1 NEVADA LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL BUREAU OFFICE OF RESEARCH Bl,CKGROUND PAPER 1975 No. 12 MEDICAL t.1alpp-actice INSURI'.NCE I There are certain facts that all parties involved in malpractice insurance will agree upon, and these facts constitute wh~t is increasingly referred to as the "malpractice crisis." It is a fact that malpractice insurance premiums for self-employed general practitioners rose by 580 percent from 1960 to 1972 and for selfemployed general surgeons by 900 percent! It is also a fact that in 1970, 18,000 claims files ;'Jere opened which "las a 10 percent increase over the previous year. Further, a number of malnractic2 insurers have gotten out of the business and others have announcel their intent to do so. Halpractice suit settlements are gettinq higher with a 1973 record $4 million settlement. Out of every $10 doctor's fee, patients are paying from 20 to 50 cents for malpractice insurance. Finally, the crisis is not national yet but is present in certain regions. As an example, a North Carolina doctor pays just one-third the national average premium figures while a California doctor in the same type of practice pays 2 1/2 times the national average I It is logical to wonder about the causes for the changes in the field of malpractice claims. A suit for malpractice before l-iorld tvar II I-las virtually unkn0\1n. The Secretary of Health, Education and Welfare's Commission on Medical l-lalpractice in 1973 speculated on the reasons for change. In years oast, sickness and even death at early ages were accepted facts of Ii fe. Infant mortality \-Ias high and life expectancy far shorter than today. After Porld War II, a far greater percentaqe of people became able to afford medical care and thus more people became potential malpractice claimants. Also, the post-\".ar~ era savl a great rise in- expectations in medical care. Great publicity has been given over the past 25 years to the miracles of modern medicine. Television shows portray doctors who always cure patients. Hany people look upon health care as a product. You pay your money and you should have good health, otherwise someone is not doing the job right. Finally, it cannot be denied that there are medical accidents and that there are negligent acts co~mitted by health care providers who are, after all, humans prone to human error. 1.
2 The very nature of modern medicine makes suits more likely. The doctor-patient relationship of past generations is gone. Doctors do not make house calls. Doctors often practice in association so that the same patient will see different doctors on different visi ts. Doctors who are over~lorked and harried can be impersonal and short, thereby creating animosity in their?atients. All of these things make suits more likely if treatment is not completelv satisfactory. Similar statements can be made about large hospitals which can be rather cold ar.d impersonal. Along with a greater willingness to sue doctors by patients, there has also developed a greater,'!illingness by attorneys to try such suits. There have been some changes in the la, ; and the legal profession that accounts for this. Doctors ooint to the increased movement to "no fault" automobile insurance as the basis for increased interest by personal injury la";yers in malpractice cases. There is no firm data to confirm or deny this. Lawyers contend that an increased awareness by the general public of their legal rights as manifested in the consumer movement has led to the increase in suits. There have been a number of legal doctrines that have emerged in the field of malpractice that have had a significant effect on trying malpractice suits. The first of these is res ipsa loauitur which means literally "the thing speaks for itself." --:I:rla su:lt, it can mean that if there is a medical accident it is assumed that it was negligence by the doctor and the burden of proof shifts to the doctor to prove that he \"as not negligent. This doctrine is not widely used in malpractice suits but in California, it has been extended to rare medical accidents as well as obvious ones such as leaving an instrument in a person after an operation. The doctrine is still not widely used but there is a trend tm ;ard its use. The doctrine of informed consent means that every person has control of his body and no one may do anything to it without permission. This can mean that even if a oatient gives his consent to a procedure, if the explanation of what it entailed by the doctor was not adequate, the doctor can be liable. The emphasis is placed on the "informed" in informed consent. The use of informed consent as grounds by a plaintiff is also small but growing \-!ith California again leading the way. All states have time limitations after which a suit cannot be filed. The older an event on which a suit 1s based, the more difficult it is to see that justice is done. The discoverv rule 2.
3 is different in malpractice cases. There, the statute of limitations does not begin until the patient notices or "discovers" his injury. This can be years after the fact. This leads to \.,hat is known as the "long tail" in medical malpractice suits '''hich means that insurers have a much longer wait after any instance of medical care to see if there 'V;ill be a malpractice claim than in other types of insurance. As an example, the "tail" in auto insurance liability claims averages I 1/2 years. In malpractice, it averages 6 1/2 years. An oral quarantee of qood results is an oral contract that a certain treatment Vlillieacrto certain results. If this can be proven and the results Vlere not forthcoming, then there is a breach of contract and a patient can sue even if there \'las no negligence involved. This doctrine has on occasion been used 11hen the statute of limitation on negligence has run out since that for breach of contract is always longer. No criticism of the legal side of malpractice is so loud Iv proclaimed as is the contingency fee system. In most states: that means two things. First, the lawyer gets nothing if the suit is lost. Second, the higher the award, the higher the percentage that the la\vyer may get. This system undoubtedly has t\~o effects. The first is that there is greater incentive to push for higher awards than if an attorney "Ias being paid for his time on a straicht rate. The second effect has two sides. On the one hand, without the contingent fee basis, many people, probably the majority, could not afford the cost of a malpractice suit which runs lonqer than any other type and involves more expensive expert testimony. On the other hand, the person with a lec,itimate but small malpractice claim will be unable to find an attorney. Some balance is probably needed on the subject of what lawyers make from malpractice suits. First, despite publicity to the contrary, doctors still win more than they lose of all claims against them. Only 44.8 percent of malpractice claims in 1970 resulted in payment. Only 11.5 percent of claims 1vent to trial. Only 6.5 percent \Vent to verdict. Fewer than one in four verdicts \Vent against the doctor. The odds for an attorney in taking any malpractice case are less than even, and if they go to trial, they are very poor. In short, what a malpractice attorney is losing in time and money on his lost cases has to be made UP in his victories if he is to stay in business. Also, the publicity on big awards is overdone. There are p~obably not over seven, million dollar plus a\vards per year according to the Secretary's Corrc:::ission Report.!.l;'Cost 60 nercent 0: claims paid in 1'?70 were for less' than $3,000. Only 6 percent,'lere ewer $40,
4 Clearly the plaintiff's avlard is not the whole problem in the cost of malpractice insurance. Insurance companies must bear heavy expenses in all trials and in many claims that do not go to trial. These costs are all part of premiums paid by doctors, hospitals and ultimately by all patients. Criticism and some blame for the current "crisis" is also aimed at doctors and other health care providers by lawyers and others. A frequent criticism is that the medical profession does not adequately regulate itself, the result being a number of incomptcnt or simply out-of-date doctors be ina allohed to practice. Not even the harshest critics of the medical profession would claim that any but a very fm1 doctors are not well qualified to prilctice. There are definitely several problem areas in insuring the competency of health providers, especially doctors. All doctors are licensed to practice as are nurses and associated health personnel. State boards composed of members of the profession traditionally set the professional standards and police the profession. As a minimum state boards administer initial licensing exams and determine reciprocal licensing. After the license is granted, most states limit the grounds for revocation to criminal behavior. Only 15 states have professional incompetence as grounds for revocation. Nevada is among the 15. In all states, continuing medical education in the form of refresher courses, seminars and the like are available. Only in 11arylilnd and New Mexico are state boards empowered to require continuing education despite the fact that the profession of medicine has rapidly changed and continues to do so. This same criticism can be leveled at other professions, notably the law. Self regulation in medicine extends beyond licensing. Hospitals grant staff privileges to doctors. They may also suspend or revoke privileges. In many cases, this is not done. It is, in fact, easier for the other staff physicians to overlook possible incompetence than to make an issue, and revocation of staff privileges often leads to law suits by the doctor against the hospital. Finally, even where state boards do move to revoke a doctor's license, the doctor can go to court in an ex Darte proceedina, meaning only the doctor's side is heard, and get a stay of the revocation pending the adversarial hearing. In many states, months may pass before that hearing and years before a decision is rendered. In the meantime the incompetent doctor continues 4.
5 to practice. In one California case a doctor Has charged ~Ii th "gross incompetence" in June of 1966, but it was not until September 1972 that the court finally upheld a 90 day suspension of his license! There are also problems within the insurance industry that are a part of the malpractice crisis. Already mentioned is the "lcn~ tail" in malpractice suits. The effect of this is that insurers do not have data on which to base future premiums that is as firm as in other fields. Also, while millions"buy auto insurance or heal th or life or homemmers insurance, the market base for mal- practice insurance is only about 300,000 doctors, dentists and hospitals. The smaller an insurance base, the more prone that group is to fluctuation in claims from year to year. Finally, some insurers have tried to use the "long tail" factor to their advantage. Those new to the field expect that claims will not start showing up for several years. In the meantime, the premium money can be invested and even if claims are high, the investment revenue added to the premiums \'Iould more than cover losses. Inflation and higher claims than anticipated ruined this plan and resulted in major losses for several companies leading some to get out of the field. Only 12 insurers provide 90 percent of the malpractice insurance in the country so when even one leaves the field, quite a dislocation occurs. II Hopefully, it is clear from the foregoing section that the causes of the malpractice crisis are complex. The fields of law, medicine, insurance and even the media contribute to the problem both individually and in their interactions \1ith one another. It follows that there is no single or simple solution to the "crisis." Solutions will have to be \>lorked out on several fronts. No attempt is made here to determine what the solutions must be. Rather, this paper will conclude by listing the more prominent recommendations from the Secretary's Commission and other sources and explaining the rationale for each. The problems were posed by field; law, medicine and insurance. Recommendations \'1ill be listed in the same way. Law 1. Res ipsa loquitur--any judicially derived doctrine such as this-can be legislatively modified. To ensure that the doctrine is applied no differently in malpractice than in other types of torts would prevent further shifting of the burden of proof to doctors. 5.
6 2. Informed consent--this doctrine too can be legislatively modified. The extent to which a doctor must exnlain a proposed procedure to a patient could be limited to a standard prescribed by medical associations or medical boards. 3. Discoverv rule--again, this doctrine can be legislatively modified"so that the statute of limitations will be fromthe time of the negligent act. Such a period could be longer than other personal injury limits but it would be definite, thus giving insurers more certainty on Hhich to base rates. 4. Oral guarantee of aood results--this doctrine can be leaislatively modified to ensure that there are never implied guarantees in medical practice. 5. Contingencv fees--if this system is maintained, and without a"~faul t" or a vjorkmens compensation system instead of a tort system there seems no alternative, provide for limits on the percentage that the contingent fee can be. There are tl10 approaches here. New Jersey, by court rule, has adopted a fee system paying 50 percent of the first $1,000 ahard and dolm to 10 percent on any al1ards over $100,000. The other approach is that used in Canada,.;here the court determines the attorney's fee based on time and expenses. The second approach would prevent an attorney from making up losses from one suit I'lith the fee from the next one. 6. Ad damnum clauses--a great deal of the publicity about malpractice comes from amounts asked in suits. In fact, the+amount asked for is 53 times the amount actually alvarded in malpractice suits. Nevertheless, the media headline what the suit asks but seldom follmo; up with the final award, if any. Pennsylvania court rules provide only that a suit state whether damages desired will be under or over $10,000. Medicine 1. Continuing education--'ledical boards can be empowered to require certain types of continuing education. Despite good intentions, a great many doctors simply do not participate in continuing education. Some fields of medicine 6.
7 require more currency than others. State boards could determine what minimum continuing education is necessary. 2. ~uspension or revocation of license--stay orders on suspension or revocations should be strictlv limited in duration. In federal court, an adversary proceeding is usually held within 10 days of an ex oarte proceeding fro~ which a stay order is issued. If a-doctor should not be practicing as determined by a medical board, he must be assured due process but to protect his patients, proceedings must be swift. 3. Probati'2..11~nd rehabilitation--too often the only disciolinary device a medical board has is revocation of license either permanently or temporarily. In Nevada, if revocation is based on illness or excessive drinking, the doctor may be examined for competency and returned to practice. For revocation for any other grounds, there is no mechanism for requiring special training and reexamination. One reason medical boards may be reluctant to act against doctors is because their only measures are so extreme. If the board had the poi'ler to use probation and prescribe refresher training, the incidents of incompetence could very,veil drop. 4. Reevaluation and recertification--~1edical boards could be e-mpowered~o require currency testing either through their own tests or through specialty boards. This po'ver '.'lould vlork in conjunction ~1ith the povler to require certain continuing education. 5. Medical boards--state medical boards used to be concerned prrmarily with writing and giving tests. Now, test questions are nationally standardized. Therefore, there is no clear reason ivhy lay members cannot serve on medical boards to insure a patient/consumer viewpoint. Nevada has a 5-member, all doctor board. 6. SUspension of staff privileges--hospitals and staff menbers should be given limited i~~unity from suit for their professional actions concerning other doctors and staff privileges. This vlill make it much easier to discipline doctors whose competence is in doubt. 7.
8 'Insurance 1. G~}_evance mechanisms--~alpractice suits are sometimes f~led because a patient has a comolaint that cannot he aired in any other way. Hospitals and local medical associations can develop grievance mechanisms on their ovm. In addition, a state office of consumer health affairs could be established. In Nevada, the existing division of consumer affairs could be empowered to investigate health care complaints Alternatives to litigation-- al Screening panels--these already exist in Nevada on a voluntary basis. They consist of doctors and attorneys. Obviously, any resolution of a claim without going to trial lowers overall costs. Legislation could make going to the screening panels a requirement before a suit could be filed. Screening panels only try to determine if a claim is valid. They do not set amounts. bl Arbitration--There are tho basic approaches to arbitration. The parties may agree to go to arbitration or thg~e may be law requiring arbitration. In the hitter aporoach, there is usually a top limit to the arbitration avlard beyond which a suit is necessary. New Hampshire has enacted such a law covering a number of professions including medicine. 1',10 counties in Pennsvlvania 2.S a means of cutting dmm court loads have by rule required that all tort cases under $10,000 go to arbitration. In either screening or arbitration, resort to trial can be discouraged by a requirement that the party ;,7ho brinas suit after rejecting the recommendation of the screonina panel or the arbitration panel will be assessed a part of court costs if he loses. 3. Reinsuranco--All but the very larqest malpractice insurers need-to~able to reinsure. - This is a orocess bv,,;hich an insurer insures his clients. It is t~kinq out-insurance on insurance. Reinsurance is becoming more difficult to find, thereby increasing risks to the primary insurer.!'. bill has been introduced in Congress to have the federal government become a reinsurer in malpractice insurance. 4. "No fault"--senators Kennedy and Inouye have introduced a-federal no fault malnractice insurance bill. There are 8.
9 definitely problems with the tort system. The problem is that personal injury auto insurance is not analogous to malpractice insurance. He all kno,v Ivhat an automobile accident is. Not even doctors can agree on what a lc.edical accident is. In short, hovl \Vould a no fault system determine I.,hat a compensable incident Ivas? There is no ansi'ler at present to this. Until there is, there cannot be a workable no fault system in malpractice. 5. l'iorknens Compensation model--the I'lorkmen' s compensation system has some no fault aspects but there is a panel of experts, presumably doctors, la,vyers and kno'\<lledgeable la'1 people, who \Yould determine alvards. This is a cross bet'''een imposed arbitration and pure no fault. The insurer in such a system could be government or private insurance. In either case there could be an upper limit beyond I"hich the individual could still go into court. Doctors \'IOuld be covered on, say, the first $100,000 but vlould have to take out coverage for extraordinary claims. In 1970, only 3 percent of all claims paid were in excess of $100,000. Proponents claim that such a system is much less costly ~n terms of litigation and has the additional advantage of making it possible to settle small claims that are nm" left out. A bill to this effect has been introduced in the California Senate. III Despite the fact that the president's message on health in 1971 stated that "The consequences of the malpractice problem are profound" and that "It must be confronted soon and it must be confronted effectively. " virtually nothing other than the creation of a study com~ission has been accomplished. In the meantime, the situation has aotten vlorse to the point of crisis and now legislative remedies-are demanded. Bill~ thus far introduced in Congress "lould set up a reinsurance program (5 188), national no fault (S 215), national imposed arbitration (S 482) and further study (H 1305 and H 1378).' California has the proposed workmen's corapensation model for malpractice introduced by Senator George Carpenter on February 12. There is a demand that the legislature do something. 1'lhat that is is not clear. Trying to anticipate Vlhat Congress will do does not provide any clarity. This paper has only attempted to highlight the issues. It has made no attempt to assess the situation in Nevada concerning malpractice, but rather has tried to make 9.
10 the subject in general comprehensible. Finally, it has made no attempt to reconunend action. Various proposals are presented with the argunents their proponents use and do not reflect any positio'1s of the Office of Research. SUGGESTED READING (Available in the Research Library) Averbach, Albert; "Rx For Nalpractice"; The Insurance Law Journal, February 1970, p. 69. Bills in Congress--S ISS, S 215, S 482, H.R. 1305, H.R Congressional Record; January 16, 1975, remarks by Senator Gaylord Nelson and Supporting dc:::uments to \'lashington, D. C. Department of Health, Education and Helfare; 11edical Halnracti.ce: R.. t.f'.j-".:::. c.:... ot~ '~C m,. tt~ 'Meod. 1 ~i 1 ~ --:-T""""t epor 0...,-n,_ ~~ec;..... ary.:? 01,TI~ <..;e on "_'-.. lea,~a or ~~C l. ~---D!T;~'!'7... e, H'-'.~ PubITcation No. (OS) Washington, D.C., January Appendix. Keeton, Robert E.; "Compensation for / ledical Accidents"; Universi. tv of Pennsylvania La", Revim1, January 1973, p O'Connell, Jeffrey; "Expanding No-Fault Beyond Auto Insurance: Some Pronosals"; Virginia Law Revie,.,; Nay 1973, p Wall Street Journal, January 30, 1975, p. 10; "Teledyne Takes Drastic sfeps in an Effort to Salvage its Argonaut Insurance Unit." APG/
11 ~! I,.'. kf\ft'c/at-;ve- Ct;r;vz h! / 9C;;/ 0>7 ~,-b Cu~ hi' II e P.. /97(, NATE RIALS ON NEDICAL MALPRACTICE 1. Intermountain Medical Malpractice Sem.inar, DHEW Pub. No. (HR~) , two copies. 2. Position Paper - Nevada Trial Lawyers, Pet.er Neumann, July 30, Report of the Florida Medical Liability Insurance Commission to the Governor and the Florida Legislature, Jan Folder of materials from ANA on Unnecessary Surgery. 5. Folder of malpractice bills from other states. 6. Reaction to Crisis: A State by State Review of ~ledical Malpractice Legislation Enacted in 1975, two copies. 7. Memorandum of Law, April 3, 1976, Gerald A. Lopez. 8. Quality Medical Care - The Citizen's Right, Association of Trial Lawyers of America, thrce volumes. 9. Assembly Select Committee on Medical Malpractice - Preliminary Report, June '74, California Assembly. 10. The States and Medical ~alpractice CSG Research Brief, Folder of federal bills. 12. Report on Kansas Legislative Interin Studies to the 1976 Legislature - Special Committee on Medical Malpractice, Jan. 1976~ 13. Doctor's Malpractice Insurance, Joint Legis. Audit Comm. Office of Auditor General, California Legis. Report 265.2~ 14. A Legislator's Guide to the Medical Malpractice Issue, NCSL and Health Policy Center, Georgetmvn University, 1976, three copies.
12 (Materials on Medical ~alpractice) 15. NArC f-'1a.lpracticc C13ims, :'\p::::-il 19~D. 17. Trial Magazine. May/June Folder of california bills. 19. An Analysis of the Southern California Arbitration Project, Jan June 1975, No',;., 1975, PJ.JL 20. Medical Malpractice Conference. Feb., 27-28, Medical Malpracitce. A Selected Annotated Bibliography. April, An Overview of Medical Malpractice. Corr~ittee on Inter state and Foreign COlUlnerce. U. S. House of Representatives. March, 17, Articles and Clippings, Malpractice. 24~ Medi.cal Malpractice and the State Legislatures. A Monthly Newsletter. 25. Nevada Dr. Questionairc. 26. Report to the All-Industry Committee Special Malpractice Review: 1974 Closed Claim Survey. Preliminary Analysis of Survey Results. Dec., I, No Fault or Workmen's Compensation or Arbitration Systems. (Several different articles and pamphlets)
CHAPTER 2005-266 Committee Substitute for Senate Bill No. 940 An act relating to repeated medical malpractice; amending s. 456.041, F.S.; requiring the Department of Health to verify information submitted
Advocate Magazine March 2011 Why medical malpractice still matters. Despite MICRA limitations, medical-negligence claims still have a crucial role in society BY BRUCE G. FAGEL We all know the statistics
QUESTION NO. 3 Amendment to Titles 1 and 3 of the Nevada Revised Statutes CONDENSATION (ballot question) Shall Title 1 of the Nevada Revised Statutes governing attorneys, and Title 3 of the Nevada Revised
California Public Employees Retirement System Agenda Item 9 ITEM NAME: Proposition 46 Drug and Alcohol Testing of Doctors and Medical Negligence Lawsuits PROGRAM: ITEM TYPE: Legislation State Initiative
osition Official Title and Summary Prepared by the Attorney General Requires drug and alcohol testing of doctors and reporting of positive test to the California Medical Board. Requires Board to suspend
Arizona State Senate Issue Paper June 22, 2010 Note to Reader: The Senate Research Staff provides nonpartisan, objective legislative research, policy analysis and related assistance to the members of the
SRJ 35: Study of Health Care Medical Malpractice: Montana's Approach to Limiting Liability by Sue O'Connell, Research Analyst Prepared for the Children, Families, Health, and Human Services Interim Committee
Appendix G: Summary of State Studies on Tort Reforms ing Office, Medical Malpractice: SIX State Case Studies Show Claims and Insurance Costs Still Rise Despite Reforms, HRD-87-21 (Washington, DC U S Government
Special Report Physician medical malpractice by Jean LeMasurier Malpractice insurance premiums for physicians have increased at an average rate of over 30 percent per year. This rate is significantly higher
Personal Injury Law: Minnesota Medical Malpractice Medical Malpractice Terms Statutes of Limitations Minnesota Medical Malpractice Laws Medical malpractice includes many forms of liability producing conduct
CHAPTER 85 AN ACT concerning advanced practice nurses, amending P.L.1947, c.262, amending the title and body of P.L.1991, c.377 and supplementing that act. BE IT ENACTED by the Senate and General Assembly
Proposition 46 Drug and Alcohol Testing of Doctors. Medical Negligence Lawsuits. Initiative Statute. Yes/No Statement A YES vote on this measure means: The cap on medical malpractice damages for such things
RESOLUTION 108-2011 Albert L. Fisher, MD 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Whereas, Wisconsin physicians have paid billions of dollars into the Injured Patients and Families Compensation Fund over the last 35 years, for which
August 28, 2013 Hon. Kamala D. Harris Attorney General 1300 I Street, 17 th Floor Sacramento, California 95814 Attention: Ms. Ashley Johansson Initiative Coordinator Dear Attorney General Harris: Pursuant
Choosing the Right Attorney for Your Case The Law and You Information Series 1, Volume 4 The Right Attorney for You When should I seek the advice of an attorney? It is important to start looking for an
No-Fault Automobile Insurance By Margaret C. Jasper, Esq. Prior to the enactment of state no-fault insurance legislation, recovery for personal injuries sustained in an automobile accident were subject
ASSEMBLY, No. STATE OF NEW JERSEY th LEGISLATURE PRE-FILED FOR INTRODUCTION IN THE 0 SESSION Sponsored by: Assemblyman HERB CONAWAY, JR. District (Burlington) Co-Sponsored by: Assemblywoman Handlin SYNOPSIS
Background Paper 79-5 PRODUCT LIABILITY PRODUCT LIABILITY Product liability refers to the legal responsibility by the manufacturer or marketer of a product for any bodily injury or property damage caused
Testimony Before: Senate Codes, Health & Insurance Committees Tuesday, December 1, 2009 10:00 a.m. Hearing Room B, Legislative Office Building Albany, NY Presented By: Dr. William Doscher, MD, FACS Legislative
Board for Physician Workforce Spotlight on National Tort Reform & Reform in the Surrounding States August 2010 Tort reform continues to be a highly debated issue at both the state and national level. In
SENATE, No. STATE OF NEW JERSEY th LEGISLATURE INTRODUCED AUGUST, 0 Sponsored by: Senator LORETTA WEINBERG District (Bergen) SYNOPSIS Enters New Jersey in Nurse Multistate Licensure Compact. CURRENT VERSION
Chapter 93B. Occupational Licensing Boards. 93B-1. Definitions. As used in this Chapter: "License" means any license (other than a privilege license), certificate, or other evidence of qualification which
K a n s a s L e g i s l a t i v e R e s e a r c h D e p a r t m e n t Kansas Legislator Briefing Book 2016 L-1 Creation of Operator Registration Act and Changes in Adult Care Home Licensure Act L-2 Health
2009 Medical Malpractice Claims Report Department of Commerce & Insurance November 1, 2009 Table of Contents 2009 Tennessee Medical Malpractice Report INTRODUCTION...2 I. REPORTING ENTITIES...3 II. REPORTING
CHAPTER 2011-233 Committee Substitute for Committee Substitute for Committee Substitute for Committee Substitute for House Bill No. 479 An act relating to medical malpractice; creating ss. 458.3175, 459.0066,
How to Protect Your Rights When Injured on the Job What every railroad worker should know UNITED TRANSPORTATION UNION 24950 Country Club Blvd., Ste. 340 North Olmsted, Ohio 44070-5333 (216) 228-9400 www.utu.org
Medical Malpractice BAD DOCTORS G. Randall Green, MD, JD St. Joseph s Hospital Health Center Syracuse, New York The nature of the crisis US not in a medical malpractice litigation crisis US in a medical
The Facts About Medical Malpractice in Pennsylvania Congress Watch March 2004 Public Citizen s Congress Watch i Medical Malpractice in Pennsylvania Executive Summary Section I: Lawsuits Are Not Responsible
A REASONABLE PERSPECTIVE ON RECREATIONAL INJURY LIABILITY James C. Kozlowski, J.D., Ph.D. 1988 James C. Kozlowski Driving an automobile is probably the most dangerous activity in our daily lives. Certainly,
K a n s a s L e g i s l a t i v e R e s e a r c h D e p a r t m e n t Kansas Legislator Briefing Book 2015 L-1 Health Care Stabilization Fund and Kansas Medical Malpractice Law L-2 The Health Care Compact
By Darryl S. Weiman, M.D., J.D. Federal Tort Claims Act Passed by Congress in 1946 to reduce the negative impacts of the doctrine of sovereign immunity Designed to eliminate the practice of congressman
Executive summary and overview of the national report for Denmark Section I Summary of findings There is no special legislation concerning damages for breach of EC or national competition law in Denmark,
Injured on the Job Your Rights under FELA Quick Facts: What To Do If Injured 1. Consult your own doctor for treatment. Give your doctor a complete history of how your injury happened. Make sure that the
CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET OFFICE U.S. Congress Washington, DC 20515 Douglas W. Elmendorf, Director October 9, 2009 Honorable Orrin G. Hatch United States Senate Washington, DC 20510 Dear Senator: This letter
PROPOSITION 46: MEDICAL MALPRACTICE LAWSUITS CAP AND DRUG TESTING OF DOCTORS INITIATIVE September 2014 SDCTA Position: OPPOSE Rationale for Position: Raising the medical malpractice lawsuits cap will drive
Act No. 204 Public Acts of 2012 Approved by the Governor June 26, 2012 Filed with the Secretary of State June 27, 2012 EFFECTIVE DATE: June 27, 2012 Introduced by Rep. Shaughnessy STATE OF MICHIGAN 96TH
Jennifer L. La Fayette Final Analysis Legislative Service Commission Sub. S.B. 179 124th General Assembly (As Passed by the General Assembly) Sens. Wachtmann, Jacobson, Prentiss, Mumper Reps. Seitz, Manning,
MEDICO/LEGAL ASSOCIATION ALICE SPRINGS 2002 MEDICAL NEGLIGENCE The World Changes In considering what some have called the crisis in medical negligence we need to bear in mind that there has been a large
ANNALS OF HEALTH LAW ADVANCE DIRECTIVE VOLUME 19 SPRING 2010 PAGES 306-315 The Effect of Medical Malpractice Jonathan Thomas * I. INTRODUCTION: WHAT IS MEDICAL MALPRACTICE Every year, medical malpractice
Department of Legislative Services Maryland General Assembly 2004 Session HB 1237 FISCAL AND POLICY NOTE House Bill 1237 Judiciary (Delegate Vallario, et al.) Health Care Malpractice - Mandatory Mediation
ECRI Institute Perspectives Rise in office-based surgery and anesthesia demands vigilance over safety Advances in technology and anesthesia allow invasive procedures once done only in hospitals or ambulatory
CHAPTER 7 NURSING LIABILITY INSURANCE We have all read many articles on and heard seminar speakers advocate why nurses should not buy professional liability insurance. However, in our opinion, there are
By Gareth R Thomas & Corbett Haselgrove- Spurin CONTENTS Page Topic 1 Aims and Objects Introduction What is ADR? Mediation 2 Ground rules for mediation 3 Steps in a mediation Advantages of mediation Why
STATEMENT OF CHERYL NIRO Incoming Member, Standing Committee on Medical Professional Liability Member, House of Delegates On Behalf of the AMERICAN BAR ASSOCIATION Before the Committee on Health, Education,
Qualified Settlement Funds: A Quick Guide for Trial Lawyers By Jason D. Lazarus, Esq. Introduction Assume you just settled a personal injury case for John Doe who is married to Jane. John has a significant
Common Myths About Personal Injury and Wrongful Death Cases 1 By B. Keith Williams There are several myths about accident cases and the attorneys that handle them. It is important to keep these myths in
9 THE AMERICAN LAW INSTITUTE Continuing Legal Education Third Party Litigation Funding: Pros, Cons, and How It Works November 1, 2012 Telephone Seminar/Audio Webcast Alternative Litigation Funding Conference
Is What You Know About Injury Claims Accurate? Presented by: Attorney Mark L. Krueger www.kh-law.net IS WHAT YOU KNOW ABOUT INJURY CLAIMS ACCURATE? Misconception No. 1 I have no claim if the responsible
A BILL FOR AN ACT NO. \32S RELATING TO TORTS. BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF HAWAII: SECTION 1. Chapter 671, Hawaii Revised Statutes, is amended by adding five new sections to be appropriately
Series: Malpractice From A-Z First of a Series of Five Medical Malpractice Insurance: The Implications and Complications By Philip R. Dupont & Maggie L. Nigro You ou should be aware that the new Missouri
LC001 01 -- S 0 S T A T E O F R H O D E I S L A N D IN GENERAL ASSEMBLY JANUARY SESSION, A.D. 01 A N A C T RELATING TO BUSINESSES AND PROFESSIONS - NURSES - NURSE LICENSURE COMPACT Introduced By: Senators
AMENDED IN ASSEMBLY APRIL 14, 2015 california legislature 2015 16 regular session ASSEMBLY BILL No. 597 Introduced by Assembly Member Cooley February 24, 2015 An act to amend Sections 36 and 877 of, and
History of the Workers' Compensation Court For the Senate Joint Resolution No. 23 Study Prepared for the Revenue and Transportation Interim Committee by Megan Moore, Legislative Research Analyst Legislative
WORKERS COMPENSATION IN RHODE ISLAND A SUMMARY OF THE LAW PREPARED BY ATTORNEY GARY J. LEVINE 369 SOUTH MAIN STREET PROVIDENCE, RI 09203 401-521-3100 www.workerscompri.com TABLE OF CONTENTS INJURIES COVERED
LC Paper No. CB(2)517/05-06(01) SUBMISSION OF THE LAW SOCIETY S WORKING PARTY TO THE LEGCO LEGAL AFFAIRS PANEL REGARDING THE OPERATIONS OF RECOVERY AGENTS IN HONG KONG 1. This is a submission of the Recovery
Medical Malpractice Litigation What to Expect as a Defendant Being named as a defendant in a malpractice suit may be your first exposure to civil litigation. You will probably wish it would just go away.
ANNUAL REPORT Per SCR 111 of 2007 BY LOUISIANA PATIENT S COMPENSATION FUND October 1, 2008 A BRIEF HISTORY OF THE LOUISIANA PATIENT S COMPENSATION FUND In the early 1970 s, a problem of crisis proportions
the compensation myth The Compensation Myth It is common to hear stories of the Compensation Culture or claims that Britain is becoming Risk Averse as a result of people claiming compensation. The truth
California Workers Compensation Medical Provider Network Employee Notification & Guide In partnership with We are pleased to introduce the California workers compensation medical provider network (MPN)
Less than zero: The effect on clinics of raising MICRA s $250,000 cap By Jay Angoff This white paper addresses the effect on Community Health Centers of increasing California s $250,000 limit on compensation
The Project on Medical Liability in Pennsylvania Funded by The Pew Charitable Trusts PENNSYLVANIA MALPRACTICE STUDY General Public Survey Small Business Survey Conducted by Princeton Survey Research Associates,
This document is made available electronically by the Minnesota Legislative Reference Library as part of an ongoing digital archiving project. http://www.leg.state.mn.us/lrl/lrl.asp.~l' ''''d:.,j i.;'~\;
The Ohio State University Knowledge Bank kb.osu.edu Ohio State Law Journal (Moritz College of Law) Ohio State Law Journal: Volume 15, Issue 4 (1954) 1954 Law and Medicine: A Report on Interprofessional
CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET OFFICE COST ESTIMATE March 10, 2003 H.R. 5 Help Efficient, Accessible, Low-cost, Timely Healthcare (HEALTH) Act of 2003 As ordered reported by the House Committee on Energy and Commerce
RECENT MEDICAL MALPRACTICE CASES By Judge Bryan C. Dixon 1. MERE TELEPHONE CONVERSATION WITH TREATING DOCTOR DOES NOT ESTABLISH DUTY TO PATIENT Jennings v. Badgett, 2010 OK 7 Facts: Plaintiffs are parents
MEDCHI, THE MARYLAND STATE MEDICAL SOCIETY HOUSE OF DELEGATES CL Report 3-13 INTRODUCED BY: SUBJECT: REFERRED TO: Council on Legislation A Fifty State Survey of Tort Reform Provisions Reference Committee
Making Sure The Left Hand Knows What The Right Hand Is Doing Representing Health Care Providers In Medical Negligence Cases by: Troy J. Crotts, Esq. Florida Continues as National Leader in Disciplinary
Checklist of Current Problems in the Workers Compensation System General Workers compensation, the nation s oldest social insurance program, is broken. Introduced as a no-fault program to provide medical
Working with the Physician s Counsel in Defending Off-Label Use Litigation By Gerald P. Schneeweis Morris Polich & Purdy LLP Working with the Physician s Counsel in Defending Off-Label Use Litigation By
MONTANA SELF INSURERS ASSOCIATION Executive Director Bob Worthington Board of Directors Rick Clark Plum Creek Timber Co Tim Fitzpatrick MT Schools Group Donna Haeder NorthWestern Corp Marv Jordan MT Contractors
Prepared by: Barton L. Slavin, Esq. 1. Identify Insurance Company - On the Police Report there is a three digit code that identifies the insurance company for a vehicle. The following link will take you
Senate Bill No. 292 Senator Roberson CHAPTER... AN ACT relating to civil actions; providing immunity from civil actions for a board of trustees of a school district or the governing body of a charter school
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC05-1150 IN RE: PETITION TO AMEND RULE 4-1.5(F)(4)(B) OF THE RULES OF PROFESSIONAL CONDUCT / COMMENTS OF DAN CYTRYN, ESQUIRE OF LAW OFFICES CYTRYN & SANTANA, P.A.
S.B. SENATE BILL NO. SENATOR ROBERSON MARCH, Referred to Committee on Judiciary SUMMARY Revises provisions relating to certain civil actions involving negligence. (BDR -) FISCAL NOTE: Effect on Local Government:
2007 Medical Malpractice Claims Report Department of Commerce & Insurance November 1, 2007 2007 Tennessee Medical Malpractice Report INTRODUCTION In 2004, the Tennessee General Assembly enacted 2004 Tenn.
california legislature 2015 16 regular session ASSEMBLY BILL No. 597 Introduced by Assembly Member Cooley February 24, 2015 An act to amend Sections 36 and 877 of, and to add Chapter 6 (commencing with
AN ACT IN THE COUNCIL OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA Codification District of Columbia Official Code 2001 Edition 2007 Winter Supp. West Group Publisher To amend AN ACT To provide for regulation of certain
N e w Y o r k S t a t e S e n a t e Notice of Public Hearing SUBJECT: Medical Malpractice Reform Senate Standing Committee on Insurance Neil D. Breslin, Chair Senate Standing Committee on Health Thomas
of Workers Compensation Systems in Select Jurisdictions JURISDICTION: TEXAS ENVIRONMENT Population Size 19.3 million in 1997. Labour Force 8 million (1997) Demographic and Economic Indicators has enjoyed
VIRGINIA ACTS OF ASSEMBLY -- 2015 SESSION CHAPTER 585 An Act to amend and reenact 38.2-2206 of the Code of Virginia and to amend the Code of Virginia by adding in Article 7 of Chapter 3 of Title 8.01 a
Physicians on Medical Malpractice Reform Options Survey Methodology This survey was conducted online from August 31 October 31, 2012. Invitations for the survey were emailed to physicians who have been