1 PPA 419 Aging Services Administration Lecture 6b Nursing Home Reform Act of 1987 (OBRA 87)
2 The 1987 Nursing Home Reform Act In a 1986 study, conducted at the request of Congress, the Institute of Medicine found that residents of nursing homes were being abused, neglected, and given inadequate care. The Institute of Medicine proposed sweeping reforms, most of which became law in 1987 with the passage of the Nursing Home Reform Act, part of the Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1987.
3 The 1987 Nursing Home Reform Act The basic objective of the Nursing Home Reform Act is to ensure that residents of nursing homes receive quality care that will result in their achieving or maintaining their "highest practicable" physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being.
4 The 1987 Nursing Home Reform Act To secure quality care in nursing homes, the Nursing Home Reform Act requires the provision of certain services to each resident and establishes a Residents' Bill of Rights.
5 The 1987 Nursing Home Reform Act Nursing homes receive Medicaid and Medicare payments for long-term care of residents only if they are certified by the state to be in substantial compliance with the requirements of the Nursing Home Reform Act.
6 The 1987 Nursing Home Reform Act
7 The 1987 Nursing Home Reform Act The Nursing Home Reform Act specifies what services nursing homes must give residents and establishes standards for these services. Required services include: Periodic assessments for each resident; A comprehensive care plan for each resident; Nursing services; Social services; Rehabilitation services; Pharmaceutical services; Dietary services; and, If the facility has more than 120 beds, the services of a full-time social worker.
8 OBRA 87 - The Residents' Bill of Rights The right to freedom from abuse, mistreatment, and neglect; The right to freedom from physical restraints; The right to privacy; The right to accommodation of medical, physical, psychological, and social needs; The right to participate in resident and family groups;
9 OBRA 87 - The Residents' Bill of Rights The right to be treated with dignity; The right to exercise self-determination; The right to communicate freely; The right to participate in the review of one's care plan, and to be fully informed in advance about any changes in care, treatment, or change of status in the facility; and The right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal.
10 OBRA 87 Survey and Certification To monitor whether nursing homes meet the Nursing Home Reform Act requirements, the law also established a certification process that requires states to conduct unannounced surveys, including resident interviews, at irregular intervals at least once every 15 months.
11 OBRA 87 Survey and Certification The surveys generally focus on residents' rights, quality of care, quality of life, and the services provided to residents. Surveyors also conduct more targeted surveys, or complaint investigations, in response to complaints against nursing homes.
12 OBRA 87 Survey and Certification If the survey reveals that a nursing home is out of compliance, the Nursing Home Reform Act enforcement process begins. The severity of the remedy depends on whether the deficiency puts a resident in immediate jeopardy, and whether the deficiency is an isolated incident, part of a pattern, or widespread throughout the facility.
13 OBRA 87 Survey and Certification For some violations, nursing homes have an opportunity to correct the deficiency before remedies may be imposed. Other sanctions include: Directed in-service training of staff; Directed plan of correction; State monitoring; Civil monetary penalties;
14 OBRA 87 Survey and Certification Other sanctions include: Denial of payment for all new Medicare or Medicaid admissions; Denial of payment for all Medicaid or Medicare patients; Temporary management; and Termination of the provider agreement.
15 Conclusion The Nursing Home Reform Act established basic rights and services for residents of nursing homes. These standards form the basis for present efforts to improve the quality of care and the quality of life for nursing home residents.
16 Conclusion The extent to which the Nursing Home Reform Act succeeds in actually improving nursing homes, however, depends on the effectiveness of its enforcement.
17 Regulating Nursing Homes Major problems continue despite federal regulation. In , 25-33% had serious or potentially life threatening problems. 26% had poor food hygiene, 21% provided inadequate care, 19% had environments that contributed to injuries in residents, 18% improperly treated pressure sores. About 77% of problem facilities had problems in subsequent surveys.
18 Regulating Nursing Homes Ownership and quality of care Greatest violations in for-profit homes (30% more violations of quality of care and quality of life) Federal Regulation State and licensing and certification with federal standards Standardized comprehensive assessments on admission and yearly. Care plans Annual surveys of 185 quality requirements. Central data collection on compliance Enforcement procedures with intermediate sanctions.
19 Regulating Nursing Homes Federal regulation 1987 law, intermediate sanctions: fines, payment denial, managers. Flaws Inadequate staffing Poor mix of skills Ineffective system of survey and enforcement (GAO) Poor levels of Medicaid payment decrease staffing.
20 Federal and State Enforcement of the 1987 Nursing Home Reform Act BACKGROUND The Nursing Home Reform Act of 1987 established quality standards for nursing homes nationwide, established resident rights, and defined the state survey and certification process to enforce the standards (See PPI Fact Sheet Number 84: "The Nursing Home Reform Act of 1987.") Ten years after the passage of the Nursing Home Reform Act, however, a series of research studies and Senate hearings called attention to serious threats to residents' well-being. These problems were attributed to weaknesses in federal and state survey and enforcement activities.
21 Federal and State Enforcement of the 1987 Nursing Home Reform Act In 1997, the Senate Committee on Aging, chaired by Senator Charles Grassley, received reports of widespread death and suffering in California nursing homes caused by inadequate care. In response to these reports, the Committee held a hearing on California nursing homes in July 1998.
22 Federal and State Enforcement of the 1987 Nursing Home Reform Act A General Accounting Office (GAO) report presented at the hearing revealed that, despite the requirements of the Nursing Home Reform Act, weak enforcement put many residents at risk of substandard care. Between 1995 and 1998, state surveyors cited 30 percent of nursing homes in California for violations that put residents in immediate jeopardy or caused actual harm to residents. Another 33 percent of facilities were cited with substandard conditions that caused less serious harm, and another 35 percent had more than minimal deficiencies. Only 2 percent of California facilities were found to have minimal or no deficiencies.
23 Federal and State Enforcement of the 1987 Nursing Home Reform Act While state surveyors identified widespread serious problems, the report suggested that many other care problems went undetected due to weaknesses in federal and state nursing home oversight. Even when serious problems were identified, enforcement actions often failed to ensure that they were corrected and did not recur.
24 Federal and State Enforcement of the 1987 Nursing Home Reform Act Although the study focused on California, the findings were indicative of broader problems in the nursing home enforcement system. Based on their findings, GAO recommended strengthening federal and state oversight of nursing homes to better protect residents throughout the country.
25 Federal and State Enforcement of the 1987 Nursing Home Reform Act THE SURVEY PROCESS COMPARED WITH THE ALTERNATIVES Also in July 1998, the Health Care Financing Administration (HCFA) published a report that examined the effectiveness of the current survey and certification process and the proposed alternatives of private accreditation and incentives. While the study indicated that the Nursing Home Reform Act of 1987 had resulted in improved resident outcomes, it also concluded that many of the enforcement processes were not working as intended. Despite the flaws in the survey and certification process, however, the study found federal enforcement to be more effective in protecting residents than either private accreditation or incentives.
26 Federal and State Enforcement of the 1987 Nursing Home Reform Act THE 1998 NURSING HOME INITIATIVE Concurrent with the Senate Committee on Aging hearing, the GAO report on California nursing homes, and the HCFA study, the Clinton Administration announced the 1998 Nursing Home Initiative. The Initiative included a series of proposed steps designed to improve enforcement of nursing home quality standards. To implement the Nursing Home Initiative, HCFA has begun a series of steps to improve nursing home enforcement procedures. These include: Staggering nursing home inspections, with a set number occurring on weekends and evenings; Inspecting more frequently nursing homes that are repeat offenders with serious violations, without decreasing frequency of inspections for other facilities; Enhancing the HCFA review of nursing home surveys conducted by the states; Terminating federal nursing home survey funding to states that fail to perform adequate surveys;
27 Federal and State Enforcement of the 1987 Nursing Home Reform Act THE 1998 NURSING HOME INITIATIVE HCFA has begun a series of steps to improve nursing home enforcement procedures. These include: Imposing immediate sanctions on nursing homes found guilty of a second offense for violations harming residents; such facilities will not receive a "grace period" allowing them to correct problems and avoid penalties; Allowing states to impose civil monetary penalties for each instance of a serious or chronic violation; and Ensuring that state survey agencies enforce sanctions against nursing homes with serious violations and that sanctions are not lifted until after an onsite visit has verified compliance. Some states have also implemented their own efforts to improve nursing home quality enforcement.
28 Federal and State Enforcement of the 1987 Nursing Home Reform Act FUNDING FOR ENFORCEMENT State survey, certification, and enforcement activities are funded through the Medicare and Medicaid programs. The federal government finances 100% of the Medicare budget and 75% of the Medicaid budget for state survey and certification activities. States provide the remaining 25% of the Medicaid survey and certification budget. Currently, HCFA distributes federal funds to states based on past state practices and costs, thereby perpetuating low budgets in states that have spent less for survey and certification activities. HCFA is now exploring options for better distribution of future survey and certification funding. In the meantime, recognizing the increased costs associated with the Nursing Home Initiative, the Administration and Congress have significantly increased the federal Medicare and Medicaid budget for state survey and certification activities. Federal funding grew from $290.2 million in fiscal year 1998 to $310.1 million in 1999, and to $358.7 million in fiscal year 2000.
29 Federal and State Enforcement of the 1987 Nursing Home Reform Act NURSING HOME QUALITY NATIONWIDE Following the California study and the announcement of the 1998 Nursing Home Initiative, GAO and HCFA conducted additional research that included nursing homes nationwide. The findings were presented at a series of additional hearings on nursing home quality held by the Senate Committee on Aging in 1999 and These reports and hearings confirmed that problems of substandard quality, weak survey procedures, and ineffective enforcement were not limited to California, but were widespread throughout the nation. Key findings include: In 1997 to 1998, over one-fourth of nursing homes nationwide (27%) were cited with violations that caused actual harm to residents or placed them at risk of death or serious injury. Another 43 percent of homes were cited with violations that created a potential for more than minimal harm. During annual surveys, state surveyors often missed significant care problems, such as pressure sores, malnutrition, and dehydration. This problem reflected both weaknesses in state survey methods and the predictable timing of the surveys.
30 Federal and State Enforcement of the 1987 Nursing Home Reform Act NURSING HOME QUALITY NATIONWIDE Complaints made by residents, family members, or nursing home staff often went uninvestigated for weeks or months. In addition, states frequently had procedures that discouraged the filing of complaints. When serious quality deficiencies were detected, enforcement mechanisms frequently failed to ensure that the problems were corrected and remained corrected. Federal procedures for overseeing state monitoring were limited in their scope and effectiveness. Over half (54%) of nursing homes had fewer than the minimum number of nurse aide time per resident to avoid harming residents. These facilities put residents at increased risk of hospitalization for avoidable causes, pressure sores, and significant weight loss due to inadequate staffing. As a result of these findings, GAO recommended additional steps to improve enforcement of quality standards, many of which are being addressed by HCFA's new efforts at enforcement.
31 Federal and State Enforcement of the 1987 Nursing Home Reform Act EFFECTS OF THE NURSING HOME INITIATIVE In September 2000, the Senate Committee on Aging held a hearing on the outcomes of the Nursing Home Initiatives. A GAO official testified at the hearing that the Initiatives had resulted in improvements to state survey and federal oversight procedures, including: Several states have increased, or plan to increase, the number of surveyors; Several states are automating their information systems to track complaints more effectively; States have begun to use new methods introduced by the initiatives to spot serious deficiencies when conducting surveys; and HCFA has made organizational changes to improve nursing home oversight activities and to help ensure consistency across regions. At the same time, a GAO report noted that many of the new policies and practices have only recently begun and will need time to be fully implemented. Moreover, HCFA is in the process of implementing the Nursing Home Initiative, some parts of which may not be introduced until 2002 or Hence, it may take a few more years before the full effects of the efforts to improve quality of care can be known.
32 Federal and State Enforcement of the 1987 Nursing Home Reform Act CONCLUSION Inadequate implementation and enforcement have seriously limited the effectiveness of the Nursing Home Reform Act of To address this problem, the Senate Committee on Aging began holding hearings on nursing home quality, and the Clinton Administration introduced the 1998 Nursing Home Initiative. While these efforts have resulted in some improvements, more work needs to be done to improve quality in the nation's nursing homes. As a recent GAO report concludes, "Sustained efforts by HCFA and the states are essential to realize the potential of the quality initiatives" (GAO, 2000).
33 GAO Nursing Home Studies since 1998 Nursing Homes: Efforts to Strengthen Federal Enforcement Have Not Deterred Some Homes from Repeatedly Harming Residents. GAO Washington, D.C.: March 2007
34 GAO Nursing Home Studies since 1998 Nursing Homes: Despite Increased Oversight, Challenges Remain in Ensuring High-Quality Care and Resident Safety. GAO Washington, D.C.: December 28, Nursing Home Deaths: Arkansas Coroner Referrals Confirm Weaknesses in State and Federal Oversight of Quality of Care. GAO Washington, D.C.: November 12, 2004.
35 GAO Nursing Home Studies since 1998 Nursing Home Fire Safety: Recent Fires Highlight Weaknesses in Federal Standards and Oversight. GAO Washington D.C.: July 16, Nursing Home Quality: Prevalence of Serious Problems, While Declining, Reinforces Importance of Enhanced Oversight. GAO Washington, D.C.: July 15, 2003.
36 GAO Nursing Home Studies since 1998 Nursing Homes: Public Reporting of Quality Indicators Has Merit, but National Implementation Is Premature. GAO Washington, D.C.: October 31, Nursing Homes: Quality of Care More Related to Staffing than Spending. GAO R. Washington, D.C.: June 13, 2002.
37 GAO Nursing Home Studies since 1998 Nursing Homes: More Can Be Done to Protect Residents from Abuse. GAO Washington, D.C.: March 1, Nursing Homes: Federal Efforts to Monitor Resident Assessment Data Should Complement State Activities. GAO Washington, D.C.: February 15, 2002.
38 GAO Nursing Home Studies since 1998 Nursing Homes: Sustained Efforts Are Essential to Realize Potential of the Quality Initiatives. GAO/HEHS Washington, D.C.: September 28, Nursing Home Care: Enhanced HCFA Oversight of State Programs Would Better Ensure Quality. GAO/HEHS Washington, D.C.: November 4, 1999.
39 GAO Nursing Home Studies since 1998 Nursing Home Oversight: Industry Examples Do Not Demonstrate That Regulatory Actions Were Unreasonable. GAO/HEHS R. Washington, D.C.: August 13, Nursing Homes: Proposal to Enhance Oversight of Poorly Performing Homes Has Merit. GAO/HEHS Washington, D.C.: June 30, 1999.
40 GAO Nursing Home Studies since 1998 Nursing Homes: Complaint Investigation Processes Often Inadequate to Protect Residents. GAO/HEHS Washington, D.C.: March 22, Nursing Homes: Additional Steps Needed to Strengthen Enforcement of Federal Quality Standards. GAO/HEHS Washington, D.C.: March 18, California Nursing Homes: Care Problems Persist Despite Federal and State Oversight. GAO/HEHS Washington, D.C.: July 27, 1998.
41 California Nursing Home Information CMS Nursing Home Compare: Questions/SearchCriteria.asp?version=default&browser=Fir efox%7c2%7cwinxp&language=english&defaultstatus=0& pagelist=home&cookiesenabledstatus=true California Department of Health Services Licensing and Certification Program. California Nursing Home Search:
GAO United States Government Accountability Office Report to Congressional Requesters May 2008 NURSING HOMES Federal Monitoring Surveys Demonstrate Continued Understatement of Serious Care Problems and
1 The Nursing Home Inspection Process SUMMARY Both the Minnesota Department of Health (MDH) and the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services share responsibility for ensuring that Minnesota s nursing
SUNSET REVIEW OF THE NURSING HOME PENALTY CASH FUND Submitted by Colorado Department of Regulatory Agencies June 1992 June 5, 1992 The Honorable Bob Schaffer Joint Sunrise/Sunset Review Committee Chairman
Consumer Information Report for Nursing Homes Summary 2013 ************************************************************************************** 9255 N 76TH ST MILWAUKEE, WI 53223 (414) 355-9300 **************************************************************************************
Department of Health and Human Services OFFICE OF INSPECTOR GENERAL OREGON PROPERLY VERIFIED CORRECTION OF DEFICIENCIES IDENTIFIED DURING SURVEYS OF NURSING HOMES PARTICIPATING IN MEDICARE AND MEDICAID
Ohio Department of Health Division of Quality Assurance Quarterly Nursing Home Report Issue 4, April 2012 Quarterly Nursing Home Report April 2012 This report provides information on selected indicators
United States General Accounting Office Washington, DC 20548 June 13, 2002 The Honorable John B. Breaux Chairman The Honorable Larry E. Craig Ranking Minority Member Special Committee on Aging United States
Highlights from A Good Life in Old Age? Monitoring and Improving Quality in Long-Term Care, OECD Publishing, 2013. Population ageing in the United States has been slower than in most the other OECD countries:
GAO United States General Accounting Office Testimony Before the Special Committee on Aging, U.S. Senate For Release on Delivery Expected at 10:00 a.m. Thursday, November 4, 1999 NURSING HOMES Enhanced
Department of Health and Human Services OFFICE OF INSPECTOR GENERAL Nursing Home Deficiency Trends and Survey and Certification Process Consistency JANET REHNQUIST Inspector General MARCH 2003 OEI-02-01-00600
OFFICE OF THE LEGISLATIVE AUDITOR O L A STATE OF MINNESOTA EVALUATION REPORT Nursing Home Inspections FEBRUARY 2005 Report No. 05-05 PROGRAM EVALUATION DIVISION Centennial Building - Suite 140 658 Cedar
Statement of Sarah Slocum Michigan State Long Term Care Ombudsman and Secretary of the National Association of State Long-Term Care Ombudsman Programs To the U.S. Senate Special Committee on Aging On Improving
United States Government Accountability Office Report to Congressional Requesters October 2015 NURSING HOME QUALITY CMS Should Continue to Improve Data and Oversight GAO-16-33 October 2015 NURSING HOME
Department of Health and Human Services OFFICE OF INSPECTOR GENERAL Nursing Home Survey and Certification: Overall Capacity JUNE GIBBS BROWN Inspector General MARCH 1999 OEI-02-98-00330 OFFICE OF INSPECTOR
NURSING HOME QUALITY Findings from GAO Reports Walter Ochinko Assistant Director Health Care Team Government Accountability Office National Health Policy Forum March 25, 2010 Background Since 1997, GAO
Complaint Investigations of Minnesota Health Care Facilities Report to the Minnesota Legislature explaining the investigative process and summarizing investigations from July 1, 2003 to June 30, 2006 and
TITLE 7 CHAPTER 1 PART 13 HEALTH HEALTH GENERAL PROVISIONS INCIDENT REPORTING, INTAKE, PROCESSING AND TRAINING REQUIREMENTS 18.104.22.168 ISSUING AGENCY: New Mexico Department of Health. [22.214.171.124 NMAC - Rp,
AN EVALUATION Regulation of Nursing Homes and Assisted Living Facilities Department of Health and Family Services 02-21 December 2002 2001-2002 Joint Legislative Audit Committee Members Senate Members:
s n a p s h o t The Changing Face of California s 2007 Introduction The number of Californians age 65 and older is projected to nearly double within the next 20 years. And the number of frail elderly individuals
Legislative Audit Division State of Montana January 2003 Report to the Legislature Performance Audit Nursing Home Surveys Certification Bureau, Quality Assurance Division Department of Public Health and
IMMEDIATE IMPLICATIONS OF HEALTH CARE REFORM PASSAGE FOR SKILLED NURSING FACILITIES Health Care Reform has now passed in the form of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (the Act ). The passage
OKLAHOMA Downloaded January 2011 310:675 7 8.1. ADMINISTRATIVE RECORDS (d) Administrative records of the facility shall include the following information: (15) A record of all nurse aide competency and
Department of Health and Human Services OFFICE OF INSPECTOR GENERAL Nursing Home Medical Directors Survey JANET REHNQUIST INSPECTOR GENERAL FEBRUARY 2003 OEI-06-99-00300 OFFICE OF INSPECTOR GENERAL http://www.oig.hhs.gov/
Commissioner s Office 625 Robert St. N., Suite 500 P.O. Box 64975 St. Paul, MN 55164-0975 (651) 201-5000 Annual Quality Improvement Report on the Nursing Home Survey Process Minnesota Department of Health
R430. Health, Health Systems Improvement, Child Care Licensing. R430-3. General Child Care Facility Rules Inspection and Enforcement. R430-3-1. Legal Authority and Purpose. This rule is adopted pursuant
Resident Rights in Nursing Homes Nursing home residents have patient rights and certain protections under the law. The nursing home must list and give all new residents a copy of these rights. Resident
Summary. With new Health Care Reform changes set to go into effect over the next 12-24 months, many remember the impact that the previous reform changes had on the Nursing Home insurance marketplace. This
1 Government Regulation and Oversight of Nursing Homes: Improving Quality of Care for Nursing Home Residents and Protecting Residents from Abuse and Neglect Geriatric Grand Rounds Institute on Aging Iowa
AHLA CC. The Intersection of Regulatory and Personal Injury Litigation Practical Considerations Joseph L. Bianculli Health Care Lawyers PLC Arlington, VA T. Andrew Graham Hall Booth Smith PC Atlanta, GA
4.16. Freedom from Restraints and Abuse. WEST VIRGINIA Downloaded January 2011 4.16.a. General. Each resident shall be free from mental and physical abuse, and free from chemical and physical restraints
GAO United States General Accounting Office Report to Congressional Requesters March 2002 NURSING HOMES More Can Be Done to Protect Residents from Abuse GAO-02-312 Contents Letter Appendix I Results in
NURSING HOME ABUSE AND NEGLECT Michael Timberlake Siniard, Timberlake, and League 125 Holmes Avenue Huntsville, Alabama 35801 256-536-0770 firstname.lastname@example.org I. Introduction. Currently, there are approximately
Disability Rights Network of Pennsylvania 1414 N. Cameron Street Second Floor Harrisburg, PA 17103-1049 (800) 692-7443 (Voice) (877) 375-7139 (TDD) www.drnpa.org HOSPITAL COMPLAINTS This fact sheet will
SURVEY GUIDE LONG-TERM CARE FACILITIES Nursing Homes, Skilled Nursing Facilities, Nursing Facilities STATE OF WISCONSIN DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SERVICES Division of Quality Assurance Bureau of Nursing Home
Department of Health and Human Services OFFICE OF INSPECTOR GENERAL Quality Assurance Committees in Nursing Homes JANET REHNQUIST INSPECTOR GENERAL JANUARY 2003 OEI-01-01-00090 OFFICE OF INSPECTOR GENERAL
The Affordable Care Act and Building Bridges: Making a Difference in Long Term Care Nursing Homes Ilene Henshaw and Rhonda Richards Nora Super Director, Federal AARP Government Relations Health and Long
Principle: Ensuring compliance with applicable laws, regulations and professional standards of practice implementing systems and processes that prevent fraud and abuse. 91 Compliance with Laws and Regulations
Quality Management Strategy Participant Access: An assessment to determine eligibility is conducted by participating Acquired Brain Injury waiver (ABI) providers utilizing the Medicaid Waiver Assessment
2007 Residents Rights Week Training Suggestion Training topic: Residents Rights The Basics (estimated training time = 1 hour) Intended audience: Residents, family members, long-term care staff, volunteer
ISSUES INVOLVED IN TAKING A NURSING HOME CASE TO TRIAL Navan Ward Jr. Navan.Ward@beasleyallen.com 18 th Annual Spring Retreat & Seminar Federal & State Regulations Federal Regs the Omnibus Budget Reconciliation
NEW YORK STATE OFFICE OF THE STATE COMPTROLLER H. Carl McCall STATE COMPTROLLER DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH NURSING HOME COMPLAINTS 2001-S-36 DIVISION OF MANAGEMENT AUDIT AND STATE FINANCIAL SERVICES OSC Management
Nursing Home Care Quality Twenty Years After The Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1987 December 2007 Prepared by Joshua M. Wiener, Ph.D. Marc P. Freiman, Ph.D. David Brown, M.A. RTI International Nursing
HOSPITAL COMPLAINTS Prepared by the Disability Rights Network of Pennsylvania This Fact Sheet will provide a brief overview of hospital patients' rights established by the federal Centers on Medicare and
Utah Medicaid Provider Manual Long Term Care Services Division of Health Care Financing October 2007 APPENDIX B NURSE AIDE TRAINING & COMPETENCY EVALUATION PROGRAM NURSE AIDE TRAINING & COMPETENCY EVALUATION
Nursing Home Residents at Risk Failure of the New York State Nursing Home Survey and Complaint Systems Written by Cynthia Rudder, Ph.D., Executive Director Richard J. Mollot, Esq., Associate Director Martin
TESTIMONY OF ILLINOIS STATE REP. TERRY PARKE NATIONAL CONFERENCE OF INSURANCE LEGISLATORS (NCOIL) SUBCOMMITTEE ON OVERSIGHT AND INVESTIGATIONS COMMITTEE ON FINANCIAL SERVICES U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
Chapter 3 The Nursing Assistant Chapter Overview To protect patients and residents from harm, you need to know: What you can and cannot do What is right conduct and wrong conduct Rules and standards of
Mary Rogers, HPR Social Work Specialist Kate JohnsTon, Program Specialist Posted 12/31/2015 Co. Protecting, Maintaining and Improving the Health of Minnesotans Certified Mail # 7013 3020 0001 8869 0428
New York State Department of Health NURSING HOME RESIDENT ABUSE AND COMPLAINT INVESTIGATION PROGRAM REPORT JANUARY 1, 2012 DECEMBER 31, 2012 Andrew M. Cuomo. Governor TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION...
Agency for Health Care Administration Presenter: Intermediate Care Facilities for the Developmentally Disabled Licensure and Certification Issues Kimberly Smoak, MSH Health Services and Facilities Consultant
Establishing An Effective Corporate Compliance Program Joan Feldman, Esq. Vincenzo Carannante, Esq. William Roberts, Esq. November 11, 2014 Shipman & Goodwin LLP 2014. All rights reserved. HARTFORD STAMFORD
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION OFFICE OF INSPECTOR GENERAL AUDIT SERVICES March 24, 2015 Control Number ED-OIG/A05N0012 James W. Runcie Chief Operating Officer Federal Student Aid U.S. Department
Department of Health and Human Services OFFICE OF INSPECTOR GENERAL NURSING FACILITIES COMPLIANCE WITH FEDERAL REGULATIONS FOR REPORTING ALLEGATIONS OF ABUSE OR NEGLECT Daniel R. Levinson Inspector General
ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SERVICES DIVISION OF LICENSING SERVICES Office of Long-Term Care Licensing 150 North 18th Ave, Suite 440, Phoenix, AZ 85007 400 W. Congress, Tucson, AZ 85701 A CONSUMER=S GUIDE
Partnering and Communication with Federal Law Enforcement Kelly Bagby, AARP Foundation Litigation Andy Mao, Department of Justice Overview of Presentation Survey of Federal authorities and theories used
Code of Federal Regulations From the U.S. Government Printing Office via GPO Access The Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) is the codification of the general and permanent rules published in the Federal
United States General Accounting Office Washington, DC 20548 May 7, 2001 The Honorable James M. Jeffords Chairman Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions United States Senate Subject: Private
CHAPTER 9: NURSING HOME RESPONSIBILITIES REGARDING COMPLAINTS OF ABUSE, NEGLECT, MISTREATMENT AND MISAPPROPRIATION 9.1. PURPOSE Effective protection of residents in long term care facilities from abuse,
GAO United States General Accounting Office Report to the Ranking Minority Member, Committee on Government Reform and Oversight, House of Representatives February 1998 MEDICAID Elevated Blood Lead Levels
Minnesota Nursing Home Bill of Rights Tubman Elder Care & Rights Center gratefully acknowledges funding from the Minnesota Board on Aging for its work with Resident and Family Advisory Council Education.
Department of Veterans Affairs Office of Inspector General Healthcare Inspection Oversight of the Community Nursing Home Program Oklahoma City VA Medical Center Oklahoma City, Oklahoma Report No. 08-02526-39
Department of Health and Human Services OFFICE OF INSPECTOR GENERAL MEDICARE HOSPICES: CERTIFICATION AND CENTERS FOR MEDICARE & MEDICAID SERVICES OVERSIGHT Daniel R. Levinson Inspector General April 2007
C H A P T E R 5 RESTRAINT AND SECLUSION I. INTRODUCTION 5.1 A. Scope of Chapter... 5.1 B. Restraint and Seclusion Laws... 5.1 Federal Law... 5.1 California Law... 5.1 Must Comply with All Laws... 5.2 C.
I S S U E kaiser commission on medicaid and the uninsured January 2013 P A P E R Implementation of Affordable Care Act Provisions To Improve Nursing Home Transparency, Care Quality, and Abuse Prevention
VA Office of Inspector General OFFICE OF AUDITS AND EVALUATIONS Veterans Health Administration Audit of the Community Nursing Home Program March 29, 2013 11-00331-160 ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS CMS GEC
NURSE AIDE RESIDENT ABUSE PREVENTION TRAINING ACT Act of Jun. 9, 1997, P.L. 169, No. 14 Cl. 24 AN ACT Providing for Statewide nurse aide training programs relating to nursing facilities. The General Assembly
Introduction California Code of Regulations Division 5 Title 22 OBRA Roles and Responsibilities of C.N.A. I. Title 22 - California Code of Regulations, Division 5. 1. California state laws enacted by legislature
Department of Health and Human Services DEPARTMENTAL APPEALS BOARD Civil Remedies Division In the Case of: AccentCare Home Health of Phoenix, Inc., Petitioner, - v. Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services.
GAO United States Government Accountability Office Report to the Ranking Member, Committee on Finance, U.S. Senate May 2007 NURSING HOMES Federal Actions Needed to Improve Targeting and Evaluation of Assistance
Resident Rights If you are considering placing a loved one in a nursing home or know of someone already receiving care, it is important to know under Michigan law, residents of long term care are guaranteed
December 9, 2013 Oklahoma State Department of Health Protective Health Services Long Term Care Questions and Answers 1. Where can I get information about the results of surveys, inspections and investigations
Long-Term Care Regulatory Reform: HCFA, the IOM and Opportunity Lost By Elizabeth K. Schneidert I. Introduction As a result of the government's efforts to ensure that residents of long-term care facilities
Patient Bill of Rights and Responsibilities The patient or the patient s legal representative has the right to be informed of the patient s rights and responsibilities as a patient through effective means
Department of Health and Human Services OFFICE OF INSPECTOR GENERAL Medicare Home Health Agency Survey and Certification Deficiencies JUNE GIBBS BROWN Inspector General SEPTEMBER 2000 OEI-02-99-00532 OFFICE
WELCOME TO STRAITH HOSPITAL FOR SPECIAL SURGERY During your stay with us, our goal is to make your hospital experience as favorable as possible by providing information and open channels of communication.
GAO United States General Accounting Office Testimony Before the Special Committee on Aging, U.S. Senate For Release on Delivery Expected at 1:30 p.m. Monday, March 4, 2002 NURSING HOMES Many Shortcomings
The Family Counseling Center of Fulton County NOTICE OF PRIVACY PRACTICES This notice describes the privacy practices of The Family Counseling Center of Fulton County and the privacy rights of the people
Five-Star Nursing Home Quality Rating System This is a summary of the information contained in the CMS Technical User s Guide July 2012. The guide in its entirety can be found at CMS.gov. Since the launch
WHAT IS A CASE FOR NURSING HOME ABUSE OR NEGLECT? Michael R. O Connell The O Connell Law Firm, P.C., and thanks to Law Office of David A. Couch (Arkansas) 1780 S. Bellaire St., Ste 584 Denver, CO 80222
Secretary of State NOTICE OF PROPOSED RULEMAKING HEARING* A Statement of Need and Fiscal Impact accompanies this form. Department of Human Services, Aging and People with Disabilities 411 Agency and Division
GAO United States General Accounting Office Congressional Requesters March 2000 MEDICARE FRAUD AND ABUSE DOJ Has Made Progress in Implementing False Claims Act Guidance GAO/HEHS-00-73 United States General
Case: 15-60272 Document: 00513369046 Page: 1 Date Filed: 02/04/2016 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT Summary Calendar BRENHAM NURSING AND REHABILITATION CENTER, United States
Minnesota Patients Bill of Rights Legislative Intent It is the intent of the Legislature and the purpose of this statement to promote the interests and well-being of the patients of health care facilities.
V O I C E S F O R Q U A L I T Y C A R E A Report on the State of Nursing Homes Washington, D.C. 2013 With Hopes for a Better To m o r ro w Data in this report taken from the CMS Nursing Home Compare web
STATE OF NEW YORK : DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH IN THE MATTER RICHARD F. DAINES, M.D., as Commissioner of Health of the State of New York, to determine the action to be taken with respect to: PARKVIEW CARE AND
7 09/30 Mary Heim, HPR Social Work Specialist 30 Kate JohnsTon, Program Specialist 10/19 Posted 10/27/2015 Co. Protecting, Maintaining and Improving the Health of Minnesotans CMS Certification Number (CCN):
Minnesota Patients Bill of Rights Legislative Intent It is the intent of the Legislature and the purpose of this statement to promote the interests and well-being of the patients of health care facilities.
Assisted Living: What A Guardian Needs To Know Course level: Intermediate Writer: Holly Robinson, JD is associate staff director of ABA Commission on Law and Aging, where she directs the Older Americans