1 REVIEW Open Access English law for the surgeon II: Clinical negligence Waseem Jerjes 1,2*, Jaspal Mahil 3 and Tahwinder Upile 3,4 Abstract Traditionally, in the United Kingdom and Europe, the surgeon was generally not troubled by litigation from patients presenting as elective as well as emergency cases, but this aspect of custom has changed. Litigation by patients now significantly affects surgical practice and vicarious liability often affects hospitals. We discuss some fundamental legal definitions, a must to know for a surgeon, and highlight some interesting cases. Review Expert medical opinion is essential in helping the courts to assess whether or not the surgeon has exercised a standard level of care under the circumstances. Depending on the testimony of those professionals, the court should decide if the defendant achieved that standard; in other words: negligent or not . Of course the defendant surgeon standard of care will be compared to the standard of care in the same surgical discipline . Civil law and clinical negligence The civil law of negligence is designed to provide compensation for one individual injured by another s negligence. Negligence can be determined by a threefold test. Initially, a duty of care must be established, a breach to that duty has occurred and this has caused harm to that person . In a surgical setting, it is automatically assumed that the examining or the operating surgeon has a duty of care; difficulty arises where a person has not been accepted as a patient. English law does not oblige anyone to be a Good Samaritan . When that standard of care provided by that surgeon falls below the standard of a responsible body of medical/surgical men and leads to harm to the patient, here the surgeon is found negligent . The custom test is usually applied to assess the surgeon s standard of care. A surgeon is considered to have deviated from normal practice if it was proved that there is a usual and normal practice, this practice was not adopted by the surgeon and the surgeon adopted a * Correspondence: 1 UCL Department of Surgery, University College London Medical School, London, UK Full list of author information is available at the end of the article practice in which no professional man of ordinary skills would have taken . Historically, negligence was recognised as part of the torts until Donoghue v Stevenson was related to the claims of the decomposed remnants of a snail in a ginger beer bottle. Since then a duty of care was established; in this case, the duty of the manufacturers of foods and drinks towards the public . Soon this has been applied in every single field including surgery. During the last half a century, Bolam v Friern Hospital Management Committee laid down the rule when assessing the standard of care in negligence and has been quoted in almost every clinical negligence case in England and Wales. In 1954, John Hector Bolam who suffered from clinical depression agreed to be admitted to a mental health institution run by Friern Hospital Management Committee to undergo electro-convulsive therapy. The procedure involved initiating a number of medically controlled seizures. Prior to the procedure, no relaxant drugs were administered nor were restraints used. Unfortunately, Mr Bolam flailed about violently and suffered multiple injuries including hip fracture. Eventually, Mr Bolam started proceedings against Friern Hospital Management Committee accusing them of negligence for not administering the relaxants, not restraining him and failing to provide fully informed consent as he was never told about the risks involved with such therapy. During the proceedings, expert witnesses had confirmed that the majority of the medical opinions are not in favour of using relaxants and applying restraints as these could actually increase the risks of complications including fractures. The expert witnesses also elaborated 2011 Jerjes et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
2 Page 2 of 6 that, at that time, it is not a common practice to warn the patients about small risk of treatment. During that period, juries were being used for tort cases in England and Wales and it was their duty to hold the defendant liable or not. The jury delivered a verdict in favour of the defendant hospital. Mr Justice McNair said I myself would prefer to put it this way, thatheisnotguiltyofnegligenceifhehasactedin accordance with a practice accepted as proper by a responsible body of medical men skilled in that particular art...at the same time, that does not mean that a medical man can obstinately and pig-headedly carry on with some old technique if it has been proved to be contrary to what is really substantially the whole of informed medical opinion. Thelocus classicus of the test for the standard of care developed from this landmark. The Bolam principle When there are two or more conflicting surgical opinions with regard to diagnosing or treating a patient, the Bolam principle is applied. The technical issues involved with the Bolam principle makes it difficult for the courts when dealing with negligence compared to non-medical cases or cases that does not involve healthcare professionals. Although a duty of care can be easily established but setting the standard of care is very difficult. It is not difficult to find two surgeons disagree on the optimal treatment offered to a single patient. Also, patients arrive to hospital complaining of symptoms; if developed complications post surgery, it would be difficult to establish if it is due to substandard care or just a sequel of their pre-existing symptoms and hence establish the connection between breach of care and harm caused by that breach (i.e. a patient suffering from sensory and/or motor weakness as a result of a fracture; when the fracture is fixed and the symptoms persist, no one can tell if the symptoms are the result from the fracture injury or a post surgical complication). Also, when an intervention or non-intervention is applied and it was found not to improve the prognosis, would the surgeon be hold liable if offered no care? (i.e. a surgeon not performing a laparotomy on a complicated patient suffering from perforation). In 1964, the bankers an advertising partnership, Hedley Byrne, was about to undertake some significant advertising contracts for Easipower Ltd., and wanted to be sure of their financial security . The bankers telephoned the bank of Heller & Partners Ltd. inquiring about the financial state and credit record of their client. Heller vouched for their client s record but qualified it by waiving responsibility, stating that the information was: for your private use and without responsibility on the part of the bank and its officials. Hedley Byrne relied on that information and entered into a contract with Easipower which went bankrupt soon afterwards. Hedley Byrne sued Heller for negligence. The court found that the relationship between the parties was sufficiently proximate as to create a duty of care. Here a reasonable reliance is created and have been applied, alongside with Bolam, to assess negligence in advisory activities (i.e. diagnosis, treatment and prognosis). In Akenzua v Secretary of State for the Home Department , the police were held liable when they released a dangerous criminal, to act as an informant, who was due to be deported. This resulted in the death of a memberofthepublic.thepolicehadadutyofcare towards the public and given the criminal s record, the officials must at least have been reckless and exercising that power must have known that it was illegal. It was enough that it was foreseeable that the criminal would harm somebody. In a similar case, Palmer v Tees Health Authority, a doctor was accused of negligence to diagnose that there was a real, substantial, and foreseeable risk of a psychiatric out-patient committing serious sexual offences against children; this has lead to the murder of a four-year-old child. The court struck out the claim on the grounds that there was no duty of care towards the child, as any child, at any time, was in the same danger. Furthermore, as the patient did not suffer from a treatable mental illness, there was no legal right to either treat or detain the person . A woman developed an abscess after she had her ear pierced by a jeweler. Subsequently she sued for negligence as the instruments used were not aseptically sterile.however,thestandardofcareprovidedbythat jeweler was the same as any other jeweler. Thus, no compensation was given; the woman expected a higher standard of care that may be provided by a surgeon not a jeweler . In West Midlands Regional Health Authority, 2 consultants (physician and surgeon) instead of waiting for sputum results for a patient who presented with symptoms of tuberculosis, carried out an endoscopic diagnostic surgery to rule out other diseases including cancer. The patient, who was subsequently diagnosed with tuberculosis, suffered paralysis of the left vocal cords following damage to the left recurrent laryngeal nerve. The decision of the physician and the surgeon to proceed wassaidbytheirexpertpeerstobereasonableinthe circumstances . A casualty officer in Chelsea & Kensington Hospital, being unwell and failing to attend, gave instructions to discharge three patients who attended earlier to the emergency department. One patient died, later, due to arsenical poisoning, a rare cause of death. The hospital was found negligent in failing to examine the patient but not the death of that patient . The court was
3 Page 3 of 6 satisfied that even if the defendants had performed their duty of care and admitted the deceased to their hospital, he would still have died of arsenic poisoning five hours after being admitted, and that he therefore suffered no loss as a consequence of the breach of duty complained of . When an overtired or overworked surgeon has mistaken a diagnosis or commits a surgical error, he/she is liable to the injured patient. The lack of resources often causes surgeons to work for excessive continuous hours and in one judgment, a judge said the lack of resources should be taken into account in medical negligence claims . But this was later rejected in Brooks v Home Office . In another case, a mother in a high-risk pregnancy had been in labour for 22 hours. The senior registrar applied forceps to assist the delivery. The newborn suffered severe brain damage. The surgeon was not found negligent as the standard of care did not fall below that of a reasonable doctor in the circumstances . A neurosurgeon was not found negligent when he failed to inform the patient of a very low risk (1%) of paraplegia following cervical cord de-compression in which the patient subsequently underwent and suffered this rare complication . It was argued that the doctor doesn t need to provide information about possible remote side effects. Lord Scarman stated I have to say that a judge s preference for one body of distinguished professional opinion to another also professionally distinguished is not sufficient to establish negligence in a practitioner whose actions have received the seal of approval of those whose opinions, truthfully expressed, honestly held, were not preferred. This provided strong endorsement to the Bolam principle. Also, although the court might prefer one body of surgical opinion to other, but this doesn t mean that a surgeon who adopted that opinion can found to be negligent. On a balance of probability, a judge has rejected the appeal in Hotson v East Berkshire Area Health Authority . A 20-year-old and after failing to diagnose the extent of his hip injuries 7 years ago, exhibited deformity of the hip joint and permanent disability. The case was rejected on the grounds that even if the diagnosis had been made correctly, there was still a 75% risk of the plaintiff s disability developing, but that the medical staff s breach of duty had turned that risk into an inevitability, thereby denying the plaintiff a 25% chance of a good recovery, and hence only 25% of the full values of damage were granted. In Wilsher v Essex Area Health Authority , a junior doctor administered excessive oxygen to a premature child during the post-natal care; this lead to blindness. The medical experts provided evidence that there are five further causes that might have lead to blindness. The Lords, therefore, found that it was impossible to say that it had caused, or materially contributed, to the injury and the claim was dismissed. When it comes to trainees, the courts make no allowance when assessing liability. In a number of cases courts has rejected that junior doctors are inexperienced and mistakes can happen. According to the courts, junior doctors are required to adhere to the same standard of care as their senior colleagues; and also seek senior opinion when required. At that stage the term team negligence was introduced. In Jones v Manchester Corporation , the Court of Appeal did not accept the evidence that the inexperience of the doctor has lead him to administer excessive dose of anaesthesia which lead to the patient s death. One point was made clear in this case, a junior doctor, who, recognising his inexperience, calls in his consultant will have discharged his duty. Responsibility in the law will move to the consultant. When it comes to continuous professional development, a doctor is expected to be up to date with all the recent developments in the field, also need to be aware of all the abandoned techniques or therapies. However, where to draw the line, is always debatable. A doctor was found guilty when a patient developed brachial palsy following blood transfusion. The evidence was based on a publication in a prominent journal 6 months previously. It was an interesting case where a judgment was based on a published article. Wisely, the Court of Appeal overturned the case suggesting that it would be impossible to expect every doctor to read every single published article . It used to be acceptable when a surgeon says that his/her current surgical practice was the acceptable practice when he/she started the training years ago, for example. Nowadays this surgeon can be found negligent if its current practice is not up to date. A patient in the Royal Prince Alfred Hospital who had been born with a spinal problem had her spinal cord totally severed, following the operation, leaving her paraplegic. Mr. Justice Reynolds found that a major issue was the relationship between the hospital and the surgeons, that the hospital was not liable or vicariously liable but that the surgeons who performed the operation were negligent . The principle of the so-called super-specialist was well protected by the Bolam principle when a spinal surgeon was not found negligent after operating on a patient who eventually sustained paraplegia. The majority of the evidence provided by his colleagues confirm that the operation represent high-risk and has been abandoned. Only 11 surgeons in the whole country were using such approach .
4 Page 4 of 6 The Bolitho principle Few attempts were employed by the courts to move away from the Bolam principle (or test) but in almost every case higher courts have overruled their appeals. In Bolitho v City and Hackney Health Authority, the claim relates to treatment received by Patrick Nigel Bolitho at St. Bartholomew s Hospitalon1984whenhewastwo years old. Patrick suffered catastrophic brain damage as a result of the bronchial air passages becoming blocked leading to cardiac arrest. The doctor who, negligently, failed to attend said that she would not have intubated the boy even if she would have attended as she weighted risks against benefits; at that time it was agreed that the only course of action to prevent the damage was to have the boy intubated. Six expert witnesses were brought to testify, in which five said they would have carried the procedure and one disagreed. By the end of the trial it was common ground, first, that intubation so as to provide an airway in any event would have ensured that the respiratory failure which occurred did not lead to cardiac arrest and, second, that such intubation would have had to be carried out, if at all, before the final catastrophic episode . The House of Lords held that there would have to be a logical basis for the opinion not to intubate. This means that a judge will be entitled to choose between two bodies of expert opinion and to reject an opinion which is logically indefensible. This has been interpreted as being a situation where the court sets the law for clinical negligence. Sometimes certain conduct might add to the risk of injury, if the defendant engages in such conduct in breach of a common law duty, and if the injury is the kind to which the conduct related, then the defendant is taken to have caused the injury even though the existence and extent of the contribution made by the breach cannot be ascertained. In McGhee v National Coal Board , the House of Lords held that where a breach of duty has a material effect on the likelihood of injury then the subsequent injury will be said to have been caused by the breach. McGhee, who was employed to clean out brick kilns, sued his employer for negligence for failing to provide the proper washing facilities to prevent the outbreak of dermatitis from the accumulation of coal dust on his skin. The issue before the House of Lords was whether the failure to provide the washing facilities had caused the rash. Lord Reid stated: The medical evidence is to the effect that the fact that the man had to cycle home caked with grime and sweat added materially to the risk. Discussion The Bolam principle considered until now to be a good screening modality for standard care. Practice in surgery has not reached the stage of scientific reliability where answer can be given. With Bolam, a test can be validated when two or more genuine and respected reviews are held, as the standard of care is a matter of medical judgment. However academics believe that it seems to overprotect surgeons and also allows them to set their own standards. The main criticism to the Bolam principle as a descriptive test of what is actually done, while negligence cases usually on what should be done. The definition of a competent body of opinion is imprecise and can legitimize marginal practices. Solicitors often find it to be inconsistent with negligence principles generally. The most essential component in negligence is to prove that the surgeon failed under the circumstances to provide an acceptable standard care to his/her patient. The circumstances vary in every single case and it is almost impossible to compare two cases; also every surgeon would react differently to the circumstances depending on the level of experience, knowledge, training and school of thought. The Bolam principle is one way to show that the care provided was standard or substandard. The Bolam principle has been perceived as being reliant on the testimony of the professionals supporting the defendant. The Bolitho case by implication imposes that the standard proclaimed must be justified on a logical basis taking into consideration the risks and benefits. The shift from the Bolam to the Bolitho approach allowed the court to reach its own conclusions based on logic rather than knowledge after taking more enquiring stance to test the medical evidence offered by both parties in litigation. In Penney v East Kent Health Authority, three women developed cervical cancer after a negative screening test. Despite that the claimants slides showed abnormal cells, they were labeled as normal. The health authority defence was that these findings (abnormal cells) are differently interpreted and this should be decided according to the Bolam test. The trial judge and the Court of Appeal agreed that the logical act by a reasonable person is to label these slides as borderline so Bolitho was preferred over Bolam . It was felt that judges used to be reluctant to find surgeons guilty of negligence and many judges used to believe that surgeons needed to be protected from this threat. Lord Denning, as a supporter of the medical profession, in the case of Hatcher v Black  described negligence as a dagger in the doctor s back. It can be always argued that health professionals are human and mistakes and poor practice are unavoidable. Recently, there has been marked increase in the compensation claims against NHS hospital and surgeons. The old belief that surgeons should not be hold liable for their mistakes has now changed .
5 Page 5 of 6 Courts cannot decide whether a surgeon was negligent without expert evidence of accepted surgical practice . In any profession, especially in surgery, genuine differences of opinion may arise. It can be found that both sides of debate advance medical reasons for their respective judgment. Also, if deviation from accepted clinical practice is considered to be negligence; this might reflect badly on the advances in all the surgical fields; this suggests that clinicians will not be able to apply an original technique or surgical procedure without facing suspension and a case of negligence. Lord Clyde in Hunter v Hanley said that such thing could be disastrous and severely affect the progress in medical science . The Compensation Act 2006 was passed as something of a knee-jerk reaction to much publicised claims of a compensation culture. Section 1 of the Act states that a court considering a claim in negligence or breach of statutory duty may, in determining whether the defendant should have taken particular steps to meet a standard of care (whether by taking precautions against a risk or otherwise), have regard to whether a requirement to take those steps might- (a) prevent a desirable activity from being taken at all, to a particular extent or in a particular way, or (2) discourage persons from undertaking functions in connection with a desirable activity. It is unlikely for this act to have any effect on the clinical negligence claims, unless judges decided to accept the claims about defensive medicine and surgery, and determine that allowing physicians and surgeons to be sued damages national healthcare . There has been a recent move to the use of guidelines and deviation from them as a proof of negligence . This has been promoted by changes to The Civil Procedure  which promotes expedience and the use of guidelines even if in the changed rules for disclosure. Unfortunately, as yet many of the guidelines produced by agencies such as NICE have been shown to be flawed even to the extent that they could not be implemented locally because of lack of resources or even patient applicability. NICE has recently been forced to publically apologise for its imposed health inequality for cancer suffers. Even so the House of Lords in Bland  and The Court of Appeal in Burke  regarded guidelines as the extension of the Bolam Principle. Several guidelines have been radically changed because of bias of information selection and committee makeup, with each deviation leading to a new raft of negligence claims. The Bolitho test of logic is preferable in treatment selection even if somewhat arbitrary; this is a further move away from the Bolam Principle. It is believed that guidelines will prevent doctors from implementing professional judgment when dealing with their patients;  in the field of surgery, every patient should be treated on their own merit. An uncertainty is not made more certain by the imposition of an arbitrary logic; similarly a procedure that is subject to variation is difficult to test against general guidelines which are meant to be adapted to the individual circumstances of the patient. The question of professional negligence is problematic because, to a certain degree, each surgical discipline sets itsownstandardsandmaytothatextentbeconsidered self-regulating. It is difficult to strike a balance in law between the interests of the professionals and those who rely on them. Courts believe that Bolitho, although welcomed, is being used mainly in a back-up position . A situation may arise whereby a surgeon has performed many procedures but has through a fortunate chance not had occasion to have a patient who has experienced a specific complication from these procedures. Would the surgeon be correct in quoting their own quite valid risk figures and percentages without quoting the chance complication that none of the patients treated has experienced but which on average may occur for another surgeon. Eventually the complication may happen but how does a wise surgeon inform the patient in a meaningful way? In summary, healthcare at best is empirically imprecise and Bolam provides an ideal compromise to allow for this uncertainty. Unfortunately attempts to regulate surgical practice by outside agencies using an idealistic paradigm has led to the Bolitho view and further judgments which although more legally simplistic to apply is based on constructs of logic and the vagaries of the vox populare that may not withstand the test to time. Unfortunately, until the occasion of the reasonable and unbiased expert witness, many arguments which suggest logic can be critically but subtly flawed, however to rely upon this expert evidence may be fallacious and for a court to decide upon two contrary logical arguments may deviate even further from the truth and eventually justice. Author details 1 UCL Department of Surgery, University College London Medical School, London, UK. 2 Leeds Institute of Molecular Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK. 3 Department of Otolaryngology/Head and Neck Surgery, Barnet and Chase Farm hospitals NHS Trust, Enfield, UK. 4 UCLH Head and Neck Unit, London, UK. Authors contributions All authors contributed to conception and design, carried out the literature research, manuscript preparation and manuscript review. All authors read and approved the final manuscript. Competing interests The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
6 Page 6 of 6 Received: 11 December 2011 Accepted: 21 December 2011 Published: 21 December 2011 References 1. Brazier M, Cave E: Medicine, Patients and the Law. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books;, , Maynard v. West Midlands Regional Health Authority:. 1984, 1 WLR 634 at 638, HL. 3. Jones MA: Medical Negligence. Sweet & Maxwell;, General Medical Council, Good Medical Practice: 2006, para Bolam v Friern Hospital Management Committee: 1957, 1 WLR 582, Hunter v Hanley:. 1955, SC 200 at Donoghue v Stevenson: 1932, AC Hedley Byrne & Co. Ltd. v Heller & Partners Ltd: 1964, AC Akenzua v Secretary of State for the Home Department: 2002, EWCA Civ 1470, (2003) 1 WLR Palmer v Tees Health Authority: 1998, All ER 180; (1999) Lloyd s Medical Reports 151 (CA). 11. Phillips v William Whiteley Ltd: 1938, 1 All ER Maynard v West Midlands Regional Health Authority: 1985, 1 All ER Barnett v Chelsea & Kensington Hospital: 1968, 1 All ER Barnett v Chelsea & Kensington Hospital: 1969, 1 QB Knight v Home Office: 1990, 3 All ER Brooks v Home Office: 1999, 48 BMLR Whitehouse v Jordan: 1981, 1 All ER Sidaway v Bethlem Royal Hospital Governors: 1985, AC Hotson v East Berkshire Area Health Authority: 1987, 2 All ER Wilsher v Essex Area Health Authority: 1988, AC Jones v Manchester Corporation: 1952, 2 All ER Crawford v Charing Cross Hospital, The Times: Albrighton v RPA Hospital: 1980, 2 NSWLR De Freitas v O Brian:. 1995, 25 BMLR 51,  6 Med LR108, CA. 25. Bolitho v City and Hackney Health Authority: 1997, 4 All ER McGhee v National Coal Board: 1972, 3 All ER 1008, 1 WLR Penney v East Kent Health Authority: 2000, 55 BMLR 63,  Lloyd s Rep Med Hatcher v Black, The Times: Woolf Lord: Are the Courts Excessively Differential to the Medical Profession? 9 Medical Review A v Burne: 2006, EWCA Civ 24 at para Hunter v Hanley: 1955, SLT The Compensation Act 2006, Section Samanta A, Mello MM, Foster C, Tingle J, Samanta J: The role of clinical guidelines in medical negligence litigation: a shift from the Bolam standard? Med Law Rev 2006, 14(3):321-66, Autumn. 34. The CPR came into effect on 26 April Airedale NHS Trust v Bland: 1993, 1 All ER Burke v General Medical Council (defendant) and Disability Rights Commission (interested party) and the Official Solicitor (intervenor): 2005, EWCA Hurwitz B: How does medical evidence based guidance influence determinations of medical negligence?. British Medical Journal 2004, 329(7473): Mason & McCall Smith s; Law and Medical Ethics., doi: / Cite this article as: Jerjes et al.: English law for the surgeon II: Clinical negligence. Head & Neck Oncology :52. Submit your next manuscript to BioMed Central and take full advantage of: Convenient online submission Thorough peer review No space constraints or color figure charges Immediate publication on acceptance Inclusion in PubMed, CAS, Scopus and Google Scholar Research which is freely available for redistribution Submit your manuscript at
Mr. Vincent Kika INTRODUCTION MAN CAN BUT ACHIEVE TRANSITORY SLEEP WHILE LORD CAN PUT HIM TO ETERNAL SLEEP -Dr. Graham pearce. New technologies and extended roles in practice of medicine undoubtedly creates
Bar Vocational Course Legal Research Task Below is an example of a 2,500 word legal research piece which is typical of the task required as part of the Bar Vocational Course. This particular piece is on
Tipp FM Legal Slot 29 th May 2012 Medical Negligence John M. Lynch, Principal Today I will discuss medical negligence following a number of recent high profile cases and inquests. Firstly, what is Medical
Causation for nursing Abstract This article considers the application of the tests of factual and legal causation to cases of medical negligence. It is argued that in light of the recent development of
 JMSC Civ 85 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF JUDICATURE OF JAMAICA CIVIL DIVISION CLAIM NO. 2007 HCV 05051 BETWEEN PAULA WHYTE CLAIMANT AND THE ATTORNEY GENERAL FIRST DEFENDANT AND SOUTH EAST REGIONAL HEALTH
March 2014 Vol. 3, No. 1 Postgraduate Medical Journal of Ghana SPECIAL ARTICLES ANATOMY OF THE MEDICAL NEGLIGENCE CLAIM Adwedaa E Anesthesiologist and The Director of Perioperative Services at the Cypress
LEGAL ISSUES FOR NURSES LEGAL ACCOUNTABILITY 1. A practitioner is accountable for her actions (and, in certain circumstances, omissions), when caring for a patient. She is accountable to her patient, her
ACCOUNTABILITY IN CLINICAL PRACTICE: LITIGATION AND THE NON-MEDICAL PRESCRIBER presented to Allied Healthcare Professionals On 1 April 2008 By Timothy Willitts Cobden House Chambers 19 Quay Street Manchester
LEGAL & ETHICAL ISSUES Dr Les Gemmell MBBS, FRCA, MA Many doctors are unsure of their roles and responsibilities in their interactions with the legal system. This is not surprising, given the increased
Medical Innovation Bill Response to the Department of Health Consultation, April 2014 Kingsley Napley LLP are a firm of solicitors. We have a team that specialises in clinical negligence, acting exclusively
17 CURRENT CONTROVERSIES Missed medical diagnoses and the case for permitting proportionate recovery under English Law M Stauch Journal of Academic Legal Studies 2005;1:17 21 Correspondence to: Marc Stauch,
JAMES MILLER STRESS - EMPLOYERS BEHAVING BADLY? SEPTEMBER 2002 Reynolds Porter Chamberlain Chichester House 278-282 High Holborn London WC1V 7HA Direct Tel: 020 7306 3517 Fax: 020 7242 1431 Direct Email:
Duty of Care Kung Fu Instructor in Training Program Shaolin Guardian Network Negligence This civil wrong is most importance to all professional groups, as far as being a source of potential legal action.
Association of Personal Injury Lawyers GOVERNMENT PROPOSALS FOR REFORM OF LEGAL CLAIMS AGAINST THE NHS A BRIEFING FROM THE ASSOCIATION OF PERSONAL INJURY LAWYERS (APIL) CONTENTS Introduction 3 5 ways for
KEYWORDS Standards / Duty of care / Professionalism / Legal issues Provenance and Peer review: Commissioned; Peer reviewed; Accepted for publication November 2011. Legal and professional issues for the
CLINICAL NEGLIGENCE ARTICLE: THE DETECTION & TREATMENT OF BREAST CANCER & CLAIMS FOR LOSS OF LIFE EXPECTANCY IN CLINICAL NEGLIGENCE CASES Reports relating to the detection and treatment of breast cancer
Negligence and patient safety Mark Gagan Intended Learning outcomes Following this presentation the participant should be able to define accountability, negligence and the triad of negligence Determine,using
How they affect YOU! Dr Mark Corcoran 8 th Feb 2013 ACCOUNTABILITY Civil Liability Negligence Criminal Liability Assault and Battery Manslaughter Professional Accountability Disciplinary Hearings Complaints
BUSINESS LAW GUIDEBOOK SECOND EDITION CHARLES YC CHEW CHAPTER 8: THE LAW OF NEGLIGENCE IN THE BUSINESS WORLD TEST YOUR KNOWLEDGE 1. Outline the elements of the tort of negligence. The elements of the tort
Justice Committee Apologies (Scotland) Bill Written submission from the Law Society of Scotland Introduction The Law Society of Scotland (the Society) aims to lead and support a successful and respected
Medical Negligence A client s guide What is medical negligence? This note is intended to give you a broad outline about medical negligence (sometimes called clinical negligence) cases. It is not a substitute
3PB Barristers THE PATIENT S RIGHT OF AUTONOMY MONTGOMERY V LANARKSHIRE HEALTH BOARD ( UKSC 11]) by Hamish Dunlop, Barrister at 3PB Barristers 1. On 11 th March 2015, the Supreme Court gave their
Ethical and Legal Aspects of the ACCP Role Danny Bryden, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust email@example.com An Advanced Role We cover both minor and major illness and injuries. We carry out
www.personalinjury.ffw.com Freephone 0800 358 3848 www.personalinjury.ffw.com Freephone 0800 358 3848 Medical Negligence A client s guide head and shoulders above the rest in terms of skills, experience
www.ffw.com/personalinjury Freephone 0800 358 3848 www.ffw.com/personalinjury Freephone 0800 358 3848 Medical Negligence A guide for clients The team provides a first class service at all levels of experience.
EXPLANATION OF LEGAL TERMS Affidavit: After the event litigation insurance: Application notice: Bar Council: Barrister: Basic Charges: Before the Event Legal Expenses Insurance: Bill of costs: Bolam test:
ACTIVITY 3 A patient is admitted into an NHS trust hospital for surgery to repair a hernia. Unfortunately, by mistake, a swab is left inside the patient who has to return to theatre for a second operation.
Setting the Standards for Medical Negligence: The Bolam test post Rogers v Whitaker. The High Court, in Rogers v Whitaker 1, rejected the Bolam 2 test of medical negligence, at least with respect to the
Written Evidence Apologies (Scotland) Bill The Law Society of Scotland s Response May 2015 The Law Society of Scotland 2015 Introduction The Law Society of Scotland (the Society) aims to lead and support
Employer Liability for Consequences of Teacher Stress House of Lords Decision Macrossans Lawyers, Brisbane, Queensland In Barber v. Somerset County Council the House of Lords recently delivered an important
This booklet was published with the generous support of Warren Collins Birmingham, Bristol, Cardiff, Newcastle, Lancaster, Leeds, London, Manchester, Sheffield and Wimbledon. www.simpsonmillar.co.uk Telephone:
PERSONAL INJURY CLAIMS Frequently Asked Questions 1. Can I make a claim? If you have been injured because of the fault of someone else, you can claim financial compensation through the courts. The dependants
Legal & Ethical Issues of Patient Transfers The Situation Scott a 30yr old is in the ED with meningococcal meningitis; he is very sick and requires Intensive Care. The hospital s ICU is full although there
Williams v. University of Birmingham  EWCA Civ 1242 Court of Appeal, 28 October 2011 Summary In a mesothelioma claim, the defendant was not in breach of duty in relation to exposure to asbestos for
Guide to Criminal procedure This free guide gives a general idea to members of the public as to what you may expect to encounter if you or someone you know is charged with a criminal offence. The overriding
RECENT MEDICAL MALPRACTICE CASES By Judge Bryan C. Dixon 1. MERE TELEPHONE CONVERSATION WITH TREATING DOCTOR DOES NOT ESTABLISH DUTY TO PATIENT Jennings v. Badgett, 2010 OK 7 Facts: Plaintiffs are parents
This is the author s version of a work that was submitted/accepted for publication in the following source: Stickley, Amanda P. (2012) Long term exposure to asbestos satisfies test for causation. Queensland
Greek/Australian International Legal and Medical Conference 2015 Monday, 1 June 2015 "Developments in the law relating to medical negligence in the last 30 years" The Hon Justice Susan Kiefel AC High Court
Medical Negligence Medicine, Ethics and the Law This short paper is from background notes used by Mr Peyton in his lecturers and discussions as an invited speaker to groups of doctors and lawyers throughout
Sally Hatfield QC Byrom Street Chambers June 2013 Or rather: Who to sue, and by what standard to judge, in the new NHS? A hospital has delegated the performance of some services formerly within the province
This article originally appeared in The Colorado Lawyer, Vol. 25, No. 26, June 1996. by Jeffrey R. Pilkington TORT AND INSURANCE LAW REPORTER Informal Discovery Interviews Between Defense Attorneys and
Client s Right to Give Informed Consent Client s Rights and Counselor Responsibilities Chapter 5 Psychology 475 Professional Ethics in Addictions Counseling Listen to the audio lecture while viewing these
Lord Chancellor s Exceptional Funding Guidance (Inquests) 1. This guidance is issued by the Lord Chancellor to the Director of Legal Aid Casework under section 4(3) of the Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment
Informed Consent in Obstetrics and Gynaecology Catherine Swee Kian TAY LLM, LLB (Honours) Department of Business Policy, National University of Singapore; Barrister-at-Law (of Lincoln s Inn, United Kingdom);
Step-by-step guide to pursuing a medical negligence claim Suffering from medical negligence can be a painful and distressing experience for anyone. This short guide offers some advice to help people thinking
How they affect YOU! Dr Mark Corcoran 13 th Jan 2015 ACCOUNTABILITY Civil Liability Negligence Criminal Liability Assault and Battery Manslaughter Professional Accountability Disciplinary Hearings Complaints
Compensation Claims Contents Employers' duties What kind of claims may be made? The tort of negligence Tort of breach of statutory duty Civil liability exclusions Conditions to be met for breach of statutory
TORT LAW SUMMARY LAWSKOOL UK TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION 5 DEFENCES 6 Consent (Or Volenti Non Fit Injuria) 6 Illegtality (or Ex Trupi Causa) 7 Contributory Negiligence 8 NEGLIGENCE 11 Duty of Care 11
Medico Legal Aspects of Dental and Periodontal Practice Philip R. Greene, BDS, FDSRCPS, CUEW, JP. Specialist in Periodontics, Dental Expert Witness Treatment of Patients involves several stages: 1. Diagnosis
LC Paper No. CB(2)517/05-06(01) SUBMISSION OF THE LAW SOCIETY S WORKING PARTY TO THE LEGCO LEGAL AFFAIRS PANEL REGARDING THE OPERATIONS OF RECOVERY AGENTS IN HONG KONG 1. This is a submission of the Recovery
Hypothesis: Disability Income Replacement The Importance of Disclosure and The Duty of Care Banff School August 18, 2010 It is the duty of an agent to recommend insurance that is suitable for the client
Page1 Journal of Personal Injury Law 2011 The differing treatments of judgment by professionals at work and when they are driving home Geoff Clarke Subject: Personal injury. Other related subjects: Health.
Clinical Negligence by Janet C Kelly Midwifery Lecturer 1 Aim To give an insight into the concept of clinical negligence and its relation to children s nursing 2 Objectives 1. To explain the concept and
Employers Liability Trigger Litigation Following my preliminary note of the 11 th October 2010 I have now had an opportunity to study the decision in detail. This litigation was to decide what event would
Hip Transplant Detailed Study INTRODUCTION This case involves four patients who underwent hip replacements with a "metal-on-metal" device designed and manufactured by "Replacement Manufacturer." The patients
Medical Law Review, 10, Autumn 2002, pp. 322 329 Oxford University Press UNITED KINGDOM CLINICAL NEGLIGENCE: INFORMED CONSENT AND CAUSATION Chester v. Afshar Court of Appeal: Hale L.J., Sir Christopher
Bar Council response to the Reducing Legal Costs in Clinical Negligence Claims pre-consultation paper 1. This is the response of the General Council of the Bar of England and Wales (the Bar Council) to
MEDICAL NEGLIGENCE ANNUAL CASE REVIEW MEDICAL NEGLIGENCE 2009/2010 Ian Butcher, barrister 1 GETT V TABET (2010) 265 ALR 227 No damages for loss of chance for personal injury following negligence Need for
Bridget Rankin Principal Pharmacist, Medicines Information Guy s & St. Thomas NHS Foundation Trust April 2015 Aim of the Session Identify legal and ethical problems that may be encountered when providing
Personal Injury Law: Minnesota Medical Malpractice Medical Malpractice Terms Statutes of Limitations Minnesota Medical Malpractice Laws Medical malpractice includes many forms of liability producing conduct
QBE European Operations The Enterprise and Regulatory Reform Act 2013 Issues Forum The Enterprise and Regulatory Reform Act 2013 Issues Forum Contents History 1 A time of reform 2 Strict liability 2 The
FURR & HENSHAW http://www.scmedicalmalpractice.com 1900 Oak Street Post Office Box 2909 Myrtle Beach, South Carolina 29578 (843) 626-7621 (800) 849-2525 firstname.lastname@example.org and 1534 Blanding Street Columbia,
Medical Negligence Fact Sheet An essential guide to Medical Negligence claims Every day, countless people are treated by doctors, nurses, dentists and other medical professionals. Fortunately, the standard
5.50E PRE-EXISTING CONDITION INCREASED RISK/LOSS OF CHANCE PROXIMATE CAUSE (10/2014) NOTE TO JUDGE In a series of cases, including Fosgate v. Corona, 66 N.J. 268 (1974); Evers v. Dollinger, 95 N.J. 399
Expert Medical Evidence: The Australian Medical Association s Position The Australian Medical Association and its members have had an increasing interest in this field for many years, with the level of
PEER PROFESSIONAL OPINION ITS IMPACT ON MEDICAL CLAIMS By Sarah Vallance Following the release of the Final Report of the Review of the Law of Negligence in September 2002 (the Ipp Report), all Australian
Sample Tort Law Problem Question UniCramNotes.com Copyright UniCramNotes.com 2010 Page 1 Sample Tort Law Problem Question Whether Autumn Bay High and Johnny owe a duty of care to Persephone and Aphrodite.
Commissioning Policy: Defining the boundaries between NHS and Private Healthcare April 2013 Reference : NHSCB/CP/12 NHS Commissioning Board Commissioning Policy: Defining the Boundaries between NHS and
Neutral Citation Number:  EWHC 3279 (QB) Case No: HQ09X03020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE QUEEN'S BENCH DIVISION Royal Courts of Justice Strand, London, WC2A 2LL Date: 20/11/2012 Before : THE HONOURABLE
Legal Research Record Summary of problem(s) Design and Dress Limited (DDL) has experienced problems due to the alleged harassment of one of their employees, Susie Baker, by another employee, Stephen Harding
PAPER NO. 4/2012 MARCH 2012 Suing for the Loss of the Right to Sue: Why Wright is Wrong Nicholas McBride & Sandy Steel Further information about the University of Cambridge Faculty of Law Legal Studies
Making Amends the CMO s proposals for reforming the approach to clinical negligence in the NHS. Response to the consultation document by The Royal College of Surgeons of England OCTOBER 2003 Response of
ARE WE DOING ENOUGH TO PROTECT PROTECTED PARTIES? LESSONS FOR PERSONAL INJURY LAWYERS FROM THE SUPREME COURT JUDGMENT IN DUNHILL V BURGIN Introduction Policy arguments do not answer legal questions, said
Fitness to Practise Determination The following case was heard by a Fitness to Practise Panel. It is presented here to give an example of one possible outcome of breaching a principle in Good Medical Practice.
Prescribing legally and ethically A CPD open learning programme for non-medical prescribers DLP 153 Contents iii About CPPE open learning programmes viii About this learning programme xi Section 1 Overview
You can find the latest version of this guidance on our website at www.gmc-uk.org/guidance. Published 25 March 2013 Comes into effect 22 April 2013 Personal beliefs and medical practice 1 In Good medical
Experts Misconduct By P S Ranjan Advocate & Solicitor Malaysia Experts Misconduct Difficulties in Definition Experts Misconduct - in the context of legal proceedings broadly, interference with the course
Torts Copyright July, 2006 State Bar of California After paying for his gasoline at Delta Gas, Paul decided to buy two 75-cent candy bars. The Delta Gas store clerk, Clerk, was talking on the telephone,
Overview of Psychological Injury Euan Ambrose Definitions Recognized psychological illness as defined in DSM IV or ICD 10 Not grief, fear, sorrow, distress, anxiety or other normal human emotions (1) Primary
 JMCA Civ 37 JAMAICA IN THE COURT OF APPEAL SUPREME COURT CIVIL APPEAL NO 41/2007 BEFORE: THE HON MR JUSTICE MORRISON JA THE HON MR JUSTICE BROOKS JA THE HON MS JUSTICE LAWRENCE-BESWICK JA (AG) BETWEEN
PERSONAL INJURY COMPENSATION CLAIM GUIDE PERSONAL INJURY COMPENSATION CLAIM GUIDE This booklet has been produced by D.J. Synnott Solicitors to give our clients an understanding of the personal injury compensation
Informed Consent, Wisconsin-Style Are You Meeting the Reasonable Patient Standard? February 2013 Lockton Companies Informed consent is a fundamental aspect of patient care. NANCY LAMO RN/BSN, JD, CPHRM
Legislation to encourage medical innovation a consultation British Medical Association response Executive Summary This consultation is about proposed primary legislation to liberate doctors from perceived
Unintentional Torts - Definitions Negligence The failure to exercise the degree of care that a reasonable person would exercise that results in the proximate cause of actual harm to an innocent person.
: A guide to making a claim 2 Our guide to making a clinical negligence claim At Kingsley Napley, our guiding principle is to provide you with a dedicated client service and we aim to make the claims process