2.1 Billion over five years. (b) States must enter into contracts with one or more eligible Medicaid RACs.
38 Medicaid RACs Program Definitions Medicaid RAC program means a recovery audit contractor program administered by a State to identify overpayments and underpayments and recoup overpayments. Medicare RAC program means a recovery audit contractor program administered by CMS to identify payments and overpayments and recoup overpayments.
39 Medicaid RACs Program Activities to be conducted by Medicaid RACs and States (a) Medicaid RACs will review claims submitted by providers of fitems and services or other individuals id furnishing items and services for which payment has been made. 1) States may exclude Medicaid managed care claims from review by Medicaid RACs. 2) States may coordinate with Medicaid RACs regarding the recoupment of overpayments. 3) States must coordinate the recovery audit efforts of their RACs with other auditing entities. 4) State must make referrals of suspected fraud and/or abuse to the MFCU or other appropriate law enforcement agency. 5) States must set limits on the number and frequency of medical records to be reviewed by the RACs.
40 Medicaid RACs Program Eligibility requirements for Medicaid RACs (a) An entity that wishes to perform the functions of a Medicaid RAC must enter into a contract with a State to carry out any of the activities under the following conditions: a) The entity must demonstrate to a State that it has the technical capability to carry out the activities. b) The entity must hire a minimum of 1.0 FTE Contractor Medical Director who is a Doctor of Medicine or Doctor of Osteopathy in good standing. c) The entity must hire certified coders. d) The entity must work with the State to develop an education and outreach program. e) The entity must provide minimum customer service measures.
41 Medicaid RACs Program Eligibility requirements for Medicaid RACs f) The entity must not review claims that are older than 3 years from the date of the claim. g) The entity should not audit claims that have already been audited or that are currently being audited by another entity. h) The entity must refer suspected cases of fraud and/or abuse to the State in a timely manner. i) The entity meets other requirements as the State may require.
42 Medicaid RACs Program Payments to RACs a) General. Fees paid to RACs must be made only from amounts recovered. b) Overpayments. States must determine the contingency fee rate to be paid to Medicaid RACs. 1. The contingency fees paid to Medicaid RACs must be based on a percentage of the overpayment recovered. 2. States must determine at what stage in the Medicaid RAC audit process Medicaid d RACs will receive e contingency cy fee payments. 3. If a provider appeals a Medicaid RAC overpayment determination and the determination is reversed, at any level, then the Medicaid id RAC must return the contingency fees. 4. The contingency fee may not exceed that of the highest Medicare RAC, unless the State submits, and CMS approves, a waiver of the specified maximum rate.
43 Medicaid RACs Program Payments to RACs c) Underpayments. 1. States must determine the fee paid to a Medicaid RAC to identify underpayments. 2. States must adequately incentivize the detection of underpayments. 3. States must notify providers of underpayments that are identified by the RACs.
44 Medicaid RACs Program Medicaid RAC provider appeals States must provide appeal rights under State law or administrative i i procedures to Medicaid id providers that seek review of an adverse Medicaid RAC determination.
RAC Questions & Answers What is CMS s expansion schedule for the nationwide RAC program? Who will serve as contractors for the nationwide RAC program? Whose claims can be reviewed by the RAC? Aren t RACs
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES DEPARTMENTAL APPEALS BOARD DECISION OF MEDICARE APPEALS COUNCIL In the case of Claim for Supplementary Medical Robert Markman M.D. Insurance Benefits (Part B) (Appellant)
How to Successfully Appeal a RAC Audit Kelly McCloskey Cherf Hogan Marren, Ltd. General Background RAC - Recovery Audit Contractor The Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement, and Modernization Act (2003)
Recovery Audit Contractor Program What is a RAC? Recovery Audit Contractor RAC Mission Detect and correct past improper payments so that future improper payments can be prevented: Providers can avoid submitting
Department of Health and Human Services OFFICE OF INSPECTOR GENERAL MEDICARE RECOVERY AUDIT CONTRACTORS AND CMS S ACTIONS TO ADDRESS IMPROPER PAYMENTS, REFERRALS OF POTENTIAL FRAUD, AND PERFORMANCE Daniel
APPLICABLE PLAN APPEALS Appealing a Medicare Secondary Payer Recovery Claim where Medicare pursues recovery from insurers or workers compensation entities. Presented by: The Division of Medicare Secondary
Medicare Financial Management Manual Chapter 3 - Overpayments Transmittals for Chapter 3 Table of Contents (Rev. 260, 01-29-16) 10 Overpayments Determined by the FI or Carrier 10.1 Aggregate Overpayments
Exploring the Impact of the RAC Program on Hospitals Nationwide Results of AHA RACTRAC Survey, 2 nd Quarter 2015 September 10, 2015 RAC 101 Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) Recovery Audit
CMS Referral for Own Motion Review by DAB/MAC Appellant at ALJ Level Hart to Heart Ambulance Service, Inc. ALJ Appeal Number 1-784906086 Beneficiary (if not the Appellant) List attached ALJ Decision Date
Demand Letter Date RAC Point of Contact Provider Name Address 1 Address 2 Re: Letter ID: XXXXXX Issue: (Issue Name) Dear Medicare Provider, The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) has retained
Medicare Claims Processing Manual Chapter 34 - Reopening and Revision of Claim Determinations and Decisions Transmittals for Chapter 34 (Rev. 2241, 06-17-11) Table of Contents 10 - Reopenings and Revisions
BCBSM MENTAL HEALTH AND SUBSTANCE ABUSE MANAGED CARE PROGRAM Professional Provider Participation Agreement This agreement (Agreement) is between Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan (BCBSM), and the provider
HCFA Rulings Department of Health and Human Services Health Care Financing Administration Ruling No. 98-1 Date: December 1998 Health Care Financing Administration (HCFA) Rulings are decisions of the Administrator
McGuireWoods Health Care practice is ranked 6th largest in the country by the American Health Lawyers Association. RAC Preparation 7 Key Steps and Best Practices Elissa K. Moore, Associate 704.343.2218
Recovery Audit Contractor Audits: What You Need to Know August 19-21, 2009 Gulfport Hattiesburg Meridian Jackson Kosciusko Presented by: Jeff Moore Phelps Dunbar LLP email@example.com Materials PowerPoint
Revenue Cycle Management Practice W h i t e p a p e r By William Malm, ND, RN Practice Director, Revenue Cycle Management, HCPro, Inc. Recovery audit contractors Recovery Audit Contractors Strategic planning
Hospital Client Alert January 2009 H EALTH M ANAGEMENT A SSOCIATES RAC A UDITS HMA Team Health Management Associates (HMA) has assembled an integrated team of financial, clinical, legal and administrative
Recovery Audit Contractor Update Medicare s Recovery Audit Contractor (RAC) Program HFMA Northern California Spring Conference Rudy Braccili Jr, MBA, CPAM Sr. Director, National Medicare & Medicaid Center
The Audit Landscape: MICs, MACs, RACs and ZPICs Andrew B. Wachler Wachler & Associates, P.C. 210 E. Third St., Suite 204 Royal Oak, MI 48067 248 544 0888 firstname.lastname@example.org HCAM/MCAL Annual Convention
Administrative Code Title 23: Medicaid Part 306 Third Party Recovery Table of Contents Title 23: Division of Medicaid... 1 Part 306: Third Party Recovery... 1 Part 306 Chapter 1: Third Party Recovery...
NEGOTIATING WITH MEDICARE AND MEDICAID I. MEDICARE PROVIDES HEALTHCARE COVERAGE A. Persons 65 Years Old and Older B. Certain Disabled Persons under 65 C. Persons with End-Stage Renal Disease II. MEDICARE
A. GENERAL QUESTIONS: 1. Why is CMS offering a settlement? CMS believes that the changes in Final Rule 1599-F, 1 the so called the 2 midnight rule, (published in August 2013) will reduce future appeals
This document is scheduled to be published in the Federal Register on 10/23/2015 and available online at http://federalregister.gov/a/2015-27030, and on FDsys.gov DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Jane Snecinski, FACHE P.O. Box 12078 Atlanta, GA 30355 www.postacuteadvisors.com RAC Demonstration Project 3 year demonstration project Greatest impact to IRF from California Issue with greatest impact
Overview of Hospital Utilization Review Legal Authority The Inspector General (IG) hospital utilization review function operates under guidelines and regulations contained in: Texas Administrative Code
Ambulance Provider Participation Agreement BLUE CROSS AND BLUE SHIELD OF MICHIGAN AMBULANCE PROVIDER PARTICIPATION AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT is made by and between Blue Cross and Shield of Michigan (BCBSM)
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES DEPARTMENTAL APPEALS BOARD DECISION OF MEDICARE APPEALS COUNCIL Docket Number: M-10-452 In the case of Home Care 4 U, Inc. (Appellant) Claim for Hospital Insurance
Objectives Audits: Know your risks and Get prepared 1. Establish familiarity with various audit contractors and identify variances in their audit processes 2. Understand documentation guidelines and requirements
MI Medicaid RAC Scope of Work HMS May 13, 2013 RFP Number State Name Date Agency Name Table of Contents 1. Background... 2 2. Purpose... 3 3. Period of Performance... 4 4. Project Launch Meeting... 5 5.
MEDICAL AUDITS: TOP TEN TIPS FOR PHYSICIANS TO ANTICIPATE, RESPOND AND PROTECT THEIR PRACTICES The pressure on both governmental and private payers to reduce the cost of healthcare and the often mistaken,
* What Happens When Your Health Insurance Carrier Says NO Most health carriers today carefully evaluate requests to see a specialist or have certain medical procedures performed. A medical professional
More Muscle For Medicare In Health Care Bankruptcies By Dawn Messick and Judith Waltz For many health care entities, Medicare payments constitute a large percentage of their dependable revenue. Distressed
Health Care Regulation and Quality Improvement 800 NE Oregon Street, Suite 305 Portland, Oregon 97232 971-673-0540 971-673-0556 (Fax) This letter is in response to your expression of interest in becoming
ems Recovery Auditing in the Medicare and Medicaid Programs for Fiscal Year 2011 FY 2011 Report to Congress as Required by Section 1893(h) of the Social Security Act for Medicare and Section 6411c of the
Appellant at ALJ Level CMS Referral for Own Motion Review by DAB/MAC Fondren Orthopedic Group, L.L.P. ALJ Appeal Number 1-991166855 and 2 others Beneficiary (if not the Appellant) List attached ALJ Decision
GAO United States General Accounting Office Testimony Before the Committee on Finance, U.S. Senate For Release on Delivery Expected at 10:00 a.m. In Bozeman, Montana Tuesday, May 28, 2002 MEDICARE Using
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES DEPARTMENTAL APPEALS BOARD DECISION OF MEDICARE APPEALS COUNCIL Docket Number: M-10-1929 In the case of Claim for E.M.P. (Appellant) Medicare Secondary Payer ****
Department of Health and Human Services DEPARTMENTAL APPEALS BOARD Civil Remedies Division Freedom Allied Medical Supply Corp. (Supplier No. 5768790001), Petitioner v. Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services.
Fraud and abuse overview The National Insurance Association of America (NIAA) and the National Health Care Anti-Fraud Association (NHCAA) estimate that the financial losses due to health care fraud are
Indiana Recovery Audit Contractor (RAC) Complex Reviews Webinar February 15, 2013 Webinar Goals Provide information HMS - selected vendor as the Indiana Medicaid RAC Indiana s Medicaid RAC Program Details
RAC Auditing Reform is Essential to Fix Urgent, Critical Problems Recovery Audit Contractors (RACs) audit Medicare claims submitted by hospitals and other health care providers. They are one of many different
Medicare Dilemma ADMINISTRATION AND SETTLEMENT OF WORKERS COMPENSATION CLAIMS AND THE MEDICARE DILEMMA I. Introduction Craig B. Nichols 2009 Hansen Dordell 3900 Northwoods Drive, Suite 250 St. Paul, MN
Certified Registered Nurse Anesthetist Direct Reimbursement Participation Agreement Certified Registered Nurse Anethetist Direct Reimbursement Participation Agreement THIS AGREEMENT is made by and between
Avoiding Medicaid Fraud Odyssey House of Utah Questions? Contact your Program Director or Emily Capito, Director of Operations MEDICAID FRAUD OVERVIEW Medicaid Fraud The Medicaid Program provides medical
Department of Health and Human Services DEPARTMENTAL APPEALS BOARD Civil Remedies Division Steve McFarland, ACNP, Petitioner, v. Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. Docket No. C-12-842 Decision
Medicare Appeals: Part D Drug Denials December 16, 2014 2013 Appeals Statistics by Type 23,716 Part D Reconsideration Appeals* Appeals Type Percentage of Total Appeals Appeals Per Million Medicare Beneficiaries
How to Request an Exception or Appeal a Decision From Your Prescription Drug Plan Exceptions What is an Exception? Sometimes you may not be able to obtain a prescription medication that your healthcare
FRAUD AND ABUSE Arizona Revised Statute ARS 36-2918.01 requires providers to immediately report suspected fraud and abuse. Members or providers who intentionally deceive or misrepresent in order to obtain
Strategic Approaches to Challenging Inpatient-Outpatient Denials at the ALJ Hearing Andrew B. Wachler Wachler & Associates, P.C. 210 E. Third St., Ste. 204 Royal Oak, MI 48067 (248) 544-0888 email@example.com
Section 9. Claims As a contracted provider, it is important to understand how the claims process works to avoid delays in processing your claims. The following items are covered in this section for your
Improving Audits: How We Can Strengthen the Medicare Program for Future Generations United States Senate Special Committee on Aging Committee Staff Report Table of Contents Introduction...2 Background...6
How to Prepare a Winning RAC Appeal Craneware InSight Consulting Copyright 2011, CRANEWARE INSIGHT. All rights reserved. www.cranewareinsight.com p.1 Introduction Introductions Karen Bowden, RHIA, Senior
Compliance 101: Understanding Health Reform s New Compliance Requirements Uri Bilek Feldesman Tucker Leifer Fidell LLP Does your organization have a designated Compliance Officer? a. Yes b. No c. Don't
Recovery Audit Contractors (RACs) and Medicare The Who, What, When, Where, Why and How? Eileen Turner Acting Associate Regional Administrator Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services San Francisco Regional
Department of Health and Human Services DEPARTMENTAL APPEALS BOARD Civil Remedies Division Sheldon Pinsky, Ph.D., LICSW, Petitioner v. Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. Docket No. C-11-86 Decision
HOSPITAL SURVEY REPORT: The Real Cost of the Inefficient Medicare RAC Program The Recovery Audit Contractor (RAC) program was created by Congress to audit providers Medicare claims to identify overpayments
Guide to EHR s Governmental Appeals Management Updated: October 2012-1 - Introduction to EHR s Appeals Management Services EHR is committed to helping your hospital respond to the increase in appeals volume
YOUR DATES HERE YOUR LOGO HERE ZPIC, RAC and MAC Audits Proactive vs. Reactive Approach Lisa Thomson, Vice President Pathway Health 877-777-5463 www.pathwayhealth.com YOUR LOGO HERE OBJECTIVES Understand
Subpart B Insurance Coverage That Limits Medicare Payment: General Provisions 411.20 Basis and scope. (a) Statutory basis. (1) Section 1862(b)(2)(A)(i) of the Act precludes Medicare payment for services
ALABAMA Al 27-1-17 12 Months An insurer, health service corporation, An insurer, health service An insurer, health service corporation, and and health benefit plan shall not corporation, or health benefit
Indiana State Medical Association Coalition Meeting May 23, 2014 Coalition Topics 1. Due to the increased number of billing errors with new patients, please provide a reminder of when a patient is a new
Medicare Financial Management Chapter 4 - Debt Collection Table of Contents (Rev. 246, 11-26-14) Transmittals Issued for this Chapter 10 - Requirements for Collecting Part A and B Provider Non-MSP Overpayments
SAMPLE MANAGED CARE CONTRACT PHYSICIAN AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT is entered into by and between, Inc., a corporation, ("Network") and, M.D. ("Physician"). WHEREAS, the Network is developing a provider network
Private Fee-For-Service -----Provider Questions and Answers 1. What qualifications must a health care provider have in order to be eligible to furnish services to Medicare beneficiaries who are enrolled
Case 116-cv-03280 Document 1 Filed 05/03/16 Page 1 of 8 PREET BHARARA United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York By REBECCA C. MARTIN ANDREW E. KRAUSE Assistant United States Attorneys
This document is to help you understand that each state has its own laws in terms of how far back a payer can go to reclaim their money via a post-payment audit. If you need additional audit assistance
Final National Health Care Billing Audit Guidelines as amended by The American Association of Medical Audit Specialists (AAMAS) May 1, 2009 Preface Billing audits serve as a check and balance to help ensure
THE MEDICARE RECOVERY AUDIT CONTRACTOR (RAC) PROGRAM: An Evaluation of the 3-Year Demonstration June 2008 THE MEDICARE RECOVERY AUDIT CONTRACTOR (RAC) PROGRAM: An Evaluation of the 3-Year Demonstration
NY PIP Rule Revisions Effective February 1, 2009 Arbitration Forums, Inc. (AF) has worked in collaboration with the New York State Insurance Department and the Loss Transfer Committee to incorporate revisions
Administration 1 Charity Care Policy Chapter: Administration Release Date: March 2014 POLICY It is the policy of InterMedical Hospital of SC, Inc. (the "IMH") to provide care to all patients regardless
RULES AND REGULATIONS FOR UTILIZATION REVIEW IN ARKANSAS 2003 ARKANSAS DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION 1 Authority and Purpose.. 1 SECTION 2 Definitions...2 SECTION 3 Private Review Agents
SELF AUDITS AND DISCLOSURES IN A RAC WORLD Kathleen Houston Drummy Partner Davis Wright Tremaine LLP Los Angeles, CA 1 Broader Program Integrity Landscape Improper Payments As a result of error As a result
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES DEPARTMENTAL APPEALS BOARD ORDER OF MEDICARE APPEALS COUNCIL REMANDING CASE TO ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGE Docket Number: M-11-2222 In the case of Eagle Air Medical
Department of Health and Human Services DEPARTMENTAL APPEALS BOARD Appellate Division In the Case of: DATE: September 28, 2009 Renal CarePartners of Delray Beach, LLC, Petitioner, - v. Centers for Medicare
Jimmo v. Sebelius Glenda Mack, Division Vice President Clinical Operations Jimmo v. Sebelius Specifics 1. Settlement approved by Federal Judge on January 24 th 2013 2. Class action suit on behalf of beneficiaries
LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF IDAHO Sixty-third Legislature First Regular Session - IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES HOUSE BILL NO. BY HEALTH AND WELFARE COMMITTEE 0 AN ACT RELATING TO PHARMACIES; AMENDING
Connecting America for Better Health Medicare Electronic Health Record Incentive Payments for Eligible Professionals The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (Recovery Act) of 2009 provides for incentive
Health Care Regulation and Quality Improvement 800 NE Oregon Street, Suite 305 Portland, Oregon 97232 971-673-0540 971-673-0556 (Fax) This letter is in response to your expression of interest in becoming
Center for Program Integrity Peter Budetti, Deputy Administrator Director, Center for Program Integrity National Conference of State Legislators Spring Forum April 14, 2011 Center for Program Integrity
IMPLEMENTING COMPLIANCE PROGRAMS FOR ACCOUNTABLE CARE ORGANIZATIONS Amy K. Fehn I. Overview of Accountable Care Organizations and the Medicare Shared Savings Program The Medicare Shared Savings Program
SAN DIEGO COUNTY WATER AUTHORITY EMERGENCY STORAGE PROJECT LABOR AGREEMENT Appendix B Workers Compensation. 1. The Contractor and the Union parties to the Emergency Storage Project Labor Agreement (the
The State Treasurer of New Jersey Judicial Retirement System of New Jersey Member Term Life Coverage Foreword We are pleased to present you with this Booklet. It describes the Program of benefits we have
Your consent to our cookies if you continue to use this website.