1 10 YEARS OF QUALITY ASSURANCE: ACHIEVEMENTS AND IMPERATIVES Quality Assurance in Online Education Towards a Culture of Assessment Dr. Hilroy A. Thomas, Associate Dean/Associate Professor, St. Thomas University, Florida, USA 33054, ;
2 ISSUES, ISSUES, ISSUES! 1. Who Is Responsible for: approving, authorizing, certifying certifying, providing oversight, registering or licensing non-state sponsored institutions of higher learning in your country? 2. Diploma Mills- Is the victim also to Blame, especially now? 3. John Bear 4. Prior Learning Assessment
3 The Online Landscape is Shifting Where Are We Now? what is online learning? how do we do it? how do we expand or escalate? how do we ensure its quality?
4 This Workshop 1. Review briefly the culture of assessment which h slows the quality assurance process 2. Show how adequate quality assurance, in compliance with accrediting agencies distance learning policies and practices, can be ensured 3. The case of St. Thomas University s online programs
5 Part One: The Quality Assurance Issue in Context The purpose of every college-related online quality assurance activity: 1. Ensure that the college adheres to program standards, relevant policies, and best practices for teaching online. 2. Show evidence for how they are maintained
6 Quality Assurance Normally Requires: 1. Conduct Program Reviews 2. Conducting Self-study (also known as compliance certificate, or quality enhancement plan ) 3. Evidence of sound and varied use of technology 4. Report on self-study, compliance certificate or enhancement plan 5. Subsequent peer review or audit
7 The quality assurance processes can be: 1. Very involved and comprehensive 2. Intimidating 3. Humbling: highlighting positively in some areas and underlining the areas of concern in others
8 Is Measured Against 4 Standards Includes measurements or meeting standards: 1. Fail to meet the minimum i standard d in an area of assessment, 2. Meet the minimum standard in an area of assessment, 3. Exceed the minimum standard in an area of assessment, or 4. Far exceed the minimum standard in an area of assessment.
9 Internal vs. External Standards An internal academic quality assurance process: 1. Solicits it the participation i of skilled instructors t and administrators, 2. Includes a self-regulatory process, 3. Is guided by internal or institutional policies, 4. Usually responds to the institutional mission and core values, and 5. Is mainly voluntary and not policed by governments or external agencies.
10 Internal vs. External Standards External academic quality assurance: 1. May not be voluntary and 2. Will be policed by government or external agencies.
11 Quality Assurance vs. Accreditation 1. Is quality assurance the same as accreditation? ti 2. How many have been through a voluntary and comprehensive quality assurance process in their entire existence. 3. Are the development and strategic plans a substitute for quality assurance?
12 Common criteria on which a college could be assessed 1. Overall Mission i 2. Core standards 3. Pre-established established quality standards 4. Involves a self-study (includes Program Reviews)
13 Common criteria on which a college could be assessed 5. Includes a peer view 6. Use of Technology 7. Funding and financial are realistic and are met 8. Student admissions standards 9. Student support services 10.Quality of educational programs
14 Common criteria on which a college could be assessed 11.Qualifications and use of Faculty 12.Quality and use of instructional materials 13.Use of Learning Outcomes 14.Who are principally responsible for defining and enforcing the rules and norms assuring the quality of academic programs? 15.Role of government or private, non-profit agency
15 Role of Program Standards in Quality Assurance Program standard is defined an established set of criteria or level of quality or achievement for measuring, evaluating and judging success or performance of an activity, process or entity.
16 Role of Program Standards in Quality Assurance 1. College faculty typically identify, develop, instill, promote, insure and assure program standards related to academic program quality 2. Standards provide a basis for policies, rules, and procedures that are essential for providing systematic programs and services to any special population p
17 Who else normally formulate standards? 1. Ministries i i of Government 2. Specific professional associations 3. Agencies 4. Employers and 5. Market forces
18 What happens once you identify standards? What happens once you identify standards? d 1. Analyze them 2. Develop scoring rubrics or schedules 3. Reflect on them 4. Review them 5. Use them
19 Sample #1 Quality Standard analyzed! Quality Standard Instructional Materials 1. The instructional ti materials contribute t to the achievement of stated course learning outcomes 2. The purpose of the materials and how they are to be used are clearly l explained 3. All materials used in the course are appropriately cited 4. Instructional materials are current 5. Present a variety of perspectives on course content 6. Distinction between required and optional materials are clearly explained Source: Butcher & Wilson-Stydom (2013)
20 Sample #2 Quality Standard analyzed! Quality Standard Course Technology 1. The tools and media support the course learning outcomes 2. Course tools and media support student engagement and guide the student to become an active learner 3. Navigation throughout the online course components is logical, consistent and efficient 4. Students can readily access the technologies required in the course 5. Course technologies are current Source: Butcher & Wilson-Stydom (2013)
21 Questions to guide an institution in defining its program standards 1. Is quality assurance mainly for compliance/accountability or for academic enhancement/innovations? 2. Do quality assurance mechanisms or program standards exist and are identifiable in your college? 3. Who is responsible for QA at your college or university? 4. To what extent do they exist? 5. Adequacy of both the traditional internal and external practices (and those institutional policies) i for assuring acceptable academic standards?
22 Questions to guide an institution in defining its program standards 6. Is program relevance to graduates and the economy an important factor in establishing program standards? 7. Should the institution safeguard the public interest in the assurance of academic standards? 8. Is voluntary institutional and program accreditation an adequate mechanism for assuring the quality of student learning? 9. When were your first and last institutional self-study, external peer review, and a public report of findings? 10. Where should the balance exist between external (national/agency) control and institutional responsibility for improvement?
23 Questions to guide an institution in defining its program standards 11. Who has the majority authority to set and measure standards: institutions themselves, external forces, including governments, students, and their parents? 12. Extent to which innovation in academic programs is encouraged while maintaining and improving academic standards and institutional policies? 13. What is the evidence of growing or declining academic standards in educational achievement? 14. Is achieving a better linkage of higher education with the labor market as important as the educational attainment?
24 Questions to guide an institution in defining its program standards 15. Does exclusively focusing on the subject level assessments provide limited incentives for the overall institution to develop an effective internal quality assurance process? 16. What is the role of informed student choice as an influential means of external quality assurance? 17. Role of outcome measures such as graduate placement and salaries as informative and generally valid quality information for potential students and their value as general indicators of effectiveness for academic programs? 18. Do the same standards also apply to online programs.
25 Are You Ready for Quality Assurance for Your Online Programs 1. Determining how instructors and their institutions ensure the quality of online courses and programs under their jurisdiction, even when the parent institution does not perform systemic program quality assurance. 2. Assessing the quality of your online program is tantamount to maintaining higher education standards. 3. Does your institution have a functional and well designed institution-wide quality assurance system, to design, review and establish program standards and best practices specifically for online programs and courses?. 4. If not, what can we do? 5. Is there a Culture of Assessment?
26 Why Do It? Do What? 1. All colleges that t teach courses online, including those in the Caribbean, must have a plan to assure quality programming. g 2. WHY?
27 WHY? 1. College: To protect and enhance the reputation of the college in attracting quality students and instructors while ensuring that business and industry can trust the quality of graduates they employ. 2. Student: To give students the confidence that their credentials have value and relevance in today s workplace, and will be recognized and accepted by prospective employers and other reputable accredited institutions, regionally and overseas.
28 WHY? 3. Faculty: To provide training, resources, and technical support for the development of online courses, the maintenance (including teaching) of on-going online courses and assessing the learning outcomes of those programs or courses. 4 There are other interests of course: accrediting 4. There are other interests, of course: accrediting agencies, legislators, tax payers, private sector and other employers and other institutions of higher learning.
29 Case of St. Thomas University PART TWO Case of St. Thomas University
30 Case of St. Thomas University Standard # 1: Definition of Distance Education
31 Case of St. Thomas University Standard # 2 Student Privacy and Authenticity: The institution must demonstrate that the student who registers in a distance or correspondence education course or program is the same student t who participates in and completes the course or program and receives the credit verification and identity
32 Case of St. Thomas University Standard #3 Enrolment Report: An institution that offers distance or correspondence education must ensure that it reports accurate headcount enrollment on its annual Institutional Profile submitted to the Commission.
33 Case of St. Thomas University Standard #4 Compliance: Institutions must ensure that their distance and correspondence education courses and programs comply with the Principles of Accreditation. ti This applies to all educational programs and services, wherever located or however delivered.
34 Case of St. Thomas University Standard #5 Mission: Curriculum and Instruction If an institution offers significant distance and correspondence education, it should be reflected in the institution s mission.
35 Case of St. Thomas University Standard #6 Curriculum and Instruction, Faculty s Role: The faculty assumes primary responsibility for and exercises oversight of distance and correspondence education, ensuring both the rigor of programs and the quality of instruction.
36 Case of St. Thomas University Standard #7 Curriculum and Instruction, Technology: The technology used is appropriate to the nature and objectives of the programs and courses and expectations concerning the use of such technology are clearly communicated to students.
37 Case of St. Thomas University Standard #8 Curriculum and Instruction, Copyright: Distance and correspondence education p policies are clear concerning ownership of materials, faculty compensation, copyright issues, and the use of revenue derived from the creation and production of software, telecourses, or other media products.
38 Case of St. Thomas University Standard #9 Curriculum and Instruction, Academic Support: Academic support services are appropriate and specifically related to distance and correspondence education.
39 Case of St. Thomas University Standard #10 Curriculum and Instruction, Program Length: Program length is appropriate p for each of the institution s educational programs, including those offered through distance education and correspondence education.
40 Case of St. Thomas University Standard #11 Curriculum and Instruction: Coherence For all degree programs offered through distance or correspondence education, the programs embody a coherent course of study that is compatible with the institution s mission and is based upon fields of study appropriate to higher education.
41 Case of St. Thomas University Standard #12 Curriculum and Instruction, ti Credit Level: For all courses offered through distance or correspondence education, the institution employs sound and acceptable practices for determining the amount and level of credit awarded and justifies the use of a unit other than semester credit hours by explaining it equivalency.
42 Case of St. Thomas University Standard #12 Curriculum and Instruction, ti Contractual t Arrangements: An institution entering into consortial arrangements or contractual t agreements for the delivery of courses/programs or services offered by distance or correspondence education is an active participant in ensuring the effectiveness and quality of the courses/programs offered by all of fthe participants. i t
43 Case of St. Thomas University Standard #13 Faculty, Adequacy: An institution offering distance or correspondence learning courses/programs ensures that there is a sufficient number of faculty yqualified to develop, design, and teach the courses/programs.
44 Case of St. Thomas University Standard #14 Faculty, Evaluation: The institution has clear criteria for the evaluation of faculty teaching distance education courses and programs.
45 Case of St. Thomas University Standard #15 Faculty, Training Faculty who teach in distance and correspondence education programs and courses receive appropriate training.
46 Standard #16 Institutional Effectiveness: Comparability of distance and correspondence education programs to campus-based programs and courses is ensured by the evaluation of educational effectiveness, including assessments of student learning outcomes, student retention, and student satisfaction. The institution regularly assesses the effectiveness of its provision of library/learning resources and student support services for distance or correspondence education students. t USE ASSESSMENT RUBRICS or other measures
47 Case of St. Thomas University Standard #17 Library and Learning Resources: Students have access to and can effectively use appropriate library resources. Access is provided to laboratories, facilities, and equipment appropriate p to the courses or programs
48 Standard #18 Student Services, Access: Students have adequate access to the range of services appropriate to support the programs offered through distance and correspondence education.
49 Case of St. Thomas University Standard #19 Student Services, Appeal: Students in distance or correspondence programs have an adequate procedure for resolving their complaints, and the institution follows its policies and procedures.
50 Case of St. Thomas University Standard #20 Student Services, Truth in Advertising: Advertising, recruiting, and admissions information adequately and accurately represent the programs, requirements, and services available to students.
51 Case of St. Thomas University Standard #21 Student Services, Security in Assessment: Documented procedures assure that security of personal information is protected in the conduct of assessments and evaluations and in the dissemination of results.
52 Case of St. Thomas University Standard #22 Student Services: Use of Technology Students enrolled in distance education courses are able to use the technology employed, have the equipment necessary to succeed, and are provided assistance in using the technology employed.
53 Case of St. Thomas University Standard #23 Facilities and Finances: Appropriate equipment and technical expertise required for distance and correspondence education are available. The institution, in making distance and correspondence education courses/programs a part of its mission, provides adequate funding for faculty, staff, services, and technological infrastructure to support the methodology.
54 Case of St. Thomas University Standard #24 Distance Education Policy Review Procedures
55 Case of St. Thomas University Standard #25 Course Work for the Degree: The institution provides instruction for all course work required for at least one degree program at each level which it awards degrees. If the Institution does not provide instruction ti for all course work and (1) makes arrangements for some instruction to be provided by other accredited institutions or entities through contracts or consortia or (2) uses some other alternative approach to meeting this requirement, the alternative approach must be approved by the Commission on Colleges. In both cases the institution demonstrates that it controls all aspects of its educational program.
56 10 YEARS OF QUALITY ASSURANCE: ACHIEVEMENTS AND IMPERATIVES 1. Please read this document for more details 2. Read all Conference Papers 3. Where you have already started, continue to lead and HELP others to realize the CANQUATE Imperative! 4. For non-starters start something, somewhere, and start leading the QA imperative! 5. Take the risks, seek help, we will all help you to succeed. Thank You!
Southern Association of Colleges and Schools Commission on Colleges 1866 Southern Lane Decatur, Georgia 30033-4097 Guidelines for Addressing Distance and Correspondence Education A Guide for Evaluators
DISTANCE EDUCATION PROGRAMS Interregional Guidelines for the Evaluation of Distance Education (Online Learning) Middle States Commission on Higher Education DISTANCE EDUCATION PROGRAMS Interregional Guidelines
SACS REQUIREMENTS AND STANDARDS Core Requirements 2.1 The institution has degree-granting authority from the appropriate government agency or agencies. (Degree-granting Authority) 2.2 The institution has
THE FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY SIGNATURE PAGE PROPOSAL FOR OFFERING AN EXISTING ON-CAMPUS UNDERGRADUATE DEGREE IN AN ONLINE (or other distance-learning) FORMAT COLLEGE: DEPARTMENT: NAME OF DEGREE PROGRAM:
THE FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY SIGNATURE PAGE PROPOSAL FOR OFFERING AN EXISTING ON-CAMPUS GRADUATE DEGREE IN AN ONLINE (or other distance-learning) FORMAT COLLEGE: DEPARTMENT: NAME OF DEGREE PROGRAM: APPROVED:
NEW ENGLAND ASSOCIATION OF SCHOOLS AND COLLEGES COMMISSION ON INSTITUTIONS OF HIGHER EDUCATION 3 Burlington Woods, Suite 100, Burlington, MA 01803-4514 Voice: (781) 425 7785 Fax: (781) 425 1001 Web: http://cihe.neasc.org
Assumed Practices Policy Changes Proposed on First Reading Background Adjustments to the Criteria for Accreditation or Assumed Practices are considered by the Board annually, usually with first reading
Indicate Regional Compact: Midwestern Higher Education Compact New England Board of Higher Education Southern Regional Education Board Western Interstate Commission for Higher Education Application and
Assumed Practices Policy Changes Adopted on Second Reading The Board of Trustees adopted these policies on second reading at its meeting on June 26, 2015. Background Adjustments to the Criteria for Accreditation
Principles of Accreditation and Effective Distance Learning Strategies in Creating and Sustaining a Distance Learning Culture in a University Environment A Presentation for National Institute on the Assessment
Distance Learning Guidelines Introduction Florida Gateway College strives to offer the highest quality educational learning experience to all of its students, whether it is in a traditional classroom setting
GUIDELINES FOR DISTANCE LEARNING IN THE RHODE ISLAND SYSTEM OF PUBLIC HIGHER EDUCATION SCOPE: WHAT THESE GUIDELINES COVER 1 These guidelines pertain to any distance learning course or program offered by
Commission on Colleges Southern Association of Colleges and Schools Best Practices For Overview to the Best Practices These Best Practices are divided into five separate components, each of which addresses
Commission on Colleges Southern Association of Colleges and Schools 1866 Southern Lane Decatur, Georgia 30033-4097 Distance Education and the Principles of Accreditation: Documenting Compliance Guidelines
QUALITY ASSURANCE POLICY ACADEMIC DEVELOPMENT & QUALITY ASSURANCE OFFICE ALPHA UNIVERSITY COLLEGE 1. BACKGROUND The Strategic Plan of 2003-2005 E.C of Alpha University s defines the direction Alpha University
E-Learning @ Pasco-Hernando Community College Operational Guidelines I. Operational Definition: E-Learning @ PHCC is a formal education process in which the majority of the instructional interaction occurs
Recommended Standards for Distance Education NCPSA, ver. 2.2 NCPSA Standards for IT and Distance Learning Described herein are six broad based standards and specific indicators of best practices for teaching
Commission on Colleges Southern Association of Colleges and Schools 1866 Southern Lane Decatur, Georgia 30033-4097 JOINT CURRICULAR VENTURES INVOLVING THE AWARD OF CREDIT BY MEMBER INSTITUTIONS: POLICY
Board of Governors for Higher Education Sec. 10a-34 page 1 (12-96) TABLE OF CONTENTS Licensure and Accreditation of Institutions and Programs of Higher Learning ARTICLE ONE Policies and Procedures Introduction....
middle states association of colleges and schools STANDARDS FOR ACCREDITATION of Supplementary Education Organizations (SEO) Commission on Secondary Schools (CSS) of the Middle States Association of Colleges
NEW ENGLAND ASSOCIATION OF SCHOOLS AND COLLEGES COMMISSION ON INSTITUTIONS OF HIGHER EDUCATION 3 Burlington Woods, Suite 100, Burlington, MA 01803-4514 Voice: (781) 425 7785 Fax: (781) 425 1001 Web: http://cihe.neasc.org
15. Policy on Institutions Participating in Title IV Programs This policy sets forth the Accrediting Commission s procedures for the institutions to seek to establish eligibility to participate in, Federal
Standards for an Accredited Educational Program in Radiologic Sciences EFFECTIVE JANUARY 1, 2002 Adopted by: The Joint Review Committee on Education in Radiologic Technology: January 1996; Revised 2001
Graduate Program Resource Manual To assist programs in their efforts to ensure effective educational programs, continuous improvement and staying in compliance with accreditation requirements. Prepared
NICHOLLS STATE UNIVERSITY DISTANCE EDUCATION Policy Statement Revised 10/19/2011 Definition of Distance Education In accordance with the Commission on Colleges of the Southern Association of Colleges and
S TANDARDS for Accreditation and R EQUIREMENTS of Affiliation THIRTEENTH EDITION Middle States Commission on Higher Education StandardS for accreditation and requirements of affiliation thirteenth edition
Note: These regulations are in effect while being revised to comply with Public Act 13-118. All references to the Board of Governors for Higher Education, Department of Higher Education and Commissioner
COMPREHENSIVE SCHOOL VISIT: Compliance and Institutional Effectiveness Questions Consumer Protection Does the school s refund policy conform to the principles of those prescribed in Administrative Rule
Health Informatics 2010 Master s Degree Standards and Interpretations for Accreditation of Master s Degree Programs in Health Informatics Who We Are The Commission on Accreditation for Health Informatics
HIM 2008 Master s Degree Standards and Interpretations for Accreditation of Master s Degree Programs in Health Information Management Who We Are The Commission on Accreditation for Health Informatics and
HIM 2012 Baccalaureate Degree Standards and Interpretations for Accreditation of Baccalaureate Degree Programs in Health Information Management Who We Are The Commission on Accreditation for Health Informatics
Supreme Education Council Higher Education Institute Licensing and Accreditation Standards for Higher Education Institutions in Qatar Doha April 2011 0 Standards for Licensing and Accreditation of Higher
NLNAC STANDARDS AND CRITERIA ASSOCIATE DEGREE PROGRAMS I. Mission and Governance There are clear and publicly stated mission and/or philosophy and purposes appropriate to postsecondary or higher education
THE HIGHER LEARNING COMMISSION S FEDERAL COMPLIANCE PROGRAM: A GUIDE FOR INSTITUTIONS AND EVALUATION TEAMS Effective for visits beginning January 1, 2012 This document outlines the Commission s requirements
General Requirements ACCREDITING COMMISSION FOR COMMUNITY AND JUNIOR COLLEGES, WESTERN ASSOCIATION OF SCHOOLS AND COLLEGES (ACCJC) Policy on Accreditation of Baccalaureate Degrees (New, First Reading January
Missouri Baptist University Center for Distance Learning Policies and Procedures Manual MBU Center for Distance Learning Vision, Mission and Goals Through technologically-enhanced teaching-learning opportunities,
Oklahoma State Regents for Higher Education NEW PROGRAM REQUEST FORM FOR TRADITIONAL AND ONLINE PROGRAMS (Created for Consideration of Programs Outside Institutional Function) Revised June 2015 Institution
Site Visitor Report Template for Doctoral Programs Instructions: This form should be used by a Site Visit Team to compile and submit their findings of their scheduled Site Visit (please note that answers
Page 2 of 15 Program Integrity State A uthor ization Question 1: Does section 600.9(a)(1)(i)(A) permit an institution to be authorized by name by a State as a postsecondary educational institution in one
DETC Accreditation Handbook 2014 A.1. Accreditation Standards Accreditation Standards The DETC Accrediting Commission has adopted the language below as Standards (as noted by 51 capital letters), which
NLNAC STANDARDS AND CRITERIA BACCALAUREATE DEGREE PROGRAMS I. Mission and Governance There are clear and publicly stated mission and/or philosophy and purposes appropriate to postsecondary or higher education
National Commission for Academic Accreditation & Assessment Standards for Quality Assurance and Accreditation of Higher Education Programs Evidence of Performance Judgments about quality based on general
DISTANCE EDUCATION STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES Distance Education in a National Context Distance education is becoming a standard practice in higher education. 1 According to a report issued by the National
5. Student Rights and Responsibilities The Office of the Registrar strives to be transparent, objective, impartial and fair in its regulation, governance and registration practices. The Registrar endeavors
Quality Assurance Guidelines and Criteria for Provider Access to Initial Validation of Programmes Leading to QQI Awards Further Education and Training QQI, an integrated agency for quality and qualifications
National Commission for Academic Accreditation & Assessment Handbook for Quality Assurance and Accreditation in Saudi Arabia PART 3 EXTERNAL REVIEWS FOR ACCREDITATION AND QUALITY ASSURANCE Ver. 2.0 July
BSN PROGRAM CCNE Standard I: The mission, philosophy, and expected outcomes of the program are congruent with those of the parent institution, reflect professional nursing standards and guidelines, and
A NATIONAL DIALOGUE: The Secretary of Education s Commission on the Future of Higher Education ISSUE PAPER Fourth in a series of Issue Papers released at the request of Chairman Charles Miller to inform
Template for Departmental Report for Northwest Commission on Colleges and Universities Self Study (The most critical information is in Italic) Standard One: Mission and Goals, Planning and Effectiveness
Essential Standards for Registration State and Territory Registering Bodies Australian Capital Territory New South Wales Northern Territory Queensland South Australia Tasmania Victoria Western Australia
2011 Outcomes Assessment Accreditation Handbook Associate Degree Programs Baccalaureate Degree Programs Master Degree Programs Accreditation Policies can be found in a separate document on the ATMAE website
1. Title Academic Program Approval Standards 2. Rule and Regulation Sec. 1 Overarching Principles. The standards used for review and approval of academic program proposals are derived from three overarching
Audit report VET Quality Framework Standards for Registered Training Organisations 2015 ORGANISATION DETAILS Organisation s legal name: Trading name/s: RTO number: CRICOS number: AUDIT TEAM Lead auditor:
ACCREDITING COMMISSION FOR COMMUNITY AND JUNIOR COLLEGES Western Association of Schools and Colleges Accreditation Standards, Annotated 1 (Adopted June 2014) Introduction 2 The primary purpose of an ACCJC
Standards and Guidelines for the Accreditation of Educational Programs in Surgical Technology Essentials/Standards initially adopted in l972; revised in 1991, 2000, 2002, and 2004 by the: American College
Evaluation: General Education, Programs and Responding to Federal Compliance Issues John D. Jones, Ph.D. Presenter Evaluation is a systematic determination of a subject's merit, worth and significance,
TITLE 135 PROCEDURAL RULE WEST VIRGINIA COUNCIL FOR COMMUNITY AND TECHNICAL COLLEGE EDUCATION SERIES 11 DEGREE DESIGNATION, GENERAL EDUCATION REQUIREMENTS, NEW PROGRAM APPROVAL, AND DISCONTINUANCE OF EXISTING
Dual Degrees Offered Collaboratively by Two or More Institutions Definition A dual degree program is defined as a program of study offered collaboratively by two institutions that leads to the award of
Introduction 1 ACCREDITING COMMISSION FOR COMMUNITY AND JUNIOR COLLEGES Western Association of Schools and Colleges Accreditation Standards (Adopted June 2014) The primary purpose of an ACCJC accredited
National Commission for Academic Accreditation & Assessment Standards for Quality Assurance and Accreditation of Higher Education Programs November 2009 Standards for Quality Assurance and Accreditation
E-LEARNING TEMPLATE ACCET Document 3.E-learning Page 1 of 16 INTRODUCTION The E-learning Template must be completed by institutions offering courses and/or programs via e-learning technology and methodology.
Southern Association of Colleges and Schools Commission on Colleges 1866 Southern Lane Decatur, Georgia 30033-4097 COLLABORATIVE ACADEMIC ARRANGEMENTS: POLICY AND PROCEDURES - Policy - Collaborative academic
Cleveland State University Approval Process for NEW Graduate Degree Programs (based on Revised OBOR Guidelines of November 2012 and Faculty Senate Policy of October 2006) 1 Step 1 A Program Development
GUIDELINES FOR FORENSIC LABORATORY MANAGEMENT PRACTICES INTRODUCTION The American Society of Crime Laboratory Directors is a professional organization of managers and supervisors employed in forensic laboratories.
Offshore and Cross-Border Programs FULL POLICY CONTENTS Scope Policy Statement Reason for Policy Procedures Definitions ADDITIONAL DETAILS Additional Contacts Web Address Forms Related Information Effective:
Introduction Founded 1885 New England Association of Schools and Colleges Commission on Independent Schools (CIS) Commission on American and International Schools Abroad (CAISA) Standards and for the Accreditation
Introduction and overview Request for Proposals Distance (Online) Program Development Funds In support of the 2020 Vision for Excellence, Mizzou Online has allocated $2 million in FY 2015 to support development
STANDARDS FOR ACCREDITATION OF POST-GRADUATE CRNA FELLOWSHIPS January 2014 Copyright 2014 by the Council on Accreditation of Nurse Anesthesia Educational Programs 222 S. Prospect Avenue, Park Ridge, Illinois,
Part 201 Chapter 4: Standards and Regulations (SR) Introduction. If a standard does not apply to the institution, the institution shall provide a detailed written justification and rational as to why the
Quality Assurance for Distance Education Programming Quality assurance for distance programming at Creighton University is a multifaceted process involving faculty, staff, students, administrators, and
UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT DALLAS PRINCIPLES OF GOOD PRACTICE FOR ELECTRONICALLY-BASED COURSES CHECKLIST AND AGREEMENT Introduction The Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board, through the Distance Education
HIGHER LEARNING COMMISSION STATEMENT TO THE U.S. SENATE COMMITTEE ON HEALTH, EDUCATION. LABOR AND PENSIONS March 21, 2011 This statement supplements the written and oral testimony provided on March 10,
The University of Hawai i Community Colleges Online Learning Strategic Plan GOAL 1,2,3,4,5 DESCRIPTION OUTCOMES RESEARCH QUESTIONS AND DATA REPORTING FURTHER CONSIDERATIONS Overview As an important subset
National Commission for Academic Accreditation & Assessment Standards for Quality Assurance and Accreditation of Higher Education Institutions November 2009 Standards for Institutional Accreditation in
CPME 120 STANDARDS AND REQUIREMENTS FOR ACCREDITING COLLEGES OF PODIATRIC MEDICINE COUNCIL ON PODIATRIC MEDICAL EDUCATION This document is concerned with ensuring the quality and improvement of colleges
Principles of Accreditation: Foundations for Quality Enhancement Commission on Colleges Southern Association of Colleges and Schools 1866 Southern Lane Decatur, Georgia 30033-4097 404-679-4501 404-679-4558
III. ACCREDITATION STANDARDS AND CRITERIA FOR ACADEMIC QUALITY OF POST-SECONDARY AND HIGHER DEGREE PROGRAMS IN NURSING A. NLNAC Definition of Quality The core values of accreditation emphasize learning,