'.., ;.,.: ';',.-" 516 West Shaw Avenue, Suite 200

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "'.., ;.,.: ';',.-" 516 West Shaw Avenue, Suite 200"

Transcription

1 CRAIG NEEDHAM (SBN ) ANNE KEPNER (SBN ) KIRSTEN FISH (SBN 0) NEEDHAM, DAVIS, KEPNER & YOUNG, LLP 10 The Alameda, Suite San Jose, CA 1 Tel: (0)- Fax: (0) -1 GORDON A. STEMPLE (SBN )...,..... _;... GORDON A. STEMPLE, A Law Corporation '..".",r:.. '.., ;.,.: ';',.-" 1 West Shaw Avenue, Suite 0,.: "\ Fresno, California 0 Phone: () 1- Fax: () -0 Attorneys for Plaintiffs-'r SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA _::;::~.':' :'. IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA- UNLIMITE.,. CASENtl0C V PI-BLIP ADAME; DEANNA MCDANIEL ADAME; MOISES AGUILAR; LISA AGUILAR; JOHN AZEVEDO; ALICE AZEVEDO; DANIEL BARSANTI; JOYCE BARSANTI; STEPHEN BARSANTI; MICHAEL BARSANTI; GINO BARSANTI; LUCIANNA BARSANTI; ANDREW BATTEL; ROBERTA BATTEL BYPASS TRUST; BERNARDITA BILBES; CRISANTO BLAQUERA; MARIA BLAQUERA; DAVID BRADY; TIM BRETHAUER; LAUREN BRETHAUER; BERTINA CHANG; DAN CHAPMAN; PATRICK CHAPMAN; LEE CHAPMAN; DIANNE CHARLESWORTH; JOHN CHARLESWORTH; MARGARET CHARLESWORTH; PALMA CHRISTMAN; WILLIAM CHRISTMAN; WENDY CHRISTOPHERSON; WARREN CHRISTOPHERSON; ALVIRA CHRISTOPHERSON; DENISE CO; HENRY CO; JESUS DELGALDO; KEITH DENNIS; MICHELLE DENNIS; DARYL DERUS; JEROME C. DERUS; RENATO D'ORFANI; ANGELA D'ORFANI; CARLOS FEBLES; JUDY FEBLES; MICHAEL 1. GARVEY; JAMES GARVEY; GENEVIEVE GARVEY; FRANCES GOFF; THOMAS GRAY; DAVID GRAY; ANTOINETTE GRAY; STEVEN GRAY; SHEILA GRAY-GREGORY; ANDRE GREMETT; DIANNA GREMETT; JOE GURUMLAI; MARGIT GURUMLAI; TAKEO HANDA; SUMIE UCS COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES 1. Dangcrous Condition of Public.' Prollerty;. Ncgligcncc;. Intcntional Infliction of Emotional Distrcss;. Ncgligent Infliction of Emotional Distress;. Strict Liability for Ultrahazardous Activity;. Public Nuisancc;. Trespass; and'. Inverse Condemnation BVFAX {NDK Y Main\\ J\PLEADING\00 0 DOC} COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES

2 HANDA; BERTALEE HATCHETT; RONALD HATCHETT; WILLIAM HAUSER; ROGER IDIART; JAN IDIART; PETER IOIART; KATHRYN IOIART; NANCY JACKSON; RONALD JACKSON; RALF KARGE; DESIREE KARGE; MICHAEL KISSNER; MARILYN KISSNER; CAROLYN KOGURA; GAUDELIO LAQUESTA; ZENAIDA LAQUESTA; DAVID LEWIS; KERRY LEWIS; THOMAS LONERO; REGINA LONERO; JIM MACKIE JR.; EULALIA MACKIE; LUCILLE MAZZEO; MENDIBLE FAMILY TRUST; MANUAL MENDIBLE; CHRISTINE MENDIBLE; SIFET OSMANOVIC; FERIDA OSMANOVIC; GWENDOLINE PATRINO; HOWARD PECK; JENNY PECK; IRMA QUINTEROS; KRISTINA RANDAZZO; TONYA RANDAZZO; KEN RANDAZZO; MARGARITA RANDAZZO; ANTHONY ROGERS; VIRGINIA ROGERS; JO ANNE SCHIRO; DAWN SEAVEY; DAVID A. SILVA; JOI-IN P. SILVA; FRED SILVA; BERNARD SOMERS; ROSE SOMERS; HAROLD SONENKLAR; JEANETTE SPANTON; JOE SUNSERI JR.; KAY SUNSERI; PATRICK SUNSERI; MARIANNE SUNSERI; GARY SUNSERI; JUDY SUNSERI; BARBARA TAMER; SAMIR TAMER; KAREN TANNER; KRISTY TANNER, by and through her Conservator, KAREN TANNER; MARILYN TRAVIS; KIRK VARTAN; MARGUERITE VARTAN; JAMES VILLAVERT; RICHELLE VILLAVERT; MICHAEL WALIAS; JULIA WALIAS; JOHN WARD; JEAN WARD; CHARLES WILSON II; CHARLES WILSON III; VALERIE WILSON; LAWRENCE WEDDEL; FRANCIS WEDDEL, by and through her Power of Attorney, LAWRENCE WEDDEL; NICHOLAS YATSKO; and KATHLEEN YATSKO, vs. Plaintiffs, STATE OF CALIFORNIA; CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF GENERAL SERVICES; THE REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA; RICHARD E. HATCl-IETT (as a nominal defendant); KATHLEEN TANNER (as a nominal defendant); KARLA TANNER (as a nominal defendant); and DOES 1 through 0, inclusive, Defendants. {NDK Y Main\S0 JSIPLEADINGIOO I00.DOC} ~ '. ~,.;. COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES

3 The above-captioned plaintiffs (hereinafter collectively referred to as "plaintiffs"), allege as ] 1 I " follows against STATE OF CALIFORNIA, CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF GENERAL, SERVICES, THE REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA" and RICHARD E. ' HATCHETT (as a nominal defendant), KATHLEEN TANNER (as a nominal defendant), KARLA TANNER (as a nominal defendant), and DOES I through 0, inclusive, as follows: GENERAL ALLEGATIONS 1. The true names and capacities, whether individual, corporate, associate or otherwise and the true involvement ofdefendants sued herein as DOES I through 0, inclusive, are unknown to Plaintiffs who therefore sue said defendants by such fictitious names and will amend this Complaint to show the true names, capacities and involvement when ascertained. Plaintiff is informed and believes, and thereon alleges, that each ofthe defendants designated as a DOE is legally responsible in some manner for the events and happenings herein referred to and thereby legally caused the injuries and damages herein alleged.. Plaintiffs are informed and believe and that at all relevant times alleged herein each ofthe defendants was the employer, employee, agent, servant, principal, partner, joint venturer, franchisee, aider and abettor, alter ego, co-conspirator or subsidiary ofthe other defendants and at all relevant times alleged herein acted within the course and scope of such employment, agency, service, partnership, joint venture, franchise, enterprise, alter ego relationship and/or conspiracy and with the knowledge and approval ofsaid co-defendants. ", -.. Jurisdiction ofthis coul1 is proper because all acts and omissions alleged herein took place in the County ofsanta Clara, State of California.. At all times herein mentioned, defendant STATE OF CALIFORNIA is and was a sovereign state of the United States ofamerica.. At all times herein mentioned, defendant CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF GENERAL SERVICES is and was a department ofthe State ofcalifornia, duly organized and existing under the laws ofthe State ofcalifornia as, a public entity.. At all times herein mentioned, defendant THE REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA is a corporation that administers the University ofcalifornia, a public trust. {NDKY Main\\1\PLEADING\OOI00.DOC) COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES ~ '.

4 . At all times herein mentioned, plaintiffs are informed and believe and allege thereon that II the approximately -acre parcel of real property located at approximately 0 North Winchester. Boulevard, San Jose, CA '1 in the County of Santa Clara, which was formerly known and operated -' I, as the University of California Deciduous Fruit Station, and thereafter known and operated as the Bay Area Research Extension Center (hereinafter referred to as the "BAREC" propey), was public property under the control ofdefendants STATE OF CALIFORNIA, CALIFORNJA DEPARTMENT OF GENERAL SERVICES, and/or THE REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA and DOES I through 0 (hereinafter collectively referred to as "Defendants").. Plaintiffs PHILIP ADAME and DEANNA MCDANIEL-ADAME are residents of the County of Santa Clara, State of California, and own and live on residential real property located at Pineview Drive, San Jose, CA 1, which is adjacent to or near the BAREC property.'. Plaintiffs MOISES AGUILAR and LISA AGUILAR are residents of the County of Santa Clara, State of California, and own and live on residential real property located at N. Henry Avenue, San Jose, CA 1, which is adjacent to or near the BAREC property.. Plaintiffs JOHN AZEVEDO and LISA AZEVEDO are residents of the County of Santa Clara, State of California, and own and live on residential real property located at 1 N. Henry Avenue, San Jose, CA 1, which is adjacent to or near the BAREC propey.. Plaintiffs DANIEL BARSANTI, JOYCE BARSANTI, STEPHEN BARSANTI, and MICHAEL BARSANTI are now or were residents of the County ofsanta Clara, State of California, and previously lived on residential real property located at Dorcich Street, San Jose, CA 1, which is adjacent to or near the BAREC propcy, at the time(s) they and their home were exposed to toxins from the BAREC property.. Plaintiffs GINO BARSANTI and LUCIANNA BARSANTI are residents of the County of Santa Clara, State of California, and own and liye on residential real property located at Dorcich Street, San Jose, CA 1, which is adjacent to or near the BAREC property. 1. Plaintiff ANDREW BATTEL is now or was a resident of the County of Santa Clara, State of California. Said plaintiff is the sole surviving heir of his father, decedent John Battel, who also previously lived on residential real property located at N. Henry Avenue, San Jose CA 1, which {NDKY Main\\ I\PLEADING\OO I00.DOCj COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES

5 r is adjacent to or near the BAREC property, at the time(s) he and his home were exposed to toxins from the BAREC property. 1. The ROBERTA BATTEL BYPASS TRUST owns residential real property located at. ~.. N. Henry Avenue, San Jose CA 1, whichis adjacent to or near the BARECproperty. 1. Plaintiff BERNARDITA BILBES is a resident of the County of Santa Clara, State of California, and owns and lives on residential real property located at Westridge Drive, San Jose, CA 1, which is adjacent to or near the BAREC property. 1. Plaintiffs CRISANTO BLAQUERA, and MARIA BLAQUERA are residents of the County of Santa Clara, State of California, and own and live on residential real propelty located at Westridge Drive, San Jose, CA 1, which is adjacent to or near the BAREC property. Plaintiff DAVID BRADY is the sole surviving heir of his wife, decedent Maureen Brady. Said decedent previously lived on residential real property located at Pineview Drive, San Jose, CA 1, which is adjacent to or near the BAREC properly, at t1~e time(s) she and her home were exposed to toxins from the BAREC property...plaintiffs TIM BRETHAUER and LAUREN BRETHAUER are residents of the County of Santa Clara, State of California, and own and live on residential real propelty located at 1 N. Henry Avenue, San Jose, CA 1, which is adjacent to or near the BAREC propelty. 1. PlaintiffBERTINA CHANG is now or was a resident of the County of Santa Clara, State of California, and owns and previously lived on residential real property located at Forest Avenue,. '. San Jose, CA 1, which is adjacent to or near the BAREC property, at the time(s) she and her home were exposed to loxins from the BAREC property.. Plaintiffs DAN CHAPMAN, PATRICK CHAPMAN, and LEE CHAPMAN are the sole surviving heirs oftheir decedent, Kathleen Chapman, the mother ofdan CHAPMAN and PATRICK CHAPMAN and the wife of LEE CHAPMAN, and are now or were residents of the County of Santa Clara, State of California. Plaintiff LEE CHAPMAN owns and lives on residential real propelty located at Cecil Street, San Jose, CA 1, which is adjacent to or near the BAREe property. Said plaintiffs and their decedent previously lived on residential real property located at 10 Dorcich Street, San Jose, CA 1, which is adjacent to or near the BAREC property, at the time(s) they and their (NDKY Main\S0\I S\PLEAD1NG\OOI 00.DOC) COMPLAINT POR DAMAGES

6 ~ r. home were exposed to toxins from the BAREC property I. Plaintiffs DIANNE CHARLESWORTH, JOI-IN CHARLESWORTH and MAR'OA.RET CHARLESWORTH are now or were residents of the County of Santa Clara, State of California. DIANNE CHARLESWORTH previously lived on residential real property located at J N. Henry Street, San Jose, CA 1, which is adjacent to or near the BAREC property, at the time(s) they and their home were exposed to toxins from the BAREC property. JOHN CHARLESWORTH and MARGARET CHARLESWORTH own and live on residential real property located at 1 N. Henry Street, San Jose, CA 1, which is adjacent to or near the BAREC property. JOHN CHARLESWORTH and MARGARET CHARLESWORTH previously lived on residential real property located at Forest Avenue, San Jose, CA 1, which is adjacent to or near the BAREC property, a the time(s) they and their home were exposed to toxins from the BAREC property. DIANNE CHARLESWORTH and JOHN CHARLESWORTH are the sole surviving heirs oftheir decedent, Robert Lee Charlesworth, the husband of plaintiff DIANNE CHARLESWORTH and the father of plaintiff JOHN CHARLESWORTH, who previously lived at 1 N. Henry Street, San Jose, CA 1, which is adjacent to or near the BAREC property, at the time(s) he and his home were exposed to toxins from the BAREC property.. Plaintiffs PALMA CHRISTMAN and WILLIAM CHRISTMAN are residents of the County of Santa Clara, State of California, and own and live on residential real property located at Forest Avenue, San Jose, CA 1, which is adjacent to or near the BAREC property.. Plaintiff WENDY CHRISTOPHERSON is now or was a resident of the County of Santa Clara, State of California, and previously lived on residential real property located at N. Henry Avenue, San Jose, CA 1, which is adjacent to or near the BAREC property, at the time(s) she and her property were exposed to toxins from the BAREC property.. Plaintiffs WARREN CHRISTOPHERSON and ALVIRA CHRISTOPHERSON are residents ofthe County of Santa Clara, State of California, and own and live on residential real property located at N. Henry Avenue, San Jose, CA 1, which is adjacent to or near the BAREC property.. Plaintiffs DENISE CO and HENRY CO are residents of the County of Santa Clara, State of California, and own and live on residential real property located at 1 N. Henry Avenue, San Jose, {NDKY Main\\I \PLEADING\OOl00.DOC} COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES

7 II CA 1, which is adjacent to or near the BAREC property.,. Plaintiff JESUS DELGALDO is a resident of the County of Santa Clara, State of.. California, and owns and Iives on residential real property located at Forest Avenue, San Jose, CA. ~. 1, which is adjacent to or near the BAREe property.. Plaintiffs KEITH DENNIS and MICHELLE DENNIS are residents of the County of Santa Clara, State of California, and own and live on residential real property located at Forest Avenue, San Jose, CA 1, which is adjacent to or near the BAREC property.. Plaintiff DARYL DERUS is a resident of the County of Santa Clara, State ofcalifoll1ia, and owns and lives on residential real property located at Pineview Drive, San Jose, CA 1, which is adjacent to or ncar the BAREC property.. PlaintiffJEROME C. DERUS is a resident of the County of Santa Clara: State of California, and owns and lives on residential real property located at 1 N. Henry Avenue, San Jose, CA 1, which is adjacent to or near the BAREC property. 0. Plaintiffs RENATO D'ORFANI and ANGELA D'ORFANI are residents of the County of Santa Clara, State of California, and own and live on residential real property located at Pineview Drive, San Jose, CA 1, which is adjacent to or near the BAREC property. 1. Plaintiffs CARLOS FEBLES and JUDY FEBLES are now or were residents of the County of Santa Clara, State of California, and previously lived on residential real property located at Forest Avenue, San Jose, CA 1, which is adjacent to or ncar the BAREC property, at the time(s) they and their home were exposed to toxins from the BAREC property.. Plaintiff MICHAEL J. GARVEY is the sole surviving heir of his wife, decedent Peggy Garvey, and owns and lives on residential real property located at N. Henry Avenue, San Jose, CA 1, where his decedent Peggy Garvey previously lived and which is adjacent to or ncar the BAREC property, at the time(s) she and her home were exposed to toxins from the BAREC property.. Plaintiffs JAMES GARVEY and GENEVIEVE GARVEY are residents of the County of Santa Clara, State of California, and own and live on residential real property located at 1 Pineview Drive, San Jose, CA 1, which is adjacent to or near the BAREC property.. Plaintiff FRANCES GOFF is a resident of the County of Santa Clara, State of California, {NDKY Mnin\\1\PLEADING\OOI00.DOC} COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES " -,

8 i I and owns and lives on residential real propelty located at 0 Crestview Drive, San Jose, CA I, which is adjacent to or near the BAREC property, l' ;. II PlaintiffTHOMAS ORAY is now or was a resident of the County of Santa Clara,State. ~. of California, and previously lived on residential real propclty located at Pineview Drive, San Jose, CA 1, which is adjacenito or near the BAREC property, at the time(s) he and his home were exposed to toxins from the BAREC property.. Plaintiffs DAVID ORAY and ANTOINETTE ORAYare residents ofthe County of Santa Clara, State ofcalifornia, and own and live on residential real property located at Pineview Drive, San Jose, CA 1, which is adjacent to or near the BAREC property.. Plaintiff STEVEN ORAY is a resident ofthe County of Santa Clara, State of California, and lives on residential real property located at Pineview Drive, San Jose, CA ', which is adjacent to or near the BAREC property...'. PlaintiffSHEILA ORAY-GREGORY is or was a resident of the County of Santa Clara, State of California, and previously lived on residential real property located at Pineview Drive, San Jose, CA 1, which is adjacent to or near the BAREC property, at the time(s) she and her home were exposed to toxins from the BAREC property.. Plaintiffs ANDRE OREMETT and DIANNA GREMETT are residents of the County of Santa Clara, State ofcalifornia, and own and live on residential real property located at Crestview Drive, San Jose, CA 1, which is adjacent to or near the BAREC property. ", ~. 0. Plaintiffs JOE GURUMLAI and MARGIT OURUMLAI are residents of the County of Santa Clara, State of California, and own and live on residential real property located at Pineview Drive, San Jose, CA 1, which is adjacent to or near the BAREC property. 1. Plaintiffs TAKEO HANDA and SUMIE I-JANDA are residents of the County ofsanta Clara, State of California, and own and live on residential real propelty located at 1 N. Henry Avenue, San Jose, CA I], which is adjacent to or near the BAREC propel1y.. PlaintiffBERTALEE HATCHETT is a resident of the County of Santa Clara, State of California, and owns and lives on residential real property located at DOl'cich Street, San Jose, CA 1, which is adjacent to or near the BAREC propel1y. Plaintiff RONALD HATCHETT is or was a {NDKY Main\\I \PLEADING\OOI00,DOq COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES

9 resident of the County of Santa Clara, State of California, and previously lived at residential real property II l";' located at Dorcich Street, San Jose, CA 1, which is adjacent to or near the BAREC property, at the time(s) he and- his horne were exposed to toxins from the BAREC property. Plaintiffs BERTALEE. ~.. HATCHETT and RONALD HATCHETT are surviving heirs of decedent James C. Hatchett, the husband of BERTALEE I-IATCHETT,and the father of RONALD HATCHETT. Said decedent previously lived at residential real property located at Dorcich Street, San Jose, CA 1, which is adjacent to or near the BAREC property, at the time(s) he and his home were exposed to toxins from the BAREC property.. Nominal defendant RICHARD E. HATCHETf is the son of decedent James C. Hatchett.. Plaintiff WILLIAM HAUSER is a resident of the County of Santa Clara, State of California, and owns and lives on residential real property located at 1 Westridge Drive, San Jose, CA 1, which is adjacent to or near the BAREC propelty.. Plaintiffs ROGER IDIART and JAN IDIART ~re residents of the County of Santa Clara, State of California, and own and Jive on residential real property located at N. Henry Avenue, San Jose, CA 1, which is adjacent to or near the BAREC property.. Plaintiff PETER IDIART is now or was a resident of the State of California and previously lived at residential real property located at N. Henry Avenue, San Jose, CA 1, which is adjacent to or near the BAREC propelty, at the time(s) he and his home were exposed to toxins from the BAREC property.. Plaintiff KATHRYN IDIART is or was a resident of the County of Santa Clara, State of California, and previously lived at residential real property located at N. Henry Avenue, San Jose, CA 1, which is adjacent to or near the BAREC property, at the time(s) she and her home were exposed to toxins from the BAREC property.. Plaintiffs NANCY JACKSON and RONALD JACKSON are residents of the County of Santa Clara, State of California, and own and live on residential real property located at Pineview Drive, San Jose, CA 1, which is adjacent to or near the BAREC property.. Plaintiffs RALF KARGE and DESIREE KARGE are residents of the County of Santa Clara, State of California, and own and live on residential real property located at Crestview Drive, {NDKY Mail1\\1\PLEADINO\OOI00.DOC} COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES

10 San Jose, CA 1, which is adjacent to or near the BAREC property. II I.';'." 0. Plaintiffs MICHAEL KISSNER and MARILYN KISSNER are resident of the County of Santa Clara, State of CaHfornia, and own and live on residential real property located at 0 Forest. ~" Avenue, San Jose, CA 1, which is adjacent to or near the BAREC property. 1. Plaintiff CAROLYN KOGURA is a resident ofthe County of Santa Clara, State of California, and owns and lives on residential real property located at 1 Forest Avenue, San Jose, CA 1, which is adjacent to or near the BAREC property.. Plaintiffs GAUDELIO LAQUESTA and ZENAIDA LAQUESTA are residents of the County of Santa Clara, State of California, and own and live on residential real property located at Dorcich Street, San Jose, CA 1, which is adjacent to or near the BAREC property.. Plaintiffs DAVID LEWIS and KERRY LEWIS are residents of the County of Santa Clara, State of California, and own and live on residential real property located at N. Henry Avenue,.. San Jose, CA 1, which is adjacent to or near the BAREC property.. Plaintiffs THOMAS LONERO and REGINA LONERO are residents of the County of Santa Clara, State of California, and own and live on residential real property located at N. Henry Avenue, San Jose, CA 1, which is adjacent to or near the BAREC property.. Plaintiff JIM MACKIE JR. is now or was a resident of the County of Santa Clara, State of California, and lives at residential real property located at 0 Forest Avenue, San Jose, CA 1, which is adjacent to or near the BAREC property. Plaintiff EULALIA MACKIE is a resident of the ", '. County of Santa Clara, State of California, and owns and lives on residential real property located at 0 Forest Avenue, San Jose, CA 1, which is adjacent to or near the BAREC property. Plaintiffs JIM MACKIE JR. and EULALIA MACKIE are the sale surviving heirs of decedent Jim Mackie, husband ofeulalia MACKIE and father of JIM MACKIE JR. Said decedent previously lived at residential real property located at 0 Forest Avenue, San Jose, CA 1, which is adjacent to or near the BAREC property, at the time(s) he and his home were exposed to toxins from the BAREC property.. Plaintiff LUCILLE MAZZEO is a resident of the County of Santa Clara, State of California, and owns and lives on residential real property located at Pinewood Drive, San Jose, CA 1, which is adjacent to or near the BAREC property. {NDKY MainI1SIPLEADINGIOOI00.DOCj COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES

11 . PlaintiffMENDIBLE FAMILY TRUST owns residential real property located at Pineview Dr., San Jose, CA 1, which is adjacent to or near the BAREC property.. Plaintiffs'MANUAL MENDIBLE and CHRISTINE MENDIBLE are residentsofthe ~.. County of Santa Clara, State of California, and live on residential real property located at 1 Pineview Dr., San Jose, CA 1, which is adjacent to or near the BAREC property.. Plaintiffs SIFET OSMANOVIC and FERIDA OSMANOVIC are residents of the County of Santa Clara, State of California, and own and live on residential real property located at Forest Avenue, San Jose, CA 1, which is adjacent to or near the BAREC property. 0. Plaintiff GWENDOLINE PATRINO is a resident of the County of Santa Clara, State of California, and owns and lives on residential real property located at 0 Crestview Drive, San Jose, CA 1, which is adjacent to or near the BAREC property. Said plaintiff is the sole survi'ving heir of decedent Ben Patrino, her husband, who also lived at residential real property located at 0 Crestview Drive, San Jose, CA 1, which is adjacent to or near the BAREC property, at the time(s) he and his home were exposed to toxins from the BAREC property. 1. Plaintiffs HOWARD PECK and JENNY PECK are residents of the County ofsanta Clara, State of California, and own and live on residential real property located at Forest Avenue, San Jose, CA 1, which is adjacent to or near the BAREC property.. Plaintiff IRMA QUINTEROS is a resident of the County of Santa Clara, State of California, and owns and lives on residential real propel1y located at Forest Avenue, San Jose, CA 1, which is adjacent to or near the BAREC property.. Plaintiff KRISTINA RANDAZZO is now or was a resident of the County of Santa Clara, State of California, and previously lived at residential real property located at 1 N. Henry Avenue, San Jose, CA 1, which is adjacent to or near the BAREC property, at the time(s) she and her home were exposed to toxins from the BAREC property.. PlaintiffTONYA RANDAZZO is now or was a resident of the County of Santa Clara, State of California and previously lived at residential real property located at 1 N. Henry Avenue, San Jose, CA 1, which is adjacent to or near the BAREC property, at the time(s) she and her home were exposed to toxins from the BARBC property. {NDKY M~il1\\1\PLEAf)}NG\OOI00.DOC} II COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES

12 .0 )0 )) ) ) ) ) 1 1. Plaintiffs KEN RANDAZZO and MARGARITA RANDAZZO are resident ofthe ~,. ;. County ofsanta Clara, State ofcalifornia, and own and live on residential real property located at ) N. Henry Avenue, Sim Jose,' CA )), which is adjacent to or near the BAREC propel1y.,. Plaintiffs ANTHONY ROGERS and VIRGINIA ROGERS are residents:ofthe County 0 Santa Clara, State of California, and own and live on residential real property located at Pineview Drive, San Jose, CA 1), which is adjacent to or near the BAREC property. Said plaintiffs also own residential real propel1y located at Pinewood Drive, San Jose, CA ) ), which is adjacent to or near the BAREC propel1y.. Plaintiff JO ANNE SCHIRO is a resident ofthe County of Santa Clara, State of California, and owns and lives on residential real property located at 1 Dorcich Street, San Jose, CA 1, which is adjacent to or near the BAREC propel1y. Said plaintiff also owns residential rea) property located at Dorcich Street, San Jose, CA )), which is adjacent to or near the BAREC.. property. Said plaintiff is the sole surviving heir of decedent Chincy Schiro, her mother, who lived at ) 1 Dorcich Street, San Jose, CA ) ), which is adjacent to or near the BAREC property, at the time(s) she and her home were exposed to toxins from the BAREC property.. PlaintiffDAWN SEAVEY is a resident ofthe County ofsanta Clara, State of California, and owns and lives on residential real property located at Forest Avenue, San Jose, CA 1, which is adjacent to or near the BAREC property.. PlaintiffDAVID A. SILVA is now or was a resident of the County of Santa Clara, State ", -. of California, and previously lived at residential real property located at Dorcich Street, San Jose, CA 1, which is adjacent to or near the BAREC property, at the time(s) he and his home were exposed to toxins from the BAREC property. 0. Plaintiff JOliN P. SILVA is now or was a resident of the County of Santa Clara, State of California, and previously lived at residential real property located at Dorcich Street, San Jose, CA 1, which is adjacent to or near the BAREC propelty, at the time(s) he and his home were exposed to toxins fr01 the BAREC propel1y. 1. P)aintiffFRED SILVA is a resident of the County of Santa Clara, State ofcalifornia, and owns and lives on residential real property located at Dorcich Street, San Jose, CA 1, which is {NDKY M<lin\\1\PLEADING\OOI00.DOC} COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES

13 adjacent to or near the BAREC property Plaintiffs BERNARD SOMERS and ROSE SOMERS are residents of the County of Santa Clara, State- of California, and own and live on residential real propcrty located at 1 Dorcich Street, San Jose, CA 1, which is adjacent to or ncar the BAREC property.. Plaintiff HAROLD SONENKLAR is a resident of the County of Santa Clara, State of California, and owns and lives on residential real property located at 0 N. Henry Avenue, San Jose, C 1, which is adjacent to or near the BAREC property., Plaintiff JEANETTE SPANTON is a resident of the County of Santa Clara, State of California, and owns and lives on residential real property located at Dorcich Street, San Jose, CA 1, which is adjacent to or near the BAREC property.. Plaintiff JOE SUNSERI JR. is a resident ofthe County of Santa Clara, Slate of California, and owns and lives on residential real propclty located at I Dorcich Street, San Jose, CA 1, which is adjacent to or near the BAREC property. Said plaintiff is a surviving heir of decedent Joe Sunseri, his father, who lived at residential real property located at 1 Dorcich Street, San Jose, CA 1, which is adjacent to or near the BAREC property, at the time(s) he and his home were exposed to toxins from the BAREC property.. PlaintiffKAY SUNSERI is a resident ofthe County of Santa Clara, State of California, and owns and lives on residential real property located at 1 DOl'cich Street, San Jose, CA 1, which is adjacent to or near the BAREC property. Said plaintiff is a surviving heir ofdecedent Joe Sunseri, her husband, who lived on residential real property located at 1 Dorci~h Street, San Jose, CA 1, which is adjacent to or near the BAREC property, at the time(s) he and his home were exposed to toxins from the BAREC property.. Plaintiffs PATRICK SUNSERI and MARIANNE SUNSERI are residents of the County of Santa Clara, State of California, and own and live on residential real property located at Dorcich Street, San Jose, CA 1, which is adjacent to or near the BAREC property. Plaintiff PATRICK SUNSERI is a surviving heir of decedent Joe Sunseri, his father, who lived on residential real property located at 1 Dorcich Street, San Jose, CA 1, which is adjacent to or near the BAREC property, at the time(s) he and his home were exposed to toxins from the BAREC propclty. lndky Main\\1\PLEADING\OOI00.DOC} 1 COMPLA1NT FOR DAMAGES

14 i!. Plaintiffs GARY SUNSERI and JUDY SUNSERI are residents of the County of Santa Clara, State of California, and own and live on residential real property located at 0 N. Henry'Avenue, San Jose, CA n, which is adjacent to or near the BAREC property. Plaintiff GARY SUNSERI is a surviving heir of decedent Joe Sunseri, his father, who lived on residential real property located at J 1 Dorcich Street, San Jose, CA 1, which is adjacent to or near the BAREC property, at the time(s) he and his home were exposed to toxins from the BAREC propel1y.. Plaintiffs BARBARA TAMER and SAMIR TAMER are residents of the County of Santa Clara, State of California, and own and live on residential real property located at Pineview Drive, San Jose, CA 1, which is adjacent to or near the BAREC property. 0. Plaintiff KAREN TANNER is a resident of the County of Santa Clara, State of California, and owns residential real property located at Westridge, San Jose, CA 1 and Westridge Drive, San Jose, CA 1, which are adjacent to or near the BAREC property. Said plaintiff previously lived on Westridge, San Jose, CA 1, which is 'adjacent to or near the BAREC property. Said plaintiff is a surviving heir of decedent Rita Tanner, her mother, who lived on Westridge, San Jose, CA1, which is adjacent to or near the BAREC property, at the time(s) she and her home were exposed to toxins from the BAREC propel1y. 1. Plaintiff KRISTY TANNER is a resident of the County of Santa Clara, State of California, and lives on residential real property located at Westridge, San Jose, CA 1, which is adjacent to or near the BAREC property. Said plaintiff is a surviving heir of decedent Rita Tanner, her mother, who lived at Westridge, San Jose, CA 1, which is adjacent to or 'near the BAREC property, at the time(s) she and her home were exposed to toxins from the BAREC property. Said plaintiff brings this action by and through her conservator, plaintiff KAREN TANNER.. Nominal defendants KATHLEEN TANNER and KARLA TANNER are the daughters 0 decedent Rita Tanner.. PlaintifTMARILYN TRAVIS is a resident ofthe County of Santa Clara, State of California, and owns and lives on residential real property located at Dorcich Street, San Jose, CA 1, which is adjacent to or near the BAREC property. Said plaintiff is the sole surviving heir of decedent Ted Travis, her husband, who lived on Dm'dch Street, San Jose, CA 1, which is {NDKY Main\S0\ IS\PLEADlNG\OO 0 DOC} 1 COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES

15 adjacent to or near the BAREC propel1y, at the time(s) he and his home were exposed to toxins from the II BAREC property.. PlaintiffsKIRK VARTAN and MARGUERITE VARTAN are residents of the County of... Santa Clara, State of California, and own and live on residential real property located at N. Henry Avenue, San Jose, CA 1, which is adjacent to or near the BAREC property.. Plaintiffs JAMES VILLAVERT and RICHELLE VILLAVERT are residents of the County of Santa Clara, State of California, and own and live on residential real property located at 10 Dorcich Street, San Jose, CA 1, which is adjacent to or near the BAREC property.. Plaintiffs MICHAEL WALIAS and JULIA WALIAS are residents of the County of Santa Clara, State of California, and own and live on residential real property located at 1 Crestview Drive, San Jose, CA 1, which is adjacent to or near the BAREC property.. Plaintiffs JOHN WARD and JEAN WARD are resident of the County of Santa Clara,.. State of California, and own and live on residential real property located at Crestview Drive, San Jose, CA 1, which is adjacent to or near the BAREC property. PlaintiffJEAN WARD is the sole surviving heir of decedent Paul Hel1er, who lived on residential real property located at Crestview Drive, San Jose, CA 1, which is adjacent to or near the BAREC property, at the time(s) he and his home were exposed to toxins from the BAREC property.. Plaintiffs CHARLES WILSON II, CHARLES WILSON III and VALERIE WILSON are the sole surviving heirs of decedent Michelle Battle, who previously lived on residential real property ", '. located at N. Henry Avenue, San Jose CA 1, which is adjacent to or near the BAREC propel1y, at the time(s) she and her home were exposed to toxins from the BAREC property.. PlaintiffLAWRENCE WEDDEL is a resident ofthe County of Santa Clara, State of California, and lives on residential real property located at 10 N. Henry Avenue, San Jose, CA 1, which is adjacent to or near the BAREC property. 0. Plaintiff FRANCIS WEDDEL is a resident of the County of Santa Clara, State of California, and owns and lives on residential real property located at 10 N. Henry Avenue, San Jose, CA 1, which is adjacent to or near the BAREC property. Said plaintiff brings this action by and through her power ofattorney, plaintifflawrence WEDDEL. {NDK Y Main\\1\PLEADlNG\OOI00.DOqI COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES

16 1. Plaintiffs NICHOLAS YATSKO and KATHLEEN YATSKO are residents of the County of Santa Clara, State of California, and own and live on residential real property located at Forest Avenue, San Jose-, CA 1, which is adjacent to or near the BAREC propey. FACTUAL ALLEGATIONS. Plaintiffs are informed and believe and allege thereon that defendants STATE OF CALIFORNIA, CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF GENERAL SERVICES and DOES 1 through arc the current owners of the BAREC property. Plaintiffs are informed and believe that on or about May 0, 0, the BAREC propey was conveyed to said defendants by defendants THE REGENTS OF TI-I-; UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA and DOES through 0.. Plaintiffs are informed and believe and allege thereon that prior to the transfer of ownership ofthe BAREC property to defendants the STATE OF CALIFORNIA, CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF GENERAL SERVICES and DOES 1 through, defendants THE REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA and DOES througl; 0' owned and operated the BAREC property for approximately years, that is, from approximately 1 to 0.. Plaintiffs-are informed and believe and allege thereon that during the time the BAREC propey was owned, operated and maintained by defendants THE REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA and DOES through 0, said defendants used the BAREC property to develop, test and design new pesticides, as defined by Cal Food & Agr Code 1, as well as herbicides, fungicides and other, as yet unknown, hazardous chemicals the use of which is regulated or prohibited under Chapter (commencing with 0I) of Division of the Agricultural Code (her~inafterreferred to collectively as "toxins").. Plaintiffs are informed and believe and allege thereon that defendants THE REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA and DOES through 0 knowingly applied substantial amounts of said dangerous neurotoxic and carcinogenic toxins to the vegetation and soil of the BAREC property from approximately 1 to 0, that said toxins remained in the soil ofthe BAREC property from that time to the time the property was transferred to defendants the STATE OF CALIFORNIA, CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF GENERAL SERVICES and DOES 1 through in 0, that said toxins still remain in the soil of the BARBC property currently owned and tilled by defendants the {NDKY Main\\1\PLEADING\OOI00.DOC} 1 COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES

17 /~ j'! II STATE OF CALIFORNIA, CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF GENERAL SERVICES and DOES I through to this day, and that as a result, the BAREC property has at all relevant times mentioned, herein been in a dangerous condition in that the propelty creates a substantial risk ofinjury when. " adjacent property is used with due care in a manner in which it is rcasonably foreseeable:that it will. be used.. Plaintiffs are informed and believe and allege thereon that, in the course of and after such applications of said toxins by defendants THE REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA and DOES through 0, said toxins migrated and continue to migrate to and near the adjacent residential property sunounding the BAREC property through air, airborne soil dusts, adhered to soil palticulates, rain, fog and irrigation water, and as soil vapors rising up (volatilization) from underground water beneath and ncar the adjacent residential property that surrounds the BAREe property.. Plaintiffs are informed and believe and allege thereon that said toxins from the BAREC.. property have entered and continue to enter their bodies through the routes of dermal contact (absorption), inhalation, and/or consuming what was at the time believed to be safe home-grown vegetables and fruits fro1 the BAREC property (hereinafter referred to collectively as "routes of exposure").. Plaintiffs are informed and believe and allege thereon that, unbeknownst to them at the timc, at least 0 different documented chemical compounds were applied to the BAREC property by defendant defendants THE REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA and DOES., ". through 0 between approximately 1 and 0 in unsafe amounts greater than allowed by state and federal licenses, permits, ordinances, reporting requirements and other laws. The amount of undocumented chemical compounds that said defendants applied to the BAREC property and/or applied to the vegetation on the BAREC propelty prior to this time (that is, before records were kept for the BAREC property) is unknown.. Plaintiffs are informed and believe and allege thereon that soil samples taken at properties bordering the BAREC property have detected the presence of toxins in excess of thc Preliminary Remediation Goals ("PRGs") set by the EPA. Said soil samples showed the presencc of gamma-bhc;,,-00e;,-dot; Oieldrin; Heptachlor epoxide; Arsenic; Cadmium; and Chromium (NDKY Main\\ I\PLEADING\OO I00.DOq COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES " '

18 (~ (hereinafter also incorporated into the term "toxins"). Said toxins are the same as those listed as having been applied to and detected on the BAREC property Plaintiffs are informed and believe and allege thereon that at least approximately cases.. _. ~.. of varying forms of cancer have been documented in the immediate neighborhood adjacent to or near the BAREC property. 1. At all times herein mentioned, defendants, and each of them, were legally charged with a duty to, and did in fact undertake to, own, operate, maintain, possess, control, repair, remedy, correct and/or improve the BAREC property, including providing safeguards against the dangerous condition of the BAREC property and/or warning of the dangerous condition ofthe BAREC propel1y. Said defendants were legally charged with the duty of keeping the subject BAREC property in a safe condition and to protect the adjacent propel1ies and/or those living on adjacent properties against foreseeable injury, including plaintiffs, within the meaning of Government Code 0 et seq. and Government Code.. Plaintiffs are informed and believe and auege thereon that defendants, and each ofthem, negligently, recklessly, and/or intentionally and knowingly breached their duty to plaintiffs by applying toxins to the BAREC property in unsafe amounts greater than allowed by state and federal licenses, permits, ordinances, reporting requirements and other laws and/or tilling the soil on the BAREC property after said toxins were applied to the property and were aware that these toxins would follow said routes ofexposure to plaintiffs and the environment, placing plaintiffs and the environment at an increased risk of foreseeable harm.. Plaintiffs are informed and believe and allege thereon that said toxins from thebarec property have migrated and continue to migrate to the adjacent residential land, homes and persons of plaintiffs to this day and that the BAREC property has been at all relevant times mentioned herein been in a dangerous condition in that said property creates a substantial risk of injury when adjacent property is used with due care in a manner in which it is reasonably foreseeable that it will be used.. Plaintiffs are informed and believe and allege thereon that defendants, and each of them, have known for many years of the ongoing migration of said toxins from the BAREC property to the adjacent residential land, homes and persons of plaintiffs and where and when said toxins would follow (NDKY Main\\J\PLEADING\OOJ00.DOC) ) COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES " -.

19 :~, said routes of exposure to plaintiffs. Said conditions and circumstances were created by the negligent " and/or intentional acts or omissions of defendants or their employees or agents acting within the scope of their employment or agency. Alternatively, said defendants had actual and/or constructive notice of the ~.- ' aforesaid conditions and circumstances for a sufficient time prior to the injuries to plaintiffs to have taken measures to protect against the same in that said conditions and circumstances had existed for such a period of time and were of such an obvious nature to said defendants that, in the exercise of reasonable and due care, said defendants should have discovered and/or recognized the same and the dangerous character thereof. Said defendants negligently failed to take such remedial or precautionary measures to protect against injury to plaintiffs.. Plaintiffs are informed and believe and allege thereon that the injuries to plaintiffs alleged herein were proximately caused by said dangerous condition and were reasonably foreseeable as a consequence of said dangerous condition.... Plaintiffs have filed this Complaint within the applicable statute oflimitations pursuant to the delayed discovery rule, as plaintiffs had no knowledge, nor should they have, of the wrongful and tortious conduct alleged herein by defendants, and each of them, the effect of said conduct, and/or that said conduct was the cause of plaintiffs' injuries as alleged herein, until within the applicable statute of limitations for the filing of this Complaint. Based on the delayed discovery rule, plaintiffs' failure to discover their causes of action against defendants, and each of them, prior to this time is reasonable, 'ustifiable and not a result of plaintiffs' failure to investigate or to act. ". Plaintiffs MOJSES AGUILAR, LISA AGUILAR, JOHN AZEVEDO, ALICE AZEVEDO, GINO BARSANTI, LUCIANNA BARSANTI, ANDREW BATTEL, ROBERTA BATTEL BYPASS TRUST, BERNARDITA BILBES, CRISANTO BLAQUERA, MARIA BLAQUERA, DAVI BRADY, TIM BRETHAUER, LAUREN BRETHAUER, BERTINA CHANG, DIANNE CHARLESWORTH, JOHN CHARLESWORTH, MARGARET CHARLESWORTH, PALMA CHRISTMAN, WILLIAM CHRISTMAN, WARREN CHRISTOPHERSON, ALVIRA CHRISTOPHERSON, DENISE CO, HENRY CO, JESUS DELGALDO, KEITH DENNIS, MICHELLE DENNIS, RENATO D'ORFANI, ANGELA D'ORFANl, DAVID GRAY, ANTOINETTE GRAY, STEVEN GRAY, ANDRE GREMETT, DIANNA GREMETT, MARGlT GURUMLAI, TAKEO {NDKY. Main\\1\I'LEADING\OOI00.Doq 1 COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES

20 (~ HANDA, SUMIE HANDA, BERTALEE HATCHETf, ROGER IDIART, JAN IDIART, PETER IDIART, KATHRYN IDIART, RALF KARGE, DESIREE KARGE, MICHAEL KISSNER, MARILYN KISSNER, CAROLYN KOGURA, GAUDELIO LAQUESTA, ZENAIDA LAQUESTA, DAVID, LEWIS, KERRY LEWIS; THOMAS LONERO, REGINA LONERO, JIM MACKIE JR., EULALIA, MACKIE, SIFET OSMANOVIC, FERIDA OSMANOVIC, GWENDOLINE PATRINO, HOWARD PECK, JENNY PECK, IRMA QUINTEROS, KRISTINA RANDAZZO, TONYA RANDAZZO, KEN RANDAZZO, MARGARITA RANDAZZO, JO ANNE SCHIRO, DA WN SEAVEY, FRED SILVA, BERNARD SOMERS, ROSE SOMERS, JEANETTE SPANTON, JOE SUNSERI JR., KAY SUNSERI, PArRICK SUNSERI, MARIANNE SUNSERI, GARY SUNSERI, JUDY SUNSERI, KAREN TANNER, KRISTY TANNER, MARILYN TRAVIS, KIRK VARTAN, MARGUERITE VARTAN, JAMES VILLAVERT, RICHELLE VILLAVERT, MICHAEL WALIAS, JULIAWALlAS, JOHN WARD, JEAN WARD, CHARLES WILSON II, CHARLES WILSON III, VALERIEWILSON, LAWRENCE WEDDEL, FRANCIS WEDDEL, NICHOLAS'yAirSKO, and KATHLEEN YATSKO have prepared and served claims upon defendants STATE OF CALIFORNIA and THE DEPARTMENT OF GENERAL SERVICES within the time, manner and form prescribed by law. Said claims have been or are deemcd rejected or, although they were properly presented within the time prescribed by law under the delayed discovery rule, were improperly not considered by defendants STATE OF CALIFORNIA and THE DEPARTMENT OF GENERAL SERVICES because they were decmed by said defendants to have been filed beyond six months from the date of inj ury to said plaintiffs, despite factual assertions in the claim that clearly indicated otherwise under the delayed discovcry rule.. Plaintiffs PHILIP ADAME; DEANNA MCDANIEL-ADAME, LEE CHAPMAN, DARYL DERUS, JEROME C. DERUS, MICHAEL J. GARVEY, JAMES GARVEY, GENEVIEVE GARVEY, FRANCES GOFF, JOE GURUMLAI, WILLIAM HAUSER, NANCY JACKSON, RONALD JACKSON, LUCILLE MAZZEO, MENDIBLE FAMILY TRUST, MANUAL MENDIBLE, CHRISTINE MENDIBLE, ANTHONY ROGERS, VIRGINIA ROGERS, HAROLD SONENKLAR, BARBARA TAMER, and SAMIR TAMER have not yet served claims upon defendants STATE OF CALIFORNIA and THE DEPARTMENT OF GENERAL SERVICES. Accordingly, except for the Eighth Cause of Action for Inverse Condcmnation as alleged herein, said plaintiffs are hereby asserting (NDKY Main\\1\PLEADING\OOI00.DOC) COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES

DATED: April 29, 2002 BARRY NOVACK

DATED: April 29, 2002 BARRY NOVACK BLANCHARD E. TUAL, Administrator CASE NO. EC 034380 of the Estate of BONNY LEE BAKLEY on behalf of the Heirs of COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES FOR said Decedent, WRONGFUL DEATH Plaintiff, vs. ROBERT BLAKE, aka

More information

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF ALAMEDA

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF ALAMEDA JOHN A. RUSSO, City Attorney (SBN ) RANDOLPH W. HALL, Chief Asst. City Attorney (SBN 00) JAMES F. HODGKINS, Supervising Trial Attorney (SBN 1) One Frank H. Ogawa Plaza, th Floor Oakland, California Telephone:

More information

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO 1 0 1 MARC D. ADELMAN Attorney at Law State Bar No. Liberty Station Historic Decatur Road, Suite 00 San Diego, CA - (1) -0 Phone (1) -0 Fax Email: AdelmanMD@aol.com Attorney for Plaintiff SUPERIOR COURT

More information

IN THE THIRD JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT, SALT LAKE COUNTY STATE OF UTAH. Case No. : Judge:

IN THE THIRD JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT, SALT LAKE COUNTY STATE OF UTAH. Case No. : Judge: Alan W. Mortensen (6616) DEWSNUP, KING & OLSEN 36 South State Street, Ste. 2400 Salt Lake City, UT 84111 Telephone (801) 533-0400 Facsimile (801) 363-4218 Attorneys for Plaintiffs IN THE THIRD JUDICIAL

More information

SUPERIOR COURT FOR THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA IN THE COUNTY OF ORANGE. Plaintiffs, Defendants

SUPERIOR COURT FOR THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA IN THE COUNTY OF ORANGE. Plaintiffs, Defendants BRODIE & FLOCKHART MICHAEL A. BRODIE (State Bar No. 0) MONICA M. FLOCKHART (State Bar No. 1001) Chardonnay Irvine, California Telephone No. () - / Facsimile No. () 1- Attorneys for Plaintiffs, TAYLEE BLISCHKE,

More information

Attorney for Plaintiff SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES COUNTY CENTRAL DISTRICT STANLEY MOSK COURTHOUSE

Attorney for Plaintiff SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES COUNTY CENTRAL DISTRICT STANLEY MOSK COURTHOUSE VACHON LAW FIRM Michael R. Vachon, Esq. (SBN ) 0 Via Del Campo, Suite San Diego, California Tel.: () -0 Fax: () - Attorney for Plaintiff SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES COUNTY CENTRAL

More information

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF SOMEWHERE ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF SOMEWHERE ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Harvey C. Berger (SBN POPE & BERGER 0 West "C" Street, Suite 100 San Diego, California 1 Telephone: (1-1 Facsimile: (1 - Attorneys for Plaintiff PLAINTIFF SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA IN AND

More information

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, WEST DISTRICT 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, WEST DISTRICT 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 JAMES W. JOHNSTON ATTORNEY AT LAW 00 S. Flower Street, Suite 10 Los Angeles, California 001 State Bar No. (1) 1- Attorney for Plaintiff IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO,

More information

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 LAW OFFICES OF FERNANDO F. CHAVEZ Fernando Fabela Chavez, Esq., (SBN: 0 10 The Alameda #01 San Jose, CA 1 (0 1-0 Telephone / (0 1-0 Facsimile Attorneys for Plaintiffs GUILLERMINA MORALES

More information

vs. JURY TRIAL DEMANDED COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES AND DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL Plaintiff JAMES SCHAIRER, by and through undersigned counsel, hereby sues

vs. JURY TRIAL DEMANDED COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES AND DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL Plaintiff JAMES SCHAIRER, by and through undersigned counsel, hereby sues IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE th 16 JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR MONROE COUNTY, FLORIDA GENERAL JURISDICTION DIVISION CASE NO. JAMES SCHAIRER, individually, Plaintiff, vs. JURY TRIAL DEMANDED PAUL KERCHER,

More information

BNSF RAILWAY COMPANY as Successor in Interest to the ATCHISON, TOPEKA & SANTA FE RAILWAY COMPANY, C O M P L A I N T

BNSF RAILWAY COMPANY as Successor in Interest to the ATCHISON, TOPEKA & SANTA FE RAILWAY COMPANY, C O M P L A I N T FILED IN MY OFFICE DISTRICT COURT CLERK 2/10/2012 9:16:03 AM GERI LYNN SANCHEZ STATE OF NEW MEXICO COUNTY OF VALENCIA THIRTEENTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT KAREN R. SALAZAR, Individually and as Personal Representative

More information

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA Jack Anderson, Esq. SBN 0 JACK ANDERSON, ESQ., APLC Balboa Avenue, Suite E San Diego, California Tel.: ( - Fax: ( 0- jackandersonaplc@yahoo.com Attorney for Defendant and Cross-Complainant Starline Windows,

More information

1 2 3 4 5 [ATTORNEY NAME] (ATTORNEY STATE BAR NUMBER) [ATTORNEY EMAIL ADDRESS] [LAW FIRM NAME] [LAW FIRM STREET ADDRESS] [LAW FIRM CITY/STATE/ZIP CODE] [LAW FIRM TELEPHONE NUMBER] [LAW FIRM FAX NUMBER]

More information

) Verified c-o-m-p-la-in-t- --;o~~&"-a~a~e~a6d4 0. Plaintiff, ) Demand for Jury Trial. Defendants. ) Over $25,000.00 ----------------------------~)

) Verified c-o-m-p-la-in-t- --;o~~&-a~a~e~a6d4 0. Plaintiff, ) Demand for Jury Trial. Defendants. ) Over $25,000.00 ----------------------------~) \\.. I' 1 1 1 1 ORIAEDCOPY ~~G'NAL F'L~~rt LeOS Angeles Superior Michael B. Eisenberg, Esq. #0 EISENBERG & ASSOCIATES 0 Wilshire Blvd, Suite OC1 1 Los Angeles, California 00 =... Telephone: () 1-1 John

More information

COMPLAINT. COMES NOW the Plaintiffs, JERRY BYNUM, as Personal Representative of the Estate

COMPLAINT. COMES NOW the Plaintiffs, JERRY BYNUM, as Personal Representative of the Estate IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR MARION COUNTY, FLORIDA JERRY BYNUM, as Personal Representative of the Estate of REGINA BYNUM, deceased; and JERRY BYNUM, individually, Plaintiffs,

More information

1416-CV14463. 1. Plaintiff is a resident of Jackson County, Missouri and is the biological mother of

1416-CV14463. 1. Plaintiff is a resident of Jackson County, Missouri and is the biological mother of IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR JACKSON COT]NTY, MISSOURI AT INDEPENDENCE TAMMY BRYANT, Natural Mother of Kevin'Wahlers, Deceased, vs. Plaintiff ASRA, LLC dlbla 40 HIGHV/AY SINCLAIR Serve Registered Agent: Rizwan

More information

NOTICE OF CLAIM. Claimant, -against-

NOTICE OF CLAIM. Claimant, -against- SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF ORANGE -------------------------------------------------------------------------x In the Matter of the Claim of JEAN H. PIERRE, JR., AS NATURAL PARENT AND

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 LAW OFFICES OF RONALD A. MARRON RONALD A. MARRON (SBN 10) ron@consumersadvocates.com ALEXIS WOOD (SBN 000) alexis@consumersadvocates.com KAS GALLUCCI (SBN 0) kas@consumersadvocates.com

More information

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF SOLANO. Defendants. ) THE PARTIES

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF SOLANO. Defendants. ) THE PARTIES '. 1 6 MILLSTONE PETERSON & WATTS, LLP Attorneys at Law GLENN W. PETERSON, ESQ (SBN 6 Lava Ridge Court, Suite Roseville, CA 661 Phone: -80-8 Fax: -80-8 Attorneys for Plaintiff Otto W. Giuliani ENDORSED

More information

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 JAMES W. JOHNSTON ATTORNEY AT LAW 00 S. Flower Street, Suite 00 Los Angeles, California 001 State Bar No. (1) 1- Attorney for Plaintiff IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES

More information

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES Fernando F. Chavez, Esq. SBN 0 CHAVEZ LAW GROUP 00 West Beverly Blvd., Montebello, Ca 00 Phone: () 00-0, Facsimile: (0) 1-01 E-mail: ffchavez0@gmail.com Attorneys for Plaintiffs SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE

More information

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES STANLEY MOSK COURTHOUSE

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES STANLEY MOSK COURTHOUSE Stephen R. Cornwell, CA Bar #0 CORNWELL & SAMPLE, LLP Attorneys at Law 0 N. Fruit Avenue Fresno, CA -01 Telephone: () 1- Facsimile: () -1 Attorneys for Plaintiffs MARNI ILENE KATZ COTTER; REN VINCENT COTTER

More information

DISTRICT COURT, CITY AND COUNTY OF DENVER, STATE OF COLORADO Court Address: 1437 Bannock Street Denver, Colorado 80202

DISTRICT COURT, CITY AND COUNTY OF DENVER, STATE OF COLORADO Court Address: 1437 Bannock Street Denver, Colorado 80202 DISTRICT COURT, CITY AND COUNTY OF DENVER, STATE OF COLORADO Court Address: 1437 Bannock Street Denver, Colorado 80202 DATE FILED: June 20, 2014 12:58 PM FILING ID: 592F22DEF1397 CASE NUMBER: 2014CV31778

More information

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE THIRD CIRCUIT STATE OF HAWAII ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) COMPLAINT FOR INJUNCTIVE AND OTHER RELIEF

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE THIRD CIRCUIT STATE OF HAWAII ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) COMPLAINT FOR INJUNCTIVE AND OTHER RELIEF ROBERT D.S. KIM A Law Corporation Attorney At Law ROBERT D.S. KIM 4255-0 77-6400 Nalani Street, Suite A-1 Kailua-Kona, Hawaii 96740 Telephone (808 329-6611 Attorney for Plaintiffs IN THE CIRCUIT COURT

More information

Filing # 22009228 Electronically Filed 12/29/2014 03:48:06 PM

Filing # 22009228 Electronically Filed 12/29/2014 03:48:06 PM Filing # 22009228 Electronically Filed 12/29/2014 03:48:06 PM PENELOPE BELVOIR, as Executor de son Tort for the Pending Estate of Robert Belvoir, Deceased, vs. Plaintiff, ROPES COURSES, INC., FB ORLANDO

More information

GRAY, L.L.C. 760 ROUTE 10 WEST, SUITE 203 WHIPPANY, NEW JERSEY 07981 PH: 973-240-7313 F: 973-240-7316 Attorneys for Plaintiff Henry Kent

GRAY, L.L.C. 760 ROUTE 10 WEST, SUITE 203 WHIPPANY, NEW JERSEY 07981 PH: 973-240-7313 F: 973-240-7316 Attorneys for Plaintiff Henry Kent POMPELIO, FOREMAN & GRAY, L.L.C. 760 ROUTE 10 WEST, SUITE 203 WHIPPANY, NEW JERSEY 07981 PH: 973-240-7313 F: 973-240-7316 Attorneys for Plaintiff Henry Kent HENRY KENT, vs. Plaintiff, SMILES II RESTAURANT,

More information

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO UNLIMITED JURISDICTION

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO UNLIMITED JURISDICTION JAMES C. STURDEVANT (SBN 94551 JESPER I. RASMUSSEN (SBN 121001 THE STURDEVANT LAW FIRM A Professional Corporation 475 Sansome Street, Suite 1750 San Francisco, California 94111 Telephone: (415 477-2410

More information

PLAINTIFF S FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT AND DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL. MYRIAM DEL SOCORRO LOPEZ, by and through his undersigned counsel, and files this First

PLAINTIFF S FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT AND DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL. MYRIAM DEL SOCORRO LOPEZ, by and through his undersigned counsel, and files this First IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE ELEVENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR MIAMI-DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA GENERAL JURISDICTION DIVISION CASE NO.: 08-56892 CA 27 WILSON TORRES, individually, and as Personal Representative

More information

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF TULSA COUNTY STATE OF OKLAHOMA

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF TULSA COUNTY STATE OF OKLAHOMA IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF TULSA COUNTY STATE OF OKLAHOMA JEANNE BEEN as executrix of the estate of ROBERT JENKINS, Deceased, Plaintiff, v. Case No. CJ-2003-02541 JASON M. WEED and LANDMARK EDUCATION CORPORATION,

More information

IN THE THIRD JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT, SALT LAKE COUNTY, UTAH

IN THE THIRD JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT, SALT LAKE COUNTY, UTAH Robert G. Gilchrist (3715) Jeff M. Sbaih (14014) EISENBERG GILCHRIST & CUTT 900 Parkside Tower 215 South State Street Salt Lake City, Utah 84111 Phone: (801) 366-9100 Email: rgichrist@egclegal.com Email:

More information

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS COUNTY DEPARTMENT, LAW DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No. COMPLAINT AT LAW

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS COUNTY DEPARTMENT, LAW DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No. COMPLAINT AT LAW IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS COUNTY DEPARTMENT, LAW DIVISION INJURED PERSON, v. Plaintiff, RESPONSIBLE PARTY, a body corporate and politic, Defendant. No. COMPLAINT AT LAW NOW COMES the

More information

2:11-cv-00891-ASB Date Filed 04/13/11 Entry Number 1 Page 1 of 11

2:11-cv-00891-ASB Date Filed 04/13/11 Entry Number 1 Page 1 of 11 2:11-cv-00891-ASB Date Filed 04/13/11 Entry Number 1 Page 1 of 11 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA CHARLESTON DIVISION JAMMIE C. TYNDALL, individually and as personal

More information

Attorney for Plaintiff SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY CIVIL DIVISION. MARIA GODINEZ, an individual,

Attorney for Plaintiff SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY CIVIL DIVISION. MARIA GODINEZ, an individual, VACHON LAW FIRM Michael R. Vachon, Esq. (SBN ) 0 Via Del Campo, Suite San Diego, California Tel.: () -0 Fax: () - Attorney for Plaintiff SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY

More information

FILED 15 JUL 27 AM 9:22

FILED 15 JUL 27 AM 9:22 FILED JUL AM : KING COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT CLERK E-FILED CASE NUMBER: --- KNT JUDITH JORGENSEN, vs. SUPERIOR COURT OF WASHINGTON KING COUNTY Plaintiff, JAMES WONG and TYRA WONG, husband and wife creating

More information

w' Floor - against - SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK Index No.: Date Filed: TAMARA VANDERHYDEN, Plaintiff,

w' Floor - against - SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK Index No.: Date Filed: TAMARA VANDERHYDEN, Plaintiff, SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK TAMARA VANDERHYDEN, - against - Plaintiff, PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF NEW YORK CITY, BETH ISRAEL MEDICAL CENTER, GERALD ZUPNICK, M.D., MAURE JACQUELINE

More information

Case: 1:16-cv-00951 Document #: 1 Filed: 01/22/16 Page 1 of 18 PageID #:1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION

Case: 1:16-cv-00951 Document #: 1 Filed: 01/22/16 Page 1 of 18 PageID #:1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION Case: 1:16-cv-00951 Document #: 1 Filed: 01/22/16 Page 1 of 18 PageID #:1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION PAMELA ANDERSON, Individually and ) as Independent

More information

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES (SPACE BELOW FOR FILING STAMP ONLY) LAW FIRM OF KAISER, DEBIASO. ANDREW AND SWINDELLS SUMfTOMO TOWER NINTH FLOOR 444 WEST OCEAN BOULEVARD LONG BEACH, CALIFORNIA 90802-4516 (310) 590-8471 ERIC C. DEMLER

More information

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF MONTEREY. No.

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF MONTEREY. No. TREVOR A. GRIMM, State Bar No. JONATHAN M. COUPAL, State Bar No. 1 TIMOTHY A. BITTLE, State Bar No. 00 Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Foundation 1 Eleventh Street, Suite 1 Sacramento, CA 1 (1-0 Attorneys for

More information

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE IN RE ASBESTOS LITIGATION: STEVEN P. SCHULTZ and KIMBERLY S. SCHULTZ, Plaintiffs, v. COLGATE-PALMOLIVE COMPANY; COTY, INC.; CYPRUS AMAX MINERALS COMPANY (sued

More information

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA Paul L. Hoffman, CSB #1 Michael D. Seplow, CSB # 0 K. Arianne Jordan, CSB # 1 SCHONBRUN DeSIMONE SEPLOW HARRIS & HOFFMAN LLP Ocean Front Walk Venice, California 01 Telephone: ( -01 Fax: ( -00 Gloria Allred,

More information

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF HORRY COUNTY STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA COMPLAINT

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF HORRY COUNTY STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA COMPLAINT TYRELL and NIKKI NELSON, individually and as parents and natural guardians of JORDAN NELSON, a minor, v. Plaintiffs, CAMBRIDGE ELEVATING,INC.; SEASIDE ELEVATORS, LLC; COASTAL CAROLINA ELEVATORS, LLC; KENNETH

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Case:-cv-0 Document Filed0// Page of Michael Millen Attorney at Law (#) Calle Marguerita Ste. 0 Telephone: Fax: (0) -0 mikemillen@aol.com Attorney for Plaintiff UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT

More information

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF BALDWIN COUNTY, ALABAMA * *

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF BALDWIN COUNTY, ALABAMA * * IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF BALDWIN COUNTY, ALABAMA vs. Plaintiffs, CIVIL ACTION NUMBER CV-99-792 Defendants. COMPLAINT 1. Plaintiffs, Bryan K. Bunten and Lisa Bunten, are over the age of nineteen (19) years

More information

COMPLAINT. Plaintiffs, Dileida Vizcaino and Norma Vizcaino, as Co-Personal Representatives of the

COMPLAINT. Plaintiffs, Dileida Vizcaino and Norma Vizcaino, as Co-Personal Representatives of the IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 19TH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA DILEIDA VIZCAINO AND NORMA VIZCAINO, AS CO-PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVES OF THE ESTATE OF FEDERICO VIZCAINO; ANANDA C.

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Case :-cv-000-jah -CAB Document Filed 0// Page of 0 Joshua B. Swigart, Esq. (SBN: ) josh@westcoastlitigation.com Robert L. Hyde, Esq. (SBN: ) bob@westcoastlitigation.com Hyde & Swigart Camino Del Rio South,

More information

Case 14-90056-LT Filed 05/14/14 Entered 05/14/14 14:14:36 Doc 6 Pg. 1 of 13

Case 14-90056-LT Filed 05/14/14 Entered 05/14/14 14:14:36 Doc 6 Pg. 1 of 13 Case -00-LT Filed 0// Entered 0// :: Doc Pg. of NANCY L. STAGG, CA Bar No. 0 nstagg@foley.com MATTHEW J. RIOPELLE, CA Bar No. 0 mriopelle@foley.com FOLEY & LARDNER LLP VALLEY CENTRE DRIVE, SUITE 00 SAN

More information

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN MATEO GENERAL ALLEGATIONS

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN MATEO GENERAL ALLEGATIONS COOLEY LLP PATRICK P. GUNN ( ) ( PGUNN@COOLEY.COM) ABIGAIL E. PRINGLE () APRINGLE@COOLEY.COM) 1 California Street, th Floor San Francisco, CA 1-00 FILED Telephone: ( ) -00 SAN MATEO COUNY Facsimile: (

More information

FfLED Superior Court Of California, Ii/21/20H

FfLED Superior Court Of California, Ii/21/20H r 1 1 1 C. Brooks Cutter, SBN 0 William A. Kershaw SBN 0 John R. Parker, Jr., SBN 1 KERSHAW, CUTTER & RATINOFF, LLP 01 Watt Avenue Sacramento, CA Telephone: () -00 Facsimile: () - Robert A. Buccola, SBN

More information

CASE NO.: COMPLAINT. COMES NOW the Plaintiff, TRICIA NORMAN, Individually, and as Personal

CASE NO.: COMPLAINT. COMES NOW the Plaintiff, TRICIA NORMAN, Individually, and as Personal IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE TENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR POLK COUNTY, FLORIDA CIVIL DIVISION TRICIA NORMAN, Individually and as Personal Representative of the Estate of REBECCA SEDWICK, deceased,

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA. Case No: Defendants, Steven Lecy and the City of Minneapolis, through their

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA. Case No: Defendants, Steven Lecy and the City of Minneapolis, through their CASE 0:13-cv-00873-RHK-TNL Document 1 Filed 04/15/13 Page 1 of 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA Michael A. Ofor, Case No: Plaintiff, v. Steven Lecy, and City of Minneapolis, NOTICE

More information

FILED: NASSAU COUNTY CLERK 07/12/2013 INDEX NO. 601780/2013 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 07/12/2013

FILED: NASSAU COUNTY CLERK 07/12/2013 INDEX NO. 601780/2013 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 07/12/2013 FILED: NASSAU COUNTY CLERK 07/12/2013 INDEX NO. 601780/2013 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 07/12/2013 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NASSAU ----------------------------------------------------------------------}C

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Civil Action No. INFANT SWIMMING RESEARCH, INC., v. Plaintiff, FAEGRE & BENSON, LLP, MARK FISCHER, JUDY HEUMANN, NORMAN HEUMANN, BOULDER

More information

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF CLARK

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF CLARK IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF CLARK GLORIA BLACK, Individually and as ) Personal Representative for the Estate of Clara ) Marshall, ) Plaintiff, ) ) 1 vs. )

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION THREE

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION THREE Filed 1/9/02; pub. order 1/28/02 (see end of opn.) IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION THREE ISRAEL P. CHAMBI, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. THE REGENTS OF

More information

PREVIEW PLEASE DO NOT COPY THIS DOCUMENT THANK YOU. LegalFormsForTexas.Com

PREVIEW PLEASE DO NOT COPY THIS DOCUMENT THANK YOU. LegalFormsForTexas.Com Form: Plaintiff's original petition-wrongful Death [Name], PLAINTIFF vs. [Name], DEFENDANT [ IN THE [Type of Court] COURT [Court number] PLAINTIFF'S ORIGINAL PETITION 1. DISCOVERY CONTROL PLAN 1.1 Plaintiff

More information

COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES AND DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL. Plaintiff, TARIN SAROKA, individually, and as the Personal Representative of the

COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES AND DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL. Plaintiff, TARIN SAROKA, individually, and as the Personal Representative of the IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR THE 15 TH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA TARIN SAROKA, individually and as the Personal Representative of the Estate of ALAN BAZINET, CIVIL DIVISION CASE

More information

Case 2:10-cv-01224-JCM-LRL Document 1 Filed 07/22/10 Page 1 of 8

Case 2:10-cv-01224-JCM-LRL Document 1 Filed 07/22/10 Page 1 of 8 Case :0-cv-0-JCM-LRL Document Filed 0//0 Page of Reno, NV ( -00 Fax ( 0-0 0 Mark R. Thierman, NV# laborlawyer@pacbell.net THIERMAN LAW FIRM, P.C. Reno, Nevada Tel: ( -00 Fax: ( 0-0 David R. Markham, CAL#

More information

Attorneys for Plaintiff People of the State of California FOR THE COUNTY OF ORANGE. Defendants.

Attorneys for Plaintiff People of the State of California FOR THE COUNTY OF ORANGE. Defendants. BILL LOCKYER, Attorney General of the State of California HERSCHEL T. ELKINS Senior Assistant Attorney General ALBERT NORMAN SHELDEN Supervising Deputy Attorney General HOWARD WAYNE (State Bar No. ) Deputy

More information

THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case :-cv-00-loa Document Filed 0// Page of 0 Bradley Jardis, vs. Keith M. Knowlton, L.L.C. SBN 0 S. Rural Road, Suite 0, PMB# Tempe, Arizona -00 (0 -; FAX (0 - Keith M. Knowlton - SBN 0 Attorney for Plaintiff

More information

(a) I I for whom a guardian or conservator of the estate or a guardian ad litem has been appointed (b) I I other (specify): (5) I I ovner (specify):

(a) I I for whom a guardian or conservator of the estate or a guardian ad litem has been appointed (b) I I other (specify): (5) I I ovner (specify): ATTORNEY OR PARTY WITHOUT ATTORNEY (Name, Slale t., _ALAN M. LASKIN, SBN 148858 BRADLEY A. SCHULTZ, SBN 242512 LAW OFFICES OF ALAN M. LASKIN 1810 S STREET SACRAMENTO, CA 95811 jmber, and address): TELEPHONE

More information

Case 3:10-cv-02236-DRD Document 31 Filed 05/05/11 Page 1 of 9

Case 3:10-cv-02236-DRD Document 31 Filed 05/05/11 Page 1 of 9 Case 3:10-cv-02236-DRD Document 31 Filed 05/05/11 Page 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO DAVID ASHE Plaintiff, CIVIL NO. 10-2236 ( DRD ) vs. DISTRIBUIDORA NORMA,

More information

COURT OF COMMON PLEAS HAMILTON COUNTY, OHIO

COURT OF COMMON PLEAS HAMILTON COUNTY, OHIO COURT OF COMMON PLEAS HAMILTON COUNTY, OHIO JAMES JASPER CASE NO. 4972 State Route 276 Batavia, OH 45103 Judge And MINOR CHILDREN OF JAMES AND ELIZABETH JASPER 4972 State Route 276 Batavia, OH 45103 And

More information

Case3:15-cv-03986-JCS Document1 Filed09/01/15 Page1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case3:15-cv-03986-JCS Document1 Filed09/01/15 Page1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Case:-cv-0-JCS Document Filed0/0/ Page of KRONENBERGER ROSENFELD, LLP Karl S. Kronenberger (Bar No. ) Jeffrey M. Rosenfeld (Bar No. ) Ansel J. Halliburton (Bar No. 0) 0 Post Street, Suite 0 San Francisco,

More information

2006 WL 6142740 (Miss.Cir.) (Trial Pleading) Circuit Court of Mississippi. Lee County. No. CV05-045 (A)L. June 12, 2006. Second Amended Complaint

2006 WL 6142740 (Miss.Cir.) (Trial Pleading) Circuit Court of Mississippi. Lee County. No. CV05-045 (A)L. June 12, 2006. Second Amended Complaint 2006 WL 6142740 (Miss.Cir.) (Trial Pleading) Circuit Court of Mississippi. Lee County Charlene DUNN, Plaintiff, v. John A. MURPHY, Future Benefits, Inc. American Equity Investment Life Insurance Company,

More information

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF JACKSON COUNTY SIXTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT STATE OF MISSOURI

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF JACKSON COUNTY SIXTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT STATE OF MISSOURI IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF JACKSON COUNTY SIXTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT STATE OF MISSOURI STEPHANIE BRUNO, 3900 NW 60 th Place Kansas City, Missouri 64151 and JOHN AND C.D. BRUNO, 4702 NW Linden Rd Kansas City,

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE NO. Defendant

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE NO. Defendant William D. Marler Marler Clark LLP PS 01 Second Ave, Suite 00 Seattle, WA 1-0 Ph: IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE DOROTHY H. PEARCE, vs. Plaintiff,

More information

SUPERIOR COURT OF WASHINGTON FOR THURSTON COUNTY

SUPERIOR COURT OF WASHINGTON FOR THURSTON COUNTY THE HONORABLE CAROL MURPHY 1 1 1 1 1 SUPERIOR COURT OF WASHINGTON FOR THURSTON COUNTY TARVA LEE, ) ) No: --00- Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) COMPLAINT FOR BREACH OF ) CONTRACT, BAD FAITH, FARMERS INSURANCE COMPANY

More information

CASE NO.: CIVIL DIVISION COMPLAINT. through undersigned counsel, and hereby sues Defendant, Winn-Dixie Stores, Inc., a Florida GENERAL ALLEGATIONS

CASE NO.: CIVIL DIVISION COMPLAINT. through undersigned counsel, and hereby sues Defendant, Winn-Dixie Stores, Inc., a Florida GENERAL ALLEGATIONS IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA, vs. Plaintiff, CASE NO.: CIVIL DIVISION WINN-DIXIE STORES, INC., Defendant, / COMPLAINT COMES NOW Plaintiff,,

More information

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF GREENE COUNTY, MISSOURI

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF GREENE COUNTY, MISSOURI IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF GREENE COUNTY, MISSOURI JANE DOE INDIVIDUALLY ) and on BEHALF OF ) THE CLASS OF PERSONS ) DESIGNATED BY 537.080, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) Case Number *************** vs. ) ) DEFENDANT

More information

MEMORANDUM. Tim Cameron, Kim Chamberlain, Chris Killian Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association

MEMORANDUM. Tim Cameron, Kim Chamberlain, Chris Killian Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: RE: Tim Cameron, Kim Chamberlain, Chris Killian Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association David R. Carpenter, Collin P. Wedel, Lauren A. McCray Liability of Municipal Members

More information

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO - CENTRAL DIVISION. Plaintifl. Defendants.

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO - CENTRAL DIVISION. Plaintifl. Defendants. 1 EDMUND G. BROWN JR. Attorney General of California CATHERINE Z. YSRAEL Supervising Deputy Attorney General JUDITH FIORENTINI Deputy Attorney General State Bar No. 1 West A Street, Suite 10 San Diego,

More information

CASE NO: DIVISION: COMPLAINT. Jurisdiction and Venue 1. This is an action for damages in excess of $15,000.00, exclusive of costs and interest,

CASE NO: DIVISION: COMPLAINT. Jurisdiction and Venue 1. This is an action for damages in excess of $15,000.00, exclusive of costs and interest, IN THE CIRCUIT COURT, EIGHTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR BREVARD COUNTY, FLORIDA CASE NO: DIVISION: JEANETTE McMAHON, as Personal Representative of the Estate of Michael McMahon, TRACY GROGAN, as

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION EIGHT

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION EIGHT Filed 2/11/15 Estate of Thomson CA2/8 NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified

More information

NOTICE OF PROPOSED CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT. A court authorized this notice. This is not a solicitation from a lawyer.

NOTICE OF PROPOSED CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT. A court authorized this notice. This is not a solicitation from a lawyer. NOTICE OF PROPOSED CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT A court authorized this notice. This is not a solicitation from a lawyer. Peter Ng, et al. v International Disposal Corp. of California, et al. Superior Court

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS PEORIA DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS PEORIA DIVISION IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS PEORIA DIVISION JONATHAN DANIEL, ) ) Plaintiff, ) No. 14 CV 01232 ) vs. ) ) Honorable Michael M. Mihm THE CITY OF PEORIA, et al.,

More information

Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas

Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas MEMORANDUM OPINION No. 04-13-00815-CV IN THE ESTATE OF Alvilda Mae AGUILAR From the Probate Court No. 2, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2012-PC-2802 Honorable

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 1 MICHAEL P. VERNA(# 4070) NATHANIEL B. DUNCAN (#463) 2 JEANNE YANG (#4) BOWLES & VERNA LLP 3 N. California Blvd., Suite 75 Walnut Creek, CA 456 4 Telephone: () 35-3300 Facsimile: () 35-0371 5 Email: mverna@bowlesverna.com

More information

COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS SUPERIOR COURT DEPARTMENT BUSINESS LITIGATION SESSION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS SUPERIOR COURT DEPARTMENT BUSINESS LITIGATION SESSION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS SUFFOLK, ss SUPERIOR COURT DEPARTMENT BUSINESS LITIGATION SESSION JAMES MAGIDSON and CHRISTOPHER MILLSON, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, Plaintiffs,

More information

Case No.: CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT FOR BREACH OF IMPLIED WARRANTY OF WORKMANSHIP AND HABITABILITY. Plaintiffs,

Case No.: CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT FOR BREACH OF IMPLIED WARRANTY OF WORKMANSHIP AND HABITABILITY. Plaintiffs, 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 Stephen L. Weber, Esq. (AZ SBN 01) Michael J. White, Esq. (AZ SBN 01) James W. Fleming, Esq. (AZ SBN 0) KASDAN SIMONDS WEBER & VAUGHAN LLP 00 N. Central Ave., Suite 0 Phoenix, AZ 0 E-Mail:

More information

Haro was at home with his family when they saw an intruder lurking in their backyard. When

Haro was at home with his family when they saw an intruder lurking in their backyard. When 500 Yam hill Plaza Building 815 S.W. Second Avenue Portland, Oregon 97204 Phone: (503) 1-1792 Fax: (503) 1516 Of Attorneys for Plaintiff IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON ADALBERTO

More information

CIVIL ACTION COMPLAINT

CIVIL ACTION COMPLAINT Gregg D. Trautmann, Esq. TRAUTMANN PRYOR & LUTHER, LLC 262 East Main Street Rockaway, NJ 07866 (973) 316-8100 Attorney for Plaintiff ROBYN KLEINHANS Plaintiff vs. RALPH CLAYTON AND SONS, INC. (A New Jersey

More information

IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS SUMMIT COUNTY, OHIO. : v. : COMPLAINT FOR WRONGFUL : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : :

IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS SUMMIT COUNTY, OHIO. : v. : COMPLAINT FOR WRONGFUL : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS SUMMIT COUNTY, OHIO Paul W. Vincent, as Administrator of the Estate of Daniel L. Vincent, and on behalf of the surviving spouse, CASE NO. children, parents and siblings of

More information

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA UNLIMITED JURISDICTION

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA UNLIMITED JURISDICTION E. CRAIG MOODY, ESQ., SBN: Post Street, Suite 0 San Francisco, CA craig@ecraigmoodylaw.com Telephone: () 1-00 Telecopier: () 1-01 Attorney For Petitioner Existence Genetics, LLC SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE

More information

2:12-cv-12969-SFC-RSW Doc # 1 Filed 07/06/12 Pg 1 of 8 Pg ID 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

2:12-cv-12969-SFC-RSW Doc # 1 Filed 07/06/12 Pg 1 of 8 Pg ID 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION 2:12-cv-12969-SFC-RSW Doc # 1 Filed 07/06/12 Pg 1 of 8 Pg ID 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION LAWANDA SALISBURY, Plaintiff, v. INTUITIVE SURGICAL, INC. Defendants.

More information

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, NORTH COUNTY DIVISION ) ) ) ) GENERAL ALLEGATIONS

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, NORTH COUNTY DIVISION ) ) ) ) GENERAL ALLEGATIONS Marcus Ambrose, Esq. (Cal. Bar # AMBROSE LAW FIRM, P.C. 00 Avenida Encinas, Ste. -0 Carlsbad, CA Tel.. Fax 0.01.000 Email mail@ambroselawfirm.com Attorney for Plaintiff SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case :-cv-000-tor Document Filed 0/0/ 0 John T. John, WSBA # Daniel J. Oates, WSBA # 0 Alaskan Way, Suite 00 Seattle, Washington Telephone: ( -00 Email: jjohn@grahamdunn.com doates@grahamdunn.com Attorney

More information

CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION THREE

CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION THREE Filed 3/21/97 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION THREE STACY RUTTENBERG, Plaintiff and Appellant, B092022 (Super. Ct. No. LC025584)

More information

SUPERIOR COURT FOR THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA

SUPERIOR COURT FOR THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 OFFICE OF THE SAN DIEGO CITY ATTORNEY JAN I. GOLDSMITH, City Attorney (SBN 0) PAUL F. PRATHER, Deputy City Attorney (SBN ) CITY OF SAN DIEGO 0 Third Avenue # 10 San Diego, CA 1 Telephone:

More information

COMPLAINT. Plaintiff [PLAINTIFF] hereby sues the Defendants, [DEFENDANT #1], [DEFENDANT INTRODUCTION

COMPLAINT. Plaintiff [PLAINTIFF] hereby sues the Defendants, [DEFENDANT #1], [DEFENDANT INTRODUCTION Form 2:40-2 Complaint Negligence, Motor Vehicle IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE ## JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR [COUNTY], FLORIDA [PLAINTIFF], Plaintiff, CASE NO.: ##-##### ## ## GENERAL JURISDICTION vs. [DEFENDANT

More information

Plaintiffs, Defendants.

Plaintiffs, Defendants. SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF SUFFOLK DANIEL SCHULER, as Administrator of the Goods, Chattels and Credits of ERIN M. SCHULER, Deceased, and DANIEL SCHULER, as Father and Natural Guardian

More information

SEPARATION AGREEMENT AND GENERAL RELEASE. into by and between ( Employee ) and ( the

SEPARATION AGREEMENT AND GENERAL RELEASE. into by and between ( Employee ) and ( the SEPARATION AGREEMENT AND GENERAL RELEASE This Separation Agreement and General Release ( this Agreement ) is made and entered into by and between ( Employee ) and ( the Agency ) (collectively, the Parties

More information

) CIVIL NO. v. ) WORLD CLASS NETWORK, INC., ) a Nevada corporation; ) COMPLAINT FOR ) RELIEF. DANIEL R. DIMACALE, an individual; )

) CIVIL NO. v. ) WORLD CLASS NETWORK, INC., ) a Nevada corporation; ) COMPLAINT FOR ) RELIEF. DANIEL R. DIMACALE, an individual; ) 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 STEPHEN CALKINS General Counsel ANN I. JONES RAYMOND E. McKOWN Federal Trade Commission 100 Wilshire Blvd., Suite Los Angeles, California 00 ( -00 JOHN ANDREW SINGER Federal Trade Commission

More information

INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR AGREEMENT (ICA)

INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR AGREEMENT (ICA) INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR AGREEMENT (ICA) (This agreement is not a construction contract within the meaning of Civil Code section 2783, and is not an agreement for the provision of construction services within

More information

Case 1:14-cv-02790-ILG-JMA Document 1 Filed 05/02/14 Page 1 of 9 PageID #: 1. KAREN FENNELL, JAMES JORDAN, JR. and ANTHONY SOLIS,

Case 1:14-cv-02790-ILG-JMA Document 1 Filed 05/02/14 Page 1 of 9 PageID #: 1. KAREN FENNELL, JAMES JORDAN, JR. and ANTHONY SOLIS, Case 1:14-cv-02790-ILG-JMA Document 1 Filed 05/02/14 Page 1 of 9 PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ---------------------------------------------------------------X KAREN

More information

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA CIVIL DIVISION COMPLAINT

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA CIVIL DIVISION COMPLAINT IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA CIVIL DIVISION Plaintiff, CASE NUMBER: JUDGE: vs. Defendant. / COMPLAINT COMES NOW, Plaintiff,, and hereby sues

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION JPM NETWORKS, LLC, ) d/b/a KWIKBOOST ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. ) 3:14-cv-1507 JCM FIRST VENTURE, LLC )

More information

STATE OF INDIANA ) IN THE MARION COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT ) SS: COUNTY OF MARION ) CAUSE NO.:

STATE OF INDIANA ) IN THE MARION COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT ) SS: COUNTY OF MARION ) CAUSE NO.: STATE OF INDIANA ) IN THE MARION COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT ) SS: COUNTY OF MARION ) CAUSE NO.: KURT WEEKLY ) and MARY MILLS ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) vs. ) ) DAVID M. BISARD, the CITY OF ) INDIANAPOLIS, and the

More information

MEMORANDUM. Preface. Brief Answer

MEMORANDUM. Preface. Brief Answer MEMORANDUM From: Mitchell S. Cohen, Esquire Re: Decisions Governing the Issue of Secondary Exposure Asbestos Cases in the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania and States of New Jersey and New York Date: 11 November

More information

"*-ldshdå:i. Bc5 r447 i

*-ldshdå:i. Bc5 r447 i Ronald L.M. Goldman, Esq. (State B,ar # A. Ilyas Akbari, Esq. (State F,ar #01 Beuv HroluNo Arusrpl & GolpvaN, P.C. 1 Wilshire Boulevard., Suite 0 Los Angeles, Califomi a 00-1 1 Telephone: ( - Facsimile:

More information

Case 5:11-cv-01374-DNH-DEP Document 1 Filed 11/21/11 Page 1 of 26 ----------------------------------------------------------------- Plaintiff,

Case 5:11-cv-01374-DNH-DEP Document 1 Filed 11/21/11 Page 1 of 26 ----------------------------------------------------------------- Plaintiff, Case 5:11-cv-01374-DNH-DEP Document 1 Filed 11/21/11 Page 1 of 26 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ----------------------------------------------------------------- HOWARD I.

More information