The Court s Approach to Muliple Injuries, Pre-exiting Injuries, and Psychological Injuries on the Determination of Catastrophic Impairment:
|
|
- Anthony Owen Cameron
- 3 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Derek Nicholson (613) John Read (613) Patrick Murphy (613) Donna Robinson (613) Wellington Street W, Ottawa, Ontario K1Y 2X7 The Court s Approach to Muliple Injuries, Pre-exiting Injuries, and Psychological Injuries on the Determination of Catastrophic Impairment: Overview -The Impact of Desbiens vs Mordini - This decision analyses in detail the definition of catastrophic impairment under two categories of the definition. The 55% whole body impairment ( WBI ) definition [see text of definitions below on next page in bold] and the Marked or extreme Impairment due to Mental or Behavioural disorder definition. The un-appealed decision clarifies the Superior Court s approach to determining whether a Plaintiff meets either definition of Catastrophic Impairment in cases involving; a) the impact of multiple injuries and how they should be considered under either definition; b) the impact of a severe pre-existing injury on meeting either definition; c) the impact of psychological and mental problems when combined with physical injuries. A summary of the key principles arising from the decision appear at page 6 of this paper. The Facts: Mr. Justice Spiegel s opening summarizes the sad realities facing this Plaintiff: The Gods of good fortune have not been kind to Phillipe Desbiens.
2 Fourteen years before the car accident in question, Mr. Desbiens became a paraplegic because of a roofing accident. The Defendant struck Mr. Desbiens while he was sitting in his wheelchair on the sidewalk. Mr. Desbiens was thrown 10 feet. Prior to the car accident he was found to have adapted well to his paraplegic condition. As a result of the accident he was found to have suffered multiple permanent injuries including a displaced fracture of his right femur, severe soft tissue injuries to the right side of his body, chronic pain disorder and significant psychological impairments including depression and an adjustment disorder. The functional impact of these injuries resulted in difficulty in transferring in and out of his wheelchair and functioning as he had before. His psychological profile was reflective of a dysfunctional coping style as a result of the car accident. This Bill 59 decision related to the combined effect of Sections 267.5(3) and (4) of the Insurance Act which prior to October 1, 2003 protected Defendants from claims for expenses for health care unless the Plaintiff sustained a Catastrophic Impairment. It is of obvious relevance to the current SAB definition of Catastrophic Impairment (Ontario Regulation 403/96 for accidents occurring on or after the 1 st of November, 1996) which has the same wording. The definitions for 55% whole body impairment and marked or extreme impairment due to mental or behavioural disorder as considered in Desbiens appear in Sections 2 (1.2)(f) and (g) of the current SABs. These sections provide as follows: (f) Subject to subsections (2) and (3), any impairment or combination of impairments that, in accordance with the American Medical Association s Guide to the Evaluation of Permanent Impairment, 4 th Edition, 1993, results in 55% or more impairment of the whole person; or (g) Subject to subsections (2) and (3), any impairment that, in accordance with the American Medical Association s Guides to the Evaluation of Permanent Impairment, 4 th Edition, 1993, results in a Class 4 impairment (marked
3 impairment) or Class 5 impairment (extreme impairment) due to mental or behavioural disorder. Mr. Justice Spiegel exhaustively deals with a number of issues in reviewing the evidence and determining his legal ability to make his ultimate finding that Mr. Desbiens did meet the definition of catastrophic impairment under the 55% whole body impairment requirement. In the course of so doing he rejected, on the facts of that case, that Mr. Desbiens met the definition utilizing the (g) categories of Class 4 or 5 marked or extreme impairment due to mental or behavioural disorder. Mr. Justice Spiegel made the following findings: 1. That despite significant impairments as a paraplegic, prior to the accident of November 8, 1999 Mr. Desbiens was a well functioning paraplegic before his motor vehicle accident; 2. That as a result of the motor vehicle accident he suffered a very dramatic loss of independence and became dependent on others to carry out most of his daily activities. 3. In analysing the AMA Guides ( the Guides ), he noted that Chapters 2 to 13 of the Guides deal with different organ systems where Chapter 14 dealt with
4 mental and behavioural disorders. The specific criteria for assessing impairments relating to Chapters 2 to 13 provided tables and figures to provide physicians assistance in translating clinical findings into impairment percentages. Unfortunately, Chapter 14 did not provide comparable charts and left the Trial Judge to determine whether it was appropriate or legally possible to assign impairment percentage ratings to psychological or behavioural challenges such as those suffered by Mr. Desbiens. He concluded that Mr. Desbiens did not sustain a catastrophic impairment as defined under Clause (g). This left Mr. Desbiens only possible category for such a definitional finding as being (f) i.e. the 55% whole body impairment; 4. He found, based on all of the evidence, that Mr. Desbiens suffered a 40% whole body impairment (WBI). His 40% finding of WBI was made of his pre-existing paraplegia which related to impairments of the musculo-skeletal system. The following summary is of the impairments so found: Region WBI % Right Upper Extremity 23% Right Lower Extremity 8% Left Upper Extremity 7%
5 Cervical Spine 5% Lumbar Spine 5% Total 4 0 % W B I 5. He found that the AMA Guides did not provide for any methodology for determining WBI taking into account an individual s pre-existing conditions. He therefore found that he was entitled to add the additional whole body impairment impact to the preexisting whole body impairment assessment to determine whether or not a Plaintiff had achieved the 55% WBI percentage necessary to be defined as catastrophically impaired. 6. He found that in Mr. Desbiens case by either approach, a loss of function approach or a activities of daily living equivalent, Mr. Desbiens had achieved the 55% threshold by reason of the musculo-skeletal problems that further impaired his transferability and activities of daily living. He relied on the Plaintiff s physician Dr. Delaney, in exercising her discretion under the Guides and her report which provided: If we keep in mind that he was already paraplegic and we add these new impairments, which are responsible for his alteration and
6 function, we can clearly see that he has sustained a catastrophic impairment in the context of his current state and pre-existing medical condition. COUNSEL S INSTRUCTION TO MEDICAL PRACTITIONERS The Judge felt that the Plaintiff s physiatrist, Dr. Delaney and the Defendant s physician both confirmed that once they had calculated impairments exceeding 55% WBI, they did not spend as much time detailing further impairments. The Trial Judge felt that it would be more helpful to have physicians provide a complete analysis and quantification of all impairments even after the 55% WBI is reached. The purpose of course is to assist the Trial Judge in the event that there is a rejection by a Judge or Tribunal of any of the impairment ratings assigned by the physicians. This would allow the Court better evidence with which to determine if other impairments assisted in bringing the impairment rating over the 55% WBI threshold. ALTERNATIVE APPROACH - COMBINING PHYSICAL, MUSCULO- SKELETAL AND PSYCHOLOGICAL IMPAIRMENTS The Judge found that the physical impairments exceeded 55% and therefore qualified Mr. Desbiens under subclause (f), as being catastrophicly impaired. However, he felt it was important to determine the matter in the alternative. He considered whether or not the psychological factors and impairments could be rated on a percentage basis under the
7 legislation and then considered as to whether or not the Plaintiff exceeded the 55% WBI percentage. The first difficulty that was dealt with was that the AMA Guides in Chapters 14 and 15 for mental and behavioural disorders did not provide percentage analysis guidelines for physicians as did Chapters 2 to 13 (dealing with different organ systems). The Trial Judge examined the Regulations and analysed the Legislation in its total context having regard to the purpose of the Legislation and the consequences of the proposed Legislation. Under Section 10 of the Interpretation Act he found that the Legislation was deemed to be remedial and was to be given a fair, large and liberal construction and interpretation. He examined experts from the Legislative debates reviewing the change from Bill 164 to Bill 59 which purported to make Bill 59 more fair in terms of compensation. In reviewing the Guides he found that physicians had discretion in assigning an impairment rating for all kinds of impairments and that it was in accordance with the Guides to assign percentages to Mr. Desbiens psychological impairments and to combine them with his physical impairments in determining whether he meets the definition of catastrophic impairment under Clause (f) (para 222, pg The Decision) CHARTER OF RIGHTS CHALLENGE UNDER SECTION 15 The Plaintiffs had challenged the Legislation on the basis of Section 15 of the Charter which provides:
8 15(1) - every individual is equal before and under the law and has the right to equal protection and equal benefit of the law without discrimination and, in particular, without discrimination based on... mental or physical disability. The Judge did not conduct an extensive analysis of Charter rights but did conclude as follows: In my view, to deprive innocent victims of motor vehicle accidents the right to recover much needed health care expenses because their psychological impairments cannot be combined with their physical impairments in considering their overall WBI is unjust. Moreover, it is inconsistent with the principals and norms of Section 15 of the Charter... in my view, the Defendant s interpretation leads to discrimination against persons who have a mental disability. It is trite to say that an outcome that is inconsistent with the Charter principals and norms cannot be considered. The Judge therefore accepted the assessment by the Plaintiff s psychologist Dr. Finlayson that the psychological problems as a result of the accident would be worth a 25% WBI. That combined with the 40% WBI related to musculo-skeletal problems resulted in a overall WBI of 55% which satisfied the requirements of Clause (f). IMPORTANT PRINCIPLES ARISING FROM THE DESBIENS AND THE MORDINI CASE
9 Desbiens is one of the few cases that considers a number of principals with respect to assessing catastrophic impairment issues. The potential Appeal has now been abandoned. The principals that may gleaned from this case are as follows: 1. In a case involving pre-existing impairments, medical assessors and the Court are entitled to consider cumulatively the impact of the motor vehicle accident injuries stacked upon the preexisting whole body impairment levels to determine whether or not the 55% WBI threshold has been achieved; 2. While psychological impairments under the Guides are not specifically categorized by the American Medical Association in percentages, it is appropriate for physicians and the Court or Arbitrator to assess the percentage assessment for psychological or behavioural problems even though there are no percentages in the pertinent chapters of the Guides dealing with psychological or behavioural disorders. It is then appropriate to add those to the physical percentage assessments to determine if the 55% WBI threshold has been achieved.
10 3. Insurance Legislation and the definition of catastrophic impairment should be interpreted broadly and inclusively rather than restrictively, in a manner that will not deprive an injured person of medical, rehabilitation or attendant care benefits available under the SABs. 4. A medical assessment is not limited to identify and quantify only in percentages listed in the Guide. If an injured person has an impairment that is not specifically dealt with in the Guides it will be dealt with by way of analogy to other impairments under the Guides. A percentage impairment rating may be applied to such impairment. 5. When dealing with medical assessors it is important to have in mind and to specifically instruct them as is appropriate on the following matters: a) the medical advisor has discretion and may apply common sense when applying the Guides to a particular Plaintiff to establish a realistic assessment of the level of impairment; b) the assessor should specifically annotate each and every injury in terms of percentages of whole body impairment in detail and with written
11 reasons so that the Trier of fact can analyse the physician s assessment; c) even when the assessors have reached the 55% WBI under Clause (f) they should carefully document each and every additional injury for WBI impairment so that should the assessor not agree on any particular element the Trier of fact may clearly understand and have an appropriate guide for valuation. This may assist the Plaintiff in overcoming the 55% WBI in Clause (f); d) the assessors should have experience in doing WBI and other assessments under the AMA Guides as this clearly added weight to the opinion of Dr. Delaney and Dr. Finlayson; e) the expert should record his or her calculations in detail; f) the expert should be encouraged to conduct a detailed examination; g) the expert should be specifically advised that they may include pre-existing impairments in their global calculation of the WBI for the purposes of the assessment;
12 h) the expert should confirm which disabilities relate or are causally connected to the motor vehicle accident. 6. Since Mr. Justice Spiegel held that physicians and medical assessors have a broad discretion in assessing impairment levels, it may be appropriate for the assessor to consider impairment ratings under more recent levels of the American Medical Association s Guides to the Valuation of Permanent Impairment. The statutory regulations for Clause 2(1.2)(f) and (g) both refer to the 4 th Edition, 1993 for the purposes of the valuation. It is arguable that more recent editions, I believe there is now a 5 th and 6 th Edition out, may still be of benefit to physicians in considering development in impairment rating assessments and may in fact be of assistance in process. It is often an issue that is raised by physicians and otherwise in discussing and preparing for an assessment that the 4 th Edition is not the working edition but is now antiquated. GENERAL MATTERS WITH RESPECT TO CLAUSE (f) AND (g) ASSESSMENTS Under Section 2(2.1) in dealing with the 55% WBI or the Class 4 or 5 impairment due to mental or behavioural disorder it is important to advise
13 the assessor or physician that that health practitioner has to state in writing that it is unlikely that the catastrophic impairment will cease or in the alternative, that two years have elapsed since the accident. Schedule A: Catastrophic Impairment Background Materials: INTRODUCTION Able and knowledgeable legal assistance following a devastating injury arising out of a motor vehicle accident can be critical in the assistance of clients suffering devastating and catastrophic impairments. The within paper is designed as an overview of the statutory accident benefits (SABs) provisions defining catastrophic impairment, the increased benefits available once such a designation has been made which will provide assistance to counsel with respect to the procedures, collection of medical
14 information and the expanding use of the 55% whole body impairment measurement. DEFINITION In Canada, it appears that only Ontario has seen fit to include in its Statutory Accident Benefits Regulations, a distinction between catastrophic and non-catastrophic impairment. This definition with distinction first arose under the provisions of Bill 59 and has followed through into Bill 198 with some minor modification. The current definition of catastrophic impairment for accidents occurring after the 30 th of September, 2003, appears in Section 2 (1.2) and includes: i) paraplegia; ii) quadriplegia; iii) amputation or other impairment causing total and permanent loss of use of both arms or both legs; iv) the amputation or other impairment causing the total and permanent loss of use of one or both arms and one or both legs; v) a total loss of vision in both eyes;
15 vi) a brain impairment that results in a score of 9 out of 15 on the Glasgow Coma Scale according to a test administered within a reasonable period of time after the accident by a person trained for that purpose (such as an Ambulance Attendant); vii) a brain impairment with a score on the Glasgow Outcome Scale of 2 (vegetative) or 3 (severe disability on the Glasgow Outcome Scale) according to a test administered more than six months after the accident by a person trained for that purpose; viii) an assessed 55% whole body impairment (WBI) as assessed in accordance with the 4 th edition of the American Medical Association s Guides to the Valuation of Permanent Impairment two years after the accident or earlier if the health assessor confirms there will likely not be an improvement; ix) an impairment that results in a Class 4 (marked) impairment or a Class 5 (extreme) impairment due to mental or behavioural disorder in accordance with the American Medical Association s Guides to the Valuation of Permanent Impairment, 4 th Ed, 1993.
16 The complete text of the definitions is attached as Schedule A to this paper and includes the definition of catastrophic impairment for accidents that occurred before the 1 st of October, EFFECT OF DETERMINATION OF CATASTROPHIC IMPAIRMENT UNDER S. 40 Once the insured has been designated as catastrophic the maximum Attendant Care benefit increases from $3,000 per month which is payable for 2 years (maximum of $72,000.00) to $6,000 per month to a maximum of $1,000, with no time limit. The Medical and Rehabilitation Benefits increase from a maximum of $100, for a maximum period of 10 years to $1,000, with no time limit. Note that section 27 allows for an insured to purchase increased optional coverage which will increase the amounts available. The optional coverage section is attached. PROCEDURES NECESSARY FOR DETERMINATION AND DESIGNATION OF CATASTROPHIC IMPAIRMENT The criteria for determination of a catastrophic impairment is set out in Section 40.
17 In order to apply for catastrophic status the Applicant must submit an OCF 19 Application for Catastrophic Impairment. (See attached copy of form) This form is completed by the insured Applicant or substitute decision maker in conjunction with one of the applicant s qualified Medical Practitioners as set out in the regulations. Once this form is submitted to the insurer the insurer must respond to it within 30 days. Response is made on an OCF 20 Catastrophic Impairment Determination and Request for Assessment. (See attached form) The insurer on that form will indicate one of the following: Χ Χ Χ That the insured is catastrophic; The insured is not catastrophic; or The insurer requires the applicant to be assessed by a designated assessment centre If the insurer determines that the Applicant has not sustained a catastrophic impairment and the Applicant disagrees then the Applicant can request a CAT DAC by signing the form and returning it to the insurer. The results of the CAT DAC are binding on both the insured and the insurer. In the event that the insured disagrees with the results the insured may
18 proceed to a mediation and then if that is not successful proceed to either an arbitration or litigation. If the insurer disagrees with the CAT DAC results then the insurer can proceed to mediation and if that fails can commence litigation. ( Note that an insurer cannot take a file to arbitration.) In the interim the insurer must treat the insured as being catastrophic and make payments accordingly.
plaintiff can sue for health care expenses and the damages assessment may increase dramatically.
an accident occurring between November 1, 1996 and October 1, 2003, a catastrophically impaired edition, 1993, results in 55 per cent or more impairment of the whole person." This definition can a plaintiff
CATASTROPHIC IMPAIRMENT: EARLIER DETERMINATION, FACTORING IN PREMORBID IMPAIRMENTS AND POST ACCIDENT POTENTIAL DETERIORATION
Toronto ABI Network Conference 2014 Allstream Centre, Exhibition Place, Toronto November 20 and 21, 2014 CATASTROPHIC IMPAIRMENT: EARLIER DETERMINATION, FACTORING IN PREMORBID IMPAIRMENTS AND POST ACCIDENT
Accident Benefits & Spinal Cord Injuries under Bill 198
Accident Benefits & Spinal Cord Injuries under Bill 198 Presented by: David F. MacDonald, David A. Payne & Wendy Moore Johns June 23, 2005 Attendant Care Provided by Family Members in Hospital Pay Now,
Copyright Lerners LLP. HELPING YOU HELP YOUR PATIENTS: Learning about Insurance issues in MVA cases
Copyright Lerners LLP HELPING YOU HELP YOUR PATIENTS: Learning about Insurance issues in MVA cases MOTOR VEHICLE ACCIDENT LEGISLATION 1. TORT CLAIMS 2. STATUTORY ACCIDENT BENEFITS 3. WHAT IS AN ACCIDENT
Accident Benefit. As most of our readers are already aware, there have been significant changes to the laws governing
Accident Benefit R E P O R T E R Changes to Ontario Auto Insurance In this issue: Changes to Ontario Auto Insurance Overview Of Regulatory Changes Changes to The Definition of Catastrophic Impairment Regulatory
DEFINING CATASTROPHIC IMPAIRMENT: ADVANCED RESEARCH IN SABS 1
DEFINING CATASTROPHIC IMPAIRMENT: ADVANCED RESEARCH IN SABS 1 Dina Mejalli, Greg Monforton and Partners The implementation of the new Statutory Accident Benefits Schedule ( SABS ) 2 on September 1, 2010,
What you need to know about your legal rights
TR_Motorcycle_Kit_06-025 KitText.qxd 13-03-13 10:15 AM Page 1 InformatIon KIt for MOTORCYCLISTS Effective: November 1, 2012 What you need to know about your legal rights Personal Injury Litigators since
Our Personal Injury Guidebook
Our Personal Injury Guidebook Partnering with you on your road to recovery 2 Table of Contents Injured? You Must Take the Following Steps........... 3 Our Promise to Our Clients.................... 4 At
Your Guide to Recovery
Your Guide to Recovery PERSONAL INJURY LAWYERS Committed to Your Future We will: Ensure all necessary notices are provided to maintain your claim and commence the action within the limitation period. Work
Our Personal Injury Guidebook
Our Personal Injury Guidebook Partnering with you on your road to recovery 2 Table of Contents Injured? You Must Take the Following Steps........... 3 Our Promise to Our Clients.................... 4 At
Motor Vehicle Accident Claims: What are your rights?
Motor Vehicle Accident Claims: What are your rights? If you or a loved one has been seriously injured in a motor vehicle accident, there are a number of critical decisions that must be made. Who will care
UPDATE ON PERSONAL INJURY LAW AND PRACTICE. May 9 12, 2012. William A. G. Simpson
UPDATE ON PERSONAL INJURY LAW AND PRACTICE 22 nd Annual Conference of The Institute of Law Clerks of Ontario May 9 12, 2012 William A. G. Simpson Partner Lerners LLP (London) This paper will provide a
A Catastrophe In The Making?
A Catastrophe In The Making? An examination of the proposed changes to the definition of Catastrophic Impairment Rehabilitation and Life Care Planning Symposium April 11 & 12, 2013 Greg Monforton Brian
THE ROAD AHEAD FOR IMPECUNIOUS VICTIMS th. A. Introductory Comments and General Overview of Benefits
THE ROAD AHEAD FOR IMPECUNIOUS VICTIMS th Paper originally presented to the Carleton County Law Association on May 25, 2010 by Derek Nicholson A. Introductory Comments and General Overview of Benefits
THE MAJOR IMPACT OF THE NEW MINOR INJURIES CATEGORY
THE MAJOR IMPACT OF THE NEW MINOR INJURIES CATEGORY By Cary N. Schneider September, 2010 VOL. 4, ISSUE 4 Cary N. Schneider is a partner at Beard Winter LLP who specializes in accident benefit and tort
ACCIDENT BENEFIT CHANGES Overview of the Statutory Accident Benefits Schedule Ontario Regulation 34/10 effective September 1, 2010
ACCIDENT BENEFIT CHANGES Overview of the Statutory Accident Benefits Schedule Ontario Regulation 34/10 effective September 1, 2010 Darcy Merkur & Leonard Kunka of Thomson, Rogers 2010 INDEX: Page # INTRODUCTION
TYPE OF INJURY and CURRENT SABS Paraplegia/ Tetraplegia
Paraplegia/ Tetraplegia (a) paraplegia or quadriplegia; (a) paraplegia or tetraplegia that meets the following criteria i and ii, and either iii or iv: i. ii. iii i. The Insured Person is currently participating
File Review and Consultation $ CATASTROPHIC IMPAIRMENT EVALUATIONS
FEE SCHEDULE 2011 SERVICE FEE File Review and Consultation $450-850 CATASTROPHIC IMPAIRMENT EVALUATIONS OCF-19 Application -CAT Clinic Evaluations Medical Evaluation $2000 Mental/Behavioural Evaluation
Accidents Happen. Recover with Dye & Russell INFORMATION FOR ACCIDENT VICTIMS AND THEIR FAMILIES DYE & RUSSELL. Personal Injury Lawyers
Accidents Happen Recover with Dye & Russell INFORMATION FOR ACCIDENT VICTIMS AND THEIR FAMILIES DR DYE & RUSSELL Personal Injury Lawyers ACCIDENTS HAPPEN Recover with Dye & Russell At Dye & Russell, we
CAR ACCIDENT GUIDE TABLE OF CONTENTS
CAR ACCIDENT GUIDE TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Introduction... 1 First Step... 1 Finding and Hiring a Lawyer... 1 Financial Arrangements... 2 Your Claim... 3 Documenting Your Claim... 5 Parties to the Claim...
The more things change The less they are the same. Friday May 22, 2015
The more things change The less they are the same. Friday May 22, 2015 2010 Providing more Choice for Ontarians 2015 Fairness for Ontario Consumers 80% of victims in Ontario limited to $3,500 Other provinces
MOTOR VEHICLE PERSONAL INJURY MANUAL for HEALTH CARE PROFESSIONALS
MOTOR VEHICLE PERSONAL INJURY MANUAL for HEALTH CARE PROFESSIONALS Guidelines for health care professionals to assist patients with obtaining benefits as a result of injuries suffered in a motor vehicle
(3) provide certainty around cost and payment for insurers and regulated health professionals;
Welcome to the World of the SABS - Out with the PAF in with the MIG: A review of the Application of the Minor Injury Guideline in SABS Claims by Marie T. Clemens On September 1, 2010, Ontario Regulation
Everything You Wanted To Know About Catastrophic Impairment But Were Afraid To Ask
Everything You Wanted To Know About Catastrophic Impairment But Were Afraid To Ask By: Christopher D. Deeley, B.A. (Hons.), M.A., LL.B. Camporese Sullivan Di Gregorio Associates Lawyers TABLE OF CONTENTS
EVER ESCALATING CLAIMS: THE EVOLVING AUTO INSURANCE PRODUCT STRESSES ON THE SYSTEM By: Catherine Korte
EVER ESCALATING CLAIMS: THE EVOLVING AUTO INSURANCE PRODUCT STRESSES ON THE SYSTEM By: Catherine Korte For those of you who self insure, let s say the first million. For those of you who own fleets. For
CATASTROPHIC IMPAIRMENT: EARLIER DETERMINATION, FACTORING-IN PRE-MORBID IMPAIRMENTS AND POST-ACCIDENT POTENTIAL DETERIORATION
CATASTROPHIC IMPAIRMENT: EARLIER DETERMINATION, FACTORING-IN PRE-MORBID IMPAIRMENTS AND POST-ACCIDENT POTENTIAL DETERIORATION FEBRUARY 4, 2015 MEDICO LEGAL SOCIETY OF TORONTO DAVID F. MACDONALD* Thomson,
Understanding Automobile Insurance and Rehabilitation in Ontario: Common Sense Definitions and Explanations
Understanding Automobile Insurance and Rehabilitation in Ontario: Common Sense Definitions and Explanations clinical excellence human focus 15 Barrie Blvd., St. Thomas, ON N5P4B9 Ph: 519-637-0981 Fx: 519-637-6997
BILL 198 AND THE THRESHOLD. L. Russell Hatch Blaney McMurtry LLP 416.593.3920 rhatch@blaney.com
BILL 198 AND THE THRESHOLD L. Russell Hatch Blaney McMurtry LLP 416.593.3920 rhatch@blaney.com BILL 198 AND THE THRESHOLD In October 2003, the Ontario government passed Bill 198 as the successor to Bill
ACCIDENT BENEFITS - THIS YEAR S TOP CASES IN REVIEW
ACCIDENT BENEFITS - THIS YEAR S TOP CASES IN REVIEW THE 7 TH ANNUAL ADVOCACY CONFERENCE Presented by: THE HAMILTON LAW ASSOCIATION Prepared by: A. Jarvis Scott Hughes, Amys LLP One King Street West Suite
Workers Compensation Amendment (Transitional) Regulation 2012
New South Wales Workers Compensation Amendment (Transitional) Regulation 2012 under the Workers Compensation Act 1987 Her Excellency the Governor, with the advice of the Executive Council, has made the
Personal Injury Motor Vehicle Litigation: SABS and Tort
Personal Injury Motor Vehicle Litigation: SABS and Tort Shauna K. Powell, Lerners LLP The purpose of this paper is to provide a general overview of the tort and the Statutory Accident Benefits Schedule
Working within the New SABs
Summary: The new Statutory Accident Benefits (SABs) are slated to come into effect on September 1, 2010. The new SABs represent a significant cut in the benefits available to injured parties. In some cases,
Steven Rastin. Rastin Associates. Midland. and. Tracy M Romanowski. Midland. insight INFORMATION. September 17 18 2007
TAB 4 Proving Catastrophic Impairment Pursuant to the Statutory Accident Benefits Schedule Key Considerations Steven Rastin Rastin Associates Midland and Tracy M Romanowski Accident Benefits Specialist
ACCIDENT BENEFITS: RECENT CHANGES AND DEVELOPMENTS
The Law Society of Upper Canada October 18, 2007 ACCIDENT BENEFITS: RECENT CHANGES AND DEVELOPMENTS Richard M. Bogoroch, Melinda J. Baxter and Tripta S. Chandler Bogoroch & Associates REPRESENTING PERSONS
INSURER-FUNDED MEDICAL, REHABILITATION AND ATTENDANT CARE SERVICES FOR BRAIN INJURY SURVIVORS WHILE IN HOSPITAL
A Case Study Approach Presentation to Hamilton Health Sciences Centre s Acquired Brain Injury Program Slow to Recover Team March 03, 2008 INSURER-FUNDED MEDICAL, REHABILITATION AND ATTENDANT CARE SERVICES
Practicing Within the New Auto Insurance Scheme: Pitfalls and Strategies
Practicing Within the New Auto Insurance Scheme: Pitfalls and Strategies Introduction An increase of nearly 800 per cent in insurance company profits for 2003 was a surprise, especially after repeated
LAWYERS New South Wales & Victoria. A transport accident is an incident directly caused by a motor car or motor vehicle, a railway train, or a tram.
LAWYERS New South Wales & Victoria Transport Accident Commission (TAC) Claims FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS What is a transport accident? A transport accident is an incident directly caused by a motor car
What you should know
What you should know when you have been injured in a motor vehicle accident This booklet provides information about insurance benefits and other compensation that may be available to you when you have
Have you or someone you know suffered a personal injury? TIPS TO MAXIMIZE COMPENSATION
Have you or someone you know suffered a personal injury? TIPS TO MAXIMIZE COMPENSATION If you have suffered a personal injury it is important to consider all potential sources of compensation. A personal
APPENDIX A CONSULTATION DRAFT. An Act to Amend the Insurance Act
APPENDIX A March 13, 2014 CONSULTATION DRAFT An Act to Amend the Insurance Act BE IT ENACTED by the Lieutenant Governor and the Legislative Assembly of the Province of Prince Edward Island as follows:
IN THE MATTER OF the Insurance Act, R.S.O. 1990, c.i.8, as amended, and Ontario Regulation 668.
IN THE MATTER OF the Insurance Act, R.S.O. 1990, c.i.8, as amended, and Ontario Regulation 668. AND IN THE MATTER OF the Arbitration Act, S.O. 1991, c.17 AND IN THE MATTER OF AN ARBITRATION BETWEEN: STATE
In reviewing the recommended changes being proposed, the Coalition s comments can be summarized as follows:
Executive Summary The Coalition of Health Professional Associations in Automobile Insurance Services (Coalition) represents over 10,000 front line health professionals from ten regulated health professions
The complete legal solution for injury and insurance claims
The complete legal solution for injury and insurance claims Let THE HIMELFARB PROSZANSKI LLP Advantage guide you on your road to recovery. Mr. Himelfarb is head of the Litigation practice at the firm.
YOUTH LEGAL CENTRE. Victims compensation. 1 Introduction. 2 Eligibility
YOUTH LEGAL CENTRE Victims compensation 1 Introduction The New South Wales victims compensation scheme allows victims of violent crime to receive: counselling financial compensation injuries suffered payment
EXAMINATIONS, ASSESSMENTS AND REPORTS WHAT S COVERED AND WHO PAYS? 1
EXAMINATIONS, ASSESSMENTS AND REPORTS WHAT S COVERED AND WHO PAYS? 1 Sloan H. Mandel Partner Thomson, Rogers On September 1, 2010, a new SABS regime takes effect. There are a number of drastic changes
NEW CHANGES TO AUTOMOBILE LEGISLATION
NEW CHANGES TO AUTOMOBILE LEGISLATION INTRODUCTION When the original insurance law reforms were brought out back in 1990 and with each subsequent change, they have been led by fanfare from the government
Concerning the Cap on Pain and Suffering Awards for Minor Injuries
Discussion Paper Concerning the Cap on Pain and Suffering Awards for Minor Injuries Office of the Superintendent of Insurance January, 2010 Introduction The Province of Nova Scotia regulates automobile
AMENDMENTS TO THE AUTO INSURANCE REGULATIONS: ACCIDENT BENEFITS AND BILL 198
AMENDMENTS TO THE AUTO INSURANCE REGULATIONS: ACCIDENT BENEFITS AND BILL 198 Introduction Earlier this year, the Progressive Conservative Government passed Bill 198 amending the Insurance Act. This represents
Motor Accidents Compensation Amendment (Claims and Dispute Resolution) Act 2007 No 95
New South Wales Motor Accidents Compensation Amendment (Claims and Dispute Contents Page 1 Name of Act 2 2 Commencement 2 3 Amendment of Motor Accidents Compensation Act 1999 No 41 2 4 Amendment of other
Transport Accident (Amendment) Bill
MTHltR RO \'NSON ~ ;-IF.DOERWlCKS '..IBRAR\ Transport Accident (Amendment) Bill As Sent Print EXPLANATORY MEMORANDUM PART I-PRELIMINARY Clause 1 Clause 2 sets out the purposes of the Act. provides for
Accident Rehabilitation and Compensation Insurance Amendment ANALYSIS. 5. Power to borrow, etc. 3. Claims 6. Validations
Accident Rehabilitation and Compensation 3 ANALYSIS Title 4. Assessors I. Short Title and commencement 2. Definition of "medical misadventure" 5. Power to borrow, etc. 3. Claims 6. Validations An Act to
FACT PATTERN ONE. The following facts are based on the case of Bedard v. Martyn [2009] A.J. No. 308
FACT PATTERN ONE The following facts are based on the case of Bedard v. Martyn [2009] A.J. No. 308 The infant plaintiff developed a large blood clot in his brain at some time either before or during the
Accident Benefits Coverage in Ontario
Accident Benefits Coverage in Ontario June 2007 Accident Benefits Coverage in Ontario Table of Contents If You Are in a Car Crash...1 Specified Benefits...3 Death and Funeral Payments...7 Medical, Rehabilitation
ACCIDENT BENEFITS COVERAGE IN ONTARIO CAR INSURANCE VISIT IBC.CA
ACCIDENT BENEFITS COVERAGE IN ONTARIO CAR INSURANCE VISIT IBC.CA Accident Benefits Coverage in Ontario Contents If You Are in a Motor Vehicle Collision...2 Specified Benefits...4 Death and Funeral Payments...8
BILL NO. 46. An Act to Amend the Insurance Act (No. 2)
HOUSE USE ONLY CHAIR: WITH / WITHOUT 4th SESSION, 64th GENERAL ASSEMBLY Province of Prince Edward Island 63 ELIZABETH II, 2014 BILL NO. 46 An Act to Amend the Insurance Act (No. 2) Honourable Janice A.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA BROWARD DIVISION. Plaintiff, Case No.: COMPLAINT
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA BROWARD DIVISION NANCY PRITCHARD, v. Plaintiff, Case No.: KAPLAN HIGHER EDUCATION CORPORATION; KAPLAN HIGHER EDUCATION CORPORATION, as PLAN ADMINISTRATOR;
WORKERS COMPENSATION BOARD APPEAL TRIBUNAL. [Personal information] CASE I.D. #[personal information]
WORKERS COMPENSATION BOARD APPEAL TRIBUNAL BETWEEN: [personal information] CASE I.D. #[personal information] PLAINTIFF AND: WORKERS COMPENSATION BOARD OF PRINCE EDWARD ISLAND DEFENDANT DECISION #41 [Personal
SUMMARY. 1 See page 13
RESPONSE OF THE ONTARIO TRIAL LAWYERS ASSOCIATION TO THE RECOMMENDATIONS FOR CHANGES TO THE DEFINITION OF CATASTROPHIC IMPAIRMENT FINAL REPORT OF THE CATASTROPHIC IMPAIRMENT EXPERT PANEL TO THE SUPERINTENDENT
LEVEL 4 - UNIT 7 INTRODUCTORY CONSIDERATIONS FOR PERSONAL INJURY LAWYERS SUGGESTED ANSWERS - JANUARY 2015
LEVEL 4 - UNIT 7 INTRODUCTORY CONSIDERATIONS FOR PERSONAL INJURY LAWYERS SUGGESTED ANSWERS - JANUARY 2015 Note to Candidates and Tutors: The purpose of the suggested answers is to provide students and
DECISION WITH RESPECT TO PRELIMINARY ISSUE
IN THE MATTER OF THE INSURANCE ACT, R.S.O. 1990 c. I.8, as amended AND IN THE MATTER OF THE ARBITRATION ACT, S.O. 1991, c.17, as amended BETWEEN: AND IN THE MATTER OF AN ARBITRATION WAWANESA MUTUAL INSURANCE
REASONS FOR DECISION
Financial Services Commission of Ontario Commission des services financiers de l Ontario BETWEEN: ANNA PASTORE Applicant and AVIVA CANADA INC. Insurer REASONS FOR DECISION Before: Heard: Elizabeth Nastasi
RISK RESPONSIBILITY REALITY APPENDIX D AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE IN CANADA
The appendix includes relevant clauses drawn from the Compulsory Minimum Insurance Coverage for Private Passenger Vehicles as prepared by the Insurance Bureau of Canada (FACTS 2005 p. 12-15) used with
PERSONAL INJURY PARTICULARS
PERSONAL INJURY PARTICULARS Magistrates Court of South Australia (Civil Division) www.courts.sa.gov.au Date Filed: Court Use Form 22 Trial Court Action No Address Street Telephone Facsimile DX BETWEEN
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORT
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORT No. R.. Date ROAD ACCIDENT FUND ACT, 1996 ROAD ACCIDENT FUND REGULATIONS, 2008 The Minister of Transport has, under section 26 of the Road Accident Fund Act, 1996 (Act No. 56 of
Bill 198 and the New SABS. Thomson, Rogers presents: Adapting to the Changes in the Acute Care Setting. Hamilton Health Science Centre March 21, 2003
Bill 198 and the New SABS Thomson, Rogers presents: Adapting to the Changes in the Acute Care Setting Hamilton Health Science Centre March 21, 2003 David Neill, David MacDonald and Michael Bennett Thomson,
B U R T & D A V I E S PERSONAL INJURY LAWYERS TAC CLAIMS SERIOUS INJURY
TAC CLAIMS SERIOUS INJURY The TAC compensation scheme that operates in Victoria is primarily a no-fault compensation scheme. However, transport accident victims whose injuries were caused by the negligence
Closed Automobile Insurance Third Party Liability Claim Study in Ontario
Closed Automobile Insurance Third Party Liability Claim Study in Ontario Survey Completion Instructions 1. Please complete one record for each injured claimant resulting from the same accident. For example,
Workplace Health, Safety & Compensation Review Division
Workplace Health, Safety & Compensation Review Division WHSCRD Case No: 13277-12 WHSCC Claim No: 633272 Decision Number: 14132 Lloyd Piercey Review Commissioner The Review Proceedings 1. The review took
The unidentified vehicle is a vehicle whose driver or owner cannot be determined.
UNIDENTIFIED MOTORIST CLAIMS IN ONTARIO AN OVERVIEW Written Materials by: Elizabeth Iwata, Associate McCague Borlack LLP Presentation by: Elizabeth Iwata Unidentified motorist claims are, at times, challenging
1.1 Australian Capital Territory 1.2 New South Wales 1.3 Northern Territory 1.4 Queensland
Attachment C 1. Workers Compensation Schemes 1.1 Australian Capital Territory 1.2 New South Wales 1.3 Northern Territory 1.4 Queensland 1.5 South Australia 1.6 Tasmania 1.7 Victoria 1.8 Western Australia
No-Fault Automobile Insurance
No-Fault Automobile Insurance By Margaret C. Jasper, Esq. Prior to the enactment of state no-fault insurance legislation, recovery for personal injuries sustained in an automobile accident were subject
CHAPTER 36. An Act to Amend the Insurance Act (No. 2)
4th SESSION, 64th GENERAL ASSEMBLY Province of Prince Edward Island 63 ELIZABETH II, 2014 CHAPTER 36 (Bill No. 46) An Act to Amend the Insurance Act (No. 2) Honourable Janice A. Sherry Minister of Environment,
THE TOP 10 QUESTIONS YOU SHOULD ASK YOUR CAR ACCIDENT LAWYER
THE TOP 10 QUESTIONS YOU SHOULD ASK YOUR CAR ACCIDENT LAWYER? Introduction After six straight years of decline, the National Highway Traffic Administration (NHTSA) reports that auto accidents, injuries
IN THE HIGH COURT OF NEW ZEALAND WELLINGTON REGISTRY CIV 2003-485-1921. BETWEEN VERONICA WEIR Appellant
IN THE HIGH COURT OF NEW ZEALAND WELLINGTON REGISTRY CIV 2003-485-1921 BETWEEN VERONICA WEIR Appellant AND ACCIDENT COMPENSATION CORPORATION Respondent Hearing: 15 July 2004 Appearances: J Miller & S A
APPENDIX 2A Sample Initial Letter
APPENDIX 2A Sample Initial Letter Dear [name]: Re: Motor Vehicle Accident Please read this letter carefully and retain it in your file, as it contains important information about your claim and the basis
Conditional Fee Agreement (CFA)
Conditional Fee Agreement (CFA) This agreement is a binding legal contract between you and your solicitor/s. Before you sign, please read everything carefully. This agreement must be read in conjunction
February 25, 2015. Summary
February 25, 2015 Director Public Service Bodies and Government Division Excise and Gst/Hst Rulings Directorate Canada Revenue Agency 14 th Floor, Place de Ville, Tower A 320 Queen Street Ottawa, ON K1A
Insurance Bulletin. The Court has its Say! Assessment of General Damages Under the Civil Liability Act (Qld) May 2005
Insurance Bulletin The Court has its Say! May 2005 Assessment of General Damages Under the Civil Liability Act (Qld) This is the first occasion in Queensland where the quantum provisions of the CLA have
VICTORIAN TRANSPORT ACCIDENT CLAIMS - A GUIDE TO YOUR ENTITLEMENTS
VICTORIAN TRANSPORT ACCIDENT CLAIMS - A GUIDE TO YOUR ENTITLEMENTS This guide includes the following: What is a transport accident? Who is the TAC? How do I make a claim? When will I know if my claim has
Workplace Health, Safety & Compensation Review Division
Workplace Health, Safety & Compensation Review Division WHSCRD Case No: 14275-11 WHSCC Claim No: 837491 Decision Number: 15034 Marlene A. Hickey Chief Review Commissioner The Review Proceedings 1. The
OFFICE OF CRIMINAL INJURIES COMPENSATION
OFFICE OF CRIMINAL INJURIES COMPENSATION DEPARTMENT OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL WESTERN AUSTRALIA Chief Assessor's Report 2011/2012 CRIMINAL INJURIES COMPENSATION The Honourable Michael Mischin, MLC Attorney
NCAA CATASTROPHIC INJURY INSURANCE PROGRAM FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS
NCAA CATASTROPHIC INJURY INSURANCE PROGRAM FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS APPLICABLE TO 8/1/12 TO 7/31/13 POLICY PERIOD This document is a summary of the NCAA Catastrophic Injury Insurance Program. The insurance
Accident Compensation (Common Law and Benefits) Bill
ARTYUR ROBll,lSQN ~ HEDDERWlCKS UBfW~Y Accident Compensation (Common Law and Benefits) Bill As Sent Print EXPLANATORY MEMORANDUM Clause 1 Clause 2 Clause 3 Clause 4 sets out the purpose of the Bill. provides
Workers Compensation Employee Benefits
Provided By The Holmes Organisation Workers Compensation Employee The Florida Workers Compensation Law (FWCL) regulates the determination and payment of benefits for injured employees in the state. An
Accident Benefit REPORTER. In this issue: A Catastrophic Upheaval. n Cyclists and Access to Accident Benefits: the Path toward Payments
In this issue: Accident Benefit May 2011 n A Catastrophic Upheaval n Cyclists and Access to Accident Benefits: the Path toward Payments Darcy Merkur Partner Thomson, Rogers A Catastrophic Upheaval The
MOTOR VEHICLE ACCIDENT CLAIMS ACT
Province of Alberta MOTOR VEHICLE ACCIDENT CLAIMS ACT Revised Statutes of Alberta 2000 Chapter M-22 Current as of April 1, 2015 Office Consolidation Published by Alberta Queen s Printer Alberta Queen s
Claims Assessment and Resolution Service Assessor Guidance Material
Claims Assessment and Resolution Service Assessor Guidance Material Costs regulation 2015 Disclaimer This publication contains information about claims assessments under the NSW Compulsory Third party
Personal Injury Claims
Personal Injury Claims Improving consistency, accuracy & transparency of settlements Mark Strang ACII, Chartered Insurance Practitioner Business Development Manager, ISO Agenda Personal Injury Claims Background
Comparative Analysis of Damages Concepts in Tort and under the SABS by: Ryan A. Murray, Oatley Vigmond Personal Injury Lawyers LLP
Comparative Analysis of Damages Concepts in Tort and under the SABS by: Ryan A. Murray, Oatley Vigmond Personal Injury Lawyers LLP Introduction In Ontario a person hurt or killed in a car, truck, bus,
About CADRI and Direct Marketing. Overview of CADRI submission. Objectives. Summary of CADRI recommendations
This submission is on behalf of The Canadian Association of Direct Response Insurers (CADRI) in regard to the consultation on Part VI of the Insurance Act - the review of Ontario s automobile insurance
UPDATE ON THE THRESHOLD HAS ANYTHING REALLY CHANGED?
UPDATE ON THE THRESHOLD HAS ANYTHING REALLY CHANGED? Eric M. Swan Jill M. Edwards MacDonald & Swan LLP 1540 Cornwall Road Suite 106 Oakville, ON 905-842-3838 www.macdonaldandswan.com 2 UPDATE ON THE THRESHOLD
ACCIDENT BENEFIT CONTINGENCY FEE RETAINER AGREEMENT
ACCIDENT BENEFIT CONTINGENCY FEE RETAINER AGREEMENT This contingency fee retainer agreement is B E T W E E N : Bogoroch & Associates LLP Sun Life Financial Tower 150 King Street West, Suite 1707 Toronto,
Workplace Health, Safety & Compensation Review Division
Workplace Health, Safety & Compensation Review Division WHSCRD Case No: 13252-11 WHSCC Claim No.(s): 604016, 611050, 672511 705910, 721783, 731715, 753775, 784014, 831110 Decision Number: 14189 Marlene
THE PHYSIO CENTRE. Motor Vehicle Accident. Instructions for Completing the Forms in this package
THE PHYSIO CENTRE Motor Vehicle Accident Instructions for Completing the Forms in this package There are 2 forms enclosed in this package which are required for patients under MVA coverage. 1. Agree To
Decision Number: WCAT-2015-02919
WCAT Decision Number: WCAT-2015-02919 WCAT Decision Date: September 23, 2015 Panel: Joanne Kembel, Vice Chair Introduction [1] This is a referral to the chair of the (WCAT) under section 251 of the Workers
Ontario Car Accident Insurance
Ontario Car Accident Insurance Car Accident Insurance in Ontario I was injured in a car accident. What insurance is available to assist me as I recover? There are possibly two main sources of compensation
MOTOR VEHICLE COLLISION SUMMARY ADVICE FORM
Form 1.03 July 9, 2014 MOTOR VEHICLE COLLISION SUMMARY ADVICE FORM TO: (Name) (Address) FROM: KUBITZ & COMPANY Lawyers 1716 10 th Avenue S.W. Calgary, Alberta T3C 0J8 (City, Province, Postal Code) Home