Sophomore (30-60 semester hours or quarter hours) Two-year Colleges Number of Students Tested at Each Institution July 2008 through June 2013

Transcription

1 Number of Students Tested at Each Institution July 2008 through June 2013 List of Institutions Number of School Name Students AIKEN TECHNICAL COLLEGE, SC 169 ARKANSAS NORTHEASTERN COLLEGE, AR 84 ASHLAND COMMUNITY AND TECHNICAL COLLEGE, KY 388 ATLANTIC CAPE COMMUNITY COLLEGE, NJ 104 BISHOP STATE COMMUNITY COLLEGE, AL 71 BLACK HAWK COLLEGE, IL 101 BOSSIER PARISH COMMUNITY COLLEGE, LA 435 BURLINGTON COUNTY COLLEGE, NJ 209 CAMDEN COUNTY COLLEGE, NJ 37 CENTRAL ARIZONA COLLEGE, AZ 69 COCHISE COLLEGE, AZ 205 COCONINO COMMUNITY COLLEGE, AZ 73 COLLEGE OF COASTAL GEORGIA, GA 139 COLLEGE OF SOUTHERN MARYLAND, MD 127 COLUMBIA STATE COMMUNITY COLLEGE, TN 700 COMMUNITY COLLEGE OF BALTIMORE COUNTY, THE, MD 673 COMMUNITY COLLEGE OF THE AIR FORCE, AL 204 COTTEY COLLEGE, MO 59 CUMBERLAND COUNTY COLLEGE, NJ 101 DARTON COLLEGE, GA 371 DAYTONA STATE COLLEGE, FL 178 DEAN COLLEGE, MA 116 DEL MAR COLLEGE, TX 156 DELAWARE COUNTY COMMUNITY COLLEGE, PA 131 EASTERN GATEWAY COMMUNITY COLLEGE, OH 71 EASTERN WEST VIRGINIA COMMUNITY AND TECHNICAL COLLEGE, WV 34 EASTFIELD COLLEGE, TX 159 FLETCHER TECHNICAL COMMUNITY COLLEGE, LA 263 FLORIDA GATEWAY COLLEGE, FL 80 FLORIDA STATE COLLEGE AT JACKSONVILLE, FL 485 GLENDALE COMMUNITY COLLEGE, AZ 288 GREENVILLE TECHNICAL COLLEGE, SC 318 JEFFERSON STATE COMMUNITY COLLEGE, AL 140 KANAWHA VALLEY COMMUNITY & TECHNICAL COLLEGE, WV 52 KASKASKIA COLLEGE, IL 69 KEISER UNIVERSITY, FL 218 LAKE LAND COLLEGE, IL 56 LARAMIE COUNTY COMMUNITY COLLEGE, WY 584 LDS BUSINESS COLLEGE, UT 217 LOS ANGELES SOUTHWEST COLLEGE, CA 31 MADISONVILLE COMMUNITY COLLEGE, KY 130 Only those institutions testing 30 or more students in a college class were included in the analyses for that college class.

2 Number of Students Tested at Each Institution July 2008 through June 2013 List of Institutions Number of School Name Students MARTIN COMMUNITY COLLEGE, NC 165 MCDOWELL TECHNICAL COMMUNITY COLLEGE, NC 69 METROPOLITAN COMMUNITY COLLEGE, MO 486 MINERAL AREA COLLEGE, MO 626 MONTANA TECH OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MONTANA, MT 48 MONTCALM COMMUNITY COLLEGE, MI 142 MORGAN COMMUNITY COLLEGE, CO 58 MOTLOW STATE COMMUNITY COLLEGE, TN 1,439 MOTT COMMUNITY COLLEGE, MI 402 NATIONAL COLLEGE, VA 96 NAVARRO COLLEGE, TX 57 NORTH IOWA AREA COMMUNITY COLLEGE, IA 1,783 NORTHEAST STATE TECHNICAL COMMUNITY COLLEGE, TN 1,710 NORTHEASTERN OKLAHOMA A&M COLLEGE, OK 369 PALM BEACH STATE COLLEGE, FL 125 PIMA COMMUNITY COLLEGE, AZ 439 RARITAN VALLEY COMMUNITY COLLEGE, NJ 132 RIVER PARISHES COMMUNITY COLLEGE, LA 113 ROANE STATE COMMUNITY COLLEGE, TN 2,129 SAINT PHILIP'S COLLEGE, TX 349 SEMINOLE STATE COLLEGE, FL 252 SOUTHERN WEST VIRGINIA COMMUNITY AND TECHNICAL COLLEGE, WV 449 SOUTHWEST TENNESSEE COMMUNITY COLLEGE, TN 1,668 SOUTHWEST TEXAS JUNIOR COLLEGE, TX 102 ST. JOHNS RIVER STATE COLLEGE, FL 135 ST. VINCENT'S COLLEGE, CT 74 STATE COLLEGE OF FLORIDA, MANATEE-SARASOTA, FL 99 STATE FAIR COMMUNITY COLLEGE, MO 1,814 SURRY COMMUNITY COLLEGE, NC 300 THREE RIVERS COMMUNITY COLLEGE, MO 282 UNION COUNTY COLLEGE, NJ 277 UNIVERSITY OF AKRON WAYNE COLLEGE, OH 158 VICTOR VALLEY COMMUNITY COLLEGE, CA 88 VICTORIA COLLEGE, TX 86 VOLUNTEER STATE COMMUNITY COLLEGE, TN 1,548 WALTERS STATE COMMUNITY COLLEGE, TN 1,688 WARREN COUNTY COMMUNITY COLLEGE, NJ 98 WESTERN WYOMING COMMUNITY COLLEGE, WY 169 YOUNG HARRIS COLLEGE, GA 80 28,199 Only those institutions testing 30 or more students in a college class were included in the analyses for that college class.

3 Distribution of Institutional Mean Total Scores Mean Number of Percent of Mean Number of Percent of Total Institutions Instns. Total Institutions Instns. Score Below Score Below 470 to to to to to to to to to to to to to to to to to to to to to to to to to to to to to to to to to to to to to to to to to to to to to to to Total Number of Institutions 80 Mean Std. Dev. 5.20

4 Distribution of Institutional Mean Subscores Skills Subscores Critical Thinking Reading Writing Math No. of Pct. No. of Pct. No. of Pct. No. of Pct. Mean Subscore Instns. Below Instns. Below Instns. Below Instns. Below 126 to to to to to to to to to to to to to to to to to to to to to to Number of Institutions Mean Standard Deviation

5 Distribution of Institutional Mean Subscores (continued) Context-based Subscores Humanities Social Sciences Natural Sciences No. of Pct. No. of Pct. No. of Pct. Mean Subscore Instns. Below Instns. Below Instns. Below 126 to to to to to to to to to to to to to to to to to to to to to to Number of Institutions Mean Standard Deviation

6 Distribution of Individual Students' Total Scores Scaled Percent Scaled Percent Scaled Percent Scaled Percent Score Below Score Below Score Below Score Below 500 > > > > > > > > > < < < No. of Students 23,220* 90th percentile 464 Mean th percentile 450 Standard Deviation th percentile th percentile th percentile 418 *The score distribution used to compute these statistics has been modified, to prevent the statistics from being dominated by a few very large institutions. If an institution contributed more than 1100 students to this data set, the score of each of its students has been weighted by the fraction 1100/n, where n is the number of students from that institution. For example, if an institution tested 2200 students, the score of each of its students would receive a weight of 1100/2200 = 1/2. In computing the statistics, each of its students would count only half as much as a student from an institution that tested 1100 or fewer students. Therefore, an institution testing 2200 students would influence the statistics just as much as if it had tested only 1100 students.

7 Scaled Score Sophomore (30-60 semester hours or quarter hours) Distribution of Individual Students' Subscores Skills Subscores: Percent of Students Below Each Scaled Score Critical Context-Based Subscores: Pct. of Students Below Each Scaled Score Social Natural Thinking Reading Writing Mathematics Humanities Sciences Sciences 130 >99 99 >99 >99 >99 >99 > >99 98 >99 >99 99 >99 > >99 95 >99 >99 98 >99 > > > > <1 1 1 <1 1 < <1 <1 1 <1 <1 < Number of Students 23,220* 23,220* 23,220* 23,220* 23,220* 23,220* 23,220* Mean Score Standard Deviation th percentile th percentile th percentile th percentile th percentile *The score distribution used to compute these statistics has been modified, to prevent the statistics from being dominated by a few very large institutions. If an institution contributed more than 1100 students to this data set, the score of each of its students has been weighted by the fraction 1100/n, where n is the number of students from that institution. For example, if an institution tested 2200 students, the score of each of its students would receive a weight of 1100/2200 = 1/2. In computing the statistics, each of its students would count only half as much as a student from an institution that tested 1100 or fewer students. Therefore, an institution testing 2200 students would influence the statistics just as much as if it had tested only 1100 students.

8 Summary of Proficiency Classifications Percent of Students Classified as Skill Dimension and Level Not Proficient Marginal Proficient Critical Thinking 3% 14% 82% Reading, Level 2 30% 20% 51% Reading, Level 1 60% 22% 18% Writing, Level 3 4% 19% 77% Writing, Level 2 13% 33% 54% Writing, Level 1 54% 32% 14% Mathematics, Level 3 4% 11% 84% Mathematics, Level 2 20% 25% 56% Mathematics, Level 1 45% 29% 26% Total Number of Students: 28,199 Weighted Number of Students: 23,220* *The score distribution used to compute these statistics has been modified, to prevent the statistics from being dominated by a few very large institutions. If an institution contributed more than 1100 students to this data set, the score of each of its students has been weighted by the fraction 1100/n, where n is the number of students from that institution. For example, if an institution tested 2200 students, the score of each of its students would receive a weight of 1100/2200 = 1/2. In computing the statistics, each of its students would count only half as much as a student from an institution that tested 1100 or fewer students. Therefore, an institution testing 2200 students would influence the statistics just as much as if it had tested only 1100 students.

9 Demographic Summary Percent in Category Unweighted data Weighted data* Demographic Category AGE Under 20 13% 14% 20 to 29 62% 62% 30 to 39 14% 14% 40 to 49 8% 7% 50 to 59 3% 3% 60 or more <1% <1% GENDER Male 37% 37% Female 63% 63% ETHNICITY American Indian/Alaskan Native 1% 1% Asian/Asian American/Pacific Is. 2% 2% African American 10% 10% Black Hispanic 1% 1% Hispanic 6% 7% Latin American 1% 1% White 76% 74% Other 4% 4% BEST LANGUAGE English 88% 87% Other Language 9% 9% Both Equal 4% 4% *The score distribution used to compute these statistics has been modified, to prevent the statistics from being dominated by a few very large institutions. If an institution contributed more than 1100 students to this data set, the score of each of its students has been weighted by the fraction 1100/n, where n is the number of students from that institution. For example, if an institution tested 2200 students, the score of each of its students would receive a weight of 1100/2200 = 1/2. In computing the statistics, each of its students would count only half as much as a student from an institution that tested 1100 or fewer students. Therefore, an institution testing 2200 students would influence the statistics just as much as if it had tested only 1100 students.

10 Demographic Summary Percent in Category Unweighted data Weighted data* Demographic Category ENROLLMENT STATUS Full Time 77% 77% Part Time 23% 23% CREDIT HRS TRANSFERRED Not a Transfer 72% 73% 0-15 Hours Transferred 11% 11% Hours Transferred 8% 8% >30 Hours Transferred 8% 8% HOURS WORKED FOR WAGES None 23% 23% 1-15 Hours 18% 18% Hours 30% 30% >30 Hours 29% 29% CUMULATIVE GPA % 32% % 36% % 24% % 7% % 1% Less than 1.00 <1% <1% *The score distribution used to compute these statistics has been modified, to prevent the statistics from being dominated by a few very large institutions. If an institution contributed more than 1100 students to this data set, the score of each of its students has been weighted by the fraction 1100/n, where n is the number of students from that institution. For example, if an institution tested 2200 students, the score of each of its students would receive a weight of 1100/2200 = 1/2. In computing the statistics, each of its students would count only half as much as a student from an institution that tested 1100 or fewer students. Therefore, an institution testing 2200 students would influence the statistics just as much as if it had tested only 1100 students.