1 Electronic Medical Records The thirty year struggle for adoption Drew Loucks, Dwight Keysor and Lauren Peters
2 Introduction Electronic medical records (EMRs) were introduced to the healthcare market in the 1980s and were expected to transform the healthcare industry by digitizing all medical records. EMRs were expected to massively reduce costs and improve patient safety and quality of care. However, the healthcare industry as a whole has been slow to adopt this technology principally due to poor economic incentives for the care delivery organizations (hospitals, private practices, clinics) that would use them. As of Q1 2010, less than 40 hospitals in the US (.7%) had adopted a fully integrated EMR (See Figure 1). 1 As a result, the government has had to subsidize the capital costs of the technology given the apparent benefits to the healthcare industry and greater society. This paper is going to look at the EMR ecosystem and its stakeholders in order to better understand why a technology with so much promise, hype, and perceived benefit has seen such slow adoption rates. Obviously, the producers of EMRs did not fully understand the overall ecosystem and what would be required in order for the technology to take hold in the industry. There is also the concern for what the emerging standard will be across the EMRs themselves as well as within an EMR (e.g. different software applications). We believe that some of the main reasons for the slow adoption are that the return on investment for a care delivery organization is low relative to the large up front capital costs and ongoing operation costs (See Appendix 1 for example pricing) For example a small practice can pay $30,000 for a 3-year licensing contract and about $3,000 per year in maintenance, this can go up to $125,000 and $20,000 respectively for larger networks. 2 In addition, the time required for integration and training never outweighed the perceived benefits, which mainly accrued to the other players within the ecosystem. On top of this the EMR software packages were historically not user friendly, hard to install, and other innovations and standards were not in place to make this a successful endeavor. Even today the promise is still the same: the EMR environment should provide the healthcare industry as a whole with massive benefit including improved accuracy, increased efficiency, better patient safety, more accurate coding, improved patient confidentiality, disaster recovery capabilities, massive reduction in paper, better patient data safety, better resource allocation, significant cost savings, reduced malpractice premiums, advanced data outputs, coordination of care regardless of patient location, and better information flow to give better care at a lower cost. But even with all these benefits, adoption of the technology has taken well over 30 years and we still need to have a government stimulus program in place to incent doctors to migrate to EMR technology. HIMSS Analytics, the authoritative source on EMR adoption trends, devised the EMR adoption model to track EMR progress at hospitals and health systems (See Figure 1). This model scores hospitals in the HIMSS Analytics Database on their progress in completing the 8 stages to creating a paperless patient record environment. 3 As you can see 1 HIMSS Analytics, EMR Sophistication correlates to hospital quality data, white paper, 2006 (illustrated in Figure 1) 2 Zaroukian, Michael MD, PhD. EMR Cost Benefit Analysis: Managing ROI into Reality Accessed 10 October HIMSS Analytics, EMR Sophistication correlates to hospital quality data, white paper, 2006.
3 from the figure below the healthcare system is still a long way from a true paperless environment. Why has adoption of this technology taken so long? Why do we need government intervention into a market where there is so much value? What was the EMR technology ecosystem missing in the past that today can make this technology successful? Figure 1 What is an EMR? The leading healthcare technology organization, Healthcare Information and Management Systems Society (HIMSS), defines an EMR as a software application environment composed of a clinical data repository, clinical decision support, controlled medical vocabulary, order entry, computerized provider order entry, pharmacy management software, and clinical documentation application. This application supports the patient s electronic medical record across inpatient and outpatient environments, and is used by healthcare practitioners to document, monitor, and manage health care delivery within a care delivery organization (CDO). The data in the EMR is the legal record of what happened to the patient during their encounter at the CDO and is owned by the CDO. 5 It is important to understand the difference between EMRs and EHRs (Electronic Health Records) as they very often are used interchangeably but are actually quite different. HIMSS defines EHRs as a subset of each care delivery organizations EMR. It is the EHRs of the patient 4 4 HIMSS Analytics, EMR Sophistication correlates to hospital quality data, white paper, Garet, Dave and Davis, Mike, Electronic medical records vs Electronic health records: Yes, there is a difference, white paper, 2006.
4 that can be shared across different CDOs and states to allow the data to be accessed anywhere not just in the CDO s infrastructure. 6 The EMR environment is fairly complex as it includes several core applications that work together to capture accurate patient data. The players throughout the ecosystem can then access it to improve quality of care, patient safety, reduce medical errors, and greatly reduce the time and cost needed to administer patients. Government Intervention HITECH ACT Despite these benefits the healthcare industry has been very slow to adopt the EMR technology. The primary reasons for the historically low adoption rates, which we will discuss in greater detail later, are low return on investment (ROI) to the CDO, the cost of ongoing maintenance and the massive amount of time required to implement the system. The government, however, recognizes the tremendous benefits that EMR technology offers in the form of cost savings and improvements in quality of care. As a result, in 2009 the government passed the HITECH Act which budgeted approximately $20 billion over the next 10 years to incent hospitals and physicians to implement the use of EHRs and EMRs. Under this plan each hospital is eligible for $2 million and physicians $44,000. Below is a chart of expected reimbursements and payments made to specific doctors over time. Figure 2 7 To receive these incentives organizations must implement an EMR that (1) protects the privacy of health information; (2) ensures the comprehensive collection of patient demographic and clinical data; (3) includes patient demographic and clinical health information; and (4) has the capacity to provide clinical decision and physician order entry. In addition, the organization must demonstrate meaningful use of EHRs and EMRs. The criteria for meaningful use includes: 1) eprescribing electronic prescribing, 2) allowing for the electronic exchange of 6 Garet, Dave and Davis, Mike, Electronic medical records vs Electronic health records: Yes, there is a difference, white paper, AthenaHealth, Inc, A summary of the HITECH ACT, whitepaper, 2009.
5 health information to improve the quality of health care, such as the promoting of care coordination, and 3) submitting clinical quality measures to the government to be decided at a later date by CMS. 8 The general goal and timeline of the bill is below: Focus on data capture and sharing Stage Focus on purely gathering data and implementing EHRs and EMRs Advanced analytical and clinical processes Stage Healthcare analytics should begin to start being used more heavily Improved performance and health outcomes Stage Benchmarking against relevant data will become standard Those practices that do not adopt the technology will be penalized with cuts in Medicare and Medicaid payments: %, %, % (maximum reduction). 9 This penalty paired with the subsidy provides an incentive to implement a meaningful use EMR. This should drive massive market adoption of the technology. The Innovation Ecosystem: An Assessment of Risks I. Initiation Risk: At this stage there is essentially no initiation risk as the concept and products have been available for well over 30 years. Initiative risk concerns that have been addressed during EMR progression include storage capacity, ease of data transfer, speed, determining certain format and language standards, and information security. For assessment purposes, however, we will review four relevant questions to more thoroughly evaluate the risk. a. Feasibility of product: The hardware and software applications have been developed and proven. The standard/platform consideration is less of a threat now, but there is still anticipation about which product will emerge as the leader. Particularly given industry consolidation, the producer that can secure momentum in the marketplace (with proven efficacy) will most likely have a long-term hold on majority market share. 8 AthenaHealth, Inc, A summary of the HITECH ACT, whitepaper, AthenaHealth, Inc, A summary of the HITECH ACT, whitepaper, 2009.
6 II. b. Benefit to customers: The value proposition to customers, which are the care delivery organizations, is clear; enhanced operational efficiency and significantly improved quality of care, as long as security of records is ensured. c. Competitive landscape: There have been hundreds of companies focused on harnessing this market opportunity over the past 30 years. A few of the top, mature vendors in the space include GE Centricity, Cerner, Sage and McKesson and some of the newer vendors include NextGen, e-mds, eclinicalworks, and MED3000. However, the large number of players within this space has added to the problem of adoption, which we will review in greater detail shortly. d. Supply chain management: As previously mentioned, the products have been brought to market and therefore we do not believe the supply chain poses a risk at this stage. Interdependence Risk a. Interdependence represents one of the biggest challenges towards the success of EMR technology. As mentioned in our discussion of the competitive landscape, there have been hundreds of companies that have entered the market with new and innovative healthcare delivery product offerings. Given the highly specialized nature of the healthcare industry, there are many opportunities to carve out a niche. One problem that has evolved as a result is that many of the EMR hardware and software applications that have been developed are incompatible with each other. Figure 3 illustrates the complex environment that exists within the EMR environment (note: definitions of acronyms are included in the appendix). The numerous service and product offerings available and the weak interdependence links between applications will continue to hinder success for EMR technology. Not only is there interdependence required within the applications of the EMR itself, but within other digitized components currently existing within the CDO, which represents operational uncertainty. The adoption of digital critical complementary systems (e.g. bill pay system) has not been absent from the healthcare space and these systems have faced the same hurdles as EMRs (capital investment, training). The existence of this fragmented, piecemeal digital landscape within some CDOs presents a challenge for EMRs to be adopted. Managers want to find a system that will talk with or at least provide the least disruption to the networks already in place. The EMR adoption may make these previous investments obsolete and therefore may delay the decision to implement a new system.
7 Figure 3 10 III. Adoption Risk a. Herein lies the crux of the issue. A map of the players involved in the EMR ecosystem is illustrated below. We have also included a chart outlining the pros and cons. Organizational uncertainty exists as there may be many decision makers that influence adoption (e.g. pharmacy, lab, core hospital). Our key takeaway in analyzing the EMR ecosystem is that the benefits offered by EMR technology do not exceed the costs (economic and intangible) incurred by the care delivery organizations. It is true that EMR technology would greatly enhance efficiency and improve the quality of care for these organizations. However, below we discuss the principal issues that have hindered adoption over the past 30 years. i. ROI: Given the massive amount of cost savings that are associated with EMR adoption, it is easy to make an argument that the ROI is quite attractive. The challenge, however, is that it is difficult to measure the savings. For example, if errors in prescription filling are cut due to the adoption of electronic records (no more illegible handwritten prescriptions from doctors) it is difficult to measure the cost savings that is associated with this improved efficiency. ii. Integration and training: The adoption of EMR technology would require an immense amount of training for doctors, supporting staff and 10 HIMSS Analytics, EMR Sophistication correlates to hospital quality data, white paper, 2006.
8 Figure 4 administrators (mostly the latter two). The time and cost associated with this endeavor proved to be a major hurdle for adoption among care delivery organizations. There is also some resistance among doctors about losing the individualization of care since these systems often create standardized checklists. iii. Ease of use: Many of the initial attempts at adoption were met with resistance because users found the applications difficult to install and use. iv. Interdependence: As mentioned above, the dynamic nature of the ecosystem has led to numerous product and service offerings within the ecosystem. The problem that has evolved is that many of these hardware and software applications do not speak to each other. This too has inhibited adoption.
9 Figure 5 Stakeholders Pros Cons Software Providers Meaningful market Compatibility with opportunity other products and Hardware Providers Meaningful market opportunity Regulators Improved quality of healthcare Reduced care costs Improved data sources for analysis Insurance Companies Improved information flow More accurate and efficient coding and billing Reduced diagnosis and treatment error Less paper applications Compatibility with other products and applications New regulation standards to be determined and enforced (e.g. Potential for insurance companies to use data to discriminate against ill patient pools or reimbursement to providers) Doctors Better patient safety More accurate coding More efficient billing Patient Confidentiality Disaster recovery capability Reduction in paper Data safety Reduced malpractice premiums Improved information flow Coordination of care regardless of patient location Advanced data output Training requirement Not all user friendly Weak interdependence between applications Fear of doctor that it depersonalizes and mechanizes the art of care delivery Requirement of EMR more cost burdensome for private practice doctors than those affiliated with hospital
10 Patients Reduced wait times Better quality of care Reduced insurance premiums Less paperwork Enhanced confidentiality Reduced risk of misdiagnosis and treatment error Care Delivery Organizations Better patient safety More accurate coding Patient Confidentiality Disaster recovery capability Reduction in paper Data safety Reduced malpractice premiums Improved information flow Cost savings Lack of process improvement as EMRs have not been adopted to scale (product improvement has existed for 30 years). Digitizing records brings in new notion of security breaches to patients (similar to identity theft risk financial services sector experienced) High initial capital costs ROI difficult to measure Training requirement Weak interdependence between applications Not all user friendly Lack of process improvement in EMR industry may penalize early adopter CDO Conclusion The value EMRs present to society, including improved patient outcomes and better efficiency of expensive resources (healthcare professionals and equipment) outweigh the implementation and operating costs. Allowing for cost sharing and aligning benefit realization across all players in the EMR ecosystem will help with the enormous costs associated with having a nationally coordinated Health IT system. One health economist, Professor Robert Miller of the University of California, San Francisco, suggests a full implementation of EMRs in all U.S. physicians' offices and hospitals would cost a massive $150 billion spread over the next eight years, He assesses this amount as manageable given that it accounts for less than 1 percent increase per year in total U.S. healthcare spending. 11 This amount may be manageable but CDOs have not taken the leap. The complexity of the product and the ecosystem within which an EMR operates in addition to the high cost of adoption and operation has left this technology on the ground for 30 years. Uptake is inevitable, as there is no substitute for digitizing records (the choice lies in either paper or digital) but the speed of the adoption curve will most likely uptick due to recent legislation. EMRs are currently still on the product 11 National EMR Adoption could cost $150B. FierceHealth IT. 3 August 2008 accessed 8 Oct
11 improvement curve and the recent HITECH act is trying to spark adoption and start the march down the process improvement curve. This switch will hopefully allow for price decreases making the system more accessible to smaller care organizations such as nursing homes and notfor-profit hospitals. The HITECH act helps the organizations (CDOs) responsible for the capital outlay with the full cost as these CDOs do not fully internalize the benefit, all players in the ecosystem do. Since everyone benefits (including society as a whole) the costs should be distributed amongst the ecosystem and not solely placed on the CDO. Cost distribution is a difficult topic to breach, as it cannot burden any one or all collectively, so as to further discourage adoption. The HITECH act has partly aligned this cost sharing initiative between CDO and government with the subsidy and penalty, easing one of the largest roadblocks to adoption. Since the healthcare sector, given its high regulation and complex web of players, does not operate as a true free market economy this balance between internalizing benefits and costs is delicate and often requires legislation. The next key player in the ecosystem for alignment is the Payers/Insurance companies as they see they benefit most from digitizing (we consider Doctors as decision makers within the CDO). Patients do benefit, and perhaps a small amount of the cost can be passed along, but we suspect that is not the most effective route of cost sharing and may exacerbate the rising healthcare cost problem that plagues the nation. EMR companies and legislators need to examine how the payers benefit from increased data accuracy and outcome information these networks provide and have them contribute financially for this benefit. If laws are put into place requiring funding and reimbursement to rely on digital reporting and analysis, the success of EMR systems will be necessary from the view of every stakeholder and the costs will be more manageable if shared.
12 Appendix 1 Estimated EMR Costs (Source: Accessed 9 October 2010: Costs Software License EMR license prices range from $1,000 - $25,000. Where an average license for a FULL/TRUE EMR usually starts at $10,000 and a where a light/entry level EMR usually starts at around $1,000. Implementation Implementation costs are usually billed hourly at a rate of $75-$150 per hour. Average implementation time per provider is 35 hours. Where 10 hours are used for customization, 25 hours for training and 10 hours for computer/network setup. This becomes exponentially lower as more physicians are added. For our example, we will use an hourly rate of $100 per hour. Hardware Where most physicians have a 3 to 1 assistant ratio, we ve suggested 1 Tablet PC for the provider, 3 workstations for the assistants and a Server. Tablet PC = $2,500, Workstation = $1,000, Server = $2,000. Support & Maintenance Ongoing support costs will be incurred from both an annual support contract with the software vendor for updates and technical support and the increased need of hardware/network support through a local IT representative. Appendix 2 - Definitions clinical data repository (CDR): The CDR is a real-time database that consolidates data from a variety of clinical sources to present a unified view of a single patient. In a hospital this is a repository for clinical data from the various departmental systems or a data warehouse, which provides access to a patient's health information through a single log in. controlled medical vocabulary (CMV): it ensures that the practitioners who use the EMR are accessing accurate and comparable data. clinical decision support system (CDSS): is software designed to aid clinicians in decision making by matching individual patient characteristics to computerized knowledge bases for the purpose of generating patient-specific assessments or recommendations. computerized provider order entry (CPOE): this systems comprises clinical applications that enable clinicians (eg, physicians, nurses, therapists, pharmacists) to enter orders (for tests, medications, services, or other clinical processes) for further processing (storage in a database for record-keeping, routing/communicating to someone.
13 Bibliography AthenaHealth, Inc, A summary of the HITECH ACT, whitepaper, Garet, Dave and Davis, Mike, Electronic medical records vs Electronic health records: Yes, there is a difference, HIMSS Analytics white paper, HIMSS Analytics, EMR Sophistication correlates to hospital quality data, white paper, Le Clair, Craig. Electronic Medical Records Need More To Support Meaningful Use. Forrester Research. May 20, National EMR Adoption could cost $150B. FierceHealth IT. 3 August 2008 accessed 8 Oct Rishel, Wes. The Definition of EHRs in US Health IT Incentive Regulations. Gartner. February 3, Rishel, Wes. Meaningful Use and certification of EHRs: Tracking evolving targets. Gartner. September 17, Shaffer, VI. Predicts 2010: Healthcare Providers and Governments Seek the Benefits and Address the IT Implications of Electronic Health Record. Gartner. December 7, Zaroukian, Michael MD, PhD. EMR Cost Benefit Analysis: Managing ROI into Reality Accessed 10 October 2010.
New September 2010 Critical Report! Electronic Health Records: Trends, Issues, Regulations & Technologies A Management Primer & Update Including: EHR Definition and Role EHR vs. EMR The New Momentum in
Addressing the State of the Electronic Health Record (EHR) Agenda Definitions Attributes Differences Adoption Model Current State Challenges Implementation considerations What is it? EMR CMR EHR EPR PHR
Electronic Medical Records Robert M. Underwood, MD, CPE, FAAEM CMIO, RMH Healthcare Disclaimer I am an employee of RMH Healthcare No financial interest in any IT company What is a CMIO? History: September
Electronic Medical Records Competitive Pricing and Experience Analysis A Representative Example for Kafka Clinic a 5- Physician Family Practice Josh Harrington Haas School of Business email@example.com
A Guide to Choosing the Right EMR Software A Guide to Choosing the Right EMR Software Eight Important Benchmarks for Community and Critical Access Hospitals Eight Important Benchmarks for Community and
Successful EHR Change Management Roles and responsibilities White paper Table of contents Executive summary... 2 Introduction... 3 Never underestimate the power of the people... 3 People... 4 From resisting
Healthcare Information Technology (HIT) Why State Governments Must Help Create a National Health Information Network Ian C. Bonnet Deloitte Consulting LLP October, 2005 State Leadership in developing a
Proving Meaningful Use of a Certified EMR In order to qualify for the incentive, you must first prove meaningful use of a certified EMR. Meaningful use is defined as the use of certified EHR technology
Hospital IT Expenses and Budgets Related to Clinical Sophistication Market Findings from HIMSS Analytics Table of Contents 2 3 4 8 13 14 Executive Summary Expense Metrics Used for this Research Operating
IBM Software Information Management Achieving meaningful use of healthcare information technology A patient registry is key to adoption of EHR 2 Achieving meaningful use of healthcare information technology
Medweb Telemedicine 667 Folsom Street, San Francisco, CA 94107 Phone: 415.541.9980 Fax: 415.541.9984 www.medweb.com Meaningful Use On July 16 2009, the ONC Policy Committee unanimously approved a revised
Meaningful Use and Security Risk Analysis Meeting the Measure Security in Transition Executive Summary Is your organization adopting Meaningful Use, either to gain incentive payouts or to avoid penalties?
Achieving Meaningful Use in Private Practice A close examination of Stage 2 requirements Abstract As part of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009, the Federal Government laid the groundwork
Integrated eprescribing Patient Coupon Solutions If You re Not in the HCP Workflow, You re Out Devin Paullin EVP, Corporate Business Development Physicians Interactive Dan Pucci Director of National Sales,
OPTIMIZING THE USE OF YOUR ELECTRONIC HEALTH RECORD A collaborative training offered by Highmark and the Pittsburgh Regional Health Initiative Introductions Disclosures Successful completion of training
Meaningful Use Overview Meaningful use is the use of a certified electronic health record (EHR) to demonstrate improved quality and safety of health care delivery for a patient population within a clinical
Dr. Peters has declared no conflicts of interest related to the content of his presentation. Steve G. Peters MD NAMDRC 2013 No financial conflicts No off-label usages If specific vendors are named, will
WHITEPAPER Healthcare Data Interoperability: What s Required to Establish Meaningful Use Driving Healthcare Efficiency As the cost of healthcare increases, so does the drive of healthcare organizations
US Hospital Information Systems Overview and Outlook, 2013 2020 Managing Information in an Era of Reform December 2014 Contents Section Slide Number Executive Summary 11 Market Background 19 The EHR Landscape
EMDEON CLINICAL SOLUTIONS Meaningful Use is easy with our web-based EMR Lite and leading Health Information Exchange Simplifying the Business of Healthcare EMDEON OVERVIEW Emdeon Connecting payers, providers
May 2006 Issue EHRs and Information Availability: Are You At Risk? The EHR initiative is changing the face of disaster and the nature of prevention planning. By Jim Grogan On April 27, 2004, the age of
Chapter 15 The Electronic Medical Record 8 th edition 1 Lesson 15.1 Introduction to the Electronic Medical Record Define, spell, and pronounce the terms listed in the vocabulary. Discuss the presidential
Agenda A 360-Degree Approach to EMR Implementation Environmental Overview Information on the HITECH Stimulus Opportunities Hospitals, Physicians and Interoperability Preparing for an EMR Implementation
Research Are Electronic Medical Records Worth the Costs of Implementation? TARA O'NEILL AUGUST 6, 2015 Executive Summary Electronic medical records (EMRs), as a cornerstone of a more intelligent, adaptive,
WHITEPAPER 6 EHR TRENDS to Watch in 2015 INTRODUCTION Since the passage of the HITECH Act in 2009, the healthcare industry has undergone rapid changes in technology. The adoption of electronic health records
Concept Series Paper on Electronic Prescribing E-prescribing is the use of health care technology to improve prescription accuracy, increase patient safety, and reduce costs as well as enable secure, real-time,
CHAPTER ONE: EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Industry at a Glance Physician Use of EMR Hospital Use of EMR Size and Growth of the Market Key Issues and Trends Affecting the Market Leading Market Participants Conclusions
Health Information Technology chartbook volume II Maine Hospitals Survey 2010 UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN MAINE Health Information Technology Maine Hospitals Survey Volume II Authors Martha Elbaum Williamson,
White Paper Four rights can t be wrong: why now is the right time to implement an EHR OptumInsight www.optum.com Page 1 White Paper EHRs and small to mid-size physician practices: Finding the right fit
Transforming Healthcare in Emerging Markets with EMR adoption Author Ann Geo Thekkel User Experience. Accenture, India Ann.firstname.lastname@example.org Abstract Compromising 24 countries, 35 percent of the
Status of Electronic Health Records in Missouri Hospitals HIDI SPECIAL REPORT JULY 2012 HIDI SPECIAL REPORT INTRODUCTION The steady progress that Missouri hospitals continue to demonstrate in their adoption
PUBLISHED BY: CareCloud Corporation 5200 Blue Lagoon Drive, Suite 900 Miami, FL 33126 Phone: (877) 342-7517 Email: email@example.com Copyright 2012 CareCloud Corporation. All rights reserved. No part
EMR Incorporation: Evaluating the Benefits for Your Organization BHM Healthcare Solutions Measurable Results. Sustainable Solutions Learning Objectives To evaluate the pros and cons of electronic medical
The Human Experiment- Electronic Medical/Health Records Patient safety is one of the primary stated intentions behind the push for computerized medical records. To the extent illegible handwriting leads
An Innovative Approach to Health Data Integration: The athenanet-microsoft Amalga Connector June 14, 2011 By Nancy Fabozzi, Senior Industry Analyst, Health Care and Life Sciences IT, Frost & Sullivan Digitized
Monday, March, 00 :5 :5 pm Adoption and Meaningful Use of EHR Technology in a Hospital Sanjay Shah, MBA, CMPE, FHIMSS President, HCIT+ (Former) VP & CIO, Cabell Huntington Hospital Anthony Adkins, RN Director
With the changes made in the final rule, earning the EHR incentive is still not easy, but at least it s easier. A Physician s Guide to the Medicare and Medicaid EHR Incentive Programs: The Basics David
Whitepaper Choosing the Right Athlete Electronic Health Record System Dave Glickman Chief Operating Officer, Presagia Page 1 of 13 CONTENTS Introduction... 3 What Makes an Athlete EHR Unique... 4 Getting
1.Welcome Page Page 1 Page 2 2.Practice Characteristics Please describe the facility where you primarily work 1. Which of the following best describes the facility where you primarily work? Hospital based
Regional Extension Centers: Support for EMR Adoption and Meaningful Use Achievement Jennifer McAnally Director, tnrec The State of Healthcare Today The United States ranks: 37 th 72 nd 41 st 46 th Overall
HL7 & Meaningful Use Charles Jaffe, MD, PhD CEO Health Level Seven International HIMSS 11 Orlando February 23, 2011 Overview Overview of Meaningful Use HIT Standards and Meaningful Use Overview HL7 Standards
How Real-Time Data Integration is Changing the Face of Healthcare IT INTRODUCTION The twin goals of the Affordable Care Act reducing costs and improving quality have triggered sweeping changes to the way
Running head: ORGANIZATIONAL IS BUDGETING CRITERIA/SOLUTIONS 1 Organizational IS Budgeting Criteria/Solutions Jennifer Cavallaro National University Running head: ORGANIZATIONAL IS BUDGETING CRITERIA/SOLUTIONS
Meaningful Use Rules Proposed for Electronic Health Record Incentives Under HITECH Act By: Cherilyn G. Murer, JD, CRA Introduction On December 30, 2009, The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS)
PUBLISHED BY: CareCloud Corporation 5200 Blue Lagoon Drive, Suite 900 Miami, FL 33126 Phone: (877) 342-7517 Email: firstname.lastname@example.org Copyright 2013 CareCloud Corporation. All rights reserved. No part
MERIT-BASED INCENTIVE PAYMENT SYSTEM (MIPS) ADVANCING CARE INFORMATION CATEGORY QUALITY PAYMENT PROGRAM FINAL RULE SUMMARY Synopsis The Medicare Reauthorization and CHIP Act of 2015 (MACRA) sunsets the
Electronic Prescribing Guide Establishing a Computer-to-Computer Connection Between Your Practice, Payers and Pharmacies Electronic Prescribing Guide This guide is provided to you by Surescripts, the Nation
ROPES & GRAY ALERT Health Care February 28, 2012 CMS Issues Proposed Rule on Stage 2 Meaningful Use, ONC Issues Companion Proposed Rule on 2014 EHR Certification Criteria On February 23, 2012, the Centers
Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health Act HITECH and Meaningful Use - An Overview - HITECH and Meaningful Use - An Overview - Background What is Meaningful Use (MU) MU Criteria
Stage 2 Meaningful Use What the Future Holds Lindsey Wiley, MHA HIT Manager Oklahoma Foundation for Medical Quality An Important Reminder For audio, you must use your phone: Step 1: Call (866) 906-0123.
Some Tout CMS Proposed Meaningful Use Definition for Use of Electronic Health Records As Too Ambitious By Craig A. Conway, J.D., LL.M. (Health Law) email@example.com Just in time for the New Year,
The Stark Law Effect Driving EMR Adoption and Connectivity to Hospitals 1 Stark Law, often referred to as the physician-referral law, has governed hospital and physician relationships for more than two
Adopting Electronic Medical Records: What Do the New Federal Incentives Mean to Your Individual Physician Practice? U John M. Neclerio, Esq.,* Kathleen Cheney, Esq., C. Mitchell Goldman, Esq., and Lisa
TEKsystems Healthcare Services is dedicated to providing workforce planning, human capital management and professional IT services to the healthcare industry. Utilizing our suite of services, including
Making the EHR Switch If you are contemplating the move to a new electronic health record (EHR) solution, you are not alone. A 2013 survey by Black Book Rankings* shows that nearly one in six medical practices
EHR Meaningful Use Incentives for School-Based Health Clinics Denise Holmes Institute for Health Care Studies Michigan State University September 27, 2011 Background The Health Information Technology for
Comments to Legislative Workgroup on E-Prescribing eqhealth Solutions is a not-for-profit, physician sponsored health care organization operating in Louisiana, Illinois, Florida and Mississippi. It has
What GI Practices Need to Know About the Electronic Health Record Incentive Program Joel V. Brill, MD, AGAF Lawrence R. Kosinski, MD, MBA, AGAF Disclosures Joel V. Brill, MD AGAF AGA Registry Executive
Of EHRs and Meaningful Use Pat Wise, RN, MA, MS FHIMSS COL (USA ret d) VP, Healthcare Information Systems, HIMSS 1 MU: Where We are Today From www.cms.gov As of the end of January 31, 2013: >210,000 EPs
Gartner Opening Session: Healthcare Payer and Provider Analysts Annemarie Earley and Joanne Galimi Notes accompany this presentation. Please select Notes Page view. These materials can be reproduced only
Record Locator Service on Trusted, Secure Nationwide Network Can Improve Care Coordination and Enable Meaningful Interoperability Summary Despite a recent slowdown in the growth of healthcare spending,
May 7, 2012 Ms. Marilyn Tavenner Acting Administrator Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services Department of Health and Human Services Attention: CMS-0044-P Mail Stop C4-26-05 7500 Security Boulevard
On February 17, 2009, President Obama signed into law the American Recovery & Reinvestment Act (ARRA) designed to stimulate the lagging U.S. economy. For the healthcare sector, ARRA included a health IT
CMS AND ONC FINAL REGULATIONS DEFINE MEANINGFUL USE AND SET STANDARDS FOR ELECTRONIC HEALTH RECORD INCENTIVE PROGRAM The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) and the Office of the National Coordinator
Easing the Burden of Healthcare Compliance In This Paper Federal laws require that healthcare organizations that suspect a breach of sensitive data launch an investigation into the matter For many mid-sized
Meaningful Use, ICD-10 and HIPAA 5010 Overview, talking points and FAQs Providence Health & Services is committed to using technology and evidence-based practices to deliver the highest quality care in
The Risks and Rewards when Implementing Electronic Medical Records Systems By: Erin Smith Aebel and Douglas Cherry There s No Such Thing as Free Money In 2009, President Obama signed the American Recovery
TRANSITIONING TO ELECTRONIC MEDICAL RECORDS: KEY ADVANTAGES OF ADOPTING A BEHAVIORAL HEALTH SPECIFIC EMR OVERVIEW This whitepaper helps behavioral health care practices navigate the process of adopting
The value MIE delivers can be summed up in two words: minimally TM invasive EHR WebChart EHR Portfolio minimally invasive TM Philosophy The MIE architecture was built to have a minimally invasive impact
Ambulatory Surgery Centers Is it time for a surgery center EMR? The few ambulatory surgery centers (ASC) that use full electronic medical records (EMR) systems are not only ahead of their colleagues in
Health IT What Does it Mean to You? Susan Brown, Iowa REC Director September 19, 2012 HEALTH IT, EHRs & MEANINGFUL USE 2 Health IT Video http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a3zb5 Jsh_c&feature=endscreen&NR=1
Four Years On: From HITECH to Optimization 2 Overview Healthcare Provider IT Marketplace and Impact of Last Four Years Calculating the ROI Associated with Healthcare IT Investments Establishing a Monitored
230 E. Ohio Street Suite 500 Chicago, IL 60611 Phone: 252-946-3546 Fax: 734-973-6996 E-mail: firstname.lastname@example.org AllMeds, Inc. Allscripts Healthcare Solutions Amazing Charts Aprima Medical Software, Inc.
The Five levels of EHR Adoption Mark R. Anderson, FHIMSS, CPHIMS CEO of AC Group, Inc. Mark Anderson, FHIMSS, CPHIMS Healthcare IT Futurist Why is this session important From 2009 and now in early 2011,
Meaningful Use Updates HIT Summit September 19, 2015 Meaningful Use Updates Nadine Owen, BS,CHTS-IS, CHTS-IM Health IT Analyst Hawaii Health Information Exchange No other relevant financial disclosures.
Enhancing patient care in rural communities Improving care, managing costs Affordable information technology Rural hospitals fill a tremendous need in communities across the country but face unenviable
ATTACHMENT T NAMCS EMR Supplement 2010 OMB No. 0920-0234: Approval expires 08/31/2009 NOTICE - Public reporting burden of this collection of information is estimated to average 20 minutes per response,
An Update in Electronic Health Records Mark Seigel, MD, FACOG Assistant Professor, Obstetrics and Gynecology, George Washington University School of Medicine Disclosure I have no financial interests or
Healthcare Informatics June 2012 Accountable Care Organizations Early Lessons learned from strong revenue cycle performers Healthcare Informatics Accountable Care Organizations Early Lessons learned from
May 28, 2015 The Honorable Andy Slavitt Acting Administrator Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Department of Health and Human Services Room 445-G, Hubert H. Humphrey Building 200 Independence Ave,