Program Executive Office Integrated Warfare Systems

Transcription

1 Program Executive Office Integrated Warfare Systems 2010 National Defense Center of Excellence for Research in Ocean Sciences Industry Day 30 September 2010 Mr. Jimmy Smith, Director, Above Water Sensors Directorate UNCLASSIFIED

2 Content PEO IWS Background Advanced Development (PEO IWS 5A) ACB APB Capability Gaps System Engineering (PEO IWS 7) Information Assurance Open Architecture Fleet Synthetic Training Small Business Innovative Research (SBIR)

3 155 Programs

4 What We Do The PEO IWS organization is aligned to develop, procure and deliver Enterprise Warfighting Solutions for Surface Ships PEO IWS has life cycle responsibilities for analysis of combat system performance, system planning, design management, systems engineering, integration, installation, test, maintenance and disposal Navy s Open Architecture (OA) Enterprise lead for Assistant Secretary of the Navy for Research, Development and Acquisition (ASN(RDA))

5 PEO IWS International Partners

6 155 Programs Undersea Systems IWS 5.0 MPM CAPT Davis DPM Mr. Thomas

7 Surface Duct Range Dependent SVP (Worldwide Coverage) Mutual Interference Maximum 30 Contact Entities Schools of Fish Wake Effects Surface Ship Echoes Directional Ambient Noise Surface Clutter High Fidelity Target Model Water-Borne Propagation Shipwrecks Range Dependent Bottom Bottom Clutter Bottom Bounce Propagation 7 7

8 Advanced Development Projects Submarine Advanced Processing Build 4-Step Process Transitions Advanced Development 3. Lab-based End-to-End Developmental System T&E Engineering Measurement Programs Assess System Performance Operationally Improved Modeling, Assessments & Requirements Generation Submarine Sensors Twin-Line Thin-Line Concept 4. At-sea Developmental System T&E APB System Engineering 4 Step Process 1. Technology Survey 2. Technology Evaluation Upgrades/ Targeted Enhancements Production System Integration/Test Certification Development Cycle Performance Measurement EMP LCCA Vector Sensor Concept Data Operational System 1. Component level open data set survey 2. Component level closed data set independent evaluation risk mitigation step 3. Integrated system level closed data set evaluation 4. Integrated system build on production HW at sea evaluation Operational Environment CAVES Surface Ship Advanced Capability Build 4. At-sea Developmental System T&E 3. Lab-based End-to-End Developmental System T&E SAST APB System Engineering 4 Step Process 1. Technology Survey 2. Technology Evaluation Advanced Capability Build (ACB) - Surface ASW Synthetic Trainer - Continuous Active Sonar - Active Clutter Reduction Active Clutter Distributed Netted Sensors Over-the-horizon communications - Different noise characteristics - Collocated with Relay prior ONR Buoy data collected RAP VLA DWADS In-buoy processing high power acoustic source Volumetric Receive Array

9 Implementing Open Architecture

10 FY04 FY06 FY08 FY10 FY12 FY14 FY16 Surface Ship USW Combat Systems Legacy to Future Systems through the ACB Process ACB-09 ACB-11 ACB-13 ACB-15 ACB-17 Legacy IPS SIPS Legacy Systems and IPS / SIPS DDG AN/SQQ-89(V)4/6/10/14/15 (V)15-EC200/204 SIPS/IPS CG AN.SQQ-89(V)6/7/12.A(V)15-0 SIPS FFG AN/SQQ-89(V)2/9 TI09/ACB 09 Search CZ improvements Bi-Static Capability Clutter Mitigation Classify Automated Classification Engage MK54 OTS Supportability Synthetic Training Baseline Establishes a common H/W & S/W architecture Provides improved capabilities through the APB process Reconstitutes Towed Array for DDG 51 Flight IIA Basis for USW Combat Systems on DDG 1000 and LCS ACB 11 and Beyond Search Mutual Interference Mitigation Improved Active Capability Classify ATTDS Signal Processing Sonar Situational Awareness Automated Data Fusion Distributed Netted Sensors Engage MK-54 VLA Netted Engagement Supportability Reality Based Environment Fully Integrated Synthetic Training Communications ACOMMS USW-DSS integration

11 ACB Capability Gaps Active Detection Needs: Improved detection and classification at extended ranges Reduce false alarm rate from automation and operators Reduce mutual interference between multiple active ships Torpedo Defense Needs: Full coverage at extended ranges Reduce false alert rate Command and Control Recent capabilities increase operator workload, common displays will mitigate this issue Passive Need improved passive detection capability against diesel submarines Training Need full simulation of full sensor suite and recorded data playback capability

12 System Performance Improvements Through Incremental Development PEO IWS Rapid Capability Improvement Process Upgrades/ Enhancements System Integration Testing Certification ONR IWS5A / IWS5B APL Technology Assessment Advance Development Environment IWS5 AN/SQQ-89(V) PMS ARCI PMS BYG-1 PMS ISIS Production System Operational Environment Engineering Measurement Programs Improved Modeling, Assessments Requirements Generation Employment Guidelines Development Tactics & Training EMP Performance Measurement Tactical Systems Apples-to-Apples Embedded Data Collection A Proven Process for Rapid Capability Improvement

13 APB Capability Gaps Passive Signal Processing Imaging Active Signal Processing Automation Contact Management Contact Followers Target Motion Analysis Information Management Training Gaps and Seams Analysis still in progress - More detail to be provided at the Dec 2010 Submarine Industry Day

14 IWS 5A Broad Agency Announcement (BAA) Advanced Undersea Technologies BAA N IWS5A01 (FEDBIZOPS) Open from 8 June 2010 to 7 June 2011 Three focus areas: Submarine Combat System Signal Processing Technologies Surface Antisubmarine Warfare Systems Signal Processing Technologies Undersea Sensor, Handling, and Communication Technologies Industry Days Surface Ship Industry Day was 19 August Submarine Industry Day in November/December 2010 White Papers Submitted with technical approach, experience, capabilities, past performance, and initial cost estimate Papers evaluated and if selected will be invited to submit full technical and/or cost proposal for a maximum of 5 year period including all options. Emphasis on maturing technologies for laboratory and at-sea testing and subsequent transition into Naval combat systems.

15 155 Programs Future C/S & HSI IWS 7.0 MPM CAPT Gannon DPM Mr. Miranda

16 IA Technologies NAVSEA afloat systems require IA and IA enabled products that Support the establishment of a robust defense-in-depth (DiD) security architecture to protect, detect, react, and recover information systems from inadvertent operator error, malicious attack (internal and external), and major calamity (fire, flooding, loss of power, etc.) and Promote the availability, integrity, confidentiality, authentication, and non-repudiation of information

17 IA Technologies Key characteristics include: Effective against nation state information operations tradecraft Support real-time, tactical data exchanges Are complementary across network infrastructure, systems, applications, and hosts (within a layer of the architecture) Are complementary across levels in the shipboard architecture Automated, where possible and practical, to support decreased manning Relatively easy and inexpensive to implement, maintain, and update User friendly

18 Component Based Radar Open Architecture

19 Challenges Business Area #1: Establishing an Enabling Environment, Demonstrating Life cycle Affordability, Encouraging Competition and Collaboration; Business Area #2: Designating Key Interfaces; Technical Area #1: Achieving Interoperability between Joint Warfighting Applications, Providing Secure Information Exchange, using Selected Open Standards; Technical Area #2: Architecting Modular Designs and Generating Design Disclosures, Employing Modular Designs; Technical Area #3: Using Reusable Applications Software; Technical Area #4: Certifying Conformance.

20 Fleet Synthetic Training The Fleet Synthetic Training goal is to provide a system that can produce a higher level of operational proficiency and readiness in a measurably shorter period of time reducing the cost of preparing for operations. This will be achieved by taking advantage of advances in advanced and distributed training applications: Focus Area Crew Performance Definition, Assessment, and Debrief Cognitive Theory Analysis Decompose surface ship crew functions into a set of metrics based competencies Competency based training metrics tracking to achieve a higher level of proficiency, reduce incidents & minimize training cost Develop a Measurement Model of Performance in Multi-tasking Environments Competency Based Metrics Automated Analysis Automate decomposition of metrics for analyses and feedback of complex training events Adaptability for specific levels of training (individual, team, unit, Strike Group, Coalition) Scenario Generation & Control (SGC) Competency based training requires a cognitive theory based SGC system Adaptive Scenario Generation and Control Data Collection Based Upon Competencies Schema that recognizes exercise competencies & collects appropriate data Verbal Command Data Collection Capture & understand verbal commands utilized by an automated assessment tool/system Debriefs Capability to diagnose crew performance deficiencies Provide relevant sample best practice guidance and examples Evaluate training scenario effectiveness Systematically track trends in performance and establish performance distributions and performance benchmarks

21 Fleet Synthetic Training Focus Area Distributed Training Applications Intelligent Agent Exercise Conduct Phase Rational / Thinking Injections Agent-based modeling to provide Mission level doctrinally correct behaviors Realistic and automated team simulation supporting training with low overhead while providing high fidelity representations of crew, own ship, Strike Group and opposing forces Reactive entities and environment (e.g., shifting radar ducts, water column temps, etc.) Mission Rehearsal, In-Theater Scenario Management Optimization Overcome communications s/ bandwidth limitations Near real-time Intelligence insertion Rapid injection of Objective Area Phenomenon Schema to approach Real World fidelity Higher, High Level Architecture replacement / adaptation Robust replication of C4ISR entities and organizations with integrated exercise capability Determine Strike Group Effectiveness

22 Enterprise Sensing Rapidly evolving, layered, net-centric sensors and C3 enterprise services

23 155 Programs PEO IWS SBIR Efforts

24 PEO IWS FY09 Spending Contract Vehicles/Avenues: Requirements IDIQ BOA GSA Seaport-e Total Small Business Contract Dollars: $11,571,557 Product Service Code (PSC) Descriptions Administrative and Management Support Services Ammunitions and Explosives Ships, Small Craft, Pontoons, and Floating Docks Electrical and Electronic Equipment Components Engineering and Technical Services Fire Control Equipment Guided Missiles Weapons Radar Equipment, Except Airborne Research and Development Other FY09 contract actions

25 PEO IWS FY09 Small Business Contracts Veteran Owned SDVOSB Woman Owned Minority Owned Asian Pacific Black Hispanic Disadvantaged Small Disadvantaged 8(a) IWS FY09 Dollars IWS FY09 SB Contract Values Veteran Owned $ 3,537,845 SDVOSB $ 306,345 Woman Owned $ 6,681,731 Minority Owned $ 11,011,287 Asian Pacific $ 5,042,985 Black $ 2,440,000 Hispanic $ 2,622,044 Disadvantaged $ 125,881 Small Disadvantaged $ 8,048,787 8(a) $ 7,948,787 Small Business Dollars Only Large Business Prime Contract Dollars Excluded Total Small Business Contract Dollars: $11,571,557

26 PEO IWS ACTIVE SBIR TOPICS (FY02.1 FY10.2 Solicitations ) N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N Phase II to Phase III Transition Rate 41% N N B N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N

27 Small Business Funding Profile As of September 2010 SBIR Execution Outside Sources FY02 FY03 FY04 FY05 FY06 FY07 FY08 FY09 FY10 $M Execution Outside $M FY02 FY03 FY04 FY05 FY06 FY07 FY08 FY09 FY10

28 Questions?