Proje Fikrinin Oluşması...15 dk. Çalışma Programı (Başlık Kodu) Proje Teklif Çağrıları (Çağrı Kodu) Proje Teklifi Hazırlama...

Transcription

1 AB 7.Çerçeve Programı KOBİ ler Yararına Araştırma Proje Teklifi Hazırlama Uygulama Çalışması

2 Zamanlama Proje Fikrinin Oluşması...15 dk Çalışma Programı (Başlık Kodu) Proje Teklif Çağrıları (Çağrı Kodu) Proje Teklifi Hazırlama...90 dk 1: Bilimsel/Teknik Kalite...30 dk 2: Uygulama...30 dk 3: Etki...20 dk Kontroller...10 dk

3 Zamanlama Proje Fikrinin Oluşması...15 dk Grup içindeki yatkinliklere göre kendi proje fikrinizi oluşturunuz. Proje Konusu Proje Başlığı ve Kısa Adı

4 Cover Page Proposal full title: Improving airport Efficiency, Security and Passenger Flow by Enhanced Passenger Monitoring Proposal acronym: OPTAG Type of funding scheme: Research for SMEs Name of the coordinating person: (SME-1 Project Manager s name) List of participants:

5 Cover Page Participant no. Participant organisation name Country SME (Coordinator) XXX Austria SME XXX Italy SME XXX Italy SME XXX The Netherlands SME XXX Italy SME XXX Italy RTD-Performer XXX Austria RTD-Performer XXX Spain RTD-Performer XXX Spain RTD-Performer XXX The Netherlands End-User XXX United Kingdom End-User XXX Poland End-User XXX Turkey End-User XXX Spain

6 Zamanlama Proje Teklifi Hazırlama...90 dk 1: Bilimsel/Teknik Kalite...30 dk 1.1 Sound concept and quality of objectives Ana Hedef Özel Hedefler Uygunluk 1.2 Innovative character in relation to the state-of-the-art Mevcut Durum 1.3 Contribution to advancement of knowledge / technological progress Yenilik 1.4 Contribution to advancement of knowledge / technological progress İş Paketleri Çıktılar Mihenk Taşları Birer Paragraf İş Paketleri Tablosu Çıktılar Tablosu Mihenk Taşları Tablosu

7 1.1 Sound concept and quality of objectives In 2002, The European Environment Agency In The Netherlands, Austria, Italy, 20000, 30000, polluted, comtaminated sites, areas dangereous for human health. Policy launched by the European Commission stating that xxx Commission identified 8 threats: erosion, contamination, decline in biodiversity, etc. Guidelines to characterise project subject. Digital availability differs from the content of the compounds. Tests measure short-time effects, but other dominating effects are of chronic nature. Institutions need an additional parameter between routine tests and risk assessment Present test (names) exhibit strong disadvantages like: None of these tests is able to measure (scientific name) An indicator system should be relevant, easy to handle, time cost efficient, such a system is not available yet.

8 1.1 Sound concept and quality of objectives The present project proposal proposes a scientific approach to a technological problem of a group pf SMEs involved in the field of... The project is relevant to each SME and they all are interested in developing new and innovative products relevant to their activities, markets, application fields. SME participant description and their benefit from the project can be seen in table xxx. The specification and qualification of the project objectives are: the improvement of the SMEs competitiveness, the trans-national cooperation will be facilitated, a world-wide leading role to the present SMEs, the impact on community societal bjectives (creation of a high-skill society in a knowledge-based economy)

9 1.2 Innovative character in relation to the state-of-the-art Current Techniques to charecterise contaminated land include Classification of different Techniques/Methods Applications (Mevcut kullanılan teknolojiler ile neler yapılabiliyor) Kelimelere ve uygulamalara atıflar (makaleler ve yayınlar) Already existing systems do work in a limited way They reflect overall impact, measures, etc.

10 1.3 Contribution to advancement of knowledge / technological progress The XXX (Proposal name) approach represents a completely new and leading method which combines xxx (new techniques used in the project) The XXX focuses on functional genes of microorganisms which represents xxx (advantages) The main advantage over all known concepts is not using prior systems, but measures the project main research subject itself There will be two platforms in the project: XXX, information developed in the project will be included Thematic XXX, focus on specific topics Statistical model, linkage between the information and analysis Showing starting points are important: In this project, we start with this and continue to work on that to measure and get information for the analysis Yeni metod ile ne yapilmasi hedefleniyor: şu methodu proje ortağı bir end-user halihazırda kullanmakta fakat projede önerilen analizleri gerçekleştirememekte. Yeni uygulanacak olan metodlardan bahsedilerek hangi yani datalara ulaşılabileceğinden bahsedilmesi artı puan

11 1.4 Quality and effectiveness of S/T methodology and associated work plan Overall strategy of work plan Introduction ile genel hedefler verilebilir The objectives of this proposal are as follows: The main aim of XXX (Proposal Name) is to develop Base on the existing know-how and experiences of the participants, the XXX aims to help... In order to reach the project s goal, the tasks undertaken by R&D Performers are briefly described as follows (as shown in figure, table xxx): Description of Work/Methodology WP1, WP2, WP3, WP4, WP5, WP6,...

12 1.4 Quality and effectiveness of S/T methodology and associated work plan Overall strategy of work plan Description of Work/Methodology WP1, WP2, WP3, WP4, WP5, WP6,... The work is divided into 7 WPs as follows: ilk aşamada kısa 1 er cümlelik genel olarak neler yapılacak (development and testing of deliverables; covers; includes) Due to the very innovative character of the task The most innovative knowledge of the project is delivered by WPx In this WP, XXX will be designed and constructed The objectives of WPx represent a substantial progress beyon the state of the art and deliver very valuable knowledge...

13 1.4 Quality and effectiveness of S/T methodology and associated work plan Dissemination: This WP will promote the XXX products and the related technologies that result from the project and scientific results obtained The target is public-private authorities The core of this WP is web-site Presentation of the findings of the project (potential use on international scientific journals) Mailing list (All partners will have access) discussion forum among partners, chat rooms, ideas to be implemented Çalışmalarla ilgili e-learning başlangıç uygulamaları olabilir SMEs and RTD-Performers will present the different results and the concept of the XXX at national and international scientific and technical meetings, seminars, conferences (Mümkünse o konu ile ilgili olan yılda 1 yada 2 kez düzenlenenleri araştırıp,bulmak, oralarda yayınlanacaklarından bahsetmek) Technology transfer events, exhibitions (proje çıktılarının sunulması) RTD-Performers lardan SMEs lere yönelik proje içi eğitimler coordination of dissemination of the results (publishing, conference contributions)

14 1.4 Quality and effectiveness of S/T methodology and associated work plan Management: Consortium coordination, Technical and financial reporting, Liaison with the Commission for all administrative, financial and technical matters Organisation of the project to assure timely dissemination of deliverablesand achievement of results Organisation of the communication among partners Monitoring of project results and quality control of project deliverables Preparation and submission of periodic and final reports to the Commission Initiation and coordination of activities related to patenting the results of the project

15 1.4 Quality and effectiveness of S/T methodology and associated work plan Timing of work packages (Gantt chart)

16 1.4.3 Detailed work description / a. Work package list Work package No [1] WP1 Work package title Project Management Type of activity [2] Lead participant No [3] Lead participant Short Name Personmonths [4] Start month [5] MGT 1 TUBITAK 22, WP2 Name RTD 3 TUBITAK 20, WP3 Name RTD 6 TUBITAK 14,3 1 6 WP4 Name RTD 5 TUBITAK 74, WP5 Name RTD 4 TUBITAK 14, WP6 Name RTD 6 TUBITAK 27, End month 5 WP7 Dissemination & Exploitation OTHER 2 TUBITAK 40, TOTAL 214,4 [1] Workpackage number: WP 1 WP n. [2] Please indicate one activity per work package: RTD = Research and technological development (including any activities to prepare for the dissemination and/or exploitation of project results, and coordination activities); DEM = Demonstration; MGT = Management of the consortium; OTHER = Other specific activities, if applicable in this call. [3] Number of the participant leading the work in this work package. [4] The total number of person-months allocated to each work package. [5] Measured in months from the project start date (month 1).

17 1.4.3 Detailed work description / b. Deliverables list Del. num. [1] Deliverable Title WP num. Nature [2] Dissemi-nation level [3] Delivery date [4] D.1.1 Name WP1 R CO M2 D.2.1 Name WP2 P CO M2 D.7.2 Homepage design and user interface WP7 O PU M3 D.4.4 Name WP4 O CO M5 D.3.2 Name WP3 R CO M7 D.1.2 Name WP1 R CO M7 D.7.1 Persentation of the first results in selected conference WP7 O PU M8 D.6.3 Name WP6 R CO M13 D.2.2 Name WP2 R CO M13 D.7.2 Seminar on the second results for SMEs WP7 O CO M16 D.3.1 Name WP3 R CO M17 D.2.3 Name WP2 R CO M24 [1] Deliverable numbers in order of delivery dates. Please use the numbering convention <WP number>.<number of deliverable within that WP>. For example, deliverable 4.2 would be the second deliverable from work package 4. [2] Please indicate the nature of the deliverable using one of the following codes: R = Report, P = Prototype, D = Demonstrator, O = Other [3] Please indicate the dissemination level using one of the following codes: PU = Public PP = Restricted to other programme participants (including the Commission Services). RE = Restricted to a group specified by the consortium (including the Commission Services). CO = Confidential, only for members of the consortium (including the Commission Services). [4] Measured in months from the project start date (month 1).

18 1.4.3 Detailed work description / c. Work packages descriptions Work package number Start date or starting event: Work package title Activity Type [1] Participant number Person-months per participant: Objectives Description of work (possibly broken down into tasks), and role of participants Deliverables (brief description and month of delivery) [1] Please indicate one activity per work package: RTD = Research and technological development (including any activities to prepare for the dissemination and/or exploitation of project results, and coordination activities); DEM = Demonstration; MGT = Management of the consortium; OTHER = Other specific activities, if applicable.

19 1.4.3 Detailed work description / c. Work packages descriptions Work package number Start date or starting event: Work package title Activity Type [1] Participant number Person-months per participant: Objectives NE Description of work (possibly broken down into tasks), and role of participants NASIL Deliverables (brief description and month of delivery) [1] Please indicate one activity per work package: RTD = Research and technological development (including any activities to prepare for the dissemination and/or exploitation of project results, and coordination activities); DEM = Demonstration; MGT = Management of the consortium; OTHER = Other specific activities, if applicable.

20 1.4.3 Detailed work description / c. Work packages descriptions Objectives Development, Design, Validation, Procedure, Identification, Establishing, Prediction, Determination To produce, To process, Extending, Classifying, Investigating, Building models, Testing the characteristics Description of work (possibly broken down into tasks), and role of participants Testing, Monitoring, Sampling, Selection, Estimation, Detection, Producing Task1.1, Task1.2, Task2.3, Task3.5, Task4.2, Task7.3, vb. Ortakların yetkinliklerine göre herbir task için görevlendirmeler yapılmalıdır. Yapılacak işin şu kısmı şu ortak tarafından şu ortağın koordiinatörlüğünde şu kadar sürede WP leader e bilgilendirme yapılacaktır gibi. XXX has previous experience in... Management: Organisation of meetings, Liaison with the Commission, Reporting, IPR Dissemination: Meetings, Conferences, Exhibitions, Web-site, Transferring the knowledge from the RTDperformers to SME partners Deliverables (brief description and month of delivery)

21 1.4.3 Detailed work description / d. Summary effort table Participant no. & short name Part.1 Part.2 Part.3 Part. Part. Part. Total SMEs Total RTDP Total OTHER Total all Partners Research & innovation activities - total WP1 WP2 WP3 Demonstration activities - total Other activities - total Management activities - total TOTAL ACTIVITIES

22 1.4.3 Detailed work description / e. List of milestones Milestone number Milestone Description Work package(s) involved Expected date [1] Means of verification [2] [1] Measured in months from the project start date (month 1). [2] Show how you will confirm that the milestone has been attained. Refer to indicators if appropriate. For example: a laboratory prototype completed and running flawlessly; software released and validated by a user group; field survey complete and data quality validated.

23 1.4.4 Graphical presentation

24 Zamanlama Proje Teklifi Hazırlama...90 dk 2: Uygulama...30 dk Description of project management structure and procedures Proje nasıl yönetilecek? Komiteler Description of the consortium Ortaklar Tablosu Tamamlayıcı rolleri Ortaklar Tablosu Birer Paragraf

25 Implementation Management, consortium, resources 2. Implementation 2.1 Quality of the Consortium as a whole Description of project management structure and procedures Description of the consortium 2.2 Appropriate allocation and justification of the resources to be committed Sub-contracting other than "Subcontracting to RTD performers" Other countries

26 2.1 Quality of the Consortium as a whole / Description of project management structure and procedures Maksimum 4 Sayfa. Management Board The Coordinator - CO The Management Board - MB The Project Manager - PM The Financial and Administrative Board - FAB The Review Committe - RC The Work Package Leader WPL Conflict Resolution Contingency plan Consortium Agreement Quality Assurance & Risk Management Communication, Reporting, Meetings and Knowledge Transfer R&D Technical Advisory Group Project Technical Committe WP1 Leade r WP2 Leade r WP3 Leade r Coordinator Project Manager Review Committe WP4 Leade r WP5 Leade r Financial and Administrativ e Board SME Support Group WP6 Leade r

27 2.1 Quality of the Consortium as a whole / Description of project management structure and procedures The Coordinator CO The project will be coordinated by XXX who will provide an effective and a perfect management organization in order to ensure flawless and fast work procedures. ERBIL has several years of experience in EU-funded and national projects, and will act as the core contact between the Commission and the partners for normal purposes. The Coordinator is the principal interface to the Commission and conducts the contract negotiations and has the overall control and responsibility of the project. The Management Board MB The overall sustainability management of the project will be provided by MB. It consists of representatives from each partners and PM will be the person who lead MB. MB determines the overall project strategy, coordinates the project achievements and supervises the activities of Review Committee. It controls and provides the achievements of the set objectives. It is dedicated to be the primary contact between the Commission and the project manager. Authorization and preparation of amendments to the contract is the one of the main task of MB to prevent any conflicts within among the partners. The Project Manager - PM Execute the Project Plan and of the technical activities, on behalf of the PC and in accordance with the PC; Prepare the Partner Agreement; Confirm that any revision to the Project Plan is feasible and in accordance with directives from the PC; Ensure an optimal contact between the Project and the European Commission, as well as secure a proper project orientation with respect to the most important European issues; Prepare a periodic activity and management report in months 12, 24; Deal with financial issues: preparation of audit certificate reports; collection of the Periodical Audits Certificates from partners in month 24 as requested by the new FP7 rules. These last will be issued by certified independent accountants on the costs incurred for the previous period of work; Guarantee the project internal (at Consortium level) and external (with the Project Officer) communication; Maintain the overall view on the project in order to guarantee the homogeneity of project development, keep in regular contact with Work-Package Leaders in order to monitor progress.

28 2.1 Quality of the Consortium as a whole / Description of project management structure and procedures The Financial and Administrative Board FAB Provide the delivery of consortium agreement on time, Monitor the budgets of the project partners, Inform partners about the delivery of the audit certificates, periodic activity and management reports, intermediate activity reports and follow-up of the claims, Provide technical support to all the partners in order to support them in the preparation phase of the reports, audit certificates and management of the budget. The Review Committe RC Coordination and supervising partners and project progress, Ensurance of effective quality assurance and risk management, Watching, evaluating, and facilitating work package leaders in order to keep the efficiency of work done during the project, Assuring and maintaining permanent communication among the key actors in order to disseminate and exploit the project results, Maintaining coordination of staff dedicated to implement the project methodology, Providing logistics support within the project. The Work Package Leader WPL Work Package leadres will be responsible for the technical coordination and supervision of their work packages they are responsible for. Conflict Resolution Important decisions in the XXX project will be reached by consensus in the PC. In case of a serious dispute any member of the consortium can initiate red-flag procedure by alerting the coordinator of the issue that needs resolution. Any dispute of technical nature will be resolved by the Project Manager, taking into consideration all sides of the respective issue, if necessary also through advice of outside experts. Initially, negotiation will be used to resolve disputes. Should consensus not be achievable, a normal majority vote will be used. The Project Manager will cast the tie-breaking vote, if necessary. In case a decision could not be reached for reasons of conflict of interest, an independent referee will be appointed whose judgment will be considered conclusive. In the case of persistent or exceptional disputes, which threaten the continuation of the project, the Coordinator will inform the project officer.

29 2.1 Quality of the Consortium as a whole / Description of project management structure and procedures Contingency plan Should any unforeseen circumstance, be it by force major or not, a specific procedure will be put in place to ensure an immediate reaction and allow the consortium to take all necessary measures to keep in line with the objectives of the project. This will be specified in the consolidated management procedure to be integrated in the Consortium Agreement, which deals with aspects specific to managing a project where groups of partners operate in various parts of Europe. If necessary, a communication flow between the Project Manager and the European Commission will be set up. The contingency procedure will be in principle designed to compress the decision making process within 72 hours from the issue being brought to knowledge of partners. The alert on a contingency procedure will automatically imply an urgent meeting within 15 days while the contingency plan will be put in place on the basis of a synchronized agenda, and request of official positions on the contingency issue to all partners, to be responded within 48 hours. Should responses from partners be sufficient to solve the issue, the contingency procedure will be stopped and the solution agreed implemented, otherwise the contingency plan will proceed to the urgent meeting to make sure that a decision is taken and implemented according to the modalities described in the Consortium Agreement. Consortium Agreement The Coordinator will issue a project meeting in order to define a preliminary co-operation framework and set up the Consortium Agreement, to be signed before signature of the contract with the Commission. The Consortium Agreement will define roles, responsibilities and mutual obligations of the project partners both for the duration of the project and afterwards. The document will outline the possible IPR issues, and evaluating intangible assets emerging from the project.

30 2.1 Quality of the Consortium as a whole / Description of project management structure and procedures Quality Assurance & Risk Management Project Manager will be the responsible person in acquiring the quality of the project during its duration. Quality of the deliverables will show the consistence of the project during its implementation. Deliverables will be monitored by Project Manager and submitted to Management Board. It is the Management Board to discuss and compare deliverables with the project plan, and assess their quality within the MB. MB will prevent the late submission of deliverables to the Commission. Communication, Reporting, Meetings and Knowledge Transfer Knowledge transfer among consortium partners will be issued day-to day basis. Fast and effective communication will be provided in a systematic way in order to maintain the quality of the project management. Locations of the partners are various; therefore, electronic communication will be used among partners. Electronic mailing will be used in order to exchange information and disseminating project documents through consortium. The twin partners will reinforce the dissemination and the management of the activities in each country. Work package leaders will coordinate the activities and provides effective exchange of knowledge via mailings at first glance and if necessary meetings on technical level will be held within the said WP to solve the problem occurred. Project meetings will be organized in months 1, 5, 12, 20 and 23 to compare progress with the project plan, decide on actions to be taken if delays occur, monitor work issued to the project. A comprehensive set of minutes will be prepared by PM after all meetings with action points clearly stated with both completion dates and names of those responsible for the action.

31 2.1 Quality of the Consortium as a whole / Description of project management structure and procedures Work Package No: Work Package Title Responsible Partner Partner No: WP1 Project Management TUBITAK 1 WP2 Name TUBITAK 3 WP3 Name TUBITAK 6 WP4 Name TUBITAK 5 WP5 Name TUBITAK 4 WP6 Name TUBITAK 6 WP7 Dissemination & Exploitation TUBITAK 2

32 2.1 Quality of the Consortium as a whole / Description of project management structure and procedures Partner No. Partner short name Role in the Project Name of the Representative of the Partner 1 SME (Coordinator) Project Manager Mr. XXX 2 SME Review Committe Member Mrs. YYY 3 SME Review Committe Member Ms. ZZZ 4 SME Review Committe Member Mr. XXX 5 SME Review Committe Member Mrs. YYY 6 SME Review Committe Member Ms. ZZZ 7 RTD-Performer Review Committe Member Mr. XXX 8 RTD-Performer Review Committe Member Mrs. YYY 9 RTD-Performer Review Committe Member Ms. ZZZ 10 RTD-Performer Review Committe Member Mr. XXX 11 End-User Review Committe Member Mrs. YYY 12 End-User Review Committe Member Ms. ZZZ 13 End-User Review Committe Member Mr. XXX 14 End-User Review Committe Member Mrs. YYY

33 2.1 Quality of the Consortium as a whole / Description of the consortium Maksimum 3 Sayfa + Her ortak için yarım sayfa. (Ortak No) (Country) (Ortak Kısa İsmi) (Ortak Uzun İsmi) Description

34 2.1 Quality of the Consortium as a whole / Description of the consortium Ortaklar SME, RTD-Performers, End-users, Others ya da Danışman firma diye ortakların projedeki rollerine göre ayrım yapılabilir. (proje yönetimi konusunda tecrübeli olduğuna dair bilgilendirme) (Ortak No) 1 (Country) Austria (Ortak Kısa İsmi) TUBITAK (Ortak Uzun İsmi) The Scientific and Technological Reseacrh Council of TURKEY Description Firma/Kuruluş yetkinliklerini tanıtıcı bilgiler Faaliyet alanı deneyimleri Do not make your project seem European by putting European partners as peppers

35 2.2 Appropriate allocation and justification of the resources to be committed Maksimum 4 Sayfa. Name of RTD Performer Number of Person /Month Personnel Costs Durable Equipment Consumables Computing Overhead Costs Other Costs Total by RTD Project Results (No **) Work package No (***) Total Receipts(*) (*) This Total must be equal to the figure estimated in Form A3.1 (**) Same Number as in table (Multiple combination is possible) (***) Multiple combination is possible

36 Zamanlama Proje Teklifi Hazırlama...90 dk 3: Etki...20 dk 3.1 Contribution, at the European [and/or international level], to the expected impacts listed in the work programme under the relevant activity Avrupa Katma Değeri KOBİ Katma Değeri 3.2 Appropriateness of measures envisaged for the dissemination and/or exploitation of project results, and management of intellectual property Bilginin Yayılımı Planı (Dissemination Plan) Hayata Geçirilmesi Planı (Exploitation Plan) Birer Paragraf

37 Impact - The potential impact through the development, dissemination and use of project Maksimum 10 Sayfa. 3. Impact. The potential impact through the development, dissemination and use of project results 3.1 Contribution, at the European [and/or international level], to the expected impacts listed in the work programme under the relevant activity 3.2 Appropriateness of measures envisaged for the dissemination and/or exploitation of project results, and management of intellectual property Project results and IPR Dissemination and Use

38 3.1 Contribution, at the European [and/or international level], to the expected impacts listed in the work programme under the relevant activity EU ülkelerin durumunu anlatan tablolarla açıklamalar (Estimations from 2007 to 2013) Proje dahilinde sektörel ayrım yapılıyorsa güncel en son verilerin gösterilmesi (çalışan sayısı, firma sayısı, yıllık toplam ciro, vb.) Estimated time to market An increasing trade deficit Eurostat verileri KOBİ lerin büyüklük sınıflamasına göre ticari veriler, proje dahilinde son üründen önce kullanılan piyasa ürünü ile ilgili (0-49, ) Mevcut durumda pazardaki rolü The project is economically relevant as well as the SMEs will have economical benefits The results of the project XXX can contribute to the competitiveness improvement of the participating SMEs through...

39 3.2.1 Project results and IPR Varsayılan: Bütün proje çıktılarının KOBİ ler tarafından kullanılması. Açık bir şekilde proje çıktılarının KOBİ ler tarafından kullanılacağının belirtilmesi. Ortaklar tarafından FMH nın nasıl koruyacağının, paylaşılacağının ve yönetileceğinin belirtilmesi. Proje çıktılarının (sistem, ürün, module, vb.) projenin hangi aşamalarında (İş paketleri) ortaya çıkacağının açıkça belirtilmesi, hangi ortağın o iş paketinden sorumlu olması, sorumlu ortağın hakkı (patent, lisans, telif hakkı, vb.) Projedeki çıktıların daha önceden patenti alınmış mı. Herhangi bir şekilde öngörülemeyen bir çıktı olursa, haklarının kime ait olacağı. FMH için ayrı bir iş paketinin yazılması öngörülmektedir. Firma avukatlarından bilgi almak şart.

40 3.2.2 Dissemination and Use Exploitation plan will cover exploitation restrictions, licensing arrangements, protection SMEs will ude the existing available channels inn order to disseminate project results; routes envisaged for exploitation of the resuts. (uluslararası fuarlar, tanıtımlar, konferanslar, tematik dergi isimleri yazılabilir) The benefits of each participating SME is briefly described below: Herbir SME neler projeden neler bekliyor At least two kinds of results/products will be available for marketing/exploitation after the project (ortaya çıkacak ürünler ile ilgili bilgiler verilebilir / low cost, fast, adoptable, estimated price, estimated profit-europe/world) Development and implementation of a cost-effective and easy-to-use instruments SMEP (Participant No) SMEP (Participant No) Project Result (No) Project Result (Description) Type of Exploitation (*) Remuneration ( ) Type of Exploitation (*) Remuneration ( ) (*) Ownership, Patenting, Licensing, Royalties, other IPR protection, etc

41 Ethical Issues YES PAGE Informed Consent 1.Does the proposal involve children? 1.Does the proposal involve patients or persons not able to give consent? 1.Does the proposal involve adult healthy volunteers? 1.Does the proposal involve Human Genetic Material? Does the proposal involve Human biological samples? Does the proposal involve Human data collection? Research on Human embryo/foetus 1.Does the proposal involve Human Embryos? 1.Does the proposal involve Human Foetal Tissue / Cells? 1.Does the proposal involve Human Embryonic Stem Cells? Privacy 1.Does the proposal involve processing of genetic information or personal data (eg. health, sexual lifestyle, ethnicity, political opinion, religious or philosophical conviction) 1.Does the proposal involve tracking the location or observation of people? Research on Animals 1.Does the proposal involve research on animals? 1.Are those animals transgenic small laboratory animals? 1.Are those animals transgenic farm animals? 1.Are those animals cloning farm animals? 1.Are those animals non-human primates? Research Involving Developing Countries 1.Use of local resources (genetic, animal, plant etc) 1.Benefit to local community (capacity building ie access to healthcare, education etc) Dual Use 1.Research having potential military / terrorist application I CONFIRM THAT NONE OF THE ABOVE ISSUES APPLY TO MY PROPOSAL X

42 Consideration of Gender Aspects Maksimum 1 sayfa Proje dahilindeki cinsiyet eşitliği Proje çıktılarının yayılmasındaki cinsiyet dağılımı Geniş kitlelere ulaşım (Üniversiteler, çeşitli okullar, vb.)

43 Proje Teklifi Hazırlama ile ilgili tüm sorularınız ve yardım taleplerinizde bizimle iletişime geçebilirsiniz. TÜBİTAK AB 7.ÇP Ulusal Koordinasyon Ofisi Tel: Faks: ncpsme@tubitak.gov.tr