JOINDER OF THIRD PARTIES: ENTITIES AND/OR INDIVIDUALS. Moderator: BRIAN L. WEBB, Dallas Webb & Associates, P.C. Panelists:

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "JOINDER OF THIRD PARTIES: ENTITIES AND/OR INDIVIDUALS. Moderator: BRIAN L. WEBB, Dallas Webb & Associates, P.C. Panelists:"

Transcription

1 JOINDER OF THIRD PARTIES: ENTITIES AND/OR INDIVIDUALS Moderator: BRIAN L. WEBB, Dallas Webb & Associates, P.C. Panelists: KATIE PEARSON KLEIN, McAllen Dale & Klein, L.L.P. JOHN F. NICHOLS, SR., Houston Nichols Law, P.L.L.C. THOMAS L. AUSLEY, Austin Ausley, Algert, Robertson & Flores, LLP Author: JOHN F. NICHOLS, SR., Houston Nichols Law, P.L.L.C. State Bar of Texas 35 TH ANNUAL ADVANCED FAMILY LAW COURSE August 3-6, 2009 Dallas CHAPTER 72

2

3 BRIAN L. WEBB Webb & Associates, P.C. Dallas, Texas Brian Webb has practiced family law for more than 30 years and has been Board Certified since A popular lecturer and author, his published works cover a wide variety of family law topics. Brian has presided over Texas three largest statewide family law organizations (the Family Law Section of the State Bar of Texas, the Texas Academy of Family Law specialists, and the Texas Chapter of the American Academy of Matrimonial Lawyers) and has served on the boards of national and international family law organizations. Brian is currently an officer in the Texas Family Law Foundation, which spearheads the legislative effort for Texas family lawyers and is President-elect of the American Academy of Matrimonial Lawyers Foundation which provides financial assistance to organizations benefiting the children of divorce as well as other worth causes. Brian is a past recipient of the Judge Sam Emison Award and has been chosen to be in TexasSuperLawyers.com every year since its inception, including multiple selections as one of the Top 100 Super Lawyers in Texas and multiple selections as one of the Top 100 Super Lawyers in the Dallas/Fort Worth area. He has been listed in Best Lawyers in America every year since 1989.

4

5 BIOGRAPHICAL INFORMATION ON JOHN NICHOLS, SR. 1 EDUCATION B.S., Rice University 1964 LL.B., University of Houston 1967 PROFESSIONAL ACTIVITIES Board Certified: Family Law, Personal Injury Law and Civil Trial Law Past Chairperson: Litigation Section, State Bar of Texas Diplomate: American Board of Trial Advocates Fellow: International Society of Barristers Fellow: American College of Family Trial Lawyers Fellow: American Academy of Matrimonial Lawyers Fellow: International Academy of Matrimonial Lawyers LAW RELATED PUBLICATIONS HONORS Author of articles on family law, personal injury law and civil trial law. State Bar of Texas Gene Cavin Award (2008) Rice University Athletic Hall of Fame (Football) Texas Center for the Judiciary Outstanding Article Award (2007) Appreciation John Nichols extends his grateful appreciation to the following people who worked on this article: Tina Gibson, and summer intern Victor Brooks of Rice University. John Nichols extends his special appreciation to Susan Myres for her grant of authority to use her article on Third Party Actions in this presentation. 1 See also

6

7 KATIE PEARSON KLEIN Dale & Klein, L.L.P. McAllen, Texas Katie Pearson Klein is board certified in Family Law (87) and Civil Trial Law (89) and has practiced for 33 years. She is a past Director of the Family Law Section, Past course director of Marriage Dissolution and serves on the Pattern Jury Charges Committee. She has been a frequent author and speaker at seminars sponsored by the State Bar of Texas.

8

9 THOMAS L. AUSLEY AUSLEY, ALGERT, ROBERTSON & FLORES, L.L.P Northland Drive, Suite 420 Austin, Texas (512) (512) Facsimile EDUCATION Texas Tech University, B.B.A. in Finance, 1965 University of Texas School of Law, J.D., 1968 PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATIONS Member, State Bar of Texas since 1968 Board Certified by Texas Board of Legal Specialization Family Law, 1980 (re-certified 2005) Fellow, American Academy of Matrimonial Lawyers Officer of the Texas Chapter: Treasurer, Secretary, President-Elect, President, Member, Board of Governors of American Academy of Matrimonial Lawyers National Chapter Member, International Academy of Matrimonial Lawyers Member, American Bar Association - Family Law Section Associate, American Board of Trial Advocates Member, Board of Trustees for the Collaborative Institute of Texas ( ) Charter Member, Texas Family Law Foundation Member, Board of Trustees ( ) Member, College of the State Bar of Texas Member, Family Law Section Council, State Bar of Texas ( ) Secretary, , Treasurer, Fellow, Texas Bar Foundation Fellow, American Bar Foundation, Life Fellow, State Bar of Texas Life Fellow, American Academy of Matrimonial Lawyers Foundation Listed in the Martindale-Hubbell Bar Registry of Preeminent Lawyers Member, Texas Academy of Family Law Specialists President, Travis County Family Law Advocates ( ) President, Political Action Committee ( ) Member, State Bar Task Force on Reorganization of the Office of General Counsel (1994) Member, Austin Bar Association Member, Williamson County Bar Association

10 LEGAL PROFILE & HONORS Forty-one years= experience in the practice of law in Austin, Texas Practice includes primarily family law, including collaborative divorce, civil litigation, mediation and arbitration. Listed in The Best Lawyers in America, Family Law Section, 1987-present Named by Texas Monthly Magazine as: ATexas Super Lawyers_"( present), one of the ATop 50 Central/West Texas (2004 and 2007), and one of the ATop 100 Lawyers in (2007). Named ALawyer of the Year in Central by Best Lawyers_, 2009 Listed in Austin Monthly, The Best Lawyers in Austin - Family Law, 2002 Received the Outstanding Fundraiser Award given by the Association of Fundraising Professionals, Austin Chapter, 2008 Received President and Chair=s Courage and Integrity Award given by Planned Parenthood Federation of America, 2004 Received Good Guys and Gals Award given by the National Women=s Political Caucus, Texas Chapter, 2004 rating, Martindale-Hubbell Legal Directory Finalist, 1 st annual AEthics in Business Individual (Samaritan Counseling Center and St. Edwards University) LEGAL SEMINARS AND WRITINGS Author and speaker, 1995 Advanced Family Law Drafting Course Author and speaker, 1997 Advanced Family Law Course Author and speaker, 1998 Advanced Family Law Courses (August and December) Author, 1999 Advanced Family Law Course Author and speaker, 2000 Ultimate Trial Notebook for Family Law Planning Committee, 2003 Family Law on the Front Lines Author and speaker, 2003 Advanced Family Law Course - Characterization and Tracing Author and speaker, 2004 Advanced Family Law Course Professionalism in Family Law Speaker, st Annual Collaborative Law Seminar Author and speaker, 2004 Ultimate Trial Notebook - Pretrial and Scheduling Orders Speaker, 2004 University of Texas Family Law on the Front Lines - Collaborative Law Author and speaker, 2005 University of Texas Family Law on the Front Lines - Impaired Clients: Ethical Issues and Advocacy Author and speaker, 2005 Associate Judge=s Training - The Hague Convention Author and speaker, 2005 State Bar of Texas= Advanced Family Law Course - Ethics & the Enhancement of the Attorney-Client Relationship Speaker, 2006 Paralegal Association of the Permian Basin - Ethics Speaker, Texas Academy of Family Law Specialists= Trial Institute, 2006 (Reno, Nevada) Moderator, Judges= Panel for 2006 Marriage Dissolution Institute Course Director - Family Law, State Bar of Texas 2006 Annual Meeting (Austin) Course Director - Ultimate Trial Notebook, 2006 (New Orleans, Louisiana) Speaker/Panelist, 2007 State Bar of Texas= Family Law on the Front Lines, Representing the Difficult Client (Galveston) Workshop Moderator, 2007 State Bar of Texas= Advanced Family Law Course, Advanced Collaborative Law (San Antonio) Speaker, 2007 State Bar of Texas= Advanced Family Law Course, The Not So Easy To Identify Executive Employment Benefits (San Antonio)

11 Author and speaker, 2008 State Bar of Texas= Advanced Family Law Course - The Professional Practice: Yourself, Your Office, and Your Relationships with Others Speaker, 2008 State Bar of Texas= Advanced Family Law Course - Collaborative Family Law Track Speaker, 2009 Collaborative Law Institute of Texas Boot Camp Speaker, 2009 International Academy of Matrimonial Lawyers Annual Meeting, USA and Canadian Chapters, The Path to Yearning for Zion/FLDS Speaker, 2009 University of Texas School of Law and Texas Family Law Foundation=s 10 th Biennial Family Law Legislative Update Various seminars for the Paralegal Division of the State Bar of Texas, State Bar of Texas, Travis County Bar Association, and Volunteer Legal Services of Central Texas ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION & COLLABORATIVE TRAINING & EXPERIENCE LBJ School of Public Affairs Advanced Mediation Training (1997) Advanced Family Law Mediation Training (1997) Dispute Resolution Center of Austin Mediation Training: Basic 40-hour course, 2004 Family Law course, 2004 Travis County Bar Association Settlement Week Mediator Training Appointed by Travis County District Judges as court-appointed mediator Volunteer mediator, Travis County Settlement Weeks ( ) Volunteer mediator, Williamson County Settlement Week ( present) Collaborative Divorce Training: Basic: 2000, 2002, 2003 Intermediate: 2000 Advanced: 2004 Multi-Disciplinary: 2006 American Academy of Matrimony Lawyers Arbitration Training (2000)

12

13 The Texas Perspective on Joinder of Additional Parties and Cause of Action to the Divorce Additional Parties Before a case is called for trial, additional parties, necessary or proper parties to the suit, may be brought in, either by the plaintiff or the defendant, upon such terms as the court may prescribe; but not at a time nor in a manner to unreasonably delay the trial of the case. Tex.R.Civ. P. 37 (1941). Additional Causes of Action Joinder of tort claims with the divorce, when feasible, is encouraged. Resolving both the tort and divorce actions in the same proceeding avoids two trials based at least in part on the same facts and settles in one suit all matters existing between the parties. Twyman v. Twyman, 855 S.W.2d 619, 625 (Tex. 1993), citing Mogford v. Mogford, 616 S.W.2d 936 (Tex.Civ.App. San Antonio 1981, writ ref d n.r.e.).

14

15 TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION II. INTENTIONAL AND UNINTENTIONAL TORTS... 1 A. Elements Intentional Torts... 1 B. Elements Unintentional Torts C. Redressing Wrongs D. Res Judicata and Collateral Estoppel Distinction E. Procedural Bars And Defenses To Bringing Actions And Limiting Damages Divorce Cases Non-Divorce Cases Limitations of Actions Defense to Limitations The Relation Back Doctrine Defense to Limitations Aggravation of Pre-Existing Conditions Defense to Limitations Discovery Rule Defense to Limitations Continuing Tort... 4 G. Schlueter, Before and After Introduction Reference Material Schlueter v. Schlueter - Briefed III. JOINDER OF ADDITIONAL PARTIES AND ACTIONS... 7 A. Definition and Scope... 7 B. Interpleader - Tex. it Civ. P Introduction Filing the Interpleader Petition Requirements for Interpleader Filing a Response Hearing on the Interpleader Order Family Law Case Application C. Impleader (Joinder) - Tex.R.Civ.P. 37, 38, 39 and Introduction Filing the Third-party Petition by Original Respondent - Tex. R. Civ. P. 38(a) Filing the Third-party Petition by Original Petitioner Effect of Dismissal of Original Petition for Petitioner Motion to Strike, Sever, Separate Risks Involving Impleader Trial Court Considerations Involving Impleader Family Law Case Application D. Plea In Intervention - Tex. R. Civ. P. 60 and Introduction Filing the Plea Notice of the Plea Requirements Motion to Strike and Hearing Order on Motion to Strike Family Law Case Application E. Consolidation - Tex. R. Civ. P. 174(a) Introduction Motion Response Order i

16 5. Family Law Case Application F. Conclusion IV. RECOGNIZED TORTS IN TEXAS A. Statutory Torts Texas Deceptive Trade Practices Consumer Protection Act. Tex. Bus. & Com. Code, ; Tex. Pattern Jury Charges - Business/ Consumer, Chapter 102 (2006) Texas Fraud in Real Estate and Stock Transactions Act. Tex. Bus. & Com. Code, (Vernon 2002, and Supp. 2007) Texas Uniform Fraudulent Transfer Act. Tex. Bus. & Com. Code, (Vernon 2002 and Supp. 2007) Texas Family Code - Transfer and Debts Pending Decree. Tex. Fam. Code. Ann., Texas Kidnapping Act. Tex. Fam. Code Ann., Texas Theft Liability Act. Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code, Texas Civil Wiretap Act. Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code, Texas Principal and Income Act. Tex. Prop. Code, Texas Prudent Investor Act. Tex. Prop. Code, B. Statutory and Common Law Torts Covered in this Article Abuse of Process Assault False Imprisonment Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress Intentional or Negligent Transmission of Venereal Disease Invasion of Privacy-Intrusion on Seclusion and Solitude Invasion of Privacy-Public Disclosure of Private Facts Defamation - Slander Interception of Wire, Aural and Electronic Communications Conversion Economic Duress Forgery Fraudulent Transfer of Community Property Accounting Actual Fraud on the Person and Property Breach of Fiduciary Duty Under the Trust Fund Doctrine Breach of Fiduciary Relationship - Business and Personal Constructive Fraud on the Person and Property Identifying Information Misapplication of Fiduciary Property Breach of Contract and Money Had and Received Rescission Promissory Estoppel Usurpation of Community Opportunity Waste of Assets Alter-Ego Corporations Joint Venture/Partnership Alter-Ego Trusts Civil Conspiracy Wrongful Interference with Existing Contract Tortious Interference with Prospective or Business Relations Oral Gift of Land Estoppel Trespass to Chattels/Replevin Agency Bailment Fraudulent Conveyance ii

17 38. Malicious Prosecution Property Held or Controlled Fraudulent Destruction, Removal, or Concealment of Writing Securing Execution of Documentation through Deception Damages V. TORTS NOT RECOGNIZED IN TEXAS VI. PROVIDING CIVIL REMEDIES FOR CIVIL AND CRIMINAL WRONGS APPENDIX 1 THIRD PARTY ACTION FORMS APPENDIX 2 NICHOLS LAW, P.L.L.C. S PLEADINGS FOR CAUSES OF ACTION APPENDIX 3 CHARGE OF THE COURT FOR CAUSES OF ACTION APPENDIX 4 FIDUCIARY LITIGATION: CONFLICTS AND OVERLAPS iii

18

19 JOINDER OF THIRD PARTIES: ENTITIES AND/OR INDIVIDUALS I. INTRODUCTION. New or developing causes of action in the twenty first century in Texas law and family law, including fiduciary litigation, generally track or follow developing technology and themes. This article covers new or emerging torts as well as the application existing torts and contractual or quasi - contractual actions to family law cases, primarily in personal and property torts, fiduciary and third party litigation. References to outstanding articles on this topic are: (1) Drafting Third Party Actions Three s A Crowd Drafting Third Party Actions by Susan Myres and Tara Luedke Mora Myres, Dale and Associates, 2002 State Bar of Texas Advanced Family Law Drafting Course, Chapter 14; (2) Taking Divorce To A Toxic Level by Bobby K. Newman, 2002 Advanced Family Law Drafting Course, Chapter 19; (3) Tips For Drafting Like A Pro: From Basic Clams To Exotic Causes of Action by Wendy S. Burgower and Carlotta H. Ramirez, 2003 Advanced Family Law Drafting and Advocacy: Art and Form, Chapter 3; (4) Dead on Arrival: Advising When They Don t Have A Cause of Action, by Dan Pozza, 2005 State Bar College Summer School, Chapter 12; (5) Creative And Innovative Marital Causes of Action, by Cheryl L. Wilson, James E. Farris, Pamela E. George, and Robert J. Piro, 2005 New Frontiers In Marital Property Law, Chapter 2; and (6) Economic And Physical Torts [What s Left After Schlueter?] by John Nichols, Sr., 2001 Advanced Family Law Course, Chapter 23. This paper is basically composed of four appendices: Appendix 1 Covers appendices from Susan Myres and Tara Luedke-Mora s outstanding paper on Drafting Third Party Actions - Three s A Crowd - Drafting Third Party Actions presented at the 2002 State Bar of Texas Advanced Family Law Drafting Course. 1 Appendix 2 - covers the pleadings for causes of action not normally found in the Texas Family Law Practice Manual-2008 Edition that are used by Nichols Law, P.L.L.C. The pleadings also contain citations to supporting authority. Appendix 3 - covers the charge of the court on the causes of action with authority supporting the submission. It is recommended that the charge of the court also be used in non-jury cases, with citation to the supporting authority, since the legal issues are the same, whether the finder-of-fact is a judge or a jury. Appendix 4 - covers fiduciary litigation, including a discussion of the conflicts and overlaps in fiduciary duties and obligations that can and do occur when a spouse wears several fiduciary hats at the same time. II. INTENTIONAL AND UNINTENTIONAL TORTS. In distinguishing between intentional and unintentional torts, the Supreme Court of Texas in Reed Tool Co. v. Copelin, 686 S.W.2d 404 (Tex. 1985) stated at p. 404, [T]he fundamental difference between negligent injury or even grossly negligent injury, and intentional injury, is the specific intent to inflict injury. The Restatement (Second) of Torts defines intent to mean that the actor desires to have caused consequences of his act or that he believes that the consequences are substantially certain to result from it. Sec. 8A (1965). A. Elements Intentional Torts. The elements of intentional torts are: (1) intentional conduct that breaches a recognized duty; and (2) actual damages. Practice note - foreseeability is not required in determining damages for an intentional or knowing tort if recovery is sought for the immediate and direct consequences of the tort. Thompson v. Hodges, 237 S.W.2d 757, 759 (Tex. Civ. App. San Antonio 1951, writ ref d n.r.e.). B. Elements Unintentional Torts. The elements of unintentional torts are: (1) unintentional conduct that breaches a recognized duty; (2) foreseeability [proximate or producing cause]; and (3) actual damages.

20 C. Redressing Wrongs. All torts discussed herein necessarily include the above stated elements, depending on whether they are intentional or unintentional torts. An injury without a wrong does not create a cause of action, but to give a right or redress there must not only be an injury but it must have been occasioned by a commission of a legal wrong or violation of a legal right and breach of a legal duty. State v. Brewer, 169 S.W.2d 468 (Tex. 1943). A tort is a wrongful act [generally] not involved in a breach of contract for which a civil action may be maintained. Smith v. International Printing Pressman and Assistants Union of North America, 190 S.W.2d 769 (Tex. Civ. App. Dallas, 1946), reversed 198 S.W.2d 729 (Tex. 1946). A tort may be based on misfeasance or omission to act, as well as an act of commission. Montgomery Ward & Co. v. Scharrenbeck, 204 S.W.2d 508 (Tex. 1947). D. Res Judicata and Collateral Estoppel Distinction. Bonniwell v. Beech Aircraft Corp., 663 S.W.2d 816, 818 (Tex. 1984). "Res judicata is frequently characterized as claim preclusion because it bars litigation of all issues connected with a cause of action or defense which, with the use of diligence, might have been tried in a prior suit. [citing case] When a prior judgment is offered in a subsequent suit in which there is identity of parties, issues and subject matter, such judgment is treated as an absolute bar to retrial of claims pertaining to the same cause of action on the theory that they have merged into the judgment. [citing cases].... Collateral estoppel is narrower than res judicata. It is frequently characterized as issue preclusion because it bars re-litigation of any ultimate issue of fact actually litigated and essential to the judgment in a prior suit, regardless of whether the second suit is based upon the same cause of action.... A party suing to invoke the doctrine of collateral estoppel must establish (1) the facts sought to be litigated were fairly litigated in the prior action; (2) those facts were essential to the judgment in the first action; and, (3) the parties were cast as adversaries in the first action." "Res judicata, or merger and bar, precludes re-litigation of the same claim [cause of action] while collateral estoppel precludes re-litigation of the same issue." McCoy v. Cook, 419 N.W.2d 44, 46 (Mich. App. 1988). Therefore, res judicata = claim preclusion, and collateral estoppel = issue preclusion. In K. F. v. Faour, 762 S.W.2d 361 (Tex. App. Houston [1st Dist.] 1989) a sexual abuse claim was not precluded because neither the pleadings nor the terms of the divorce decree showed that the issue was asserted and determined in the divorce court. See, contra, Brinkman v. Brinkman, 966 S.W.2d 780 (Tex. App. San Antonio 1998, pet. denied) and criticism of Brinkman in Brinkman v. Brinkman: Where Res 2 Judicata has gone too far, 13 BYU J. Pub. L. 379, 390 (1999) E. Procedural Bars And Defenses To Bringing Actions And Limiting Damages. 1. Divorce Cases. Tex. Fam. Code Ann provides for a court ordered equitable [ just and right ] division of marital property having due regard for the rights of each party and any children of the marriage. This standard for equitable distribution has existed in Texas since 1841, when Texas was still a Republic, and which gives the court wide discretion in dividing the estate of the parties, correctable only when an abuse of discretion has been shown. Murff v. Murff, 615 S.W.2d 696 (Tex. 1981); Hedtke v. Hedtke, 112 Tex. 404, 248 S.W.2d (1923). As such, the trial court may consider any number of factors, including the economic, financial and social histories of the parties. If a two, four or even ten year statute of limitations applied to the equitable division of property, inequitable results would occur. Since there is no statute of limitations for bringing an action for divorce of a formal or informal marriage, a good faith argument can be made that no statute of limitations should be applied to the equitable division of property by the trial court at the time of divorce. No cases have been found where a statute of limitations was applied in the context of a division of property under Tex. Fam. Code Ann , or any of its predecessors statutes. However, in post-divorce divisions of undisclosed or undivided property, Tex. Fam. Code Ann provides for a two year statute of limitations and states: (a) a suit under this subchapter must be filed before the second anniversary of the date a former spouse unequivocally repudiates the existence of the ownership interest of the other former spouse and communicates that repudiation to the other former spouse; and, (b) the two-year limitations period is tolled for the period that a court of this state does not have jurisdiction over the former spouses or over the property. 2. Non-Divorce Cases. Several appellate courts in non-divorce cases have held that an independent action for breach of fiduciary duty is controlled by the two year statute of limitations. Clade v. Larsen, 838 S.W.2d 277, 281 (Tex. App. Dallas 1992, writ denied); El Paso Associates, Ltd. v. J.R. Thurman & Co., 786 S.W.2d 17, 20 (Tex. App. El Paso 1990, no writ); Redman Industries Inc. v. Couch, 613 S.W.2d 787 (Tex. App. Houston [14th Dist.] 1981, writ ref d n.r.e.). However, one court held that since a claim for fraud or misrepresentation ordinarily is a claim for a debt and is governed by a four year statute of limitations, a breach of fiduciary duty claim subsumes a claim of constructive fraud.

21 Therefore, the Corpus Christi Court of Appeals held a breach of fiduciary duty claim is also governed by a four year statute of limitations. In re Estate of Herring, 970 S.W.2d 583 (Tex. App. Corpus Christi 1998, no writ). But see Maxon v. Travis County Rent Account, 21 S.W. 3d 311 (Tex. App. - Austin 1999, pet. dism d by argmt) where the Austin Court of Appeals declined to follow Herring s four year statue of limitations ruling in breach of fiduciary duty cases and applied the two year statute of limitations in breach of fiduciary duty cases under Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code, This issue has not been settled by the Texas Supreme Court. In Little v. Smith, 943 S.W.2d 414 (Tex. 1997) the Court addressed a case in which the issue of the statute of limitations was applicable. Unfortunately the period of time was well beyond the four year statute of limitations and the asserting party probably cared little as to whether the two or four year statute applied. The Court did not address this issue. 3. Limitations of Actions. A primary concern is whether marriage tolls the bringing of an interspousal tort action. Whitley v. Whitley, 436 S.W.2d 607 (Tex. Civ. App. Houston 1968) [alienations action - fact that plaintiff was married did not toll statute of limitations after cause of action arose]. It can be argued in "fiduciary torts" that as long as a fiduciary relationship exists between spouses, the statute of limitations is tolled until discovery of the tort [conversion, etc.], much the way it is in other fiduciary relationships, such as attorney and client or stockbroker and client. Pace v. McEwen, 574 S.W.2d 792 (Tex. Civ. App. El Paso 1978, writ ref'd n.r.e.)[stockbroker]. See Little v. Smith, supra and Belt v. Oppenheimer, Blend, Harrison, and Tate, Inc., 192 S.W. 3d 780 (Tex. 2006). However, these tort suits are generally based on deceptive, fraudulent conduct. Practice Note: Since the disability of coverture in domestic tranquility arguments does not prevent the running of limitations in interspousal property and contract actions [Dyer v. Dyer, 616 S.W.2d 663, 665 (Tex. Civ. App. Corpus Christi 1981, no writ)], it is difficult to see how suits based in tort would have the effect of destroying domestic tranquility. The disability of coverture argument was rejected in Whitley v. Whitley, 436 S.W.2d 60 (Tex. Civ. App. Houston 1968, no writ) [alienation action]. The general rule is that a cause of action sounding in tort accrues when the tort is completed, that is, the act is committed and damage is suffered. Atkins v. Crosland, 417 S.W.2d 150 (Tex. 1967). This rule is supported by the public policy expressed in 12 statutes of limitations, which favor repose and discourages the assertion of stale demands. McClung v. Johnson, 620 S.W.2d 644 (Tex. Civ. App. Dallas 1981, writ ref'd n.r.e.) Defense to Limitations The Relation Back Doctrine. The doctrine of "relation back" has been codified in Texas and states: "If a filed pleading relates to a cause of action, cross action, counterclaim, or defense that is not subject to a plea of limitation when the pleading is filed, a subsequent amendment or supplement to the pleading that changes the facts or grounds of liability or defense is not subject to a plea of limitation unless the amendment or supplement is wholly based on a new, distinct, or different transaction or occurrence." Tex. Prac. & Rem. Code This is effective for pleading additional causes of action after discovery is completed. See Peek v. De Barry, 871 S.W.2d 520 (Tex. App. San Antonio 1994, writ denied) and Cain v. State, 882 S.W.2d 515 (Tex. App. Austin 994, no writ). 5. Defense to Limitations- Aggravation of Pre- Existing Conditions. Most domestic torts will not be of the "continuing" variety; for example, an assault and battery has a beginning and end; beginning when the act or event occurs and the ending when damage is suffered. Most often domestic torts of this variety will go through periods of quiescence followed by a period of new assaults. Flashbacks from prior assaults generally occur and make worse the effects of new assaults. In Texas, the tortfeasor takes his victim as he finds him. Padget v. Gray, 727 S.W.2d 706, 711 (Tex. App. Amarillo 1987, no writ). As the court stated in Thompson v. Quarles, 297 S.W.2d 321, 329 (Tex. Civ. App. Galveston 1956, writ ref'd n.r.e.), when quoting from 15 Am. Jur., Damages, Sec. 81, page 490: "The general rule seems to be that where the result of the accident is to bring into activity a dormant or incipient disease, or one to which the injured person is predisposed, the defendant is liable for the entire damages which ensue, for it cannot be said that the development of the disease as a result of the injury was not the consequence which might naturally or ordinarily follow as a result of the injury, and therefore, the negligent person may be held liable therefor. In other words, if a latent condition itself does not cause pain, suffering, etc., but that condition plus an injury caused such pain, the injury, and not the latent condition, is the proximate cause." [emphasis added]

22 Practice Note: This reasoning would also apply to intentional torts. 6. Defense to Limitations Discovery Rule. Fraud, be it actual or constructive, can be inherently undiscoverable. A breach of fiduciary duty claim is subject to the discovery rule. Little v. Smith, 943 S.W.2d 414, 420 (Tex. 1997). Where there has been a breach of fiduciary duty, the statute of limitations does not begin to run until the claimant knew, or should have known, of the facts in existence or facts that in the exercise of reasonable diligence would have led to discovery of the wrongful act. See also Slay v. Burnett Trust, 143 Tex. 621, 187 S.W.2d 377, 394 (1945); Belt v. Oppenheimer, 192 S.W. 3d 780 (Texas 2006) 7. Defense to Limitations Continuing Tort. Conceptually, a continuing tort is a tolling provision allowing the avoidance of a limitation defense. Twyman v. Twyman, 790 S.W.2d 819, 820 (Tex. App. Austin 1990), reversed on other grounds, 855 S.W.2d 619 (Tex. 1993). A matter in avoidance of the statute of limitations, not raised affirmatively by the pleadings is deemed waived. See Woods v. William M. Mercer, Inc., 769 S.W.2d 515, 518 (Tex. 1988) (stating this principle in the context of a case dealing with the discovery rule). A continuing tort involves both continuing wrongful conduct and continuing injury. Upjohn Co. v. Freeman, 885 S.W.2d 542 (Tex. App. Dallas 1994, writ denied). False imprisonment, for example is a continuing tort for which a cause of action accrues when the detention ceases. Adler v. Beverly Hills Hospital, 594 S.W.2d 153, 156 (Tex. Civ. App. Dallas 1980, no writ). Traditionally, continuing tort theories apply to such causes fo action as nuisance, trespass and false imprisonment, Jim Arnold Corp. v. Bishop, 928 S.W.2d 761, (Tex. App. Beaumont 1996, no writ) and intentional infliction of emotional distress. Newton v. Newton, 895 S.W.2d 503, 506 (Tex. App. Fort Worth 1995, no writ) (verbal abuse). A continuing tort involves wrongful conduct inflicted over a period of time that is repeated until desisted, and each day creates a separate cause of action. See Two Pesos, Inc. v. Gulf Ins. Co., 901 S.W.2d 495, 500 (Tex. App. San Antonio 1983, writ ref d n.r.e.) A cause of action for continuing tort does not accrue until the defendant s tortious act ceases. See Tectonic Realty Ins. Co. v. CNA Lloyd s of Texas Ins. Co., 812 S.W.2d 647, 654 (Tex. App. Dallas 1991, writ denied). Because continuing tort causes of action are grounded in the idea of a continuing injury to the Plaintiff, tort claimants may sue for acts that occurred beyond the two-year statute of limitations, as long as the cause of action accrued within the applicable statute of limitations. Twyman v. 4 Twyman, 790 S.W.2d 819, 821 (Tex. App. Austin 1990), reversed on other grounds, 855 S.W.2d 619 (Tex. 1993). G. Schlueter, Before and After. 1. Introduction. This section discusses the impact of Schlueter v. Schlueter, 975 S.W.2d 584 (Tex. 1998) on Texas family law practice. 2. Reference Material. The author has found the following reference material by other authors to be of excellent quality and has borrowed liberally from these comments and papers. The author wishes to express appreciation to these legal writers for their contributions to this paper and especially to the late Ted Terry, Kristin Proctor, and James LaRue for gracious and generous permission to use excerpts from their paper: Ted Terry, Kristin Proctor, and James LaRue, Breach of Fiduciary Duty and Non-Physical Tort Claims, 24th Annual Advanced Family Law Course, (1998), Tab VV.; Bradley L. Adams, The Doctrine of Fraud on the Community, 49 BAYLOR L. REV 445, (1997); Barbara Anne Kazen, Division of Property at the Time of Divorce, 49 BAYLOR L. REV 417, (1997); and Tom Oldham, Special Property Problems, 23rd Annual Advanced Family Law Course, (1997). 3. Schlueter v. Schlueter - Briefed. a. Question Answered. Schlueter answered the question of what remedies are available to a spouse alleging fraud on the community committed by the other spouse. b. Facts. The husband transferred various community assets to his father shortly before he filed for divorce. The wife brought independent tort claims against her husband and father-in-law, seeking damages for fraud, breach of fiduciary duty and conspiracy in her counterclaim for divorce. Based on favorable jury findings the trial court ordered a disproportionate division of the community estate in favor of the wife, and rendered judgment for the wife against the husband and his father for actual and exemplary damages. Holding that a tort cause of action for fraud on the community exists independent of a divorce proceeding, the Austin Court of Appeals affirmed, 929 S.W.2d 994. The Texas Supreme Court (hereinafter referred to as the Court ) granted petition for review to resolve the conflict among the Courts of Appeals on this question.

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

Fourteenth Court of Appeals Reversed and Remanded and Opinion filed August 16, 2001. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-00-00177-CV HENRY P. MASSEY AND ANN A. MASSEY, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS ADMINISTRATOR OF THE ESTATE OF COURTNEY

More information

The Enforceability of Mediated Settlement Agreements. By: Thomas J. Smith The Law Offices of Thomas J. Smith San Antonio, Texas

The Enforceability of Mediated Settlement Agreements. By: Thomas J. Smith The Law Offices of Thomas J. Smith San Antonio, Texas The Enforceability of Mediated Settlement Agreements By: Thomas J. Smith The Law Offices of Thomas J. Smith San Antonio, Texas NIGHTMARE ON MEDIATION STREET You mediate a case where the Plaintiff is suing

More information

MALICIOUS PROSECTION

MALICIOUS PROSECTION MALICIOUS PROSECTION DALE JEFFERSON, Houston Martin, Disiere, Jefferson & Wisdom, L.L.P. State Bar of Texas CAUSES OF ACTION March 30-31, 2006 - Irving April 6-7, 2006 Houston CHAPTER 18 MALICIOUS

More information

Theda Spurgeon Appellant Vs. No. 11-04-00050-CV -- Appeal from Erath County Coan & Elliott, Attorneys at Law Appellee

Theda Spurgeon Appellant Vs. No. 11-04-00050-CV -- Appeal from Erath County Coan & Elliott, Attorneys at Law Appellee 11th Court of Appeals Eastland, Texas Opinion Theda Spurgeon Appellant Vs. No. 11-04-00050-CV -- Appeal from Erath County Coan & Elliott, Attorneys at Law Appellee Coan & Elliott, Attorneys at Law, (C&E)

More information

to add a number of affirmative defenses, including an allegation that Henry s claim was barred

to add a number of affirmative defenses, including an allegation that Henry s claim was barred REVERSE and REMAND; and Opinion Filed May 11, 2015. S In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-14-00616-CV DOROTHY HENRY, Appellant V. BASSAM ZAHRA, Appellee On Appeal from the

More information

Case 3:09-cv-00748-B Document 23 Filed 09/23/09 Page 1 of 8 PageID 649 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION

Case 3:09-cv-00748-B Document 23 Filed 09/23/09 Page 1 of 8 PageID 649 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION Case 3:09-cv-00748-B Document 23 Filed 09/23/09 Page 1 of 8 PageID 649 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION ESTATE OF JOHNNY FISHER, Dec d, Plaintiff, v. CIVIL ACTION

More information

Navigating the Statute of Limitations in Texas

Navigating the Statute of Limitations in Texas Navigating the Statute of Limitations in Texas Wesley G. Johnson Cooper & Scully, P.C. 900 Jackson Street, Suite 100 Dallas, TX 75202 Telephone: 214-712 712-9500 Telecopy: 214-712 712-9540 Email: Wes.Johnson@CooperScully.com

More information

COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH

COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH NO. 2-07-159-CV JACK WHITE APPELLANT V. GAIL WHITE APPELLEE ------------ FROM THE 90TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF YOUNG COUNTY ------------ MEMORANDUM

More information

reverse the trial court s November 21, 2012 judgment awarding Frost $159,385.98 and render

reverse the trial court s November 21, 2012 judgment awarding Frost $159,385.98 and render Reverse and Render in part; Affirm in part and Opinion Filed August 11, 2015 S In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-12-01491-CV GARY C. EVANS, Appellant V. THE FROST NATIONAL

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS NO. 13-1006 IN RE ESSEX INSURANCE COMPANY, RELATOR ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS PER CURIAM Rafael Zuniga sued San Diego Tortilla (SDT) for personal injuries and then added

More information

NO. 01-03-00062-CV. D. B., Appellant. K. B., Appellee. On Appeal from the 311th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No.

NO. 01-03-00062-CV. D. B., Appellant. K. B., Appellee. On Appeal from the 311th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. Opinion issued August 12, 2004 In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas NO. 01-03-00062-CV D. B., Appellant V. K. B., Appellee On Appeal from the 311th District Court Harris County, Texas

More information

REVERSE, RENDER, and REMAND; and Opinion Filed August 20, 2013. In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas. No.

REVERSE, RENDER, and REMAND; and Opinion Filed August 20, 2013. In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas. No. REVERSE, RENDER, and REMAND; and Opinion Filed August 20, 2013. In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-10-01614-CV W. DAVID HOLLIDAY, Appellant V. GREG WEAVER AND WENDY WEAVER,

More information

NO. 12-12-00183-CV IN THE COURT OF APPEALS TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT TYLER, TEXAS

NO. 12-12-00183-CV IN THE COURT OF APPEALS TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT TYLER, TEXAS NO. 12-12-00183-CV IN THE COURT OF APPEALS TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT TYLER, TEXAS IN RE: TRUCK INSURANCE EXCHANGE, ORIGINAL PROCEEDING RELATOR MEMORANDUM OPINION Relator Truck Insurance Exchange

More information

CIVIL TRIAL RULES. of the COURTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, TEXAS. Table of Contents GENERAL MATTERS. Rule 1.10 Time Standards for the Disposition of Cases...

CIVIL TRIAL RULES. of the COURTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, TEXAS. Table of Contents GENERAL MATTERS. Rule 1.10 Time Standards for the Disposition of Cases... CIVIL TRIAL RULES of the COURTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, TEXAS Table of Contents GENERAL MATTERS Addendum to Local Rules Rule 1.10 Time Standards for the Disposition of Cases...2 Rule 1.11 Annual Calendar...3

More information

Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas

Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas MEMORANDUM OPINION No. 04-13-00815-CV IN THE ESTATE OF Alvilda Mae AGUILAR From the Probate Court No. 2, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2012-PC-2802 Honorable

More information

CLARK COUNTY, NEVADA. ANSWER ) Defendant. ) )

CLARK COUNTY, NEVADA. ANSWER ) Defendant. ) ) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ANS (NAME) (ADDRESS) (CITY, STATE, ZIP) (TELEPHONE) Defendant Pro Se DISTRICT COURT CLARK COUNTY, NEVADA ) ) Case No.: Plaintiff,

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION EIGHT

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION EIGHT Filed 2/11/15 Estate of Thomson CA2/8 NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified

More information

Civil Suits: The Process

Civil Suits: The Process Jurisdictional Limits The justice courts have exclusive jurisdiction or the authority to hear all civil actions when the amount involved, exclusive of interest, costs and awarded attorney fees when authorized

More information

DEALING WITH DAMAGES RECOVERIES AS PROPERTY

DEALING WITH DAMAGES RECOVERIES AS PROPERTY DEALING WITH DAMAGES RECOVERIES AS PROPERTY JOHN F. NICHOLS, SR. TRISTAN H. LONGINO Nichols Law, P.L.L.C. Tradition Bank Plaza 5020 Montrose Blvd., Suite 400 Houston, Texas 77006 (713) 654-0708 (713) 654-0706

More information

COURT OF APPEALS EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS EL PASO, TEXAS

COURT OF APPEALS EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS EL PASO, TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS EL PASO, TEXAS MICHAELA WARD, v. Appellant, LINDA THERET, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS PRINCIPAL OF MCKINNEY NORTH HIGH SCHOOL, Appellee. No. 08-08-00143-CV Appeal from

More information

NUMBER 13-11-00757-CV COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

NUMBER 13-11-00757-CV COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG NUMBER 13-11-00757-CV COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG ROYSTON, RAYZOR, VICKERY & WILLIAMS, L.L.P., Appellant, v. FRANCISCO FRANK LOPEZ, Appellee. On appeal from

More information

Small Claims: The Process in Detail

Small Claims: The Process in Detail What is a small claims division? Every justice court in Arizona has a small claims division to provide an inexpensive and speedy method for resolving most civil disputes that do not exceed $2,500. All

More information

AFFIRMATIVE AND DEFENSIVE PLEADINGS IN INSURANCE COVERAGE AND BAD FAITH LITIGATION THE 18TH ANNUAL INSURANCE SYMPOSIUM

AFFIRMATIVE AND DEFENSIVE PLEADINGS IN INSURANCE COVERAGE AND BAD FAITH LITIGATION THE 18TH ANNUAL INSURANCE SYMPOSIUM AFFIRMATIVE AND DEFENSIVE PLEADINGS IN INSURANCE COVERAGE AND BAD FAITH LITIGATION THE 18TH ANNUAL INSURANCE SYMPOSIUM Prepared by: STEVEN R. SHATTUCK JANA S. REIST 900 Jackson Street, Suite 100 Dallas,

More information

trial court and Court of Appeals found that the Plaintiff's case was barred by the statute of limitations.

trial court and Court of Appeals found that the Plaintiff's case was barred by the statute of limitations. RESULTS Appellate Court upholds decision that malpractice action barred September 2, 2015 The South Carolina Court of Appeals recently upheld a summary judgment obtained by David Overstreet and Mike McCall

More information

Illinois Supreme Court Requires Plaintiff to Apportion Settlements Among Successive Tortfeasors

Illinois Supreme Court Requires Plaintiff to Apportion Settlements Among Successive Tortfeasors Illinois Supreme Court Requires Plaintiff to Apportion Settlements Among Successive Tortfeasors By: Joseph B. Carini III & Catherine H. Reiter Cole, Grasso, Fencl & Skinner, Ltd. Illinois Courts have long

More information

1999, the decree ordered Molly to pay, as a part of the division of the marital estate, the $14,477

1999, the decree ordered Molly to pay, as a part of the division of the marital estate, the $14,477 Reverse and Remand; Opinion Filed May 4, 2015. S In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-13-01422-CV TEXANS CREDIT UNION, Appellant V. RICHARD C. BRIZENDINE, Appellee On Appeal

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS 444444444444 NO. 13-0776 444444444444 CHAPMAN CUSTOM HOMES, INC., AND MICHAEL B. DUNCAN, TRUSTEE OF THE M. B. DUNCAN SEPARATE PROPERTY TRUST, PETITIONERS, v. DALLAS PLUMBING

More information

CORNERSTONE A-SIDE MANAGEMENT LIABILITY INSURANCE COVERAGE FORM

CORNERSTONE A-SIDE MANAGEMENT LIABILITY INSURANCE COVERAGE FORM CORNERSTONE A-SIDE MANAGEMENT LIABILITY INSURANCE COVERAGE FORM THIS IS A CLAIMS MADE POLICY WITH DEFENSE EXPENSES INCLUDED IN THE LIMIT OF LIABILITY. PLEASE READ AND REVIEW THE POLICY CAREFULLY. In consideration

More information

Case 06-03280 Document 35 Filed in TXSB on 11/27/06 Page 1 of 7 IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

Case 06-03280 Document 35 Filed in TXSB on 11/27/06 Page 1 of 7 IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS Case 06-03280 Document 35 Filed in TXSB on 11/27/06 Page 1 of 7 IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION IN RE DAVID WIMBERLY, CASE NO. 05-81669-G3-13 Debtor,

More information

2014 IL App (1st) 130250-U. No. 1-13-0250 IN THE APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT

2014 IL App (1st) 130250-U. No. 1-13-0250 IN THE APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT 2014 IL App (1st) 130250-U FIFTH DIVISION September 12, 2014 No. 1-13-0250 NOTICE: This order was filed under Supreme Court Rule 23 and may not be cited as precedent by any party except in the limited

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS 444444444444 NO. 06-0258 444444444444 DENIS PROULX, PETITIONER v. MICHAEL A. WELLS, RESPONDENT 4444444444444444444444444444444444444444444444444444 ON PETITION FOR REVIEW

More information

In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas. No. 05-14-00894-CV

In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas. No. 05-14-00894-CV Reversed and Remanded and Opinion Filed July 28, 2015 S In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-14-00894-CV TEXAS HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES COMMISSION, Appellant V. JOSEPH MCRAE,

More information

PREVIEW PLEASE DO NOT COPY THIS DOCUMENT THANK YOU. LegalFormsForTexas.Com

PREVIEW PLEASE DO NOT COPY THIS DOCUMENT THANK YOU. LegalFormsForTexas.Com Form: Plaintiff's original petition-wrongful Death [Name], PLAINTIFF vs. [Name], DEFENDANT [ IN THE [Type of Court] COURT [Court number] PLAINTIFF'S ORIGINAL PETITION 1. DISCOVERY CONTROL PLAN 1.1 Plaintiff

More information

CIVIL PROCEDURE 101. Presentation by: Judge Emily Peacock, Scott Silverman, Esq. and Loren Beer, Esq.

CIVIL PROCEDURE 101. Presentation by: Judge Emily Peacock, Scott Silverman, Esq. and Loren Beer, Esq. CIVIL PROCEDURE 101 Presentation by: Judge Emily Peacock, Scott Silverman, Esq. and Loren Beer, Esq. The Federal Rules govern the conduct of all civil actions brought in Federal district courts. The Florida

More information

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT ORDER AND JUDGMENT * Before KELLY, ANDERSON, and TYMKOVICH, Circuit Judges.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT ORDER AND JUDGMENT * Before KELLY, ANDERSON, and TYMKOVICH, Circuit Judges. FILED United States Court of Appeals UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS Tenth Circuit WILLIAM MOSHER; LYNN MOSHER, Plaintiffs - Appellants, FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT November 19, 2014 Elisabeth A. Shumaker Clerk

More information

ASSEMBLY BILL No. 597

ASSEMBLY BILL No. 597 AMENDED IN ASSEMBLY APRIL 14, 2015 california legislature 2015 16 regular session ASSEMBLY BILL No. 597 Introduced by Assembly Member Cooley February 24, 2015 An act to amend Sections 36 and 877 of, and

More information

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-13-00055-CV Paula Villanueva, Appellant v. McCash Enterprises, Inc. d/b/a Comet Cleaners and Comet Cleaners, Appellees FROM THE COUNTY COURT AT

More information

HP0868, LD 1187, item 1, 123rd Maine State Legislature An Act To Recoup Health Care Funds through the Maine False Claims Act

HP0868, LD 1187, item 1, 123rd Maine State Legislature An Act To Recoup Health Care Funds through the Maine False Claims Act PLEASE NOTE: Legislative Information cannot perform research, provide legal advice, or interpret Maine law. For legal assistance, please contact a qualified attorney. Be it enacted by the People of the

More information

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

Fourteenth Court of Appeals Affirmed and Opinion filed February 7, 2002. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-00-01144-CV ANTONIO GARCIA, JR., Appellant V. PALESTINE MEMORIAL HOSPITAL, n/k/a MEMORIAL MOTHER FRANCES HOSPITAL,

More information

Court of Appeals. First District of Texas

Court of Appeals. First District of Texas Opinion issued December 16, 2014 In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas NO. 01-14-00351-CV JAMES W. PAULSEN, Appellant / Cross-Appellee v. ELLEN A. YARRELL, Appellee / Cross-Appellant

More information

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR THE TWENTIETH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT ST. CLAIR COUNTY, ILLINOIS NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR THE TWENTIETH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT ST. CLAIR COUNTY, ILLINOIS NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION If you were injured or provided treatment for an injury and filed a claim under your Allstate Med Pay coverage, and were compensated in an amount

More information

Province of Alberta LIMITATIONS ACT. Revised Statutes of Alberta 2000 Chapter L-12. Current as of December 17, 2014. Office Consolidation

Province of Alberta LIMITATIONS ACT. Revised Statutes of Alberta 2000 Chapter L-12. Current as of December 17, 2014. Office Consolidation Province of Alberta LIMITATIONS ACT Revised Statutes of Alberta 2000 Current as of December 17, 2014 Office Consolidation Published by Alberta Queen s Printer Alberta Queen s Printer 5 th Floor, Park Plaza

More information

2 Tex. Intell. Prop. L.J. 171. Texas Intellectual Property Law Journal Winter, 1994. Recent Development RECENT DEVELOPMENTS IN TRADE SECRET LAW

2 Tex. Intell. Prop. L.J. 171. Texas Intellectual Property Law Journal Winter, 1994. Recent Development RECENT DEVELOPMENTS IN TRADE SECRET LAW 2 Tex. Intell. Prop. L.J. 171 Texas Intellectual Property Law Journal Winter, 1994 Recent Development RECENT DEVELOPMENTS IN TRADE SECRET LAW Sue Z. Shaper a1 Copyright (c) 1994 by the State Bar of Texas,

More information

IN THE NEBRASKA COURT OF APPEALS. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND JUDGMENT ON APPEAL (Memorandum Web Opinion)

IN THE NEBRASKA COURT OF APPEALS. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND JUDGMENT ON APPEAL (Memorandum Web Opinion) IN THE NEBRASKA COURT OF APPEALS MEMORANDUM OPINION AND JUDGMENT ON APPEAL (Memorandum Web Opinion) SIMMONS V. PRECAST HAULERS NOTICE: THIS OPINION IS NOT DESIGNATED FOR PERMANENT PUBLICATION AND MAY NOT

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION EIGHT

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION EIGHT Filed 10/11/13 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION EIGHT ED AGUILAR, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. B238853 (Los Angeles County

More information

CAUSE NO. DC-12-07825

CAUSE NO. DC-12-07825 CAUSE NO. DC-12-07825 Filed 13 September 9 P4:46 Gary Fitzsimmons District Clerk Dallas District CADE MANNETTI, v. Plaintiff, VISIONARY RESTAURANTS LLC, VISIONARY STAFFING LLC, WILLIAM McCROREY, AND THOMAS

More information

VIRGINIA ACTS OF ASSEMBLY -- 2015 SESSION

VIRGINIA ACTS OF ASSEMBLY -- 2015 SESSION VIRGINIA ACTS OF ASSEMBLY -- 2015 SESSION CHAPTER 585 An Act to amend and reenact 38.2-2206 of the Code of Virginia and to amend the Code of Virginia by adding in Article 7 of Chapter 3 of Title 8.01 a

More information

Case 10-03582 Document 11 Filed in TXSB on 04/27/11 Page 1 of 10

Case 10-03582 Document 11 Filed in TXSB on 04/27/11 Page 1 of 10 Case 10-03582 Document 11 Filed in TXSB on 04/27/11 Page 1 of 10 SAN ANTONIO FEDERAL CREDIT UNION, Defendant(s). IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION

More information

Wrongful Death Damages Exemplary Damages

Wrongful Death Damages Exemplary Damages A Wrongful Death Damages Exemplary Damages Causes of Action Accruing before September 1, 1995 If you have answered Yes to Question [51.4 or other question authorizing potential recovery of punitive damages],

More information

RENDERED: FEBRUARY 8, 2008; 10:00 A.M. NOT TO BE PUBLISHED Commonwealth Of Kentucky Court of Appeals NO. 2006-CA-002347-MR DEBRA LYNN FITZGERALD

RENDERED: FEBRUARY 8, 2008; 10:00 A.M. NOT TO BE PUBLISHED Commonwealth Of Kentucky Court of Appeals NO. 2006-CA-002347-MR DEBRA LYNN FITZGERALD RENDERED: FEBRUARY 8, 2008; 10:00 A.M. NOT TO BE PUBLISHED Commonwealth Of Kentucky Court of Appeals NO. 2006-CA-002347-MR DEBRA LYNN FITZGERALD APPELLANT APPEAL FROM WARREN CIRCUIT COURT v. HONORABLE

More information

Case 4:14-cv-01527 Document 39 Filed in TXSD on 07/08/15 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION ORDER

Case 4:14-cv-01527 Document 39 Filed in TXSD on 07/08/15 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION ORDER Case 4:14-cv-01527 Document 39 Filed in TXSD on 07/08/15 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION CHARTIS SPECIALTY INSURANCE CO., Plaintiff, v. CIVIL ACTION

More information

UNINSURED/UNDERINSURED MOTORIST CLAIMS AFTER BRAINARD. By C. Brooks Schuelke. Perlmutter & Schuelke, LLP th

UNINSURED/UNDERINSURED MOTORIST CLAIMS AFTER BRAINARD. By C. Brooks Schuelke. Perlmutter & Schuelke, LLP th UNINSURED/UNDERINSURED MOTORIST CLAIMS AFTER BRAINARD By C. Brooks Schuelke Perlmutter & Schuelke, LLP th 1717 W. 6 Street, Ste. 375 Austin, Texas 78703 (512)476-4944 www.civtrial.com brooks@civtrial.com

More information

ASSEMBLY BILL No. 597

ASSEMBLY BILL No. 597 california legislature 2015 16 regular session ASSEMBLY BILL No. 597 Introduced by Assembly Member Cooley February 24, 2015 An act to amend Sections 36 and 877 of, and to add Chapter 6 (commencing with

More information

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

Fourteenth Court of Appeals Petition for Writ of Mandamus Denied, Appeal Dismissed for Lack of Jurisdiction, and Opinion filed August 20, 2009. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-08-00925-CV ATLAS GULF-COAST, INC. D/B/A ATLAS

More information

COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH

COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH NO. 02-13-00125-CV CHRISTOPHER EDOMWANDE APPELLANT V. JULIO GAZA & SANDRA F. GAZA APPELLEES ---------- FROM COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 2 OF TARRANT COUNTY

More information

ATTORNEY S FEES AND LOSER PAYS STATUTE

ATTORNEY S FEES AND LOSER PAYS STATUTE ATTORNEY S FEES AND LOSER PAYS STATUTE WENDY S. BURGOWER 3355 W. Alabama, Suite 825 Houston, Texas 77098 (713)529-3982 State Bar of Texas 35 TH ANNUAL MARRIAGE DISSOLUTION INSTITUTE April 26-27, 2012 Dallas

More information

LIMITATIONS. The Limitations Act. being

LIMITATIONS. The Limitations Act. being 1 LIMITATIONS c. L-16.1 The Limitations Act being Chapter L-16.1* of The Statutes of Saskatchewan, 2004 (effective May 1, 2005), as amended by the Statutes of Saskatchewan, 2007, c.28. *NOTE: Pursuant

More information

Commonwealth of Kentucky Court of Appeals

Commonwealth of Kentucky Court of Appeals RENDERED: DECEMBER 7, 2012; 10:00 A.M. NOT TO BE PUBLISHED ORDERED PUBLISHED FEBRUARY 8, 2013; 10:00 A.M. Commonwealth of Kentucky Court of Appeals NO. 2011-CA-000990-MR RANDY PEZZAROSSI APPELLANT APPEAL

More information

Eleventh Court of Appeals

Eleventh Court of Appeals Opinion filed June 14, 2012 In The Eleventh Court of Appeals No. 11-10-00281-CV RSL FUNDING, LLC, Appellant V. AEGON STRUCTURED SETTLEMENTS, INC. AND MONUMENTAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellees On Appeal

More information

HARVEY KRUSE, P.C. BAD FAITH

HARVEY KRUSE, P.C. BAD FAITH HARVEY KRUSE, P.C. BAD FAITH Prepared By: Michael F. Schmidt P25213 HARVEY KRUSE, P.C. 1050 Wilshire Drive, Suite 320 Troy, MI 48084 (248) 649-7800 Fax (248) 649-2316 A. INTRODUCTION Subject to specific

More information

Case 4:10-cv-01249 Document 103 Filed in TXSD on 10/09/13 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION

Case 4:10-cv-01249 Document 103 Filed in TXSD on 10/09/13 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION Case 4:10-cv-01249 Document 103 Filed in TXSD on 10/09/13 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION TOP PEARL, LTD., Plaintiff, v. CIVIL ACTION H-10-1249 COSA

More information

CALIFORNIA FALSE CLAIMS ACT GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 12650-12656

CALIFORNIA FALSE CLAIMS ACT GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 12650-12656 CALIFORNIA FALSE CLAIMS ACT GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 12650-12656 12650. (a) This article shall be known and may be cited as the False Claims Act. (b) For purposes of this article: (1) "Claim" includes any

More information

CLASSIC A-SIDE MANAGEMENT LIABILITY INSURANCE COVERAGE FORM

CLASSIC A-SIDE MANAGEMENT LIABILITY INSURANCE COVERAGE FORM CLASSIC A-SIDE MANAGEMENT LIABILITY INSURANCE COVERAGE FORM THIS IS A CLAIMS MADE POLICY WITH DEFENSE EXPENSES INCLUDED IN THE LIMIT OF LIABILITY. PLEASE READ AND REVIEW THE POLICY CAREFULLY. In consideration

More information

MONTANA EIGHTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT, CASCADE COUNTY. Appearing on behalf of the Named Plaintiff and the Class were attorneys Daniel P.

MONTANA EIGHTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT, CASCADE COUNTY. Appearing on behalf of the Named Plaintiff and the Class were attorneys Daniel P. ,5SEPV Wl0: 3ii /"'LCD JCOURT MONTANA EIGHTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT, CASCADE COUNTY Robert Jacobsen, -vs- Allstate Insurance Company, Plaintiff, Defendant. Cause No.: ADV-03-201(d) Final Order Approving

More information

Court of Appeals. First District of Texas

Court of Appeals. First District of Texas Opinion issued April 19, 2016 In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas NO. 01-15-00361-CV FREDDIE L. WALKER, Appellant V. RISSIE OWENS, PRESIDING OFFICER OF THE TEXAS BOARD OF PARDONS AND

More information

Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas

Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas MEMORANDUM OPINION No. 04-13-00593-CV Venus MINSAL, Appellant v. Abel H. GARCIA, Appellee From the 166th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court

More information

Appendix I: Select Federal Legislative. Proposals Addressing Compensation for Asbestos-Related Harms or Death

Appendix I: Select Federal Legislative. Proposals Addressing Compensation for Asbestos-Related Harms or Death Appendix I: Select Legislative Appendix I: Select Federal Legislative is and Mesothelioma Benefits Act H.R. 6906, 93rd 1973). With respect to claims for benefits filed before December 31, 1974, would authorize

More information

Court of Appeals. First District of Texas

Court of Appeals. First District of Texas Opinion issued December 19, 2013. In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas NO. 01-12-00515-CV MICHAEL SKINNER, Appellant V. PAMELA SKINNER, Appellee On Appeal from the 257th District Court

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION JASON LONG, Plaintiff, v. NO. 0:00-CV-000 ABC THE CHABON GROUP, INC., Defendant. DEFENDANT S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

More information

Court of Appeals. First District of Texas

Court of Appeals. First District of Texas Opinion issued June 11, 2013. In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas NO. 01-12-00636-CV SINHUE TEMPLOS, Appellant V. FORD MOTOR COMPANY, Appellee On Appeal from the 333rd District Court

More information

Case 3:04-cv-01482-BF Document 19 Filed 06/30/05 Page 1 of 5 PageID 470

Case 3:04-cv-01482-BF Document 19 Filed 06/30/05 Page 1 of 5 PageID 470 Case 3:04-cv-01482-BF Document 19 Filed 06/30/05 Page 1 of 5 PageID 470 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION MARCY JACKSON VERNON, Plaintiff, v. Civil

More information

29 of 41 DOCUMENTS. SAN DIEGO ASSEMBLERS, INC., Plaintiff and Appellant, v. WORK COMP FOR LESS INSURANCE SERVICES, INC., Defendant and Respondent.

29 of 41 DOCUMENTS. SAN DIEGO ASSEMBLERS, INC., Plaintiff and Appellant, v. WORK COMP FOR LESS INSURANCE SERVICES, INC., Defendant and Respondent. Page 1 29 of 41 DOCUMENTS SAN DIEGO ASSEMBLERS, INC., Plaintiff and Appellant, v. WORK COMP FOR LESS INSURANCE SERVICES, INC., Defendant and Respondent. D062406 COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FOURTH APPELLATE

More information

STANDARD CONTINGENT FEE REPRESENTATION AGREEMENT FOR INDIVIDUALS

STANDARD CONTINGENT FEE REPRESENTATION AGREEMENT FOR INDIVIDUALS Notice: This Agreement is not valid unless signed and accepted by an officer of The Feldman Law Firm, P.C., who will make the sole decision whether to accept your case. This Agreement may be digitally

More information

NASD REGULATION, INC. OFFICE OF HEARING OFFICERS. : No. C11970032 v. : : Hearing Officer - SW : : Respondent. :

NASD REGULATION, INC. OFFICE OF HEARING OFFICERS. : No. C11970032 v. : : Hearing Officer - SW : : Respondent. : NASD REGULATION, INC. OFFICE OF HEARING OFFICERS : DEPARTMENT OF ENFORCEMENT, : : Complainant, : Disciplinary Proceeding : No. C11970032 v. : : Hearing Officer - SW : : Respondent. : : ORDER GRANTING MOTION

More information

HAWAI`I REVISED STATUTES CHAPTER 672B DESIGN CLAIM CONCILIATION PANEL. Act 207, 2007 Session Laws of Hawai`i

HAWAI`I REVISED STATUTES CHAPTER 672B DESIGN CLAIM CONCILIATION PANEL. Act 207, 2007 Session Laws of Hawai`i HAWAI`I REVISED STATUTES CHAPTER 672B DESIGN CLAIM CONCILIATION PANEL Act 207, 2007 Session Laws of Hawai`i Section 672B-1 Definitions 672B-2 Administration of chapter 672B-3 Design claim conciliation

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI DIVISION IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI DIVISION SIMON DOMINGUEZ, PEDRO DOMINGUEZ, JOSE FRANCISCO BRIONES, and ROBERT PEREZ On Behalf of Themselves and All

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS STATE OF ARIZONA DIVISION ONE

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS STATE OF ARIZONA DIVISION ONE NOTICE: THIS DECISION DOES NOT CREATE LEGAL PRECEDENT AND MAY NOT BE CITED EXCEPT AS AUTHORIZED BY APPLICABLE RULES. See Ariz. R. Supreme Court 111(c); ARCAP 28(c); Ariz. R. Crim. P. 31.24 IN THE COURT

More information

The two sides disagree on how much money, if any, could have been awarded if Plaintiffs, on behalf of the class, were to prevail at trial.

The two sides disagree on how much money, if any, could have been awarded if Plaintiffs, on behalf of the class, were to prevail at trial. SUPERIOR COURT OF THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES If you are a subscriber of Kaiser Foundation Health Plan, Inc. and you, or your dependent, have been diagnosed with an autism spectrum disorder, you could receive

More information

ORDER GRANTING SUMMARY JUDGMENT. THIS MATTER comes on for consideration of DEFENDANT S MOTION FOR I. STATEMENT OF THE CASE

ORDER GRANTING SUMMARY JUDGMENT. THIS MATTER comes on for consideration of DEFENDANT S MOTION FOR I. STATEMENT OF THE CASE DISTRICT COURT, EL PASO COUNTY, COLORADO Court address: P.O. Box 2980 270 South Tejon Street Colorado Springs, CO 80903 DATE FILED: July 29, 2014 2:12 PM CASE NUMBER: 2013CV2249 Phone Number: (719) 452-5279

More information

TRONOX TORT CLAIMS TRUST. Individual Review and Arbitration Procedures for Category A and Category D Personal Injury Claims

TRONOX TORT CLAIMS TRUST. Individual Review and Arbitration Procedures for Category A and Category D Personal Injury Claims TRONOX TORT CLAIMS TRUST Individual Review and Arbitration Procedures for Category A and Category D Personal Injury Claims Pursuant to Sections 3.4 and 3.5 of the Tronox Tort Claims Trust Distribution

More information

Read the attached order carefully. It applies to you and you will be responsible for complying with the order.

Read the attached order carefully. It applies to you and you will be responsible for complying with the order. Read the attached order carefully. It applies to you and you will be responsible for complying with the order. Highlights No relocation of child(ren) page 4 Shared parenting and time sharing page 3 Parenting

More information

GLOSSARY OF SELECTED LEGAL TERMS

GLOSSARY OF SELECTED LEGAL TERMS GLOSSARY OF SELECTED LEGAL TERMS Sources: US Courts : http://www.uscourts.gov/library/glossary.html New York State Unified Court System: http://www.nycourts.gov/lawlibraries/glossary.shtml Acquittal A

More information

Joint and Several Liability Under Texas Tort Law

Joint and Several Liability Under Texas Tort Law Joint and Several Liability Under Texas Tort Law By Frank Vlahakos and Fred A. Simpson This article points out some recent changes in the basic requirements to establish a defendant s joint and several

More information

PUBLIC ENTITY POLICY LAW ENFORCEMENT LIABILITY COVERAGE FORM OCCURRENCE COVERAGE

PUBLIC ENTITY POLICY LAW ENFORCEMENT LIABILITY COVERAGE FORM OCCURRENCE COVERAGE A Stock Insurance Company, herein called the Company PUBLIC ENTITY POLICY LAW ENFORCEMENT LIABILITY COVERAGE FORM OCCURRENCE COVERAGE Various provisions in this policy restrict coverage. Please read the

More information

Case 4:06-cv-00191 Document 12 Filed in TXSD on 05/25/06 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION

Case 4:06-cv-00191 Document 12 Filed in TXSD on 05/25/06 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION Case 4:06-cv-00191 Document 12 Filed in TXSD on 05/25/06 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION BARBARA S. QUINN, Plaintiff, v. CIVIL ACTION NO. H-06-00191

More information

In The NO. 14-98-00234-CV. UNITED STATES AUTOMOBILE ASSOCIATION, Appellant

In The NO. 14-98-00234-CV. UNITED STATES AUTOMOBILE ASSOCIATION, Appellant Affirmed and Opinion filed January 13, 2000. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-98-00234-CV UNITED STATES AUTOMOBILE ASSOCIATION, Appellant V. UNDERWRITERS AT INTEREST and STEVEN RICHARD BISHOP,

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS United States Court of Appeals FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT Fifth Circuit F I L E D December 18, 2009 No. 09-10562 Summary Calendar Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk JM WALKER

More information

CLIENT INFORMATION: GUIDELINES ON ADMINISTRATION & BILLING

CLIENT INFORMATION: GUIDELINES ON ADMINISTRATION & BILLING CLIENT INFORMATION: GUIDELINES ON ADMINISTRATION & BILLING As updated from time-to-time for billing rates and responsible attorney and, following actual notice to the client. This agreement forms the basis

More information

Potential legal opinion liability for Ohio business lawyers

Potential legal opinion liability for Ohio business lawyers Potential legal opinion liability for Ohio business lawyers by Phillip M. Callesen and James W. May Lawyers know that one of the biggest risks of practicing law is that a client may sue the lawyer for

More information

Mastering Prejudgment Interest

Mastering Prejudgment Interest Mastering Prejudgment Interest R. Brent Cooper Diana L. Faust Cooper & Scully, P.C. 900 Jackson Street, Suite 100 Tel: (214) 712-9500 Fax: (214) 712-9540 Brent.Cooper@CooperScully.com Diana.Faust@CooperScully.com

More information

INJURY SETTLEMENTS ARE USUALLY COMMUNITY PROPERTY IN A TEXAS DIVORCE

INJURY SETTLEMENTS ARE USUALLY COMMUNITY PROPERTY IN A TEXAS DIVORCE INJURY SETTLEMENTS ARE USUALLY COMMUNITY PROPERTY IN A TEXAS DIVORCE by Greg Enos February 2014 A spouse s recovery for an injury claim is usually community property because most settlements mix all of

More information

If You re Going to the Courthouse, Please File this for Me: Ten Documents Which Must be Filed in the Trial Court to Preserve Error for Appeal

If You re Going to the Courthouse, Please File this for Me: Ten Documents Which Must be Filed in the Trial Court to Preserve Error for Appeal If You re Going to the Courthouse, Please File this for Me: Ten Documents Which Must be Filed in the Trial Court to Preserve Error for Appeal Chad M. Ruback The Ruback Law Firm 8117 Preston Road Suite

More information

when litigant filed pleading. Vernon's Ann.Texas Rules Civ.Proc., Rule 13.

when litigant filed pleading. Vernon's Ann.Texas Rules Civ.Proc., Rule 13. George R. NEELY, Appellant, v. COMMISSION FOR LAWYER DISCIPLINE, Appellee. No. 01-98-00034-CV. Court of Appeals of Texas, Houston (1st Disk). June 18, 1998. Commission for Lawyer Discipline filed disciplinary

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS 444444444444 NO. 13-0761 444444444444 IN RE NATIONAL LLOYDS INSURANCE COMPANY, RELATOR 4444444444444444444444444444444444444444444444444444 ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS

More information

2013 IL App (3d) 120130-U. Order filed September 23, 2013 IN THE APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS THIRD DISTRICT A.D., 2013

2013 IL App (3d) 120130-U. Order filed September 23, 2013 IN THE APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS THIRD DISTRICT A.D., 2013 NOTICE: This order was filed under Supreme Court Rule 23 and may not be cited as precedent by any party except in the limited circumstances allowed under Rule 23(e)(1). 2013 IL App (3d) 120130-U Order

More information

COURT OF APPEAL, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION ONE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

COURT OF APPEAL, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION ONE STATE OF CALIFORNIA Filed 10/4/13; pub. order 10/28/13 (see end of opn.) COURT OF APPEAL, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION ONE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SAN DIEGO ASSEMBLERS, INC., D062406 Plaintiff and Appellant, v. WORK COMP

More information

OPINION. No. 04-10-00546-CV. TEXAS FARM BUREAU MUTUAL INSURANCE CO., Appellant/Cross-Appellee

OPINION. No. 04-10-00546-CV. TEXAS FARM BUREAU MUTUAL INSURANCE CO., Appellant/Cross-Appellee OPINION No. 04-10-00546-CV TEXAS FARM BUREAU MUTUAL INSURANCE CO., Appellant/Cross-Appellee v. Shannan ROGERS and Cristen Bazan, as legal heirs of Cynthia Bazan, deceased, Appellees/Cross-Appellants From

More information

Amy S. Harris Shareholder

Amy S. Harris Shareholder Shareholder Amy Harris joined Macdonald Devin in 1989 and represents clients in state and federal trial and appellate courts, primarily in insurance defense litigation and insurance coverage. She has served

More information

Title XLV TORTS. Chapter 768 NEGLIGENCE. View Entire Chapter

Title XLV TORTS. Chapter 768 NEGLIGENCE. View Entire Chapter Title XLV TORTS Chapter 768 NEGLIGENCE View Entire Chapter 768.28 Waiver of sovereign immunity in tort actions; recovery limits; limitation on attorney fees; statute of limitations; exclusions; indemnification;

More information

Rivers McNamara, PLLC 1209 West Fifth Street, Suite 200 Austin, Texas 78703 (512) 439-7000 rrivers@riversmcnamara.com

Rivers McNamara, PLLC 1209 West Fifth Street, Suite 200 Austin, Texas 78703 (512) 439-7000 rrivers@riversmcnamara.com RICHEL RIVERS Rivers McNamara, PLLC 1209 West Fifth Street, Suite 200 Austin, Texas 78703 (512) 439-7000 rrivers@riversmcnamara.com EDUCATION University of Texas School of Law (J.D. 1976) Trinity University

More information