SUBROGATION PRINCIPLES AND PRACTICE PAUL HANDY CRAWFORD & CO BRENDAN MCCARTHY BEACHCROFT LLP
|
|
- Loreen Haynes
- 8 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 SUBROGATION PRINCIPLES AND PRACTICE PAUL HANDY CRAWFORD & CO BRENDAN MCCARTHY BEACHCROFT LLP Introduction We have split this paper into 5 sections: 1. Basic Principles 2. Causes of Action and Obtaining Information 3. Limitations and Defences 4. Distribution of Recovered Monies 5. Negotiating Sharing Agreements Basic Principles What is subrogation? Subrogation is the right of insurers, once they have paid the insurance money due, to exercise any rights or remedies of the insured arising out of the insured event to recover their outlay from a culpable third party. That right is almost invariably enshrined expressly in the wording of the insurance policy but, even if not written in to the policy, applies in any event. There are two key underlying principles to bear in mind when dealing with subrogation. The first is that subrogation is a doctrine founded on the indemnity principle, namely that an insured has a right to be indemnified against his loss but cannot make a profit from it by getting paid his insurance money as well as obtaining compensation from a third party. By way of example therefore and as illustrated by one of the leading subrogation cases, Castellain v Preston [1883] 11 QBD 380, if an insured vendor of a property suffers fire damage between exchange and completion and is indemnified by his insurers, the insured must then account back to insurers when the sale of the house is completed and he receives the full purchase price to which he was entitled in spite of the fire. Page 1 of 12
2 There are qualifications to this principle. For example, a gift from a third party, intended as extra compensation, will not be taken into consideration when accounting to insurers. Also, an insured can retain any surplus sum received from a third party once it has accounted to insurers. In Yorkshire Insurance Co. Ltd v Nisbet Shipping Co. Ltd [1962] 2 QB 330, insurers had paid the insured for the total loss of his ship in a collision. The insured then sued the owner of the other ship responsible for the collision. The damages were recovered in Canadian dollars but by the time the damages had been paid, the pound sterling had been devalued and as a result, the damages, when converted back to sterling, exceeded the insurance money paid. The High Court held that, once the insured reimbursed insurers in full, it was entitled to retain any surplus. Therefore windfalls belong to the insured. Secondly, insurers cannot pursue a claim in the name of their insured until the insured has been fully indemnified, unless agreed otherwise. The majority of policies will include an express condition permitting insurers to commence a subrogated claim in the insured's name even if negotiations over the extent of the entitlement to an indemnity have not been concluded. If not, such terms may need to be specifically agreed if urgent action needs to be taken in pursuing the recovery. Insurers must, of course, agree to indemnify the insured in respect of costs associated with bringing a subrogated claim. It is also likely that the policy will include an express term giving insurers the right to control any legal proceedings brought against a third party. In the absence of a specific term or agreement to that effect, if the insured has suffered a loss over and above the amount for which they have been indemnified, the insured is entitled to control the proceedings and can settle the claim without reference to the insurer. However, the insured must still act in good faith, which means including both insured and uninsured losses and not compromising any claim insurers may have when negotiating a settlement. Should the insurer's claim be prejudiced, the insurer would be able to seek reimbursement from the insured. It is important to remember that, following a loss, there can only be one claim made in the name of the insured, only 'one bite at the cherry', so it is important to ensure that all insured and uninsured losses are included. It is a settled rule of law that only one claim for damages can be made arising from one cause of action (a cause of action being defined as the set of facts or circumstances that give rise to a claim in Page 2 of 12
3 law). The reasons for this are based in public policy. There is a public interest in avoiding any possibility of two courts reaching inconsistent decisions on the same facts and issues, in there being finality in litigation and in protecting citizens from being vexed more than once by what is really the same claim. The significance of this rule is that a second claim arising out of the same cause of action will be regarded as an abuse of process and will be struck out. Hence the importance of making sure that both insured and uninsured losses are included in the claim. If a claim for either proceeds in isolation and results in a settlement or a judgment, a separate subsequent claim for the other will be prejudiced. The Courts in cases such as Buckland v Palmer [1984] 1 WLR 1109 and Hayler v Chapman [1989] 1 Lloyds Rep 490 (where, unbeknownst to insurers, the policyholders had sued for their uninsured losses) have refused later attempts by insurers to set aside the judgment or overturn the settlement so that they could bring a subrogated claim for the insured losses. That said, and provided of course the Defendant is willing to agree, there is nothing to prevent settlement of the insured element of any claim, but care must be taken in drafting the settlement agreement so as to ensure that the uninsured loss claim is preserved and there can be no argument that it is in full and final settlement of all causes of action by the insured against the third party. Causes of Action and Obtaining Information When considering whether there may be a recovery against a third party, it is necessary to consider all possible causes of action. These may include: Breach of contract Negligence Nuisance Defective Premises Act 1972 Rylands v Fletcher Consumer Protection Act 1987 Water Resources Act 1991 and related legislation This is not an exhaustive list. For a claim in contract, there obviously needs to have been a contract i.e. offer, acceptance and Page 3 of 12
4 consideration. What is crucial is establishing as a matter of fact what terms apply as well as any relevant limitations and exclusions and whether they are valid under the Unfair Contract Terms Act Where, as will be very likely, the contract involves the sale of goods and/or the supply of services, some very important terms are implied into the contract by statute law. Of particular importance where the contract involves the supply of goods is the term implied by section 14 of The Sale of Goods Act 1979 to the effect that the goods must be of satisfactory quality and fit for their purpose. So far as the supply of services is concerned, a term is implied by section 13 of The Supply of Goods and Services Act 1982 to the effect that the services must be carried out with reasonable care and skill. For negligence, there needs to be a duty of care owed, which has been breached, the breach of which has caused the damage and the damage can be demonstrated as not being too remote. Nuisance is the wrong done to a person by unlawfully disturbing them in the enjoyment of their property. This cause of action needs to be borne in mind, for example, in cases where there is damage by tree roots. The Defective Premises Act 1972 imposes duties on builders and others who do work on dwellings to ensure that work is done in a professional manner with proper materials so that the dwelling will be fit for habitation. There are also some helpful causes of action which involve strict liability. Where the loss occurs in the context of activities that might be regarded as high risk or inherently dangerous, a claim under Rylands v Fletcher [1868] UKHL 1 may be a possibility. The requirements for a claim under Rylands v Fletcher are that a person brings some substance onto his land for his own purposes which is likely to do harm if it escapes. The substance must be accumulated on the land, the use of the land must be non-natural and the substance must escape causing actual damage. Section 1 of the Consumer Protection Act 1987 imposes strict liability on the producers of defective products which cause damage to property intended for private use. Possible defendants include the manufacturer, any importer and, in certain circumstances, suppliers. Finally, the Water Industry Act 1991 and the Water Resources Act 1991 both place a strict liability on Page 4 of 12
5 water undertakings and the rivers authorities respectively where there is an escape of water from their pipes or equipment. As soon as the possible causes of action have been identified, it is vital to gather all relevant evidence as soon as possible. Time is of the essence for a number of reasons. Firstly, the fresher the insured's memory, the more they will be able to remember and the more weight their evidence will carry. Secondly, you do not want any documentation to be lost or destroyed. Thirdly, the reality is that an insured is going to be a lot less helpful once it has received its indemnity, whatever the policy conditions requiring co-operation may say. Fourthly, relevant documentation may highlight limits or restrictions on the rights of the insured to bring a claim against the third party and, if so, it is best to know that at the outset. In particular, but not exclusively, for contractual claims, all relevant documentation, whether express contracts, purchase orders, invoices, exchanges of correspondence, records of telephone conversations or photographs need to be sought. As a generalisation, there can be a presumption that a contract is some magical ringbound document with the word "Agreement" written in capitals on the front. Policyholders need to understand that agreements can be made informally and orally and all that information may be vital. If any more reason is needed to ensure that all electronic documents are sought, a new Electronic Disclosure Practice Direction (Practice Direction 31B) comes into force on 1 October. According to Kroll Ontrack (Summer 2008), 93% of information is now held in a digital format and 70% of that data is never printed. In any scenario therefore, there may be crucial documents that have only existed in electronic format and will not come to light if electronic searches are not conducted. In order to assist with gathering all relevant documents, it may be worth asking an insured the following questions: Who are the relevant people involved in the transaction? What is the relevant time frame? In what format is the relevant information likely to be kept? May there be relevant deleted files? Relevant s, even deleted ones, text messages and any other data retained in electronic formats should specifically be asked for. The key media are computers, laptops, mobiles, blackberrys and the like. It is a misconception to think that electronic disclosure only applies to big ticket, document heavy claims. At an early stage, the insured needs to be reminded of their obligations to retain all relevant Page 5 of 12
6 information, whether those documents assist or adversely affect the case. Quantum information should also be compiled and assembled at this stage. Where quantum may be an issue, it is prudent to notify the third party at an early stage so that their adjuster can be kept informed of the adjustment as it progresses. Limitations and Defences As the insurer stands in the shoes of the insured, the most important restriction on the doctrine of subrogation is that insurers can be in no better position than the insured would have been themselves. If the insured is therefore prevented from making a claim, the insurer falls with him. No Right of Claim This can arise in many ways. If the insured's claim is out of time, either by way of a contractual provision or by virtue of the Limitation Act, insurers' right of subrogation is lost as well. If immunity is granted by the policy itself in the form of a subrogation waiver, then that is the end of that. If the insured no longer exists and cannot exercise its rights, then insurers cannot do so either. In Smith (Plant Hire) Ltd v Mainwaring [1982] 2 Lloyds Rep 244, insurers had issued subrogation proceedings in their insured's name but later found out that the insured had been wound up some time previously. No assignment of rights had been taken prior to the liquidation and accordingly the Defendant was successful in getting the claim struck out as the claimant simply did not exist. If an insurer seeks to exercise subrogation in the name of an entity that has suffered no loss because it has already been fully indemnified under a contract with a third party, the claim will fail. In HSBC Rail (UK) v Network Rail Infrastructure [2006] 1 WLR 643, the claimant was the owner of railway rolling stock which was leased to a train operating company. The rolling stock had been damaged in a train derailment. By virtue of arrangements under the lease, the claimant had been fully indemnified by the train operating company. Insurers later commenced subrogation proceedings in the claimant's name against Network Rail who were responsible for the upkeep of the rail infrastructure. The claim was dismissed as the claimant had, in the eyes of the law, suffered no loss as it had already been fully indemnified by a third party under contract. Page 6 of 12
7 Another example, as we have seen above, is where there has already been a claim made in the insured's name arising out of the incident which has been prosecuted to judgment or settlement. Any subsequent attempt by or on behalf of insurers to launch a subrogated claim will be struck out as an abuse of process. Persons against whom subrogation is unavailable The Insured An insured has no right of action against himself and nor do his insurers. In Simpson v Thompson [1877] 3 App Cas 279 two ships in the ownership of the same insured collided. Having indemnified the owner in respect of one ship, insurers attempted to subrogate against him by virtue of his ownership of the other vessel but the House of Lords dismissed the claim as an insured has no right of action against himself. Persons for whose benefit insurance has been procured One specific area of importance which is well known is where, under a contractual arrangement, the insured may have agreed that the insurance should enure to a third party's benefit. This is a frequent issue in relation to leases, as seen in Mark Rowlands Ltd v Berni Inns Ltd [1986] 1 QB 211. In that case, a landlord leased a building to a tenant and the property was subsequently damaged by fire through the tenant's negligence. The property was insured by the landlord and once indemnified, the issue was whether a subrogated action could be brought against the tenant. The answer was no. The Court of Appeal took the view that the contractual arrangements between landlord and tenant as encapsulated in the lease were such that the landlord had taken out buildings insurance for the benefit of himself and his tenant and that in the event of fire the landlord and tenant had intended to look to the buildings insurers to cover the loss. The following factors were relevant, namely that: The landlord was required to insure the premises against fire. The tenant was required to pay part of the cost of the insurance (called an "insurance rent") taken out by the landlord. The tenant was required to keep the property in good repair, but that obligation did not extend to repairing fire damage. In the event of a fire the landlord was required to use the insurance proceeds to repair the property. Page 7 of 12
8 Co-assureds Where more than one party is insured under a composite policy (typically, contractor and subcontractor, landlord and tenant, bailor and bailee, etc) and a loss is caused through the negligence of one party, the question arises whether subrogation rights can be exercised against that co-assured. The answer in most cases is no. Many contracts contain risk allocation and insurance clauses and these often require one party to take out joint names insurance. The question which invariably arises following a loss is whether the obligation on one of the parties to take out joint names insurance operates to exclude the liability of the other party and instead require that party to look only to the insurers for any loss. The answer to that question is found by construing the true meaning and effect of the contract. The first question to ask is whether there is an intention that the joint names insurance is designed to render the party against whom proceedings have been commenced a co-assured. In Tyco Fire Solutions v Rolls-Royce Motor Cars Ltd [2008] EWCA Civ.286 there was a coinsurance clause in a construction contract which required the employer to maintain in the joint names of himself, the Construction Manager and others, including but not limited to, contractors, insurance of existing structures against Specified Perils. Construing the contract as a whole, the Court held that the clause was not one under which the employer was required to make the contractor a coassured but was simply a promise by the employer that there would be cover in place in respect of existing structures. The clause did not therefore render the contractor a co-assured and therefore he was not immune from subrogation in respect of the cause of the loss. If the effect of the joint names clause is to render the party in question a co-assured, the question then is whether, properly construed, the co-insurance clause operates to discharge that party from a liability they would otherwise have faced. In Co-operative Retail Services v Taylor Young Partnership Ltd [1990] 48 BLR 108, the Co-op engaged a contractor to construct new office premises for them and the contract required the contractor to take out a joint names policy covering the employer, the main contractor and the subcontractor against damage by fire to the contact works. The contract also contained an indemnity by the main contractor to the Co-op in respect of damage caused to their property by negligence but that Page 8 of 12
9 indemnity specifically absolved the main contractor from responsibility for damage to the contract works caused by insured risks prior to practical completion. On a proper construction of the contractual arrangements, the House of Lords was satisfied that the effect was to exclude all liability to the Co-op for fire damage and that any such damage was to be made good by the insurance. The Co-operative Retail decision was followed by the Court of Appeal in Scottish & Newcastle plc v G D Construction (St Albans) Ltd [2003] Lloyds Rep I.R However subrogation is excluded only where the co-assured has an insurable interest in the damaged subject matter. In National Oilwell (UK) Ltd v Davy Offshore Ltd [1993] 2 Lloyds Rep 582, certain works under construction were insured by the contractor and sub-contractors under a joint names policy. All of the parties had an insurable interest in the entire works so that each could have potentially insured the entire works. The contract between the contractor and the relevant subcontractor obliged the contractor to insure only in respect of losses occurring before goods had been delivered to the contractor by the sub-contactor. The losses which actually occurred were postdelivery losses. As such, the High Court held that the sub-contractor was a co-assured only in respect of pre-delivery losses and accordingly was found not to be immune from subrogation in respect of post-delivery losses. Distribution of Recovered Monies Where a subrogation recovery is successful, the general principles of how to deal with the distribution of recovered monies between an insurer and their insured are set out in the House of Lords decision in Napier and Ettrick (Lord) v R F Kershaw Ltd and Others [1993] 1 All ER 385. The following hypothetical example was used in that case to explain the general principle: Insured's loss - 160,000 Settlement monies - 130,000 Policy outlay - 100,000 Policy excess - 25,000 It was held that the insured was entitled to be fully indemnified for his loss of 160,000 although the recovery of the excess should come last in the chain of priorities. This is commonly summarised as "pay up and recover down" and is best illustrated by the following diagram. Page 9 of 12
10 35k uninsured loss 100k policy outlay Pay up Recover down 25k excess Accordingly from the settlement monies of 130,000, the first payment is 35,000 to the insured (their uninsured loss claim other than the excess) with the balance of 95,000 going to the insurer, towards the 100k they had paid the insured. If the recovery had been anything over 135k, that extra would have gone to the insured, towards their excess. However the rules are different where there is underinsurance and the policy is subject to average. In those circumstances, the insurer and insured are deemed to be co-insurers of the loss which means that any subrogated recovery proceeds are apportioned between them on a pro-rata basis. The position is different again where the policy is a valued policy. If a policyholder under a valued policy (which is not subject to average) is insured to the full agreed value of the subject matter (say, 80,000) but the agreed value is less than its actual value (of, say, 100,000) and the recovery from the third party is only 70,000, it appears that the entire 70,000 would be payable first to the insurers and the policyholder would recover nothing. The reason is that, by virtue of see 27(3) of the Marine Insurance Act 1906, the valuation agreed between the insurer and the insured is conclusive. Accordingly the insured is fully indemnified under a valued policy when he receives payment of the agreed value. Therefore the principle underpinning Napier and Ettrick (i.e. that the insured must receive a full indemnity before the insurer has any rights over the proceeds) does not apply to valued policies. Negotiating Sharing Agreements In the interest of avoiding disputes and misunderstandings and to facilitate the efficient conduct of a recovery action, it is advisable to agree a sharing arrangement between insurers and insured at an Page 10 of 12
11 early stage. At the heart of such sharing agreement would be an agreed formula for distribution of monies recovered so as to avoid any disagreements at the conclusion of the claim. The conventional and, in most cases, the most equitable approach is to agree a pro-rata split of any monies recovered. However, a particular difficulty that can arise with the pro-rata approach is where the uninsured losses are excessive/unsubstantiated. We have all encountered cases where insureds have been insistent on including, for example, very substantial claims for management time. Therefore, it is advisable to include in the sharing agreement a mechanism for resolving any disputes as to the recoverability of heads of loss as well as a dispute resolution mechanism to resolve swiftly any differences of opinion as to whether a settlement offer should be accepted or not. Other important matters to include in a sharing agreement are how the costs of the action are to be shared as well as co-operation clauses and agreed channels of communication. Experience shows that sharing agreements make recovery actions much simpler and easier to conduct, avoid disputes and encourage greater 'buy-in' by the insured in the overall recovery effort. Conclusion In summary therefore, and finishing off where we started, when considering a subrogated recovery it is worth bearing in mind the following checklist: 1. Has the insured been fully indemnified so that the right of subrogation is triggered. If not, a special agreement may need to be drawn up, expressly granting subrogation rights. 2. What evidence is available, both in hard copy and electronically. 3. What causes of action may apply? 4. What limitations are there to any recovery? This will include consideration of contractual terms between the parties and in the insurance policy. Be aware of notification/litigation time limits as well. Page 11 of 12
12 5. What are the heads of claim? This must include insured and uninsured losses. 6. How will any recovery be shared? This requires agreement both in terms of the recovery monies and own and other party costs. September 2010 Page 12 of 12
13 This paper is published on a general basis for information only and no liability is accepted for errors of fact or opinion it may contain. Professional advice should always be obtained before applying the information to particular circumstances. Beachcroft LLP
SUBROGATION IN ENGLAND AND WALES THE LEGAL PRINCIPLES
SUBROGATION IN ENGLAND AND WALES THE LEGAL PRINCIPLES 1 The doctrine of subrogation according to the English Courts Practical issues Prejudice acts and omissions of the insured Restrictions on Insurers
More informationLimiting liability for professional firms
Limiting liability for professional firms Introduction Disputes can arise between providers of professional services and their clients or other (third) parties for a number of reasons. Limiting or excluding
More informationLiability. PL/Products & PI Efficacy Financial Loss- Fact or Fiction?
Liability PL/Products & PI Efficacy Financial Loss- Fact or Fiction? Agenda Liability Definitions Where does PL/Products cover stop and PI cover start? Examples Efficacy Financial Loss What is it? Fact
More informationWORKERS COMPENSATION SUBROGATION AND THIRD PARTY SETTLEMENTS. B. Industrial Revolution and Workers Compensation Statutes
I. HISTORICAL BACKGROUND A. Common Law WORKERS COMPENSATION SUBROGATION AND THIRD PARTY SETTLEMENTS Before the advent of workers compensation statutes, the only protection afforded to victims of work place
More informationIS PUBLIC LIABILITY INSURANCE ENVIRONMENTAL INSURANCE?
1 IS PUBLIC LIABILITY INSURANCE ENVIRONMENTAL INSURANCE? DAVID HART Q.C. 1. This talk is about why the answer to my question is an emphatic No. Many environmental claims are not covered by the typical
More informationInsurance brokers and contract reviews requested by clients - a danger area for brokers
Insurance brokers and contract reviews requested by clients - a danger area for brokers Paper prepared for Pro Risk seminar to brokers held nationally in May 2011 1 Introduction 1.1 Most brokers have had
More informationNC General Statutes - Chapter 93A Article 2 1
Article 2. Real Estate Education and Recovery Fund. 93A-16. Real Estate Education and Recovery Fund created; payment to fund; management. (a) There is hereby created a special fund to be known as the "Real
More informationOf course, the same incident can give rise to an action both for breach of contract and for negligence.
4. WHAT CAN YOU BE LIABLE FOR AND WHY? 4.1 Negligence Liability for negligence is a civil, not a criminal, matter. It is for the victim to prove that the defendant owed them a "duty of care", that that
More informationHOLD HARMLESS, INDEMNITY, SUBROGATION AND ADDITIONAL INSURED INSURANCE IN TRANSPORTATION CONTRACTS
HOLD HARMLESS, INDEMNITY, SUBROGATION AND ADDITIONAL INSURED INSURANCE IN TRANSPORTATION CONTRACTS By James W. Bryan Nexsen Pruet P.L.L.C. Greensboro, North Carolina 336-373-1600 jbryan@nexsenpruet.com
More informationRISK MANAGEMENT IN CONTRACTS
RISK MANAGEMENT IN CONTRACTS There are many circumstances in which an Institution will contract with another party including service contracts, sales agreements, leases, practicum placement and affiliation
More informationStandard conditions of purchase
Standard conditions of purchase 1 OFFER AND ACCEPTANCE 2 PROPERTY, RISK & DELIVERY 3 PRICES & RATES The Supplier shall provide all Goods and Services in accordance with the terms and conditions set out
More informationVIRGINIA ACTS OF ASSEMBLY -- 2015 SESSION
VIRGINIA ACTS OF ASSEMBLY -- 2015 SESSION CHAPTER 585 An Act to amend and reenact 38.2-2206 of the Code of Virginia and to amend the Code of Virginia by adding in Article 7 of Chapter 3 of Title 8.01 a
More informationLAW REFORM (CONTRIBUTORY NEGLIGENCE) AMENDMENT BILL 2001
1 LAW REFORM (CONTRIBUTORY NEGLIGENCE) AMENDMENT BILL 2001 EXPLANATORY NOTES GENERAL OUTLINE OBJECTIVES OF THE LEGISLATION The purpose of this Bill is to address the impact of the decision of the High
More informationREQUEST FOR QUOTATION/ PURCHASE ORDER
REQUEST FOR QUOTATION/ PURCHASE ORDER Conditions of Contract- Services These Conditions may be varied only by the written agreement of the Council. No terms or conditions put forward at any time by the
More informationTEXAS ASSOCIATION OF REALTORS INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR AGREEMENT FOR SALES ASSOCIATE. Robyn Jones Homes, LLC
1 TEXAS ASSOCIATION OF REALTORS INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR AGREEMENT FOR SALES ASSOCIATE USE OF THIS FORM BY PERSONS WHO ARE NOT MEMBERS OF THE TEXAS ASSOCIATION OF REALTORS IS NOT AUTHORIZED Texas Association
More informationMOTOR VEHICLE ACCIDENT CLAIMS ACT
Province of Alberta MOTOR VEHICLE ACCIDENT CLAIMS ACT Revised Statutes of Alberta 2000 Chapter M-22 Current as of April 1, 2015 Office Consolidation Published by Alberta Queen s Printer Alberta Queen s
More informationPublic and Product Liability - General
Section 3E Public and Product Liability - General Definitions Business The business stated in the specification to this section and includes: a) the provision and management of canteen, sports, social,
More informationclaiming coverage as an additional insured under an umbrella liability policy it issded tot
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON TERRIE LEWARK, assignee of PUBLIC STORAGE, INC. Appellant, No. 68634-8-1 DIVISION ONE v. UNPUBLISHED OPINION DAVIS DOOR SERVICES, INC., a Washington corporation,
More informationTerms and Conditions of Offer and Contract (Works & Services) Conditions of Offer
Conditions of Offer A1 The offer documents comprise the offer form, letter of invitation to offer (if any), these Conditions of Offer and Conditions of Contract (Works & Services), the Working with Queensland
More informationSERVICES AGREEMENT Agreement Consultant MBA SERVICES Consultancy Terms Consultant Notification Form FEES EXPENSES
SERVICES AGREEMENT This Services Agreement ( Agreement ) is a contract between you (the Consultant ) and MBA & Company Consultancy Limited ( MBA ), a company incorporated and registered in England and
More informationCOMMERCIAL LEASES & SUBROGATED INSURANCE RECOVERY CLAIMS
COMMERCIAL LEASES & SUBROGATED INSURANCE RECOVERY CLAIMS A presentation to Greenwoods LLP on 06.10.11 at 77 Gracechurch Street, London EC3 JONATHAN BELLAMY Barrister-at-law, FCIArb, Chartered Arbitrator
More informationRISK & INSURANCE IN CONSTRUCTION
RISK & INSURANCE IN CONSTRUCTION 1. Introduction - The need for Construction Insurance 1.1 The construction contract has four significant characteristics that separate it from any other contract. Firstly,
More informationPolicy and Procedure for Claims Management
Policy and Procedure for Claims Management RESPONSIBLE DIRECTOR: COMMUNICATIONS, PUBLIC ENGAGEMENT AND HUMAN RESOURCES EFFECTIVE FROM: 08/07/10 REVIEW DATE: 01/04/11 To be read in conjunction with: Complaints
More informationCLAIMS AGAINST TRANSLATORS: THE TRILOGY OF PREVENTION, HANDLING AND RESOLUTION PART ONE: PREVENTION AND MITIGATION
CLAIMS AGAINST TRANSLATORS: THE TRILOGY OF PREVENTION, HANDLING AND RESOLUTION PART ONE: PREVENTION AND MITIGATION Martin M. Ween, Esq. Partner Wilson, Elser, Moskowitz, Edelman & Dicker, LLP 150 E. 42
More informationDAMAGES FOR LATE PAYMENT AND THE INSURER S DUTY OF GOOD FAITH SUMMARY
DAMAGES FOR LATE PAYMENT AND THE INSURER S DUTY OF GOOD FAITH SUMMARY S.1 In this Issues Paper we consider whether a policyholder should be entitled to damages where the insurer has refused to pay a valid
More informationRE: 1562860 ONTARIO LTD. c.o.b. as SHOELESS JOE S Plaintiff v. INSURANCE PORTFOLIO INC. and CHRISTOPHER CONIGLIO. Defendants v.
COURT FILE NO.: 4022A/07 (Milton) DATE: 20090401 SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE - ONTARIO RE: 1562860 ONTARIO LTD. c.o.b. as SHOELESS JOE S Plaintiff v. INSURANCE PORTFOLIO INC. and CHRISTOPHER CONIGLIO Defendants
More informationChase Lincoln Realty & Property Management Company 7045 Summer Place Charlotte, NC 28213 Phone: 704-921-1912, Fax: 704-921-1914
Chase Lincoln Realty & Property Management Company 7045 Summer Place Charlotte, NC 28213 Phone: 7049211912, Fax: 7049211914 EXCLUSIVE PROPERTY MANAGEMENT AGREEMENT Longterm Rental Property This Exclusive
More informationFACTORING AGREEMENT ARGYLL COMMUNITY HOUSING ASSOCIATION LIMITED
ARGYLL COMMUNITY HOUSING ASSOCIATION LIMITED This is a FACTORING AGREEMENT between Argyll Community Housing Association Limited, having our registered office at 63-65 Chalmers Street, Ardrishaig, Argyll,
More informationLEGAL SCHEME REGULATIONS
LEGAL SCHEME REGULATIONS These Regulations came into force on 1 July 2014. 1 Introduction 1.1 These Regulations govern the Union s legal Scheme. The Rules of the Union set out your other rights and entitlements.
More informationCalifornia Civil Code 2782.05
California Civil Code 2782.05 (a) Except as provided in subdivision (b), provisions, clauses, covenants, and agreements contained in, collateral to, or affecting any construction contract and amendments
More informationA. For the consideration agreed below to be paid to Contractor by City, Contractor shall provide
STATE OF TEXAS CONTRACT FOR SERVICES COUNTY OF DALLAS THIS CONTRACT is made and entered into by and between the CITY OF DALLAS, a Texas municipal corporation, located in Dallas County, Texas (hereinafter
More informationGuild Yule LLP. Bars to Subrogation in the Landlord/Tenant and Strata Arenas
Guild Yule LLP Bars to Subrogation in the Landlord/Tenant and Strata Arenas April 2016 Vanessa A. Knutson D. Mark Gyton This paper is intended to give general information about legal topics and is not
More informationProvince of Alberta LIMITATIONS ACT. Revised Statutes of Alberta 2000 Chapter L-12. Current as of December 17, 2014. Office Consolidation
Province of Alberta LIMITATIONS ACT Revised Statutes of Alberta 2000 Current as of December 17, 2014 Office Consolidation Published by Alberta Queen s Printer Alberta Queen s Printer 5 th Floor, Park Plaza
More informationRole of Executors (and Trustees) in claims
Role of Executors (and Trustees) in claims The role of executors in claims against an estate depends very much on the type of claim being advanced. As we can see in the presentation, executors often feel
More informationHow To Write A Water Meter
Template of Agreement between Scottish Water and Utility Connection Provider A signed agreement between Scottish Water and the Utility Connection Provider and is part of the accreditation process. Work
More informationAMENDATORY ENDORSEMENT NORTH CAROLINA PERSONAL AUTO POLICY
AMENDATORY ENDORSEMENT NORTH CAROLINA PERSONAL AUTO POLICY This Endorsement amends the Policy as follows: I. DEFINITIONS The Definitions Section is amended as follows: A. The third paragraph is replaced
More informationClient Care and Terms and Conditions
Client Care and Terms and Conditions Introduction We set out below our standard terms and conditions which apply if we act for you. We also provide you with information relating to the Rules of Conduct
More informationPROPERTY MANAGEMENT AGREEMENT
PROPERTY MANAGEMENT AGREEMENT OWNER: AGENT: PROPERTY: APN: Owner and Property Manager, as hereinafter identified, agree as follows: 1. APPOINTMENT OF AGENT: Owner hereby appoints and grants Property Manager
More informationHow To Manage Claims At The Trust
GWASANAETHAU AMBIWLANS CYMRU YMDDIRIEDOLAETH GIG WELSH AMBULANCE SERVICES NHS TRUST CLAIMS MANAGEMENT POLICY Clinical Negligence, Personal Injury, Losses and Compensation Claims Approved by Date Review
More informationThe Defective Premises Act 1972: Establishing and Escaping Liability
The Defective Premises Act 1972: Establishing and Escaping Liability Introduction 1. The duty under section 4 of the Defective Premises Act 1972 ( the Act ) is as important as it is confusing. It is often
More informationMIB Uninsured Agreement
MIB Uninsured Agreement THIS AGREEMENT is made on the 3rd July 2015 between the SECRETARY OF STATE ( the Secretary of State ) and the MOTOR INSURERS BUREAU ( MIB ), whose registered office is for the time
More informationPresentation by: Mark Bailey, Partner IPTC. Managed services looking beneath the surface IPTC Webinars Thursday 15 March 2012
Presentation by: Mark Bailey, Partner IPTC Managed services looking beneath the surface IPTC Webinars Thursday 15 March 2012 Polling questions does your organisation use cloud services or an IT service
More informationFour Seasons Property Management Inc 2334 The Plaza Charlotte, NC 28205
Four Seasons Property Management Inc 2334 The Plaza Charlotte, NC 28205 EXCLUSIVE PROPERTY MANAGEMENT AGREEMENT Long-term Rental Property This Exclusive Property Management Agreement is entered into by
More informationConstruction Defect Action Reform Act
COLORADO REVISED STATUTES Title 13. Courts and Court Procedure Damages Regulation of Actions and Proceedings Article 20. Actions Part 8. Construction Defect Actions for Property Loss and Damage Construction
More informationGreene Wood & McLean v Templeton Insurance Ltd [2008] APP.L.R. 07/10
JUDGMENT : Mr. Justice Teare : Commercial Court. 10 th July 2008. 1. This is an application by the Defendant to set aside the order made by Walker J. on 14 March 2008 in which he granted permission for
More information7.4.1 Be required to make exhaustive or continuous on-site reviews;
SUPPLEMENTARY CONDITIONS TO THE CANADIAN STANDARD FORM OF CONTRACT FOR ARCHITECTURAL SERVICES DOCUMENT SIX 2006 EDITION RAIC 6 2006 FRASER HEALTH PROJECTS The following Supplementary Conditions are specific
More informationChapter 1 Insurance Concepts & Principles
Chapter 1 Chapter Objectives Your learning objectives are as follows: Understand the mechanism of insurance. Understand the difference between property and casualty insurance. Learn the parts of the insurance
More informationWhat You Should Know About General Agreements of Indemnity and Why You Should Know It
What You Should Know About General Agreements of Indemnity and Why You Should Know It Summary When a contractor (for purposes of this discussion, contractor includes subcontractor) first seeks surety credit,
More informationFOR PROPERTY LOSS AND DAMAGE 1
13-20-801. Short title Colorado Revised Statutes Title 13; Article 20; Part 8: CONSTRUCTION DEFECT ACTIONS FOR PROPERTY LOSS AND DAMAGE 1 This part 8 shall be known and may be cited as the Construction
More informationIndependent Living Insurance. Policy Summary
Independent Living Insurance Policy Summary Independent Living Insurance This summary does not contain the full terms and conditions of your policy. Please refer to your policy document for the full terms
More informationCOMMENTARY. California s New Subcontractor Defense Regime for Non-Residential Projects: Creating Order or Chaos?
May 2013 JONES DAY COMMENTARY California s New Subcontractor Defense Regime for Non-Residential Projects: Creating Order or Chaos? As explained in a recent Commentary (available at http://www.jonesday.com/navigating_treacherous_
More informationHow To Write A Short Form Prime Prime Prime Contract Between A Contractor And Owner
SHORT FORM PRIME CONTRACT BETWEEN OWNER & CONTRACTOR This Agreement ( Contract ) is made this day of, 20, between ( Contractor ) and ( Owner ) at The work described in Section 1 below shall be performed
More informationEXCLUSIVE PROPERTY MANAGEMENT AGREEMENT Long-term Rental Property
EXCLUSIVE PROPERTY MANAGEMENT AGREEMENT Long-term Rental Property This Exclusive Property Management Agreement is entered into by and between ( Owner ) and ( Agent ). IN CONSIDERATION of the mutual covenants
More informationCLINICAL NEGLIGENCE SCHEME FOR TRUSTS
CLINICAL NEGLIGENCE SCHEME FOR TRUSTS MEMBERSHIP RULES April 2001 (Revised 1 May 2014 following the coming into force of The National Health Service (Clinical Negligence Scheme) (Amendment) Regulations
More informationBusiness leases guide
Business leases guide BUSINESS LEASES GUIDE Contents What is a business "tenancy"? Creation of a tenancy Common terms in lease Repairing liability FRI terms Landlord's covenants Insurance Tenant's continuing
More informationIndemnity Basis of Settlement. Practical Problems in Adjusting Losses. By the CILA Property Special Interest Group
Indemnity Basis of Settlement. Practical Problems in Adjusting Losses. By the CILA Property Special Interest Group INTRODUCTION All insurance policies are based on providing the policyholder with an indemnity,
More informationInternational Construction Warranties Limited. Terms & Conditions. Version UK1
International Construction Warranties Limited Terms & Conditions Version UK1 Rules of Registration Version 5 All Companies applying for or taking out a Warranty on a New Development with ICW shall comply
More informationFACTORING AGREEMENT ARGYLL COMMUNITY HOUSING ASSOCIATION LIMITED
ARGYLL COMMUNITY HOUSING ASSOCIATION LIMITED This is a Factoring Agreement between Argyll Community Housing Association Limited, having our registered office at 63-65 Chalmers Street, Ardrishaig, Argyll,
More informationCalifornia Senate Bill 474 Impact on Owners & Contractors
California Senate Bill 474 Impact on Owners & Contractors Beginning January 1, 2013, project owners, general contractors ( GC ), construction managers ( CM ) and any lower tier contractor who employs subcontractors
More informationAGREEMENT WITH A SELF-EMPLOYED CONTRACTOR FOR CONSULTANCY SERVICES
AGREEMENT WITH A SELF-EMPLOYED CONTRACTOR FOR CONSULTANCY SERVICES Names of Parties 1. (Company Name) of (Company Address) ( Consultancy ). 2. Redline Group Ltd of 26-34 Liverpool Road, Luton. Beds LU1
More informationGENERAL LIABILITY - PUBLIC AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY
GENERAL LIABILITY - The General Terms and Conditions and the following terms and conditions all apply to this section. SPECIAL DEFINITIONS FOR THIS SECTION Bodily injury Defence costs Denial of access
More information(INDIVIDUALS ONLY) IndContPkge Version: 1.7 Updated: 18 Jul. 03
INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR PACKAGE (INDIVIDUALS ONLY) IndContPkge Version: 1.7 Updated: 18 Jul. 03 Contents Preface 2 Checklist 3 Helpful Hints 4 Frequently Asked Questions 5 Agreement with an Independent
More informationHow To Settle A Car Accident In The Uk
PERSONAL INJURY COMPENSATION CLAIM GUIDE PERSONAL INJURY COMPENSATION CLAIM GUIDE This booklet has been produced by D.J. Synnott Solicitors to give our clients an understanding of the personal injury compensation
More informationSeptember 2008. Claims Guideline
September 2008 Claims Guideline CLAIMS GUIDELINE Table of Contents 1 INTRODUCTION... 1 2 PURPOSE OF THE GUIDELINE... 1 3 DEFINITIONS... 2 MARKET CONDUCT 4 GENERAL REQUIREMENTS... 3 5 CLAIMS NOTIFICATION...
More informationCONTRACTING HINTS AND TIPS
CONTRACTING HINTS AND TIPS Contents 1. Contract formation 2. Entire agreement clauses 3. Warranties and indemnities 4. Time of the essence 5. Contract variation 6. Exclusion and limitation clauses 7. Exercising
More informationTerms and Conditions of Sale
Broadberry Data Systems Limited ("The Company") Terms and Conditions of Sale 1. General a) Unless otherwise expressly agreed in writing by a Director (or authorised executive) of the Company all goods
More informationCLAIMS AGAINST TELEPHONE ANSWERING SERVICES: THE TRILOGY OF PREVENTION, HANDLING AND RESOLUTION PART ONE: PREVENTION AND MITIGATION
CLAIMS AGAINST TELEPHONE ANSWERING SERVICES: THE TRILOGY OF PREVENTION, HANDLING AND RESOLUTION PART ONE: PREVENTION AND MITIGATION Martin M. Ween, Esq. Partner Wilson, Elser, Moskowitz, Edelman & Dicker,
More informationConstruction Insurance Important Things You Need to Know
Construction Insurance Important Things You Need to Know CIBSE Home Counties South East Wednesday 15 February 2014 Presented by: May Looi, Solicitor Insurance policies commonly required in construction
More informationNominated Subcontractors on International Projects: Approaches to Risk Allocation
Nominated Subcontractors on International Projects: Approaches to Risk Allocation September 5, 2005 (he following outline was used in a presentation to the Overseas Construction Association of Japan, Inc.
More informationSecurity for payment: bonds and guarantees five pitfalls and protection
Article This article first appeared in a slightly different form in Civil Engineering Surveyor, July 2010 Security for payment: bonds and guarantees five By Jonathan Hosie In the current economic climate,
More informationProfessional Practice 544
February 15, 2016 Professional Practice 544 Tort Law and Insurance Michael J. Hanahan Schiff Hardin LLP 233 S. Wacker, Ste. 6600 Chicago, IL 60606 312-258-5701 mhanahan@schiffhardin.com Schiff Hardin LLP.
More information3420. Liability insurance; standard provisions; right of injured person
3420. Liability insurance; standard provisions; right of injured person (a) No policy or contract insuring against liability for injury to person, except as provided in subsection (g) of this section,
More informationLIABILITIES AND REMEDIES OF BOAT DEALERS, BROKERS AND REPAIRERS
LIABILITIES AND REMEDIES OF BOAT DEALERS, BROKERS AND REPAIRERS Prepared by Christopher Giaschi An earlier version of this paper was presented at the 1995 Industry Conference and Trade Show of the British
More informationIDENTIFICATION OF CONTRACTS OF INSURANCE INSTRUMENT 2004
FSA 2004/58 IDENTIFICATION OF CONTRACTS OF INSURANCE INSTRUMENT 2004 Powers exercised A. The Financial Services Authority makes this instrument in the exercise of the power in section 157(1) (Guidance)
More informationJRI S STANDARD TERMS OF PURCHASE. Business Day: a day (other than a Saturday, Sunday or public holiday) when banks in London are open for business.
JRI S STANDARD TERMS OF PURCHASE 1. INTERPRETATION 1.1 Definitions. In these Conditions, the following definitions apply: Business Day: a day (other than a Saturday, Sunday or public holiday) when banks
More informationTHE STATE OF FLORIDA...
TABLE OF CONTENTS I. THE STATE OF FLORIDA... 2 A. FREQUENTLY CITED FLORIDA STATUTES... 2 1. General Considerations in Insurance Claim Management... 2 2. Insurance Fraud... 5 3. Automobile Insurance...
More informationMONTANA SELF INSURERS ASSOCIATION
MONTANA SELF INSURERS ASSOCIATION Executive Director Bob Worthington Board of Directors Rick Clark Plum Creek Timber Co Tim Fitzpatrick MT Schools Group Donna Haeder NorthWestern Corp Marv Jordan MT Contractors
More informationSCHEDULE 5 INSURANCE TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS... 1
SCHEDULE 5 INSURANCE TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS... 1 1.1 Project Specific Construction Period Insurance... 1 1.2 Additional Construction Period Insurance... 1 1.3 Operating Period Insurance
More informationCASE EXAMPLES CONTRACTUAL INDEMNITIES & OBLIGATIONS TO INSURE
CASE EXAMPLES CONTRACTUAL INDEMNITIES & OBLIGATIONS TO INSURE NSW Arabian Horse Association Inc v Olympic Coordination Authority [2005] NSWCA 210 New South Wales Court of Appeal, 23 June 2005 Facts The
More informationHow To Get A Construction Contract In The United States
SOUTH CAROLINA LIEN AND BOND CLAIMS William ( Trey ) W. Watkins, Jr. 145 King Street, Suite 300 Charleston, SC 29401 843-329-9500 1 Introduction to Surety 3 Main differences between Insurance and Bonds
More informationMUSIC RESOURCES TERMS AND CONDITIONS FOR SCHOOLS ( Conditions )
MUSIC RESOURCES TERMS AND CONDITIONS FOR SCHOOLS ( Conditions ) Please ensure all relevant staff have read and understood these Conditions before signing. Please complete, sign and return the Music Resources
More informationGeneral Conditions of Contract for the Provision of Design and other Professional Services
General Conditions of Contract for the Provision of Design and other Professional Services CC11 April 1991 (Revised September 2010) First Issued 1987 Revised 1988 Revised 1991 Revised 2000 Revised 2006
More informationAGREEMENT EMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES Fixed Price Form of Agreement
AGREEMENT EMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES Job Description: Contract No.: Consultant: GLY Job No.: Document No.: THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into this hereinafter referred to as Contractor, and professional
More informationTHE BROKER S LIABILITY FOR PREMIUMS: SHOULD SECTION 53 BE REFORMED? SUMMARY
Steel House 11 Tothill Street, London, SW1H 9LJ 140 Causewayside Edinburgh EH9 1PR THE BROKER S LIABILITY FOR PREMIUMS: SHOULD SECTION 53 BE REFORMED? SUMMARY S.1 In this Issues Paper we consider whether
More informationSenior Executive Employment Contract
Senior Executive Employment Contract [Company Name] [Employee Name] Drafted by Solicitors Contents Clause 1. Interpretation... 1 2. Term of appointment... 2 3. Employee warranties... 2 4. Duties... 3 5.
More informationGOODS AND SERVICES AGREEMENT BETWEEN SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA PUBLIC POWER AUTHORITY AND COMPANY/CONTRACTOR NAME
GOODS AND SERVICES AGREEMENT BETWEEN SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA PUBLIC POWER AUTHORITY AND COMPANY/CONTRACTOR NAME This GOODS AND SERVICES AGREEMENT ("Agreement") is entered into and effective [DATE], by and
More informationREPORT Disrepair Claims: The true cost of disrepair - Some of the Issues
REPORT Disrepair Claims: The true cost of disrepair - Some of the Issues 1 Contents Section Subject Page 1. Introduction 3 2. Landlord s Obligations 4&5 3 Tenant s Obligations 6 4. Types of Disrepair 7
More informationA Litigator s View of the Special Employer Doctrine
A Litigator s View of the Special Employer Doctrine By: Richard M. Williams, Esq. Published By: Employee Benefit Plan Review July 2013 INTRODUCTION It is a well-established principle of common law that
More informationGuide to the Debt Recovery Process
Guide to the Debt Recovery Process How it works, and what we The debt recovery process can seem confusing and daunting. We aim to simplify it as much as we can, and to make clear from the outset what we
More informationAlberta Finance and Enterprise - Insurance - Family Protection Endorsement
Alberta Finance and Enterprise - Insurance - Family Protection Endorsement Page 1 of 6 Automobile Insurance - S.E.F. No. 44 FAMILY PROTECTION ENDORSEMENT (For Alberta Only) Index Definitions Insuring Agreement
More informationThe Association offers a factoring service to homeowners whose properties
PARAGON HOUSING ASSOCIATION LIMITED POLICY: POLICY AREA: FACTORING POLICY FINANCE AND INVESTMENT DATE APPROVED: 21 ST AUGUST 2013 DATE NEXT REVIEW: AUGUST 2018 Contents 1. Introduction 2. Aims 3. Objectives
More informationCITY OF LONDON LAW SOCIETY, LAND LAW COMMITTEE S INSURANCE PROVISIONS FOR A RACK RENT LEASE OF COMMERCIAL PROPERTY MARCH 2014
CITY OF LONDON LAW SOCIETY, LAND LAW COMMITTEE S INSURANCE PROVISIONS FOR A RACK RENT LEASE OF COMMERCIAL PROPERTY MARCH 2014 Schedule 1 Insurance provisions 1 1 INSURED RISKS AND OTHER DEFINITIONS 1.1
More informationA Solicitors Guide to. Employment Protection Insurance
A Solicitors Guide to Employment Protection Insurance An objective guide to Employment Protection Insurance and retainers Introduction Solicitors all over the country face the challenge of new forms of
More informationTEMPLE LITIGATION ADVANTAGE INSURANCE FOR DISBURSEMENTS AND OPPONENT S COSTS Certificate of Insurance
TEMPLE LITIGATION ADVANTAGE INSURANCE FOR DISBURSEMENTS AND OPPONENT S COSTS Certificate of Insurance In return for the payment of the Premium specified in the Schedule and based on any Information that
More informationScheme Rules. The JLT (Schools PA) Discretionary Trust Arrangement. Distinctive. Choice. JLT GROUP SERVICES PTY LTD
Scheme Rules The JLT (Schools PA) Discretionary Trust Arrangement Distinctive. Choice. JLT GROUP SERVICES PTY LTD Version (SchoolsPA) 2014 Distinctive Choice JLT is an international group of Risk Specialists
More informationCase Name: Trainor v. Barker
Page 1 Case Name: Trainor v. Barker Between Patricia Trainor, David Bruce Trainor, Carl Phillip Trainor and Deanna Rachael Trainor by her litigation guardian Patricia Trainor, Plaintiffs, and Aaron Gary
More informationA&E Briefings. Indemnification Clauses: Uninsurable Contractual Liability. Structuring risk management solutions
A&E Briefings Structuring risk management solutions Spring 2012 Indemnification Clauses: Uninsurable Contractual Liability J. Kent Holland, J.D. ConstructionRisk, LLC Professional consultants are judged
More informationThe Expert Navigators in Maritime, Transportation and Insurance Law
The Expert Navigators in Maritime, Transportation and Insurance Law Isaacs & Co. is one of Canada's leading full-service maritime, transportation and insurance law firms and concentrates on all areas of
More informationIncludes office contents, furniture, fixtures, teaching and other equipment
This summary is intended as a simple guide to explain the main types (or classes) of insurance cover available to academies. We have included brief descriptions of the cover together with suggestions about
More informationContractual assumption of liability beyond common law & your insurance cover 4. Words and phrases to be wary of 5
Guide to Better Agreements for Services for Architects December 2008 This Guide has been prepared in good faith but no warranty as to the correctness of such guidance or advice is given by NZACS or its
More information