1 PRB 09-24E ANTI-SPAM LAWS IN WESTERN COUNTRIES: A COMPARISON Alysia Davies Legal and Legislative Affairs Division 18 January 2010 PARLIAMENTARY INFORMATION AND RESEARCH SERVICE SERVICE D INFORMATION ET DE RECHERCHE PARLEMENTAIRES
2 The Parliamentary Information and Research Service of the Library of Parliament works exclusively for Parliament, conducting research and providing information for Committees and Members of the Senate and the House of Commons. This service is extended without partisan bias in such forms as Reports, Background Papers and Issue Reviews. Analysts in the Service are also available for personal consultation in their respective fields of expertise. CE DOCUMENT EST AUSSI PUBLIÉ EN FRANÇAIS
3 CONTENTS Page UNITED STATES...1 AUSTRALIA...3 NEW ZEALAND...5 EUROPEAN UNION...7 UNITED KINGDOM...9
4 ANTI-SPAM LAWS IN WESTERN COUNTRIES: A COMPARISON Canada is the only G8 country that does not currently have specific anti-spam legislation. During the most recent session of the Parliament of Canada, a government bill to implement anti-spam legislation (Bill C-27, the Electronic Commerce Protection Act) reached the Standing Senate Committee on Transport and Communications before Parliament was prorogued on 30 December 2009 and it died on the Order Paper. 1 Other countries have adopted models for their anti-spam legislation that share some similarities with Canada s proposed model, although there are certain differences in the areas of consent, exceptions and penalties. This paper will briefly outline some of the major features of anti-spam legislation in the United States, Australia, New Zealand, the European Union, and the United Kingdom. UNITED STATES The major federal anti-spam legislation in the United States is the Controlling the Assault of Non-Solicited Pornography and Marketing Act of 2003, commonly known as the CAN-SPAM Act. It applies to commercial electronic mail messages, which are defined in section 3(2) as any commercial with a primary purpose of commercial advertisement or promotion of a product or service, which is not an relating to a business transaction or relationship. The consent model used in the CAN-SPAM Act is opt-out (section 5), which means that consent to receive can be considered implicit unless the recipient opts out and indicates he or she no longer wishes to receive such . (This can be accomplished by various means, such as following the unsubscribe instructions at the end of a commercial , or clicking on a link provided to facilitate opting out.) The law requires that a commercial electronic mail message include: 1 For a legislative summary of the bill, see Alysia Davies, Bill C-27: Electronic Commerce Protection Act, LS-645E, Parliamentary Information and Research Service, Library of Parliament, Ottawa, rev. 13 November 2009, ls=c27&source=library_prb&parl=40&ses=2.
5 2 (i) (ii) a functioning return address or other Internet-based mechanism permitting the recipient to opt out, which remains functional for at least 30 days after the initial was sent (section 5(a)(3)(A)(i) and (ii), and section 5(a)(5)(A)(ii)); clear and conspicuous identification that the message is an advertisement or solicitation (section 5(a)(5)(A)(i)); and (iii) a valid physical postal address of the sender (section 5(a)(5)(A)(iii)). There are various exceptions that permit certain types of s to be sent in a different manner, as well as certain interactions between federal and state laws that remove other types of s from federal jurisdiction. s related to an existing transaction or business relationship, such as those related to benefit plans, account balances, product recalls, upgrades, warranties, product safety, and subscriptions, are exceptions to the definition of commercial electronic mail message, and do not have to follow the opt-out rules under the CAN-SPAM Act s definition. The CAN-SPAM Act does cover fraudulent or deceptive s, but only to the extent that these s are not already dealt with under state laws about other forms of computer crime. If a fraudulent or deceptive falls under the state statutes as an integral part of another type of computer crime that is governed at the state level, the CAN-SPAM Act does not apply (see section 8(b)(2)(B)). However, the federal CAN-SPAM Act supersedes all state laws that specifically regulate spam , so if the problematic nature of the is based on its being spam alone, the federal statute governs in place of the state one. (This holds true even if the state anti-spam law is more restrictive than the federal one, as is the case in several states, including California.) If there is a breach of the CAN-SPAM Act, there are administrative, civil and criminal penalties available, depending on which provisions are violated. Administrative actions are initiated by the Federal Trade Commission (FTC), the main enforcement body for the CAN-SPAM Act, since violations under the Act are considered to be unfair or deceptive trade acts or practices. Civil actions may be brought in the courts either by a state attorney general, or by an Internet Service Provider (ISP) under certain conditions, although no private right of action is available to an ordinary citizen. Criminal prosecutions are dealt with by the federal Department of Justice.
6 3 Certain other agencies are also involved in enforcing the CAN-SPAM Act, depending on what kind of institution may have committed a violation and whether it already has an enforcement body associated with its activities. For example, if a national bank is a spammer, the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency will be the enforcement body for the purposes of the CAN-SPAM Act. If a broker or dealer is a spammer, the Securities and Exchange Commission will become involved. Other potential enforcement bodies include the Federal Communications Commission, the Farm Credit Administration, the Secretary of Agriculture and/or the Secretary of Transportation, among others, in connection with regulated activities in particular sectors of the economy (section 7(b)). In terms of penalties, criminal violations of the CAN-SPAM Act, which include various fraudulent acts such as falsifying header information and gaining unauthorized access to computers to use them for spamming, are punishable by fines under the criminal provisions of Title 18 of the United States Code and/or a prison term of up to five years, three years or one year, depending on the nature of the offence. It is also possible to seek forfeiture of a spammer s assets in criminal cases (section 4). In civil cases, statutory damages of up to either $1,000,000 or $2,000,000 may be awarded, depending on whether the action is brought by an ISP or a state attorney, plus aggravated damages where warranted (sections 7(f) and (g)). With respect to administrative actions, the FTC has its normal powers under the Federal Trade Commission Act (section 7(d)), which appear to include the ability to either issue administrative orders (the violation of which can result in a fine of up to $11,000 per violation), or prosecute certain cases before the courts in a manner similar to the Department of Justice. 2 Injunctions may also be issued (section 7(f)(2)). AUSTRALIA In Australia, spam is regulated by the Spam Act The activity to which it applies is described in detail the Act s definition of commercial electronic message covers a message sent using an Internet or other carriage service to an account or an instant messaging, telephone or similar account (section 5) and relating to a specific list of commercial 2 Federal Trade Commission, A Brief Overview of the Federal Trade Commission s Investigative and Law Enforcement Authority, rev. July 2008,
7 4 purposes (section 6). (It does not, however, include faxes or telephone voice calls.) 3 The term message is further defined to specify that it includes text, data, speech, music, other sounds, visual images (animated or otherwise), or any other form of information (section 4). The specified list of purposes that render a message commercial include: advertising; promoting or offering to supply goods, services, land or an interest in land; or a business opportunity for investment. Any message that is intended to dishonestly obtain a gain, financial advantage or property belonging to another person by means of deception is also included in the definition (section 6). The exceptions to this definition are listed in Schedule 1 to the Act, titled Designated commercial electronic messages. While these exceptions must, like commercial message senders, still include information about the individual or organization that authorized the sending of the message (in compliance with section 17 of the Act), they do not have to observe the section 16 ban on unsolicited communications or the section 18 requirement to include a means of unsubscribing. The exceptions include messages that contain no more than factual information, accompanied by certain specific features such as contact information of the sender and author, that are not commercial (Schedule 1, section 2), as well as any messages authorized by government bodies, registered political parties, religious organizations, and charities (Schedule 1, section 3). Another exception consists of messages sent by educational institutions to students or alumni (Schedule 1, section 4). Further exceptions may be specified by regulation (Schedule 1, section 5). The consent model is detailed in Schedule 2 to the Act, which focuses on an optout regime. Consent can be inferred from the conduct of an individual or organization, as well as their business and other relationships (Schedule 2, section 2). There is also a conspicuous publication provision which states that although electronic message addresses cannot be harvested for use merely because they are publicly posted, they may be used to contact certain categories of people. A specific list of examples includes addresses publicly posted in an official capacity for employees, directors, partners, and holders of a statutory office (Schedule 2, sections 4(2)(a) and (b)). However, if those addresses are posted with a disclaimer indicating that the account-holder does not wish to receive unsolicited commercial electronic messages, then they cannot be harvested for that purpose (Schedule 2, section 4(2)(d)). 3 See section 5(5) of the Act and section 2.1 of the Spam Regulations 2004.
8 5 Enforcement is pursued via the courts, specifically the Federal Court of Australia, which can award civil penalties for violations of the Act, as well as compensation to any victims, and/or forfeiture of any financial benefit to the Crown where warranted. The courts may also order injunctions, and accept undertakings from violators to cease certain types of activity. Court actions are initiated and prosecuted by the Australian Communications and Media Authority (ACMA), the main enforcement body for the Act (section 26). Where the Court determines that a third party has been a victim of a violation of the Act, either the ACMA or that third party may apply for compensation for the victim to be paid in addition to the civil penalties (section 28). The amount of the penalty can vary depending on whether the violator has a prior record, whether it is an individual or a body corporate, and which provision of the Act has been violated (section 25(1)). The penalties are expressed in the form of penalty units, an Australian term for a fine specified by the Crown which is revised and updated on a regular basis. The highest penalties are for cases where a violator has sent unsolicited commercial electronic messages, or has aided, abetted, counselled, procured, induced, been knowingly concerned in or conspired with others to send such messages. In such a case, the maximum penalty for an individual without a prior record is 20 penalty units per violation, to a maximum of 400 penalty units per day for multiple violations. The maximum penalty for a corporation without a prior record is 100 penalty units per violation to a maximum of 2,000 penalty units per day for multiple violations. (The maximums increase if the violator has a prior record.) The current federal penalty unit in Australia is A$110, 4 which would make a civil penalty of 400 units worth A$44,000, and one of 2,000 units worth A$220,000. The maximum penalties for other violations of the Act, such as not including accurate sender information, are lower. NEW ZEALAND New Zealand s anti-spam activities are regulated under the Unsolicited Electronic Messages Act It contains many similarities to the Australian legislation, with some particular refinements of its own. 4 Crimes Act 1914, Section 4AA.
9 6 A commercial electronic message is defined as a message, using a telecommunications service and sent to an electronic address, to market or promote goods, services, land, an interest in land or a business or investment opportunity, or to assist or enable dishonest financial advantage or gain, whether via direct communication or a link (sections 5 and 6). As with the Australian legislation, an electronic message includes a message sent to an account or an instant messaging, telephone or similar account, but does not include voice calls and faxes (Schedule to the Act). It also includes all the specific forms of information such as text, video and sound that are listed in the Australian legislation (section 4). The New Zealand legislation provides a very specific list of exceptions to what constitutes a commercial electronic message (section 6). Not included in the definition are messages that: provide a quote or estimate for goods and services requested by the recipient; facilitate, complete or confirm an agreed-upon commercial transaction; provide warranty information, product recall information or safety/security information about goods or services purchased by the recipient; provide notification of factual information about a subscription, membership, account, loan or similar ongoing relationship; provide information directly related to an employment relationship or benefit plan; deliver goods or services, such as product upgrades, that the recipient is entitled to receive under a previous transaction; provide the recipient with information about goods or services from a government body or court/tribunal; fulfill other purposes specified by the regulations. Commercial electronic messages must contain the usual requirements of accurate sender information and an unsubscribe facility, and cannot be unsolicited (sections 9 11). The consent model in the Act is an opt-out model, which allows consent to be inferred from the conduct, business and other relationships of the persons concerned, in addition to any other circumstances specified by regulation (section 4). The Act also contains the conspicuous publication provision, which allows electronic addresses to be harvested if they have been placed publicly online in an official capacity without a disclaimer indicating that they are not to be used for unsolicited electronic messages (section 4).
10 7 Enforcement duties are carried out by the Department of Internal Affairs, which has an Anti-Spam Compliance Unit that takes complaints and carries out investigations. 5 It can issue warnings and infringement notices, and accept undertakings from a violator (section 19(b) and (c)). This unit is also responsible for applying to the courts to obtain remedies for violations of the Act (section 19(c)). Matters under the Act may be taken to the District Court or the High Court, depending on the type of violation (sections 37 and 38 of the Act). In addition, a private right of action is available in New Zealand to any person affected by a violation of the Act (section 19(a)), and the Department s enforcement unit may apply to join in any such action (section 19(c)). The courts can impose civil penalties for a violation of the Act of up to NZ$200,000 for a person or NZ$500,000 for an organization (sections 45 and 48), as well as awarding compensation and/or damages as the circumstances warrant (sections 46 and 48). EUROPEAN UNION European Union (EU) directives are required to be implemented into legislation in all of the 27 member countries. The EU Directive on privacy and electronic communications 6 was introduced in 2002, and its key components have since been incorporated into various forms of national legislation in the member countries, including in the United Kingdom, which will be discussed at further length in the next section of this paper. The Directive on privacy and electronic communications builds upon and interacts with an earlier directive from 1995, the Data Protection Directive, 7 which laid the template for privacy legislation in all of the member countries. The Data Protection Directive anticipated some of the issues with spam, and contained general principles that continue to be applied in the spam-fighting context New Zealand Department of Internal Affairs, Anti-Spam, wpg_url/services-anti-spam-index. Directive 2002/58/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 July 2002 concerning the processing of personal data and the protection of privacy in the electronic communications sector (Directive on privacy and electronic communications), OJ L 201, , pp Directive 95/46/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 24 October 1995 on the protection of individuals with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data (Data Protection Directive), OJ L 281, , pp
11 8 The EU directives apply to all direct marketing communications by automatic calling machines, fax or (Article 13(1) of the Directive on privacy and electronic communications). The consent model is opt-in, based on the precedent already established by the Data Protection Directive, which has used an opt-in model based on express consent in situations involving electronic privacy from its inception. This principle has been incorporated and widely implemented in all of the countries under EU jurisdiction (Article 13 of the Directive on privacy and electronic communications, Article 14(b) of the Data Protection Directive). There is an exception in the Directive on privacy and electronic communications, which permits contact information consensually provided by customers in the context of the sale of a product or service to be used for direct marketing of similar products or services by that same company, on an opt-out consent basis. However, the customer must be given the opportunity to opt out at the time of the collection of this contact information in the first instance, as well as via any later contact (Article 13(2) and Preamble Article 41 of the Directive on privacy and electronic communications). It should be noted that this exception is for electronic contact details for electronic mail only and is not applicable to direct marketing via the other methods covered in Article 13 of the Directive on privacy and electronic communications, i.e., fax or automatic calling machines. Opt-in consent remains the standard for these. The handling of person-toperson marketing calls is left to national discretion to some degree, within the framework of existing privacy legislation (Preamble Article 42 of the Directive on privacy and electronic communications). Electronic mail is defined as any text, voice, sound or image message sent over a public communications network which can be stored in the network or in the recipient s terminal equipment until it is collected by the recipient (Article 2 of the Directive on privacy and electronic communications). There is also a distinction in European law between a natural person, i.e., a person, and a legal person, which includes a corporation or other organization. Privacy is considered to be a right under the European legal framework, and the consent provisions are designed to protect the rights of all individual natural persons who may be the recipients of direct marketing, regardless of the sender or medium. In cases where a legal person, i.e., a corporation or organization in general, rather than an actual individual person, is the recipient of
12 9 direct marketing attempts, the member countries are given more discretion to regulate their own solutions, such as allowing companies to join an opt-out register to prevent receipt of such attempts. However, some protection is required to be legislated for them as well, whatever form it may take (Article 13(5) and Preamble Article 45 of the Directive on privacy and electronic communications). Sending direct marketing via a disguised or concealed identity, or without an opt-out unsubscribe mechanism, is prohibited (Article 13(4) of the Directive on privacy and electronic communications). Enforcement bodies and penalties are left to be designated by the national legislation in each member country. UNITED KINGDOM As with the European Union legislation, the United Kingdom s anti-spam rules build upon the privacy legislation framework it already has in place. The EU Directive on privacy and electronic communications has been incorporated into British law by means of the Privacy and Electronic Communications (EC Directive) Regulations 2003 ( the Regulations ), which interact with the UK s pre-existing Data Protection Act 1998 ( the Act ) to provide specific anti-spam measures. The British anti-spam rules apply to all direct marketing communications by automatic calling machines, fax or (which includes text, voice, sound or image sent via electronic communications). The British have exercised their national discretion to include voice-to-voice telephone calls in their rules as well (sections 2 and of the Regulations). As prescribed by the EU directive, and consistent with the data privacy approach used throughout Europe, the consent model is opt-in (sections of the Regulations and 7 12 of the Act). As per the EU directive, there is an exception contact information that is consensually provided by customers in the context of the sale or negotiations for sale of a product or service may be used for direct marketing of similar products or services on an opt-out basis (section 22 of the Regulations). It would appear that do-not-call registries and do-not-fax registries are also in operation (sections 25 and 26 of the Regulations).
13 10 It is prohibited to send an covered by the Regulations without including an accurate identity for the sender and a valid address for unsubscribing (section 23 of the Regulations). Enforcement is provided by Britain s Information Commissioner, who oversees both the Act and the Regulations, and who investigates complaints and makes findings in the form of various types of notices (sections of the Regulations and Part V of the Act). The findings of the Commissioner may be appealed to the Information Tribunal, which can hear appeals on any decision notices, information notices, enforcement notices, and special information notices issued by the Commissioner (section 48 of the Act). Further appeals may be made to the courts on points of law only (section 49 of the Act). Failure to comply with any notice issued by the Information Commissioner is a criminal offence subject to prosecution and a penalty fine up to the statutory maximum, which is currently 5,000 in England and Wales, and 10,000 in Scotland 8 (sections 47 and 60 of the Act). 9 A private right of action is also available through the courts to any person wishing to claim damages resulting from a violation of the Regulations (section 30 of the Regulations). 8 9 Criminal Justice Act 1982, s. 74, as read with the Magistrates Courts Act 1980, s. 32(9) (for England and Wales), as amended by the Criminal Justice Act 1991, s. 17; Criminal Procedure (Scotland) Act 1995, s. 225(8), as amended (for Scotland). The only instance in which a different penalty amount may be imposed under the Act is for obstruction of or failure to provide assistance with the execution of a warrant or the inspection of overseas information systems by the Commissioner. The fine in this case can go up to the top level of the standard scale (a different measure than the statutory maximum), which is 5,000 in England, Scotland and Wales (Criminal Justice Act 1982, s. 37, as substituted by the Criminal Justice Act 1991, s. 17 (for England and Wales) and by the Criminal Procedure (Scotland) Act 1995, s. 225 (for Scotland)).
Privacy Bulletin April 2014 Key Differences between US and Canadian Anti-Spam Laws Canada's Anti-Spam Law (or "CASL") will be in effect in July 2014, about ten years after the U.S. has enacted its anti-spam
SUMMARY OF PUBLIC LAW 108-187 THE CAN-SPAM ACT OF 2003 On December 16, 2003, President Bush signed into law the CAN-SPAM Act of 2003. CAN-SPAM stands for "Controlling the Assault of Non-Solicited Pornography
Overview of Current Anti-Spam Regulations Privacy, Data Collection and Information Management Practice Team The proliferation of unsolicited commercial e-mail, more commonly known as spam, has prompted
DECEMBER 2003 Congress Passes New Anti-Spam Legislation On December 16, 2003, President Bush signed into law the Controlling the Assault of Non-Solicited Pornography and Marketing Act (the CAN-SPAM Act
Spam Act 2003: A practical guide for business This guide provides practical information to businesses that send electronic messages. It explains the main requirements of the Spam Act 2003 (the Spam Act),
Unsolicited Electronic Messages Act 2007 Prohibiting Spam and promoting good business practice This guide provides practical information so businesses can ensure they meet the requirements of the Unsolicited
BIZ SERVICE PROVIDER CAN-SPAM Compliance & Data Verification Policy Document BSP CAN-SPAM Policy & Data Verification Guide BSP Page 1 of 5 Version 8.1 Effective Date; May 2015 BIZ SERVICE PROVIDER I. Summary
Spam Act 2003: An overview for business This overview has been designed for: small businesses that wish to gain an understanding of the Spam Act; and senior managers within firms that send electronic messages.
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) on Anti-Spam Legislation On December 16, 2003, the President signed the CAN-SPAM Act of 2003 (S.877) into law, which went into effect January 1, 2004. Though the legislation
Crawford Chondon &Partners LLP Present Is your Business Ready for Canada s Anti Spam Law? By: Michael MacLellan Overview 1. What is Canada s Anti-Spam Legislation, and how will it apply? 2. What does CASL
Communications and Information Technology Commission THE ANTI-SPAM REGULATORY POLICY FRAMEWORK FOR THE KINGDOM OF SAUDI ARABIA Final Version 23/02/2008 Submitted to: Submitted By: Acceptance of Deliverable
dentons.com Focus on Communications Canada s New Anti-Spam Legislation: Overview and Implications for Businesses January, 2011 Contact Margot Patterson Dentons Canada LLP Counsel, Ottawa firstname.lastname@example.org
Canada s New Anti-Spam Regime: Practical Compliance Tips and Guidance for Your Organization Eloïse Gratton, Partner Janine MacNeil, Partner February 6, 2014 Overview 1) Introduction 2) CASL Requirements
The DMA s Analysis of Can Spam Act of 2003 December 11, 2003 The following is a Direct Marketing Association analysis of the Can Spam Act of 2003 (S. 877), which Congress sent to the President for signing
December 11, 2013 Canada s Anti-Spam Laws and Implications for the Health Industry Presented by: Kathryn Frelick, Co-chair, National Health Industry Group email@example.com 416.595.2979 OVERVIEW
Canada s Anti-Spam Law ( CASL ): It s the Law on July 1, 2014 questions for directors to ask Author: Jennifer Babe, LL.M, ICD.D Why Should I Read This Alert? a) despite its name, this Act covers much more
Journal of Applied Business and Economics Can Spam Be Legislated? Karen L. Hamilton Columbus State University Robert A. Fleck, Jr. Columbus State University Spam, the unsolicited email that shows up in
OHA BACKGROUNDER Canada s Anti-Spam Legislation (CASL) May 2014 In December 2010, the federal government passed Bill C-28, the Fighting Internet and Wireless Spam bill, referred to as Canada s Anti-Spam
TO: FROM: SUBJECT: JCOTS CYBERCRIMES ADVISORY COMMITTEE PATRICK CUSHING, JOINT COMMISSION ON TECH NOLOGY AND SCIENCE HB 1354 - WIRELESS DEVICES; UNSOLICITED MESSAGES AND IMAGES SENT THERETO; PENALTY DATE:
The Do Not Call Register Act 2006 and The Spam Act 2003 Jane Cole Manager, Telemarketing Investigations Section Julia Cornwell McKean Manager, Anti Spam Team Real Estate Industry Initiative - 2009 1 Presentation
AN OVERVIEW OF CANADA S ANTI-SPAM LEGISLATION These materials are provided for general information only and do not constitute legal advice. Readers are encouraged to seek legal advice for any particular
Managing the message Canada s new anti-spam law sets a high bar According to a recent Deloitte poll, only 13% of organizations say they understand CASL requirements and have begun to apply them to their
Anti-SPAM Policy v.3 06-01-2011 Each user must agree to this policy. comf5 has a no tolerance policy for the sending of spam and unsolicited email, and we prohibit the use of third-party, purchased, rented,
Draft Regulations to illustrate the Treasury s current intention as to the exercise of powers under clause 5 of the Small Business, Enterprise and Employment Bill. D R A F T S T A T U T O R Y I N S T R
Boston Chicago New Jersey New York Orange County Philadelphia E-mail Marketing: Practical Tips for CAN-SPAM Act Compliance One of the most persuasive forms of advertising is direct marketing, which consists
FTC FACTS for Business ftc.gov FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION FOR THE CONSUMER 1-877-FTC-HELP The CAN-SPAM Act: A Compliance Guide for Business D o you use email in your business? The CAN-SPAM Act, a law that
STATUTORY INSTRUMENTS 2013 No. 233 ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION The Timber and Timber Products (Placing on the Market) Regulations 2013 Made - - - - 6th February 2013 Laid before Parliament 8th February 2013
I ICO guidance Guidance on political campaigning 3 Guidance on political campaigning Data Protection Act Privacy and Electronic Communications Regulations Contents Introduction... 3 A. Why comply?... 5
PRB 99-38E INSIDER TRADING Margaret Smith Law and Government Division 22 December 1999 PARLIAMENTARY RESEARCH BRANCH DIRECTION DE LA RECHERCHE PARLEMENTAIRE The Parliamentary Research Branch of the Library
117 STAT. 2699 Public Law 108 187 108th Congress An Act To regulate interstate commerce by imposing limitations and penalties on the transmission of unsolicited commercial electronic mail via the Internet.
Draft Regulations to illustrate the Treasury s current intention as to the exercise of powers under clause 4 of the the Small Business, Enterprise and Employment Bill. D R A F T S T A T U T O R Y I N S
9 Summary of California Law (10th), Corporations I. INTRODUCTION A. In General. 1. [ 1] Nature of Corporation. 2. [ 2] Reserved Legislative Power Over Corporation Law. 3. [ 3] Statutory Development. 4.
Trext Details: Texting Best Practices, Legality and Security 1 For questions contact Kira McCoy: (303)-947-6583 firstname.lastname@example.org I. Texting Best Practices (Based on research from CTIA, Cellular Telecommunications
Psychoactive Substances Act 2016 CHAPTER 2 Explanatory Notes have been produced to assist in the understanding of this Act and are available separately Psychoactive Substances Act 2016 CHAPTER 2 CONTENTS
13-25a-101. Title. This chapter is known as the "Telephone and Facsimile Solicitation Act." Enacted by Chapter 26, 1996 General Session 13-25a-102. Definitions. As used in this chapter: (1) "Advertisement"
Legal Affairs 1625 North Market Blvd., Suite S 309, Sacramento, CA 95834 www.dca.ca.gov Legal Guide CR-9 CREDIT REPAIR SERVICES (California Civil Code 1789.10 et seq.; 15 U.S.C.A. 1679 et seq.) January
STATE OF ARKANSAS APPRAISER LICENSING AND CERTIFICATION BOARD APPRAISAL MANAGEMENT COMPANY STATUTES 1 ARKANSAS APPRAISER LICENSING AND CERTIFICATION BOARD APPRAISAL MANAGEMENT COMPANY STATUTES SUBCHAPTER
MASSACHUSETTS IDENTITY THEFT RANKING BY STATE: Rank 23, 66.5 Complaints Per 100,000 Population, 4292 Complaints (2006) Updated January 17, 2009 Current Laws: Identity Crime: A person is guilty of identity
COMPUTER MISUSE AND CYBERSECURITY ACT (CHAPTER 50A) (Original Enactment: Act 19 of 1993) REVISED EDITION 2007 (31st July 2007) An Act to make provision for securing computer material against unauthorised
Exercising Your Right of Consent to and Opt-out from Direct Marketing Activities under the Personal Data (Privacy) Ordinance 1 It is common for members of the public to receive unsolicited telephone calls,
[First Reprint] SENATE COMMITTEE SUBSTITUTE FOR SENATE, No. 0 STATE OF NEW JERSEY th LEGISLATURE ADOPTED MARCH, 00 Sponsored by: Senator JOSEPH CONIGLIO District (Bergen) Assemblyman JEFF VAN DREW District
Resource Sheet Surveying with CustomerGauge - Legal Considerations: Adam Dorrell Please Note this is not a legal document, and should be used for guidance only. You are advised to seek legal advice before
Miller Thomson Legal Alert on Canada s Upcoming Anti-Spam Legislation Canada s Anti-Spam Legislation (CASL) Are You Ready? 2 No One Falls For These Scams, Do They? Nigerian 419 scam lead to Australians
Arizona State Senate Issue Brief September 17, 2015 Note to Reader: The Senate Research Staff provides nonpartisan, objective legislative research, policy analysis and related assistance to the members
Privacy Law in Canada Federal and provincial privacy legislation has a profound impact on the way virtually all organizations carry on business across the country. Canada s privacy laws, while likely the
Federal Regulations on Advertising: Phone, Fax, or E-mail By Jordan B. Hansell 700 Walnut, Suite 1600 Des Moines, Iowa 50309 Telephone: 515-283-8166 Facsimile: 515-283-8018 email@example.com Disclaimer
OCCUPATIONS CODE TITLE 8. REGULATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL AND INDUSTRIAL TRADES CHAPTER 1303. RESIDENTIAL SERVICE COMPANIES As Revised and in Effect on September 1, 2009 Texas Real Estate Commission P.O. Box
MISLEADING ADVERTISING GUIDE Complying with The Competition Act CREA THE CANADIAN REAL ESTATE ASSOCIATION Table of Contents Introduction...............................................2 What is Misleading
Acceptable Use Policy TERMS & CONDITIONS www.tagadab.com INTRODUCTION Tagadab has created this (AUP) for our customers to protect our resources, our customer s resources, and to ensure that Tagadab Ltd
STATUTORY INSTRUMENTS 2004 No. 2095 FINANCIAL SERVICES AND MARKETS The Financial Services (Distance Marketing) Regulations 2004 Made - - - - 4th August 2004 Laid before Parliament 5th August 2004 Coming
304.15-717 Circumstances under which life settlement transactions are unlawful -- Required statement regarding false information -- Furnishing information regarding fraudulent life settlement acts. (1)
PRB 99-38E CANADA BUSINESS CORPORATIONS ACT: INSIDER TRADING Penny Becklumb Law and Government Division Revised 14 October 2008 PARLIAMENTARY INFORMATION AND RESEARCH SERVICE SERVICE D INFORMATION ET DE
S T A T U T O R Y I N S T R U M E N T S 2015 No. 1945 FINANCIAL SERVICES AND MARKETS The Small and Medium Sized Business (Credit Information) Regulations 2015 Made - - - - 26th November 2015 Coming into
2012 Email and Text Message Campaigns Justine Young Gottshall Partner, InfoLawGroup What s the Risk? Effective and active marketing area This makes it a target for litigation and enforcement action Consumer
ARE YOU DOING E-MAIL MARKETING? LEGALLY? Copyright 2008, Michael D. Jenkins, J.D., CPA All Rights Reserved Since so many small businesses now do a substantial part of their marketing on the Internet, it
Unsolicited Electronic Messages Ordinance Guide for the Public Revised in April 2012 Table of Content Chapter 1 - Introduction... 2 Chapter 2 - Scope of the UEMO... 3 Criterion 1- message type... 3 Criterion
ARTICLE 29 Data Protection Working Party 11601/EN WP 90 Opinion 5/2004 on unsolicited communications for marketing purposes under Article 13 of Directive 2002/58/EC Adopted on 27 February 2004 This Working
BBB Wise Giving Alliance & The International Committee of Fundraising Organizations Advancing Trust in the Charitable Sector Federal Trade Commission, Bureau of Consumer Protection Allison M. Lefrak, Attorney,
Senate General Assembly File No. 757 February Session, 2014 (Reprint of File No. 191) Substitute Senate Bill No. 209 As Amended by Senate Amendment Schedule "A" and House Amendment Schedule "A" Approved
The Australian Guidelines for Electronic Commerce March 2006 Commonwealth of Australia 2006 ISBN 0 642 74333 9 This work is copyright. Apart from any use as permitted under the Copyright Act 1968, no part
Acceptable Use Policy of UNWIRED Ltd. Acceptance of Terms Through Use This site provides you the ability to learn about UNWIRED and its products and services as well as the ability to access our network
MODEL POLICY CONCERNING SOLICITATIONS SENT BY E-MAIL Disclaimer concerning the Use of this Model Policy: The following is a model that Texas REALTORS may use as a guide to develop an office policy related
Knowledge Practical guide to competition damages claims in the UK Practical guide to competition damages claims in the UK Contents Reforms to damages litigation in the UK for infringements of competition
Model Spent Convictions Bill - Consultation paper Background The Standing Committee of Attorneys-General is working on a project to design a national model Bill for a spent-convictions scheme. A spentconvictions
Broadband Acceptable Use Policy Contents General... 3 Your Responsibilities... 3 Use of Email with particular regards to SPAM... 4 Bulk Email... 5 Denial of Service... 5 Administration of Policy... 6 2
OFFICE OF THE MINISTER OF COMMERCE The Chair CABINET ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE REVIEW OF FINANCIAL PRODUCTS AND PROVIDERS: REGISTRATION OF FINANCIAL SERVICE PROVIDERS PROPOSAL 1 This paper seeks agreement
Voter Contact Registry How to contact Canadians the right way This Guidebook is for general information only. You should always seek independent legal advice for any specific problem or issue. Respecting
Intellectual Property Act 2014 CHAPTER 18 Explanatory Notes have been produced to assist in the understanding of this Act and are available separately 6.00 Intellectual Property Act 2014 CHAPTER 18 CONTENTS
http://www.michie.com/tennessee/lpext.dll/tncode/12ebe/13cdb/1402c/1402e?f=templates&... Page 1 of 1 47-18-2101. Short title. This part shall be known and may be cited as the Tennessee Identity Theft Deterrence
Overview of Mexico s Legislation to Combating Spam By Cristos Velasco, NACPEC *, Mexico January 2005 Unlike the Unites States 1, Mexico does not have an independent anti-spam legislation to control and
1. Introduction Special data protection rules apply to the protection of Personal Data by Data Controllers in the electronic communications sector. These are in addition to the general obligations that
June 10, 2010 2010 Legislative Amendments to the Indiana Code Relating to First Lien Mortgage Act (the Act ) Effective July 1, 2010 (except as otherwise indicated) Questions, Answers, and Administrative
ACCESS, OPENNESS, ACCOUNTABILITY: A Guide to the Newfoundland and Labrador Registry of Lobbyists TABLE OF CONTENTS AN OVERVIEW OF THE LOBBYIST REGISTRATION ACT 3 INTRODUCTION 3 DEFINITIONS 4 LOBBYING 4
Securing safe, clean drinking water for all Enforcement policy Introduction The Drinking Water Inspectorate (DWI) is the independent regulator of drinking water in England and Wales set up in 1990 by Parliament
Investment Business in Bermuda Foreword This memorandum has been prepared for the assistance of those who require information about the Investment Business Act 2003. It deals in broad terms with the requirements
Guidance letter to all political parties regarding European and Local Elections Polling day 24th May 2014 Restrictions on Electronic Direct Marketing / Canvassing I am taking the opportunity to write to
EXPLANATORY MEMORANDUM TO THE COMPENSATION (REGULATED CLAIMS MANAGEMENT SERVICES) ORDER 2006 THE COMPENSATION (SPECIFICATION OF BENEFITS) ORDER 2006 THE COMPENSATION (CLAIMS MANAGEMENT SERVICES) REGULATIONS
Kingdom of Saudi Arabia Communication and Information Technology Commission Public Consultation Document On the Anti-SPAM Policy Framework Rajab 1428 H (July 2007) 1. Introduction SPAM 1 represents a major
Hello. Here at MailChimp, we only allow you to send SMS messages through our SMS app, Gather. Since we're dipping our toe into the SMS-messaging pool, we wanted to give you some information about SMS rules.
CONSULTATION PAPER NO 2. 2004 REGULATION OF GENERAL INSURANCE MEDIATION BUSINESS This consultation paper explains the need for the Island to regulate general insurance mediation business and examines the