1 Ann Ist Super Sanità 2010 Vol. 46, No. 3: DOI: /ANN_10_03_ The impact measure of solid waste management on health: the hazard index Loredana Musmeci, Mirella Bellino, Maria Rita Cicero, Fabrizio Falleni, Augusta Piccardi and Stefania Trinca Dipartimento di Ambiente e Connessa Prevenzione Primaria, Istituto Superiore di Sanità, Rome, Italy Summary. The risk associated with waste exposure depends on the level of emissions arising from waste disposal and from the effects of these emissions on human health (dose-reponse). In 2007 an epidemiological study was conducted in two Italian provinces of the Campania Region, namely Naples and Caserta, with the aim of assessing the health effects deriving from exposure to waste. In these studies, the important aspect is the population exposure assessment, in relation to the different types of waste disposal. The Regional Agency for Environmental Protection (ARPA Campania) has identified and characterized the various authorized/unauthorized dumping sites in the provinces of Naples and Caserta. Most of the waste disposals used are illegal and invisible (sunken or buried); thus, the toxic substances therein contained are unknown and difficult to identify. In order to locate the possible areas exposed to a higher waste-related health risk, a synthetical hazard index (at the municipality level) was designed. By means of GIS, the number of waste impact areas was identified for each of the 196 municipalities in the two provinces; then, Census data (ISTAT 2001) was used to estimate the proportion of the population living in the impact areas. The synthetical hazard index at municipality level accounts for three elements: a) the intrinsic characterization of the waste disposal, determining the way in which the pollutant is released; b) the impact area of the dumping site (within 1 km radius), same areas are influenced by more than one site; c) the density of the population living in the impact area surrounding the waste disposal site. Key words: waste disposal, environmental exposure, risk assessment, hazard index. Riassunto (La misura di impatto della gestione dei rifiuti solidi sulla salute: l indice di pericolo). Il rischio correlato all esposizione a rifiuti dipende dal livello di emissioni, provenienti dai siti di smaltimento e dagli effetti di tali emissioni sulla salute umana (dose-risposta). Nel 2007 è stato realizzato uno studio epidemiologico di mortalità nelle due province di Napoli e Caserta (Regione Campania) con lo scopo di valutare gli effetti sanitari, derivanti dall esposizione a rifiuti. In questo tipo di studio, un aspetto importante è la stima dell esposizione della popolazione in relazione alle diverse tipologie di siti di smaltimento presenti sul territorio, è stato pertanto elaborato un indice di pericolo sintetico (a livello comunale) allo scopo di localizzare nei 196 comuni delle province di Napoli e Caserta le possibili aree esposte a rischio sanitario da rifiuti. Nel caso specifico, i siti di smaltimento censiti dall ARPA Campania, sia di tipo autorizzato, sia illegale, di diverse dimensione e contenenti composizioni di rifiuti di varia natura sono stati classificati in base alla loro potenziale pericolosità. Per mezzo del GIS, per ciascuno dei 196 comuni è stato individuato il numero di aree di impatto attribuibili ai siti presenti e, usando i dati del Censimento ISTAT (2001), è stata stimata la percentuale di popolazione residente nelle aree di impatto. L indice di pericolo a livello comunale è stato determinato sulla base di tre elementi: le caratteristiche intrinseche del sito di smaltimento; l area di impatto del sito di smaltimento (entro 1 km di raggio); la densità della popolazione residente in ciascuna area di impatto. Parole chiave: smaltimento rifiuti, esposizione ambientale, valutazione del rischio, indice di pericolo. INTRODUCTION In recent decades several studies have reported the effects of waste exposure on health. A wide range of toxic substances can be released into the environment from waste disposal sites, for example, methane, carbon dioxide, benzene and cadmium. Many of these pollutants have been shown to be toxic for human health. In addition if the waste disposals are illegal they are likely to contain highly hazardous compounds resulting from industrial activities (e.g. nuclear discharges, asbestos, lead). Two main health outcomes have been found to be statistically associated with waste exposure: cancer Address for correspondence: Loredana Musmeci, Dipartimento di Ambiente e Connessa Prevenzione Primaria, Istituto Superiore di Sanità, Viale Regina Elena 299, Rome, Italy.
2 294 Loredana Musmeci, Mirella Bellino, Maria Rita Cicero, et al. and congenital malformations. Hazardous waste has been shown to influence the likelihood of developing lung, brain cancer, bladder and lung cancer [1, 2] living close to a waste disposal site is also associated with a significant increase in congenital anomalies. As of late, Campania, a Region of Southern Italy, has been a scene of controversy concerning waste disposal and treatment. Resident people and health authorities are more and more worried, while a heavy demand for new plants is in progress. Indeed, the regional administration is dealing with a rearrangement of the waste-disposal system following recent emergencies. Moreover, the regional territory houses some areas which have to be reclaimed as requested by a ministerial decree; precisely, in Agro Aversano and along Domitia-Flegrea seacoast various sites of uncontrolled waste-abandonment have been identified and assessed by the Campania Region s Environmental Protection Agency (ARPA Campania) [3, 4]; many of them contain hazardous industrial substances. Here the spreading of unauthorized dumping sites has started in the 80s and goes on. So one important issue in environmental matters is waste disposal. Accordingly it is desirable to start assessing possible consequences from population exposure to emissions from unauthorized dumping sites and plants for disposal and treatment of urban solid waste and hazardous substances. A working group including World Health organization (WHO), National Research Council (CNR), Istituto Superiore di Sanità (ISS), Department of Civil Protection (DCP), Campania Regional epidemiologic Observatory (OER) and Campania Region s Environmental Protection Agency (ARPA Campania) has been assigned the task of checking whether and how waste treatment in Campania could have adverse effects on environment and public health. Its work has partly dealt with epidemiological investigations on mortality and congenital anomalies in municipalities belonging to the Provinces of Naples and Caserta. At the same time, risk and exposure assessment relative to the presence of storage, treatment, illegal disposal and dumping sites of hazardous and urban waste has been worked out by implementing data dating back to the period and coming from various administrations in a dedicated geo-database, so to extract synthetical descriptive indexes measuring position-variability of such sites and of their potential health impact. The described approach has been used in many geographical-epidemiological studies on health effects deriving from the presence of waste; it consists in evaluating population exposure on the basis of their distance from landfills. Recent specialized literature suggests that the range of influence considered varies from 2 to 4 km [2, 5, 6]. But these studies are about dumping sites containing either hazardous or special large-sized waste. We rather aim to analyze an ensemble of sites, diversified in nature and dimensions, sometimes very close to each other, in an area characterized by either a high or very high population density. Therefore, our choice criterion was to select population living really close to the sites, according to a common epidemiological approach to high-risk groups. As a result, an area 1 km in range around each site has been chosen since it ensures an adequate statistical power. Outcomes from the above analysis, performed on all 196 municipalities in the Provinces of Naples and Caserta, represented a basis for recent epidemiological studies [7, 8] in order to assess adverse effects of the presence waste on the environment and resident population. The impact chain starts when waste enters the landfill or is abandoned illegally in the soil or in the water. Depending on the intrinsic quality of the waste and on the density of the population in the surrounding area, hazardous emission will be released into the environment affecting human health. According to previous studies in Campania, the health risk due to environmental hazards arising from waste exposure is confined to the two provinces of Naples and Caserta, where most of the illegal dumping sites are located. The dumping sites in Naples and Caserta differ in dimension and composition. In addition, most of these waste disposals are illegal and not visible (sunken or buried) thus the toxic substances that the disposals contain are not known and are difficult to identify. In order to map the possible areas exposed to a higher waste related health risk, a synthetical hazard index (HI) was developed. METHODS The analysis of influence of polluting sources on the territory and people has been organized into the following steps. Characterization of waste disposal and abandonment sources and assignment of a hazard index (HI) to sites On the basis of the data regarding waste disposal plants and unauthorised dumping grounds (from 1997 to 2003) [3, 4], and after a thorough validation of the georeferenciation process, 140 sites were chosen in the province of Caserta and 86 in the province of Naples. Selected sites have been further classified according to their hazard level (HI hazard index) taking into account site nature (dumping and storage sites, slagheaps, submerged waste, uncontrolled waste abandonment, etc.), legal status (authorized or nonauthorized sites), waste volume and nature, and pollutant emission-mode (Figure 1). The assignment criterion rested mainly upon environmental impact on water, air and soil of storagetreatment-disposal-abandonment fashion concerning hazardous and urban waste.
3 Hazard index in waste management 295 According to the above-mentioned criteria, Table 1 shows the HI for various types of waste disposal/treatment and/or abandonment. Table 1 Hazard indexes (HI) for various waste disposal/ treatment and/or abandonment typologies TYPE Submerged waste (lakes) 4 A Slagheaps 3 B Hazardous waste storage and disposal 3 B Abandonment of metal drums 3 B Pit slagheaps containing hazardous waste 2 B 2 nd class type B dumping sites (special/industrial waste) HI 2 C Car wrecking and scrapping plants 1 D Plants for electric and electronic waste reclaim 1 D Temporary storage of non-hazardous waste 1 D Plants for chemical-physical treatment of waste 1 D Non-hazardous waste reclaim 1 D Plants for treatment (storage) of special waste 1 D Special waste incineration and oil reclaim plants 1 D Uncontrolled RSU dumping sites 1 E Pit large-volume (> cc) non-hazardous slagheaps Large-volume (> cc) non-hazardous slagheaps Controlled RSU dumping sites authorized inert-waste dumping sites 1 E 1 E 1 F Composting plants 1 F Plants for refuse-derived-fuel (RDF) selection and production 1 F Refluent-water depuration plants 1 F Industrial slagheaps 1 F Identification and characterization of the environmental impact areas and assignment of a composite hazard index (CHI) By means of ArcGIS software-platform [9, 10], customized through Python and Avenue programming languages, a territorial analysis has been performed in terms of sites and municipalities. Site-analysis has identified and characterized sources, calculating their fallout areas (buffer strips of 1 km from sites). On the other hand, analysis on a municipality-scale needs an identification and characterization of areas influenced by more than one site, so as to avoid counting population living in one area more than one time; at the same time, a specific coefficient is needed to describe global danger to them. Therefore, a script has been worked out to pass from fallout areas to environmental impact areas. Selecting a buffer strip 1 km in range around any potential polluting source, fallout areas have been identified. These latter have been assigned HIs from corresponding sites; then, each area influenced by more than one site has been attributed a multi-code (CHI) consisting in a series HIs from single sources lying in the examined area (Figure 2). Computation of a municipal hazard index (MHI) A potential hazard index (PHI, numeric parameter) has been associated with each CHI (alpha-numeric parameter) 1 ; this way a classification of hazard values was made. Consequently, if impact-area types and surfaces (S) are known for each municipality, then a municipal hazard index (MHI) can be derived. As a result, the following function has been implemented: n MHI = Si x PHIi i = 1 n being the number of impact areas in the municipality under examination. The grade consists of an alpha-numeric code where the number increases with hazard and the letter goes A to F at the decreasing of it (A = max hazard; F = min hazard). In a few words, the number identifies danger magnitude, while the letter is a multiplication factor related to waste intrinsic dangerousness. Precisely: A: potential hazardous or very hazardous submerged waste B: hazardous waste C: potential hazardous emissions from industrial special waste D: potential hazardous emissions from nonhazardous waste E: uncontrolled non-hazardous waste F: controlled non-hazardous waste. Computation of population living in each impact area to assess risk from exposure Then a further hazard index has been introduced, taking into account information about the distribution of potentially exposed population; at this aim, population falling in each impact area have been computed, extracting them from ISTAT 2001 census tracts. Analysis steps follow: - computation of population density in census tracts: population density in each tract has been obtained dividing resident people by tract surface; - intersection of census tracts and impact areas: the two layers have been intersected, so deriving new 1 In each CHI, frequencies of numbers and letters have been assigned different statistical weights.
4 296 Loredana Musmeci, Mirella Bellino, Maria Rita Cicero, et al. 4A 3B 2B 2C 1D 1E 1F polygons. This way attributes associated with the two layers have been spatially combined as well; - computation of people living in polygons of the new layer: population falling in each new polygon has been computed by multiplying population density by polygon surface. Computation of a synthetical waste risk index (SWRI) A synthetical-waste risk index (SWRI) has been derived multiplying surfaces of impact areas falling in a specific municipality by their PHIs and population living in each area (E) and then summing over the number n of areas included in the municipality under examination: n SWRI = Si x PHIi x EPi i = 1 Fig. 1 Characterization of waste disposal and assignment of a hazard index (HI) to sites. RESULTS So far our approach has allowed us to describe geographical distribution of waste disposal sites in terms of their PHIs, in order to identify and characterize, by means of GIS, those areas apt to waste contamination, which gather between inshore mu- Fig. 2 Identification of environmental-impact areas and assignment of hazard index (HI).
5 Hazard index in waste management Potential hazard indicator (PHI) Synthetic waste risk indicator Fig. 3 Potential hazard index (PHI) and synthetical waste risk index (SWRI). nicipalities and those falling north-east of Naples. Mapping of impact areas (Figure 3) by means of their CHIs has enabled us to select those zones lying in the two Provinces, which are under waste pressure most . A SWRI has been computed for each of the 196 municipalities under examination, thinking of resident population as a target of contamination. As shown by the geographical distribution of SWRIs, municipalities on the border between the Provinces of Caserta and Naples and those lying along the Tyrrhenian coast are exposed to risk most. According to epidemiological studies, high mortality by cancer and frequent congenital anomalies are typical of such areas as well . A correlation study is in progress in order to assess connection among SWRI, mortality rates from specific causes and congenital anomalies. CONCLUSIONS The goal of this analysis was trying to give geographical-epidemiological studies a contribution, using waste-disposal data collected in Campania to derive an exposure index based not only on distance from dumping sites, but also on characterization of neighbouring areas depending on territorial significant elements, as allowed by GIS features. As a first result, some municipalities along the coast and north of Naples have been shown to be characterized by high-risk impact areas, which represent top targets for reclamation procedures and further analytical epidemiological studies. So far, only population living in impact areas around potential polluted sites (computed by means of population density of census tracts) have been taken into account as a possible target, but, as a second step, further environmental and territorial factors (hydrological data, soil exploitation, socioeconomic conditions, etc.) are going to be included into the computation of SWRI. Geographical distribution of SWRIs is consistent with outcomes from epidemiological studies performed so far. Anyway, many other factors (extensive agriculture, industrial activities, socioeconomic conditions, high population density, health conditions) influence this territory from an environmental point of view and have to examined in the context of a multivariate analysis. Conflict of interest statement There are no potential conflicts of interest or any financial or personal relationships with other people or organizations that could inappropriately bias conduct and findings of this study. Submitted on invitation. Accepted on 22 April References 1. Griffith J, Duncan RC, Riggan WB, Pellom AC (1989). Cancer mortality in U.S. counties with hazardous waste sites and ground water pollution. Arch Environ Health 44(2): Dolk H, Vrijheid M, Armstrong B, Abramsky L, Bianchi F, Garne E, Nelen V, Robert E, Scott JE, Stone D, Tenconi R. Risk of congenital anomalies near hazardous-waste landfill sites in Europe: the EUROHAZCON study. Lancet 1998; 352(9126): Angrisani MG, Bianco P, Belluomo R, et al. Emergenza rifiuti Regione Campania, aggiornamento sul censimento dei siti inquinati. Litorale Domitio Flegreo ed Agro Aversano. Napoli: ARPA Campania; Agenzia Regionale per la Protezione dell Ambiente, Campania - Ingegneria Ambientale. Valutazione delle pressioni ambientali legate allo smaltimento illegale di rifiuti. Napoli: ARPA Campania; 2003.
6 298 Loredana Musmeci, Mirella Bellino, Maria Rita Cicero, et al. 5. Elliott P, Briggs D, Morris S, de Hoogh C, Hurt C, Jensen TK, Maitland I, Richardson S, Wakefield J, Jarup L. Risk of adverse birth outcomes in populations living near landfill sites. BMJ 2001;323: Jarup L, Briggs D, de Hoogh C, Morris S, Hurt C, Lewin A, Maitland I, Richardson S, Wakefield J, Elliott P. Cancer risks in populations living near landfill sites in Great Britain. Br J Cancer 2002;86(11): Trinca S, Comba P, Felli A, Forte T, Musmeci L, Piccardi A. Childhood mortality in an area of southern italy with numerous dumping grounds: application of GIS and preliminary findings. In: First European Conference Geographic Information Sciences in public Health. Sheffield, September Sheffield (UK): University of Sheffield; Altavista P, Belli S, Bianchi F, Binazzi A, Comba P, Del Giudice R, Fazzo L, Felli A, Mastrantonio M, Menegozzo M, Musmeci L, Pizzuti R, Savarese A, Trinca S, Uccelli R. Mortalità per causa in un area della Campania con numerose discariche di rifiuti. Epidemiol Prev 2004;6: Zeiler M. Modeling our world: the ESRI Guide to geodatabase design. Reelands (CA): ESRI Press; Lang L. GIS for health organizations. Reelands (CA): ESRI Press; Trinca S, Martini MG, Madeo L, Matteucci M, Musmeci L. Messa a punto di un indicatore di esposizione ai rifiuti per studi di epidemiologia geografica nella Regione Campania. In: XXX Congresso Italiano di Epidemiologia. Palermo, 4-6 Ottobre Comba P, Bianchi F, Fazzo L, Menegozzo M, Minichilli F, Mitis F, Musmeci L, Pizzuti R, Santoro M, Trinca S, Martuzzi M, Health impact of waste management in Campania working group. Cancer mortality in an area of Campania (Italy) characterized by multiple toxic dumping sites. Ann NY Acad Sci.
Land Contamination & Reclamation, 7 (2), 1999 1999 EPP Publications Assessing Risks from Contaminated Sites: Policy and Practice in 16 European Countries Colin C Ferguson Abstract A concerted action initiative
INSIGHT DESERTIFICATION PROCESS : BIO-PHYSICAL AND SOCIO-ECONOMIC DRIVERS IN ITALY COMPRENDERE I PROCESSI DI DESERTIFICAZIONE IN ITALIA: IL RUOLO DELLE VARIABILI BIO-FISICHE E SOCIO-ECONOMICHE Luigi Perini*
United States Environmental Protection Agency Office of Environmental Information Washington, DC 20460 EPA/240/B-06/001 February 2006 Guidance on Systematic Planning Using the Data Quality Objectives Process
World Health Organization Regional Office for Europe Copenhagen Air Quality Guidelines for Europe Second Edition WHO Regional Publications, European Series, No. 91 The World Health Organization was established
Quantitative research methods in educational planning Series editor: Kenneth N.Ross Module Kenneth N. Ross 3 Sample design for educational survey research UNESCO International Institute for Educational
Towards a Framework for the Manag gement of Conta aminated Land Position Paper October 2009 WSP Environment & Energy www.wspenvironmental.co.za Contents Page 1 Introduction 1 1.1 Background 1 1.2 Guiding
United States Office of Environmental EPA/240/B-06/002 Environmental Protection Information Agency Washington, DC 20460 Data Quality Assessment: A Reviewer s Guide EPA QA/G-9R FOREWORD This document is
The Use of Microbiological Risk Assessment Outputs to Develop Practical Risk Management Strategies: Metrics to improve food safety Report Kiel, Germany 3 7 April 2006 A JOINT FAO/WHO EXPERT MEETING Federal
Environmental Impact Assessment Review 24 (2004) 667 694 www.elsevier.com/locate/eiar Not so Black and White: environmental justice and cumulative impact assessments Eric J. Krieg a,, Daniel R. Faber b
United States Office of Solid Waste EPA 550-B99-003 Environmental Protection and Emergency Response November 1999 Agency (5104) www.epa.gov/ceppo/ RMPs Are on the Way! How LEPCs and Other Local Agencies
National Collaborating Centre for Healthy Public Policy www.ncchpp.ca METHOD FOR SYNTHESIZING KNOWLEDGE ABOUT PUBLIC POLICIES REPORT SEPTEMBER 2010 National Collaborating Centre for Healthy Public Policy
Technical Report - 2014-080 Mapping and Assessment of Ecosystems and their Services Indicators for ecosystem assessments under Action 5 of the EU Biodiversity Strategy to 2020 2nd Report Final, February
Indicator Protocols Set: EN Indicator Protocols Set Environment (EN) 2000-2011 GRI Version 3.1 Version 3.1 1 2000-2011 GRI Version 3.1 Indicator Protocols Set: EN Environment Performance Indicators Aspect:
Agricultural Pesticide Use Near Public Schools in California California Environmental Health Tracking Program April 2014 Agricultural Pesticide Use Near Public Schools in California California Environmental
Pilot Study Report Urban adaptation in two Hungarian municipalities W ORKING PAP E R Case Study: Vulnerability Assessment in the Hungarian Urban Settlements city of Veszprém and 13 th District of Budapest
A Bayesian Modeling Approach for Cyclist Injury Risk Analysis at Intersections and Corridors Jillian Strauss PhD Student Department of Civil Engineering and Applied Mechanics McGill University Macdonald
OECD Guidelines on Measuring Subjective Well-being OECD Guidelines on Measuring Subjective Well-being This work is published on the responsibility of the Secretary-General of the OECD. The opinions expressed
Chapter 4: MEASURING PROGRESS An indicator is something that helps you understand where you are, which way you are going, and how far you are from where you want to be. An effective indicator alerts you
ST/ESA/STAT/SER.F/89 Department of Economic and Social Affairs Statistics Division Studies in Methods Series F No. 89 Manual for the Development of A System of Criminal Justice Statistics United Nations
January 2014 European Social Charter (revised) European Committee of Social Rights Conclusions 2013 (ITALY) Articles 3, 11, 12, 13, 14, 23 and 30 of the Revised Charter This text may be subject to editorial
THE CENTRE FOR MARKET AND PUBLIC ORGANISATION What Parents Want: School preferences and school choice Simon Burgess, Ellen Greaves, Anna Vignoles and Deborah Wilson October 2009 Working Paper No. 09/222
Health risk assessment from the nuclear accident after the 2011 Great East Japan Earthquake and Tsunami based on a preliminary dose estimation Health risk assessment from the nuclear accident after the
General Principles of Software Validation; Final Guidance for Industry and FDA Staff Document issued on: January 11, 2002 This document supersedes the draft document, "General Principles of Software Validation,
Topic 11 Implementation and follow up Objectives To explain the role and contribution of implementation and follow up measures within the EIA process. Training session outline To understand the procedures
Main author João Fontes, Sustainability Consultant at PRé Sustainability Version 2.0 - September 2014 Contributors Roundtable for Product Social Metrics Platinum Members* >> Ahold Andrea Bolhuis, Karin
Chapter 2 Measurement of exposures and outcomes 2.1 Introduction Most epidemiological research involves the study of the relationship of one type of event or characteristic to another. Consider the following
PROJECT FINAL REPORT Grant Agreement number: 212117 Project acronym: FUTUREFARM Project title: FUTUREFARM-Integration of Farm Management Information Systems to support real-time management decisions and
Ass e s s i n g th e Env i r o n m e n ta l Impa c t s of Con s u m p t i o n an d Pro d u c t i o n Priority Products and Materials U n i t e d Na t i o n s En v i r o n m e n t Pr o g r a m m e Acknowledgements
Monitoraggio via Satellite dei Flussi Migratori nell Area del Mediterraneo (Remote Monitoring of Migrants Vessels in the Mediterranean Sea) Francesco Topputo Dinamica Srl Via Rembrandt, 69 20147 Milano