Louisiana Workers Compensation Chapter 1
|
|
- Barbara Perkins
- 8 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 8200 Hampson Street, Suite 302 New Orleans, LA (504) Louisiana Workers Compensation Chapter 1 Arising out of and in the Course of Employment What activity/accident and injuries are covered by workers compensation? What is a compensable accident? Worker s compensation is a no fault system. It is a compromise between employers and employees. The employer will compensate employees for all injuries regardless of fault, and in exchange, the employee gives the employer tort immunity. This is called the exclusive remedy. The system is designed to insure that workers injured on the job get immediate medical coverage and wage replacement. If the employee were forced to sue his employer in tort, the payment of wage replacement and medical expenses would not be paid unless and until the employee proved employer fault. If the employee could prove that the employer was at fault, however, the final payout would include greater damages, including pain and suffering. If there was no fault on employer, there would be no liability. Tort immunity in exchange for no fault coverage is the compromise of workers compensation. Whiteley & May Law Firm frank@whiteley-law.com Page 1
2 Arising out of and in the course of employment 1.) Arising out of looks at the source of the risk. The question is whether the risk is greater for the employee than for a non-employee? 2.) Course of employment looks at the time and place of the activity. If the employee is at work, clocked in, and doing a work activity almost any accident and injury will be found to be compensable. A Typical Workers Compensation Claim: John is an ironworker. He works for Whiteley Ironworks. While at work he bends over to pick up a hammer. He feels a pop in his back. He is injured and needs immediate back surgery. He can no longer work. Whiteley Ironworks was not negligent in causing the accident, (no fault). John s injury will still be covered by the Whiteley Ironworks workers compensation policy. Society benefits from Whiteley Ironworks bearing the expense on injuries occurring at work, as work injuries are part of the cost of Whiteley Ironworks doing business. John needs immediate medical care and wage replacement. If we did not have a system of workers compensation, John might become a ward of the state. He would be without income, and he would not be able to care for his family. He might be unable to pay for needed health care, or John may be forced to have his medical expenses covered by the State through Medicare or the Charity Hospital system. Balancing test: A strong showing of course of employment can overcome a weak showing of arising out of employment. An accident occurs in the course of employment when the employee sustains an injury while actively engaged in the performance of his duties during working hours, either on the employer's premises or at other places where employment activities take the employee. Kern v. Southport Mill, 174 La. 432, 141 So. 19 (1932); The principal criteria for determining course of employment are time, place and employment activity. Thus, when the employee is squarely within the course of his employment, virtually any risk (whether an increased risk or not) has been considered as arising out of employment. Mundy v. The Department of Health and Human Resources, 593 So. 2d 346, 348 (La. 01/17/92), The risks which have caused the greatest difficulty are those that have neither a particular employment character nor a particular personal character. 1 A. Larson, Whiteley & May Law Firm frank@whiteley-law.com Page 2
3 Workmen's Compensation 7.00 (1990). When the accident occurs at such a time or place or during such an activity so that the employee is barely within the outer boundary of the "course of employment" inquiry, a very strong showing by the employee that the risk arose out of the employment is necessary to establish the relationship between the injury and the employment necessary for entitlement to compensation. Mundy v. The Department of Health and Human Resources: In Mundy, the plaintiff worked as a nurse for Charity Hospital. On the date of the accident, the plaintiff arrived at the hospital and proceeded to the elevator to take it to the eleventh floor where she was scheduled to work the night shift. A stranger entered the elevator with her. When the elevator stopped and the doors opened on the second floor the man started stabbing Mundy. Nurse Mundy eventually pushed her assailant out of the elevator onto second floor. Mundy then proceeded to her eleventh floor work station where she received medical care. Instead of filing a workers compensation action, Nurse Mundy filed a tort action for negligence against her employer. Her employer argued that it was protected by the exclusive remedy of workers compensation, and as such, the plaintiff did not have a viable tort claim. Id. The trial court granted a judgment for the plaintiff finding that plaintiff had not come under the control or supervision of Charity Hospital at the time when the incident occurred, and therefore, she was not in the course and scope of her employment. The issue of course and scope was eventually reviewed by the Louisiana Supreme Court. Id. The Supreme Court reasoned that, An accident occurs in the course of employment when the employee sustains an injury while actively engaged in the performance of his duties during working hours on the employer s premises Id. citing Kern v. Southport Mill, 174 La. 432, 141 So. 19 (1932). The principal criteria for determining course of employment are time, place and employment activity. Id. at 349. (Emphasis added). The Court further reasoned that: An accident arises out of employment if the risk from which the injury resulted was greater for the employee than for a person not engaged in the employment. Id. Both the course and scope of employment and arising out of employment requirements must be analyzed together. However, in a close case, course and scope has been found to counterbalance a relatively weak showing of arising out of employment. Id. citing Raybol v. Louisiana State University, 520 So. 2d 724 (La. 1988). Whiteley & May Law Firm frank@whiteley-law.com Page 3
4 For example: When the accident occurs at such a time or place or during such an activity so that the employee is barely within the outer boundary of the course of employment inquiry, a very strong showing by the employee that the risk arose out of the employment is necessary to establish the relationship between the injury and the employment necessary for entitlement to compensation. Id. at 350 citing Robinson v. F. Strauss & Son, Inc., 481 So. 2d 592 (La. 1986). In Mundy, [w]hile the conditions of the employment arguably caused plaintiff to be at the place of the attack at the time the attack occurred, there were other alternative routes for her to reach her work station. Id. Mundy. The "course of employment" inquiry, plaintiff was attacked before she arrived at her work station and before she began her employment duties. Although she had entered the building in which her work station was located, she was in the public area of the building open to the public, on an elevator used by patients and visitors as well as employees. Id. Mundy. She clearly had not yet reached the place where she would be under the supervision and control of her employer. Templet v. Intracoastal Truck Line, Inc., 255 La. 193, 230 So.2d 74 (1969). Under the circumstances one could hardly say that there was a strong "course of employment" showing. Id. Mundy. Often times the choice of remedy (tort or workers compensation) by the injured party skews the analysis of the Court. When an employee seeks workers compensation benefits as their remedy the court s expand the course and scope. When the employee seeks tort the workers compensation coverage is contracted. Otherwise, how can cases like Glory v. Zuppardo's Economical Supermarket, Inc. 532 So2d 933 (La App 5th Cir 1988) be reconciled with Mundy? In the Glory case, the employee had punched out. She went to the parking lot, and then she returned to the store to get her paycheck. While still in the store, on her way back to her car, she slipped and fell. Glory sought workers compensation from her employer and was found to be in the course and scope of her employment. Whiteley & May Law Firm frank@whiteley-law.com Page 4
5 TRAVEL TO AND FROM WORK: The general rule is that travel to and from your home to your work place is not covered by workers compensation. There are, however, exceptions to this rule. 1.) If the employer interest itself in the travel. Paid for travel time; A company car; or Milage or expense reimbursement. 2.) The employee is on a mission for the employer. The employee is sent home to get a work supply; The employee is sent to the store to get work materials; or The employee is sent to bank on the way home to make a deposit of business funds. What are the limits, is the employee only covered on the way to the bank, but what about after he makes the deposit? 3.) The accident happens on the employer s premises. The employee works for Exxon, they are on the premises of the refinery, but they have not reached the work station. Distinguish, Mundy: only Exxon employees are allowed to drive their personal vehicles into the Exxon refinery. 4.) Travel will be in the course and scope of employment when the employee is traveling from one work site to the next. For example, a lawyer is traveling from the courthouse where he had a hearing to a deposition at another office. So called guest passenger cases have resulted in some unusual findings that can only be explained by the injured worker choice of remedy, whether tort or workers compensation. In Hill v. West American Ins. Co., Nos , (La App 3d Cir 5/19/94) 635 So2d 1165, the employee, guest passenger, was injured while riding in a company car. The accident occurred while he and co-employee drove from job site in a remote area to get lunch. The co-employee/driver was at fault in causing the accident. The court permitted employee to sue the employer's auto liability insurer for tort damages. Similarly, in Dupre v. Exxon Pipeline Company, No (La App 3d Cir 6/1/94) 638 So2d 1118, the court permitted the employee of an Exxon sub-contractor to sue Exxon in tort for injuries received in an auto in which the employee was a guest passenger in a truck being driven by an Exxon employee. The employee had completed the work at a remote job site and was being transported to the Exxon office where he had his personal vehicle parked. The court held that he was not in the course of employment because he had finished the job duties. Whiteley & May Law Firm frank@whiteley-law.com Page 5
6 While Working Out of Town or the Traveling Salesman Rule: The Comfort Doctrine provides workers compensation coverage for accidents occurring while the employee is out of town for work but occur during personal time. In Robinson v. Simmons Co., (La. App. 4 th Cir. 3/22/00), 762 So2d 112, writ denied (La. 6/2/00) the employee was traveling from Louisiana to Wisconsin on a sales trip. The employee was shot and killed in Chicago. His car was later found in Gary, Indiana. It was not determined what exactly the employee was doing in Chicago, whether going out to eat or sightseeing, or perhaps he was engaged in some activity totally unconnected to his employment. The murder was not solved and the motivation for the killing was not determined. The employer argued that Robinson had no business reason to stop in Chicago, that he should have gone straight to Wisconsin, and that any stop in Chicago was a personal deviation. The court found the death was compensable, and noted that the traveling salesman cases are to be construed liberally. Deviation from Employment Mission: In Walker v. Acadian Builders of Gonzales, Inc., after completing his job duties, the decedent jumped into a golf course pond adjacent to the worksite and drowned. 835 So. 2d 827 (La. App. 1 Cir. 11/08/02). The trial court found that the decedent was not in the course and scope of employment because the risk associated with drowning in a pond was not incidental to the decedent s employment. Id. at 829. In the Walker case, the employee was waiting to be picked up by his employer at the time of his death. Would the result have been the same if, instead of drowning, the employee had been struck by lightning? When analyzing the course of employment requirement: the court focuses on whether the employee sustains an injury while actively engaged in the performance of his duties during working hours, either on the employer s premises or at a place contemplated by employment activities. Id. citing Davis v. St. Tammany Parish School Board, 808 So. 2d 826 (La. App. 1 Cir. 02/15/02). When reviewing the arising out of employment requirement, the court inquires into the character or origin of the risk suffered by the employee and determines whether this risk was incidental to employment. Id. The decedent drowned after his employment duties were completed for the day, at a place that was not contemplated by his employment activities and because he was not actively engaged in his employment duties when the accident occurred, the court determined that he was not in the course and scope of employment at the time of the accident. Furthermore, the court determined that the accident did not arise out of the Whiteley & May Law Firm frank@whiteley-law.com Page 6
7 decedent s employment because the risk of the injury was not incidental to [the decedent] s employment as a foundation digger. Not only was the decedent not digging a foundation, the employer did not require him to be at the place of the accident. Decedent s actions were not in furtherance of any work activity, but were for his pure enjoyment. In fact, the court determined that the act of swimming in the pond was so substantially different that it completely removed him from his employment with the defendant. Id. at 830. See also Robinson v. F. Strauss & Son. Inc., 481 So.2d 592 (La. 1986) (denial of compensation affirmed when "course of employment" showing was weak because employee had deviated from employment task to attempt reconciliation with a neighbor who was jealous over the employee's attention to the neighbor's girlfriend, and the neighbor's shooting of the employee provided a weak "arising out of employment" showing). Threshold Doctrine: An exception, known as the threshold doctrine, has been recognized when an accident occurs at a place with an unusually hazardous travel risk which is immediately adjacent to, but not on, the employer's premises. The threshold doctrine generally involves a special risk, attributable to the location of the work premises, that is different from the risks to which the general traveling public is exposed or that is more aggravated in the area adjacent to the employer's premises than elsewhere. W. Malone & H. Johnson, supra, at 169; see Templet v. Intracoastal Truck Line, Inc., 255 La. 193, 230 So.2d 74 (1969.) The threshold doctrine usually applies to inherently dangerous conditions, like railroad tracks adjacent to an employer s premises, where employees are forced to walk across the tracks in order to reach the employer s premises. One case even held that a high crime rate neighborhood can fall within the threshold doctrine. In Robinson v. Brown, 35,430-WCA (La. App. 2d Cir. 12/19/01), 803 So. 2d 396, the court found that the threshold doctrine did not apply. The employee went to work during an ice storm and found a note on the office door stating that the office would be closed for the day. After she left the building, and was walking to the parking lot where her car was parked, she slipped on a patch of ice and injured her back. At the time of accident, she was crossing a public street. The court rejected the threshold doctrine finding that the ice storm reached the area the day before the alleged fall and that the icy condition existed over most of the area and was not unique to an area in which the employee was required to traverse to and from her place of employment. Furthermore, she was not on her employer's premises at the time of the fall; she had already left the building and was on a public street, walking toward a parking lot that was open to the general public. My Boss Told Me To Do It: In Hebert v. CIGNA, 637 So. 2d 1221 (La. App. 3 Cir. 5/25/94), Lenis Hebert was employed by Murphy s Lease and Welding Service, Inc. as a roustabout. Occasionally, Hebert s assignments included performing personal tasks for the owner of Murphy s Whiteley & May Law Firm frank@whiteley-law.com Page 7
8 Welding, Gerald Libersat. These personal tasks included work at Libersat s cattle farm. Id. at On the day of the accident, Libersat told one of Hebert s supervisors to request that Hebert round up a calf which had gotten loose on the cattle farm. The supervisor instructed Hebert to perform this task. While attempting to lasso the calf on horseback, Hebert was thrown from the horse he was riding. The horse fell onto Hebert, and he was rendered a paraplegic. The trial court determined that the claimant was in the course and scope of his employment with Murphy s Welding at the time of the accident on the owner s cattle farm. The appeals court affirmed, reasoning that because the claimant was given special instructions to perform this task, and based on the rationale that the employee has no practical choice but perform the assigned task. Hebert was within the course and scope of his employment at Murphy s Welding even though roping calves has nothing to do with welding fabrication. The court further recognized that Hebert was performing a task required by him in his regular employment at Murphy s. Id. at (Emphasis added). When an employee is following the direct order of a person in authority to perform a task outside of his normal employment duties for the benefit of his employer or of the superior, and is injured in the course of that work, the injury is usually compensable. (Emphasis added). The rationale is that the employer has implicit power to enlarge the normal course of the employee s employment by assigning particular tasks or duties the employee has no practical choice but perform the assigned tasks. Id. at 1225, citing Vicknair v. Southern Farm Bureau Casualty Insurance Company, 292 So. 2d 747 (La. App. 4 Cir. 1974). Ultimately, the court held that when a regular employee is requested by his employer to perform a job or errand not within the course and scope of his regular employment or the regular business of his employer, during regular working hours, while being paid by his regular employer, and the employee is injured as a result of that work, workers compensation benefits are due. Id. (Emphasis added). In Freeman v. Brown s Furniture of Bunkie, Inc., the appeals court found that the services plaintiff performed for [his supervisor] were a requirement of his employment with Brown s. 527 So. 2d 544 (La. App. 3 Cir. 06/22/88). (Emphasis added). This was the finding of the Court even though Brown was injured preforming services at a fireworks store not the furniture store. Whiteley & May Law Firm frank@whiteley-law.com Page 8
9 Affirmative Defenses: Section 23:1031: D. An injury by accident shall not be considered as having arisen out of the employment and is thereby not covered by the provisions of this Chapter if the injured employee was engaged in horseplay at the time of the injury. E. An injury by accident should not be considered as having arisen out of the employment and thereby not covered by the provisions of this Chapter if the employer can establish that the injury arose out of a dispute with another person or employee over matters unrelated to the injured employee's employment. In Jackson v. Quikrete Products, Inc., 2001-CA-1181 (La. App. 4th Cir. 04/17/02), 816 So2d 338, the argument between two co-employees initially arose out of a dispute over who would move bags of concrete. One of the employees then defamed the mother of the other employee, and the fight escalated into a personal dispute, any injuries as a result of the fight are considered as arising out of the employment. The origin of the fight was so employment related that statements in the heat of the momoment did not turn it into a purely personal matter. Section Defenses (1) No compensation shall be allowed for an injury caused: (b) by the injured employee's intoxication at the time of the injury, unless the employee's intoxication resulted from activities which were in pursuit of the employer's interests or in which the employer procured the intoxicating beverage or substance and encouraged its use during the employee's work hours, or (c) to the initial physical aggressor in an unprovoked physical altercation, unless excessive force was used in retaliation against the initial aggressor. Hypotheticals: 1.) Hillary is a maid at the Days Inn. At the end of her shift, she punches out. There are numerous ways to exit the building. She chooses to go to the front of the hotel where people checking and unloading luggage are protected from the rain by a covered driveway. Her sister arrives in a car to give Hillary a ride home. After Hillary gets into the car, a section of the overhang (covered drive) falls onto the car, injuring Hillary and her sister. Are Hillary s injuries covered by Worker s Compensation? Whiteley & May Law Firm frank@whiteley-law.com Page 9
10 2.) An employee left work premises after dark. She headed to her vehicle which was parked in the lot across the street. The employer required all employees to park in the lot owned by the employer. The lot was up about fifteen steps from the street. It had formerly been the foundation of an old high school. The steps had no handrails and many steps were broken and uneven. The employee falls on the steps leading to the parking lot. Will the injuries be held to be compensable and, if so, under what doctrine? 3.) A worker volunteered to drive his boss home after work. He made a slight detour on the way to his boss s house to make a night deposit. After delivering the boss, he had an automobile accident on the way to the employee s home. Will the injuries sustained by the employee be compensable? 4.) After a meeting with his boss, an employee was fired and told to gather his personal affects and leave the premises. The employee did so, but after gathering his box of personal affects, tripped down the stairs and was injured. Is he in the course and scope of his employment? Whiteley & May Law Firm frank@whiteley-law.com Page 10
Benefits. Mary S. Kohnke Wagner, Esq. Marshall, Dennehey, Warner, Coleman & Goggin. The following sections explain each element.
5 Mary S. Kohnke Wagner, Esq. Marshall, Dennehey, Warner, Coleman & Goggin General Purpose of the Pennsylvania Workers Compensation Act The Pennsylvania Legislature enacted the Pennsylvania Workers Compensation
More information2005-C -2496 CHARLES ALBERT AND DENISE ALBERT v. FARM BUREAU INSURANCE COMPANY, ET AL. (Parish of Lafayette)
FOR IMMEDIATE NEWS RELEASE NEWS RELEASE # 0 FROM: CLERK OF SUPREME COURT OF LOUISIANA The Opinions handed down on the 17th day of October, 200, are as follows: PER CURIAM: 2005-C -249 CHARLES ALBERT AND
More informationSUPREME COURT OF LOUISIANA
o SUPREME COURT OF LOUISIANA No. 95-C-1851 DONALD HEBERT Versus JOE JEFFREY, JR., VENTURE TRANSPORT COMPANY, RANGER INSURANCE COMPANY, THOMAS H. GORDON, DWIGHT J. GRANIER AND LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY
More informationSTATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS
STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS RANDY BEUS, Deceased, by MONICA BEUS, Surviving Spouse, UNPUBLISHED August 3, 2006 Plaintiff-Appellee, v No. 258995 WCAC BROAD, VOGT & CONANT INC., STAR LC No. 03-000316
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF IOWA
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF IOWA No. 08 1635 Filed February 4, 2011 TIMOTHY L. MERRIAM, An Individual; JUSTINE MERRIAM, Both Individually and as Next Friend of CHRISTOPHER MERRIAM, A Minor, KAYLA MERRIAM,
More information(Filed 19 December 2000) 1. Insurance--automobile--parent s claim for minor s medical expenses--derivative of child s claim
ROBERTA HOLT, Guardian Ad Litem for MARY ELIZABETH HOLT, a minor; and ROBERTA HOLT, Plaintiffs, v. ATLANTIC CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant No. COA99-1481 (Filed 19 December 2000) 1. Insurance--automobile--parent
More informationBEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS COMPENSATION COMMISSION CLAIM NO. F712897 PEARLINE R. YOUNG CLAIMANT ABILITIES UNLIMITED RESPONDENT EMPLOYER
BEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS COMPENSATION COMMISSION CLAIM NO. F712897 PEARLINE R. YOUNG CLAIMANT ABILITIES UNLIMITED RESPONDENT EMPLOYER RISK MANAGEMENT RESOURCES RESPONDENT CARRIER HARRIET D. BEAUGARD
More informationFOR IMMEDIATE NEWS RELEASE NEWS RELEASE # 15. The Opinions handed down on the 25th day of February, 2003, are as follows:
FOR IMMEDIATE NEWS RELEASE NEWS RELEASE # 15 FROM: CLERK OF SUPREME COURT OF LOUISIANA The Opinions handed down on the 25th day of February, 2003, are as follows: BY KIMBALL, J.: 2002-C - 1634 RONALD J.
More informationDecided: May 11, 2015. S15A0308. McLEAN v. THE STATE. Peter McLean was tried by a DeKalb County jury and convicted of the
In the Supreme Court of Georgia Decided: May 11, 2015 S15A0308. McLEAN v. THE STATE. BLACKWELL, Justice. Peter McLean was tried by a DeKalb County jury and convicted of the murder of LaTonya Jones, an
More informationNo. 2001-CC-0175 CLECO CORPORATION. Versus LEONARD JOHNSON AND LEGION INDEMNITY COMPANY
9-18-01 SUPREME COURT OF LOUISIANA No. 2001-CC-0175 CLECO CORPORATION Versus LEONARD JOHNSON AND LEGION INDEMNITY COMPANY ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT, PARISH OF ST. TAMMANY
More informationReports or Connecticut Appellate Reports, the
****************************************************** The officially released date that appears near the beginning of each opinion is the date the opinion will be published in the Connecticut Law Journal
More informationWorkers' Compensation. "Zone of Employment
Workers' Compensation "Zone of Employment In the Course of and Arising out of The in the course of element limits compensable injuries to those sustained by an employee while performing a required duty
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF TENNESSEE SPECIAL WORKERS COMPENSATION APPEALS PANEL AT NASHVILLE (April 2000 Session) TATUM CARTER v. WAL-MART STORES, INC.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TENNESSEE SPECIAL WORKERS COMPENSATION APPEALS PANEL AT NASHVILLE (April 2000 Session) TATUM CARTER v. WAL-MART STORES, INC. Direct Appeal from the Chancery Court for Rutherford
More informationILLINOIS OFFICIAL REPORTS
ILLINOIS OFFICIAL REPORTS Appellate Court Suter v. Illinois Workers Compensation Comm n, 2013 IL App (4th) 130049WC Appellate Court Caption MARY SUTER, Appellant, v. THE ILLINOIS WORKERS COMPENSATION COMMISSION
More informationNo. 99-C-2573 LEE CARRIER AND HIS WIFE MARY BETH CARRIER. Versus RELIANCE INSURANCE COMPANY
Ed. Note: Opinion Rendered April 11, 2000 SUPREME COURT OF LOUISIANA No. 99-C-2573 LEE CARRIER AND HIS WIFE MARY BETH CARRIER Versus RELIANCE INSURANCE COMPANY ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OF APPEAL,
More informationEVIDENCE AND PRACTICE TIPS
EVIDENCE AND PRACTICE TIPS By: Stephen J. Heine Heyl, Royster, Voelker & Allen, Peoria The Laws of Intestate Succession Permit Only Descendants to Share in the Proceeds of a Wrongful Death Suit Where the
More informationRIGHT Lawyers. Stacy Rocheleau, Esq. Gary Thompson, Esq.
rightlawyers.com RIGHT Lawyers Right Lawyers has successfully represented numerous clients in the areas of car accidents, work injuries, and slip and falls. The goal of this guide is to provide you answers
More informationNUTS & BOLTS OF OHIO S WORKERS COMPENSATION SYSTEM
NUTS & BOLTS OF OHIO S WORKERS COMPENSATION SYSTEM It is neither charity, nor pension, nor indemnity, nor insurance, nor wages, though, if a definition of each and all of these terms were placed in parallel
More informationJUDGMENT AFFIRMED. Division II Opinion by JUDGE TERRY Casebolt and Furman, JJ., concur. Announced June 10, 2010
COLORADO COURT OF APPEALS Court of Appeals No. 09CA0830 Arapahoe County District Court No. 08CV1981 Honorable Michael Spear, Judge Travelers Property Casualty Company of America, Plaintiff-Appellant, v.
More informationHow To Take Action In New Jersey
Garden State CLE 21 Winthrop Road Lawrenceville, New Jersey 08648 (609) 895-0046 fax- 609-895-1899 Atty2starz@aol.com Video Course Evaluation Form Attorney Name Atty ID number for Pennsylvania: Name of
More informationIn the Missouri Court of Appeals Eastern District
In the Missouri Court of Appeals Eastern District DIVISION IV JASON POPE, ) No. ED98108 ) Respondent, ) Appeal from the Labor and ) Industrial Relations Commission vs. ) ) GATEWAY TO THE WEST ) HARLEY
More informationTHIRTY FOURTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT PARISH OF ST. BERNARD STATE OF LOUISIANA TERRENCE FEDELE VERSUS CHALMETTE MEDICAL CENTER, INC.
THIRTY FOURTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT PARISH OF ST. BERNARD STATE OF LOUISIANA NUMBER 89-352 DIVISION B TERRENCE FEDELE VERSUS CHALMETTE MEDICAL CENTER, INC. FILED DEPUTY CLERK REASONS FOR JUDGMENT This
More informationSTATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS
STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS ESTATE OF TIMOTHY HUGHES, Plaintiff-Appellee, UNPUBLISHED January 23, 2007 v No. 259987 Oakland Circuit Court CITIZENS INSURANCE COMPANY, LC No. 2000-024949-CZ and Defendant/Cross-Defendant-
More informationLet s Get Personal. Your Homeowners policy contains two coverages that are very similar, so we wanted to make sure that you understand them both.
Personal Liability, that is. Let s Get Personal Your Homeowners policy contains two coverages that are very similar, so we wanted to make sure that you understand them both. Medical Payments vs. Personal
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF INDIANA
FOR PUBLICATION ATTORNEY FOR APPELLANTS: MICHAEL A. MINGLIN Miller & Minglin, P.C. Indianapolis, Indiana ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLEE: JAMES W. ROEHRDANZ ERIC D. JOHNSON Kightlinger & Gray, LLP Indianapolis,
More informationIN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA
IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA Clyde Kennedy, : Petitioner : : v. : No. 1649 C.D. 2012 : Submitted: May 17, 2013 Workers Compensation Appeal : Board (Henry Modell & Co., Inc.), : Respondent
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE Assigned on Briefs May 31, 2001
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE Assigned on Briefs May 31, 2001 LARRY DONALD HOWARD, M.D. v. CORNERSTONE MEDICAL ASSOCIATES, P.C. Appeal by Permission from the Supreme Court Special Workers
More informationSTATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, THIRD CIRCUIT 12-107 ************
STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, THIRD CIRCUIT 12-107 THELMA M. HODGES AND MARCUS J. McCOY VERSUS MICHAEL A. TAYLOR ************ APPEAL FROM THE THIRTY-FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT PARISH OF JEFFERSON
More information2012 IL App (1st) 112728-U. No. 1-11-2728
2012 IL App (1st 112728-U FIRST DIVISION November 5, 2012 No. 1-11-2728 Notice: This order was filed under Supreme Court Rule 23 and may not be cited as precedent by any party except in the limited circumstances
More informationFrank E. Jenkins, III JENKINS & BOWEN, P.C. 15 South Public Square Cartersville, Georgia 30120 (770) 387-1373
Frank E. Jenkins, III JENKINS & BOWEN, P.C. 15 South Public Square Cartersville, Georgia 30120 (770) 387-1373 Wallace Miller, III WALLACE MILLER, III, LLC 509 Forest Hills Road Macon, Georgia 30209 (478)
More informationIN COURT OF APPEALS. DECISION DATED AND FILED May 8, 2007. Appeal No. 2005AP1653 DISTRICT III DUSTIN R. ELBING, PLAINTIFF,
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED May 8, 2007 David R. Schanker Clerk of Court of Appeals NOTICE This opinion is subject to further editing. If published, the official version will appear in the
More informationSAFETY REVIEW NOT SPECIFIED IN CONTRACT
SAFETY REVIEW NOT SPECIFIED IN CONTRACT James C. Kozlowski, J.D., Ph.D. 2008 James C. Kozlowski In contracting for personal services, an architect's duty depends on the particular agreement entered into
More informationPlaintiff moves the Court for judgment in the amount of. The question before the Court is whether the
VIRGINIA : IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR THE CITY OF RICHMOND PARTICIA A. MCDUFFIE, Plaintiff, PROGRESSIVE NORTHWESTERN INSURANCE COMPANY, Case No.: CL06-5494-1 and Defendant, PROGRESSIVE CASUALTY INSURANCE
More informationINDEPENDENT INSURANCE AGENTS OF LOUISIANA 9818 BLUEBONNET BOULEVARD BATON ROUGE, LA 70810 TEL: 225/819-8007 FAX: 225/819-8027 www.iial.
INDEPENDENT INSURANCE AGENTS OF LOUISIANA 9818 BLUEBONNET BOULEVARD BATON ROUGE, LA 70810 TEL: 225/819-8007 FAX: 225/819-8027 www.iial.com TA 206 Date: 5/21/02 SUBJECT: LOUISIANA LIQUOR LIABILITY LAW BACKGROUND:
More informationWORKERS COMPENSATION IN RHODE ISLAND A SUMMARY OF THE LAW
WORKERS COMPENSATION IN RHODE ISLAND A SUMMARY OF THE LAW PREPARED BY ATTORNEY GARY J. LEVINE 369 SOUTH MAIN STREET PROVIDENCE, RI 09203 401-521-3100 www.workerscompri.com TABLE OF CONTENTS INJURIES COVERED
More informationWORKER S COMPENSATION OR NOT-THAT S THE QUESTION.
WORKER S COMPENSATION OR NOT-THAT S THE QUESTION. Attorney Reed Noble has successfully handled Workers Compensation cases for clients since 1982. The North Carolina Worker's Compensation Act is designed
More informationENFIELD PIZZA PALACE, INC., ET AL. v. INSURANCE COMPANY OF GREATER NEW YORK (AC 19268)
SCHALLER, J. The plaintiffs 2 appeal from the judgment rendered in favor of the defendant, Insurance Company of Greater New York, in this declaratory judgment action concerning a dispute about the defendant
More information2009 WI APP 51 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION
2009 WI APP 51 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 2008AP1036 Complete Title of Case: JOHN A. MITTNACHT AND THERESA MITTNACHT, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, V. ST. PAUL FIRE AND CASUALTY
More information2015 IL App (1st) 143925-U. No. 1-14-3925 IN THE APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT
2015 IL App (1st) 143925-U FOURTH DIVISION September 30, 2015 No. 1-14-3925 NOTICE: This order was filed under Supreme Court Rule 23 and may not be cited as precedent by any party except in the limited
More informationFrank E. Jenkins, III JENKINS & BOWEN, P.C. 15 South Public Square Cartersville, Georgia 30120 (770) 387-1373
Frank E. Jenkins, III JENKINS & BOWEN, P.C. 15 South Public Square Cartersville, Georgia 30120 (770) 387-1373 Wallace Miller, III WALLACE MILLER, III, LLC 509 Forest Hills Road Macon, Georgia 30209 (478)
More informationNEW YORK STATE BAR ASSOCIATION. LEGALEase. If You Have An Auto Accident SAMPLE
NEW YORK STATE BAR ASSOCIATION LEGALEase If You Have An Auto Accident If You Have An Auto Accident What should you do if you re involved in an automobile accident in New York? STOP! By law, you are required
More informationBut For Causation in Defective Drug and Toxic Exposure Cases: California s Form Jury Instruction CACI 430
But For Causation in Defective Drug and Toxic Exposure Cases: California s Form Jury Instruction CACI 430 By Matt Powers and Charles Lifland Since the California Supreme Court s 1991 decision in Mitchell
More informationIllinois Fund Doctrine
Illinois Fund Doctrine Illinois Association of Defense Trial Counsel By: Michael Todd Scott State Farm Insurance Company, Bloomington The Illinois Fund Doctrine, Can It Be Avoided? I. Introduction Since
More informationJudgment Rendered December 28 2006. Appealed from the Nineteenth Judicial District Court. Attorneys for Plaintiff Appellant
NOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL FIRST CIRCUIT NUMBER 2006 CA 0451 LISSETTE SAVOY MENENDEZ AS THE APPOINTED NATURAL TUTRIX OF VANESSA SAVOY VERSUS MICHAEL B O NIELL FRIENDS
More information****************************************************** The officially released date that appears near the beginning of each opinion is the date the
****************************************************** The officially released date that appears near the beginning of each opinion is the date the opinion will be published in the Connecticut Law Journal
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA MEMORANDUM. Bartle, J. December, 2012
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA ZENITH INSURANCE COMPANY : CIVIL ACTION : v. : : WELLS FARGO INSURANCE SERVICES : OF PENNSYLVANIA, INC., et al. : NO. 10-5433
More informationSUPREME COURT OF LOUISIANA NO. 97-C-0416 PAUL B. SIMMS JASON BUTLER, ET AL.
SUPREME COURT OF LOUISIANA NO. 97-C-0416 PAUL B. SIMMS V. JASON BUTLER, ET AL. ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OF APPEAL, FOURTH CIRCUIT, PARISH OF ORLEANS MARCUS, Justice * Newton Moore, an employee
More informationCHAPTER 30: EMPLOYEE INJURIES
CHAPTER 30: EMPLOYEE INJURIES INTRODUCTION TO JOB SAFETY Our legal system has developed three ways of handling employee injuries: A. NEGLIGENCE SUITS Was developed under common-law where the injured employee
More informationTo determine whether or not an injury arises out of the maintenance or use of a motor vehicle:
What are No-Fault benefits? "No-fault benefits" are also often referred to as "Personal Injury Protection benefits or "PIP Benefits" for short. No Fault refers to insurance coverage provided by your own
More informationFILED November 14, 2013 Carla Bender th
NOTICE Decision filed 11/14/13. The text of this decision may be changed or corrected prior to the filing of a Petition for Rehearing or the disposition of the same. 2013 IL App (4th) 130049WC NO. 4-13-0049WC
More informationWorkers' Compensation "Zone of Employment" by Michael J. Spisak. To be covered by the Workers Compensation Fund, Plaintiff s injury must have
Workers' Compensation "Zone of Employment" by Michael J. Spisak I. In the Course of and Arising out of To be covered by the Workers Compensation Fund, Plaintiff s injury must have occurred in the course
More informationWhat to expect when you are injured in a New York accident!
What to expect when you are injured in a New York accident! An ebook by Stuart DiMartini 1325 Sixth Avenue, 27 th Floor New York, NY 10019 dimartinilaw.com 2012 Law Offices of Stuart DiMartini P a g e
More informationPresent: Carrico, C.J., Compton, Stephenson, Lacy, Keenan, Koontz, JJ., and Whiting, Senior Justice NORTHBROOK PROPERTY AND CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY
Present: Carrico, C.J., Compton, Stephenson, Lacy, Keenan, Koontz, JJ., and Whiting, Senior Justice VIRGINIA ELECTRIC AND POWER COMPANY OPINION BY JUSTICE LAWRENCE L. KOONTZ, v. Record No. 951919 September
More informationSTATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS
STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS JAMES HENDRICK, v Plaintiff-Appellant, STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, UNPUBLISHED May 24, 2007 No. 275318 Montcalm Circuit Court LC No. 06-007975-NI
More informationSTATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS
STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS JACK D. HILL, Deceased, by EDWARD F. HILL, Personal Representative, Plaintiff, FOR PUBLICATION May 11, 2001 9:05 a.m. and AUTOMOBILE CLUB OF MICHIGAN, Intervening Plaintiff-Appellant,
More informationIN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA
IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA Jay Ebersole, Administrator of the : Estate of Stephanie Jo Ebersole, : Deceased : : v. : No. 1732 C.D. 2014 : Argued: February 9, 2015 Southeastern Pennsylvania
More informationRESPONDENT'S ANSWER BRIEF JAMES H. WHITE, JR. STAATS, WHITE & CLARKE. Florida Bar No.: 309303. 229 McKenzie Avenue. Panama City, Florida 32401
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA FILED THE TRAVELERS INSURANCE COMPANY and THE PHOENIX INSURANCE COMPANY, vs. Petitioners, CASE NO.: 85,337 BRETT ALLAN WARREN, Personal DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL Representative
More informationNO. COA13-614 NORTH CAROLINA COURT OF APPEALS. Filed: 3 December 2013. v. Buncombe County No. 11 CRS 59792 DANNY DALE GOSNELL
NO. COA13-614 NORTH CAROLINA COURT OF APPEALS Filed: 3 December 2013 STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. Buncombe County No. 11 CRS 59792 DANNY DALE GOSNELL 1. Homicide first-degree murder not guilty verdict jury
More informationIn the Court of Appeals of Georgia
SECOND DIVISION JOHNSON, P.J., ELLINGTON and MIKELL, JJ. NOTICE: THIS OPINION IS UNCORRECTED AND SUBJECT TO REVISION BY THE COURT. September 22, 2009 In the Court of Appeals of Georgia A09A1222. WILLIAMS
More information2012 IL App (5th) 100579-U NO. 5-10-0579 IN THE APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS FIFTH DISTRICT
NOTICE Decision filed 05/03/12. The text of this decision may be changed or corrected prior to the filing of a Petition for Rehearing or the disposition of the same. 2012 IL App (5th) 100579-U NO. 5-10-0579
More informationSTATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, THIRD CIRCUIT 03-987 **********
STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, THIRD CIRCUIT 03-987 LAWANDA THEODILE VERSUS RPM PIZZA, INC. ********** APPEAL FROM THE OFFICE OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION - # 4 PARISH OF LAFAYETTE, NO. 03-02178 SHARON
More informationSTATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, THIRD CIRCUIT 05-676 **********
STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, THIRD CIRCUIT 05-676 INTERNATIONAL MAINTENANCE CORPORATION VERSUS ROBERT L. STODDARD APPEAL FROM THE OFFICE OF WORKERS COMPENSATION - DISTRICT 3 PARISH OF CALCASIEU,
More informationLowcountry Injury Law
Lowcountry Injury Law 1917 Lovejoy Street Post Office Drawer 850 Beaufort, South Carolina 29901 Personal Injury Phone (843) 524-9445 Auto Accidents Fax (843) 532-9254 Workers Comp DanDenton@Lawyer.com
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS
Docket No. 107472. IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS ZURICH AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellant, v. KEY CARTAGE, INC., et al. Appellees. Opinion filed October 29, 2009. JUSTICE BURKE delivered
More informationNOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION
NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. JOHN MACARTNEY, v. Plaintiff-Appellant, NEW JERSEY TRANSIT RAIL OPERATIONS,
More informationIN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE IN AND FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE IN AND FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY STATE FARM MUTUAL, ) AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE ) COMPANY (as subrogee of Tera ) & Nanette Robinson), ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) C.A.
More informationRecent Case Update. www.pjmlaw.com 1. VOL. XXIII, NO. 2 Summer 2014
Recent Case Update VOL. XXIII, NO. 2 Summer 2014 Legal Malpractice Attorney-Client Relationship Summary Judgment Williamson v. Schweiger (Court of Appeals, 13 AP 1777, July 1, 2014) (unpublished) Plaintiff
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT. No. 14-11100 Non-Argument Calendar. D.C. Docket No. 1:13-cv-00018-JRH-BKE
Case: 14-11100 Date Filed: 07/17/2014 Page: 1 of 7 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT No. 14-11100 Non-Argument Calendar D.C. Docket No. 1:13-cv-00018-JRH-BKE
More informationIncident Reporting Manual
Pillar Income Asset Management, Inc. Incident Reporting Manual For use in reporting: Property Losses General Liability Incidents Workers Compensation Incidents Commercial Auto Incidents Prepared by: The
More informationNew Hampshire Association for Justice Focus on Workers Compensation Law
New Hampshire Association for Justice Focus on Workers Compensation Law Bedford, NH March 18, 2011 By: Andrew J. Reinhardt Reinhardt & Harper, PLC 1809 Staples Mill Road, Suite 300 Richmond, VA 23230 Phone:
More informationSPECIAL REPORT TRAIN INJURY CASE Protect Your Rights: 7 Mistakes That Can Derail Your Train Injury Case
SPECIAL REPORT TRAIN INJURY CASE Protect Your Rights: 7 Mistakes That Can Derail Your Train Injury Case If you are employed in the train industry, you should be aware of what to do should you become injured
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT. Israel : : v. : No. 3:98cv302(JBA) : State Farm Mutual Automobile : Insurance Company et al.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT Israel : : v. : No. 3:98cv302(JBA) : State Farm Mutual Automobile : Insurance Company et al. : Ruling on Motion for Summary Judgment [Doc. #82] After
More informationJESSIE W. WATKINS NO. 2008-CA-0320 VERSUS COURT OF APPEAL AUBREY CHEATHAM, TOTAL POWER ELECTRIC, INC., AND U.S. CAPITAL INSURANCE COMPANY
JESSIE W. WATKINS VERSUS AUBREY CHEATHAM, TOTAL POWER ELECTRIC, INC., AND U.S. CAPITAL INSURANCE COMPANY * * * * * * * * * * * NO. 2008-CA-0320 COURT OF APPEAL FOURTH CIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA APPEAL
More informationNO. 49,958-CA COURT OF APPEAL SECOND CIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA * * * * * * Versus * * * * * *
Judgment rendered July 1, 2015. Application for rehearing may be filed within the delay allowed by Art. 2166, La. C.C.P. NO. 49,958-CA COURT OF APPEAL SECOND CIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA * * * * * * DANNY
More informationSupreme Court of Missouri en banc
Supreme Court of Missouri en banc MARK KARSCIG, Appellant, v. No. SC90080 JENNIFER M. MCCONVILLE, Appellant, and AMERICAN FAMILY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, Respondent. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF PETTIS
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF INDIANA
Pursuant to Ind.Appellate Rule 65(D), this Memorandum Decision shall not be regarded as precedent or cited before any court except for the purpose of establishing the defense of res judicata, collateral
More informationSTATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS
STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS GINGER SCHILLER, Plaintiff, UNPUBLISHED October 24, 2013 v No. 310085 Wayne Circuit Court HOME-OWNERS INSURANCE CO., a/k/a LC No. 11-002957-NF AUTO-OWNERS INSURANCE CO.,
More informationMARCH 2005 LAW REVIEW RECREATION SAFETY ACT IMMUNITY LIMITED TO INHERENT RISKS
RECREATION SAFETY ACT IMMUNITY LIMITED TO INHERENT RISKS James C. Kozlowski, J.D., Ph.D. 2005 James C. Kozlowski A number of jurisdictions have enacted recreation safety statutes which effectively incorporate
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT. No. 13-13338 Non-Argument Calendar. D.C. Docket No.
Case: 13-13338 Date Filed: 01/13/2014 Page: 1 of 6 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT No. 13-13338 Non-Argument Calendar D.C. Docket No. 1:12-cv-03858-WBH MERITPLAN
More informationSupreme Court of Florida
Supreme Court of Florida No. SC02-2659 CYNTHIA CLEFF NORMAN, Petitioner, vs. TERRI LAMARRIA FARROW, Respondent. [June 24, 2004] WELLS, J. We have for review Norman v. Farrow, 832 So. 2d 158 (Fla. 1st DCA
More informationTHE FIRST QUESTION TO ASK? - WHAT CONSTITUTES AN ACCIDENT? (Prepared for Massachusetts Bar Institute Continuing Legal Education 2002)
THE FIRST QUESTION TO ASK? - WHAT CONSTITUTES AN ACCIDENT? Kristen A. Barnes Braintree, Massachusetts (Prepared for Massachusetts Bar Institute Continuing Legal Education 2002) The availability of automobile
More informationRecent Case Update. Insurance Stacking UIM Westra v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company (Court of Appeals, 13 AP 48, June 18, 2013)
Recent Case Update VOL. XXII, NO. 2 Summer 2013 Insurance Summary Judgment Stacking UIM Saladin v. Progressive Northern Insurance Company (Court of Appeals, 12 AP 1649, June 4, 2013) On August 26, 2010,
More informationWORKERS' COMPENSATION SUBROGATION AND THIRD-PARTY CLAIMS
WORKERS' COMPENSATION SUBROGATION AND THIRD-PARTY CLAIMS I. INTRODUCTION BY RICHARD M. JUREWICZ, ESQUIRE GALFAND BERGER, LLP 1835 Market Street, Suite 2710 Philadelphia, PA 19103 1-800-222-8792 (ext. 829)
More informationSTATE OF MISSISSIPPI WORKERS COMPENSATION COMPENDIUM OF LAW
STATE OF MISSISSIPPI WORKERS COMPENSATION COMPENDIUM OF LAW Part One: The Employment Relationship & Scope of Compensability Prepared By Copeland, Cook, Taylor and Bush, P.A 600 Concourse, Suite 100 1076
More information2013 IL App (1st) 122479 - U SECOND DIVISION May 14, 2013. No. 1-12-2479
2013 IL App (1st) 122479 - U SECOND DIVISION May 14, 2013 No. 1-12-2479 NOTICE: This order was filed under Supreme Court Rule 23 and may not be cited as precedent by any party except in the limited circumstances
More informationAPPEAL NO. 980924 DECISION. We affirm.
APPEAL NO. 980924 This appeal arises pursuant to the Texas Workers' Compensation Act, TEX. LAB. CODE ANN. ' 401.001 et seq. (1989 Act). A contested case hearing (CCH) was held on April 4, 1998. With regard
More informationIN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE IN AND FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE IN AND FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY CHARLES R. LITCHFORD and ) PATRICIA LITCHFORD, ) ) Plaintiffs ) v. ) C.A. No. 06C-02-243MJB ) MICHAEL JOHNSON; DP, INC.; ) DP
More information[Cite as Rogers v. Dayton, 118 Ohio St.3d 299, 2008-Ohio-2336.]
[Cite as Rogers v. Dayton, 118 Ohio St.3d 299, 2008-Ohio-2336.] ROGERS v. CITY OF DAYTON ET AL., APPELLEES; STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE CO., APPELLANT. [Cite as Rogers v. Dayton, 118 Ohio St.3d
More informationInjured on the Job. Your Rights under FELA. Quick Facts: What To Do If Injured
Injured on the Job Your Rights under FELA Quick Facts: What To Do If Injured 1. Consult your own doctor for treatment. Give your doctor a complete history of how your injury happened. Make sure that the
More informationUnited States Workers Compensation/Indemnification Overview
United States Workers Compensation/Indemnification Overview January 18, 2012 Jill Kirila jill.kirila@squiresanders.com Kevin Hess kevin.hess@squiresanders.com 36 Offices in 17 Countries Workers Compensation
More informationSTATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, THIRD CIRCUIT 11-94 **********
STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, THIRD CIRCUIT 11-94 DANIELLE C. GARRICK VERSUS WAL-MART STORES, INC., ET AL. ********** APPEAL FROM THE OFFICE OF WORKERS COMPENSATION - # 3 PARISH OF CALCASIEU, NO.
More information2016 IL App (1st) 133918-U. No. 1-13-3918 IN THE APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS FIRST DISTRICT
2016 IL App (1st) 133918-U No. 1-13-3918 SIXTH DIVISION May 6, 2016 NOTICE: This order was filed under Supreme Court Rule 23 and may not be cited as precedent by any party except in the limited circumstances
More informationNOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION TWO
Filed 2/2/16 P. v. Moore CA4/2 NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication
More informationIndiana Supreme Court
ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLANTS George M. Plews Sean M. Hirschten Plews Shadley Racher & Braun LLP Indianapolis, Indiana ATTORNEYS FOR AMICUS CURIAE THE INSURANCE INSTITUTE OF INDIANA, INC. John C. Trimble Richard
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT. No. 13-15213 Non-Argument Calendar. D.C. Docket No. 1:12-cv-00238-GRJ.
Case: 13-15213 Date Filed: 06/17/2014 Page: 1 of 10 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT No. 13-15213 Non-Argument Calendar D.C. Docket No. 1:12-cv-00238-GRJ
More informationIN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE IN AND FOR KENT COUNTY
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE IN AND FOR KENT COUNTY DANIEL R. SOUTH, : : Plaintiff, : : v. : : STATE FARM MUTUAL : AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE : COMPANY, a foreign corp., : : Defendant. : Submitted:
More informationSTATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS
STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS EDWIN HOLLENBECK and BRENDA HOLLENBECK, UNPUBLISHED June 30, 2011 Plaintiffs-Appellants, v No. 297900 Ingham Circuit Court FARM BUREAU MUTUAL INSURANCE LC No. 09-000166-CK
More informationHon. RICHARD STONE (Ret.)
Hon. RICHARD STONE (Ret.) Mediator Arbitrator Private Judge Referee Representative Cases PERSONAL INJURY Petitioner claimed he is mentally ill and under the care of Defendant Mental Health Clinic, and
More informationAutomobile Liability Policy Held to Cover Stolen Car
The Ohio State University Knowledge Bank kb.osu.edu Ohio State Law Journal (Moritz College of Law) Ohio State Law Journal: Volume 22, Issue 3 (1961) 1961 Automobile Liability Policy Held to Cover Stolen
More information