1 Journal of Empirical Legal Studies Volume 4, Issue 1, , March 2007 Do the Claims Hold Up? A Study of Medical Negligence Claims Against Neurologists Lee D. Cranberg, M.D., Thomas H. Glick, M.D., and Luke Sato, M.D.* We performed an in-depth review of each of the 42 closed medical malpractice claims filed in the past 20 years against neurologist defendants covered by a common insurer. For each case, we determined whether the neurologist had rendered harmful, substandard care and noted the case outcome. In 23 of 42 claims (55 percent), there had been no harmful negligence, and payment on behalf of the neurologist occurred only once. The other 19 claims had negligent harm, but in 13 of them (68 percent) no payment was made on behalf of the negligent neurologist. In our series, the medical negligence system performed poorly, yielding a majority of inappropriate claims and no payment in a majority of appropriate claims. Several studies have investigated whether medical negligence claims yield merited outcomes. (1 9) We sought to expand this body of knowledge by studying a series of claims against neurologists. I. Methods The data for the current study are identical to the data used in a previous report, (10) but the data are analyzed differently here. The previous report, emphasizing patient safety, assessed whether the neurologist committed *Address correspondence to Lee D. Cranberg, M.D., Division of Neurology, Cambridge Health Alliance, 1493 Cambridge St., Cambridge, MA 02139; phone: ; fax: ; Cranberg is also at Harvard Medical School. Glick is at the Division of Neurology, Cambridge Health Alliance and Harvard Medical School. Sato is at Harvard Medical School and with The Risk Management Foundation of the Harvard Medical Institutions, Inc. 2007, Copyright the Authors Journal compilation 2007, Cornell Law School and Blackwell Publisher, Inc. 155
2 156 Cranberg et al. harmful, preventable errors. This report, applying the standard of tort law, assesses whether the neurologist committed harmful, negligent errors. 1 The data are drawn from all 42 closed claims (resolved by withdrawal, dismissal, settlement, or judgment) since 1986 that involved at least one staff or resident neurologist defendant covered by Controlled Risk Insurance Company (CRICO), the sole malpractice insurer for all Harvard-affiliated medical institutions and their staff, and its patient-safety and riskmanagement arm The Risk Management Foundation of the Harvard Medical Institutions (RMF). Two of us who are neurologists (L.D.C., T.H.G.) reviewed the entire case files including medical records, expert reports, and legal documents. For each case, the two of us agreed whether or not there had been substandard neurologic care that caused significant patient harm. We used the legal definition of substandard care that is, care below the standard that would be expected of any neurologist under similar circumstances. (We made no formal assessment of the quality of care rendered by non-neurologist defendants.) We then looked at the outcome of the claims to see if payments were matched to harmful, substandard care. Since it was only the neurologist s care that was being evaluated, we tabulated only whether payments were made on behalf of the neurologist defendants. In a case with co-defendants from other specialties, if payments to the plaintiff were made on behalf of the other specialist(s) but no payment was made on behalf of the neurologist defendant, the case was counted as a no-payment case. Conversely, if any fraction of the payment to the plaintiff was made on behalf of the neurologist defendant, the case was tallied as a payment case. II. Results Of the 42 claims, four were formal requests for compensation that did not evolve into lawsuits. The remaining 38 claims started as or became lawsuits. The non-lawsuit cases were comparable in character and outcome to the lawsuit cases. 2 1 Also, upon further reflection by us, one case we had previously reported as having no significant patient harm has been reclassified and is reported here as having significant patient harm. 2 No payment was made on behalf of the neurologist defendants in any of the four non-lawsuit cases. Of the three cases that were withdrawn by the plaintiff, the neurologist defendant met the
3 A Study of Medical Negligence Claims Against Neurologists 157 Table 1: Care Received from the Neurologist Defendant(s) Versus Outcome Payment N (%) No Payment N (%) Totals N (%) Harmful substandard care 6 (32%) 13 (68%) 19 (100%) No harmful substandard care 1 (4%) 22 (96%) 23 (100%) Totals Note: p = (two-tailed Fisher s exact test). Payments on behalf of neurologist defendants in seven cases (Table 1) ranged from low (less than $100,000) to high (more than $500,000). All payments occurred as part of a settlement agreement between the plaintiff and the defendant s insurer. No payment occurred as a result of a trial verdict, as all trial verdicts were in the defendants favor. In the 35 cases without payment on behalf of a neurologist defendant, five received money from settlement with non-neurologist defendants, at which point the claim against the neurologist was dropped. The remaining 30 cases received no payment on behalf of any defendant and were comprised of 18 withdrawn by the plaintiff, nine with a jury verdict in favor of the defendant, two dismissed by a judge before trial, and one with a binding arbitration decision in favor of the defendant. Of the 18 withdrawn cases, harmful substandard care was present in five. Nineteen cases had harmful substandard care by a neurologist and 23 did not. Of these 23, the patient suffered no harm in 10, harm because of the illness in four, harm because of unavoidable iatrogenic injury in three, and harmful error in six that might have been obviated by more proactive, dogged, and team-oriented care by the neurologist, whose care, nonetheless, was not substandard. In most of these six cases, the cardinal error had been made by a non-neurologist, as exemplified by Case 1. Case 1. While he was in the hospital under the care of an endocrinologist, a 65-year-old diabetes patient fell and may have struck his head. The patient appeared to recover quickly and seemed fine to the endocrinologist. The endocrinologist spoke on the phone with a neurologist, who reportedly said that no brain imaging (such as CT or MRI) was necessary unless the patient developed new symptoms or signs. The neurologist did not offer to see the patient, nor was he asked to. The patient was discharged from the hospital the next day, but standard of care in two but not in one. In the fourth case, the neurologist defendants had not met the standard of care, but the claim against them was dropped after settlement with non-neurologist defendants.
4 158 Cranberg et al. two days later he became comatose. He was then admitted to a different hospital, where a large intracranial hemorrhage (subdural hematoma) was discovered. Despite surgery to remove the hematoma, the patient died. Of the 19 cases with harmful substandard care, payment was made in six. These six cases included some with highly regrettable outcomes due to definite errors. Case 2. A 22-year-old woman developed sudden left-sided weakness and numbness that resolved after a matter of hours. A neurology resident in the emergency room did not consider the correct diagnosis of transient ischemic attack (a short-lived focal neurological deficit that is often a warning for an impending stroke) nor did the resident consult with a supervising neurologist. The patient was sent home. Three days later, the patient had a major stroke, and she was left with inability to use her left arm, a weak left leg, blindness in the left field of vision, cognitive deficits, a need to rely on others for routine daily activities, and prominent self-consciousness about her disfigurement. In her case, the stroke probably could have been prevented with proper treatment. The case was settled in the high range. Case 3. A 26-year-old man had new-onset epileptic seizures. A head CT scan revealed a brain abnormality that the radiologist tentatively attributed to a brain tumor, and the radiologist advised obtaining an MRI. However, even though the patient then saw the neurologist five times over the course of nine months, no further imaging study of any sort was performed. By the time such study was performed, it revealed a malignant brain tumor that was much larger than it had been originally. At surgery it was impossible to remove all of the tumor. The case was settled in the high range. Of the 19 cases with harmful, substandard care, 13 (over two-thirds) did not result in payment even though many of them also had highly regrettable outcomes. Case 4. A 32-year-old woman was referred for neurology consultation when she developed leg numbness the day after hysterectomy surgery. A neurology resident documented that the patient had a number of signs (warm, tender, swollen leg; a positive stretch sign ) pointing to swelling in a muscular compartment of the leg, a condition requiring emergency surgery to prevent leg damage. However, the senior consulting neurologist ignored the resident s findings, gave an alternate diagnosis that proved to be erroneous, recommended no treatment, and failed to follow up on the patient in the ensuing three days by which time the patient had permanent nerve damage and permanent loss of function in the leg. The plaintiff lost at trial. Case 5. An 18-year-old man hit his head and perhaps suffered a concussion while playing rugby, and he then had headaches that persisted for weeks. He was seen by a neurologist, who did not order any imaging study, such as a head CT scan. However, the neurologist did recommend a follow-up appointment, which the patient did not keep. When a head CT scan was obtained about a week later by a different physician, a very large and lifethreatening subdural hematoma was present. Surgery removed the hematoma, but because of its large size at that point, some brain damage was incurred. The patient was left with neurologic deficits, including a seizure disorder. The case was withdrawn before trial.
5 A Study of Medical Negligence Claims Against Neurologists 159 Table 2: Medical Negligence Claims: Quality of Care Rendered and Outcome Brennan et al. (1) Taragin et al. (2) Cheney et al. (3) Farber et al., (4) White (5) Cranberg et al. Percentage of Claims with Negligence Unclear No negligence Percentage of Claims Resulting in Payment, by Claim Type Claims with Negligence a Unclear No negligence a 16 4 Number of Claims 46 8,231 1, a Calculated by omitting cases for which the payment outcome was unknown. Source: Adapted from White. (5) Patients given adequate care almost never received payment. Of the 23 patients whose neurologic care met the standard, only one received payment. Payments were made almost exclusively (six of seven payments) in cases of negligent harm. 3 This finding was statistically significant (p = 0.034). III. Discussion Our study joins several others that have investigated the merits and outcomes of medical malpractice claims. (1 9) Table 2 summarizes those studies that have evaluated claims according to whether patient harm had been due to the tort requirement of negligence. Studies of malpractice claims evaluated by other criteria, such as whether the harmful care was avoidable (6) or 3 The one case that resulted in payment on behalf of a non-negligent neurologist was that of a two-and-a-half-year-old child who was rendered blind after neurosurgeons failed to perform surgery to remove bilateral subdural hematomata that were causing increased intracranial pressure. The defendants were a pediatric neurology fellow and a staff neurosurgeon. The pediatric neurology fellow was rotating through the neurosurgery service at the time, was low man on the neurosurgical team, and did not have the authority to decide whether to operate. Since it was our judgment that he had abided by the standard of care for neurologists, we did not think payment should have been made on his behalf. However, in the ultimate settlement agreement, responsibility was ascribed at 20 percent for him and at 80 percent for the neurosurgeon. (As explained in Section I, we did not make a formal judgment about the quality of care rendered by the neurosurgeon.)
6 160 Cranberg et al. defensible, (7) or contained error, (8) are not included in the table. Also excluded from the table is one study (9) with insufficient numerical data. Like Cheney et al. (3) and the study by Farber and White, (4,5) and unlike the other studies in Table 2, our assessment of whether a physician s care had been substandard was made by physicians whose specialty was the same as that of the defendant. We did not necessarily adopt the insurer s assessment of whether negligence was present but instead made our independent assessment after a review of records, including the neurologist expert witness reports for both the plaintiff and defendant. Our focus on neurologists was a limitation of our study. We did not judge the care rendered by non-neurologist defendants or tally payments on their behalf, whereas the other studies in Table 2 gauged the care and outcome for all defendants. 4 Because the number of cases in our series is small and because all our cases are drawn from one insurer and one specialty, the generalizability of our findings is uncertain. Nonetheless, our key findings are in line with previous studies. A significant proportion of claims filed (55 percent in our study; a range of 40 to 80 percent in the other studies) were in cases without negligence. The evidence suggests that the explanation for this phenomenon has less to do with cunning plaintiffs or lawyers hoping for an undeserved windfall than it does with the paucity of information available to plaintiffs and their attorneys before filing a claim. (8,11) Often, it is only during the discovery process of a lawsuit, when records are received and expert opinions rendered, that plaintiffs can learn the full story of what happened to them and recognize that perhaps some or all of the defendants named in a claim had, in fact, abided by the standard of care. (8,11) Whereas defendants were negligent or not in roughly equal numbers, payments were incurred almost exclusively by the negligent defendants. In our series, a plaintiff was eight times more likely to receive payment if the defendant had rendered substandard care than if the defendant had not (32 percent vs. 4 percent). 5 In fact, in our series there was only one case in which 4 One possible exception is Cheney et al., (3) a study of claims against anesthesiologists. It is not clear from their report whether they assessed the care or outcome for non-anesthesiologist co-defendants. 5 In our series, the proportion of cases resulting in payment whether they be negligent cases (0.32) or non-negligent ones (0.04) is lower than those of the other series displayed in Table 2. Part of the explanation is that our figures do not include payments on behalf of
7 A Study of Medical Negligence Claims Against Neurologists 161 payment was made for non-negligent care. 6 The other studies displayed in Table 2 show a similar pattern of negligent cases yielding payment (56 91 percent of such cases) more often than non-negligent ones (16 47 percent), indicative of a system with some ability to sift negligent cases meriting payment from non-negligent ones. Unfortunately, the sifting has been far from perfect, resulting in two types of mismatches: payment for non-negligent cases and no payment for negligent ones. The former mismatch arising in 4 to 47 percent of cases (see Table 2) understandably worries physicians. Non-culpable defendants on whose behalf payment is made often feel unjustly convicted and fined, and they incur undeserved grief, besmirched reputation, and possible personal financial loss. The other mismatch (no payment despite negligent harm) is also unjust. The medical tort system failed to pay 13 of 19 (68 percent) deserving plaintiffs in our series 7 and from 9 to 44 percent of deserving plaintiffs in the other series in Table 2. Five of the 13 unpaid but deserving cases in our series were withdrawn before trial. We have the impression that the financial and psychic expenses and serial legal successes required to prevail in a severalyear-long malpractice lawsuit were overwhelming for many of the plaintiffs and/or their attorneys. This study and others based on claims data undoubtedly understate the inadequacy of the medical tort system to compensate deserving patients since claims data necessarily do not include the unknown number of aggrieved patients who did not file a claim. Money can rarely truly compensate for a plaintiff s loss, 8 which may include death or life-changing disability, but lack of financial compensation for unnecessary, negligent injury can be doubly embittering to plaintiffs and non-neurologist defendants. Another reason may be that CRICO refuses to settle any defensible case. 6 See note 3. 7 In five cases, the claim against the neurologist was dropped after settlement with nonneurologist defendants. In three of them the neurologist had rendered substandard care, and in two of them the neurologist had abided by the standard of care. Even if the designation of all five of these cases is changed to deserving cases with payment, still about 50 percent of deserving cases would not have received any payment. 8 For one family s experience, see Gilbert, S. M. ( 1997) Wrongful Death: A Memoir. New York: W.W. Norton & Company.
8 162 Cranberg et al. their families. After having been let down by the health-care system, they are let down by the legal system as well. References 1. Brennan, T. A., C. A. Sox, & H. R. Burstin (1996) Relation Between Negligent Adverse Events and the Outcomes of Medical Malpractice Litigation, 335 New England J. of Medicine Taragin, M. I., L. R. Willett, A. P. Wilczek, R. Trout, & J. L. Carson (1992) The Influence of Standard of Care and Severity of Injury on the Resolution of Medical Malpractice Claims, 117 Annals of Internal Medicine Cheney, F. W., K. Posner, R. A. Caplan, & R. J. Ward (1989) Standard of Care and Anesthesia Liability, 261 J. of the American Medical Association Farber, H. S., & M. J. White (1994) A Comparison of Formal Versus Informal Dispute Resolution in Medical Malpractice, 23 J. of Legal Studies White, M. J. (1994) The Value of Liability in Medical Malpractice, 13(4) Health Affairs Sloan, F. A., & C. R. Hsieh (1990) The Variability in Medical Malpractice Payments: Is the Compensation Fair? 24 Law & Society Rev Phillips, R. L. Jr., L. A. Bartholomew, S. M. Dovey, G. E. Fryer Jr., T. J. Miyoshi, & L. A. Green (2004) Learning from Malpractice Claims about Negligent, Adverse Events in Primary Care in the United States, 13 Quality and Safety in Health Care Studdert, D. M., M. M. Mello, A. A. Gawande, T. K. Gandhi, A. Kachalia, C. Yoon, A. L. Puopolo, & T. A. Brennan (2006) Claims, Errors, and Compensation Payments in Medical Malpractice Litigation, 354 New England J. of Medicine Sloan, F. A., P. B. Githens, E. W. Clayton, G. B. Hickson, D. A. Gentile, & D. F. Partlett (1993) Suing for Medical Malpractice. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. 10. Glick, T. H., L. D. Cranberg, R. B. Hanscom, & L. Sato (2005) Neurologic Patient Safety: An In-Depth Study of Malpractice Claims, 65 Neurology Farber, H. S., & M. J. White (1991) Medical Malpractice: An Empirical Investigation of the Litigation Process, 22 Rand J. of Economics 199.
Medical Malpractice Litigation What to Expect as a Defendant Being named as a defendant in a malpractice suit may be your first exposure to civil litigation. You will probably wish it would just go away.
Policy Research Perspectives Medical Liability Claim Frequency: A 2007-2008 Snapshot of Physicians By Carol K. Kane, PhD Introduction This report presents a snapshot of physicians experiences with medical
Filed 10/22/99 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION FIVE DILLON BOLTON, Plaintiff and Appellant, B123278 (Super. Ct. No. SC037295)
Common Myths About Personal Injury and Wrongful Death Cases 1 By B. Keith Williams There are several myths about accident cases and the attorneys that handle them. It is important to keep these myths in
Medical Malpractice: What You Don t Know Can Hurt You O. William Brown, MD, JD Chief, Division of Vascular Surgery William Beaumont Hospital Interim Chief, Division of Vascular Surgery Wayne State University
Personal Injury Law: Minnesota Medical Malpractice Medical Malpractice Terms Statutes of Limitations Minnesota Medical Malpractice Laws Medical malpractice includes many forms of liability producing conduct
Medical Malpractice BAD DOCTORS G. Randall Green, MD, JD St. Joseph s Hospital Health Center Syracuse, New York The nature of the crisis US not in a medical malpractice litigation crisis US in a medical
THE VALUE OF LIABILITY IN MEDICAL MALPRACTICE by Michelle J. White Prologue: In the debate over reforming the U.S. health care system, there are relatively few areas of agreement among the various parties
The Accuracy of the Medical Malpractice System: What the Evidence Tells Us Michelle Mello, JD, PhD Harvard School of Public Health 1 Today s discussion 1. The MIMEPS study 1. Methodology 2. Descriptive
Posner KL: Data Reveal Trends in Anesthesia Malpractice Payments. ASA Newsletter 68(6): 7-8 & 14, 2004. Full Text Early results from the ASA Closed Claims Project showed that payments in anesthesia lawsuits
How to Select a Lawyer by J. Sherrod Taylor Persons with traumatic brain injury (TBI) and their families must make many important decisions in the early days following injury. One significant decision-that
WHAT IS LEGAL MALPRACTICE IN CALIFORNIA? A client who sustains harm as a direct result of legal malpractice can file a civil lawsuit against the attorney who was responsible for causing that harm. MICHAEL
The Petrylaw Lawsuits Settlements and Injury Settlement Report TRAUMATIC BRAIN INJURIES How Minnesota Juries Decide the Value of Pain and Suffering in Brain Injury Cases The Petrylaw Lawsuits Settlements
What Is My Injury Claim Worth? How insurance companies evaluate your injury accident case Based on California law. Written by a California licensed injury accident lawyer for Californians. Provided for
Informed Consent, Wisconsin-Style Are You Meeting the Reasonable Patient Standard? February 2013 Lockton Companies Informed consent is a fundamental aspect of patient care. NANCY LAMO RN/BSN, JD, CPHRM
2014 IL App (1st) 122440-U SECOND DIVISION July 29, 2014 No. 1-12-2440 NOTICE: This order was filed under Supreme Court Rule 23 and may not be cited as precedent by any party except in the limited circumstances
Making Sure The Left Hand Knows What The Right Hand Is Doing Representing Health Care Providers In Medical Negligence Cases by: Troy J. Crotts, Esq. Florida Continues as National Leader in Disciplinary
PRODUCT LIABILITY Product Liability Litigation The Effect of Product Safety Regulatory Compliance By Kenneth Ross Product liability litigation and product safety regulatory activities in the U.S. and elsewhere
Policy Research Perspectives Professional Liability Insurance Indemnity and Expenses, Claim Adjudication, and Policy Limits, 1999-2008 By José R. Guardado, PhD Introduction This report presents information
STEPS IN A LOUISIANA PERSONAL INJURY LAWSUIT Having at least a basic understanding of the most common steps involved in a typical personal injury case may help empower you as a victim. Broussard & Hart,
Association of Personal Injury Lawyers GOVERNMENT PROPOSALS FOR REFORM OF LEGAL CLAIMS AGAINST THE NHS A BRIEFING FROM THE ASSOCIATION OF PERSONAL INJURY LAWYERS (APIL) CONTENTS Introduction 3 5 ways for
The following article is from National Underwriter s latest online resource, FC&S Legal: The Insurance Coverage Law Information Center. The Insurance Coverage Law Information Center LIABILITY CLAIMS COSTS
Andrew M. Morse firstname.lastname@example.org direct: 801.322.9183 fax: 801.363.0400 Introduction Andrew Morse is the president of SCM, serves on the firm's Executive Committee, and its Snow Trial Services team. He also
The Indiana Trial Lawyer Association s Lifetime Achievement Seminar Honoring Peter L. Obremsky May 23-24, 2005 The Use of Medical Literature in the Brain Injury Case Thomas C. Doehrman Doehrman-Chamberlain
Advocate Magazine March 2011 Why medical malpractice still matters. Despite MICRA limitations, medical-negligence claims still have a crucial role in society BY BRUCE G. FAGEL We all know the statistics
Mandatory Arbitration The Alternative To Trial By Christopher M. Davis, Attorney at Law 206-727-4000 Phone: 206-727-4000 Fax: 206-727-4001 email@example.com Copyright 2007 by Christopher Michael
CatastrophiC injury / Wrongful Death 360 www.mpplaw.com about our practice Morris polich & purdy llp has a team of seasoned trial attorneys dedicated to handling, in both state and federal court, high-exposure
FACT PATTERN ONE The following facts are based on the case of Bedard v. Martyn  A.J. No. 308 The infant plaintiff developed a large blood clot in his brain at some time either before or during the
21 st Annual Health Law Institute 2015-8635 March 13, 2015 Session #2 10:30 am 12:00 noon The End of Malpractice Litigation? Improving Care and Communications to Reduce Risk Charles J. Chulack, III, Esq.
Malpractice Reform: In Search of an Approach that is Rational, Fair, and Promotes Quality Improvement Joshua B. Murphy, JD Mayo Clinic Legal Department Rochester, MN Presenter Disclosures Joshua B. Murphy,
Information You are asking advice from Thomson Snell & Passmore about a possible clinical negligence claim. Such claims are complex and it would greatly assist your understanding of the issues if you read
Tipp FM Legal Slot 29 th May 2012 Medical Negligence John M. Lynch, Principal Today I will discuss medical negligence following a number of recent high profile cases and inquests. Firstly, what is Medical
Guide to Malpractice Insurance for Naturopathic Physicians Whether you re a new Naturopathic Physician or have been practicing for decades, making sure you have the right malpractice insurance policy is
CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET OFFICE U.S. Congress Washington, DC 20515 Douglas W. Elmendorf, Director October 9, 2009 Honorable Orrin G. Hatch United States Senate Washington, DC 20510 Dear Senator: This letter
Things You Should Know About Your Child s Personal Injury Case Virginia law treats often children differently than it treats adults for many reasons. Children are not considered mature enough to understand
Types of Brain Injury The bones of your skull are hard and they protect your brain. Your brain is soft, like firm Jell-O. When your head moves, your brain moves inside your skull. When your head is hit
March 1, 2010 I. FIRM NEWS 1. On March 19, 2010 firm member, Thomas F. Gallagher, Esquire gave a presentation in Mount Laurel, New Jersey on relevant statutory immunities for community based youth sports
The Malpractice Lawsuit: Process and Prevention Advocate Health Care 7 th Annual Advocate Trauma Symposium Wyndham Lisle - Chicago November 18, 2010 Rogelio Lasso The John Marshall Law School BACKGROUND
CASE INFORMATION SHEET FLORIDA LEGAL PERIODICALS, INC. P.O. Box 3370, Tallahassee, FL 32315-3730 (904) 224-6649/(800) 446-2998 * FAX (850) 222-6266 COUNTY AND COURT: CIRCUIT COURT, POLK COUNTY, Bartow,
Products Liability and Insuring Protection ForanGlennonPalandechPonzi&Rudloff PC Personal Injury Property Damage Economic Loss User (consumer) of ultimate product containing spring gets injured or dies.
William Gallagher Associates Introduction to Medical Malpractice Insurance What is Medical Malpractice Insurance? Insurance, in general, is the practice of sharing your risk with a large number of individuals
Virtual Mentor American Medical Association Journal of Ethics March 2009, Volume 11, Number 3: 242-246. HEALTH LAW Difficult Patient-Physician Relationships and the Risk of Medical Malpractice Litigation
Virtual Mentor American Medical Association Journal of Ethics January 2013, Volume 15, Number 1: 46-50. HEALTH LAW Medicine, the Law, and Conceptions of Evidence Valarie Blake, JD, MA Evidence-based medicine
XARELTO BLEEDING RISKS AND POTENTIALLY FATAL SIDE EFFECTS 1 In 2011, a new anticoagulant drug was approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The new drug Xarelto was marketed as a more convenient
Brain Injury Litigation Peter W. Burg Burg Simpson Eldredge Hersh & Jardine, P.C. www.burgsimpson.com Some General Facts About Traumatic Brain Injury TBIs contribute to a substantial number of deaths and
A GUIDE TO PURCHASING LAWYER S PROFESSIONAL LIABILITY INSURANCE IN VIRGINIA Presented By The Virginia State Bar's Special Committee on Lawyer Malpractice Insurance May 2008 The Need For Professional Liability
State of Connecticut Insurance Department Commissioner Thomas R. Sullivan P.O. Box 816 153 Market Street Hartford, CT 06142-0816 (860) 297-3801 www.ct.gov/cid Connecticut Medical Malpractice Annual Report
Cooper Hurley Injury Lawyers 2014 Granby Street, Suite 200 Norfolk, VA, 23517 (757) 455-0077 (866) 455-6657 (Toll Free) YOUR RIGHTS WHEN YOU ARE INJURED ON THE RAILROAD Cooper Hurley Injury Lawyers 2014
LEGAL ISSUES IN WOUND CARE Contents Litigation.................................... 3 Standards of Care for Wound Care Practice.......... 3 Negligence................................... 4 Malpractice...................................
ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION CENTER 840 Newport Center Drive Suite 450 Newport Beach, CA 92660-6324 Telephone: (949) 760-5288 Fax: (949) 760-5289 NFL, RETIRED PLAYERS RESOLVE CONCUSSION LITIGATION; COURT-APPOINTED
Step-by-step guide to pursuing a medical negligence claim Suffering from medical negligence can be a painful and distressing experience for anyone. This short guide offers some advice to help people thinking
QUESTION NO. 3 Amendment to Titles 1 and 3 of the Nevada Revised Statutes CONDENSATION (ballot question) Shall Title 1 of the Nevada Revised Statutes governing attorneys, and Title 3 of the Nevada Revised
Personal Injury Lawyers The personal injury lawyers of the Law Office of Mayer Gordon are aggressive, creative and tenacious in helping victims of car accidents, truck accidents,motorcycle accidents, wrongful
Page 1 of 7 Ben Brodhead on proving causation and damages in spinal fusion cases. Friend on Facebook Follow on Twitter Forward to a Friend Proving Causation and Damages in Spinal Fusion Cases By: Ben C.
30 N LaSalle Street Suite 1524 Chicago, IL 60602 Telephone: (312) 262 6700 Facsimile: (312) 262 6710 Attorneys at Law THE FIRM With over 40 years of combined litigation experience, Adria Mossing and Jim
Board for Physician Workforce Spotlight on National Tort Reform & Reform in the Surrounding States August 2010 Tort reform continues to be a highly debated issue at both the state and national level. In
Position Statement on Medical Liability Reform The North American Spine Society (NASS) is a multidisciplinary medical organization dedicated to fostering the highest quality, evidence based and ethical
MALPRACTICE OF HEALTH CARE PROVIDERS Presented by: Michael G. Berry Berry Wilson, LLC 200 East High Street, Suite 300 P.O. Box 1606 Jefferson City, Missouri 65102 Phone: 573-638-7272 firstname.lastname@example.org
Why a Personal Injury Practice Is Different I wrote in the first two editions of this book that starting a personal injury practice is not for the fainthearted. Sadly, that fact is even truer today than
Bar Council response to the Reducing Legal Costs in Clinical Negligence Claims pre-consultation paper 1. This is the response of the General Council of the Bar of England and Wales (the Bar Council) to
Incidental brain cavernomas Information leaflet for people who do not have symptoms from their brain cavernoma Website: www.cavernoma.org.uk E-mail: email@example.com Registered charity number: 1114145
Virtual Mentor American Medical Association Journal of Ethics September 2011, Volume 13, Number 9: 637-641. HEALTH LAW The Jury Is Still Out on Health Courts Valarie Blake, JD, MA In many physicians minds,
VIRGINIA ACTS OF ASSEMBLY -- 2015 SESSION CHAPTER 585 An Act to amend and reenact 38.2-2206 of the Code of Virginia and to amend the Code of Virginia by adding in Article 7 of Chapter 3 of Title 8.01 a
Testimony Before: Senate Codes, Health & Insurance Committees Tuesday, December 1, 2009 10:00 a.m. Hearing Room B, Legislative Office Building Albany, NY Presented By: Dr. William Doscher, MD, FACS Legislative
Impeaching the Spine Injury Medical Expert By Ernest P. Chiodo, M.D., J.D., M.P.H., M.S., M.B.A., C.I.H. Physician-Attorney-Biomedical Engineer It is a common error that an attorney retains the wrong type
3721L.01I AN ACT To amend chapter 383, RSMo, by adding thereto thirteen new sections relating to the Missouri health care arbitration act. BE IT ENACTED BY THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF THE STATE OF MISSOURI,
Illinois Association of Defense Trial Counsel Springfield, Illinois www.iadtc.org 800-232-0169 IDC Quarterly Volume 24, Number 1 (24.1.62) Health Law Update By: Roger R. Clayton, Mark D. Hansen, and J.
FURR & HENSHAW http://www.scmedicalmalpractice.com 1900 Oak Street Post Office Box 2909 Myrtle Beach, South Carolina 29578 (843) 626-7621 (800) 849-2525 firstname.lastname@example.org and 1534 Blanding Street Columbia,
FULL DISCLOSURE OF MEDICAL ERRORS Helen Gulgun Bukulmez, J.D. Josie s Story QuickTime and a decompressor are needed to see this picture. . There is a current and important transformation towards full disclosure
MRI for cervical radiculopathy Referral by a medical practitioner (excluding a specialist or consultant physician) for a scan of spine for a patient 16 years or older for suspected: cervical radiculopathy
MESH CLIENT NEWSLETTER Isssue 2 :: March, 2012 :: Dear Clients, In our last Mueller Law Newsletter, we included information on the difference between a class action and a mass tort. In an effort to keep
UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND SCHOOL OF LAW LEGAL METHOD-CIVIL PROCEDURE (3 Hours) Day Division Wednesday, December 18, 1991 Professor Condlin - Section B 9:10 a.m. - 12:10 p.m. No. Signature: Printed Name: INSTRUCTIONS:
Non-epileptic seizures a short guide for patients and families Information for patients Department of Neurology Royal Hallamshire Hospital What are non-epileptic seizures? In a seizure people lose control
I William J. Leedom Shareholder Phone: 206.622.5511 Email: email@example.com Bill is a distinguished trial lawyer. Over the past forty years, he has represented clients in over 80 jury trials in the state
Chapter 4 Crimes (Review) On a separate sheet of paper, write down the answer to the following Q s; if you do not know the answer, write down the Q. 1. What is a crime? 2. There are elements of a crime.
In the Supreme Court of Georgia Decided: March 27, 2015 S14G0919. GALA et al. v. FISHER et al. HINES, Presiding Justice. This Court granted a writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals in Fisher v. Gala,
2009 Medical Malpractice Claims Report Department of Commerce & Insurance November 1, 2009 Table of Contents 2009 Tennessee Medical Malpractice Report INTRODUCTION...2 I. REPORTING ENTITIES...3 II. REPORTING
TM SM The company you turn to for your Medical-Legal Support solutions. SM Nurse Consultants Comprehensive Medical Record Review Certified Nurse Life Care Planners Medicare Set-Aside Consultants Knowledge.
Introduction What is Personal Injury? Personal injury is any injury that occurs to your person. Most personal injuries are a result of an accident, although some can result from malicious, deliberate intent.
A Guide to the Medical Inquiry and Conciliation Panel The Medical Inquiry and Conciliation Panel Office of Administrative Hearings Department of Commerce and Consumer Affairs State of Hawai`i THIS GUIDE
WATSON, BLANCHE, WILSON & POSNER Recent Developments in Medical Malpractice & Health Law AServing Healthcare Professionals for Over 65 years@ Est. 1945 www.wbwplaw.com Vol. 9 Issue 1 Summer 2013 Malpractice