Limitation period in sexual abuse case
|
|
- Emil Sanders
- 8 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Limitation period in sexual abuse case Standard Note: SN/HA/4209 Last updated: 10 April 2013 Author: Alexander Horne and Catherine Fairbairn Section Home Affairs Section The limitation period is the time within which one person may bring a civil action against another. The current rules on limitation periods in civil proceedings are complex. Different periods apply to different causes of action. Until recently, as a consequence of a House of Lords decision in a 1993 case, the law distinguished between intentionally caused injury, for which the limitation period was considered to be six years, and negligently caused injury, for which the limitation period is an extendable period of three years. People who were victims of abuse when they were children, but who did not bring proceedings against their alleged abusers until they were much older, could find that the rules resulted in their claims being time-barred. This situation was criticised by many. However, in a landmark ruling in January 2008, the House of Lords held that its own earlier decision was wrong and that the limitation period for intentionally caused injury (including sexual abuse cases) should also be an extendable period of three years. The Law Commission had already recommended that the current rules on limitation periods be replaced with a single core regime which would apply to most civil actions. In personal injury claims, there would be an extendable limitation period of three years, whether the claim concerned was made in negligence or in respect of an intentionally caused injury. In July 2002, the Government announced its acceptance, in principle, of the Law Commission's recommendations, subject to further consideration of several issues, and stated that it would legislate when a suitable opportunity arose. In January 2007, the Government announced that it would consult on the detailed content of a draft Bill to implement the Law Commission's recommendations. In February 2008, the Government confirmed that the proposed consultation would take account of the recent House of Lords judgment. However, in November 2009, the Government announced that reform of the law of limitation of actions would not be taken forward. This information is provided to Members of Parliament in support of their parliamentary duties and is not intended to address the specific circumstances of any particular individual. It should not be relied upon as being up to date; the law or policies may have changed since it was last updated; and it should not be relied upon as legal or professional advice or as a substitute for it. A suitably qualified professional should be consulted if specific advice or information is required. This information is provided subject to our general terms and conditions which are available online or may be provided on request in hard copy. Authors are available to discuss the content of this briefing with Members and their staff, but not with the general public.
2 Contents 1 Limitation periods General Personal injury actions, including sexual assault claims Recent House of Lords decision 4 2 Law Commission recommendations 5 3 Government response 7 4 Recent developments 7 2
3 1 Limitation periods 1.1 General The limitation period is the time within which one person may bring a civil action against another. The current rules on limitation periods in civil proceedings are complex. Different periods apply to different causes of action. Any constituent who is considering making a legal claim should take specific legal advice to determine the relevant time limit. The Limitation Act 1980, applies to civil claims. 1 Part I of the Act sets out the ordinary periods of limitation applicable to different types of civil actions. In effect, a person with a civil claim will lose it if he or she does not sue within a specified period of time. The general rule is that the limitation period for an action in tort 2 is six years from the date on which the cause of action accrues Personal injury actions, including sexual assault claims The limitation period for personal injury actions is set out in section 11. Sub-section (1) provides that: This section applies to any action for damages for negligence, nuisance or breach of duty (whether the duty exists by virtue of a contract or of provision made by or under a statute or independently of any contract or any such provision) where the damages claimed by the plaintiff for the negligence, nuisance or breach of duty consist of or include damages in respect of personal injuries to the plaintiff or any other person. In cases covered by section 11, the limitation period is three years from the date on which the cause of action accrues, or, if later, three years from the date of knowledge of the person injured, or the date of majority, but the court can extend time if it is just and equitable to do so. Section 14 sets out the definition of date of knowledge. Section 33 of the Limitation Act 1980 gives the court discretion to allow a civil action within the scope of section 11 to be brought, even if the limitation period has expired. The court must have regard to all the circumstances of the case and must take into account a list of factors laid down in section 33(3), including the length of delay in commencing proceedings and the reasons for that delay. Having identified the reasons, the court must then consider whether or not there is an equitable (ie just) reason to justify not applying the normal limitation period to the case. Until recently, as a result of a House of Lords decision in a 1993 case, Stubbings v Webb, section 11 was interpreted by the courts as applying to negligently caused personal injury, but not to deliberately caused personal injury, including sexual assault. 4 The limitation period for deliberately caused personal injury was considered to be six years from the date of the injury, or the date of majority (ie by the age of 24, time generally ran out for someone who suffered sexual abuse while a child). 5 As a consequence, people who were victims of abuse when they were children, but who did not bring proceedings against their alleged abusers As amended by the Latent Damage Act 1986, which inserted new sections 14A, 14B, 28A in the Limitation Act 1980, amending the law about limitation of actions in relation to actions for damages for negligence not involving personal injuries A tort is a civil wrong Limitation Act 1980 section 2 [1993] AC 498 Limitation Act 1980 section 2 3
4 until they were much older, could find that the rules resulted in their claims being time-barred. This situation was criticised by many. 6 In one case, the claimant had been sexually abused by her father but did not commence legal proceedings until nearly 10 years after the last act of abuse. The cause of action against the father was intentional assault and accordingly the claim was held to be time-barred. However, the claimant also brought proceedings against her mother based on her negligent failure to protect her against the father. This fell under section 11 of the Limitation Act 1980 and so was subject to the court s discretion to extend the limitation period under section 33, which the judge granted and the Court of Appeal affirmed. The action against the mother was therefore allowed to proceed. 7 Sir Ralph Gibson, one of the judges hearing the case in the Court of Appeal, commented that the result was illogical and surprising. 1.3 Recent House of Lords decision On 30 January 2008, the House of Lords (which was the predecessor to the current Supreme Court) delivered its ruling on the limitation period for sexual abuse claims in five appeal cases (including A v. Hoare, the so called "Lotto Rapist" case). 8 In each case, earlier hearings before lower courts had held that, in accordance with Stubbings v Webb, the claim failed because it had been brought out of time. However, the House of Lords held that Stubbings v Webb had been wrongly decided, that actions for personal injury deriving from intentional trespass to the person fell within section 11 of the 1980 Act (with an extendable three year limit) and that therefore courts had discretion under section 33 of the Act to extend the time limit in the claimants' favour. This means that, depending on the circumstances, a claim for damages for personal injuries caused by a sexual assault now generally has a limitation period of three years from the date when the victim first considers the injury sufficiently serious to justify proceedings, but judges have discretion to extend that period if thought equitable. The House of Lords also considered the date of knowledge provision in section 14 and held that the test was whether a reasonable person with the claimant s knowledge would have considered the injury sufficiently serious to start legal proceedings. If the claimant had any personal characteristics which might prevent him from acting as a reasonable person would, these could be taken into account by the judge when deciding whether to exercise discretion to extend the limitation period. Lord Brown of Eaton-under-Heywood acknowledged that the effect of the decision might be to encourage more claims many years after the alleged incident had taken place but he said that not all of these would be allowed to proceed: a substantially greater number of allegations (not all of which will be true) are now likely to be made many years after the abuse complained of. Whether or not it will be possible for defendants to investigate these sufficiently for there to be a reasonable prospect of a fair trial will depend upon a number of factors, not least when the complaint was first made and with what effect. If a complaint has been made and recorded, and more obviously still if the accused has been convicted of the abuse complained of, that will be one thing; if, however, a complaint comes out of the blue with no apparent support for it (other perhaps than that the alleged abuser has been See, for example, Limitation: A Lewis Carol Story by Peter Garsden, Vice-President of the Association of Child Abuse Lawyers (at 10 April 2013) S v W (Child Abuse: Damages) [1995] 1 FLR 862 A v Iorworth Hoare; C v Middlesbrough Council; X & Anor v Wandsworth LBC; H v Suffolk County Council; Young v Catholic Care (Diocese of Leeds) [2008] UKHL 6 4
5 accused or even convicted of similar abuse in the past), that would be quite another thing. By no means everyone who brings a late claim for damages for sexual abuse, however genuine his complaint may in fact be, can reasonably expect the court to exercise the section 33 discretion in his favour. On the contrary, a fair trial (which must surely include a fair opportunity for the defendant to investigate the allegations see section 33(3)(b)) is in many cases likely to be found quite simply impossible after a long delay. 9 Baroness Hale of Richmond considered that a fair trial could be possible long after the event and sometimes the law has no choice. It is even possible to have a fair trial of criminal charges of historic sex abuse. Much will depend upon the circumstances of the particular case Law Commission recommendations Reform of the law relating to limitation periods has been under consideration for some time, quite separately from the specific appeal cases recently heard by the House of Lords. In July 2001, the Law Commission published a report in which it recommended that the current rules on limitation periods be replaced with a single core regime which would apply to most civil actions. 11 They proposed that a three-year extendable time limit should apply to all personal injury claims. The Law Commission s report included a discussion of the particular problems which arise in relation to claims by victims of child sexual abuse and how these might be addressed under the new core regime : 6. CLAIMS BY VICTIMS OF CHILD SEXUAL ABUSE (1) Should any limitation period apply? 4.23 Claims by victims of child sexual abuse pose particular problems for any limitations regime. The acts giving rise to the cause of action will, by their nature, occur when the claimant is a child. Depending on the nature of the abuse, the claimant may suffer immediate physical injury. However the abuse may also cause extensive and prolonged, psychiatric problems. This later injury may only manifest itself - or at least be recognised as such by the victim - several years after the abuse. This creates problems similar to those of latent disease. ( ) 4.25 We considered in the Consultation Paper whether sexual abuse claims are so unique that they should not be subject to any limitation period. We concluded that they were not. It can be argued forcibly that in the case of sexual abuse (at least where the defendant has been tried and convicted for a criminal offence in respect of the abuse) there may be no justification for protecting the interests of the defendant (an important function of a limitation regime). However, it may not have been established that the defendant committed the assault, and the principle that litigation should be stifled at some point (irrespective of the merits of the case) to prevent claims being brought at a time when it is no longer possible to give a fair trial to the dispute, remains valid. We provisionally proposed, therefore, that such claims should continue to be subject to a limitation period. This was supported by around ninety per cent of consultees Paragraph 86 Paragraph 60 Limitation of Actions Law Com No
6 answering this question and we now therefore confirm as a final recommendation that claims in sexual abuse cases should be subject to at least the primary limitation period Three consultees pointed out, in addition to the arguments we put forward in the Consultation Paper in support of our provisional proposal, that it is difficult to justify giving special treatment to sexual abuse claims alone, without according similar protection to, for example, non-sexual assaults against children. Sexual abuse may, in the current climate, be regarded as uniquely unacceptable but other non-sexual abuse of children may be as damaging. Yet it would be difficult to argue that all attacks against children should be exempted from the limitation regime However, two consultees argued that no limitation period should apply to sexual abuse claims because, among other reasons, sexual abuse victims commonly suffer from dissociation making them unable to bring claims against their abusers. The term dissociation is used in two senses. Lee Moore refers to dissociative amnesia, which is a diagnostic category of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, describing an inability to recall personal information of a stressful and traumatic nature - such as sexual abuse suffered. Pannone & Partners use the term in a more general sense, to describe the position where the plaintiff is aware of both the trauma and of its consequences for his psychological make-up but the trauma was so awful that memories or reminders of it would be too psychologically damaging for the plaintiff, and thus, the plaintiff dissociates himself or herself from these memory triggers, for example litigation Where dissociative amnesia (or a similar mental condition) is responsible for the claimant s inability to bring a claim within the limitation period, the claimant will be afforded some protection by our recommendations in respect of lack of capacity. Dissociative amnesia would appear to fall within the terms of mental disability as we have defined it above. Where therefore the claimant can show that this was the cause of his or her inability to bring proceedings, the primary limitation period would be suspended for at least ten years from the onset of the disability. This would also apply where the claimant suffered from another recognised mental disorder. We have rejected the suggestion that disability should be defined to include any separate provision for the psychological incapacity suffered by victims of sexual abuse because of the difficulty of defining this incapacity. However, the definition of disability is sufficiently wide to ensure that where a claimant is psychologically incapable of commencing proceedings, and this incapacity can be identified as a mental disability, that claimant will be given the same protection as any other claimant under a disability. ( ) 4.31 We do have some concerns that claims may be brought many years after the events on which the claimant s cause of action is based, at a time when it is difficult for a fair trial to be given to the claimant s allegations. However, subject to the provision on disability, the victim is likely to have immediate knowledge of the relevant facts, so that the primary limitation period expires three years after majority. Although the court will have a discretion to disapply the primary limitation period, it must consider whether the defendant s ability to defend the claim will be prejudiced due to the lapse of time since the events giving rise to the cause of action. And our concerns are no greater in respect of sexual abuse claims than personal injury cases generally. In other words, these concerns are not a good reason for making a separate modification in respect of sexual abuse claims, but a factor to be considered in deciding whether or not there should be a long-stop for personal injury claims. 6
7 4.32 We recommend that claims by child abuse victims should be subject to the core regime as modified in relation to other personal injury claims Government response In a written answer on 16 July 2002, Lord Irvine of Lairg, who was then Lord Chancellor, gave the Government s response to the Law Commission s report: The Government accept in principle the Law Commission's recommendations on limitation of actions, subject to further consideration of certain aspects of its report, and will legislate when a suitable opportunity arises. 13 On 9 January 2007, Baroness Ashton of Upholland who was then Parliamentary Under- Secretary of State at the Department for Constitutional Affairs (as it was then, now Ministry of Justice), made a written ministerial statement in which she confirmed the Government s intention to consult on the detailed content of a draft Bill to implement the Law Commission's recommendations: In July 2002 my noble and learned friend the Lord Chancellor announced his acceptance in principle of the recommendations in the Law Commission's 2001 report Limitation of Actions (Law Com 270) subject to further consideration of certain aspects (Hansard, 16 July 2002, WA 127). As part of the ongoing preparation of these reforms my department will consult in spring 2007 on the detailed content of a draft Bill to implement the Law Commission's recommendations. This consultation will include consideration of the issue of giving the court powers to allow it to hear certain cases beyond current limitation periods, allowing the victim to sue if the offender later receives a windfall, for example. The Government undertook to consult on this in the July 2006 publication, Rebalancing the Criminal Justice System in favour of the lawabiding majority. 14 In a written answer in February 2008, Bridget Prentice, who was then Parliamentary Under Secretary of State at the Ministry of Justice, confirmed that the proposed consultation, for which no date had been set, would take account of the recent House of Lords judgment. 15 However, in November 2009, Bridget Prentice announced that the proposed draft Civil Law Reform Bill would not now include provisions to reform the law of limitation of actions: These provisions were based on a Law Commission report of But a recent consultation with key stakeholders has demonstrated that there are insufficient benefits and potentially large-scale costs associated with the reform. In addition, the courts have remedied some of the most significant difficulties with the law that the Law Commission identified, for example, in relation to the limitation aspects of child abuse cases. The limitation reforms will therefore not now be taken forward Recent developments In response to a Parliamentary Question about what the Government is doing to ensure that victims of child abuse have access to sufficient support, the Minister, Helen Grant, indicated that: Limitation of Actions Law Com No. 270, (footnotes removed) HL Deb 16 July 2002 c127wa HL Deb 9 January 2007 c8ws HC Deb 6 February 2008 c1190w HC Deb 19 November 2009 c13ws 7
8 The Government is committed to developing a justice system that provides the highest possible standards of protection and support for young victims of crime. Responsibility for the care and support of child victims of rape, sexual assault and sexual exploitation is led by the Department for Education. The Ministry of Justice is working closely with the Department of Education to deliver their Tackling Child Sexual Exploitation Action Plan which was published in Children are one of a number of vulnerable victims for whom services will be prioritised following the response to last year's Ministry of Justice public consultation Getting it Right for Victims and Witnesses. The Ministry of Justice is also providing nearly 4 million of funding this year through its Rape Support Fund for support and counselling services for women and girls over the age of 13 years who have suffered recent or historic rape or sexual violence. The Government has opted into EU Directive 2011/92/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council on combating the sexual abuse and sexual exploitation of children and child pornography. The directive, which is due to come into force on 18 December 2013, will help to ensure that there is a co-ordinated and consistent response throughout the European Union in combating child sexual exploitation, which as a result of advances in technology, increasingly goes beyond the limits of national borders. 17 There have been a number of recent articles on the issue, particularly following allegations of sexual abuse against former broadcaster Jimmy Savile. 18 The case of Savile was complicated by the fact that he had not been convicted of a criminal offence at the time of his death and that it was thought that many of his assets had been donated to charity. One commentator, writing in the Solicitors Journal, observed that: Normally in a case involving the conviction of an abuser, the court will exercise its discretion under section 33 of the Limitation Act 1980 to disapply limitation. However it is not certain how a court might react to a number of separate claims, brought against a deceased tortfeasor where there may be nothing more in the way of evidence than the victim s statement and videotapes of Savile s shows HC Deb 7 Mar 2013 c1135w 18 See: e.g. BBC Online, Jimmy Savile scandal: What legal redress for abuse victims?, 11 January 2013; F. Gerry, Jimmy Savile, (2012) Criminal Law and Justice Weekly 176(42), 609; Vicarious Liability extended, (2012) New Law Journal 162(7540), 1480; and, M. Johnson, Jimmy Savile s victims still have serious obstacles to overcome, (2012) Solicitors Journal 156(41), See: M. Johnson, Jimmy Savile s victims still have serious obstacles to overcome, (2012) Solicitors Journal 156(41), 9. 8
How To Limit Liability In The Uk To \U00A31,000
LIMITATION OF ACTIONS Law Com No 270 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1 LIMITATION OF ACTIONS Law Com No 270 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The current law on limitation periods suffers from a number of problems. The Limitation Act
More informationLegal Research Record
Legal Research Record Summary of problem(s) Design and Dress Limited (DDL) has experienced problems due to the alleged harassment of one of their employees, Susie Baker, by another employee, Stephen Harding
More informationLIMITATION UPDATE. 1. Recently, the Courts have been looking at three areas of limitation law and
LIMITATION UPDATE 1. Recently, the Courts have been looking at three areas of limitation law and practice. One is when it is permissible to introduce a new claim in pending proceedings after the limitation
More informationLimitation of Actions (Personal Injury Claims) Act 1983
ANNO TRICESIMO SECUNDO ELIZABETHAE SECUNDAE REGINAE VICTORIA Limitation of Actions (Personal Injury Act 1983 No. 9884 An Act to make provision for Extending the Period within which Actions for Damages
More informationGADSBY WICKS SOLICITORS EXPLANATION OF LEGAL TERMS
EXPLANATION OF LEGAL TERMS Affidavit: After the event litigation insurance: Application notice: Bar Council: Barrister: Basic Charges: Before the Event Legal Expenses Insurance: Bill of costs: Bolam test:
More informationLIMITATION OF CERTAIN ACTIONS ACT
LIMITATION OF CERTAIN ACTIONS ACT CHAPTER 7:09 Act 36 of 1997 Amended by 2 of 2000 Current Authorised Pages Pages Authorised (inclusive) by L.R.O. 1 18.. L.R.O. 2 Chap. 7:09 Limitation of Certain Actions
More informationScottish Government Removal of the 3 year limitation period from civil actions for damages for personal injury for in care survivors of historical
Scottish Government Removal of the 3 year limitation period from civil actions for damages for personal injury for in care survivors of historical child abuse A response by the Association of Personal
More informationChapter 6B STATE ELIGIBILITY GUIDELINES. Last Amended: 1 July 2006. Manual of Legal Aid
Chapter 6B STATE ELIGIBILITY GUIDELINES Last Amended: 1 July 2006 Manual of Legal Aid TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER 6B - STATE ELIGIBILITY GUIDELINES GENERAL...3 PROVISION OF LEGAL ASSISTANCE...3 GENERAL GUIDELINES
More informationSouth Australia LAW REFORM (CONTRIBUTORY NEGLIGENCE AND APPORTIONMENT OF LIABILITY) ACT 2001
South Australia LAW REFORM (CONTRIBUTORY NEGLIGENCE AND APPORTIONMENT OF LIABILITY) ACT 2001 An Act to reform the law relating to contributory negligence and the apportionment of liability; to amend the
More informationDiscussion Paper - Limitation periods in civil claims for child sexual abuse
THE LAW SOCIETY OF NEW SOUTH WALES Our ref: Injury:JElw:942619 25 March 2015 Mr Andrew Cappie-Wood Secretary Department of Justice GPO Box 6 SYDNEY NSW 2001 By email: justice.policy@agd.nsw.gov.au Dear
More informationCHAPTER 310 THE LAW REFORM (FATAL ACCIDENTS AND MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS) ACT [PRINCIPAL LEGISLATION] ARRANGEMENT OF SECTIONS
CHAPTER 310 THE LAW REFORM (FATAL ACCIDENTS AND MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS) ACT [PRINCIPAL LEGISLATION] ARRANGEMENT OF SECTIONS Section Title 1. Short title and application. 2. Interpretation. PART I PRELIMINARY
More informationCRIMINAL INJURIES COMPENSATION SCHEME: REVISED SCHEME AS ADOPTED BY THE STATES OF JERSEY 14th APRIL 2015
CRIMINAL INJURIES COMPENSATION SCHEME: REVISED SCHEME AS ADOPTED BY THE STATES OF JERSEY 14th APRIL 2015 Published by the STATES GREFFE for the HOME AFFAIRS DEPARTMENT Page - 2 CRIMINAL INJURIES COMPENSATION
More informationPreliminary Considerations. This chapter will enable you to achieve the following learning outcomes from the CILEx syllabus:
Chapter 2: Preliminary Considerations Outline 2.1 Introduction 2.2 Limitation 2.3 Calculating limitation periods 2.4 Viability 2.5 Financing litigation 2.6 Summary Aims of this Chapter This chapter will
More informationwww.mcdermottqc.com Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Bill: Implications for Personal Injury Litigation
www.mcdermottqc.com Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Bill: Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Bill: The Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Bill covers a wide
More informationMr Speaker, this Bill amends the Limitation Act 1974 to make it easier for a person suffering a latent disease to take action.
SECOND READING SPEECH Limitation Amendment Bill 2013 Mr Speaker, this Bill amends the Limitation Act 1974 to make it easier for a person suffering a latent disease to take action. The time limit within
More informationCRIMINAL JUSTICE (SCOTLAND) BILL AMENDMENTS TO BE LODGED AT STAGE 2
Section 5, Page 2, line 28 Leave out and insert This amendment provides for information to be given to suspects at a police station in terms of a letter of rights to be provided both verbally
More informationLAW REFORM (CONTRIBUTORY NEGLIGENCE) AMENDMENT BILL 2001
1 LAW REFORM (CONTRIBUTORY NEGLIGENCE) AMENDMENT BILL 2001 EXPLANATORY NOTES GENERAL OUTLINE OBJECTIVES OF THE LEGISLATION The purpose of this Bill is to address the impact of the decision of the High
More informationProvince of Alberta LIMITATIONS ACT. Revised Statutes of Alberta 2000 Chapter L-12. Current as of December 17, 2014. Office Consolidation
Province of Alberta LIMITATIONS ACT Revised Statutes of Alberta 2000 Current as of December 17, 2014 Office Consolidation Published by Alberta Queen s Printer Alberta Queen s Printer 5 th Floor, Park Plaza
More informationJuly 2015. New Limitation of Actions Act. Q&A p. 1-10 Transition Rules p. 11 Table of Concordance p. 12
July 2015 New Limitation of Actions Act Q&A p. 1-10 Transition Rules p. 11 Table of Concordance p. 12 1 Questions and Answers For the Questions and Answers For the New Limitation of Actions Act While the
More informationCommunity Legal Information Association of PEI, Inc. Sexual Assault
Community Legal Information Association of PEI, Inc. Sexual Assault As an adult in Canada, you have the right to choose when or if you engage in sexual activity. Sexual activity without your consent is
More informationTitle 8 Laws of Bermuda Item 67 BERMUDA 1951 : 39 LAW REFORM (LIABILITY IN TORT) ACT 1951 ARRANGEMENT OF SECTIONS
BERMUDA 1951 : 39 LAW REFORM (LIABILITY IN TORT) ACT 1951 ARRANGEMENT OF SECTIONS 1 Interpretation 2 Savings 3 Apportionment of liability where contributory negligence 4 Defence of common employment abolished
More informationNORTHERN IRELAND OFFICE CONSULTATION CRIMINAL INJURIES COMPENSATION (NI) ORDER 2001 A RESPONSE BY THE ASSOCIATION OF PERSONAL INJURY LAWYERS
NORTHERN IRELAND OFFICE CONSULTATION CRIMINAL INJURIES COMPENSATION (NI) ORDER 2001 A RESPONSE BY THE ASSOCIATION OF PERSONAL INJURY LAWYERS NOVEMBER 2001 The executive committee would like to acknowledge
More informationFIRST SUPPLEMENT TO THE GIBRALTAR GAZETTE
FIRST SUPPLEMENT TO THE GIBRALTAR GAZETTE No. 3741 of 29th October, 2009 I ASSENT, ADRIAN JOHNS, LS GOVERNOR. 29th October, 2009. GIBRALTAR No. 41 of 2009 AN ACT to amend the Limitation Act. ENACTED by
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE December 02, 2014 Session
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE December 02, 2014 Session CONNIE REDMOND v. WALMART STORES, INC., ET AL. Appeal from the Circuit Court for Davidson County No. 13C3247 Joseph P. Binkley,
More informationClinical Negligence. Investigating Your Claim
www.lees.co.uk Clinical Negligence Investigating Your Claim Lees Solicitors LLP 44/45 Hamilton Square Birkenhead Wirral CH41 5AR Tel: 0151 647 9381 Fax: 0151 649 0124 e-mail: newclaim@lees.co.uk 1 The
More informationAct on Compensation for Criminal Damage
JLS/1374/05-EN NB: Unofficial translation Act on Compensation for Criminal Damage (935/1973; amendments up to 675/2002 included) General provisions Section 1 (63/1984) (1) Compensation shall be paid from
More informationBill 34 The New Limitation Act: Significant Changes and Transition Issues Explained
Bill 34 The New Limitation Act: Significant Changes and Transition Issues Explained A Presentation for CLE Employment Law Conference 2013 Pan Pacific Hotel Vancouver, BC May 9, 2013 Carman J. Overholt,
More informationNumber 31 of 2004 ARRANGEMENT OF SECTIONS. Preliminary and General
Number 31 of 2004 CIVIL LIABILITY AND COURTS ACT 2004 ARRANGEMENT OF SECTIONS PART 1 Preliminary and General Section 1. Short title and commencement. 2. Interpretation. 3. Orders and regulations. 4. Service
More informationEXPLANATORY MEMORANDUM TO THE CONDITIONAL FEE AGREEMENTS ORDER 2013. 2013 No. 689
EXPLANATORY MEMORANDUM TO THE CONDITIONAL FEE AGREEMENTS ORDER 2013 2013 No. 689 1. This explanatory memorandum has been prepared by the Ministry of Justice and is laid before Parliament by Command of
More informationSEXUAL ABUSE THE RESPONSE OF THE ARCHDIOCESE OF SYDNEY
SEXUAL ABUSE THE RESPONSE OF THE ARCHDIOCESE OF SYDNEY CONTENTS INTRODUCTION: Justice and Healing... 4 Four key principles... 5 The victims of sexual abuse are our first priority. Preventing abuse and
More informationNegligence and Damages Bill
EXPLANATORY NOTES Explanatory notes to the Bill, prepared by Andy McDonald, are published separately as Bill 76 EN. Bill 76 6/1 CONTENTS PART 1 PYSCHIATRIC INJURY 1 Close tie (duty of care) 2 Close tie
More informationThe Criminal Procedure Rules Part 17 as in force on 2 February 2015 PART 17 EXTRADITION
Contents of this Part PART 17 EXTRADITION Section 1: general rules When this Part applies rule 17.1 Meaning of court, presenting officer and defendant rule 17.2 Section 2: extradition proceedings in a
More informationSTATES OF JERSEY CRIMINAL INJURIES COMPENSATION SCHEME: REVISED SCHEME STATES GREFFE
STATES OF JERSEY CRIMINAL INJURIES COMPENSATION SCHEME: REVISED SCHEME Lodged au Greffe on 5th February 2015 by the Minister for Home Affairs STATES GREFFE 2015 Price code: B P.13 PROPOSITION THE STATES
More informationA BILL for AN ACT. Serial 137 Personal Injuries (Civil Claims) Bill 2003 Dr Toyne
Serial 137 Personal Injuries (Civil Claims) Bill 2003 Dr Toyne A BILL for AN ACT to provide for the economical and early resolution of claims for damages for personal injuries before proceedings are commenced,
More informationNHS REDRESS ACT 2006
INTRODUCTION These notes refer to the NHS Redress Act 2006 (c. 44) NHS REDRESS ACT 2006 EXPLANATORY NOTES 1. These explanatory notes relate to the NHS Redress Act 2006, which received Royal Assent on 8th
More informationFOR THE GREATER GOOD? SUMMARY DISMISSAL, PSYCHIATRIC INJURY AND REMOTENESS
FOR THE GREATER GOOD? SUMMARY DISMISSAL, PSYCHIATRIC INJURY AND REMOTENESS While stress at work claims where a Claimant has been exposed to a lengthy and continuous period of stress recently benefited
More informationChapter 4 Crimes (Review)
Chapter 4 Crimes (Review) On a separate sheet of paper, write down the answer to the following Q s; if you do not know the answer, write down the Q. 1. What is a crime? 2. There are elements of a crime.
More information4.2 The Scope Order is made under the power in s 4(2)(e) of the Act.
EXPLANATORY MEMORANDUM TO THE COMPENSATION (REGULATED CLAIMS MANAGEMENT SERVICES) ORDER 2006 THE COMPENSATION (SPECIFICATION OF BENEFITS) ORDER 2006 THE COMPENSATION (CLAIMS MANAGEMENT SERVICES) REGULATIONS
More informationThe Draft Criminal Injuries Compensation Scheme 2012
The Draft Criminal Injuries Compensation Scheme 2012 The Draft Criminal Injuries Compensation Scheme 2012 Draft Scheme laid before Parliament under section 11(1) of the Criminal Injuries Compensation
More informationProtection from Harassment Bill
Protection from Harassment Bill Bill No. 12/2014. Read the first time on 3rd March 2014. PROTECTION FROM HARASSMENT ACT 2014 (No. of 2014) Section ARRANGEMENT OF SECTIONS PART I PRELIMINARY 1. Short title
More informationAbuse and Sexual Assault
Abuse and Sexual Assault INJURY & NEGLIGENCE SPECIALISTS Injury & Negligence WELCOME TO PANNONE PART OF SLATER & GORDON We have years of experience dealing with cases of abuse and sexual assault and know
More informationConsultation on a proposed Apologies (Scotland) Bill
Consultation on a proposed Apologies (Scotland) Bill A response by the Association of Personal Injury Lawyers September 2012 Introduction The Association of Personal Injury Lawyers (APIL), a not-for-profit
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF FIJI AT SUVA CIVIL JURISDICTION. Civil Action No. HBC 137 of 2008 BETWEEN:
IN THE HIGH COURT OF FIJI AT SUVA CIVIL JURISDICTION Civil Action No. HBC 137 of 2008 BETWEEN: ATISH CHAND SHARMA of Lot 11, J.P. Maharaj Road, Nakasi, Nasinu, Unemployed. PLAINTIFF AND: HARDWOOD SALES
More informationTechnical claims brief
QBE European Operations Technical claims brief Monthly update January/February 2014 Technical claims brief Monthly update January/February 2014 Contents Legislation 1 Mesothelioma Bill passes at report
More informationAPPLICATION FOR COMPENSATION 1 (Where there is no Court Order) Criminal Offence Victims Act S.33 Criminal Code S.663D
RETURN FORMS TO: Your Legal Representatives Or Criminal Injury Compensation Unit Department of Justice & Attorney-General GPO Box 149 BRISBANE QLD 4001 APPLICATION FOR COMPENSATION 1 (Where there is no
More informationCivil Service Injury Benefits Scheme
Civil Service Injury Benefits Scheme Civil Service Injury Benefits Scheme The Civil Service Injury Benefits Scheme was made on 22 July 2002 under section 1 of the Superannuation Act 1972 and came into
More informationDELAYS IN THE CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM OF VANUATU
DELAYS IN THE CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM OF VANUATU DON PATERSON INTRODUCTION Delays in the hearing of cases, both civil and criminal, in the Supreme Court of Vanuatu are becoming a matter of some concern
More informationREPORT TO CRIME & DISORDER OVERVIEW & SCRUTINY PANEL. Title: OVERVIEW OF THE CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM. Date: 27 th October 2009
REPORT TO CRIME & DISORDER OVERVIEW & SCRUTINY PANEL Title: OVERVIEW OF THE CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM Date: 27 th October 2009 Officer Reporting: Brian Martin, Community Safety Manager Contact Officer(s):
More information67 th UPDATE TO THE CIVIL PROCEDURE RULES PRACTICE DIRECTION MAKING DOCUMENT
67 th UPDATE TO THE CIVIL PROCEDURE RULES PRACTICE DIRECTION MAKING DOCUMENT The new Practice Direction supplementing the Civil Procedure Rules 1998 is made by the Master of the Rolls under the powers
More informationQueensland DRUG REHABILITATION (COURT DIVERSION) ACT 2000
Queensland DRUG REHABILITATION (COURT DIVERSION) ACT 2000 Act No. 3 of 2000 Queensland DRUG REHABILITATION (COURT DIVERSION) ACT 2000 Section TABLE OF PROVISIONS PART 1 PRELIMINARY Page 1 Short title.....................................................
More informationJustice Committee. Courts Reform (Scotland) Bill. Written submission from Clydeside Action on Asbestos
Justice Committee Courts Reform (Scotland) Bill Written submission from Clydeside Action on Asbestos In our view, the Court of Session should deal only with most complex and important cases and that most
More informationSexual Offences (Procedure and Evidence) (Scotland) Bill
Sexual Offences (Procedure and Evidence) (Scotland) Bill [AS INTRODUCED] Section CONTENTS Prohibition of personal conduct of defence by alleged sex offender 1 Prohibition of personal conduct of defence
More informationUSING LAWYERS IN HONG KONG
USING LAWYERS IN HONG KONG This Guide deals in general terms with using lawyers in Hong Kong. It aims to help a seafarer understand the legal profession in Hong Kong, and how to select, engage and if need
More informationScheme Of Compensation for Personal Injuries Criminally Inflicted
Scheme Of Compensation for Personal Injuries Criminally Inflicted General 1. The Criminal Injuries Compensation Tribunal established under paragraph 17 of the Scheme may pay ex gratia compensation in accordance
More informationTitle 5: ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES AND SERVICES
Title 5: ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES AND SERVICES Chapter 337-A: PROTECTION FROM HARASSMENT Table of Contents Part 12. HUMAN RIGHTS... Section 4651. DEFINITIONS... 3 Section 4652. FILING OF COMPLAINT; JURISDICTION...
More informationA Guide for Childhood Sexual Abuse Survivors
You are not alone. It was not your fault. You have courage. You have choices. You have power. We re here to help. A Guide for Childhood Sexual Abuse Survivors Breaking the silence. Raising Awareness. Fighting
More informationLegal Action / Claiming Compensation in Scotland
Legal Action / Claiming Compensation in Scotland This help sheet explains your legal rights if you have been injured as a result of medical treatment and the steps involved in seeking compensation through
More informationCriminal Injuries Compensation Act 1983
1350 ANNO TRICESIMO SECUNDO ELIZABETHAE SECUNDAE REGLNAE VICTORIA Criminal Injuries Compensation Act 1983 No. 9992 An Act to Re-enact with Amendments the Law relating to Compensation for Persons injured
More informationCRIMINAL LAW & YOUR RIGHTS MARCH 2008
CRIMINAL LAW & YOUR RIGHTS MARCH 2008 1 What are your rights? As a human being and as a citizen you automatically have certain rights. These rights are not a gift from anyone, including the state. In fact,
More informationGlobal Guide to Competition Litigation Poland
Global Guide to Competition Litigation Poland 2012 Table of Contents Availability of private enforcement in respect of competition law infringements and jurisdiction... 1 Conduct of proceedings and costs...
More information1969, No. 55. BE IT ENACTED by the General Assembly of New Zealand in Parliament assembled, and by the authority of the same, as follows:
Criminal Injuries Compensation 589 Title 1. Short Title and commencement 2. Interpretation 3. Procedure of Tribunal 4. Evidence in proceedings before Tribunal ANALYSIS 5. Power to award compensation 6.
More information8 July 2015 CRIMINAL JUSTICE (Victims of Crime) BILL 2015 GENERAL SCHEME CONTENTS PART 1 PRELIMINARY. PART 2 Information for Victims
1 P a g e 8 July version Preamble Head 8 July 2015 CRIMINAL JUSTICE (Victims of Crime) BILL 2015 GENERAL SCHEME 1. Short title and commencement 2. Interpretation 3. Expenses CONTENTS PART 1 PRELIMINARY
More informationJohn Greenway Baroness Turner Lord Brookman Lord Davies Lord Sheikh
Subject: Compensation Bill new Clauses (re Asbestosis) Note of key matters: Attenders: Presenters APPG Others Justin Jacobs, Head of Liability, Motor & Risk Pricing at the ABI Graham Gibson, Director of
More informationResponse of Browne Jacobson LLP (Solicitors) Civil Law Reform Bill - CP53/09
Response of Browne Jacobson LLP (Solicitors) - CP53/09 February 2010 Contents Contents... 2 Introduction... 3 Browne Jacobson LLP... 3 Interest in the Consultation... 3 The Response... 3 Summary... 4 Response
More informationCourt Services and Offender Supervision Agency for the District of Columbia Policy Statement 1105.1 Effective date: 12/14/2000 Page 2
Court Services and Offender Supervision Agency for the District of Columbia Page 2 III. DELEGATION OF AUTHORITY The General Counsel is delegated authority pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2672 to consider, ascertain,
More informationCriminal Justice (Scotland) Bill [AS INTRODUCED]
Criminal Justice (Scotland) Bill [AS INTRODUCED] CONTENTS Section PART 1 ARREST AND CUSTODY CHAPTER 1 ARREST BY POLICE 1 Power of a constable 2 Exercise of the power Arrest without warrant Procedure following
More informationAPPENDIX B: RECOMMENDATIONS TO BE IMPLEMENTED ON A NATIONALLY CONSISTENT BASIS
APPENDIX B: RECOMMENDATIONS TO BE IMPLEMENTED ON A NATIONALLY CONSISTENT BASIS Implementation of the Panel's Recommendations A national response Recommendation 1 The Panel's recommendations should be incorporated
More informationCivil Wrongs (Liability of the State) Law, 5712 1952
The 1952 law presented here is the official English translation. The approved 2005 amendments are printed in bold italics and were translated by Adalah. Civil Wrongs (Liability of the State) Law, 5712
More informationCivil Law (Wrongs) (Proportionate Liability and Professional Standards) Amendment Act 2004
Australian Capital Territory Civil Law (Wrongs) (Proportionate Liability and Professional Standards) Amendment Act 2004 Contents Page 1 Name of Act 2 2 Commencement 2 3 Legislation amended 2 4 New chapter
More informationPROTECTION, ASSISTANCE AND SUPPORT OF CHILD VICTIMS
PROTECTION, ASSISTANCE AND SUPPORT OF CHILD VICTIMS PUBLIC HEARING Combating sexual abuse, sexual exploitation of children and child pornography Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs 28-29
More informationThe Impact of the Jackson Reforms on Costs and Case Management
The Impact of the Jackson Reforms on Costs and Case Management Response by Police Actions Lawyers Group to Consultation by Civil Justice Council March 2014 1. The Police Actions Lawyers Group (PALG) is
More informationCIVIL JUSTICE COUNCIL THE IMPACT OF THE JACKSON REFORMS ON COSTS AND CASE MANAGEMENT
Introduction CIVIL JUSTICE COUNCIL THE IMPACT OF THE JACKSON REFORMS ON COSTS AND CASE MANAGEMENT Submission by the Motor Accident Solicitors Society (MASS) March 2014 1. This response is prepared on behalf
More informationRecent Developments in Personal Injury Law
Recent Developments in Personal Injury Law LIABILITY Provision and Use of Work Equipment Regulations Smith v Northamptonshire CC [2008] EWCA Civ 181 The Claimant (S) was employed by the Defendant local
More informationA GUIDE TO CRIMINAL INJURIES COMPENSATION
A GUIDE TO CRIMINAL INJURIES COMPENSATION Being a victim of crime such as physical or sexual assault can have significant and long-term consequences for a woman s health and wellbeing. If you have experienced
More informationLIMITATIONS. The Limitations Act. being
1 LIMITATIONS c. L-16.1 The Limitations Act being Chapter L-16.1* of The Statutes of Saskatchewan, 2004 (effective May 1, 2005), as amended by the Statutes of Saskatchewan, 2007, c.28. *NOTE: Pursuant
More informationPRACTICE NOTE: LAWYER FOR THE CHILD: CODE OF CONDUCT
PRACTICE NOTE: LAWYER FOR THE CHILD: CODE OF CONDUCT 1 INTRODUCTION AND COMMENCEMENT 1.1 This Code of Conduct for lawyers appointed to act for children in Family Court proceedings replaces the previous
More informationPersonal Injury Law: Minnesota Medical Malpractice
Personal Injury Law: Minnesota Medical Malpractice Medical Malpractice Terms Statutes of Limitations Minnesota Medical Malpractice Laws Medical malpractice includes many forms of liability producing conduct
More informationVictims of Crime (Compensation) Regulations 2003
Historical version: 18.12.2003 to 5.5.2004 Regulations disallowed South Australia Victims of Crime (Compensation) Regulations 2003 under the Victims of Crime Act 2001 Contents 1 Short title 2 Commencement
More informationFIXED COSTS PART 45. Contents of this Part
FIXED COSTS PART 45 PART 45 Contents of this Part I FIXED COSTS Rule 45.1 Scope of this Section Rule 45.2 Amount of fixed commencement costs in a claim for the recovery of money or goods Rule 45.2A Amount
More informationWest Virginia S.A.F.E. Training and Collaboration Toolkit Serving Sexual Violence Victims with Disabilities
West Virginia Crime Victims Compensation Fund This module offers information on what expenses are eligible for compensation through the West Virginia Crime Victims Compensation Fund, the basic process
More informationThe legal system. Chapter 2 TYPES OF LAW. Criminal and civil law. Public and private law
Chapter This chapter covers the way the English legal system is organised: the two main branches of law; the personnel of the legal system and their roles; and the courts which make up the system. As court
More informationQueensland CRIMINAL OFFENCE VICTIMS ACT 1995
Queensland CRIMINAL OFFENCE VICTIMS ACT 1995 Act No. 54 of 1995 Queensland CRIMINAL OFFENCE VICTIMS ACT 1995 TABLE OF PROVISIONS Section Page PART 1 PRELIMINARY 1 Short title.....................................................
More informationNDIKU MUTUA AND 4 OTHERS. THE FOREIGN AND COMMONWEALTH OFFICE Defendant. Intervening Party
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE QUEEN S BENCH DIVISION B E T W E E N: CLAIM NO HQ09X02666 NDIKU MUTUA AND 4 OTHERS Claimants And THE FOREIGN AND COMMONWEALTH OFFICE Defendant And REDRESS Intervening Party
More informationAN BILLE UM CHIONTÓIRÍ A ATHSHLÁNÚ 2007 REHABILITATION OF OFFENDERS BILL 2007. Mar a tionscnaíodh As initiated ARRANGEMENT OF SECTIONS
AN BILLE UM CHIONTÓIRÍ A ATHSHLÁNÚ 2007 REHABILITATION OF OFFENDERS BILL 2007 Section 1. Interpretation. Mar a tionscnaíodh As initiated ARRANGEMENT OF SECTIONS 2. Application to have sentence spent. 3.
More informationCompliance With Pre-Court Procedures - The Workers Compensation Rehabilitation Act 2003 Post Berowra Holdings
I N S U R A N C E C A S E N O T E Compliance With Pre-Court Procedures - The Workers Compensation Rehabilitation Act 2003 Post Berowra Holdings The introduction of the pre-court procedures under the Workers
More informationALBERTA S JUSTICE SYSTEM AND YOU
ALBERTA S JUSTICE SYSTEM AND YOU This brochure will give you the facts about your justice system the major participants and the important roles that each plays. In addition, it will help you better understand
More informationWESTERN AUSTRALIAN FEDERATION OF SEXUAL ASSAULT SERVICES (WAFSAS) FORUM 4 October 2005, Perth
WESTERN AUSTRALIAN FEDERATION OF SEXUAL ASSAULT SERVICES (WAFSAS) FORUM 4 October 2005, Perth Criminal Injuries Compensation By Helen Porter, Office of Criminal Injuries Compensation. INTRODUCTION In this
More informationCivil Law of Damages: Issues in Personal Injury - A Consultation Paper The Law Society of Scotland s response March 2013
Consultation Response Civil Law of Damages: Issues in Personal Injury - A Consultation Paper The Law Society of Scotland s response March 2013 The Law Society of Scotland 2013 Introduction The Law Society
More informationTechnical claims brief. Monthly update February 2013
Technical claims brief Monthly update February 2013 Contents News 1 Ministry of Justice Claims Portal Extension put back 1 Solicitors Regulatory Authority stands by April 1 2013 implementation of referral
More informationAPPLICATION FOR COMPENSATION 1 (Where there is a court order) Criminal Offence Victims Act S.32 Criminal Code S.663C
RETURN FORMS TO: Your Legal Representatives Or Criminal Injury Compensation Unit Department of Justice & Attorney-General GPO Box 149 BRISBANE QLD 4001 APPLICATION FOR COMPENSATION 1 (Where there is a
More informationLEGAL AID, SENTENCING AND PUNISHMENT OF OFFENDERS BILL. Parliamentary Briefing by the Bar Council For Report Stage, House of Commons
LEGAL AID, SENTENCING AND PUNISHMENT OF OFFENDERS BILL Parliamentary Briefing by the Bar Council For Report Stage, House of Commons The Bar Council represents over 15,000 barristers in England and Wales.
More informationEmployer Liability for Consequences of Teacher Stress House of Lords Decision
Employer Liability for Consequences of Teacher Stress House of Lords Decision Macrossans Lawyers, Brisbane, Queensland In Barber v. Somerset County Council the House of Lords recently delivered an important
More informationEXPLANATORY MEMORANDUM TO THE CONDITIONAL FEE AGREEMENTS (AMENDMENT) ORDER 2010. 2010 No. [Draft]
EXPLANATORY MEMORANDUM TO THE CONDITIONAL FEE AGREEMENTS (AMENDMENT) ORDER 2010 2010 No. [Draft] 1. This explanatory memorandum has been prepared by the Ministry of Justice and is laid before Parliament
More informationCrimes (Serious Sex Offenders) Act 2006 No 7
New South Wales Crimes (Serious Sex Offenders) Act 2006 No 7 Contents Part 1 Part 2 Preliminary Page 1 Name of Act 2 2 Commencement 2 3 Objects of Act 2 4 Definitions 2 5 Definitions of serious sex offence
More informationVictims of Crime (Statutory Compensation) Regulations 2004
Version: 21.10.2004 South Australia Victims of Crime (Statutory Compensation) Regulations 2004 under the Victims of Crime Act 2001 Contents 1 Short title 2 Commencement 3 Interpretation 4 Requirements
More informationCivil Justice Council response to Insurance Task Force interim report. May 2015
Civil Justice Council response to Insurance Task Force interim report May 2015 The CJC welcomes an initiative to combat insurance fraud, which is not always easy to detect, but is a crime, and does lead
More informationArizona State Senate Issue Paper June 22, 2010 MEDICAL MALPRACTICE. Statute of Limitations. Note to Reader: INTRODUCTION
Arizona State Senate Issue Paper June 22, 2010 Note to Reader: The Senate Research Staff provides nonpartisan, objective legislative research, policy analysis and related assistance to the members of the
More informationGLOSSARY OF SELECTED LEGAL TERMS
GLOSSARY OF SELECTED LEGAL TERMS Sources: US Courts : http://www.uscourts.gov/library/glossary.html New York State Unified Court System: http://www.nycourts.gov/lawlibraries/glossary.shtml Acquittal A
More informationDEPARTMENT OF HEALTH FIXED RECOVERABLE COSTS PROPOSALS FOR CLINICAL NEGLIGENCE: Implications for patients access to justice and for patient safety
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH FIXED RECOVERABLE COSTS PROPOSALS FOR CLINICAL NEGLIGENCE: Implications for patients access to justice and for patient safety Briefing by Action against Medical Accidents (AvMA) October
More informationFLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY POLICE DEPARTMENT Chief David L. Perry
FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY POLICE DEPARTMENT Chief David L. Perry 830 West Jefferson Street 850-644-1234 VICTIMS' RIGHTS BROCHURE YOUR RIGHTS AS A VICTIM OR WITNESS: ------- We realize that for many persons,
More information