1 ASSISTED REPRODUCTION AND THE DUTY OF CARE TO THE UNBORN CHILD Tim Weiss Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Flinders University and Flinders Medical Centre South Australia Assisted Reproduction Assisted reproduction is a term now widely used to describe a range of treatments to assist otherwise infertile couples to conceive and carry a child to term. Some of the procedures, like donor insemination (DI), have been in routine use for a considerable time, while others, like in vitro fertilisation (IVF) and variants thereof, are comparatively recent innovations. The number of children born as a result of these treatments, while insignificant in comparison to 'unassisted' births, is still considerable. In Australia, 1061 children have been born from treatment cycles completed by the end of 1991 (Lancaster 1993, pp. 1,7 & 14) and in South Australia 158 children were born following treatment in 1991 alone (SA Council on Reproductive Technology 1993, p. 17). The development of technologies to assist couples to reproduce has occurred rapidly and there has been little time for the rational development of a moral and ethical framework to guide providers of assisted reproduction. For scientists working in the area this problem is particularly acute. Embryologists working in human IVF programs play a key role in influencing the fate of gametes and embryos. We manipulate semen for insemination, select oocytes (eggs) for transfer in a GIFT procedure, select embryos for transfer following IVF and determine which embryos to freeze or to discard. We deal with the earliest stages of human life, the sperm, the egg and the embryos which are the product of the union of the gametes. This work has excited the public imagination and has been the subject of numerous enquiries, reports, books and endless newspaper and magazine articles, some supporting the new technologies developed to assist infertile couples and many critical of it. However, in spite of much debate about the legal and ethical status of the embryo, considerable uncertainty remains. These are certainly issues about which many points of view have been expressed, but, perhaps because of the difficulty of the imponderable questions involved, a consensus still seems a distant hope. Nevertheless, these are real issues which confront scientists in assisted reproduction programs every day. Guidance, or regulation, of this work is provided by three main sources; Institutional Ethics Committees and government bodies such as the National Health and Medical Research Council, legislation and the common law. It is important to recognise that developments in the law in this area are not just relevant to practitioners of assisted reproduction. In addition to medical specialists whose duty of care to their patients is obvious, a variety of laboratory scientists may find themselves faced with similar issues. Advances in prenatal diagnosis, for example, mean that the work performed in the laboratory may have important consequences for couples considering whether to continue or terminate a pregnancy. The Human Genome Project, involving scientists all over the globe in an endeavour
2 which has been compared in its magnitude and cost to the American Apollo moon program, has important implications for human rights in general, but particularly for 'less than perfect' fetuses who may face selective termination ( Post 1991, pp ). This paper addresses questions of liability and responsibility raised in courts faced with issues of fetal 'rights' and looks at how legislators have attempted to deal with the same. The Common Law: Wrongful Life (and Wrongful Birth) The moral, ethical and legal consequences of bringing an unwanted, healthy child, or a child impaired in some way, into the world have provided philosophers, ethicists, lawyers and commentators of all kinds much fuel for debate. John Stuart Mill, in the 19th century, believed that... to bring a child into existence without a fair prospect of being able, not only to provide food for its body but instruction for its mind was a moral crime, against the unfortunate offspring and against society (cited by Carey 1991, p.28) The question as to how society should deal with undesired pregnancy and unwanted children, healthy or otherwise, has proved problematic. The issues are divisive, as can readily be seen in the debate that rages around abortion. The relatively recent emergence in the courts of the torts of 'wrongful birth' and 'wrongful life' has proven to be at least as contentious as the 'right to life' issue, which is hardly surprising given the shared ground (see Hersch 1983 for a review of 'wrongful life'). In discussing actions for wrongful life it is not the intention to suggest that providers of assisted reproduction are negligent in their practice. These cases are worthy of consideration because they provide a forum in which issues such as the value of existence, the rights of the child and parents and the rights and responsibilities of health care providers have been discussed. The two torts have emerged from malpractice suits alleging negligence before or during a pregnancy and they raise many of the complex issues faced by the practitioner of assisted reproduction, the couple seeking assistance and legislators concerned with regulating these activities. Pre-natal injury. A child that is injured in utero has, at birth, a cause of action to recover damages from the tortfeasor whose negligent action caused the injury, provided that the components of an action in negligence are present; that is, a duty of care owed, breach of that duty, the breach was the proximate cause of the injury and the injury or damage is compensable (Lynch v Lynch & Anor (1991) Aust Torts Reports , 69,091). Actions of this kind are distinct from the tort of wrongful life where the injury or harm is not prima facie caused by the alleged negligent defendant. What is meant by 'Wrongful Birth' and 'Wrongful Life'? In Procanik v Cillo (478 A.2d 755 N.J. 1984), the New Jersey Supreme Court considered an appeal for damages by the parents and their child who was born suffering from impairments resulting from his mother contracting German measles during her pregnancy.
3 In his judgment Proctor J. defined wrongful life as referring... "to a cause of action brought by or on behalf of a defective child who claims that but for the defendant doctor's negligent advice or treatment, the child would not have been born... and wrongful birth... applies to a cause of action of parents who claim that the negligent advice or treatment deprived them of the choice of avoiding conception... or... of terminating the pregnancy (Procanik 1984). Wrongful birth actions may be further characterised as 'wrongful conception' where the child was normal but unplanned and 'wrongful birth' where the child was born impaired. In order to appreciate the questions raised in these cases the components of an action for negligence and how they are applied in these suits, need to be considered. Duty of Care It is fairly obvious that a duty of care is owed by the practitioner to a couple seeking treatment. What may not be immediately apparent is whether any duty is owed to the unborn child who may not even be in existence at the time of the alleged negligent acts or, where pregnancy termination is available, has no guarantee of continued existence. This problem is presumably overcome if it can be considered that the child is 'foreseeable'. The 'test' for whether a duty of care exists is expressed in general terms by the High Court which held that... in order to establish the prior existence of a duty of care with respect to a plaintiff subsequently injured as the result of a sequence of events following a defendant's carelessness it is not necessary for the plaintiff to show that the precise manner in which his injuries were sustained was reasonably foreseeable; it is sufficient if it appears that injury to a class of persons of which he was one might reasonably have been foreseen as a consequence (Chapman v Hearse (1961) 106 CLR 112, pp ). A child born with syphilis is, therefore, a foreseeable victim of a doctor's failure to screen a mother for the disease though the child was not born, or even conceived, at the time of the negligent act (X & Anor v Pal & Ors (1991) Aust Torts Reports , 68,868). In Renslow v Mennonite Hospital (367 N.E.2d 1250 IL. 1977) the issue was whether "physicians could be held liable for a fetal blood disorder suffered by a child due to the negligent transfusion of the mother 9 years prior to conception.." It was held that the plaintiff child was a foreseeable victim of negligence. Breach of Duty Whether or not a breach of duty occurred will be determined by the examination of the facts of the case. The allegedly negligent act will be compared with the standard of care exercised by the profession as a whole and will usually involve an appraisal by expert witnesses. This may not, however, always be straightforward. In areas of medicine like assisted reproduction, in which practices change rapidly as advances in technology are made, there may arise special difficulties in determining what the standard of care is, or should be.
4 Harm resulting from the breach of duty What is the harm that has been suffered? In the case of 'wrongful birth' the legal damage is not the child itself but the parent's financial burden of raising a child that they had not planned to have. In Thake and another v Maurice  All ER 513 the plaintiff's husband was sterilised in 1975 after they had had 5 children. In 1978 the plaintiff gave birth to a healthy child and it was held that the defendant had negligently failed to warn the plaintiff of the slight risk of pregnancy. She was granted compensation for the birth, pain and suffering and the cost of rearing the child. In contrast, in the Georgia Supreme Court, damages were not allowed for raising a child born with Down's syndrome because "society places a value on human life in general, and on the lives of children in particular, making it most difficult to support any notion that parents may suffer compensable injury resulting from the birth of a child" (Atlanta Obstetrics and Gynecology Group v Abelson, Daily Report, vol. 101, no. 244, p. 98). Where the child is impaired the situation becomes more complex and is certainly affected by public policy considerations (Dickens 1989 p. 398). The plaintiffs may allege that the negligence deprived them of the opportunity to terminate the pregnancy. In Gleitman v Cosgrove (49 N.J. 22, 227 A.2d 689,1967) heard in the New Jersey Supreme Court prior to the Roe v Wade decision the court rejected an action for wrongful birth on the grounds that it was against public policy to award damages for the loss of the opportunity to abort a fetus injured in utero. In wrongful life cases it becomes more difficult to determine the harm. Is birth, even in an impaired condition, a legally recognisable injury? In other words, if the only injury caused by the defendant's negligence was the plaintiff's birth, is life an injury? Most courts have said no but it seems to be an inconsistent position if the parents of the impaired child may be awarded damages. Wrongful Life Allowed There have only been a handful of cases which have recognised wrongful life claims (see Morrissey 1991, pp for a review of American cases). The court in Curlender v Bio-Science Laboratories (106 Cal. App. 3d 811, 1980) awarded both general and special damages to a child born afflicted with Tay-Sachs disease. In rejecting the position of earlier courts that such a child had suffered no legally cognisable injury the court held that... [t]he reality of the 'wrongful life' concept is that such a plaintiff exists and suffers, due to the negligence of others. It is neither necessary nor just to retreat into meditation on the mysteries of life. We need not be concerned with the fact that had defendants not been negligent, the plaintiff might not have come into existence at all (Curlender, supra p. 896) In Turpin v Sortini ( Cal., 643 P.2d 954, 1982) the defendant was a hearing specialist who had assured the plaintiff's parents that an earlier child had normal hearing. On the strength of this advice the couple conceived a second child who was born suffering from a congenital hearing impairment. The plaintiff child sought general damages for being "deprived of the fundamental right of a child to be born as a whole, functional human being without total deafness" and special damages for the cost of "specialised teaching, training and hearing equipment" (Turpin, supra p. 956). Unlike Curlender the court held that general damages could not be awarded because... (1) it is simply impossible to determine in any rational fashion whether the plaintiff has in fact suffered an injury in being born impaired rather than not
5 being born, and (2)... it would be impossible to assess general damages in any fair, non-speculative manner (Turpin supra p.963). Nevertheless the court did award special damages to the plaintiff. In recognising the wrongful life claim the court did not accept that such a decision would in any way "'disavow' the value of life" and further, considered that public policy does not establish "as a matter of law- that under all circumstances 'impaired life' is 'preferable' to 'non-life'" (Turpin supra p.962). Wrongful life action not allowed The first recorded 'wrongful life' case was that of Zepeda v Zepeda (190 N.E.2d ) which involved a suit by a physically normal but illegitimate child against his father, in which the child alleged that his mother had been fraudulently induced into having sex with the defendant! Perhaps it is not surprising that this case was unsuccessful. Gleitman v Cosgrove (supra, 1967) was an action on behalf of a child who suffered impairments of sight, speech and hearing as a result of his mother contracting German measles during pregnancy. The plaintiff's mother had been assured by her doctor that there would be no effect on the fetus. The court held that the child had no cause since the child had suffered no injury recognised by law since being born is not an injury and public policy demanded rejection of the claim since even life with defects was more valuable than non-existence. In 1990, the Massachusetts Supreme Court (Viccaro v Milunsky 551 NE.2d 8) recognised the parent's claim for wrongful birth but stated that there would be a fundamental problem of logic in allowing a plaintiff child to recover against a defendant when the plaintiff would never have been born but for the defendant's negligence. English and Australian courts have similarly rejected the notion of a wrongful life claim. A child born impaired as a result of her mother's infection with rubella during pregnancy had no cause of action against doctors who negligently failed to warn the mother of the risk to her pregnancy (McKay & Anor v Essex Health Authority & Anor QB 1166). Stephenson L.J. concluded that the "only duty which either defendant can owe to the unborn child infected with disabling rubella is a duty to abort or kill her.." and held that this duty was not one that could be recognised by the court. The court further held that the impossibility of assessing damages on the basis of "a loss of expectation of death" made the claim untenable. This reasoning was followed in Bannerman v Mills & Anor (1991, Australian Torts Reports ) where the court held that "the tort of wrongful life is not known to the common law and even if it were it would not be possible to assess any damage in monetary terms". In both these cases the courts considered that the parents of the child plaintiff did have a right to bring an action for negligent advice. The common law: conclusion The common law position would therefore seem to be that a plaintiff child has no cause of action in a suit for wrongful life because the alleged tortfeasors have not caused the injury and being born, even with severe impairments, is not an injury. (For an analysis of whether such a child has been 'harmed' by being born see Steinbock 1992, pp ) Critics of the traditional tort analysis relied on by the courts in rejecting wrongful life suits have suggested that a comparison of harms leading to compensation may be possible in these cases (Perry 1990 p. 82). The injured or impaired child may be better served by focusing on the resulting condition of the child and that litigation may be the only way such children can obtain the resources they need to maintain their care (Steinbock supra p.125; Dickens supra p. 400).
6 Legislation Concern for the welfare of children conceived and born with the assistance of reproductive technology is reflected to varying extents in legislation. The Reproductive Technology Act (SA) 1988 expressly declares that... [t]he welfare of any child to be born in consequence of an artificial procedure must be treated as of fundamental paramount importance, and accepted as a fundamental principle, in the formulation of the code of ethical practice (s. 10(2)). Legislation in the United Kingdom (UK), Victoria and Western Australia does not express this principle with the same vigour. Section 13(5) of the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act 1990 (UK) directs that as a condition of licensing... [a] woman shall not be provided with treatment services unless account has been taken of the welfare of any child who may be born as a result of the treatment (including the need of that child for a father), and of any other child who may be affected by the birth. Section 29(7)(b) of the Infertility (Medical Procedures) Act, 1984 (Vic) instructs the Standing Review and Advisory Committee to "...ensure that the highest regard is given to the principle that human life shall be preserved and protected at all times." In the regulations accompanying the Victorian Act, Schedule 3 (Infertility (Medical Procedures) Regulations (1988)) requires that couples contemplating assisted reproduction be counselled as to the "... possible risks to the woman and any child resulting from participation in a relevant procedure" (s.1.8). The Victorian committee, in a submission to the Minister of Health, has recommended that the legislation be amended to include, as a 'Guiding Principle' that the "welfare and interests of any prospective child should be considered" (Review of Post-Syngamy Embryo Experimentation. Part III Recommendations for Amendment of the Infertility (Medical Procedures) Act 1984 Oct. 1991; s.2). The Human Reproductive Technology Act 1991 (WA) contains a similar provision (s.4.(d)(iv)). Although the South Australian 'code of ethical practice' is yet to be gazetted there is little doubt that s.10(2) of the SA Act will have considerable influence. In it's 1991 report to the Minister of Health the SA Council on Reproductive Technology reflected on the significance of this section saying that... [t]his protectionist theme of children's rights has now expanded to include debates about the child "in utero" and the child not yet conceived. It is important, therefore that those involved in assisted reproduction technology pay due regard to the impact of their practices on the children who are born as a result (p.1). While there will undoubtedly be considerable discussion about the interpretation of these sections the intention of the legislature would seem to be clear in recognising that the interests of the child must be paramount (in SA at least) from fertilisation to delivery. Conclusion Nevertheless, it is as unfortunate as it is inevitable that children will be, and are, born following assisted reproduction procedures into a 'less than perfect life.' In the absence of a negligent act causing a physical impairment does such a child have a cause of
7 action against the practitioners who treated the child's parents and without whose assistance the child 'would not have been born'? The conclusion from the 'wrongful life' cases reviewed above would seem to be 'no'. But the position of the courts in these cases may not be readily applied to a child who is the result of an assisted reproduction procedure. The issue of causation is more problematic when the very existence of the child is the result of manipulations in the laboratory and operating theatre. We return inevitably, it seems, to the unanswered, and perhaps unanswerable questions of whether a child has a right to an unimpaired existence, and whether any kind of existence is preferable to non-existence. The authors of the UK Act (supra) considered the position of a child born disabled following assisted reproduction. Section 44 of the Act amends s.1 of the Congenital Disabilities (Civil Liability) Act 1976 such that the child has a cause of action where... s.1a.(1) (a) a child carried by a woman as a result of the placing in her of an embryo or of sperm and eggs or her artificial insemination is born disabled, (b) the disability results from an act or omission in the course of the selection, or the keeping or use outside the body, of the embryo carried by her or of the gametes used to bring about the creation of the embryo, and (c) a person is under this section answerable to the child in respect of the act or omission. s.1a.(3) provides that... [t]he defendant is not under this section answerable to the child if at the time the embryo, or the sperm and eggs, are placed in the woman or the time of her insemination (as the case may be) either or both of the parents knew of the risk of their child being born disabled (that is to say, the particular risk created by the act or omission). None of the relevant Australian Acts have addressed this issue. In terms of advice to providers of assisted reproduction it may be safe to draw the following, rather obvious, conclusions. 1) A duty of care is owed to the unborn child to ensure as far as is possible that the child is born unimpaired. 2) A duty of care is owed to the couple receiving treatment for infertility which includes an obligation to fully disclose any risk to them, or to any child born as a result of the treatment. References Dickens, B.M. 1989, 'Abortion and distortion of justice in the law', Law, Medicine & Health Care, vol. 17, no. 4, Winter, p Lancaster, P.L. 1993, IVF Pregnancies : National Perinatal Statistics Unit, the University of Sydney. SA Council on Reproductive Technology 1993, Report to the Minister of Health, 31 March Post, S.G. 1991, 'Selective abortion and gene therapy: reflections on human limits', Hum. Gene. Ther., vol. 2, no. 3, Fall, p Carey, J.S. 1991, 'I am not yet born - but that won't stop me suing you', New Statesman, 15 November, p. 28.
8 Hersch, P. 1983, 'Tort liability for 'Wrongful Life'', U.N.S.W. Law Journal, vol. 6, p Morrissey, M.B. 1991, 'Wrongful life actions in the 1990's: The continuing need to define and measure a plaintiff's injury', University of Toledo Law Review, vol. 23, Fall, p Steinbock, B Life Before Birth: The Moral and Legal Status of Embryos and Fetuses, Oxford University Press, New York. Perry, C. 1990, 'Children's suits for suffering life', Pediatrician, vol. 17, p. 79.
Northern, Eastern and Western Devon Clinical Commissioning Group South Devon and Torbay Clinical Commissioning Group Clinical Policy Committee Commissioning policy: Assisted Conception Fertility assessment
English is not an official language of the Swiss Confederation. This translation is provided for information purposes only and has no legal force. Federal Act on Medically Assisted Reproduction (Reproductive
MEDICO/LEGAL ASSOCIATION ALICE SPRINGS 2002 MEDICAL NEGLIGENCE The World Changes In considering what some have called the crisis in medical negligence we need to bear in mind that there has been a large
2006 Forum: Rights and Responsibilities 233 RIGHTS AND RESPONSIBILITIES IN WRONGFUL BIRTH / WRONGFUL LIFE CASES DAVID HIRSCH I INTRODUCTION The parents of a child born as a consequence of medical negligence
Act of 5 December 2003 No. 100 relating to the application of biotechnology in human medicine, etc Cf. earlier Acts of 5 August 1994 No. 56 and 12 June 1987 No. 68 Chapter 1. Purpose and scope 1-1. Purpose
Indiana RANKING: 7 Indiana has made significant strides in recent years to protect women and unborn children from the harms inherent in abortion and from substandard abortion clinics. This trend continued
Review of parentage laws AUSTRALIAN HUMAN RIGHTS COMMISSION SUBMISSION TO THE FAMILY LAW COUNCIL 3 May 2013 ABN 47 996 232 602 Level 3, 175 Pitt Street, Sydney NSW 2000 GPO Box 5218, Sydney NSW 2001 General
Tipp FM Legal Slot 29 th May 2012 Medical Negligence John M. Lynch, Principal Today I will discuss medical negligence following a number of recent high profile cases and inquests. Firstly, what is Medical
Virginia RANKING: 19 Virginia provides fairly comprehensive protection for women, the unborn, and newly born children. It is also one of only a small number of states that has enacted meaningful, protective
This publication was rescinded by National Health and Medical Research Council on 16/09/2004 and is available on the Internet ONLY for historical purposes. Important Notice This notice is not to be erased
Ethical issues in assisted reproductive technologies Effy Vayena Assisted Reproductive Technologies (ART) All treatments or procedures that include the in vitro handling of human oocytes and human sperm
CHAPTER 310 THE LAW REFORM (FATAL ACCIDENTS AND MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS) ACT [PRINCIPAL LEGISLATION] ARRANGEMENT OF SECTIONS Section Title 1. Short title and application. 2. Interpretation. PART I PRELIMINARY
Negligence: Element III: Proximate Cause Chapter 15 Introduction Proximate Cause. 1) the causation question (cause in fact): Did the defendant cause the plaintiff s injury? 2) The policy question ( a cut-off
Duty of Care Kung Fu Instructor in Training Program Shaolin Guardian Network Negligence This civil wrong is most importance to all professional groups, as far as being a source of potential legal action.
LEGAL AND ETHICAL ISSUES PERTAINING TO PREIMPLANTATION GENETIC DIAGNOSIS July 2003 Dr Christine Yap Consultant Obstetrician & Gynaecologist IVF Clinician Singapore General Hospital Ms Laura Liew National
THIRD SECTION Application no. 39974/10 M.P. and Others against Romania lodged on 9 June 2010 STATEMENT OF FACTS 1. The applicants, Ms M.P., Mr M.P. and their son M.-D.P., are Romanian nationals who were
BUSINESS LAW GUIDEBOOK SECOND EDITION CHARLES YC CHEW CHAPTER 8: THE LAW OF NEGLIGENCE IN THE BUSINESS WORLD TEST YOUR KNOWLEDGE 1. Outline the elements of the tort of negligence. The elements of the tort
Fall, 19821 MEDICAL MALPRACTICE WRONGFUL LIFE Turpin v. Sortini 31 Cal. 3d 220, 643 P.2d 954, 182 Cal. Rptr. 337 (1982) I. INTRODUCTION N THE PAST FIFTEEN YEARS, several state appellate courts have considered
Michigan Prepared by Cardelli Lanfear P.C. 322 West Lincoln Royal Oak, MI 48067 Tel: 248.850.2179 Fax: 248.544.1191 1. Introduction History of Tort Reform in Michigan Michigan was one of the first states
SUBMISSION OF THE BAR COUNCIL OF IRELAND TO THE JOINT COMMITTEE ON HEALTH AND CHILDREN ON THE CHALLENGE OF RISING COSTS IN PROFESSIONAL MEDICAL INDEMNITY INSURANCE 1. INTRODUCTION (a) General Remarks 1.
REPRODUCTIVE MEDICINE AND INFERTILITY ASSOCIATES Woodbury Medical Arts Building 2101 Woodwinds Drive Woodbury, MN 55125 (651) 222-6050 RECIPIENT COUPLE INFORMED CONSENT AND AUTHORIZATION FOR IN VITRO FERTILIZATION
720 1998 Tort Law Review TORT LAW REVIEW VOL. 6 1998 INDEMNITY FOR THE COST OF REARING WANTED CHILDREN FROM UNWANTED PREGNANCIES Ian R. Kerr "Wrongful pregnancy" is the trendy label that is sometimes used
Women s Health Victoria Termination of Pregnancy Post 20 Weeks Background Paper March 2007 Prepared by Kerrilie Rice Policy and Research Officer Published by Level 1, 123 Lonsdale Street Melbourne Victoria
Saint Mary s Hospital Department of Reproductive Medicine Legal Parenthood Information For Patients 1 This leaflet applies to couples and individuals undergoing treatment with donor sperm, donor eggs or
QUESTION NO. 3 Amendment to Titles 1 and 3 of the Nevada Revised Statutes CONDENSATION (ballot question) Shall Title 1 of the Nevada Revised Statutes governing attorneys, and Title 3 of the Nevada Revised
S.B. SENATE BILL NO. SENATOR ROBERSON MARCH, Referred to Committee on Judiciary SUMMARY Revises provisions relating to certain civil actions involving negligence. (BDR -) FISCAL NOTE: Effect on Local Government:
Personal Injury Law: Minnesota Medical Malpractice Medical Malpractice Terms Statutes of Limitations Minnesota Medical Malpractice Laws Medical malpractice includes many forms of liability producing conduct
2014 PA Super 238 AMY HUSS, Appellant IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA v. JAMES P. WEAVER, Appellee No. 1703 WDA 2013 Appeal from the Order entered September 25, 2013, Court of Common Pleas of Washington
5.51 LEGAL MALPRACTICE (Approved 6/79) CHARGE 5.51A Page 1 of 9 A. General Duty Owing An action brought against an attorney alleging negligence in the practice of law is referred to as a malpractice action.
Legal Compensation & Ethical Duties of a Health Care Professional " Alexander M. Voudouris Pace Law Firm Overview" Learning objectives Legal Compensation Compensation for Personal Injury Potential Ethical
FACT PATTERN ONE The following facts are based on the case of Bedard v. Martyn  A.J. No. 308 The infant plaintiff developed a large blood clot in his brain at some time either before or during the
BERMUDA 1951 : 39 LAW REFORM (LIABILITY IN TORT) ACT 1951 ARRANGEMENT OF SECTIONS 1 Interpretation 2 Savings 3 Apportionment of liability where contributory negligence 4 Defence of common employment abolished
AMENDED IN ASSEMBLY APRIL 14, 2015 california legislature 2015 16 regular session ASSEMBLY BILL No. 597 Introduced by Assembly Member Cooley February 24, 2015 An act to amend Sections 36 and 877 of, and
ASSISTED REPRODUCTIVE TECHNOLOGY Adopted 2013 The Christian Medical & Dental Association is a public voice for Christian healthcare professionals and students. Founded in 1931, CMDA provides programs and
Passed by both Houses New South Wales Civil Liability Amendment (Personal Responsibility) Bill 2002 Contents Page 1 Name of Act 2 2 Commencement 2 3 Amendment of Civil Liability Act 2002 No 22 2 4 Consequential
Williams v. University of Birmingham  EWCA Civ 1242 Court of Appeal, 28 October 2011 Summary In a mesothelioma claim, the defendant was not in breach of duty in relation to exposure to asbestos for
Illinois Insurance Facts Illinois Department of Financial and Professional Regulation Division of Insurance Insurance Coverage for Infertility Treatment Revised November 2004 Infertility is a condition
Compensation Claims Contents Employers' duties What kind of claims may be made? The tort of negligence Tort of breach of statutory duty Civil liability exclusions Conditions to be met for breach of statutory
ACTIVITY 3 A patient is admitted into an NHS trust hospital for surgery to repair a hernia. Unfortunately, by mistake, a swab is left inside the patient who has to return to theatre for a second operation.
The plaintiff in Schmidt filed suit against her employer, Personalized Audio Visual, Inc. ("PAV") and PAV s president, Dennis Smith ("Smith"). 684 A.2d at 68. Her Complaint alleged several causes of action
Step-by-step guide to pursuing a medical negligence claim Suffering from medical negligence can be a painful and distressing experience for anyone. This short guide offers some advice to help people thinking
Clinical Trial Compensation Guidelines Preface These guidelines contain two distinct sections: Phase I Clinical Trials Compensation Guidelines Phases II, III and IV Clinical Trials Compensation Guidelines
LIMITATION OF CERTAIN ACTIONS ACT CHAPTER 7:09 Act 36 of 1997 Amended by 2 of 2000 Current Authorised Pages Pages Authorised (inclusive) by L.R.O. 1 18.. L.R.O. 2 Chap. 7:09 Limitation of Certain Actions
Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis (PGD) in Western Australia Human somatic cells have 46 chromosomes each, made up of the 23 chromosomes provided by the egg and the sperm cell from each parent. Each chromosome
Medical research and data sharing how open can we be? Dr Renate Gertz AHRC Centre School of Law University of Edinburgh Scotland Introduction The uses of health data Primary uses: For clinical care (relatively
Limitation of Liability Submission to the Attorney-General (Western Australia) July 2000 The Institution of Engineers, Australia Institution of Engineers, Australia 11 National Circuit, Barton, ACT, 2604
california legislature 2015 16 regular session ASSEMBLY BILL No. 597 Introduced by Assembly Member Cooley February 24, 2015 An act to amend Sections 36 and 877 of, and to add Chapter 6 (commencing with
Senate Bill No. 292 Senator Roberson CHAPTER... AN ACT relating to civil actions; providing immunity from civil actions for a board of trustees of a school district or the governing body of a charter school
INFORMED CONSENT AND AUTHORIZATION FOR IN VITRO FERTILIZATION OF PREVIOUSLY CRYOPRESERVED OOCYTES We, the undersigned, as patient and partner understand that we will be undergoing one or more procedures
Legal Action / Claiming Compensation in Scotland This help sheet explains your legal rights if you have been injured as a result of medical treatment and the steps involved in seeking compensation through
GUIDE TO PERSONAL INJURY/ACCIDENT CLAIMS At Richard Grogan & Associates we have Solicitors with significant experience and expertise who will advise and guide you through all matters relating to bringing
Note WHEN LIFE IS AN INJURY: AN ECONOMIC APPROACH TO WRONGFUL LIFE LAWSUITS THOMAS A. BURNS INTRODUCTION Can life be an injury? Jurists, theologians, and philosophers have spilled much ink over this question.
THE FIRTH V SUTTON DECISIONS Introduction In professional negligence proceedings against a solicitor, the court s aim is to determine what amount of money would put the plaintiff in the position he would
APPENDIX B: RECOMMENDATIONS TO BE IMPLEMENTED ON A NATIONALLY CONSISTENT BASIS Implementation of the Panel's Recommendations A national response Recommendation 1 The Panel's recommendations should be incorporated
"Wrongful Birth": An Ironic Name for a Cause of Action in the Law of Medical Malpractice R. Lee Akazaki This publication first appeared in the September 1999 volume of The Advocates Quarterly. Introduction
Chapter 4 Crimes (Review) On a separate sheet of paper, write down the answer to the following Q s; if you do not know the answer, write down the Q. 1. What is a crime? 2. There are elements of a crime.
MEDICAL NEGLIGENCE ANNUAL CASE REVIEW MEDICAL NEGLIGENCE 2009/2010 Ian Butcher, barrister 1 GETT V TABET (2010) 265 ALR 227 No damages for loss of chance for personal injury following negligence Need for
ABA Section of Family Law 2012 Fall CLE Conference Philadelphia, October 2012 Surrogacy and Employment Law: When it s not your pregnancy is it your leave of absence? The UK position Colin Rogerson Solicitor
EXPLANATION OF LEGAL TERMS Affidavit: After the event litigation insurance: Application notice: Bar Council: Barrister: Basic Charges: Before the Event Legal Expenses Insurance: Bill of costs: Bolam test:
Religious Attitudes to Matters of Life Sanctity of Life Life is a sacred God-given gift. It is only for God to decide when it starts and ends. It is extremely precious and should be treated with the utmost
Standards & Guidelines December 2011 v1 Serving the public by guiding the medical profession Approval Date: Originating Committee: December 2011 v1 Advisory Committee on Non-Hospital Surgical Facilities
In the Supreme Court of Georgia Decided: October 19, 2009 S08G1947. MCCORD et al. v. LEE et al. MELTON, Justice. This case regards the proper application of the statute of limitations in a medical malpractice
Province of Alberta LIMITATIONS ACT Revised Statutes of Alberta 2000 Current as of December 17, 2014 Office Consolidation Published by Alberta Queen s Printer Alberta Queen s Printer 5 th Floor, Park Plaza
Medical malpractice Deborah B. Garibay, RN, JD, CPHRM Deputy General Counsel Medical Faculty Associates, Inc. 4 required elements Duty owed Breach of the duty Causation Harm/damages Duty A patient physician
Australian Proportionate Liability Regime May 2014 16 NOVEMBER 2011 Curwoods Lawyers Australia Square Plaza Building Level 9, 95 Pitt Street SYDNEY NSW 2000 t +61 2 9231 4166 f +61 2 9221 3720 CURWOODS
ISSUE In line with the overall tort system, the purpose of medical malpractice liability is to compensate patients who suffer an injury as a result of medical negligence. However, an effective tort system
In the September 2007 issue of Family Law News we published an article that analyzed the Court of Appeals ruling on gestational surrogacy in Roberto d.b. That article is printed for you again, this time
AKRON LAw REVIEW MEDICAL MALPRACTICE Wrongful Birth * Preconception Torts 0 Duty to Inform of Genetic Risks Becker v. Schwartz, 46 N.Y.2d 401, 386 N.E.2d 807, 413 N.Y.S.2d 895 (1978). N 1977 the Supreme
In vitro Fertilization: The status of the frozen embryo Prof Anne Muigai Jomo Kenyatta University of Agriculture and Technology, Juja, Kenya The first Kenyan IVF babies were born on 8 th May 2006 The event
This is the author s version of a work that was submitted/accepted for publication in the following source: Stickley, Amanda P. (2012) Long term exposure to asbestos satisfies test for causation. Queensland
LITIGATION OF PRODUCTS LIABILITY CASES IN EXOTIC FORUMS - PUERTO RICO By Francisco J. Colón-Pagán 1 I. OVERVIEW OF PUERTO RICO LEGAL SYSTEM A. Three branches of government B. Judicial Branch 1. Supreme
Principles of European Tort Law TITLE I. Basic Norm Chapter 1. Basic Norm Art. 1:101. Basic norm (1) A person to whom damage to another is legally attributed is liable to compensate that damage. (2) Damage
Queensland Workers Compensation and Rehabilitation and Other Legislation Amendment Act 2010 Act No. 24 of 2010 Queensland Workers Compensation and Rehabilitation and Other Legislation Amendment Act 2010
MEMORANDUM From: Mitchell S. Cohen, Esquire Re: Decisions Governing the Issue of Secondary Exposure Asbestos Cases in the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania and States of New Jersey and New York Date: 11 November
ONE OF US, questionnaire on bioethics f o r candidates for European elections 2014 Europe, protection of life and respect for human dignity Last year, almost 2,000,000 EU citizens all over the 28 Member
Your consent to our cookies if you continue to use this website.