1 PROTON IRRADIATION OF CENTAUR, KUIPER BELT, AND OORT CLOUD OBJECTS AT PLASMA TO COSMIC RAY ENERGY JOHN F. COOPER Raytheon Technical Services Company LLC, SSDOO Project, NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, MD, U.S.A. ( ERIC R. CHRISTIAN Office of Space Science, NASA Headquarters, Washington, D.C., U.S.A. JOHN D. RICHARDSON 1 and CHI WANG 1,2 1 Center for Space Research, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, U.S.A.; 2 Laboratory for Space Weather, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China Abstract. Times for accumulation of chemically significant dosages on icy surfaces of Centaur, Kuiper Belt, and Oort Cloud objects from plasma and energetic ions depend on irradiation position within or outside the heliosphere. Principal irradiation components include solar wind plasma ions, pickup ions from solar UV ionization of interstellar neutral gas, energetic ions accelerated by solar and interplanetary shocks, including the putative solar wind termination shock, and galactic cosmic ray ions from the Local Interstellar Medium (LISM). We present model flux spectra derived from spacecraft data and models for ev to GeV protons at 40 AU, a termination shock position at 85 AU, and in the LISM. Times in years to accumulate dosages 100 ev per molecule are computed from the spectra as functions of sensible surface depth less than one centimeter at unit density. The collisional resurfacing model of Luu and Jewitt is reconsidered in the context of depth-dependent dosage rates from plasma, suprathermal, and higher energy protons, and global exposure, by micrometeoroid dust grain impacts, of moderately irradiated red material below a thin crust of heavily irradiated neutral material. This material should be more visible on dynamically cold objects in the 40 AU region. 1. Introduction The bubble of solar wind plasma and frozen-in magnetic fields expanding out from the solar corona, within a few radii of the Sun, to boundaries with the local interstellar gas and plasma near about 100 AU is called the heliosphere. Dependent on points of origin at the Sun, and on time phase during the eleven year cycle of solar activity, the solar wind plasma expands radially outward at speeds of km/s. Neutral atoms flowing into the heliosphere from the Very Local Interstellar Medium (VLISM) can be ionized by solar UV, and by charge exchange with solar wind ions, then picked up by magnetic fields in the outward plasma flow. Due to inverse-square fall-off of solar wind ion density with distance from the Sun, these interstellar pickup ions increasingly contribute to the plasma pressure and become the dominant component beyond the orbit of Saturn (Burlaga et al., Earth, Moon and Planets 92: , Kluwer Academic Publishers. Printed in the Netherlands.
2 262 JOHN F. COOPER ET AL. 1996; Whang et al., 1996). Further out near AU (Stone, 2001; Stone and Cummings, 2001; Whang and Burlaga, 2002) the outflowing plasma is expected to encounter the solar wind termination shock where flow speeds abruptly transition to sub-sonic values 100 km/s. The shock position is dependent in part on the plasma and neutral gas density in the Local Interstellar Medium (LISM) and could move into the giant planet region, or even nearer to the Earth s orbit, if the Sun passed through a region of much higher LISM density (Zank and Frisch, 1999; Frisch, 2000). Further out at 120 AU or more should be the heliopause, the contact boundary between the diverted solar wind plasma flows and the in-flowing interstellar plasma. The intervening region between the termination shock and the heliopause is called the heliosheath. In this latter region the previously radial flow of the solar wind is diverted into a direction downstream from the 26 km/s flow of the interstellar gas to form a huge teardrop-shaped structure called the heliotail which extends hundreds to perhaps thousands of AU from the Sun into the VLISM. Within the heliosphere the interplanetary environment of solar wind plasma, solar (SEP) and interplanetary energetic particles, and galactic cosmic rays (GCR) has long been surveyed in-situ beyond Neptune s orbit at 30 AU, since 1983 and 1990 by the Pioneer 10 and 11 spacecraft, and since 1987 and 1989 by Voyager 1 and 2. Of these, the Pioneers are no longer transmitting data and the Voyagers are now respectively at 89 and 71 AU, far beyond the 48 AU semi-major axis (a) cutoff of the Classical KBO population but within the range of aphelia 48 <Q< 10 3 AU for known Centaurs (perihelia at 5 <q<35 AU) and Scattered KBOs (q >35 AU). Voyager 1 is expected to cross the termination shock, later followed by Voyager 2, within the next several years and possibly to exit the heliosphere across the heliopause within its remaining 17 + years of operational lifetime. Both spacecraft will have been silent for millennia before reaching the Oort Cloud region at 10 4 to 10 5 AU. Within the next quarter century NASA may launch an interstellar probe (e.g., Mewaldt et al., 2001a) moving outward at 10 AU/year with the ultimate goal of surveying the VLISM environment out to several hundred AU. Until then, the next mission to the outer solar system is planned to be New Horizons (Stern and Spencer, 2003), which will fly by the Pluto/Charon system in 2015 and thereafter attempt several flybys of accessible KBOs. Enroute to Pluto this mission may attempt at least one Centaur flyby after swinging by Jupiter in The principal goal of this paper is to utilize plasma and energetic ions data from heliospheric spacecraft measurements to model the heliocentric radial variation in ion irradiation fluxes potentially affecting the visible surface chemistry of the KBOs, highly eccentric Centaurs with Q>40 AU, and Oort Cloud comets. Near the orbit of Earth we rely on time-averaged measurements (e.g., Mewaldt et al., 2001b) from the Advanced Composition Explorer (ACE) spacecraft located in L1 halo orbit 10 6 km from the Earth along the Earth Sun line, while comparable data are provided by the two Voyager spacecraft in the outer heliosphere. Between ACE and the Voyagers, and beyond radial positions of the latter out into the VLISM, we must rely on available models for radial and temporal variations of the plasma
3 PROTON IRRADIATION OF KUIPER BELT OBJECTS 263 and energetic ion flux spectra. The data we are using extend from 1 ev only up to several kev for plasma ions, but above 0.1 MeV/nucleon for energetic ions, so we must also extrapolate in energy with upper and lower flux limits across the intermediate, so-called suprathermal range. The plasma model we are now using only applies to protons, pending future work in progress on other species, so the results here are only for protons across the full energy range from 1 ev to 10 GeV. Over a wide range of depths the proton component tends to dominate irradiation effects of electronic ionization in the affected bodies, but there are effects of surface sputtering, implantation, and elastic nuclear energy loss for which heavy ions become more important at very shallow depths 1 µm. We do compute both the electronic and elastic nuclear components of proton energy loss but do not include secondary particle and photon production from inelastic nuclear scattering. Since the inelastic collision lengths for primary ions incident on solid icy material are tens to hundreds of centimeters, assuming unity density, our energy deposition model is restricted to depths less than one centimeter. At meter depths, interactions of secondary charged particles (p, α, e ±, π ±, µ ± ), neutrons, and gamma rays are dominant. At much greater depths the natural radioactive decay of some heavy nuclei in the icy surfaces and denser cores of cometary bodies becomes the main energy source for radiolytic chemistry (e.g., Draganić et al., 1987; Johnson, 1990) PLASMA DISTRIBUTIONS 2. Heliospheric and LISM Proton Flux Model A very new development from our earlier work (Cooper et al., 1998, 2001a) is the inclusion of proton energy distributions from a model described below for plasma protons at ev to kev energy from the solar wind plasma and from pickup of photo-ionized inter-stellar hydrogen in the 400 km/s flow as measured to date by Voyager 2 out to 71 AU. The Voyager 1 plasma spectrometer has not been fully operational since 1980, so plasma distributions and moments (speed, density, temperature, pressure) are available only from Voyager 2. Figure 1 shows the density and temperature profiles from the model for solar wind protons, pickup protons, and the interstellar neutral hydrogen. Only a small percentage of thermal energy from pickup ions is needed to produce the observed non-adiabatic radial profile in temperature for the solar wind protons. For the heliospheric plasma ion distributions at 40 and 85 AU we use the three-fluid, one-dimensional solar wind model of Wang and Richardson (2001, 2003). The model includes solar wind protons, pickup protons, and electrons, each assumed to have Maxwellian distributions, relaxed over time from more anisotropic initial distributions as interstellar hydrogen atoms are charge-exchanged to form the pickup ions. The interstellar neutral distributions are computed selfconsistently using a hydrodynamic approach. The solar wind protons and interstellar neutrals are coupled by charge exchange interactions. An energy partition
4 264 JOHN F. COOPER ET AL. Figure 1. Heliocentric radial profiles for temperature (K) and density of solar wind and pickup plasma ions, and of interstellar neutral hydrogen, from the multi-fluid, spherically symmetric MHD model of Wang and Richardson (2001, 2003). Not shown is the solar wind proton speed, which slows slightly in response to pickup ion pressure. ratio is used to represent the division of energy provided by the pickup process between solar wind and pickup protons. The initial solar wind conditions at the inner boundary at 1 AU are radial outward speed V = 441 km/s, solar wind proton density N = 7.0/cc and temperature T = K, and interplanetary magnetic field = Gauss. The interstellar hydrogen atoms at the solar wind termination shock are taken to have speed 20 km/s and temperature K, while H 0 density, and the energy partition ratio for ions, are varied to give good fits to radial speed and temperature profiles measured by the operational plasma spectrometer on Voyager 2. Good fits are obtained for a neutral density of 0.09/cc and a partition ratio of 0.05, which means that five percent of the total energy from the pickup process goes into solar wind protons. For the LISM plasma ions, which are not included in the Wang and Richardson model, we compute convecting maxwellian (Vasyliunas, 1971) distributions for the LISM parameters T 7000 K, u 26 km/s, and N 0.1/cc of interstellar protons as derived from Wood and Linsky (1997). In the moving frame of a convecting plasma the speeds of ions with mass m are specified by an isotropic maxwellian distribution for density N and temperature T. In the inertial frame along the axis of convection there is a convective maxwellian
5 PROTON IRRADIATION OF KUIPER BELT OBJECTS 265 distribution for ions moving along this axis. In Equation (1) below the unidirectional number flux j, given as a function of ion kinetic energy E, is defined for ions moving at inertial speed v and convected with the entire thermal distribution at speed u, in the positive direction along such an axis. Units are cgs for m, N, v, and the Boltzman constant k, inkelvin(k)fort, and in MeV for E. The factor f = converts to MeV from cgs energy units of ergs. fn m j(e) = e 2kT (v(e) u)2 (protons/cm 2 -s-mev). (1) (2πmkT) 1/2 Modeling of plasma ion irradiation for semi-spherical icy bodies requires averaging over directions of ion incidence along and perpendicular to the axis of solar wind radial flow. As a first approximation for simplicity of computation we assume that there are separate populations of ions moving unidirectionally towards a spherical surface from six directions. These are parallel and anti-parallel to positive directions along three orthogonal axes X i centered at the irradiated object: X 1 for radial flow outward from the Sun in the Ecliptic, X 2 in direction of prograde orbital motion around the Sun, and X 3 in the northward direction from the Ecliptic. The global average directional flux (ions/cm 2 -s-sr-mev) at energy E onto this surface is given simply by J(E)=[j + (E) + j (E) + j (E)/4π where the first two terms in brackets are for parallel and antiparallel flows along X 1, while the third is the sum of all flows into the surface on the two other perpendicular axes. The 1 4 factor arises from unidirectional flow from any direction onto a sphere of arbitrary radius r, cross-sectional area πr 2, and total surface area 4πr 2, while the 1/π factor converts from unidirectional flow units to directional flux for the case of isotropic flow onto a locally flat surface. Slow rotation of irradiated bodies eliminates asymmetric irradiation effects due to radial solar wind flow, so it is reasonable to define an isotropic directional flux J 0 equivalent to globally averaged surface fluxes J,and this is used to show flux spectra of the plasma ions later in the paper. For radiation dosage computations versus depth the local current flow into an irradiated spherical surface is πj 0. The relative amplitudes of the three major flow components (j +, j,andj ) are determined by the directionality and thermal widths of the three different types of proton distributions (solar wind H +, pickup H +,LISMH + )atthegiventemperatures for each type. Radial flow of the solar wind and pickup ions is of course a major factor for j + and j, while isotropic temperature in the moving frame is dominant for j. In Figure 2A the high convection speed u 400 km/s and low temperature T KofthesolarwindH + distribution at 40 AU results in a very narrow energy distribution around the convection speed energy E 1 kev, and a completely separate j component at low energy due only to the thermal distribution. For higher temperature T K of the pickup H + distributions at 40 AU (Figure 2B), and low convection speed u 26 km/s of the LISM H + distributions (Figure 2C), there are substantial j components, and the three components overlap in energy. The proton distributions at 85 AU near the
6 266 JOHN F. COOPER ET AL. assumed termination shock position are qualitatively similar to those at 40 AU, the principal change being a decline in solar wind proton density. Note from Figure 1 that charge exchange equalizes temperatures of solar wind H + and interstellar H 0 in the 10 to 70 AU range COSMIC RAY PROTON DISTRIBUTIONS For the present work we define cosmic ray protons as being those with energies above 0.1 MeV from sources within and outside the heliosphere. Sources include solar energetic particle (SEP) events, acceleration by interplanetary shocks and the solar wind termination shock, and inward diffusion through the heliosheath of galactic cosmic rays thought mostly to be accelerated by interstellar shocks from supernova explosions. Protons and heavier ions accelerated at the termination shock, after pickup from photo-ionization of interstellar gas neutrals, are called anomalous cosmic rays (ACR). The seed population of energetic protons for the cosmic ray source extends down a few kev, below which lie the plasma protons discussed above. Up to 0.1 MeV we designate constituents of this seed population as the suprathermal ions. One of our co-authors, E. R. Christian, has worked as part of the Mewaldt et al. (2001b) collaboration to produce a long-term fluence model for selected heavier ions (He, O, Fe) from data acquired near 1 AU by the Advanced Composition Explorer (ACE) spacecraft. This model extended from plasma energies > 0.3 kev/nucleon up to 300 MeV/nucleon for fluences integrated over about three years from October 1997 to June 2000, a period of rising solar activity from minimum to maximum conditions. For the 1-AU baseline of the present work we have used the ACE data above 0.1 MeV/nucleon from three instruments: the Ultra-Low Energy Isotope Spectrometer (ULEIS), the Solar Isotope Spectrometer (SIS), and the Cosmic Ray Isotope (CRIS) Spectrometer. One limitation of ACE composition data is that only the Z>1 ions are measured to avoid instrument saturation by high proton intensities, particularly during large SEP events. However, since Mewaldt et al. (2001b) found that flux spectra of different ions showed similar shapes of energy distribution, i.e., power-law at kev/nucleon to MeV/nucleon energies, we have inferred the 1-AU proton fluence spectrum from standard abundance ratios for H/He and the ACE He fluence spectra from ULEIS, SIS, and CRIS. During the same time interval covered by Mewaldt et al. (2001b) the Cosmic Ray (CRS) experiments on the Voyager 1 and 2 spacecraft respectively acquired spectral flux data at AU and AU for protons and heavier ions above 0.1 MeV/nucleon. These data were of course not acquired in-situ for the < 50 AU orbits of the Classical KBOs and less eccentric Centaurs. We instead use GCR flux spectra computed at 40 and 85 AU, shown in Figure 3, from a one-dimensional cosmic ray transport model with parameter fits to peak fluxes during conditions of minimum solar activity in the mid-1990s at ACE and the two Voyager spacecraft, which gives maximum limits for radiation effects of GCR ions. GCR source spec-
7 PROTON IRRADIATION OF KUIPER BELT OBJECTS 267 Figure 2. Normalized components at 40 AU of the solar wind (Panel 2A) and pickup (Panel 2B) proton flux spectra incident onto a spherical body from directions parallel, antiparallel, and perpendicular to radial outward flow from the Sun. There is no antiparallel component for (2A) due to relatively low temperature and high convection speed. The same components are shown in Panel 2C for the VLISM proton spectra.
8 268 JOHN F. COOPER ET AL. Figure 3. These two panels show components of a heliospheric proton model compiled by E. R. Christian and J. F. Cooper for 40 AU (left panel), an earlier assumed position of the solar wind termination position at 85 AU (right panel), and the LISM (right panel). The total H + flux is shown also separated out into three constituents: solar energetic particles (SEP), anomalous cosmic ray (ACR) component of cosmic rays accelerated at the termination shock, and galactic cosmic rays (GCR) from sources outside the heliosphere. tra in the LISM are defined here from work of Webber and Potgieter (1989) for power-law flux spectra (vs. E) of the form p 2.75 in terms of proton momentum p(e) from models of interstellar shock acceleration. The SEP proton spectra in Figure 3 were estimated from ULEIS and SIS fits for time-averaged flux spectra at ACE by means of an inverse-square power law with solar distance. Aside from any further acceleration that may occur by interaction with interplanetary shocks during SEP ion propagation outward from 1 AU, this gives a reasonable upper limit on SEP proton fluxes in the outer solar system. However, adiabatic energy loss in the expanding solar wind likely produces even steeper fall-off in SEP fluxes. Near solar minimum the ACR ions, including protons, are dominant components of radiation dosage outward from 40 AU to the outer heliosphere, while these ions largely disappear at solar maximum. There is a 22-year cycle in the polarity of the solar dipole magnetic field, which is frozen into the solar wind plasma within several radii of the Sun and thereby carried outward into the heliosphere. Due to sign-dependent transport effects, the ACR ions accelerated at the termination shock have larger fluxes, and more positive radial gradients, at 40 to 85 AU near the Ecliptic when the solar dipole moment is directed southward (qa < 0 polarity) than when it is northward (qa > 0 polarity). At the 85-AU termination shock for our model Figure 3 shows the ACR flux spectra determined for this location from Voyager CRS data (Cummings and Stone, 1996, 1998; Stone et al., 1996) for mid These ACR spectra are for the qa > 0 solar magnetic polarity and
9 PROTON IRRADIATION OF KUIPER BELT OBJECTS 269 are intermediate in intensity between very low ACR fluxes at solar maximum and the six-times higher fluxes at the qa < 0 solar minimum in Plots of the total H + fluxes at the termination shock and in the LISM from this model were earlier published by Cooper et al. (2001a), but the flux spectra reported there for the termination shock were plotted incorrectly and are actually several orders of magnitude lower for protons. A corrected version of the termination shock spectra was also recently reported in Strazzulla et al. (2003). At 40 AU the modulated ACR spectra are computed from the 1-D transport model for diffusion in from the source flux at 85 AU with model parameters determined from fits to the peak fluxes at the Voyagers COMPOSITE PROTON FLUX SPECTRA In Figure 4 we show for each region the composite of proton flux spectra at plasma and cosmic ray energies, along with low and high limits on suprathermal fluxes in between these energy regimes. The low suprathermal limit is defined by the power-law extension of the cosmic ray spectrum to an intersection with the highenergy side of the plasma distribution. The high limit is drawn from the cosmic ray endpoint to join with the convective peak of the plasma distribution. From visual comparison of the three panels in Figure 4 it is evident that proton flux levels increase over a wide range of energy less than 100 MeV at the three selected spatial regions from 40 AU to the LISM. Radial gradients, corrected for latitudinal differences, in 10 to 20 MeV/nucleon ACR intensity between Voyager 1 and 2 vary from zero at qa > 0 solar minima to less than ten percent/au for qa < 0 minima, although there were some negative (< 10%/AU) and larger positive (< 20%/AU) excursions during solar maximum in (Cummings and Stone, 1998). Generally positive radial gradients are consistent with the primary source of the ACR ions being at the termination shock. At GeV energies the GCR protons are only weakly affected by solar modulation, so there is little difference from the LISM into the heliosphere. On the Voyagers the suprathermal range is covered above tens of kev by the Low Energy Charged Particle (LECP) experiments on each spacecraft, but these instruments do not distinquish between protons and heavier ions, and the measured fluxes are highly variable. In the future we will consider long-term averages of the LECP fluxes with the reasonable assumption of count rate dominance by protons, but the present limits allow initial estimates to be made on radiation dosage contributions of the three energy regimes: plasma, suprathermal, and cosmic ray. Time averaging over solar cycles will also be needed at plasma and cosmic ray energies, and the ACR component actually needs averaging over 22-year solar magnetic cycles, i.e., over the 25-year span of Voyager measurements from 1 AU to the outer heliosphere. In the LISM there are presently no direct measurements but we can hope to acquire these at suprathermal to cosmic ray energies by 2020 if at
10 270 JOHN F. COOPER ET AL. Figure 4. Composite spectrum models of average surface flux for thermal, extrapolated suprathermal, and cosmic ray proton spectra at (A) 40 AU, (B) an assumed solar wind termination shock position at 85 AU, and (C) outside the Heliosphere in the LISM. WL97 refers to Wood and Linsky (1997). least a still operational Voyager 1 crosses the heliopause into the local interstellar environment by that date. 3. Radiation Dosage For protons the primary radiation dosage process is deposition of energy within the volume of material as a function of depth. This deposition occurs either by electronic ionization of target atoms or by direct collisions with nuclei within the atoms. Nuclear collisions are purely elastic, as for billiard balls, up to some threshold energy for inelastic collisions, which can also excite or break up the
11 PROTON IRRADIATION OF KUIPER BELT OBJECTS 271 struck nucleus with increasing effect at higher energies. The present work is limited to dosages from electronic ionization and elastic collisions, and the differential energy loss rates in MeV/cm for water are maximal at different energies, 100 ev for nuclear collisions versus 100 kev for electronic ionization. Thus the plasma protons mostly lose energy by nuclear collisions while ionization becomes dominant for suprathermal and cosmic ray protons. Inelastic collisions producing secondary particles become important at proton energies above a few hundred MeV, where electronic energy loss approaches minimum levels. However, energy loss in a given layer is dominated by protons stopping in that layer, and vertically incident protons above 30 MeV penetrate beyond the top 1-cm layer of interest here. Since space irradiation acts over a range of surface incidence angles from the vertical, higher energy protons incident at large angles also contribute in this top layer. The three panels of Figure 5 show times in years to accumulate chemically significant dosages in the standard unit of 100 ev per 16-amu for water ice from the corresponding flux spectra in each panel of Figure 4. Curves for the electronic ionization and elastic nuclear collision components of proton energy loss, and the results using the upper and lower limits on suprathermal spectra in the kev range, are shown separately. The procedures used here to compute volume dosage rates as functions of surface depth are the same as described by Cooper et al. (2001b) for magnetospheric ion irradiation of Galilean moons in Jupiter s magnetosphere, except that the lowest ion energy has been extended down to 1 ev to accommodate the plasma model data. Differential energy loss and range data for protons incident on water ice were computed, as in Cooper et al. (2001b), from the Stopping and Range of Ions in Matter (SRIM) code of Ziegler et al. (1985) at Exclusion of secondary electromagnetic and nuclear interactions results in overestimates of dosage times due to high energy protons above a few hundred MeV from the GCR source. Near 1 AU the output from the CREME-96 cosmic-ray dosage model of Tylka et al. (1997) indicates a limiting time scale years from this component, as reported earlier by Cooper et al. (2001a). Since the GCR protons are decreasingly affected by solar modulation as secondary processes become dominant at the higher energies, 10 9 years is the limiting time throughout and beyond the heliosphere due to secondary effects. The time-vs-depth curves show important limits and trends related to distribution of proton flux in energy and solar distance. Time scales of 10 4 to 10 6 years computed for depths less than 0.01 µm are probably unrealistically short, since surfaces are continually (1) gardened by interplanetary and interstellar dust impacts (Yamamoto and Mukai, 1998; Landgraf et al., 2002) and (2) sputtered (Johnson, 1990) by protons and heavier ions at ev to MeV energies. Irradiation products at such depths are thereby either eroded away into space or mixed to deeper levels and correspondingly lower concentrations. At 40 AU the times for chemically effective dosages fall sharply below the year GCR secondary interaction limit only at depths less than 0.1 µm and with little difference between the electronic and nuc-
12 272 JOHN F. COOPER ET AL. Figure 5. Times in years for accumulation of radiolytically significant dosages of 100 ev per 16-amu in proton-irradiated material (e.g., Johnson, 1990; Strazzulla and Johnson, 1991) versus surface depth for water ice at unit density. Solid and dashed curves in each panel, 5A 5C, are for irradiation from composite proton spectra in the corresponding panels of Figure 4 at low and high suprathermal limits. Two sets of curves are shown for proton energy loss from electronic ionization (thin curves) and elastic nuclear collisions (thick curves). Secondary interaction processes such as electron bremsstrahlung production of gamma rays and inelastic nuclear collision production of nucleons (p,n,α), pions, and muons are not included.
13 PROTON IRRADIATION OF KUIPER BELT OBJECTS 273 lear dosages, such that the sensible layer to 1-cm depth is minimally processed. For the 85-AU termination shock location the times at 0.1-µm depth drop to 10 7 to 10 8 years, while in the LISM the electronic time scale even at 1 cm is below the year limit. Flux and dosage rates increase by orders of magnitude in this depth range from 40 AU out into the LISM. From 40 AU to the termination shock this trend reflects the positive radial intensity gradient for ACR protons diffusing inward from the shock acceleration source. Future spacecraft measurements will show if energetic proton fluxes fall off beyond the shock at points within the heliosheath and beyond the heliopause in the VLISM less than 10 3 AU from the Sun. Present models suggest maximal dosage rates in the LISM. Thus Oort Cloud comets, and possibly Scattered KBOs with aphelia near the heliosheath and VLISM, are maximally irradiated, while Classical KBOs near 40 AU are minimally irradiated. Radial intensity gradients +10%/AU of ACR ions might account for spatial variations in color within this latter population, e.g., redder objects with increasing perihelia in the 32 <q<45 AU range as reported by Doressoundiram et al. (2002) and at this conference by Doressoundiram (2003). For radiation chemistry models, we cannot assume, however, that all irradiated objects start with the same primordial composition. Objects accreted at different distances and temperatures in the early solar nebula may have very different surface composition ranging from pure water ice to refractory crusts with high abundances of organic molecules. In these proceedings, Moore et al. (2003) and Moroz et al. (2003) discuss laboratory measurements of the different products that arise from irradiation of various such materials. Initially bright mixtures of H 2 O, CO, N 2, and CH 4 can evolve under irradiation to more complex (in some cases, redder) molecules (Moore et al., 2003) but eventually become spectrally neutral (Moroz et al., 2003) as organics are carbonized. Reddening is thus a possible intermediate effect, but not necessarily the final state after billions of years of irradiation. It has long been known that heavy irradiation at levels far above 100 ev/16- amu can produce dark, spectrally neutral residues in carbonaceous materials (e.g., Strazzulla and Johnson, 1991), and Moroz et al. (2003) have now further demonstrated this effect with initially red organics. In Figure 5 we show that these highest irradiation levels are always reached in times 10 6 y at small depths 10 6 cm due to effects of plasma, suprathermal, and lower energy ACR ions which have not been considered in previous models. In the absence of other surface modification processes we might then expect all KBOs to have blackened neutral crusts at these depths. At greater depth the lower dosage rates from more energetic ions could produce organic molecules and reddening from more basic primordial components, but the steep increases in dosage times with depth suggest that these are initially produced in thin layers, particularly at 40 to 85 AU. Within the oldest, dynamically cold KBOs, the reddened layer may extend to meter depths due to secondary interactions, but the outer neutral crust would be correspondingly thicker.
14 274 JOHN F. COOPER ET AL. 4. Collisional Resurfacing Revisited A competition between cosmic ray irradiation, presumed to cause reddening due to formation of complex organics, and collisional gardening, bringing more pristine, spectrally neutral ices to the visible surfaces, was first proposed (Luu and Jewitt, 1996) to account for the color diversity of KBOs from a growing number of spectroscopic observations. There has been an ongoing debate about whether there is a bimodal distribution of colors (Tegler and Romanishin, 2000, 2003) or whether the distribution is more continuous (Jewitt and Luu, 2001; Hainaut and Delsanti, 2002) from neutral to very red. Within the classical KBO population there are apparent correlations of more neutral colors with increasing inclination (Trujillo and Brown, 2002) and collision impact speeds (Stern, 1996, 2002), suggestive of collisional resurfacing effects. However, the meaning of these correlations is currently in dispute (Thébault and Doressoundiram, 2003), and the dynamically hotter, more neutral objects might have different primordial origins and dynamical ages than the colder, redder objects at lower inclination and eccentricity. The same correlations are neither found in the Plutino population of KBOs at the same semimajor axis distance as Pluto, which should be even more collisionally affected than the classical KBOs, nor in the highly eccentric population of Scattered KBOs. Thébault (2003) has helpfully noted at this workshop that the current confusion on the color diversity problem may arise from a present misunderstanding of the basic physical processes involved, including effects of a potentially large population of small Scattered KBOs impacting on the main belt. We suggest that the additional process missing from previous discussions of the color diversity problem is the slow but steady gardening of Classical KBO surfaces by micrometeoroid impacts from a combination of interstellar grains at high velocity 26 km/s and KBO dust grains (e.g., Landgraf et al., 2002) at lower velocity. These small impacts are capable of driving global shifts in color by slowly exposing moderately reddened buried material below heavily irradiated crusts of dynamically cold KBOs. Surface modification of dynamically hot KBOs would be driven by larger impactors digging up large volumes of minimally irradiated, more neutral material. A critical role for KBO dust grains, varying (e.g., increasing) in residence time and density with radial position in the Classical Kuiper Belt, might further explain color-orbit correlations in this KBO population. Ultimately this problem may be resolved by New Horizons direct measurements of KBO surface composition and of flux distributions for ions and dust in the KBO region. In the interim, our work continues with available data to model resurfacing. Added in proof: Finally, Figure 5(A) suggests that the cold KBOs have existed for billions of years in a broad zone near 40 AU of moderate irradiation from galactic cosmic ray ions at micron to meter depths. This region is bounded on the sunward side by increasing fluxes of solar energetic ions and anti-sunward by rising fluxes of energetic ions diffusing inward from the termination shock. Erosion from plasma sputtering and micrometeoroid impacts remove the accumulation of more
15 PROTON IRRADIATION OF KUIPER BELT OBJECTS 275 neutral radiation products at sub-micron depths and continually exposes redder products in the sensible layer and deeper from galactic cosmic ray interactions. This special location in the heliospheric environment may therefore be optimal for production and survival of sensible red organics in the radiation mantles of these objects. Acknowledgements Support is acknowledged by J. F. Cooper for radiation dosage modeling through Raytheon from the following NASA contracts: NAS for the Space Science Data Operations Office project at Goddard Space Flight Center, NASW and NASW for the Jovian System Data Analysis Program, and NASW for the Planetary Atmospheres program. Work at MIT was supported under NASA contract from JPL to MIT and NASA grant NAGS C. Wang is also supported in part by NNSFC of China. Voyager 1 and 2 position data were provided by the HelioWeb spacecraft ephemeris service of the National Space Science Data Center at space/helios/heli.html. References Burlaga, L. F., Ness, N. F., Belcher, J. W., Lazarus, A. J., and Richardson, J. D.: 1996, Voyager Observations of the Magnetic Field, Interstellar Pickup Ions and Solar Wind in the Distant Heliosphere, Sp. Sci. Rev. 78, Cooper, J. F., Christian, E. R., and Johnson, R. E.: 1998, Heliospheric Cosmic Ray Irradiation of Kuiper Belt Comets, Adv. Sp. Res. 21, Cooper, J. F., Christian, E. R., and Johnson, R. E.: 2001a, Heliospheric Interactions with Kuiper Belt Objects, in Proc. 27th Intern. Cosmic Ray Conf., Hamburg, August 7 15, 2001, Vol. 10, pp Cooper, J. F., Johnson, R. E., Mauk, B. H., Garrett, H. B., and Gehrels, N.: 2001b, Energetic Ion and Electron Irradiation of the Icy Galilean Satellites, Icarus 149, Cummings, A. C. and Stone, E. C.: 1996, Composition of Anomalous Cosmic Rays and Implications for the Heliosphere, Sp. Sci. Rev. 78, Cummings, A. C. and Stone, E. C.: 1998, Anomalous Cosmic Rays and Solar Modulation, Sp. Sci. Rev. 83, Doressoundiram, A.: 2003, Colour Properties and Trends in Trans-Neptunian Objects (this volume). Doressoundiram, A., Peixinho, N., de Bergh, C., Fornasier, S., Thébault, Ph., Barucci, M. A., and Veillet, C.: 2002, The Color Distribution in the Edgeworth Kuiper Belt, Astron. J. 124, Draganić, I. G., Ryan, M. P. Jr., and Draganić, Z. D.: 1987, Radiation Dosimetry and Chemistry of a Cometary Nucleus, Adv. Sp. Res. 7, (5)13 (5)16. Frisch, P. C.: 2000, The Galactic Environment of the Sun, Sci. Amer. 88, Hainaut, O. R. and Delsanti, A. C.: 2002, Colors of Minor Bodies in the Solar System, Astron. Astrophys. 389, Jewitt, D. C. and Luu, J. X.: 2001, Colors and Spectra of Kuiper Belt Objects, Astron. J. 122,
16 276 JOHN F. COOPER ET AL. Johnson, R. E.: 1990, Energetic Charged Particle Interactions with Atmospheres and Surfaces, Springer-Verlag, Heidelberg. Landgraf, M., Liou, J.-C., Zook, H. A., and Grün, E.: 2002, Origins of Solar System Dust beyond Jupiter, Astron. J. 123, Luu, J. and Jewitt, D.: 1996, Color Diversity among the Centaurs and Kuiper Belt Objects, Astron. J. 112, Mewaldt, R. A., Liewer, P. C., and the Interstellar Probe Science and Technology Definition Team: 2001a, Scientific Payload for an Interstellar Probe Mission, in K. Scherer et al. (eds.), The Outer Heliosphere: The Next Frontiers, COSPAR Colloquia Series, Vol. 11, Pergamon, pp Mewaldt, R. A. et al.: 2001b, Long Term Fluences of Energetic Particles in the Heliosphere, in R. F. Wimmer-Schweingruber (ed.), Solar and Galactic Composition, AIP Conf. Proc. 598, AIP, Melville, NY, pp Moore, M. H., Hudson, R. L., and Ferrante, R. F.: 2003, Radiation Products in Processed Ices Relevant to Edgeworth Kuiper-Belt Objects (this volume). Moroz, L. V., Baratta, G., Distefano, E., Strazzulla, G., Dotto, E., and Barucci, M. A.: 2003, Ion Irradiation of Asphalite: Optical Effects and Implications for Trans-Neptunian Objects and Centaurs (this volume). Stern, S. A.: 1996, Signatures of Collisions in the Kuiper Disk, Astron. Astrophys. 310, Stern, S. A.: 2002, Evidence for a Collisional Mechanism Affecting Kuiper Belt Object Colors, Astron. J. 124, Stern, A. and Spencer, J.: 2003, New Horizons: The First Reconnaissance Mission to Bodies in the Kuiper Belt (this volume). Stone, E. C.: 2001, News from the Edge of Interstellar Space, Science 293, Stone, E. C., Cummings, A. C., and Webber, W. R.: 1996, The Distance to the Solar Wind Termination Shock in 1993 and 1994 from Observations of Anomalous Cosmic Rays, J. Geophys. Res. 101, Stone, E. C. and Cummings, A. C.: 2001, Estimate of the Location of the Solar Wind Termination Shock, in Proc. 27th Intl. Cosmic Ray Conf., Hamburg, Vol. 10, pp Strazzulla, G. and Johnson, R. E.: 1991, Irradiation Effects on Comets and Cometary Debris, in R. L. Newburn, Jr. et al. (eds.), Comets in the Post Halley Era, Vol. I, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, pp Strazzulla, G., Cooper, J. F., Christian, E. R., and Johnson, R.E.: 2003, Ion irradiation of TNOs: From the Fluxes Measured in Space to the Laboratory Experiments, C.R. Physique, 4, Tegler, S. C. and Romanishin, W.: 2000, Extremely Red Kuiper-Belt Objects on Near-Circular Orbits Beyond 40 AU, Nature 407, Tegler, S. C. and Romanishin, W.: 2003, Resolution of the Kuiper Belt Object Color Controversy: Two Distinct Color Populations, Icarus 161, Thébault, P.: 2003, A Numerical Check of the Collisional Resurfacing Scenario, in this proceedings. Thébault, P. and Doressoundiram, A.: 2003, Colors and Collision Rates within the Kuiper Belt: Problems with the Collisional Resurfacing Scenario, Icarus 162, Trujillo, C. A. and Brown, M. E.: 2002, A Correlation between Inclination and Color in the Classical Kuiper Belt, Astrophys. J. 566, L125 L128. Tylka, A. J. et al.: 1997, CREME96: A Revision of the Cosmic Ray Effects on Micro-Electronics Code, IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. 44, Vasyliunas, V. M.: 1971, Deep Space Plasma Measurements, in R. H. Lovberg and H. R. Griem (eds.), Methods of Experimental Physics, Vol. 9, Plasma Physics, Part B, Academic Press, New York, pp Wang, C. and Richardson, J. D.: 2001, Energy Partition between Solar Wind Protons and Pickup Ions in the Distant Heliosphere: A Three-Fluid Approach, J. Geophys. Res. 106, Wang, C. and Richardson, J. D.: 2003, Determination of the Solar Wind Slowdown near Solar Maximum, J. Geophys. Res. 108(A2), 1058, doi: /2002ja
17 PROTON IRRADIATION OF KUIPER BELT OBJECTS 277 Webber, W. R. and Potgieter, M. S.: 1989, A New Calculation of the Cosmic-Ray Antiproton Spectrum in the Galaxy and Heliospheric Modulation Effects on This Spectrum Using a Drift Plus Wavy Current Sheet Model, Astrophys. J. 344, Whang, Y. C. and Burlaga, L. F.: 2002, Voyager Crossing of the Termination Shock: Prediction, Adv. Sp. Res. 29, Whang, Y. C., Burlaga, L. F., and Ness, N. F.: 1996, Pickup Protons in the Heliosphere, Sp. Sci. Rev. 78, Wood, B. E. and Linsky, J. L.: 1997, A New Measurement of the Electron Density in the Local Interstellar Medium, Astrophys. J. 474, L39 L42. Yamamoto, S. and Mukai, T.: 1998, Dust Production by Impacts of Interstellar Dust on Edgeworth Kuiper Belt Objects, Astron. Astrophys. 329, Zank, G. P. and Frisch, P. C.: 1999, Consequences of a Change in the Galactic Environment of the Sun, Astrophys. J. 518, Ziegler, J. F., Biersack, J. P., and Littmark, U.: 1985, The Stopping and Range of Ions in Solids, Pergamon Press, New York.
1 The heliosphere-interstellar medium interaction: One shock or two? John D. Richardson M.I.T. Abstract. The issue of whether a shock forms in the interstellar medium as it approaches the heliopause has
The Origin of the Solar System and Other Planetary Systems Modeling Planet Formation Boundary Conditions Nebular Hypothesis Fixing Problems Role of Catastrophes Planets of Other Stars Modeling Planet Formation
Name: Astronomy 103: First Exam Stephen Lepp October 25, 2010 Each question is worth 2 points. Write your name on this exam and on the scantron. 1 Short Answer A. What is the largest of the terrestrial
WELCOME to Aurorae In the Solar System Aurorae in the Solar System Sponsoring Projects Galileo Europa Mission Jupiter System Data Analysis Program ACRIMSAT Supporting Projects Ulysses Project Outer Planets
Our Galaxy, the Milky Way In the night sky, the Milky Way appears as a faint band of light. Dusty gas clouds obscure our view because they absorb visible light. This is the interstellar medium that makes
The solar wind (in 90 minutes) Mathew Owens 5 th Sept 2013 STFC Advanced Summer School firstname.lastname@example.org Overview There s simply too much to cover in 90 minutes Hope to touch on: Formation of the
The Formation of Planetary Systems Astronomy 1-1 Lecture 20-1 Modeling Planet Formation Any model for solar system and planet formation must explain 1. Planets are relatively isolated in space 2. Planetary
Science Standard 4 Earth in Space Grade Level Expectations Science Standard 4 Earth in Space Our Solar System is a collection of gravitationally interacting bodies that include Earth and the Moon. Universal
Lecture Outlines Chapter 15 Astronomy Today 7th Edition Chaisson/McMillan Chapter 15 The Formation of Planetary Systems Units of Chapter 15 15.1 Modeling Planet Formation 15.2 Terrestrial and Jovian Planets
Let s first consider the large gas planets: Jupiter, Saturn, Uranus and Neptune Planets to scale with Sun in background 67 62 14 The many moons of the outer planets.. Most of the moons are very small 1
The orbit of Halley s Comet Given this information Orbital period = 76 yrs Aphelion distance = 35.3 AU Observed comet in 1682 and predicted return 1758 Questions: How close does HC approach the Sun? What
I The Sun and Solar Energy One of the most important forces behind global change on Earth is over 90 million miles distant from the planet. The Sun is the ultimate, original source of the energy that drives
The Layout of the Solar System Planets fall into two main categories Terrestrial (i.e. Earth-like) Jovian (i.e. Jupiter-like or gaseous) [~5000 kg/m 3 ] [~1300 kg/m 3 ] What is density? Average density
Chapter 6 Formation of Planetary Systems: Our Solar System and Beyond What does the solar system look like? The solar system exhibits clear patterns of composition and motion. These patterns are far more
Spectroscopy, the Doppler Shift and Masses of Binary Stars http://apod.nasa.gov/apod/astropix.html Doppler Shift At each point the emitter is at the center of a circular wavefront extending out from its
Chapter 8 Formation of the Solar System Agenda Announce: Mercury Transit Part 2 of Projects due next Thursday Ch. 8 Formation of the Solar System Philip on The Physics of Star Trek Radiometric Dating Lab
The Limits of Our Solar System John D. Richardson Massachusetts Institute of Technology Nathan A. Schwadron Boston University Richardson and Schwadron: The Limits of Our Solar System 443 The heliosphere
Chapter 8 Welcome to the Solar System 8.1 The Search for Origins What properties of our solar system must a formation theory explain? What theory best explains the features of our solar system? What properties
Chapter 7 Our Planetary System 7.1 Studying the Solar System Our goals for learning:! What does the solar system look like?! What can we learn by comparing the planets to one another?! What are the major
Chapter 7 Our Planetary System Agenda Pass back & discuss Test 2 Where we are (at) Ch. 7 Our Planetary System Finish Einstein s Big Idea Earth, as viewed by the Voyager spacecraft A. General Basics Intro
Our Planetary System Earth, as viewed by the Voyager spacecraft 7.1 Studying the Solar System Our goals for learning: What does the solar system look like? What can we learn by comparing the planets to
Origin of the Solar System Lecture 7 Formation of the Solar System Reading: Chapter 9 Quiz#2 Today: Lecture 60 minutes, then quiz 20 minutes. Homework#1 will be returned on Thursday. Our theory must explain
Formation of the Solar System Any theory of formation of the Solar System must explain all of the basic facts that we have learned so far. 1 The Solar System The Sun contains 99.9% of the mass. The Solar
OUTER PLANETS MINOR MEMBERS OF THE SOLAR SYSTEM SUN Jupiter (Earth for Scale) Jupiter s bands are clouds Hubble view of Jupiter Arrow shows entry point of Galileo probe, Dec. 1995 Galilean moons Io True
Introduction to the Solar System Lesson Objectives Describe some early ideas about our solar system. Name the planets, and describe their motion around the Sun. Explain how the solar system formed. Introduction
In studying the Milky Way, we have a classic problem of not being able to see the forest for the trees. A panoramic painting of the Milky Way as seen from Earth, done by Knut Lundmark in the 1940 s. The
What Are Stars? How are stars formed? Stars are formed from clouds of dust and gas, or nebulas, and go through different stages as they age. star: a large celestial body that is composed of gas and emits
14b. Pluto, Kuiper Belt & Oort Cloud Pluto Pluto s moons The Kuiper Belt Resonant Kuiper Belt objects Classical Kuiper Belt objects Pluto Data: Numbers Diameter: 2,290.km 0.18. Earth Mass: 1.0. 10 22 kg
15.6 Planets Beyond the Solar System Planets orbiting other stars are called extrasolar planets. Until 1995, whether or not extrasolar planets existed was unknown. Since then more than 300 have been discovered.
Lecture 8: Cloud Stability Heating & Cooling in Molecular Clouds Balance of heating and cooling processes helps to set the temperature in the gas. This then sets the minimum internal pressure in a core
Solar System Fundamentals What is a Planet? Planetary orbits Planetary temperatures Planetary Atmospheres Origin of the Solar System Properties of Planets What is a planet? Defined finally in August 2006!
Chin. J. Astron. Astrophys. Vol. 5 (2005), No. 2, 184 192 (http:/www.chjaa.org) Chinese Journal of Astronomy and Astrophysics Proton and He 2+ Temperature Anisotropies in the Solar Wind Driven by Ion Cyclotron
THE SOLAR SYSTEM - EXERCISES 1 THE SUN AND THE SOLAR SYSTEM Name the planets in their order from the sun. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 The asteroid belt is between and Which planet has the most moons? About how many?
Solar System Formation Solar System Formation Question: How did our solar system and other planetary systems form? Comparative planetology has helped us understand Compare the differences and similarities
Origins of the Cosmos Summer 2016 Pre-course assessment In order to grant two graduate credits for the workshop, we do require you to spend some hours before arriving at Penn State. We encourage all of
Lecture #34: Solar System Origin II How did the solar system form? Chemical Condensation ("Lewis") Model. Formation of the Terrestrial Planets. Formation of the Giant Planets. Planetary Evolution. Reading:
Chapter 12 Remnants of Rock and Ice Asteroids, Comets, and the Kuiper Belt 12.1 Asteroids and Meteorites Our goals for learning What are asteroids like? Why is there an asteroid belt? Where do meteorites
7. Our Solar System Terrestrial & Jovian planets Seven large satellites [moons] Chemical composition of the planets Asteroids & comets The Terrestrial & Jovian Planets Four small terrestrial planets Like
WDS'13 Proceedings of Contributed Papers, Part II, 7 12, 2013. ISBN 978-80-7378-251-1 MATFYZPRESS Statistical Study of Magnetic Reconnection in the Solar Wind J. Enžl, L. Přech, J. Šafránková, and Z. Němeček
Solar System Overview Planets: Four inner planets, Terrestrial planets Four outer planets, Jovian planets Asteroids: Minor planets (planetesimals) Meteroids: Chucks of rocks (smaller than asteroids) (Mercury,
PART 1 OBJECTS IN THE SOLAR SYSTEM 4.1 INTRODUCTION Besides the Sun, the central object of our solar system, which is a star and will be discussed in more detail in Chapter 11, there are basically three
Lecture 14 Introduction to the Sun ALMA discovers planets forming in a protoplanetary disc. Open Q: what physics do we learn about the Sun? 1. Energy - nuclear energy - magnetic energy 2. Radiation - continuum
ASTR 105 The Solar System 1. Orderly motions 2.Two kinds of planets 3.Two kinds of small bodies 4.Exceptions to the rules Today: Group Lab at the end of class Next THURSDAY 03/10: First Group Project Orderly
Chapter 6 Formation of Planetary Systems Our Solar System and Beyond The solar system exhibits clear patterns of composition and motion. Sun Over 99.9% of solar system s mass Made mostly of H/He gas (plasma)
The Sun: The Center of Attention Where is the sun located? The sun rises every day in the east and appears to travel across the sky before it sets in the west. This led astronomers to believe the sun moved
OVERVIEW More than ever before, Physics in the Twenty First Century has become an example of international cooperation, particularly in the areas of astronomy and cosmology. Astronomers work in a number
Chapter 15.3 Galaxy Evolution Elliptical Galaxies Spiral Galaxies Irregular Galaxies Are there any connections between the three types of galaxies? How do galaxies form? How do galaxies evolve? P.S. You
Interstellar Cosmic-Ray Spectrum from Gamma Rays and Synchrotron Chuck Naval Research Laboratory, Washington, DC email@example.com Andy Strong Max-Planck-Institut für extraterrestrische Physik,
August 1999 NF-207 The Earth Science Enterprise Series These articles discuss Earth's many dynamic processes and their interactions Clouds and the Energy Cycle he study of clouds, where they occur, and
Wave-particle and wave-wave interactions in the Solar Wind: simulations and observations Lorenzo Matteini University of Florence, Italy In collaboration with Petr Hellinger, Simone Landi, and Marco Velli
A scientific law is something that has been proven to be true. A. True B. False C. Only in experimental sciences. i>clicker Questions The fifth planet from the sun, the sixth planet and the seventh planet
Astronomy 110: SURVEY OF ASTRONOMY 4. Formation of Solar Systems 1. A Survey of the Solar System 2. The Solar System s Early History 3. Other Planetary Systems The solar system s rich and varied structure
5. The Nature of Light Light travels in vacuum at 3.0. 10 8 m/s Light is one form of electromagnetic radiation Continuous radiation: Based on temperature Wien s Law & the Stefan-Boltzmann Law Light has
Perspective and Scale Size in Our Solar System Notes Clue Session in Mary Gates RM 242 Mon 6:30 8:00 Read Lang Chpt. 1 Moodle Assignment due Thursdays at 6pm (first one due 1/17) Written Assignments due
Name Date Period 30 GALAXIES AND THE UNIVERSE SECTION 30.1 The Milky Way Galaxy In your textbook, read about discovering the Milky Way. (20 points) For each item in Column A, write the letter of the matching
Chapter 5 Light and Matter: Reading Messages from the Cosmos Messages Interactions of Light and Matter The interactions determine everything we see, including what we observe in the Universe. What is light?
The microstate of the solar wind Radial gradients of kinetic temperatures Velocity distribution functions Ion composition and suprathermal electrons Coulomb collisions in the solar wind Waves and plasma
GEOLOGY 306 Laboratory Instructor: TERRY J. BOROUGHS NAME: Patterns in the Solar System (Chapter 18) For this assignment you will require: a calculator, colored pencils, a metric ruler, and meter stick.
California Standards Grades 912 Boardworks 2009 Science Contents Standards Mapping Earth Sciences Earth s Place in the Universe 1. Astronomy and planetary exploration reveal the solar system s structure,
Class: Date: Astro 102 Practice Test 3 Multiple Choice Identify the choice that best completes the statement or answers the question. 1. Interstellar gas clouds may collapse to form stars if they a. have
1 Lecture 10 Formation of the Solar System January 6c, 2014 2 Orbits of the Planets 3 Clues for the Formation of the SS All planets orbit in roughly the same plane about the Sun. All planets orbit in the
Coronal expansion and solar wind The solar corona over the solar cycle Coronal and interplanetary temperatures Coronal expansion and solar wind acceleration Origin of solar wind in magnetic network Multi-fluid
Sputtering Vacuum Evaporation Recap Use high temperatures at high vacuum to evaporate (eject) atoms or molecules off a material surface. Use ballistic flow to transport them to a substrate and deposit.
1 DIRECT ORBITAL DYNAMICS: USING INDEPENDENT ORBITAL TERMS TO TREAT BODIES AS ORBITING EACH OTHER DIRECTLY WHILE IN MOTION Daniel S. Orton email: firstname.lastname@example.org Abstract: There are many longstanding
.1.1 Measure the motion of objects to understand.1.1 Develop graphical, the relationships among distance, velocity and mathematical, and pictorial acceleration. Develop deeper understanding through representations
Chapter 9 Asteroids, Comets, and Dwarf Planets Their Nature, Orbits, and Impacts Asteroid Facts Asteroids are rocky leftovers of planet formation. The largest is Ceres, diameter ~1,000 km. There are 150,000
Lecture 19: Planet Formation I. Clues from the Solar System 1 Outline The Solar System:! Terrestrial planets! Jovian planets! Asteroid belt, Kuiper belt, Oort cloud Condensation and growth of solid bodies
Life on Earth. I. Earth Terrestrial Planet 1 AU from the Sun Equilibrium temperature: 247 K (-26C) Actual mean temperature: 287 K Differentiated into Inner core Outer core Mantle Crust Composition Crust:
The Nature of Light Light and other forms of radiation carry information to us from distance astronomical objects Visible light is a subset of a huge spectrum of electromagnetic radiation Maxwell pioneered
Vagabonds of the Solar System Chapter 17 ASTR 111 003 Fall 2006 Lecture 13 Nov. 27, 2006 Introduction To Modern Astronomy I Introducing Astronomy (chap. 1-6) Planets and Moons (chap. 7-17) Ch7: Comparative
The Universe is thought to consist of trillions of galaxies. Our galaxy, the Milky Way, has billions of stars. One of those stars is our Sun. Our solar system consists of the Sun at the center, and all
Click Here for Full Article JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH, VOL. 111,, doi:10.109/005ja011533, 006 A three-dimensional MHD solar wind model with pickup protons A. V. Usmanov 1, and M. L. Goldstein 3 Received
Chapter 12 Remnants of Rock and Ice Asteroids, Comets, and the Kuiper Belt What are asteroids like? Asteroid Facts Asteroids are rocky leftovers of planet formation. Largest is Ceres, diameter ~1,000 km
7 Fission In 1939 Hahn and Strassman, while bombarding U-235 nuclei with neutrons, discovered that sometimes U-235 splits into two nuclei of medium mass. There are two important results: 1. Energy is produced.
Data Provided: A formula sheet and table of physical constants is attached to this paper. DEPARTMENT OF PHYSICS AND ASTRONOMY Autumn Semester (2014-2015) DARK MATTER AND THE UNIVERSE 2 HOURS Answer question
Summary: Four Major Features of our Solar System How did the solar system form? According to the nebular theory, our solar system formed from the gravitational collapse of a giant cloud of interstellar
ASTR 115: Introduction to Astronomy Stephen Kane ASTR 115: The Second Mid-Term Exam What will be covered? - Everything from chapters 6-10 of the textbook. What will be the format of the exam? - It will
Class 14 Patterns & diversity in our Solar System Kinematics of the solar system Comparative planetology I : The kinematics of the Solar System We have learned about the laws of physics (motion and gravity)
Lecture 19 Part 2: Climates of the Past 1) The geologic timescale: the age of the Earth/ Solar System the history of the Earth 2) The evolution of Earth s atmosphere - from its origin to present-day 3)
Interaction of Energy and Matter Gravity Measurement: Using Doppler Shifts to Measure Mass Concentration TEACHER GUIDE EMR and the Dawn Mission Electromagnetic radiation (EMR) will play a major role in