March 16, Ms. Monica Jackson Office of the Executive Secretary Consumer Financial Protection Bureau 1700 G Street, N.W. Washington D.C.

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "March 16, 2015. Ms. Monica Jackson Office of the Executive Secretary Consumer Financial Protection Bureau 1700 G Street, N.W. Washington D.C."

Transcription

1 March 16, TH STREET, N.W. SUITE 400 WASHINGTON, D.C Tel Fax Ms. Monica Jackson Office of the Executive Secretary Consumer Financial Protection Bureau 1700 G Street, N.W. Washington D.C Re: Docket No. CFPB ; RIN 3170-AA49; Amendments to the 2013 Mortgage Rules under the Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act (Regulation X) and the Truth in Lending Act (Regulation Z). Dear Ms. Jackson: The Housing Policy Council 1 of the Financial Services Roundtable (HPC) welcomes the opportunity to comment on the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau s (Bureau) proposed amendments to the 2013 mortgage rules under the Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act s (RESPA) Regulation X and the Truth in Lending Act s (TILA) Regulation Z. I. General Comments We have reviewed the proposal amendments to the definition of delinquency (12 C.F.R ); the requests for information (12 C.F.R. 1024(d) and (i)); force placed insurance (12 C.F.R (c), (d), and (e) and prompt payment processing (12 C.F.R ). While there are a few provisions within those amendments that we believe could be improved, we have no major objections or suggestions with respect to these proposals. We would like to focus instead on the four provisions with which we have substantial objections namely: (a) the changes in the successor in interest provisions (12 C.F.R (d) and 38(b); (b) the early intervention provisions (12. C.F.R ); (c) the loss mitigation provisions (12 C.F.R ) and (d) the provisions relating to periodic statements (12 C.F.R ). II. Proposals that Need Substantial Changes 1 The Housing Policy Council of The Financial Services Roundtable consists of thirty-two of the leading national mortgage finance companies. HPC members originate, service, and insure mortgages. We estimate that HPC member companies originate approximately 75% and service twothirds of mortgages in the United States. HPC's mission is to promote the mortgage and housing marketplace interests of member companies in legislative, regulatory, and judicial forums. 1

2 a. Successors in Interest We believe there are major problems with this proposal including deciding who is a successor in interest, applying mortgage servicing rules to these successors in interest and offering loss mitigation to this defined group of successors in interest. We have an overriding concern that the factual possibilities under these rules will not just be complicated (for example children, adult or minor, of multi-spouse couples one of whom is the obligor on the loan), but in many cases will be intrusive into other disputes between the parties unrelated to disclosures and could create possible conflicts with other laws. Under the proposed amendments the successor in interest may not necessarily have assumed the mortgage loan obligation under state law, and the servicer may not necessarily have agreed to add the successor in interest as obligor on the mortgage loan. This places servicers in the very difficult position of affording non-borrowers (and often completely unrelated individuals) statutory and regulatory protections and rights intended only for signatories on the note. We respectfully suggest that this broadening of applicability be reconsidered in light of all of the other federal, state and municipal requirements applicable to mortgage servicers. 1. Deciding who is a successor in interest It appears that the proposal would permit an individual who believes he has succeeded to an interest in real property to write an unsolicited letter to the servicer asking for information that normally is only available to a borrower on that loan, and that a servicer would have to treat that as an indication that the author of the letter may in fact be a successor in interest. That is extraordinarily unusual. Having received that inquiry, the burden is then on the servicer to ask of the writer the appropriate questions which, when answered, will permit the servicer to determine, under specific laws and regulations and case precedent in each state, whether that individual really has succeeded to the interests of the individual who had been identified by the servicer as the person with ownership interests in the property. That is a difficult and complicated task, since the entities or persons that can now be successors in interest under the proposal have expanded extensively. Practically speaking, this means that for purposes of determining to whom the rules apply a successor in interest may now include any one of several different categories of individuals, or an entity such as a trust who obtains title to real property no longer just through the death of the borrower. This includes, for example, certain ownership exchanges between parents and children, legally separated and divorced spouses and transfers to family trusts. We believe this proposed expansion of those individuals who must be considered successors in interest places additional and unnecessary burdens on servicers (1) to engage in 2

3 determining what information and legal documents it needs in each fact-specific situation, (2) to request and receive such information and documentation and (3) to make potentially life changing decisions for individuals in an incredibly short period of time. The variety of inquiries that must be made to seek answers that are dispositive of the question of whether that individual is a valid successor, particularly when there is no indication in writing from the individual on what basis he or she claims succession, is mind boggling. Even when the basis of succession is stated there remain difficult questions of state law as to property ownership including a variety of differences between jurisdictions and often a bewildering set of factual questions in the context of modern spousal arrangements of varying kinds and numbers. For example, partners now may move among many partners with a variety of formal or informal arrangements, some recognized in certain states and not recognized in others, and compound these arrangements with different numbers of children of the different arrangements and the complexity of that one scenario becomes apparent. We would urge the Bureau to limit those written communications to those that specifically identify the writer as one claiming to be a successor in interest to property rights of the mortgaged property, and the manner in which and under what authority that claim is made. This is not a casual claim about incidental property, but a formal statement that the writer believes that he has rights in real property, an expensive and valuable right. Real property laws in the United States and other common law jurisdictions are among the most circumscribed and legalistic laws of any that exist. It is only fitting that such a claim should place primary responsibility on the claimant to make the claim and the authority for its validity as clear as possible. The servicer should not have to act as the private investigator, accountant and lawyer for the claimant and be expected to guide a claimant through a process in which the servicer has very little direct knowledge. The rule also would require the servicer to maintain policies and procedures that allow for application of the relevant law governing each situation. For servicers that operate nationally or regionally, that would require the maintenance of policies and procedures appropriate for each jurisdiction for each of the bewildering variety of situations that might arise. That is a monumental task, not only in assembling them in the first instance but of maintaining them as laws change from time to time, both legislatively and judicially and from jurisdiction to jurisdiction. The proposed amendments require that servicers maintain policies and procedures that allow for application of the relevant law governing each successor in interest situation. Four specifically identified situations include: (1) tenancy by the entirety or joint tenancy; (2) affidavits of heirship; (3) divorce or legal separation; and (4) living spouses or parents. 2 This 2 The Bureau does note, however, that other unspecified successor in interest transfers may occur, and the servicer is required to be able to handle these also as such arise. 3

4 assessment must occur promptly so as to not compromise consideration for loss mitigation alternatives and at least 30 days prior to upcoming milestones. Thus, mortgage servicers must be able to assess based on documentation requested and received by the servicer whether an individual is or is not a successor in interest, make changes to its systems of record, and communicate the results of this assessment to requesting individuals in a very short time frame. Under the proposed amendments, servicers must respond to a written request that indicates that the person making the request may be a successor in interest by providing that person with information regarding the documents the servicer requires confirming the person s identity and ownership interest in the property. The written request requirement appears in the request for information (RFI) section of the servicing regulations, which means the mandatory RFI response timelines are applicable, except when a servicer receives a loss mitigation inquiry from a purported successor in interest outside of the RFI protocol. Industry experience confirms that disputes often arise before, during, and after the servicer s initial contact with other potential successors in interest over who the successor in interest is or should be. Servicers are not the appropriate parties to adjudicate such disputes. We are very concerned, that as proposed by the Bureau, the amendments to the servicing regulation would require that servicers determine who the correct successor or successors in interest are, based on the servicer s interpretation of the applicable law, based on facts the servicer may not be able to adequately verify, and with only the limited written documentation the servicer can obtain from the purported successor or successors in a very short time frame. We believe it should be clear that servicers cannot be required to meet such demands when the contingencies that lead to resolution are outside servicers control. The Bureau should provide a safe harbor to servicers who in good faith and consistent with the rules of the Bureau make a determination as to the rightful successor in interest and are subsequently brought into litigation between other potential successors in interest who may be challenging the question of who is the rightful successor in interest. The Bureau should provide servicers with additional time to consider and verify information and documents submitted by the purported successors in interest in order to reduce the likelihood of an unintended rush to judgment that could be detrimental to all parties concerned, including additional successors in interest who may not have had an opportunity to submit their claim. We believe a reasonable time under the circumstances to be up to ninety (90) calendar days unless the dispute is being litigated. 2. Applying mortgage servicing rules to successors in interest 4

5 Under the proposed rules, a successor in interest would be deemed to be a borrower for purposes of RESPA servicing rules, even though the individual may not be liable for the debt or have made any promises to make payment on the debt. As borrowers, they will be entitled to all the communications that any borrower may receive even though the servicer may be required to continue to provide various communications to the prior borrower. This will be true even if the successors in interest are a series of individuals. We urge the Bureau to limit the required communications to the successors in interest and to eliminate the prior borrower from any communications once a successor in interest is confirmed. We also urge the Bureau to provide a safe harbor to the servicers who, in good faith and consistent with the rules of the Bureau, make a determination of successor in interest and are subsequently brought into litigation among the potential successors in interest who may be litigating the question of who is the rightful successor in interest. 3. Offering loss mitigation to successors in interest The proposed rules would require a servicer that receives from an individual a claim of successor in interest and asks for loss mitigation options need not immediately receive a response to the inquiry about loss mitigation, but must retain the request on file until the determination is made that the individual has a rightful claim as a successor in interest. At that time, the inquiry about options for loss mitigation must receive a response from the servicer, as though the inquiry was made by a recognized borrower at that time. It is unlikely that putting such requests for loss mitigation aside or noting them for possible further action and then successfully reviving them after a determination is made in what possibly is a very complex successor question will actually succeed. It would be better to begin the loss mitigation process only after the question of succession is answered in favor of the individual having made his case to be a valid successor in interest. At that point a request for loss mitigation would be relevant and timely. b. Early Intervention The proposed rules will be very complicated, and it is very possible that despite their good faith efforts, servicers will make errors in trying to implement them. The requirement that live contacts be continued throughout the delinquency seems unnecessary and redundant, since the borrower knows that he or she is delinquent, and constant attempts to establish live contact may simply be seen as harassment. If the borrower has availed him or herself of no contact protection under the FDCPA (Federal Debt Collection Practices Act), crafting a written notice in a way that will satisfy the Bureau s proposed rule but not cause a bankruptcy court to find a violation of that order may turn out to be difficult and treated differently in different courts. For live contact requirements, the Bureau proposes to exempt borrowers who are in bankruptcy, have 5

6 discharged personal liability for the mortgage loan, or shares liability on a mortgage loan with a person who is a debtor in a Chapter 12 or Chapter 13 bankruptcy case. Those exemptions would not be available to a borrower who is jointly liable on the mortgage loan with someone who is a debtor in a Chapter 7 or Chapter 11 bankruptcy case. When multiple successors in interest are involved, the information searches to review all of these variables can become extensive, difficult, and produce unpredictable results. The proposed rules revise already established mortgage servicing rules to require that servicers establish or make good faith efforts to establish live contact with a delinquent borrower no later than the 36th day after each payment due date for the duration of the borrower s delinquency. As a general matter, it is questionable whether borrowers will gain any benefit from being repeatedly informed by a live person of something about which they are acutely aware; namely, that they are delinquent. We believe that at some point such communications become unnecessary badgering that will only bring more discomfort to borrowers who are already suffering under financial stress. The Bureau proposes to adopt two especially technical exemptions to the early intervention requirements: (1) borrowers in bankruptcy and (2) cease and desist requests under the FDCPA. 1. Borrowers in bankruptcy The Bureau proposes to narrow the scope of the bankruptcy exemption from the early intervention requirements. Currently, servicers are wholly exempted from the early intervention requirements with respect to a mortgage loan if at least one of the borrowers is a debtor in bankruptcy. This includes both the live contact and the written notice requirements. However, the Bureau believes that servicers should apply the early Intervention contact requirements in limited bankruptcy-related circumstances. For the live contact element of the early intervention requirement, the Bureau proposes to maintain the exemption with respect to a borrower who is in bankruptcy, has discharged personal liability for the mortgage loan or shares liability on a mortgage loan with a person who is a debtor in a Chapter 12 or Chapter 13 bankruptcy case. However, the proposed revisions provide that the exemption would no longer apply to a borrower who is jointly liable on the mortgage loan with someone who is a debtor in a Chapter 7 or Chapter 11 bankruptcy case. In other words, a borrower jointly liable on a debt where another borrower files for Chapter 7 or 11 bankruptcies can receive calls to establish live contact. When multiple successors in interest are involved, the information searches to review all of these variables can become extensive, difficult and produce unpredictable and sometimes questionable results. 6

7 We note that this requirement like others noted below will require that servicers apply different operational rules to new variables. That is, distinguishing live contact requirements based on bankruptcy chapter filings (which can and often do change) and by different borrowers on the debt will require both costly system and operational changes that still will not guarantee foolproof execution. For the written notice element of the early intervention requirement, the Bureau proposes a very different rule because of the nature of the notice. Specifically, the proposed regulations require that a servicer provide the written notice to a delinquent borrower who is in bankruptcy or has discharged personal liability for the mortgage loan. There are exceptions to this requirement. The Bureau intends to exempt servicers from sending a written notice in the following circumstances: No loss mitigation options are available; The borrower is a debtor in bankruptcy, and the borrower s confirmed plan of reorganization provides that the borrower will surrender the property securing the mortgage loan, provides for the avoidance of the lien securing the mortgage loan, or otherwise does not provide for, as applicable, the payment of pre-bankruptcy arrearage or the maintenance of payments due under the mortgage loan; The borrower is a debtor in bankruptcy, and the borrower files with the court a Statement of Intention to surrender the property securing the mortgage loan; or The borrower is a debtor in bankruptcy, and a court enters an order in the bankruptcy case providing for the avoidance of the lien securing the mortgage loan or lifting the automatic stay with respect to the property securing the mortgage loan. The complexity of these requirements is evident on their face. The requirements are especially onerous when servicers will also have to layer on the live contact variances. We request the Bureau simplify the live contact and written notice requirements so that the population of consumers requiring both types of contact is identical and less contingent on bankruptcy status or process, which are always subject to change and rarely reported in real time. 2. Cease and Desist requests under the FDCPA The FDCPA provides, If a consumer notifies a debt collector in writing that the consumer refuses to pay a debt or that the consumer wishes the debt collector to cease further communication with the consumer, the debt collector shall not communicate further with the consumer with respect to such debt. If a servicer receives such a written communication currently, it creates a conflict with the mandatory early intervention contact requirements, and 7

8 the Bureau rules do not require the servicer to comply with the contact requirements. That is eminently reasonable. The Bureau proposes to alter this guidance in the proposed amendments. For the live contact element of the early Intervention requirement, the Bureau proposes that the current exemption remain. However, for the written notice element of the early intervention requirement, servicers must begin sending a special version of the written notice that (1) excludes any request for payment; (2) includes other information already contained in the mortgage servicing rules and (3) includes a statement that the servicer may or intends to invoke its specified remedy of foreclosure. We urge the Bureau not to change its prior guidance on this subject. If a borrower avails him or herself of the no contact protection under the FDCPA, crafting a special version of the written notice that will satisfy the Bureau s proposed rule, while possible, seems counter to the consumer protection at the heart of the FDCPA. Most debtors will feel such a statement is a continuing demand for payment. We ask the Bureau to carefully consider whether these technical and complex changes to the early intervention requirements are really helpful to borrowers. We believe they are not. Devising a fact pattern that might find utility in narrowing the exemptions in bankruptcy cases should not by itself lead to a narrowing of those exemptions. We urge the Bureau to reconsider its cost benefit analysis of the early intervention provisions of the proposed rule given the substantial complexity of the changes. It should be cognizant of the fact that adding layers of cost to mortgage servicing can lead to a reduction in originations and tighter access to credit. In short, adding additional complexity to the regulations increases costs for the lender-servicer and can have a negative impact on consumers. c. Loss mitigation 1. Evaluations If borrowers receive a modification in their loan and make payments under the modification for a substantial period of time such as five years, and then, because of a life event or some similar situation, find themselves in default, it is not unreasonable or bad business to offer them a second modification. That is standard practice among most mortgage servicers and support for that is found in most investor contracts. However, on the other hand, if a borrower is in default and has applied for a modification and perhaps has a short term modification, but shortly before the servicer is ready to make a decision on the application brings current the loan, and then repeats that process of default, 8

9 application, bringing the loan current again, perhaps multiple times, it is not unreasonable to prohibit such a borrower from applying for additional modifications. We urge the Bureau to consider placing limitations on the number of times a servicer in situations comparable to the example above must evaluate an applicant for loss mitigation. 2. Notification that application is complete Five days to respond and notify the borrower that the loss mitigation application is complete is too short a time frame. In particular, that is true when one considers the letter that must accompany the information that the application is complete. 3 If the Bureau is willing to permit a generic response such as This is to notify you that the application is complete, then that could be done in 5 days. But if there must be seven specific items covered in the letter and many of them require loan specific information (for example, was a foreclosure sale scheduled when the borrower completed the application and, if so, for when), preparing such a letter will require more than 5 days in many cases. We urge that the Bureau provide 10 days to give notification if the letter requires loan specific information, but if it can be generic and not provide loan specific information, 5 days will be sufficient. 3. Lack of information beyond control of servicer There are times when the borrower has provided all the documents and information that he can and has answered all the questions that the servicer has relative to his loss mitigation application. The borrower, of course, would like to know that is the case as soon as possible to partially relieve his anxiety. The borrower would also like to know when a decision will be made on the application. Unfortunately, sometimes the servicer has not yet received information from one or more third parties that is necessary to be considered when evaluating the application. For example, a home owners association may not have notified the servicer that there are no outstanding accounts owed by the borrower and no obligations unmet, notwithstanding repeated inquiries to the association for that information. If there is a delay, the servicer is expected to seek to obtain the information as quickly as possible, a very loose standard, and one somewhat made ambiguous by the comments in the explanation that accompanies the proposed rule, that efforts should be with more immediate urgency than previously. That is a standard that does not provide guidance. 3 The notice of complete application must state or contain: (A) That the loss mitigation application is complete; (B) The date the servicer received the complete application; (C) Whether a foreclosure sale was scheduled as of the date the servicer received the complete application and, if so, the date of that scheduled sale; (D) The date the borrower s loss mitigation protections began, as applicable, and a concise description of those protections; (E) That the servicer expects to complete its evaluation within 30 days of the date it received the complete application; (F) A statement that, although the application is complete, the borrower may need to submit additional information at a later date if the servicer determines that it is necessary; and (G) If applicable, that the borrower will have the opportunity to appeal the servicer s determination to deny the borrower for any trial or permanent loan modification. 9

10 The proposed rule would require considerable detail in the letter explaining that situation, such as when the request went to the third party, who the third party is, etc. 4 It is unlikely that this detailed information will be of much interest to the borrower, yet requiring it in the letter exposes the servicer to one more opportunity to make an unintentional mistake. In addition, certain mistakes may create greater anxiety from the borrower than is necessary, even though they are completely accurate ( the IRS has not yet responded to our inquiry, for example). Absent a strong case that the detailed information will be of real significance to the borrower, it would be preferable for the servicer to send a more general letter which stated that the borrower had now provided all of the information that the servicer asked him to provide, that the servicer was prepared to evaluate the application once additional information necessary for that evaluation was received by the servicer, that such additional information had been requested of the party who had the information, and that if the borrower wants information about the matter, the servicer will provide it if the borrower telephoned the servicer at an appropriate tollfree number provided in the letter. 4. Short term forbearance or repayment plans We have one overriding concern with the provisions in sec (c)(2)(iii). In that section, the plan must be in writing, and in practice, almost all short term payment or forbearance plans are oral. The plans are later confirmed through the statements that follow the commencement of the plan in which the payments due and other details are listed. Our members can cite very few experiences in which a short term payment or forbearance plan has been challenged as having been unfair to the borrower. At a minimum, there has been a reduction in payment due and a relaxation of the time frame in which delinquencies must be corrected. Those criteria are the essence of such plans and they are always beneficial to the consumer. That being the case, we do not believe there is a benefit to the consumer in requiring those plans to be in writing. There is a detriment, however, in that once a plan must be reduced to writing, it must meet certain internal reviews and controls that add to the time required to initiate such plans. In emergencies such as natural disasters, oral short-term plans have proven especially advantageous. 4 In addition, if, 30 days after a complete loss mitigation application is received, a servicer is unable to determine which loss mitigation options, if any, it will offer the borrower because it lacks documents or information from a party other than the borrower or the servicer, the servicer must promptly provide the borrower a written notice stating the following: (a) that the servicer has not received documents or information not in the borrower s control that the servicer requires to determine which loss mitigation options, if any, the servicer will offer on behalf of the owner or assignee of the mortgage; (b) the specific documents or information that the servicer lacks; (c) the date on which the servicer first requested that documentation or information during the current loss mitigation application process; and (d) that the servicer will complete its evaluation of the borrower for all available loss mitigation options promptly upon receiving the documentation or information. 10

11 Using oral short-term plans has worked well for a very long time, and we urge the Bureau to refrain from unnecessarily complicating it by requiring them to be in writing. d. Periodic Statements There are a variety of issues raised in that part of the proposed amendments covering periodic statements. Many of them arise from the introduction of bankruptcy matters into the TILA environment; a change that we think is not warranted. We have comments on that and on other parts of the proposed changes in the periodic statement requirements. Proposed comment (d)(1)-1 states If the balance of a mortgage loan has been accelerated but the servicer will accept a lesser amount to reinstate the loan, the amount due under (d)(1) should identify only the lesser amount that will be accepted to reinstate the loan. The reinstatement amount is not typically a static value and includes the expenses incurred by third parties on the servicer s behalf to date, including outside counsel, court costs and appraisal costs. When a consumer requests reinstatement, servicers must undertake a process to request the then-current billings from local counsel in addition to other incurred fees. This is a highly manual process, which itself results in time and cost from outside counsel to merely compile their billings. No servicer, to our knowledge, has integrated automatic, real time, outside law firm billing into its mortgage servicing records systems (which may literally be impossible to do), yet we believe this is exactly what comment 41(d)(1)-1 seems to contemplate in practice when it calls for monthly updates to the reinstatement amount on the periodic statements for all accelerated borrowers. We appreciate the discussion in the preamble of the Bureau s intent behind this provision; however, the costs of this proposal must be weighed against its benefits. Whether servicers implement a vast new automated solution (again this may not be possible) or simply use a very time-intensive manual solution, we believe that this requirement would impose very large cost increases for the servicing of accelerated loans. These costs would far outweigh the benefits to consumers whom the Bureau must recognize are already well behind in their obligations and whom have already been given the benefit of the Bureau s own extensive new mortgage servicing protections including early intervention, single point of contact, and loss mitigation evaluation. Our concerns with this provision stem from the particular nature of the reinstatement amount which is highly variable and not known to the servicer in real-time. Periodic statements are primarily designed to disclose expected future amounts due. However, as soon as a reinstatement amount is disclosed, it can increase as a result of continued action by outside professionals including court fees, appraisals and similar expenses. It is unclear from the proposal whether the Bureau expects servicers to accept as the amount due for reinstatement a 11

12 disclosed reinstatement amount that lacks additional costs not available at the time the reinstatement fee was disclosed. We believe that most borrowers will not understand the difference between an amount required to reinstate the loan and the accelerated amount. There will be further confusion when borrowers request state-mandated payoff statements or receive other required notifications that only include one value. Some jurisdictions do not even require a reinstatement option and the methodology for computing the reinstatement amount varies within each jurisdiction. We suggest instead that borrowers with accelerated loans would see even more benefit from a statement on the periodic statement which indicates that while their loan amount has been accelerated, the servicer may be able to reinstate the regular payment schedule of the loan. If the borrowers are interested in reinstating the loan, they should call the servicer to inquire about the terms and conditions of reinstatement. At that time, the servicer could calculate the reinstatement amount known at that time and notify the borrower that there may already be incurred costs that have not yet been billed to the servicer which also must be paid by the borrower. This would effectively allow servicers to retain their current practices for calculating reinstatement amounts, while providing accelerated borrowers a new awareness of the possibility of loan reinstatement in furtherance of the Bureau s stated intent behind this provision. The Bureau also introduces a bankruptcy-specific periodic billing statement, which will for purposes of mortgage servicers be a wholly new document that will have very limited applicability. It seems paradoxical that the bankruptcy automatic stay deems non-communication with bankrupt filers as being best for them to reassess their financial situation without having to worry about creditor communications, while the Bureau deems periodic debt-specific communications to those same individuals as in their best interest. We respectfully suggest that the U.S. Bankruptcy Code, Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure, court orders and local rules guidelines and standing orders are exceedingly complex and represent a delicate balance between the rights of creditors and debtors under federal law. We think the Bureau should not attempt to integrate these provisions with already complex provisions in the TILA disclosure regime, particularly with the additional new complications associated with the successor in interest proposals. Instead, they should retain the present rules and guidance. TILA and RESPA have historically been silent on the treatment of these borrowers and have instead deferred to the bankruptcy rules regarding how mortgage creditors and servicers should proceed. There is no new additional law that has been adopted which calls for the integration with bankruptcy law as is done in the regulations. Dodd-Frank is silent as to periodic statements to borrowers in bankruptcy. As a matter of public policy, mortgage creditors are similarly situated to other consumer creditors and should be treated equally with other types of 12

13 consumer creditors in bankruptcy. In fact, the attempt to segregate those from other creditors in bankruptcy may well lead to anger and confusion when consumers receive periodic statements. Such statements will be seen as an attempt to collect a debt, notwithstanding what the consumers believe are the protections afforded by bankruptcy courts. We believe many bankruptcy judges will feel the same way. As the Bureau acknowledges, some jurisdictions have borrowers make all payments directly to the bankruptcy trustee. Those payments would, of course, not be known to the servicer and would not, therefore, be reflected on the periodic statements. It is not clear what benefit consumers would receive from receiving periodic statements in those jurisdictions, since they would not only be seen as a debt collection effort (notwithstanding the most carefully worded disclaimer why else would you send a statement?) but as the Bureau acknowledges, would be inaccurate. In short, borrowers in a bankruptcy proceeding are a protected class which already has an established body of federal law and procedure for communications between creditors and borrowers in bankruptcy. We believe borrowers receive extensive protections by the bankruptcy regime. If the current elaborate architecture of federal bankruptcy protections is insufficient for consumers, we believe that amendments to the rules of bankruptcy should be made. We do not think that the appropriate place to strengthen bankruptcy protections is in the regulations which implement TILA, nor do we believe disclosure is appropriate in those cases other than as mandated by the bankruptcy rules and its courts. The issue is complicated further by recognition that the Bureau may lack authority under TILA to mandate that statements be sent to at least one group covered in the proposal. The requirement to send periodic statements is found in 12 CFR , Reg. Z, TILA. However, (a)(1) states This section applies to a closed-end consumer credit transaction secured by a dwelling 5 TILA does not apply if it is not a closed-end consumer credit transaction. When a debt is discharged from a sole-obligor consumer in bankruptcy, it is no longer a consumer credit transaction. The creditor may have a lien against a property, but any claim must be exercised in rem against the property itself, as the creditor no longer has a claim against the consumer anymore. TILA does not apply to in rem actions or to all creditors with residential real estate liens. TILA does not even apply to corporate loans secured by a lien on residential real estate, because it s not a consumer credit transaction. TILA also does not apply to consumer business purpose loans. Therefore, not only do we think that the Bureau should leave the bankruptcy protections to the bankruptcy rules and system, but we respectfully suggest that there is no legal authority under TILA to require the provision of periodic statements to borrowers who have discharged their loan in bankruptcy. 5 The five exceptions to this rule include reverse mortgages, time shares, coupon books, small servicers, and debtors in bankruptcy. 13

14 This is not words over substance, since it is possible that servicers that continue to provide periodic statements could incur TILA liability for errors, even when the underlying credit has been discharged, and they have no recourse to the consumer for the loan amount. 6 We appreciate the Bureau s consideration of these comments and we hope they will help produce a final regulation that protects consumers and enables lender-servicers to comply with the additional standards in a cost-effective manner. Thank you. Sincerely, John H. Dalton President Housing Policy Council of the Financial Services Roundtable 6 See also the general coverage of TILA in section (c) Coverage. In general, this part applies to each individual or business that offers or extends credit, other than a person excluded from coverage of this part by section 1029 of the Consumer Financial Protection Act of 2010, Title X of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, Public Law , 124 Stat. 1376, when four conditions are met: The credit is offered or extended to consumers; The offering or extension of credit is done regularly; The credit is subject to a finance charge or is payable by a written agreement in more than four installments; and The credit is primarily for personal, family, or household purposes. 14

REGULATORY ALERT NATIONAL CREDIT UNION ADMINISTRATION 1775 DUKE STREET, ALEXANDRIA, VA 22314. DATE: January 2014 NO.: 14-RA-03

REGULATORY ALERT NATIONAL CREDIT UNION ADMINISTRATION 1775 DUKE STREET, ALEXANDRIA, VA 22314. DATE: January 2014 NO.: 14-RA-03 REGULATORY ALERT NATIONAL CREDIT UNION ADMINISTRATION 1775 DUKE STREET, ALEXANDRIA, VA 22314 DATE: January 2014 NO.: 14-RA-03 TO: SUBJECT: ENCL: ACTION: Federally Insured Credit Unions Mortgage Servicing

More information

Summary of the proposed changes to the Mortgage Servicing Rules. The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau is proposing several amendments to the

Summary of the proposed changes to the Mortgage Servicing Rules. The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau is proposing several amendments to the Summary of the proposed changes to the Mortgage Servicing Rules The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau is proposing several amendments to the Bureau s Mortgage Servicing Rules under Regulation X, which

More information

The CFPB Finalizes New Mortgage Servicing Rules

The CFPB Finalizes New Mortgage Servicing Rules A DV I S O RY April 2013 The CFPB Finalizes New Mortgage Servicing Rules On January 17, 2013, the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) finalized rules implementing the mortgage loan servicing requirements

More information

Bankruptcy - What is a CFPB Mortgage Servicer and How Does it Work?

Bankruptcy - What is a CFPB Mortgage Servicer and How Does it Work? Impact of the CFPB Mortgage Servicing Rules on Your Bankruptcy Practice Thomas E. Hoffman John Rao National Consumer Law Center 2013 CFPB Mortgage Servicing Rules Dodd-Frank Act of 2010 amended RESPA and

More information

COMMENTS. to the. Consumer Financial Protection Bureau. 12 CFR Part 1026. [Docket No. CFPB-2016-0016] RIN 3170-AA49

COMMENTS. to the. Consumer Financial Protection Bureau. 12 CFR Part 1026. [Docket No. CFPB-2016-0016] RIN 3170-AA49 COMMENTS to the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau 12 CFR Part 1026 [Docket No. CFPB-2016-0016] RIN 3170-AA49 Amendments to the 2013 Mortgage Rules under the Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act (Regulation

More information

Compliance Bulletin and Policy Guidance: Mortgage Servicing Transfers

Compliance Bulletin and Policy Guidance: Mortgage Servicing Transfers 1700 G Street, N.W., Washington, DC 20552 Bulletin 2014-01 Date: August 19, 2014 Subject: Compliance Bulletin and Policy Guidance: Mortgage Servicing Transfers The Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection

More information

REGULATORY ALERT NATIONAL CREDIT UNION ADMINISTRATION 1775 DUKE STREET, ALEXANDRIA, VA 22314. DATE: January 2014 NO.: 14-RA-04

REGULATORY ALERT NATIONAL CREDIT UNION ADMINISTRATION 1775 DUKE STREET, ALEXANDRIA, VA 22314. DATE: January 2014 NO.: 14-RA-04 REGULATORY ALERT NATIONAL CREDIT UNION ADMINISTRATION 1775 DUKE STREET, ALEXANDRIA, VA 22314 DATE: January 2014 NO.: 14-RA-04 TO: SUBJECT: ENCL: Federally Insured Credit Unions Mortgage Servicing Requirements

More information

CFPB Mortgage Servicing Rules Overview

CFPB Mortgage Servicing Rules Overview CFPB Mortgage Servicing Rules Overview For additional information, visit www.consumerfinance.gov/regulations Note: This document was used in support of a live discussion. As such, it does not necessarily

More information

November 6, 2012. The Honorable Richard Cordray Director Consumer Financial Protection Bureau 1700 G Street NW Washington, DC 20006-4702

November 6, 2012. The Honorable Richard Cordray Director Consumer Financial Protection Bureau 1700 G Street NW Washington, DC 20006-4702 November 6, 2012 The Honorable Richard Cordray Director Consumer Financial Protection Bureau 1700 G Street NW Washington, DC 20006-4702 Re: Integrated Mortgage Disclosures under the Real Estate Settlement

More information

Mortgage Servicing: Loss Mitigation (12 CFR 1024.41)

Mortgage Servicing: Loss Mitigation (12 CFR 1024.41) Mortgage Servicing: Loss Mitigation (12 CFR 1024.41) The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau s (CFPB) new mortgage servicing rule includes requirements and restrictions relating to communicating with

More information

June 16, 2014. Periodic Mortgage Statements for Bankruptcy-Protected Debtors

June 16, 2014. Periodic Mortgage Statements for Bankruptcy-Protected Debtors June 16, 2014 The Honorable Richard Cordray Director Consumer Financial Protection Bureau 1700 G Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20552 Re: Periodic Mortgage Statements for Bankruptcy-Protected Debtors Dear

More information

2013 Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act (Regulation X) and Truth in Lending Act (Regulation Z) Mortgage Servicing Final Rules

2013 Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act (Regulation X) and Truth in Lending Act (Regulation Z) Mortgage Servicing Final Rules JANUARY 8, 2014 2013 Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act (Regulation X) and Truth in Lending Act (Regulation Z) Mortgage Servicing Final Rules SMALL ENTITY COMPLIANCE GUIDE 1 Version Log The Bureau updates

More information

Summary of Mortgage Servicing Rules

Summary of Mortgage Servicing Rules February 12, 2013 Summary of Mortgage Servicing Rules The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) released its final rules on mortgage loan servicing on January 17, 2013. These new national standards

More information

Help For Struggling Borrowers

Help For Struggling Borrowers DECEMBER 18, 2013 Help For Struggling Borrowers A guide to the mortgage servicing rules effective on January 10, 2014 Table of contents Introduction... 7 1. Applying for loss mitigation... 10 1.1 Introduction...

More information

Regulatory Practice Letter September 2012 RPL 12-17

Regulatory Practice Letter September 2012 RPL 12-17 Regulatory Practice Letter September 2012 RPL 12-17 Mortgage Servicing Standards - CFPB Proposed Rule Executive Summary The Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection ( CFBP or Bureau ) released two proposed

More information

CFPB Mortgage Servicing Standards

CFPB Mortgage Servicing Standards www.pwc.com/consumerfinance www.pwcregulatory.com CFPB Mortgage Servicing Standards An analysis of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau s Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act (Regulation X) and Truth

More information

209 CMR: DIVISION OF BANKS AND LOAN AGENCIES

209 CMR: DIVISION OF BANKS AND LOAN AGENCIES 209 CMR 32.00: TRUTH IN LENDING Section GENERAL 32.01: Purpose and Scope 32.02: Definitions and Rules of Construction 32.03: Exempt Transactions 32.04: Finance Charges OPEN END CREDIT 32.05: General Disclosure

More information

Student Loan Collection and the CFPB

Student Loan Collection and the CFPB Student Loan Collection and the CFPB Consumer Financial Protection Bureau o Generally! Established under Title X of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (12 U.S.C. 5301 et seq.)!

More information

Financial Services & Products ADVISORY

Financial Services & Products ADVISORY WWW.ALSTON.COM Financial Services & Products ADVISORY DECEMBER 19, 2014 CFPB s Proposed Changes to the Mortgage Servicing Rules: The Devil Is in the Details On November 20, 2014, the Consumer Financial

More information

BUREAU OF CONSUMER FINANCIAL PROTECTION. Amendments to the 2013 Mortgage Rules under the Real Estate Settlement

BUREAU OF CONSUMER FINANCIAL PROTECTION. Amendments to the 2013 Mortgage Rules under the Real Estate Settlement BILLING CODE: 4810-AM-P BUREAU OF CONSUMER FINANCIAL PROTECTION 12 CFR Part 1024, 12 CFR Part 1026 [Docket No. CFPB-2013-0031] RIN 3170-AA37 Amendments to the 2013 Mortgage Rules under the Real Estate

More information

New CFPB mortgage servicing rules present significant challenges for mortgage servicers

New CFPB mortgage servicing rules present significant challenges for mortgage servicers New CFPB mortgage servicing rules present significant challenges for mortgage servicers Prepared by: Jose Vivar, Director, McGladrey LLP 312-634-4394, jose.vivar@mcgladrey.com Michael Sher, Partner, McGladrey

More information

Fair Debt Collection Practices Act 1

Fair Debt Collection Practices Act 1 Fair Debt Collection Practices Act 1 The Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA)(15 U.S.C. 1692 et seq.), which became effective March 20, 1978, was designed to eliminate abusive, deceptive, and unfair

More information

December 22, 2010. Dear Ms. Johnson,

December 22, 2010. Dear Ms. Johnson, December 22, 2010 Jennifer J. Johnson Secretary Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System 20th Street and Constitution Avenue, NW Washington, DC 20551 Docket No. R 1390, Dear Ms. Johnson, The Conference

More information

Re: Comments on CFPB s Advance Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (Docket No. CFPB-2013-0033) Regarding Collection of Medical Debts

Re: Comments on CFPB s Advance Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (Docket No. CFPB-2013-0033) Regarding Collection of Medical Debts Page 1 of 5 Submitted electronically to www.regulations.gov (RIN 3170-AA41, Docket No. CFPB-2013-0033) Monica Jackson Office of the Executive Secretary Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection 1700 G Street

More information

How To Serve A Mortgage In The United States

How To Serve A Mortgage In The United States Break Out Session: Mortgage Loan Servicing and Administration 2 Agenda Mortgage Servicing Rules (Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act [RESPA] and Truth in Lending Act [TILA]) Effective Date: Applications

More information

Case 10-33583-bjh11 Doc 31 Filed 12/07/10 Entered 12/07/10 18:18:45 Desc Main Document Page 1 of 10

Case 10-33583-bjh11 Doc 31 Filed 12/07/10 Entered 12/07/10 18:18:45 Desc Main Document Page 1 of 10 Document Page 1 of 10 Eric A. Liepins ERIC A. LIEPINS, P.C. 12770 Coit Road Suite 1100 Dallas, Texas 75251 Ph. (972) 991-5591 Fax (972) 991-5788 ATTORNEYS FOR DEBTOR IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

More information

VII 3.1. VII. Unfair and Deceptive Practices FDCPA. Fair Debt Collection Practices Act. Introduction. Communications Connected with Debt Collection

VII 3.1. VII. Unfair and Deceptive Practices FDCPA. Fair Debt Collection Practices Act. Introduction. Communications Connected with Debt Collection Fair Debt Collection Practices Act Introduction The Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA), effective in 1978, was designed to eliminate abusive, deceptive, and unfair debt collection practices. The

More information

ESCROW REQUIREMENTS UNDER TILA

ESCROW REQUIREMENTS UNDER TILA Overview Escrow Requirements Reg. Z High Cost Mortgage and Counseling - Reg. Z & X Ability to Repay & Qualified Mortgages Reg. Z & X Mortgage Servicing Reg. Z & X Loan Originator Compensation Reg. Z Copies

More information

CONSUMER. Dealing with Debt Collection Harassment

CONSUMER. Dealing with Debt Collection Harassment CONSUMER Information for Advocates Representing Older Adults National Consumer Law Center Debt collectors have been the most complained-about industry on the Federal Trade Commission s consumer website

More information

October 27, 2014. Docket No. CFPB-2014-0019, RIN 3170-AA10 Home Mortgage Disclosure (Regulation C)

October 27, 2014. Docket No. CFPB-2014-0019, RIN 3170-AA10 Home Mortgage Disclosure (Regulation C) October 27, 2014 The Honorable Richard Cordray Director Consumer Financial Protection Bureau 1700 G Street NW Washington, DC 20006-4702 Monica Jackson Office of the Executive Secretary Consumer Financial

More information

CFPB Mortgage Amendments. Get Caught Up!

CFPB Mortgage Amendments. Get Caught Up! CFPB Mortgage Amendments Get Caught Up! Agenda HPML Appraisal Requirements High Cost Mortgage QM Points and Fees QM Cure Provision HPML Escrow Requirements HMDA Revisions Loan Estimate Form Closing Disclosure

More information

SUMMARY OF THE CFPB NOTICE

SUMMARY OF THE CFPB NOTICE COMMENTS OF THE TAX PROBLEM RESOLUTION SERVICES COALITION TO THE BUREAU OF CONSUMER FINANCIAL PROTECTION IN CONSIDERATION OF DOCKET NUMBER CFPB-HQ-2011-2 FOR DEFINING LARGER PARTICIPANTS IN CERTAIN CONSUMER

More information

CFPB Proposes Comprehensive Mortgage Servicing Regulations

CFPB Proposes Comprehensive Mortgage Servicing Regulations August 2012 CFPB Proposes Comprehensive Mortgage Servicing Regulations On August 9, 2012, the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) issued two notices of proposed rulemaking (NPRs) 1 implementing

More information

NEW CFPB RULES FOR HIGH COST MORTGAGES AND HOMEOWNERSHIP COUNSELING February 3, 2013

NEW CFPB RULES FOR HIGH COST MORTGAGES AND HOMEOWNERSHIP COUNSELING February 3, 2013 NEW CFPB RULES FOR HIGH COST MORTGAGES AND HOMEOWNERSHIP COUNSELING February 3, 2013 On January 10, 2013, the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau ( CFPB ) issued a final rule that carries out changes

More information

RE: RIN 2900 AO65 Loan Guaranty: Ability-to-Repay Standards and Qualified Mortgage Definition under the Truth in Lending Act

RE: RIN 2900 AO65 Loan Guaranty: Ability-to-Repay Standards and Qualified Mortgage Definition under the Truth in Lending Act June 9, 2014 Mr. John Bell Assistant Director for Loan Policy and Valuation Veterans Benefits Administration, Department of Veterans Affairs 810 Vermont Avenue, NW Washington, DC 20420 RE: RIN 2900 AO65

More information

RESPA and TILA Mortgage Servicing Final Rules

RESPA and TILA Mortgage Servicing Final Rules This summary is provided by the Minnesota Credit Union Network for informational purposes only, and is intended to provide credit unions with the general regulatory requirements and effective dates for

More information

Regulatory Practice Letter January 2014 RPL 14-03

Regulatory Practice Letter January 2014 RPL 14-03 Regulatory Practice Letter January 2014 RPL 14-03 CFPB Nonbank Supervision of Student Loan Servicers Final Rule CFPB Student Loan Ombudsman - Annual Report Executive Summary Effective March 1, 2014, the

More information

Individual Bankruptcy A Client's Guide to the Language and Procedure

Individual Bankruptcy A Client's Guide to the Language and Procedure Individual Bankruptcy A Client's Guide to the Language and Procedure BAKKE NORMAN L A W O F F I C E S Welcome Thank you for considering Bakke Norman, S.C. to represent your interests. This booklet will

More information

Changes in Mortgage Regulation in 2013 Katie Wechsler December, 2012

Changes in Mortgage Regulation in 2013 Katie Wechsler December, 2012 Changes in Mortgage Regulation in 2013 Katie Wechsler December, 2012 In 2011 and 2012 the Federal banking agencies proposed several regulations to the mortgage industry, none of which have been finalized,

More information

RE: Information Collection Debt Collection Survey from the Consumer Credit Panel, OMB Control Number: 3170-XXXX, [Docket No: CFPB-2014-0005]

RE: Information Collection Debt Collection Survey from the Consumer Credit Panel, OMB Control Number: 3170-XXXX, [Docket No: CFPB-2014-0005] May 6, 2014 Ashwin Vasan Chief Information Officer Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (Attention: PRA Office) 1700 G St., NW Washington, D.C. 20552 RE: Information Collection Debt Collection Survey from

More information

Chapter 30 Home Equity Conversion Mortgages. 47-30-103. Authorized lenders Designation Application.

Chapter 30 Home Equity Conversion Mortgages. 47-30-103. Authorized lenders Designation Application. Chapter 30 Home Equity Conversion Mortgages 47-30-101. Short title. 47-30-102. Definitions. 47-30-103. Authorized lenders Designation Application. 47-30-104. Compliance Noncomplying loans unenforceable

More information

CUNA s SUMMARY OF THE CFPB s MORTGAGE LENDING RULES Spring 2013

CUNA s SUMMARY OF THE CFPB s MORTGAGE LENDING RULES Spring 2013 MANDATORY ESCROW ACCOUNTS Effective: June 1, 2013 REGULATION Requires escrow accounts be maintained for five years (rather than the current one year) for higher-priced mortgage loans. A higher-priced mortgage

More information

This chapter shall be known and may be cited as the "Home Equity Conversion Mortgage Act."

This chapter shall be known and may be cited as the Home Equity Conversion Mortgage Act. Source: http://www.lexisnexis.com/hottopics/tncode/ 47-30-101. Short title. This chapter shall be known and may be cited as the "Home Equity Conversion Mortgage Act." HISTORY: Acts 1993, ch. 410, 2. 47-30-102.

More information

Compliance & Foreclosure

Compliance & Foreclosure Compliance & Foreclosure June 19th, 2015 Hilton Hotel, Dedham, MA Erika J. Hoover, Esq. Compliance Counsel Life of a foreclosure default to post sale Pre-foreclosure compliance issues Obsolete mortgages

More information

The Federal Register published the proposed rule on August 23, 2012.

The Federal Register published the proposed rule on August 23, 2012. CFPB Issues Draft RESPA-TILA Proposed Rules On July 9, the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau ( Bureau or CFPB ) released draft proposed rules and model forms that combine the required disclosures under

More information

AMERICAN BAR ASSOCIATION CONSUMER FINANCIAL SERVICES COMMITTEE SPRING MEETING SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFIORNIA

AMERICAN BAR ASSOCIATION CONSUMER FINANCIAL SERVICES COMMITTEE SPRING MEETING SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFIORNIA AMERICAN BAR ASSOCIATION CONSUMER FINANCIAL SERVICES COMMITTEE SPRING MEETING SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFIORNIA TILA-RESPA INTEGRATED DISCLOSURE RULE BACKGROUND, TILA LIABILITIES & OPERATIONAL CONCERNS I. OVERVIEW

More information

Re: Response of the Consumer Bankers Association to the Request for Information Regarding Student Loan Servicing

Re: Response of the Consumer Bankers Association to the Request for Information Regarding Student Loan Servicing Monica Jackson Office of the Executive Secretary Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection 1700 G Street, NW Washington, DC 20552 July 13, 2015 Re: Response of the Consumer Bankers Association to the Request

More information

REGULATORY ALERT NATIONAL CREDIT UNION ADMINISTRATION 1775 DUKE STREET, ALEXANDRIA, VA 22314

REGULATORY ALERT NATIONAL CREDIT UNION ADMINISTRATION 1775 DUKE STREET, ALEXANDRIA, VA 22314 REGULATORY ALERT NATIONAL CREDIT UNION ADMINISTRATION 1775 DUKE STREET, ALEXANDRIA, VA 22314 DATE: March 2001 NO: 01-RA-04 TO: All Federally-Insured Credit Unions SUBJECT: Homeowners Protection Act (HOPA)

More information

GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA SESSION 1991 H 1 HOUSE BILL 22

GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA SESSION 1991 H 1 HOUSE BILL 22 GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA SESSION H HOUSE BILL Short Title: Regulate Reverse Mortgages. (Public) Sponsors: Representatives Brubaker, Easterling, Hasty, Ligon, Lineberry, Privette, and Woodard.

More information

Mortgage Loans. Understand the Terms of Your Loan before You Sign. Mortgage Loans. Standard Home Equity Loans or Second Mortgages

Mortgage Loans. Understand the Terms of Your Loan before You Sign. Mortgage Loans. Standard Home Equity Loans or Second Mortgages Mortgage Loans Understand the Terms of Your Loan before You Sign This brochure can help you determine what is best for your situation, become familiar with mortgage loan terms, and learn what is involved

More information

Home Equity Conversion Mortgage (Reverse Mortgage) This Mortgage ("Security Instrument") is given on (date). The Mortgagor is (Name), of

Home Equity Conversion Mortgage (Reverse Mortgage) This Mortgage (Security Instrument) is given on (date). The Mortgagor is (Name), of Home Equity Conversion Mortgage (Reverse Mortgage) This Mortgage ("Security Instrument") is given on (date). The Mortgagor is (Name), of (street address, city, county, state, zip code), hereafter called

More information

LAUREN ROSS Attorney at Law 2550 N. Hollywood Way Suite 404 Burbank, CA 91505-5046 Tel.(818) 847-0211 Facsimile (818) 847-0214

LAUREN ROSS Attorney at Law 2550 N. Hollywood Way Suite 404 Burbank, CA 91505-5046 Tel.(818) 847-0211 Facsimile (818) 847-0214 LAUREN ROSS Attorney at Law 2550 N. Hollywood Way Suite 404 Burbank, CA 91505-5046 Tel.(818) 847-0211 Facsimile (818) 847-0214 INITIAL CONSULTATION AGREEMENT AND REQUIRED NOTICES Please Note: These documents

More information

WELCOME TO THE MASCIA LAW FIRM NEW CLIENT PACKAGE

WELCOME TO THE MASCIA LAW FIRM NEW CLIENT PACKAGE In these trying times you need a law firm that believes in you, A firm that will make the impossible, POSSIBLE. WELCOME TO THE MASCIA LAW FIRM NEW CLIENT PACKAGE A WELCOME LETTER FROM MASCIA LAW FIRM On

More information

RESIDENTIAL LIMITED COVERAGE MORTGAGE MODIFICATION POLICY Issued By WFG NATIONAL TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY

RESIDENTIAL LIMITED COVERAGE MORTGAGE MODIFICATION POLICY Issued By WFG NATIONAL TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY RESIDENTIAL LIMITED COVERAGE MORTGAGE MODIFICATION POLICY Issued By WFG NATIONAL TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY Any notice of claim and any other notice or statement in writing required to be given to the Company

More information

Re: Docket No. CFPB-2013-0002 Proposed Amendments to the Ability-to-Repay Standards under the Truth in Lending Act (Regulation Z)

Re: Docket No. CFPB-2013-0002 Proposed Amendments to the Ability-to-Repay Standards under the Truth in Lending Act (Regulation Z) February 25, 2013 Monica Jackson Office of the Executive Secretary Consumer Financial Protection Bureau 1700 G Street, NW Washington, DC 20552 Re: Docket No. CFPB-2013-0002 Proposed Amendments to the Ability-to-Repay

More information

CFPB Mortgage Servicing Standards

CFPB Mortgage Servicing Standards PwC s CFPB Mortgage Servicing Standards Perspectives Issue 5/October 2013 CFPB Mortgage Servicing Standards Understanding periodic statement rules Introduction This represents the fifth in a series of

More information

CFPB Issues Much Anticipated Final Rules: Ability to Repay, Qualified Mortgages, Escrow Requirements and Homeownership Counseling

CFPB Issues Much Anticipated Final Rules: Ability to Repay, Qualified Mortgages, Escrow Requirements and Homeownership Counseling CFPB Issues Much Anticipated Final Rules: Ability to Repay, Qualified Mortgages, Escrow Requirements and Homeownership Counseling The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau ( CFPB ) issued their much anticipated

More information

Business and Agri Loan Terms and Conditions

Business and Agri Loan Terms and Conditions October 2012 Thank you for choosing an ANZ loan. When you take out a loan, various terms and conditions apply to it. These are covered in this Terms and Conditions document and in your loan agreement.

More information

HOME MORTGAGE MODIFICATION

HOME MORTGAGE MODIFICATION HOME MORTGAGE MODIFICATION Individuals in bankruptcy cases assigned to Judge Waites, including joint debtors, may seek court approval of consensual modifications of home mortgage loans in one or more of

More information

Florida Foreclosure/Real Estate Law. E-Book. A Simple Guide to Florida Foreclosure/Real Estate Law. by: Florida Law Advisers, P.A.

Florida Foreclosure/Real Estate Law. E-Book. A Simple Guide to Florida Foreclosure/Real Estate Law. by: Florida Law Advisers, P.A. Florida Foreclosure/Real Estate Law E-Book A Simple Guide to Florida Foreclosure/Real Estate Law by: Florida Law Advisers, P.A. 1 Call: 800-990-7763 Web: www.floridalegaladvice.com TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION...

More information

TEN LOOPHOLES THAT CAN STOP FORCLOSURE FAST

TEN LOOPHOLES THAT CAN STOP FORCLOSURE FAST TEN LOOPHOLES THAT CAN STOP FORCLOSURE FAST Copyright Notice All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means electronic or mechanical. Any

More information

Loss Mitigation Procedures and Foreclosure Hurdles

Loss Mitigation Procedures and Foreclosure Hurdles Loss Mitigation Procedures and Foreclosure Hurdles Attorney David Pelletier Axley Brynelson, LLP dpelletier@axley.com 608.260.2495 www.axley.com What does the loss mitigation rule require? Rule does not

More information

Business Chapter 13 Cases: The Self-Employed Debtor

Business Chapter 13 Cases: The Self-Employed Debtor Business Chapter 13 Cases: The Self-Employed Debtor (Friday, March 23, 2012, 1:45pm - 2:25pm) Presented by Douglas B. Jacobs, California Consumer Bankruptcy Attorney This presentation will discuss: 1.

More information

GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA 1991 SESSION CHAPTER 546 HOUSE BILL 22

GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA 1991 SESSION CHAPTER 546 HOUSE BILL 22 GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA 1991 SESSION CHAPTER 546 HOUSE BILL 22 AN ACT TO REGULATE REVERSE MORTGAGES. The General Assembly of North Carolina enacts: Section 1. Chapter 53 of the General Statutes

More information

Wall Street Reform and Consumer Financial Protection Act of 2010

Wall Street Reform and Consumer Financial Protection Act of 2010 Wall Street Reform and Consumer Financial Protection Act of 2010 Mortgage Servicing Issues February 4, 2011 Presented by Joseph Gabai 2010 Morrison & Foerster LLP All Rights Reserved mofo.com Financial

More information

Frequently Asked Questions. for. Chapter 7 Debtors

Frequently Asked Questions. for. Chapter 7 Debtors Frequently Asked Questions for Chapter 7 Debtors The information contained in this document is provided as a service to our clients, and does not constitute legal advice. We try to provide quality information,

More information

JIIlI Freddie rollol'l_bo'jtrorn@frlldclirrnac.com Mcloan. VA 22102,;,'10

JIIlI Freddie rollol'l_bo'jtrorn@frlldclirrnac.com Mcloan. VA 22102,;,'10 JIIlI Freddie rollol'l_bo'jtrorn@frlldclirrnac.com Mcloan. VA 22102,;,'10 rqmac We make home possible&\! Robert E. Bostrom T~: (103) 903-2690 8200 Jones F3r,mch ()rive Lxocutivo VIC(! PlD'Ji

More information

Fair Debt Collection Practices Act

Fair Debt Collection Practices Act Background The Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA) (15 USC 1692 et seq.), which became effective in March 1978, was designed to eliminate abusive, deceptive, and unfair debt collection practices.

More information

Common Bankruptcy Concerns for Lenders

Common Bankruptcy Concerns for Lenders Types of Bankruptcy, and Eligibility Common Bankruptcy Concerns for Lenders The U.S. Bankruptcy Code is divided into several different chapters. Some chapters are applicable to all types of bankruptcy

More information

Local Rules 2084-1 through 2084-26 govern chapter 13 practice in cases filed after October 16, 2005.

Local Rules 2084-1 through 2084-26 govern chapter 13 practice in cases filed after October 16, 2005. RULE 2084-1. SCOPE CHAPTER 13 RULES Local Rules 2084-1 through 2084-26 govern chapter 13 practice in cases filed after October 16, 2005. RULE 2084-2. FILING REQUIREMENTS (a) Application to Pay Fee in Installments.

More information

BANKRUPTCY THE BASICS

BANKRUPTCY THE BASICS Law Offices of Nakita R. Blocton A Limited Liability Company 950 22 nd Street North, Suite 715, Birmingham, Alabama 35203 - Post Office Box 2783, Birmingham, Alabama 35202 Telephone: (205) 251-8747 Fax:

More information

2013 Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act (Regulation X) and Truth in Lending Act (Regulation Z) Mortgage Servicing Final Rules

2013 Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act (Regulation X) and Truth in Lending Act (Regulation Z) Mortgage Servicing Final Rules JUNE 7, 2013 2013 Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act (Regulation X) and Truth in Lending Act (Regulation Z) Mortgage Servicing Final Rules SMALL ENTITY COMPLIANCE GUIDE 1 Please refer to our proposed

More information

CFPB-2014-0028; RIN 3170-AA48

CFPB-2014-0028; RIN 3170-AA48 Robert R. Davis Executive Vice President Mortgage Markets, Financial Management & Public Policy (202) 663-5588 RDavis@aba.com Ms. Monica Jackson Office of the Executive Secretary 1275 First Street, NE

More information

December 10, 2013. Loans in Areas Having Special Flood Hazards

December 10, 2013. Loans in Areas Having Special Flood Hazards December 10, 2013 Legislative and Regulatory Activities Division Office of the Comptroller of the Currency 400 7th Street SW, Ste. 3E-218 Mail Stop 9W-11 Washington, D.C. 20219 Docket ID OCC-2013-0015

More information

S. XXX, the Student Loan Borrower Bill of Rights Senators Durbin, Warren, Boxer, and Reed Section by Section

S. XXX, the Student Loan Borrower Bill of Rights Senators Durbin, Warren, Boxer, and Reed Section by Section S. XXX, the Student Loan Borrower Bill of Rights Senators Durbin, Warren, Boxer, and Reed Section by Section Section 1. Short Title The Student Loan Borrowers Bill of Rights Section 2. Truth in Lending

More information

Advantage Education Loan Promissory Note

Advantage Education Loan Promissory Note Promissory Note with Kentucky Higher Education Student Loan Corporation in Louisville, KY In this Promissory Note ( Note ) the words I, me, my, and we mean the borrower and cosigner(s) who have signed

More information

Climb Investco, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company. Climb Credit, Inc., a Delaware Corporation

Climb Investco, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company. Climb Credit, Inc., a Delaware Corporation Amended and Restated Final Agreement of the Parties PARTIES Lender Manager Master Servicer School ELIGIBILITY Eligible Assets Eligible Schools TRANSACTION Transaction Term Survival Program Size Funding

More information

VISA. Classic. Credit Card. Agreement and Disclosure Statement. Classic. Federally insured by NCUA

VISA. Classic. Credit Card. Agreement and Disclosure Statement. Classic. Federally insured by NCUA Classic The Partnership FCU MAILING ADDRESS For ALL correspondence, deposits & loan payments PO Box 18539 Washington DC 20036-8539 VISA Classic Credit Card Member Services & Loans Audio Response ADVANTAGE

More information

Improving a Credit Profile

Improving a Credit Profile Improving a Credit Profile Steps to improving a credit profile STEP 1. Order your credit Report STEP 2. Evaluate & develop a plan STEP 3. Is the personal information accurate? STEP 4. Are the tradelines

More information

John Rao, Staff Attorney, National Consumer Law Center Diane Thompson, of counsel, National Consumer Law Center

John Rao, Staff Attorney, National Consumer Law Center Diane Thompson, of counsel, National Consumer Law Center RESPA 101 John Rao, Staff Attorney, National Consumer Law Center Diane Thompson, of counsel, National Consumer Law Center Jessica Hiemenz National Consumer Law Center September 9, 2013 This Webinar is

More information

Mortgage Brokerages, Lenders and Administrators Act, 2006. Additional Draft Regulations for Consultation

Mortgage Brokerages, Lenders and Administrators Act, 2006. Additional Draft Regulations for Consultation Mortgage Brokerages, Lenders and Administrators Act, 2006 Additional Draft Regulations for Consultation Proposed by the Ministry of Finance January, 2008 Mortgage Brokerages, Lenders and Administrators

More information

CREDIT COUNSELING REQUIREMENT

CREDIT COUNSELING REQUIREMENT CREDIT COUNSELING REQUIREMENT In order to file bankruptcy, an individual must receive from an approved nonprofit budget and credit counseling agency... an individual or group briefing... that outlines

More information

Visa Credit Card Cardmember Agreement

Visa Credit Card Cardmember Agreement Visa Credit Card Cardmember Agreement In this Agreement the words You, Your and Yourself mean each and all of those who apply for the card or who sign this Agreement. Card means the Visa Credit Card and

More information

Condominiums, Consumer protection, Housing, Insurance, Mortgage servicing, Mortgagees, Mortgages, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.

Condominiums, Consumer protection, Housing, Insurance, Mortgage servicing, Mortgagees, Mortgages, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements. List of Subjects in 12 CFR Part 1024 Condominiums, Consumer protection, Housing, Insurance, Mortgage servicing, Mortgagees, Mortgages, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements. Authority and Issuance For

More information

NC General Statutes - Chapter 53 Article 21 1

NC General Statutes - Chapter 53 Article 21 1 Article 21. Reverse Mortgages. 53-255. Title. This Article shall be known and may be cited as the Reverse Mortgage Act. (1991, c. 546, s. 1; 1995, c. 115, s. 1.) 53-256. Purpose. It is the intent of the

More information

Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act 1

Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act 1 Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act 1 Examination Objectives To determine if the financial institution has established policies and procedures to ensure compliance with the Real Estate Settlement Procedures

More information

Loan Originator Compensation Requirements under the Truth In Lending Act

Loan Originator Compensation Requirements under the Truth In Lending Act BUREAU OF CONSUMER FINANCIAL PROTECTION 12 CFR Part 1026 [Docket No. CFPB-2013-0013] RIN 3170-AA37 Loan Originator Compensation Requirements under the Truth In Lending Act (Regulation Z); Prohibition on

More information

NAFCU S SECTION-BY-SECTION ANALYSIS OF THE CREDIT CARD ACT

NAFCU S SECTION-BY-SECTION ANALYSIS OF THE CREDIT CARD ACT NAFCU S SECTION-BY-SECTION ANALYSIS OF THE CREDIT CARD ACT TITLE I CONSUMER PROTECTION... 2 SEC. 101. PROTECTION OF CREDIT CARDHOLDERS... 2 SEC. 102. LIMITS ON FEES AND INTEREST CHARGES.... 4 SEC. 103.

More information

BUSINESS CREDIT AND CONTINUING SECURITY AGREEMENT

BUSINESS CREDIT AND CONTINUING SECURITY AGREEMENT BUSINESS CREDIT AND CONTINUING SECURITY AGREEMENT This Business Credit and Continuing Security Agreement ("Agreement") includes this Agreement and may include a Business Credit Agreement Rider and Business

More information

A voluntary bankruptcy under the BIA commences when a debtor files an assignment in bankruptcy with the Office of the Superintendent of Bankruptcy.

A voluntary bankruptcy under the BIA commences when a debtor files an assignment in bankruptcy with the Office of the Superintendent of Bankruptcy. Bankruptcy and Restructuring 121 BANKRUPTCY AND RESTRUCTURING Under Canadian constitutional law, the federal government has exclusive legislative control over bankruptcy and insolvency matters. Insolvency

More information

Coping with a Money Crunch Dealing with Creditors

Coping with a Money Crunch Dealing with Creditors Chapter 4: After the Disaster Coping with a Money Crunch Dealing with Creditors Outstanding bills and no money to pay creditors can be very frightening. Unemployment, death, illness, divorce or accident

More information

CREDIT, DEBT COLLECTION, & BANKRUPTCY

CREDIT, DEBT COLLECTION, & BANKRUPTCY Chapter Four CREDIT, DEBT COLLECTION, & BANKRUPTCY Credit is money, goods or services provided to an individual who promises to pay the lender at a later time. You may not be denied credit because of your

More information

A. ABA Supports the CFPB s Ongoing Efforts to Clarify the Rules

A. ABA Supports the CFPB s Ongoing Efforts to Clarify the Rules Robert R. Davis Executive Vice President Mortgage Markets, Financial Management & Public Policy (202) 663-5588 RDavis@aba.com Ms. Monica Jackson Office of the Executive Secretary Consumer Financial Protection

More information

Qualified Mortgage Rule After 6 Months

Qualified Mortgage Rule After 6 Months Latest Developments Under TILA and RESPA Attorney David Pelletier dpelletier@axley.com 608.260.2495 Attorney Kevin D. Trost ktrost@axley.com 608.283.6747 WISCONSIN BANKING LAW UPDATE Community Bankers

More information

Case 2:06-cv-13665-MOB-VMM Document 9 Filed 03/02/2007 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

Case 2:06-cv-13665-MOB-VMM Document 9 Filed 03/02/2007 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION Case 2:06-cv-13665-MOB-VMM Document 9 Filed 03/02/2007 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION In re: CARLA CRAIG-LIKELY, Debtor, / CARLA CRAIG-LIKELY, v.

More information

I. RETURN INTEGRITY & ACCURACY TO FORECLOSURE AND BANKRUPTCY PROCEEDINGS

I. RETURN INTEGRITY & ACCURACY TO FORECLOSURE AND BANKRUPTCY PROCEEDINGS I. RETURN INTEGRITY & ACCURACY TO FORECLOSURE AND BANKRUPTCY PROCEEDINGS A. Put an end to robosigning - signing affidavits filed with the court without personal knowledge. Affidavits/sworn statements utilized

More information

TITLE 18 INSURANCE DELAWARE ADMINISTRATIVE CODE 1. 900 Consumer Rights. 906 Use of Credit Information [Formerly Regulation 87]

TITLE 18 INSURANCE DELAWARE ADMINISTRATIVE CODE 1. 900 Consumer Rights. 906 Use of Credit Information [Formerly Regulation 87] TITLE 18 INSURANCE DELAWARE ADMINISTRATIVE CODE 1 900 Consumer Rights 906 Use of Credit Information [Formerly Regulation 87] 1.0 Authority This regulation is adopted by the Commissioner pursuant to the

More information

SAN FRANCISCO AMENDS BUSINESS TAX ORDINANCE BOARD OF REVIEW ELIMINATED, STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS FOR REFUNDS INCREASED AND MUCH MORE. Tax March 26, 2004

SAN FRANCISCO AMENDS BUSINESS TAX ORDINANCE BOARD OF REVIEW ELIMINATED, STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS FOR REFUNDS INCREASED AND MUCH MORE. Tax March 26, 2004 SAN FRANCISCO AMENDS BUSINESS TAX ORDINANCE BOARD OF REVIEW ELIMINATED, STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS FOR REFUNDS INCREASED AND MUCH MORE Tax On February 19, 2004, San Francisco Mayor Gavin Newsom approved recent

More information

60-Second Compliance Summary. REGULATION Z Truth in Lending Closed-End Credit. Unit

60-Second Compliance Summary. REGULATION Z Truth in Lending Closed-End Credit. Unit Unit 1 REGULATION Z Truth in Lending Closed-End Credit 60-Second Compliance Summary Establishes comprehensive disclosure requirements for consumer credit products Protects consumers against unfair credit

More information

HOME OWNERSHIP EQUITY PROTECTION ACT OF 1994. Raymond Natter 1

HOME OWNERSHIP EQUITY PROTECTION ACT OF 1994. Raymond Natter 1 HOME OWNERSHIP EQUITY PROTECTION ACT OF 1994 Raymond Natter 1 Recent Congressional attention to the problems of predatory mortgage lending has led for calls for the Federal Reserve Board to use its authority

More information