Virginia Lawyer Register
|
|
|
- Godfrey Augustine Baldwin
- 10 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS Respondent s Name Address of Record Action Effective Date CIRCUIT COURTS *John Wesley Bonney Norfolk, VA Revocation February 26, 2014 William Stephen Coleman Mechanicsville, VA Suspension w/terms 6 months April 30, 2014 Benjamin Thomas Reed Norfolk, VA Suspension w/terms 2 years March 31, 2014 DISCIPLINARY BOARD James Pearce Brice Jr. Virginia Beach, VA Suspension 30 Days February 28, 2014 David Peter Buehler New Orleans, LA Suspension 6 Months December 13, 2013 Dale Eugene Duncan McLean, VA Revocation February 21, 2014 Jane Karen Eshagpoor Richmond, VA Suspension 90 Days May 16, 2014 Diane Baily Fenton Virginia Beach, VA Suspension 120 Days May 1, 2014 David Raymond Flynn Virginia Beach, VA Revocation May 1, 2014 *John F. Kane Norfolk, VA Suspension 1 year and 1 Day March 28, 2014 Douglas Edward Mataconis Warrenton, VA Suspension 9 Months March 14, 2014 William Magruder McKee Norfolk, VA Suspension 6 Months February 21, 2014 Marcus Noah Perdue III Covington, VA Revocation April 25, 2014 Duane Timothy Phillips Linwood, NJ Suspension 3 Months April 25, 2014 Jorge Antonio Rodriguez Mundelein, IL Suspension 30 Days April 25, 2014 Jason Christopher Roper Mars, PA Suspension 6 Months February 17, 2015 Michael Bruce Stone Las Vegas, NV Suspension w/terms 2 years January 6, 2014 All but 90 days stayed upon compliance with terms. Douglas Paul Wachholz Reno, NV Revocation May 1, 2014 DISTRICT COMMITTEES Vivien J. Cockburn Washington, DC Public Admonition May 19, 2014 Robert Monroe Cooper Jr. Manassas, VA Public Reprimand February 19, 2014 Lorie Ellen O Donnell Leesburg, VA Public Reprimand February 21, 2014 Douglass Hayden Fisher Richmond, VA Public Reprimand w/terms January 30, 2014 Richard Scott Gordon Newport News, VA Public Reprimand May 1, 2014 Phillip Stone Griffin II Winchester, VA Public Reprimand April 18, 2014 Brent Alan Jackson Richmond, VA Public Reprimand w/terms April 23, 2014 Vaughan Christopher Jones Richmond, VA Public Reprimand February 10, 2014 Robert Adam May Jr. Burke, VA Public Reprimand March 26, 2014 Darryl Arthur Parker Richmond, VA Public Admonition w/terms March 27, 2014 John Douglas Primeau Manassas, VA Public Reprimand w/terms March 24, 2014 William L. Stables Jr. Harrisonburg, VA Public Reprimand April 1, 2014 *Respondent has noted an appeal with the Supreme Court of Virginia. 48 VIRGINIA LAWYER June/July 2014 Vol. 63
2 SUSPENSION FAILURE TO PAY DISCIPLINARY COSTS Respondent s Name Address of Record Effective Date Lifted William Scott Bradbury Falls Church, VA May 22, 2014 *** David Peter Buehler New Orleans, LA May 28, 2014 *** Sara Elizabeth Chase Henrico, VA February 11, 2014 *** February 26, 2014 *** Kyle Mars Courtnall Fairfax, VA March 7, 2014 *** Reuben Voll Greene Richmond, VA January 4, 2014 *** Clive Allen O Leary Fredericksburg, VA April 30, 2014 *** David Garrett Mullins Virginia Beach, VA February 18, 2014 *** SUSPENSION FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH SUBPOENA Respondent s Name Address of Record Effective Date Lifted David Richards Dubose Richmond, VA March 24, 2014 March 27, 2014 William Shawn McDaniel Bristol, VA March 11, 2014 *** DISCIPLINARY SUMMARIES The following are summaries of disciplinary actions for violations of the Virginia Rules of Professional Conduct (RPC) (Rules of the Virginia Supreme Court Part 6, II, eff. Jan. 1, 2000) or another of the Supreme Court Rules. Copies of disciplinary orders are available at the Web link provided with each summary or by contacting the Virginia State Bar Clerk s Office at (804) or [email protected]. VSB docket numbers are provided. CIRCUIT COURT John Wesley Bonney Norfolk, Virginia , *On April 30, 2014, Mr. Bonney filed an appeal with the Supreme Court of Virginia. On February 26, 2014, a three-judge panel of the Circuit Court of the City of Norfolk revoked John Wesley Bonney s license to practice law for violating professional rules that govern competence, safekeeping property, candor toward the tribunal, and misconduct. RPC 1.1, 1.15(a), 3.3(a)(1), 8.4(c) William Stephen Coleman Mechanicsville, Virginia Effective April 30, 2014, a three-judge panel of the Circuit Court of the City of Richmond suspended William Stephen Coleman s license to practice law for six months with terms for violating professional rules that govern safekeeping property. This was an agreed disposition of misconduct charges. RPC 1.15(a)(3)(i,ii), (b)(3), 1.15(b)(5), (c)(1), (c) (2)(i,ii), (c)(3,4), (d)(2), (d)(3)(i-iv), (d)(4) Benjamin Thomas Reed Norfolk, Virginia Effective March 31, 2014, the Circuit Court of the City of Norfolk suspended Benjamin Thomas Reed s license to practice law for two years with terms for violating professional rules that govern safekeeping property and misconduct. RPC 1.15(a)(1)(3)(c)(1-3)(d)(3), 8.4(b,c) DISCIPLINARY BOARD James Pearce Brice Jr. Virginia Beach, Virginia Effective February 28, 2014, the Virginia State Bar Disciplinary Board suspended James Pearce Brice Jr. s license to practice law for thirty days for violating professional rules that govern safekeeping property and bar admission and disciplinary matters. This was an agreed disposition of misconduct charges. RPC 1.15(a)(3)(i,ii),(b) (3)(5),(c)(1)(2)(i,ii),(d)(3)(i-iv)(4); 8.1(a),(c) Vol. 63 June/July 2014 VIRGINIA LAWYER 49
3 DISCIPLINARY BOARD David Peter Buehler New Orleans, Louisiana On December 13, 2013, the Virginia State Bar Disciplinary Board suspended David Peter Buehler s license to practice law for six months for violating professional rules that govern diligence, meritorious claims and contentions, candor toward the tribunal, fairness to opposing party and counsel, respect for rights of third persons, and misconduct. RPC 1.3(a), 3.1, 3.3(a)(1), 3.4(g), 4.4, 8.4(c) Dale Eugene Duncan McLean, Virginia On February 21, 2014, the Virginia State Bar Disciplinary Board revoked Dale Eugene Duncan s license to practice law for violating professional rules that govern competence; communication; conflict of interest: general rule; declining or terminating representation; and misconduct. RPC 1.1, 1.4(b), 1.7(a)(1),(a)(2),(b)(4), 1.16(a)(1), 8.4(a),(c) Jane Karen Eshagpoor Richmond, Virginia , , , , and Effective May 16, 2014, the Virginia State Bar Disciplinary Board suspended Jane Karen Eshagpoor s license to practice law for ninety days for violating professional rules that govern communication, safekeeping property, declining or terminating representation, unauthorized practice of law; multijurisdictional practice of law, bar admission and disciplinary matters, and misconduct. This was an agreed disposition of misconduct charges. RPC 1.4(a), 1.15(a)(1)(b) (3-5)(c)(2)(i,ii), 1.16(d), 5.5(c), 8.1(c), 8.4(c) Diane Baily Fenton Virginia Beach, Virginia Effective May 1, 2014, the Virginia State Bar Disciplinary Board suspended Diane Baily Fenton s license to practice law for 120 days for violating professional rules that govern diligence, communication, and declining or terminating representation. This was an agreed disposition of misconduct charges. RPC 1.3(a), 1.4(a), 1.16(a)(1)(c) David Raymond Flynn Virginia Beach, Virginia , , , , On May 1, 2014, the Virginia State Bar Disciplinary Board revoked David Raymond Flynn s license to practice law. In consenting to the revocation, Mr. Flynn acknowledged that if the disciplinary proceedings based on his alleged misconduct were brought to a conclusion he could not successfully defend them. Rules Part 6, IV, John F. Kane Norfolk, Virginia *On April 7, 2014, Mr. Kane filed an appeal with the Supreme Court of Virginia On March 28, 2014, the Virginia State Bar Disciplinary Board suspended John F. Kane s license to practice law for one year and one day for violating professional rules that govern misconduct and unauthorized practice of law; multijurisdictional practice of law. RPC 5.5(c), 8.4(b) Douglas Edward Mataconis Warrenton, Virginia Effective March 14, 2014, the Virginia State Bar Disciplinary Board suspended Douglas Edward Mataconis s license to practice law for nine months for violating professional rules that govern competence, scope of representation, diligence, communication, fees, and bar admission and disciplinary matters. This was an agreed disposition of misconduct charges. RPC 1.1, 1.2(a), 1.3(a) (b), 1.4(a), 1.5(b)(c), 8.1(c) William Magruder McKee Norfolk, Virginia On February 21, 2014, the Virginia State Bar summarily suspended William Magruder McKee s license to practice law for six months for failing to comply with the duties of a suspended attorney. Rules Part 6 IV, VIRGINIA LAWYER June/July 2014 Vol. 63
4 DISCIPLINARY BOARD Marcus Noah Perdue III Covington, Virginia On April 25, 2014, the Virginia State Bar Disciplinary Board revoked Marcus Noah Perdue III s license to practice law for failing to comply with requirements imposed on him by the board s one-year suspension order issued August 23, Rules Part 6, IV Duane Timothy Phillips Linwood, New Jersey Effective April 25, 2014, the Virginia State Bar Disciplinary Board suspended Duane Timothy Phillips s license to practice law for three months based on his three-month suspension by the Supreme Court of the State of New Jersey. Mr. Phillips s Virginia license had been summarily suspended on April 7, Rules Part 6, IV, 13-24(G) Jorge Antonio Rodriquez Mundelein, Illinois On April 25, 2014, the Virginia State Bar Disciplinary Board suspended Jorge Antonio Rodriguez s license to practice law for thirty days based on his thirty-day suspension by the Supreme Court of the State of Illinois. Mr. Rodriguez s license was summarily suspended on April 7, 2014, and he was ordered to show cause why the same discipline that was imposed in Illinois should not be imposed in Virginia. Rules Part 6, IV, G Jason Christopher Roper Mars, Pennsylvania On March 28, 2014, the Virginia State Bar Disciplinary Board suspended Jason Christopher Roper s license to practice law for six months for failing to fulfill terms of a public reprimand ordered June 25, The six-month suspension will begin at the conclusion of a current threeyear suspension imposed February 17, RPC 1.6; 1.7; 1.9; 1.16; 3.1; 3.3; 3.4(i); 3.4(j); 4.2; 4.4; 8.1(a); 8.4(a)(b)(c) Michael Bruce Stone Las Vegas, Nevada Effective January 6, 2014, the Virginia State Bar Disciplinary Board suspended Michael Bruce Stone s license to practice law for two years, with all but ninety days stayed conditioned upon his compliance with terms. The Virginia ruling is based on the actions taken by the Supreme Court of California. Part Six, IV, Douglas Paul Wachholz Reno, Nevada , On May 1, 2014, the Virginia State Bar revoked Douglas Paul Wachholz s license to practice law. In consenting to the revocation, he acknowledged that the material facts upon which the allegations are predicated are true and that he could not successfully defend against them. DISTRICT COMMITTEES Vivien J. Cockburn Washington, D.C On May 14, 2014, the Virginia State Bar Fourth District Subcommittee issued a public admonition to Vivien J. Cockburn for violating Washington, D.C., professional rules that govern special responsibilities of a prosecutor and misconduct. This was an agreed disposition of misconduct charges. Rules Part 6, IV, B.4; Washington, D.C., RPC 3.8(e), 8.4(d) Robert Monroe Cooper Jr. Manassas, Virginia On February 19, 2014, the Virginia State Bar Fifth District Section III Subcommittee issued a public reprimand to Robert Monroe Cooper Jr. for violating professional rules that govern diligence and communication. This was an agreed disposition of misconduct charges. RPC 1.3(a), 1.4(a) Vol. 63 June/July 2014 VIRGINIA LAWYER 51
5 Lorie Ellen O Donnell Leesburg, Virginia On February 21, 2014, the Virginia State Bar Seventh District Subcommittee issued a public reprimand to Lorie Ellen O Donnell for violating professional rules that govern misconduct. This was an agreed disposition of misconduct charges. RPC 8.4(b) Donnell pdf Douglass Hayden Fisher Richmond, Virginia On January 30, 2014, the Virginia State Bar Third District Subcommittee, Section II, issued a public reprimand with terms to Douglass Hayden Fisher for violating professional rules that govern diligence, communication, safekeeping property, and declining or terminating representation. This was an agreed disposition of misconduct charges. RPC 1.3(a), 1.4(b), 1.15(b)(3)(4), 1.16(c)(d) Richard Scott Gordon Newport News, Virginia and On May 1, 2014, the Virginia State Bar First District Subcommittee issued a public reprimand to Richard Scott Gordon for violating professional rules that govern diligence, fairness to opposing party and counsel, and bar admission and disciplinary matters. This was an agreed disposition of misconduct charges. RPC 1.3(a), 3.4(d), 8.1(c) Phillip Stone Griffin II Winchester, Virginia On April 18, 2014, the Virginia State Bar Seventh District Subcommittee issued a public reprimand to Phillip Stone Griffin II for violating a professional rule that governs communication with persons represented by counsel. This was an agreed disposition of misconduct charges. RPC Brent Alan Jackson Richmond, Virginia On April 23, 2014, the Virginia State Bar Third District Subcommittee, Section II issued a public reprimand with terms to Brent Alan Jackson for violating professional rules that govern safekeeping property and conflict of interest: general rule. This was an agreed disposition of misconduct charges. RPC 1.7(a)(1,2)(b)(1-4), pre-june 15, (e) (1)(iii), post June 15, (c)(2)(i-ii) Vaughan Christopher Jones Richmond, Virginia On February 10, 2014, the Virginia State Bar Third District Subcommittee issued a public reprimand to Vaughan Christopher Jones for violating a professional rule that governs safekeeping property. This was an agreed disposition of misconduct charges. RPC 1.15(b)(5),(d)(3)(ii) Robert Adam May Jr. Burke, Virginia , On March 26, 2014, the Virginia State Bar Fifth District Section III Subcommittee issued a public reprimand to Robert Adam May Jr. for violating professional rules that govern bar admission and disciplinary matters. This was an agreed disposition of misconduct matters. RPC 8.1(c) John Douglas Primeau Manassas, Virginia On March 24, 2014, the Virginia State Bar Fifth District Section III Subcommittee issued a public reprimand with terms to John Douglas Primeau for violating professional rules that govern scope of representation, diligence, and communication. This was an agreed disposition of misconduct charges. RPC 1.2(a), 1.3(a-c), 1.4(a,b) William L. Stables Jr. Harrisonburg, Virginia On April 1, 2014, the Virginia State Bar Seventh District Committee issued a public reprimand to William L. Stables Jr. for failing to comply with the terms of a public admonition issued by the Seventh District Subcommittee on June 3, Mr. Stables was found to have violated professional rules that govern diligence, communication, and bar admission and disciplinary matters. Part 6, IV, Z, RPC 1.3(a), 1.4(a), 8.1(c) 52 VIRGINIA LAWYER June/July 2014 Vol. 63
6 NOTICES TO MEMBERS SUPREME COURT OF VIRGINIA ADOPTS RULE CHANGES AND AMENDMENTS On May 1, 2014, the Supreme Court of Virginia adopted amendments to Paragraph 17, effective immediately: Mandatory Continuing Legal Education. Effective May 16, 2014, the Court amended rules 5:1A, 5:17, and 5A:12, and added rule 5A:1A. All concern Penalties for Non-compliance; Show Cause; Dismissal, and Petitions for Appeal. amendments/2014_05_16_rule_5_1a_rule_5_17_ rule_5a_1a_rule%205a_12.pdf Effective July 1, 2014, the Court added Rule 1A:8: Military Spouse Provisional Admission. amendments/2014_05_16_rule_1a_8.pdf COUNCIL APPROVES AMENDMENT AND NEW RULE On June 12, the council unanimously approved and forwarded to the Supreme Court of Virginia an amendment to Rule 1.10: Imputed Disqualification: General Rule Also on June 12, by a vote of 64-1, the council approved and forwarded to the Court new Rule 5.8: Procedures for Lawyers Leaving Law Firms and Dissolution of Law Firm. ADDITION TO VSB BYLAWS On June 12, the council unanimously approved an addition to VSB and Council Bylaws, adding a new Part III regarding amendments: Upon motion of a council member, the bylaws contained in either Part I or Part II may be amended at any regular meeting of the bar council provided there has been at least thirty days notice of the proposed amendment to all Virginia State Bar members. Amendment of the bylaws must be by a two-thirds vote of the council members present and voting at that regular meeting. COMMENTS SOUGHT ON AMENDMENTS TO RULES OF THE SUPREME COURT OF VIRGINIA The Advisory Committee on Rules of Practice and Procedure, a subcommittee of Judicial Council, seeks comments on proposed amendments to Rule 2:803, Business Records Rule Reformatting, records_rule_reformatting.pdf The committee also seeks comments on proposed Rule 4:11, Numerical Limit on Requests for Admissions, requests_for_admissions.pdf Comments on the desirability of this reformatting of Rule 2:803(6) into this outline format with the intention of keeping the standards and doctrines of business records law in Virginia unchanged may be sent by August 15 to Steven Dalle Mura, Director of Research, Supreme Court of Virginia, 100 North Ninth Street, Richmond, VA 23219, or by , with the subject line Rule 2:803(6), to [email protected]. Comments on draft Rule 4:11 may be sent by August 15 to Steven Dalle Mura, Director of Research, Supreme Court of Virginia, 100 North Ninth Street, Richmond, VA 23219, or by , with the subject line: Rule 4:11(e), to [email protected]. EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE SEEKS COMMENTS ON PROPOSAL TO ADD AND PHONE NUMBER TO ADDRESS OF RECORD The Virginia State Bar Executive Committee is seeking public comment on proposed changes to Rules of the Supreme Court of Virginia Part 6, IV, Organization & Government of the Virginia State Bar, Paragraph 3. Comments should be submitted to Karen A. Gould, Executive Director, Virginia State Bar, 1111 E. Main St., Suite 700, Richmond, VA , no later than the end of the business day on August 15, Comments may be submitted via to [email protected]. Vol. 63 June/July 2014 VIRGINIA LAWYER 53
7 3. Classes of Membership Members of the Virginia State Bar shall be divided into five classes, namely: (a) Active Members, (b) Associate Members, (c) Judicial Members, (d) Disabled and Retired Members; and (e) Emeritus Members. Each member shall submit in writing to the membership department of the Virginia State Bar an address of record which will be used for all membership and regulatory purposes, including official mailings and notices of disciplinary proceedings. The address of record shall include a current street address, address (if any), telephone number, and any post office address the member may use. If a member s address of record is not a physical address where process can be served, the member must submit in writing to the membership department an alternate address where process can be served. The alternate address is personal information and shall not be disclosed pursuant to Section , Code of Virginia. Members have a duty promptly to notify the membership department in writing of any changes in either the address of record or any alternate address. Any change in either the address of record or any alternate address information shall be promptly reported in writing to the membership department or changed online at the Virginia State Bar website within thirty days of its effective date. Members, by request, may have their names and addresses removed from the Virginia State Bar s membership list when it is distributed for other than official purposes. COMMENTS SOUGHT ON PROPOSED AMENDMENT TO COUNCIL ELECTION PROCEDURES The Bylaw Amendment Committee, consisting of Howard W. Martin, Jr., Jon D. Huddleston, and Adam D. Elfenbein, has proposed the following amendment to the council bylaws, Article II, Sec. 2, in order to prevent the elimination of ballots when the voter fails to vote for precisely the number of positions to be filled on council from his or her circuit. By adding the language or fewer person(s), this permits the voter to cast a ballot for fewer persons than positions to be filled, but does not permit them to write-in and vote for more candidates than there are positions to be filled. It also eliminates the disqualification of ballots when the ballot has been cast for just one candidate, even though more than one position is to be filled. Comments should be submitted to Karen A. Gould, executive director, Virginia State Bar, 1111 E. Main St., Suite 700, Richmond, VA , no later than the end of the business day on August 15, Comments may be submitted via to [email protected]. PROPOSED AMENDMENT Article II Election of Council Sec. 2 Ballot * * * Write-in votes shall be permitted, but the executive director may exclude illegible write-in votes and shall exclude write-in votes for any candidate ineligible to serve pursuant to these bylaws, if elected. In those instances where there are more candidates for Council positions than there are positions to be filled from the circuit, the ballot will contain instructions to vote only for the same number of persons or fewer person(s) as there are positions to be filled; ballots which do not conform to this requirement will not be counted. LEGAL ETHICS OPINION 1873 On March 20, 2014, the Virginia State Bar s Standing Committee on Legal Ethics issued Legal Ethics Opinion 1873 as final: Continued Use of Former Firm Name in URL after Firm Name Has Changed. COMMITTEE ON LAWYER DISCIPLINE SEEKS PUBLIC COMMENT CONCERNING INSURANCE RULE On May 7, 2014, the Committee on Lawyer Discipline (COLD) voted unanimously to approve the proposed Paragraph 13.4 to be included in Part Six, Section IV of the Rules of the Supreme Court of Virginia. This paragraph is in response to changes to Virginia Code Section (D) which charge the bar with setting standards for minimum malpractice coverage when disciplinary charges heard by a three-judge panel result in a finding of criminal conduct involving loss of client property. Comments or questions should be submitted in writing to Executive Director, Virginia State Bar, 1111 East Main Street, Suite 700, Richmond, Virginia , no later than August 15, The Virginia State Bar Council will consider the proposed amendments when it meets on October 24, VIRGINIA LAWYER June/July 2014 Vol. 63
8 PART SIX, SECTION IV, RULES OF THE SUPREME COURT OF VIRGINIA 13.4 Insurance coverage requirement for respondents under Va. Code (D) Pursuant to Va. Code (D), when an attorney who has been found guilty of engaging in criminal activity that violates the Rules of Professional Conduct and results in the loss of property of one or more of the attorney s clients and has been required by a three-judge court to maintain professional malpractice insurance during the time he or she is licensed to practice law in the Commonwealth of Virginia, that attorney shall carry such coverage in the minimum amount of $500,000 per claim and $1 million in the aggregate with a maximum $10,000 deductible, with a Virginia licensed insurer, eligible surplus line insurer or registered risk retention group. The coverage provider must have an A.M. Best minimum rating of A-. The attorney shall require the insurer to include language in the policy specifying that the VSB be given notice of cancellation or nonrenewal. The attorney shall certify such coverage and the notice requirement to the VSB on a yearly basis with a certificate of insurance provided to the VSB by an agent or broker licensed in Virginia. This certificate must be received initially within 10 days after inception or reinstatement of the policy. COMMITTEE ON LAWYER DISCIPLINE SEEKS PUBLIC COMMENT ON DISCLOSURE OF INFORMATION RULE On May 7, 2014, the Committee on Lawyer Discipline (COLD) approved amendments to Part Six, IV, 13 of the Rules of the Supreme Court of Virginia. The proposed Paragraph M clarifies bar counsel s obligation to disclose certain information notwithstanding rules that proscribe such disclosure on the basis that the information is confidential. Paragraph H addresses the notice required when information is disclosed as anticipated in proposed Paragraph M. Comments or questions should be submitted in writing to Executive Director, Virginia State Bar, 1111 East Main Street, Suite 700, Richmond, Virginia , no later than August 15, The Virginia State Bar Council will consider the proposed amendments when it meets on October 24, PROCEDURE FOR DISCIPLINING, SUSPENDING, AND DISBARRING ATTORNEYS SUBSTANTIAL COMPLIANCE, NOTICE AND EVIDENTIARY RULINGS, AND ADDRESS NOTIFICATION * * * H. Notice. 1. Whenever any notice or other writing to be directed to an Attorney is required or permitted under this Rule, such notice or other writing shall be deemed effective when mailed by first class mail to the Attorney at the Attorney s last address on record for membership purposes with the Bar or, if the Attorney is a Foreign Lawyer, a lawyer engaged pro hac vice in the practice of law in Virginia, or a lawyer not admitted in Virginia, when mailed by first class mail to the last known address on record with the Bar or, if no such address is on record, then to the Clerk of the Supreme Court of Virginia. 2. Whenever any notice or other writing is to be directed to a Complainant is required or permitted under this Rule, such notice or other writing shall be deemed effective when mailed by first class mail to the Complainant at the Complainant s last known address with the Bar. * * * CONFIDENTIALITY OF DISCIPLINARY RECORDS AND PROCEEDINGS * * * M. Disclosure of Exculpatory Evidence. Bar Counsel shall comply with the duty to disclose exculpatory evidence under these rules regardless of whether the information is considered confidential under Paragraph The Attorney or Complainant who is the subject of the disclosure shall be notified whenever this information is transmitted pursuant to this subparagraph unless Bar Counsel decides that giving this notice will prejudice a disciplinary investigation. LICENSE FORFEITURES The licenses of the members of the Virginia State Bar who have forfeited their licenses to practice law for failure to pay annual membership fees are posted at: Forfeiture is governed by Section , Code of Virginia, Title 54.1, Professions and Occupations. The list is current as of June, 16, Vol. 63 June/July 2014 VIRGINIA LAWYER 55
Virginia Lawyer Register
DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS CIRCUIT COURT Respondent s Name Address of Record Action Effective Date Vaughan Christopher Jones Richmond, VA Public Reprimand w/terms September 10, 2014 Kenneth Wayne Paciocco
The Official Publication of the Virginia State Bar www.vsb.org
Virginia Lawyer Register The Official Publication of the Virginia State Bar www.vsb.org In this issue: 2 Disciplinary Proceedings 3 Disciplinary Summaries 5 notice to Members Proposed Amendments to Rule
Virginia Lawyer Register
Virginia Lawyer Register The Official Publication of the Virginia State Bar www.vsb.org In this issue: page 2 Disciplinary Proceedings 3 Disciplinary Summaries Circuit Courts 4 Disciplinary Summaries Circuit
The Official Publication of the Virginia State Bar www.vsb.org
Virginia Lawyer Register The Official Publication of the Virginia State Bar www.vsb.org In this issue: 2 Disciplinary Proceedings 3 Disciplinary Summaries Vol. 61/No. 6 January 2013 4 notices to Members
VIRGINIA: BEFORE THE VIRGINIA STATE BAR DISCIPLINARY BOARD MEMORANDUM ORDER
VIRGINIA: BEFORE THE VIRGINIA STATE BAR DISCIPLINARY BOARD IN THE MATTER OF: VSB Docket No. 08-052-073229 STEPHEN ALAN BAMBERGER MEMORANDUM ORDER This matter came on August 23, 2011, to be heard on the
The Official Publication of the Virginia State Bar www.vsb.org
Virginia Lawyer Register The Official Publication of the Virginia State Bar www.vsb.org Vol. 60/No. 2 August 2011 In this issue: 2 Disciplinary Proceedings 3 Disciplinary Summaries 6 October Council Proposals
Donald P. Russo, you stand before the Disciplinary Board, your
BEFORE THE DISCIPLINARY BOARD OF THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL Petitioner v. No. 111 DB 2015 Attorney Registration No. 25873 DONALD P. RUSSO Respondent (Northampton County)
Attorneys convicted of crimes.
Rule 214. Attorneys convicted of crimes. (a) An attorney convicted of a [serious] crime shall report the fact of such conviction within 20 days to the [Secretary of the Board] Office of Disciplinary Counsel.
BEFORE THE SEVENTH DISTRICT SUBCOMMITTEE OF THE VIRGINIA STATE BAR
VIRGINIA: BEFORE THE SEVENTH DISTRICT SUBCOMMITTEE OF THE VIRGINIA STATE BAR IN THE MATTER OF HUNTER B. CHAPMAN, ESQUIRE VSB DOCKET NO. 03-070-2631 SUBCOMMITTEE DETERMINATION PUBLIC ADMONITION WITH TERMS
NO. 14-B-0619 IN RE: DAVID P. BUEHLER ATTORNEY DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS
05/23/2014 "See News Release 028 for any Concurrences and/or Dissents." SUPREME COURT OF LOUISIANA NO. 14-B-0619 IN RE: DAVID P. BUEHLER ATTORNEY DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS PER CURIAM Pursuant to Supreme
M.R. 3140 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS
M.R. 3140 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS Order entered June 21, 2012. (Deleted material is struck through and new material is underscored.) Effective immediately, Supreme Court Rule 756
Rule 1A:8. Military Spouse Provisional Admission.
RULES OF SUPREME COURT OF VIRGINIA PART ONE A FOREIGN ATTORNEYS Rule 1A:8. Military Spouse Provisional Admission. 1. Requirements. A person who meets all requirements of subparagraphs (a) through (m) of
Rule 42. Practice of attorneys not admitted in Nevada. (1) All actions or proceedings pending before a court in this state;
Rule 42. Practice of attorneys not admitted in Nevada. 1. Application of rule. (a) This rule applies to: (1) All actions or proceedings pending before a court in this state; (2) All actions or proceedings
UNITED STATES TAX COURT WASHINGTON, D.C. 20217 PRESS RELEASE
UNITED STATES TAX COURT WASHINGTON, D.C. 20217 September 5,2014 PRESS RELEASE The Chief Judge of the United States Tax Court announced today that the following practitioners have been disciplined by the
In the Matter of Thomas J. Howard, Jr. O R D E R. This matter is before the court pursuant to a petition for reciprocal discipline filed by this
Supreme Court In the Matter of Thomas J. Howard, Jr. No. 2015-360-M.P. O R D E R This matter is before the court pursuant to a petition for reciprocal discipline filed by this Court s Disciplinary Counsel
RULES FOR LAWYER DISCIPLINARY ENFORCEMENT OF THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA
RULES FOR LAWYER DISCIPLINARY ENFORCEMENT OF THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA December 1, 2015 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA RULES
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF MARYLAND. Misc. Docket AG. No. 13. September Term, 2005 ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMMISSION OF MARYLAND WILLIAM M.
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF MARYLAND Misc. Docket AG No. 13 September Term, 2005 ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMMISSION OF MARYLAND v. WILLIAM M. LOGAN Bell, C.J. Raker Wilner Cathell Harrell Battaglia Greene JJ.
How To Resolve A Disciplinary Action In Virginia
Virginia Lawyer Register The Official Publication of the Virginia State Bar www.vsb.org Vol. 61/No. 2 August/September 2012 In this issue: 2 Disciplinary Proceedings 3 Disciplinary Summaries 5 reinstatement
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS OF WEST VIRGINIA January 2013 Term. No. 12-0005. LAWYER DISCIPLINARY BOARD, Petitioner. JOHN P. SULLIVAN, Respondent
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS OF WEST VIRGINIA January 2013 Term No. 12-0005 FILED January 17, 2013 released at 3:00 p.m. RORY L. PERRY II, CLERK SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS OF WEST VIRGINIA LAWYER DISCIPLINARY
CHAPTER 20. FLORIDA REGISTERED PARALEGAL PROGRAM 20-1. PREAMBLE. The purpose of this chapter is to set forth a definition that must be met in order to
1103 1104 1105 1106 1107 1108 1109 1110 1111 1112 1113 1114 1115 1116 1117 1118 1119 1120 1121 1122 1123 1124 1125 1126 1127 CHAPTER 20. FLORIDA REGISTERED PARALEGAL PROGRAM 20-1. PREAMBLE Rule 20-1.1.
CHAPTER 20. FLORIDA REGISTERED PARALEGAL PROGRAM 20-1. PREAMBLE RULE 20-1.1 PURPOSE
CHAPTER 20. FLORIDA REGISTERED PARALEGAL PROGRAM 20-1. PREAMBLE RULE 20-1.1 PURPOSE The purpose of this chapter is to set forth a definition that must be met in order to use the title paralegal, to establish
BEFORE THE DISCIPLINARY BOARD OF THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA
BEFORE THE DISCIPLINARY BOARD OF THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL : No. 399, Disciplinary Docket Petitioner : No. 3 Supreme Court : v. : No. 30 DB 1998 Disciplinary Board
Recommendation of the Three-Member Panel of the Disciplinary Board dated April 11,
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL, Petitioner v. DAVID HAROLD KNIGHT, Respondent No. 1937 Disciplinary Docket No. 3 No. 37 DB 2013 Attorney Registration No. 44985 (Bucks
How To Get A $1,000 Filing Fee From A Bankruptcy Filing Fee In Arkansas
BEFORE THE SUPREME COURT COMMITTEE ON PROFESSIONAL CONDUCT PANEL A IN RE: DONALD W. COLSON ARKANSAS BAR ID No. 2005166 CPC Docket No. 2013-008 FINDINGS AND ORDER Donald W. Colson is an attorney licensed
HOUSTON LAWYER REFERRAL SERVICE, INC. RULES OF MEMBERSHIP
HOUSTON LAWYER REFERRAL SERVICE, INC. RULES OF MEMBERSHIP The Houston Lawyer Referral Service, Inc. (HLRS) is a non-profit corporation sponsored by the Houston Bar Association, Houston Young Lawyers Association,
Rule 82.1 Who May Appear as Counsel; Who May Appear Pro Se
Rule 82.1 Who May Appear as Counsel; Who May Appear Pro Se Only members of the bar of this Court may appear as counsel in civil cases. Only individuals who are parties in civil cases may represent themselves.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA LYNCHBURG DIVISION. v. Civil Action Number: 6:09cv9
Hartford Casualty Insurance Company v. Peanut Corporation Of America Doc. 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA LYNCHBURG DIVISION HARTFORD CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY,
INDIANA PARALEGAL ASSOCIATION CODE OF ETHICS AND PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITY AND RULES FOR ENFORCEMENT
INDIANA PARALEGAL ASSOCIATION CODE OF ETHICS AND PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITY AND RULES FOR ENFORCEMENT PREAMBLE The Indiana Paralegal Association ("IPA") is a professional organization comprised of individual
BEFORE THE LAWYER DISCIPLINARY BOARD STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA STATEMENT OF CHARGES
BEFORE THE LAWYER DISCIPLINARY BOARD STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA InRe: David S. Hart, a member of Bar No.: 7976 The West Virginia State Bar I.D. No.: 14-01-037 To: STATEMENT OF CHARGES David S. Hart, Esquire
PETER L. OSTERMILLER Attorney at Law Kentucky Home Life Building Eighteenth Floor 239 South Fifth Street Louisville, Kentucky 40202 www.ploesq.
PETER L. OSTERMILLER Attorney at Law Kentucky Home Life Building Eighteenth Floor 239 South Fifth Street Louisville, Kentucky 40202 www.ploesq.com Telephone: (502) 736-8100 Fax: (502) 736-8129 E-mail:
UPL Advisory Opinion 10-02 (February 2010) Out of State Attorney Practicing Law in the State of Arizona
UPL Advisory Opinion 10-02 (February 2010) Out of State Attorney Practicing Law in the State of Arizona This is an Advisory Opinion regarding whether an attorney admitted to practice law in a jurisdiction
MISSOURI S LAWYER DISCIPLINE SYSTEM
MISSOURI S LAWYER DISCIPLINE SYSTEM Discipline System Clients have a right to expect a high level of professional service from their lawyer. In Missouri, lawyers follow a code of ethics known as the Rules
VIRGINIA: BEFORE THE THIRD DISTRICT COMMITTEE, SECTION III, OF THE VIRGINIA STATE BAR DISTRICT COMMITTEE DETERMINATION (PUBLIC REPRIMAND WITH TERMS)
VIRGINIA: BEFORE THE THIRD DISTRICT COMMITTEE, SECTION III, OF THE VIRGINIA STATE BAR IN THE MATTER OF KENNETH HAMMOND TAYLOR VSB Docket No. 02-033-2910 DISTRICT COMMITTEE DETERMINATION (PUBLIC REPRIMAND
MCKINNEY'S NEW YORK RULES OF COURT COURT OF APPEALS PART 521. RULES OF THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE LICENSING OF LEGAL CONSULTANTS.
MCKINNEY'S NEW YORK RULES OF COURT COURT OF APPEALS PART 521. RULES OF THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE LICENSING OF LEGAL CONSULTANTS Table of Contents 521.1 General regulation as to licensing 521.2 Proof
(c) Admission Without Examination of Members of the Bar of Other Jurisdictions.
Rule 46. Admission to the Bar. (c) Admission Without Examination of Members of the Bar of Other Jurisdictions. (4) Special Legal Consultants. (A) Licensing Requirements. In its discretion, the court may
October 2005. 68 Tex. B. J. 868
October 2005 68 Tex. B. J. 868 REINSTATEMENT Robert L. Crill, 54, of Arlington, has petitioned the District Court of Tarrant County for reinstatement as a member of the State Bar of Texas. BODA ACTIONS
Complying with the FCPA- An Exploration of Ethical Issues Raised by Recent Cases Are the Professional Conduct Rules Any Different?
Complying with the FCPA- An Exploration of Ethical Issues Raised by Recent Cases Are the Professional Conduct Rules Any Different? By Roseann B. Termini, Esq. [email protected] www.fortipublications.com
MERCER COUNTY BAR ASSOCIATION XTREME CLE. 2.0 NJ CLE Credits. Charles Centinaro, Esq., Director of Attorney Ethics
MERCER COUNTY BAR ASSOCIATION XTREME CLE COURSE TITLE: LOCATION: Ethics with Charles Centinaro 2.0 NJ CLE Credits The Conference Center at MCCC DATE: Wednesday, October 29, 2014 TIME: SPEAKERS: 8:00 am
A BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF MICHIGAN S ATTORNEY DISCIPLINE SYSTEM
A BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF MICHIGAN S ATTORNEY DISCIPLINE SYSTEM HISTORY Michigan s system for attorney discipline has existed in its current form since 1978. With the creation of the State Bar of Michigan
SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN
SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN 2015 WI 71 CASE NO.: COMPLETE TITLE: & In the Matter of Disciplinary Proceedings Against Jordan E. Gall, Attorney at Law: Office of Lawyer Regulation, Complainant, v. Jordan
William Austin Watkins, you stand before the Disciplinary Board, your
BEFORE THE DISCIPLINARY BOARD OF THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL Petitioner v. WILLIAM AUSTIN WATKINS Respondent No. 99 DB 2012 Attorney Registration No. 52407 (Monroe
Texas Lawyer Discipline - A Summary
Houston Intellectual Property Law Association Presentation Recent Changes in the Grievance Procedure and How They Will Affect Your Law Practice SPEAKER: Robert S. Bob Bennett [email protected]
Peter Tom, Justice Presiding, Angela M. Mazzarelli Eugene Nardelli Luis A. Gonzalez Bernard J. Malone, Jr., Justices.
SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION FIRST JUDICIAL DEPARTMENT Peter Tom, Justice Presiding, Angela M. Mazzarelli Eugene Nardelli Luis A. Gonzalez Bernard J. Malone, Jr., Justices. ---------------------------------------x
MARYLAND RULES OF PROCEDURE TITLE 19 - ATTORNEYS CHAPTER 200 - ADMISSION TO THE BAR. Rule 15.1. SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION FOR MILITARY SPOUSE ATTORNEYS
MARYLAND RULES OF PROCEDURE TITLE 19 - ATTORNEYS CHAPTER 200 - ADMISSION TO THE BAR ADD new Rule 15.1, as follows: Rule 15.1. SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION FOR MILITARY SPOUSE ATTORNEYS (a) Definition As used
Rule 1A:4. Out-of-State Lawyers When Allowed to Participate in a Case Pro Hac Vice.
Rule 1A:4. Out-of-State Lawyers When Allowed to Participate in a Case Pro Hac Vice. 1. Introduction. A lawyer who is not a member of the Virginia State Bar, but is currently licensed and authorized to
SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN
SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN 2015 WI 29 CASE NO.: COMPLETE TITLE: In the Matter of Disciplinary Proceedings Against Tina M. Dahle, Attorney at Law: Office of Lawyer Regulation, Complainant, v. Tina M. Dahle,
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.
--S.20-- S.20 One Hundred First Congress of the United States of America AT THE FIRST SESSION Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday, the third day of January, one thousand nine hundred and
: : before this court (the Court Annexed Mediation Program ); and
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - In re: ADOPTION OF PROCEDURES GOVERNING : MEDIATION OF MATTERS AND THE
SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN
SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN 2015 WI 2 CASE NO.: COMPLETE TITLE: In the Matter of Disciplinary Proceedings Against Emory H. Booker, III, Attorney at Law: Office of Lawyer Regulation, Complainant, v. Emory
M.R.25193 - In re: Michael A. Hall. Disciplinary Commission.
SUPREME COURT OF ILLINOIS FRIDAY, MAY 18, 2012 THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING ANNOUNCEMENTS: MISCELLANEOUS RECORD M.R.25193 - In re: Michael A. Hall. Disciplinary The petitions by the Administrator of the
FACT SHEET Contact: Office of Legislative and Public Affairs (703) 305-0289 Fax: (703) 605-0365 [email protected] www.justice.gov/eoir/ Feb.
U.S. Department of Justice Executive Office for Immigration Review Office of the Director 5107 Leesburg Pike, Suite 2600 Falls Church, Virginia 22041 FACT SHEET Contact: (703) 305-0289 Fax: (703) 605-0365
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND. Plaintiff
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND MICHAEL TANKERSLEY, 1060 N. Montana Street, Arlington, VA 22205, v. Plaintiff JAMES W. ALMAND, in his official capacity as Trustee of the Client
A. Accredited law school means a law school either provisionally or fully approved and accredited by the American Bar Association.
Arizona Rules of the Supreme Court 38(d) (d) Clinical Law Professors and Law Students 1. Purpose. This rule is adopted to encourage law schools to provide clinical instruction of varying kinds and to facilitate
Multijurisdictional Practice of Law for In-House Counsel
Multijurisdictional Practice of Law for In-House Counsel Presentation for Association of Corporate Counsel - Charlotte March 2010 Robinson, Bradshaw & Hinson, P.A. Robert E. Harrington and Peter C. Buck
11-15463-shl Doc 10928 Filed 11/20/13 Entered 11/20/13 11:33:51 Main Document Pg 1 of 5
11-15463-shl Doc 10928 Filed 11/20/13 Entered 11/20/13 113351 Main Document Pg 1 of 5 Stephen Karotkin Alfredo R. Pérez WEIL, GOTSHAL & MANGES LLP 767 Fifth Avenue New York, New York 10153 Telephone (212)
SEATTLE INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY AMERICAN INN OF COURT ETHICS MAY 21, 2015
SEATTLE INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY AMERICAN INN OF COURT ETHICS MAY 21, 2015 INTRODUCTION JONATHAN MCFARLAND 2 IN RE REINES - CASE OVERVIEW CHRISTIE MATTHAEI 3 APPLICABLE RULES THERESA WANG 4 APPLICABLE FEDERAL
AMERICAN BAR ASSOCIATION STANDARDS FOR IMPOSING LAWYER SANCTIONS
AMERICAN BAR ASSOCIATION STANDARDS FOR IMPOSING LAWYER SANCTIONS Definitions Adopted by the Michigan Supreme Court in Grievance Administrator v Lopatin, 462 Mich 235, 238 n 1 (2000) AInjury@ is harm to
RULE 89. WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEYS; VISITING LAWYERS; TEMPORARY PRACTICE WITH LEGAL SERVICES ORGANIZATIONS
RULE 89. WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEYS; VISITING LAWYERS; TEMPORARY PRACTICE WITH LEGAL SERVICES ORGANIZATIONS (a) Withdrawal of Attorneys. An attorney may withdraw from a case in which the attorney appears
GOVERNMENT PROSECUTIONS AND QUI TAM ACTIONS
GOVERNMENT PROSECUTIONS AND QUI TAM ACTIONS DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA OFFICIAL CODE DIVISION I. GOVERNMENT OF DISTRICT. TITLE 2. GOVERNMENT ADMINISTRATION. CHAPTER 3B. OTHER PROCUREMENT MATTERS. SUBCHAPTER
FAMILY LAW SECTION, STATE BAR OF NEVADA THE STANDARDS FOR BOARD CERTIFIED SPECIALIZATION IN FAMILY LAW
FAMILY LAW SECTION, STATE BAR OF NEVADA THE STANDARDS FOR BOARD CERTIFIED SPECIALIZATION IN FAMILY LAW 1.0 DURATION OF BOARD CERTIFICATION OF SPECIALIZATION IN FAMILY LAW 1.1 Board Certification of Specialization
OPINION AND ORDER REINSTATING TIMOTHY PAUL McCAFFREY S LICENSE TO PRACTICE LAW
SUPREME COURT, STATE OF COLORAD0 CASE NO.: 99PDJ108 ORIGINAL PROCEEDING BEFORE THE PRESIDING DISCIPLINARY JUDGE OPINION AND ORDER REINSTATING TIMOTHY PAUL McCAFFREY S LICENSE TO PRACTICE LAW TIMOTHY PAUL
To the Honorable Chief Justice and Associate Justices of. This matter came before us on a certification of default
SUPREME COURT OF NEW JERSEY Disciplinary Review Board Docket No. DRB 11-221 District Docket No. IV-2010-489E IN THE MATTER OF DUNCAN GORDON CAMERON AN ATTORNEY AT LAW Decision Decided: November 30, 2011
The Interior Designers Act
1 The Interior Designers Act being Chapter I-10.02 of the Statutes of Saskatchewan, 1995 (effective June 19, 1997) as amended by the Statutes of Saskatchewan 2009, c.t-23.01; 2010, c.19 and 20; and 2014,
SCR CHAPTER 31 CONTINUING LEGAL EDUCATION
SCR CHAPTER 31 CONTINUING LEGAL EDUCATION SCR 31.01 Definitions. In this chapter: (1) "Board" means the board of bar examiners. (2) "Committee" means a panel comprised of at least 3 members of the board.
HOUSTON LAWYER REFERRAL SERVICE, INC. APPLICATION FOR MEMBERSHIP
HOUSTON LAWYER REFERRAL SERVICE, INC. APPLICATION FOR MEMBERSHIP The Houston Lawyer Referral Service, Inc. (HLRS) is a non-profit corporation sponsored by the Houston Bar Association, Houston Young Lawyers
lawyer regulation SANCTIONED ATTORNEYS
SANCTIONED ATTORNEYS MARK F. BRINTON Bar No. 007674; File Nos. 02-1473, 03-0042 and 03-0440 dated Feb. 20, 2004, Mark F. Brinton, 1745 S. Alma School Rd., Suite H-102, Mesa, AZ 85210, was suspended for
03/07/2008 "See News Release 017 for any Concurrences and/or Dissents." SUPREME COURT OF LOUISIANA NO. 07-B-1996 IN RE: DOUGLAS M.
03/07/008 "See News Release 017 for any Concurrences and/or Dissents." SUPREME COURT OF LOUISIANA NO. 07-B-1996 IN RE: DOUGLAS M. SCHMIDT ATTORNEY DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS PER CURIAM Pursuant to Supreme
Rules for Lawyer Disciplinary Enforcement (Louisiana Supreme Court Rule XIX) With amendments through January 27, 2016
Rules for Lawyer Disciplinary Enforcement (Louisiana Supreme Court Rule XIX) With amendments through January 27, 2016 Published by the Louisiana Attorney Disciplinary Board 2800 Veterans Memorial Boulevard
OFFICE OF CHIEF DISCIPLINARY C ROSS A ANNENBERG 100 WASHINGTON STREET ELLIS LAW OFFICES HARTFORD CT 06106 33 PLEASANT STREET WORCESTER MA 01609
STATE OF CONNECTICUT Michael P. Bowler Statewide Bar Counsel (860) 568-51 57 STATEWIDE GRIEVANCE COMMllTEE www.jud. ct.gov Second Floor - Suite Two 287 Main Street, East Harlford, Connecticut 06118-1885
THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE SUPREME COURT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE O R D E R
THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE SUPREME COURT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE O R D E R Pursuant to Part II, Article 73-a of the New Hampshire Constitution and Supreme Court Rule 51(A), the Supreme Court of New Hampshire
Comparison of Newly Adopted Arizona Rules of Professional Conduct with ABA Model Rules
Comparison of Newly Adopted Arizona Rules of Professional Conduct with ABA Model Rules ARIZONA New rules as adopted by Arizona Supreme Court to be effective 12/1/03. Rules 1.13, 5.5 and 8.5 as amended
NC General Statutes - Chapter 55 Article 14 1
Article 14. Dissolution. Part 1. Voluntary Dissolution. 55-14-01. Dissolution by incorporators or directors. (a) The board of directors or, if the corporation has no directors, a majority of the incorporators
ABA MODEL RULE FOR THE LICENSING AND PRACTICE OF FOREIGN LEGAL CONSULTANTS
ABA MODEL RULE FOR THE LICENSING AND PRACTICE OF FOREIGN LEGAL CONSULTANTS 1. General Regulation as to Licensing In its discretion, the [name of court] may license to practice in this United States jurisdiction
2011: The Year in Ethics and Bar Discipline. By Constance V. Vecchione, Bar Counsel January 2012
2011: The Year in Ethics and Bar Discipline By Constance V. Vecchione, Bar Counsel January 2012 In this article, the Office of Bar Counsel takes a second look at key developments in ethics and bar discipline
LAWYER REGULATION. was assessed the costs and expenses of the disciplinary
SANCTIONED ATTORNEYS CHERYL C. CAYCE Bar No. 012447; File No. 04-2103 Supreme Court No. SB-06-0177-D dated Feb. 9, 2007, Cheryl C. Cayce, 2730 E. Broadway, Suite 250, Tucson, AZ 85716, a member of the
Your Rights as a Complainant in the Grievance Process State of Connecticut Judicial Branch www.jud.ct.gov
Attorney Grievance Procedures in Connecticut Your Rights as a Complainant in the Grievance Process State of Connecticut Judicial Branch www.jud.ct.gov Attorney Grievance Procedures in Connecticut To the
11/20/2009 "See News Release 073 for any Concurrences and/or Dissents." SUPREME COURT OF LOUISIANA NO. 09-B-1795 IN RE: DEBORAH HARKINS BAER
11/20/2009 "See News Release 073 for any Concurrences and/or Dissents." SUPREME COURT OF LOUISIANA NO. 09-B-1795 IN RE: DEBORAH HARKINS BAER ATTORNEY DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS PER CURIAM * This disciplinary
SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN
SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN 2014 WI 2 CASE NO.: COMPLETE TITLE: In the Matter of Disciplinary Proceedings Against Steven T. Berman, Attorney at Law: Office of Lawyer Regulation, Complainant, v. Steven T.
RULES OF THE U. S. DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
RULES OF THE U. S. DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON The following rules, adopted by the judges of the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington, shall bind
IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Received 09/02/2015 Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania Filed 09/02/2015 Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania 1 REL 2001 IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA IN RE: Reliance Insurance Company In Liquidation
ETHICS & THE NEW RULES
ETHICS & THE NEW RULES THOMAS H. WATKINS, Austin Brown McCarroll LLP State Bar of Texas 19 th ANNUAL TEXAS MINORITY COUNSEL PROGRAM September 7-9, 2011 Austin, Texas CHAPTER 15 Thomas Watkins Brown McCarroll,
SUPREME COURT OF LOUISIANA NO. 09-B-2680 IN RE: KENNER O. MILLER, JR. ATTORNEY DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS
05/21/2010 "See News Release 038 for any Concurrences and/or Dissents." SUPREME COURT OF LOUISIANA NO. 09-B-2680 IN RE: KENNER O. MILLER, JR. ATTORNEY DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS PER CURIAM * This disciplinary
RULES OF THE ORANGE COUNTY BAR ASSOCIATION LAWYER REFERRAL & INFORMATION SERVICE. Purpose Section 1
RULES OF THE ORANGE COUNTY BAR ASSOCIATION LAWYER REFERRAL & INFORMATION SERVICE Purpose Section 1 The Lawyer Referral & Information Service Committee Section 2 Duties of the Lawyer Referral & Information
MISSISSIPPI OCCUPATIONAL THERAPY ASSOCIATION BYLAWS
MISSISSIPPI OCCUPATIONAL THERAPY ASSOCIATION BYLAWS MSOTA P. O. Box 2188 Brandon, MS 39043 Phone: 601-853-9564 www.mississippiota.org [email protected] Revised by MSOTA Board 11/14/92 Finalized
ESTATE PLANNING AND PROBATE LAW SPECIALIZATION ADVISORY BOARD STANDARDS AND PROCEDURES FOR CERTIFICATION, RECERTIFICATION, AND DECERTIFICATION
ESTATE PLANNING AND PROBATE LAW SPECIALIZATION ADVISORY BOARD STANDARDS AND PROCEDURES FOR CERTIFICATION, RECERTIFICATION, AND DECERTIFICATION By virtue of the authority vested in the Estate Planning and
ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS MISC. DOCKET NO. 99- IN THE MATTER OF GREGORY B. DUNBAR
ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS MISC. DOCKET NO. 99- IN THE MATTER OF GREGORY B. DUNBAR On this day, the Court considered the Motion for Acceptance of Resignation as Attorney and Counselor at Law of
FILED November 9, 2007
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS OF WEST VIRGINIA September 2007 Term No. 33067 LAWYER DISCIPLINARY BOARD, Petitioner FILED November 9, 2007 released at 10:00 a.m. RORY L. PERRY II, CLERK SUPREME COURT
The Respiratory Therapists Act
1 RESPIRATORY THERAPISTS c. R-22.0002 The Respiratory Therapists Act being Chapter R-22.0002 of The Statutes of Saskatchewan, 2006 (effective April 1, 2009) as amended by the Statutes of Saskatchewan,
[Cite as Mahoning Cty. Bar Assn. v. Bauer, 143 Ohio St.3d 519, 2015-Ohio-3653.]
[Cite as Mahoning Cty. Bar Assn. v. Bauer, 143 Ohio St.3d 519, 2015-Ohio-3653.] MAHONING COUNTY BAR ASSOCIATION v. BAUER. [Cite as Mahoning Cty. Bar Assn. v. Bauer, 143 Ohio St.3d 519, 2015-Ohio-3653.]
LR2-400. Case management pilot program for criminal cases. A. Scope; application. This is a special pilot rule governing time limits for criminal
LR2-400. Case management pilot program for criminal cases. A. Scope; application. This is a special pilot rule governing time limits for criminal proceedings in the Second Judicial District Court. This
How To Write A Medical Laboratory
1 MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGISTS c.m-9.3 The Medical Laboratory Technologists Act being Chapter M-9.3 of the Statutes of Saskatchewan, 1995 (effective February 1, 1996) as amended by the Statutes of
APPLICATION FOR ADMISSION OF JOHN K. CUNNINGHAM, PRO HAC VICE
Document Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY Caption in compliance with D.N.J. LBR 9004-2(c) FOX ROTHSCHILD LLP (Formed in the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania) Michael J. Viscount,
CHAPTER 277 CERTIFICATION OF ALARM SYSTEM CONTRACTORS AND INSTALLERS. 661 277.1(100C) Establishment of program. There is established within the fire
Adopt the following new chapter: CHAPTER 277 CERTIFICATION OF ALARM SYSTEM CONTRACTORS AND INSTALLERS 661 277.1(100C) Establishment of program. There is established within the fire marshal division an
How To Pass The Marriamandary Individual Tax Preparers Act
SENATE BILL Q, C, Q lr CF HB By: Senators Conway, Colburn, Della, Garagiola, Lenett, and Pugh Pugh, and Haines Introduced and read first time: February, 00 Assigned to: Rules Re referred to: Education,
